Next Article in Journal
Transport Mechanisms and Dielectric Features of Mg-Doped ZnO Nanocrystals for Device Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Properties of Highly Elastic, Lightweight, and Thermally Insulating SiO2 Fibrous Porous Materials
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Niobium and Molybdenum on the Microstructures and Corrosion Properties of CrFeCoNiNbxMoy Alloys
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Calculation of Thermal Expansion Coefficient of Rare Earth Zirconate System at High Temperature by First Principles

1
National Engineering Research Center of Environment-Friendly Metallurgy in Producing Premium Non-ferrous Metals, GRINM Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 101407, China
2
GRINM Resources and Environment Tech. Co., Ltd., Beijing 101407, China
3
General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals, Beijing 100088, China
4
GRIMAT Engineering Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 101407, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(6), 2264; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062264
Submission received: 18 January 2022 / Revised: 1 March 2022 / Accepted: 9 March 2022 / Published: 18 March 2022

Abstract

:
Compounds of rare earth zirconates with pyrochlore structure are candidates for the application of thermal barrier coatings of next generation. In order to modify the mechanic properties and maintain the low thermal conductivity, other trivalent rare-earth element substitution is commonly used. Presently, investigation on the evaluation of the property of thermal expansion is attracting more attention. In this paper, a feature parameter of thermal expansion coefficient at high temperature (α) was proposed by combining Grüneisen’s equation and the Debye heat capacity model. Using α model, the thermal expansion property of different compounds can be easily figured out by first principles. Firstly, α of ZrO2, HfO2, were calculated, and results are in good agreement with the experimental data from the literature. Moreover, α of La2Zr2O7, Pr2Zr2O7, Gd2Zr2O7, and Dy2Zr2O7 were calculated, and results demonstrated that the model of α is a useful tool to predict the thermal expansion coefficient at high temperature. Finally, Gd2Zr2O7 with 4 different Yb dopant concentrations (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7 (x = 0, 0.125, 0.3125, 0.5) were calculated. Comparing with the experimental data from the literature, the calculation results showed the same tendency with the increasing of Yb concentration.

1. Introduction

It is well known that yttria-stabilized zirconia with a mass fraction of 8%(8YSZ) is widely used as top coating of thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) for aero engines [1,2]. However, with the continuously increasing demand of the thrust-to-weight ratio, 8YSZ is not workable because of its phase change and sintering since the temperature of the turbine front inlet is much greater than 1200 °C [3,4]. Gd2Zr2O7, as the representative of rare earth zirconates, is evidently one of the most promising candidates for the application of next generation TBCs due to its lower thermal conductivity and higher phase stability [5,6]. However, it still suffers from the problem that mechanical properties are not high enough and thermal cycling performance is poor [7]. The thermal expansion properties play the key role. Comparatively, the thermal expansion coefficient of rare earth zirconates is about 9–10 × 10−6 K−1(1073 K) [8], which is much lower than that of 8YSZ, about 11 × 10−6 K−1(1073 K) [3]. The thermal expansion coefficient of NiCoCrAlY bonding layer, is about 17.5 × 10−6 K−1(1273 K) [5]. The mismatch of the thermal expansion between the ceramic top layer and the bonding layer causes thermal stresses during thermal cycling, which can lead to cracks and failure of the TBCs system [9,10].
In order to improve the thermal expansion property of rare earth zirconates, doping with other trivalent rare earth elements is typically used. Excellent thermophysical properties such as high thermal stability, lower thermal conductivity, and high thermal expansion have been demonstrated in doped rare earth zirconates, such as Sm2(Zr1-xCex)2O7, (Nd1-xGdx)2Zr2O7, Gd2(Zr1-xTix)2O7 and (Sm1-xGdx)Zr2O7 [6,11,12,13], etc.
Nevertheless, the research described above was carried out mainly by experiments, which are time costly and not fully adequate. For instance, heat conduction and thermal expansion of materials are closely related to lattice vibrations. However, to investigate the lattice vibrations of materials experimentally, neutron scattering or Raman spectroscopy is required [14]. Correspondingly, computational material simulations are more efficiently implemented to accelerate the design of materials. As we know, the first principles exhibit powerful capabilities in material design. Zhao [15] investigated the structure, mechanical properties, minimum thermal conductivity, and electronic properties of a series of Gd-site and Zr-site substituted Gd2Zr2O7 pyrochlores by first principles. Atsushi Togo [16] calculated the thermal expansion properties of Ti3SiC2, Ti3AlC2, and Ti3GeC2 by the first principles combing with quasi-harmonic approximation (QHA). Feng [17] investigated the thermal expansion properties of rare earth zirconates (Ln2Zr2O7, Ln = La, Nd, Sm and Gd) of pyrochlore structures by using first principles. Meanwhile, the calculation of properties of doped compounds by first principles is very difficult especially for the calculation of the thermal expansion property. For instance, the conventional cell of Gd2Zr2O7 contains 88 atoms, and cell expansion must be performed to obtain solid solution structures with different doping concentrations, which makes the calculation of phonons extremely difficult.
Classically, Grüneisen proposed a thermal expansion equation [18], in which the thermal expansion coefficient(α) is determined by elastic properties and heat capacity (CV). Further, CV is the function of Debye temperature and temperature. When the temperature is much greater than Debye temperature, CV can be considered as a constant. In this case, the calculation of α is simplified to the calculation of elastic properties, which makes the calculation much easier and faster. Coincidentally, the TBCs for aero engines operate at a high temperature, which is much higher than Debye temperature. Moreover, investigations showed that the coefficient of thermal expansion gradually increases with temperature increasing at high temperature, but the increasing rate gradually decreases. Reasonably, the thermal expansion coefficient at super high temperature(α) can be used as a comparison factor to characterize the thermal expansion property of different dopant/concentration compound materials.
Therefore, in this paper, based on the Grüneisen’s equation, a computational model of α was developed, by which the calculation of a series of rare earth zirconates were implemented by the first principles.

2. Methodology

The supercell containing 88 atoms of Gd2Zr2O7 was used for calculation. The structures of Yb doped Gd2Zr2O7 were formed by replacing Gd atoms with different amounts of Yb atoms. The structural models for (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7 were built using the cluster expansion approach by calculating the lowest forming energy [19,20,21]. Further, the structures were optimized by the Birch–Murnaghan equation of state [22]. The elastic constants of the material were calculated by the stress–strain method [23].
The first principles calculations were based on density functional theory using the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) [24] with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) for exchange-correlation energy, in the form of Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) [25]. The kinetic cut-off energy for the plane wave expansion was taken to be 600 eV in the Brillouin zone integrations using 2 × 2 × 2 k points. The average force acting on ions was reduced to 0.05 eV/Ang. Valence electrons included for distinct atoms were O 2s22p4, Zr 5s14d3, Hf 5d36s1, Gd 6s25p65d1, Yb 6s25p6.

3. Results

3.1. Yb Doped Gd2Zr2O7 Structure

The supercell of Gd2Zr2O7 contains 88 atoms, including 16 Gd atoms, 16 Zr atoms and 56 oxygen atoms. A total of 2, 5 and 8 Yb atoms were used to replace the Gd atoms to obtain three different concentrations: (Gd0.875Yb0.125)2Zr2O7, (Gd0.875Yb0.3125)2Zr2O7, and (Gd0.5Yb0.5)2Zr2O7, respectively. Correspondingly, the possible numbers of (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7 doped structures were C 16 2 , C 16 5 , and C 16 8 . Excluding the equivalent structures, the number of unequal possible doped structures are 3, 35, and 97, separately. The forming energy E of each structure was calculated using the cluster expansion approach, according to Equation (1) [21], and the final doped structure was identified by the structure with the lowest forming energy.
E = ( E 0 n 1 × E 1 n 2 × E 2 ) ( n 1 + n 2 )
wherein E0 is the energy of the doped structure; E1 and E2 are the energy of the single cell of Gd2Zr2O7 and Yb2Zr2O7, and n1 and n2 are the number of dopant atoms, respectively. The calculation results were shown in Figure 1. According to the lowest forming energy, the geometrical configurations of three different doping structures were elaborated in Figure 2.

3.2. Lattice Constant and Elastic Modulus

Based on the geometrical configurations shown in Figure 2, the lattice constants and elastic modulus were calculated and listed in Table 1.
It can be seen that the lattice constants decrease with the increasing of Yb dopant. The calculated bulk and shear modulus of Gd2Zr2O7 are 176.6 Gpa and 91.9 GPa, respectively, which meets agreement with the data measured by experiments [26]. Generally, the bulk modulus and shear modulus of (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7 decrease with the increasing of Yb content, which are possibly caused by structure change. Subramanian M A [27] pointed out that doping of Yb atoms reduce the average cation radius ratio r(A3+)/r(B4+) and change the crystal structure of Gd2Zr2O7 from pyrochlore to disorders in the structures. For the cubic phase, there are three independent elastic constants, C11, C12, and C44 [28]. The calculated elastic constants are all positive, satisfying the generalized elastic stability criterion, namely, C11 + 2C12 > 0; C44 > 0; C11 − C12 > 0, indicating that all studied structures are mechanically stable [29]. According to Pugh’s theory [30], when G/B < 0.5, the material is ductile; otherwise, the material is brittle. The G/B value of all materials calculated is greater than 0.5, indicating that they are brittle materials.

3.3. Thermal Expansion of Rare Earth Zirconates System

According to Grüneisen’s equation [18], the volumetric coefficient of thermal expansion (β) can be expressed as Equation (2).
β = γ B C V V
Here, γ is Grüneisen’s constant, CV is the heat capacity, B is the bulk modulus, and V is the molar volume.
As we know, the rare earth zirconate is in cubic phase. For cubic phase, γ is defined as function of the Poisson’s ratio (μ) as the following Equation (3) [31].
γ = 3 2 ( 1 + μ 2 3 μ )
CV can be calculated by the Debye heat capacity model as the following Equation (4) [32]:
C V = 9 N k B ( T T D ) 3 0 T D T x 4 e x ( e x 1 ) 2 d x
wherein N = nNA, NA is Avogadro’s constant, and n is the number of atoms in the molecular formula; kB is the Boltzmann constant; TD is the Debye temperature. Meanwhile, TD can be calculated by the following Equation (5) [33].
T D = h k B [ 3 n 4 π ( N A ρ M ) ] 1 / 3 υ m
wherein h, ρ, M, υm is Planck’s constant, theoretical density, relative molecular mass, and speed of sound, respectively. υm is defined as Equation (6).
υ m = 3 3 ( 1 υ L 3 + 2 υ S 3 ) 1 / 3
υL, υS is the longitudinal and transverse sound velocity and can be expressed as Equations (7) and (8), separately.
υ L = 3 B + 4 G 3 ρ
υ S = G ρ
For cubic crystals, β = 3α, α is the linear expansion coefficient [17]. From the above Equations (4)–(8), it can be deduced that α can be expressed as Equation (9):
α = 9 N k B 1 + μ 2 3 μ ( T T D ) 3 0 T D T x 4 e x ( e x 1 ) 2 d x 2 B V
Moreover, Equation (9) can be rewritten as Equation (10).
α = ( 9 N k B 1 + μ 2 3 μ T 3 0 T D T x 4 e x ( e x 1 ) 2 d x 2 B V ) T D 3
According to the calculation result shown in Table 1, B, μ, and V of different (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7 vary within 4% difference, which can be considered as constant. Thus, it is indicated from Equation (10) that α is proportional to TD−3 at the same temperature, which is compliant with Ruffa’s equation [34].
Furthermore, supposing that the temperature is much greater than the Debye temperature, the integral term in Equation (9) can be mathematically simplified and finally Equation (11) can be obtained.
α = 3 N k B 1 + μ 2 3 μ 2 B V
Here, α representatives the linear thermal expansion coefficient at super high temperature. Actually, the TBCs are working under the temperature (e.g., the temperature of combustion chamber in F135 turbine engine can be up to 2253 K [35]) much higher than TD of rare earth zirconate (about 500 K) [36]. Another one, α of rare earth zirconate, increases with the increase in temperature, meanwhile the increasing rate slows down more and more [37,38,39]. Therefore, α can be likely used to compare the difference of thermal expansion property of different dopant/concentration for the same compound.

3.4. The Validity of α Model

Cubic ZrO2 and HfO2 are of typical fluorite structure which is the same as that of rare earth zirconates [40]. Firstly, the lattice parameter and elastic properties were calculated by first principles. Secondly utilizing the α model, the thermal expansion properties of cubic ZrO2 and HfO2 were calculated, and both results were listed in Table 2. Comparing to the data from the material project database, calculation results of lattice parameter and elastic properties are very close to the same level. Hong [41] and Irshad, K.A. [42] measured the linear thermal expansion coefficient (α) of cubic ZrO2 and HfO2 by in situ high-temperature X-ray diffraction, and it is (12 ± 3) × 106 K1 and 8.80 × 10−6 K1, respectively. Comparably, the calculated results of α are 9.72 × 106 K1 and 9.05 × 10−6 K1. It is revealed that both are a good match.
In order to further verify the validity of the α model, α of serial rare earth zirconates, including La2Zr2O7, Pr2Zr2O7, Gd2Zr2O7, and Dy2Zr2O7 were calculated. The data of elastic property was cited from the literature [36], and both were shown in Table 3. α and α were plotted in Figure 3. Compared to α measured by experiment [8], α are clearly higher because α were measured at 800 °C which is not too much higher than Debye temperature. Henry Lehmann [37] measured the thermal expansion coefficients of Gd2Zr2O7 and La2Zr2O7, which were 10.652 × 10−6 K−1 (1473 K) and 9.09 × 10−6 K−1 (1373 K), respectively. The results are very close to α calculated. It is further demonstrated that α can be a useful tool to predict the thermal expansion coefficient at high temperature.

3.5. The Effect of Yb Doping of Gd2Zr2O7 on α

α of Gd2Zr2O7 with 4 different Yb doping contents Gd2Zr2O7, (Gd0.875Yb0.125)2Zr2O7, (Gd0.875Yb0.3125)2Zr2O7, and (Gd0.5Yb0.5)2Zr2O7 were calculated. Table 4 shows the calculation result of theoretical density, sound velocity, and Debye temperature.
It can be seen that TD of Gd2Zr2O7 was calculated to be 511 K, which is in good agreement with that measured by Toshiaki Kawano [8]. TD is decreases with the increase of Yb dopant, which is dominated by the decrease of average velocity of sound (υm).
Figure 4 shows the difference between calculated α and α measured by experiment at 1073 K [43].
It is clear that Yb doping can increase the thermal coefficient greatly because theoretical density increases meanwhile TD decreases with Yb doping, as shown in Table 4. However, α is a bit lower than α. Feng [17] also discussed and explained the problem. Actually, the first principles were developed based on the material being from an ideally perfect crystal. However, for real bulk materials, various defects (e.g., vacancies and dislocations) and pores ineluctably existed. In general, the total energy of a crystal with defects is higher than that of an ideally perfect crystal, and the anharmonic effect may be affected by various defects and pores in the structure. In addition, the density of the tested ceramic coupon is certainly lower than that of theoretical density. That is the reason why the thermal expansion coefficient measured by experiment is higher than that calculated.
Figure 4 also reveals that both α and α increase with an increase in Yb content. The increase of thermal coefficient is more remarkable with lower Yb doping concentration. With higher Yb doping concentration, the growth rate slows down. Both the measured and calculated results have the same tendency.
Thermal expansion is related to the crystal structure and the electronic structure [44]. The PDOS of (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7 crystals are shown in Figure 5. In terms of bonding, Gd/Yb-5d, Zr-4d, and O-2p overlap, which means that the electronic state around the Fermi level is primarily determined by the relatively weak p-d bond between O-2p and Zr-4d (or Gd/Yb-5d). The main change from doping is the relative position changes in Gd/Yb- 5d, which may be caused by the difference in the valence electron layers between Gd and Yb. With the increase of Yb content, the total state density curve moves slightly to the lower energy level. Low crystal energy means high coefficient of thermal expansion [45], and the rare earth element Yb influences the O-2p states due to hybridization [44]. The p-d bond strength decreased with the increase in Yb content. According to the value of the PDOS ordinate, the PDOS of Zr-4d is the largest, so the p-d bond strength of Zr-O is higher than Yb-O and Gd-O.

4. Conclusions

Rare earth zirconates are candidates for next generation TBCs, and it is important to develop a method to characterize the thermal expansion property. Combining the Grüneisen’s equation and the Debye heat capacity model, an efficient model of α to characterize the thermal expansion coefficient at super high temperature was established. Firstly, using the α model, the high temperature thermal expansion coefficients of cubic ZrO2 and cubic HfO2 were calculated to be 9.72 × 10−6 K−1and 9.05 × 10−6 K−1, respectively, which are in agreement with those shown in the literature. Secondly, α of serial rare earth zirconates, including La2Zr2O7, Pr2Zr2O7, Gd2Zr2O7, and Dy2Zr2O7 were calculated, and results demonstrated that α can be a useful tool to predict the thermal expansion coefficient at high temperature. Lastly, α of (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7 with four different doping contents were calculated, and results showed the same tendency as that measured by experiments. Generally, by characterizing the thermal expansion coefficient at high temperature through the elastic properties and Debye temperature of the material, the complicated calculation of phonon spectrum can be avoided. Thus, the model of α has the broad application prospect to predict the thermal expansion property at high temperature for other rare earth zirconates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.W. (Xingqi Wang) and X.B.; methodology, X.W. (Xingqi Wang); J.W. and X.W. (Xingming Wang); software, W.X. and J.W.; formal analysis, W.X.; C.P. and X.L.; data curation, X.W. (Xingqi Wang); X.L. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, X.W. (Xingqi Wang) and Y.L.; writing—review and editing, X.W. (Xingqi Wang), C.P., and L.W.; supervision, X.B., L.W., and X.W. (Xingming Wang); project administration, X.W. (Xingming Wang) and L.W.; funding acquisition, X.W. (Xingming Wang). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Science and Technology Major Project, grant number 2017-Ⅶ-0007-0100.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to the MatCloud+ for the high-throughput materials simulations and data analysis support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no Conflict of interest.

References

  1. Padture, N.P.; Gell, M.; Jordan, E.H. Thermal Barrier Coatings for Gas-Turbine Engine Applications. Science 2002, 296, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Clarke, D.R.; Oechsner, M.; Padture, N.P. Thermal-barrier coatings for more efficient gas-turbine engines. MRS Bull. 2012, 37, 891–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Zhou, Y.X.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, P.; Song, P.; Chong, X.Y.; Feng, J. Thermal properties of Y1−xMgxTaO4−x/2 ceramics via anion sublattice adjustment. Rare Met. 2020, 39, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Clarke, D.R.; Levi, C.G. Materials design for the next generation thermal barrier coatings. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2003, 33, 383–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cao, X.Q.; Vassen, R.; Stoever, D. Ceramic materials for thermal barrier coatings. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2004, 24, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, H.S.; Sun, K.; Xu, Q.; Wang, F.; Liu, L.; Wei, Y.; Chen, X.G. Thermophysical properties of Sm2(Zr1−xCex)2O7 ceramics. Rare Met. 2009, 28, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, L.; Li, M.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, F. Improved toughness and thermal expansion of non-stoichiometry Gd2−xZr2+xO7+x/2 ceramics for thermal barrier coating application. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2016, 32, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kawano, T.; Muta, H.; Uno, M.; Ohishi, Y.; Kurosaki, K.; Yamanaka, S. Characterization and thermomechanical properties of Ln2Zr2O7 (Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Eu, Gd, Dy) and Nd2Ce2O7. MRS Online Proc. Libr. 2013, 1514, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Martena, M.; Botto, D.; Fino, P.; Sabbadini, S.; Gola, M.M.; Badini, C. Modelling of TBC system failure: Stress distribution as a function of TGO thickness and thermal expansion mismatch. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2006, 13, 409–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bacos, M.P.; Dorvaux, J.M.; Lavigne, O.; Mévrel, R.; Poulain, M.; Rio, C.; Vidal-Setif, M.H. Performance and degradation mechanisms of thermal barrier coatings for turbine blades: A review of ONERA activities. Aerospacelab 2011, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, Z.G.; Ouyang, J.H.; Zhou, Y. Heat capacities and derived thermodynamic functions of neodymium-gadolinium zirconates from 298.15 to 1050 K. J. Alloy. Compd. 2009, 475, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ponnilavan, V.; Aravind, A.; Ezhilan, M.; Kannan, S. Titanium substitution in Gd2Zr2O7 for thermal barrier coating applications. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 16450–16457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, Z.G.; Ouyang, J.H.; Zhou, Y. Structural evolution and thermophysical properties of (SmxGd1-x)2Zr2O7 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1.0) ceramics. J. Alloy. Compd. 2009, 472, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Peczkowski, P.; Kowalik, M.; Zachariasz, P. Synthesis and Physicochemical Properties of Nd-, Sm-, Eu-Based Cuprate High-Temperature Superconductors. Phys. Status Solidi 2018, 215, 1700888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, F.A.; Xiao, H.Y.; Bai, X.M.; Liu, Z.J.; Zu, X.T. Effects of doping Yb3+, La3+, Ti4+, Hf4+, Ce4+ cations on the mechanical properties, thermal conductivity, and electronic structures of Gd2Zr2O7. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 776, 306–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Togo, A.; Chaput, L.; Tanaka, I.; Hug, G. First-principles phonon calculations of thermal expansion in Ti3SiC2, Ti3AlC2, and Ti3GeC2. Phys. Rev. B 2010, 81, 174301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Feng, J.; Xiao, B.; Zhou, R.; Pan, W. Thermal expansions of Ln2Zr2O7 (Ln = La, Nd, Sm, and Gd) pyrochlore. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 103535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Grüneisen, E. Theorie des festen Zustandes einatomiger Elemente. Ann. Phys. 1912, 344, 257–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mayer, J.E.; Montroll, E. Molecular distribution. J. Chem. Phys. 1941, 9, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Y.; Iwata, S.; Mohri, T. First-principles calculation of phase equilibria and phase separation of the Fe-Ni alloy system. Rare Met. 2006, 25, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, X.Y.; Wang, Z.G.; Zhao, X.S.; Song, J.L.; Zhang, M.M.; Liu, H.D. MatCloud: A high-throughput computational infrastructure for integrated management of materials simulation, data and resources. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2018, 146, 319–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Birch, F. Finite elastic strain of cubic crystals. Phys. Rev. 1947, 71, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yamada, Y.; Yoshimura, N.; Sakurai, T. Plastic stress-strain matrix and its application for the solution of elastic-plastic problems by the finite element method. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 1968, 10, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, G.; Kürti, J.; Rajczy, P.; Kertesz, M.; Hafner, J.; Kresse, G. Performance of the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) in chemical applications. J. Mol. Struct. 2003, 624, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ernzerhof, M.; Scuseria, G.E. Assessment of the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof exchange-correlation functional. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 5029–5036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Shimamura, K.; Arima, T.; Idemitsu, K.; Inagaki, Y. Thermophysical properties of rare-earth-stabilized zirconia and zirconate pyrochlores as surrogates for actinide-doped zirconia. Int. J. Thermophys. 2007, 28, 1074–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Subramanian, M.A.; Aravamudan, G.; Rao, G.V.S. Oxide pyrochlores-a review. Prog. Solid State Chem. 1983, 15, 55–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xiong, K.; Wang, B.W.; Sun, Z.P.; Li, W.; Jin, C.C.; Zhang, S.M.; Xu, S.Y.; Guo, L.; Mao, Y. Frist-principles prediction of elastic, electronic, and thermodynamic properties of high entropy carbide ceramic (TiZrNbTa)C. Rare Met. 2022, 41, 1002–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mouhat, F.; Coudert, F.X. Necessary and sufficient elastic stability conditions in various crystal systems. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 90, 224104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pugh, S.F. Relations between the elastic moduli and the plastic properties of polycrystalline pure metals. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 1954, 45, 823–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sanditov, D.S.; Belomestnykh, V.N. Relation between the parameters of the elasticity theory and averaged bulk modulus of solids. Tech. Phys. 2011, 56, 1619–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Degueldre, C.; Tissot, P.; Lartigue, H.; Pouchon, M. Specific heat capacity and Debye temperature of zirconia and its solid solution. Thermochim. Acta 2003, 403, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kittel, C.; McEuen, P. Kittel’s Introduction to Solid State Physics; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hisashige, T.; Yamamura, Y.; Tsuji, T. Thermal expansion and Debye temperature of rare earth-doped ceria. J. Alloy. Compd. 2006, 408, 1153–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Langston, L.S. Fahrenheit 3600. Mech. Eng. 2007, 129, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Feng, J.; Xiao, B.; Wan, C.L.; Qu, Z.X.; Huang, Z.C.; Chen, J.C.; Pan, W. Electronic structure, mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of Ln2Zr2O7 (Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu and Gd) pyrochlore. Acta Mater. 2011, 59, 1742–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lehmann, H.; Pitzer, D.; Pracht, G.; Vassen, R.; Stöver, D. Thermal conductivity and thermal expansion coefficients of the lanthanum rare-earth-element zirconate system. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2003, 86, 1338–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kutty, K.G.; Rajagopalan, S.; Mathews, C.K.; Varadaraju, U.V. Thermal expansion behaviour of some rare earth oxide pyrochlores. Mater. Res. Bull. 1994, 29, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Y.J.; Zhao, J.; Chen, W.; Yang, J. Theoretical calculation and experimental study on thermal expansion coefficient of inorganic materials. Phys. Eng. 2020, 30, 93–97. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bakan, E.; Vaßen, R. Ceramic top coats of plasma-sprayed thermal barrier coatings: Materials, processes, and properties. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 2017, 26, 992–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hong, Q.J.; Ushakov, S.V.; Kapush, D.; Benmore, C.J.; Weber, R.J.; van de Walle, A.; Navrotsky, A. Combined computational and experimental investigation of high temperature thermodynamics and structure of cubic ZrO2 and HfO2. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Irshad, K.A.; Srihari, V.; Kumar, D.S.; Ananthasivan, K.; Jena, H. High-pressure structural stability, equation of state, and thermal expansion behavior of cubic HfO2. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 103, 5374–5381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Guo, L.; Guo, H.B.; Peng, H.; Gong, S.K. Thermophysical properties of Yb2O3 doped Gd2Zr2O7 and thermal cycling durability of (Gd0.9Yb0.1)2Zr2O7/YSZ thermal barrier coatings. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 34, 1255–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pęczkowski, P.; Łuszczek, M.; Szostak, E.; Muniraju, N.K.C.; Maziopa, A.K.; Gondek, Ł. Superconductivity and appearance of negative magnetocaloric effect in Ba1–xKxBiO3 perovskites, doped by Y, La and Pr. Acta Mater. 2022, 222, 117437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wan, C.; Qu, Z.; Du, A.; Pan, W. Influence of B site substituent Ti on the structure and thermophysical properties of A2B2O7-type pyrochlore Gd2Zr2O7. Acta Mater. 2009, 57, 4782–4789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Calculation of E of (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7 (x = 0.125, 0.3125, 0.5).
Figure 1. Calculation of E of (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7 (x = 0.125, 0.3125, 0.5).
Materials 15 02264 g001
Figure 2. Geometrical configurations of (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7, (a) Gd2Zr2O7; (b) (Gd0.875Yb0.125)2Zr2O7; (c) (Gd0.6875Yb0.3125)2Zr2O7; (d) (Gd0.5Yb0.5)2Zr2O7.
Figure 2. Geometrical configurations of (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7, (a) Gd2Zr2O7; (b) (Gd0.875Yb0.125)2Zr2O7; (c) (Gd0.6875Yb0.3125)2Zr2O7; (d) (Gd0.5Yb0.5)2Zr2O7.
Materials 15 02264 g002
Figure 3. α and α of La2Zr2O7, Pr2Zr2O7, Gd2Zr2O7, and Dy2Zr2O7.
Figure 3. α and α of La2Zr2O7, Pr2Zr2O7, Gd2Zr2O7, and Dy2Zr2O7.
Materials 15 02264 g003
Figure 4. α and α of (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7.
Figure 4. α and α of (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7.
Materials 15 02264 g004
Figure 5. Partial density of states of (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7: (a) x = 0; (b) x = 0.125; (c) x = 0.3125; (d) x = 0.5.
Figure 5. Partial density of states of (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7: (a) x = 0; (b) x = 0.125; (c) x = 0.3125; (d) x = 0.5.
Materials 15 02264 g005
Table 1. Lattice constant, the elastic constants (C11, C12, and C44), bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), and Poisson’s ratio (μ) of rare earth zirconates.
Table 1. Lattice constant, the elastic constants (C11, C12, and C44), bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), and Poisson’s ratio (μ) of rare earth zirconates.
a0/(nm)C11/(GPa)C12/(GPa)C44/(GPa)B/(GPa)G/(GPa)G/Bμ
Gd2Zr2O7, cal.1.056316.4106.784.2176.691.90.520.278
Gd2Zr2O7, exp. [26]1.054 17493
(Gd0.875Yb0.125)2Zr2O71.055312.3100.283.4170.691.70.540.272
(Gd0.6875Yb0.3125)2Zr2O71.052308.496.783167.291.60.550.269
(Gd0.5Yb0.5)2Zr2O71.050310.49682.5167.791.70.550.269
Table 2. Lattice constant, bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), Poisson’s ratio (μ), and α of ZrO2 and HfO2.
Table 2. Lattice constant, bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), Poisson’s ratio (μ), and α of ZrO2 and HfO2.
a0/(nm)B/(GPa)G/(GPa)μα (K−1)
ZrO2, cal.0.512238.5100.60.3169.72 × 10−6
ZrO2 [a]0.5152351030.31
HfO2, cal.0.508253.8112.60.3079.05 × 10−6
HfO2 [b]0.5082481150.3
[a] Materials data on ZrO2 (SG:225) by Materials Project. ID:mp-1565. [b] Materials data on HfO2 (SG:225) by Materials Project. ID:mp-550893.
Table 3. Lattice constant a0, bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), Poisson’s ratio (μ) of rare earth zirconates system [36].
Table 3. Lattice constant a0, bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), Poisson’s ratio (μ) of rare earth zirconates system [36].
a0/(nm)B/(GPa)G/(GPa)μThermal Expansion Coefficient/(10−6K−1)
αα/(1073 K) [8]
La2Zr2O71.081176870.3029.7558.883
Pr2Zr2O71.0721551030.269.8579.415
Gd2Zr2O71.052165630.28410.6110.094
Dy2Zr2O71.054164900.26810.0579.166
Table 4. Density (ρ), longitudinal wave velocity (υL), shear wave velocity of sound (υS), average velocity of sound (υm) and Debye temperature (TD) of rare earth zirconates.
Table 4. Density (ρ), longitudinal wave velocity (υL), shear wave velocity of sound (υS), average velocity of sound (υm) and Debye temperature (TD) of rare earth zirconates.
ρ/(kg·m−3)υL/(m·s−1)υS/(m·s−1)υm/(m·s−1)TD/(K)
Gd2Zr2O76868660036594075511
(Gd0.875Yb0.125)2Zr2O76944649636354046508
(Gd0.6875Yb0.3125)2Zr2O77059640236024007504
(Gd0.5Yb0.5)2Zr2O77176635735743977502
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Bai, X.; Xiao, W.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; Peng, C.; Wang, L.; Wang, X. Calculation of Thermal Expansion Coefficient of Rare Earth Zirconate System at High Temperature by First Principles. Materials 2022, 15, 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062264

AMA Style

Wang X, Bai X, Xiao W, Liu Y, Li X, Wang J, Peng C, Wang L, Wang X. Calculation of Thermal Expansion Coefficient of Rare Earth Zirconate System at High Temperature by First Principles. Materials. 2022; 15(6):2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062264

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xingqi, Xue Bai, Wei Xiao, Yuyang Liu, Xiaoning Li, Jianwei Wang, Cheng Peng, Lijun Wang, and Xingming Wang. 2022. "Calculation of Thermal Expansion Coefficient of Rare Earth Zirconate System at High Temperature by First Principles" Materials 15, no. 6: 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062264

APA Style

Wang, X., Bai, X., Xiao, W., Liu, Y., Li, X., Wang, J., Peng, C., Wang, L., & Wang, X. (2022). Calculation of Thermal Expansion Coefficient of Rare Earth Zirconate System at High Temperature by First Principles. Materials, 15(6), 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062264

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop