Next Article in Journal
Reliability Analysis of Critical Systems in A Fuel Booster Pump Using Advanced Simulation Techniques
Next Article in Special Issue
Nano X-ray Tomography Application for Quantitative Surface Layer Geometry Analysis after Laser Beam Modification
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Activated Carbon from Trachycarpus fortunei Seeds for the Removal of Cationic and Anionic Dyes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adhesive Joints with Laser Shaped Surface Microstructures
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 6
10.3390/ma15061988
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Use of Laser Energy for Etching Enamel Surfaces in Dentistry—A Scoping Review

by
Anca Labunet
1,
Andrada Tonea
1,
Andreea Kui
2,* and
Sorina Sava
1
1
Dental Materials and Ergonomics Discipline, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400089 Cluj Napoca, Romania
2
Prosthetic Dentistry Discipline, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(6), 1988; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15061988
Submission received: 16 January 2022 / Revised: 22 February 2022 / Accepted: 4 March 2022 / Published: 8 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laser Treatment for Surface Layers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: In dental practice, different situations require etching the enamel layer. Acid etching, the present golden standard, may be replaced by other methods, such as laser etching. The main focus of our scoping review is to assess the existent literature regarding the effectiveness of different types of lasers, to identify the main aspects studied so far, and to understand where new search strategies are needed. Methods: The search was conducted in several databases focusing on the laser etching of human definitive enamel. We included English language articles published between January 2000 and December 2021. Results: The 34 articles reviewed showed that hard lasers, Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YAG, may represent an alternative etching method on enamel surfaces. They create a fractured, irregular surface and open dentin tubules, highly suitable for adhesion but with a lower risk of cavity formation. Nd:YAG, CO2, and Diode lasers do not help in creating sufficient shear bond strength. There is, however, evidence suggesting that microcracks in the enamel layer may appear after thermomechanical ablation using laser energy. Conclusions: While the use of acid etching is still successfully used for enamel conditioning, some researchers have emphasized the role played by saliva in the enamel-remineralization process a few days after the procedure. In this context, laser energy can be used, especially for bonding ceramic brackets in the case of orthodontic treatments. However, as thermomechanical ablation can generate microcracks, further research is required in order to establish clear findings concerning the use of laser energy on enamel etching.

1. Introduction

Miaman [1] pioneered the application of lasers in dentistry in 1960, and, up until now, their applications have continued to expand. Based on the active medium, several types of lasers are available: (1) gas lasers, such as carbon dioxide (CO2); (2) solid-state lasers, such as neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG), the erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser (Er:YAG); (3) liquid (dye) lasers, such as Rhodamine G6 (containing liquid colorant as the medium); (4) semiconductor lasers, such as GaAs or GaAIAs lasers, having a semiconductor as the medium, also known as Diode lasers and (5) ‘free-electron’ lasers, which use an electron accelerator, but are not available for dental applications [1]. Diode lasers, also known as soft lasers, are considered in low-level laser therapy or ‘bio-stimulation’ [1,2]. Lasers can be used to perform a variety of dental treatments, including frenectomies, crown shaping, composite polymerization, and control of hemorrhaging, caries detection and removal, pain and hypersensitivity treatments, gingivectomy, gingivoplasty, and soft-tissue lesions’ treatment [3].
The CO2 laser wavelength has an important high affinity for water, thus rapidly removing soft tissue and providing homeostasis without penetrating tissues. However, its disadvantages refer to its large size, high price, and its capacity to interfere with and destroy hard tissues [4]. Erbium lasers have two distinct wavelengths, Er,Cr:YSGG (yttrium scandium gallium garnet) and Er:YAG (yttrium aluminum garnet), with the most important absorption of water in any dental laser wavelength and a high affinity for hydroxyapatite. They can be used for treating dental hard tissues [5]. The Nd:YAG wavelength is used in surgery for removing and coagulating dental soft tissues and in periodontal treatments [6].
The Diode laser has several applications in dental practice, being used frequently for crown reshaping through gingivoplasty, frenectomies, exposure of superficially impacted teeth, removal of inflamed and hypertonic tissues, and photostimulation of the aphthous and herpetic lesions [7].
There are four different possible interactions of lasers with a target tissue: reflection, transmission, scattering, and absorption. Through absorption, the laser elevates the temperature and creates photochemical effects varying depending on the water content of the tissues. Depending on the temperature reached, ablation–vaporization of the water in the tissues, denaturing of the proteins, or dehydration and burning of the tissue—carbonization—can occur. Absorption requires a molecule that absorbs light, known as chromophores, with an affinity for specific wavelengths of light. In the soft tissue present in the oral cavity, chromophores are melanin, hemoglobin, and water, and in hard tissues of dental origin, they are water and hydroxyapatite. There are different absorption coefficients depending on the wavelengths the lasers have [8,9].
In clinical practice, different situations (composite fillings, adhesive techniques in restorative dentistry, bracket bonding in orthodontics, etc.) imply etching the enamel layer. Acid etching involves a selective dissolution of the enamel, causing microporosities, resulting in bonding via mechanical retention. This classic technique of acid etching of the enamel layer was introduced by Buonocore [10], while Newman used this technique for bracket bonding in orthodontics by using composite resins on the etched dental surfaces [11].
Ever since the application of laser energy in dentistry, various laser types have been applied when etching the enamel and dentin layer. It is known that laser irradiation on the enamel layer produces melting and recrystallization, which leads to a surface roughness comparable to the one obtained after acid etching at a microscopic level [11,12].
The wavelength, power, mode of operation (pulsed, continuous wave), and exposure duration all affect the results of laser applications. Irradiation was tested as a viable way to produce etching effects on hard dental tissue, as there have been various research papers discussing the best laser parameters to optimize etching applications (Figure 1) [11,12,13,14].
Among the advantages of using laser energy for enamel etching, reducing the probability of enamel damage with the reduction in the debonding force needed has clinical importance [11,16,17]. However, some disadvantages, such as undesired thermal side effects and the developments of microcracks (which might represent a starting point for carious attacks), have been reported [11,18]. The purpose of this scoping review was to assess the existent literature on the effectiveness of different types of lasers (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YAG, Nd:YAG, CO2) on the enamel layer, to identify the main aspects studied so far regarding the topic, as well as to understand where new search strategies are needed. Our research examines the current state of science regarding lasers for different clinical situations necessitating the etching of the enamel layer and investigates any advantages of using laser energy compared to classical methods. The research question was: ’to what extent can laser energy can be used for enamel etching in dental practice?’

2. Materials and Methods

This study is a scoping review, considering the fact that outcomes and methodologies of studies regarding laser use for etching of the enamel layer are heterogeneous. Our research was performed according to the recommendations provided by Arkey and O’Malley in 2005, as well as the protocol guidelines provided by the Joanna Briggs Institute [19,20,21]. The search strategy was performed in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines (Figure 1) [19].

2.1. Search Strategy

The search included several databases—PubMed Central, Scopus, Medline via Ovid in December 2021—focusing on laser etching. Search for additional literature was completed via Google Scholar and through additional research of references from the included publications. All databases were searched between January 2000 and December 2021. The terms ’laser’, ’etch’, ’enamel layer’, and their combinations were used together using ’AND’ to build the search strategies. All references were imported and organized in the bibliographic software Mendeley®.

2.2. Selection of Articles

The inclusion criteria were as follows: all study types systematic reviews and meta-analysis, experimental studies performed on human definitive teeth, articles written in English, and articles for which full text is available. Studies performed on bovine and human temporary teeth, studies concerning the adhesion specifically on dentin layer, or research focusing on laser preparation of cavities instead of laser etching were excluded (Table 1).
A total of 118 papers were discovered by using the search method. After the duplicates were eliminated, 78 articles were considered. The authors individually screened the abstracts in order to identify the papers that were relevant to the aims of the research, resulting in 43 studies. A total of 7 records were additionally excluded based on the outcomes, which did not match the aims of this research. After full-text reading of the resulting studies, 16 publications were eliminated because they did not meet the inclusion criteria, and a total of 34 publications were eventually included in the study (Figure 2).

2.3. Data Collection

From each publication, the data that were extracted included the authors, year of publication, journal, aim of study, and methodology. In addition, key findings and conclusions were also extracted. In order to organize the data, Excel spreadsheets (Microsoft Office 2019®, MS, Redmond, WA, USA) were used.

3. Results

A selection of 34 articles was included in this scoping review. All publications investigated one of the four types of lasers—Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YAG, Nd:YAG, CO2—for conditioning the enamel surface. All publications are presented in three tables, according to laser types and their outcomes, in the order of publication (Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4).

4. Discussion

The classic method used for enamel etching is acid etching, a method that uses 37% phosphoric acid for the selective dissolution of the enamel layer, causing microporosities and resulting in a bonding mechanism via mechanical retention (the penetration of the resin tags into the microporous substrate) [11]. While this method is used successfully in different dental domains, there are some disadvantages, such as the possibility of decalcification, which leaves the enamel layer susceptible to caries attacks, as well as the discoloration caused by resin tags [11]. Although there are few studies published on enamel remineralization after acid etching using orthophosphoric acid, there is some evidence suggesting that a few days after conditioning, thanks to the role played by saliva, conditioned enamel cannot be distinguished from untreated enamel [54]. This is why novel technologies, such as laser irradiation and laser-etching techniques, have been developed as promising alternatives to acid etching. However, the use of lasers to condition the enamel surface could be even more aggressive, as it results in the ablation of similar tissue. The shear bond strength (SBS) has been investigated, especially in the context of orthodontic brackets bonding, and while some studies suggest that using self-etching primers reduces the bond strength and therefore the risk of the enamel layer fracture [55] when debonding, laser irradiation (especially Er,Cr:YSGG laser) shows promising results, especially for producing less-important adhesion forces to the enamel [56].
When using laser energy on the enamel surface, a melting and recrystallization process is initiated, creating a porous surface similar to the type III pattern produced by orthophosphoric acid via acid etching, thus providing an alternative to traditional etching [57]. On dental tissue, laser etching seems to create a fractured, uneven surface and open dentin tubules, highly suitable for adhesion [58].
Laser irradiation of dental hard tissues modifies the proportion of minerals in the tissues, reduces water and organic component content, and helps form stable, less-acid-soluble compounds [59]. Through this mechanism, the surface becomes less susceptible to cavity formation. Groth and collaborators found that, when combined, laser and acid conditioning increased etching depth, and laser-only etched enamel showed a small reduction in mineral concentration and higher porosity, revealing a greater penetration of acid [22].

4.1. Er:YAG Lasers

Most studies identified by the reviewers focused on Er:YAG lasers, a type of laser with application in cavity preparations in dental practice. Studies compared laser conditioning with conventional 37% phosphoric acid, revealing that the two methods can provide similar shear bond strengths [28,31,32,35,36]. There are certain studies revealing even a higher bond strength for laser etching [30,33]. The laser helps in improving shear bond strength values when bonding orthodontic brackets to the enamel surfaces by using a self-etching adhesive system [33]. Nd:YAG and Diode lasers also help improve the adhesion of self-etching systems in cavities [15]. When comparing Er:Yag to Nd:Yag for laser etching, the latter showed significantly lower results [25,37]. When combining acid and laser etching, the fissure sealant retention was improved [34].
However, three pieces of research revealed that laser conditioning of the enamel layer was less effective than acid etching [23,26,27]. These articles seem to be biased by the protocol used, lower power of lasers, or misuse of the systems. Compared to the nine studies showing improvement of adhesion when using laser, the outcome of the latter studies may be caused by technical inaccuracies.
Other studies compared different adhesive systems with significantly different results. Prime & Bond NT completely sealed dental hard tissue margins, while Etch & Prime 3.0 has shown the poorest overall results, which are statistically significant [24]. Additionally, additional laser conditioning after phosphoric acid etching might be beneficial to generation V, total etching in 2 steps [29].
These findings show that Er:YAG laser etching may function as a less-aggressive, high-efficacy method to create micro retention in total or self-etching adhesive systems, minimizing thermal damage. Nevertheless, thermomechanical ablation caused by these lasers can generate microcracks in the enamel layer [11].

4.2. Er,Cr:YSGG Laser

An Er,Cr:YSGG laser also helps increase surface roughness and eliminate the smear layer without cracking, as shown by scanning electron microscopy [38]. Similarly, 1.5- and 2-W laser irradiation may be an alternative to conventional acid etching [39,41]. Similar results between conventional acid etching and laser etching with this laser type were proven by several studies [42,44,45,46,47]. There is, however, the risk of enamel damage due to thermomechanical ablation, which can lead to microcracks [11].
Lower adhesion when using a laser was found in some studies, but the laser output was generally lower, as the main cause for such findings [40,43,48].
For this type of laser, the efficacy of etching seems slightly lower, but the advantages shown in the elimination of acid etching side effects show that it may be a viable alternative.

4.3. Other Lasers

Goswami and his team studied the Nd:YAG-laser-etched enamel surface, finding a surface that is similar in aspect to other laser types but with a lower shear bond strength than acid etching [50]. One study found similar effects of bond strength when comparing Nd:YAG to acid etching [52]. Contrary to this, Fuhrmann and collaborators found CO2 and Nd:YAG lasers produced sufficient modification of enamel for bracket bonding [49]. However, the CO2 laser was proven to produce lower adhesion in most studies [51,53].
As shown by the research included in this review, Nd:YAG and CO2 lasers may produce similar results and are not a viable alternative to conventional etching. Their effects on hard tissue are limited, and acid etching is preferred.

5. Conclusions

While classic acid enamel conditioning provides suitable results in order to assure proper adhesion in dental procedures, laser use has also been considered in this matter. While there are few pieces of research on enamel remineralization after acid etching, there is evidence suggesting that, due to saliva, the conditions of enamel cannot be distinguished from untreated enamel a few days after the procedure. On the enamel surface, hard lasers such as Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG seem to create a surface suitable for composite materials’ adhesion. Studies testing this method on orthodontic brackets, dental sealing, and composite fillings show mostly similar or higher adhesion than the golden standard, orthophosphoric acid. Laser irradiation of dental hard tissues helps form stable, less-acid-soluble adhesion, also lowering the risk of cavities’ formation and eliminating the smear layer. When combined, laser and acid conditioning increase etching depth. Additionally, when laser etching is prior to a self-etching adhesive, studies have shown higher shear bond strength values. Differences between findings may be caused by the laser output and power- or user-related inconsistencies. There are, however, some concerns regarding laser etching related to thermomechanical ablation, which might generate microcracks in the enamel layer. CO2, Diode, and Nd:YAG lasers have not been researched enough to provide us with a definitive conclusion.
While surface modifications have been thoroughly researched through scanning electronic microscopy, new-generation materials’ interaction with laser-etched surfaces may need further research. Therefore, based on the limitations of this scoping review, the results suggest that laser energy is beneficial in addition to acid etching in order to increase shear bond strength in dental-adhesive techniques.
Based on the information provided by the studies included in this research, a possible use of laser etching in dental practice could invovle bonding ceramic brackets in the case of orthodontic treatments. As the procedure for debonding the brackets (at the end of the treatment) can produce damage to the enamel layer, the situation may require a lesser shear bond strength.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.L. and S.S.; methodology, A.T.; software, A.K.; validation, S.S., A.L. and A.L.; formal analysis, A.T.; investigation, A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.L.; writing—review and editing, A.K.; visualization, A.T.; supervision, S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Submission for ethical approval was not required as the study relied on secondary data analysis of publicly available scientific literature.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Romanos, G.E. Laser Fundamental Principles. In Advanced Laser Surgery in Dentistry; Wiley Blackell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  2. Goldman, L.; Goldman, B.; Van Lieu, N. Current laser dentistry. Lasers Surg. Med. 1987, 6, 559–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Miserendino, L.J.; Pick, R.M. Current Applications of Lasers in Dentistry. In Lasers in Dentistry; Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc.: Singapore, 1995; pp. 126–128. [Google Scholar]
  4. Verma, S.K.; Maheshwari, S.; Singh, R.K.; Chaudhari, P.K. Laser in dentistry: An innovative tool in modern dental practice. Natl. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 2012, 3, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Harashima, T.; Kinoshita, J.; Kimura, Y.; Brugnera, A.; Zanin, F.; Pecora, J.D.; Matsumoto, K. Morphological comparative study on ablation of dental hard tissues at cavity preparation by Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2005, 23, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ishikawa, I.; Aoki, A.; Takasaki, A.A. Clinical application of erbium: YAG Laser in periodontology. J. Int. Acad. Periodontol. 2008, 10, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Hilgers, J.J.; Tracey, S.G. Clinical uses of Diode lasers in orthodontics. J. Clin. Orthod. 2004, 38, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Carroll, L.; Humphreys, T.R. LASER-tissue interactions. Clin. Dermatol. 2006, 24, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sulieman, M. An overview of the use of lasers in general dental practice: 2. Laser wavelengths, soft and hard tissue clinical applications. Dent. Update 2005, 32, 286–288, 291–294, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lopes, G.C.; Thys, D.G.; Klaus, P.; Oliveira, G.M.; Widmer, N. Enamel acid etching: A review. Compendium 2007, 28, 662–669. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kabas, A.S.; Ersoy, T.; Gülsoy, M.; Akturk, S. Femtosecond laser etching of dental enamel for bracket bonding. J. Biomed. Opt. 2013, 18, 098003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Myers, T.D. Effects of a pulsed Nd:YAG laser on enamel and dentin. In Proceedings of the SPIE, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 14–19 January 1990; Volume 1200, pp. 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dostálová, T.; Jelínková, H.; Kucerová, H.; Krejsa, O.; Hamal, K.; Kubelka, J.; Procházka, S. Noncontact Er:YAG laser ablation: Clinical evaluation. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 1998, 16, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Obata, A.; Tsumura, T.; Niwa, K.; Ashizawa, Y.; Deguchi, T.; Ito, M. Super pulse CO2 laser for bracket bonding and debonding. Eur. J. Orthod. 1999, 21, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Resaei-Soufi, L.; Ghanadan, K.; Moghimbeigi, A. The effects of Er:YAG, Nd:YAG, and Diode (940 nm) lasers irradiation on microtensile bond strength of two steps self-etch adhesives. Laser Ther. 2019, 28, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Drummond, J.L.; Wigdor, H.A.; Walsh, J.T., Jr.; Fadavi, S.; Punwani, I. Sealant bond strengths of CO2 laser-etched versus acid-etched bovine enamel. Lasers Surg. Med. 2000, 27, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martínez-Insua, A.; da Silva Dominguez, L.; Rivera, F.G.; Santana-Penín, U.A. Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er:YAG-laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2000, 84, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Otsuki, M.; Eguro, T.; Maeda, T.; Tanaka, H. Comparison of the bond strength of composite resin to Er:YAG laser irradiated human enamel pre-treated with various methods in vitro. Lasers Surg. Med. 2002, 30, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tricco, A.C.; Lillie, E.; Zarin, W.; O’Brien, K.K.; Colquhoun, H.; Levac, D.; Moher, D.; Peters, M.D.; Horsley, T.; Weeks, L.; et al. PRISMA Extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA- ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018, 169, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Arksey, H.; O’Malley, L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2005, 8, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. The Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: 2014 Edition; The Joanna Briggs Institute, The University of Adelaide: Adelaide, Australia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  22. Groth, E.B.; Mercer, C.E.; Anderson, P. Microtomographic analysis of subsurface enamel and dentine following Er:YAG laser and acid etching. Eur. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent. 2001, 9, 73–79. [Google Scholar]
  23. De Munck, J.; Van Meerbeek, B.; Yudhira, R.; Lambrechts, P.; Vanherle, P. Micro-tensile bond strength of two adhesives to Erbium:YAG-lased vs. bur-cut enamel and dentin. Eur. J. Oral. Sci. 2002, 110, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dibb, R.G.; Corona, S.A.; Borsatto, M.C.; Ferreira, K.C.; Ramos, R.P.; Pécora, J.D. Assessing microleakage on class V composite resin restorations after Er:YAG laser preparation varying the adhesive systems. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 2002, 20, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Armengol, V.; Laboux, O.; Weiss, P.; Jean, A.; Hamel, H. Effects of Er:YAG and Nd:YAP laser irradiation on the surface roughness and free surface energy of enamel and dentin: An in vitro study. Oper. Dent. 2003, 28, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Manhart, J.; Huth, K.C.; Chen, H.Y.; Hickel, R. Influence of the pretreatment of occlusal pits and fissures on the retention of a fissure sealant. Am. J. Dent. 2004, 17, 12–18. [Google Scholar]
  27. Delme, K.; Deman, P.J.; De Moor, R.J.G. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation. J. Oral Rehabil. 2005, 32, 676–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hosseini, M.H.; Namvar, F.; Chalipa, J.; Saber, K.; Chiniforush, N.; Sarmadi, S.; Mirhashemi, A.H. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Enamel Prepared By Er:YAG Laser and Conventional Acid-Etching. J. Dent. 2012, 9, 20–26. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yung, F.Y.W.; Gutknecht, N.; Franzen, R.; Fischer, H. Shear strength of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared enamel: An in vitro comparative study. Lasers Med. Sci. 2013, 28, 879–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zavareh, F.A.; Samimi, P.; Birang, P.; Eskini, M.; Bouraima, S.A. Assessment of Microleakage of Class V Composite Resin Restoration Following Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser Conditioning and Acid Etching with Two Different Bonding Systems. J. Lasers Med. Sci. 2013, 4, 39–47. [Google Scholar]
  31. Arami, S.; Shahabi, S.; Tabatabaie, M.; Chiniforush, N.; Morshedi, E.; Torabi, S. Assessing microleakage of composite restorations in class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser irradiation or diamond bur. J. Conserv. Dent. 2014, 17, 216–219. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ciucchi, P.; Neuhaus, K.W.; Emerich, M.; Peutzfeldt, A.; Lussi, A. Evaluation of different types of enamel conditioning before application of a fissure sealant. Lasers Med. Sci. 2015, 30, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Çokakoğlu, S.; Nalçacı, R.; Üşümez, S.; Malkoç, S. Effects of different combinations of Er:YAG laser-adhesives on enamel demineralization and bracket bond strength. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2016, 34, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Durmus, B.; Giray, F.; Peker, S.; Kargul, B. Clinical evaluation of a fissure sealant placed by acid etching or Er:YAG laser combined with acid etching. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2017, 15, 157–162. [Google Scholar]
  35. Luong, E.; Shayegan, A. Assessment of microleakage of class V restored by resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer and pit and fissure resin-based sealants following Er:YAG laser conditioning and acid etching: In vitro study. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent. 2018, 30, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Onay, E.O.; Yamanel, K.; Korkmaz-Ceyhan, Y.; Gulsahi, K. Comparison of three adhesive systems in class II composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth: Influence of Er:YAG laser conditioning and gingival margin levels on microleakage. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2018, 1, e781–e788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kaviani, A.; Nejad, N.K. Effect of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG laser tooth conditioning on the microleakage of self-adhesive resin cement. Biomater. Investig. Dent. 2021, 20, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hossain, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Yamada, Y.; Suzuki, N.; Murakami, Y.; Matsumoto, K. Analysis of surface roughness of enamel and dentin after Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation. J. Clin. Laser Med. Surg. 2001, 19, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Berk, N.; Başaran, G.; Ozer, T. Comparison of sandblasting, laser irradiation, and conventional acid etching for orthodontic bonding of molar tubes. Eur. J. Orthod. 2008, 30, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Botta, S.B.; da Ana, P.A.; Zezell, D.M.; Powers, J.M.; Matos, A.B. Adhesion after erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser application at three different irradiation conditions. Lasers Med. Sci. 2009, 24, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Türkmen, C.; Sazak-Oveçoğlu, H.; Günday, M.; Güngör, G.; Durkan, M.; Oksüz, M. Shear bond strength of composite bonded with three adhesives to Er,Cr:YSGG laser-prepared enamel. Quintessence Int. 2010, 41, e119–e124. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Karaman, E.; Yazici, A.R.; Baseren, M.; Gorucu, J. Comparison of acid versus laser etching on the clinical performance of a fissure sealant: 24-month results. Oper. Dent. 2013, 38, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ustunkol, I.; Yazici, A.R.; Gorucu, J.; Dayangac, B. Influence of laser etching on enamel and dentin bond strength of Silorane System Adhesive. Lasers Med. Sci. 2015, 30, 695–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kumar, G.; Dhillon, J.K.; Rehman, F. A comparative evaluation of retention of pit and fissure sealants placed with conventional acid etching and Er,Cr:YSGG laser etching: A randomised controlled trial. Laser Ther. 2016, 30, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dilip, S.; Srinivas, S.; Noufal, M.N.; Ravi, K.; Krishnaraj, R.; Charles, A. Comparison of surface roughness of enamel and shear bond strength, between conventional acid etching and erbium, chromium-doped: Yttrium scandium-gallium-garnet laser etching—An in vitro study. Dent. Res. J. 2018, 15, 248–255. [Google Scholar]
  46. Shafiei, F.; Sardarian, A.; Fekrazad, R.; Farjood, A. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a universal adhesive using different etching methods. Dent. Press J. Orthod. 2019, 5, 33.e1–33.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Şimşek, H.; Rüya Yazıcı, A.; Cem Güngör, H. In Vitro Evaluation of Different Protocols for Preventing Microleakage of Fissure Sealants Placed Following Saliva Contamination. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2020, 1, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Al Habdan, A.H.; Al Rabiah, R.; Al Busayes, R. Shear bond strength of acid and laser conditioned enamel and dentine to composite resin restorations: An in vitro study. Clin. Exp. Dent. Res. 2021, 7, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Fuhrmann, R.; Gutknecht, N.; Magunski, A.; Lampert, F.; Diedrich, P. Conditioning of enamel with Nd:YAG and CO2 dental laser systems and with phosphoric acid. An in-vitro comparison of the tensile bond strength and the morphology of the enamel surface. J. Orofac. Orthop. 2001, 62, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Goswami, M.; Singh, A. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to acid etched or Nd:Yag lased enamel. J. Indian Soc. Pedod. Prev. Dent. 2011, 29, 140–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Oshagh, M.; Pakshir, H.R.; Najafi, H.Z.; Naseri, M.M.; Nasrabadi, N.I.; Torkan, S. Comparison of the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets in bonding and rebonding: Preparation with laser versus conventional acid etch technique. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2013, 31, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Suhaimi, F.M.; Alam, N.Z.; Ariffin, S.M.; Razak, N.A.; Razab, M.K. Surface modifications of human tooth using Nd:YAG laser for dental applications. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Seogwipo-si, Korea, 11–15 July 2017; Volume 2017, pp. 4537–4540. [Google Scholar]
  53. Bhandari, D.P.; Anbuselvan, G.J.; Karthi, M. Evaluation of resin penetration depth in enamel surface for orthodontic bonding exposed to five types of enamel conditioning methods: A scanning electron microscopic study. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2019, 11 (Suppl. S2), S221–S227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Nelson, D.G.; Wefel, J.S.; Jongebloed, W.L.; Featherstone, J.D. Morphology, histology and crystallography of human dental enamel treated with pulsed low-energy infrared laser radiation. Caries Res. 1987, 21, 411–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Uysal, T.; Ustdal, A.; Kurt, G. Evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with self-etching primer. Eur. J. Orthod. 2010, 32, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Yassaei, S.; Fekrazad, R.; Shahraki, N.; Goldani Moghadam, M. A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching. J. Dent. Res. Dent. Clin. Dent. Prospects 2014, 8, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Silverstone, L.M.; Saxton, C.A.; Dogon, I.L.; Fejerskov, O. Variation in the pattern of acid etching of human dental enamel examined by scanning electron microscopy. Caries Res. 1975, 9, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Visuri, S.R.; Gilbert, J.L.; Wright, D.D.; Wigdor, H.A.; Walsh, J.T., Jr. Shear strength of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin. J. Dent. Res. 1996, 75, 599–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Lee, B.S.; Hsieh, T.T.; Lee, Y.L.; Lan, W.H.; Hsu, Y.J.; Wen, P.H.; Lin, C.P. Bond strengths of orthodontic bracket after acid-etched, Er:YAG laser-irradiated and combined treatment on enamel surface. Angle Orthod. 2003, 73, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Materials 15 01988 g001 550
Figure 1. Parameters used for enamel etching, according to the laser type [11,15].
Figure 1. Parameters used for enamel etching, according to the laser type [11,15].
Materials 15 01988 g001
Materials 15 01988 g002 550
Figure 2. PRISMA flow diagram for research stages.
Figure 2. PRISMA flow diagram for research stages.
Materials 15 01988 g002
Table
Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
CriterionInclusionExclusion
Time periodPublications available between January 2000 and December 2021All publications published before January 2000
LanguageEnglishNon-English
Type of articlesAll research types including primary research (e.g., experimental studies performed on human teeth, clinical trials, pilot studies), secondary research, reviews, related to the use of laser on etching of enamel layer;
Publications for which full-text is available		Studies performed on bovine teeth and temporary human teeth;
Studies investigating the adhesion specifically on dentin layer;
Research only focusing on laser preparation of cavities
Table
Table 2. Publications investigating Er:YAG laser for enamel etching.
Table 2. Publications investigating Er:YAG laser for enamel etching.
No.Year of PublishingLaser TypeMethodsResults
1[22]/2001Er:YAGX-ray microtomographyLaser and acid conditioning increased etching depth; laser-only etched enamel subsurface revealed small reduction in mineral concentration and increase in porosity, allowing greater penetration of acid
2[23]/2002Er:YAGTotal-etching adhesive OptiBond FL +/− acid etching/self-etching adhesive Clearfil SE Bond +/− laser etchingLaser etching—less effective than acid-etching
3[24]/2002Er:YAGCavities conditioned with short pulsed Er:YAG laser (500 mJ/5 Hz) + for additional 30 s using lower dosimetries (120 mJ/4 Hz): acid etch + Bond-1/acid etching+Prime & Bond NT/self-etching Etch & Prime 3.0Prime & Bond NT completely sealed both margins; Etch & Prime 3.0 had the poorest overall results, with a statistically significant difference
4[25]/2003Er:YAG, Nd:YAP37% phosphoric acid/Er:YAG laser/Nd:YAP laserMorphological changes on hard dental tissues—higher with acid-etch and Er:YAG laser than Nd:YAG laser. Free surface energy—sgn greater with acid-etch or Er:YAG laser
5[26]/2004Er:YAG37% H3PO4, diamond bur/37% H3PO4, Er:YAG laser/Er:YAG laser and 37% H3PO4/air abrasion/air abrasion + acid etching with 37% H3PO4 + compomer fissure sealantConventional acid etching—significatly higher sealant retention than Er:YAG laser etching or air abrasion. Mechanical conditioning of the laser or air abrasion + acid-etching results statistically equal to the acid-etch only group
6[27]/2005Er:YAGEr:YAG laser and acid etching/Er:YAG laser, laser etching and acid etching/Er:YAG laser and only laser etching/high-speed bur and acid etchingAcid-etch is favored when using resin composite in Er:YAG-lased Class V cavities; the contact seaL at enamel margins in Er:YAG-lased and laser-etched cavities depended on the resin composite composition and on the adhesive
7[28]/2012Er:YAG37% phosphoric acid, Er:YAG laser at 1 W/1.5 WMean SBS obtained with Er:YAG laser at 1 W or 1.5 W is similar to conventional etching
8[29]/2013Er:YAGTotal etching—3 steps and 2 steps, self-etching—2 steps and 1 stepAdditional laser etching after phosphoric acid etch–beneficial to generation 5, total etching in 2 steps. No significant change or detrimental effect to the other types in SBS
9[30]/2013Er:YAGEr:YAG laser + Optibond FL,/Er:YAG laser + 35% phosphoric acid + Optibond FL/Er:YAG laser + Clearfil SE Bond/a35% phosphoric acid + OptibondFL/Clearfil SE BondEr:YAG laser for conditioning followed by different dentin adhesive systems had an influence on the marginal sealing of composite resin restorations
10[31]/2014Er:YAGDiamond bur + acid etch/cavity conditioning by Er:YAG laser + acid etch/Er:YAG laser + laser etching/diamond bur + laser etching/Er:YAG laser with no conditioning procedureNo significant difference in evaluating microleakage degree of cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser and diamond bur
11[32]/2015Er:YAGEr:YAG/air abrasion/self-etching adhesive with phosphoric acid or laser/acid etchingConventional acid etching sgn lower microleakage, higher unfilled area proportions than the Er:YAG laser + self-etch adhesive group
12[33]/2016Er:YAGAcid + Transbond XT/Er:YAG (100 mJ or 200 mJ 10 Hz) etching + Transbond XT/Transbond Plus self-etching primer/Er:YAG (100 mJ or 200 mJ, 10 Hz) etching + Transbond Plus SEP/Clearfil Protect Bond/Er:YAG (100 mJ or 200 mJ, 10 Hz) etching + Clearfil Protect BondLowest SBS values were in 1 step self etch; the highest were in laser+ self-etch. When two-step self-etch adhesive is used for bonding brackets, laser etching at 1 W (100 mJ, 10 Hz) seems to improve SBS
13[34]/2017Er:YAGPhosphoric acid etching/Er:YAG laser + acid etching, fissure sealantEr:YAG laser + acid etching sgn improves fissure sealant retention over conventional acid etching alone
14[35]/2018Er:YAG37% phosphoric acid, Er:YAG laser and phosphoric acid etching, and combination with Er:YAG laserEr:YAG laser and the resin composite; the resin-modified glass ionomers and fissure sealant may provide a variant of hard dental tissue etching to acid etching
15[36]/2018Er:YAG37% phosphoric acid/Adper Single Bond 2; Er:YAG laser/37% phosphoric acid/Adper Single Bond 2; Clearfil SE Bond; Er:YAG laser/Clearfil SE Bond; Adper Easy One; Er:YAG laser/Adper Easy OneEr:YAG laser conditioning may show some advantage prior to Adper Single Bond 2 application in enamel
16[15]/2019Nd:YAG, Er:YAG, Diode Two-step self-etching adhesives/lasers before or after primer or bondingNd:YAG laser after applying the primer, Diode laser after bonding agent, may sgn improve the microtensile bond strength in two-step self-etch adhesive systems
17[37]/2021Nd:YAG, Er:YAGNo conditioning/Er:YAG laser (2940 nm, 10 Hz, 1.2 W)/Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm, 1.5 W, 10 Hz) + self-etching adhesiveEr:YAG laser (2940 nm, 10 Hz, 1.2 W) on cavity surface shows lower marginal microleakage of self-etch adhesive resin cement restorations compared to Nd:YAG (1064 nm, 1.5 W, 10 Hz) and no conditioning groups
Abbreviations: Er:YAG = erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet; Nd:YAG = neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet; SEM = scanning electronic microscopy; SBS = shear bond strength; Sgn = statistically significant.
Table
Table 3. Publications investigating Er,Cr:YSGG laser for enamel etching.
Table 3. Publications investigating Er,Cr:YSGG laser for enamel etching.
Year of PublishingLaser TypeMethodsResults
1[38]/2001Er,Cr:YSGGEr,Cr:YSGG, 37% phosphoric acidSurface roughness was sgn higher with the laser system. Scanning electron microscopy showed that the irradiated surface produced a rough surface that was entirely lacking a smear layer, with no cracking of enamel or dentin
2[39]/2008Er, Cr:YSGGEr, Cr:YSGG 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, and 2 W, phosphoric acidA more important layer of adhesive was left on the enamel surface with low-power laser irradiation. Sandblasting and low-power laser irradiation (0.5, 0.75, and 1 W) seem to not etch enamel in a way that is acceptable for orthodontic molar tube bonding, but 1.5- and 2-W laser irradiation was shown to be an alternative to conventional acid etching
3[40]/2009Er,Cr:YSGGEr,Cr:YSGG 0.25 W, 20 Hz, 2.8 J/cm2 energy per pulse of 12.5 mJ, water delivery rate 11 mL/minLaser conditioning significantly lowered the bond strength of several adhesive systems applied on enamel
4[41]/2010Er,Cr:YSGGEr,Cr:YSGG laser/37% phosphoric acid + primer adhesive; self-etched primer + adhesive; all-in-one adhesive—single doseEr,Cr:YSGG laser > 37% phosphoric acid. SBS of laser etched + primer/adhesive group sgn higher than 37% phosphoric acid + primer/adhesive
5[42]/2013Er,Cr:YSGGPhosphoric acid etching/laser etching—clinicalThe clinical performance of fissure sealants placed after acid or Er,Cr:YSGG laser etching was similar
6[43]/2015Er, Cr:YSGGLaser etch/phosphoric acid etched laser + silorane adhesive systemPhosphoric acid best for SBS with Silorane System Adhesive. Non etched = laser etched
7[44]/2016Er,Cr:YSGG37% phosphoric acid/Er,Cr:YSGG laser 2.78 µm, 1.5 WOverall retention rate in acid etched—slightly higher compared to laser etched; difference statistically non-significant
8[45]/2018Er,Cr:YSGGEtching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 s, irradiation with Er, Cr:YSGG laser at 1 watt for 10 s and 20 s, and irradiation with Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 1.5 watts for 10 s and 20 s. Metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT1.5 W/20 s Er,Cr:YSGG laser produced comparable bond strength to acid etching; no sgn diff between laser and acid etch
9[46]/2019Er,Cr:YSGGEr,Cr:YSGG laser, phosphoric acid + Scotchbond Universal/Transond XTHighest SBS—Scotchbond Universal with laser etching; Transbond XT with acid or laser etching, and Scotchbond in self-etch mode—lowest bond strength
10[47]/2020Er,Cr:YSGGEr,Cr:YSSG/phosphoric acid etching/acid etching + etch-and-rinse adhesive/self-etching adhesive—in vitro. contaminating enamel surfaces with artificial saliva + fissure sealant/contamination and repeated conditioning + fissure sealantRe-application of Er,Cr:YSSG laser and self-etching adhesive did not have an effect on microleakage of fissure sealants. Without re-application, acid-etching + etch-and-rinse adhesive—only superior to acid-etching
11[48]/2021Er,Cr:YSGGEr,Cr:YSGG, 37% phosphoric acidThe shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to hard dental tissues etched with phosphoric acid was more important than results obtained when conditioned with Er,Cr:YSGG laser
Abbreviations: Er,Cr:YSGG = erbium-doped yttrium scandium gallium garnet; SEM = scanning electronic microscopy; SBS = shear bond strength; Sgn = statistically significant.
Table
Table 4. Publications investigating other lasers for etching the enamel layer.
Table 4. Publications investigating other lasers for etching the enamel layer.
Year of PublishingLaser TypeMethodsResults
1[49]/2001CO2 and Nd:YAGCO2 laser/Nd:YAG laser/phosphoric acid etchingCO2 laser—demineralization gaps of various dimensions, Nd:YAG laser—honeycomb structures similar to acid-etch technique. CO2 and Nd:YAG lasers—sufficient modification of enamel for bracket bonding
2[50]/2011Nd:YAG35% phosphoric acid/Nd:YAG laser 0.8 W, 10 Hz, for 10 s with 80 mJ/pulse power + bonding + compositeUnder SEM, acid showed typical honeycomb appearance, and laser—bubble-like cavities. In enamel, acid etching technique showed higher SBS
3[51]/2013CO2CO2 laser, phosphoric acidInitial preparation with acid has a higher SBS value than CO2 laser, with higher secondary bonding. Less adhesive residue present on enamel after tooth preparation with laser following debonding
4[52]/2017Nd:YAGNd:YAG laser and 37% phosphoric acidComparison of the compositions demonstrated that calcium has higher percentage when exposed to laser-etching compared to acid-etching. Nd:YAG laser can be implemented for etching procedure as a replacement of the conventional technique
5[53]/2019CO2CO2 laser/37% phosphoric acid/polyacrylic acid/self-etching/air abrasionThe teeth etched with 37% phosphoric acid exhibited significantly greater depth of resin penetration (15.1 µm) than self-etching and polyacrylic acid. Laser etching showed similar depth with acid etching. Air abrasion shows lowest depth of all groups
Abbreviations: SEM = scanning electronic microscopy; SBS = shear bond strength; Sgn = statistically significant.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Labunet, A.; Tonea, A.; Kui, A.; Sava, S. The Use of Laser Energy for Etching Enamel Surfaces in Dentistry—A Scoping Review. Materials 2022, 15, 1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15061988

AMA Style

Labunet A, Tonea A, Kui A, Sava S. The Use of Laser Energy for Etching Enamel Surfaces in Dentistry—A Scoping Review. Materials. 2022; 15(6):1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15061988

Chicago/Turabian Style

Labunet, Anca, Andrada Tonea, Andreea Kui, and Sorina Sava. 2022. "The Use of Laser Energy for Etching Enamel Surfaces in Dentistry—A Scoping Review" Materials 15, no. 6: 1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15061988

APA Style

Labunet, A., Tonea, A., Kui, A., & Sava, S. (2022). The Use of Laser Energy for Etching Enamel Surfaces in Dentistry—A Scoping Review. Materials, 15(6), 1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15061988

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop