Next Article in Journal
Clinical Evaluation of QuickNaviTM-Ebola in the 2018 Outbreak of Ebola Virus Disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Next Article in Special Issue
A New Era for Mild Strain Cross-Protection
Previous Article in Journal
Phages and Human Health: More Than Idle Hitchhikers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis Affects Plant Immunity to Viral Infection and Accumulation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/v11070588
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tracing the Lineage of Two Traits Associated with the Coat Protein of the Tombusviridae: Silencing Suppression and HR Elicitation in Nicotiana Species

by
Mustafa Adhab
1,2,
Carlos Angel
3,
Andres Rodriguez
1,
Mohammad Fereidouni
1,
Lóránt Király
4,
Kay Scheets
5 and
James E. Schoelz
1,*
1
Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
2
Department of Plant Protection, University of Baghdad, 10071 Baghdad, Iraq
3
National Coffee Research Center-Cenicafe, Planalto, km. 4, Vía antigua Chinchiná-Manizales, Manizales (Caldes), Colombia
4
Department of Pathophysiology, Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-1022 Budapest, Herman Ottó str. 15, Hungary
5
Department of Plant Biology, Ecology, and Evolution, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2019, 11(7), 588; https://doi.org/10.3390/v11070588
Submission received: 18 April 2019 / Revised: 18 June 2019 / Accepted: 20 June 2019 / Published: 28 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Immunity to Virus Infections)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this paper we have characterized the lineage of two traits associated with the coat proteins (CPs) of the tombusvirids: Silencing suppression and HR elicitation in Nicotiana species. We considered that the tombusvirid CPs might collectively be considered an effector, with the CP of each CP-encoding species comprising a structural variant within the family. Thus, a phylogenetic analysis of the CP could provide insight into the evolution of a pathogen effector. The phylogeny of the CP of tombusvirids indicated that CP representatives of the family could be divided into four clades. In two separate clades the CP triggered a hypersensitive response (HR) in Nicotiana species of section Alatae but did not have silencing suppressor activity. In a third clade the CP had a silencing suppressor activity but did not have the capacity to trigger HR in Nicotiana species. In the fourth clade, the CP did not carry either function. Our analysis illustrates how structural changes that likely occurred in the CP effector of progenitors of the current genera led to either silencing suppressor activity, HR elicitation in select Nicotiana species, or neither trait.

1. Introduction

Plant defenses against viral pathogens may be divided into two broad categories. The first line of defense in plants involves their capacity to recognize viral nucleic acids, typically double stranded RNAs, and to mobilize the gene silencing machinery to target the viral RNAs for degradation [1,2]. This defense response is known as RNA silencing (or RNAi), and several recent reviews have noted the similarity of the RNAi defense against viruses to Pathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern (PAMP)-Triggered Immunity (PTI), which has been characterized for bacterial, fungal and oomycete pathogens [3,4,5]. Indeed, modifications of the zigzag model for evolution of innate immunity have been proposed that equate the RNAi response against viral pathogens to the PAMP response against nonviral pathogens [3,5]. Most or perhaps all plant viruses encode one or more proteins in their genome to suppress the effects of RNAi and protect their genomic RNA from degradation before it is encapsidated into virions [1,2].
A second line of defense in plants involves the capacity to recognize specific virus proteins by host resistance (R) proteins, which frequently leads to the development of a hypersensitive response (HR) [3,4,5,6,7]. HR against virus infections is typically manifested through the development of necrotic local lesions that may appear as early as two days post-inoculation (dpi) or up to 7 dpi, depending on the host/virus combination. Virus proteins recognized in this manner by host resistance proteins fit the definition of avirulence (avr) proteins in accordance with the gene-for-gene theory [3,4,5,6].
In this paper we have characterized the lineage of two traits associated with the coat proteins (CPs) of the tombusvirids: Silencing suppression and avirulence. Such an analysis could be valuable for understanding the interplay between plant defense elicitation and counterdefense functions associated with a pathogen effector. Members of the Tombusviridae are characterized by ssRNA genomes individually encapsidated into icosahedral virions. The family currently consists of 76 species, with the majority distributed within 16 genera. One genus, umbravirus, is unusual in that the viruses in this genus do not encode a CP, relying instead on the CP of their specific helper viruses [8].
Analyses of the gene order and proteins encoded by different tombusvirids indicates that one of the mechanisms that has given rise to new genera is recombination between species from different genera REFs [9,10,11,12]. Thus, genera are now defined based on the phylogenies of the complete RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) and the number of sgRNAs produced, which led to the division of genus Carmovirus into three new genera [9], while genus Necrovirus was split into Alphanecrovirus and Betanecrovirus [11] the RdRPs of alphanecroviruses and betanecroviruses lie on separate branches of RdRP phylogenetic trees, and do not reproduce the relationship of their CPs.
Several studies have shown that the CPs of this diverse family have the capacity to trigger HR in some of their hosts and/or may function as silencing suppressors. For example, the CP of the betacarmovirus turnip crinkle virus (TCV) elicits HR in Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Dijon [13,14] and also functions as a silencing suppressor [15,16,17], although CP motifs conditioning silencing suppressor activity can be uncoupled from HR elicitation [18,19]. In addition to TCV, the CPs of alphacarmoviruses, gammacarmoviruses and pelarspoviruses have also been demonstrated to have silencing suppressor activity [20,21,22,23]. The CP of the tombusvirus tomato bushy stunt virus (TBSV) triggers HR in six species of Nicotiana belonging to section Alatae [24] and is not a silencing suppressor [15]. However, most tombusvirid CPs have not been evaluated for the capacity to elicit HR in Nicotiana species and some have not been evaluated for silencing suppression. Nonetheless, tombusvirid CPs might collectively be considered an effector, with the CP of each species comprising a structural variant within the dataset. Thus, a phylogenetic analysis of the CPs could provide insight into the evolution of a pathogen effector/avr protein.
To initially explore the avr potential of tombusvirid CPs, we focused on the capacity of the CP of tobacco necrosis virus strain D, isolate Hungary (abbreviated here as TNVDH), to trigger HR in Nicotiana species. TNVDH belongs is a betanecrovirus; its genome consists of a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA of approximately 3.8 kb that is encapsidated into small icosahedral viral particles with a diameter of 28 nanometers [25,26]. The genome of TNVDH encodes five proteins that are expressed through a combination of readthrough strategies and subgenomic RNAs (Figure 1A) [27]. The P22 and the readthrough product P82 are necessary for replication, the P7a and P7b proteins are necessary for movement, and the P29 protein is the coat protein, responsible for formation of the icosahedral particles [26,28]. TNVD has been transmitted experimentally to at least 88 species in 37 dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous families and it elicits HR in the majority of these species [29]. The only hosts that were initially shown to be systemically infected by TNV were Anthriscus cerefolium and Trachymene cerulea [29]. It has recently been shown that TNV also induces a systemic necrosis in Nicotiana benthamiana [26] and a symptomless infection in Arabidopsis thaliana [30].
The observation that TNVD triggers HR in most plant species is intriguing, because it suggests that these plants may contain receptors to recognize and defend against TNV infection. In the present study, 20 Nicotiana species representing the diversity of the Nicotiana genus were tested for their response to mechanical inoculation of TNVDH. We found that 19 species responded to TNVDH infection with HR; in fact, TNVDH was able to move systemically in only one of the species, N. benthamiana. To determine whether the TNVDH CP was capable of triggering HR in Nicotiana species, we expressed the TNVDH CP through agroinfiltration and found that HR is elicited in the same species of section Alatae that responded via HR to the TBSV CP [24]. Interestingly, a phylogenetic analysis of the tombusvirid CPs indicated that the CP of TNVDH is only distantly related to the CP of TBSV [10]. Consequently, we expanded our investigation of the tombusvirid CPs to representatives of selected genera within the family, evaluating each CP for silencing suppression as well as HR elicitation in Nicotiana. This analysis reinforces the phylogeny of the tombusvirid CPs of the Tombusviridae and illustrates how structural changes that occurred in the CP effector of two of the three progenitors of the current genera generally led to either silencing suppressor activity or HR elicitation in select Nicotiana species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Inoculation of Nicotiana Species with TNV Virions

Seeds of different Nicotiana species were obtained from the U.S. Tobacco Germplasm Collection at North Carolina State University [31], as described in Angel and Schoelz [24]. To break dormancy, seeds were treated for 30 min with commercial bleach at 50% strength (2.6% vol/vol NaOCl). TNV- DH virions were initially inoculated to N. benthamiana and infected tissue was frozen for further inoculations. For inoculation of test plants, plant tissues infected with TNV- DH were ground with a mortar and pestle at a dilution of approximately 1:20 (wt/vol) with inoculation buffer (0.05 M phosphate buffer pH 7.0) and gently rubbed onto Nicotiana leaves dusted with 600-mesh carborundum.

2.2. Coat Protein Constructs

The TNV strain DH clone and virions were a gift from Dr. Lorant Kiraly (Hungarian Academy of Sciences); the infectious clone was developed by Molnár and coworkers ([26]; NCBI accession number U62546). The full-length clones of CyRSV ([32]; NCBI accession number X15511) and CNV ([33]; NCBI accession number M25270) were gifts from Dr. Herman Scholthof (Texas A&M University). The full-length MCMV clone is from Dr. Kay Scheets (Oklahoma State University); its nucleotide sequence is described in Nutter et al. ([34]; NCBI accession number X14736). The full-length PMV clone was a gift from Dr. Karen Scholthof (Texas A&M University); its nucleotide sequence is described in Turina et al. ([35]; NCBI accession number U55002). The MNSV CP clone was a gift from Dr. D’Ann Rochon; its nucleotide sequence is described in Riviere and Rochon ([36]; NCBI accession number M29671.1).
The CPs of TNV DH, pCP∆49, pCP∆77, pCP∆146, pCP∆77KO, CyRSV, CNV, MCMV, MNSV, MNeSV, and PMV clones were all amplified by PCR, and initially cloned into pGEM-T-Easy (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). Primers used for PCR amplification were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, U.S.A.) and are listed in Supplemental Table S1. PCR conditions consisted of an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR product was purified by agarose gel elution using the QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, U.S.A.) for cloning into pGEM-T-Easy. Escherichia coli colonies containing inserts were selected on Luria Bertani (LB) media containing 40 µL XGal (20 mg/mL), 10 µL IPTG (20%) and kanamycin (50 µg/mL). Candidate clones were sequenced in both orientations by the DNA Core Facility at the University of Missouri (Columbia, MO, U.S.A.). Once the fidelity of the sequence was confirmed, the insert was transferred into the Agrobacterium binary plasmid pKYLX7 digested with either XhoI or HindIII on the 5′ end and SacI on the 3′ end [24]. Restriction enzyme sites used for each CP clone are listed in the primer sequences in Supplemental Table S1. pKYLX7 plasmids carrying the CP insert were transformed into A. tumefaciens strain AGL1 [37] by electroporation with a PG200 Progenetor II (Hoefer Scientific Instruments, San Francisco, CA, U.S.A.). Transformants were selected on LB medium supplemented with kanamycin (50 µg/mL) and tetracycline (12.5 µg/mL).
The CP expression plasmids for RCNMV, TCV, PFBV, and PLPV were provided to us in Agrobacterium binary vectors. The RCNMV CP plasmid was a gift from Dr. Tim Sit (North Carolina State University). The RCNMV CP coding sequence (NCBI accession number J04357) was determined by Xiong et al. [38] and cloned into the Agrobacterium binary vector pPZP212 [39]. The TCV CP plasmid was a gift from Dr. Feng Qu (The Ohio State University). The cloning of the TCV CP sequence ([40]: NCBI accession number M22445) into the Agrobacterium binary vector PZP is described in Qu et al. [16]. The insertion of the TBSV CP construct into the Agrobacterium binary vector pKYLX7 was described previously [21]. The TBSV CP coding sequence was determined in Hearne et al. ([41]; NCBI Accession number M21958). The PFBV and PLPV CP constructs were cloned into the Agrobacterium binary vector pMOG800 under the control of the 35S promoter [21,23].

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis of the Tombusvirid CPs

The alignment was made using MUSCLE while trees were generated with the Maximum Likelihood (ML) algorithm in MEGA7 [42] using 1000 boostrap replicates. All positions with less than 50% site coverage were eliminated. That is, fewer than 50% alignment gaps, missing data, and ambiguous bases were allowed at any position.

2.4. Agroinfiltration Assay for HR Elicitation and Silencing Suppression

A. tumefaciens strains were grown in 3 Ml LB broth supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/mL) for 24 h at 28 °C in an incubator shaker at 220 rpm. From each initial culture, 500 μL was added to flasks with 40 mL LB broth containing kanamycin (50 μg/mL), and the cultures grown for an additional 24 h. Bacteria were then sedimented by centrifugation at 14,000 g for 10 min and resuspended in 20 mL of infiltration solution (3.9 g/L MES, 20g/L Sucrose, 10 g/L Glucose, pH 5.4) supplemented with 20 μL 0.2M acetosyringone. Cells were incubated overnight at 28 °C and 220 rpm and cultures subsequently diluted to an OD600 1.0 immediately before infiltration into Nicotiana leaves as described in Angel and Schoelz [24]. After agroinfiltration, all plants were returned to the greenhouse where they were observed on a daily basis for HR.
For the silencing suppressor assay, the virus CPs, TBSV P19, and TCV CPs were co-agroinfiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves at equivalent optical densities with a GFP gene that had been cloned into the binary vector pKYLX7. The GFP clone and assay are described in Angel et al. [43]. Plants were examined for GFP expression using a Blak-Ray Long Wave Ultraviolet Lamp (Upland, CA), beginning at 2 days after infiltration (dai) and extending up to 10 dai.

2.5. ELISA Assay for TNV CP expression

Agroinfiltrated tissues were collected at 3 dpi and ground with mortar and pestle at a ratio of 1:3 (tissue/grinding buffer). Grinding buffer consisted of 1× phosphate buffered saline, 2% polyvinylpyrrolidone MW 40,000 g/mol, 0.2% bovine serum albumin and 0.05% Tween 20). Double antibody sandwich ELISA (DAS-ELISA) was carried out using TNV-serotype D coating and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibodies purchased from AC diagnostics (Fayetteville, AR, U.S.A.). Colorimetric reactions with the substrate p-nitrophenyl phosphate were quantified at 405 nm using a Multiskan MCC-340 microplate reader (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Cincinnati, OH, U.S.A.). All experiments were repeated three times.

3. Results

3.1. Survey of Nicotiana Species for Resistance to TNVDH Virion Inoculations

To examine the reaction of Nicotiana species to TNVDH, TNVDH virions were rub-inoculated to leaves of 20 Nicotiana species that represent the diversity of the Nicotiana genus (Table 1). The same Nicotiana species had previously been used to characterize avr proteins present in the TBSV genome [24]. Eighteen of the twenty Nicotiana species responded to TNVDH inoculation with a hypersensitive response, defined here as the rapid development of necrosis in the inoculated leaf. Necrotic local lesions appeared between 2 to 5 dpi and no systemic movement of the virus occurred in these plants (Table 1). Necrotic lesions varied in size, number per leaf, and timing. For example, N. quadrivalvis responded with large necrotic lesions that coalesced to cover nearly the entire leaf (Figure 2A), whereas N. forgetiana accession TW50, included in the same test, responded with fewer lesions (Figure 2B). Only one Nicotiana species, N. otophora, responded to TNVDH virion inoculation with chlorotic local lesions (Figure 2C), which developed much more slowly than the necrotic responses of the other Nicotiana species. Interestingly, no symptoms of TNVDH infection developed on upper, noninoculated leaves of N. otophora. It may mean that N. otophora is resistant to TNVDH or that the plants develop a symptomless systemic infection. N. benthamiana was the only Nicotiana species scored as susceptible to TNVDH, as this plant species did develop systemic symptoms. N. benthamiana developed necrotic local lesions upon inoculation of TNVDH virions (Figure 2D) and as the virus moved into upper noninoculated leaves, those leaves developed a systemic necrosis symptom (Figure 2E), as described previously by Molnár et al. [26]. Consequently, the reactions of 18 of the Nicotiana species were classified as an HR type resistance, one was classified as resistant with no HR, and only one species was susceptible to TNVDH (Table 1). Supplemental Figures S1–4, illustrate the diversity of responses of all 20 Nicotiana species to TNVDH virion inoculations.

3.2. The TNVDH Coat Protein Triggers HR in Nicotiana Species Section Alatae.

A previous study had shown that a binary plasmid Agrobacterium tumefaciens expressing the coat protein (CP) of Tomato bushy stunt virus elicited a rapid HR upon agroinfiltration into Nicotiana species belonging to section Alatae [24]. To investigate whether the TNVDH CP was capable of triggering an HR in any Nicotiana species, we cloned the full-length TNVDH CP coding sequence into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens binary vector pKYLX7 to create pTNV-CP (Figure 1). Upon agroinfiltration into leaves of each of the 20 Nicotiana species, pTNV-CP elicited HR in several species in section Alatae (Table 1), including the species N. langsdorffii, N. longiflora, N. bonariensis, N. alata, and N. forgetiana. Of the six species in section Alatae, only N. plumbaginifolia failed to respond to agroinfiltration of pTNV-CP with HR, even with observations up to 10 dai. By contrast, HR was initiated in N. langsdorffii by pTNV-CP agroinfiltration as early as 2 dai and the tissue had completely collapsed by 3 dai (Figure 3). The TNVDH CP did not elicit HR in any of the other Nicotiana species included in our study (Table 1). The same five Nicotiana species that responded with HR to agroinfiltration of the TNVDH coat protein also responded with HR to agroinfiltration of a plasmid expressing the TBSV CP [24]. Interestingly, the CP of TBSV also did not trigger HR in the same two accessions of N. plumbaginifolia (24).
A previous analysis of the TBSV CP showed that the first 79 codons could be eliminated and the resultant CP deletion mutant was still capable of eliciting HR upon agroinfiltration into N. langsdorffii [21]. To determine the effect of N-terminal deletions on the capacity of pTNV-CP to trigger HR in an agroinfiltration assay, we deleted 49, 77, and 146 amino acids from the N-terminus of the TNVDH coding sequence. The sizes of the deletions were determined by the presence of start codons in-frame within the TNV DH coding sequence, the same strategy that was used for the choice of deletions in the TBSV CP. Both pCP∆49 and pCP∆77 triggered HR upon agroinfiltration into N. langsdorffii that was identical to pTNV-CP, whereas pCP∆146 did not elicit any response (Figure 3A). Furthermore, mutation of the start codon of pCP∆77 from ATG to TTG abolished HR elicitation, showing that HR was dependent on TNVDH CP expression (Figure 3B). To verify that TNVDH CP was expressed, total plant protein was isolated from leaves and CP was measured by ELISA. Figure 3C shows that TNVDH CP epitopes were detected in leaf tissue agroinfiltrated with pCP29 and with pCP∆77. This experiment showed that the first 77 amino acids of the TNVDH CP do not contribute to HR in N. langsdorffii, similar to an earlier finding that the first 79 amino acids of the TBSV CP do not contribute to HR in the same host [24].

3.3. Evaluation of the Coat Proteins of the Tombusviridae for Triggering HR in Members of Nicotiana Section Alatae

A phylogenetic analysis of the CPs of the type members for each genus within the tombusvirus family revealed that TBSV and TNVDH CPs are distantly related (Figure 4). Since both the TBSV and TNVDH CPs triggered HR in the same five Nicotiana species within section Alatae, we hypothesized that CPs of other tombusvirid genera might elicit the same response. To test this hypothesis, we compared the capacity of CP genes from representatives tombusvirid genera to trigger HR in members of section Alatae and also compared their ability to function as silencing suppressors in N. benthamiana. To assess the capacity of the CPs from tombusvirids to elicit HR in section Alatae, we developed or obtained CP constructs representing 10 genera within the family. We also included the CPs of two additional viruses from the tombusvirus genus: Cucumber necrosis virus (CNV) and cymbidium ringspot virus (CyRSV).
We initially tested representatives from the tombusvirus, dianthovirus, betacarmovirus, alphanecrovirus, panicovirus, and machlomovirus genera, and the agroinfiltration tests for N. langsdorffii are illustrated in Figure 5. Each of the CP constructs was agroinfiltrated into leaf panels of Nicotiana species section Alatae along with pTNV-CP, to ensure that environmental conditions and leaf age were conducive for HR development, and the empty vector pKYLX7, to test for development of any nonspecific necrosis associated with infiltration of Agrobacterium. Each CP construct was agroinfiltrated into at least three plants and three leaves per plant, for a minimum of nine infiltrations and plants were observed up to ten days after agroinfiltration. HR was consistently elicited in the leaf panel agroinfiltrated with pTNV-CP, as well as leaf panels agroinfiltrated with constructs that expressed the CPs of RCNMV, CNV, and CyRSV. In the case of the section Alatae species, all responded to agroinfiltration of the same set of CPs with HR except for accessions of TW106 and 108 of N. plumbaginifolia. A necrotic reaction appeared at 2 to 3 dai in N. langsdorffii, N. forgetiana (TW50 and TW51) and N. alata (TW7 and TW8) but in the case of N. longiflora it usually appeared between 4–6 dai. No HR was observed in leaf panels agroinfiltrated with constructs that expressed the CPs of MCMV, TCV and PMV. The results of all of the agroinfiltration tests are summarized in Table 2.
We realized that there were significant gaps in the phylogenetic tree, and to address this issue we obtained CP clones for a gammacarmovirus, melon necrotic spot virus (MNSV), the aphacarmovirus pelargonium flower break virus (PFBV), a betacarmovirus, pelargonium line pattern virus (PLPV), and the zeavirus maize necrotic streak virus (MNeSV). In these tests, pTNV-CP was used as the positive control and pTCV-CP was used as the negative control. We found that pMNSV-CP and pMNeSV-CP constructs induced HR in N. langsdorffii, N. fogetiana and N. alata, but did not induce HR in N. plumbaginifolia. By contrast, pPLPV-CP and pPFBV-CP did not induce HR in any of the Nicotiana species in section Alatae (results illustrated for N. langsdorffii, Suppl. Figure 5, Table 2).
An inspection of the phylogenetic tree constructed for tombusvirid CPs shows that Clades 2 and 4 have retained the capacity to trigger HR in members of Nicotiana section Alatae (Figure 4). HR elicitation was confirmed for two CPs within Clade 2: The betanecrovirus TNV D and the zeavirus MNeSV. Furthermore, HR elicitation was also confirmed within Clade 4 for five CP sequences within the genera: three tombusviruses (TBSV, CNV, CyRSV), the dianthovirus RCNMV, and the gammacarmovirus MNSV.

3.4. Evaluation of the CPs of Selected Tombusvirids for a Functional Silencing Suppressor in N. benthamiana

CPs of several of the tombusvirids have been shown to function as a silencing suppressor: betacarmoviruses TCV and Hibiscus chlorotic ringspot virus (HCRSV) [16,17,22], alphacarmovirus PFBV [21], gammacarmovirus MNSV [20], and pelarspovirus PLPV [23]. In each case, GFP expression has been enhanced and extended when a binary plasmid designed to express GFP is co-agroinfiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves with plasmids containing one of these CPs. By contrast, the CP of MCMV does not act to enhance and extend the expression of GFP in the standard silencing suppressor assay that works for HCRSV, PFBV, MNSV, TCV and PLPV [44].
To investigate whether the TNV CP had the capacity for silencing suppression, we co-agroinfiltrated pTNV-CP with p35S-GFP into N. benthamiana leaves and evaluated GFP expression over a period of 8–10 days. GFP expression in leaf sections agroinfiltrated with p35S-GFP alone or co-agroinfiltrated with pTNV-CP peaked at 3–4 dai and by 8 dai, GFP expression was extinguished (Figure 6). By contrast, GFP expression remained strong in leaf sections co-agroinfiltrated with p35S-GFP and plasmids containing TCV CP or TBSV P19. This test showed that TNV DH CP does not function as a silencing suppressor analogous to TCV CP or TBSV P19. To our knowledge, the CPs of several other tombusviruses have not been formally evaluated for silencing suppression. We found that none of the CPs of CNV, MCMV, PMV, CyRSV or MNeSV displayed silencing suppressor activity (Figure 6, Table 2). Of the tombusvirid CPs previously found to be silencing suppressors, we confirmed this activity for the CPs of PLPV, PFBV, and MNSV, whereas the CPs of TBSV and RCNMV were confirmed to have no silencing suppressor function (Figure S6, Table 2). In tracing the lineage of silencing suppressor function for the tombusvirid CPs, the trait appears to be confined to Clade 3, with the one exception of the gammacarmovirus CP of MNSV, which is located in Clade 4 (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

Agroinfiltration is a powerful tool for the discovery and initial characterization of pathogen proteins capable of triggering HR in plant hosts. This tool has been validated for several virus avr proteins including the cauliflower mosaic virus P6 protein [45] and the helicase domain of the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) replicase [46,47], the NSm gene of tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) [48] as well as the P19 and P22 proteins of TBSV [40]. For each of these virus avr genes, the avr trait was first identified through techniques involving either gene swaps between virus strains [49,50], the insertion of the avr gene into a virus vector [51,52], or direct mutagenesis of the avr gene within an infectious clone of the virus [53]. The capacity for HR was then confirmed through agroinfiltration of the viral gene, separate from the virus genome. Agroinfiltration has also been used as the initial technique for characterization of virus avr genes. For example, it has been used to show that the NSs protein of TSWV triggers HR in Capsicum annuum species resistant to the virus infection [54]. Furthermore, the CP gene of Potato virus X (PVX) was shown to induce HR upon its co-agroinfiltration with its R gene counterpart into N. benthamiana [55]. Recently, Vleeshouwers and coworkers [56] utilized agroinfiltration to initially characterize the capacity of 54 effectors of Phytophthora infestans to trigger HR in wild Solanum species, illustrating how this technique could accelerate discovery and functional analysis of pathogen avr genes.
In a previous paper, Angel and Schoelz [24] showed that the TBSV CP triggered HR in several members of Nicotiana section Alatae, including N. alatae, N. langsdorffii, N. forgetiana, N. bonariensis, and N. longiflora. In the present paper we have now extended this analysis to show that the same Nicotiana species in section Alatae that recognized the TBSV CP also recognize the CPs of several other tombusvirids. This analysis has implications for the lineage of the avr motif (or motifs) associated with the tombusvirid CPs as well as the lineage for the silencing suppressor function associated with the CP.

4.1. Tracing the Lineage of HR Induction and Silencing Suppression Associated with the CPs of the Tombusviridae

In this paper we considered the CPs of individual tombusvirid species to be structural variants of a single effector. Consequently, a phylogenetic tree of the CPs can be a valuable source of information on the traits associated with the CP, just as phylogenetic trees of host plants can be informative about the inheritance of resistance. The two traits we evaluated in this paper were the capacity to trigger HR in Nicotiana species of section Alatae and silencing suppression. Silencing suppressor activity associated with the tombusvirid CP has been characterized in several papers [16,17,20,21,22,23]. Our goal in the present paper was to characterize the status of silencing suppressor activity in virus species for which there are no published records. Furthermore, we considered it valuable to test silencing suppressor activity and HR elicitation of CP constructs under a uniform set of conditions.
We found that elicitation of HR in Nicotiana could be traced to CPs in two clades: Clades 2 and 4 (Figure 4). In Clade 2, elicitation of HR was confirmed in one betanecrovirus and the monotypic zeavirus (Figure 4); it remains to be seen whether the CPs of the alphanecroviruses also have the capacity to trigger HR in Nicotiana. In Clade 4, HR elicitation in Nicotiana was confirmed by one or more tombusvirus, gammacarmovirus, and dianthovirus, but must still be investigated in aureusviruses, and the single gallantivirus, and macanavirus (Figure 4). Further work is necessary to determine whether an amino acid motif common to the CPs in Clades 2 and 4 is recognized by a single R protein in Nicotiana, or whether recognition is mediated by motifs unique to each of the clades.
An intriguing result is that viruses in Clade 1, which are the only tombusvirids that produce small CPs lacking a protruding domain, had neither HR elicitation nor silencing suppressor function, and hosts for MCMV and panicoviruses are restricted to the family Poaceae. MNeSV is likewise restricted to hosts in the family Poaceae, but nt sequence analysis indicated that the homology to tombusviruses surrounding the necrovirus-like CP ORF had borders that precisely retain two tombusviral regulatory sequences [12]. Thus, it is apparent that MNeSV has not lost the betanecrovirus CP characteristics that induced necrosis. The host range of the macanavirus furcrea necrotic streak virus is restricted to members of the monocot family Asparagaceae, [57] which may limit the ability of its CP, which contains a protruding domain, to cause any effect in dicot species.
In tracing the lineage of silencing suppression within the CP, we found that the silencing suppressor function was largely confined to Clade 3 (Figure 4). A comparison of the CPs in Clades 3 and 4 show that the silencing suppression trait in Clade 3 can be genetically separated from the HR determinant in Clade 4. In fact, the phylogenetic tree for the CP suggests that the separation of these traits occurred in a progenitor that led to the occurrence of Clades 3 and 4 (Figure 4, red arrow). It is significant to note that silencing suppressor function has been attributed to proteins other than the CP in many of the virus species in Clade 4, such as the strong silencer P19 in the tombusvirus genus [2] and both the RCNMV replication complex and MP [58,59]. Consequently, the CPs of the viruses in Clade 4 might not have a need to function as silencing suppressors.
The one intriguing exception to the separation of silencing suppressor and HR determinant is found in the CP of MNSV, as it carries both traits. Interestingly, phylogenetic analyses of the RdRP and movement proteins of tombusvirids showed that these proteins are more closely aligned with the other members of the gammacarmovirus genus in Clade 3 than with any member of Clade 4 [10], suggesting a recombination event occurred between MNSV and some member of Clade 4 to orient the MNSV CP in Clade 4. Indeed, interfamilial recombination has already been documented between the 3′ untranslated region of MNSV and the polerovirus cucurbit aphid-borne yellows virus, a luteovirid [60], so it is possible that other recombination events might have placed the MNSV CP ORF in Clade 4 and the balance of the virus in Clade 3.
The MNSV CP demonstrates that although separate, the motifs for HR elicitation in Nicotiana and silencing suppression can coexist in the same protein sequence. This conclusion is similar to what has been found with the CP of TCV, which also carries motifs for silencing suppression and HR elicitation in A. thaliana ecotype Dijon [13,14,15,16,17]. Choi and coworkers [18] also concluded that HR elicitation and silencing suppression were separate traits. Interestingly, the motif in the TCV CP that elicits HR in Dijon is likely located in a different part of the CP than the motif in the CPs that triggers HR in Nicotiana. In the case of the TCV CP, the amino acids responsible for breaking resistance in Dijon have been localized to the N-terminus of the TCV CP [14,61]. By contrast, deletion analyses of the CPs of TBSV and TNVDH have shown that the capacity to trigger HR in Nicotiana section Alatae is retained in CPs in which the first 77 amino acids can be deleted.
The interplay between resistance and susceptibility is frequently portrayed as an arms race between the pathogen and host in which any advantage gained by one side is countered by modifications on the other to nullify that advantage [3,5,62]. Similarly, it has also been suggested that viral silencing suppressors may be preferentially targeted by the host, perhaps to protect the integrity of the host silencing apparatus [3,52,54,62,63]. In this scenario, host R proteins have arisen to counter the silencing suppression function of the virus protein. However, the phylogenetic analysis in Figure 4 is striking because it indicates that there may not be any obvious relationship between the development of the CP as a silencing suppressor and its selection as a target for HR elicitation by the host. With the exception of MNSV, the CPs in Clade 4 that are the target for HR elicitation by members of Nicotiana Section Alatae have all lost the capacity of silencing suppression, whereas an R protein has not yet been identified that can uniformly recognize the CPs that retain silencing suppressor function. An alternative hypothesis would be that the silencing suppression and avr traits may be associated with structural requirements of the virion, traits that became set in the CP progenitors that resulted in the separation of Clades 3 and 4.
The three-dimensional structure of the CPs of several tombusvirids have been determined (reviewed in [64]), and coupled with the wealth of amino acid sequence information on tombusirid CPs, it would be valuable now to further examine the structural basis for silencing suppression and for elicitation of HR. In fact, amino acid sequences associated with the silencing suppressor function of the TCV CP were characterized in Cao et al. [19]; in particular, mutation of two basic amino acid residues (R130 and R137) appeared to have a significant effect on silencing activity. With the increased number and diversity of CP sequences now available, it would be interesting to continue with this analysis. It is possible that both silencing suppression and HR elicitation may be associated as much with the secondary and tertiary structure of the CP rather than with the primary amino acid sequences. A similar analysis of the CP effector of TMV was completed several years ago, showing that the three-dimensional structure of the coat protein is critical for recognition by the N’ gene. The recognition site consists of a central hydrophobic core surrounded by polar and charged amino acid resides [65]. In addition, the formation of coat protein dimers, trimers, and tetramers may also influence recognition [66]. It would be interesting to know if the sequence in the CPs of the members of Clades 2 and 4 recognized by at least one putative R protein in Nicotiana also is as complex as the TMV CP elicitor.

4.2. Tracing the Lineage of Resistance Genes to the Tombusviridae in the Genus Nicotiana

Many Nicotiana species respond to TBSV and TNV virion inoculation with HR, and putative R genes within these species target at least three different TBSV proteins (24). The P19 protein triggers HR in N. tabacum, N. sylvestris, and N. bonariensis [24,51]. Similarly, the P22 gene triggers HR in N. glutinosa and N. forgetiana TW50 [24,51]. Since most tombusvirids do not carry genes comparable to P19 and P22, these R proteins would appear to be targeting primarily members of the genus tombusviruses and aureusviruses. However, a third type of R gene has evolved to target a broader range of the tombusvirids, as our evidence indicates that several species of Nicotiana section Alatae can recognize the CPs of tombusviruses [24], dianthovirus, gammacarmovirus, betanecrovirus and zeavirus.
These results illustrate the potential for characterizing resistance genes in Nicotiana species towards different viruses and strains of the same virus. For instance, Doroszewska and Depta [67] inoculated virions of six isolates of Potato virus Y (PVY) from three groups, PVYNW, PVYNZ and PVYNTN, on leaves of 96 accessions of 68 Nicotiana species, including autotetraploid forms and botanical varieties. Five accessions belonging to N. africana, N. glauca, N. raimondii, N. knightiana and N. benavidesii were fully resistant to the six PVY isolates, but several other accessions and species were resistant to one or more PVY isolates, varying in their response. Similarly, Laskowska et al [68] tested 94 accessions of Nicotiana species accessions against TSWV and found that members of the Alatae section were mostly resistant, including five accessions in N. alata, N. forgetiana, three accessions of Nicotiana x sanderae, and also two N. tabacum cultivars showed HR local or systemic related resistance to TSWV.
Interestingly, a recent study has shown that several members of Nicotiana section Alatae also carry a functional orthologue of the N’ gene, which recognizes the CP of TMV [69]. Members of section Alatae that carry a functional orthologue include N. alatae (PI42334), N. forgetiana, and N. langsdorffii. It is intriguing that these Nicotiana species are able to respond with HR to inoculation of viruses from such genera as tobamovirus, tombusvirus, and betanecrovirus, and that these species respond to an even larger selection of CPs with HR upon agroinfiltration. It would be interesting to know if there is a common R protein in these Nicotiana species responsible for recognition these viruses. It may be that an N or N’ homologue might condition resistance in Nicotiana to tombusvirids. Yuan and coworkers [69] reported that Nicotiana species carried from one to up to 22 distinct N homologues, whereas Balaji et al. [70] found evidence for approximately 14 N homologues in N. clevelandii and N. glutinosa, in addition to the N gene. Significantly, silencing of the N gene present in N. edwardsonii suppressed HR induced by inoculation of TBSV and CymRSV, as well as TMV, suggesting that a Tombusvirus R gene shares some homology with the N gene.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/11/7/588/s1, Figure S1: Response of Nicotiana species to TNVDH virion inoculation. Figure S2: Response of Nicotiana species to TNVDH virion inoculation. Figure S3: Response of Nicotiana species to TNVDH virion inoculation. Figure S4: Response of Nicotiana species to TNVDH virion inoculation. Figure S5: Evaluation of selected tombusvirid CPs for elicitation of necrosis in N. langsdorffii. Figure S6: Agroinfiltration of p35S-GFP alone or co-agroinfiltration with virus CP clones or TBSV p19. Table S1: PCR primers used for cloning tombusvirid CP sequences. Table S2: List of virus isolate acronyms, along with the full name of the virus species used in Figure 4.

Author Contributions

Experiments conceived and designed by J.E.S., M.A., L.K., and C.A.; experiments were performed by M.A., J.E.S., C.A., A.R. and M.F.; the data was analyzed by M.A., J.E.S., C.A., A.R., L.K., K.S. and M.F.; reagents/materials were provided by J.E.S., L.K., and K.S. Portions of the original draft was written by M.A., J.E.S., C.A., A.R. and M.F.; the review and editing was conducted by M.A., J.E.S., K.S., and C.A. J.E.S. was responsible for supervision, project administration and funding acquisition.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Tim Sit for the gift of the RCNMV CP clone, Feng Qu for the gift of the TCV CP clone, Carmen Hernandez Fort for the gifts of the CP clones for PFBV and PLPV, Karen-Beth Scholthof for the gift of the PMV CP clone, D’Ann Rochon for the gift of the MNSV clone, and Sandra Valdes for technical assistance. M.A.A. was supported through a fellowship from HCED-Iraq and the D.F. Millikan Endowment at the University of Missouri, L.K. is funded by the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH grant K-128868). This research was also partially funded through the Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Qu, F.; Morris, T.J. Suppressors of RNA silencing encoded by plant viruses and their role in viral infections. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 5958–5964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Scholthof, H.B. The tombusvirus-encoded P19: From irrelevance to elegance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. deRonde, D.; Butterbach, P.; Kormelink, R. Dominant resistance against plant viruses. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Mandadi, K.K.; Scholthof, K.-B.G. Plant immune responses against viruses: How does a virus cause disease? Plant Cell 2013, 25, 1489–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zvereva, A.S.; Pooggin, M.M. Silencing and innate immunity in plant defense against viral and non-viral pathogens. Viruses 2012, 4, 2578–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Leisner, S.M.; Schoelz, J.E. Joining the crowd: Integrating plant virus proteins into the larger world of pathogen effectors. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2018, 56, 89–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Schoelz, J.E. Viral determinants of resistance and susceptibility. In Natural Resistance Mechanisms of Plant to Viruses; Loebenstein, G., Carr, J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 13–43. [Google Scholar]
  8. Rochon, D.; Rubino, L.; Russo, M.; Martelli, G.P.; Lommel, S. Tombusviridae. In Virus Taxonomy-Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses; King, A.M.Q., Adams, M.J., Carstens, E.B., Lefkowitz, E.J., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2012; pp. 1111–1138. [Google Scholar]
  9. Scheets, K.; White, K.A.; Rubino, L.; Martelli, G.P.; Rochon, D.A. ICTV taxonomic proposal 2015.007a-rP.A.v1.split_Carmovirus. Divide the Genus Carmovirus (family Tombusviridae) into Three New Genera: Alphacarmovirus, Betacarmovirus, and Gammacarmovirus. 2015. Available online: https://talk.ictvonline.org/ICTV/proposals/2015.007a-rP.A.v1.split_Carmovirus.pdf (accessed on 20 May 2019).
  10. Scheets, K.; Jordan, R.; White, A.; Hernandez, C. ICTV taxonomic proposal 2014.006b-fP.A..v3.Pelarspovirus. In the family Tombusviridae assign 5 previously unassigned species to a new genus, Pelarspovirus. 2014. Available online: https://talk.ictvonline.org/files/ictv_official_taxonomy_updates_since_the_8th_report/m/plant-official/5847 (accessed on 20 May 2019).
  11. Adams, M.J.; King, A.M.; Carstens, E.B. Ratification vote on taxonomic proposals to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2013). Arch. Virol. 2013, 158, 2023–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Scheets, K.; Redinbaugh, M.G. Infectious cDNA transcripts of maize necrotic streak virus: Infectivity and translational characteristics. Virology 2006, 350, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Oh, J.-W.; Kong, Q.; Song, C.; Carpenter, C.D.; Simon, A.E. Open reading frames of Turnip crinkle virus involved in satellite symptom expression and incompatibility with Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Dijon. Mol. Plant-Microbe. Interact. 1995, 8, 979–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao, Y.; DelGrosso, L.; Yigit, E.; Dempsey, D.A.; Klessig, D.F.; Wobbe, K.K. The amino terminus of the coat protein of Turnip crinkle virus is the AVR factor recognized by resistant Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2000, 13, 1015–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qu, F.; Morris, T.J. Efficient infection of Nicotiana benthamiana by Tomato bushy stunt virus is facilitated by the coat protein and maintained by p19 through suppression of gene silencing. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2002, 15, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Qu, F.; Ren, T.; Morris, T.J. The coat protein gene of turnip crinkle virus suppresses posttranscriptional gene silencing at an early initiation step. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 511–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Thomas, C.L.; Leh, V.; Lederer, C.; Maule, A.J. Turnip crinkle virus coat protein mediates suppression of RNA silencing in Nicotiana benthamiana. Virology 2003, 306, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Choi, C.W.; Qu, F.; Ren, T.; Ye, X.; Morris, T.J. RNA silencing-suppressor function of Turnip crinkle virus coat protein cannot be attributed to its interaction with the Arabidopsis protein TIP. J. Gen. Virol. 2004, 85, 3415–3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Cao, M.; Ye, X.; Willie, K.; Lin, J.; Zhang, X.; Redinbaugh, M.G.; Simon, A.E.; Morris, T.J.; Qu, F. The capsid protein of turnip crinkle virus overcomes two separate defense barriers to facilitate systemic movement of the virus in Arabidopsis. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 7793–7802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Genovés, A.; Navarro, J.A.; and Pallás, V. Functional analysis of the five melon necrotic spot virus genome-encoded proteins. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 2371–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Martinez-Turiño, S.; Hernandez, C. Inhibition of RNA silencing by the coat protein of pelargonium flower break virus: Distinctions from closely related suppressors. J. Gen. Virol. 2009, 90, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Meng, C.; Chen, J.; Peng, J.; Wong, S.M. Host-induced avirulence of Hibiscus chlorotic ringspot virus mutant correlates with reduced gene-silencing suppression activity. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pérez-Cañamás, M.; Hernández, C. Key importance of small RNA binding for the activity of a glycine/tryptophan (GW) motif-containing viral suppressor of RNA silencing. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 3106–3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Angel, C.A.; Schoelz, J.E. A survey of resistance to tomato bushy stunt virus in the genus Nicotiana reveals that the hypersensitive response is triggered by one of three different viral proteins. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2013, 26, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Coutts, R.H.A.; Rigden, J.E.; Slabas, A.R.; Lomonosssoff, G.P.; Wise, P.J. The complete nucleotide sequence of tobacco necrosis virus strain D. J. Gen. Virol. 1991, 72, 1521–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Molnár, A.; Havelda, Z.; Dalmay, T.; Szutorisz, H.; and Burgyan, J. Complete nucleotide sequence of tobacco necrosis virus strain DH and genes requried for RNA replication and virus movement. J. Gen. Viol. 1997, 78, 1235–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chkuaseli, T.; Newburn, L.R.; Bakhshinyan, D.; White, K.A. Protein expression strategies in tobacco necrosis virus-D. Virology 2015, 486, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Fang, L.; Coutts, R.H. Investigations on the tobacco necrosis virus D p60 replicase protein. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Price, W.C. Host ranges of six plant viruses. Am. J. Bot. 1940, 27, 530–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bascó, R.; Künstler, A.; Király, L. Tobacco necrosis virus replication and spread in Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia: A potential system for studying plant defense reactions to symptomless virus infections. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2016, 38, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lewis, R.S.; Nicholson, J.S. Aspects of the evolution of Nicotiana tabacum L. and the status of the Nicotiana Germplasm Collection. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2007, 54, 727–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Grieco, F.; Burgyan, J.; Russo, M. The nucleotide sequence of cymbidium ringspot virus RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 17, 6383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rochon, D.; Tremaine, J. Complete nucleotide sequence of the cucumber necrosis virus genome. Virology 1989, 169, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nutter, R.C.; Scheets, K.; Panganiban, L.C.; Lommel, S.A. The complete nucleotide sequence of the maize chlorotic mottle virus genome. Nucl. Acids Res. 1989, 17, 3163–3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Turina, M.; Maruoka, M.; Monis, J.; Jackson, A.O.; Scholthof, K.B. Nucleotide sequence and infectivity of a full-length cDNA clone of panicum mosaic virus. Virology 1998, 241, 141–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Riviere, C.J.; Rochon, D.M. Nucleotide sequence and genomic organization of melon necrotic spot virus. J. Gen. Virol. 1990, 71, 1887–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lazo, G.R.; Stein, P.A.; Ludwig, R.A. A DNA transformation-competent Arabidopsis genomic library in Agrobacterium. BioTechnology 1991, 9, 963–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Xiong, Z.; Kim, K.H.; Kendall, T.L.; Lommel, S.A. Synthesis of the putative red clover necrotic mosaic virus RNA polymerase by ribosomal frameshifting in vitro. Virology 1993, 193, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hajdukiewicz, P.; Svab, Z.; and Maliga, P. The small, versatile pPZP family of Agrobacterium binary vectors for plant transformation. Plant Mol. Biol. 1994, 25, 989–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Carrington, J.C.; Heaton, L.A.; Zuidema, D.; Hillman, B.I.; Morris, T.J. The genome structure of turnip crinkle virus. Virology 1989, 170, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hearne, P.Q.; Knorr, D.A.; Hillman, B.I.; Morris, T.J. The complete genome structure and synthesis of infectious RNA from clones of Tomato bushy stunt virus. Virology 1990, 177, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Angel, C.A.; Hsieh, Y.-C.; Schoelz, J.E. Comparative analysis of the capacity of tombusvirus P22 and P119 proteins to function as avirulence determinants in Nicotiana species. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2011, 24, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Scheets, K. Analysis of gene functions in maize chlorotic mottle virus. Virus Res. 2016, 222, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Palanichelvam, K.; Cole, A.B.; Shababi, M.; Schoelz, J.E. Agroinfiltration of cauliflower mosaic virus gene VI elicits hypersensitive response in Nicotiana species. In Mol. Plant-Microbe-Interact.; 2000; Volume 13, pp. 1275–1279. [Google Scholar]
  46. Abbink, T.E.M.; Tjernberg, P.A.; Bol, J.F.; Linthorst, H.J.M. Tobacco mosaic virus helicase domain induces necrosis in N-gene-carrying tobacco in the absence of virus replication. Mol. Plant-Microbe. Interact. 1998, 11, 1242–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Erickson, F.; Holzberg, S.; Calderon-Urrea, A.; Handley, V.; Axtell, M.; Corr, C.; Baker, B. The helicase domain of the TMV replicase proteins induces the N-mediated defense response in tobacco. Plant J. 1999, 18, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Huang, C.; Liu, Y.; Yu, H.; Yuan, C.; Zeng, J.; Zhao, L.; Tong, Z.; Tao, X. Non-structural protein NSm of tomato spotted wilt virus is an avirulence factor recognized by resistance genes of tobacco and tomato via different elicitor active sites. Viruses 2018, 10, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Daubert, S.D.; Schoelz, J.E.; Li, D.; Shepherd, R.J. Expression of disease symptoms in cauliflower mosaic virus genomic hybrids. J. Mol. Appl. Genet. 1984, 2, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Schoelz, J.E.; Shepherd, R.J.; Daubert, S.D. Region VI of cauliflower mosaic virus encodes a host range determinant. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1986, 6, 2632–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Scholthof, H.B.; Scholthof, K.-B.G.; Jackson, A.O. Identification of tomato bushy stunt virus host-specific symptom determinants by expression of individual genes from a potato virus X vector. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 1157–1172. [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang, K.; Empleo, R.; Nguyen, T.T.V.; Moffett, P.; Sacco, M.A. Elicitation of hypersensitive responses in Nicotiana glutinosa by the suppressor of RNA silencing protein P0 from poleroviruses. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2015, 16, 435–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Padgett, H.S.; Beachy, R.N. Analyis of a tobacco mosaic virus strain capable of overcoming N gene-mediated resistance. Plant Cell 1993, 5, 577–586. [Google Scholar]
  54. deRonde, D.; Butterbach, P.; Lohuis, D.; Hedil, M.; van Lent, J.W.M.; Kormelink, R. Tsw gene-based resistance is trigered by a functional RNA silencing suppressor portein of the tomato spotted wilt virus. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013, 14, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bendahmane, A.; Kanyuka, K.; Baulcombe, D.C. The Rx gene from potato controls separate virus resistance and cell death responses. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 781–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Vleeshouwers, V.G.A.A.; Rietman, H.; Krenek, P.; Champouret, N.; Young, C.; Oh, S.-K.; Wang, M.; Bouwmeester, K.; Vosman, B.; Visser, R.G.F.; et al. Effector genomics accelerates discovry and funcational profiling of potato disease resistance and Phytophthora infestans avirulence genes. PLoS ONE 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Morales, F.; Castano, M.; Calvert, L.; Arroyave, J.A. Furcraea necrotic streak virus: An apparent new member of the dianthovirus group. J. Phytopathol. 1992, 134, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Powers, J.G.; Sit, T.L.; Heinsohn, C.; Gerorge, C.G.; Kim, K.-H.; Lommel, S.A. The red clover necrotic mosaic virus RNA-2 encoded movement protein is a second suppressor of RNA silencing. Virology 2008, 381, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Takeda, A.; Tsukuda, M.; Mizumoto, H.; Okamoto, K.; Kaido, M.; Mise, K.; Okuno, T. A plant RNA virus suppresses RNA silencing through viral RNA replication. EMBO J. 2005, 24, 3147–3157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Miras, M.; Sepere, R.N.; Kraft, J.J.; Miller, W.A.; Aradna, M.A.; Truniger, V. Interfamilial recombination between viruses led to acquistion of a novel translation-enhancing RNA element that allows resistance breaking. New Phytol. 2014, 202, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ren, T.; Qu, F.; Morris, T.J. HRT gene function requires interaction between a NAC protein and viral capsid protein to confer resistance to turnip crinkle virus. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1917–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Nakahara, K.S.; Masuta, C. Interaction between viral RNA silencing suppressors and host factors in plant immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 20, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Pumplin, N.; Voinnet, O. RNA silencing suppression by plant pathogens: Defense, counter-defense and counter-counter-defense. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 745–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sit, S.L.; Lommel, S.A. Tombusviridae. In eLS; John Wiley and Sons, Ltd: Chichester, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Culver, J.N. Tobacco mosaic virus assembly and disassembly: Determinants in pathogenicity and resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2002, 40, 287–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Toedt, J.M.; Braswell, E.H.; Schuster, T.M.; Yphantis, D.A.; Taraporewala, Z.F.; Culver, J.N. Biophysical characterization of a designed TMV coat protein mutant, R46G, that elicits a moderate hypersensitive response in Nicotiana sylvestris. Protein Sci. 1999, 8, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Doroszewska, T.; Depta, A. Resistance of wild Nicotiana species to different PVY isolates. Phytopathologia 2011, 59, 9–24. [Google Scholar]
  68. Laskowska, D.; Doroszewska, T.; Depta, A.; Kursa, K.; Olszak-Przybyś, H.; Czubacka, A. A survey of Nicotiana germplasm for resistance to Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV). Euphytica 2013, 193, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yuan, X.; Yan, C.; Wu, Z.; Ren, F.; Zhang, H.; Baker, B.; Chen, J.; Kuang, H. Frequent gain and loss of resistance against tobacco mosaic virus in Nicotiana species. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 1813–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Balaji, B.; Cawly, J.; Angel, C.; Zhang, Z.; Palanichelvam, K.; Cole, A.; Schoelz, J. Silencing of the N family of resistance genes in Nicotiana edwardsonii compromises the hypersensitive response to tombusviruses. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2007, 20, 1262–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Viruses 11 00588 g001 550
Figure 1. Genome organization of TNVDH, and TNV CP constructs used for transient expression in Nicotiana species. (A) TNV-DH genome structure. The six open reading frames are illustrated by boxes. The p82 protein is highlighted in a different color from the p22 protein to emphasize that it is a readthrough product of the p22 protein. (B) Structure of inserts into the Agrobacterium binary vector pKYLX7. The arrow indicates the direction of transcription of the 35S promoter. All TNV CP constructs were generated by PCR and delimited by XhoI and SacI sites for cloning into pKYLX7. The clones pCP∆49, pCP∆77, and pCP∆146 utilized start codons present in-frame within the TNVDH CP coding sequence, and represent deletion of the first 49, 77 and 146 codons of the CP sequence, respectively. The clone pCP∆77KO, the start codon has been changed to TTG.
Figure 1. Genome organization of TNVDH, and TNV CP constructs used for transient expression in Nicotiana species. (A) TNV-DH genome structure. The six open reading frames are illustrated by boxes. The p82 protein is highlighted in a different color from the p22 protein to emphasize that it is a readthrough product of the p22 protein. (B) Structure of inserts into the Agrobacterium binary vector pKYLX7. The arrow indicates the direction of transcription of the 35S promoter. All TNV CP constructs were generated by PCR and delimited by XhoI and SacI sites for cloning into pKYLX7. The clones pCP∆49, pCP∆77, and pCP∆146 utilized start codons present in-frame within the TNVDH CP coding sequence, and represent deletion of the first 49, 77 and 146 codons of the CP sequence, respectively. The clone pCP∆77KO, the start codon has been changed to TTG.
Viruses 11 00588 g001
Viruses 11 00588 g002 550
Figure 2. Response of Nicotiana species to TNVDH virion inoculation. (A) N. quadrivalvis at 3 dpi. (B) N. forgetiana TW50 at 5 dpi. (C) N. otophora at 3 dpi. (D) N. benthamiana at 5 dpi. (E) N. benthamiana at 9 dpi. The red arrows indicate N. benthamiana leaves exhibiting systemic symptoms, whereas the yellow arrow indicates lesions in an inoculated leaf.
Figure 2. Response of Nicotiana species to TNVDH virion inoculation. (A) N. quadrivalvis at 3 dpi. (B) N. forgetiana TW50 at 5 dpi. (C) N. otophora at 3 dpi. (D) N. benthamiana at 5 dpi. (E) N. benthamiana at 9 dpi. The red arrows indicate N. benthamiana leaves exhibiting systemic symptoms, whereas the yellow arrow indicates lesions in an inoculated leaf.
Viruses 11 00588 g002
Viruses 11 00588 g003 550
Figure 3. Agroinfiltration of pTNV-CP, N-terminal TNV CP deletion mutants, and empty vector pKYLX7 into N. langsdorffii at 3 dai. A. Analysis of TNV-CP and three deletion mutants. B. Analysis of TNV-CP, pCP∆77 and pCP∆77KO. C. ELISA values assessed at 405 nm for expression of TNV CP constructs. Leaf panels infiltrated with constructs that do not react with HR are circled in red.
Figure 3. Agroinfiltration of pTNV-CP, N-terminal TNV CP deletion mutants, and empty vector pKYLX7 into N. langsdorffii at 3 dai. A. Analysis of TNV-CP and three deletion mutants. B. Analysis of TNV-CP, pCP∆77 and pCP∆77KO. C. ELISA values assessed at 405 nm for expression of TNV CP constructs. Leaf panels infiltrated with constructs that do not react with HR are circled in red.
Viruses 11 00588 g003
Viruses 11 00588 g004 550
Figure 4. Phylogenetic (distance) analysis of 54 CPs of CP-encoding tombusvirids. ML trees were generated as described in materials and methods. There were 356 positions in the final dataset. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) CP (AAA03191.1) was used as the outgroup. Brackets and/or colored text and/or colored boxes mark monophyletic RdRP lineages. Virus CPs enclosed in a red box were identified as avirulence determinants for the Nicotiana section Alatae. Virus CPs enclosed in a green box function as silencing suppressors in N. benthamiana. Virus CPs in blue boxes neither triggered HR in members of section Alatae nor acted as silencing suppressors. The arrow indicates a point of divergence between CPs that elicit HR in Nicotiana section Alata and CPs that function as silencing suppressors.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic (distance) analysis of 54 CPs of CP-encoding tombusvirids. ML trees were generated as described in materials and methods. There were 356 positions in the final dataset. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) CP (AAA03191.1) was used as the outgroup. Brackets and/or colored text and/or colored boxes mark monophyletic RdRP lineages. Virus CPs enclosed in a red box were identified as avirulence determinants for the Nicotiana section Alatae. Virus CPs enclosed in a green box function as silencing suppressors in N. benthamiana. Virus CPs in blue boxes neither triggered HR in members of section Alatae nor acted as silencing suppressors. The arrow indicates a point of divergence between CPs that elicit HR in Nicotiana section Alata and CPs that function as silencing suppressors.
Viruses 11 00588 g004
Viruses 11 00588 g005 550
Figure 5. Evaluation of selected CPs of the Tombusviridae for elicitation of necrosis in N. langsdorffii. pTNV-CP and empty vector pKYLX7 were agroinfiltrated into every leaf as positive and negative controls, respectively. Red circles illustrate zones of infiltration for constructs that did not elicit necrosis. Photos were taken at 7 dai.
Figure 5. Evaluation of selected CPs of the Tombusviridae for elicitation of necrosis in N. langsdorffii. pTNV-CP and empty vector pKYLX7 were agroinfiltrated into every leaf as positive and negative controls, respectively. Red circles illustrate zones of infiltration for constructs that did not elicit necrosis. Photos were taken at 7 dai.
Viruses 11 00588 g005
Viruses 11 00588 g006 550
Figure 6. Agroinfiltration of p35S-GFP alone or co-agroinfiltration with virus CP clones or TBSV p19. The clones pTCV-CP and TBSV p19 were included in each leaf as positive controls for silencing suppression, whereas p35S-GFP was included in each leaf to illustrate the induction of the host silencing response. The zone of infiltration is highlighted in tissues that did not exhibit silencing suppression. Photos were taken under UV illumination between 8–10 dai.
Figure 6. Agroinfiltration of p35S-GFP alone or co-agroinfiltration with virus CP clones or TBSV p19. The clones pTCV-CP and TBSV p19 were included in each leaf as positive controls for silencing suppression, whereas p35S-GFP was included in each leaf to illustrate the induction of the host silencing response. The zone of infiltration is highlighted in tissues that did not exhibit silencing suppression. Photos were taken under UV illumination between 8–10 dai.
Viruses 11 00588 g006
Table
Table 1. Response of 20 Nicotiana species to inoculation with TNV virions and agroinfiltration of the pTNV-CP.
Table 1. Response of 20 Nicotiana species to inoculation with TNV virions and agroinfiltration of the pTNV-CP.
Nicotiana spp.SectionTNV Virion Inoc.aAgroinfiltration of pTNV-CP
N. langsdorffiiAlataeHR bN c
N. longifloraAlataeHRN
N. bonariensisAlataeHRN
N. alataAlataeHRN
N. forgetianaAlataeHRN
N. plumbaginifoliaAlataeHRno rxn d
N. quadrivalvisPolydicliaeHRno rxn
N. clevelandiiPolydicliaeHRno rxn
N. edwardsonii dUndulatae/PolydicliaeHRno rxn
N. glutinosaUndulataeHRno rxn
N. arentsiiUndulataeHRno rxn
N. undulataUndulataeHRno rxn
N. tabacumNicotianaHRno rxn
N. sylvestrisSylvestresHRno rxn
N. otophoraTomentosaeCLL eno rxn
N. tomentosiformisTomentosaeHRno rxn
N. repandaRepandaeHRno rxn
N. glaucaNoctifloraeHRno rxn
N. rusticaRusticaeHRno rxn
N. benthamianaSuaveolentesSusc fno rxn
a Virions were present in sap from N. benthamiana leaves infected with TNV. b HR, necrotic local lesions, no development of systemic symptoms. c N, rapid necrosis within the zone of infiltration. d no rxn, no visible reaction within the zone of infiltration. e CLL, chlorotic local lesions, no development of systemic symptoms. f Susceptible – symptoms develop in upper, non-inoculated leaves.
Table
Table 2. Reaction of Nicotiana species in section Alatae to agroinfiltration of CPs of the Tombusviridae and assessment of silencing suppressor function of CPs in N. benthamiana.
Table 2. Reaction of Nicotiana species in section Alatae to agroinfiltration of CPs of the Tombusviridae and assessment of silencing suppressor function of CPs in N. benthamiana.
Virus CPN. langsdorffiiN. longifloraN. alata tw7N. forgetiana tw50N. plumbaginifolia tw106Silencing Suppressor Activity a
tombusvirus
pTBSVN bNNNno rxn cNo
pCyRSVNNNNno rxnNo
pCNVNNNNno rxnNo
gammacarmovirus
pMNSVNNNNno rxnYes
dianthovirus
pRCNMVNNNNno rxnNo
betacarmovirus
pTCVno rxnno rxnno rxnno rxnno rxnYes
pelarspovirus
pPLPVno rxnno rxnno rxnno rxnno rxnYes
alphacarmovirus
pPFBVno rxnno rxnno rxnno rxnno rxnYes
zeavirus
pMNeSVNNNNno rxnNo
alphanecrovirus
pTNVNNNNno rxnNo
panicovirus
pPMVno rxnno rxnno rxnno rxnno rxnNo
machlomovirus
pMCMVno rxnno rxnno rxnno rxnno rxnNo
a Silencing suppressor activity assessed by co-agroinfiltration of target CP with 35SGFP in N. benthamiana. b N, rapid necrosis within the zone of infiltration. c no rxn, no visible reaction within the zone of infiltration.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Adhab, M.; Angel, C.; Rodriguez, A.; Fereidouni, M.; Király, L.; Scheets, K.; Schoelz, J.E. Tracing the Lineage of Two Traits Associated with the Coat Protein of the Tombusviridae: Silencing Suppression and HR Elicitation in Nicotiana Species. Viruses 2019, 11, 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11070588

AMA Style

Adhab M, Angel C, Rodriguez A, Fereidouni M, Király L, Scheets K, Schoelz JE. Tracing the Lineage of Two Traits Associated with the Coat Protein of the Tombusviridae: Silencing Suppression and HR Elicitation in Nicotiana Species. Viruses. 2019; 11(7):588. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11070588

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adhab, Mustafa, Carlos Angel, Andres Rodriguez, Mohammad Fereidouni, Lóránt Király, Kay Scheets, and James E. Schoelz. 2019. "Tracing the Lineage of Two Traits Associated with the Coat Protein of the Tombusviridae: Silencing Suppression and HR Elicitation in Nicotiana Species" Viruses 11, no. 7: 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11070588

APA Style

Adhab, M., Angel, C., Rodriguez, A., Fereidouni, M., Király, L., Scheets, K., & Schoelz, J. E. (2019). Tracing the Lineage of Two Traits Associated with the Coat Protein of the Tombusviridae: Silencing Suppression and HR Elicitation in Nicotiana Species. Viruses, 11(7), 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11070588

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop