Next Article in Journal
Estimation of Aboveground Vegetation Water Storage in Natural Forests in Jiuzhaigou National Nature Reserve of China Using Machine Learning and the Combination of Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Chloroplast Genome Variation and Phylogenetic Analyses of Seven Dwarf Ornamental Bamboo Species
Previous Article in Journal
The Evaluation of Small- and Medium-Stream Carbon Pools in the Riparian Forests in Latvia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetic Evaluation of Juniperus sabina L. (Cupressaceae) in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions of China Based on SSR Markers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/f13040508
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Morphometric Analyses of Leaf Shapes in Four Sympatric Mediterranean Oaks and Hybrids in the Algerian Kabylie Forest

by
Amel Akli
1,*,
Zaida Lorenzo
2,
Ricardo Alía
3,
Khellaf Rabhi
1 and
Enrique Torres
4
1
Department of Agronomic Sciences, Université Tizi Ouzou-Mouloud Mammeri, Tizi Ouzou 15000, Algeria
2
INIA, CSIC, DTEVL, Avda A Coruña s/n., 28040 Madrid, Spain
3
INIA, CSIC, Forest Research Centre, Avda A Coruña s/n., 28040 Madrid, Spain
4
Department of Agroforestry Sciences, Universidad de Huelva, 21006 Huelva, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2022, 13(4), 508; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13040508
Submission received: 14 January 2022 / Revised: 22 March 2022 / Accepted: 23 March 2022 / Published: 25 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Population Genetic and Morphological Diversity of Woody Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
(1) Background: local morphological variation can provide useful information to clarify the role of hybridization in Mediterranean oaks. Accordingly, we have characterized putative hybrids and oak species coexisting in a highly diversified oak forest in Algeria with four native oak species (Quercus suber L., Q. ilex L., Q. canariensis Willd., and Q. afares Pomel). (2) Methods: sixteen plots, including 89 trees from the four native species and their putative hybrids were sampled. Leaves were scanned and their geometric morphometry analyzed by using 11 landmarks on the right side on their abaxial surface. Variation within and among species, and the relationship among oak species and their hybrids were analyzed, utilizing an ANOVA and a canonical analysis using morphoJ software. (3) Results: using the geometric morphometry analysis, we observed that Q. afares shape is intermediate between Q. suber and Q. canariensis, being Q. ilex very different from the others, and that there is no overlap among them. Putative hybrids are morphologically close to Q. afares and, to a lesser extent, to Q. suber and, finally, to Q. ilex and Q. canariensis. (4) Conclusions: the study opens the field for future molecular characterization of hybrids, and for determining their role in terms of adaptation to actual and predicted future climatic conditions. The morphological proximity of hybrids to Q. afares demonstrate this species advantage in the area of study and its importance for the future evolution of the species in the Mediterranean.

1. Introduction

Natural hybridization and introgression are two general evolutionary factors in plants with major evolutionary implications [1] related to the appearance of new entities [2] or new variants more adapted to environments different from those of the parental species [3], or even favoring the colonization of new environments [4,5]. Therefore, hybridization and introgression have practical implications in genetic resources conservation and breeding, as they determine the value of different individuals or populations in defining those activities [6,7]. Accordingly, hybrid zones can provide a wealth of novel genetic variation of value under future climatic conditions [8].
Oaks represent good models for hybridization studies, as interspecific hybridization is a frequent mechanism related to the presence of individuals morphologically and ecologically intermediate between different oak species [9,10,11,12,13] at different spatial scales (local vs. broad range). Hybridization in oaks is related to the extensive sharing of organelle and nuclear genes between different species in a given population [5,14,15]. Different factors influence the frequency and the distribution of hybrids in a population, mainly, reproductive barriers and the direction of introgression [12,16,17,18,19]. The extent and pattern of hybridization can also be influenced by environmental heterogeneity, and the spatial distribution [5,20,21] related to the selective advantages of the species and hybrids.
The study of hybrids in mixed stands could be of great interest in understanding the dynamics and evolution of oaks, and different studies have already characterized the extent of hybridization and the mechanisms involved [10,11]. Phenotypic differentiation between species can provide insights into understanding the mechanisms underlying species differentiation in a given area [22]. These are of special interest under climate change scenarios, as mixed oak forests present a large phenotypic variation in morphological and physiological traits related to adaptation [23,24], derived from the large level of intrapopulation variation of the different oak species [10,24,25], and its implications in local adaptation [26].
Oaks (Quercus spp.) are well represented throughout the Mediterranean basin, and have been described as a complex made of the species and its hybrids. High levels of intrapopulation variation and differentiation have been shown in Mediterranean oak forests [11,27]. Oaks represent an example of a Mediterranean taxonomic group in which individual species maintain morphological and ecological identities despite extensive hybridization and introgression [5,28]. The use of leaf morphology traits has allowed the analysis of the complex genetic structure in populations of this group of species [29,30,31,32]. Leaf morphological traits are highly variable among species [11,33], and can be used to discriminate among them [34]. It has been shown that a morphological classification [21,35,36] has a clear correspondence with the genetic assignment of individuals. These traits have also implications in the adaptation of the species and hybrids to different ecological conditions [37]. However, there is an ongoing critical revision at the taxonomic level, based on multidisciplinary approaches, demonstrating that extremely varied taxonomic frameworks often do not correspond to a real genetic and morphological diversity [38,39,40,41].
The Kabylie forests in Algeria is a mixed forest, which allows the analysis of leaf morphology diversity of oak species and hybrids. This particular forest consists of a mixture of sympatric species living in the same geographic area: Quercus afares Pomel (Afares oak, a stabilized hybrid [42]), Q. canariensis Willd. (Zéen oak), Q. ilex L. (Evergreen oak) and Q. suber L. (Cork oak). Q. canariensis is the dominant species, occupying about 45% of the wooded area; while the pure cork oak occupies 15% of the peripheral zone [43]. The endemic afares oak can be found on certain ridgelines, and is continuously distributed from the Kabylie region in Algeria to the Kroumiria region in Tunisia [43]. Additionally, pure stands occupy about 15% of the wooded area, in occasions mixed with hybrids, while mixed stands cover about 25% of the forested area of cork and afares oaks. Some Q. canariensis and Q. afares over 250 years old have been identified in many Kabylie forests sites, showing their ancestral origin [44].
Our study concerns the leaf characterization of four oak species and their hybrids in the Kabylie forest: Q. afares, Q. canariensis, Q. ilex, and Q. suber. Geometric morphometry [45] quantifies the size and shape of the leaves by analyzing the relative positions of anatomical landmarks and sets of points in them, and has a strong relationship with other morphological traits [46]. Our hypothesis is that mixed Mediterranean oak forests present a high level of inter- and intra-specific variability in leaf morphology, with hybrids increasing the level of phenotypic variation in the area. To study the pattern of phenotypic variation in these mixed stands, we analyze the geometric morphometry of the leaves of hybrids and individuals from the different oak species in the area. Finally, we discuss the implications of our results in the improvement of Mediterranean oaks management and conservation, given that phenotypic variation is the basis for natural selection operating under changing climatic conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

Sampling was carried out in 89 trees located in 16 plots in three Kabylie forests (Akfadou, Beni Ghobri and Taourirt Ighil forests) (Figure 1 and Figures S1–S6). The identification of species and hybrids was based on their taxonomical descriptions, using leaf morphological traits [34,47,48]. Leaf morphology has also been used in the characterization of hybrids in the studied area [49]. Bark has additionally been used to confirm the identification of Q. suber and its hybrids (Figures S1–S6). In total, we sampled Q. afares (20 trees), Q. canariensis (10), Q. ilex (7), Q. suber (11), and putative hybrids (41). The number of sampled trees differs from one plot to another depending on the presence of putative hybrid trees. From each tree, we collected 5 to 10 intact mature leaves at the same period—when leaves were fully developed (10/2015 to 11/2015)-, in the four directions of the crown and at the same height, to avoid dimorphism.

2.1. Morphometric Analysis

The leaves were pressed and dried (Figure S7), and the abaxial surface was scanned using a Brother scanner at a resolution of 300 DPI. The digitalized images were used to record 11 landmarks on the right half side of each leaf [45,50] (Figure 2). In this study, we assessed 532 leaves coming from the 89 sampled trees (a mean of 6 leaves per tree). We scanned two images per leaf (1064 images), and we made two assessments for each scanned image to minimize digitization errors [45,51]. These landmarks were converted into a configuration of 11 pairs of Cartesian coordinates of each leaf. The analysis was made by the software morphoJ [52].

2.2. Data Analysis

Cartesian coordinates of the landmarks were used for data analysis. We performed an outlier analysis based on the visualization of the cumulative distribution of distances of individual samples of the average form of the complete sample, showing no outliers in the data (Figure S8).
The data were used to test the morphological discrimination of the trees (pure and hybrid) present in the forest. Having carried out a limited genetic study in order to discriminate pure oak species in the first place, we checked the homogeneity of the leaf shape conformation in the individuals of the species and putative hybrids.
We used the variation of leaf shape hierarchically (procrustean ANOVA) distributed among leaves, trees, and species to create mean configurations at each of these levels. Leaf-level data were analyzed for leaf shape variation, tree-level data for species discrimination, and species-level data (including hybrid individuals) for multivariate analysis. Centroid size and conformation components of leaves were used for further analysis.
In a second step, a canonical analysis was applied to the individuals, excluding the hybrids, to check for differences among the species described in the Akfadou forest. Canonical analysis was used to find the morphological feature that best separates groups of specimens. The method describes, explains and predicts the membership of predefined groups (species) of a set of observations (trees) from a series of predictive variables (cartesian coordinates). The main purpose of the method is to reduce the number of data’s dimensions, by looking for those where individuals are most separate. These new variables are linear combinations with the original ones. Factorial graphs in scatter plots are constructed enabling a distinction between data groups. A discriminant analysis of comparison (DA) was used to compare each of the two pairs of species.
In a third step, a canonical analysis and a discriminant comparison analysis were applied to all the individuals—including hybrids- to check for the distribution of hybrids in the morphometric space of the pure species in the forest.

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Variation in Oaks Species in the Akfadou Forest

The Procrustes overlay (Figure 2) indicates the dispersion of the landmarks in the samples. Each landmark is surrounded by a cloud of dots representing the different coordinates of all leaves, and the variability from the consensus (higher for landmarks 1, 4, 9, 10 and 11).
The results obtained by the ANOVA analysis (Table 1), indicates the importance of the species (46.77% of total variation in size and 22.11 in conformation or shape) in leaf morphology, followed by that of the plot (21.53 and 9.66% respectively) and, to a lesser extent, of the tree within species and plot (9.63 and 20.14% respectively).

3.2. Morphometric Leaf Variation between Species

The canonical analysis diagram (Figure 3) shows the segregation of groups according to the average conformations per tree of the same species. Along axes 1 and 2, the species are significantly discriminated, and these two axes explain 93.05 % of the total variation. We observe that the shape of Q. afares is intermediate between Q. suber and Q. canariensis, being Q. ilex very different from the other species, and without overlap among them.
The discriminant analysis of comparison confirms the proximity between Q. afares and Q. suber (Figure 3), and the differences with the other species. Boxplots of the populations confirm the differences among the species (Figure S9).

3.3. Morphometric Variations of Hybrids

When including the putative hybrids in the analysis, the canonical analysis shows that those individuals are morphologically close to Q. afares and, to a lesser extent, to Q. suber and, finally, to Q. ilex and Q. canariensis (Figure 4).
The Cross-validation of DA has revealed an overlap of hybrids with Q. afares, and to a lesser extent with Q. suber (T2 values significant, p < 0.0001). The overlaps with Q. canariensis and Q. ilex are non-significant (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

Our study shows that geometric morphometry can explain the pattern of variation among oak species and hybrid individuals at a reduced spatial scale. The results suggest that, in the studied area, the hybrids identified are close to Q. afares and Q. suber, but clearly differ from Q. canariensis and Q. ilex there.
Oak species variation in mixed forest stands has been an open topic for decades [35,36,50] and, in particular, for Q. afares, which has been described as a stabilized hybrid between Q. suber and Q. canariensis [42,44,49]. Our results confirm, after a discriminant analysis, the clear separation of Q. afares from the parental species. Q. afares is closer to Q. suber than to the other parental species (Q. canariensis) in leaf geometric morphometry. The pattern of variation in these morphological traits (a significant effect of site and trees indicative of within-species variation at the local scale), is consistent with other studies [49,51,53], and reflect the existence of standing variation for natural selection to act [54]. The significative within-tree effect is indicative of the phenotypic plasticity of these traits, an important evolutionary factor in Mediterranean oaks at different levels [55,56].
The existence of a significant number of hybrids allows the identification and the analysis of the relationship with the parental species using leaf morphological traits. Based on our results, the hybrids are similar to some of the Q. afares individuals, indicating a likely similar origin (Q. suber × Q. canariensis crosses), or a backcrossing of Q. afares with Q. suber individuals. In all the cases, the similarity with Q. canariensis or Q. ilex is quite low. The leaf morphology of the hybrids is similar to Q. afares, and it is predominant in the area. This leaf morphology could be related to the different sensitivity of this species to the climate [44], and to an absence of particular evidence of decline of the hybrids with respect to the parental species [49]. In our case, we lack a precise genetic characterization to determine the genetic background of Q. afares and the hybrids. In a preliminary genetic characterization of the parental species and the hybrids using five nSSR developed for Q. suber and Q. ilex (Annex 1), the genotypes of 4 out of the 5 hybrids analyzed are compatible with different types of hybrids (eg. Q. afares × Q. suber or Q. suber × Q. canariensis). However, we cannot discard Q. ilex as one of the maternal species, even if geometric morphology does not show any relationship with it. These results are concordant with the analysis of Q. afares and lack of spatial structure [42,49], and with the value of leaf morphology in the analysis of variation in oaks [31,57,58]. However, a complete genetic analysis is needed to discriminate the discrepancies of genetic assignment using morphological traits in a group as complex as that of Mediterranean oaks [29,59]. We also need to consider the necessary samples sizes to better understand this process, related to the inter- and intra-specific variability of Mediterranean oaks [35,53].
One question still open is the impact of hybrids on the genetic structure of the parental species in the long term. Hybrids of Q. ilex and Q. suber [17] are mainly derived from a crossing event, with no clear effects in the long term. However, our results suggest that Q. afares, as a stabilized hybrid, could have an impact on the future genetic structure of the populations, as some of the hybrids are increasing the leaf morphological space of oaks. This is an important aspect for local diversity, a pattern that has not previously been reported at the local scale. However, in some cases, interspecific gene exchanges with molecular markers have been detected in the absence of obvious morphologically intermediate forms [14,60]. In conclusion, we need further genetic research to address this important question.
The implications for management and conservation are related to the use of the different species and to how their hybrids can represent important genetic resources for the future in terms of adaptation or use of those species. At this moment, hybrids are not appreciated, as their main, production-related, characteristics are dissimilar to those of Q. suber, which can have a higher economic value. However, hybrids can have some role in the adaptation to intermediate ecological conditions with respect to the parental species. For instance, Q. afares and Q. canariensis present contrasting differences in relation to the area’s climatic variability [44] and, therefore, we need to increase our knowledge of the role of these hybrids.
This study demonstrates the importance of hybridization in Mediterranean oaks at a local scale, opening the field for future studies analyzing the genetics of the hybrids in terms of molecular characterization and the implications for adaptation to future conditions in a changing global context. We also need to determine if hybridization at the local scales is a mass effect due to the high diversity of oak species and their extensive gene flow, with small effects in the short term in these mixed forests. This information will be essential for implementing efficient conservation measures [61].

5. Conclusions

Mediterranean oaks present a complex genetic structure among the species and populations. Mixed forests, such as the Argelian Kabylie are frequent, consisting of pure species of the genus Quercus; Q. canariensis, Q. afares, Q. suber and Q. ilex and natural hybrids. This study demonstrates the prevalence of hybrids with leaf morphology similar to that of Q. afares, a stabilized hybrid in the area. The new hybrids defined in this work are similar to Q. afares individuals, indicating a bias towards their morphology. In addition, it demonstrates the extensive importance of hybridization in the complex genetic structure at the local scale, and opens the field for future studies. We need to develop population and species genetic studies to further our understanding of the role of hybridization and introgression in the evolutionary history of this species, and to confirm the degree of hybridization in this forest. We also need to analyze the role of hybrids in the adaptation to future conditions. All this information is essential to improve the management and/or genetic conservation programs of the species in the Mediterranean.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/f13040508/s1, Figure S1: Hybrid oaks (Location: CY-Cynegetic centre); Figure S2: Quercus afares (Location: SH- Sidi El Hadi); Figure S3: Quercus afares: a –tree, b-bark (Location: SH- Sidi El Hadi; Figure S4: Quercus suber (Location: AD-Adrar); Figure S5: Hybrids (a-Location: YA-Yakouren, b- VM- Vide Mehaga); Figure S6: Hybrids (Location: LN- Lac noir); Figure S7. Leaves from the different species analysed, Figure S8: Cumulative distribution of distances of individual samples of the average distribution of the complete sample; Figure S9: Size Centroid variation after average species within trees (box plot). [Q. afares (A), Q. suber (S), Q. ilex (I), Q. canariensis (C) and the hybrids (H)]. Annex 1. Genetic characterization.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A., K.R. and E.T.; Formal analysis, A.A. and R.A.; Funding acquisition, R.A. and E.T.; Methodology, Z.L. and E.T.; Project administration, E.T.; Supervision, K.R.; Writing—original draft, A.A. and R.A.; Writing—review & editing, A.A., Z.L., R.A., K.R. and E.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Amel Akli was financed by a grant (Pne2019/2020) from the Algerian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (MESRS) for co-supervision agreement between the Mouloud Mammeri University (Algeria) and the Huelva University (Spain) for PhD studies. Ricardo Alía was funded by the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 773383 (B4EST project), and the Ministry of Science (RTI2018-094691-B-C32).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available at the Zenodo repository (https://zenodo.org/ (accessed on 13 January 2022)), doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6376254.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Abbott, R.J.; Barton, N.H.; Good, J.M. Genomics of hybridization and its evolutionary consequences. Mol. Ecol. 2016, 25, 2325–2332. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Seehausen, O. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rieseberg, L.H.; Raymond, O.; Rosenthal, D.M.; Lai, Z.; Livingstone, K.; Nakazato, T.; Durphy, J.L.; Schwarzbach, A.E.; Donovan, L.A.; Lexer, C. Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science 2003, 301, 1211–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Potts, B.M.; Reid, J.B. Hybridization as a dispersal mechanism. Evolution 1988, 42, 1245–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Petit, R.J.; Bodénès, C.; Ducousso, A.; Roussel, G.; Kremer, A. Hybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks. New Phytol. 2003, 161, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Potts, B.M.; Dungey, H.S. Interspecific hybridization of Eucalyptus: Key issues for breeders and geneticists. New For. 2004, 27, 115–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chan, W.Y.; Hoffmann, A.A.; van Oppen, M.J.H. Hybridization as a conservation management tool. Conserv. Lett. 2019, 12, e12652. [Google Scholar]
  8. Janes, J.K.; Hamilton, J.A. Mixing it up: The role of hybridization in forest management and conservation under climate change. Forests 2017, 8, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Howard, D.J.; Preszler, R.W.; Williams, J.; Fenchel, S.; Boecklen, W.J. How discrete are oak species? Insights from a hybrid zone between Quercus grisea and Quercus gambelii. Evolution 1997, 51, 747–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Curtu, A.L.; Gailing, O.; Finkeldey, R. Evidence for hybridization and introgression within a species-rich oak (Quercus spp.) community. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7, 218. [Google Scholar]
  11. Curtu, A.L.; Gailing, O.; Leinemann, L.; Finkeldey, R. Genetic variation and differentiation within a natural community of five oak species (Quercus spp.). Plant Biol. 2007, 9, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Antonecchia, G.; Fortini, P.; Lepais, O.; Gerber, S.; Léger, P.; Scippa, G.S.; Viscosi, V. Genetic structure of a natural oak community in central Italy: Evidence of gene flow between three sympatric white oak species (Quercus, Fagaceae). Ann. For. Res. 2015, 58, 205–216. [Google Scholar]
  13. Petit, R.J.; Pineau, E.; Demesure, B.; Bacilieri, R.; Ducousso, A.; Kremer, A. Chloroplast DNA footprints of postglacial recolonization by oaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 9996–10001. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Whittemore, A.T.; Schaal, B.A. Interspecific gene flow in sympatric oaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 2540–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Dumolin-Lapégue, S.; Kremer, A.; Petit, R.J. Are chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA variation species independent in oaks? Evolution 1999, 53, 1406–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Sofletea, N.; Enescu, C.M.; Curtu, A.L. Small-Scale Morphologial Desriptors Analysis in four Romaninan Oak Stands reported to Series Lanuginosae Simk. Bull. Transilv. Univeristy Brasov. 2011, 4, 77–84. [Google Scholar]
  17. Burgarella, C.; Lorenzo, Z.; Jabbour-Zahab, R.; Lumaret, R.; Guichoux, E.; Petit, R.J.; Soto, A.; Gil, L. Detection of hybrids in nature: Application to oaks (Quercus suber and Q. ilex). Heredity 2009, 102, 442–452. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lepais, O.; Petit, R.J.; Guichoux, E.; Lavabre, J.E.; Alberto, F.; Kremer, A.; Gerber, S. Species relative abundance and direction of introgression in oaks. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18, 2228–2242. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lepais, O.; Gerber, S. Reproductive patterns shape introgression dynamics and species succession within the European white oak species complex. Evolution 2011, 65, 156–170. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gugger, P.F.; Fitz-Gibbon, S.T.; Albarrán-Lara, A.; Wright, J.W.; Sork, V.L. Landscape genomics of Quercus lobata reveals genes involved in local climate adaptation at multiple spatial scales. Mol. Ecol. 2021, 30, 406–423. [Google Scholar]
  21. Curtu, A.L.; Alizoti, P.; Ballian, D. Marginal/peripheral populations of forest tree species and their conservation status: Report for southeastern Europe. Ann. Silvic. Res. 2017, 41, 41–47. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kremer, A.; Zanetto, A.; Ducousso, A. Multilocus and Multitrait Measures of Differentiation for Gene Markers and Phenotypic Traits. Genetics 1997, 145, 1229–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kleinsmit, J.; Bacilieri, R.; Kremer, A.; Roloff, A. Genetic, morphological, ecological and phenological differentiation between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. in a mixed stand of Northwest of France. Silvae Genet. 1995, 44, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jensen, J.S. Provenance Variation in Phenotypic Traits in Quercus robur and Quercus petraea in Danish Provenance Trials. Scand. J. For. Res. 2000, 15, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ducousso, A.; Guyon, J.P.; Kremer, A. Latitudinal and altitudinal variation of bud burst in western populations of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt) Liebl). Ann. Sci. For. 1996, 53, 775–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ramírez-Valiente, J.A.; Santos del Blanco, L.; Alía, R.; Robledo-Arnuncio, J.J.; Climent, J. Adaptation of Mediterranean forest species to climate: Lessons from common garden experiments. J. Ecol. 2021, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiménez, P.; de Heredia, U.L.; Collada, C.; Lorenzo, Z.; Gil, L. High variability of chloroplast DNA in three Mediterranean evergreen oaks indicates complex evolutionary history. Heredity 2004, 93, 510–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Belahbib, N.; Pemonge, M.-H.H.; Ouassou, A.; Sbay, H.; Kremer, A.; Petit, R.J. Frequent cytoplasmic exchanges between oak species that are not closely related: Quercus suber and Q. ilex in Morocco. Mol. Ecol. 2001, 10, 2003–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fortini, P.; Viscosi, V.; Maiuro, L.; Fineschi, S.; Vendramin, G.G. Comparative leaf surface morphology and molecular data of five oaks of Comparative leaf surface morphology and molecular data of five oaks of the subgenus Quercus Oerst (Fagaceae). Plant Biosyst. 2009, 143, 543–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fortini, P.; Di Marzio, P.; Di Pietro, R. Differentiation and hybridization of Quercus frainetto, Q. petraea, and Q. pubescens (Fagaceae): Insights from macro-morphological leaf traits and molecular data. Plant. Syst. Evol. 2015, 301, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Di Pietro, R.; Conte, A.L.; Di Marzio, P.; Gianguzzi, L.; Spampinato, G.; Caldarella, O.; Fortini, P. A multivariate morphometric analysis of diagnostic traits in southern Italy and Sicily pubescent oaks. Folia Geobot. 2020, 55, 163–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Di Pietro, R.; Marzio, P.D.; Medagli, P.; Misano, G.; Silletti, G.N.; Wagensommer, R.P.; Fortini, P. Evidence from multivariate morphometric study of the Quercus pubescens complex in southeast Italy. Bot. Serbica 2016, 40, 83–100. [Google Scholar]
  33. Proietti, E.; Filesi, L.; Di Marzio, P.; Di Pietro, R.; Masin, R.; Conte, A.L.; Fortini, P. Morphology, geometric morphometrics, and taxonomy in relict deciduous oaks woods in northern Italy. Rend. Lincei. Sci. Fis. Nat. 2021, 32, 549–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vazquez, F.M.; Coombes, A.J.; Garcia-Alonso, D.; Marquez, F.; Rodriguez-Meireles, C.; Guerra Barrena, M.J.; Vila-Viçosa, C. Anotaciones a la nomenclatura del género Quercus L., (FAGACEAE) en la Península Ibérica y NW de África. Folia Bot. Extrem. 2018, 12, 5–79. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kremer, A.; Dupouey, J.L.; Deans, J.D.; Cottrell, J.; Csaikl, U.; Finkeldey, R.; Espinel, S.; Jensen, J.; Kleinschmit, J.; Van Dam, B.; et al. Leaf morphological differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea is stable across western European mixed oak stands. Ann. For. Sci. 2002, 59, 777–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Gugerli, F.; Walser, J.C.; Dounavi, K.; Holderegger, R.; Finkeldey, R. Coincidence of small-scale spatial discontinuities in leaf morphology and nuclear microsatellite variation of Quercus petraea and Q. robur in a mixed forest. Ann. Bot. 2007, 99, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ramírez-Valiente, J.A.; Etterson, J.R.; Deacon, N.J.; Cavender-Bares, J. Evolutionary potential varies across populations and traits in the neotropical oak Quercus oleoides. Tree Physiol. 2019, 39, 427–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Enescu, C.M.; Curtu, A.L.; Sofletea, N. Is Quercus virgiliana a distinct morphological and genetic entity among European white oaks? Turk. J. Agric. 2013, 37, 632–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Di Pietro, R.; Conte, A.L.; Di Marzio, P.; Fortini, P.; Farris, E.; Gianguzzi, L.; Müller, M.; Rosati, L.; Spampinato, G.; Gailing, O. Does the genetic diversity among pubescent white oaks in southern Italy, Sicily and Sardinia islands support the current taxonomic classification? Eur. J. For. Res. 2021, 140, 355–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Midolo, G.; Wellstein, C.; Faurby, S. Individual fitness is decoupled from coarse-scale probability of occurrence in North American trees. Ecography 2021, 44, 789–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wellstein, C.; Spada, F. The status of Quercus pubescens willd. in Europe. In Warm-Temperate Deciduous Forests around the Northern Hemisphere, Geobotany Studies; Box, E., Fujiiwara, K., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 153–163. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mir, C.; Toumi, L.; Jarne, P.; Sarda, V.; Di Giusto, F.; Lumaret, R. Endemic North African Quercus afares Pomel originates from hybridisation between two genetically very distant oak species (Q. suber L. and Q. canariensis Willd.): Evidence from nuclear and cytoplasmic markers. Heredity 2006, 96, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Messaoudène, M.; Laribi, M.; Derridj, A. Étude de la diversité floristique de la forêt de l’Akfadou (Algérie). Bois For. Trop. 2007, 291, 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  44. Messaoudène, M.; Tessier, L. Relations cerne-climat dans des peuplements de Quercus afares willd et Quercus canariensis Pomel en Algerie. Ann. Sci. For. 1997, 54, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Viscosi, V.; Cardini, A. Leaf morphology, taxonomy and geometric morphometrics: A simplified protocol for beginners. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e25630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Viscosi, V.; Loy, A.; Fortini, P. Geometric Morphometric Analysis as a Tool to Explore Covariation between Shape and Other Quantitative Leaf Traits in European White Oaks. Tools for Identifying Biodiversity: Progress and Problems. In Proceedings of the International Congress, Paris, France, 20–22 September 2010; Nimis, P.M., Vignes Lebbe, R., Eds.; EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste: Trieste, Italy, 2010; pp. 257–261. [Google Scholar]
  47. Quézel, P.; Santa, S. Nouvelle Flore de l’Algérie et des Régions Désertiques Méridionales, Volume 1; CNRS ed.: Paris, France, 1962; pp. 1–565. [Google Scholar]
  48. Quézel, P.; Santa, S. Nouvelle Flore de l’Algérie et des Régions Désertiques Méridionales, Volume 2; CNRS ed.: Paris, France, 1963; pp. 566–1170. [Google Scholar]
  49. Mhamdi, S.; Brendel, O.; Montpied, P.; Ghouil-Amimi, H.; Hasnaoui, I.; Dreyer, E. Leaf morphology displays no detectable spatial organisation in the relict Quercus afares Pomel compared to the co-occurring parental species Q. canariensis Willd. and Q. suber L. Ann. For. Sci. 2013, 70, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Song, J.; Zhang, R.; Yan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Du, F.K. Geometric morphometric analyses of leaf shapes in two sympatric Chinese oaks: Quercus dentata Thunberg and Quercus aliena Blume (Fagaceae). Ann. For. Sci. 2018, 75, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Viscosi, V. Geometric morphometrics and leaf phenotypic plasticity: Assessing fluctuating asymmetry and allometry in European white oaks (Quercus). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2015, 179, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Klingenberg, C.P. MorphoJ: An integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11, 353–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Viscosi, V.; Lepais, O.; Gerber, S.; Fortini, P. Leaf morphological analyses in four European oak species (Quercus) and their hybrids: A comparison of traditional and geometric morphometric methods. Plant Biosyst. 2009, 143, 564–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Alberto, F.J.; Aitken, S.N.; Alía, R.; González-Martínez, S.C.; Hänninen, H.; Kremer, A.; Lefèvre, F.; Lenormand, T.; Yeaman, S.; Whetten, R.; et al. Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change—evidence from tree populations. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 1645–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Valladares, F.; Matesanz, S.; Guilhaumon, F.; Araújo, M.B.; Balaguer, L.; Benito-Garzón, M.; Cornwell, W.; Gianoli, E.; van Kleunen, M.; Naya, D.E.; et al. The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change. Ecol. Lett. 2014, 17, 1351–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Ramírez-Valiente, J.A.; Valladares, F.; Delgado, A.; Nicotra, A.B.; Aranda, I. Understanding the importance of intrapopulation functional variability and phenotypic plasticity in Quercus suber. Tree Genet. Genomes 2015, 11, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Viscosi, V.; Antonecchia, G.; Lepais, O.; Fortini, P.; Gerber, S.; Loy, A. Leaf Shape and Size Differentiation in White Oaks: Assessment of Allometric Relationshops among Three Sympatric Species and Their Hybrids. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2012, 173, 874–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Franjić, J.; Liber, Z.; Škvorc, Ž.; Idžojtić, M.; Šoštarić, R.; Stančić, Z. Morphological and molecular differentiation of the Croatian populations of Quercus pubescens Willd. (Fagaceae). Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2006, 75, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Fortini, P.; Antonecchia, G.; Di Marzio, P.; Maiuro, L.; Viscosi, V. Role of micromorphological leaf traits and molecular data in taxonomy of three sympatric white oak species and their hybrids (Quercus L.). Plant Biosyst. 2013, 149, 546–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dodd, R.S.; Afzal-Rafii, Z. Selection and dispersal in a multispecies oak hybrid zone. Evolution 2004, 58, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Radford, E.; Catullo, G.; de Montmollin, B. Important Plant Areas of the South and East Mediterranean Region: Priority Sites for Conservation; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland; Malaga, Spain, 2011. [Google Scholar]
Forests 13 00508 g001 550
Figure 1. Geographical location of sampled populations and number of sampled trees. (Name of the locations: AD-Adrar, AI-Ait Aicha, AK-Akfadou, AS-Ait Salah, CA-Col Ait Salah, CK-Col Akfadou, CY-Cynegetic centre, DA-Damous, HO-Houra, IN-Intersection, LN-Lac noir, MV-Mehaga village, SH-Sidi El Hadi, TK-Tala Kittan, VM-Vide Mehaga, YA-Yakouren.
Figure 1. Geographical location of sampled populations and number of sampled trees. (Name of the locations: AD-Adrar, AI-Ait Aicha, AK-Akfadou, AS-Ait Salah, CA-Col Ait Salah, CK-Col Akfadou, CY-Cynegetic centre, DA-Damous, HO-Houra, IN-Intersection, LN-Lac noir, MV-Mehaga village, SH-Sidi El Hadi, TK-Tala Kittan, VM-Vide Mehaga, YA-Yakouren.
Forests 13 00508 g001
Forests 13 00508 g002 550
Figure 2. Position and description of landmarks on the right side of a leaf in the Akfadou forest and generalized procrustean overlay of all samples. Average conformations (consensus) are represented by blue dots.
Figure 2. Position and description of landmarks on the right side of a leaf in the Akfadou forest and generalized procrustean overlay of all samples. Average conformations (consensus) are represented by blue dots.
Forests 13 00508 g002
Forests 13 00508 g003 550
Figure 3. Canonical analysis of the four species in the Akfadou forest [Q. afares (A), Q. suber (S), Q. ilex (I), Q. canariensis (C)], and representation of leaf differences along the two canonical axes (CV1 = 66.93%, CV2 = 26.12%).
Figure 3. Canonical analysis of the four species in the Akfadou forest [Q. afares (A), Q. suber (S), Q. ilex (I), Q. canariensis (C)], and representation of leaf differences along the two canonical axes (CV1 = 66.93%, CV2 = 26.12%).
Forests 13 00508 g003
Forests 13 00508 g004 550
Figure 4. Canonical analysis of the four species and hybrids in the Akfadou forest [Q. afares (A), Q. suber (S), Q. ilex (I), Q. canariensis (C) and the hybrids (H)], and representation of leaf differences along the two canonical axes (CV1 = 47.08%; CV2= 35.88%).
Figure 4. Canonical analysis of the four species and hybrids in the Akfadou forest [Q. afares (A), Q. suber (S), Q. ilex (I), Q. canariensis (C) and the hybrids (H)], and representation of leaf differences along the two canonical axes (CV1 = 47.08%; CV2= 35.88%).
Forests 13 00508 g004
Forests 13 00508 g005 550
Figure 5. Discrimination analysis (DA) of leaf shape for pairs of species. (a) Q. afares (A) vs. Hybrids (H), (b) Q. suber (S) vs. Hybrids (H), (c) Q.ilex (I) vs. Hybrids (H), (d) Q. canariensis (C) vs. Hybrids (H).
Figure 5. Discrimination analysis (DA) of leaf shape for pairs of species. (a) Q. afares (A) vs. Hybrids (H), (b) Q. suber (S) vs. Hybrids (H), (c) Q.ilex (I) vs. Hybrids (H), (d) Q. canariensis (C) vs. Hybrids (H).
Forests 13 00508 g005
Table
Table 1. Hierarchical analysis of variance for the centroid size (size) and conformation (shape) of the leaves. (DF refer to degrees of freedom. Significance: ***: p < 0.001, **: p < 0.01).
Table 1. Hierarchical analysis of variance for the centroid size (size) and conformation (shape) of the leaves. (DF refer to degrees of freedom. Significance: ***: p < 0.001, **: p < 0.01).
SizeShape
EffectDFSum of SquaresFPercentage of Variation (%)DFSum of SquaresFPercentage of Variation (%)
Plot1527,722,600.9919.35 ***21.53 2706.71 ***9.66
Species3560,215,876.6018.02 ***46.776308.135.02 ***22.11
Trees8112,391,290.781.6 **9.6314587.411.98 ***20.14
Leaves29327,979,062.0792.49 ***21.73527413.5619.85 ***36.87
Error 415428,489.35 0.3374700.97 2.63
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akli, A.; Lorenzo, Z.; Alía, R.; Rabhi, K.; Torres, E. Morphometric Analyses of Leaf Shapes in Four Sympatric Mediterranean Oaks and Hybrids in the Algerian Kabylie Forest. Forests 2022, 13, 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13040508

AMA Style

Akli A, Lorenzo Z, Alía R, Rabhi K, Torres E. Morphometric Analyses of Leaf Shapes in Four Sympatric Mediterranean Oaks and Hybrids in the Algerian Kabylie Forest. Forests. 2022; 13(4):508. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13040508

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akli, Amel, Zaida Lorenzo, Ricardo Alía, Khellaf Rabhi, and Enrique Torres. 2022. "Morphometric Analyses of Leaf Shapes in Four Sympatric Mediterranean Oaks and Hybrids in the Algerian Kabylie Forest" Forests 13, no. 4: 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13040508

APA Style

Akli, A., Lorenzo, Z., Alía, R., Rabhi, K., & Torres, E. (2022). Morphometric Analyses of Leaf Shapes in Four Sympatric Mediterranean Oaks and Hybrids in the Algerian Kabylie Forest. Forests, 13(4), 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13040508

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop