Next Article in Journal
The Viral G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Homologs M33 and US28 Promote Cardiac Dysfunction during Murine Cytomegalovirus Infection
Next Article in Special Issue
An Endogenous Retrovirus Vaccine Encoding an Envelope with a Mutated Immunosuppressive Domain in Combination with Anti-PD1 Treatment Eradicates Established Tumours in Mice
Previous Article in Journal
T Cell Responses Correlate with Self-Reported Disease Severity and Neutralizing Antibody Responses Predict Protection against SARS-CoV-2 Breakthrough Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
ERVWE1 Reduces Hippocampal Neuron Density and Impairs Dendritic Spine Morphology through Inhibiting Wnt/JNK Non-Canonical Pathway via miR-141-3p in Schizophrenia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pregnancy Is Associated with Impaired Transcription of Human Endogenous Retroviruses and of TRIM28 and SETDB1, Particularly in Mothers Affected by Multiple Sclerosis

1
Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
2
Department of Surgical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology 1, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
3
Pathology Unit, Department Laboratory Medicine, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
4
Pediatric Laboratory, Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2023, 15(3), 710; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030710
Submission received: 7 February 2023 / Revised: 1 March 2023 / Accepted: 6 March 2023 / Published: 9 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endogenous Retroviruses)

Abstract

:
Accumulating evidence highlights the pathogenetic role of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) in eliciting and maintaining multiple sclerosis (MS). Epigenetic mechanisms, such as those regulated by TRIM 28 and SETDB1, are implicated in HERV activation and in neuroinflammatory disorders, including MS. Pregnancy markedly improves the course of MS, but no study explored the expressions of HERVs and of TRIM28 and SETDB1 during gestation. Using a polymerase chain reaction real-time Taqman amplification assay, we assessed and compared the transcriptional levels of pol genes of HERV-H, HERV-K, HERV-W; of env genes of Syncytin (SYN)1, SYN2, and multiple sclerosis associated retrovirus (MSRV); and of TRIM28 and SETDB1 in peripheral blood and placenta from 20 mothers affected by MS; from 27 healthy mothers, in cord blood from their neonates; and in blood from healthy women of child-bearing age. The HERV mRNA levels were significantly lower in pregnant than in nonpregnant women. Expressions of all HERVs were downregulated in the chorion and in the decidua basalis of MS mothers compared to healthy mothers. The former also showed lower mRNA levels of HERV-K-pol and of SYN1, SYN2, and MSRV in peripheral blood. Significantly lower expressions of TRIM28 and SETDB1 also emerged in pregnant vs. nonpregnant women and in blood, chorion, and decidua of mothers with MS vs. healthy mothers. In contrast, HERV and TRIM28/SETDB1 expressions were comparable between their neonates. These results show that gestation is characterized by impaired expressions of HERVs and TRIM28/SETDB1, particularly in mothers with MS. Given the beneficial effects of pregnancy on MS and the wealth of data suggesting the putative contribution of HERVs and epigenetic processes in the pathogenesis of the disease, our findings may further support innovative therapeutic interventions to block HERV activation and to control aberrant epigenetic pathways in MS-affected patients.

1. Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease leading to demyelination and neurodegeneration of the central nervous system (CNS) with consequent physical and cognitive disabilities. It affects young people and is more common in women [1]. Clinical observations and experimental findings highlight that MS is an autoimmune disease deriving from a complex interplay of genetic, epigenetic, hormonal, and environmental factors [2,3,4,5]. Its physiopathology involves neuroinflammation, death of oligodendrocytes, axonal damage, defects in myelin repair, alterations in glial cells and astrocytes, and infiltrating lymphocytes and macrophages in the CNS [6,7,8]. Pregnancy inhibits the inflammatory activity of several autoimmune disorders [9,10,11,12,13,14], including MS [15,16,17]. The beneficial effects of gestation on MS are highest in the third trimester, with a marked recrudescence of disease activity in the first months postpartum [15,18]. Pregnancy history reduces the risk of a first demyelinating episode and is associated with lower disability scores, suggesting that the trend to have fewer children at older age may contribute to the current increase in MS prevalence in females [19,20,21]. Pregnancy and treatment with pregnancy hormones protect mice from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), the classical animal model of human MS [22,23,24]. The biological underpinnings of pregnancy-driven hormonal and immune variations ultimately leading to improved MS disease course, however, remain elusive [25].
Human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) represent 8% of our genome. They are relics of ancient retroviral germ cell infections [26]. Complete HERV sequences reflect their retroviral nature, with open reading frames (ORFs) in four principal genes: group-associated antigen (gag), protease (pro), polymerase (pol), and envelope (env), flanked between two regulatory long terminal repeats (LTRs). During evolution, the accumulated mutations blocked the capacity to produce infectious virions. Some viral sequences are, however, transcribed, and a few encode proteins, such as the Syncytin 1 (SYN1) [27] and Syncytin 2 (SYN2) [28], which are engaged in essential physiological functions, such as placental syncytiotrophoblast formation and maternal–fetal immunotolerance [29,30,31,32]. On the other hand, HERVs are able to exert pathogenic actions through several biologic mechanisms. They can act as promoters or enhancers of cellular genes [33,34,35]. Their RNAs through retrotranscription can generate novel insertions into the DNA or, being recognized as non-self by viral RNA receptors, trigger innate and adaptive immune responses [33,36,37], with associated neurotoxicity [34,38]. HERV proteins can alter the immune system and induce production of specific and/or cross-reactive antibodies with tissue molecules, as observed in MS towards myelin proteins [39]. Syncytins and a HERV-env protein have potent intrinsic immunomodulatory properties [31,32,40]. Several lines of research have evidenced an association between aberrant HERV expressions and autoimmune diseases [35,41,42,43] and neurologic disorders [44,45,46,47]. A strong correlation has been found between enhanced expression of all HERV families studied and onset and progression of MS [48,49,50,51]. In particular, two highly homogenous HERV-W-env proteins [52] have been proposed as crucial elements: the multiple-sclerosis-associated retrovirus (MSRV) [53] and SYN1. Both molecules were detected in affected patients during disease activity phases and are highly expressed in active plaques of MS brains [54,55]. The DNA copy number of MSRV is increased in MS patients and is influenced by gender and disease severity [56]. In vivo, MSRV-env induced autoimmunity to myelin proteins and caused EAE in mice [55]. Its recognition by TLR4 stimulated production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and promoted Th1-like responses [7,34]. Its particles elicited a superantigen-like activation of T-lymphocytes [57], while its early presence in spinal fluid may predict a worst disease outcome [58]. SYN1 is located on chromosome 7q21-22, in a candidate region for genetic susceptibility to MS [59,60]. It exerts vigorous immuno-suppressive actions and is upregulated in MS [31,56,61]. It contributes to the production of chemokines, cytokines [30,31], and of the C-reactive protein in glial cells via the TLR3/IL-6 pathway [62]. SYN1 inhibits Th1 cell functions and promotes the shift to Th2-mediated immunity [63]. It can cause demyelination and is highly cytotoxic to human or rat oligodendrocytes [54]. SYN2 is an envelope protein encoded by HERV-FRD and shares with SYN1 syncytial and immuno-suppressive properties [32].
Activation of HERVs may be regulated by environmental factors via epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation and heterochromatin-silencing by histone modifications. Epigenetic alterations induce transitory or persistent variations in gene expression without changes in the genetic code. Tripartite motif containing 28 (TRIM28), also referred to as KAP1 or TIF1-β, is a co-repressor of Krüppel-associated box domain zinc finger proteins (KRAB-ZFPs) [64], the largest family of transcriptional regulators in the human genome [65]. TRIM28 acts as a scaffold protein for the recruitment of other proteins participating in chromatin silencing. Among these, the most important is the SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltransferase 1 (SETDB1), also known as ESET, a methyltransferase with high specificity for the lysine 9 residue of histone H3 [66]. Both TRIM28 and SETBD1 represent specific tags for epigenetic transcriptional repression of retroviral sequences [67,68]. Furthermore, growing evidence documents their pivotal role in the control of the immune response [68,69,70,71,72], in neural cell differentiation and synapse functions [73,74]. Dysregulation of the epigenetic landscape has become an attractive hypothesis to explain some autoimmune diseases [75] and neurologic disorders [76,77]. The divergence in twins discordant for MS has been ascribed to environmental risk factors through epigenetic mechanisms [78,79], and DNA methylation defects characterize neural cells from MS patients [3,80].
Despite the positive effects of pregnancy on the disease course and the wealth of data suggesting a potential involvement of HERVs and of TRIM28/SETDB1 in triggering and maintaining MS, no investigation has explored whether their expression changes during gestation. Based on these considerations, the aims of the present study were to assess and compare the transcription levels of pol genes of HERV-H, -K, and -W, the three retroviral families most extensively studied [26,33,35]; of env genes of SYN1, SYN2, and MSRV; and of TRIM28 and SETDB1 in the peripheral blood, in the chorion, and in the decidua basalis of the placenta from pregnant women affected or unaffected by MS; in cord blood from their neonates; and in the peripheral blood from healthy women of child-bearing age.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Populations

Peripheral blood and placental tissue were collected at delivery after an uneventful pregnancy from women affected by MS (Group A) and from healthy controls (Group B).
Placenta tissues were washed with Hank’s solution to remove contaminating blood. The decidua basalis (i.e., the maternal part of the placenta) and the chorion (i.e., the fetal part of the placenta, represented mainly by syncytiotrophoblast) were macroscopically identified and separated by an expert pathologist and confirmed by a microscopic examination. Small samples (∼5–10 mg wet weight) of each part of the placental tissue were placed in dry tubes and immediately processed for RNA extraction.
Cord blood samples were collected from neonates born to mothers affected or unaffected by MS.
Peripheral blood samples were also obtained from nonpregnant healthy volunteers of child-bearing age. Of these, a subgroup (C1) had been enrolled as control subjects in a study on expressions of pol genes of HERV-H, -K, and -W; another subgroup (C2) was recruited to assess the other variables of this study.

2.2. Total RNA Extraction

Total RNA was extracted from whole blood using the automated extractor Maxwell following the RNA Blood Kit protocol without modification (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). This kit provides treatment with DNase during the RNA extraction process. To further exclude any contamination of genomic DNA, RNA extracts were directly amplified without reverse transcription to validate the RNA extraction protocol. RNA concentration and purity were assessed by traditional UV spectroscopy (ND-1000 spectrophotometer, Biochrom Enterprise Waterbeach, Cambridge, UK) with absorbance at 260 and 280 nm. The RNAs were stored at −80 °C until use.

2.3. Reverse Transcription

A total of 400 nanograms of total RNA was reverse-transcribed with 2 μL of buffer 10×, 4.8 μL of MgCl2 25 mM, 2 μL ImpromII (Promega), 1 μL of RNase inhibitor 20 U/L, 0.4 μL random hexamers 250 μM (Promega), 2 μL mix dNTPs 100 mM (Promega), and dd-water in a final volume of 20 μL. The reaction mix was carried out in a GeneAmp PCR system 9700 Thermal Cycle (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) under the following conditions: 5 min at 25 °C, 60 min at 42 °C, and 15 min at 70 °C for the inactivation of the enzyme; the cDNAs were stored at −20 °C until use.

2.4. Transcription Levels of pol Genes of HERV-H, -K, and -W; of env Genes of SYN1, SYN2, and MSRV; and of TRIM28 and SETB1 by Real-Time PCR Assay

Relative quantification of transcription levels of pol genes of HERV-H, HERV-K, and HERV-W; of env genes of SYN1, SYN2, and MSRV; and of TRIM28 and SETDB1 were achieved as previously described in detail [46,81,82,83] using the primers and probes reported in Table 1. Briefly, 40 ng of cDNA was amplified in a 20 μL total volume reaction, containing 2.5 U goTaQ MaterMix (Promega), 1.25 mmol/L MgCl2, 500 nmol of specific primers, and 200 nmol of specific probes.
All the amplifications were run in a 96-well plate at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and at 60 °C for 1 min. Each sample was run in triplicate. Relative quantification of target gene transcripts was performed according to the 2−ΔΔCt method (Livak 2001). GAPDH was selected as a reference gene, as it has been shown to have good efficiency and excellent reproducibility with constant expression in human leucocyte samples [84] and previously used in our studies [46,81,82,83]. Briefly, after normalization of the PCR result of each target gene with the housekeeping gene, the method includes additional calibration of this value with the median expression of the same gene evaluated in a pool of healthy controls after normalization with the housekeeping gene. The results, expressed in arbitrary units (called relative quantification, RQ), show the variations of target gene transcripts relative to the standard set of controls. Since we measured Ct (Cycle threshold) for every target in all samples, we argue that our methods were suitable for HERVs, TRIM28, and SETDB1 detection and quantifications. All analyses were performed in a laboratory of biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) according to the NHI [85] and WHO [86] guidelines.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The one-way ANOVA test was used to compare the expression level of pol genes of HERV-H, -K, -W; of env genes of SYN1, SYN2, and MSRV; and of TRIM28 and SETDB1 in whole blood from parturients affected by MS (Group A), healthy parturients (Group B), and healthy women of child-bearing (Group C). The Mann–Whitney test was used to compare the transcripts of every target gene in whole blood and in placenta tissues from parturients affected and unaffected by MS and between their children. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Prism software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). In all analyses, p < 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Study Populations

Peripheral blood and placenta tissues were collected from 20 women affected by MS (Group A) and 27 unaffected women (Group B). The median age (years) and interquartile ranges (25–75%) of Group A was 33.9, 31.4–37.7; of Group B: 39.1, 33.2–41.3. The gestational age at delivery was similar between the two groups: median, interquartile range 25–75% = Group A 273 days, 248–278; Group B 268 days, 259–273 (p = 0.4042). The rate of preterm delivery (gestation < 37 weeks) was 25% in Group A and 26% in Group B. A total of 10 women (50%) in Group A and 17 (63%) in Group B were delivered by planned Caesarean section.
Mothers affected by MS were all asymptomatic without any therapy for at least 4 months.
Cord blood samples were collected from the 22 neonates (2 pairs of dizygotic twins, 6 males, 27%) born to MS-affected women and 27 neonates (10 males, 37%) born to healthy mothers.
Peripheral blood was also collected from 38 nonpregnant women of child-bearing age to assess expressions of HERV-H-pol, HERV-K-pol, and HERV-W-pol (Group C1) and from other 20 nonpregnant women for detection of env genes of SYN1, SYN2, and MSRV and of TRIM28 and SETDB1 (Group C2).

3.2. HERV Transcription Levels in Whole Blood from Parturients with and without Multiple Sclerosis and from Nonpregnant Healthy Women of Child-Bearing Age

The median transcription levels of pol genes of HERV-H, -K, and -W and of env genes of SYN1, SYN2, and MSRV differed significantly between parturients with MS (Group A), unaffected mothers (Group B), and nonpregnant women of child-bearing age (Group C) using the one-way ANOVA test. In particular, the median values of every target gene were significantly higher in nonpregnant women than in each group of parturients. Mothers affected by MS showed significantly lower levels of HERV-K-pol, SYN2-env, and MSRV-env than unaffected mothers, while no significant differences emerged for HERV-H-pol, HERV-W-pol, and SYN1-env (Figure 1 and Figure 2).

3.3. TRIM28 and SETDB1 Transcription Levels in Whole Blood from Parturients with and without Multiple Sclerosis and in Healthy Nonpregnant Women of Child-Bearing Age

The median transcription levels of TRIM28 and SETDB1 were significantly different between parturients with MS (Group A), unaffected mothers (Group B), and nonpregnant women of child-bearing age (Group C2) by one-way ANOVA analysis (Figure 3). In particular, their median values were significantly higher in nonpregnant women than in each group of parturients. Mothers affected by MS showed significantly lower mRNA levels of both TRIM28 and SETDB1 than healthy mothers (Figure 3).

3.4. HERV Transcription Levels in the Decidua Basalis from Placenta of Mothers with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthy Mothers

The median transcription levels of pol genes of HERV-H and HERV-K and of env genes of SYN1, SYN2, and MSRV were significantly lower in mothers affected by MS (Group A) than in unaffected mothers (Group B) with exception of HERV-W-pol (Figure 4).

3.5. TRIM28 and SETDB1 Transcription Levels in the Decidua Basalis from Placenta of Mothers with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and Healthy Mothers

The median transcription levels of TRIM28 and SETDB1 were significantly lower in the decidua basalis from mothers with MS than in unaffected mothers (Figure 5).

3.6. HERV Transcription Levels in the Chorion from Placenta of Mothers with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthy Mothers

The median transcription levels of every HERV tested were significantly lower in the chorion from mothers affected by MS than from unaffected mothers (Figure 6).

3.7. TRIM28 and SETDB1 Transcription Levels in the Chorion from of Mothers with Multiple Sclerosis and from Healthy Mothers

The median transcription levels of TRIM28 and SETDB1 were significantly lower in the chorion from mothers with MS than from healthy mothers (Figure 7).

3.8. HERV Transcription Levels in Cord Blood from Neonates Born to Women with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthy Women

The median transcriptional levels of every HERV studied were comparable between neonates born to mothers affected by MS and those born to healthy mothers (Figure 8), with the exception of HERV-W-pol which was significantly higher in the former.

3.9. Transcription Levels of TRIM28 and SETDB1 in Cord Blood from Neonates Born to Mothers with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthy Mothers

The median transcriptional levels of TRIM28 and SETDB1 were comparable between neonates born to mothers with MS compared to those born to healthy mothers (Figure 9).

4. Discussion

Present results show for the first time that pregnant women exhibit significantly lower transcriptional levels of HERVs at delivery compared to healthy nonpregnant women of child-bearing age. A second intriguing result of our study was the unexpected significantly lower mRNA levels of HERV-K-pol and of env genes of SYN1, SYN2, and MSRV in peripheral blood from mothers with MS compared to healthy mothers. This impaired transactivation of HERVs was even more evident by comparing their expressions in the placenta of mothers with and without MS. The former displayed a significant decline of every viral sequence both in the chorion and in the decidua basalis, with the exception of HERV-W-pol, whose lower values did not reach the statistical significance in the decidua. Therefore, whereas the expression of all HERV elements studied resulted upregulated in MS patients compared to healthy subjects [48,49,50,51], in pregnancy they were significantly downregulated. A third point was that the mRNA levels of most HERV genes were overlapping between neonates born to MS mothers or to healthy mothers. Consequently, the reduced activation of endogenous retroviruses appears a specific maternal feature, whereas it is absent in the cord blood of their neonates. As mentioned, a wealth of experimental and clinical data highlights that HERV overexpression is involved in triggering and maintaining MS. The maternal downregulation of HERV mRNA levels may thus account for the lower relapse rate of the disease in the third trimester of pregnancy, indirectly confirming the key role of HERVs in MS physiopathology.
The cause(s) of the impaired HERV transcription at delivery and its real clinical significance remains to be elucidated. In vitro and animal studies have shown that TRIM28 and SETDB1 may be potent corepressors of retroviruses [87,88]. Their higher expressions may give rise to increased DNA methylation and heterochromatin formation, ultimately leading to HERV silencing [87,89]. The transcript levels of TRIM28 and SETDB1 mirrored, however, those of HERV elements: They were significantly lower in the peripheral blood of pregnant vs. nonpregnant women, and in blood, chorion, and decidua basalis of MS mothers compared to healthy mothers, with no differences between their neonates. Therefore, the lower HERV expressions in pregnant women, particularly in those affected by MS, cannot be attributable to enhanced activation of TRIM28/SETDB1 repressors. To this purpose, it worth noting that TRIM28 and SETDB1 are essential for maintaining endogenous retroviruses in a silent state in murine pluripotent stem cells and early embryos [89,90]. In contrast, when these cells differentiate into somatic cell types, transcription of retroviral sequences is independent of such repressors [89,91], which sometimes may act as transcriptional activators rather than as repressors [92,93,94]. This might occur in pregnant women, although other regulatory upstream pathways could account for the parallel changes in the transcription of cellular genes and retroviral sequences. Notably, parallel transcriptions of TRM28/SETDB1 and HERVs were observed in other clinical situations with activation of the immune system [46,82,83]. It must be remembered that the potential functional interactions between TRIM28/SETDB and HERVs may be regulated by post-translational events between the encoded proteins, whereas we assessed only their transcriptional profiles (see below). Furthermore, high protein synthesis is necessary during pregnancy, in particular for placenta growth and functional processes. This requires enhanced transcriptional profiles of many cellular genes with consequent increased number of their mRNAs available for translation and of misfolded proteins. The lower relative quantification of HERV transcripts in pregnant vs. non-pregnant women might reflect their relative downregulation compared to cellular genes whose transactivation is upregulated during gestation.
The concentrations of several hormones increase dramatically during pregnancy. A number of studies investigated their putative positive impact on MS. Some hormones can influence HERV expressions. Four major estrogen subtypes have been identified: estrone (E1), 17-β estradiol (E2), estriol (E3), and estetrol (E4). E1 is reversibly converted to E2, the more biologically active and predominant form in reproductive age. E3 and E4 are mostly synthetized during pregnancy, with the former being prevalent. There are two forms of estrogen receptors (ERs): ERα (NR3A1) and ERβ (NR3A2). Binding of these receptors with their ligands activate transcription factors that regulate a broad range of estrogen-responsive genes present, for example, in all cells of the immune system [95]. E2 [96] and E3 [97,98,99] treatments demonstrated a protective action in EAE. A pilot trial with E3 showed a reduction in gadolinium-enhancing lesions at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), an increase in lesion activity after cessation of treatment, and another reduction after resumption of treatment [100]. The addition of estriol to standard therapy with IFN-β1a [101] or glatiramer acetate [102,103] resulted in neuroprotection in women with MS. These positive effects of estriol appear to be mediated by direct neuroprotective effects [104,105] and anti-inflammatory mechanisms [97,106]. Notably, higher estriol plasma concentrations correlated with lower expressions of HERV-K and SYN1 genes in leucocytes of reproductive-age females [107]. Therefore, the increasing estriol production during gestation could account for its positive effects on MS and the HERV downregulation.
Similar inverse correlation was observed between plasma levels of progesterone and expression of HERV-K and SYN1 [107]. Treatment with estrogen and progesterone, however, stimulated HERV-K expression in breast cancer cells [108,109]. Progesterone shares structural similarities to glucocorticoids and can bind to the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), although with lower affinity [110]. Progesterone-linked effects on maternal immune tolerance to fetal alloantigens are mediated by the GR-dependent pathway [111,112], and the hormone drives increased corticosteroid synthesis by placental cells [113]. Progesterone could therefore contribute to potentiate the negative actions of corticosteroids on endogenous retroviruses [114,115]. In the MS preclinical model EAE, the activity of progesterone was, however, inconsistent [116,117], and a phase-II clinical trial with a synthetic progesterone treatment to prevent postpartum MS relapses [118] was stopped early owing to futility [119].
Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) attracts regulatory T cells (Tregs) to the fetal–maternal interface at very early stages in pregnancy to orchestrate immune tolerance towards the fetus [120]. In women with miscarriages or ectopic pregnancy, the decreased hCG mRNA and protein concentrations were associated with reduced Foxp3, IL-10, and TGF-β mRNA levels compared with normal pregnant women [121]. However, hCG expression was colinear, not inversely related, with SYN1 expression [122].
Corticosteroids rise dramatically during pregnancy, up to 20-fold in mice. Given their multifaced vigorous anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive activity, they are among the most effective drugs to fight autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Tregs are more resistant to steroid challenges than reactive T cells. Hence, high corticosteroid levels result in enrichment of resistant Tregs, whereas the latter succumb to glucocorticoid-induced cell death [110]. The protection conferred by pregnancy to EAE was completely abrogated in glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-negative knockout animals, and GR signaling in T cells was indispensable for protection towards EAE [111]. In vivo studies documented that corticosteroids inhibit the expressions of endogenous retroviruses [114,115]. Therefore, the pregnancy-induced marked increase in corticosteroids may result in improved evolution of MS and to the downregulation of HERV mRNA levels. In the postpartum period, when pregnancy hormones decrease quickly, the relapse rate of the disease is higher than before pregnancy [15,18]. A rebound in autoimmune diseases after a rapid drop of corticosteroid therapy is a well-known phenomenon in the daily clinical practice.
The negative impact of estriol, progesterone, and corticosteroids on HERV expressions could derive from their additive or synergic activities, perhaps also with other factors, such as vitamin D [123,124,125]. Their interactions to induce Foxp3+ Tregs, maternal immunotolerance, risk of developing MS, and prevention of autoimmune demyelinating processes has been documented [111,112,126,127,128,129]. Other elements exhibiting increased plasma levels during pregnancy, for example short-chain fatty acids, such as acetate values, are significantly correlated with disability and aberrant immune response in MS [130,131]. Their potential influence on the variables here taken into consideration remains questionable.
TRIM28 and SETDB1 are main players in the epigenetic mechanisms that modulate the cellular response to external stimuli. They regulate the transcription of thousands of genes [132,133]. The impaired expression of TRIM28/SETDB1 found in pregnant women in comparison to nonpregnant women is in line with the hypomethylation of DNA and histone modification during gestation. Once demethylated, a gene recovers its capacity to be transcribed, and this guarantees an increased number of mRNAs available for protein requirement in pregnancy. Alterations of epigenetic processes and DNA methylation abnormalities in neural cells have been implicated in the development of MS [3,78]. TRIM28 and SETDB1 are highly expressed in the CNS, participating in the differentiation of cell lineages within the brain, and their alterations or of their substrates have been found in several neurologic disorders [73,77,93,134,135,136]. TRIM28 and SETDB1 exert relevant regulatory activities on innate and adaptive immune responses [68,69,70,133]. Epigenetic modifications also regulate the expression of steroidogenic enzymes, of steroid nuclear receptors, and the response of steroid sensitive genes [137]. The impaired TRIM28/SETDB1 expressions could thus be involved in the multiple corticosteroid-driven biologic effects during gestation [110], including their positive action on MS.
There were larger variations in the transcript levels of every gene tested in nonpregnant women than in pregnant women. This trend, more evident in MS mothers, and the divergence in HERV and TRIM28/SETDB1 expressions both in peripheral blood and in the placenta of MS mothers compared to healthy mothers are difficult to explain by distinct plasma levels of any hormone or other circulating factor. Although this possibility has not been investigated, differential expression in the target, such as hormonal receptors in immune cells and major hormone-mediated signaling pathways [109,138], might result in reduced individual variations during pregnancy with more pronounced inhibitory effects in MS mothers. Upon binding to their ligand, nuclear hormone receptors (NRs) interact with their specific DNA response elements [139]. NRs are among the major regulators of transcription [140], and their impact on responsive genes is modulated by many co-regulatory molecules [141], which could be altered in MS patients. Gestational age has been shown to be inversely related to HERV expressions [81]. Differences between MS-affected and-unaffected women at delivery might thus derive from a distinct percentage of premature deliveries or Caesarean sections. Obstetric outcomes, such as the gestational age and mode of delivery in MS pregnancy, are, however, similar to those of the general population [142,143], and the percentages of these variables were actually comparable in our two maternal populations. The origin of the different expressions of HERV and TRIM28/SETDB1 between mothers with and without MS remains an intriguing, unsolved dilemma requiring specific ad hoc studies.

5. Conclusions

Our results show that pregnancy is associated with hypo-expressions of HERVs and of TRIM28/SETDB1, particularly in mothers affected by MS. These findings may originate from the combined action of some hormones increased over pregnancy, while their rapid postpartum decline may contribute to recrudescence of disease flares. In this context, the in vitro effects of single hormones on HERV transcription and a few clinical trials on their therapeutic efficacy have been investigated. The action of their combinations on HERV activation has been poorly explored [108], while favorable results could open the way for the use of balanced hormonal cocktails with potentially more beneficial effects than a single product in MS-affected females. The differences that emerged in HERV and TRIM28/SETDB1 expressions in peripheral blood and in the placenta between mothers with and without MS need additional targeted studies to understand the reason of such discrepancies. Several anti-HERV therapeutic measures might be adopted in MS patients, such as specific anti-RNAs, monoclonal antibodies or cytotoxic T lymphocytes against HERV antigens, and antiretroviral treatments [144,145]. A trial with an anti-MSRV-env monoclonal antibody in patients with MS is in progress [146], ProTEct-MS NCT04480307. The HERV activation is increased in HIV+ subjects [147]; antiretroviral drugs in seropositive individuals inhibited both HIV viral load and HERV expression [148,149], and the risk of developing MS is lower in HIV+ subjects [150]. Activation of NF-KB and the consequent production of inflammatory cytokines stimulate HERV transcription [151]. NF-kB plays a key role in MS pathology [152]. We demonstrated that antiretroviral drugs inhibit proteasome activity [153,154], with a consequent block of NF-kB-driven inflammatory cytokine release. The potential therapeutic advantage of antiretroviral drugs in MS patients may thus derive not only from their specific action again retroviruses, but also from indirect effects on host cell components. The administration of combined antiretroviral treatment for six months in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis to contrast the HERV-K hyper-expression showed a trend to better disease progression in those with positive antiviral results [155]. The impaired expression of TRIM28/SETDB1 at delivery may contribute to the DNA hypo-methylation and histone tail modification, ultimately resulting in the typical enhanced transcription of cellular genes during gestation. Whether their further downregulation in MS mothers contributes to the pregnancy-driven positive effects on the disease and alterations in epigenetic mechanisms are implicated in the development of MS remain attractive hypotheses. Dysregulated epigenetic modifications can be targeted by specific drugs, such as small molecule compounds [156]. Since the beneficial effects of pregnancy on MS are comparable to the most effective current treatments, the results of our study further support innovative therapeutic interventions to block HERV activation and to control aberrant epigenetic pathways in MS-affected patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.-A.T., M.B. and L.M.; Separation of placental tissues, G.A.; methodology, C.C., S.G., M.D., I.G. and M.B.; data analysis, I.G., F.F. and M.B.; enrollment of study populations, L.M., F.F. and C.B., writing—original draft preparation, P.-A.T. and M.B.; writing—review and editing, P.-A.T., L.M., I.G. and M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported in part by a grant from Autonomous Region of Sardinia, project n. 22 (R.L. 12.12.2022): Endogenous retroviruses in neurologic diseases and type 1 diabetes.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Clinical data were treated in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration (World Medical Association General Assembly, Seoul, Korea, October 2008). The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin (code 00546/2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CNScentral nervous system
DCdendritic cell
EAEexperimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
HERVshuman endogenous retroviruses
KRAB-ZFPsKrüppel-associated box domain zinc finger proteins
NF-kBnuclear factor kB
MSmultiple sclerosis
MSRVmultiple sclerosis retrovirus
PBMCsperipheral blood mononuclear cells
PRRpattern recognition receptor
SETDB1SET domain bifurcated histone lysine methyltrasferase 1
SYN1syncytin 1
SYN2syncytin 2
Tregregulatory T cell
TRIM28tripartite motif containing 28
TLRtoll-like receptor

References

  1. Koch-Henriksen, N.; Sørensen, P.S. The changing demographic pattern of multiple sclerosis epidemiology. Lancet Neurol. 2010, 9, 520–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Goris, A.; Vandebergh, M.; McCauley, J.L.; Saarela, J.; Cotsapas, C. Genetics of multiple sclerosis: Lessons from polygenicity. Lancet Neurol. 2022, 21, 830–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kular, L.; Ewing, E.; Needhamsen, M.; Pahlevan Kakhki, M.; Covacu, R.; Gomez-Cabrero, D.; Brundin, L.; Jagodic, M. DNA methylation changes in glial cells of the normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis patients. Epigenetics 2022, 17, 1311–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Avila, M.; Bansal, A.; Culberson, J.; Peiris, A.N. The role of sex hormones in multiple sclerosis. Eur. Neurol. 2018, 80, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Giovannoni, G.; Hawkes, C.H.; Lechner-Scott, J.; Levy, M.; Yeh, E.A.; Gold, J. Is EBV the cause of multiple sclerosis? Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2022, 58, 103636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Calahorra, L.; Camacho-Toledano, C.; Serrano-Regal, M.P.; Ortega, M.C.; Clemente, D. Regulatory cells in multiple sclerosis: From blood to brain. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Duperray, A.; Barbe, D.; Raguenez, G.; Weksler, B.B.; Romero, I.A.; Couraud, P.-O.; Perron, H.; Marche, P.N. Inflammatory response of endothelial cells to a human endogenous retrovirus associated with multiple sclerosis is mediated by TLR4. Int. Immunol. 2015, 27, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Healy, L.M.; Stratton, J.A.; Kuhlmann, T.; Antel, J. The role of glial cells in multiple sclerosis disease progression. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2022, 18, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Whitacre, C.C.; Reingold, S.C.; O’Looney, P.A. A gender gap in autoimmunity. Science 1999, 283, 1277–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Buchel, E.; Van Steenbergen, W.; Nevens, F.; Fevery, J. Improvement of autoimmune hepatitis during pregnancy followed by flare-up after delivery. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002, 97, 3160–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Riis, L.; Vind, I.; Politi, P.; Wolters, F.; Vermeire, S.; Tsianos, E.; Freitas, J.; Mouzas, I.; Ruiz Ochoa, V.; O’Morain, C.; et al. Does pregnancy change the disease course? A study in a European cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 101, 1539–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Förger, F.; Marcoli, N.; Gadola, S.; Möller, B.; Villiger, P.M.; Østensen, M. Pregnancy induces numerical and functional changes of CD4+CD25 high regulatory T cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2008, 67, 984–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. de Man, Y.A.; Dolhain, R.J.E.M.; van de Geijn, F.E.; Willemsen, S.P.; Hazes, J.M.W. Disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis during pregnancy: Results from a nationwide prospective study. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 59, 1241–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ananthakrishnan, A.N.; Zadvornova, Y.; Naik, A.S.; Issa, M.; Perera, L.P. Impact of pregnancy on health-related quality of life of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J. Dig. Dis. 2012, 13, 472–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Confavreux, C.; Hutchinson, M.; Hours, M.M.; Cortinovis-Tourniaire, P.; Moreau, T. Pregnancy in multiple sclerosis group rate of pregnancy-related relapse in multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 339, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vukusic, S.; Hutchinson, M.; Hours, M.; Moreau, T.; Cortonis-Tourniarie, P.; Adeleine, P.; Confavreux, C. Pregnancy in multiple sclerosis group Pregnancy and multiple sclerosis (the PRIMS study): Clinical predictors of post-partum relapse. Brain 2004, 127, 1353–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Langer-Gould, A.; Beaber, B.E. Effects of pregnancy and breastfeeding on the multiple sclerosis disease course. Clin. Immunol. 2013, 149, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Finkelsztejn, A.; Brooks, J.B.B.; Paschoal, F.M., Jr.; Fragoso, Y.D. What can we really tell women with multiple sclerosis regarding pregnancy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. BJOG 2011, 118, 790–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ponsonby, A.L.; Lucas, R.M.; van der Mei, I.A.; Dear, K.; Valery, P.C.; Pender, M.P.; Taylor, B.V.; Kilpatrick, T.J.; Coulthard, A.; Chapman, C.; et al. Offspring number, pregnancy, and risk of a first clinical demyelinating event: The Australian Immune Study. Neurology 2012, 78, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Jokubaitis, V.G.; Spelman, T.; Kalincik, T.; Lorscheider, J.; Havrdova, E.; Horakova, D.; Duquette, P.; Girard, M.; Prat, A.; Izquierdo, G.; et al. Predictors of long-term disability accrual in relapse-onset multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2016, 80, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Ghajarzadeh, M.; Mohammadi, A.; Shahraki, Z.; Sahraian, M.A.; Mohammadifar, M. Pregnancy history, oral contraceptive pills consumption (OCPs), and risk of multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2022, 13, 89. [Google Scholar]
  22. Langer-Gould, A.; Garren, H.; Slansky, A.; Ruiz, P.J.; Steinman, L. Late pregnancy suppresses relapses in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: Evidence for a suppressive pregnancy-related serum factor. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 1084–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. McClain, M.A.; Gatson, N.N.; Powell, N.D.; Papenfuss, T.L.; Gienapp, I.E.; Song, F.; Shawler, T.M.; Kithcart, A.; Whitacre, C.C. Pregnancy suppresses experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis through immunoregulatory cytokine production. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 8146–8152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Dendrou, C.A.; Fugger, L.; Friese, M.A. Immunopathology of multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 15, 545–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gold, S.M.; Voskuhl, R.R. Pregnancy and multiple sclerosis: From molecular mechanisms to clinical application. Semin. Immunopathol. 2016, 38, 709–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Johnson, W.E. Origins and evolutionary consequences of ancient endogenous retroviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 355–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Blond, J.L.; Lavillette, D.; Cheynet, V.; Bouton, O.; Oriol, G.; Chapel-Fernandes, S.; Mandrand, B.; Mallet, F.; Cosset, F.L. An envelope glycoprotein of the human endogenous retrovirus HERV-W is expressed in the human placenta and fuses cells expressing the type D mammalian retrovirus receptor. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 3321–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Blaise, S.; de Parseval, N.; Benit, L.; Heidmann, T. Genomewide screening for fusogenic human endogenous retrovirus envelopes identifies syncytin 2, a gene conserved on primate evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 13013–13018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Mangeney, M.; Renard, M.; Schlecht-Louf, G.; Bouallaga, I.; Heidmann, O.; Letzelter, C.; Richaud, A.; Ducos, B.; Heidmann, T. Placental syncytins: Genetic disjunction between the fusogenic and immunosuppressive activity of retroviral envelope proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 20534–20539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Holder, B.S.; Tower, C.L.; Forbes, K.; Mulla, M.J.; Aplin, J.D.; Abrahams, V.M. Immune cell activation by trophoblast-derived microvesicles is mediated by syncytin 1. Immunology 2012, 136, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Garcia-Montojo, M.; Rodriguez-Martin, E.; Ramos-Mozo, P.; Ortega-Madueño, I.; Dominguez-Mozo, M.I.; Arias-Leal, A.; García-Martínez, M.Á.; Casanova, I.; Galan, V.; Arroyo, R.; et al. Syncytin-1/HERV-W envelope is an early activation marker of leukocytes and is upregulated in multiple sclerosis patients. Eur. J. Immunol. 2020, 50, 685–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lokossou, A.G.; Toudic, C.; Nguyen, P.T.; Elisseeff, X.; Vargas, A.; Rassart, É.; Lafond, J.; Leduc, L.; Bourgault, S.; Gilbert, C.; et al. Endogenous retrovirus-encoded Syncytin-2 contributes to exosome-mediated immunosuppression of T cells. Biol. Reprod. 2020, 102, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Isbel, L.; Whitelaw, E. Endogenous retroviruses in mammals: An emerging picture of how ERVs modify expression of adjacent genes. BioEssays 2012, 34, 734–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rolland, A.; Jouvin-Marche, E.; Viret, C.; Faure, M.; Perron, H.; Marche, P.N. The envelope protein of a human endogenous retrovirus-W family activates innate immunity through CD14/TLR4 and promotes Th1-like responses. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 7636–7644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Grandi, N.; Tramontano, E. Human endogenous retroviruses are ancient acquired elements still shaping innate immune responses. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Chuong, E.B.; Elde, N.C.; Feschotte, C. Regulatory evolution of innate immunity through co-option of endogenous retroviruses. Science 2016, 351, 1083–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Mu, X.; Ahmad, S.; Hur, S. Endogenous retroelements and the host innate immune sensors. Adv. Immunol. 2016, 132, 47–69. [Google Scholar]
  38. Dembny, P.; Newman, A.G.; Singh, M.; Hinz, M.; Szczepek, M.; Krüger, C.; Adalbert, R.; Dzaye, O.; Trimbuch, T.; Wallach, T.; et al. Human endogenous retrovirus HERV-K(HML-2) RNA causes neurodegeneration through Toll-like receptors. JCI Insight 2020, 5, e131093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ramasamy, R.; Joseph, B.; Whittall, T. Potential molecular mimicry between the human endogenous retrovirus W family envelope proteins and myelin proteins in multiple sclerosis. Immunol. Lett. 2017, 183, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Morozov, V.A.; Dao Thi, V.L.; Denner, J. The transmembrane protein of the human endogenous retrovirus-K (HERV-K) modulates cytokine release and gene expression. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Tovo, P.A.; Rabbone, I.; Tinti, D.; Galliano, I.; Trada, M.; Daprà, V.; Cerutti, F.; Bergallo, M. Enhanced expression of human endogenous retroviruses in new-onset type 1 diabetes: Potential pathogenetic and therapeutic implications. Autoimmunity 2020, 53, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tovo, P.A.; Opramolla, A.; Pizzol, A.; Calosso, G.; Daprà, V.; Galliano, I.; Calvi, C.; Pinon, M.; Cisarò, F.; Rigazio, C.; et al. Overexpression of endogenous retroviruses in children with celiac disease. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2021, 180, 2429–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ukadike, K.C.; Mustelin, T. Implications of endogenous retroelements in the etiopathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Huang, W.J.; Liu, Z.C.; Wei, W.; Wang, G.H.; Wu, J.G.; Zhu, F. Human endogenous retroviral pol RNA and protein detected and identified in the blood of individuals with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 2006, 83, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Johansson, E.M.; Bouchet, D.; Tamouza, R.; Ellul, P.; Morr, A.S.; Avignone, E.; Germi, R.; Leboyer, M.; Perron, H.; Groc, L. Human endogenous retroviral protein triggers deficit in glutamate synapse maturation and behaviors associated with psychosis. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eabc0708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tovo, P.A.; Davico, C.; Marcotulli, D.; Vitiello, B.; Daprà, V.; Calvi, C.; Montanari, P.; Carpino, A.; Galliano, I.; Bergallo, M. Enhanced expression of human endogenous retroviruses, TRIM28 and SETDB1 in autism spectrum disorder. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chesnokova, E.; Beletskiy, A.; Kolosov, P. The role of transposable elements of the human genome in neuronal function and pathology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nowak, J.; Januszkiewicz, D.; Pernak, M.; Liweń, I.; Zawada, M.; Rembowska, J.; Nowicka, K.; Lewandowski, K.; Hertmanoswka, H.; Wender, M. Multiple sclerosis-associated virus-related pol sequences found both in multiple sclerosis and healthy donors are more frequently expressed in multiple sclerosis patients. J. Neurovirol. 2003, 9, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Brudek, T.; Christensen, T.; Aagaard, L.; Petersen, T.; Hansen, H.J.; Møller-Larsen, A. B cells and monocytes from patients with active multiple sclerosis exhibit increased surface expression of both HERV-H Env and HERV-W Env, accompanied by increased seroreactivity. Retrovirology 2009, 6, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Morandi, E.; Tanasescu, R.; Tarlinton, R.E.; Constantin-Teodosiu, D.; Gran, B. Do antiretroviral drugs protect from multiple sclerosis by inhibiting expression of MS-associated retrovirus? Front. Immunol. 2019, 9, 3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gröger, V.; Cynis, H. Human endogenous retroviruses and their putative role in the development of autoimmune disorders such as multiple sclerosis. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mameli, G.; Poddighe, L.; Astone, V.; Delogu, G.; Arru, G.; Sotgiu, S.; Serra, C.; Dolei, A. Novel reliable real-time PCR for differential detection of MSRVenv and syncytin-1 in RNA and DNA from patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Virol. Methods 2009, 161, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Perron, H.; Lalande, B.; Gratacap, B.; Laurent, A.; Genoulaz, O.; Geny, C.; Mallaret, M.; Schuller, E.; Stoebner, P.; Seigneurin, J.M. Isolation of retrovirus from patients with multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1991, 337, 862–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Antony, J.M.; van Marle, G.; Opii, W.; Butterfield, D.A.; Mallet, F.; Yong, V.W.; Wallace, J.L.; Deacon, R.M.; Warren, K.; Power, C. Human endogenous retrovirus glycoprotein-mediated induction of redox reactants causes oligodendrocyte death and demyelination. Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7, 1088–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Perron, H.; Dougier-Reynaud, H.-L.; Lomparski, C.; Popa, I.; Firouzi, R.; Bertrand, J.-B.; Marusic, S.; Portoukalian, J.; Jouvin-Marche, E.; Villiers, C.L.; et al. Human endogenous retrovirus protein activates innate immunity and promotes experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in mice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Garcia-Montojo, M.; Dominguez-Mozo, M.; Arias-Leal, A.; Garcia-Martinez, Á.; De las Heras, V.; Casanova, I.; Faucard, R.; Gehin, N.; Madeira, A.; Arroyo, R.; et al. The DNA copy number of human endogenous retrovirus-W (MSRV-type) is increased in multiple sclerosis patients and is influenced by gender and disease severity. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Perron, H.; Jouvin-Marche, E.; Michel, M.; Ounanian-Paraz, A.; Camelo, S.; Dumon, A.; Jolivet-Reynaud, C.; Marcel, F.; Souillet, Y.; Borel, E.; et al. Multiplesclerosis retrovirus particles and recombinant envelope trigger an abnormal immune response invitro, by inducing polyclonal Vbeta16 T-lymphocyte activation. Virology 2001, 287, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Sotgiu, S.; Mameli, G.; Serra, C.; Zarbo, I.R.; Arru, G.; Dolei, A. Multiple sclerosis-associated retrovirus and progressive disability of multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 2010, 16, 1248–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bonnaud, B.; Beliaeff, J.; Bouton, O.; Oriol, G.; Duret, L.; Mallet, F. Natural history of the ERVWE1 endogenous retroviral locus. Retrovirology 2005, 2, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Laufer, G.; Mayer, J.; Mueller, B.F.; Mueller-Lantzsch, N.; Ruprecht, K. Analysis of transcribed human endogenous retrovirus W env loci clarifies the origin of multiple sclerosis-associated retrovirus env sequences. Retrovirology 2009, 6, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Greenig, M. HERVs, immunity, and autoimmunity: Understanding the connection. PeerJ 2019, 7, 6711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Wang, X.; Liu, Z.; Wang, P.; Li, S.; Zeng, J.; Tu, X.; Yan, Q.; Xiao, Z.; Pan, M.; Zhu, F. Syncytin-1, an endogenous retroviral protein, triggers the activation of CRP via TLR3 signal cascade in glial cells. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2018, 67, 324–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hummel, J.; Kämmerer, U.; Müller, N.; Avota, E.; Schneider-Schaulies, S. Human endogenous retrovirus envelope proteins target dendritic cells to suppress T-cell activation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2015, 45, 1748–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Friedman, J.R.; Fredericks, W.J.; Jensen, D.E.; Speicher, D.W.; Huang, X.P.; Neilson, E.G.; Rauscher, F.J., 3rd. KAP-1, a novel corepressor for the highly conserved KRAB repression domain. Genes Dev. 1996, 10, 2067–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Sobocinska, J.; Molenda, S.; Machnik, M.; Oleksiewicz, U. KRAB-ZFP transcriptional regulators acting as oncogenes and tumor suppressors: An Overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 23, 2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Schultz, D.C.; Ayyanathan, K.; Negorev, D.; Maul, G.G.; Rauscher, F.J., 3rd. SETDB1: A novel KAP-1-associated histone H3, lysine 9-specific methyltransferase that contributes to HP1-mediated silencing of euchromatic genes by KRAB zinc-finger proteins. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 919–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Nisole, S.; Stoye, J.P.; Saïb, A. TRIM family proteins: Retroviral restriction and antiviral defence. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhou, X.F.; Yu, J.; Chang, M.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, D.; Cammas, F.; Sun, S.C. TRIM28 mediates chromatin modifications at the TCRα enhancer and regulates the development of T and natural killer T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 20083–20088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Cuellar, T.L.; Herzner, A.M.; Zhang, X.; Goyal, Y.; Watanabe, C.; Friedman, B.A.; Janakiraman, V.; Durinck, S.; Stinson, J.; Arnott, D. Silencing of retrotransposons by SETDB1 inhibits the interferon response in acute myeloid leukemia. J. Cell. Biol. 2017, 216, 3535–3549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Gehrmann, U.; Burbage, M.; Zueva, E.; Goudot, C.; Esnault, C.; Ye, M.; Carpier, J.M.; Burgdorf, N.; Hoyler, T.; Suarez, G.; et al. Critical role for TRIM28 and HP1β/γ in the epigenetic control of T cell metabolic reprograming and effector differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 25839–25849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Adoue, V.; Binet, B.; Malbec, A.; Fourquet, J.; Romagnoli, P.; van Meerwijk, J.P.M.; Amigorena, S.; Joffre, O.P. The histone methyltransferase SETDB1 controls T helper cell lineage integrity by repressing endogenous retroviruses. Immunity 2019, 50, 629–644.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Czerwinska, P.; Jaworska, A.M.; Wlodarczyk, N.A.; Mackiewicz, A.A. Melanoma stem cell-like phenotype and significant suppression of immune response within a tumor are regulated by TRIM28 protein. Cancers 2020, 12, 2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fasching, L.; Kapopoulou, A.; Sachdeva, R.; Petri, R.; Jönsson, M.E.; Männe, C.; Turelli, P.; Jern, P.; Cammas, F.; Trono, D.; et al. TRIM28 represses transcription of endogenous retroviruses in neural progenitor cells. Cell Rep. 2015, 10, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kawabe, H.; Stegmüller, J. The role of E3 ubiquitin ligases in synapse function in the healthy and diseased brain. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2021, 112, 103602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Renaudineau, Y.; Youinou, P. Epigenetics and autoimmunity, with special emphasis on methylation. Keio J. Med. 2011, 60, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Ibi, D.; González-Maeso, J. Epigenetic signaling in schizophrenia. Cell Signal. 2015, 27, 2131–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Markouli, M.; Strepkos, D.; Chlamydas, S.; Piperi, C. Histone lysine methyltransferase SETDB1 as a novel target for central nervous system diseases. Prog. Neurobiol. 2021, 200, 101968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Baranzini, S.E.; Mudge, J.; Van Velkinburgh, J.C.; Khankhanian, P.; Khrebtukova, I.; Miller, N.A.; Zhang, L.; Farmer, A.D.; Bell, C.J.; Kim, R.W.; et al. Genome, epigenome and RNA sequences of monozygotic twins discordant for multiple sclerosis. Nature 2010, 464, 1351–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Castillo-Fernandez, J.E.; Spector, T.D.; Bell, J.T. Epigenetics of discordant monozygotic twins: Implications for disease. Genome Med. 2014, 6, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Celarain, N.; Tomas-Roig, J. Aberrant DNA methylation profile exacerbates inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis patients. J. Neuroinflammation 2020, 17, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Bergallo, M.; Galliano, I.; Pirra, A.; Daprà, V.; Licciardi, F.; Montanari, P.; Coscia, A.; Bertino, E.; Tovo, P.A. Transcriptional activity of human endogenous retroviruses is higher at birth in inversed correlation with gestational age. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019, 68, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Tovo, P.A.; Garazzino, S.; Daprà, V.; Pruccoli, G.; Calvi, C.; Mignone, F.; Alliaudi, C.; Denina, M.; Scolfaro, C.; Zoppo, M.; et al. COVID-19 in children: Expressions of type I/II/III interferons, TRIM28, SETDB1, and endogenous retroviruses in mild and severe cases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tovo, P.A.; Monti, G.; Daprà, V.; Montanari, P.; Calvi, C.; Alliaudi, C.; Sardo, A.; Galliano, I.; Bergallo, M. Enhanced expression of endogenous retroviruses and of TRIM28 and SETDB1 in children with food allergy. Clin. Transl. Allergy 2022, 12, e12124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Marsili, L.; Bachiocco, V.; Frati, F.; Aloisi, A.M. Quantitative real-time PCR detection of TRPV1-4 gene expression in human leukocytes from healthy and hyposensitive subjects. Mol. Pain 2008, 4, 51. [Google Scholar]
  85. NIH. NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant or Synthetic Nucleic Acid Molecules. 2019. Available online: https://osp.od.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019_NIH_Guidelines.htm (accessed on 25 April 2019).
  86. WHO. Laboratory Biosafety Guidance Related to Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Interim Guidance. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/laboratory-biosafety-guidance-related-to-coronavirus-disease-(COVID-19) (accessed on 13 May 2020).
  87. Turelli, P.; Castro-Diaz, N.; Marzetta, F.; Kapopoulou, A.; Raclot, C.; Duc, J.; Tieng, V.; Quenneville, S.; Trono, D. Interplay of TRIM28 and DNA methylation in controlling human endogenous retroelements. Genome Res. 2014, 24, 1260–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Jiang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lu, H.; Sun, S.C.; Jin, W.; Wang, X.; Dong, C. Epigenetic activation during T helper 17 cell differentiation is mediated by Tripartite motif containing 28. Nat. Commun. 2018, 12, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Rowe, H.M.; Kapopoulou, A.; Corsinotti, A.; Fasching, L.; Macfarlan, T.S.; Tarabay, Y.; Viville, S.; Jakobsson, J.; Pfaff, S.L.; Trono, D. TRIM28 repression of retrotransposon-based enhancers is necessary to preserve transcriptional dynamics in embryonic stem cells. Genome Res. 2013, 23, 452–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Matsui, T.; Leung, D.; Miyashita, H.; Maksakova, I.A.; Miyachi, H.; Kimura, H.; Tachibana, M.; Lorincz, M.C.; Shinkai, Y. Proviral silencing in embryonic stem cells requires the histone methyltransferase ESET. Nature 2010, 464, 927–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Wiznerowicz, M.; Jakobsson, J.; Szulc, J.; Liao, S.; Quazzola, A.; Beermann, F.; Aebischer, P.; Trono, D. The Kruppel-associated box repressor domain can trigger de novo promoter methylation during mouse early embryogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 34535–34541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Bojkowska, K.; Aloisio, F.; Cassano, M.; Kapopoulou, A.; Santoni de Sio, F.; Zangger, N.; Offner, S.; Cartoni, C.; Thomas, C.; Quenneville, S.; et al. Liver-specific ablation of Krüppel-associated box-associated protein 1 in mice leads to male-predominant hepatosteatosis and development of liver adenoma. Hepatology 2012, 56, 1279–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Santoni de Sio, F.R.; Barde, I.; Offner, S.; Kapopoulou, A.; Corsinotti, A.; Bojkowska, K.; Genolet, R.; Thomas, J.H.; Luescher, I.F.; Pinschewer, D.; et al. KAP1 regulates gene networks controlling T-cell development and responsiveness. FASEB J. 2012, 26, 4561–4575. [Google Scholar]
  94. Randolph, K.; Hyder, U.; D’Orso, I. KAP1/TRIM28: Transcriptional activator and/or repressor of viral and cellular programs? Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 834636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ysrraelit, M.C.; Correale, J. Impact of sex hormones on immune function and multiple sclerosis development. Immunology 2019, 156, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Offner, H.; Polanczyk, M. A potential role for estrogen in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1089, 343–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gold, S.M.; Sasidhar, M.V.; Morales, L.B.; Du, S.; Sicotte, N.L.; Tiwari-Woodruff, S.K.; Voskuhl, R.R. Estrogen treatment decreases matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 in autoimmune demyelinating disease through estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha). Lab. Investig. 2009, 89, 1076–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Ziehn, M.O.; Avedisian, A.A.; Dervin, S.M.; O’Dell, T.J.; Voskuhl, R.R. Estriol preserves synaptic transmission in the hippocampus during autoimmune demyelinating disease. Lab. Investig. 2012, 92, 1234–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Kim, R.Y.; Mangu, D.; Hoffman, A.S.; Kavosh, R.; Jung, E.; Itoh, N.; Voskuhl, R. Oestrogen receptor β ligand acts on CD11c+ cells to mediate protection in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Brain 2018, 141, 132–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Sicotte, N.L.; Liva, S.M.; Klutch, R.; Pfeiffer, P.; Bouvier, S.; Odesa, S.; Wu, T.C.; Voskuhl, R.R. Treatment of multiple sclerosis with the pregnancy hormone estriol. Ann. Neurol. 2002, 52, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pozzilli, C.; De Giglio, L.; Barletta, V.T.; Marinelli, F.; Angelis, F.D.; Gallo, V.; Pagano, V.A.; Marini, S.; Piattella, M.C.; Tomassini, V.; et al. Oral contraceptives combined with interferon β in multiple sclerosis. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2015, 2, e120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Voskuhl, R.R.; Wang, H.; Wu, T.C.; Sicotte, N.L.; Nakamura, K.; Kurth, F.; Elashoff, R. Estriol combined with glatiramer acetate for women with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016, 15, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. MacKenzie-Graham, A.; Brook, J.; Kurth, F.; Itoh, Y.; Meyer, C.; Montag, M.J.; Wang, H.J.; Elashoff, R.; Voskuhl, R.R. Estriol-mediated neuroprotection in multiple sclerosis localized by voxel-based morphometry. Brain Behav. 2018, 8, e01086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Spence, R.D.; Voskuhl, R.R. Neuroprotective effects of estrogens and androgens in CNS inflammation and neurodegeneration. Front. Neuroend. 2012, 33, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Crawford, D.K.; Mangiardi, M.; Song, B.; Patel, R.; Du, S.; Sofroniew, M.V.; Tiwari-Woodruff, S.K. Oestrogen receptor beta ligand: A novel treatment to enhance endogenous functional remyelination. Brain 2010, 133, 2999–3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Voskuhl, R.R.; Gold, S.M. Sex-related factors in multiple sclerosis susceptibility and progression. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2012, 8, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mueller, O.; Moore, D.W.; Giovannucci, J.; Etter, A.R.; Peterson, E.M.; Mudge, A.; Liu, Y. Expression of endogenous retroviruses in peripheral leukocytes during the menstrual cycle suggests coordinated hormonal regulation. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 2018, 34, 909–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ono, M.; Kawakami, M.; Ushikubo, H. Stimulation of expression of the human endogenous retrovirus genome by female steroid hormones in human breast cancer cell line T47D. J. Virol. 1987, 61, 2059–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Nguyen, T.D.; Davis, J.; Eugenio, R.A.; Liu, Y. Female sex hormones activate human endogenous retrovirus type K through the OCT4 transcription factor in T47D breast cancer cells. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 2019, 35, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Solano, M.E.; Arck, P.C. Steroids, pregnancy and fetal development. Front. Immunol. 2020, 10, 3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Engler, J.B.; Kursawe, N.; Solano, M.E.; Patas, K.; Wehrmann, S.; Heckmann, N.; Lühder, F.; Reichardt, H.M.; Arck, P.C.; Gold, S.M.; et al. Glucocorticoid receptor in T cells mediates protection from autoimmunity in pregnancy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E181–E190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Hierweger, A.M.; Engler, J.B.; Friese, M.A.; Reichardt, H.M.; Lydon, J.; DeMayo, F.; Mittrücker, H.W.; Arck, P.C. Progesterone modulates the T-cell response via glucocorticoid receptor-dependent pathways. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2019, 81, e13084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Kuroda, K.; Venkatakrishnan, R.; Salker, M.S.; Lucas, E.S.; Shaheen, F.; Kuroda, M.; Blanks, A.; Christian, M.; Quenby, S.; Brosens, J.J. Induction of 11β-HSD 1 and activation of distinct mineralocorticoid receptor- and glucocorticoid receptor-dependent gene networks in decidualizing human endometrial stromal cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 2013, 27, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Fiegl, M.; Strasser-Wozak, E.; Geley, S.; Gsur, A.; Drach, J.; Kofler, R. Glucocorticoid-mediated immunomodulation: Hydrocortisone enhances immunosuppressive endogenous retroviral protein (p15E) expression in mouse immune cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1995, 101, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Hsu, K.; Lee, Y.K.; Chew, A.; Chiu, S.; Lim, D.; Greenhalgh, D.G.; Cho, K. Inherently variable responses to glucocorticoid stress among endogenous retroviruses isolated from 23 mouse strains. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2017, 1863, 2594–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Hoffman, G.E.; Le, W.W.; Murphy, A.Z.; Koski, C.L. Divergent effects of ovarian steroids on neuronal survival during experimental allergic encephalitis in Lewis rats. Exp. Neurol. 2001, 171, 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Giatti, S.; Caruso, D.; Boraso, M.; Abbiati, F.; Ballarini, E.; Calabrese, D.; Pesaresi, M.; Rigolio, R.; Santos-Galindo, M.; Viviani, B.; et al. Neuroprotective effects of progesterone in chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2012, 24, 851–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Vukusic, S.; Ionescu, I.; El-Etr, M.; Schumacher, M.; Baulieu, E.E.; Cornu, C.; Confavreux, C. The prevention of post-partum relapses with progestin and estradiol in multiple sclerosis (POPART’MUS) trial: Rationale, objectives and state of advancement. J. Neurol. Sci. 2009, 286, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Voskuhl, R.; Momtazee, C. Pregnancy: Effect on multiple sclerosis, treatment considerations, and breastfeeding. Neurotherapeutics 2017, 14, 974–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Bansal, A.S.; Bora, S.A.; Saso, S.; Smith, J.R.; Johnson, M.R.; Thum, M.-Y. Mechanism of human chorionic gonadotrophin-mediated immunomodulation in pregnancy. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2012, 8, 747–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Schumacher, A.; Brachwitz, N.; Sohr, S.; Engeland, K.; Langwisch, S.; Dolaptchieva, M.; Alexander, T.; Taran, A.; Malfertheiner, S.F.; Costa, S.D.; et al. Human chorionic gonadotropin attracts regulatory T cells into the fetal-maternal interface during early human pregnancy. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 5488–5497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Frendo, J.L.; Olivier, D.; Cheynet, V.; Blond, J.L.; Bouton, O.; Vidaud, M.; Rabreau, M.; Evain-Brion, D.; Mallet, F. Direct involvement of HERV-W Env glycoprotein in human trophoblast cell fusion and differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 3566–3574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Correale, J.; Ysrraelit, M.C.; Gaitan, M.I. Gender differences in 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 immunomodulatory effects in multiple sclerosis patients and healthy subjects. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 4948–4958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Cutolo, M.; Paolino, S.; Sulli, A.; Smith, V.; Pizzorni, C.; Seriolo, B. Vitamin D, steroid hormones, and autoimmunity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2014, 1317, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Rolf, L.; Damoiseaux, J.; Hupperts, R.; Huitinga, I.; Smolders, J. Network of nuclear receptor ligands in multiple sclerosis: Common pathways and interactions of sex-steroids, corticosteroids and vitamin D3-derived molecules. Autoimmun. Rev. 2016, 15, 900–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Disanto, G.; Handel, A.E.; Ramagopalan, S.V. Estrogen-vitamin D interaction in multiple sclerosis. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 95, e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Spanier, J.A.; Nashold, F.E.; Mayne, C.G.; Nelson, C.D.; Hayes, C.E. Vitamin D and estrogen synergy in Vdr-expressing CD4+ T cells is essential to induce Helios+FoxP3+ T cells and prevent autoimmune demyelinating disease. J. Neuroimmunol. 2015, 286, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Gombash, S.E.; Lee, P.W.; Sawdai, E.; Lovett-Racke, A.E. Vitamin D as a risk factor for multiple sclerosis: Immunoregulatory or neuroprotective? Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 796933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Latifi, T.; Zebardast, A.; Marashi, S.M. The role of human endogenous retroviruses (HERVs) in multiple sclerosis and the plausible interplay between HERVs, Epstein-Barr virus infection, and vitamin D. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2022, 57, 103318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Pérez-Pérez, S.; Domínguez-Mozo, M.I.; Alonso-Gómez, A.; Medina, S.; Villarrubia, N.; Fernández-Velasco, J.I.; García-Martínez, M.Á.; García-Calvo, E.; Estévez, H.; Costa-Frossard, L.; et al. Acetate correlates with disability and immune response in multiple sclerosis. PeerJ 2020, 8, e10220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Cuello, J.P.; Martínez Ginés, M.L.; García Domínguez, J.M.; Tejeda-Velarde, A.; Lozano Ros, A.; Higueras, Y.; Meldaña Rivera, A.; Goicochea Briceño, H.; Garcia-Tizon, S.; de León-Luis, J.; et al. Short-chain fatty acids during pregnancy in multiple sclerosis: A prospective cohort study. Eur. J. Neurol. 2022, 29, 895–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Groner, A.C.; Meylan, S.; Ciuffi, A.; Zangger, N.; Ambrosini, G.; Dénervaud, N.; Bucher, P.; Trono, D. KRAB-zinc finger proteins and KAP1 can mediate long-range transcriptional repression through heterochromatin preading. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, 25361–25369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Krischuns, T.; Günl, F.; Henschel, L.; Binder, M.; Willemsen, J.; Schloer, S.; Rescher, U.; Gerlt, V.; Zimmer, G.; Nordhof, C.; et al. Phosphorylation of TRIM28 enhances the expression of IFN-_ and proinflammatory cytokines during HPAIV infection of human lung epithelial cells. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Spyropoulou, A.; Gargalionis, A.; Dalagiorgou, G.; Adamopoulos, C.; Papavassiliou, K.A.; Lea, R.W.; Piperi, C.; Papavassiliou, A.G. Role of histone lysine methyltransferases SUV39H1 and SETDB1 in gliomagenesis: Modulation of cell proliferation, migration, and colony formation. Neuromol. Med. 2014, 16, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Xu, Q.; Goldstein, J.; Wang, P.; Gadi, I.K.; Labreche, H.; Rehder, C.; Wang, W.P.; McConkie, A.; Xu, X.; Jiang, Y.H. Chromosomal microarray analysis in clinical evaluation of neurodevelopmental disorders-reporting a novel deletion of SETDB1 and illustration of counseling challenge. Pediatr. Res. 2016, 80, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Grassi, D.A.; Jönsson, M.E.; Brattås, P.L.; Jakobsson, J. TRIM28 and the control of transposable elements in the brain. Brain Res. 2019, 1705, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Martinez-Arguelles, D.B.; Papadopoulos, V. Epigenetic regulation of the expression of genes involved in steroid hormone biosynthesis and action. Steroids 2010, 75, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Khan, D.; Ansar Ahmed, S. The immune system is a natural target for estrogen action: Opposing effects of estrogen in two prototypical autoimmune diseases. Front. Immunol. 2016, 6, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Chrousos, G.P.; Kino, T. Intracellular glucocorticoid signaling: A formerly simple system turns stochastic. Sci. STKE 2005, 2005, pe48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Mangelsdorf, D.J.; Thummel, C.; Beato, M.; Herrlich, P.; Schütz, G.; Umesono, K.; Blumberg, B.; Kastner, P.; Mark, M.; Chambon, P.; et al. The nuclear receptor superfamily: The second decade. Cell 1995, 83, 835–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  141. Malovannaya, A.; Lanz, R.B.; Jung, S.Y.; Bulynko, Y.; Le, N.T.; Chan, D.W.; Ding, C.; Shi, Y.; Yucer, N.; Krenciute, G.; et al. Analysis of the human endogenous coregulator complexome. Cell 2011, 145, 787–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Cuello, J.P.; Martinez Gines, M.L.; Martin Barriga, M.L.; de Andres, C. Multiple sclerosis and pregnancy: A single-centre prospective comparative study. Neurologia 2017, 32, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Arneth, B.M. Pregnancy in patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Investig. Med. 2022, 70, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Giménez-Orenga, K.; Oltra, E. Human Endogenous Retrovirus as Therapeutic Targets in Neurologic Disease. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Baldwin, E.T.; Götte, M.; Tchesnokov, E.P.; Arnold, E.; Hagel, M.; Nichols, C.; Dossang, P.; Lamers, M.; Wan, P.; Steinbacher, S.; et al. Human endogenous retrovirus-K (HERV-K) reverse transcriptase (RT) structure and biochemistry reveals remarkable similarities to HIV-1 RT and opportunities for HERV-K-specific inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2200260119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Hartung, H.P.; Derfuss, T.; Cree, B.A.; Sormani, M.P.; Selmaj, K.; Stutters, J.; Prados, F.; MacManus, D.; Schneble, H.M.; Lambert, E.; et al. Efficacy and safety of temelimab in multiple sclerosis: Results of a randomized phase 2b and extension study. Mult. Scler. 2021, 9, 22–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Laderoute, M.P.; Giulivi, A.; Larocque, L.; Bellfoy, D.; Hou, Y.; Wu, H.X.; Fowke, K.; Wu, J.; Diaz-Mitoma, F. The replicative activity of human endogenous retrovirus K102 (HERV-K102) with HIV viremia. AIDS 2007, 21, 2417–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Tyagi, R.; Li, W.; Parades, D.; Bianchet, M.A.; Nath, A. Inhibition of human endogenous retrovirus-K by antiretroviral drugs. Retrovirology 2017, 14, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Morandi, E.; Tanasescu, R.; Tarlinton, R.E.; Constantinescu, C.S.; Zhang, W.; Tench, C.; Gran, B. The association between human endogenous retroviruses and multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Gold, J.; Goldacre, R.; Maruszak, H.; Giovannoni, G.; Yeates, D.; Goldacre, M. HIV and lower risk of multiple sclerosis: Beginning to unravel a mystery using a record-linked database study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2015, 86, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Manghera, M.; Ferguson-Parry, J.; Lin, R.; Douville, R.N. NF-κB and IRF induce endogenous retrovirus K expression via interferon stimulated response elements in its 5’ long terminal repeat. J. Virol. 2016, 90, 9338–9349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Mc Guire, C.; Prinz, M.; Beyaert, R.; van Loo, G. Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) in multiple sclerosis pathology. Trends Mol. Med. 2013, 19, 604–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Piccinini, M.; Rinaudo, M.T.; Chiapello, N.; Ricotti, E.; Baldovino, S.; Mostert, M.; Tovo, P.A. The human 26S proteasome is a target of antiretroviral agents. AIDS 2002, 16, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Piccinini, M.; Rinaudo, M.T.; Anselmino, A.; Buccinnà, B.; Ramondetti, C.; Dematteis, A.; Ricotti, E.; Palmisano, L.; Mostert, M.; Tovo, P.A. The HIV protease inhibitors nelfinavir and saquinavir, but not a variety of HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors, adversely affect human proteasome function. Antivir. Ther. 2005, 10, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Garcia-Montojo, M.; Fathi, S.; Norato, G.; Smith, B.R.; Rowe, D.B.; Kiernan, M.C.; Vucic, S.; Mathers, S.; van Eijk, R.P.A.; Santamaria, U.; et al. Inhibition of HERV-K (HML-2) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients on antiretroviral therapy. J. Neurol. Sci. 2021, 423, 17358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Garcia-Martinez, L.; Zhang, Y.; Nakata, Y.; Chan, H.L.; Morey, L. Epigenetic mechanisms in breast cancer therapy and resistance. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Expression of pol genes of HERV-H, -K, and -W in peripheral blood from 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS), 27 healthy control (HC) mothers, and 38 nonpregnant healthy women of child-bearing age. RQ: relative quantification. Circles, squares, and triangles show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are in red. Medians and IQR 25–75%: HERV-H-pol: Group A (mothers with MS) 0.80, 0.61–1.35; Group B (unaffected mothers) 0.93, 0.66–1.60; Group C1 (nonpregnant women) 1.81, 1.10–2.32; HERV-K-pol: Group A 0.60, 0.45–0.99; Group B 0.92, 0.72–1.56; Group C1 2.47, 1.66–3.03; HERV-W-pol: Group A 1.02, IQR 0.92–1.78; Group B 1.04, 0.95–1.28; Group C1 1.95, 1.59–2.35.
Figure 1. Expression of pol genes of HERV-H, -K, and -W in peripheral blood from 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS), 27 healthy control (HC) mothers, and 38 nonpregnant healthy women of child-bearing age. RQ: relative quantification. Circles, squares, and triangles show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are in red. Medians and IQR 25–75%: HERV-H-pol: Group A (mothers with MS) 0.80, 0.61–1.35; Group B (unaffected mothers) 0.93, 0.66–1.60; Group C1 (nonpregnant women) 1.81, 1.10–2.32; HERV-K-pol: Group A 0.60, 0.45–0.99; Group B 0.92, 0.72–1.56; Group C1 2.47, 1.66–3.03; HERV-W-pol: Group A 1.02, IQR 0.92–1.78; Group B 1.04, 0.95–1.28; Group C1 1.95, 1.59–2.35.
Viruses 15 00710 g001
Figure 2. Expression of env genes of Syncytin (SYN) 1, SYN2, and of multiple-sclerosis-associated retrovirus (MSRV) in peripheral blood from 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS), 27 healthy control (HC) mothers, and 20 nonpregnant healthy women of child-bearing age. RQ: relative quantification. Circles, squares, and triangles show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are in red. Medians and IQR 25–75%: SYN1-env: Group A (mothers with MS) 0.77, 0.56–1.01; Group B (unaffected mothers) 1.05, 0.68–1.69; Group C2 (nonpregnant women) 4.23, 3.24–6.04; SYN2-env: Group A 0.76, 0.56–0.99; Group B 0.94, IQR 0.80–1.31; Group C2 4.50, IQR 3.02–5.20; MSRV-env: Group A 0.70, IQR 0.56–0.85; Group B 1.23, IQR 0.58–1.48; Group C2 3.47, 2.77–4.48.
Figure 2. Expression of env genes of Syncytin (SYN) 1, SYN2, and of multiple-sclerosis-associated retrovirus (MSRV) in peripheral blood from 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS), 27 healthy control (HC) mothers, and 20 nonpregnant healthy women of child-bearing age. RQ: relative quantification. Circles, squares, and triangles show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are in red. Medians and IQR 25–75%: SYN1-env: Group A (mothers with MS) 0.77, 0.56–1.01; Group B (unaffected mothers) 1.05, 0.68–1.69; Group C2 (nonpregnant women) 4.23, 3.24–6.04; SYN2-env: Group A 0.76, 0.56–0.99; Group B 0.94, IQR 0.80–1.31; Group C2 4.50, IQR 3.02–5.20; MSRV-env: Group A 0.70, IQR 0.56–0.85; Group B 1.23, IQR 0.58–1.48; Group C2 3.47, 2.77–4.48.
Viruses 15 00710 g002
Figure 3. Expression of TRIM28 and SETDB1 in peripheral blood from 20 mothers with MS, 27 healthy control (HC) mothers, and 20 nonpregnant HC women of child-bearing age. RQ: relative quantification. Circles, squares, and triangles show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are in red. Medians and IQR 25–75%: TRIM28: Group A (mothers with MS) 0.78, 0.60–0.93; Group B (unaffected mothers) 1.11, 0.83–1.27; Group C2 (nonpregnant women) 2.80, 2.12–3.38; SETDB1: Group A 0.68, 0.60–0.91; Group B 1.07, 0.78–1.39; Group C2 3.32, 2.68–3.81.
Figure 3. Expression of TRIM28 and SETDB1 in peripheral blood from 20 mothers with MS, 27 healthy control (HC) mothers, and 20 nonpregnant HC women of child-bearing age. RQ: relative quantification. Circles, squares, and triangles show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are in red. Medians and IQR 25–75%: TRIM28: Group A (mothers with MS) 0.78, 0.60–0.93; Group B (unaffected mothers) 1.11, 0.83–1.27; Group C2 (nonpregnant women) 2.80, 2.12–3.38; SETDB1: Group A 0.68, 0.60–0.91; Group B 1.07, 0.78–1.39; Group C2 3.32, 2.68–3.81.
Viruses 15 00710 g003
Figure 4. Expression of pol genes of HERV-H, -K, and -W and of env genes of Syncityn (SYN) 1, SYN2, and of multiple-sclerosis-associated retrovirus (MSRV) in the decidua basalis of 22 placentas from 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS) and of 27 placentas from healthy control (HC) mothers. RQ: relative quantification. Circles and squares show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are shown in red; these include two pairs of dizygotic twins in blue and green. Medians and IQR 25–75%: HERV-H-pol Group A (mothers with MS) 0.84, 0.62–1.03; Group B (unaffected mothers) 1.11, 0.97–1.35; HERV-K-pol: Group A 0.78, 0.62–1.01; Group B 1.19 0.82–1.46; HERV-W-pol: Group A 0.79, 0.64–1.38; Group B 1.03, 0.77–1.85; SYN1-env: Group A 0.50, 0.26–1.03; Group B 1.20, 0.60–2.23; SYN2-env: Group A 0.61, 0.36–1.12; Group B 1.30, 0.61–2.27; MSRV-env: Group A 0.55, 0.43–0.72; Group B 0.95, IQR 0.73–1.29.
Figure 4. Expression of pol genes of HERV-H, -K, and -W and of env genes of Syncityn (SYN) 1, SYN2, and of multiple-sclerosis-associated retrovirus (MSRV) in the decidua basalis of 22 placentas from 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS) and of 27 placentas from healthy control (HC) mothers. RQ: relative quantification. Circles and squares show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are shown in red; these include two pairs of dizygotic twins in blue and green. Medians and IQR 25–75%: HERV-H-pol Group A (mothers with MS) 0.84, 0.62–1.03; Group B (unaffected mothers) 1.11, 0.97–1.35; HERV-K-pol: Group A 0.78, 0.62–1.01; Group B 1.19 0.82–1.46; HERV-W-pol: Group A 0.79, 0.64–1.38; Group B 1.03, 0.77–1.85; SYN1-env: Group A 0.50, 0.26–1.03; Group B 1.20, 0.60–2.23; SYN2-env: Group A 0.61, 0.36–1.12; Group B 1.30, 0.61–2.27; MSRV-env: Group A 0.55, 0.43–0.72; Group B 0.95, IQR 0.73–1.29.
Viruses 15 00710 g004
Figure 5. Expression of TRIM28 and SETDB1 in decidua basalis of 22 placentas from 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS) (Group A) and 27 placentas from healthy control (HC) mothers (Group B). RQ: relative quantification. Circles and squares show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are shown in red; these include two pairs of twins in blue and green. Medians and IQR 25–75%: TRIM28: Group A (mothers with MS) 0.64, IQR 0.43–0.88; Group B (unaffected mothers) 1.11, 0.65–1.53; SETDB1: Group A 0.57, 0.39–0.77; Group 0.95, 0.73–1.29.
Figure 5. Expression of TRIM28 and SETDB1 in decidua basalis of 22 placentas from 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS) (Group A) and 27 placentas from healthy control (HC) mothers (Group B). RQ: relative quantification. Circles and squares show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are shown in red; these include two pairs of twins in blue and green. Medians and IQR 25–75%: TRIM28: Group A (mothers with MS) 0.64, IQR 0.43–0.88; Group B (unaffected mothers) 1.11, 0.65–1.53; SETDB1: Group A 0.57, 0.39–0.77; Group 0.95, 0.73–1.29.
Viruses 15 00710 g005
Figure 6. Expression of pol genes of HERV-H, -K, and -W and of env genes of Synctyn (SYN) 1, SYN2, and of multiple-sclerosis-associated retrovirus (MSRV) in the chorion of 22 placentas from 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS) and 27 healthy control (HC) mothers. RQ: relative quantification. Circles and squares show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are shown in red; these include two pairs of twins in blue and green. Medians and IQR 25–75%: HERV-H-pol Group A (mothers with MS) 0.63, 0.51–0.71; Group B (unaffected mothers) 1.09, 0.68–1.69; HERV-K-pol: Group A 0.63, 0.44–0.99; Group B 1.05, 0.83–1.48; HERV-W-pol: Group A 0.79, 0.50–1.06; Group B 1.21, IQR 0.77–2.02; SYN1-env: Group A 0.33, 0.20–0.63; Group B 1.39, IQR 0.53–2.07; SYN2-env: Group A 0.50, 0.21–0.85; Group B 1.16, 0.45–1.59; MSRV-env: Group A 0.48, 0.37–0.67; Group B 1.09, 0.61–1.79.
Figure 6. Expression of pol genes of HERV-H, -K, and -W and of env genes of Synctyn (SYN) 1, SYN2, and of multiple-sclerosis-associated retrovirus (MSRV) in the chorion of 22 placentas from 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS) and 27 healthy control (HC) mothers. RQ: relative quantification. Circles and squares show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are shown in red; these include two pairs of twins in blue and green. Medians and IQR 25–75%: HERV-H-pol Group A (mothers with MS) 0.63, 0.51–0.71; Group B (unaffected mothers) 1.09, 0.68–1.69; HERV-K-pol: Group A 0.63, 0.44–0.99; Group B 1.05, 0.83–1.48; HERV-W-pol: Group A 0.79, 0.50–1.06; Group B 1.21, IQR 0.77–2.02; SYN1-env: Group A 0.33, 0.20–0.63; Group B 1.39, IQR 0.53–2.07; SYN2-env: Group A 0.50, 0.21–0.85; Group B 1.16, 0.45–1.59; MSRV-env: Group A 0.48, 0.37–0.67; Group B 1.09, 0.61–1.79.
Viruses 15 00710 g006
Figure 7. Expression of TRIM28 and SETDB1 in the chorion of 22 placentas from 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS) and in 27 healthy control (HC) mothers. RQ: relative quantification. Circles and squares show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are shown in red; these include two pairs of twins in blue and green. Medians and IQR 25–75%: HERV-H-pol: Group A (mothers with MS) 0.95, 0.76–1.09; Group B (unaffected mothers) 1.07, 0.82–1.23; HERV-K-pol: Group A 0.97, 0.72–1.15; Group B 1.11, IQR 0.81–1.24; HERV-W-pol: Group A median 1.67, IQR 1.34–1.92; Group B 1.04, 0.87–1.40; SYN1-env: Group A 1.01, 0.84–1.30; Group B 0.97, 0.73–1.35; SYN2-env: Group A 0.85, 0.76–1.06; Group B 1.07, 0.56–1.55; MSRV-env: Group A 1.08, 0.94–1.19; Group B 0.99, 0.82–1.21.
Figure 7. Expression of TRIM28 and SETDB1 in the chorion of 22 placentas from 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS) and in 27 healthy control (HC) mothers. RQ: relative quantification. Circles and squares show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are shown in red; these include two pairs of twins in blue and green. Medians and IQR 25–75%: HERV-H-pol: Group A (mothers with MS) 0.95, 0.76–1.09; Group B (unaffected mothers) 1.07, 0.82–1.23; HERV-K-pol: Group A 0.97, 0.72–1.15; Group B 1.11, IQR 0.81–1.24; HERV-W-pol: Group A median 1.67, IQR 1.34–1.92; Group B 1.04, 0.87–1.40; SYN1-env: Group A 1.01, 0.84–1.30; Group B 0.97, 0.73–1.35; SYN2-env: Group A 0.85, 0.76–1.06; Group B 1.07, 0.56–1.55; MSRV-env: Group A 1.08, 0.94–1.19; Group B 0.99, 0.82–1.21.
Viruses 15 00710 g007
Figure 8. Expression of pol genes of HERV-H, -K, and -W and of env genes of Synctyn (SYN) 1, SYN2, and of multiple-sclerosis-associated retrovirus (MSRV) in cord blood from 22 neonates born to 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS) and from 27 neonates born to healthy control (HC) mothers. RQ: relative quantification. Circles and squares show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are shown in red; these include two pairs of twins in blue and green. Medians and IQR 25–75%: HERV-H-pol Group A (mothers with MS) 0.95, 0.76–1.09; Group B (unaffected mothers) 1.07, 0.82–1.23; HERV-K-pol: Group A 0.97, 0.72–1.15; Group B 1.11, 0.81–1.24; HERV-W-pol: Group A 1.67, 1.34–1.92; Group B 1.04, 0.87–1.40; SYN1-env: Group A 1.01, 0.84–1.30; Group B 0.97, 0.73–1.35; SYN2-env: Group A 0.85, 0.76–1.06; Group B 1.07, 0.56–1.55; MSRV-env: Group A 1.08, 0.94–1.19; Group B 0.99 0.82–1.21.
Figure 8. Expression of pol genes of HERV-H, -K, and -W and of env genes of Synctyn (SYN) 1, SYN2, and of multiple-sclerosis-associated retrovirus (MSRV) in cord blood from 22 neonates born to 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS) and from 27 neonates born to healthy control (HC) mothers. RQ: relative quantification. Circles and squares show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are shown in red; these include two pairs of twins in blue and green. Medians and IQR 25–75%: HERV-H-pol Group A (mothers with MS) 0.95, 0.76–1.09; Group B (unaffected mothers) 1.07, 0.82–1.23; HERV-K-pol: Group A 0.97, 0.72–1.15; Group B 1.11, 0.81–1.24; HERV-W-pol: Group A 1.67, 1.34–1.92; Group B 1.04, 0.87–1.40; SYN1-env: Group A 1.01, 0.84–1.30; Group B 0.97, 0.73–1.35; SYN2-env: Group A 0.85, 0.76–1.06; Group B 1.07, 0.56–1.55; MSRV-env: Group A 1.08, 0.94–1.19; Group B 0.99 0.82–1.21.
Viruses 15 00710 g008
Figure 9. Expression of TRIM28 and SETDB1 in cord blood from 22 neonates born to 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS) and from 27 neonates born to healthy control (HC) mothers. RQ: relative quantification. Circles and squares show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are shown in red; these include two pairs of twins in blue and green. Medians and IQR 25–75%: TRIM28: Group A (mothers with MS) 0.93, 0.79–1.13; Group B (unaffected mothers) 0.97, 0.72–1.42; SETDB1: Group A 1.04, 0.89–1.14; Group B 0.94, 0.79–1.21.
Figure 9. Expression of TRIM28 and SETDB1 in cord blood from 22 neonates born to 20 mothers with multiple sclerosis (MS) and from 27 neonates born to healthy control (HC) mothers. RQ: relative quantification. Circles and squares show the mean of three individual measurements; horizontal lines show the median values. Premature deliveries are shown in red; these include two pairs of twins in blue and green. Medians and IQR 25–75%: TRIM28: Group A (mothers with MS) 0.93, 0.79–1.13; Group B (unaffected mothers) 0.97, 0.72–1.42; SETDB1: Group A 1.04, 0.89–1.14; Group B 0.94, 0.79–1.21.
Viruses 15 00710 g009
Table 1. Primers and probes used to assess the transcription levels of pol genes of HERV-K, -W, and –H; of env genes of Syncytin 1, Syncytin 2, and multiple-sclerosis-associated retrovirus; and of TRIM28 and SETDB1.
Table 1. Primers and probes used to assess the transcription levels of pol genes of HERV-K, -W, and –H; of env genes of Syncytin 1, Syncytin 2, and multiple-sclerosis-associated retrovirus; and of TRIM28 and SETDB1.
NamePrimer/
Probe
Sequence
HERV-K polForward5′-CCACTGTAGAGCCTCCTAAACCC-3′
Reverse5′-TTGGTAGCGGCCACTGATTT-3′
Probe6FAM-5′-CCCACACCGGTTTTTCTGTTTTCCAAGTTAA-3′-TAMRA
HERV-W polForward5′-ACMTGGAYKRTYTTRCCCCAA-3′
Reverse5′-GTAAATCATCCACMTAYYGAAGGAYMA-3′
Probe6FAM-5′-TYAGGGATAGCCCYCATCTRTTTGGYCAGGCA-3′-TAMRA
HERV-H polForward5′-TGGACTGTGCTGCCGCAA-3′
Reverse5′-GAAGSTCATCAATATATTGAATAAGGTGAGA-3′
Probe6FAM-5′-TTCAGGGACAGCCCTCGTTACTTCAGCCAAGCTC-3′-TAMRA
Syncytin 1 envForward5′-ACTTTGTCTCTTCCAGAATCG-3′
Reverse5′-GCGGTAGATCTTAGTCTTGG-3′
Probe6FAM-5′-TGCATCTTGGGCTCCAT-3′-TAMRA
Syncytin 2 envForward5′-GCCTGCAAATAGTCTTCTTT-3′
Reverse5′-ATAGGGGCTATTCCCATTAG-3′
Probe6FAM- 5′-TGATATCCGCCAGAAACCTCCC-3′-TAMRA
MSRV envForward5′-CTTCCAGAATTGAAGCTGTAAAGC-3′
Reverse5′-GGGTTGTGCAGTTGAGATTTCC-3′
Probe6FAM-5′-TTCTTCAAATGGAGCCCCAGATGCAG-3′-TAMRA
TRIM28Forward5′-GCCTCTGTGTGAGACCTGTGTAGA-3′
Reverse5′-CCAGTAGAGCGCACAGTATGGT-3′
Probe6FAM-5′-CGCACCAGCGGGTGAAGTACACC-3′-TAMRA
SETDB1Forward5′-GCCGTGACTTCATAGAGGAGTATGT-3′
Reverse5′-GCTGGCCACTCTTGAGCAGTA-3′
Probe6FAM-5′-TGCCTACCCCAACCGCCCCAT-3′-TAMRA
GAPDHForward5′-CGAGATCCCTCCAAAATCAA-3′
Reverse5′-TTCACACCCATGACGAACAT-3′
Probe6FAM-5′-TCCAACGCAAAGCAATACATGAAC-3′-TAMRA
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tovo, P.-A.; Marozio, L.; Abbona, G.; Calvi, C.; Frezet, F.; Gambarino, S.; Dini, M.; Benedetto, C.; Galliano, I.; Bergallo, M. Pregnancy Is Associated with Impaired Transcription of Human Endogenous Retroviruses and of TRIM28 and SETDB1, Particularly in Mothers Affected by Multiple Sclerosis. Viruses 2023, 15, 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030710

AMA Style

Tovo P-A, Marozio L, Abbona G, Calvi C, Frezet F, Gambarino S, Dini M, Benedetto C, Galliano I, Bergallo M. Pregnancy Is Associated with Impaired Transcription of Human Endogenous Retroviruses and of TRIM28 and SETDB1, Particularly in Mothers Affected by Multiple Sclerosis. Viruses. 2023; 15(3):710. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030710

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tovo, Pier-Angelo, Luca Marozio, Giancarlo Abbona, Cristina Calvi, Federica Frezet, Stefano Gambarino, Maddalena Dini, Chiara Benedetto, Ilaria Galliano, and Massimiliano Bergallo. 2023. "Pregnancy Is Associated with Impaired Transcription of Human Endogenous Retroviruses and of TRIM28 and SETDB1, Particularly in Mothers Affected by Multiple Sclerosis" Viruses 15, no. 3: 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030710

APA Style

Tovo, P. -A., Marozio, L., Abbona, G., Calvi, C., Frezet, F., Gambarino, S., Dini, M., Benedetto, C., Galliano, I., & Bergallo, M. (2023). Pregnancy Is Associated with Impaired Transcription of Human Endogenous Retroviruses and of TRIM28 and SETDB1, Particularly in Mothers Affected by Multiple Sclerosis. Viruses, 15(3), 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030710

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop