Next Article in Journal
Therapeutic Potential of 5′-Methylschweinfurthin G in Merkel Cell Polyomavirus-Positive Merkel Cell Carcinoma
Next Article in Special Issue
Lessons from the Cerebrospinal Fluid Analysis of HTLV-1-Infected Individuals: Biomarkers of Inflammation for HAM/TSP Development
Previous Article in Journal
Varidnaviruses in the Human Gut: A Major Expansion of the Order Vinavirales
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Epidemiology of HIV-1 among Prisoners in Central Brazil and Evidence of Transmission Clusters
 
 
Case Report
Peer-Review Record

The First Two Cases of Monkeypox Infection in MSM in Bahia, Brazil, and Viral Sequencing

Viruses 2022, 14(9), 1841; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14091841
by Carlos Brites *, Felice Deminco, Marcia Sampaio Sá, Jean Tadeu Brito, Estela Luz and Andreas Stocker
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Viruses 2022, 14(9), 1841; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14091841
Submission received: 2 August 2022 / Revised: 17 August 2022 / Accepted: 21 August 2022 / Published: 23 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art HIV and HTLV Research in Latin America)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this paper Carlos Brites et al reported 2 MPX cases one in an HIV infected patient and the other in a non-HIV patient. It is well-written and documented. I have few comments and suggestions:

1. I think that is no need to report if the patients have been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, maybe if they are vaccinated against smallpox or chickenpox.

2. About the second case, authors reported that the sexual partner was asymptomatic, this means that was he tested for MPX or not? Please specify this in your paper.

3. I did not find in references chapter the reference about romanian case (Oprea C, Ianache I, Piscu S, Tardei G, Nica M, Ceausu E, Popescu CP, Florescu SA. First report of monkeypox in a patient living with HIV from Romania. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 24;49:102395. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102395. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35753658.)

Author Response

Reviewer 1

We thank reviewer 1 for the useful comments and sugestions. Please see below a point-by-point response to the questions.

In this paper Carlos Brites et al reported 2 MPX cases one in an HIV infected patient and the other in a non-HIV patient. It is well-written and documented. I have few comments and suggestions:

 

  1. I think that is no need to report if the patients have been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2, maybe if they are vaccinated against smallpox or chickenpox.

R- We deleted the information on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. They were not vaccinated against smallpox or checkenpox

  1. About the second case, authors reported that the sexual partner was asymptomatic, this means that was he tested for MPX or not? Please specify this in your paper.

R- The partner was not tested, because no lesion was detected, and he was completely asymptomatic. We added the information on testing to text.

  1. I did not find in references chapter the reference about romanian case (Oprea C, Ianache I, Piscu S, Tardei G, Nica M, Ceausu E, Popescu CP, Florescu SA. First report of monkeypox in a patient living with HIV from Romania. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2022 Jun 24;49:102395. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102395. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35753658.)

R- Thanks for the note, the reference was added to reference list

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors , 

Thank you for your efforts in presenting the case report. Here are my comments to be considered in your revision :

- The manuscript title must be improved.

- The paper can benefit from these articles in the background and/or discussion: 

https://doi.org/10.3389/fitd.2022.951380

https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58070924

- Information about ethical approval / patients' consent have to be presented

- I recommend the paper to go through English language editing.

Best regards

Author Response

We thank reviewer 2 for the comments and suggestions that surely will help to improve the final manuscript

Reviewer 2

Thank you for your efforts in presenting the case report. Here are my comments to be considered in your revision :

- The manuscript title must be improved.

R- We modified the title to make it more precise

- The paper can benefit from these articles in the background and/or discussion: 

https://doi.org/10.3389/fitd.2022.951380

https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58070924

Thanks for the suggestions. We include the first reference, as it is an interesting review on monkeypox, but the second one does not fit well in our cases report.

- Information about ethical approval / patients' consent have to be presented

R- ethical approval was added to the text

- I recommend the paper to go through English language editing.

R- English language  was reviewed as suggested

Back to TopTop