Next Article in Journal
Room Temperature Consolidation of a Porous Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) Matrix by the Addition of Maltose to the Water-in-Oil Emulsion
Previous Article in Journal
Roles of Extracellular Polysaccharides and Biofilm Formation in Heavy Metal Resistance of Rhizobia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanical Properties and Durability of Ultra High Strength Concrete Incorporating Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

1
Department of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
2
Research Center of Engineering Materials and Structural Durability, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2016, 9(6), 419; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9060419
Submission received: 5 May 2016 / Revised: 5 May 2016 / Accepted: 18 May 2016 / Published: 27 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Advanced Composites)

Abstract

:
In this work, the effect of the addition of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) on the mechanical properties and durability of ultra high strength concrete (UHSC) is reported. First, the MWCNTs were dispersed by a nano sand-mill in the presence of a surfactant in water. The UHSC specimens were prepared with various amounts of MWCNTs, ranging from 0% to 0.15% by weight of cement (bwoc). Results indicated that use of an optimal percentage of MWCNTs (0.05% bwoc) caused a 4.63% increase in compressive strength and a 24.0% decrease in chloride diffusion coefficient of UHSC at 28 days curing. Moreover, the addition of MWCNTs also improved the flexural strength and deformation ability. Furthermore, a field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) was used to observe the dispersion of MWCNTs in the cement matrix and morphology of the hardened cement paste containing MWCNTs. FE-SEM observation revealed that MWCNTs were well dispersed in the matrix and no agglomerate was found and the reinforcing effect of MWCNTs on UHSC was thought to be pulling out and microcrack bridging of MWCNTs, which transferred the load in tension.

1. Introduction

Concrete, a quasi-brittle construction material commonly used in the world, has a relatively high compressive strength, but low flexural and tensile strengths [1]. Moreover, cracks are one of the main hidden defects in concrete structures; they cause brittle fracture, shorten the service life, and lower the durability [2,3,4,5]. Generally, the damage and failure of concrete are caused by the nucleation, growth, and coalescence of microcracks [6,7,8]. One strategy to inhibit the formation of cracks is to randomly introduce short discrete fibers into concrete [9]. After the microcracks coalesce into macrocracks, traditional microfibers (e.g., steel fiber or polypropylene fiber) mitigate their unstable propagation by providing effective bridging, strength, toughness, and ductility [9,10,11,12,13,14]. However, these microfibers cannot stop or prevent the initiation of microcracks in a concrete matrix [15,16].
In the past decade, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), discovered by Iijima in 1991 [17], have attracted much interest among cement and concrete researchers. CNTs are quasi one-dimensional carbon nanomaterials with aspect ratios ranging from 30 to more than many thousands, and they can be classified as single-walled CNTs (SWCNTs) rolled up by one-layer graphene sheet and multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs) rolled up by multilayer graphene sheets [18,19]. CNTs have excellent mechanical properties, with elastic modulus of approximately 1 TPa, tensile strength of over 50 GPa and yield strain of up to 10%–20% [20,21,22]. These unique properties of CNTs may be help to prevent the initiation of microcracks in cement matrix at very early times [1,19]. Therefore, CNTs can be used as reinforcement materials of cement composites. Previous studies showed that the addition of CNTs (especially MWCNTs) improved the mechanical properties [15,16,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30] and durability [31,32,33] of cement composites.
Li et al. [23] reported that the addition of 0.5% surface-treated MWCNTs by weight of cement (bwoc) into cement mortar increased the compressive and flexural strengths by 19% and 25%, respectively. Yakovlev et al. [24] reported that the use of CNTs (0.05% bwoc) increased the compressive strength of a cement-based foam concrete by 70%. Konsta-Gdoutous et al. [25] reported that the incorporation of MWCNTs (0.08% bwoc) to cement paste caused a 35% increase in flexural strength. Sobolkina et al. [28] reported that the modification of a cement paste with CNT dispersions significantly increased the compressive strength and moderately increased the tensile strength under a high strain rate loading. Hu et al. [15] reported that the addition of MWCNTs with a carboxyl group (0.1% bwoc) into cement paste improved the fracture energy and fracture toughness by 42.9% and 19.2%, respectively. Zou et al. [30] reported that the use of MWCNTs significantly improved the elasticity modulus, flexural strength, and fracture energy of cement pastes. Yang et al. [32] reported that the addition of MWCNTs increased the impermeability and abrasion resistance of cement composites. The addition of MWCNTs also efficiently improved the resistance to chloride ion penetration and sulfate attack [33]. Moreover, the addition of MWCNTs improved the microstructure of cement matrix, such as it decreased the porosity and increased microcrack bridging capacity at a nanoscale level [23,30]. This helped to improve the mechanical and durability properties of cement composites. Furthermore, the addition of MWCNTs with high electrical property increased the pressure-sensitive properties of cement composites [34,35].
Because of the low yield and high cost of MWCNTs, previous studies have focused on the effect of MWCNTs on the performance of cement pastes or mortars; however, the properties of concrete, especially ultra high strength concrete (UHSC) have been rarely reported. Modern high-rise buildings are built higher and larger and in ever increasing numbers, and the application of UHSC has become an inevitable trend. The compressive strength of UHSC is >100 MPa, but its safety has been questioned because of possible ultra-brittle failure behavior [36,37].
In the present study, the effect of MWCNTs on the mechanical properties and durability of UHSC was investigated. First, the MWCNTs were dispersed by a nano sand-mill in the presence of a surfactant (noncovalent treatment) in water. Moreover, the dispersion of MWCNTs in the cement matrix and morphology of the hardened cement paste containing MWCNTs (0.3% bwoc) were observed using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM).

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

The properties of MWCNTs are shown in Table 1. Polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP), a commercially available surfactant, was used for dispersing MWCNTs in water. Ordinary Portland cement type II 42.5R (C), silica fume (SF), and ground granulated blast-furnace slag (BS) were used in all mixtures. The chemical compositions and physical properties of C, SF, and BS are listed in Table 2. A polycarboxylate-based superplasticizer (SP) was used in concrete mixtures for workability purposes. The fine aggregate (FA) used in this study was natural river sand with a fineness modulus of 2.79. The coarse aggregate (CA) was crushed granite with a maximum size of 20 mm. Moreover, tributyl phosphate (TP) was used for defoaming.

2.2. Dispersion of MWCNTs

The MWCNTs were dispersed using PVP by the surfactant-milling method. The mass ratio of the MWCNTs to the dispersant was 1:2, and the dispersant was first dissolved in water. Then, the weighed MWCNTs were added into the aqueous dispersant solutions and well dispersed at room temperature for 2 h using a BYZr-0.3 L turbo-type nano sand-mill (Figure 1), which produced by Shenzhen City Boyee chemical mechanical Co., Ltd. in China. The final dispersion concentration was 3 wt % MWCNTs that remained homogeneous when stored for >2 months. The key processing parameters of the nano sand-mill were as follows: a linear velocity of 10.5–11.5 r/min, 0.8–1.0 mm zirconium balls of zirconium oxide as the grinding medium, 60%–70% filling amount, and cooling water temperature 5 ± 3 °C.

2.3. Preparation of Specimens

A mixture of cement paste containing MWCNTs was prepared for FE-SEM observation. The MWCNTs were added in the amount of 0.3% bwoc, and the water/cement ratio of the cement paste was 0.5. The cement paste was analyzed after 28 days of standard curing (RH: ≥95%, T: 20 ± 1 °C) in a standard curing box.
Five mixtures of UHSC were prepared by mixing cementitious materials (cm), aggregates, MWCNTs, water, and SP. The ratio of water-to-cementitious materials (w/cm) was maintained as 0.20 for all the concrete admixtures. MWCNTs were added at levels of 0.00%, 0.03%, 0.05%, 0.10%, and 0.15% bwoc in the UHSC mixtures. The UHSC samples were denoted as CNT00, CNT03, CNT05, CNT10, and CNT15. The mixture proportions for the UHSC are shown in Table 3.
Prior to pouring into a concrete mixer, the aggregates were air dried at room temperature. Sand was poured and mixed with the cementitious materials (C, SF, and BS), followed by the addition of coarse aggregates. All the dry materials were mixed for 2 min before water and SP were added. For the mixture containing MWCNTs, the dispersion of MWCNTs was first dissolved in water. After adding water and SP, the concrete mixtures were mixed for 4 min. After pouring the mixtures into oiled molds, the specimens were compacted on a vibration table. Then, the specimens were covered with a plastic sheet for 24 h. All the specimens were cured in a standard curing room (RH: ≥95%, T: 20 ± 2 °C) until the specified testing age.

2.4. Test Methods

2.4.1. Flexural and Compressive Strength Tests

To evaluate the effect of CNTs on the mechanical properties of the UHSC samples, flexural and compressive strength tests were conducted on cuboids of 100 mm × 100 mm × 300 mm with a loading rate of 20 kN/min and cubes of 100 mm × 100 mm × 100 mm with a loading rate of 1.0 MPa/s according to the GB/T50081-2002 standard [38], respectively. Each test was conducted in triplicates. The flexural strength was calculated using the following formula:
f = 3 F L 2 b h 2
where f is the flexural strength (MPa), F is the failure load (N), L is the span between two supporting points (200 mm), and b and h are the width and height of the specimens (mm), respectively.

2.4.2. Accelerated Chloride Permeability Tests

The conventional permeability test methods (e.g., water permeability or gas permeability test) cannot be applied to high performance concrete because it is very dense and impermeable [39]. Because the UHSC developed in this study had an extremely low permeability, the rapid chloride permeability test method, NEL method, [40] was used in this study.
The specimen size for the chloride permeability test was Φ 100 mm × 50 mm, and each test was conducted in triplicates. The specimens were washed thoroughly and then placed in a vacuum box as shown in Figure 2a to expel all the air from the internal voids. After the vacuum suction was maintained for 6 h at a vacuum level of 0.06 atm, a saturated NaCl solution (4 M) was injected into the vacuum box, and the specimens were submerged in brine for 4 h at 0.06 atm. Then, the vacuum pump and valves were closed, and the specimens were soaked for another 18 h, thus filling all the voids with brine. Finally, the specimens were removed and sandwiched between two copper electrodes under an 8 V low voltage, as shown in Figure 2b [41].

2.4.3. Morphology Observation

The field-emission transmission electron microscopy (FE-TEM) micrographs of the MWCNT samples were obtained using a PHILIPS TECNAI 10 instrument (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) working at 100 kV.
The cement paste sample with a size of approximately 5 mm × 5 mm × 5 mm was prepared at 28 days after being crushed. The sample was kept in alcohol till the SEM observation. The field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) micrographs of the cement paste samples were recorded using a Nova NANOSEM 430 instrument (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) working at 10.0 kV.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mechanical Properties

The results of the strength tests are shown in Figure 3. The compressive strength of the specimens was higher than 114.40 MPa at 28 days. Because the compressive strength was measured using nonstandard samples, the test results were multiplied with a strength conversion coefficient of 0.95 [36]. Apparently, the compressive strength of the concrete specimens prepared in this study reached the technical requirement of UHSC [36,37]. The compressive and flexural strengths increased with the percentage of MWCNTs until they reached 0.05% bwoc. Then, the strengths decreased with increasing percentage of MWCNTs from 0.05% to 0.15% bwoc. As shown in Figure 3, the specimens containing 0.03% and 0.05% MWCNTs bwoc exhibited 4.66% and 5.65% increase in compressive strength at 7 days; 4.20% and 4.63% increase in compressive strength at 28 days; simultaneously 5.11% and 7.56% increase in flexural strength at 7 days than the control UHSC sample, respectively. Clearly, the best result was obtained for 0.05% MWCNTs bwoc. In the literature, it has been concluded that small amounts of MWCNTs of approximately 0.02–0.10 wt % provide the best improvements in the mechanical properties of cement-based materials [26].
Figure 4 shows the typical flexural stress–strain curves of the UHSC containing MWCNTs. The addition of MWCNTs significantly increased the deformation ability of UHSC. The failure displacement increased with increasing MWCNT content. Similar results were obtained in the literature [23,29].

3.2. Chloride Permeability

The results of the chloride permeability tests are shown in Figure 5. The effectiveness of MWCNTs in increasing the resistance to the chloride penetration of UHSC increased in the order CNT05 > CNT03 > CNT10 > CNT00 > CNT15, consistent with the variation between the strengths and percentage of MWCNTs (Figure 3). As shown in Figure 5, the chloride diffusion coefficient of CNT03, CNT05, and CNT10 samples decreased by 22.8%, 24.0%, and 8.8% compared to that of CNT00, respectively. These results indicate that the addition of MWCNTs significantly affected the chloride permeability of UHSC.
In the literature, previous studies concluded that the increase or decrease in the resistance to chloride penetration is essentially because of the improvement or degeneration of the pore structures of concrete [41]. The fact that the addition of MWCNTs improved the resistance to chloride penetration of UHSC indicates that the porosity of UHSC decreased, and the pore sizes decreased because of the addition of MWCNTs [29]. However, the chloride diffusion coefficient of UHSC showed an increasing trend when the percentage of MWCNTs was higher than 0.05 wt %. These results can be attributed to the addition of surfactant PVP. The presence of PVP caused foaming inside the cement matrix during the mixing, consistent with that reported in the literature [42]. In this study, the mass ratio of PVP to MWCNTs was 2:1. With increasing percentage of MWCNTs from 0.10% to 0.15% bwoc, a lot of foam was generated by PVP for MWCNTs to improve the pore structure of UHSC, and the use of a defoamer was not sufficient to eliminate the effect of foam completely. This is one of the main reasons why the strength of UHSC did not improve continuously with increasing content of MWCNTs.

3.3. Micrograph

To successfully apply MWCNTs for the reinforcement of cement matrix, two key requirements must be satisfied: good dispersion and optimal bond strength [43].
Figure 6 shows a micrograph of the original MWCNTs. The MWCNTs were typically entangled hollow tubes with 20–40 nm outer diameters. Figure 7 shows the distribution of the MWCNTs in a cement matrix. Clearly, the MWCNTs were well dispersed in the cement matrix with each MWCNT existing individually, and no MWCNT aggregate was observed in the matrix. Therefore, the first requirement was achieved.
Figure 7a,b show the pulled-out MWCNTs on the fracture surface of the hardened cement paste. Figure 7a shows that a small amount of cement hydration products attached to the surface of the pulled-out end. Furthermore, Figure 7b shows that a pulled-out MWCNT with ~70 nm diameter was larger than that of the original MWCNTs (20–40 nm), indicating that the pulled-out MWCNT was tightly wrapped with the hydration products. However, a large amount of cement hydration products attached to the surface of MWCNTs modified with a H2SO4 and HNO3 mixture (covalent treatment) [23]. The smooth surface of the pulled-out MWCNT corresponds to the nanotube-matrix interface shear failure, whereas the MWCNT surface covered with the hydration product corresponds to the matrix failure. The matrix failure indicates that the bonding strength between the MWCNTs and cement matrix is strong [30]. Thus, compared to covalent dispersion, the noncovalent dispersion maintains the superior properties of MWCNTs, but does not provide high bond strength between the MWCNTs and matrix [44]. This may be an important reason for the limited increase in strengths of UHSC mentioned in Section 3.1.
Notably, an individual MWCNT that acts as a bridge across a crack was observed except for several pulled-out MWCNTs (Figure 7c). If this crack-bridging CNT is observed at a larger amplification (Figure 7d), clearly the two ends of the MWCNT were embedded in both sides of the crack with ~0.4 µm in width. In comparison, microfibers generally require a few micrometers of crack opening for developing a noticeable crack bridging stress [30]. These results show that MWCNTs act as bridges across microcracks that cannot be achieved by conventional microfibers and therefore guarantee the load transfer under tension [23], which is helpful to improve the deformation ability and durability.

4. Conclusions

The following conclusions have, hence, been drawn:
  • A new method proposed for dispersing MWCNTs in water is effective. The FE-SEM observation shows that the MWCNTs were well dispersed, and no MWCNT agglomerate was visible in the cement matrix.
  • The mechanical properties increased in the presence of the optimum percentage of MWCNTs (0.05% bwoc). Particularly, the compressive strength of UHSC containing 0.05 wt % MWCNTs at 28 days increased by 4.63% than that of UHSC without MWCNTs (116.7 MPa). Moreover, the addition of MWCNTs significantly increased the flexural strength and deformation ability of UHSC.
  • Compared to the relatively small increase in strengths, a significant improvement was observed in the resistance to chloride penetration by incorporating MWCNTs. The chloride diffusion coefficient of UHSC containing 0.05 % MWCNTs bwoc decreased by 24.0%.
  • The morphology of the hardened cement paste was observed by FE-SEM analysis to understand the mechanism of improvement with MWCNTs. The microstructural studies indicate that MWCNTs act as bridges across microcracks, thus guaranteeing the transfer of the tension load. Furthermore, a lot of MWCNTs were pulled out from the matrix without rupture failure.
  • The application of MWCNTs in UHSC needs further study, and covalent treatment should be considered for dispersing MWCNTs.

Acknowledgments

Authors greatly acknowledge the financial support from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 51478207) and Guangdong Province science and technology plan project (NO. 2012B091000149, NO. 2013B090600046, and NO. 2015B090901003).

Author Contributions

Dong Ouyang conceived and designed the experiments; Liulei Lu performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the paper; Weiting Xu revised the manuscript of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Raki, L.; Beaudoin, J.; Alizadeh, R.; Makar, J.M.; Sato, T. Cement and Concrete Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. Materials 2010, 3, 918–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lee, B.J.; Hyun, J.H.; Kim, Y.Y.; Shin, K.J. Chloride permeability of damaged high-performance fiber-reinforced cement composite by repeated compressive loads. Materials 2014, 7, 5802–5815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wiktor, V.; Jonkers, H.M. Quantification of crack-healing in novel bacteria-based self-healing concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2011, 33, 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gu, C.S.; Li, Z.C.; Xu, B. Abnormality diagnosis of cracks in the concrete dam based on dynamical structure mutation. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2011, 54, 1930–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gao, X.F.; Lo, Y.T.; Tam, C.M. Investigation of micro-cracks and microstructure of high performance lightweight aggregate concrete. Build. Environ. 2002, 37, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ravi-Chandar, K.; Yang, B. On the role of microcracks in the dynamic fracture of brittle materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 1997, 45, 535–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sain, T.; Kishen, J.M.C. Energy-based equivalence between damage and fracture in concrete under fatigue. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2007, 74, 2320–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ning, J.G. A constitutive model based on the evolution and coalescence of elliptical micro-cracks for quasi-brittle materials. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2012, 57, 3773–3781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nili, M.; Afroughsabet, V. The long-term compressive strength and durability properties of silica fume fiber-reinforced concrete. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 531, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kalifa, P.; Chéné, G.; Gallé, C. High-temperature behaviour of HPC with polypropylene fibres: From spalling to microstructure. Cem. Concr. Res. 2001, 31, 1487–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Banthia, N.; Sappakittipakorn, M. Toughness enhancement in steel fiber reinforced concrete through fiber hybridization. Cem. Concr. Res. 2007, 37, 1366–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nili, M.; Afroughsabet, V. Combined effect of silica fume and steel fibers on the impact resistance and mechanical properties of concrete. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2010, 37, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, S.W.; Jang, S.J.; Kang, D.H.; Ahn, K.L.; Yun, H.D. Mechanical properties and eco-efficiency of steel fiber reinforced alkali-activated slag concrete. Materials 2015, 8, 7309–7321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, S.C.; Oh, J.H.; Cho, J.Y. Compressive behavior of fiber-reinforced concrete with end-hooked steel fibers. Materials 2015, 8, 1442–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hu, Y.; Luo, D.; Li, P.; Li, Q.; Sun, G. Fracture toughness enhancement of cement paste with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 70, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, S.L.; Liu, J.T.; Li, Q.H. Mechanical properties and microstructure of multi-walled carbon nanotube-reinforced cement paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 76, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Iijima, S. Helical microtubes of graphitic carbon. Nature 1991, 354, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Grobert, N. Carbon nanotubes—Becoming clean. Mater. Today 2007, 10, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Musso, S.; Tulliani, J.M.; Ferroc, G.; Tagliaferro, A. Influence of carbon nanotubes structure on the mechanical behavior of cement composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2009, 69, 1985–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Treacy, M.M.J.; Ebbesen, T.W.; Gibson, J.M. Exceptionally high Young’s modulus observed for individual carbon nanotubes. Nature 1996, 381, 678–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Walters, D.A.; Ericson, L.M.; Casavant, M.J.; Liu, J. Elastic strain of freely suspended single-wall carbon nanotube ropes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 74, 3803–3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yu, M.F.; Lourie, O.; Dyer, M.J.; Moloni, K.; Kelly, T.F.; Ruoff, R.S. Strength and breaking mechanism of multiwalled carbon nanotubes under tensile load. Science 2000, 287, 637–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, G.Y.; Wang, P.M.; Zhao, X. Mechanical Behavior and Microstructure of Cement Composites Incorporating Surface-Treated Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Carbon 2005, 43, 1239–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yakovlev, G.; Keriene, J.; Gailius, A. Cement based foam concrete reinforced by carbon nanotubes. Mater. Sci. 2006, 12, 147–151. [Google Scholar]
  25. Konsta-Gdouto, M.S.; Metaxa, Z.S.; Shah, S.P. Multi-scale mechanical and fracture characteristics and early-age strain capacity of high performance carbon nanotubes/cement nanocomposites. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2010, 32, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Konsta-Gdoutos, M.S.; Metaxa, Z.S.; Shah, S.P. Highly dispersed carbon nanotube reinforced cement based materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2010, 40, 1052–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tyson, B.M.; Asce, S.M.; Al-Rub, R.K.A.; Grasley, Z. Carbon nanotubes and carbon nanofibers for enhancing the mechanical properties of nanocomposite cementitious materials. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2011, 23, 1028–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sobolkina, A.; Mechtcherine, V.; Khavrus, V.; Maier, D.; Mende, M.; Ritschel, M.; Leonhardt, A. Dispersion of carbon nanotubes and its influence on the mechanical properties of the cement matrix. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2012, 34, 1104–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, B.M.; Han, Y.; Liu, S. Effect of highly dispersed carbon nanotubes on the flexural toughness of cement-based composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 46, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zou, B.; Chen, S.J.; Korayem, A.H.; Collins, F.; Wang, C.M.; Duan, W.H. Effect of ultrasonication energy on engineering properties of carbon nanotube reinforced cement pastes. Carbon 2015, 85, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Del Carmen Camacho, M.; Galao, O.; Baeza, F.J.; Zornoza, E.; Garcés, P. Mechanical properties and durability of CNT cement composites. Materials 2014, 7, 1640–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, H.Q.; Yu, H.S.; Zhao, X. Reinforcement of the mechanical and durability performance of cement-based materials with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Adv. Microsc. Res. 2014, 9, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, B.M.; Liu, S.; Han, Y.; Leng, P. Preparation and durability of cement-based composites doped with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2015, 7, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, G.Y.; Wang, P.M.; Zhao, X.H. Pressure-sensitive properties and microstructure of carbon nanotube reinforced cement composites. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2007, 29, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Han, B.G.; Yu, X.; Ou, J.P. Effect of water content on the piezoresistivity of MWNT/cement composites. J. Mater. Sci. 2010, 45, 3714–3719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ouyang, D.; Yu, B. A study on mechanical properties of very high strength concrete. J. Chongqing Jianzhu Univ. 2003, 25, 38–42. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  37. Yi, N.H.; Kim, J.H.J.; Han, T.S.; Cho, Y.G.; Lee, J.H. Blast-resistant characteristics of ultra-high strength concrete and reactive powder concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 28, 694–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. GB/T 50081-2002. Standard for Test Method of Mechanical Properties on Ordinary Concrete; National Standard of the P.R. China: Beijing, China, 2003. (In Chinese)
  39. Oh, B.H.; Cha, S.W.; Jang, B.S.; Jang, S.Y. Development of high-performance concrete having high resistance to chloride penetration. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2002, 212, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lu, X. Application of the Nernst-Einstein equation to concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 1997, 27, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, M.H.; Li, H. Pore structure and chloride permeability of concrete containing nano-particles for pavement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 608–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhu, H.B.; Wang, P.M.; Li, C.; Liu, X.; Yang, P.; Cao, X. Reseach on disperion of multi-walled carbon nanotubes in cement paste. J. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 40, 1431–1436. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  43. Coleman, J.N.; Khan, U.; Blau, W.J.; Gun’ko, Y.K. Small but strong: A review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube-polymer composites. Carbon 2006, 44, 1624–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, S.J.; Collins, F.G.; Macleod, A.J.N.; Pan, Z.; Duan, W.H.; Wang, C.M. Carbon nanotube-cement composites: A retrospect. IES J. Part A Civ. Struct. Eng. 2011, 4, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Image of the nano sand-mill.
Figure 1. Image of the nano sand-mill.
Materials 09 00419 g001
Figure 2. Instrument used in the chloride permeability test. (a) Brine saturation device under vacuum; (b) test equipment.
Figure 2. Instrument used in the chloride permeability test. (a) Brine saturation device under vacuum; (b) test equipment.
Materials 09 00419 g002
Figure 3. Mechanical properties of UHSC containing MWCNTs. (a) compressive strength; (b) flexural strength.
Figure 3. Mechanical properties of UHSC containing MWCNTs. (a) compressive strength; (b) flexural strength.
Materials 09 00419 g003
Figure 4. Load-displacement curves of UHSC incorporating MWCNTs. CNT00, CNT03 CNT05, CNT10, and CNT15 denotes the UHSC sample containing 0.00%, 0.03%, 0.05%, 0.10%, and 0.15% MWCNTs bwoc, respectively.
Figure 4. Load-displacement curves of UHSC incorporating MWCNTs. CNT00, CNT03 CNT05, CNT10, and CNT15 denotes the UHSC sample containing 0.00%, 0.03%, 0.05%, 0.10%, and 0.15% MWCNTs bwoc, respectively.
Materials 09 00419 g004
Figure 5. The chloride diffusion coefficient of UHSC with different content of MWCNTs.
Figure 5. The chloride diffusion coefficient of UHSC with different content of MWCNTs.
Materials 09 00419 g005
Figure 6. TEM image of MWCNTs. Bar = 200 nm.
Figure 6. TEM image of MWCNTs. Bar = 200 nm.
Materials 09 00419 g006
Figure 7. SEM images of pulled-out and crack bridging MWCNTs in cement matrix: (a) A typically pulled-out CNT with the cement hydration attaching on the surface; (b) a pulled-out CNT with about 70 nm in diameter; (c) pulling out and crack bridging of CNTs; (d) local amplification for the crack-bridging CNT in (c).
Figure 7. SEM images of pulled-out and crack bridging MWCNTs in cement matrix: (a) A typically pulled-out CNT with the cement hydration attaching on the surface; (b) a pulled-out CNT with about 70 nm in diameter; (c) pulling out and crack bridging of CNTs; (d) local amplification for the crack-bridging CNT in (c).
Materials 09 00419 g007
Table 1. Material properties of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs).
Table 1. Material properties of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs).
Diameter (nm)Length (μm)Purity (wt %)Ash (wt %)Specific Surface Area (m2/g)
20–405–15>97<380–140
Table 2. Chemical composition and physical properties of C, SF, and BS. LOI, SG, and SSA are the abbreviation of loss on ignition, specific gravity, and specific surface area, respectively.
Table 2. Chemical composition and physical properties of C, SF, and BS. LOI, SG, and SSA are the abbreviation of loss on ignition, specific gravity, and specific surface area, respectively.
MaterialChemical Composition (wt %)Physical Properties
SiO2Al2O3Fe2O3CaOMgOSO3LOISGSSA (m2/kg)
C20.134.534.1163.881.352.282.823.10331
SF93.850.690.170.751.220.411.882.20~20,000
BS44.9114.8631.087.180.651.802.831228
Table 3. Mixture proportions of ultra high strength concrete (UHSC) incorporating MWCNTs.
Table 3. Mixture proportions of ultra high strength concrete (UHSC) incorporating MWCNTs.
NO.w/cmCNTs (wt %)TP (vol %)Quantities (kg/m3)
CSFBSCNTsFACAWPCs
CNT000.20.000.1342060120079897612015
CNT030.20.030.13420601200.12679897612015
CNT050.20.050.13420601200.2179897612015
CNT100.20.100.13420601200.4279897612015
CNT150.20.150.13420601200.6379897612015

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, L.; Ouyang, D.; Xu, W. Mechanical Properties and Durability of Ultra High Strength Concrete Incorporating Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Materials 2016, 9, 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9060419

AMA Style

Lu L, Ouyang D, Xu W. Mechanical Properties and Durability of Ultra High Strength Concrete Incorporating Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Materials. 2016; 9(6):419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9060419

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Liulei, Dong Ouyang, and Weiting Xu. 2016. "Mechanical Properties and Durability of Ultra High Strength Concrete Incorporating Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes" Materials 9, no. 6: 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9060419

APA Style

Lu, L., Ouyang, D., & Xu, W. (2016). Mechanical Properties and Durability of Ultra High Strength Concrete Incorporating Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Materials, 9(6), 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9060419

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop