Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Printing Orientation Influence of Composite Resin for 3D Printing Compared to Conventional Resin
Previous Article in Journal
Incorporating Wastewater Sludge as a Cement Alternative in Repair Mortar: An Experimental Study of Material Properties
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 17
Issue 22
10.3390/ma17225627
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nanocrystalline/Amorphous Tuning of Al–Fe–Nb (Mn) Alloy Powders Produced via High-Energy Ball Milling

by
Nguyen Thi Hoang Oanh
,
Dao Truong An
and
Nguyen Hoang Viet
*
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(22), 5627; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17225627
Submission received: 31 October 2024 / Revised: 13 November 2024 / Accepted: 16 November 2024 / Published: 18 November 2024
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The demand for advanced Al-based alloys with tailored structural and magnetic properties has intensified for applications requiring a high thermal stability and performance under challenging conditions. This study investigated the phase evolution, magnetic properties, thermal stability, and microstructural changes in the Al-based alloys Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2, synthesized via mechanical alloying (MA), using stearic acid as a process control agent. The X-ray diffraction results indicated that Al82Fe16Nb2 achieved a β-phase solid solution with 13–14 nm crystallite sizes after 5 h of milling, reaching an amorphous state after 10 h. In contrast, Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 formed a partially amorphous structure within 10 h, with enhanced stability with additional milling. Magnetic measurements indicated that both alloys possessed soft magnetic behavior under shorter milling times (1–5 h) and transitioned to hard magnetic behavior as amorphization progressed. This phenomenon was associated with a decrease in saturation magnetization (Ms) and an increase in coercivity (Hc) due to structural disorder and residual stresses. Thermal stability analyses on 10 h milled samples conducted via differential scanning calorimetry showed exothermic peaks between 300 and 800 °C, corresponding to phase transformations upon heating. Post-annealing analyses at 550 °C demonstrated the presence of phases including Al, β-phase solid solutions, Al₁3Fe₄, and residual amorphous regions. At 600 °C, the Al3Nb phase emerged as the β-phase, and the amorphous content decreased, while annealing at 700 °C fully decomposed the amorphous phases into stable crystalline forms. Microstructural analyses demonstrated a consistent reduction in and homogenization of particle sizes, with particles decreasing to 1–3 μm in diameter after 10 h. Altogether, these findings highlight MA’s effectiveness in tuning the microstructure and magnetic properties of Al–Fe–Nb (Mn) alloys, making these materials suitable for applications requiring a high thermal stability and tailored magnetic responses.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, the rapid development of advanced materials has highlighted the need for novel structural and functional materials, which has become a core area of study in materials science [1,2]. Aluminum–transition metal (Al–TM) alloys have become increasingly significant in this field due to their outstanding properties, such as a high strength-to-weight ratio, superior corrosion resistance, and impressive thermal stability at elevated temperatures in challenging environments, including oxidizing, carburizing, and sulfidizing conditions [3,4]. These advantageous qualities make Al–TM alloys ideal for applications across diverse manufacturing sectors, including the automotive, aerospace, and electronics industries. Among these, Al–Fe–Nb and Al–Fe–Nb (Mn) alloys are particularly compelling to researchers, not only for their corrosion resistance in harsh environments but also for their enhanced mechanical strength. This improvement is achieved by tailoring the nanostructures to include specific combinations of nanocomposites, and amorphous and nanocrystalline phases. Nevertheless, a significant challenge remains in designing and controlling these nanostructures to optimize their properties, which currently limits broader technological applications. Advancing methods for nanocrystalline/amorphous tuning will be essential to fully realize the potential of these alloys in industrial settings [2,4,5,6,7,8].
Within these Al-based systems, the addition of niobium (Nb) plays a significant role in enhancing the microstructure and stability of the alloy. While Nb and Al share similar atomic radii (both are approximately 143 pm), Nb contributes to alloy stability not via size-induced lattice strain but through its high melting point, chemical stability, and limited solubility in aluminum [9,10]. The presence of Nb often promotes the formation of finely dispersed second-phase particles within the aluminum matrix. These particles then act as obstacles to grain boundary movement and dislocation motion, thereby improving mechanical strength and thermal stability [7,11,12,13]. Moreover, Nb encourages the formation of stable intermetallic compounds such as Al3Nb, which are known to enhance high-temperature performance and oxidation resistance [13,14,15]. These properties make Nb an ideal alloying element for applications requiring prolonged thermal stability.
One of the most effective methods for fabricating these materials is the mechanical alloying (MA) method. MA is an advanced material handling technique that combines mechanical and chemical processes to create materials with unique structures and compositions. In the MA process, heavy plastic deformation, fracturing, and the cold welding of powders enhance atomic diffusion and induce the formation of the nanocrystalline/amorphous phase [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. The accumulation of deformation energy and lattice defects increases the free energy of the crystalline phases and thus destabilizes them relative to the amorphous state. This process usually occurs in systems with large negative mixing enthalpy, as is the case with many Al–TM alloys. According to research by Suryanarayana et al. [18], the Al–Zr system has a negative mixed enthalpy of -44 kJ/mol, which facilitates the formation of amorphous structures. Notably, MA can produce an amorphous structure under a lower concentration of alloy elements than traditional rapid-casting methods, expanding the range of components that can achieve an amorphous structure.
In this study, we explore the structural evolution, phase transitions, magnetic characteristics, and thermal stability of nanocrystalline and amorphous Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloys produced via mechanical alloying. Detailed analyses of these alloys, including their microstructural transformations and property enhancements, provide insights into the mechanisms underlying phase stability and alloy performance in demanding applications.

2. Materials and Methods

Elemental powders of aluminum (Al), iron (Fe), niobium (Nb), and manganese (Mn) (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK), each with a purity of 99.9% and an average particle size of less than 45 μm, were used for MA alloy synthesis. The surface morphology of the elemental powders is shown in Figure 1. The target compositions for this study were Al84Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2. Mixing and alloying were carried out in a high-energy planetary ball mill (AGO-II type) utilizing sealed hardened steel vials and tungsten carbide (WC) balls to prevent contamination. The milling process was conducted in an argon atmosphere to minimize oxidation, using a milling rotation speed of 350 rpm with a ball-to-powder weight ratio of 20:1 and milling times of 1, 2, 5, and 10 h. To prevent powder adherence to the milling tools (ball, powder, and vial wall), 3 wt.% stearic acid was added as a process control agent.
The thermal behavior of the resulting powders was analyzed using a Setaram Labsys Evo S60/58988 Differential Thermal Analyzer via differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at a heating rate of 20 K/min, allowing us to observe changes in thermal properties with temperature. Based on the DSC results, the as-milled powders were annealed in quartz tubes under a controlled argon atmosphere to maintain an inert environment and prevent oxidation. Annealing was performed at temperatures of 550 °C, 600 °C, and 700 °C, with an argon gas flow rate of 70 mL/min. Heating was controlled at a rate of 10 K/min up to the target temperatures, with the samples held for durations of 15 min to achieve uniform heat treatment. After annealing, the furnace was allowed to cool naturally under continuous argon flow.
The phase composition of the powders was characterized using an X’Pert PRO diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation and scanned over an angular range of 20° ≤ 2θ ≤ 100°. The phases present in the alloy samples were identified using the MDI Jade 6.5 software, providing detailed phase analysis and insight into the structural evolution of the alloy compositions following MA and heat treatment.
The morphology and elemental composition of the as-milled and annealed powders were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). SEM/EDS analyses were conducted at various magnifications to observe the particle shapes and morphology in the alloy powders. EDS was used for elemental analysis to identify the distribution and relative concentrations of alloying elements within individual particles.
The magnetic properties of the samples were evaluated using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). Measurements were performed at room temperature, 298 K, with a magnetic field strength of up to ±10 kOe to assess magnetic characteristics such as coercivity (Hc), saturation magnetization (Ms), and remanence (Mr). These magnetic measurements provided insights into the structural and compositional effects on the magnetic properties of the nanocrystalline and amorphous phases induced by mechanical alloying and subsequent annealing.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 presents the XRD patterns of the Al–Fe–Nb and Al–Fe–Nb–Mn mixed powders before milling, where the diffraction peaks represent pure elemental Al, Fe, Nb, and Mn. The diffraction angles (2 theta) and intensities matched the standard reference cards of Al (PDF #04-0787), Fe (PDF #06-0696), Mn (PDF #33-0887), and Nb (PDF #34-0370). The XRD patterns of Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloy powders milled at different times are presented in Figure 3 (1, 2, 5, and 10 h). After 1 h of milling, the diffraction peaks still indicated the presence of pure metals in both alloys. With an increase in the milling time to 2 h, the intensity of the diffraction peaks of pure elements decreased, and the width of the peak became broader. At this time, the crystalline size reduced because the fracture process dominated. However, the diffraction peaks of Nb disappeared, and new diffraction peaks of the solid solution phase βss became observable. After 5 h of milling, the diffraction peaks of the elements expanded significantly. Moreover, the intensity of the BCC solid solution (BCC1) phase increased compared to the intensity levels of the 2 h as-milled samples. Notably, the characteristic peaks of Al, Fe, Nb, and BCC1 were no longer visible in the XRD patterns of the Al82Fe16Nb2 alloy. Only a halo peak characterized by an amorphous phase was visible. The amorphous phase formation in the Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloy was similar to that of the Al82Fe16Nb2 alloy. However, after 10 h of milling, the Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloy reached a partial amorphous phase state. Replacing 2 at.% of Fe atoms with Mn in the Al82Fe16Nb2 alloy affected the formation of the amorphous phase. The amorphization process of the Al82Fe16Nb2 alloy system was completed after 10 h milling due to the relatively high negative mixing enthalpy of the Al–Fe, Al–Nb, and Fe–Nb pairs of −11, −18, and −11 kJ/mol, respectively, as shown in Table 1.
The Al82Fe16Nb2 alloy only satisfies rules (1) and (2) of Inoue’s three empirical rules for the formation of bulk amorphous materials [23,24,25]. Since the atomic size of Nb is equal to that of Al, the size difference of Nb–Al is 0%. According to research by Oanh et al. on the Al–Fe–Ni(Ti, Cu) material system, negative mixing enthalpy is the most essential factor among the three empirical rules when preparing amorphous alloys using MA [26]. For the Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloy system, all the element pairs had negative mixing enthalpy, except for the Fe–Mn pair, which had a mixing enthalpy of 0 kJ/mol. This result explains why substituting 2 at.% Fe with Mn resulted in an alloy that was not completely amorphous after 10 h of milling. The crystalline size of BCC1 phase for Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloys after milling for 2 and 5 h was calculated using the Scherrer formula [27], as outlined in Table 2. The crystalline size of the solid solution BCC1 phase was about 13–15 nm.
Table 1. Atomic radii mismatch (in %) and enthalpies of mixing (in kJ/mol) for binary systems involving Al, Fe, Nb, and Mn [25,28].
Table 1. Atomic radii mismatch (in %) and enthalpies of mixing (in kJ/mol) for binary systems involving Al, Fe, Nb, and Mn [25,28].
AlFeNbMn
Al-13.2 [%]0 [%]21.6 [%]
Fe−11 [kJ/mol]-13.2 [%]9.6 [%]
Nb−18 [kJ/mol]−16 [kJ/mol]-21.6 [%]
Mn−19 [kJ/mol]0 [kJ/mol]−4 [kJ/mol]-
SEM images of Al82Fe16Nb2 powders after different milling times are presented in Figure 4. In the early stage of the milling process (1 h), the mixture of Al, Fe, and Nb elemental powders was deformed due to collision with the milling balls and milling vial. The plasticity of Al, Fe, and Nb flattened these elements after impact. At this stage, the cold-welding process dominated the adhesion metal powders comprising the layer structure (Figure 4a). The white phase corresponds to the Nb metal inlaid and adhering to the dark phase (Al and Fe metals). The size of the as-milled powder was about 50 μm. With an increase in the milling time to 2h, the milling powder experienced a fragmentation process, reducing the particle size to less than 10 μm (Figure 4b). This decrease in particle size was evident with a decrease in crystal size due to the diffraction peak being broadened compared to that of the sample after 1 h of milling (Figure 3a). With an increase in the milling time to 5 h, the fragmentation process dominated the powder size by about 5 μm (Figure 4c). The powder particles then became more uniform compared to the results after 2 h of milling. According to the XRD patterns in Figure 3a, a new phase of the solid solution β-phase (BCC1) began to form alongside a reduction in crystal size (due to the diffraction peak being broader than that of the 2 h as-milled sample). Thus, increasing the milling time to 5 h promoted diffusion, leading to the formation of a solid solution of BCC1. With an increase in the milling time to 10 h (Figure 4d), the powder particles continued to decrease in size to 1–3 μm. The particle size became quite uniform, with some particles being larger in size due to adhesion of the powder particles caused by cold welding.
Figure 5 presents SEM images of the Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 powder after different milling times. The microstructural evolution of the Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloy was similar to that of the Al82Fe16Nb2 alloy. In the early stage of the milling process (1 h of milling), the mixture powders became deformed due to collisions with the milling ball and the vial (Figure 5a). Powders of Al, Fe, Nb, and Mn were laminated after impact. At this stage, the cold-welding process dominated the adhesive metal powders comprising the layer structure. The white and dark phases were adhesive and laminated. The size of the as-milled powders was about 50 μm. With an increase in the milling time to 2 h, the milled powder experienced a fragmentation process, reducing the particle size to approximately 5–15 μm (Figure 5b). Two phases of light and dark could still be observed in the milling powder, indicating that, under a milling time of 2 h, the homogenization process had not yet entirely occurred. The decrease in particle size was evident with a reduction in crystal size due to the diffraction peak being broader than that of the sample after 1 h of milling (Figure 3b). With an increase in the milling time to 5 h, the fragmentation process dominated the powder size by about 10 μm (Figure 5c), with particles showing a more uniform mixture compared to the results under the 2 h milling process. According to the XRD patterns in Figure 3b, further crystal size reductions (due to the diffraction peak being broader than that of the 2 h as-milled sample) coincided with the formation of a new BCC1 phase solid solution. Thus, diffusion occurred when the milling time was 5 h, forming the BCC1 solid solution. By extending the milling time to 10 h (Figure 5d), the powder grains continued to decrease in size to 1–3 μm. Most particles were uniformly sized, although some larger particles appeared due to the adhesion of the powder particles caused by cold welding. The alloy powder was almost completely amorphous, leaving only a few broadened diffraction peaks that are characteristic of nanocrystals, as shown in Figure 3b.
Figure 6 and Figure 7, respectively, present the hysteresis magnetic curves of Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloys milled at 350 rpm for 1 h, 2 h, 5 h, and 10 h. Here, all curves are sigmoidal in shape, indicating incomplete saturation at external fields as high as 10,000 Oe. The values of saturated magnetization (Ms) and magnetic resistance (Hc) for alloys Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 with different milling times are listed in Table 3. For the Al82Fe16Nb2 powder, after milling for 1 h, the Ms value was about 47.60 emu/g and decreased to 9.21 emu/g after 10 h of milling. This decrease in the Ms values of powders after milling was due to changes in the chemical composition, the local environment of the magnetic atoms, and the electronic structure of the materials, as reported by Xu et al. [29]. As noted by Oanh et al., the formation of an amorphous phase tends to reduce the Ms value [22]. Moreover, a reasonably low Ms value of about 0.8 emu/g was obtained for the Al82Fe14Ni2Y2 alloy. Replacing 2 at.% Mn with Fe in Al82Fe16Nb2 strengthens the electronic interaction of Fe–Mn compared to that of Fe–Fe. Therefore, the Ms value of of the final product of the Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloy was higher than that of the Al82Fe16Nb2 alloy. In contrast to the decrease in the value of Ms, with an increase in milling time, the Hc values of the Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloy powders increased. By increasing the milling time from 1 to 10 h, the Hc of the Al82Fe16Nb2 alloy increased from 23.94 to 383.79 Oe, while the Hc of the Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloy increased from 86.5 to 456 Oe. The increase in Hc during milling is attributable to the use of high-energy milling, which produces a high deviation density and residual stress in the milling powder [30,31,32,33]. For the Al82Fe16Nb2 alloy system, when the milling time is increased from 5 h to 10 h, the magnetic resistance decreases from 474.65 to 383.79 Oe due to a reduction in the particle size and an increase in the proportion of the amorphous phase. However, for the Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloy after milling for 5 h to 10 h, the Hc value remained unchanged at 456 Oe. Overall, the Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloys have soft magnetic properties at lower milling times (from 1 h to 5 h) and hard magnetic properties when forming amorphous phases (5 h and 10 h milling).
Figure 8 presents the DSC curves of the Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloys after 10 h of milling. Here, there are exothermic peaks in the temperature range of 300–800 °C. The substitution of 2 at.% Mn for Fe leads to similarities between the two alloys in terms of shape and the onset crystallization temperature (Table 4). As Kuen-Shan Jaw [34] reported, stearic acid decomposes significantly in a temperature range of 320–480 °C.
To investigate the structural changes in the Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloy powders after 10 h of milling, the alloys were annealed at 550, 600, and 700 °C for 15 min. The annealing temperature was selected based on the onset crystallization temperatures presented in Table 4. The XRD patterns of the Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloy powders after annealing at different temperatures are presented in Figure 9 and Figure 10, respectively. After annealing the Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 amorphous alloy powder at 550 °C, the diffraction peaks belonged to the Al phase, the solid solution phases of BCC1 and B2 (Al, Fe), Al13Fe4, and the amorphous phase (Figure 9d and Figure 10d). When the annealing temperature was increased to 600 °C, the phases remained similar to those observed at 550 °C; however, the B2(Al, Fe) phase content and the amorphous phase decreased, and an Al3Nb phase appeared (Figure 9e and Figure 10e). At the highest annealing temperature of 700 °C, both the amorphous phase and solid solution B2(Al, Fe) completely decomposed, and the phase content of Al3Nb and Al13Fe4 increased (Figure 9f and Figure 10f).
The ball-milled powders produced in this study, characterized by a relatively refined particle size and uniform distribution, show promising potential for sintering applications, enabling the creation of dense, homogeneous components [35,36]. Fine and evenly dispersed powder particles may promote particle bonding and densification in the sintering process, resulting in improved microstructural properties. Future studies on the sintering of these ball-milled powders could focus on optimizing parameters to maximize the density and homogeneity, thereby broadening their range of applications.

4. Conclusions

The full amorphous phase was obtained after 10 h of milling of Al82Fe16Nb2 alloy powders, while a partly amorphous phase was observed after the annealing of Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloy powders. The XRD results of the as-milled powders of the alloys appeared as a BCC solid solution phase (BCC1) with a crystalline size of 13–14 nm. Both alloys presented a uniform particle size of about 1–3 μm after milling for 10 h, with some larger particles retained due to agglomeration.
The magnetization curves for the milled and annealed powders were sigmoidal. The values of Ms decreased, while Hc changed with the milling time in the range of 1–10 h for the milled powder. Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloys have soft magnetic properties at lower milling times (from 1 h to 5 h) and hard magnetic properties when they form amorphous phases (5 h and 10 h of milling).
The DSC curves of the two alloys, Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2, presented exothermic peaks in the temperature range of 300–800 °C. After the Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 amorphous alloy powders were annealed at 550 °C, the diffraction peaks corresponded to the Al phase, BCC1, B2(Al, Fe), Al13Fe4, and the amorphous phase. The content of B2(Al, Fe) and the amorphous phases decreased together with the formation of the Al3Nb phase after the amorphous powders were annealed at 600 °C. Lastly, the amorphous and B2(Al, Fe) phases completely decomposed at 700 °C.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.T.H.O. and N.H.V.; methodology, N.T.H.O. and D.T.A.; software, D.T.A. and N.H.V.; validation, N.T.H.O., N.H.V. and D.T.A.; formal analysis, D.T.A. and N.T.H.O.; investigation, N.T.H.O. and D.T.A.; resources, N.H.V.; data curation, N.H.V. and N.T.H.O.; writing—original draft preparation, N.T.H.O. and D.T.A.; writing—review and editing, N.H.V.; visualization, N.T.H.O.; supervision, N.H.V.; project administration, N.H.V.; funding acquisition, N.H.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by the Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST) under grant number T2023-TĐ-023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are included in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could appear to have influenced the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Chen, Y.; Xie, B.; Liu, B.; Cao, Y.; Jia, L.; Fang, Q.; Liaw, P. A Focused Review on Engineering Application of Multi-Principal Element Alloy. Front. Mater. 2022, 8, 816309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Hu, J. Recent advances in the development of aerospace materials. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 2018, 97, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zakharov, V.V. About Alloying of Aluminum Alloys with Transition Metals. Met. Sci. Heat Treat. 2017, 59, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Krasnowski, M.; Kulik, T. Nanocrystalline and amorphous Al–Fe alloys containing 60–85% of Al synthesised by mechanical alloying and phase transformations induced by heating of milling products. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2009, 116, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rodrigues, C.A.D.; Botta Filho, W.J.; Tremiliosi-Filho, G. Structural Comparison of Amorphous, Nanocrystalline and Microcrystalline Al90Fe7Nb3 Alloys. Mater. Sci. Forum 2012, 727–728, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vilar, R.; Conde, O.; Franco, S. Crystallographic structure of Al3Nb in laser-processed Al–Nb alloys. Intermetallics 1999, 7, 1227–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rodrigues, C.A.D.; Yavari, A.R.; Kiminami, C.S.; Botta Filho, W.J. Milling and Hot Consolidation of Al-Fe-Nb Alloy. Mater. Sci. Forum 2003, 416–418, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, Z.; Zhang, P.; Chen, D.; Wu, Y.; Wang, M.; Ma, N.; Wang, H. First-principles investigation of thermodynamic, elastic and electronic properties of Al3V and Al3Nb intermetallics under pressures. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 085904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Albrecht, S.; Cymorek, C.; Eckert, J. Niobium and Niobium Compounds. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Verlag Chemie: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kvande, H.; Frank, W.B.; Haupin, W.E.; Vogt, H.; Bruno, M.; Thonstad, J.; Dawless, R.K.; Taiwo, O.A. Aluminum. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Verlag Chemie: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 1–48. [Google Scholar]
  11. Robert, M.H.; Filho, S.L.U. Mechanical properties of Al/NbAl3 in situ composites. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 1997, 64, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Coelho, R.E.; Ambrozio Filho, F. Production of Al-Fe-Nb-Si Alloys by Mechanical Alloying and Hot Extrusion. Key Eng. Mater. 2001, 189–191, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Audebert, F.; Sirkin, H.; Escorial, A.G. Aluminum-base Al-Fe-Nb amorphous and nanostructured alloys. Scr. Mater. 1997, 36, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Reip, C.P.; Sauthoff, G. Deformation behaviour of the intermetallic phase Al3Nb with DO22 structure and of Al3Nb-base alloys: Part I. Physical properties and short-term behaviour. Intermetallics 1993, 1, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Reip, C.P.; Sauthoff, G. Deformation behaviour of the intermetallic phase Al3Nb with DO22 structure and of the Al3Nb-base alloys. Part II: Creep behaviour. Intermetallics 1996, 4, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. El-Eskandarany, M.S. Mechanical Alloying: Energy Storage, Protective Coatings, and Medical Applications, 3rd ed.; William Andrew: Norwich, NY, USA, 8 May 2020. [Google Scholar]
  17. Suryanarayana, C. Mechanical Alloying of Nanocrystalline Materials and Nanocomposites. Madridge J. Nanotechnol. Nanosci. 2019, 4, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Suryanarayana, C. Mechanical Alloying: A Novel Technique to Synthesize Advanced Materials. Research 2019, 2019, 4219812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Enayati, M.H.; Mohamed, F.A. Application of mechanical alloying/milling for synthesis of nanocrystalline and amorphous materials. Int. Mater. Rev. 2014, 59, 394–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nguyen, H.H.; Oanh, N.T.H.; Hoang Viet, N. Enhanced thermal stability of amorphous Al-Fe alloys by addition of Ce and Mn. Mater. Res. Express 2024, 11, 065201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nguyen, H.V.; Do, N.B.; Nguyen, T.H.O.; Nguyen, C.S.; Trinh, V.T.; Le, H.T.; Jorge Junior, A.M. Synthesis and magnetic properties of Al–Cu–Fe quasicrystals prepared by mechanical alloying and heat treatment. J. Mater. Res. 2023, 38, 644–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Binh, D.N.; Oanh, N.T.H.; Viet, N.H. The effect of Ni and Ti additions on the glass forming ability and magnetic properties of Al-Fe-Y alloy prepared by mechanical alloying. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2022, 583, 121478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nabiałek, M. Fabrication Methods for Bulk Amorphous Alloys. In Alloy Materials and Their Allied Applications; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  24. Suryanarayana, C.; Inoue, A. Metallic Glasses. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Verlag Chemie: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  25. Takeuchi, A.; Inoue, A. Classification of Bulk Metallic Glasses by Atomic Size Difference, Heat of Mixing and Period of Constituent Elements and Its Application to Characterization of the Main Alloying Element. Mater. Trans. 2005, 46, 2817–2829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Oanh, N.T.H.; Viet, N.H.; Dudina, D.V.; Jorge, A.M.; Kim, J.-S. Structural characterization and magnetic properties of Al82Fe16TM2 (TM: Ti, Ni, Cu) alloys prepared by mechanical alloying. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2017, 468, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chatterjee, A.K. 8—X-Ray Diffraction. In Handbook of Analytical Techniques in Concrete Science and Technology; Ramachandran, V.S., Beaudoin, J.J., Eds.; William Andrew Publishing: Norwich, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 275–332. [Google Scholar]
  28. Takeuchi, A.; Inoue, A. Analyses of characteristics of atomic pairs in ferrous bulk metallic glasses using classification of bulk metallic glasses and pettifor map. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 2006, 8, 1679–1684. [Google Scholar]
  29. Xu, Y.; Zhou, S.; Liao, B.; Zhao, S.; Dai, X.; Chen, D. Effect of milling time on the microstructure and magnetic properties of amorphous Ti50Fe50 alloys prepared by mechanical alloying. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 3929–3935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Taghvaei, A.H.; Stoica, M.; Khoshkhoo, M.S.; Thomas, J.; Vaughan, G.; Janghorban, K.; Eckert, J. Microstructure and magnetic properties of amorphous/nanocrystalline Co40Fe22Ta8B30 alloy produced by mechanical alloying. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 134, 1214–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abrosimova, G.; Chirkova, V.; Pershina, E.; Volkov, N.; Sholin, I.; Aronin, A. The Effect of Free Volume on the Crystallization of Al87Ni8Gd5 Amorphous Alloy. Metals 2022, 12, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Paustovskii, A.V.; Gubin, Y.V.; Kunitskii, Y.A. On the Relationship between Residual Stresses and Structural Characteristics of Amorphous Alloys. Mater. Sci. 2001, 37, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nowroozi, M.A.; Shokrollahi, H. Magnetic and structural properties of amorphous/nanocrystalline Fe42Ni28Zr8Ta2B10C10 soft magnetic alloy produced by mechanical alloying. Adv. Powder Technol. 2013, 24, 1100–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jaw, K.-S.; Hsu, C.-K.; Lee, J.-S. The thermal decomposition behaviors of stearic acid, paraffin wax and polyvinyl butyral. Thermochim. Acta 2001, 367–368, 165–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Awotunde, M.A.; Adegbenjo, A.O.; Shongwe, M.B.; Olubambi, P.A. Spark Plasma Sintering of Aluminium-Based Materials. In Spark Plasma Sintering of Materials: Advances in Processing and Applications; Cavaliere, P., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 191–218. [Google Scholar]
  36. Binh, D.N.; Oanh, N.T.H.; Viet, N.H. Al-Fe-Ni Metallic Glasses via Mechanical Alloying and Its Consolidation. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 10561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 17 05627 g001
Figure 1. Surface morphology of starting elemental powders of (a) Al, (b) Fe, (c) Nb, and (d) Mn.
Figure 1. Surface morphology of starting elemental powders of (a) Al, (b) Fe, (c) Nb, and (d) Mn.
Materials 17 05627 g001
Materials 17 05627 g002
Figure 2. XRD patterns of starting mixture powders of (a) Al–Fe–Nb and (b) Al–Fe–Nb–Mn.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of starting mixture powders of (a) Al–Fe–Nb and (b) Al–Fe–Nb–Mn.
Materials 17 05627 g002
Materials 17 05627 g003
Figure 3. XRD patterns of (a) Al82Fe16Nb2 and (b) Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 powders milled for different milling times.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of (a) Al82Fe16Nb2 and (b) Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 powders milled for different milling times.
Materials 17 05627 g003
Materials 17 05627 g004
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of the Al82Fe16Nb2 powders milled for (a) 1 h, (b) 2 h, (c) 5 h, and (d) 10 h.
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of the Al82Fe16Nb2 powders milled for (a) 1 h, (b) 2 h, (c) 5 h, and (d) 10 h.
Materials 17 05627 g004
Materials 17 05627 g005
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of the Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 powders milled for (a) 1 h, (b) 2 h, (c) 5 h, and (d) 10 h.
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of the Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 powders milled for (a) 1 h, (b) 2 h, (c) 5 h, and (d) 10 h.
Materials 17 05627 g005
Materials 17 05627 g006
Figure 6. Hysteresis curves of Al82Fe16Nb2 powders milled for different milling times.
Figure 6. Hysteresis curves of Al82Fe16Nb2 powders milled for different milling times.
Materials 17 05627 g006
Materials 17 05627 g007
Figure 7. Hysteresis curves of Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 powders milled for different milling times.
Figure 7. Hysteresis curves of Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 powders milled for different milling times.
Materials 17 05627 g007
Materials 17 05627 g008
Figure 8. DSC curves of the powder compositions (a) Al82Fe16Nb2 and (b) Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2. Powders were milled for 10 h, and DSC was performed after heating from room temperature to 800 °C.
Figure 8. DSC curves of the powder compositions (a) Al82Fe16Nb2 and (b) Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2. Powders were milled for 10 h, and DSC was performed after heating from room temperature to 800 °C.
Materials 17 05627 g008
Materials 17 05627 g009
Figure 9. XRD patterns for Al82Fe16Nb2: (a) a mixture of powders (Al, Fe, and Nb); powders milled for (b) 2 h and (c) 10 h, followed by heat treatment for 15 min at (d) 550 °C, (e) 600 °C, and (f) 700 °C.
Figure 9. XRD patterns for Al82Fe16Nb2: (a) a mixture of powders (Al, Fe, and Nb); powders milled for (b) 2 h and (c) 10 h, followed by heat treatment for 15 min at (d) 550 °C, (e) 600 °C, and (f) 700 °C.
Materials 17 05627 g009
Materials 17 05627 g010
Figure 10. XRD patterns for Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2: (a) a mixture of powders (Al, Fe, Nb, and Mn); powders milled for (b) 2 h and (c) 10 h, followed by heat treatment for 15 min at (d) 550 °C, (e) 600 °C, and (f) 700 °C.
Figure 10. XRD patterns for Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2: (a) a mixture of powders (Al, Fe, Nb, and Mn); powders milled for (b) 2 h and (c) 10 h, followed by heat treatment for 15 min at (d) 550 °C, (e) 600 °C, and (f) 700 °C.
Materials 17 05627 g010
Table 2. Crystallite size of the solid solution phase BCC1.
Table 2. Crystallite size of the solid solution phase BCC1.
Alloy SystemMilling Time
(h)		2θ
(°)		Crystal Size
(nm)
Al82Fe16Nb2236.814.8
Al82Fe16Nb2536.813.4
Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2236.814.8
Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2536.715.1
Table 3. Ms and Hc values obtained from the VSM analyses for Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloys milled for different times.
Table 3. Ms and Hc values obtained from the VSM analyses for Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloys milled for different times.
PropertiesAl82Fe16Nb2
1 h2 h5 h10 h
Hc (Oe)23.94101.59474.65383.79
Ms (emu/g)47.6046.2140.289.21
Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2
Hc (Oe)86.50104456456
Ms (emu/g)44.5042.1636.1226.93
Table 4. Crystallization temperature of Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloys after milling for 10 h.
Table 4. Crystallization temperature of Al82Fe16Nb2 and Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2 alloys after milling for 10 h.
SampleTx1Tp1Tx2Tp2Tx3Tp3
Al82Fe16Nb2 496522580613628641
Al82Fe14Nb2Mn2494522--628-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oanh, N.T.H.; An, D.T.; Viet, N.H. Nanocrystalline/Amorphous Tuning of Al–Fe–Nb (Mn) Alloy Powders Produced via High-Energy Ball Milling. Materials 2024, 17, 5627. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17225627

AMA Style

Oanh NTH, An DT, Viet NH. Nanocrystalline/Amorphous Tuning of Al–Fe–Nb (Mn) Alloy Powders Produced via High-Energy Ball Milling. Materials. 2024; 17(22):5627. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17225627

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oanh, Nguyen Thi Hoang, Dao Truong An, and Nguyen Hoang Viet. 2024. "Nanocrystalline/Amorphous Tuning of Al–Fe–Nb (Mn) Alloy Powders Produced via High-Energy Ball Milling" Materials 17, no. 22: 5627. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17225627

APA Style

Oanh, N. T. H., An, D. T., & Viet, N. H. (2024). Nanocrystalline/Amorphous Tuning of Al–Fe–Nb (Mn) Alloy Powders Produced via High-Energy Ball Milling. Materials, 17(22), 5627. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17225627

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop