Next Article in Journal
Upscaling of Copper Slag-Based Geopolymer to 3D Printing Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Theoretical Design of Smart Bionic Skins with Self-Adaptive Temperature Regulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Restructuring the Basic Design of Several Accelerator-Based Concrete Mixes by Integrating Superplasticizers

1
Department of Physics and Chemistry, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, B-dul Muncii, nr. 14, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Subsidiary Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, INCDO-INOE2000, 67 Donath Street, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(22), 5582; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17225582
Submission received: 11 October 2024 / Revised: 8 November 2024 / Accepted: 12 November 2024 / Published: 15 November 2024

Abstract

:
The increasing demand for infrastructure, the need to consolidate aging structures, and the effects of climate change imply the replacement or improvement of traditional concrete. This study investigates three accelerators and their mixtures (Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, Al2(SO4)3·18H2O, and Na2S2O3·5H2O) (series I) and their counterparts with superplasticizers (Dynamon SR41) (series II) as additives in standard concrete to improve its functionality. The standard concrete and new concrete mixes were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), and tests for water absorption, bulk density, and compressive strength. XRD analysis showed that all concrete mixes had similar structures composed of quartz, portlandite, larnite, calcium silicate, ettringite, albite, and muscovite in varying proportions. Their microstructures, as shown by SEM images, revealed the presence of ettringite, portlandite, and C-S-H gel at high magnification (1–5 kx). The addition of the superplasticizer remodeled the surface of the concrete mix, reducing the pore radius and increasing its compaction. These changes helped to reduce its bulk density while increasing the compressive strength. The results showed that all the concrete mixtures are similar to the standard concrete and can replace it for better functionality, but Na2S2O3·5H2O with superplasticizer concrete mixture had the higher compressive strength, supplying additional benefits.

1. Introduction

The need to build new residential infrastructure and upgrade aging infrastructure has caused the global construction industry market to reach a value of USD 12.74 trillion in 2022 and is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.5% until 2028 [1,2]. The adverse effects of changing climatic conditions are pressuring the construction industry to reduce construction time by using high-performance, early-strength concrete instead of conventional concrete [3]. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) 2021 Annual Climate Report shows a worrying increase of 0.18 °C per decade since 1981 [4].
With an annual consumption of three tons of concrete for every person on the planet, concrete is currently the most used substance in the world after water [5]. In order to reduce the construction time, the concrete must achieve certain characteristics, such as maintaining workability during installation, hardening quickly, and maintaining the required ultimate strength capacity [6]. In addition to the basic components of concrete (cement, aggregates, and water), accelerators can be used to obtain high-performance, early-strength concrete, due to their ability to act as catalysts [7].
The various accelerators available nowadays can be classified according to their specific effects (setting and/or hardening) or chemical composition (chloride or non-chloride composition) [8]. Hardening accelerators (sodium, aluminum sulfates, etc.) are used to decrease the time required to reach rigidity from the plastic state and to provide the possibility of obtaining structures with appropriate layer thicknesses [9,10,11]. These accelerators can be used in additive manufacturing, a layer-by-layer material deposition technique that does not require a mold to hold up the newly added material, which severely limits the dimensional stability of the material [12,13]. Hardening accelerators (salt-based chlorine series, sulfate series, lower organic acid salt, triethanolamine, triisopropanolamine) have a significant influence on the workability of concrete [14], promoting early removal of the framework and shortening the curing and protection period [8]. Of the chloride-based accelerators, calcium chloride has been the most widely used accelerator in normal concrete due to its low cost and performance [8]. Other alkali chlorides (sodium and potassium chloride) are less effective than calcium chloride in accelerating the cement hydration time and shortening the technological cycle [15]. The acceleration efficiency of the non-chloride accelerators (nitrates, nitrites, thiocyanates, formates, and alkanolamines) varies in the following order: Ca2+ > Sr2+ > Ba2+ > Li+ > K+ > Na+ ≈ Cs+ > Rb+ (cations) and Cl ≈ Br > SCN > I > NO3 > ClO4 (anions), respectively [10]. Of the various ion combinations for the non-chloride accelerators, calcium nitrate is the most commonly used, as it can significantly decrease the setting time at low doses, especially when combined with other chemicals (sodium thiocyanate and/or triethanolamine) [16].
Superplasticizers are essential concrete components that significantly influence the performance of modern concrete, mainly due to their ability to improve the workability of concrete, reduce the negative effects of long mixing times, and allow for the production of highly durable structures with low environmental impact [17,18]. The main classes of superplasticizers are lignosulphonates, sulfonated melamine formaldehyde (SMF), sulfonated naphthalene formaldehyde (SNF), and polycarboxylic ether (PCE) [17]. In recent decades, there has been an increase in the number of newly developed superplasticizers with improved properties. In this regard, the acrylic polymer superplasticizers have been shown to provide higher slump with a lower rate of slump loss at the same water–cement ratio [19,20]. Dynamon SR41 is recommended for concrete with a low water–cement ratio. Its central role in concrete formation is to disperse the cement granules by promoting the slow development of the initial hydration [21,22].
Our previous study reported the preparation of some cement-based materials with white cement and accelerators (Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, Al2(SO4)3·18H2O, and Na2S2O3·5H2O) at different concentrations and their potential for use in 3D printing [23]. Considering that the durability of concrete is directly related to its constituent materials [24], this study takes a step forward by exploring the potential applications of these cement-based materials in the construction industry by incorporating them into concrete formulations using a new generation of superplasticizers. Superplasticizers are typically incorporated into concrete to achieve specific performance characteristics. In this study, the purpose of the superplasticizer was to maintain the basic properties of standard concrete while accelerating the curing process for faster setting. Specimens were prepared and tested by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), and tests for water absorption, bulk density, and compressive strength. Their structural and technical behavior was compared with control samples (base concrete or with the superplasticizer).
The novelty of this study lies in the development of new concrete mixes enhanced with both an accelerator and a superplasticizer to provide solutions that combine rapid setting with retained workability and strength. The accelerators were used to speed up curing for time-sensitive or cold-weather projects, while the superplasticizer was used to ensure fluidity without additional water, while maintaining the durability of the concrete. This approach is particularly beneficial for projects that require rapid construction and long-term structural integrity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

According to the manufacturer, the used Portland cement (CEM I 52.5R Holcim, Alesd, Romania), manufactured in Romania according to SR EN 197-1 [25], contains 95–100 wt.% clinker and 0–5 wt.% additional components, and consists of 63 wt.% tricalcium silicate (C3S), 18 wt.% dicalcium silicate (C2S), 10 wt.% tricalcium aluminate (C3A), and 1 wt.% tetracalcium iron aluminate (C4AF). The natural sand (0–0.4 mm) and coarse aggregate (8–16 mm) were purchased from a certified Romanian supplier and comply with SR EN 12620 + A1:2008 [26]. The water used for concrete preparation originates from the Romanian water supply system in Cluj-Napoca and complies with SR EN 1008:2003 regulations [27]. Dynamon SR41 (Mapei, Milan, Italy), an aqueous solution containing acrylic polymers (without formaldehyde), was used as a superplasticizer [28]. Adding a superplasticizer improves the workability and reduces mixing water of cement-based materials, thus ensuring longer workability times [21]. Analytical grade Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, Na2S2O3·5H2O, and Al2(SO4)3·18H2O were purchased from Merck (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).

2.2. Sample Preparation

Concrete samples were prepared using a water/cement ratio of 0.4 and various proportions of accelerators (Table 1). The accelerators and superplasticizers were diluted with distilled water and dispersed in a mixture of cement, natural sand, and aggregates. The amount of water was subtracted from the total amount. The mixtures were poured into 100 mm × 100 mm × 400 mm rectangular prism molds and cured in a humid environment for 1 day. Samples C (basic cement) and SC (basic cement with superplasticizer) were used as reference samples. Na2S2O3·5H2O, Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, and Al2(SO4)3·18H2O were added individually or in combination according to the recipe for C to obtain CCNa, CCa, CCaNa, C2CaNa as series I. Their counterparts SCNa, SCCa, SCCaNa, SC2CaNa, and SCCaNaAl were formulated with the same accelerator concentrations but with the addition of a superplasticizer as series II.

2.3. Characterization

The XRD patterns of the powder samples were recorded on a D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) using CuKα1 radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. Semi-quantitative evaluation was performed according to the Reference Intensity Ratio (RIR) method. The degree of crystallinity was calculated as the ratio among the area of the diffraction peaks and the sum of the areas of the diffraction peaks and amorphous halos. Scanning electron microscopy (VEGA3 SBU, Tescan, Brno-Kohoutovice, Czech Republic) with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (Quantax EDS, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) SEM/EDX at room temperature was used to obtain information about the surface, structural units, and elemental composition of the samples. Small samples (~1.5 mm) were coated with a 10 nm gold layer using a Leica EM ACE200 (LEICA, Wetzlar, Germany).
The water absorption test was performed according to ASTM C642–97 [29]. Briefly, the samples were immersed in water for 28 days and then dried at 105 °C for 24 h; dry mass (mu) was determined. Afterwards, the samples were immersed in water for 24 h, and after surface drying, the wet mass was determined (ms). The experiments were carried out in triplicate to ensure reproducibility. The percentage of water absorption was calculated according to Equation (1) [30]:
Wi = (ms − mu) × 100/ms
The apparent density was calculated using Equation (2) [31,32]:
ρa = m0/Vap
where m0 is the mass of the sample after curing and after the removal of excess water from its surface and Vap is the volume of the sample.
The compressive strength of the samples was measured using a UTCM-3742 15/250 kN Automatic Cement Flexure/Compression Testing Machine (Utest, Ankara, Turkey) on the 100 mm × 100 mm × 400 mm specimens. Three replicates were used for each concrete specimen.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. X-Ray Diffraction

The XRD patterns of the concrete specimens display similar crystalline phases, such as quartz (Q, 00-046-1045), portlandite (CH, 00-004-0733), larnite (C2S, 00-033-0302), calcium silicate (C3S, 00-055-0738), ettringite (E, 00-041-1451), albite (A, 00-009-0466), and muscovite (M, 00-058-2034) (Figure 1).
Comparing the diffraction patterns of series I with series II mixtures, it can be seen that the intensity of the diffraction peaks related to CH, C3S, and C2S are lower for the samples containing both accelerator and superplasticizer, with some of the peaks disappearing completely. In series II samples, the quartz content (derived from the natural sand used) shows an apparent increase. While the “real” amount of quartz in the concrete mixtures remains unchanged, this effect is due to the addition of the superplasticizer. The superplasticizers enhance the fluidity of the fresh concrete, remove air voids caused by the rapid setting of the accelerators, and reorganize the concrete mixture’s local microstructure. The effect of the superplasticizer on the microstructure is clearly visible in the SEM images [33,34]. The degree of crystallinity (DC) varies between 80.7% and 87.0% for series I and between 83.4% and 88.3% for series II, with a slight increase being noticed for the samples containing superplasticizers (Figure 2). The only exception can be observed in SCCaNa, where the high quartz content does not appear to be correlated with the DC.
Albite, a framework silicate, is typically found in mineral aggregates used in concrete [35]. Its presence in addition to quartz creates a strong topographic microroughness that influences the adhesion efficiency between the aggregate and the cement paste in hardened concrete, thereby increasing the strength of the concrete [36]. The highest albite content in series I is present in the case of the CCa, CCaNa, and CCaNaAl samples. The addition of the superplasticizer to the concrete samples promotes the formation of the albite crystalline phase in the basic concrete SC and SCCa, while its introduction decreases the albite content in the other samples. The decrease in albite in SCCaNa may also be a reason for the decrease in the degree of crystallinity. Ettringite, an essential constituent of concrete, plays an important role in regulating the setting process [37]. This is because ettringite crystals bind a higher amount of water than other hydrates, facilitating the rapid internal drying of the concrete [38]. Except for CCaNaAl and its counterpart with the superplasticizer, the concentration of ettringite is higher in series I concretes indicating a faster setting time than in the case of series II concretes. Portlandite, which was observed in all concrete mixtures, has a different behavior. Its concentration decreases in all samples except in SCCa and SC2CaNa, where it increases, and in SCCaNaAl where it has a similar value. Both increases and decreases in the amount of portlandite can benefit the concrete. A lower amount of portlandite indicates a lower reactivity of the concrete, increasing the resistance to sulfate attack, while a higher amount helps to maintain a strongly alkaline pH, which is beneficial for the passivation of steel reinforcement [39]. The higher amount of portlandite observed in the C and CNa mixtures indicates the potential for a further increase in the compressive strength over time as a result of the pozzolanic reaction [40]. C3S and C2S are two of the main phases of cement [38]; C3S has a significant effect on the setting time and early strength of concrete, while C2S develops strength after four weeks [41].
Figure 3 shows a similar behavior of C3S and C2S; their values are higher for series I compared to series II concretes, suggesting that the series I concretes manifest faster setting time and early strength than their counterparts with the superplasticizer. An exception can be observed in the case of the samples containing all three accelerators SCaNaAl, where the addition of the accelerators increases the C3S and C2S units.

3.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (SEM-EDX)

The microstructure of the designed concrete specimens was examined through SEM-EDX imaging at magnifications of 200–400× (Figure 4) and 1–5 kx (Figure 5). All series I concretes, except for CNa, have porous surfaces characterized by randomly distributed conglomerates corresponding to C-S-H and well-defined structures corresponding to CH. CNa displays a more compact surface that is slightly porous, with pores randomly distributed on the surface. Their surface becomes more compact with no discernible structures corresponding to CH for series II concretes.
Figure 5 shows SEM-EDX images of series I and II concrete specimens at 1–5 kx magnification. Series I concretes show well-defined structures corresponding to CH, C-S-H, and ettringite. Portlandite appears as large hexagonal crystals integrated into the cement surface, while ettringite appears as rod-shaped crystals embedded in the air voids of the hardened concretes [42]. Series II concretes display more compact structures where ettringite can be observed only for SCNa while CH can be observed only for SCNa and SCCaNaAl. It is known that ettringite formation in void spaces generates stresses that lead to cracking or damage in concrete [39]. However, the addition of superplasticizers has been shown to reduce or eliminate ettringite in the local microstructure, highlighting the beneficial effect of superplasticizers in improving the durability of concrete specimens under challenging conditions.
SEM images at 1–5 kx magnification of both series I and II were used to measure the porosity of the concrete specimens. The pore radius values are shown in Figure 6. The pore system is divided into four categories: (1) gel pores (0.5–10 nm); (2) capillary pores (5–5000 nm); (3) macropores; and (4) shrinkage cracks (>5 μm) [43]. According to the obtained data, in series I, C and C2CaNa present macropores and shrinkage cracks; CCa, CCaNa, and CCaNaAl present capillary pores and macropores and shrinkage cracks; and CNa presents only capillary pores. For series II, the pore radius is reduced significantly except for SCCaNaAl where it increases. For SC and SCCaNa, they cannot be observed at the working magnification; for SCCa, SCNa, and SC2CaNa, they are reduced to capillary pores. It can be concluded that the addition of the superplasticizer reduces the pore radius resulting in more compact samples. The reduction in pore radius is associated with a decrease in ettringite, as observed in the XRD analysis. SCCaNaAl, the only concrete mixture that shows an increase in pore radius compared to its counterpart, is also the only mixture with a superplasticizer that shows an increase in ettringite content in the XRD results.
Figure 7 shows the map of identified elements from the surface of the concrete specimens in “false” colors, revealing their spatial distribution. The identified elements and their concentrations are presented in Table 2. The elemental mapping of the basic concrete specimen C shows a uniform distribution of all elements over the surface. However, two regions located on the lateral sides of the samples show only Si and O, indicating the presence of SiO2 in these areas. The maps of the series I concretes display the distribution of all identified elements across the entire surface of the samples. A single exception can be noted in the case of CCaNaAl, where a central region exhibits the presence of Si, Al, and Na, which can be an indicator of the presence of albite (NaAlSi3O8) in this specific area. The elemental mapping of the basic concrete specimen with superplasticizer SC reveals a surface divided into two parts: the right part, where all elements are present, and the left side, where Ca is completely absent. This discrepancy suggests the possible presence of albite in this specific area. The data obtained can be correlated with the XRD data, which show a significant increase in albite in the SC sample. Similar behavior can be observed in the SCNa concrete specimens, although the area where albite is visible is relatively smaller. The elemental map of SCCa reveals the presence of only three elements: Ca, Si, and O, and their distribution on the surface suggests the presence of SiO2, portlandite, and calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H). These results are in good agreement with the XRD results, which confirm the increase of quartz and portlandite with the addition of the superplasticizer, along with the decrease in the rest of the remaining identified crystalline phases. In the elemental map of the SCCaNa, SC2CaNa, and SCCaNaAl concrete specimens, various potential phases are displayed, combining the information obtained from SCNa and SCCa.
The elemental determination of the concrete specimen surfaces allows for the calculation of the Ca/Si and Ca/(Si + Al) ratios. The Ca/Si values for basic concrete C and the concrete specimens with accelerators range from 4.43 to 7.86, while Ca/(Si + Al) ranges from 3.33 to 6.20. It is known that C3S, the main constituent of cement hydrates, leads to the formation of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) and portlandite (CH) [44]. The Ca/Si ratio of C-S-H ranges from 1.2 to 2.3, while Ca/(Si + Al) ranges from 0.7 to 2.4 [45]. The results obtained for series I concretes indicate the presence of other Ca-based compounds, mainly CH, as confirmed by the XRD diffraction patterns. The Ca/Si ratio for SC exhibits the lowest value among all concrete specimens (0.45), which is lower than the minimum values of Ca/Si obtained for C-S-H. As shown by the elemental map analysis and confirmed by the XRD diffraction patterns, SC has a significant amount of Si, probably in the form of quartz. Its presence would affect the result of the calculated ratios, possibly resulting in values below the thresholds for C-S-H. For SCCa and SCNa, the values obtained exceed the C-S-H threshold but fall below those of their counterparts with accelerators. The values obtained for SCCaNa, SC2CaNa, and SCCaNaAl are lower than those of their counterparts with accelerators and fall within the range of C-S-H values, suggesting the possible presence of Ca in this form in these concrete specimens. These results can be corroborated with the decrease in CH observed in the XRD.
Several studies have suggested an association between a low Ca/Si ratio and increased compressive strength [46]. In this study, the only notable correlation is that the Ca/Si ratio is lower in series II than in series I, consistent with similar trends in compressive strength.

3.3. Water Absorption and Apparent Density

Figure 8 and Table 3 show the water absorption and apparent density of the concrete samples. The addition of a superplasticizer reduces the permeability of the samples, indicating an increase in their density. The lowest water absorption value for series I was obtained for CNa and, respectively, SCNa for series II, suggesting a more compact structure, while the highest value was obtained for CCaNaAl and SCCaNaAl, indicating a more permeable structure [47]. These results are consistent with the pore radius measurements obtained from the SEM images, further validating the observed results.

3.4. Compressive Strength

Table 4 shows the compressive strength of the concrete specimens tested. The highest value was obtained for basic concrete, while the specimens containing superplasticizers (series I) exhibit higher values than those with accelerators only (series II).
Superplasticizers are used in practice to improve the workability of concrete, without compromising the strength [48]. The highest average value was obtained for the samples containing Na2S2O3·5H2O (SCNa), while the lowest value was obtained for the concretes containing all three accelerators (CCaNaAl). The difference in compressive strength is attributed to the ability of the accelerators and superplasticizer to first increase the fluidity and workability of the concrete mixtures, then to form a C-S-H gel, and to decrease the pore radius. This process leads to the partial elimination of ettringite which fills the pores and help to compact the concrete mixture, thus reducing permeability. Moreover, Na2S2O3·5H2O is the most suitable choice as an accelerator due to the formation of albite which can improve the compressive strength of the sample and its ability to homogenize the surface of the sample by reducing the pore radius, reducing the permeability of the concrete and increasing its compressive strength (one of the most important properties of hardened concrete).

4. Conclusions

The aim of this study was to obtain a series of concrete mixtures with similar characteristics to standard concrete but with improved setting time while maintaining workability and strength. The concrete mixtures studied consisted of (I) single or mixed accelerator (Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, Al2(SO4)3·18H2O, and Na2S2O3·5H2O) mixtures and (II) similar mixtures with a superplasticizer (Dynamon SR41). XRD analysis confirmed the presence of quartz, portlandite, larnite, calcium silicate, ettringite, albite, and muscovite in all samples. The addition of the superplasticizer increased the concentration of quartz, indicating an increase in the density of the concretes; the high concentrations of C3S and C2S in both series suggested that the addition of the superplasticizer decreased the setting time and early strength of the concrete specimens, except for SCaNaAl. High magnification (1–5 kx) SEM images revealed portlandite and ettringite crystals and C-S-H gel in all the concrete specimens of series I, but only in the SCNa mixture of series II. Measurement of pore radii showed that the addition of the superplasticizer significantly reduced the pore size except for the sample containing all three accelerators. The elemental EDX map revealed the elemental distribution on the surface of the concrete specimens. The Ca/Si ratio decreases for the concrete mixtures with the superplasticizer, which can be correlated with the increase in compressive strength in series II concretes compared to their similar counterparts in series I. Water distribution, apparent density, and compressive strength tests showed that the best results were obtained in the concrete specimens containing Na2S2O3·5H2O (SNa). The economical, time-saving, and durable accelerator-based concrete mixes containing superplasticizers can be potential candidates for use in the construction industry for faster and more durable infrastructure.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.F.S. and D.S.; methodology, A.F.S., D.S., O.C. and A.B.; software, A.F.S., D.S., O.C. and A.B.; formal analysis, A.F.S., D.S., O.C. and A.B.; investigation, A.F.S., D.S., O.C. and A.B.; data curation, A.F.S., D.S., O.C. and A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.F.S., D.S., O.C. and A.B.; writing—review and editing, D.S. and O.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization through Program 1—Development of the national research and development system, Subprogram 1.2—Institutional performance—Projects that finance the RDI excellence, Contract no. 18PFE/30.12.2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Global Construction Market Report 2023–2028: Increasing Demand for Luxury Homes Bolsters Growth. Available online: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2023/05/22/2673071/28124/en/Global-Construction-Market-Report-2023-2028-Increasing-Demand-for-Luxury-Homes-Bolsters-Growth.html (accessed on 30 August 2023).
  2. Global Construction Market Report and Forecast 2023–2028. Available online: https://www.expertmarketresearch.com/reports/construction-market (accessed on 30 August 2023).
  3. Oruc, S.; Dikbas, H.A.; Gumus, B.; Yucel, I. The Impact of Climate Change on Construction Activity Performance. Buildings 2024, 14, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Climate Change: Global Temperature. Available online: http://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-temperature (accessed on 2 September 2023).
  5. Gagg, C.R. Cement and Concrete as an Engineering Material: An Historic Appraisal and Case Study Analysis. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2014, 40, 114–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tu, H.; Wei, Z.; Bahrami, A.; Kahla, N.B.; Ahmad, A.; Özkılıç, Y.O. Recent Advancements and Future Trends in 3D Concrete Printing Using Waste Materials. Dev. Built Environ. 2023, 16, 100187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lindh, P.; Lemenkova, P. Hardening Accelerators (X-Seed 100 BASF, PCC, LKD and SALT) as Strength-Enhancing Admixture Solutions for Soil Stabilization. Slovak J. Civ. Eng. 2023, 31, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.; Lei, L.; Liu, J.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Shi, C. Accelerators for Normal Concrete: A Critical Review on Hydration, Microstructure and Properties of Cement-Based Materials. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2022, 134, 104762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zeng, L.; Zhao, S.; Wang, W.; Qiao, M.; Hong, J.; Ran, Q.; Wang, Y. Accelerated Early Age Hydration of Cement Pastes Blended with Sulphoaluminate Expansive Agent. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 2021, 19, 655–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Salvador, R.P.; Cavalaro, S.H.P.; Segura, I.; Figueiredo, A.D.; Pérez, J. Early Age Hydration of Cement Pastes with Alkaline and Alkali-Free Accelerators for Sprayed Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 111, 386–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dorn, T.; Hirsch, T.; Stephan, D. Working Mechanism of Calcium Nitrate as an Accelerator for Portland Cement Hydration. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 106, 752–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rehman, A.U.; Kim, J.-H. 3D Concrete Printing: A Systematic Review of Rheology, Mix Designs, Mechanical, Microstructural, and Durability Characteristics. Materials 2021, 14, 3800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ngo, T.D.; Kashani, A.; Imbalzano, G.; Nguyen, K.T.; Hui, D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 143, 172–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pan, W.; Ding, Z.; Chen, Y. Effects of TEA·HCl Hardening Accelerator on the Workability of Cement-Based Materials. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 182, 012046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dorn, T.; Blask, O.; Stephan, D. Acceleration of Cement Hydration—A Review of the Working Mechanisms, Effects on Setting Time, and Compressive Strength Development of Accelerating Admixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 323, 126554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khan, J.; G, S.K. Influence of Binary Antifreeze Admixtures on Strength Performance of Concrete under Cold Weather Conditions. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 34, 102055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shah, S.N.R.; Aslam, M.; Shah, S.A.; Oad, R. Behaviour of Normal Concrete using Superplasticizer under Different Curing Regimes. Pak. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2014, 15, 87–94. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kujawa, W.; Olewnik-Kruszkowska, E.; Nowaczyk, J. Concrete Strengthening by Introducing Polymer-Based Additives into the Cement Matrix—A Mini Review. Materials 2021, 14, 6071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Coppola, L.; Erali, E.; Troli, R.; Collepardi, M. Blending of Acrylic Superplasticizer with Napthalene, Melmine or Lignosulfonate-Based Polymers, International ConferenceAmerican Concrete Institute. 1997. Available online: https://trid.trb.org/View/475540 (accessed on 3 April 2024).
  20. Flatt, R.J.; Roussel, N.; Cheeseman, C.R. Concrete: An Eco Material That Needs to Be Improved. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 32, 2787–2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. “DYNAMON SR41,” Romania. Available online: https://www.mapei.com/ro/ro/ultralite/dynamon-sr4 (accessed on 3 April 2024).
  22. Scurtu, D.A.; David, L.; Levei, E.A.; Simedru, D.; Filip, X.; Roman, C.; Cadar, O. Developing Innovative Cement Composites Containing Vine Shoot Waste and Superplasticizers. Materials 2023, 16, 5313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Simedru, A.F.; Becze, A.; Cadar, O.; Scurtu, D.A.; Simedru, D.; Ardelean, I. Structural Characterization of Several Cement-Based Materials Containing Chemical Additives with Potential Application in Additive Manufacturing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tunc, E.T. Strength and durability of superplasticizer concrete based on different component parameters: An experimental and statistical study. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. SEN 197; Standard Cement-Part 1: Composition, Specification, and Conformity Criteria Common Cements. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2011.
  26. SR EN 12620+A1:2008; Agregate Pentru Beton. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2008.
  27. SR EN 1008:2003; Apa de Preparare Pentru Beton. Specificaţii Pentru Prelevare, Incercare şi Evaluare a Aptitudinii de Utilizare a Apei, Inclusiv a Apelor Recuperate din Procese ale Industriei de Beton, ca Apă de Preparare Pentru Beton. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2003.
  28. SR EN 934-2:2003; Admixtures for Concrete, Mortar and Grout. Part 2: Concrete Admixtures—Definitions, Requirements, Conformity, Marking and Labelling. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2003.
  29. ASTM C 642-82; Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption and Voids in Hardened Concrete. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. American Society for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1995.
  30. Golewski, G.L. Assessing of Water Absorption on Concrete Composites Containing Fly Ash up to 30% in Regards to Structures Completely Immersed in Water. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023, 19, e02337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nicula, L.M.; Corbu, O.; Iliescu, M. Influence of Blast Furnace Slag on the Durability Characteristic of Road Concrete Such as Freeze-Thaw Resistance. Procedia Manuf. 2020, 46, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. SR EN 12390-7:2019; Încercări pe Beton Întărit. Partea 7: Densitatea Betonului Întărit. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2019.
  33. Pereira, P.; Evangelista, L.; De Brito, J. The Effect of Superplasticizers on the Mechanical Performance of Concrete Made with Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregates. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2012, 34, 1044–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alsadey, S.; Omran, A. Effect of Superplasticizers to Enhance the Properties of Concrete. Des. Constr. Maint. 2022, 2, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hsiao, Y.-H.; La Plante, E.C.; Krishnan, N.M.A.; Pape, Y.L.; Neithalath, N.; Bauchy, M.; Sant, G. Effects of Irradiation on Albite’s Chemical Durability. J. Phys. Chem. A 2017, 121, 7835–7845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Petrounias, P.; Giannakopoulou, P.; Rogkala, A.; Stamatis, P.; Lampropoulou, P.; Tsikouras, B.; Hatzipanagiotou, K. The Effect of Petrographic Characteristics and Physico-Mechanical Properties of Aggregates on the Quality of Concrete. Minerals 2018, 8, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ideker, J.H.; Scrivener, K.L.; Fryda, H.; Touzo, B. Calcium Aluminate Cements; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 537–584. [Google Scholar]
  38. SciELO—Brazil—XRD Investigation of Cement Pastes Incorporating Concrete Floor Polishing Waste XRD Investigation of Cement Pastes Incorporating Concrete Floor Polishing Waste. Available online: https://www.scielo.br/j/ce/a/ChdzshMRqcJdyHm53kgPmLS/?lang=en (accessed on 7 April 2024).
  39. Pospisil, K.; Frybort, A.; Kratochvil, A.; Machackova, J. Scanning Electron Microscopy Method as a Tool for the Evaluation of Selected Materials Microstructure. Trans. Transp. Sci. 2008, 1, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Von Werder, J.; Simon, S.; Gardei, A.; Fontana, P.; Meng, B. Thermal and Hydrothermal Treatment of UHPC: Influence of the Process Parameters on the Phase Composition of Ultra-High Performance Concrete. Mater. Struct. 2021, 54, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Goñi, S.; Puertas, F.; Hernández, M.S.; Palacios, M.; Guerrero, A.; Dolado, J.S.; Zanga, B.; Baroni, F. Quantitative Study of Hydration of C3S and C2S by Thermal Analysis. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2010, 102, 965–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yuan, Q.; Liu, Z.; Zheng, K.; Ma, C. Inorganic Cementing Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 17–57. [Google Scholar]
  43. Imtiaz, T.; Ahmed, A.; Hossain, S.; Faysal, M. Microstructure Analysis and Strength Characterization of Recycled Base and Sub-Base Materials Using Scanning Electron Microscope. Infrastructures 2020, 5, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cuesta, A.; Santacruz, I.; De La Torre, A.G.; Dapiaggi, M.; Zea-Garcia, J.D.; Aranda, M.A.G. Local Structure and Ca/Si Ratio in C-S-H Gels from Hydration of Blends of Tricalcium Silicate and Silica Fume. Cem. Concr. Res. 2021, 143, 106405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Richardson, I.G. The Nature of C-S-H in Hardened Cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 1999, 29, 1131–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Imtiaz, L.; Rehman, S.K.U.; Ali Memon, S.; Khizar Khan, M.; Faisal Javed, M. A Review of Recent Developments and Advances in Eco-Friendly Geopolymer Concrete. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Azmi, N.B.; Khalid, F.S.; Irwan, J.M.; Mazenan, P.N.; Zahir, Z.; Shahidan, S. Performance of Composite Sand Cement Brick Containing Recycle Concrete Aggregate and Waste Polyethylene Terephthalate with Different Mix Design Ratio. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 140, 012129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dvorkin, L.; Zhitkovsky, V.; Makarenko, R.; Ribakov, Y. The Influence of Polymer Superplasticizers on Properties of High-Strength Concrete Based on Low-Clinker Slag Portland Cement. Materials 2023, 16, 2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD diffraction patterns of the investigated concrete specimens: concrete with accelerator (black line) and concrete with accelerator and superplasticizer (red line).
Figure 1. XRD diffraction patterns of the investigated concrete specimens: concrete with accelerator (black line) and concrete with accelerator and superplasticizer (red line).
Materials 17 05582 g001
Figure 2. Differences in the content of crystalline phases between series I and series II concrete specimens: (a) C vs. SC; (b) CNa vs. SCNa; (c) CCa vs. SCCa; (d) CCaNa vs. SCCaNa; (e) C2CaNa vs. SC2CaNa and (f) CCaNaAl vs. SCCaNaAl.
Figure 2. Differences in the content of crystalline phases between series I and series II concrete specimens: (a) C vs. SC; (b) CNa vs. SCNa; (c) CCa vs. SCCa; (d) CCaNa vs. SCCaNa; (e) C2CaNa vs. SC2CaNa and (f) CCaNaAl vs. SCCaNaAl.
Materials 17 05582 g002
Figure 3. Evolution of C3S and C2S crystalline phases for series I and II concrete specimens.
Figure 3. Evolution of C3S and C2S crystalline phases for series I and II concrete specimens.
Materials 17 05582 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of series I and II concrete specimens at 200–400× magnification.
Figure 4. SEM images of series I and II concrete specimens at 200–400× magnification.
Materials 17 05582 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of series I and series II concrete specimens at 1–5 kx magnification.
Figure 5. SEM images of series I and series II concrete specimens at 1–5 kx magnification.
Materials 17 05582 g005
Figure 6. The radius of air voids in series I and II concrete specimens.
Figure 6. The radius of air voids in series I and II concrete specimens.
Materials 17 05582 g006
Figure 7. Elemental map of concrete specimens presented in “false colors”. Processing parameters are: Mag 300–350×; HV = 10 KV; WD = 15 mm.
Figure 7. Elemental map of concrete specimens presented in “false colors”. Processing parameters are: Mag 300–350×; HV = 10 KV; WD = 15 mm.
Materials 17 05582 g007
Figure 8. Apparent density and water absorption test results for investigated concrete specimens.
Figure 8. Apparent density and water absorption test results for investigated concrete specimens.
Materials 17 05582 g008
Table 1. Mixing proportions of the concrete mixes.
Table 1. Mixing proportions of the concrete mixes.
SamplePortland
Cement
CEM I–52.5R
(g)
Natural Sand
(0–0.4 mm)
(g)
Coarse Aggregate
(8–16 mm)
(g)
Superplasticizer
Dynamon SR41
(mL)
Accelerator
Ca(NO3)2·4H2O
(g)
Na2S2O3·5H2O
(g)
Al2(SO4)3·18H2O
(g)
Series I
C300537.871680.067----
CNa250448.226566.722--11.772-
CCa250448.226566.722-10.793--
CCaNa250448.226566.722-5.3965.886-
C2CaNa250448.226566.722-7.1953.924-
CCaNaAl250448.226566.722-4.8693.5973.924
Series II
SC300537.871680.0673.0---
SCNa250448.226566.7222.5-11.772-
SCCa250448.226566.7222.510.793--
SCCaNa250448.226566.7222.55.3965.886-
SC2CaNa250448.226566.7222.57.1953.924-
SCCaNaAl250448.226566.7222.54.8693.5973.924
Table 2. Surface elemental composition of the investigated concrete specimens.
Table 2. Surface elemental composition of the investigated concrete specimens.
SampleElement (%)Ratio
OSiCaNaAlSCa/SiCa/(Si + Al)
C55.555.8337.40-1.22-6.425.30
SC56.3528.7412.790.421.170.530.450.43
CNa53.106.5435.451.371.771.775.424.27
SCNa39.938.2640.860.841.491.944.954.19
CCa54.615.4338.35-1.61-7.065.45
SCCa54.865.4938.00-1.66-6.925.31
CCaNa50.815.2641.341.181.41-7.866.20
SCCaNa52.8419.9423.090.971.841.311.161.06
C2CaNa52.516.2838.490.811.91-6.134.70
SC2CaNa49.8015.3329.270.723.541.341.911.55
CCaNaAl53.897.7534.301.492.56-4.433.33
SCCaNaAl50.0814.3528.931.022.782.842.021.69
Table 3. Apparent density and water absorption test results for investigated concrete specimens.
Table 3. Apparent density and water absorption test results for investigated concrete specimens.
CCNaCCaCCaNaC2CaNaCCaNaAl
ρa (g/cm3)2.072.062.052.072.052.07
Wi (%)4.184.004.254.554.554.73
SCSCNaSCCaSCCaNaSC2CaNaSCCaNaAl
ρa (g/cm3)2.242.232.222.242.252.20
Wi (%)2.642.532.732.723.313.50
Table 4. Compressive strength results for the investigated concrete specimens based on three replicates; standard deviation values are given in brackets.
Table 4. Compressive strength results for the investigated concrete specimens based on three replicates; standard deviation values are given in brackets.
CCNaCCaCCaNaC2CaNaCCaNaAl
ρ (N/mm2)18.73 (1.30)19.34 (1.33)18.75 (1.31)17.60 (1.23)17.01 (1.18)14.47 (1.03)
SCSCNaSCCaSCCaNaSC2CaNaSCCaNaAl
ρ (N/mm2)20.93 (1.45)21.35 (1.48)19.48 (1.36)19.33 (1.27)17.66 (1.20)15.67 (1.11)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Simedru, A.F.; Cadar, O.; Becze, A.; Simedru, D. Restructuring the Basic Design of Several Accelerator-Based Concrete Mixes by Integrating Superplasticizers. Materials 2024, 17, 5582. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17225582

AMA Style

Simedru AF, Cadar O, Becze A, Simedru D. Restructuring the Basic Design of Several Accelerator-Based Concrete Mixes by Integrating Superplasticizers. Materials. 2024; 17(22):5582. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17225582

Chicago/Turabian Style

Simedru, Alexandru Florin, Oana Cadar, Anca Becze, and Dorina Simedru. 2024. "Restructuring the Basic Design of Several Accelerator-Based Concrete Mixes by Integrating Superplasticizers" Materials 17, no. 22: 5582. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17225582

APA Style

Simedru, A. F., Cadar, O., Becze, A., & Simedru, D. (2024). Restructuring the Basic Design of Several Accelerator-Based Concrete Mixes by Integrating Superplasticizers. Materials, 17(22), 5582. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17225582

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop