Next Article in Journal
On the Anisotropic Milling Machinability of DD407 Single Crystal Nickel-Based Superalloy
Next Article in Special Issue
Review of the Effect of Surface Coating Modification on Magnesium Alloy Biocompatibility
Previous Article in Journal
Hardening of Nanoporous Au Induced by Exposure to Different Gaseous Environments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of the Ca2Mg6Zn3 Phase on the Corrosion Behavior of Biodegradable Mg-4.0Zn-0.2Mn-xCa Alloys in Hank’s Solution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ignition and Combustion Characteristic of B·Mg Alloy Powders

State Key Laboratory of NBC Protection for Civilian, Beijing 102205, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(8), 2717; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082717
Submission received: 28 February 2022 / Revised: 2 April 2022 / Accepted: 3 April 2022 / Published: 7 April 2022

Abstract

:
Boron and its alloys have been explored a lot and it is expected that they can replace pure aluminum powder in the energetic formulation of active materials. MgB2 compounds were prepared and characterized by a combination of mechanical alloying and heat treatment. The ignition and combustion of boron–magnesium alloys were studied with the ignition wire method and laser ignition infrared temperature measurement. The results show that MgB2 has good ignition characteristics with maximum ignition temperatures obtained by the two various methods of 1292 K and 1293 K, respectively. Compared with boron, the ignition temperature of MgB2 is greatly reduced after alloying. The ignition reaction of MgB2 mainly occurs on the surface and the ignition process has two stages. In the initial stage of ignition, the large flame morphology and combustion state are close to the combustion with gaseous Mg, whereas the subsequent combustion process is close to the combustion process of B. Compared with boron, the ignition temperature of MgB2 is greatly reduced which suggests that MgB2 may be used in gunpowder, propellant, explosives, and pyrotechnics due to its improved ignition performance.

1. Introduction

As an energetic material, combustible metal powder is widely used in gunpowder, propellant, explosives, and pyrotechnics [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The reaction of metal powder and oxidant can provide the power for gun projectile launching and rocket missile propulsion. It is the power energy of the warhead explosion and the energy source that realizes smoke interference and combustion damage. The performance of metal powder to a large extent determines the level of combat technology of weapons and equipment, and is the core technology to achieve long-range strike and high-efficiency damage, and is the key material basis for the development of advanced weapons and equipment.
Among the combustible metal powders, magnesium is easy to ignite and burn but has a low calorific value. Compared with magnesium, boron has a very high calorific value. Its mass calorific value is 2.3 times that of magnesium and 1.9 times that of aluminum, and its volume calorific value is 3.09 times that of magnesium and 1.66 times that of aluminum. However, the ignition temperature of boron is high. In the combustion process, the liquid boron oxide that is generated hinders the reaction between boron and the oxidizer; moreover, the boron particles are easy to agglomerate, which makes the combustion difficult to continue. These factors lead to the low combustion efficiency of boron and underutilization of boron’s high energy [3,7,8]. To solve the above problems, we prepared a new alloy material based on the synergistic effect with lower ignition temperature, faster combustion speed, weaker combustion agglomeration, and more complete combustion than a single metal powder material [9,10,11,12], important for improving the performance of propellants, explosives, and pyrotechnics.
The preparation of boron-containing alloys, such as Al–Ti–B and Ti–B alloys, has been reported by previous studies [13,14,15,16,17]. Shtessel et al. [10] prepared a series of Al–Mg, Al–Mg–H, and Al–B alloys by high-energy ball milling. Birol et al. [18] also prepared Al–B alloys from Al and B2O3 by ball milling, whereas Korchagin et al. [19] synthesized Ni3B using high-energy ball milling of a mixture of Ni and B powders. Guo et al. prepared MgB2 by a high-temperature sintering method at 1173 K [16,17].
Many methods based on differential thermal analysis (DTA) have been reported for estimating the ignition temperature of materials. In the mature and stable method, the ignition temperature is obtained by extrapolating the reaction temperature. However, this approach is subject to atmospheric factors, heating rate, and other parameters during testing. Shoshin et al. [20] studied the ignition of Al–Ti alloy in the air by coating a wire with the powder and measuring its temperature during electrical heating. Other researchers used lasers of different powers to measure the ignition and combustion characteristics [21,22,23]. Zhao [24] used a contact thermocouple to assess the ignition temperature of metal fuel in different atmospheres. Yang and co-workers [25] used planar flame burners to ignite modified boron and examine its combustion characteristics. Whittaker et al. [13] found that AlB2 is an energetic fuel with a high heat of combustion. Arkhipov et al. [26] studied the ignition and combustion of propellants of Al, B, and Al–B powders with binders with oxidizing agents (ammonium perchlorate or ammonium nitrate).
In this study, MgB2 was prepared by a combination of mechanical alloying and heat treatment, and the ignition and combustion of boron–magnesium alloys were studied with the ignition wire method and laser ignition infrared temperature measurement.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Instruments

Atomized spherical magnesium powder (Mg) has a particle size <45 μm and purity of 99.9%, Shanghai Shuitian Material Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. The amorphous boron powder (B) had a particle size of 1~3 μm and purity of 99.7%, Liaoning Yingkou Fine Chemical Company. MgB2 was prepared by a combination of mechanical alloying and heat treatment.
The following instruments were used: a vibrating high-energy ball mill (Beijing Nonferrous Metals Research Institute, Beijing, China), a vacuum operation box (ZKX-2, Nanjing Nanda Instrument Factory, Nanjing, China), a tube furnace (SGL-1700-II, Shanghai Jujing Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), an X-ray diffractometer (D8 ADVANCE, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany), an S-4800 cold field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), and a microcomputer automatic calorimeter (TRHW-7000E, Hebi City Tianrun Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Hebi, China).

2.2. Preparation of MgB2

The Mg and B powders in a mole ratio of 1:2 were placed in a stainless steel ball mill jar. The ball mill tank was sealed with an O-ring and passed through a flow of 0.1 MPa argon three times for three minutes. The vibrating high-energy ball mill used stainless steel balls of either φ10 mm or mixed sizes (φ2 mm, φ5 mm, and φ10 mm in a mass ratio of 1:1:3) at 20:1 mass to the powder materials. Powder loading and sampling operation were both carried out in a vacuum operation box filled with argon gas. During milling, the ball mill had a three-dimensional motion of rotational oscillation and vibration. The ball milling time was 12 min, and after milling, the powder was sealed in a vacuumed quartz glass tube and placed in a tube furnace with a flowing Ar atmosphere at 20 mL/min. The furnace was heated from room temperature (298 K) to 853 K at a rate of 5 K/min and held for 10 h.

2.3. Performance Test

The structure of the product was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using Cu target Kα radiation (0.15406 nm), a working voltage of 40 kV, a working current of 20 mA, and 2θ angle scan range of 10–90° in steps of 0.02° at a scanning speed of 0.5°/min.
The setup for measuring the ignition temperature is shown in Figure 1. The sample powder was placed on the wound ignition wire. After the power was turned on, the ignition wire was gradually heated, and we assume that at the point of powder ignition the powder and the wire had the same temperature. The timing of the ignition was monitored by a photodetector, and the temperature change in the ignition wire was measured by an infrared thermocouple. To avoid the heat released by sample combustion interfering with the temperature measurement, the infrared thermocouple monitored other parts of the ignition wire not covered with the sample powder. The light intensity and temperature data during the experiments were recorded by the data acquisition instrument.
The ignition wire was a 0Cr27Al7Mo2 iron chrome aluminum alloy wire 0.5 mm in diameter. An SYS480S36 DC switching power supply with a maximum output of 480 W directly heated the ignition wire. The supply had overcurrent protection, and its current was not less than 10 A to provide instantaneous large current through the ignition wire. To facilitate the determination of the ignition starting time, the DC power supply was controlled by a solid-state relay (SSR200D40, Hangzhou Guojing Technology, Hangzhou, China). The temperature was measured using an infrared thermocouple (OS37-20-K, OMEGA Company, Austin, TX, USA) supplemented by a temperature transmitter (TXDIN1620, OMEGA Company, Austin, TX, USA), control line, and switching power supply (YMGUD-2030LIXA, Yongming Power Company, Taiyuan, China). The infrared thermocouple output was the K-type, the temperature range was 533–1923 K, and the temperature accuracy was ±2% in the linear zone and ±5% in the other ranges. The spectra of combustion for Mg, B, and MgB2 powders had a wavelength range of 300–900, 450–650, and 300–800, respectively, with peak wavelengths of 497.7, 546, and 546.8/579 nm. The test equipment used Thorlabs’ DET10A photodiode, which is a silicon-based photodetector with a detection wavelength covering the visible range and a peak response at 730 nm in the near-infrared region. The data acquisition was carried out with a NI9222 card (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) with a maximum sampling rate of 500 K, and LABVIEW software.
The laser ignition system consisted of three parts: laser igniter, combustion chamber, and data acquisition device, as shown in Figure 2. The laser igniter included three main parts: fiber-coupled semiconductor laser, laser power supply, and an optical coupler. The microscopic high-speed photography-infrared thermography synchronization device recorded the flame, the sample morphology, and the temperature field during the MgB2 ignition and combustion processes. The thermal imaging camera (SC325, FLIR Systems, Inc., Tigard, OR, USA) could record in a temperature range up to 2273 K. The high-speed camera (FASTCAM-APX-RS, Photron, Arizona, CA, USA) had an AF Micro-Nikkor 60 mm f/2.8 D macro lens. To facilitate the observation of the ignition and combustion process of small particles, an AF Micro-Nikkor 60 mm f/2.8 D lens with macro function (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used. In the experiment, a continuous laser with a power of 4 W was used to ignite and burn 50 mg of micro-clustered sample in an air atmosphere of 0.1 MPa. Infrared thermal imagers and high-speed cameras simultaneously detected changes in the flame topography and temperature field. The surface morphology of the particles was directly observed by high-speed photography plus the macro lens, and the shooting speed was 2000 frames per second.
The micro-machine automatic calorimeter was used in an oxygen atmosphere of 3 MPa. The volume of the oxygen bomb was 300 mL, and the sample amount of the single test was 0.5 g. The combustion heat tests were performed on the samples of Mg, B, and MgB2.

3. Results

3.1. Preparation and Characterization of MgB2

The XRD spectrum of the prepared MgB2 was compared with the PDF card standard spectrum by XRD spectrum software Jade, as shown in Figure 3.
The position of the spectrum peak and the corresponding intensity are consistent with the standard spectrum peak in the PDF card, and there is basically no spurious peak, indicating that the product is MgB2 with high purity.

3.2. Experimental Study of MgB2 Ignition Performance

In this paper, the test device was designed to completely close the switch, and the resistance wire started to heat up as the starting moment; that is, the solid-state relay was fully turned on, and the control voltage continued to be higher than 3.5 V as the heating start time. Theoretically, the temperature and intensity of the powder change during the powder ignition process, and the temperature at the moment of the mutation is the ignition temperature. Since the temperature of the heating wire is increased after the electric wire is energized, it gradually becomes brighter. It is known that the output voltage of the photodiode is not more than 0.3 V during the heating process of the ignition wire. Therefore, the design of the test device is such that the light intensity continuously exceeds 0.3 V as the ignition starting time. The first peak of the light intensity is the moment when the powder is completely ignited, and the average temperature of the corresponding ignition wire is the powder ignition temperature. Since the infrared thermocouple test delay is 80 ms, the temperature curve is shifted back from the start time by 80 ms during data processing. The period of temperature change of the ignition wire is about 20 ms; that is, the infrared thermocouple outputs effective temperature measurement data after continuous testing for 20 ms. If the powder ignition time is less than 20 ms after ignition, start time is taken as the ignition duration, and the corresponding ignition wire temperature is the ignition temperature. The obtained magnesium powder ignition temperature curve is shown in Figure 4.
The blue curve is the temperature, and the red curve is the voltage value of the photodiode. It can be seen from the test that the average ignition temperature of magnesium powder is 719 K, which is the same value reported in the literature [25]. Therefore, the feasibility of the test device is verified by the ignition temperature test of magnesium powder.
The procedure of the MgB2 ignition temperature test included adjusting the varistor shown in Figure 1 and reducing the loop load resistance by 1 Ω. The obtained curve shows that the ignition temperature of the boron-magnesium alloy is 1292 K, as shown in Figure 5.
In the laser ignition experimental system shown in Figure 2, the micro-cluster of the MgB2 sample was placed on the combustion table. The laser fiber was adjusted to face the center of the micro-cluster, and then the focal length of the macro lens was adjusted to ensure that the micro-cluster was in the focus position, while simultaneously turning on the infrared thermal imager. The ignition experiment started by triggering the high-speed camera and turning on the laser power. The temperature during ignition and combustion of the MgB2 sample in the infrared thermal imaging test is shown in Figure 6 and the infrared temperature measurements at different time points are shown in Table 1 and Figure 7.
The MgB2 sample reached the highest ignition temperature of 1293 K at 0.333 s, and a flame appeared on the surface of the sample. Macek et al. studied the ignition and combustion of boron particles which showed that the ignition temperature of boron is about 2000 K under the air atmosphere [27]. The boron powder is surrounded by the highly viscous boron oxide B2O3 produced during the ignition and combustion process, so that the ignition and combustion of boron powders are difficult to carry out. Compared with boron, the MgB2 sample ignition temperature was lower by 700 K, indicating that the ignition performance is significantly improved after boron alloying.

3.3. Study of the Combustion Properties of MgB2

Infrared thermal imagers and high-speed cameras were used to simultaneously detect changes in flame topography and temperature field distribution. Among them, the initial ignition timing of the sample is t0, and the continuous burning time of the sample is t. A comparison of the high-speed photographic test results of the ignition reactions of Mg, B, and MgB2 samples is shown in Figure 8.
It can be seen from Figure 8 that the flame size of Mg is large, and the flame size of B is small during the combustion process, and the flame morphology does not change much during the combustion process, whereas the flame of the MgB2 sample is large at the initial stage. The flame of the MgB2 sample becomes smaller after 2/3 t, but the duration is still longer. This is because Mg has a low melting point and a low boiling point, and is easily melted and vaporized during ignition and combustion, so that gaseous Mg is easily formed during combustion. Boron has a relatively high melting point and boiling point, and is not easily vaporized during ignition and combustion, and its combustion process is close to solid phase combustion. The combustion of the MgB2 sample can be seen as a two-stage process. During the ignition and initial combustion stages, the MgB2 sample can form part of the gaseous Mg, thus forming a larger flame, and then approaching the solid phase combustion with B.
The ignition experiments of the Mg, B, and MgB2 samples were repeated five times, combined with the infrared test data, and the characteristic parameters thereof are shown in Table 2. Mg burns fastest whereas B burns the slowest. MgB2 sample burns at a medium speed, but its maximum combustion temperature is close to Mg.

4. Conclusions

An ignition study of the boron–magnesium alloy was carried out by using the ignition wire method and the laser ignition infrared temperature measurement method. Compared with boron, the ignition temperature of MgB2 is greatly reduced, suggesting improved ignition performance. The main conclusions obtained can be summarized as:
  • The results show the maximum ignition temperatures of MgB2 obtained by the two methods are 1292 K and 1293 K, respectively.
  • The calculation results of temperature change during MgB2 laser ignition were in good agreement with the experimental results, indicating that the calculation model is capable of describing the temperature change of the particle ignition process.
  • The flame morphology and combustion state are close to the combustion with gaseous Mg in the initial stage. However, the subsequent combustion process is close to the combustion process of B. Compared with Mg and B, the MgB2 sample burns at a medium speed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.M., K.Z. and X.Z.; methodology, Y.M., K.Z. and X.Z.; investigation, S.M., J.H., X.Z. and Y.M.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.M. and K.Z.; writing—review and editing, X.Z.; supervision, X.G. and S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51404279).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study is available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Beckstead, M.W. Correlating aluminum burning times. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 2005, 41, 533–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Berner, M.K.; Zarko, V.E.; Talawar, M.B. Nanoparticles of energetic materials: Synthesis and properties. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 2013, 49, 625–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pang, W.; Xue, Z.F.; Zhao, F.Q. Boron-Based Fuel Rich Solid Rocket Propellant Technolog; National Defense Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2016; pp. 19–21. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim, S.; Lim, J.; Lee, S.; Jeong, J.; Yoon, W. Study on the ignition mechanism of Ni-coated aluminum particles in air. Combust. Flame 2018, 198, 24–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhu, B.; Li, F.; Sun, Y.; Wu, Y.; Shi, W.; Han, W.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Q. Enhancing ignition and combustion characteristics of micron-sized aluminum powder in steam by adding sodium fluoride. Combust. Flame 2019, 205, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Feng, Y.; Xia, Z.; Huang, L.; Ma, L. Ignition and combustion of a single aluminum particle in hot gas flow. Combust. Flame 2018, 196, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Glassman, I.; Williams, F.A.; Antaki, P. A physical and chemical interpretation of boron particles combustion. In Proceedings of the 20th Symposium (International) on Combustion, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 12–17 August 1984. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, B.H.; Liu, J.Z.; Liang, D.L.; Zhou, Y.N.; Zhou, J.H. Research progress in coating mechanism and technology of boron particles. Chin. J. Explos. Propellants 2016, 39, 13–21. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shoshin, Y.L.; Mudryy, R.S.; Dreizin, E.L. Preparation and characterization of energetic Al-Mg mechanical alloy powders. Combust. Flame 2002, 128, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shtessel, E.; Dreizin, E. High Energy Metallic Mechanical Alloys for New Explosives and Incendiary Devices with Controllable Explosion Parameters, ADA397097; Exotherm Corporation: Camden, NJ, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  11. Aly, Y.; Schoenitz, M.; Dreizin, E.L. Ignition and combustion of mechanically alloyed Al-Mg powders with customized particle sizes. Combust. Flame 2013, 160, 835–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Aly, Y.; Dreizin, E.L. Ignition and combustion of Al·Mg alloy powders prepared by different techniques. Combust. Flame 2015, 162, 1440–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Whittaker, M.L.; Cutler, R.A. Effect of synthesis atmosphere, wetting, and compaction on the purity of AlB2. J. Solid State Chem. 2013, 207, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jia, Y.J. Status of Production Technology and Function mechanism of Al-Ti-B Alloy Products. Nonferrous Met. Process. 2017, 46, 33–34. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jalaly, M.; Gotor, F.J. A new combustion route for synthesis of TaB2 nanoparticles. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 1142–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guo, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, X.; Bao, T. Magnesium Boride Sintered as High-energy Fuel. J. Therm. Anal. 2013, 113, 787–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, Y. Study on Preparation, Combustion Property and Application of Modified Boron; National University of Defense Technology: Changsha, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  18. Birol, Y. Aluminothermic reduction of boron oxide for the manufacture of Al-B alloys. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 136, 963–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Korchagin, M.A.; Dudina, D.V.; Bokhonov, B.B.; Bulina, N.V.; Ukhina, A.V.; Batraev, I.S. Synthesis of nickel boride by thermal explosion in ballmilled powder mixtures. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 13592–13599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shoshin, Y.L.; Trunov, M.A.; Zhu, X.; Schoenitz, M.; Dreizin, E.L. Ignition of aluminum-rich Al-Ti mechanical alloys in air. Combust. Flame 2006, 144, 688–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Badiola, C.; Gill, R.J.; Dreizin, E.L. Combustion characteristics of micron-sized aluminum particles in oxygenated environments. Combust. Flame 2011, 158, 2064–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gill, R.J.; Badiola, C.; Dreizin, E.L. Combustion times and emission profiles of micron-sized aluminum particles burning in different environments. Combust. Flame 2010, 157, 2015–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, B.; Du, C.Z. Study on the Temperature Determination Technique for Ignition and Combustion of Propellants. Chin. J. Explos. Propellants 2001, 24, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  24. Qin, Z.; Paravan, C.; Colomobo, G.; Deluca, L.T.; Shen, R.Q.; Ye, Y.H. Ignition Temperature of Metal Fuel in Different Atmosphere. Initiat. Pyrotech. 2014, 4, 24–27. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yuan, C.M.; Li, C.; Li, G.; Zhang, P.H. Ignition temperature of magnesium powder clouds: A theoretical model. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 239–240, 294–301. [Google Scholar]
  26. Arkhipov, V.A.; Zhukov, A.S.; Kuznetsov, V.T.; Zolotorev, N.N.; Osipova, N.A.; Perfil’eva, K.G. Ignition and combustion of condensed systems with energy fillers. Combust. Explos. Shock Waves 2018, 54, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Maček, A. Combustion of boron particles: Experiment and theory. In Proceedings of the 14th Symposium (International) on Combustion, University Park, PA, USA, 20–25 August 1972. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The sketch of the ignition temperature tester.
Figure 1. The sketch of the ignition temperature tester.
Materials 15 02717 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of laser ignition experimental system.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of laser ignition experimental system.
Materials 15 02717 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of the XRD patterns of prepared MgB2 and PDF Card.
Figure 3. Comparison of the XRD patterns of prepared MgB2 and PDF Card.
Materials 15 02717 g003
Figure 4. The ignition temperature curves of Mg powder.
Figure 4. The ignition temperature curves of Mg powder.
Materials 15 02717 g004
Figure 5. Curves of MgB2 ignition temperature test.
Figure 5. Curves of MgB2 ignition temperature test.
Materials 15 02717 g005
Figure 6. Infrared temperature measurements during ignition and combustion of the of the MgB2 sample.
Figure 6. Infrared temperature measurements during ignition and combustion of the of the MgB2 sample.
Materials 15 02717 g006
Figure 7. The curve of MgB2 sample ignition temperature.
Figure 7. The curve of MgB2 sample ignition temperature.
Materials 15 02717 g007
Figure 8. Burning flame morphology of Mg (a), B (b), and MgB2 (c) samples.
Figure 8. Burning flame morphology of Mg (a), B (b), and MgB2 (c) samples.
Materials 15 02717 g008
Table 1. Infrared temperature of the MgB2 sample at different time points.
Table 1. Infrared temperature of the MgB2 sample at different time points.
t(s)00.0340.0680.1350.1740.2090.3000.3330.527
T(K)29038144561770573096912931163
Table 2. Characteristic ignition parameters of Mg, B, and MgB2 samples.
Table 2. Characteristic ignition parameters of Mg, B, and MgB2 samples.
SampleMgBMgB2
Parameter
Burning time(s)0.410.860.53
Ignition temperature(K)71920001293
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, Y.; Zhang, K.; Ma, S.; He, J.; Gai, X.; Zhang, X. Ignition and Combustion Characteristic of B·Mg Alloy Powders. Materials 2022, 15, 2717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082717

AMA Style

Ma Y, Zhang K, Ma S, He J, Gai X, Zhang X. Ignition and Combustion Characteristic of B·Mg Alloy Powders. Materials. 2022; 15(8):2717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082717

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Yusong, Kaichuang Zhang, Shizhou Ma, Jinyan He, Xiqiang Gai, and Xinggao Zhang. 2022. "Ignition and Combustion Characteristic of B·Mg Alloy Powders" Materials 15, no. 8: 2717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082717

APA Style

Ma, Y., Zhang, K., Ma, S., He, J., Gai, X., & Zhang, X. (2022). Ignition and Combustion Characteristic of B·Mg Alloy Powders. Materials, 15(8), 2717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082717

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop