Next Article in Journal
Influence of Ag and/or Sr Dopants on the Mechanical Properties and In Vitro Degradation of β-Tricalcium Phosphate-Based Ceramics
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Magnetic Biochar Modified Using the One-Step and Electrochemical Methods and Its Impact on Phosphate Adsorption
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study of Shear Performance of High-Strength Concrete Deep Beams with Longitudinal Reinforcement with Anchor Plate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hydrothermal Pretreatment of KOH for the Preparation of PAC and Its Adsorption on TC
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 17
10.3390/ma16176024
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

“Sweetwoods” Lignin as Promising Raw Material to Obtain Micro-Mesoporous Carbon Materials

by
Ance Plavniece
*,
Galina Dobele
,
Dmitrijs Djachkovs
,
Lilija Jashina
,
Oskars Bikovens
,
Aleksandrs Volperts
and
Aivars Zhurinsh
Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry, Dzerbenes Street 27, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(17), 6024; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16176024
Submission received: 29 July 2023 / Revised: 23 August 2023 / Accepted: 29 August 2023 / Published: 1 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Advanced Biomass-Derived Carbon Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Biorefineries with the significant amounts of lignin as a by-product have a potential to increase business revenues by using this residue to produce high value-added materials. The carbon materials from biomass waste increases the profitability of the production of porous carbon used for sorbents and energy production. The purpose of this research is to study the chemical properties of lignin from “Sweetwoods” biorefinery as well as to characterize lignin carbonizates and activated carbons synthesized from them. This paper describes the effect of carbonization conditions (thermal or hydrothermal) on the properties of activated carbon material. It can be concluded that, depending on the carbonization method, the three-dimensional hierarchical porous structure of activated carbon materials based on “Sweetwoods” lignin, has micro- and mesopores of various sizes and can be used for number of purposes: both for high-quality sorbents, catalysts for electrochemical reduction reactions, providing sufficient space for ion mass transfer in electrodes for energy storage and transfer.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Currently, industrial development has led to a constant increase in demand for energy and sustainable energy resources, so there is an intensive search for a replacement for fossil fuels [1]. The future of overcoming of the crisis of the 21st century largely depends on the successful use of biomass and waste from its processing.
Lignocellulosic biomass is a common source of carbon and is of great interest as a precursor to various carbon materials due to low cost, environmental friendliness and availability. Biomass is renewable and can be a source of clean and affordable energy. These advantages of biomass over fossil fuels promote forestry and lignocellulosic residues management as an alternative carbon sources for chemicals, biofuels, and carbon materials [2,3].
Lignocellulosic biomass is composed of three types of polymers: cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Lignin as an integral part of wood, which is usually goes to waste or is burned for energy harvesting, since it is the most difficult component to recycle in any other way. It is produced on a large scale during chemical processing of wood at pulp and paper and hydrolysis industries. On the other hand, lignin is a potential raw material resource for use in many areas of the national economy.
A serious obstacle to assessing the use of lignins are their heterogeneity and structural complexity, insolubility in organic solvents, and low reactivity. Therefore, for a long time, lignin was considered a waste that was usual burned to produce energy. Depolymerization of lignin is an obvious strategy to increase its value, as it provides aromatic chemicals. However, this path turned out to be complicated due to low selectivity and the tendency of lignin fragments to recombine to form condensed carbonized by-products [4].
The abundance of kraft lignin from pulp and paper mills, significant amount of waste of hydrolytic lignin in the production of ethanol from cellulose, as well as the desire to increase the profitability of enterprises, prompted scientists to pay renewed attention to this renewable aromatic heteropolymer. Technological directions have emerged where lignin is considered as a feedstock for the production of valuable products and chemicals with high added value. In recent years, lignin has attracted attention as a precursor for the production of new carbon materials [5,6]. The production of carbon materials with a specific porous structure from biomass waste increases the profitability of the production of porous carbon for energy, which explains the attention paid to this topic [7,8,9].
The most large-scale use of technical lignins is the synthesis of carbon materials with a developed porous structure. For these purposes, both physical and chemical (ZnCl2, H3PO4, K2CO3, KOH, NaOH) activations are used [10,11,12,13]. Compared to physical activation, alkaline thermochemical activation of lignin attracts attention because it allows the process to be carried out at lower temperatures (700–800 °C) and provides high porosity (SBET over 2000 m2g−1) [14,15]. Nanostructured carbon materials are seen as the most promising to meet the future carbon market demands [16,17].
An important property for interaction with an activator is the functional composition of the precursor, which can be changed using various conditions and methods of carbonization. Using hydrolytic lignin as an example, it was shown that the temperature and rate of preliminary carbonization of the precursor affect the activation process and make it possible to control the average pore size. [18]. Hydrothermal carbonation (HTC) is a new active area of research in the synthesis of carbon-rich materials due to its ability to convert wet biomass into valuable products [19,20]. The pyrolysis of isolated lignins differs significantly from the pyrolysis of wood and other lignocellulosic materials in terms of the yield of the main products [21]. Therefore, it should be taken into account that the conditions of carbonization and pyrolysis, such as temperature, environment and process time for the recovered lignins, must be optimized for each type of feedstock from different types of biomass and recovery processes (for example, kraft, organo-solvent, pyrolytic, etc.) [22,23].
The traditional wood processing industry is mainly driven by the end result, often using by-products to produce low-value solutions, so this are of businesses can be improved even further. Currently, biorefineries are focused on the production of biofuels from raw materials with a high sugar content. In this area, it is promising to unite several European companies to implement the “Sweetwoods” project, which involves the processing of 90% of hardwoods into valuable biomaterials and bioproducts suitable for further use [24]. The new pretreatment technology, combined with the innovative use of fermentation, achieves sugar recovery levels of over 90% and the formation of lignin as a by-product. Biorefineries, which will generate significant amounts of lignin in the future, have the potential to improve business revenues by using lignin to produce high value-added materials [25]. Similar studies are currently being conducted in many scientific centers. Currently, there are not enough studies investigating how the type of lignin affects the resulting hydrothermal structure of the carbonizate.
The purpose of this work is to study the chemical properties of lignin from the “Sweetwoods” biorefinery, as well as to obtain carbonizates from it using both pyrolysis and hydrothermal treatment, with the aim to synthesize activated carbon materials with controlled porosity for use as highly effective sorbents.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Their Carbonization

The “Sweetwoods” lignin was produced from birch wood by SunburstTM extrusion based pre-treatment technology [26]. Cellulose was degraded by enzymatic hydrolysis and separated from lignin, which was kindly provided by Fibenol OÜ. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) was performed as a pretreatment: 200 g of birch “Sweetwoods” lignin (SW) were dispersed in 2000 mL of distilled water and transferred into a 7.5 L stainless steel PARR-4554 autoclave (Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL, USA) ). The carbonization process was carried out at 160 (for 4 h), 200(for 4 h), 260 °C (for 2, 4, 6, 8 h), stirring at 140 rpm. To obtain a porous material thermochemical activation was performed at 800 °C using NaOH as an activator (char:activator ratio 1:3), the process is described in detail elsewhere [27].

2.2. Analytical Methods Applied for the Materials Study

Carbonized samples were testing using FTIR (Thermo Fisher Nicolet iS50 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)), Py-GC/MS: Micro Double-shot Pyrolyzer Py-2020iD ((Frontier Laboratories, Koriyama, Japan) directly coupled with Shimadzu GC/MS—QP 2010 apparatus (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with capillary column RTX-1701 (Restec, Bellefonte, PA, USA)) and TGA using Discovery TGA System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), while the methods are described in more detail elsewhere [28]. Carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen and oxygen content was evaluated using the Vario Macro CHNSO (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany) device.
Porous structure parameters were determined using a Nova 4200e device (Quantachrome, Boynton Beach, FL, USA) using proprietary software (Quantachrome, Boynton Beach, FL, USA) for data analysis for BET (Brunaer-Emmet-Teller) specific surface areas and Density Functional Theory (DFT) for pore size distribution [29].

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Properties of SW Lignin before and after Hydrothermal Carbonization and Pyrolysis

Biomass-based materials differ from fossil coals by the presence of components with different thermal stability and a fairly high content of elemental oxygen. The use of various carbonization methods makes it possible to reduce and, if necessary, control the content of heteroatoms in the structure for the synthesis of micro- or micromesoporous carbon materials using wood and waste from its chemical processing as raw materials [27]. In this study of “Sweetwood” lignin (SW), hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) and pyrolysis were used to produce alkali-activated carbons. It is known that HTC is preferred over the traditional high temperature carbonization method due to low energy consumption and easier control of parameters [30]. The HTC method is also valuable because it provides a higher yield of carbonizate.
Table 1 shows the yields and elemental analysis of SW and samples after pyrolysis and HTC. With an increase in the temperature of HTC treatment from 160 to 260 °C with different duration of the process the yield of carbonizates decreases and the carbon content increases. Under conditions of pyrolysis, the yield of carbonizate decreases even more intensively (Table 1).
The decrease in the atomic ratios of oxygen and hydrogen to carbon shows the effect of dehydration and decarboxylation reactions as a result of hydrothermal carbonization at different temperatures and times (Figure 1). These results indicate that increasing the temperature from 160 to 260 °C has more pronounced effect than increasing the reaction time from 2 to 8 h at 260 °C. This coincides with previously published results [31]. In addition, the decrease in H/C and O/C atomic ratios showed a linear relationship with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.999 with increasing reaction time.
FTIR spectra were recorded to assess the effect of carbonization temperature and time on the composition of functional groups in the structure of carbonized materials. FTIR spectrum of SW-lignin showed typical hardwood lignin (guaiacyl-syringyl type lignin) spectrum with dominant absorption maximum at 1116 cm−1 typical for aromatic C-H in plane deformation of lignin syringyl units (Figure 2).
The FTIR absorption peaks were assigned in accordance with [32,33]: 3424 cm−1 for O-H stretch, 2929 and 2850 cm−1 for C-H stretch in methyl and methylene groups, 1600 and 1514 cm−1 for aromatic skeletal vibration, 1463 cm−1 for aliphatic C-H deformations, 1428 cm−1 for aromatic skeletal vibrations combined with C-H in plane deformations, 1326 cm−1 for syringyl and/or condensed guaiacyl units of lignin, 1269 cm−1 for guaiacyl units and carbonyl group stretch, 1035 cm−1 a complex band for aromatic C-H deformation, C-O-C stretching and C-O-H bending. Regarding methoxy groups, there is currently no general consensus as to where the resonances associated with methoxy groups are located. These resonances are expected to occur at 1265, 1210, 1190, 1125, 1090–1075, 1040 and 1031 cm−1 but many of these maximums overlap with other lignin groups [34].
The SW lignin contains unconjugated carbonyl groups (absorption maximum at 1712 cm−1). After carbonization carbonyl group stretching vibration absorption maximum was shifted to 1700 cm−1 at 160 °C and approximately to 1690 cm−1 at 260 °C that revealed carbonyl group conjugation with C=C double band. With increasing of the temperature of the hydrothermal carbonization decreased absorption maximum around 3420 cm−1 that indicate decreasing of hydroxyl group content. Relative content of aromatic groups increased (absorption bands at 1600 and 1511 cm−1) but C-O-C and C-O-H group vibration intensity decreased (absorption bands at 1123 and 1035 cm−1) after the hydrothermal carbonization of the SW at 160 °C. Spectral condensation index, calculated as the dividing between sum of all minima between 1500 and 1050 cm−1 and sum of all maxima between 1600 and 1030 cm−1 [32], confirms the formation of new C-C-bonds, indicating the formation of lignin condensation, especially at 260 °C. This is also indicated by the decrease in the intensity of the stretching band of the C-O-C group at 1113 cm−1 (Figure 2). FTIR results are consistent with other analyses.
To characterize the changes in the SW-lignin under the conditions of hydrothermal treatment, the composition and content of volatile products were studied by analytical pyrolysis and compared to those of the initial lignin (Table 2). The results of the analysis show that the pyrolysis products of the initial lignin contain a small amount (7.26%) of derivatives originating from carbohydrate components. The main part of the aromatic products of pyrolysis are guaiacyl and syringyl derivatives −56.4%. The content of non-methoxylated aromatic compounds is 4.82%. The content of volatile compounds, including carbon dioxide, water and methanol, is 28.2%.
Changes in the structure of lignin begin during hydrothermal treatment already at a temperature of 160 °C and continue to develop with increasing of temperature. First of all, this manifests in the decrease in the content of all products formed from carbohydrates, except for the methyl derivatives of cyclopentane, the content of which almost doubles. The total content of aromatic derivatives of lignin with a phenylpropane structure during hydrothermal treatment at 200 and 260 °C slightly decreases due to increase in the relative proportion of demethoxylated and highly volatile derivatives. It should also be noted that under hydrothermal conditions guaiacil derivatives are less susceptible to changes compared to syringyl derivatives. With an increase in the temperature of hydrothermal treatment from 200 to 260 °C, the trend of such changes increases. However, an increase in the duration of treatment from 4 to 8 h at 260 °C practically does not change the relative content of the products.
Py-GC/MS analysis of pyrolyzed samples showed that the main volatile pyrolysis products belong to the class of benzenes and phenylpropane compounds while methoxy groups characteristic for lignin pyrolysis are absent.
The volatile pyrolysis products of SW lignin, as well as its HTC carbonizates, contain various compounds, including those with functional oxygen-containing groups, belonging to both guaiacol and syringol derivatives (vanillin, acetoguaiacon, propioguaiacone, etc.). The content of compounds with oxygen-containing groups in the aliphatic chain characterizes the degree of change in the lignin macromolecule during carbonization. Figure 3 shows the ratio of the content of volatile pyrolysis compounds with and without oxygen atoms in the propane chain for SW lignin and its HTC carbonizates. The decrease in the content of oxygen-containing compounds in the pyrolysis products is consistent with the FTIR data.
The TGA results show that the pyrolyzed carbonizates are significantly more thermally stable than those obtained under HTC conditions (Figure 4a,b). Py-GC/M and TGA results, as well as FTIR, indicate the formation of condensed structure during pyrolysis. The thermal stability of the HTC samples increases as the processing temperature rises to 260 °C. An increase in the HTC processing time at 260 °C practically does not change the thermal stability of the samples, only slightly reducing the rate of formation of volatile products (Figure 4c,d).

3.2. The Porous Structure of Activated Carbons Depending on the Method of Carbonization

The high specific surface area (BET), controllable porous structure and low cost, of activated carbon materials based on biomass, including chemical processing residues such as lignins, allow them to compete with nanotubes and other carbon materials, the production of which is limited by the complexity and high cost of technologies [29]. Provided that highly efficient porous carbon materials are obtained, the advantage of pyrolysis technologies lies in simple scaling and the ability to control process parameters, depending on the required properties of the final product.
The use of alkali as an activator under the condition of varying process temperature and the amount of the activator, as well as taking into account the properties of precursors and carbonizates, makes it possible to obtain highly porous carbon materials with a developed specific surface due to the formation of large volumes of micropores in the porous structure (Table 3). However, when the same activator is used, the indicators of the porous structure are very different for lignins of different origin. The use of black liquor and Kraft lignin as a precursor for activation leads to the formation of large volumes of mesopores both with and without carbonization of residues [6,35]. However, the use of these precursors, HTC pretreatment, and activation with the alkali such as KOH, are not the only conditions for the formation of a mesoporous structure [36,37]. There is evidence that, upon activation with alkali without preliminary carbonization, a carbon material with a mesopore volume of 78.6% can be obtained from lignin as well [38].
Thermally initiated reactions of the interaction of the alkaline component with the functional groups of lignin proceed simultaneously alongside with the processes of condensation and depolymerization of macromolecules and lead to the development of nanoporous structure of the carbon material.
In this work SW lignin carbonizates were activated with NaOH (activator to precursor ratio 3:1, temperature 800 °C). The yields of activated carbons after HTC and activation was from 5.3 to10.8%, for pyrolyzed and activated samples yield was 14.8 and 15.5% (Table 3).
According to the shape of nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms, all samples of activated carbons obtained both on the basis of HTC and pyrolyzed precursors belong to micro-, mesoporous materials with specific surfaces of more than 2000 m2 g−1 (Table 4, Figure 5). However, judging by the slope of nitrogen adsorption isotherms, their pore size distributions of samples under study are different. Samples obtained on the basis of thermally carbonized precursors have a pronounced bimodal microporous structures with differential volumes peaks on the pore size distribution curves over pore widths of 1 and 2 nm (Figure 5c,d), and the total volumes in these cases were less than that for HTC samples. For samples of activated carbons based on hydrothermally carbonized precursors and initial lignin, the volume of pores with a width of 1 nm decreases and, as the processing temperature increases, the volumes of mesopores with sizes of 2.5–4.5 nm increase (Table 4, Figure 5c,d).
The calculation of mesopore volumes relative the total volume shows that using various carbonization methods it is possible to increase mesopore volumes from 38–40% for pyrolyzed samples to 52–62% in the case of hydrothermal carbonization.
Thus, it has been demonstrated that the use of various methods of carbonization (thermal and hydrothermal) of SW lignin, followed with NaOH activation, makes it possible to obtain carbon materials with a developed specific surface area of more than 2500 m2 g−1 with a various pore size distribution. The benefit of using hydrothermal carbonization is a possibility to obtain porous carbons from biomass wastes with a mesopore volume of more than 50%, which is in demand in many sorption processes, as well as catalysts in energy devices (fuel cells, supercapacitor electrodes, ion batteries) [41,42,43].

4. Conclusions

The properties of “Sweetwoods” hydrolysis lignin and its carbonizates obtained in the conditions of pyrolysis (400, 500 °C) and hydrothermal treatment (160, 200, 260 °C) were studied by Py-GC/MS, IR-Fourier spectroscopy, and TGA. It is shown that during hydrothermal treatment, oxygen-containing functional groups remain in the structure of carbonized materials, while carbon content increases with the increase of temperature and time of treatment. Pyrolysis leads to intense dehydration and condensation of lignin with the formation of more thermally stable structure.
Activation with NaOH (3:1, 800 °C, 2 h), regardless of the chemical composition and structure of carbonizates, leads to the synthesis of activated carbons with a developed porous area of more than 2000 m2 g−1 (BET). The influence of carbonization conditions is manifested in the increase in the total pore volume and mesopores widths (2.5–4 nm) after hydrothermal treatment.
It was concluded that using pyrolysis or hydrothermal carbonization it is possible to control micro- and mesopores ratios in the three-dimensional hierarchical porous structure of alkali-activated carbon materials based on “Sweetwoods” lignin. In both cases the obtained materials can be used as high-quality sorbents or catalysts, which is especially true for hydrothermal treatment, since these carbons can provide more space for ion transport in electrodes for energy storage and transfer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P., G.D. and A.Z, methodology, A.P., G.D. and A.V.; validation and formal analysis, D.D., L.J. and O.B.; resources and data curation, D.D., L.J. and O.B.; writing—original draft preparation G.D. and A.P.; review and editing A.P. and A.V.; visualization, A.P; supervision, G.D. and A.Z.; project administration and funding acquisition, A.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by ERAF project Nr. 1.1.1.1/20/A/027 ”Improvement of wood-based biorefinery by innovative conversion of residues to nanoporous carbon materials (BiReMa)”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to „Fibenol OÜ for providing the birch hydrolysis lignin and the Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry, for the support provided.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, H.; Yuan, D.; Tang, C.; Wang, S.; Sun, J.; Li, Z.; Tang, T.; Wang, F.; Gong, H.; He, C. Lignin-Derived Interconnected Hierarchical Porous Carbon Monolith with Large Areal/Volumetric Capacitances for Supercapacitor. Carbon 2016, 100, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mohamad Nor, N.; Lau, L.C.; Lee, K.T.; Mohamed, A.R. Synthesis of Activated Carbon from Lignocellulosic Biomass and Its Applications in Air Pollution Control—A Review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Khan, T.A.; Saud, A.S.; Jamari, S.S.; Rahim, M.H.A.; Park, J.W.; Kim, H.J. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Carbon Rich Material Preparation: A Review. Biomass Bioenergy 2019, 130, 105384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pérez, E.; Tuck, C.O. Quantitative Analysis of Products from Lignin Depolymerisation in High-Temperature Water. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 99, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dobele, G.; Dizhbite, T.; Gil, M.V.; Volperts, A.; Centeno, T.A. Production of Nanoporous Carbons from Wood Processing Wastes and Their Use in Supercapacitors and CO2 Capture. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 46, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Plavniece, A.; Volperts, A.; Dobele, G.; Zhurinsh, A.; Kaare, K.; Kruusenberg, I.; Kaprans, K.; Knoks, A.; Kleperis, J. Wood and Black Liquor-Based N-Doped Activated Carbon for Energy Application. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schlee, P.; Hosseinaei, O.; Baker, D.; Landmér, A.; Tomani, P.; Mostazo-López, M.J.; Cazorla-Amorós, D.; Herou, S.; Titirici, M.M. From Waste to Wealth: From Kraft Lignin to Free-Standing Supercapacitors. Carbon 2019, 145, 470–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Antolini, E. Nitrogen-Doped Carbons by Sustainable N- and C-Containing Natural Resources as Nonprecious Catalysts and Catalyst Supports for Low Temperature Fuel Cells. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 58, 34–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Espinoza-Acosta, J.L.; Torres-Chávez, P.I.; Olmedo-Martínez, J.L.; Vega-Rios, A.; Flores-Gallardo, S.; Zaragoza-Contreras, E.A. Lignin in Storage and Renewable Energy Applications: A Review. J. Energy Chem. 2018, 27, 1422–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xi, R.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, P.; Hu, D. Effects of Activation Method on Biomass Carbon-Based Materials Used for Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Catalyst. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dessalle, A.; Quílez-Bermejo, J.; Fierro, V.; Xu, F.; Celzard, A. Recent Progress in the Development of Efficient Biomass-Based ORR Electrocatalysts. Carbon 2023, 203, 237–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.; Ran, S.; Sun, W.; Zhu, Z. Biomass-Derived Sustainable Carbon Materials in Energy Conversion and Storage Applications: Status and Opportunities. A Mini Review. Electrochem. Commun. 2022, 138, 107283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Feng, Y.; Jiang, J.; Xu, Y.; Wang, S.; An, W.; Chai, Q.; Prova, U.H.; Wang, C.; Huang, G. Biomass Derived Diverse Carbon Nanostructure for Electrocatalysis, Energy Conversion and Storage. Carbon 2023, 211, 118105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fierro, V.; Torné-Fernández, V.; Celzard, A. Methodical Study of the Chemical Activation of Kraft Lignin with KOH and NaOH. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2007, 101, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hayashi, J.; Kazehaya, A.; Muroyama, K.; Watkinson, A.P. Preparation of Activated Carbon from Lignin by Chemical Activation. Carbon 2000, 38, 1873–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. García-Mateos, F.J.; Ruiz-Rosas, R.; Rosas, J.M.; Rodríguez-Mirasol, J.; Cordero, T. Controlling the Composition, Morphology, Porosity, and Surface Chemistry of Lignin-Based Electrospun Carbon Materials. Front. Mater. 2019, 6, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Salinas-Torres, D.; Ruiz-Rosas, R.; Morallón, E.; Cazorla-Amorós, D. Strategies to Enhance the Performance of Electrochemical Capacitors Based on Carbon Materials. Front. Mater. 2019, 6, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sudakova, I.G.; Levdansky, A.V.; Kuznetsov, B.N. Methods of Chemical and Thermochemical Processing of Hydrolytic Lignin. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Chem. 2021, 14, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dharmaraja, J.; Shobana, S.; Arvindnarayan, S.; Francis, R.R.; Jeyakumar, R.B.; Saratale, R.G.; Ashokkumar, V.; Bhatia, S.K.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, G. Lignocellulosic Biomass Conversion via Greener Pretreatment Methods towards Biorefinery Applications. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 369, 128328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, N.; Li, Z.; Quan, C.; Miskolczi, N.; Egedy, A. A New Method Combining Hydrothermal Carbonization and Mechanical Compression In-Situ for Sewage Sludge Dewatering: Bench-Scale Verification. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2019, 139, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kawamoto, H. Lignin Pyrolysis Reactions. J. Wood Sci. 2017, 63, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mankar, A.R.; Pandey, A.; Modak, A.; Pant, K.K. Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Review on Recent Advances. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 334, 125235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tofani, G.; Cornet, I.; Tavernier, S. Separation and Recovery of Lignin and Hydrocarbon Derivatives from Cardboard. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2020, 12, 3409–3424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Project—Sweetwoods. Available online: https://sweetwoods.eu/ (accessed on 31 August 2023).
  25. Azadi, P.; Inderwildi, O.R.; Farnood, R.; King, D.A. Liquid Fuels, Hydrogen and Chemicals from Lignin: A Critical Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 21, 506–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sweetwater Energy Enabling the Sustainable Carbon Economy. Available online: https://fas-europe.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/1-Sweetwater-Energy-Business-Case.pdf (accessed on 22 August 2023).
  27. Plavniece, A.; Dobele, G.; Volperts, A.; Zhurinsh, A. Hydrothermal Carbonization vs. Pyrolysis: Effect on the Porosity of the Activated Carbon Materials. Sustainbility 2022, 14, 15982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Plavniece, A.; Dobele, G.; Volperts, A.; Djachkovs, D.; Jashina, L.; Bikovens, O.; Zhurinsh, A. Effect of the Pretreatment on the Porosity of the Hybrid Activated Carbons Prepared from Wood-Based Solid and Liquid Precursors. Wood Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 1743–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Volperts, A.; Plavniece, A.; Dobele, G.; Zhurinsh, A.; Kruusenberg, I.; Kaare, K.; Locs, J.; Tamasauskaite-Tamasiunaite, L.; Norkus, E. Biomass Based Activated Carbons for Fuel Cells. Renew. Energy 2019, 141, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Du, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, H.; Hou, S.; Chen, A. N-Doped Hollow Mesoporous Carbon Spheres by Improved Dissolution-Capture for Supercapacitors. Carbon 2020, 156, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Saverettiar, G.; Li, D.; Gross, A.; Ho, G. Hydrothermal Carbonization of Cattle Paunch Waste: Process Conditions and Product Characteristics. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Faix, O. Condensation Indices of Lignins Determined by FTIR-Spectroscopy. Holz als Roh-Werkst. 1991, 49, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tolvaj, L. Traditions, Anomalies, Mistakes and Recommendations in Infrared Spectrum Measurement for Wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 1819–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Latham, K.G.; Matsakas, L.; Figueira, J.; Rova, U.; Christakopoulos, P.; Jansson, S. Examination of How Variations in Lignin Properties from Kraft and Organosolv Extraction Influence the Physicochemical Characteristics of Hydrothermal Carbon. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2021, 155, 105095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, D.Y.; Ma, C.H.; Jang, Y.; Radhakrishnan, S.; Ko, T.H.; Kim, B.S. A Simple and Green Approach to Develop Porous Carbons from Biomass Lignin for Advanced Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 652, 129785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, L.; Feng, X.; Li, X.; Wang, H.; Wu, J.; Ma, H.; Zhou, J. Hydrothermal, KOH-Assisted Synthesis of Lignin-Derived Porous Carbon for Supercapacitors: Value-Added of Lignin and Constructing Texture Properties/Specific Capacitance Relationships. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 16, 570–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tian, Y.; Zhou, H. A Novel Nitrogen-Doped Porous Carbon Derived from Black Liquor for Efficient Removal of Cr(VI) and Tetracycline: Comparison with Lignin Porous Carbon. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 333, 130106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lim, G.H.; Lee, J.W.; Choi, J.H.; Kang, Y.C.; Roh, K.C. Efficient Utilization of Lignin Residue for Activated Carbon in Supercapacitor Applications. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022, 284, 126073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gong, L.; Bao, A. High-Value Utilization of Lignin to Prepare N,O-Codoped Porous Carbon as a High-Performance Adsorbent for Carbon Dioxide Capture. J. CO2 Util. 2023, 68, 102374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yu, B.; Chang, Z.; Wang, C. The Key Pre-Pyrolysis in Lignin-Based Activated Carbon Preparation for High Performance Supercapacitors. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 181, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Said, B.; Bacha, O.; Rahmani, Y.; Harfouche, N.; Kheniche, H.; Zerrouki, D.; Belkhalfa, H.; Henni, A. Activated Carbon Prepared by Hydrothermal Pretreatment-Assisted Chemical Activation of Date Seeds for Supercapacitor Application. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023, 155, 111012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, B.; Jiang, Y.; Balasubramanian, R. Synthesis of Biowaste-Derived Carbon Foam for CO2 Capture. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 185, 106453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hu, J.; Hong, C.; Zhao, C.; Si, Y.; Xing, Y.; Ling, W.; Zhang, B.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Feng, L.; et al. Nitrogen Self-Doped Hierarchical Porous Carbon via Penicillin Fermentation Residue (PR) Hydrothermal Carbonization (HTC) and Activation for Supercapacitance. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 918, 165452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 16 06024 g001
Figure 1. Van Krevelen diagrams for the SW after pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization (a) at different temperatures, (b) 260 °C at different carbonization times.
Figure 1. Van Krevelen diagrams for the SW after pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization (a) at different temperatures, (b) 260 °C at different carbonization times.
Materials 16 06024 g001
Materials 16 06024 g002
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of SW lignin before and after hydrothermal carbonization (different temperature and at different carbonization time (at 260 °C)), and pyrolysis.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of SW lignin before and after hydrothermal carbonization (different temperature and at different carbonization time (at 260 °C)), and pyrolysis.
Materials 16 06024 g002
Materials 16 06024 g003
Figure 3. Relative content of volatile pyrolysis products of HTC obtained SW lignin carbonizates containing (blue) and not containing (orange) oxygen in the aliphatic chain (data from Py-GC/MS).
Figure 3. Relative content of volatile pyrolysis products of HTC obtained SW lignin carbonizates containing (blue) and not containing (orange) oxygen in the aliphatic chain (data from Py-GC/MS).
Materials 16 06024 g003
Materials 16 06024 g004
Figure 4. TGA (a,c) and DTG (b,d) of SW lignin and its carbonizates ((a,b) at different carbonization temperatures, (c,d) HTC at 260 °C carbonization time 2, 4, 6, 8 h).
Figure 4. TGA (a,c) and DTG (b,d) of SW lignin and its carbonizates ((a,b) at different carbonization temperatures, (c,d) HTC at 260 °C carbonization time 2, 4, 6, 8 h).
Materials 16 06024 g004
Materials 16 06024 g005
Figure 5. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (a,b) and pore size distribution (c,d) of SW activated carbon depending on temperature (a,c) depending on carbonation time at 260 °C (b,d).
Figure 5. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (a,b) and pore size distribution (c,d) of SW activated carbon depending on temperature (a,c) depending on carbonation time at 260 °C (b,d).
Materials 16 06024 g005
Table 1. Elemental analyses and atomic ratios of the SW lignin before and after hydrothermal carbonization and pyrolysis.
Table 1. Elemental analyses and atomic ratios of the SW lignin before and after hydrothermal carbonization and pyrolysis.
SampleSynthesis Conditions: Temperature and TimeYield, %C, %H, %O, % *O/CH/C
SW--63.836.0129.540.311.13
HTC (160, 4 h)160, 4 h (H2O)88.765.685.8827.870.301.07
HTC (200, 4 h)200, 4 h (H2O)64.367.815.4326.350.300.96
HTC (260, 2 h)260, 2 h (H2O)62.068.355.2925.940.310.93
HTC (260, 4 h)260, 4 h (H2O)59.969.555.3024.780.290.91
HTC (260, 6 h)260, 6 h (H2O)59.470.125.3024.090.280.91
HTC (260, 8 h)260, 8 h (H2O)58.873.995.3520.070.230.87
PYR (400)400, 1 h (pyrolysis)51.880.653.6414.720.250.54
PYR (500)500, 1 h (pyrolysis45.987.103.558.360.150.49
* O%—oxygen content is calculated as 100% − (H% + C%) = O%, taking into account the content of ash elements.
Table 2. Composition of volatile degradation products of SW-lignin and its HTC carbonizates by Py-GC/MS at 500 °C.
Table 2. Composition of volatile degradation products of SW-lignin and its HTC carbonizates by Py-GC/MS at 500 °C.
SWHTC 160HTC 200HTC 260
2h4h6h8h
Carbohydrates, %7.264.233.382.062.492.502.36
Acid, Ester2.761.781.451.451.741.751.61
Aldehyde, Ketone2.591.210.92----
Cyclopentane derivates0.290.230.430.390.500.450.52
Furan1.620.940.580.220.250.300.23
Pyrantrace0.07-----
Lignin derivates, %61.2161.4959.3259.2856.3456.4656.83
Phenyl and benzyl derivates4.824.926.076.968.988.998.05
Guaiacyl derivates17.6917.9316.9716.0115.7816.2216.09
Syringyl derivates38.7038.6436.2836.3131.5831.2532.69
Summary: Carbon dioxide, Water, Methanol, %28.2131.0632.5333.9735.7235.3835.80
N-containing, %0.680.470.400.020.030.030.02
Other compounds, %1.611.603.083.404.354.844.09
Identified, %98.9798.8598.7198.7398.9399.2199.10
Table 3. Lignin bases activated carbon porous structure comparison.
Table 3. Lignin bases activated carbon porous structure comparison.
LigninCarbonization Conditions: Temperature, EnvironmentActivation Conditions: Temperature, Activator (Activator to Carbon Material)Porous StructureRef.
SBET, m2g−1Vt, cm3 g−1Vmeso from Vt,
%
Black liquor 800 °C
NaOH (2:1)		* 2104* 2.35* 71[6]
Lignin (Kraft lignin, USA) 180 °C
HTC (acidic)		800 °C
KOH (1:1)		13740.7572[35]
Lignin (Tokyo Chemical Industry
Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) 		100 °C
150 °C
200 °C
250 °C
HTC (H2O)		900 °C
KOH (2:1)		2448
3033
3178
2694		1.32
1.93
1.94
1.55		17.42
34.72
29.90
24.52		[36]
Precipitated lignin 800 °C
KOH
* 1043
* 0.58
20.69		[37]
Dealkalized lignin 350 °C800 °C
600 °C
KOH (2:1)		20500.849.52[39]
16590.7111.27
450 °C
14930.6010
550 °C
14070.578.77
Lignin (chemical plant in Shandong province, China) -

600°C		800 °C
KOH (3:1)		* 2889

2233		* 1.44

1.06		78.57

28.30		[40]
Larch
Klason lignin
Organosolv lignin		600°C900 °C2451
2304
2388		1.01
0.94
0.97		5.9
5.3
6.2		[38]
* Without carbonization.
Table 4. Yields, porous structure parameters and elemental composition of SW activated carbon.
Table 4. Yields, porous structure parameters and elemental composition of SW activated carbon.
SampleYield (After Carbonization and Activation), %Specific Surface Area (BET),
m2 g−1		Pore Volume,
cm3 g−1		Average Pore Width, nmMesopores from Vt, %N, %C, %H, %O, %
TotalMicroMeso
A-SW526551.70.80.92.652.80.7293.981.613.69
A-HTC (160, 4 h)5.320001.50.60.93.260.00.8985.490.7012.92
A-HTC (200, 4 h)6.924851.80.81.02.956.60.6690.161.317.87
A-HTC (260, 2 h)9.127781.90.91.02.753.80.4792.850.306.38
A-HTC (260, 4 h)10.525552.10.81.33.361.51.2992.230.386.11
A-HTC (260, 6 h)10.827271.80.81.02.754.31.3092.200.346.16
A-HTC (260, 8 h)11.522861.80.71.13.160.41.1989.480.828.52
A-PYR (400)14.827291.40.90.52.138.00.5891.820.267.34
A-PYR (500)15.526741.40.90.62.239.50.7394.530.284.46
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Plavniece, A.; Dobele, G.; Djachkovs, D.; Jashina, L.; Bikovens, O.; Volperts, A.; Zhurinsh, A. “Sweetwoods” Lignin as Promising Raw Material to Obtain Micro-Mesoporous Carbon Materials. Materials 2023, 16, 6024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16176024

AMA Style

Plavniece A, Dobele G, Djachkovs D, Jashina L, Bikovens O, Volperts A, Zhurinsh A. “Sweetwoods” Lignin as Promising Raw Material to Obtain Micro-Mesoporous Carbon Materials. Materials. 2023; 16(17):6024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16176024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Plavniece, Ance, Galina Dobele, Dmitrijs Djachkovs, Lilija Jashina, Oskars Bikovens, Aleksandrs Volperts, and Aivars Zhurinsh. 2023. "“Sweetwoods” Lignin as Promising Raw Material to Obtain Micro-Mesoporous Carbon Materials" Materials 16, no. 17: 6024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16176024

APA Style

Plavniece, A., Dobele, G., Djachkovs, D., Jashina, L., Bikovens, O., Volperts, A., & Zhurinsh, A. (2023). “Sweetwoods” Lignin as Promising Raw Material to Obtain Micro-Mesoporous Carbon Materials. Materials, 16(17), 6024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16176024

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop