1. Introduction
In recent decades, a large amount of wastewater, gas, and residue has been discharged into the natural water environment, causing serious pollution to water bodies [
1]. Heavy metal pollution is the focus of people’s attention, especially because of its toxicity at low concentrations and ease of accumulation in organisms [
2]. Pb(II) is particularly noted for its irreparable harmful effects on the human body [
3]. Low levels of lead could cause kidney damage and nervous system diseases, while its high levels can cause high blood pressure, joint pain, and gene mutation in humans [
4,
5,
6,
7,
8]. Therefore, it is imperative to exploit sustainable and green solutions to eliminate or reduce the pollution and harm of lead ions.
Various ways have been used to treat wastewater containing lead ions, including complexation, precipitation, microbiological, membrane technology, and adsorption. [
9,
10,
11,
12,
13] However, most of those ways have the disadvantages of high cost, poor selectivity, and secondary pollution. Therefore, the adsorption technique has been proverbially used [
14]. Carbon-containing adsorbents are widely used due to their special pore structure, large specific surface area, and good stability [
15,
16]. A large number of documents have reported the application of carbon materials as adsorbents to remove heavy metal ions, such as carbon nanosheets, [
17] carbon nanotubes [
18], nanostructured carbon materials, and so on [
19,
20,
21]. However, some drawbacks are their limited practical application, for example, poor dispersion and expensive or complicated fabrication procedures [
22]. Therefore, it is worthwhile to develop a simple adsorbent with abundant active functional groups.
It is assumed that oxygen-containing functional groups can be used as adsorption sites for heavy metal ions because these functional groups remove heavy metal ions through forming coordination bonds, so the preparation of a carbon material rich in active adsorption sites is the focus of this work. As we all know, HA is a natural macromolecule, environmentally friendly, non-toxic, and green biomass material [
23]. The structure of the HA macromolecule consists of aromatic and alicyclic rings [
24] and functional, groups such as carboxy, hydroxyl, carbonyl, or methoxy groups, attached to the ring [
25]. Because of its rich active functional groups, it has been widely used in the environment [
26,
27]. The content of carbon in HA is more than 65%, which is an ideal precursor for preparing carbon materials [
28]. However, it is still a big challenge to judge what kind of oxygen-containing functional groups are most conducive to adsorption and how to effectively control the aggregation of such functional groups.
In this work, we applied carbon-rich HA as a raw material through the modified Hummers method synthesized OBC. We hypothesized that catalytic oxidation technology could produce highly efficient and easily separate and inherited original and added more reactive functional groups rather than relying on surface area and porous channels. Similar literature has not been reported so far. The aqueous solution of Pb(II) was compared with OBC and HA as adsorbents, and adsorption properties were compared. In addition, the interaction mechanism between Pb(II) was studied through SEM, FT-IR, and XPS.
2. Experiment
2.1. Materials and Chemicals
HA came from Double Dragons Humic Acid Co., Ltd., Ürümqi, China. Potassium permanganate (KMnO4) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were obtained from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Sodium nitrate (NaNO3), 30% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), hydrochloric acid (HCl), and lead nitrate (Pb(NO3)2) were received from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Experimental deionized water was prepared by Smart-Q15 (Hitech, Shanghai, China).
2.2. Preparation of OBC
All chemicals were of pure analytical grade. Firstly, 48 mL H
2SO
4, 1 g NaNO
3, and 6 g HA were added into a three flask, and then 3 g KMnO
4 was slowly added, undergoing oxidative stripping at different temperatures. Finally, 10 mL H
2O
2 was added to remove excess MnO
4− [
29,
30,
31]. Rinse the product with deionized water until the pH is close to 7.0, then obtain OBC. HA-400 was obtained by calcining HA at 400 °C in an N
2 atmosphere for 2 h.
2.3. Adsorption Experiment
The effects of pH, pollutant concentration, and adsorption time on the adsorption were studied. The adsorption model, kinetics, and thermodynamics were also estimated. The selectivity and regeneration of the adsorbent were also studied.
An amount of OBC and Pb(II) aqueous solution was added to the conical flask for Pb(II) adsorption tests. The suspension solution was then thoroughly vibrated at 200 rpm using a mechanical shaker (THZ-100B, China Trading Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) at 25 °C. Then, the liquid was filtered by a 0.22 μm filter membrane, and the concentration of Pb(II) was detected by ICP-OES (Avio 200 and Optima 8000, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Study on the effect of pH on adsorption in the case of adsorbent mass 5.0 mg and pollutant concentration 50 mg·L−1. The initial concentration of Pb(II) ranges from 10 to 100 mg·L−1 for adsorption isotherm experiments. The kinetic experiments were implemented with contact time from 2 to 120 min.
The adsorption efficiency of Pb(II) is calculated as follows: [
32]
where
C0 and
Ce (mg·L
−1) are the initial concentration and equilibrium concentration of lead, and
V (mL) is the of the pollutant solution,
m (mg) is the quality of the adsorbent.
2.3.1. Effect of pH on Adsorption
The effects of pH on adsorption in the range of 2.0–7.0 were studied to investigate the optimal pH value.
2.3.2. Adsorption Isotherm
Under the condition of pH = 6.0, the concentration of contaminant was in the range of 20–100 mg·L
−1, and the adsorption performance is studied by ionic strength. The adsorption isotherms were studied by using the Langmuir isotherm (Equation (3)) and the Freundlich isotherm (Equation (4)) [
33].
where
KL is Langmuir’s constant,
Ce (mg·L
−1) is the concentration of Pb(II) at the equilibrium point, and
qmax (mg·g
−1) is the maximum adsorption amount.
KF is the Freundlich constant, and
n is adsorption intensity.
2.3.3. Dubinin-Radushkevich
Under the condition of pH = 6.0, the concentration of contaminant was in the range of 20–100 mg·L
−1, and the adsorption performance is studied by ionic strength. The adsorption isotherms were studied by using the Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm (Equations (5)–(7)) [
34].
where
β (mol
2·kJ
−2) is a constant related to adsorption energy,
ε (kJ·mol
−1) is Polanyi adsorption energy, and
E (kJ·mol
−1) is Polanyi adsorption energy.
2.3.4. Adsorption Kinetics
The pseudo-first-order (Equation (8)) and pseudo-second-order (Equation (9)) kinetics models [
6] were used to evaluate the kinetic parameters of Pb(II) adsorption on the OBC: [
35]
where
qt is the adsorption capacity at time
t (s) and
qe (mg·g
−1) the equilibrium adsorption capacity.
k1 (min
−1) and
k2 (g·(mg·min)
−1) are the rate constants of the two models, respectively.
2.3.5. Adsorption Thermodynamics
The effect of temperature (298.15 K, 308.15 K, 318.15 K) on the adsorption of lead was studied. The thermodynamic parameters were evaluated by the following equations: [
36]
where
R (8.314 J·(mol·K)
−1) is the gas constant,
CA is the reduced concentration of ions in a solution at equilibrium,
T (K) is temperature, and
kd is the thermodynamic equilibrium constant. Δ
G (J·(mol·K)
−1) is the entropy change, Δ
H (kJ·mol
−1) is the enthalpy change, and Δ
S (kJ·mol
−1) is the Gibbs free energy change in a given process.
2.3.6. Desorption and Regeneration
The cycle performance of the adsorbent is that the solution is desorbed at pH = 1.0 for 6 h, washed to neutral, freeze-dried to obtain the production, adsorbed again, and recycled 5 times.
2.4. Theoretical Calculation Model and Parameter
In this experiment, the adsorption process of OBC was simulated by Materialstudio 2019 software. Coronene was used as the main structure of the material, and hydroxyl, carboxyl, carbonyl, and ether bonds were connected. In the calculation process, geometry optimization and calculating the adsorption energy used generalized-gradient approximation (GGA), Perdew-Wang 91 (PW91) module in Dmol3, energy = 5.0 e−5 eV·atom−1, Max. Force = 0.1 eV·Å−1, Max. Stress = 0.2 GPa, Max. Displacement = 0.05 Å.
The calculation formula for adsorption energy is as follows:
ΔE is the adsorption energy (Kcal·mol−1), E(A … B) is the energy of the optimized adsorption structure (Ha), E(A) is the energy of the optimized OBC (Ha), and E(B) is the energy of lead ion after optimization (Ha).
2.5. Characterization
The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were utilized by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (ASAP 2020, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). The XRD of the materials was checked by an X-ray diffractometer (D8 ADVANCED, Bruker, Mannheim, Germany). A Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Thermo, iS50, Waltham, MA, USA) was conducted to obtain FT-IR to analyze the interaction between materials. A Raman microscope (DXR2xi, Thermo) was used to acquire the Raman spectra of HA and OBC. The morphological characteristic of stacked nanosheets was examined using a Regulus 8100 scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi-hightech, Tokyo, Japan) and conducted on a JEOL-2011F transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) conducted at 200 kV. XPS was analyzed using an Escalab 250Xi instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with an A1 Kα X-ray source. The zeta potential of the material was determined using an Omni zeta potential analyzer (Brookhaven, Holtsville, NY, USA).