Establishment of a Highly Efficient In Vitro Regeneration System for Rhododendron aureum
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Materials
2.2. Components of the Medium
2.3. Culture Condition
2.4. Sterilization of Explants
2.5. Primary Cultures of R. aureum
2.6. Induction of Bud Clusters from Tender Leaves
2.7. Subculture of Bud Clusters
2.8. Stem Elongation of Bud Clusters
2.9. Rooting Culture
2.10. Seedling Training and Transplantation
2.11. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Primary Culture of R. aureum
3.2. Induction of Bud Clusters
3.3. Subculture and Proliferation of Bud Clusters
3.4. Stem Elongation of Bud Clustes
3.5. Induction of Adventitious Roots
3.6. Transplantation
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Fang, M.Y.; Fang, R.Z.; He, M.Y.; Hu, L.Z.; Yang, H.B.; Chamberlain, D.F. Flora of China; Science Press: Beijing, China; Missouri Botanical Garden Press: St. Lours, MO, USA, 2005; pp. 245–260. [Google Scholar]
- Ba, C.Y. Improvement of Technique System of Tissue Culture and Rapid Propagation and Study on the Heat Resistance of Rhododendron chrysanthum Pall. Master’s Thesis, Yanbian University, Jilin, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, H.; Zhao, Y.; Yin, H.; Qin, L.W.; Liu, L.J.; Wang, C.; Jia, X.; Li, B.Y. Quantitative characteristics and dynamic analysis of the endangered species Rhododendron chrysanthun population in Changbai Mountain. Chin. J. Ecol. 2017, 36, 3123–3130. [Google Scholar]
- Parzymies, M.; Pogorzelec, M.; Glebocka, K.; Sliwinska, E. Micropropagation protocol and genetic stability of the Salix myrtilloides plants cultivated in vitro. Biology 2023, 12, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wijerathna-Yapa, A.; Hiti-Bandaralage, J. Tissue culture—A sustainable approach to explore plant stresses. Life 2023, 13, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, S.L.; Bai, X.X.; Li, G.S.; Wang, N.Z.; Li, Z.B. Callus induction and plant regeneration technology of Rhododendron micranthum. Mol. Plant Breed. 2022, 20, 1629–1634. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, X.; Chen, Y.C.; Zeng, X.P.; Li, Z.X.; Zheng, W.B.; Li, Y.F.; Huo, S.J.; Song, X.Q.; Zhao, Y. Optimization of tissue culture and rapid propagation of Rhododendron hainanense. Mol. Plant Breed. 2022, 20, 4447–4454. [Google Scholar]
- Bai, Y.Q.; Wang, D.Y.; Xie, L.J. Study on the stem in vitro culture for Rhododendron moulmainense. North. Hortic. 2020, 8, 66–73. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.X.; Ren, J.H.; Wang, P.L.; Wang, X.L.; Zhao, J.; Wang, R.R. Research on tissue culture of Rhododendron mucronulatum from Wutai Mountain. Seed 2017, 36, 122–125. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, D.Z.; Sun, Z.L.; He, X.Y.; Zhang, Q.J.; Zhu, J.Y. Micropropagation and germplasm preservation in tube of Rhododendron chrysanthum Pall. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2008, 04, 603–606. [Google Scholar]
- Ding, H.L. Study on the Tissue Culture and Anatome Plantarum of Rhododendron chrysanthun Pall. Master’s Thesis, Yanbian University, Jilin, China, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, M.; Cao, H.N.; Zong, C.W.; Xu, X.; Jin, B.K. Effect of TDZ on leaf differentiation and subculture multiplication of Rhododendron chrysanthum Pall. Acta Agric. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2012, 21, 158–162. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, M. Establishemnt of Regeneration System of Rhododendron chrysanthum Pall. Leaves and Studies on the Interspecific Hybridization. Master’s thesis, Yanbian University, Jilin, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Mertens, M.; Werbrouck, S.; Sanyn, G.; Botelho dos Santos Moreira da Silva, H.; Debergh, P. In vitro regeneration of evergreen azalea from leaves. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1996, 45, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vejsadová, H. Growth regulator effect on in vitro regeneration of rhododendron cultivars. Hortic. Sci. 2008, 35, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Skoog, F.; Miller, C.O. Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissue cultured in vitro. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol 1957, 11, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Ghosh, A.; Igamberdiev, A.U.; Debnath, S.C. Tissue culture-induced DNA methylation in crop plants: A review. Mol. Boil. Rep. 2021, 48, 823–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Erland, L.A.E.; Giebelhaus, R.T.; Victor, J.M.R.; Murch, S.J.; Saxena, P.K. The morphoregulatory role of Thidiazuron: Metabolomics-guided hypothesis generation for mechanisms of activity. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, H.H. In Vitro Rapid Propagation of Two Variety Rhododendron. Master’s Thesis, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Zaytseva, Y.G.; Novikova, T.I. TDZ-induced two-step regeneration and histological analysis of morphogenesis from pedicel tissue of Rhododendron dauricum L., a semi-evergreen species. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2022, 58, 911–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dewir, Y.H.; Nurmansyah; Naidoo, Y.; Texeira da Silva, J.A. Thidiazuron-induced abnormalities in plant tissue cultures. Plant Cell Rep. 2018, 37, 1451–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowakowska, K.; Pińkowska, A.; Siedlecka, E.; Pacholczak, A. The effect of cytokinins on shoot proliferation, biochemical changes and genetic stability of Rhododendron ‘Kazimierz Odnowiciel’ in the in vitro cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2022, 149, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, W.C. A revised tissue culture medium for shoot multiplication of Rhododendron. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1984, 109, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almeida, R.; Goncalves, S.; Romano, A. In vitro micropropagation of endangered Rhododendron ponticum L. subsp. baeticum (Boissier and Reuter) Handel-Mazzetti. Biodivers. Conserv. 2005, 14, 1059–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCown, B.H.; Lloyd, G.B. A survey of the response of Rhododendron to in vitro culture. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1982, 2, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, M.P.; Yi, Z.; Murch, S.J.; Saxena, P.K. Thidiazuron-induced regeneration of Echinacea purpurea L.: Micropropagation in solid and liquid culture systems. Plant Cell Rep. 2007, 26, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zaytseva, Y.G.; Poluboyarova, T.V.; Novikova, T.I. Effects of thidiazuron on in vitro morphogenic response of Rhododendron sichotense Pojark. and Rhododendron catawbiense cv. Grandiflorum leaf explants. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2016, 52, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, Y. Study on the Tissue Culture and Genetic Diversity of Rhododendron chrysanthum Pall. Master’s Thesis, Yanbian University, Jilin, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Pacholczak, A.; Winiarczyk, A.; Grzelak, M.; Nowakowska, K. Effect in vitro propagation of Rhododendron ‘Ken Janeck’. Propag. Ornam. Plants 2020, 20, 81–87. [Google Scholar]
Group | Purpose | TDZ Concentration (mg·L−1) | IBA Concentration (mg·L−1) |
---|---|---|---|
A | Induction of callus | 0.2 | 0.2 |
B | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
C | 0.3 | 0.5 | |
D | 0.5 | 0.2 | |
E | 0.3 | 0.8 | |
B | Subculture of callus | 0.5 | 0.5 |
B-1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | |
B-2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | |
B-3 | 0.01 | 0.5 | |
B-2 | Induction of adventitious buds | 0.1 | 0.5 |
B-2-1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | |
B-2-2 | 0.1 | 0.8 | |
B-2-3 | 0.01 | 0.8 | |
B-2-4 | 0.05 | 0.5 |
Group | TDZ Concentration (mg·L−1) | IBA Concentration (mg·L−1) | Bud Clusters Induction Rate (%) | Growth Condition |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 50.0 ± 0.05 ab | The number of adventitious buds was lower. |
2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 60.0 ± 0.04 a | Callus and adventitious buds were induced, but the number of adventitious buds was lower. |
3 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 36.7 ± 0.03 b | Callus was more obvious than adventitious buds, adventitious buds were then formed from the callus. |
4 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 50.0 ± 0.05 ab | Adventitious buds appeared early, and had the highest number of adventitious shoots. |
5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 50.0 ± 0.05 ab | Callus appeared early, and adventitious buds were formed from the callus. |
Group | TDZ Concentration (mg·L−1) | IBA Concentration (mg·L−1) | Multiplication Coefficient | Growth Condition |
---|---|---|---|---|
3-1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.02 ± 0.05 b | The buds were inconsistent in size, and some of leaves began to turn yellow. |
3-2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.78 ± 0.09 a | The buds were robust, and the leaves were large. |
3-3 | 0.01 | 0.5 | 0.60 ± 0.09 c | The leaves were large, but several buds were observed to have elongated stems. |
Group | TDZ Concentration (mg·L−1) | IBA Concentration (mg·L−1) | Stem Elongation Coefficient | Growth Condition |
---|---|---|---|---|
3-2-1 | 0.002 | 0.5 | 0.17 ± 0.03 a | Stem lengths were up to 2.5–3 cm, the seedlings were healthy. |
3-2-2 | 0.005 | 0.5 | 0.16 ± 0.03 a | The leaves showed a light redness, the stem length was inconsistent. |
3-2-3 | 0.01 | 0.5 | 0.15 ± 0.02 a | The stem length was inconsistent, and the highest was approximately 1.5 cm, the leaves showed a light redness. The bud clusters had proliferation. |
3-2-4 | 0.02 | 0.5 | 0 | No stem elongation. |
3-2-5 | 0.04 | 0.5 | 0 | No stem elongation. |
Group | IBA Concentration (mg·L−1) | Days to Root Emergence (d) | Rooting Rate (%) | Adventitious Roots Number | Growth |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 0.5 | 10 | 100 | 8.25 ± 0.41 a | Leaves turned red and stem did not elongate. |
S2 | 0.75 | 10 | 100 | 9.88 ± 0.93 ab | New buds sprouted, with almost no callus, the average root length was about 0.5 cm. |
S3 | 1.0 | 7 | 100 | 10.13 ± 1.01 ab | New buds sprouted, with almost no callus, the average root length was about 1 cm. |
S4 | 1.25 | 6 | 87.5 | 10.13 ± 10.44 ab | The average root length was 0.5–2 cm, but the callus area was large. |
S5 | 1.5 | 6 | 87.5 | 12.00 ± 0.60 a | The average root length was 0.5–1 cm but the callus area was large. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhao, W.; Dong, H.; Hou, H.; Ning, Y.; Mu, L.; Li, S. Establishment of a Highly Efficient In Vitro Regeneration System for Rhododendron aureum. Forests 2023, 14, 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071335
Zhao W, Dong H, Hou H, Ning Y, Mu L, Li S. Establishment of a Highly Efficient In Vitro Regeneration System for Rhododendron aureum. Forests. 2023; 14(7):1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071335
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhao, Wenna, Hao Dong, Hui Hou, Yajing Ning, Liqiang Mu, and Shujuan Li. 2023. "Establishment of a Highly Efficient In Vitro Regeneration System for Rhododendron aureum" Forests 14, no. 7: 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071335
APA StyleZhao, W., Dong, H., Hou, H., Ning, Y., Mu, L., & Li, S. (2023). Establishment of a Highly Efficient In Vitro Regeneration System for Rhododendron aureum. Forests, 14(7), 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071335