Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of Nasal Shedding of Equid Gammaherpesviruses in Healthy Swiss Horses
Previous Article in Journal
Monitoring Natural SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Lions (Panthera leo) at the Barcelona Zoo: Viral Dynamics and Host Responses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transcriptome and Proteomic Analysis Reveals Up-Regulation of Innate Immunity-Related Genes Expression in Caprine Herpesvirus 1 Infected Madin Darby Bovine Kidney Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Identification and Pathogenicity Evaluation of a Novel Reassortant Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (Genotype A2dB3)

1
State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Avian Immunosuppressive Diseases Division, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150069, China
2
OIE Reference Laboratory for Infectious Bursal Disease, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150069, China
3
Jiangsu Co-Innovation Centre for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease and Zoonosis, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2021, 13(9), 1682; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13091682
Submission received: 1 July 2021 / Revised: 17 August 2021 / Accepted: 18 August 2021 / Published: 25 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Proactive Study of Future Viral Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) is a non-enveloped, bi-segmented double-stranded RNA virus and the causative agent of a poultry immunosuppressive disease known as infectious bursal disease (IBD). The novel variant IBDV (nVarIBDV) recently posed a great threat to the development of the poultry industry. In this study, we identified a novel segment-reassortant IBDV strain, IBDV-JS19-14701 (Genotype A2dB3). Phylogenic analysis showed that Segments A and B of IBDV-JS19-14701 were derived from emerging nVarIBDV (Genotype A2dB1) and long-prevalent HLJ0504-like strains (Genotype A3B3) in China, respectively. The pathogenicity of IBDV-JS19-14701 was further evaluated via animal experiments. IBDV-JS19-14701 exhibited a similar virulence to chickens with the nVarIBDV. The identification of this reassortment event is beneficial for understanding the epidemiology of nVarIBDV and will contribute to the efficient prevention and control of IBD.

1. Introduction

Infectious bursal disease (IBD) is one of the most important immunosuppressive poultry infectious diseases in poultry and has caused enormous economic losses to the poultry industry worldwide. The etiological agent of IBD is infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV), which belongs to the genus Avibirnavirus in the family Birnaviridae [1]. The genome of IBDV is composed of two segments of double strand RNA, known as Segments A and B. Segment A encodes a VP5 and a polyprotein (pVP2-VP4-VP3). This polyprotein is self-cleaved by VP4 to produce VP2, VP3, and VP4 [2,3]. A hypervariable region (HVR) which spans amino acid positions from 206 to 350 of VP2 is widely used for the evolutionary analysis of IBDV [4]. Segment B encodes VP1, an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) that is responsible for genome replication, translation, and viral virulence of IBDV [5].
There are two serotypes of IBDV (Serotypes I and II), and only Serotype I strains are pathogenic to chickens [6,7]. Based on the pathogenicity and antigenicity, the Serotype I strain is traditionally categorized into four phenotypes; they are classic IBDV (cIBDV), variant IBDV (VarIBDV), very virulent IBDV (vvIBDV), and attenuated IBDV (aIBDV). According to an improved scheme for IBDV genotype classification [8], the cIBDV, VarIBDV, vvIBDV, and aIBDV correspond to Genotypes A1B1, A2B1 (including A2aB1, A2bB1, and A2cB1), A3B2, and A8B1, respectively. In addition, one virulent IBDV named HLJ0504-like strains (A3B3) are circulating in China [9,10,11,12,13], Pakistan [11,14], and India [15]. Recently, the epidemics caused by novel variant IBDV (nVarIBDV) were successively reported in China [16], Japan [17], Korea [18] and Malaysia [19]. The nVarIBDV strains were classified as Genotype A2dB1, which were genetically different from the early variant IBDV originally reported in America [8,18].
Genome segment reassortment is an important evolutionary feature of IBDV with a segmented genome. Herein, for the first time, we report the IBDV-JS19-14701 strain (Genotype A2dB3), a naturally occurring reassortant formed by the combination of nVarIBDV and HLJ0504-like IBDV; further, the pathogenicity of this strain was evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chickens and Embryos

Specific pathogen-free (SPF) chickens and SPF embryos were supplied by the National Poultry Laboratory Animal Resource Center of the Harbin Veterinary Research Institute (HVRI), the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS). The chickens were maintained in negative-pressure-filtered air isolators.

2.2. Samples Collection

In November 2019, in a 30-day-old vaccinated flock of Chinese local broiler (Yao chickens) in Jiangsu province of China, the chickens grew slowly, and the growth uniformity was poor, and the atrophy of bursa was observed; in addition, the chief complaint was symptoms of immunosuppressive disorder. This flock has been immunized with one infectious bursal disease live vaccine. Five bursa tissue samples were collected from sick chickens for laboratory examination. Tissue samples were homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 10 mL per gram of tissue). The homogenates were frozen and thawed three times, and then centrifuged at 5000× g for 5 min at 4 °C, and then the supernatants were harvested and stored at −80 °C until further investigation.

2.3. IBDV Detection

A 1-mL aliquot of TRIzol reagent (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) was added into 0.2 mL of the bursa tissue homogenate supernatant to extract the total RNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The presence of IBDV in these bursa samples was detected according to a previously described RT-PCR assay targeting the HVR of the VP2 gene [8]. The RT-PCR products were detected by 1% agarose electrophoresis analysis.

2.4. Virus Isolation and Genome Cloning

An IBDV-positive tissue supernatant sample was randomly selected to isolate the virus; three 24-day-old SPF chickens were inoculated via the ocular and intranasal routes, as described previously [20]. At 4 days post-inoculation, the bursae were collected and processed as described in Section 2.2. To detect the purity of the isolated IBDV in the bursa samples, avian influenza virus (AIV) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV) were detected by hemagglutination assay and hemagglutination inhibition assay; Marek’s disease virus (MDV), avian leukosis virus (ALV), fowl adenovirus Serotype 4 (FAdV-4), reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV), chicken anemia virus (CAV), and mycoplasma were detected by PCR; avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) and avian reovirus (ARV) were detected by RT-PCR; bacteria was detected by LB culture for 24 h. Detection primers were list in Table S1.
The DNA fragments of viral genome of IBDV were synthesized by RT-PCR using four pairs of primers (AU/A1542L and A1421U2/AL2 for Segment A; BU/B1344L and B1344U/BL for Segment B), as described in a previous study [21]. The Segments A and B PCR products were cloned into the pMD18-T vectors (Takara, Dalian, China), respectively. The sequences of the recombinant plasmids were determined using Sanger sequencing, which was performed by Comate Biosciences Company (Changchun, China).

2.5. Sequence Analysis

Nucleotide alignments were performed using the MUSCLE algorithm in MEGA 6 (ASU, Phoenix, AZ, USA) [22]. Neighbor-joining trees were constructed based on the nucleotide sequence of polyprotein of Segment A and VP1 of Segment B, using the Kimura 2-parameter method in MEGA6 [23], with 1000 replicates. Genetic similarity calculation and amino acid comparations were performed using MegAlign in the DNAstar package (MegAlign, DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA). The information for the 29 representative IBDV strains used in the phylogenetic analysis was listed in Table 1. The IBDV information covering the full-length sequences of both polyprotein and VP1 are relatively not much. To further validate the genetic characteristic of IBDV-JS19-14701, based on HVR of VP2 (representative fragment of Segment A) and B-marker of VP1 (representative fragment of Segment B), the phylogenetic trees containing more strains were constructed according to the previous method [8]. The sequence information of HVR and B-marker used in the phylogenetic analysis was list in Tables S2 and S3, respectively.

2.6. Restriction Enzyme Digestion Assay

To exclude the possibility that the sequence information of IBDV-JS19-14701 strain came from a bursa which was co-infected with HLJ0504-like vvIBDV and nVarIBDV. The RNA of isolated IBDV-JS19-14701 sample was extracted using the method in 2.3. A 1749 bp fragment (bp 1421-bp 3170 of Segment A) containing a Hind III restriction site (bp 2188 -bp 2193 of Segment A, exists in nVarIBDV but not exists in vvIBDV including HLJ0504-like strains) was amplified from the RNA sample by RT-PCR using primer set: A1421U2 (5′-GACCTCAACTCTCCCCTGAAGATTGCAGGAG-3′) and A3170L (5′-TCACTCAAGGTCCTCATCAGAGACGGT-3′). The amplicon was purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and digested with Hind III restriction enzyme (NEB) overnight. The digested products were analyzed on agarose electrophoresis. In this experiment, a representative strain of nVarIBDV (SHG19 strain) [16] and a representative strain of vvIBDV (HLJ0504 strain) [11] were used as control strains.

2.7. Pathogenicity Evaluation

Fifteen 24-day-old SPF chickens were divided into three groups (5 chickens per group). Chickens in Groups 1 and 2 were both intraocularly and intranasally infected with 100 median tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) of the isolated IBDV strain and the SHG19 control strain, respectively. Chickens in Group 3 (mock control) were administered 200 μL PBS. All chickens were observed daily for clinical symptoms. At 7 days post-infection (d p. i.), all chickens were euthanized and necropsied. The weights of the body and bursa were recorded to calculate the bursa/body weight ratio (B/BW) [B/BW = bursa: body weight × 1000] [24]. Half of the bursa tissues were fixed in 4% neutral-buffered formaldehyde for histopathological examination. To detect the infection of IBDV in bursa, the immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay was performed. The bursa sections were incubated with a mouse anti-VP2 monoclonal antibody (7D4) [16] as the primary antibody and peroxidase-labeled polymer-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) as the secondary antibody. Immunostaining was visualized by 3,3’-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride staining. Hematoxylin (Baso, Zhuhai, China) was used as a nuclear counterstain for IHC.

2.8. Statistical Analyses

All data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Data were presented as the mean ± SD in all experiments. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the statistical significance among the groups (* p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. IBDV Detection, Isolation, and Genome Sequencing

RT-PCR targeting the HVR of VP2 confirmed that all five bursa samples were positive for IBDV. One IBDV strain was successfully isolated form a randomly selected bursa suspension and designated as IBDV-JS19-1470 strain. The isolated IBDV-JS19-1470 strain is pure and is free of other pathogens including AIV, NDV, MDV, ALV, FAdV-4, REV, CAV, aMPV, ARV, mycoplasma, and bacteria.
The final consensus genomic sequence of IBDV-JS19-14701 was determined by Sanger sequencing. Sequencing, which showed that the Segment A of IBDV-JS19-14701 (3260 nucleotides, nt) consisted of a 5’-non-coding region (NCR, 84 nt), a 3’-NCR (91 nt), a small VP5-encoding ORF (450 nt), and a large ORF (3039 nt) encoding the polyprotein (pVP2-VP4-VP3). Segment B was composed of a VP1-coding ORF (2637 nt) flanked by a 5’-NCR (111 nt) and a 3’-NCR (79 nt). The genome sequences of IBDV-JS19-14701 were submitted to GenBank (Accession Numbers: Segment A-MW700332; Segment B-MW700333).

3.2. Sequence Analysis of IBDV-JS19-14701 Genome

The phylogenetic trees based on the nucleotide sequences of the polyprotein in Segment A showed that Serotype I strain contained four previously described genogroups: A1 (cIBDV), A2 (VarIBDV), A3 (vvIBDV), and A8 (aIBDV) [8]. Genogroup A2 included lineages A2a/b/c (early variant IBDV) and A2d (nVarIBDV) [8,18]. The IBDV-JS19-14701 strain was clustered with SHG19 [16], which is a representative strain of nVarIBDV (A2d) (Figure 1a). Based on the nucleotide sequences of VP1 in Segment B, the Serotype I representative strains were divided into three genogroups, B1, B2, and B3, and IBDV-JS19-14701 belonged to the Genogroup B3 (HLJ0504-like strains) but not Genogroup B1 (including SHG19-like strain) (Figure 1b). In addition, the phylogenetic trees based on HVR of VP2 and B-marker of VP1 also showed that the IBDV-JS19-14701 strain contained nVarIBDV Segment A (Genogroup A2d) and HLJ0504-like Segment B (Genogroup B3) (Figure S1).
The nucleic acid identity and amino acid comparation further confirmed the different origins of the two genome segments of the IBDV-JS19-14701 strain. In Segment A, genetic distances derived from a comparison of the nucleic acid sequences revealed that the polyprotein of IBDV-JS19-14701 shared a higher similarity (96.3–98.8%) with nVarIBDV strains (Genogroup A2d) than with other representative strains (93.2–95.0%). The characteristic amino acid residues in Segment A of IBDV-JS19-14701 exhibited a SHG19-like profile, except for one specific alteration in VP5 (78 L) (Table 2). In Segment B, the nucleic acid sequence of IBDV-JS19-14701 VP1 exhibited 92.7–95.3% identity with HLJ0504-like strains (Genogroup B3), which is higher than its identity with the nucleic acid sequence of the VP1 of novel variant IBDV strains (90.2–90.3%). All 15 characteristic amino acids in IBDV-JS19-14701 VP1 were identical to those in the representative strain HLJ0504 among the HLJ0504-like strains (Table 2).
To further validate that the sequence of IBDV-JS19-14701 strain is indeed from a single viral strain but not the result of co-infection of two strains of SHG19-like and HLJ0504-like strain, we performed a restriction enzyme digestion assay targeting the Hind III restriction site which exist in SHG19-like strain but not in HLJ0504-like strain (Figure 2a). The result showed that the 1749 bp RT-PCR product of IBDV-JS19-14701 was completely cleaved by the Hind III restriction enzyme, and the SHG19 strain had the same restriction enzyme digestion profile (Figure 2b). However, the RT-PCR product of HLJ0504 was not cleaved by the Hind III restriction enzyme (Figure 2b).
These results suggested that IBDV-JS19-14701 strain was a segment reassortment IBDV with a nVarIBDV Segment A (Genogroup A2d) and a HLJ0504-like Segment B (Genogroup B3). According to the new classification scheme [8], nVarIBDV and HLJ0504-like IBDV was corresponded to Genotypes A2dB1 and A3B3, respectively. Therefore, the genotype of the segment reassortment strain IBDV-JS19-14701 can be defined as A2dB3.

3.3. Pathogenicity Experiment

To evaluate the pathogenicity of IBDV-19JS-14701 strain, an animal experiment was performed. During the investigation period, no clinical symptoms and mortality were observed in either the IBDV-JS19-14701 infection group or the nVarIBDV SHG19 control group. The results of the autopsy, performed at 7 d. p. i., showed that IBDV-JS19-14701 induced severe atrophy of the bursa (B/BW = 2.10 ± 0.84), which was significantly different from that in the mock group (B/BW = 5.28 ± 1.99) (p < 0.05). Similar atrophy of the bursa (B/BW = 2.13 ± 0.72) was observed in the SHG19 control group (Figure 3a). Histopathological examination further confirmed that both IBDV-JS19-14701 and SHG19 induced severe damage to the bursa including atrophy of the follicles, lymphocyte depletion, and hyperplasia of fibrous tissue (Figure 3b). No lesions appeared in any of the mock chickens. IHC results showed obviously positive signals in the bursae of IBDV-JS19-14701-infection group and SHG19-infection group. No positive signal was observed in the bursae of mock group (Figure 3b).

4. Discussion

Reassortment is an important mechanism in the genetic evolution of IBDV, which has a two-segmented genome. The random exchange of genome segments between viruses in different genotypes has led to the emergence of new IBDV genotypes [25]. It has been reported that the reassortment of Segment A from very virulent strain (Genotype A3B2) and Segment B from attenuated strain (A8B1) resulted in the new segment-reassortant IBDV of genotypes of A3B1, which has been identified in China [21,26], India [27], Korea [28], Poland [29], Venezuela [30], Ethiopia [31], Nigeria [32], and Zambia [33]. Meanwhile, Segment A of attenuated strain (A8B1) and Segment B of very virulent strain (A3B2) were also recombined to generate a segment-reassortant IBDV with Genotype A8B2 [25,34]. In addition, in the USA and France, the segment-reassortant IBDVs of Genotype A3/BII (Segment A from vvIBDV and Segment B from the Serotype II strain) have been observed [35,36,37]. Our present study reported a novel IBDV reassortant of Genotype A2dB3 carrying Segment A of nVarIBDV (A2dB8) and Segment B of HLJ0504-like strain (A3B3). Further studies should be conducted to determine the origin of the IBDV-JS19-14701 strain and the mechanisms underlying the reassortment of segmented viruses.
The HLJ0504-like IBDVs (A3B3) are the main prevalent strains with high pathogenicity, which have been threatening the poultry farming in China for nearly 30 years [9,10,11,12]. Such type of IBDVs have also been circulating in the neighboring countries including Pakistan [11,14], India [15], Bangladesh [38], Thailand, Vietnam [39], and Korea [18], and were also reported in Venezuela [30]. Recently, the widespread of nVarIBDV (A2dB1) was discovered in China [16,40] and also reported in Japan [17], Korea [18], and Malaysia [19] in succession. The damage caused by nVarIBDV to the poultry industry has been well documented that nVarIBDV can cause severe bursal lesions and immunosuppression [16,41,42]. The co-existence of emerging nVarIBDV and long-prevalent HLJ0504-like strains provided the opportunity to generate reassortants through complex mechanisms, including the influence of the host, selection pressure, and environmental factors. It has been reported some available vaccines cannot protect against nVarIBDV well [42]. The flock in this study has been immunized with IBD live vaccine. Obviously, the reassortant IBDV-JS19-14701 with Segment A of nVarIBDV escaped the immune-protection of vaccine to some extent.
The pathogenicity of IBDV is determined by both segments of the genome [43], and segment reassortment can influence the virulence of IBDV. One study has confirmed that a naturally occurring reassortant strain with Segment A from vvIBDV and Segment B from attenuated IBDV has lower pathogenicity than that of vvIBDV [21]. Another study also showed that the segment reassortment between attenuated strains and vvIBDVs increased the pathogenicity of attenuated strain [44]. It has been identified that nVarIBDV is the main cause of the subclinical infection of IBD, which cannot kill chickens directly but acutely damages bursa resulting in severe immunosuppression and growth retardation [16,42,45,46]. The HLJ0504-like strain is a virulent IBDV with a high fatality rate [11]. Whether the replacement of Segment B of HLJ0504-like strain increased the pathogenicity of nVarIBDV is an issue worthy of attention. In the animal experiments, the reassortant IBDV-JS19-14701 showed similar pathogenicity to chickens as the representative nVarIBDV of SHG19 which could cause severe bursal damages. In this study, we just compared the pathogenicity between IBDV-JS19-14701 and SHG19 strains, and the detailed pathogenicity comparisons among three kinds of IBDV (IBDV-JS19-14701, SHG19, and HLJ0504) and its molecular mechanism needs further studies. The recombination between nVarIBDV and long-prevalent HLJ0504-like strain further hints the complexity of evolution and epidemic and the severity of prevention and control of IBD.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, it was firstly identified of the naturally genome-reassortant IBDV with a nVarIBDV Segment A and a HLJ0504-like Segment B. The segment-reassortment of IBDV posed additional challenges to the healthy development of poultry farming.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v13091682/s1, Figure S1: phylogenetic analysis of the nucleotide sequences encoding the HVR of VP2 (a) and B-marker of VP1 (b), Table S1: The primers for detecting other pathogens, Table S2: The HVR sequence information of IBDV representative strains, Table S3: The B-marker sequence information of IBDV representative strains.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Q. and X.W.; methodology, Y.W. and X.Q.; software, Y.W.; validation, L.F., N.J., X.N., W.Z., M.H., K.L., L.G., Y.G., C.L., H.C., A.L., Q.P. and Y.Z.; formal analysis, Y.W. and X.Q.; investigation, X.Q. and Y.W.; resources, X.Q.; data curation, X.Q. and Y.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W.; writing—review and editing, X.Q.; visualization, Y.W. and X.Q.; supervision, X.Q.; project administration, X.Q. and X.W.; funding acquisition, X.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32072852), the Heilongjiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. ZD2020C006, No.TD2019C003); the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFE0203200, No. 2017YFD0500704), the Heilongjiang Province Foundation for the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. GX18B011), China Agriculture Research System (No. CARS-41).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, and the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Protocol Code SYXK (Hei) 2017-009).

Data Availability Statement

Data can be requested by writing to the author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Delmas, B.; Attoui, H.; Ghosh, S.; Malik, Y.S.; Mundt, E.; Vakharia, V.N.; Ictv Report, C. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Bir-naviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2019, 100, 5–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chevalier, C.; Lepault, J.; Erk, I.; Da Costa, B.; Delmas, B. The Maturation Process of pVP2 Requires Assembly of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Capsids. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 2384–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Luque, D.; Saugar, I.; Rejas, M.T.; Carrascosa, J.L.; Rodríguez, J.F.; Castón, J.R. Infectious bursal disease virus: Ribonucleo-protein complexes of a double-stranded RNA virus. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 386, 891–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bayliss, C.D.; Spies, U.; Shaw, K.; Peters, R.W.; Papageorgiou, A.; Müller, H.; Boursnell, M.E.G. A comparison of the sequences of segment A of four infectious bursal disease virus strains and identification of a variable region in VP2. J. Gen. Virol. 1990, 71, 1303–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ye, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, E.; Han, X.; Yu, Z.; Liu, H. VP1 and VP3 Are Required and Sufficient for Translation Initiation of Uncapped Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Genomic Double-Stranded RNA. J. Virol. 2018, 92, e01345-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Mahgoub, H.A.; Bailey, M.; Kaiser, P. Erratum to: An overview of infectious bursal disease. Arch. Virol. 2012, 157, 2047–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qin, Y.; Zheng, S.J. Infectious Bursal Disease Virus-Host Interactions: Multifunctional Viral Proteins that Perform Multiple and Differing Jobs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.-L.; Fan, L.-J.; Jiang, N.; Gao, L.; Li, K.; Gao, Y.-L.; Liu, C.-J.; Cui, H.-Y.; Pan, Q.; Zhang, Y.-P.; et al. An improved scheme for infectious bursal disease virus genotype classification based on both genome-segments A and B. J. Integr. Agric. 2021, 20, 1372–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gao, H.; Wang, X.; Gao, Y.; Fu, C. Direct Evidence of Reassortment and Mutant Spectrum Analysis of a Very Virulent Infectious Bursal Disease Virus. Avian Dis. 2007, 51, 893–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. He, X.; Xiong, Z.; Yang, L.; Guan, D.; Yang, X.; Wei, P. Molecular epidemiology studies on partial sequences of both genome segments reveal that reassortant infectious bursal disease viruses were dominantly prevalent in southern China during 2000-2012. Arch. Virol. 2014, 159, 3279–3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Qi, X.; Gao, L.; Qin, L.; Deng, X.; Wu, G.; Zhang, L.; Yu, F.; Ren, X.; Gao, Y.; Gao, H.; et al. Genomic sequencing and molecular characteristics of a very virulent strain of infectious bursal disease virus isolated in China. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2011, 12, 1946–1949. [Google Scholar]
  12. Xia, R.X.; Wang, H.Y.; Huang, G.M.; Zhang, M.F. Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of a Chinese very virulent infectious bursal disease virus. Arch. Virol. 2008, 153, 1725–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hon, C.-C.; Lam, T.Y.; Yip, C.-W.; Wong, R.T.-Y.; Shi, M.; Jiang, J.; Zeng, F.; Leung, F.C.-C. Phylogenetic evidence for homologous recombination within the family Birnaviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2008, 89, 3156–3164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hussain, A.; Wu, T.; Li, H.; Fan, L.; Li, K.; Gao, L.; Wang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Liu, C.; Cui, H.; et al. Pathogenic Characterization and Full Length Genome Sequence of a Reassortant Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Newly Isolated in Pakistan. Virol. Sin. 2019, 34, 102–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Patel, A.K.; Pandey, V.C.; Pal, J.K. Evidence of genetic drift and reassortment in infectious bursal disease virus and emergence of outbreaks in poultry farms in India. Virus Dis. 2016, 27, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Fan, L.; Wu, T.; Hussain, A.; Gao, Y.; Zeng, X.; Wang, Y.; Gao, L.; Li, K.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; et al. Novel variant strains of infectious bursal disease virus isolated in China. Vet. Microbiol. 2019, 230, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Myint, O.; Suwanruengsri, M.; Araki, K.; Izzati, U.Z.; Pornthummawat, A.; Nueangphuet, P.; Fuke, N.; Hirai, T.; Jackwood, D.J.; Yamaguchi, R. Bursa atrophy at 28 days old caused by variant infectious bursal disease virus has a negative economic impact on broiler farms in Japan. Avian Pathol. 2020, 50, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Thai, T.N.; Jang, I.; Kim, H.A.; Kim, H.S.; Kwon, Y.K.; Kim, H.R. Characterization of antigenic variant infectious bursal disease virus strains identified in South Korea. Avian Pathol. 2021, 50, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aliyu, H.B.; Hair-Bejo, M.; Omar, A.R.; Ideris, A. Genetic Diversity of Recent Infectious Bursal Disease Viruses Isolated from Vaccinated Poultry Flocks in Malaysia. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 643976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yuwen, Y.; Gao, Y.; Gao, H.; Qi, X.; Li, T.; Liu, W.; Wang, X. Sequence analysis of the VP2 hypervariable region of eight very virulent infectious bursal disease virus isolates from the northeast of China. Avian Dis. 2008, 52, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, N.; Chen, Y.; Gao, L.; Wang, Y.; Gao, H.; Gao, Y.; Li, K.; Qi, X.; et al. Naturally occurring reassortant infectious bursal disease virus in northern China. Virus Res. 2015, 203, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980, 16, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Y.; Fan, L.; Jiang, N.; Gao, L.; Li, K.; Gao, Y.; Liu, C.; Cui, H.; Pan, Q.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Naturally occurring cell-adapted classic strain of infectious bursal disease virus. Vet. Microbiol. 2020, 243, 108620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wei, Y.; Yu, X.; Zheng, J.; Chu, W.; Xu, H.; Yu, X.; Yu, L. Reassortant infectious bursal disease virus isolated in China. Virus Res. 2008, 131, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sun, J.-H.; Lu, P.; Yan, Y.-X.; Hua, X.-G.; Jiang, J.; Zhao, Y. Sequence and Analysis of Genomic Segment A and B of Very Virulent Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Isolated from China. J. Vet. Med. B Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health 2003, 50, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Raja, P.; Senthilkumar, T.M.A.; Parthiban, M.; Thangavelu, A.; Gowri, A.M.; Palanisammi, A.; Kumanan, K. Complete Genome Sequence Analysis of a Naturally Reassorted Infectious Bursal Disease Virus from India. Genome Announc. 2016, 4, e00709-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lee, H.J.; Jang, I.; Shin, S.H.; Lee, H.S.; Choi, K.S. Genome sequence of a novel reassortant and very virulent strain of in-fectious bursal disease virus. Genome Announc. 2017, 5, e00730-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pikula, A.; Lisowska, A.; Jasik, A.; Smietanka, K. Identification and assessment of virulence of a natural reassortant of infectious bursal disease virus. Vet. Res. 2018, 49, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Le Nouën, C.; Rivallan, G.; Toquin, D.; Darlu, P.; Morin, Y.; Beven, V.; De Boisseson, C.; Cazaban, C.; Comte, S.; Gardin, Y.; et al. Very virulent infectious bursal disease virus: Reduced pathogenicity in a rare natural segment-B-reassorted isolate. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shiferaw, J.; Stacey, E.L.; Fekadu, K.; Robert, M.C.; Esayas, G.; Haileleul, N.; Kassahun, A.; Gelagay, A. Genetic characteri-sation of infectious bursal disease virus isolates in Ethiopia. Acta Trop. 2014, 130, 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nwagbo, I.O.; Shittu, I.; Nwosuh, C.I.; Ezeifeka, G.O.; Odibo, F.J.C.; Michel, L.O.; Jackwood, D.J. Molecular characterization of field infectious bursal disease virus isolates from Nigeria. Vet. World 2016, 9, 1420–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Kasanga, C.J.; Yamaguchi, T.; Munang’Andu, H.M.; Ohya, K.; Fukushi, H. Genomic sequence of an infectious bursal disease virus isolate from Zambia: Classical attenuated segment B reassortment in nature with existing very virulent segment A. Arch. Virol. 2012, 158, 685–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cui, P.; Ma, S.-J.; Zhang, Y.-G.; Li, X.-S.; Gao, X.-Y.; Cui, B.-A.; Chen, H.-Y. Genomic sequence analysis of a new reassortant infectious bursal disease virus from commercial broiler flocks in central China. Arch. Virol. 2013, 158, 1973–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jackwood, D.J.; Sommer-Wagner, S.E.; Crossley, B.M.; Stoute, S.; Woolcock, P.R.; Charlton, B.R. Identification and pathogenicity of a natural reassortant between a very virulent serotype 1 infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) and a serotype 2 IBDV. Virology 2011, 420, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Abed, M.; Soubies, S.M.; Courtillon, C.; Briand, F.-X.; Allée, C.; Amelot, M.; De Boisseson, C.; Lucas, P.; Blanchard, Y.; Belahouel, A.; et al. Infectious bursal disease virus in Algeria: Detection of highly pathogenic reassortant viruses. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2018, 60, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Soubies, S.M.; Courtillon, C.; Briand, F.-X.; Queguiner-Leroux, M.; Courtois, D.; Amelot, M.; Grousson, K.; Morillon, P.; Herin, J.-B.; Eterradossi, N. Identification of a European interserotypic reassortant strain of infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Pathol. 2016, 46, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Islam, M.R.; Nooruzzaman, M.; Rahman, T.; Mumu, T.T.; Rahman, M.M.; Chowdhury, E.H.; Eterradossi, N.; Müller, H. A unified genotypic classification of infectious bursal disease virus based on both genome segments. Avian Pathol. 2021, 50, 190–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Michel, L.O.; Jackwood, D.J. Classification of infectious bursal disease virus into genogroups. Arch. Virol. 2017, 162, 3661–3670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, A.; Pei, Y.; Zhang, K.; Xue, J.; Ruan, S.; Zhang, G. Phylogenetic analyses and pathogenicity of a variant infectious bursal disease virus strain isolated in China. Virus Res. 2019, 276, 197833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fan, L.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, N.; Gao, L.; Li, K.; Gao, Y.; Cui, H.; Pan, Q.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; et al. A reassortment vaccine candidate of the novel variant infectious bursal disease virus. Vet. Microbiol. 2020, 251, 108905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Fan, L.; Wu, T.; Wang, Y.; Hussain, A.; Jiang, N.; Gao, L.; Li, K.; Gao, Y.; Liu, C.; Cui, H.; et al. Novel variants of infectious bursal disease virus can severely damage the bursa of fabricius of immunized chickens. Vet. Microbiol. 2019, 240, 108507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Escaffre, O.; Le Nouen, C.; Amelot, M.; Ambroggio, X.; Ogden, K.M.; Guionie, O.; Toquin, D.; Muller, H.; Islam, M.R.; Eterradossi, N. Both Genome Segments Contribute to the Pathogenicity of Very Virulent Infectious Bursal Disease Virus. J. Virol. 2012, 87, 2767–2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Wei, Y.; Li, J.; Zheng, J.; Xu, H.; Li, L.; Yu, L. Genetic reassortment of infectious bursal disease virus in nature. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 350, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fan, L.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, N.; Chen, M.; Gao, L.; Li, K.; Gao, Y.; Cui, H.; Pan, Q.; Liu, C.; et al. Novel variant infectious bursal disease virus suppresses Newcastle disease vaccination in broiler and layer chickens. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 6542–6548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xu, G.; Li, J.; Shen, Q.; Hou, L.; Xia, Y.; Li, Q.; Xie, S.; Sun, S.; Ding, J.; Mao, Y.; et al. Complete Genome Characterization of a Novel Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Strain Isolated from a Chicken Farm in China. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2019, 8, e00632-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of the nucleotide sequences encoding the polyproteins (a) and VP1 (b). The trees were generated by the neighbor-joining method with MEGA6 software. Trees were drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. Only branches supported by a bootstrap value above 50% were displayed. The genogroup and corresponding phenotype for each branch was marked. The segment-reassortant strain detected in this study (IBDV-JS19-14701) was highlighted with a solid circle.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of the nucleotide sequences encoding the polyproteins (a) and VP1 (b). The trees were generated by the neighbor-joining method with MEGA6 software. Trees were drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. Only branches supported by a bootstrap value above 50% were displayed. The genogroup and corresponding phenotype for each branch was marked. The segment-reassortant strain detected in this study (IBDV-JS19-14701) was highlighted with a solid circle.
Viruses 13 01682 g001
Figure 2. Identification of co-infection by restriction enzyme digestion analysis. (a) A part of the nucleotide alignment report showing the presence or absence of the Hind III restriction enzyme site (bp 2188–bp 2193) in Segment A. An asterisk indicates a residue identical to the IBDV-JS19-14701 strain. The shaded area indicates the presence of a Hind III restriction site; (b) total RNA of IBDV-JS19-14701, SHG19, or HLJ0504 was extracted and subjected to RT-PCR, respectively. The RT-PCR products (bp 1421–bp 3170 of Segment A, 1749 bp) were then subjected to Hind III digestion.
Figure 2. Identification of co-infection by restriction enzyme digestion analysis. (a) A part of the nucleotide alignment report showing the presence or absence of the Hind III restriction enzyme site (bp 2188–bp 2193) in Segment A. An asterisk indicates a residue identical to the IBDV-JS19-14701 strain. The shaded area indicates the presence of a Hind III restriction site; (b) total RNA of IBDV-JS19-14701, SHG19, or HLJ0504 was extracted and subjected to RT-PCR, respectively. The RT-PCR products (bp 1421–bp 3170 of Segment A, 1749 bp) were then subjected to Hind III digestion.
Viruses 13 01682 g002
Figure 3. Pathogenicity evaluation of the reassortant strain IBDV-JS19-14701. (a) B/BW ratio at seven days post-infection (* p < 0.05); (b) Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (scale bars, 200 μm) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining (scale bars, 50 μm) of IBDV VP2 protein in the bursal tissues harvested at seven days post-infection.
Figure 3. Pathogenicity evaluation of the reassortant strain IBDV-JS19-14701. (a) B/BW ratio at seven days post-infection (* p < 0.05); (b) Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (scale bars, 200 μm) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining (scale bars, 50 μm) of IBDV VP2 protein in the bursal tissues harvested at seven days post-infection.
Viruses 13 01682 g003
Table 1. IBDV representative strains used in the sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis.
Table 1. IBDV representative strains used in the sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis.
StrainsPhenotype 1GenotypeGenBank Accession No.StrainsPhenotype 1GenotypeGenBank Accession No.
Segment ASegment B Segment ASegment B
IMCA1B1AY029166AY029165Harbin-1HA3B3EF517528EF517529
F52/70CA1B1HG974565HG974566GxHA3B3AY444873AY705393
Variant EVarA2aB1AF133904AF133905PK2HA3B3AY368653AY368654
9109VarA2bB1AY462027AY459321HLJ0504HA3B3AF133904AF133905
GLSVarA2cB1AY368653AY368654CU-1AA8B1X16107AF362775
SHG19nVarA2dB1MN393076MN393077JD1AA8B1AF321055AY103464
SHG352nVarA2dB1MT179720MT179722B87AA8B1DQ906921DQ906922
SHG358nVarA2dB1MT179721MT179723GtAA8B1DQ403248DQ403249
ZD-2018-1nVarA2dB1MN485882MN485883CTAA8B1AJ310185AJ310186
OKYMVVA3B2D49706D49707P2AA8B1X84034X84035
HK46VVA3B2AF092943AF092944NBAA8B1AY319768AY654284
D6948VVA3B2AF240686AF240687CEF-94AA8B1AF194428AF194429
KSVVA3B2DQ927042DQ927043HZ2AA8B1AF321054AF493979
UK661VVA3B2NC-004178NC-004179D78AA8B1AF499929AF499930
HuB-1VVA3B2KF569805GQ449693OHSerotype IIAIIBIIU30818U30819
BD399VVA3B2AF362776AF362770
1 C, classic strain; Var, variant strain; nVar, novel variant strain; VV, very virulent strain; H: HLJ0504-like strain; A, attenuated strain.
Table 2. Comparison of the characteristic amino acid residues between the novel variant strain (nVar) and HLJ0504-like IBDV (H).
Table 2. Comparison of the characteristic amino acid residues between the novel variant strain (nVar) and HLJ0504-like IBDV (H).
Segment ASegment B
VP5VP2VP4VP3VP1
StrainPhenotype49781292132212222422492522532542562792842862942993183233304515416806857157519811005461145146147242287390508511546562646687695
IBDV-19JS-14701GFPNKTVKIQNVNAILSDESLICKPHPAVITEGDALKSPSSP K
SHG19nVar*L**************************IVN*D*T**R**G**
SHG352nVar*L******************I*******IVN*D*T**R**G**
SHG358nVar*L**************************IVNVV*T**R**GS*
ZD-2018-1nVar*L*D****************I*******IVS*D*T**R**GS*
HLJ0504HR**DQAIQV*GID*TI*GD***YNSD*****************
GxHR**DQAIQV*GID*TI*GD***YNSD*****************
Harbin-1HR**DQAIQV*GID*TI*GD***YNSD************S****
PK2HR*SDQAIQV*GID*TI*GD***YNSD****S**********S*
An asterisk indicates a residue identical to the IBDV-JS19-14701 strain.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Jiang, N.; Fan, L.; Niu, X.; Zhang, W.; Huang, M.; Gao, L.; Li, K.; Gao, Y.; Liu, C.; et al. Identification and Pathogenicity Evaluation of a Novel Reassortant Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (Genotype A2dB3). Viruses 2021, 13, 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13091682

AMA Style

Wang Y, Jiang N, Fan L, Niu X, Zhang W, Huang M, Gao L, Li K, Gao Y, Liu C, et al. Identification and Pathogenicity Evaluation of a Novel Reassortant Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (Genotype A2dB3). Viruses. 2021; 13(9):1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13091682

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yulong, Nan Jiang, Linjin Fan, Xinxin Niu, Wenying Zhang, Mengmeng Huang, Li Gao, Kai Li, Yulong Gao, Changjun Liu, and et al. 2021. "Identification and Pathogenicity Evaluation of a Novel Reassortant Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (Genotype A2dB3)" Viruses 13, no. 9: 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13091682

APA Style

Wang, Y., Jiang, N., Fan, L., Niu, X., Zhang, W., Huang, M., Gao, L., Li, K., Gao, Y., Liu, C., Cui, H., Liu, A., Pan, Q., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., & Qi, X. (2021). Identification and Pathogenicity Evaluation of a Novel Reassortant Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (Genotype A2dB3). Viruses, 13(9), 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13091682

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop