Next Article in Journal
Zirconolite Polytypes and Murataite Polysomes in Matrices for the REE—Actinide Fraction of HLW
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of ECAP Route Type on the Microstructural Evolution, Crystallographic Texture, Electrochemical Behavior and Mechanical Properties of ZK30 Biodegradable Magnesium Alloy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improved Fluorescence and Gain Characteristics of Er-Doped Optical Fiber with PbS Nanomaterials Co-Doping

Key Laboratory of Specialty Fiber Optics and Optical Access Networks, Joint International Research Laboratory of Specialty Fiber Optics and Advanced Communication, Shanghai Institute for Advanced Communication and Data Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(17), 6090; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15176090
Submission received: 9 August 2022 / Revised: 29 August 2022 / Accepted: 30 August 2022 / Published: 2 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Optical and Photonic Materials)

Abstract

:
Er-doped optical fiber (EDF) with ultra-broad gain bandwidth is urgently needed given the rapid advancement of optical communication. However, the weak crystal field of the host silica glass severely restricts the bandwidth of traditional EDF at 1.5 μm. In this study, we theoretically explored the introduction of PbS nanomaterials in the silica network assisted with the non-bridging oxygen. This can significantly increase the crystal field strength of Er3+ ions in the local structure, leading to their energy level splitting and expanding the fluorescence bandwidth. Additionally, the PbS/Er co-doped optical fiber (PEDF) with improved fluorescence and gain characteristics was fabricated using modified chemical vapor deposition combined with the atomic layer deposition technique. The presence of PbS nanomaterials in the fiber core region, which had an average size of 4 nm, causes the 4I13/2 energy level of Er3+ ions to divide, increasing the fluorescence bandwidth from 32 to 39 nm. Notably, the gain bandwidth of PEDF greater than 20 dB increased by approximately 12 nm compared to that of EDF. The obtained PEDF would play an important role in the optical fiber amplifier and laser applications.

1. Introduction

Er-doped silica fiber (EDF) was firstly prepared in 1985, which considerably promotes the development of rare-earth-ions-doped active optical fiber [1]. The 1.5-micrometer fluorescence emission of Er3+ ions have been rapidly developed and applied in fiber lasers and fiber amplifiers because it coincides well with the lowest optical communication window of silica fiber [2,3,4,5]. Recently, the amplification performance of EDF in the C-band of optical communication has been unable to meet the increasing demand for high-speed communication in the global communication system. The gain bandwidth (GB), noise figure (NF), and power conversion efficiency (PCE) of Er-doped fiber amplifiers (EDFA) have thus been continuously improved by researchers through rare-earth ion co-doping [6,7], matrix material optimization [8,9,10], and structural design [11,12]. Although it can be improved by the non-uniform broadening effect of high aluminum (Al) dopant [13], the GB of EDF is strongly limited by the relatively weak crystal field of host glass materials coupled with the low PCE.
In the near-infrared region, nano-semiconductor materials (e.g., PbS) have excellent fluorescence and structural properties, such as wide bandwidth, tunable band gap, and highly symmetric structure [14,15]. Moreover, many researchers have tried to introduce nano-semiconductor materials into rare-earth-doped fibers to boost the GB of the fiber by increasing the fluorescence bandwidth and local crystal field. Zhang et al. explored the local crystal field effect of semiconductor nanomaterials on the fluorescence properties of Er3+ ions at 1.5 μm and the near-infrared fluorescence properties of PbS and Er co-doped silica glass materials in 2015 [16,17]. Additionally, Wan et al. reported the co-doped glasses with PbS nanocrystals and Tm3+ ions. After that, they changed the size of nanocrystals to increase the fluorescent efficiency and bandwidth of Tm3+ ions in the near-infrared region [18]. Moreover, PbS nanocrystals were used as the saturable absorber to broaden the bandwidth of Tm-doped fiber lasers, which is important for the passively mode-locking lasers in mid-infrared bands [19]. However, the interaction mechanism between nano-semiconductors and rare-earth ions in the local structure of silica glass remains to be studied.
Benefiting from the rapid development of density functional theory (DFT), it provides a theoretical approach for comprehending the atomic-level interaction between nano-semiconductors and rare-earth ions [20,21]. Additionally, nano-semiconductors and rare-earth ion co-doped silica fibers have been rarely reported due to the limitations in fiber preparation techniques. Atomic layer deposition (ALD) has significant benefits in the preparation of nano-semiconductors and rare-earth ions co-doped silica fibers owing to its high uniformity and conformity in the deposited nanofilms [22,23].
In this paper, the local structural models of PbS-doped and PbS/Er co-doped silica fiber materials were established for the first time. Based on DFT, the interaction between PbS and the silica network, and the local crystal field effect of PbS on the fluorescence properties of Er3+ ions in co-doped local structures are theoretically studied. Subsequently, the PbS/Er co-doped silica fiber (PEDF) was obtained by the ALD combined with the modified chemical vapor deposition (MCVD) technology, and the effect of the PbS nanomaterials on the amplification performance of EDF was investigated in terms of microstructure, fluorescence properties, gain, and NF.

2. Theoretical Calculations

2.1. Local Structural Models of PbS-Doped Fiber Materials

Silica glass has an amorphous network structure with the characteristics of the long-range disorder and short-range order. Three-membered rings (3MRs), four-membered rings (4MRs), five-membered rings (5MRs), six-membered rings (6MRs), and other hybrid ring units make up the majority of the silica glass microstructure [24]. It is important to optimize the computational complexity for large-size atomic–molecular structures. As the simplest and most common network structure, 3MRs make up a significant component of the network structure and are frequently employed to define the structure and optical properties of silica-doped materials in conjunction with economic calculation [25,26,27,28]. Therefore, the 3MR structure is used as the fundamental silica glass network to examine the interaction between PbS nano-semiconductors and silica network, and its impact on the local structure and fluorescence properties of doped Er3+ ions by DFT. Although the atomic–molecular structure has a relatively small number of atoms, it can approximately show the band gap distribution range of PbS nano-semiconductor materials [29,30]. Finally, the energy level structure of PbS/Er co-doped silica fiber material was established.
Firstly, the ground-state local structural models were optimized using the Becke-3-Lee-Yang-Parr (B3LYP) hybrid function in the Gaussian-09 program [31]. The 6–31 + G** basis sets are used for H, O, Si, and S elements, and Pb and Er are replaced by the 4 and 11 valence electrons relativistic effective core potentials (RECPs), respectively [32,33]. Following optimization, the excited state characteristics of the local structures are analyzed using the time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) [34].
The connection of PbS with the silica network would break or recombine the silica lattice structure, thereby forming much non-bridging oxygen (NBO) in the host glass. The three potential local structural models for the incorporation of PbS into the silica glass were established based on the 3MRs, as shown in Figure 1. In model (a), PbS as a modifier is embedded into the 3MR. In model (b), the Si tetrahedron and PbS combine to create a new ring out of the 3MR. According to model (c), PbS directly connects with the Si tetrahedron by the bridging oxygen (BO), accompanied by the generation of NBO. The ground-state level energy of the three structural models were determined through DFT optimization. Combined with the equation for calculating bonding energy (eV) [26]:
E = n E S i + m E O + k E H + E P b + E S E S i n O m H k P b S
where n , m , and k are the number of Si, O, and H atoms in the models, respectively. As indicated in Table 1, the calculated bond energies for models (a), (b), and (c) are 7.3141, 6.0843, and 7.3265 eV, respectively. Since the bonding energies of the obtained structures are relatively small, it can be explained by the incorporation of PbS into the silica network, which makes the local structures unstable. Model (c) exhibits the highest bonding energy, indicating that it is reasonably stable.
To further demonstrate the validity of PbS-doped 3MR, the absorption and fluorescence characteristics are analyzed using TD-DFT. Based on the calculations of the ground and excited states, the absorption shoulder of PbS-doped 3MR appears at 747 nm, which is caused by the excitonic absorption of PbS nanocrystals, as shown in Figure 2a. Moreover, the calculated fluorescence peak of the PbS-doped 3MR structure appears at 1036 nm (Figure 2b), which is in good agreement with the previous experimental results [35]. Therefore, the local structure model (c) is relatively reliable and valid to study the effect of PbS co-doping on the local structure and energy level of Er3+ ions.

2.2. Local Structural Models of PbS/Er Co-Doped Fiber Materials

According to the previous report [36], it is difficult for Er3+ ions to directly embed into the silica network due to its large ionic radius. Therefore, it will break the original network structure and connect with the Si tetrahedron of 3MRs through Bos. To balance the local electronic valence, other Si tetrahedron are also coupled to the Er3+ ion. However, the length of BO bonds between the Si tetrahedron and Er3+ ion becomes longer owing to the incorporation of PbS in the optimal structure. Furthermore, Er3+ ions primarily function as network modifiers to engage in interactions with the silica matrix via NBOs as opposed to Bos [37]. In order to change the valence balance, the local structure surrounding the Er3+ ion may be damaged through the creation of NBOs. Therefore, based on model (a), another optimized structural model (b) of PEDF material is also established, as shown in Figure 3. The two Si tetrahedrons outside the 3MR connected to Er3+ ions are removed. Moreover, new NBOs are added to enhance the electronegativity around Er3+ ions and balance the influence of doping PbS nanomaterials.
The excited state parameters of models (a) and (b) for PEDF are calculated using TD-DFT. Table 2 and Table 3 provide a list of their electronic transitions, oscillator strengths, and configurations. For model (a), there are mainly excitation energy levels of 0.7878, 1.2934, 1.3664, 1.5441, and 1.8694 eV, and the corresponding oscillator strengths (f) are 0.0002, 0.0009, 0.0005, 0.0017, and 0.0009, respectively. It is discovered that the direct addition of PbS material on the Er-doped 3MR structure does not change the excitation state characteristics of Er3+ ions in the 1.5-micrometer band, and the corresponding oscillator intensity near 1573 nm is weak at 0.0002.
For model (b), the excitation energy level (4I13/2) of Er3+ ions at 1.5 μm changes from one level (1573 nm) to two levels (1533 and 1595 nm). The obvious Stark level splitting of Er3+ ions is mainly caused by the presence of PbS semiconductor materials, which not only boosts electron charge, but also enhances the local crystal field around Er3+ ions. Moreover, the oscillator strength of the excited state at 1533 and 1595 nm is significantly increased, reaching 0.0043. The obtained results indicate that the introduction of PbS in silica glass materials can alter the local coordination environment of Er3+ ions. As a result, this leads to a broadening of the spectrum bandwidth and an increase in the intensity of the oscillator of the excitation energy level, which optimizes the fluorescence efficiency of the Er3+ ion.

2.3. Frontier Molecular Orbital

To further illustrate the regulation effect of the PbS materials on the Er3+ ion-doped silica material, the energy band structure and electron cloud density distribution for models (a) and (b) were compared and analyzed, as shown in Figure 4. Frontier molecular orbitals are defined as the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LOMO), where the band gap is the difference in energy between the two. For model (a), the frontier molecular orbital energy values from HOMO−3 to LOMO+3 are −17.207, −17.025, −16.933, −16.349, −13.853, −13.721, −13.302, and −13.178 eV, respectively. For model (b), the frontier molecular orbital energy values from HOMO−3 to LOMO+3 are −18.608, −18.242, −18.149, −18.100, −15.156, −14.753, −14.658, and −14.461 eV, respectively. The band gaps corresponding to models (a) and (b) are 2.5 and 2.9 eV, respectively, owing to the doping of Er3+ ions and PbS materials [26]. Furthermore, regardless of the HOMO or LOMO, the electron cloud distribution density around Er3+ ions in model (b) is significantly higher than that in model (a). The results further demonstrate that the introduction of PbS nanomaterials combined with NBO can not only provide a better valence-balanced environment, but also allow the local structure’s charge to accumulate around the Er3+ ions. As a result, Er3+ ions have increased activity and take on the role of the active center for the entire local structure. Importantly, in the LOMO state of model (b), the Er3+ ions are completely covered by the electron cloud after the introduction of PbS and NBO, which increases the strength of the local crystal field and the probability of Stark level splitting.

2.4. Energy Level

According to the calculated excited state level and the corresponding oscillator strength, the energy level structure of the PEDF material can also be established, as shown in Figure 5. The black arrow line in the figure represents the absorption process of Er3+ ions. The red solid line represents the splitting energy level of the Er3+ ion 4I13/2 level due to the co-doping of PbS materials. The dashed line with the purple arrow shows the excited state transition process. The solid blue arrow line shows the transition luminescence process of Er3+ ions. It can be shown that the possible emission wavelength range of the PEDF material is approximately 1533–1595 nm, and its spectral bandwidth can cover 62 nm, which is significantly larger than 38 nm in the EDF material. It provides a theoretical foundation for the development of ultra-broad and high-performance EDFA.

3. Experimental Section and Results

3.1. Fiber Preparation

In this work, PEDF and EDF samples were fabricated ALD technique combined with the MCVD method, as shown in Figure 6. Firstly, HF solution was processed with to remove impurities from the pure silica tube, which had an outer diameter of 30 mm, an interior diameter of 25 mm, and a length of 21 cm. Secondly, the high-purity precursor materials (SiCl4) volatilized and was carried into the rotating silica tube by a carrier gas (O2). The gas mixture was oxidized in the hot zone of a hydrogen/oxygen (H2/O2) burner from the outside at a temperature of approximately 1800 °C. The doped SiO2 particles were deposited on the inner wall of the silica tube in the form of fine soot, which eventually formed porous layers. During the subsequent doping process, the porous soot layers can effectively avoid RE ion clustering behavior and optimize the uniformity of the doped elements [35]. Thirdly, the ALD technique (Beneq TFS-200, Finland) was used to alternately deposit PbS and Er2O3 nanofilms on the surface of the porous layer. For PbS nanomaterials, bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato)lead(II) (Pb(tmhd)2) and H2S gas were used as Pb and S precursors, respectively. The deposition process of PbS has been described in the literature [32]. For Er2O3, tris(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato)erbium(III) (Er(tmhd)3) and O3 gas were used as Er and O precursors, respectively. The evaporation temperature range of Er(tmhd)3 was 145–170 °C, and the reaction temperature range was 250–350 °C. Then, Er(tmhd)3 (0.8 s duration) and O3 (1 s duration) pulses were alternated to produce Er2O3 nanofilms. The purging time between each precursor pulse was 2 s. After that, as a protective layer, Al2O3 was deposited by ALD on the surface of the PbS and Er2O3 nanofilms, preventing the volatilization of PbS and Er2O3 during the high-temperature MCVD process [38,39]. The precursor sources of the Al2O3 process are Al(CH3)3 and O3, respectively. The deposition parameters have been described in the literature [35]. Fourthly, co-doped materials such as GeO2 and SiO2 were deposited as the core layer using MCVD technology. The soot was subsequently consolidated into a clear glass layer using the moving burner. The tube was collapsed at very high temperatures of around 2250 °C to a transparent fiber preform with a diameter of approximately 16 mm. Finally, the fiber preform was put into the drawing tower to make the PEDF samples with core and cladding diameters of approximately 8.85 and 125.25 μm, respectively, as shown in Figure 6h. To further demonstrate the incorporation effect of PbS nanomaterials on the fluorescence characteristics of EDF, we prepared an EDF sample without PbS nanomaterials using the same preparation process. The diameter of the core and cladding of EDF were 8.66 and 124.93 μm, respectively, as shown in Figure 6i.

3.2. Structural Properties

X-ray energy spectrometer (EDS, MX80, Oxford Instruments, Oxford, UK) was used to determine the specific contents of different elements in the core region of the optical fiber. The results are listed in Table 4. The weight percent ratios (wt.%) of Pb and Er in PEDF are 0.98% and 0.12%, respectively. Additionally, there was essentially no difference in the content of Er and Al elements in the two samples.
The relative refractive index difference (RID) of the fiber samples was ascertained using the fiber refractive index analyzer (S14, Photon Kinetics, Beaverton, OR, USA), as depicted in Figure 7. The insets are cross-sectional views of the two samples. Moreover, the RIDs of EDF and PEDF are 1.08% and 1.17%, respectively. The results show that the RID of optical fiber can be effectively improved by adding PbS nanomaterials into the optical fiber core, which is also consistent with the previous conclusion [22].
To determine the distribution of PbS and Er materials, the focused ion beam (FIB) micro-cutting technology (600I, FEI, Brno, Czekh) was utilized to cut the thickness of less than 50 nm from the vertical surface of the fiber core region. Then, a standard sample with a cross-sectional area of about 10 × 2 × 3 μm was used to observe the core region of the PEDF with high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, JEM-2010F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), as shown in Figure 8a. The nanoparticles in the core region were uniformly distributed with an average size of approximately 4 nm, and the lattice fringe spacing was 0.28 nm. The diffraction rings measured in the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) diagram of Figure 8b correspond to the crystal planes (200) and (220) of PbS, which further confirms that the observed crystalline phase structure is attributed to PbS nanoparticles. Then, the element distribution of the fiber core was discovered using EDS analysis (Figure 8c). The distribution of Er elements in the PEDF was relatively uniform without obvious clustering and enrichment, which further proves the advantages of the MCVD/ALD method.

3.3. Fluorescence Properties

The cut-off method [22] was used to analyze the absorption characteristics of the samples, and the results are displayed in Figure 9a. Four typical absorption peaks associated with Er3+ ions were observed, located at approximately 650, 800, 980, and 1535 nm, respectively. These absorption peaks were mainly attributed to the level transitions of Er3+ ions at 4I15/24F9/2, 4I15/24I9/2, 4I15/24I11/2, and 4I15/24I13/2 [40]. For PEDF, two weak absorption peaks at approximately 753 and 1124 nm were also observed, which can be attributed to PbS nanomaterials [22]. Due to the small crystal size, the absorption of PbS nanocrystals mainly appeared in the ultraviolet to the visible light band, while it was weak in the near-infrared (NIR) region [41,42,43]. Therefore, although the weight ratio of Pb in the fiber was higher than that of Er3+, the absorption capacity of PbS nanomaterials in the NIR band was still significantly weaker than that of Er3+ ions.
The excitation and emission spectra of the fiber samples were examined using the Edinburgh FLS-980 fluorescence spectrometer to further characterize the fluorescence properties, as shown in Figure 9b. The EDF sample had an obvious excitation peak at 980 nm, and the corresponding emission peak was located at 1530 nm. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of emission spectrum was approximately 32 nm, which is attributed to the 4I13/24I15/2 energy level transition. According to Figure 9c, the emission peak of PEDF near 1530 nm was broadened, and the FWHM was raised to approximately 39 nm. The emission peaks can be fitted with Gaussian functions to provide two fitted emission peaks at 1532 nm and 1541 nm. It indicates that the introduction of PbS nanomaterials can enhance the crystal field strength around Er3+ ions, resulting in the Stark splitting of 4I13/24I15/2 energy levels. This is consistent with the previous simulation results. Compared with EDF, the FWHM of PEDF increases by about 22%, indicating that the introduction of PbS nanomaterials is beneficial to EDF to achieve wider gain bandwidth. However, Er doped in areas where PbS does not exist (Er-3MR) will have its original fluorescence characteristics. With the fluorescence superposition of the Er3+ ions in the nanoparticle-free region, it leads to the obtained PEDF spectrum being broadened by 7 nm, which is less than the 24 nm in the theoretical calculation. In addition, the wavelength of the splitting peak at 1541 nm is smaller than the theoretically predicted 1595 nm. Therefore, it can be speculated that both PbS/Er-3MR and Er-3MR structures are present in the PEDF, which leads to deviations in the calculated and experimental results.
The fluorescence lifetime of EDF and PEDF samples are depicted in Figure 9d. Based on the excitation and emission spectra, the excitation and monitored emission wavelengths were chosen to be 980 and 1530 nm, respectively. The fluorescence lifetime of EDF and PEDF are 10.5 and 10.9 ms, respectively. With the introduction of PbS nanomaterials, the fluorescence lifetime of Er3+ ions increases. This indicates that the non-radiative transition process of Er3+ ions in PEDF samples is suppressed, which would increase excited electrons in the metastable 4I13/2 level. As a result, the probability of stimulated radiation is increased, which is more conducive to the improvement of optical fiber amplification performance.

3.4. Gain Properties

To confirm the impact of PbS nanomaterials on the fluorescence properties of Er3+ ions, a 980-nanometer pump source was utilized to monitor the fluorescence variations in the range of 1510–1580 nm, as shown in Figure 10a. The length of the fiber samples is 7.5 m. The fluorescence intensity of PEDF is higher than that of EDF at the same pump power, and the spectral width is also broadened. Figure 10b displays the fluorescence peak intensities of EDF and PEDF at 1.55 μm under different pump powers, further demonstrating the structural regulatory effect of PbS nanoparticles on the silica network that results in an increase in EDF fluorescence intensity.
The backward pump system is used to amplify the optical signal and analyze the gain performance of the fiber sample. The system diagram is shown in Figure 11a. The system consists of the 1480–1640-nanometer band tunable laser (TSL-710, SANTEC, Komaki, Japan), 1550-nanometer band optical fiber attenuator, 980-nanometer single-mode laser diode (LD), 980/1550-nanometer wavelength division multiplexer (WDM, THORLABS, Newton, NJ, USA), isolator at 1550-nanometer band (ISO, THORLABS, Newton, NJ, USA), and spectrum analyzer (YOGAWA AQ6370D, Tokyo, Japan).
The gain characteristics of the two fiber samples are displayed in Figure 11b. The pump power and injected signal light intensity are approximately 248.1 mW and −30 dBm, respectively. PEDF exhibits a greater and wider gain than EDF, with a maximum gain of about 46 dB at 1535 nm. Notably, the GB of PEDF greater than 20 dB increases by about 12 nm compared with EDF. The NF of the two fiber samples is also shown in Figure 11c at various pump powers. It can be seen that the NF of PEDF is slightly lower than that of EDF. Moreover, the lowest NF of PEDF is approximately 4.8 dB, which is suitable for the demand of optical amplifiers. Therefore, it can be speculated that the addition of PbS optimizes the local coordination environment of Er3+ ions, thereby reducing NF in EDFA.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the local structural models of PbS-3MR and PbS/Er-3MR were established, and their related structure parameters were calculated using Gaussian-09 by DFT and TD-DFT. We theoretically investigated that the energy level of Er3+ ions at the 1.5-micrometer fluorescence band was splitting into two levels, resulting from enhanced local crystal field strength in PbS/Er-3MR structural models assisted with the NBO. Furthermore, a novel PEDF embedded with PbS nanomaterials was prepared using the MCVD method combined with the ALD technique. The incorporated PbS nanomaterials were confirmed by TEM with an average size of approximately 4 nm. As a result, the fluorescent FWHM of PEDF at 1.5 μm was increased to 39 nm due to the Stark energy level splitting, showing an improvement of 22% over that of EDF. Meanwhile, the fluorescence lifetime of PEDF was also improved to 10.9 ms. The gain of PEDF at 1535 nm reached 46 dB, and the GB of PEDF greater than 20 dB increased by almost 12 nm compared to that of EDF. It is believed that the obtained PEDF coupled with the nano-semiconductors would be promising candidates for fiber amplifiers, lasers, and broadband light sources.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, X.P.; software, Y.D. and J.W.; formal analysis, Y.S.; investigation, X.Z., Y.H. and F.P.; project administration, writing—review and editing, T.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Projects (2020YFB1805800), Natural Science Foundation of China (61735009, 61975113, 61935002), 111 Project (D20031), and Shanghai Professional Technical Public Service Platform of Advanced Optical Waveguide Intelligent Manufacturing and Testing (19DZ2294000).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Haijun Wang of Jiangnan University for computer resources.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mears, R.J.; Reekie, L.; Poole, S.B.; Payne, D.N. Low-threshold tunable CW and Q-switched fibre laser operating at 1.55 μm. Electron. Lett. 1986, 3, 159–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lin, H.; Feng, Y.; Feng, Y.; Barua, P.; Sahu, J.K.; Nilsson, J. 656 W Er-doped, Yb-free large-core fiber laser. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 3080–3083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, J.; Fromzel, V.; Dubinskii, M. Resonantly cladding-pumped Yb-free Er-doped LMA fiber laser with record high power and efficiency. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 5574–5578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhai, Z.; Halder, A.; Nunez-Velazquez, M.; Sahu, J.K. Temperature-dependent study on L-band EDFA characteristics pumped at 980 nm and 1480 nm in phosphorus and aluminum-rich erbium-doped dilica fibers. J. Lightwave Technol. 2022, 40, 4819–4824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Giles, C.R.; Desurvire, E. Modeling erbium-doped fiber amplifiers. J. Lightwave Technol. 1991, 9, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Matniyaz, T.; Kong, F.; Kalichevsky-Dong, M.T.; Dong, L. 302 W single-mode power from an Er/Yb fiber MOPA. Opt. Lett. 2020, 45, 2910–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baker, C.C.; Burdett, A.; Friebele, E.J.; Rhonehouse, D.L.; Kim, W.; Sanghera, J. Rare earth co-doping for increased efficiency of resonantly pumped Er-fiber lasers. Opt. Mater. Express 2019, 9, 1041–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, Y.; Lou, Y.; Gu, Z.; Qiu, Q.; He, L.; Li, W.; Yin, X.; Zhao, X.; Liu, S.; Peng, J.; et al. Extending the L-band amplification to 1623 nm using Er/Yb/P co-doped phosphosilicate fiber. Opt. Lett. 2021, 46, 5834–5837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shao, C.; Wang, F.; Jiao, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, X.; Yu, C.; Hu, L. Relationship between glass structure and spectroscopic properties in Er3+/Yb3+/Al3+/P5+-doped silica glasses. Opt. Mater. Express 2020, 10, 1169–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Barnes, W.L.; Laming, R.I.; Tarbox, E.J.; Morkel, P.R. Absorption and emission cross section of Er3+ doped silica fibers. IEEE J. Quantum Elect. 1991, 27, 1004–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Jain, S.; Sakamoto, T.; Jung, Y.; Davidson, I.A.; Barua, P.; Hayes, J.R.; Shibahara, K.; Mizuno, T.; Miyamoto, Y.; Nakajima, K.; et al. High spatial-density, cladding-pumped 6-mode 7-core fiber amplifier for C-band operation. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 30675–30681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Abedin, K.S.; Yan, M.F.; Taunay, T.F.; Zhu, B.; Monberg, E.M.; DiGiovanni, D.J. State-of-the-art multicore fiber amplifiers for space division multiplexing. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2017, 35, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Likhachev, M.E.; Bubnov, M.M.; Zotov, K.V.; Lipatov, D.S.; Yashkov, M.V.; Guryanov, A.N. Effect of the AlPO4 join on the pump-to-signal conversion efficiency in heavily Er-doped fibers. Opt. Lett. 2009, 34, 3355–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moreels, I.; Justo, Y.; De Geyter, B.; Haustraete, K.; Martins, J.C.; Hens, Z. Size-tunable, bright, and stable PbS quantum dots: A surface chemistry study. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 2004–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Silva, R.S.; Qu, F.; Alcalde, A.M.; Dantas, N.O. Atomic force microscopy and optical characterization of PbS quantum dots grown in glass matrix. Microelectron. J. 2003, 34, 647–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, X.; Lin, S.; Lin, T.; Zhang, P.; Xu, J.; Xu, L.; Chen, K. Improved sensitization efficiency in Er3+ ions and SnO2 nanocrystals co-doped silica thin films. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 11974–11980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, X.W.; Lin, T.; Zhang, P.; Song, H.C.; Jin, H.; Xu, J.; Xu, J.; Wang, P.J.; Niu, K.Y.; Chen, K.J. Tunable quantum dot arrays as efficient sensitizers for enhanced near-infrared electroluminescence of erbium ions. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 4138–4146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, W.; Xiao, Y.; Zhou, B.; Xu, S.; Zhang, Q. Quantum-dots-precipitated rare-earth-doped glass for ultra-broadband mid-infrared emissions. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 102, 1560–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, W.; Gao, P.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Qyyum, A.; Li, X.; Liao, M.; et al. A passively mode-locked thulium-doped fiber laser based on a D-shaped fiber deposited with PbS nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 11215–11219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Haram, S.K.; Kshirsagar, A.; Gujarathi, Y.D.; Ingole, P.P.; Nene, O.A.; Markad, G.B.; Nanavati, S.P. Quantum confinement in CdTe quantum dots: Investigation through cyclic voltammetry supported by density functional theory (DFT). J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 6243–6249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jaworski, A.; Stevensson, B.; Edén, M. The bearings from rare-earth (RE= La, Lu, Sc, Y) cations on the oxygen environments in aluminosilicate glasses: A study by solid-state 17O NMR, molecular dynamics simulations, and DFT calculations. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 13181–13198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pan, X.; Dong, Y.; Zheng, J.; Wen, J.; Pang, F.; Chen, Z.; Shang, Y.; Wang, T. Enhanced FBG temperature sensitivity in PbS-doped silica optical fiber. J. Lightwave Technol. 2019, 37, 4902–4907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ponsoda, J.J.M.; Norin, L.; Ye, C.; Bosund, M.; Söderlund, M.J.; Tervonen, A.; Honkanen, S. Ytterbium-doped fibers fabricated with atomic layer deposition method. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 25085–25095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, T.Y.; Wen, J.X.; Luo, W.Y.; Xiao, Z.Y.; Chen, Z.Y. Influences of irradiation on network microstructure of low water peak optical fiber material. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2010, 356, 1332–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lopez, N.; Vitiello, M.; Illas, F.; Pacchioni, G. Interaction of H2 with strained rings at the silica surface from ab initio calculations. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2000, 271, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sun, X.; Wen, J.; Guo, Q.; Pang, F.; Chen, Z.; Luo, Y.; Peng, G.D.; Wang, T. Fluorescence properties and energy level structure of Ce-doped silica fiber materials. Opt. Mater. Express 2017, 7, 751–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, S.; Jia, B.; Han, L.; Liu, G.; Gao, C.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J.; Yang, C.; Lu, P. Influence of ring structures on optical absorption of trivalent ytterbium in Yb-doped silica fiber. J. Lumin. 2021, 239, 118370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, Y.; Homma, O.; Urata, S.; Ono, M.; Mauro, J.C. Topological pruning enables ultra-low Rayleigh scattering in pressure-quenched silica glass. NPJ Comput. Mater. 2020, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Weidman, M.C. Controlling Nanomaterial Self-Assembly for Next Generation Optoelectronic Applications; Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; Chapter 1; pp. 20–21. [Google Scholar]
  30. Smith, A.M.; Nie, S. Semiconductor nanocrystals: Structure, properties, and band gap engineering. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Da Silva, J.L.; Ganduglia-Pirovano, M.V.; Sauer, J.; Bayer, V.; Kresse, G. Hybrid functionals applied to rare-earth oxides: The example of ceria. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 75, 045121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dong, Y.; Wen, J.; Pang, F.; Chen, Z.; Wang, J.; Luo, Y.; Peng, G.; Wang, T. Optical properties of PbS-doped silica optical fiber materials based on atomic layer deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 320, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Maron, L.; Eisenstein, O. Do f electrons play a role in the lanthanide-ligand bonds? A DFT study of Ln(NR2)3; R= H, SiH3. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 7140–7143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Atanasov, M.; Daul, C.; Güdel, H.U.; Wesolowski, T.A.; Zbiri, M. Ground states, excited states, and metal-ligand bonding in rare earth hexachloro complexes: A DFT-based ligand field study. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 2954–2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shang, Y.; Wen, J.; Dong, Y.; Zhan, H.; Luo, Y.; Peng, G.D.; Zhang, X.; Pang, F.; Chen, Z.; Wang, T. Luminescence properties of PbS quantum-dot-doped silica optical fibre produced via atomic layer deposition. J. Lumin. 2017, 187, 201–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sun, X.; Wen, J.; Jiang, D.; Pang, F.; Chen, Z.; Luo, Y.; Peng, G.; Wang, T. Absorption and microstructure properties calculated of Er-doped silica fiber based on DFT theory. In Proceedings of the Asia Communications and Photonics Conference (ACP), Wuhan, China, 2–5 November 2016. AF2A-128. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, J.; Brocklesby, W.S.; Lincoln, J.R.; Townsend, J.E.; Payne, D.N. Local structures of rare-earth ions in glasses: The ‘crystal-chemistry’approach. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1993, 163, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Haruna, T.; Iihara, J.; Yamaguchi, K.; Saito, Y.; Ishikawa, S.; Onishi, M.; Murata, T. Local structure analyses around Er3+ in Er-doped fiber with Al co-doping. Opt. Express 2006, 14, 11036–11042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tang, F.Z.; McNamara, P.; Barton, G.W.; Ringer, S.P. Nanoscale characterization of silica soots and aluminium solution doping in optical fibre fabrication. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2006, 352, 3799–3807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Peng, M.; Zhang, N.; Wondraczek, L.; Qiu, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Q. Ultrabroad NIR luminescence and energy transfer in Bi and Er/Bi co-doped germanate glasses. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 20799–20807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Borrelli, N.F.; Smith, D.W. Quantum confinement of PbS microcrystals in glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1994, 180, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yue, F.; Tomm, J.W.; Kruschke, D.; Glas, P.; Bzheumikhov, K.A.; Margushev, Z.C. PbS: Glass as broad-bandwidth near-infrared light source material. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 2287–2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, J.S.; Ullrich, B.; Das, A.; Wai, C.M.; Brown, G.J.; Dass, C.K.; Hendrickson, J.R. Luminescence studies for energy transfer of lead sulfide QD films. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 48651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Local structural models of PbS-doped 3MR. (a) PbS embedded into the 3MR; (b) PbS combined with Si tetrahedron; (c) PbS connected with Si tetrahedron by BO.
Figure 1. Local structural models of PbS-doped 3MR. (a) PbS embedded into the 3MR; (b) PbS combined with Si tetrahedron; (c) PbS connected with Si tetrahedron by BO.
Materials 15 06090 g001
Figure 2. (a) Calculated absorption spectrum of PbS-doped 3MR; (b) calculated fluorescence spectrum of PbS-doped 3MR.
Figure 2. (a) Calculated absorption spectrum of PbS-doped 3MR; (b) calculated fluorescence spectrum of PbS-doped 3MR.
Materials 15 06090 g002
Figure 3. Local structural models of PbS/Er co-doped 3MR. (a) Er connected with two Si tetrahedrons; (b) Er connected with two BOs.
Figure 3. Local structural models of PbS/Er co-doped 3MR. (a) Er connected with two Si tetrahedrons; (b) Er connected with two BOs.
Materials 15 06090 g003
Figure 4. Energy eigenvalues and electron density distributions of the HOMO and LUMO; (a) Er-3MR structural model; (b) spin-up state of PbS/Er-3MR structural model.
Figure 4. Energy eigenvalues and electron density distributions of the HOMO and LUMO; (a) Er-3MR structural model; (b) spin-up state of PbS/Er-3MR structural model.
Materials 15 06090 g004
Figure 5. Energy level diagrams of Er-3MR and PbS/Er-3MR local structural models.
Figure 5. Energy level diagrams of Er-3MR and PbS/Er-3MR local structural models.
Materials 15 06090 g005
Figure 6. (a) Schematic diagram of fiber fabrication process; (b) silica tube after HF solution treatment; (c) silica tube after deposition of SiO2 porous soot layers; (d) silica tube after ALD process; (e) optical fiber preform; (f) fiber preform after drawing; (g) fiber samples; (h) the cross section of PEDF; (i) the cross section of EDF.
Figure 6. (a) Schematic diagram of fiber fabrication process; (b) silica tube after HF solution treatment; (c) silica tube after deposition of SiO2 porous soot layers; (d) silica tube after ALD process; (e) optical fiber preform; (f) fiber preform after drawing; (g) fiber samples; (h) the cross section of PEDF; (i) the cross section of EDF.
Materials 15 06090 g006
Figure 9. (a) Absorption spectra; (b) excitation and emission spectra of EDF; (c) excitation and emission spectra of PEDF, and the mauve and cyan-blue dot lines corresponding to the base lines of the fitted peaks at 1532 and 1541 nm, respectively; (d) fluorescent lifetime curves.
Figure 9. (a) Absorption spectra; (b) excitation and emission spectra of EDF; (c) excitation and emission spectra of PEDF, and the mauve and cyan-blue dot lines corresponding to the base lines of the fitted peaks at 1532 and 1541 nm, respectively; (d) fluorescent lifetime curves.
Materials 15 06090 g009
Figure 10. (a) The fluorescent spectra of EDF and PEDF under the pump at 980 nm with the length of 7.5 m; (b) the relationships between the input power and the luminescence intensities for EDF and PEDF.
Figure 10. (a) The fluorescent spectra of EDF and PEDF under the pump at 980 nm with the length of 7.5 m; (b) the relationships between the input power and the luminescence intensities for EDF and PEDF.
Materials 15 06090 g010
Figure 11. (a) Schematics of the 1.5-micrometer band fiber amplifier; (b) gain characteristics for two fibers; (c) the variation of NF with the different input powers for EDF and PEDF.
Figure 11. (a) Schematics of the 1.5-micrometer band fiber amplifier; (b) gain characteristics for two fibers; (c) the variation of NF with the different input powers for EDF and PEDF.
Materials 15 06090 g011
Figure 7. The refractive index difference distribution of EDF and PEDF.
Figure 7. The refractive index difference distribution of EDF and PEDF.
Materials 15 06090 g007
Figure 8. (a) TEM image of PEDF; (b) HRTEM image of PEDF, and the inset is the corresponding SAED; (c) elemental mapping of PEDF.
Figure 8. (a) TEM image of PEDF; (b) HRTEM image of PEDF, and the inset is the corresponding SAED; (c) elemental mapping of PEDF.
Materials 15 06090 g008
Table 1. Energy parameters of different doping sites in the 3MR microstructural models.
Table 1. Energy parameters of different doping sites in the 3MR microstructural models.
MicrostructuresModel (a)Model (b)Model (c)
Energy (a.u.)7.31416.08437.3265
Table 2. Excited states parameters of PbS/Er-3MR local structural model (a).
Table 2. Excited states parameters of PbS/Er-3MR local structural model (a).
Electronic TransitionExcitation Energies
(eV)
Oscillator Strength
(f)
Wavelength
(nm)
S0–S10.78780.00021573.83
S0–S21.29340.0009958.62
S0–S31.36640.0005907.39
S0–S41.54410.0017802.93
S0–S51.86940.0009663.24
Table 3. Excited states parameters of PbS/Er-3MR local structural model (b).
Table 3. Excited states parameters of PbS/Er-3MR local structural model (b).
Electronic TransitionExcitation Energies
(eV)
Oscillator Strength
(f)
Wavelength
(nm)
S0–S10.77700.00431595.77
S0–S20.80860.00431533.41
S0–S31.28420.0008965.48
S0–S41.35350.0022916.05
S0–S51.56610.0031791.67
S0–S61.90440.0016651.03
Table 4. The content of different elements in the fiber samples.
Table 4. The content of different elements in the fiber samples.
SamplesO
(wt.%)
Ge
(wt.%)
Er
(wt.%)
Al
(wt.%)
Si
(wt.%)
Pb
(wt.%)
EDF42.966.850.120.6149.460
PEDF42.696.990.120.6248.590.98
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pan, X.; Dong, Y.; Wen, J.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Huang, Y.; Pang, F.; Wang, T. Improved Fluorescence and Gain Characteristics of Er-Doped Optical Fiber with PbS Nanomaterials Co-Doping. Materials 2022, 15, 6090. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15176090

AMA Style

Pan X, Dong Y, Wen J, Shang Y, Zhang X, Huang Y, Pang F, Wang T. Improved Fluorescence and Gain Characteristics of Er-Doped Optical Fiber with PbS Nanomaterials Co-Doping. Materials. 2022; 15(17):6090. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15176090

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pan, Xiangping, Yanhua Dong, Jianxiang Wen, Yana Shang, Xiaobei Zhang, Yi Huang, Fufei Pang, and Tingyun Wang. 2022. "Improved Fluorescence and Gain Characteristics of Er-Doped Optical Fiber with PbS Nanomaterials Co-Doping" Materials 15, no. 17: 6090. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15176090

APA Style

Pan, X., Dong, Y., Wen, J., Shang, Y., Zhang, X., Huang, Y., Pang, F., & Wang, T. (2022). Improved Fluorescence and Gain Characteristics of Er-Doped Optical Fiber with PbS Nanomaterials Co-Doping. Materials, 15(17), 6090. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15176090

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop