Author Contributions
Conceptualization, L.A.S. and C.J.G.d.S.J.; validation, L.A.S., C.J.G.d.S.J., A.D.M.d.M., A.K.L.d.H.C., J.D.P.d.A., I.J.B.D., Y.d.F.C. and A.F.d.S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, C.J.G.d.S.J.; writing—review and editing, C.J.G.d.S.J., A.D.M.d.M., A.K.L.d.H.C., J.D.P.d.A., I.J.B.D., Y.d.F.C., A.F.d.S.C., A.C. and L.A.S.; visualization, C.J.G.d.S.J. and L.A.S.; supervision, L.A.S.; project administration, L.A.S.; funding acquisition, L.A.S. and A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
Scheme of production of bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) packaging material.
Figure 1.
Scheme of production of bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) packaging material.
Figure 2.
Water drop deposited on the surface of the SCB sample.
Figure 2.
Water drop deposited on the surface of the SCB sample.
Figure 3.
Appearance of biocellulose after the purification stage.
Figure 3.
Appearance of biocellulose after the purification stage.
Figure 4.
Visual aspect of samples of bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane (SCB) mixed in different proportions. (A) BC alone, (B) SCB alone, (C) 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, and (D) 70% (w/w) BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Figure 4.
Visual aspect of samples of bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane (SCB) mixed in different proportions. (A) BC alone, (B) SCB alone, (C) 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, and (D) 70% (w/w) BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Figure 5.
FTIR spectra of bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) mixed in different proportions. (A) BC alone, (B) SCB alone, (C) 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, and (D) 70% BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Figure 5.
FTIR spectra of bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) mixed in different proportions. (A) BC alone, (B) SCB alone, (C) 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, and (D) 70% BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Figure 6.
TG curves of bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) mixed in different proportions. (A) BC alone, (B) SCB alone, (C) 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, and (D) 70% (w/w) BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Figure 6.
TG curves of bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) mixed in different proportions. (A) BC alone, (B) SCB alone, (C) 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, and (D) 70% (w/w) BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Figure 7.
Micrographs of bacterial cellulose with magnification of (a) 100×, (b) 500×, (c) 100×, (d) 500×, (e) 20 k×, (f) 40 k×, (g) 80 k×, (h) 160 k×. Samples chosen for the EDS analysis were taken from points A, B, C, D, E and F.
Figure 7.
Micrographs of bacterial cellulose with magnification of (a) 100×, (b) 500×, (c) 100×, (d) 500×, (e) 20 k×, (f) 40 k×, (g) 80 k×, (h) 160 k×. Samples chosen for the EDS analysis were taken from points A, B, C, D, E and F.
Figure 8.
Micrographs of sugarcane bagasse at magnification of (a) 200×, (b) 500×, (c) 200×, (d) 500×, (e) 20 k×, (f) 40 k×, (g) 80 k×, (h) 160 k×. Samples chosen for the EDS analysis were taken from points A, B, C, D, E and F.
Figure 8.
Micrographs of sugarcane bagasse at magnification of (a) 200×, (b) 500×, (c) 200×, (d) 500×, (e) 20 k×, (f) 40 k×, (g) 80 k×, (h) 160 k×. Samples chosen for the EDS analysis were taken from points A, B, C, D, E and F.
Figure 9.
Micrographs of the BC/SCB composite, composed of 50% (w/w) bacterial cellulose plus 50% (w/w) sugarcane bagasse, with magnification of (a) 200×, (b) 500×, (c) 200×, (d) 500×, (e) 20 k×, (f) 40 k×, (g) 80 k×, (h) 160 k×. Samples chosen for the EDS analysis were taken from points A, B, C, D, E and F.
Figure 9.
Micrographs of the BC/SCB composite, composed of 50% (w/w) bacterial cellulose plus 50% (w/w) sugarcane bagasse, with magnification of (a) 200×, (b) 500×, (c) 200×, (d) 500×, (e) 20 k×, (f) 40 k×, (g) 80 k×, (h) 160 k×. Samples chosen for the EDS analysis were taken from points A, B, C, D, E and F.
Figure 10.
Micrographs of the 0.7 BC/0.3 SCB composite, composed of 70% (w/w) bacterial cellulose plus 30% (w/w) sugarcane bagasse, with magnification of (a) 200×, (b) 500×, (c) 200×, (d) 500×, (e) 20 k×, (f) 40 k×, (g) 80 k×, (h) 160 k×. Samples chosen for the EDS analysis were taken from points A, B, C, D, E and F.
Figure 10.
Micrographs of the 0.7 BC/0.3 SCB composite, composed of 70% (w/w) bacterial cellulose plus 30% (w/w) sugarcane bagasse, with magnification of (a) 200×, (b) 500×, (c) 200×, (d) 500×, (e) 20 k×, (f) 40 k×, (g) 80 k×, (h) 160 k×. Samples chosen for the EDS analysis were taken from points A, B, C, D, E and F.
Figure 11.
Appearance of bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) samples after undergoing flexibility tests. (A) SCB alone, (B) 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, and (C,D) 70% BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Figure 11.
Appearance of bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) samples after undergoing flexibility tests. (A) SCB alone, (B) 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, and (C,D) 70% BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Figure 12.
Graph of tensile strength (MPa) and elongation at break (%) of bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) samples. BC = BC alone, SCB = SCB alone, BC/SCB = 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, 0.7 BC/0.3 SCB = 70% (w/w) BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Figure 12.
Graph of tensile strength (MPa) and elongation at break (%) of bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) samples. BC = BC alone, SCB = SCB alone, BC/SCB = 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, 0.7 BC/0.3 SCB = 70% (w/w) BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Table 1.
Yield and water retention capacity (WRC) of bacterial cellulose (BC) produced after 14 days of culture. Results, expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3), were significant at p < 0.05.
Table 1.
Yield and water retention capacity (WRC) of bacterial cellulose (BC) produced after 14 days of culture. Results, expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3), were significant at p < 0.05.
Weight Basis | Yield (g/L) | WRC (%) |
---|
Wet | 450.49 ± 16.61 | 97.02 ± 0.23 |
Dry | 13.41 ± 1.17 g/L |
Table 2.
Values of water contact angle, swelling ratio and sorption index of the different samples prepared. BC = Bacterial cellulose; SCB = Sugarcane bagasse; BC/SCB = 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB; 0.7 BC/0.3 SCB = 70% (w/w) BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB. Results, expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3), were significant at p < 0.05.
Table 2.
Values of water contact angle, swelling ratio and sorption index of the different samples prepared. BC = Bacterial cellulose; SCB = Sugarcane bagasse; BC/SCB = 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB; 0.7 BC/0.3 SCB = 70% (w/w) BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB. Results, expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3), were significant at p < 0.05.
Sample | Water Contact Angle (°) | Swelling Ratio | Sorption Index (s) |
---|
BC | 39.29 | 2.79 ± 0.27 | 77.32 ± 3.12 |
SCB | 15.11 | 4.77 ± 0.29 | 0.78 ± 0.09 |
BC/SCB | 48.60 | 2.16 ± 0.14 | 141.14 ± 22.13 |
0.7 BC/0.3 SCB | 53.22 | 1.57 ± 0.3 | 235.85 ± 31.29 |
Table 3.
Main functional groups detected from FTIR spectra of bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) mixed in different proportions. BC = BC alone, SCB = SCB alone, BC/SCB = 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, and 0.7 BC/0.3 SCB = 70% BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Table 3.
Main functional groups detected from FTIR spectra of bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) mixed in different proportions. BC = BC alone, SCB = SCB alone, BC/SCB = 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, and 0.7 BC/0.3 SCB = 70% BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Sample | Wavenumber (cm−1) | Characteristic Peaks |
---|
BC | 3343 | Axial deformation of O-H |
2893 | Axial deformation of CH2 |
1636 | Deformation of C=C |
1427 | Angular deformation of CH2 |
1314 | Angular deformation of CH |
1161 | Stretching of C-O-C |
1108 | Stretching of C-O-C |
1032 | Deformation of C-O |
SCB | 3333 | Axial deformation of O-H |
2884 | Axial deformation of CH2 |
1633 | Deformation of C=C |
1425 | Angular deformation of CH2 |
1315 | Angular deformation of CH |
1160 | Stretching of C-O-C |
1111 | Stretching of C-O-C |
1031 | Deformation of C-O |
BC/SCB | 3341 | Axial deformation of O-H |
2888 | Axial deformation of CH2 |
1645 | Deformation of C=C |
1425 | Angular deformation of CH2 |
1317 | Angular deformation of CH |
1165 | Stretching of C-O-C |
1111 | Stretching of C-O-C |
1032 | Deformation of C-O |
0.7 BC/0.3 SCB | 3341 | Axial deformation of O-H |
2889 | Axial deformation of CH2 |
1644 | Deformation of C=C |
1424 | Angular deformation of CH2 |
1317 | Angular deformation of CH |
1161 | Stretching of C-O-C |
1107 | Stretching of C-O-C |
1032 | Deformation of C-O |
Table 4.
TGA results for bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) mixed in different proportions. BC = BC alone, SCB = SCB alone, BC/SCB = 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, and 0.7 BC/0.3 SCB = 70% BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Table 4.
TGA results for bacterial cellulose (BC) and sugarcane bagasse (SCB) mixed in different proportions. BC = BC alone, SCB = SCB alone, BC/SCB = 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, and 0.7 BC/0.3 SCB = 70% BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Sample | Temperature Range (°C) | Loss of Mass (%) | Residue at 800 °C (%) |
---|
BC | 26–160 | 13.20 | 10.57 |
160–260 | 20.11 |
260–800 | 56.15 |
SCB | 25–160 | 6.35 | 10.07 |
160–800 | 83.59 |
BC/SCB | 23–120 | 14.17 | 6.51 |
120–260 | 41.27 |
260–800 | 38.05 |
0.7 BC/0.3 SCB | 28–130 | 10.06 | 10.62 |
130–260 | 36.60 |
260–800 | 42.72 |
Table 5.
Results of EDS analysis of bacterial cellulose (BC). Letters A, B, C, D, E and F refer to points (
Figure 7) where samples were taken for the EDS analysis.
Table 5.
Results of EDS analysis of bacterial cellulose (BC). Letters A, B, C, D, E and F refer to points (
Figure 7) where samples were taken for the EDS analysis.
Element | Mass Percentage (%) | |
---|
A | B | C | D | E | F | Average Value |
---|
C | 46.39 | 47.54 | 48.96 | 48.11 | 48.31 | 48.37 | 47.95 ± 0.89 |
O | 50.15 | 46.97 | 46.95 | 50.33 | 48.35 | 48.13 | 48.65 ± 1.49 |
Zn | 1.57 | 1.37 | 1.78 | - | 1.40 | 1.32 | 1.49 ± 0.19 |
Mg | - | 0.37 | - | - | - | - | 0.37 |
Al | - | 0.39 | - | - | - | - | 0.39 |
Si | - | 0.53 | 0.26 | - | - | - | 0.39 ± 0.19 |
Cl | 0.81 | 1.13 | 1.18 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 1.04 | 0.97 ± 0.17 |
K | 0.51 | 0.48 | - | - | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.46 ± 0.05 |
Ca | 0.57 | 1.22 | 0.87 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.80 ± 0.23 |
Table 6.
Results of EDS analysis of sugarcane bagasse (SCB). Letters A, B, C, D, E and F refer to points (
Figure 8) where samples were taken for the EDS analysis.
Table 6.
Results of EDS analysis of sugarcane bagasse (SCB). Letters A, B, C, D, E and F refer to points (
Figure 8) where samples were taken for the EDS analysis.
Element | Mass Percentage (%) |
---|
A | B | C | D | E | F | Average Value |
---|
C | 48.70 | 46.85 | 48.32 | 48.43 | 48.52 | 48.71 | 48.25 ± 0.71 |
O | 47.21 | 47.65 | 48.11 | 47.69 | 48.20 | 48.29 | 47.85 ± 0.42 |
Zn | 0.67 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.50 | 0.71 ± 0.14 |
Mg | 0.28 | 0.33 | 0.32 | - | - | - | 0.31 ± 0.04 |
Si | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.49 | 0.22 | 0.36 ± 0.10 |
Cl | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.52 | - | 0.74 | 0.55 ± 0.11 |
K | - | 1.62 | 0.37 | - | - | 0.31 | 0.76 ± 0.72 |
Ca | 2.28 | 1.85 | 1.39 | 2.17 | 1.92 | 1.24 | 1.81 ± 0.42 |
Table 7.
Results of EDS analysis of the BC/SCB composite composed of 50% (
w/
w) bacterial cellulose plus 50% (
w/
w) sugarcane bagasse. Letters A, B, C, D, E and F refer to points (
Figure 9) where samples were taken for the EDS analysis.
Table 7.
Results of EDS analysis of the BC/SCB composite composed of 50% (
w/
w) bacterial cellulose plus 50% (
w/
w) sugarcane bagasse. Letters A, B, C, D, E and F refer to points (
Figure 9) where samples were taken for the EDS analysis.
Element | Mass Percentage (%) | |
---|
A | B | C | D | E | F | Average Value |
---|
C | 45.68 | 47.12 | 45.87 | 45.28 | 48.85 | 45.99 | 46.46 ± 1.32 |
O | 48.17 | 47.41 | 47.78 | 47.90 | 44.09 | 47.42 | 47.13 ± 1.52 |
Zn | 2.70 | 2.52 | 2.45 | 2.15 | 2.37 | 2.41 | 2.45 ± 0.18 |
Mg | - | - | - | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.22 ± 0.07 |
Al | - | - | - | 0.21 | 0.55 | - | 0.38 ± 0.24 |
Si | - | - | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.70 | 0.18 | 0.47 ± 0.22 |
Cl | 2.74 | 2.26 | 2.73 | 2.73 | 2.41 | 2.37 | 2.54 ± 0.22 |
K | - | - | - | - | - | 0.12 | 0.12 |
Ca | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 1.12 | 0.76 | 1.26 | 0.86 ± 0.27 |
Table 8.
Results of EDS analysis of the 0.7 BC/0.3 SCB composite composed of 70% (
w/
w) bacterial cellulose plus 30% (
w/
w) sugarcane bagasse. Letters A, B, C, D, E and F refer to points (
Figure 10) where samples were taken for the EDS analysis.
Table 8.
Results of EDS analysis of the 0.7 BC/0.3 SCB composite composed of 70% (
w/
w) bacterial cellulose plus 30% (
w/
w) sugarcane bagasse. Letters A, B, C, D, E and F refer to points (
Figure 10) where samples were taken for the EDS analysis.
Element | Mass Percentage (%) |
---|
A | B | C | D | E | F | Average Value |
---|
C | 46.69 | 46.60 | 46.24 | 60.52 | 40.80 | 46.87 | 48.12 ± 6.57 |
O | 46.63 | 47.42 | 46.63 | 33.81 | 46.15 | 46.80 | 44.57 ± 5.27 |
Zn | 2.65 | 2.78 | 2.63 | 1.75 | 2.45 | 2.65 | 2.48 ± 0.37 |
Al | - | - | - | 0.37 | 0.33 | - | 0.35 ± 0.03 |
Si | - | - | - | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.19 | 0.37 ± 0.16 |
Cl | 2.59 | 2.57 | 2.96 | 1.88 | 2.53 | 2.45 | 2.49 ± 0.35 |
Ca | 1.44 | 0.63 | 1.03 | 1.19 | 7.29 | 1.02 | 2.10 ± 2.52 |
Table 9.
Samples and respective flexibility. BC = Bacterial cellulose, SCB = Sugarcane bagasse, BC/SCB = 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, 0.7 BC/0.3 SCB = 70% (w/w) BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Table 9.
Samples and respective flexibility. BC = Bacterial cellulose, SCB = Sugarcane bagasse, BC/SCB = 50% (w/w) BC plus 50% (w/w) SCB, 0.7 BC/0.3 SCB = 70% (w/w) BC plus 30% (w/w) SCB.
Sample | Flexibility |
---|
BC | >100 |
SCB | 26 |
BC/SCB | >100 |
0.7 BC/0.3 SCB | >100 |