Next Article in Journal
Study of Low-Temperature (Al)GaN on N-Polar GaN Films Grown by MOCVD on Vicinal SiC Substrates
Previous Article in Journal
Durability of Cutting Tools Obtained by U-FAST Technology in Particleboard Machining
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of Engineered Nanomaterials as Nanocatalysts in Catalytic Ozonation: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Utilizing Chicken Egg White and L-Cysteine for Green Synthesis of Carbon Dots: Rapid and Cost-Effective Detection of Cu2+ Ions

by
Pablo Eduardo Cardoso-Ávila
* and
Juan Luis Pichardo-Molina
Centro de Investigaciones en Óptica, Loma del Bosque 115, Leon 37150, Guanajuato, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2025, 18(3), 637; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030637
Submission received: 13 December 2024 / Revised: 14 January 2025 / Accepted: 15 January 2025 / Published: 31 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Luminescent Materials and Applications)

Abstract

:
A novel green synthesis method was developed for sulfur-doped carbon dots (S-C-dots) using chicken egg white (CEW) and L-cysteine for the rapid and cost-effective detection of copper ions (Cu2+) in water. This one-pot, room-temperature, base-catalyzed approach eliminated the need for energy-intensive processes and purification steps, adhering to the principles of green chemistry. The synthesized S-C-dots were characterized using UV–Vis, FT-IR, fluorescence, EDS, XRD, and Z-potential analyses. Among the six samples tested, A060 demonstrated superior properties, achieving a detection limit of 3.3 ppb (52 nM) for Cu2+ in aqueous solutions. This study highlights the potential of S-C-dots as eco-friendly, accessible, and efficient tools for monitoring heavy metal contamination in drinking water, offering a promising solution to global water safety challenges.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Among the various natural and anthropogenic contaminants impacting soils, aquatic environments, and food sources, heavy metal pollution is a global concern with severe consequences for human health and the environment. Heavy metals have been detected not only in soils and water bodies but also in food sources, including crops, meat, and dairy products [1,2,3]. The lack of clean, potable water affects billions of people worldwide and represents a critical issue that must be addressed, as consumption of contaminated water leads to numerous diseases and deaths each year [4,5]. Heavy metal ions can cause significant health problems, including liver and kidney damage, skin disorders, cognitive impairment, and even cancer [4].
Copper is an essential industrial material valued for its excellent mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties. In the human body, copper is one of the necessary trace elements and ranks as the third most abundant metal. Copper deficiency can hinder enzyme activity and impair cellular metabolism, whereas an excess can lead to copper accumulation in the liver, potentially resulting in ascites, cirrhosis, and other liver-related conditions [6,7].
Given that water quality issues are often exacerbated in low-income regions, it is crucial to develop simple, rapid, and cost-effective methods for Cu2+ detection, as current techniques typically involve complex sample preparation and require costly, sophisticated instrumentation. Fluorescence spectrophotometry has emerged as a preferred approach due to its high sensitivity and selectivity, ease of use, and low cost compared to alternative methods.
Small fluorescent carbon nanoparticles (<10 nm) known as carbon dots (C-dots) have attracted considerable attention due to their chemical, physical, and optical properties. C-dots have been effectively used in the detection of various metal ions, including Al3+, Ag+, Au3+, Cd2+, Cr3+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Hg2+, Pb2+, and Pt4+, among others [8]. Most reported methodologies for the synthesis of carbon dots (C-dots) rely on the hydrothermal approach due to its simplicity [6,9,10,11,12]. However, this method is associated with high energy consumption, as it requires elevated temperatures and prolonged reaction times. Alternative methods, such as carbonization and pyrolysis, similarly demand extended thermal energy usage [13,14,15,16]. The carbon sources employed for C-dot synthesis are diverse, encompassing organic chemical reagents, waste biomass, and combinations of both, with each presenting specific advantages and limitations.
It is a common misconception that utilizing biomass as the sole carbon source inherently renders a synthesis method “green”. In some cases, the pretreatment of biomass and subsequent purification of the nanomaterial increase solvent consumption, reduce atom economy, and generate additional waste. Consequently, such methods may not fully adhere to the principles of green chemistry [17].
In contrast, for a nanomaterial designed as a metal sensor, alignment with the principles of green analytical chemistry is highly desirable [18]. This alignment can be achieved by implementing strategies such as employing direct analytical techniques, minimizing sample preparation, and reducing waste and energy consumption. A “greener” nanomaterial-based metal sensor can thus be developed by carefully selecting biomass sources that facilitate synthetic routes with minimal external energy requirements and by avoiding purification steps and specialized application conditions.
In recent years, our research group has focused on synthesizing C-dots from the readily available bovine serum albumin (BSA) protein. Initially, we produced blue-emitting C-dots with a fluorescence quantum yield (QY) of 16% using a two-step solvothermal method [19]. We later reported one-pot, room-temperature synthesis of C-dots using BSA in a water/ethanol solution, yielding yellow-emitting C-dots with an improved QY of 27% [20]. Our method further evolved with nitrogen doping and the elimination of ethanol in the synthesis, which increased the QY to 31% [21]. With each improvement, the C-dots exhibited better luminescent properties while reducing energy and reactant use, thus becoming “greener.” Additionally, we explored alternative biomass sources. Chicken eggs, which are abundant and cost-effective and have a lower carbon footprint than cattle, were used as a protein source. Employing food-grade chicken egg white (CEW) powder in C-dot synthesis resulted in a QY of 26% while reducing the time and cost and improving mass and solvent economy, making the process notably “greener” [22].
In this study, we present a novel synthesis method for sulfur-doped carbon dots (S-C-dots) for the direct, rapid, and selective detection of Cu2+ ions. CEW and L-cysteine were used as carbon sources in a one-pot, room-temperature, base-catalyzed synthesis method that was rapid, simple, and required no specialized equipment. S-C-dots were characterized using UV–Vis, FT-IR, fluorescence spectroscopies, EDS, XRD, and Z-potential analyses. Additionally, direct Cu2+ detection was achieved in an aqueous medium without any S-C-dot purification, yielding a limit of detection (LOD) of 3.3 ppb (52 nM). These features make this nanomaterial a promising candidate for direct, rapid, and accessible assessments of drinking water safety. The synthesis and analytical methods align with the principles of green chemistry and green analytical chemistry [17,18] due to their low energy use, simplicity, and direct application.

2. Materials and Methods

Six C-dot samples were prepared with L-cysteine-to-CEW ratios (w/w) ranging from 0% to 100%. Briefly, 400 mg of food-grade CEW powder (MCS, Puebla, Mexico) was added to 80 mL of Milli-Q water under magnetic stirring until the solution became clear. L-cysteine (0, 80, 160, 240, 320, or 400 mg) and 3 mL of 1 M NaOH were then mixed into the CEW/L-cysteine solution and allowed to react for 5 min. Finally, 1.6 mL of 25% glutaraldehyde was added, and the solutions were placed on a rotary shaker for 6 h. No further purification was required. The samples were labeled A000, A020, A040, A060, A080, and A100 according to the L-cysteine-to-CEW ratio.
UV–Vis and FT-IR spectra were acquired using an EPP2000 fiber-optic spectrometer (Stellarnet, Tampa, FL, USA) and a Cary 660 spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Z-potential measurements were conducted on a Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern Panalytical, Great Malvern, UK). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was performed using a JEOL JSM-7800F (Tokio, Japan) scanning electron microscope. X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained using XRD D2 Phaser Bruker equipment (Billerica, MA, USA) with a Bragg–Brentano geometry and Cu-kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). Fluorescence maps were obtained with an FS5 fluorometer (Edinburgh Instruments, Livingston, UK), using 2 and 4 nm bandwidths for excitation and emission, respectively. Fluorescence quantum yield (QY) values were measured using an SC30 integrating sphere module; spectra were recorded within the 520–700 nm range with a 530 ± 6 nm excitation bandwidth and a 0.25 nm emission bandwidth. For the Cu2+ dose–response curve, sample A060 was diluted 1:20 in Milli-Q water, and 0.5 mL of this diluted S-C-dot solution was mixed with 1.5 mL of a Cu2+ solution at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 20 ppm. Each sample was prepared in triplicate, and fluorescence was measured from 545 to 600 nm with 530 nm excitation.
Consistent with the practices in the field, we utilized a single batch of food-grade CEW powder for this study. This approach is widely accepted in biomass-based research where the primary goal is to establish proof-of-concept methodologies. Testing multiple batches or brands, while potentially valuable, was beyond the scope of this study.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. S-C-Dot Characterization

Following synthesis, the pH of each S-C-dot sample was tested using reactive strips, and all samples exhibited a pH of 7. The S-C-dot samples with L-cysteine fractions from 0% to 60% displayed high zeta-potential values (−42.2 ± 2.7, −42.8 ± 2.3, −41.2 ± 0.4, and −41.2 ± 3.9 mV, respectively), suggesting good colloidal stability. However, samples A080 and A100 had lower surface charges (−23.6 ± 3.6 and −16.6 ± 1.6 mV), which could have compromised their long-term stability, particularly A100, whose zeta potential suggested imminent agglomeration.
All S-C-dot samples were intensely colored with no visible scattering. UV–Vis absorbance spectroscopy performed on diluted samples (1:10) revealed a broad absorption band below 400 nm in all samples, which was attributed to the π–π* transitions present in the S-C-dots [9,13,16,21] (Figure 1A). Additionally, samples A000 to A060 exhibited an absorption band around 530 nm, consistent with previously reported CEW-only C-dots [22]. In contrast, samples A080 and A100 displayed a new absorption band at 450 nm, accompanied by a marked decrease in the 530 nm band. The absorption bands above 400 nm originated from n–π* surface-state transitions associated with functional groups such as C=O, C=N, or heavily graphitic nitrogen [23,24,25].
Figure 1B,C show the energy band gaps of the S-C-dots, which were calculated using direct and indirect Tauc plots. The band gaps were determined as the x-axis intercepts of linear fits to selected segments of the curves. Notably, the addition of L-cysteine did not significantly alter the direct band gap of the S-C-dots, which remained between 3.32 and 3.35 eV (Figure 1B). These values were consistent with previously reported band gaps for C-dots [26].
However, the indirect band gaps varied with the L-cysteine concentration (Figure 1C). As L-cysteine was added during synthesis, the indirect band gap decreased from 2.02 eV in sample A000 to 1.78 eV in A060. The band gap increased to 2.02 eV in sample A080, then decreased again to 1.95 eV in A100. This behavior suggests that the addition of L-cysteine facilitated the formation of sulfur-rich functional groups on the S-C-dot surfaces, which initially reduced the indirect band gaps. At higher concentrations, colloidal stability was compromised, as evidenced by the zeta potential of A080, leading to S-C-dot agglomeration. This agglomeration increased the band gap and reduced the fluorescence intensities in these samples, as will be discussed in subsequent sections [27].
FT-IR analysis revealed identical vibrational modes across all samples (Figure 1D), indicating the presence of –OH, –CH2, –CO (amide I), –CN (amide II), and –CN (amide III) stretching modes [28,29].
Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis revealed an increase in the sulfur content from 0.8% to 9.3% and a slight increase in the nitrogen content from 7.1% to 9.6% as the concentration of L-cysteine was raised (Figure 2A). Conversely, the oxygen content decreased from 25.8% to 18.3%. The relative contents of carbon and nitrogen remained stable at approximately 69% and 9%, respectively, across the samples. CEW is reported to contain minerals such as sulfur, potassium, sodium, and chlorine [30,31]. Therefore, the detection of sulfur in sample A000 was anticipated, and its level was expected to increase as the S-C-dots were supplemented with the thiol-containing amino acid L-cysteine.
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) data indicated low crystallinity in all S-C-dot samples; all patterns displayed a broad peak centered at 20.1°, corresponding to the (002) plane characteristic of graphitic materials (Figure 2B) [9,13,32,33]. The increased interlayer spacing (d = 0.44 nm) was attributed to low crystallinity, likely resulting from the incorporation of nitrogen-, oxygen-, and sulfur-containing groups [14,34].
Fluorescence analysis showed similar characteristics for samples A000 to A060, with low-intensity emissions at excitation wavelengths below 450 nm. A maximum emission wavelength centered at 555 nm was observed for excitations of 450 nm and above, with an excitation peak centered at 535 nm (Figure 3A–D). In contrast, samples A080 and A100 displayed a strong excitation-dependent emission maximum across the entire tested excitation range, along with considerably lower fluorescence intensities compared to the other S-C-dot samples. Since a clear emission maximum was not identified for these two samples, the excitation range was extended to 600 nm, where a maximum emission was observed for both at 610 nm with 590 nm excitation (see Figure 3E,F).
The fluorescence quantum yield (QY) for each C-dot sample is indicated in Figure 3. With the increasing L-cysteine content, the QY decreased from 15.1% in A000 to 8.17% in A060. Despite this reduction, A060 was selected as the optimal sample for fluorescence-based metal sensing, as it showed stable colloidal behavior, retention of the 530 nm absorption band, and consistent emission centered at 555 nm across a wide excitation range. Above all, it displayed a high sulfur content (8.2%), suggesting a greater abundance of thiol groups on the surfaces of the S-C-dots. Thiol groups are well known for their strong affinity toward metal ions. They form stable metal–thiol complexes that enhance the sensitivity and selectivity of metal detection. As such, A060 was identified as the most promising candidate for establishing the proof of concept explored in this study.

3.2. Performance of A060 as a Metal Sensor

A060 was evaluated as a metal sensor for Ag+, Al3+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Ni2+, and Pb2+. As shown in Figure 4A, these S-C-dots were sensitive to Al3+, Cu2+, Fe3+, and Pb2+ at 10 ppm, as indicated by a decrease in fluorescence intensity. However, only Cu2+ and Fe3+ were detectable at 1 ppm, with Cu2+ producing the strongest response. Figure 4B displays the dose–response curve for A060 when the Cu2+ concentration was increased up to 20 ppm; the fluorescence intensity at 559 nm decreased nearly exponentially. A linear model was fitted to the data in the 0 to 1 ppm range to calculate the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ): LOD = 3δ/S = 3.3 ppb (52 nM) and LOQ = 10δ/S = 10.9 ppb (172 nM), where δ represents the standard deviation of the blank and S represents the slope of the linear model. The World Health Organization (WHO) sets a maximum limit of 2 ppm (31 µM) for Cu2+ in safe drinking water [35]; thus, the proposed fluorescence sensor can be used as a simple, rapid, and cost-effective tool for Cu2+ detection to ensure drinking water safety.
Table 1 summarizes previously reported C-dots used for Cu2+ detection, ordered from top to bottom with decreasing LOD, which range from 1.7 µM to 1 nM. The carbon sources have included chemical reactants (such as polyethyleneimine (PEI), citric acid, and amino acids) and various types of biomass, with no apparent correlation between the carbon source type and the achieved LOD. Most synthesis methods have involved high temperatures, external energy inputs, at least two purification processes, and specific buffer media for Cu2+ detection—all of which increase energy use and waste during the synthesis of the nanomaterials and their application. In contrast, our S-C-dots were synthesized using inexpensive CEW biomass and the readily available amino acid L-cysteine in a room-temperature method that required no external energy input and was completed in 6 h.
Our S-C-dots are purification-free probes that are ready for Cu2+ detection without requiring a specific buffer medium. However, 20 mL of the A060 sample was dialyzed in 1 L of Milli-Q water for 48 h using a 1000 Da dialysis membrane. The washing liquid did not exhibit any coloration or fluorescence after the dialysis process was completed. Due to the dialysis process, the UV–Vis spectra of the dialyzed A060 showed slight dilution compared to the as-prepared A060 sample; this dilution could be adjusted to achieve the same absorbance in the fluorescence experiments, as shown in Figure 5A. The UV–Vis spectrum of the dialyzed sample did not show any significant changes, with the peak positions and widths remaining practically the same.
On the other hand, Figure 5B depicts the fluorescence spectra of both cases. The fluorescence spectra were virtually identical for the as-prepared and dialyzed A060 samples, as was the decrease in fluorescence when they were exposed to 1 ppm of Cu2+. These results clearly demonstrate that purification by dialysis is unnecessary, as it does not improve the sensing capabilities of the S-C-dots.
Figure 5C shows the fluorescence spectra of the A060 blank under 532 nm excitation and the quenching effect caused by 2 ppm of Cu2+. When 3 mg of the strong chelator ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) was added to the A060 + Cu2+ (2 ppm) sample, 96% of the fluorescence intensity was restored. This result suggests that chelation of Cu2+ by the functional surface groups on the S-C-dots brought the particles into close proximity, resulting in significant fluorescence quenching [43,44].

4. Conclusions

Fluorescent S-C-dots were synthesized by combining food-grade CEW powder with the readily available amino acid L-cysteine in varying mass ratios using a simple and rapid base-catalysis method at room temperature. The S-C-dots were characterized by UV–Vis, FT-IR, fluorescence, and EDS spectroscopy, which helped identify the most suitable sample for application as a metal sensor. A060, which was tested as a metal sensor without further purification, showed a decrease in fluorescence intensity when exposed to Fe3+ and Cu2+ at 1 ppm. However, as the response to Cu2+ was notably higher, a dose–response curve was generated specifically for this metal. The calculated limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) for Cu2+ were 3.3 ppb (52 nM) and 10.9 ppb (172 nM), respectively, indicating that A060 can serve as a simple, rapid, and cost-effective sensor for detecting Cu2+ to help ensure drinking water safety.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.E.C.-Á.; Data curation, P.E.C.-Á.; Formal analysis, P.E.C.-Á. and J.L.P.-M.; Investigation, P.E.C.-Á. and J.L.P.-M.; Methodology, P.E.C.-Á. and J.L.P.-M.; Resources, P.E.C.-Á. and J.L.P.-M.; Validation, P.E.C.-Á. and J.L.P.-M.; Visualization, P.E.C.-Á.; Writing—original draft, P.E.C.-Á.; Writing—review and editing, P.E.C.-Á. and J.L.P.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by Centro de Investigaciones en Óptica, A.C. (CIO).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to M.C. Albor for her technical assistance and to the Materials Characterization Laboratory (CIO) and Ortiz-Ramos (CIO) for access to the fluorometer equipment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Oloruntoba, A.; Omoniyi, A.O.; Shittu, Z.A.; Ajala, R.O.; Kolawole, S.A. Heavy Metal Contamination in Soils, Water, and Food in Nigeria from 2000–2019: A Systematic Review on Methods, Pollution Level and Policy Implications. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2024, 235, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yin, Z.; Xie, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, Q.; Wan, S.; Chen, L.; Dai, X.; Wang, R.; Desneux, N.; Zhi, J.; et al. Bioaccumulation and transferreing for impacts on Cd and Pb by aphid consumption of the broad bean, Vicia faba L, in soil heavy metal pollution. Chemosphere 2024, 360, 142429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gori, A.; Armani, A.; Pedonese, F.; Benini, O.; Mancini, S.; Nuvoloni, R. Heavy metals (Pb, Ni) in insect-based products for human consumption sold by e-commerce in the EU market: Occurrence and potential health risk associated with dietary exposure. Food Control 2025, 167, 110781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Singh, V.; Ahmed, G.; Vedika, S.; Kumar, P.; Chaturvedi, S.K.; Rai, S.N.; Vamanu, E.; Kumar, A. Toxic heavy metal ions contamination in water and their sustainable reduction by eco-friendly methods: Isotherms, thermodynamics and kinetics study. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 7595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shannon, M.A.; Bohn, P.W.; Elimelech, M.; Georgiadis, J.G.; Marinas, B.J.; Mayes, A.M. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 2008, 452, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Deng, X.-Y.; Feng, Y.-L.; He, D.-S.; Zhang, Z.-Y.; Liu, D.-F.; Chi, R.-A. Synthesis of Functionalized Carbon Quantum Dots as Fluorescent Probes for Detection of Cu2+. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2020, 48, e20126–e20133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Georgopoulos, P.G.; Roy, A.; Yonone-Lioy, M.J.; Opiekun, R.E.; Lioy, P.J. Environmental copper: Its dynamics and human exposure issues. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part B 2001, 4, 341–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Liu, M.L.; Chen, B.B.; Li, C.M.; Huang, C.Z. Carbon dots: Synthesis, formation mechanism, fluorescence origin and sensing applications. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sidhu, J.S.; Singh, A.; Garg, N.; Kaur, N.; Singh, N. Carbon dots as analytical tools for sensing of thioredoxin reductase and screening of cancer cells. Analyst 2018, 143, 1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Niu, X.; Liu, G.; Li, L.; Fu, Z.; Xu, H.; Cui, F. Green and economical synthesis of nitrogen-doped carbon dots from vegetables for sensing and imaging applications. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 95223–95229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gedda, G.; Lee, C.-Y.; Lin, Y.-C.; Wu, H.-F. Green synthesis of Carbon dots from prawn shells for highly selective and sensitive detection of copper ions. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 224, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, J.; Li, R.S.; Zhang, H.Z.; Wang, N.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, C.Z. Highly fluorescent carbon dots as selective and visual probes for sensing copper ions in living cells via an electron transfer process. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 97, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Essner, J.B.; Laber, C.H.; Ravula, S.; Polo-Parada, L.; Baker, G.A. Pee-dots: Biocompatible fluorescent carbon dots derived from the upcycling of urine. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, P.; Wang, C.; Sun, D.; Chen, Y.; Zhuo, K. Ionic liquid as a precursor to synthesize nitrogen- and sulfur-co-doped carbon dots for detection of copper(II) ions. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2015, 31, 730–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shi, L.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Zhao, B.; Wen, X.; Zhang, G.; Dong, C.; Shuang, S. Controllable synthesis of green and blue fluorescent carbon nanodots for pH and Cu2+ sensing in living cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 77, 598–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dong, Y.; Wang, R.; Li, G.; Chen, C.; Chi, Y.; Chen, G. Polyamine-Functionalized Carbon Quantum Dots as Fluorescent Probes for Selective and Sensitive Detection of Copper Ions. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 6220–6224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Anastas, P.T.; Warner, J.C. (Eds.) Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gałuszka, A.; Migaszewski, Z.; Namieśnik, J. The 12 principles of green analytical chemistry and the SIGNIFICANCE mnemonic of green analytical practice. Trends Anal. Chem. 2013, 50, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pichardo-Molina, J.L.; Cardoso-Avila, P.E.; Flores-Villavicencio, L.L.; Gomez-Ortiz, N.M.; Rodriguez-Rivera, M.A. Fluorescent carbon nanoparticles synthesized from bovine serum albumin nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 142, 724–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Pichardo-Molina, J.L.; Cardoso-Avila, P.E.; Patakfalvi, R.J.; Aparicio-Ixta, L.; Pedro-García, F.; Ojeda-Galvan, H.J.; Flores-Villavicencio, L.L.; Villagómez-Castro, J.C. One-pot room-temperature direct synthesis of bovine serum albumin-based fluorescent carbon nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 224, 1166–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Aparicio-Ixta, L.; Pichardo-Molina, J.L.; Cardoso-Avila, P.E.; Ojeda-Galvan, H.J.; Martínez-García, M.M. Nitrogen-doped carbon dots by means of a simple room-temperature synthesis using BSA protein and nucleosides or amino acids. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 686, 133394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cardoso-Ávila, P.E.; Pichardo-Molina, J.L.; Vázquez-Olmos, M.; González-Aguiñaga, E. Chicken egg white as a “greener” biomass source for the rapid synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots. Mater. Lett. 2024, 358, 135880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, X.; Sun, X.; Hargrove, D.; Chen, J.; Song, D.; Dong, Q.; Lu, X.; Fan, T.H.; Fu, Y.; Lei, Y. A biocompatible and biodegradable protein hydrogel with green and red autofluorescence: Preparation, characterization and in vivo biodegradation tracking and modeling. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, M. Optical properties of carbon dots: A review. Nanoarchitectonics 2020, 1, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhu, S.; Song, Y.; Zhao, X.; Shao, J.; Zhang, J.; Yang, B. The photoluminescence mechanism in carbon dots (graphene quantum dots, carbon nanodots, and polymer dots): Current state and future perspective. Nano Res. 2015, 8, 355–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fayemi, O.E.; Makgopa, J.; Elugoke, S.E. Comparative electrochemical properties of polyaniline/carbon quantum dots nanocomposites modified screen-printed carbon and gold electrodes. Mater. Res. Express 2023, 10, 125603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Das, P.; Ganguly, S.; Marvi, P.K.; Sherazee, M.; Tang, X.; Srinivasan, S.; Rajabzadeh, A.R. Carbon Dots Infused 3D Printed Cephalopod Mimetic Bactericidal and Antioxidant Hydrogel for Uniaxial Mechano-Fluorescent Tactile Sensor. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2409819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rezvani, M.; Ganji, M.D.; Jameh-Bozorghi, S.; Niazi, A. DFT/TD-semiempirical study on the structural and electronic properties and absorption spectra of supramolecular fullerene-porphyrine-metalloporphyrine triads based dye-sensitized solar cells. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 194, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kong, J.; Yu, S. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopic Analysis of Protein Secondary Structures. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2007, 39, 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sharif, M.K.; Saleem, M.; Javed, K. Food Materials Science in Egg Powder Industry. In Role of Materials Science in Food Bioengineering; Handbook of Food Bioengineering; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 505–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hrabia, A. Chapter 35—Reproduction in the female. In Sturkie’s Avian Physiology, 7th ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 941–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, L.; Li, H.; Xu, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhou, T.; Huang, N.; Li, Y.; Ding, L. Selective detection of copper ion in complex real samples based on nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 4301–4309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ma, X.; Dong, Y.; Sun, H.; Chen, N. Highly fluorescent carbon dots from peanut shells as potential probes for copper ion: The optimization and analysis of the synthetic process. Mater. Today Chem. 2017, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chaudhary, N.; Gupta, P.K.; Eremin, S.; Solanki, P.R. One-step green approach to synthesize highly fluorescent carbon quantum dots from banana juice for selective detection of copper ions. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. World Health Organization. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality: Fourth Edition Incorporating the First and Second Addenda; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu, L.; Gong, H.; Li, D.; Zhao, L. Synthesis of Carbon Dots from Pear Juice for Fluorescence Detection of Cu2+ Ion in Water. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 18, 5327–5332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lin, Y.-S.; Lin, Y.; Periasamy, A.P.; Cangb, J.; Chang, H.-T. Parameters affecting the synthesis of carbon dots for quantitation of copper ions. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1, 2553–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.; Wu, W.-T.; Wu, M.B.; Sun, H.-D.; Xie, H.; Hu, C.; Wu, X.-Y.; Qiu, J.-S. Yellow-visual fluorescent carbon quantum dots from petroleum coke for the efficient detection of Cu2+ ions. New Carbon Mater. 2015, 30, 550–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ali, H.R.H.; Hassan, A.I.; Hassan, Y.F.; El-Wekil, M.M. Development of dual function polyamine-functionalized carbon dots derived from one step green synthesis for quantitation of Cu2+ and S2 − ions in complicated matrices with high selectivity. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 1353–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Qu, Q.; Zhu, A.; Shao, X.; Shib, G.; Tian, Y. Development of a carbon quantum dots-based fluorescent Cu2+ probe suitable for living cell imaging. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 5473–5475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sanni, S.O.; Moundzounga, T.H.G.; Oseghe, E.O.; Haneklaus, N.H.; Viljoen, E.L.; Brink, H.G. One-Step Green Synthesis of Water-Soluble Fluorescent Carbon Dots and Its Application in the Detection of Cu2+. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Patir, K.; Gogoi, S.K. Nitrogen-doped carbon dots as fluorescence ON–OFF–ON sensor for parallel detection of copper(ii) and mercury(ii) ions in solutions as well as in filter paper-based microfluidic device. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1, 592–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhong, Z.; Jia, L. Room temperature preparation of water-soluble polydopamine-polyethyleneimine copolymer dots for selective detection of copper ions. Talanta 2019, 197, 584–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, S.; Tian, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, X.; Luo, Y.; Asiri, A.M.; Al-Youbi, A.O.; Sun, X. Hydrothermal Treatment of Grass: A Low-Cost, Green Route to Nitrogen-Doped, Carbon-Rich, Photoluminescent Polymer Nanodots as an Effective Fluorescent Sensing Platform for Label-Free Detection of Cu(II) Ions. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2037–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The (A) UV–Vis absorption, (B) direct and (C) indirect Tauc plots, and (D) FT-IR spectra of the S-C-dots. Doted lines in (B,C) indicated the fits to the linear segment of the curves.
Figure 1. The (A) UV–Vis absorption, (B) direct and (C) indirect Tauc plots, and (D) FT-IR spectra of the S-C-dots. Doted lines in (B,C) indicated the fits to the linear segment of the curves.
Materials 18 00637 g001
Figure 2. (A) The weight percentages of carbon, nitrogen, sodium, oxygen, and sulfur in the C-dot samples, as measured by EDS. (B) The XRD spectra of S-C-dots A000 to A100 (bottom to top).
Figure 2. (A) The weight percentages of carbon, nitrogen, sodium, oxygen, and sulfur in the C-dot samples, as measured by EDS. (B) The XRD spectra of S-C-dots A000 to A100 (bottom to top).
Materials 18 00637 g002
Figure 3. (AF) Fluorescence maps of the S-C-dot samples, with black Xs indicating the maximum emission at each excitation wavelength.
Figure 3. (AF) Fluorescence maps of the S-C-dot samples, with black Xs indicating the maximum emission at each excitation wavelength.
Materials 18 00637 g003
Figure 4. (A) The fluorescence spectra of A060 when combined with metals of interest at a concentration of 1 ppm. (B) The normalized fluorescence intensity of A060 at 559 nm in the presence of various metals at 1 and 10 ppm. (C) The fluorescence responses of A060 to Cu2+ at different concentrations, with the fluorescence at 559 nm shown as the means and standard deviations of three individual samples. Rectangles show the means, and red lines are the error bars. The inset displays the linear-response region of the curve (y = 115611 − 50404x).
Figure 4. (A) The fluorescence spectra of A060 when combined with metals of interest at a concentration of 1 ppm. (B) The normalized fluorescence intensity of A060 at 559 nm in the presence of various metals at 1 and 10 ppm. (C) The fluorescence responses of A060 to Cu2+ at different concentrations, with the fluorescence at 559 nm shown as the means and standard deviations of three individual samples. Rectangles show the means, and red lines are the error bars. The inset displays the linear-response region of the curve (y = 115611 − 50404x).
Materials 18 00637 g004
Figure 5. (A) The UV–Vis absorbance spectra of sample A060 as prepared and when dialyzed. (B) The fluorescence spectra of the as-prepared A060 and dialyzed A060 in the presence of 1 ppm Cu2+. (C) The fluorescence spectra of A060 diluted in water, diluted in 2 ppm Cu2+, and after the addition of 3 mg of EDTA.
Figure 5. (A) The UV–Vis absorbance spectra of sample A060 as prepared and when dialyzed. (B) The fluorescence spectra of the as-prepared A060 and dialyzed A060 in the presence of 1 ppm Cu2+. (C) The fluorescence spectra of A060 diluted in water, diluted in 2 ppm Cu2+, and after the addition of 3 mg of EDTA.
Materials 18 00637 g005
Table 1. Comparison of previously reported C-dot-based fluorescent probes for detection of Cu2+.
Table 1. Comparison of previously reported C-dot-based fluorescent probes for detection of Cu2+.
ProbeCarbon Source (s)Synthesis MethodPurificationDetection Mediumλex/λemLOD (LR) [nM]Ref.
DTPA-C-dotsTTDDA and citric acidHT treatment at 180 °C for 6 h, DTPA Fun.3500 Da DM for 72 hpH 7.4 HEPES340/446NR (0–2600)[9]
C-dotsPeanut shellsPyrolysis at 400 °C for 4 hFM, 1000 Da DMWater312/4134800 (0–5000)[33]
CPDsUrineDehydration and carbonization at 200 °C for 12 hC, FM, 1000 Da DM for 12 h6.4 μM EDTA450/5101700 (0–30,000)[13]
C-dotsBanana juiceHT treatment at 150 °C for 4 hFM, C, vacuum dryingpH 8 Borate buffer330/4201650 (5500–4.4 × 106)[34]
C-dotsPear juiceHT treatment at 150 °C for 2 hCWater360/4551570 (0–50,000)[36]
I-C-dotsL-histidineElectrochemical treatment at pH 9FM, 500 Da DM for 24 hpH 3 PBS420/505220 (300–3000)[37]
N-C-dotsCitric acid and L-histidinePyrolysis at 220 °C for 2 h in N atmosphere1000 Da DMpH 4 NaAc-Hac buffer360/450190 (600–30,000)[32]
N-S-C-dots[C4mim] [Cys]Sulfuric acid carbonization at 120 °C for 36 hN, 500 Da DMpH 7 PBS336/430180 (500–5000)[14]
PEI-C-dotsBiomass tar and PEIHT treatment at 180 °C for 2 hFM, 3500 Da DM for 24 hpH 4 PBS340/46080 (80–400,000)[6]
C-dotsLeeksPyrolysis at 350 °C for 3 h pH 7.4360/45050 (10–104)[15]
C-dotsPetroleum cokeUltrasound-assisted chemical oxidationN, FM, 3500 Da DM for 72 hEDTA420/51329 (250–10,000)[38]
PA-C-dotsVitis vinifera juiceThermolysis at 200 °C for 6 hFMpH 7 BR435/49820 (70–60,000)[39]
N-C-dotsPak choi juiceHT treatment at 150 °C for 12 hFM, CpH 7.4 Tris-HAc380/46010 (0–100)[10]
TPEA-C-dotsGraphite rodsElectrochemical treatment, TPEA Fun.FM, CpH 7 H2O/C2H5OH (9:1, v/v)420/50010 (1000–100,000)[40]
C-dotsPEIMicrowave-assisted methodN, FM, 1000 Da DM for 24 hpH 7 BR360/4627 (10–2000)[12]
BPEI-C-dotsCitric acid and BPEIPyrolysis for 3 hSGCCpH 4365/4606 (10–1100)[16]
C-dotsPine conesMicrowave pyrolysis at 1000 W for 1 hC, FM, vacuum dryingpH 4 PBS360/4305 (Not linear)[41]
C-dotsPrawn shellsHT treatment at 200 °C for 8 hC, vacuum dryingpH 4 PBS330/4055 (0.1–5000)[11]
N-C-dotsUrea and EDTAPyrolysis at 200 °C for 1 hFMWater360/4342.3 (1–22,000)[42]
PDA-PEI copolymer dotsDA-HCl and BPEIDopamine hydro-
Chloride
PolymerizationFM, 1000 Da DM for 4 hpH 5 PBS380/5301.6 (1.6–80,000)[43]
C-dotsGrassHT treatment at 180 °C for 3 hCpH 7 PBS360/4431 (0–50,000)[44]
S-C-dotsCEW and L-cysteineRoom-temperature base catalysis for 6 hNoneWater530/55952 (0–15,700)This work
λex/λem: excitation/emission wavelengths; BPEI: branched PEI; BR: Britton–Robinson buffer; C: centrifugation; CPDs: C-dots from urine of diet heavily supplemented with vitamin C; Cyclam: Sodium N-cyclohexylsulfamate; Da: Dalton; DA-HCl: Dopamine hydro-Chloride; DM: dialysis membrane; DTPA: 3–3′-dithiodipropanoic acid; EDTA: Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; FM: filter membrane; Fun.: Functionalization; LOD: limit of detection; LR: linear range; N: neutralization; NR: not reported; PA-C-dots: polyamine-functionalized C-dots; PDA: polydopamine; PEI: Polyethyleneimine; HT: hydrothermal; I-C-dots: Iodide-C-dots; SGCC: silica gel column chromatography; TPEA: ([N-(2-aminoethyl)-N,N,N0-tris(pyridin-2-ylmethyl) ethane-1,2-diamine]; TTDDA: 4,7,10-trioxa-1,13-tridecane diamine; [C4mim] [Cys]: 1-butyl-3-methylimidazo-lium 2-amino-3-mercaptopropionic acid(L-cysteine).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cardoso-Ávila, P.E.; Pichardo-Molina, J.L. Utilizing Chicken Egg White and L-Cysteine for Green Synthesis of Carbon Dots: Rapid and Cost-Effective Detection of Cu2+ Ions. Materials 2025, 18, 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030637

AMA Style

Cardoso-Ávila PE, Pichardo-Molina JL. Utilizing Chicken Egg White and L-Cysteine for Green Synthesis of Carbon Dots: Rapid and Cost-Effective Detection of Cu2+ Ions. Materials. 2025; 18(3):637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030637

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cardoso-Ávila, Pablo Eduardo, and Juan Luis Pichardo-Molina. 2025. "Utilizing Chicken Egg White and L-Cysteine for Green Synthesis of Carbon Dots: Rapid and Cost-Effective Detection of Cu2+ Ions" Materials 18, no. 3: 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030637

APA Style

Cardoso-Ávila, P. E., & Pichardo-Molina, J. L. (2025). Utilizing Chicken Egg White and L-Cysteine for Green Synthesis of Carbon Dots: Rapid and Cost-Effective Detection of Cu2+ Ions. Materials, 18(3), 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030637

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop