Next Article in Journal
Bunyaviral N Proteins Localize at RNA Processing Bodies and Stress Granules: The Enigma of Cytoplasmic Sources of Capped RNA for Cap Snatching
Next Article in Special Issue
Novel HCV Genotype 4d Infectious Systems and Assessment of Direct-Acting Antivirals and Antibody Neutralization
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Body Mass Index after Initiation of Antiretroviral Treatment: Differences by Class of Core Drug
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Human and Rhesus Macaque Interferon-Stimulated Gene Screen Shows That Over-Expression of ARHGEF3/XPLN Inhibits Replication of Hepatitis C Virus and Other Flavivirids
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterisation of a Hepatitis C Virus Subtype 2a Cluster in Scottish PWID with a Suboptimal Response to Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir Treatment

1
Thomson Group, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK
2
NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Departments of Hepatology and Virology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2022, 14(8), 1678; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081678
Submission received: 24 June 2022 / Revised: 21 July 2022 / Accepted: 27 July 2022 / Published: 29 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impact of HCV Diversity in Natural Infection and Models of Infection)

Abstract

:
Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionised the treatment of Hepatitis C virus (HCV), allowing the World Health Organisation (WHO) to set a target of eliminating HCV by 2030. In this study we aimed to investigate glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (GP) treatment outcomes in a cohort of patients with genotype 2a infection. Methods: Clinical data and plasma samples were collected in NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde. Next generation whole genome sequencing and replicon assays were carried out at the MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research. Results: 132 cases infected with genotype 2a HCV were identified. The SVR rate for this group was 91% (112/123) following treatment with GP. An NS5A polymorphism, L31M, was detected in all cases of g2a infection, and L31M+R353K in individuals that failed treatment. The results showed that R353K was present in 90% of individuals in the Glasgow genotype 2a phylogenetic cluster but in less than 5% of all HCV subtype 2a published sequences. In vitro efficacy of pibrentasvir against sub-genomic replicon constructs containing these mutations showed a 2-fold increase in IC50 compared to wildtype. Conclusion: This study describes a cluster of HCV genotype 2a infection associated with a lower-than-expected SVR rate following GP treatment in association with the NS5A mutations L31M+R353K.

1. Introduction

An estimated 58 million people in the world have chronic Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, of whom one third will develop liver cirrhosis with associated risks of decompensated liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In 2015, the WHO estimated that there were 1.75 million new infections, predominantly due to unsafe health-care procedures and injecting drug use [1]. The development of interferon-free, all oral regimens of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has revolutionised HCV treatment. Indeed, the global elimination of HCV has generated much interest and appears to be a realistic goal, as evidenced by the World Health Organisation (WHO) 2030 target [2].
While the rates of sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) are as high as 95% [3], treatment failure occurs in a small number of individuals. Genetic surveillance of cases of treatment failure is useful, to characterise the emergence of viral drug resistance [4], a risk that occurs due to the extensive natural genetic diversity of HCV. Under drug pressure, mutations within the targeted viral proteins NS3, NS5A and NS5B may emerge, giving rise to treatment failure [5]. The NS3-inhibitors, including glecaprevir, bind to the NS3 protease catalytic site, preventing posttranslational processing of the viral polyprotein and the release of proteins that are essential to produce viral particles. The NS5A inhibitors such as pibrentasvir and NS5B RNA polymerase inhibitors impair viral replication and the production of viral particles. Treatment guidelines recommend combination DAA therapy [6,7,8] to reduce the risk of such resistance developing. However, 5–10% of individuals may fail to achieve an SVR12, with the highest risk in individuals who are cirrhotic, require retreatment, are non-adherent or are infected with diverse HCV subtypes such as 1l, 4r and 6b, usually acquired in Asia or Sub-Saharan Africa [9].
Here, we describe a cluster of individuals infected with genotype 2a with a suboptimal response to treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P), a regimen previously reported to have a high genetic barrier to resistance. We also investigate a subset of individuals from this group who failed treatment. Resistance was associated with the combination of L31M and R353K mutations within NS5A.

2. Methods

2.1. Clinical Cohort and Samples

Demographic and clinical data on individuals with HCV genotype 2 infection, managed within NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GGC), and treated with G/P, were collected between 2013 and 2019. Plasma samples from fifteen of these individuals, including two that failed treatment, were available for whole HCV genome sequencing. Liver cirrhosis was defined by a transient elastography score of greater than 12 kPa. Fisher’s exact tests were conducted for categorical variables and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test for continuous variables. Ethical approval was granted by the National Research Ethics Service Committee, East Midlands (11/EM/0323) and from the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee (12/WS/0002).

2.2. HCV RNA Quantification

HCV viral load testing was carried out at the West of Scotland Specialist Virology Centre, Glasgow Royal Infirmary. Viral loads were determined by the Abbott Alinity m in vitro realtime reverse transcriptase test (Abbott Molecular, IL, USA). It has a limit of detection (LOD) of 12 International Units per millilitre (IU/mL) and a quantitation range of 12 to 2 × 106 IU/mL. Validation shows all HCV genotypes are detected and quantitated equally.

2.3. Library Preparation and Next Generation Sequencing

Extraction of viral RNA from the plasma samples (200 µL) was performed with the Agencourt RNAdvance blood kit (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The RNA was then eluted in nuclease free water (11 µL) and reverse transcribed with Superscript III (Invitrogen, MA, USA), using random hexamers. NEB Second Strand Synthesis kit (New England Biolabs, MA, USA) and KAPA Library Prep kit (KAPA Biosystems, MA, USA) were used for library preparation. Samples were indexed using NEBNext Multiplex Oligos for Illumina (New England Biolabs, MA, USA). Qubit (Thermo Fisher, MA, USA) and TapeStation (Agilent, CA, USA) were then used to quantify and check the quality of the amplified DNA. The libraries were then pooled at similar molar concentrations and target enrichment (TE) was performed using NimbleGen SeqCap EZ system RNA probes (Roche, CH) as previously described [10]. Samples were then sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, CA, USA) using a v3 MiSeq Reagent Kit (Illumina, Illumina Centre, Cambridge, UK).

2.4. Bioinformatic Analyses

NGS data were analysed using an in-house Unix-based analysis and genotyping pipeline. In brief, raw sequence reads in the form of fastq files were cleaned and quality checked and genotyped using a KMER based approach. A BLAST guided programme, Tanoti, was then used to map the sequences to the relevant reference sequences in order to generate consensus genomes. Whole genomes were accepted, where 90% of the genome was covered, and then aligned using MAFFT (multiple alignment program for amino acid or nucleotide sequences) Version 7.313 [11]. Finally, a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed using RAxML [12]. The tree was constructed using a general time reversible nucleotide substitution model with 1000 bootstraps. Genetic distance between the sequences was calculated using MEGA X [13], and using a bootstrap method for variance estimation. HCV GLUE software (http://hcv.glue.cvr.ac.uk, accessed 13 June 2021) was used to evaluate and analyse resistance-associated mutations present in the sequenced samples [14]. Aligned, consensus amino acid sequences were inspected within NS3 and NS5A genes to identify mutations unique to HCV from the individuals who failed treatment. ClusterPicker [15] was used to define closely related sequence clusters that were less than 10% different to each other across the whole genome. Whole genomes generated as part of this study have been submitted to GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, accessed on 18 July 2022). Appendix B lists the assigned accession numbers.

2.5. Sub-Genomic Replicon (SGR) Constructs

A sub-genomic replicon (pJFH-1) encoding a Gaussia luciferase gene [16] was modified to encode the NS5A amino acid substitutions identified as unique to the virus infecting individuals who failed treatment. The NS5A constructs containing polymorphisms that have previously been associated with resistance to pibrentasvir were also synthesised and used as controls. These polymorphisms included F28F+L31I and P29S+K30G.The background plasmid sequence, spanning non-structural proteins NS3 to NS5B of HCV, was that of JFH-1, which is a subtype 2a HCV sequence that was isolated from a Japanese individual with fulminant hepatitis [17]. This strain of HCV is known to replicate well in cell culture and is sensitive to DAAs. The constructs were manufactured by Invitrogen (ThermoFisher Scientific, UK) using a site-directed mutagenesis system. A pJFH-1/GND replicon, containing a self-inactivating mutation in the NS5B gene, was used as the negative control.

2.6. RNA Transcription and Electroporation

Replicon constructs were linearised with Xba1 (New England Biolabs, MA, USA) and then purified (Monarch DNA gel extraction kit, New England Biolabs, MA, USA). Purified DNA was then used as a template for RNA transcription (T7 RiboMAX Express Large Scale RNA Production System, Promega, WI, USA) followed by RNA purification (RNeasy Mini Kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA was electroporated (270V, 950 capacitance, ∞ resistance) in 4mm cuvettes (Molecular BioProducts, ThermoFisher Scientific, UK) at 2 × 105 cells per reaction. Electroporated cells were immediately chilled on ice to rest for a few minutes before being resuspended in 5mls of 10% foetal bovine serum DMEM (Gibco, ThermoFisher Scientific, UK). Cells were seeded into 96-well plates and incubated at 37 °C for 4 h.

2.7. Replication Capacity of SGR Constructs

To ensure the SGR constructs were efficiently replicating we collected supernatant at 4, 24, 48 and 72 h for luminescence reading. We then compared the replication efficiency to that of wildtype (JFH-1) by calculating replication capacity. This was calculated using the luminescence readings in the following formula: (Mutant 72 h/Mutant 4 h)/(JFH-1 72 h/JFH-1 4 h).

2.8. Sub-Genomic Replication Inhibition Assay

The 96-well plates were seeded with electroporated cells as mentioned above and then treated with Pibrentasvir (Cayman Chemical, MI, USA, CAS No. 1353900-92-1) in serial dilutions. Cells were incubated with drug for 72 h before culture medium was removed and luciferase assay performed (Pierce™ Gaussia Luciferase Flash Assay Kit, ThermoFisher Scientific, UK). Relative light units (RLU) were calculated as the 72 h read divided by the 4 h read for each well. Maximum responses were set as the mean RLU of wells untreated with drug and the remaining RLU were normalised to this value and expressed as percentages. Drug response curves and IC50 values were calculated using non-linear regression (GraphPad Prism 9 software).

3. Results

3.1. Individual Characteristics

Between 2013 and 2019, 132 individuals infected with HCV genotype 2a were treated with G/P therapy. The median age was 48 years and 72% (95/132) were male. Outcome data were missing for nine individuals. Of those remaining, 91% (112/123) achieved SVR12. Table 1 summarises the demographic and clinical characteristics of this group. None of the individuals who failed treatment had liver cirrhosis. One individual developed HCC while being successfully treated with DAAs. None of the individuals who failed treatment had HCC prior to or post DAA therapy. Route of transmission was known for 76% (94/123), and of these, 70% (86/123) were people who inject drugs (PWID).

3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

A maximum likelihood tree was constructed with reference strains from different genotype 2 subtypes. Appendix A shows the full genotype 2 clade and reveals that the circulating HCV subtypes in the clinical cohort included both subtypes 2a and 2b. The subtype 2a cluster that includes individuals P19 and P20, who failed treatment, is shown in Figure 1. This cluster of sequences was distinct to all other sequences withing the subtype 2a clade, as analysed in ClusterPicker (https://hiv.bio.ed.ac.uk/software.html, accessed 19 May 2022). Individuals P6 and P10 were successfully treated with (G/P); P4, P7, P8 and P9 were not treated with (G/P). We noted that there was a sequence from an individual in Edinburgh from 2013 and two other sequences from UK individuals (sequence accession numbers KY320321 and KY620322), also from 2013, that formed part of this genotype 2a cluster, suggesting circulation of this subtype 2a clade since at least 2013 outside of the NHS GG&C area.

3.3. Resistance-Associated Substitutions

Resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) were analysed using HCV GLUE [14]. None of the known NS3 RASs (A156T/V, D168E/V) previously associated with glecaprevir resistance in HCV genotype 2a [19] were noted in the individuals who failed therapy. The known NS5A RAS L/M31M was identified in HCV sequences from P19 and P20 as well as the other sequences in the same subtype 2a cluster. The proportion of sequences with leucine and methionine at position 31 was 15% (22/147) and 85% (125/147), respectively, in all genotype 2a sequences from GenBank, curated by HCV GLUE. We compared available whole genome sequences from the individuals that failed (G/P) treatment (P19 and P20) to HCV sequences from individuals that were successfully treated (P6 and P10) and noted that NS5A polymorphisms R353K and P407L were present in P19 and P20, but not in P10. These were taken forward for in vitro resistance analysis. We next looked to see if the two NS5A polymorphisms were present in the other sequences within the subtype 2a cluster. Out of the remaining 10 sequences, 9 (90%) and 7 (70%) had the R353K and P407L polymorphisms, respectively. Finally, we checked to see how common these two NS5A polymorphisms were in all subtype 2a sequences by analysing an alignment of all subtype 2a NS5A sequences from HCV GLUE. The proportion of sequences that had the R353K and P407L polymorphisms were 11/257 (4.3%) and 138/257 (53.7%), respectively.

3.4. Replication Capacities of Sub-Genomic Replicon (SGR) Constructs

We tested the efficacy of pibrentasvir against SGRs harbouring the above-mentioned polymorphisms in NS5A alongside L31M polymorphism which was observed in P19 and P20 as well as P6 and P10. We first checked the replication capacities of the SGR constructs, the results of which are shown in Figure 2. The control SGR constructs (harbouring polymorphisms F28S+L31I and P29S+K30G) had greater replication capacities (median replication capacities of 1.3 and 1.2, respectively) than JFH-1 (wildtype). The same effect was seen with the SGR construct harbouring mutation P407L in NS5A (replication capacity of 1.4). The SGR construct with mutation R353K had a similar replication capacity to JFH-1.

3.5. In Vitro Efficacy of Pibrentasvir

The efficacy of pibrentasvir in replicons expressing R353K was tested with a serial dilution of pibrentasvir, in order to determine mean fold change in IC50. Figure 3 shows the effect of polymorphisms R353K and P407L when compared to JFH-1. The IC50 value for R353K (IC50 = 2.42 × 10−3, 95% CI = 9.54 × 10−4 to 6.546 × 10−3, R2 = 90.5%) was 2-fold higher than the IC50 value for JFH-1 (IC50 = 9.24 × 10−4, 95% CI = 6.68 × 10−4 to 1.28 × 10−3, R2 = 99%). The IC50 value for P407L was comparable to that of JFH-1.

4. Discussion

In this study, we describe a cluster of HCV subtype 2a infection in 123 individuals who were treated with G/P and achieved a lower than optimal SVR rate of 91%. The EASL guidelines do not routinely recommend baseline HCV resistance testing except in cases of acquisition of infection in areas harbouring subtypes that have a low barrier to resistance [20]. This study aimed to identify mutations associated with lack of SVR12 following G/P therapy, which is considered a pan-genotypic regimen, after an increase in cases of relapse following this treatment in a single health board. Both drugs are also second generation in their respective drug classes and have a higher barrier to resistance than the first-generation drugs. Phylogenetic analysis of the cohort revealed a cluster with more than 90% similarity to each other across the whole genome, suggesting a localised transmission of subtype 2a infection in individuals in Glasgow and Edinburgh. This clade has likely been circulating in Scotland for at least 10 years.
The SVR rate of 91% in this group of individuals is slightly lower than reported in clinical trials of G/P combination treatment [21,22,23]. We identified a combination of two mutations within NS5A (R353K and P407L) in individuals that failed therapy; R353K in combination with L31M is associated with low–moderate resistance to G/P therapy while P407L is associated with an increase in replication capacity. The R353K polymorphism was present in 79% (11/14) of the sequences in this cluster, but only in 4% (11/257) of all published subtype 2a sequences that include the NS5A region. When R353K is combined with L31M it has a 2-fold higher IC50 value than wildtype when tested in an in vitro SGR replicon assay. The most common previously reported polymorphisms associated with resistance to DAAs in genotype 2 are at sites 24, 28–31, 92 and 93 [24,25,26,27,28]. These are all sites within domain 1 of NS5A, which is primarily involved in RNA replication. Crystal structures have been solved for NS5A domain 1 [29]. Site 353 is an unusual site to be associated with resistance as it occurs within the linker region between domains 2 and 3, closer to domain 3, which is involved in virion assembly [30,31] and shows in vitro RNA binding capacity [32]. It may have been undetected in more limited sequencing studies that did not employ whole genome sequencing methods.
While this study was not designed, nor powered, to look at clinical or demographic factors associated with treatment failure, we noted that males were over-represented in the treatment failure group. All 11 individuals that failed treatment were male and 71% (80/112) of individuals that achieved SVR were male (Fisher’s exact test p = 0.0648).
In this study, we report a lower-than-expected SVR rate among a group of individuals with chronic genotype 2a HCV infection treated with G/P. A polymorphism at site 353 in NS5A was found to be more common in this strain than in other subtype 2a sequences and showed an increase in IC50 in an in vitro SGR replicon assay when challenged with pibrentasvir. The combination of L31M and R353K was present in both cases of treatment failure. The P407L mutation also detected in this cluster is associated with an increase in replication fitness.

Author Contributions

R.S. wrote the manuscript, performed the in vitro assays and data analysis. E.C.T. and C.D. conceptualised the study and reviewed the data analysis and manuscript. S.T.B., E.S.P. and R.F. raised the suspicion of a challenging to treat 2a cluster and provided the clinical data. R.G., A.B.-S., S.J.S. and A.M. provided the clinical samples and associated data and also conducted HCV RT-qPCR. L.T., V.J.E.v.V., M.N.C.B. and A.F. carried out the library preparation and next generation sequencing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

R.S. and E.C.T. were funded by the MRC (MC UU1201412).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval was granted by the National Research Ethics Service Committee, East Midlands (11/EM/0323) and from the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee (12/WS/0002).

Informed Consent Statement

Patients were recruited by informed written consent (11/EM/0323, 12/WS/0002). Additional samples were obtained for sequencing without consent under NHS GG&C biorepository ethics approval using non-identifiable samples.

Data Availability Statement

Genomes have been uploaded to GenBank. Accession numbers are listed in Appendix B, Table A1. Aggregated clinical data is presented in the paper but individual data are not available due to ethical restrictions on the use of identifiable information.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Maximum likelihood tree of whole nucleotide HCV genomes constructed with 1000 bootstrap replicates, showing the whole HCV genotype 2 clade using sequences from GenBank and cases. Tip labels with a background colour distinguish between individuals from Glasgow and those outside of Glasgow. Non highlighted tip labels are reference sequences, downloaded from the Flaviviridae study group, International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (https://talk.ictvonline.org/ictv_wikis/flaviviridae/w/sg_flavi/54/hepaciviruses, accessed on 27 April 2022), which has a curated alignment of all reference HCV geno-subtype genomes, and full-length genotype 2 sequences downloaded from GenBank [18].
Figure A1. Maximum likelihood tree of whole nucleotide HCV genomes constructed with 1000 bootstrap replicates, showing the whole HCV genotype 2 clade using sequences from GenBank and cases. Tip labels with a background colour distinguish between individuals from Glasgow and those outside of Glasgow. Non highlighted tip labels are reference sequences, downloaded from the Flaviviridae study group, International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (https://talk.ictvonline.org/ictv_wikis/flaviviridae/w/sg_flavi/54/hepaciviruses, accessed on 27 April 2022), which has a curated alignment of all reference HCV geno-subtype genomes, and full-length genotype 2 sequences downloaded from GenBank [18].
Viruses 14 01678 g0a1

Appendix B

Table A1. Table of accession numbers assigned to whole HCV genome sequences submitted to GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).
Table A1. Table of accession numbers assigned to whole HCV genome sequences submitted to GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).
Sequence IdentifierAccession Number
P1OP022902
P2OP022903
P3OP022904
P4OP022905
P5OP022906
P6OP022907
P7OP022908
P8OP022909
P9OP022910
P10OP022911
P11OP022912
P12OP022913
P13OP022914
P14OP022915
P15OP022916
P16OP022917
P17OP022918
P18OP022919
P19OP022920
P20OP022921

References

  1. WHO. Global Hepatitis Report; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. WHO. Global Health Sector Strategy on Viral Hepatitis 2016–2021 towards Ending Viral Hepatitis; World Health Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pawlotsky, J.M. New Hepatitis C Therapies: The Toolbox, Strategies, and Challenges. Gastroenterology 2014, 146, 1176–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Pawlotsky, J.-M. Hepatitis C Virus Resistance to Direct-Acting Antiviral Drugs in Interferon-Free Regimens. Gastroenterology 2016, 151, 70–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lontok, E.; Harrington, P.R.; Howe, A.; Kieffer, T.L.; Lennerstrand, J.; Lenz, O.; McPhee, F.; Mo, H.; Parkin, N.T.; Pilot-Matias, T.; et al. Hepatitis C virus drug resistance-associated substitutions: State of the art summary. Hepatology 2015, 62, 1623–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C 2018. J. Hepatol. 2018, 69, 461–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. AASLD-IDSA HCV Guidance Panel. Hepatitis C Guidance 2018 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 67, 1477–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. WHO. Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Persons Diagnosed with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection; World Health Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  9. Esposito, I.; Trinks, J.; Soriano, V. Hepatitis C virus resistance to the new direct-acting antivirals. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2016, 12, 1197–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Thomson, E.; Ip, C.L.C.; Badhan, A.; Christiansen, M.T.; Adamson, W.; Ansari, M.A.; Bibby, D.; Breuer, J.; Brown, A.; Bowden, R.; et al. Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies for Comprehensive Assessment of Full-Length Hepatitis C Viral Genomes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 2470–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Kazutaka, K.; Misakwa, K.; Kei-ichi, K.; Miyata, T. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 2688–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Singer, J.B.; Thomson, E.C.; McLauchlan, J.; Hughes, J.; Gifford, R.J. GLUE: A flexible software system for virus sequence data. BMC Bioinform. 2018, 19, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Pilon, R.; Leonard, L.; Kim, J.; Vallée, D.; De Rubeis, E.; Jolly, A.M.; Wylie, J.; Pelude, L.; Sandstrom, P. Transmission Patterns of HIV and Hepatitis C Virus among Networks of People Who Inject Drugs. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bamford, C.G.G.; Aranday-Cortes, E.; Filipe, I.C.; Sukumar, S.; Mair, D.; Filipe, A.D.S.; Mendoza, J.L.; Garcia, K.C.; Fan, S.; Tishkoff, S.A.; et al. A polymorphic residue that attenuates the antiviral potential of interferon lambda 4 in hominid lineages. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1007307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kato, T.; Furusaka, A.; Miyamoto, M.; Date, T.; Yasui, K.; Hiramoto, J.; Nagayama, K.; Tanaka, T.; Wakita, T. Sequence analysis of hepatitis C virus isolated from a fulminant hepatitis patient. J. Med. Virol. 2001, 64, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. NCBI Resource Coordinators. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D7–D19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ng, T.I.; Tripathi, R.; Reisch, T.; Lu, L.; Middleton, T.; Hopkins, T.A.; Pithawalla, R.; Irvin, M.; Dekhtyar, T.; Krishnan, P.; et al. In Vitro Antiviral Activity and Resistance Profile of the Next-Generation Hepatitis C Virus NS3/4A Protease Inhibitor Glecaprevir. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e01620-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Pawlotsky, J.M.; Negro, F.; Aghemo, A.; Berenguer, M.; Dalgard, O.; Dusheiko, G.; Marra, F.; Puoti, M.; Wedemeyer, H.; European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C: Final update of the series. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 1170–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Brown, R.S.; Buti, M.; Rodrigues, L.; Chulanov, V.; Chuang, W.-L.; Aguilar, H.; Horváth, G.; Zuckerman, E.; Carrion, B.R.; Rodriguez-Perez, F.; et al. Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 8 weeks in treatment-naïve patients with chronic HCV genotypes 1–6 and compensated cirrhosis: The EXPEDITION-8 trial. J. Hepatol. 2019, 72, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Asselah, T.; Kowdley, K.V.; Zadeikis, N.; Wang, S.; Hassanein, T.; Horsmans, Y.; Colombo, M.; Calinas, F.; Aguilar, H.; de Ledinghen, V.; et al. Efficacy of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir for 8 or 12 Weeks in Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2, 4, 5, or 6 Infection Without Cirrhosis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 16, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kwo, P.Y.; Poordad, F.; Asatryan, A.; Wang, S.; Wyles, D.L.; Hassanein, T.; Felizarta, F.; Sulkowski, M.S.; Gane, E.; Maliakkal, B.; et al. Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir yield high response rates in patients with HCV genotype 1–6 without cirrhosis. J. Hepatol. 2017, 67, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, N.; Han, Z.; Hartman-Neumann, S.; DeGray, B.; Ueland, J.; Vellucci, V.; Hernandez, D.; McPhee, F. Characterization of NS5A polymorphisms and their impact on response rates in patients with HCV genotype 2 treated with daclatasvir-based regimens. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 3495–3505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Bourlière, M.; Gordon, S.C.; Flamm, S.L.; Cooper, C.L.; Ramji, A.; Tong, M.; Ravendhran, N.; Vierling, J.M.; Tran, T.T.; Pianko, S.; et al. Sofosbuvir, Velpatasvir, and Voxilaprevir for Previously Treated HCV Infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 2134–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gottwein, J.M.; Pham, L.V.; Mikkelsen, L.S.; Ghanem, L.; Ramirez, S.; Scheel, T.K.; Carlsen, T.H.; Bukh, J. Efficacy of NS5A Inhibitors Against Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes 1–7 and Escape Variants. Gastroenterology 2018, 154, 1435–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Krishnan, P.; Beyer, J.; Mistry, N.; Koev, G.; Reisch, T.; DeGoey, D.; Kati, W.; Campbell, A.; Williams, L.; Xie, W.; et al. In Vitro and In Vivo Antiviral Activity and Resistance Profile of Ombitasvir, an Inhibitor of Hepatitis C Virus NS5A. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 979–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Atsukawa, M.; Tsubota, A.; Toyoda, H.; Takaguchi, K.; Nakamuta, M.; Watanabe, T.; Tada, T.; Tsutsui, A.; Ikeda, H.; Abe, H.; et al. Efficacy and safety of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis patients infected with genotype 2a in Japan. Hepatol. Res. 2018, 49, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lambert, S.; Langley, D.R.; Garnett, J.A.; Angell, R.; Hedgethorne, K.; Meanwell, N.; Matthews, S.J. The crystal structure of NS5A domain 1 from genotype 1a reveals new clues to the mechanism of action for dimeric HCV inhibitors. Protein Sci. 2014, 23, 723–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Appel, N.; Zayas, M.; Miller, S.; Krijnse-Locker, J.; Schaller, T.; Friebe, P.; Kallis, S.; Engel, U.; Bartenschlager, R. Essential Role of Domain III of Nonstructural Protein 5A for Hepatitis C Virus Infectious Particle Assembly. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kim, S.; Welsch, C.; Yi, M.; Lemon, S.M. Regulation of the Production of Infectious Genotype 1a Hepatitis C Virus by NS5A Domain III. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 6645–6656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Foster, T.L.; Belyaeva, T.; Stonehouse, N.J.; Pearson, A.R.; Harris, M. All Three Domains of the Hepatitis C Virus Nonstructural NS5A Protein Contribute to RNA Binding. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 9267–9277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood tree of whole nucleotide HCV genomes constructed with 1000 bootstrap replicates. This tree shows the Glasgow subtype 2a phylogenetic cluster that includes treatment failures P19 and P20, and P6 and P10 who were both successfully treated. Non-highlighted tree branches represent other sequences, from Scotland, in this 2a cluster, and two HCV sequences downloaded from GenBank [18], also from UK.
Figure 1. Maximum likelihood tree of whole nucleotide HCV genomes constructed with 1000 bootstrap replicates. This tree shows the Glasgow subtype 2a phylogenetic cluster that includes treatment failures P19 and P20, and P6 and P10 who were both successfully treated. Non-highlighted tree branches represent other sequences, from Scotland, in this 2a cluster, and two HCV sequences downloaded from GenBank [18], also from UK.
Viruses 14 01678 g001
Figure 2. Replication capacities of JFH-1 (wildtype), SGR constructs harbouring polymorphisms unique to P19 and P20 (R353K and P407L), and controls. Control_1 harbours the polymorphisms F28S and L31I. Control_2 harbours the polymorphisms P29S and K30G.
Figure 2. Replication capacities of JFH-1 (wildtype), SGR constructs harbouring polymorphisms unique to P19 and P20 (R353K and P407L), and controls. Control_1 harbours the polymorphisms F28S and L31I. Control_2 harbours the polymorphisms P29S and K30G.
Viruses 14 01678 g002
Figure 3. IC50 drug response curves shown for SGR constructs. The constructs harbouring NS5A_R353K is shown in panel (A) and NS5A_P407L in panel (B).
Figure 3. IC50 drug response curves shown for SGR constructs. The constructs harbouring NS5A_R353K is shown in panel (A) and NS5A_P407L in panel (B).
Viruses 14 01678 g003aViruses 14 01678 g003b
Table 1. Summary of demographic and clinical characteristics of HCV genotype 2 infected individuals treated with G/P between 2013 and 2019. * SVR = sustained virological response, ** IDU = injecting drug use. *** This includes other transmission risks including sexual transmission, tattoos and transmission through blood product administration. Fisher’s exact test used. †† Wilcoxon rank sum test used.
Table 1. Summary of demographic and clinical characteristics of HCV genotype 2 infected individuals treated with G/P between 2013 and 2019. * SVR = sustained virological response, ** IDU = injecting drug use. *** This includes other transmission risks including sexual transmission, tattoos and transmission through blood product administration. Fisher’s exact test used. †† Wilcoxon rank sum test used.
Treatment Outcome (N = 123)p Value
SVR * (N = 112)Failure (N = 11)
Gender
Male80 (71%)11 (100%)
Female32(29%)0 (0%)0.0648
Mean Age (standard deviation)48.8 (±10)47.5 (±10)0.8731 ††
Mean HCV Viral Load (IU/mL)5.88 (±0.9)5.98 (±0.7)0.8593 ††
HIV Status
HIV negative107 (96%)11 (100%)1
HIV positive5 (4%)0 (0%)
Liver Status
Non-Cirrhotic96 (86%)11 (100%)0.356
Cirrhosis (>12KPa on transient elastography)16 (14%)0 (0%)
Transmission
IDU **78 (69%)8 (73%)0.6724
Other ***10 (9%)0 (0%)
Unknown24 (22%)3 (27%)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shah, R.; Barclay, S.T.; Peters, E.S.; Fox, R.; Gunson, R.; Bradley-Stewart, A.; Shepherd, S.J.; MacLean, A.; Tong, L.; van Vliet, V.J.E.; et al. Characterisation of a Hepatitis C Virus Subtype 2a Cluster in Scottish PWID with a Suboptimal Response to Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir Treatment. Viruses 2022, 14, 1678. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081678

AMA Style

Shah R, Barclay ST, Peters ES, Fox R, Gunson R, Bradley-Stewart A, Shepherd SJ, MacLean A, Tong L, van Vliet VJE, et al. Characterisation of a Hepatitis C Virus Subtype 2a Cluster in Scottish PWID with a Suboptimal Response to Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir Treatment. Viruses. 2022; 14(8):1678. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081678

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shah, Rajiv, Stephen T. Barclay, Erica S. Peters, Ray Fox, Rory Gunson, Amanda Bradley-Stewart, Samantha J. Shepherd, Alasdair MacLean, Lily Tong, Vera Jannie Elisabeth van Vliet, and et al. 2022. "Characterisation of a Hepatitis C Virus Subtype 2a Cluster in Scottish PWID with a Suboptimal Response to Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir Treatment" Viruses 14, no. 8: 1678. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081678

APA Style

Shah, R., Barclay, S. T., Peters, E. S., Fox, R., Gunson, R., Bradley-Stewart, A., Shepherd, S. J., MacLean, A., Tong, L., van Vliet, V. J. E., Ngan Chiu Bong, M., Filipe, A., Thomson, E. C., & Davis, C. (2022). Characterisation of a Hepatitis C Virus Subtype 2a Cluster in Scottish PWID with a Suboptimal Response to Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir Treatment. Viruses, 14(8), 1678. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081678

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop