Next Article in Journal
Susceptibility and Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Variants to LCB1 and Its Multivalent Derivatives
Next Article in Special Issue
HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Expression in HPV16-Infected Epidermoid Carcinoma Cells Alters E6 Expression and Cellular Metabolism, and Induces a Hybrid Epithelial/Mesenchymal Cell Phenotype
Previous Article in Journal
Cross-Reactivity of Human, Wild Boar, and Farm Animal Sera from Pre- and Post-Pandemic Periods with Alpha- and Βeta-Coronaviruses (CoV), including SARS-CoV-2
Previous Article in Special Issue
Polymorphisms Related to Iron Homeostasis Associate with Liver Disease in Chronic Hepatitis C
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 16
Issue 1
10.3390/v16010035
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Metabolic Enzymes in Viral Infection and Host Innate Immunity

by
Chao Qin
*,
Taolin Xie
,
Wayne Wei Yeh
,
Ali Can Savas
and
Pinghui Feng
*
Section of Infection and Immunity, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2024, 16(1), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16010035
Submission received: 21 November 2023 / Revised: 20 December 2023 / Accepted: 22 December 2023 / Published: 24 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Viruses and Cellular Metabolism 2023)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Metabolic enzymes are central players for cell metabolism and cell proliferation. These enzymes perform distinct functions in various cellular processes, such as cell metabolism and immune defense. Because viral infections inevitably trigger host immune activation, viruses have evolved diverse strategies to blunt or exploit the host immune response to enable viral replication. Meanwhile, viruses hijack key cellular metabolic enzymes to reprogram metabolism, which generates the necessary biomolecules for viral replication. An emerging theme arising from the metabolic studies of viral infection is that metabolic enzymes are key players of immune response and, conversely, immune components regulate cellular metabolism, revealing unexpected communication between these two fundamental processes that are otherwise disjointed. This review aims to summarize our present comprehension of the involvement of metabolic enzymes in viral infections and host immunity and to provide insights for potential antiviral therapy targeting metabolic enzymes.

1. Introduction

Metabolic enzymes are indispensable for cell survival and the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. They play critical roles across a wide spectrum of metabolic pathways due to their distinct enzymatic activity, e.g., carboxylases, dehydrogenases, lipoxygenases, oxidoreductases, kinases, lyases, and transferases. As obligate intracellular pathogens, viruses rely on host cell machinery to power the biosynthesis of various components essential for progeny production, such as nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids. Therefore, it is not unexpected that viruses reprogram cellular metabolism to maximize progeny virion production. To do this, viruses evolved multiple strategies to hijack cellular metabolic enzymes. Viruses can increase the expression of metabolic enzymes or promote their activation. These metabolic enzymes serve essential roles in their replication: they increase the production and thus availability of essential macromolecules that are utilized to facilitate the specific stages of the viral life cycle. A few viruses, particularly herpesviruses, encode their own metabolic enzymes. These viral enzymes often catalyze the rate-limiting steps of nucleotide biosynthesis, thereby unleashing host cell restrictions to promote viral replication. This adaptation highlights the virus’s intricate strategy that co-opts cellular resources to benefit viral infection, ultimately promoting its successful replication and consequent dissemination within the host. Uncovering the mechanisms by which viruses hijack cellular metabolic enzymes or employ their own enzymes to enhance replication represents an effective avenue to identify potential targets for antiviral interventions.
Cellular metabolism plays a pivotal role within the immune system as well. Metabolic processes are essential for providing precursors and meeting the unique energy requirements associated with various immunological processes. Innate immunity, one of the integral branches of the immune system, serves as the first line of host defense against invading pathogens. Within the intricate metabolic networks associated with immune activation, numerous enzymes are intrinsically capable of modulating host immunity. Under certain circumstances, these enzymes catalyze the rate-limiting steps and thus govern the nutrient flow through the pathways necessary to fulfill the specific energetic or metabolic needs of the immune response. Alternatively, key metabolic enzymes may regulate the synthesis or consumption of metabolites that directly participate in immune signaling events. Furthermore, certain metabolic enzymes have evolved to demonstrate unique enzymatic activity in the immune response, which is distinct from their conventional enzymatic activities.
In this review, we delve into the essential metabolic enzymes implicated in viral infections and their critical roles in immune regulation. We highlight mechanistic insights and explore potential opportunities for clinical interventions. Given the broad topics that we are going to summarize, we will only focus on metabolic enzymes involved in glycolysis, the TCA cycle, nucleotide synthesis, and lipogenesis. Additionally, various virus types will be included, such as DNA viruses (e.g., herpesvirus, hepadnavirus, adenovirus, and papovavirus), RNA viruses (e.g., flavivirus, coronavirus, and picornavirus), and retroviruses.

2. Metabolic Enzymes and Viral Infection

2.1. Metabolic Enzymes in Viral Life Cycle

2.1.1. Metabolic Receptor-Mediated Viral Entry

Viruses’ entry into cells is initiated by their attachment to receptors and is followed by an internalization process [1,2] (Figure 1). Two main internalization routes enable the entry of viruses into the cell: the endocytic and non-endocytic pathways. Interestingly, receptors for nutrient uptake are frequently exploited by viruses to mediate their entry. For instance, glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) can serve as a receptor for human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) to attach to target cells [3]. Human rhinovirus 2 undergoes receptor-mediated endocytosis after interaction with a low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) [4]. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) utilizes LDLR to gain entrance into hepatocytes, but the exact mechanisms remain unknown [5]. Human folate receptor-α is one of the attachment factors for both Ebola virus (EBOV) and Marburg virus [6,7]. It will not be surprising that more receptors akin to the above-mentioned ones will be characterized to mediate viral entry. Adding an intriguing dimension, metabolic enzymes can also act as suppressors in the context of viral entry. It was reported that cholesterol-25-hydroxylase (Ch25h) can convert cholesterol to a soluble antiviral factor, 25-hydroxycholesterol (25HC) [8]. 25HC inhibits viral entry by blocking membrane fusion between viruses and cells [8]. Strikingly, Ch25h expression or 25HC treatment is capable of inhibiting various viruses, including vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV68), Ebola virus (EBOV), Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV), Russian spring–summer encephalitis virus (RSSEV), Nipah viruses, and severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV) [8,9].

2.1.2. Metabolic Enzymes in Viral Transcription and Replication

Metabolic enzymes are also active players in viral gene expression and replication (Figure 1). In the case of DNA viruses and retroviruses, their genomes can form episomes and integrate into the host chromosome, respectively. The herpesvirus genomes are maintained as circular genomes assembled with histones in latently infected cells. The similarity in the genetic composition and structure between viruses and the host cell allows viral gene transcription to be regulated by DNA and histone modifications, akin to what occurs in eukaryotic cells. By manipulating epigenetic regulation, viruses can avoid epigenetically repressed gene expression by host cells [10]. For viruses exhibiting persistent infection like human cytomegalovirus, KSHV, EBV, HSV-1, and HIV, epigenetic regulation is used to control the switch between latent and lytic phases [11,12,13,14,15]. Epigenetic regulatory enzymes, such as histone demethylases like lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) and members of the Jumonji domain 2 (JMJD2) family, histone methyltransferase Set1, and lysine methyltransferase 2A (MLL1), are essential for virus replication, including but not limited to influenza A virus, HIV, KSHV, HSV, and varicella zoster virus [16,17,18,19]. The activity of these enzymes is intimately regulated by the levels of their substrates [20], such as acetyl-coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA), S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) [21,22,23]. Furthermore, metabolic enzymes can catalyze post-translational modifications of key viral players, such as transcription factors, leading to altered viral gene expression [24,25,26]. For instance, phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine synthetase (PFAS) was reported to deamidate replication transactivator (RTA) of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), which impairs the binding of RTA to the importin complex responsible for nuclear import, thus diminishing RTA nuclear localization and transcriptional activation [24]. Furthermore, all gamma herpesvirus RTA homologues appear to be deamidated by PFAS, suggesting a common mechanism by which viral replication is intimately coupled to the activity of a nucleotide-synthetic enzyme. PFAS acts as a scaffold in the assembly of the so-called purinosome in de novo purine synthesis, raising the interesting question of how a cell’s metabolic status affects KSHV replication status.

2.1.3. Metabolic Enzymes in Mature Virion Production

Viruses enclose their viral genomic material within capsid proteins to protect it from environmental damage and enable its safe delivery into host cells [27]. Embedded in the envelope, glycoproteins mediate viral entry and contribute to the assembly and egress of progeny virions during the late stages of infection [28] (Figure 1). Immediately after translation, these naked proteins undergo the addition and modification of glycans, a process that occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus. Viruses utilize the cellular glycosylation pathway to mature their glycoproteins, and this modification is essential for proper protein folding and function [29]. The availability of glycans for glycosylation depends on metabolic pathways, including the glycolysis, nucleotide, and hexosamine biosynthetic pathway. The enzymes involved in glycan synthesis are crucial for glycosylation [30], including the rate-limiting enzymes hexokinases, phosphofructokinase-1, and pyruvate kinases for glycolysis; multiple enzymes for UTP synthesis; and glutamine-fructose-6P amidotransferases for the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway [31,32]. Glycosyltransferases use activated glycans as their sugar donors [33]. The activation of glycans requires the addition of a nucleotide to a monosaccharide, forming a nucleotidyl sugar. Among all nucleotide sugars, UDP-sugars are particularly important precursors for protein glycosylation [34]. UDP-glucose analogs have shown strong antiviral activity against diverse viruses, including herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), adenovirus type 5, vaccinia virus (VACV), poliovirus type 1, encephalomyocarditis virus, vesicular stomatitis virus, influenza virus, and measles virus [35]. The generation of UDP-sugars requires not only nucleotides and glycans as substrates but also enzymes like pyrophosphorylases that use UTP as a source or uridyltransferases to add UDP to the sugars [34]. Targeting nucleotide sugar synthesis can significantly reduce the production of infectious virions, such as HIV, human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), influenza A virus, and vesicular stomatitis virus [36,37].
Lipids, as the major components of the virion envelope, are crucial for virus packaging and egress from the infected cells [38] (Figure 1). Inhibitors that target key enzymes of lipid synthesis can significantly impair the production of infectious virions [39,40,41,42,43]. For instance, the fatty acid synthase inhibitor Orlistat, long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase inhibitor Triacsin C, and cholesterol synthesis inhibitors statins all demonstrate apparent antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2, dengue virus and Zika virus [44,45]. However, it remains unknown whether these inhibitors will have side effects on bystander cells in animal models and humans. The safety profile of statins in humans may alleviate some of the concern when considering these drugs as antiviral agents.

2.2. Viruses Hijack Cellular Metabolic Enzymes to Reprogram Cell Metabolism

2.2.1. Glycolytic Enzymes

Glycolysis is the first step in the breakdown of glucose to extract energy for cellular metabolism. Different viruses were shown to employ distinct mechanisms to reprogram glycolysis (Figure 2) (Table 1). The adenovirus ORF E4 binds MYC in the nucleus to enhance MYC’s transcriptional activation of key glycolic enzymes, such as hexokinase 2 (HK2) and phosphofructokinase-muscle type (PFKM) [46]. In addition, an adenovirus 13S-encoded E1A isoform up-regulates the expression of glycolytic enzymes to fuel aerobic glycolysis [47]. Herpesviruses are also capable of tuning glycolysis. HSV-1 was reported to increase the expression and activity of phosphofructokinase (PFK-1) to promote glucose consumption and glycolytic metabolite production [48]. HCMV infection in human fibroblasts enhances the transcription of several glycolytic enzymes (e.g., PFK, pyruvate kinase) and promotes PFK activity, resulting in an increased glycolytic flux [49]. The major immediate–early protein IE72 of HCMV down-regulates the GLUT1 receptor, while enhancing the expression of GLUT4 at the mRNA and protein levels [50]. Notably, GLUT4 exhibits a three-fold higher affinity for glucose than GLUT1. Treatment with indinavir, a drug that selectively inhibits the GLUT4 receptor, effectively reduces both glucose uptake and HCMV replication [50]. EBV-encoded latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) stabilizes MYC to promote transcription of HK2 [51]. The up-regulation of HK2 is responsible for EBV-increased glycolysis and correlates with the poor overall survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) that is caused by EBV infection in patients [51]. LMP1 also promotes the mRNA expression and stabilizes the protein of GLUT1, thus potently increasing GLUT1 receptor activity [52,53]. Furthermore, LMP1 overexpression promotes the transcription of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), which further enhances the expression of pyruvate kinase muscle isozyme M2 (PKM2) and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1) [54,55]. In KSHV-infected cells, the inhibition of PKM2 impedes aerobic glycolysis [56]. Notably, KSHV demonstrates the capability to up-regulate PKM2 [56]. Moreover, the inhibition of PKM2 also diminishes endothelial cell migration and differentiation, along with reducing the angiogenic potential of KSHV-infected cells [56]. Dengue virus (DENV) was reported to up-regulate the expression of GLUT1 and HK2, which sharply increases aerobic glycolysis [57]. HPV type 16 E7 interacts with PKM2, inducing its transition to a dimeric state that diminishes PKM2′s affinity for PEP in the final phase of glycolysis. This interaction may serve as a mechanism to redirect glycolytic intermediates for anabolic metabolism, simultaneously compensating for the reduced energy production due to augmented glutamine metabolism [58,59]. Hepatitis virus employs multiple strategies to activate glycolysis. Pre-S2 mutant protein of HBV activates the mTOR signaling cascade to promote GLUT1 translocation and aerobic glycolysis [60]. HBV up-regulates the G6PD expression driven by the X protein-mediated activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2 (Nrf2) [61]. The HCV NS5A protein interacts with HK2 and increases its activity, which contributes to HCV infection-induced glycolysis [62]. Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) increases the expression of HK2, PFKM, and PKM2, and their inhibitors significantly impede CVB3 replication [63]. The ongoing pandemic SARS-CoV-2 increases glycolysis to fuel its replication in monocytes through an HIF-1α-dependent pathway, while the treatment of cells with 2-Deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG), an HK inhibitor, efficiently blocked the replication of SARS-CoV-2 [64]. These studies provide an overview into the detailed interaction between viral pathogens and the glycolytic pathway, offering mechanistic insights into viral glycolytic reprogramming and exposing key enzymes for antiviral interventions.

2.2.2. Enzymes in Glutamine Metabolism and TCA Cycle

In addition to glucose, glutamine serves as another major source of nitrogen and carbon. The tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle plays a pivotal role in both ATP production and the synthesis of biomolecules essential for viral replication (Figure 3) (Table 1). Adenovirus activates MYC to promote glutamine uptake and usage in the reductive carboxylation that converts α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) to citrate/isocitrate [65]. KSHV infection in endothelial cells induces the expression of the glutamine transporter SLC1A5, thereby increasing glutamine uptake and intracellular glutamine levels. Inhibition of SLC1A5 or glutaminase (GLS), which catalyzes glutamine hydrolysis, induces apoptosis in KSHV latently infected cells, which can be rescued by α-KG [66]. GLS inhibition was also shown to impede the replication of adenovirus, HSV-1, and influenza A virus (IAV) in human primary cells [65]. The depletion of pyruvate carboxylase (PC) and aspartate transaminase 2 (GOT2) reduces HSV-1 replication, which is likely caused by the reduced synthesis of aspartate, which is crucial for de novo pyrimidine synthesis [67]. HCMV infection elevates glutamine utilization by increasing the expression and activity of GLS and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), which are crucial for its replication [68]. Similarly, HCV was reported to increase the transcript levels of key enzymes of glutamine metabolism in cultured cells and in liver biopsies of chronic HCV patients [69], whereas SARS-CoV-2 enhances the entry of glucose carbon into the TCA cycle by up-regulating the PC expression [70]. Meanwhile, SARS-CoV-2 decreases oxidative glutamine metabolism, while preserving reductive carboxylation [70], which likely directs glutamine carbon to support lipid synthesis, which is essential for the replication of enveloped viruses.

2.2.3. Enzymes of Nucleotide Synthesis

Nucleotide synthesis produces essential materials for the viral productive infection cycle, and viruses fine-tune nucleotide metabolism (Figure 4) (Table 1). SARS-CoV-2 was reported to activate carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase, aspartate transcarbamoylase, and dihydroorotase (CAD), and thus de novo pyrimidine synthesis by Nsp9 [71]. Activated CAD also deamidates RelA, which shuts down NF-κB activation and the expression of inflammatory genes. Strikingly, deamidated RelA binds DNA in vitro and demonstrates the ability to up-regulate key glycolytic enzymes, thus promoting aerobic glycolysis, which provides metabolites for de novo nucleotide synthesis [71]. Genetic depletion and pharmacological inhibition of CAD effectively deplete the nucleotide pool and boost the antiviral inflammatory response in cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 [71]. Particularly, 2-TCPA, a glutamine analog, potently inhibits CAD in vitro and in cells, thereby reducing SARS-CoV-2 replication ex vivo and in mouse models. These results highlight the feasibility of targeting a host metabolic enzyme for antiviral therapeutic applications. Though how viruses interact with dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) remains unknown, multiple inhibitors of DHODH show antiviral activity against a broad spectrum of viral pathogens, including influenza A virus, Zika virus, Ebola virus, and SARS-CoV-2 [72,73]. SARS-CoV-2 ORF7b and ORF8 activate CTP synthetase 1 (CTPS1) to promote de novo CTP synthesis, while shutting down interferon production [74]. The enzyme IMP dehydrogenase (IMPDH) catalyzes an essential step in the de novo biosynthesis of guanine nucleotides, namely, the conversion of IMP to XMP. IMPDH inhibitors also show a broad-spectrum antiviral activity, such as HBV, HCMV, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), HSV-1, parainfluenza-3 virus, encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV), and Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus (VEEV). [75]. Aspartate is an essential precursor of nucleotide synthesis. Inhibition of argininosuccinate synthetase 1 (AS1) increases the availability of its substrate, aspartate, thereby promoting both pyrimidine and purine synthesis. Likewise, down-regulation of AS1 enhances the genome replication and virion production of HSV-1 [76]. Some viruses stimulate nucleotide synthesis via expressing their own metabolic enzymes. For instance, HSV-1 encodes thymidine kinase, ribonucleotide reductase, dUTPase, and uracil-DNA glycosylase, which catalyze the bottle-necked steps of nucleotide synthesis, thus collectively contributing to an elevated nucleotide pool [77,78].

2.2.4. Lipogenic Enzymes

Host lipids are crucial for viral infection by providing essential components to complete key processes. As such, viruses often activate lipid synthesis pathways to increase the supply (Figure 5) (Table 1). Sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs) are the principal regulators that control cellular lipid levels. HCMV infection induces protein kinase R(PKR)-like endoplasmic reticulum (ER) kinase (PERK) expression, which stimulates SREBP1 cleavage and the activation of lipogenesis [79,80]. HCMV infection also increases the expression of diverse enzymes involved in the synthesis of very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs), such as acyl-CoA synthetases and elongases. Drugs that inhibit the synthesis of VLCFAs reduce the infectivity of HCMV progeny virions [81]. DENV infection stimulates fatty acid biosynthesis, and the de novo-synthesized lipids are incorporated into sites of DENV replication. Nonstructural protein 3 (NS3) of DENV recruits fatty acid synthase (FASN) to sites of DENV particle replication and stimulates FASN activity. Cerulenin and C75, which are FASN inhibitors, significantly reduce DENV replication [82]. Likewise, the suppression of FASN through C75 and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) via TOFA in VACV-infected cells greatly diminished the viral yield, both of which can be partially rescued by exogenous palmitate, the predominant saturated fatty acid [83]. Cerulinin also significantly inhibits the glycoprotein maturation and replication of varicella zoster virus (VZV) [84]. Transgenic mice with the HBV pre-S2 mutant antigen exhibit increased accumulation of lipid droplets. It appears that HBV pre-S2 activates the sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 1 (SREBF1) to up-regulate ACLY, which then activates fatty acid desaturase 2 (FADS2), mediated through ACLY-dependent histone acetylation [85]. EBV infection alters lipid metabolism partially through EBV-encoded RNAs (EBERs), which are capable of increasing the expression of FASN and LDLR [86]. Quercetin, known to inhibit FASN, was found to inhibit the proliferation of NPC cells [86]. Another component of EBV, the immediate–early protein BRLF1, induces the up-regulation of FASN during lytic replication [87]. Orlistat, a FASN inhibitor, can potently diminish SARS-CoV-2 replication both in vitro and in vivo [44], indicating the essential role of lipid synthesis in SARS-CoV-2 replication.

3. Metabolic Enzymes and Innate Immunity

3.1. Metabolic Enzymes and the Interferon Induction Pathway

Reciprocal interaction between the interferon induction pathway and metabolism is emerging as a topic of investigation (Figure 6). Mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) is inhibited by the glycolytic product lactate and glycolytic enzyme HK2, thus suppressing the innate immune activation downstream of cytosolic double-stranded (ds)RNA [88,89]. The stimulator of interferon gene (STING) is an ER-resident protein and requires sulfate glycosaminoglycans (sGAG), which serve as the ligands of STING in mediating IFN induction by cytosolic DNA [90,91,92]. sGAG-associated metabolic enzymes and transporters are thus engaged in the cGAS-dependent DNA-sensing pathway. The antiviral activity of MAVS and interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) is favored by O-GlcNacylation [93,94], which requires an active hexosamine biosynthesis pathway to sustain the production of sugar donors. Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH) depletion increases the expression of V-ATPase subunit ATP6V0d2, which can induce the lysosomal degradation of YAP, the Hippo pathway transcriptional co-activator that is capable of disrupting the TBK1-IRF3 interaction, concomitantly inhibiting interferon induction [95]. Furthermore, accumulating studies collectively support the conclusion that interferon signaling can regulate metabolism to tune the host immune defense against microbial infection. The depletion of interferon receptors significantly boosts aerobic glycolysis in usutu virus (USUV)-infected cells [96]. Interferon treatment can restrain glycolysis in macrophages infected with M. tuberculosis [97] and epithelial cells infected with C. trachomatis [98]. Counterintuitively, IFN-β was also shown to induce glycolysis in mouse embryo fibroblasts, which is crucial for the acute antiviral response against coxsackievirus B3 infection [99]. Moreover, multiple components of the interferon signaling pathway directly modulate metabolic enzymes to differentially reprogram metabolism. STING can bind to HK2 and inhibit its enzymatic activity as well as glycolysis [100]. He et al. revealed that MAVS interacts with the G6PD and glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate transaminase (GFPT2) [101]. As such, MAVS can divert the carbon flux from glycolysis to the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) and hexosamine biosynthesis pathway upon the activation of the RNA-sensing pathway. The IFN-inducible ubiquitin-like molecule interferon stimulated gene-15 (ISG15) can be covalently conjugated to a series of glycolytic enzymes such as lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), thereby repressing their enzymatic activity [102].
In addition to the post-translational regulation, the interferon signaling pathway directly induces the expression of an array of metabolic enzymes. Some of these enzymes execute antiviral function by orchestrating a catabolic program that prevents viruses from utilizing host metabolites. For instance, cholesterol-25-hydroxylase (CH25-H) converts cholesterol into 25-hydroxycholesterol (25-HC). Given the importance of cholesterol in cellular membrane, CH25-H impedes the progression of the virus life cycle at multiple stages, ranging from entry to budding [8,103,104]. Sterile α-motif and histidine-aspartic acid domain-containing protein 1 (SAMHD1) act as a deoxynucleotide triphosphate (dNTP) hydrolase that degrades and depletes dNTPs, resulting in the exhaustion of the deoxyl nucleotide pool to restrict DNA synthesis, which is critical for retrovirus integration [105]. Another interferon-stimulated gene (ISG), viperin, can covert cellular cytidine 5′-triphosphate (CTP) into 3′-deoxy-3′,4′-didehydro-CTP (ddhCTP), which causes chain termination when incorporated into a newly synthesized viral RNA [106]. Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO1) mediates a broad-spectrum antiviral effect by dictating the catabolism of tryptophan, an essential amino acid for viral replication [107]. However, long-term tryptophan exhaustion can lead to immunosuppression, which may be beneficial for viral infection, particularly persistent infection [108]. Polyamine deprivation comprises another ISG-mediated antiviral strategy. Spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase 1 (SAT1) can impair the replication of multiple RNA viruses, such as Chikungunya virus and Zika virus, by promoting polyamine catabolism to deplete the polyamine supply essential for viral replication [109,110,111].
Several interferon-inducible metabolic enzymes are capable of mediating the post-translational modification of viral proteins. For example, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) have been characterized as ISGs [112,113]. By adding mono-ADP-ribose to target proteins, PARPs can function as an antiviral effector through modifying viral proteins [114]. This post-translational modification requires NAD+ to serve as the donor of ADP-ribose, and up-regulation of PARPs can exhaust the cellular NAD+ pool [115]. Interferon signaling can directly drive the expression of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT), the rate-limiting enzyme of the NAD+ salvage synthesis pathway [116,117,118]. The interferon-mediated induction of NAMPT may support the antiviral response, at least partially, through replenishing the cellular NAD+ pool to fuel ADP-ribosylation. Additionally, interferon signaling induces nitrogen monoxide synthetase type-2 (NOS2/iNOS) expression [119]. iNOS can catalyze NO production, which promotes the S-nitrosylation of viral proteins, thereby exerting an antiviral effect [120].

3.2. Metabolic Enzymes and the Inflammatory Pathway

Inflammation has been recognized to shape the cellular metabolic landscape [121]. These effects underlie the reciprocal and tight regulation between inflammatory pathways and metabolic enzymes (Figure 6). A number of metabolic enzymes were shown to function as “moonlighting enzymes” that can facilitate protein post-translational modification apart from their metabolic activity [122]. HK2 can act as a protein kinase that phosphorylates inhibitor of NF-κB α (IκBα) and induces its degradation to trigger NF-κB activation [123]. PKM2 can phosphorylate signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3), a versatile transcriptional factor downstream of multiple cytokine signaling pathways, and promote its transcriptional activity [124]. Intriguingly, HK2 also acts as a pattern-recognition receptor that detects bacterial peptidoglycan in the cytoplasm and subsequently activates the NLRP3 inflammasome [125]. Fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase TIGAR (Tp53-induced glycolysis and apoptosis regulator) can suppress NF-κB activation by disassociating NEMO from the ubiquitination complex LUBAC [126]. Moreover, some metabolic enzymes can regulate inflammation through producing certain immunometabolites. Multiple glycolytic enzymes can contribute to the NLRP3 inflammasome activation by undermining aerobic glycolysis [127,128]. As a key metabolite of the TCA cycle, α-KG can directly activate the canonical NF-κB kinase IKKβ [129]. Another TCA cycle intermediate, succinate, is well-known for its pro-inflammatory effect through activating NLRP3 in LPS-primed macrophages [130], while itaconate, a derivative of aconitate, possesses anti-inflammatory activity [131]. Itaconate can modify NLRP3 through dicarboxypropylation, thereby inhibiting the inflammatory activity of the NLRP3 inflammasome [132]. Fumarate can suppress gasdermin D (GSDMD)-induced pyroptosis by mediating its succinylation [133]. Consequently, the immunomodulatory activities of metabolites convey an indirection on inflammation, reflecting their corresponding enzymes in the inflammatory response. Glutamate dehydrogenase 1 (GDH1) binds to IKKβ and generates α-KG from glutamate to facilitate IKKβ activation and the inflammatory response [129]. Aconitate decarboxylase-1 (ACOD1) negatively regulates inflammation by modulating the conversion of aconitate to itaconate [131].
Inflammatory pathways also manifest profound regulatory effects on metabolic enzymes (Figure 6). IKKβ can directly phosphorylate and suppress the glycolytic enzyme 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase (PFKFB3) [134]. Depletion of PFKFB3 abrogates TNF-α-induced NF-κB activation in endothelial cells, suggesting a potential feedback loop [134]. At the transcriptional level, multiple metabolic genes have been characterized as direct targets of the canonical NF-κB pathway, covering glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation, and the TCA cycle [135,136,137]. In mouse embryo fibroblasts, RelA/p65 is capable of inhibiting glycolytic gene expression while promoting oxidative phosphorylation gene expression in a p53-dependent manner [137]. Meanwhile, in p53-deficient cancer cells, RelA/p65 can be shuttled to the mitochondria, where it represses oxidative respiration-associated gene transcription [138,139]. Moreover, RelA-mediated glycolytic gene expression can augment the well-known Warburg effect in cancer cells [140,141,142]. RelA is also crucial for maintaining beta cell function by governing the expression of a metabolic gene network [143]. Remels et al. [144] reported that cytokine-induced NF-κB activation impairs the expression of oxidative phosphorylation genes in cardiomyocytes, which is possibly attributed to PGC1 (PPARγ coactivator 1) inhibition. NF-κB and STAT3 can cooperate with HIF-1α to regulate metabolic gene expression. They are capable of either inducing HIF1A gene transcription or acting as co-factors of HIF-1α to up-regulate glycolytic gene transcription [141,145,146]. Taken together, these studies collectively support the conclusion that the NF-κB pathway regulates energy metabolism in a highly context-dependent manner. In parallel to enhanced aerobic glycolysis, dampened mitochondrial oxidative activity is also observed in cells expressing constitutively activated STAT3 [147]. Furthermore, STAT3 inhibits the transcription of gluconeogenic genes (i.e., G6Pase, PEPCK) through binding to their promoter region [148]. This process may, at least partially, account for how cytokines regulate liver insulin sensitivity [149]. STAT3 can also undergo mitochondrial translocation, which is instigated by the phosphorylation of serine 727 residue [150]. Mitochondrial STAT3 can potentiate the electron transport chain by enhancing complexes I and II and ATP synthetase activity [151]. In agreement with its role as an oncogenic protein, mitochondrial STAT3 favors the growth of multiple cancer cell lines [151,152] and Ras-mediated cellular transformation [153]. Wang et al. reported that in TSC2-deficient cells, IL-6 can provoke serine synthesis by up-regulating the expression of phosphoserine aminotransferase 1 (PSAT1) in a STAT3-independent manner [154].

3.3. Viral Enzymes Mute Host Immune Response via Cellular Metabolic Enzymes

Furthermore, some virus-encoded metabolic enzymes can impede the host antiviral response via targeting key signaling molecules of the immune system. For example, UL50 proteins encoded by pseudorabies virus (PRV) and HSV-1 impede type I IFN-induced STAT1 phosphorylation by accelerating the lysosomal degradation of IFN receptor 1 (IFNAR1) [155]. Interestingly, murine gamma herpesvirus 68 and KSHV encode homologs of phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine synthetase (PFAS), a scaffold crucial for the assembly of the purinosome responsible for de novo purine synthesis, to negate dsRNA-induced innate immune activation [156]. PFAS belongs to the glutamine amidotransferase (GAT) family, which catalyzes the synthesis of nucleotides, amino acids, glycoproteins, and an enzyme cofactor, NAD+ [157]. Unlike PFAS, these gamma herpesvirus homologues lack the key residues required for enzyme catalysis, and thus are designated viral pseudoenzymes or vGATs [157]. Mechanistically, vGAT proteins recruit cellular PFAS to deamidate and activate RIG-I, which enables the RTA-mediated degradation of RelA and thus, the blockade of antiviral cytokine production [156]. In contrast, HSV-1 UL37 acts as a bona fide enzyme that deamidates RIG-I and cGAS, thereby muting the innate immune activation by dsRNA and dsDNA [158,159]. In deamidating RIG-I, the sequential deamidation events of N495 and N549 are required to derive the dsRNA-binding activity of RIG-I [158]. UL37-mediated deamidation of N495 enables the binding of RIG-I to the pyrophosphate amidotransferase (PPAT) and subsequent deamidation of N549 [160]. This study reveals an intricate cooperation between a viral deamidation and cellular GAT in evading RIG-I-mediated innate immune activation. Taken together, cellular GAT enzymes may constitute key signaling nodes that integrate communication between cellular metabolism and the antiviral immune response.

4. Targeting Metabolic Enzymes as an Antiviral Strategy

Targeting host factors represents a more broad-spectrum antiviral approach. As obligate intracellular pathogens, viruses are entirely dependent on host metabolites. Thus, host metabolic enzymes can be potential targets for antiviral drug development.
Nucleotide synthesis consists of the de novo and salvage synthesis pathways. Viruses usually activate de novo nucleotide synthesis to satisfy their excessive demand for nucleotides [161]. Therefore, de novo nucleotide synthesis can be a potential therapeutic target. The first and rate-limiting enzyme in de novo pyrimidine synthesis, CAD, has been characterized as a host factor crucial for the infection of a number of viruses. The large, trifunctional CAD enzyme contains carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase, aspartate transcarbamoylase, and dihydroorotase, which are coordinated by an intramolecular tunnel to deliver intermediates of de novo pyrimidine synthesis. The development of a CAD inhibitor was originally reported in the 1970s. The initial CAD inhibitor N-phosphonoacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA) targets the aspartyl transcarbamoylase domain, which catalyzes the second step of de novo pyrimidine synthesis [162]. Several clinical trials using PALA to treat cancers were carried out but failed due to limited anti-tumor activity or excessive toxicity [163], while the antiviral activity of CAD inhibitors was poorly investigated. Our lab reported a novel glutamine analog, 2-TCPA, which specifically inhibits CAD and potently reduces SARS-CoV-2 replication [71]. Consistent with the importance of CAD in SARS-CoV-2 infection, SARS-CoV-2 potently activates CAD to boost the nucleotide supply while shutting down NF-κB activation and antiviral cytokine production. To do that, CAD deamidates RelA, which shunts RelA from mediating an inflammatory response to aerobic glycolysis. Mechanistically, deamidated RelA failed to activate the transcription of known NF-κB-responsive promoters, instead activating that of diverse glycolytic genes [164]. By blocking SARS-CoV-2-induced CAD activation, 2-TCPA inhibits both de novo pyrimidine synthesis and RelA deamidation, consequently boosting inflammatory cytokine production and inhibiting nucleotide synthesis. This agent exhibited considerable anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity in cell lines and mouse models. However, the antiviral effects of CAD inhibitors on other viruses are waiting for further exploration. Catalyzing a step of de novo pyrimidine synthesis immediately downstream of CAD, dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) serves as a key enzyme coupling pyrimidine synthesis to oxidative phosphorylation, which transfers the electron generated from DHO oxidation to co-enzyme Q/ubiquinone [165]. DHODH inhibitors exert antiviral effects against a broad spectrum of viral pathogens, including coronavirus, influenza virus, flavivirus, Ebola virus, and HSV-1, in cultured cells [72,166,167,168,169,170]. Interestingly, inhibiting DHODH not only blocks de novo pyrimidine synthesis, but also augments interferon response against viral infection [169,171]. Lucas-Horani et al. reported that the increase in transcription of ISGs elicited by DHODH inhibitors was completely abrogated by the addition of uridine [172], suggesting that the nucleotide pool imbalance may account for how DHODH inhibitors evoke the interferon response. Moreover, supplementation of uridine can completely diminish the antiviral effect of the DHODH inhibitor brequinar [173,174,175], implicating that the antiviral effect of DHODH inhibition is mainly dependent on pyrimidine synthesis rather than mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Although the DHODH inhibitors leflunomide and teriflunomide are clinically available, they are currently only approved for autoimmune disease treatment [176], while other application in treating viral infection is still under investigation.
De novo purine synthesis can also be targeted to block viral replication. Inhibition of inosine 5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) impairs the synthesis of guanine nucleotides, leading to the exhaustion of GTP [177]. A clinically available IMPDH inhibitor, ribavirin, has been approved to treat the infection of hepatitis C, RSV, and several kinds of viral hemorrhagic fevers [178]. As a guanosine analog, ribavirin establishes antiviral effects through not only IMPDH inhibition, but also blockade of viral RNA synthesis [178]. IMPDH inhibition-induced GTP deprivation can further increase the frequency of ribavirin incorporation into viral RNA, forming a positive feedback loop to aggravate its antiviral effect [179].
Inhibition of glycolysis by the glucose analog 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) manifests a favorable and broad-spectrum antiviral effect in cell lines [180]. However, animal studies showed that the application of 2-DG in vivo may bring complicated outcomes in HSV-1 infection. Administration of 2-DG at an early stage of HSV-1 infection in eyes can aggravate viral dissemination and result in lethality [181]. Meanwhile, two early studies showed that 2-DG has no effect on HSV-1 and HSV-2 cutaneous infection in mice and guinea pigs [182,183]. These observations suggest that the effect of inhibitors of metabolic enzymes on viral infection and diseases thereof must be considered in the context of the host immune response.
Inhibition of FASN is another strategy to treat viral infection. FASN is required for de novo fatty acid synthesis by catalyzing the synthesis of palmitate, which favors the viral life cycle by supplying lipid synthesis and fueling viral protein palmitoylation [83]. Pharmacological inhibition of FASN shows a broad-spectrum antiviral activity against enveloped viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 [44,82,86,184]. An FDA-approved anti-obesity drug, orlistat, can effectively suppress SARS-CoV-2 replication in cells and in mouse models. Hence, targeting FASN for inhibition can be a potential strategy to treat viral infection, especially enveloped viruses, which are more dependent on lipids.

5. Discussion

In the current review, we have consolidated recent discoveries regarding the involvement of metabolic enzymes in viral infections and hosts’ immune responses. Specifically, our primary focus revolves around metabolic enzymes engaged in glycolysis, the TCA cycle, nucleotide synthesis, and lipogenesis.
As obligate intracellular pathogens, it is not surprising that viruses hijack cellular metabolic enzymes to facilitate their replication. Viruses utilize metabolic enzymes to specifically facilitate some stage of the viral life cycle (e.g., metabolic receptors for viral entry) or generate essential biomolecules for rapid replication. It is worth mentioning that some metabolic enzymes may function as antiviral factors, such as cholesterol-25-hydroxylase and PFAS. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of studies on this subject. Delving into the specific role of each metabolic enzyme in different viruses is crucial for designing antiviral strategies that target these enzymes.
Numerous studies have unveiled the diverse strategies employed by viruses to regulate the expression or activities of metabolic enzymes. In addition, these studies have uncovered potential targets for the development of antiviral drugs. However, metabolic enzymes play a crucial role in immune cells, especially lymphocytes. Inhibiting the metabolic enzymes activated by the virus may consequently result in a constrained immune response. Delving into the distinct roles of metabolic enzymes in viral infection and the immune response promises to offer fresh insights into potential antiviral targets.
The interaction between metabolism and immune response is intricate, with metabolic enzymes playing a pivotal role. Continued research into the crosstalk between metabolic enzymes and the immune response promises to unveil the significance of immunometabolism in viral infections and cancers. Furthermore, metabolic enzymes can catalyze protein post-translational modifications. Examining the impact of these modifications on viral replication and immune response not only presents an intriguing topic but also holds practical significance for antiviral development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Q. and P.F.; writing—original draft preparation, C.Q., T.X. and W.W.Y.; writing—review and editing, C.Q., P.F. and A.C.S.; funding acquisition, P.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by grants from the NIH (AG070904 and CA285192) and startup funds from the Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of USC.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

P.F. is a consultant for Marc J Bern & Partners. All other authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Coffin, J.M. Virions at the gates: Receptors and the host-virus arms race. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11, e1001574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Maginnis, M.S. Virus-Receptor Interactions: The Key to Cellular Invasion. J. Mol. Biol. 2018, 430, 2590–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Manel, N.; Kim, F.J.; Kinet, S.; Taylor, N.; Sitbon, M.; Battini, J.L. The ubiquitous glucose transporter GLUT-1 is a receptor for HTLV. Cell 2003, 115, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Grove, J.; Marsh, M. The cell biology of receptor-mediated virus entry. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 195, 1071–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Caron, J.; Pene, V.; Tolosa, L.; Villaret, M.; Luce, E.; Fourrier, A.; Heslan, J.M.; Saheb, S.; Bruckert, E.; Gomez-Lechon, M.J.; et al. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient hepatocytes differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells allow familial hypercholesterolemia modeling, CRISPR/Cas-mediated genetic correction, and productive hepatitis C virus infection. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jain, S.; Martynova, E.; Rizvanov, A.; Khaiboullina, S.; Baranwal, M. Structural and Functional Aspects of Ebola Virus Proteins. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chan, S.Y.; Empig, C.J.; Welte, F.J.; Speck, R.F.; Schmaljohn, A.; Kreisberg, J.F.; Goldsmith, M.A. Folate receptor-alpha is a cofactor for cellular entry by Marburg and Ebola viruses. Cell 2001, 106, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, S.Y.; Aliyari, R.; Chikere, K.; Li, G.; Marsden, M.D.; Smith, J.K.; Pernet, O.; Guo, H.; Nusbaum, R.; Zack, J.A.; et al. Interferon-inducible cholesterol-25-hydroxylase broadly inhibits viral entry by production of 25-hydroxycholesterol. Immunity 2013, 38, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tani, H.; Shimojima, M.; Fukushi, S.; Yoshikawa, T.; Fukuma, A.; Taniguchi, S.; Morikawa, S.; Saijo, M. Characterization of Glycoprotein-Mediated Entry of Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Virus. J. Virol. 2016, 90, 5292–5301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tsai, K.; Cullen, B.R. Epigenetic and epitranscriptomic regulation of viral replication. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 559–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reeves, M.B. Chromatin-mediated regulation of cytomegalovirus gene expression. Virus Res. 2011, 157, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Campbell, M.; Yang, W.S.; Yeh, W.W.; Kao, C.H.; Chang, P.C. Epigenetic Regulation of Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Latency. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nehme, Z.; Pasquereau, S.; Herbein, G. Control of viral infections by epigenetic-targeted therapy. Clin. Epigenet. 2019, 11, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Buschle, A.; Hammerschmidt, W. Epigenetic lifestyle of Epstein-Barr virus. Semin. Immunopathol. 2020, 42, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bloom, D.C.; Giordani, N.V.; Kwiatkowski, D.L. Epigenetic regulation of latent HSV-1 gene expression. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1799, 246–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shan, J.; Zhao, B.; Shan, Z.; Nie, J.; Deng, R.; Xiong, R.; Tsun, A.; Pan, W.; Zhao, H.; Chen, L.; et al. Histone demethylase LSD1 restricts influenza A virus infection by erasing IFITM3-K88 monomethylation. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chang, P.C.; Fitzgerald, L.D.; Hsia, D.A.; Izumiya, Y.; Wu, C.Y.; Hsieh, W.P.; Lin, S.F.; Campbell, M.; Lam, K.S.; Luciw, P.A.; et al. Histone demethylase JMJD2A regulates Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus replication and is targeted by a viral transcriptional factor. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 3283–3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Narayanan, A.; Ruyechan, W.T.; Kristie, T.M. The coactivator host cell factor-1 mediates Set1 and MLL1 H3K4 trimethylation at herpesvirus immediate early promoters for initiation of infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 10835–10840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Boehm, D.; Ott, M. Host Methyltransferases and Demethylases: Potential New Epigenetic Targets for HIV Cure Strategies and Beyond. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 2017, 33, S8–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Boon, R. Metabolic Fuel for Epigenetic: Nuclear Production Meets Local Consumption. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 768996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Etchegaray, J.P.; Mostoslavsky, R. Interplay between Metabolism and Epigenetics: A Nuclear Adaptation to Environmental Changes. Mol. Cell 2016, 62, 695–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, C.; Wang, Z.; Qin, Y. Connections between metabolism and epigenetics: Mechanisms and novel anti-cancer strategy. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 935536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huo, M.; Zhang, J.; Huang, W.; Wang, Y. Interplay Among Metabolism, Epigenetic Modifications, and Gene Expression in Cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 793428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, J.; Zhao, J.; Xu, S.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, J.; Xiao, J.; Gao, R.; Tian, M.; Zeng, Y.; Lee, K.; et al. Antiviral activity of a purine synthesis enzyme reveals a key role of deamidation in regulating protein nuclear import. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaaw7373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, X.; Egervari, G.; Wang, Y.; Berger, S.L.; Lu, Z. Regulation of chromatin and gene expression by metabolic enzymes and metabolites. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 563–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shi, Y.; Shi, Y. Metabolic enzymes and coenzymes in transcription—A direct link between metabolism and transcription? Trends Genet. 2004, 20, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mateu, M.G. Assembly, stability and dynamics of virus capsids. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2013, 531, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Feng, T.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Z.; Pan, W.; Chen, Z.; Yan, Y.; Dai, J. Glycosylation of viral proteins: Implication in virus-host interaction and virulence. Virulence 2022, 13, 670–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vigerust, D.J.; Shepherd, V.L. Virus glycosylation: Role in virulence and immune interactions. Trends Microbiol. 2007, 15, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Scheper, A.F.; Schofield, J.; Bohara, R.; Ritter, T.; Pandit, A. Understanding glycosylation: Regulation through the metabolic flux of precursor pathways. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023, 67, 108184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zuo, J.; Tang, J.; Lu, M.; Zhou, Z.; Li, Y.; Tian, H.; Liu, E.; Gao, B.; Liu, T.; Shao, P. Glycolysis Rate-Limiting Enzymes: Novel Potential Regulators of Rheumatoid Arthritis Pathogenesis. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 779787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Nagel, A.K.; Ball, L.E. Intracellular protein O-GlcNAc modification integrates nutrient status with transcriptional and metabolic regulation. Adv. Cancer Res. 2015, 126, 137–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Decker, D.; Kleczkowski, L.A. UDP-Sugar Producing Pyrophosphorylases: Distinct and Essential Enzymes with Overlapping Substrate Specificities, Providing de novo Precursors for Glycosylation Reactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mikkola, S. Nucleotide Sugars in Chemistry and Biology. Molecules 2020, 25, 5755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Alarcón, B.; González, M.E.; Carrasco, L.; Méndez-Castrillón, P.P.; García-López, M.T.; de las Heras, F.G. Mode of action of a new type of UDP-glucose analog against herpesvirus replication. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1988, 32, 1257–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Montefiori, D.C.; Robinson, W.E., Jr.; Mitchell, W.M. Role of protein N-glycosylation in pathogenesis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 9248–9252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. DeVito, S.R.; Ortiz-Riano, E.; Martinez-Sobrido, L.; Munger, J. Cytomegalovirus-mediated activation of pyrimidine biosynthesis drives UDP-sugar synthesis to support viral protein glycosylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 18019–18024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Motsa, B.B.; Stahelin, R.V. Lipid-protein interactions in virus assembly and budding from the host cell plasma membrane. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2021, 49, 1633–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Majeau, N.; Fromentin, R.; Savard, C.; Duval, M.; Tremblay, M.J.; Leclerc, D. Palmitoylation of hepatitis C virus core protein is important for virion production. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 33915–33925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, C.; Gale, M., Jr.; Keller, B.C.; Huang, H.; Brown, M.S.; Goldstein, J.L.; Ye, J. Identification of FBL2 as a geranylgeranylated cellular protein required for hepatitis C virus RNA replication. Mol. Cell 2005, 18, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Harrison, S.A.; Rossaro, L.; Hu, K.Q.; Patel, K.; Tillmann, H.; Dhaliwal, S.; Torres, D.M.; Koury, K.; Goteti, V.S.; Noviello, S.; et al. Serum cholesterol and statin use predict virological response to peginterferon and ribavirin therapy. Hepatology 2010, 52, 864–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Munger, J.; Bennett, B.D.; Parikh, A.; Feng, X.J.; McArdle, J.; Rabitz, H.A.; Shenk, T.; Rabinowitz, J.D. Systems-level metabolic flux profiling identifies fatty acid synthesis as a target for antiviral therapy. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 1179–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Samsa, M.M.; Mondotte, J.A.; Iglesias, N.G.; Assuncao-Miranda, I.; Barbosa-Lima, G.; Da Poian, A.T.; Bozza, P.T.; Gamarnik, A.V. Dengue virus capsid protein usurps lipid droplets for viral particle formation. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chu, J.; Xing, C.; Du, Y.; Duan, T.; Liu, S.; Zhang, P.; Cheng, C.; Henley, J.; Liu, X.; Qian, C.; et al. Pharmacological inhibition of fatty acid synthesis blocks SARS-CoV-2 replication. Nat. Metab. 2021, 3, 1466–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Farfan-Morales, C.N.; Cordero-Rivera, C.D.; Reyes-Ruiz, J.M.; Hurtado-Monzon, A.M.; Osuna-Ramos, J.F.; Gonzalez-Gonzalez, A.M.; De Jesus-Gonzalez, L.A.; Palacios-Rapalo, S.N.; Del Angel, R.M. Anti-flavivirus Properties of Lipid-Lowering Drugs. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 749770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Thai, M.; Graham, N.A.; Braas, D.; Nehil, M.; Komisopoulou, E.; Kurdistani, S.K.; McCormick, F.; Graeber, T.G.; Christofk, H.R. Adenovirus E4ORF1-induced MYC activation promotes host cell anabolic glucose metabolism and virus replication. Cell Metab. 2014, 19, 694–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Prusinkiewicz, M.A.; Tu, J.; Dodge, M.J.; MacNeil, K.M.; Radko-Juettner, S.; Fonseca, G.J.; Pelka, P.; Mymryk, J.S. Differential Effects of Human Adenovirus E1A Protein Isoforms on Aerobic Glycolysis in A549 Human Lung Epithelial Cells. Viruses 2020, 12, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Abrantes, J.L.; Alves, C.M.; Costa, J.; Almeida, F.C.; Sola-Penna, M.; Fontes, C.F.; Souza, T.M. Herpes simplex type 1 activates glycolysis through engagement of the enzyme 6-phosphofructo-1-kinase (PFK-1). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1822, 1198–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Munger, J.; Bajad, S.U.; Coller, H.A.; Shenk, T.; Rabinowitz, J.D. Dynamics of the cellular metabolome during human cytomegalovirus infection. PLoS Pathog. 2006, 2, e132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yu, Y.; Maguire, T.G.; Alwine, J.C. Human cytomegalovirus activates glucose transporter 4 expression to increase glucose uptake during infection. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 1573–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xiao, L.; Hu, Z.Y.; Dong, X.; Tan, Z.; Li, W.; Tang, M.; Chen, L.; Yang, L.; Tao, Y.; Jiang, Y.; et al. Targeting Epstein-Barr virus oncoprotein LMP1-mediated glycolysis sensitizes nasopharyngeal carcinoma to radiation therapy. Oncogene 2014, 33, 4568–4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cai, T.T.; Ye, S.B.; Liu, Y.N.; He, J.; Chen, Q.Y.; Mai, H.Q.; Zhang, C.X.; Cui, J.; Zhang, X.S.; Busson, P.; et al. LMP1-mediated glycolysis induces myeloid-derived suppressor cell expansion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhang, J.; Jia, L.; Lin, W.; Yip, Y.L.; Lo, K.W.; Lau, V.M.Y.; Zhu, D.; Tsang, C.M.; Zhou, Y.; Deng, W.; et al. Epstein-Barr Virus-Encoded Latent Membrane Protein 1 Upregulates Glucose Transporter 1 Transcription via the mTORC1/NF-kappaB Signaling Pathways. J. Virol. 2017, 91, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sung, W.W.; Chen, P.R.; Liao, M.H.; Lee, J.W. Enhanced aerobic glycolysis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells by Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1. Exp. Cell Res. 2017, 359, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sung, W.W.; Chu, Y.C.; Chen, P.R.; Liao, M.H.; Lee, J.W. Positive regulation of HIF-1A expression by EBV oncoprotein LMP1 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2016, 382, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ma, T.; Patel, H.; Babapoor-Farrokhran, S.; Franklin, R.; Semenza, G.L.; Sodhi, A.; Montaner, S. KSHV induces aerobic glycolysis and angiogenesis through HIF-1-dependent upregulation of pyruvate kinase 2 in Kaposi’s sarcoma. Angiogenesis 2015, 18, 477–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Fontaine, K.A.; Sanchez, E.L.; Camarda, R.; Lagunoff, M. Dengue virus induces and requires glycolysis for optimal replication. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 2358–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zwerschke, W.; Mazurek, S.; Massimi, P.; Banks, L.; Eigenbrodt, E.; Jansen-Dürr, P. Modulation of type M2 pyruvate kinase activity by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 1291–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mazurek, S.; Zwerschke, W.; Jansen-Dürr, P.; Eigenbrodt, E. Effects of the human papilloma virus HPV-16 E7 oncoprotein on glycolysis and glutaminolysis: Role of pyruvate kinase type M2 and the glycolytic-enzyme complex. Biochem. J. 2001, 356, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Teng, C.F.; Hsieh, W.C.; Wu, H.C.; Lin, Y.J.; Tsai, H.W.; Huang, W.; Su, I.J. Hepatitis B Virus Pre-S2 Mutant Induces Aerobic Glycolysis through Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Signal Cascade. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liu, B.; Fang, M.; He, Z.; Cui, D.; Jia, S.; Lin, X.; Xu, X.; Zhou, T.; Liu, W. Hepatitis B virus stimulates G6PD expression through HBx-mediated Nrf2 activation. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ramiere, C.; Rodriguez, J.; Enache, L.S.; Lotteau, V.; Andre, P.; Diaz, O. Activity of hexokinase is increased by its interaction with hepatitis C virus protein NS5A. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 3246–3254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Qian, Y.; Yang, Y.; Qing, W.; Li, C.; Kong, M.; Kang, Z.; Zuo, Y.; Wu, J.; Yu, M.; Yang, Z. Coxsackievirus B3 infection induces glycolysis to facilitate viral replication. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 962766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Codo, A.C.; Davanzo, G.G.; Monteiro, L.B.; de Souza, G.F.; Muraro, S.P.; Virgilio-da-Silva, J.V.; Prodonoff, J.S.; Carregari, V.C.; de Biagi Junior, C.A.O.; Crunfli, F.; et al. Elevated Glucose Levels Favor SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Monocyte Response through a HIF-1alpha/Glycolysis-Dependent Axis. Cell Metab. 2020, 32, 437–446.e435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Thai, M.; Thaker, S.K.; Feng, J.; Du, Y.; Hu, H.; Ting Wu, T.; Graeber, T.G.; Braas, D.; Christofk, H.R. MYC-induced reprogramming of glutamine catabolism supports optimal virus replication. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sanchez, E.L.; Carroll, P.A.; Thalhofer, A.B.; Lagunoff, M. Latent KSHV Infected Endothelial Cells Are Glutamine Addicted and Require Glutaminolysis for Survival. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1005052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Vastag, L.; Koyuncu, E.; Grady, S.L.; Shenk, T.E.; Rabinowitz, J.D. Divergent effects of human cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus-1 on cellular metabolism. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chambers, J.W.; Maguire, T.G.; Alwine, J.C. Glutamine metabolism is essential for human cytomegalovirus infection. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 1867–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Levy, P.L.; Duponchel, S.; Eischeid, H.; Molle, J.; Michelet, M.; Diserens, G.; Vermathen, M.; Vermathen, P.; Dufour, J.F.; Dienes, H.P.; et al. Hepatitis C virus infection triggers a tumor-like glutamine metabolism. Hepatology 2017, 65, 789–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mullen, P.J.; Garcia, G., Jr.; Purkayastha, A.; Matulionis, N.; Schmid, E.W.; Momcilovic, M.; Sen, C.; Langerman, J.; Ramaiah, A.; Shackelford, D.B.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection rewires host cell metabolism and is potentially susceptible to mTORC1 inhibition. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Qin, C.; Rao, Y.; Yuan, H.; Wang, T.Y.; Zhao, J.; Espinosa, B.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Savas, A.C.; Liu, Q.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 couples evasion of inflammatory response to activated nucleotide synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2122897119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Xiong, R.; Zhang, L.; Li, S.; Sun, Y.; Ding, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, Y.; Shang, W.; Jiang, X.; et al. Novel and potent inhibitors targeting DHODH are broad-spectrum antivirals against RNA viruses including newly-emerged coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Protein Cell 2020, 11, 723–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Schultz, D.C.; Johnson, R.M.; Ayyanathan, K.; Miller, J.; Whig, K.; Kamalia, B.; Dittmar, M.; Weston, S.; Hammond, H.L.; Dillen, C.; et al. Pyrimidine inhibitors synergize with nucleoside analogues to block SARS-CoV-2. Nature 2022, 604, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Rao, Y.; Wang, T.Y.; Qin, C.; Espinosa, B.; Liu, Q.; Ekanayake, A.; Zhao, J.; Savas, A.C.; Zhang, S.; Zarinfar, M.; et al. Targeting CTP Synthetase 1 to Restore Interferon Induction and Impede Nucleotide Synthesis in SARS-CoV-2 Infection. bioRxiv, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Markland, W.; McQuaid, T.J.; Jain, J.; Kwong, A.D. Broad-spectrum antiviral activity of the IMP dehydrogenase inhibitor VX-497: A comparison with ribavirin and demonstration of antiviral additivity with alpha interferon. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 859–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Grady, S.L.; Purdy, J.G.; Rabinowitz, J.D.; Shenk, T. Argininosuccinate synthetase 1 depletion produces a metabolic state conducive to herpes simplex virus 1 infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E5006–E5015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Thaker, S.K.; Ch’ng, J.; Christofk, H.R. Viral hijacking of cellular metabolism. BMC Biol. 2019, 17, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ariav, Y.; Ch’ng, J.H.; Christofk, H.R.; Ron-Harel, N.; Erez, A. Targeting nucleotide metabolism as the nexus of viral infections, cancer, and the immune response. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabg6165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yu, Y.; Maguire, T.G.; Alwine, J.C. Human cytomegalovirus infection induces adipocyte-like lipogenesis through activation of sterol regulatory element binding protein 1. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 2942–2949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yu, Y.; Pierciey, F.J., Jr.; Maguire, T.G.; Alwine, J.C. PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase is necessary for lipogenic activation during HCMV infection. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Koyuncu, E.; Purdy, J.G.; Rabinowitz, J.D.; Shenk, T. Saturated very long chain fatty acids are required for the production of infectious human cytomegalovirus progeny. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Heaton, N.S.; Perera, R.; Berger, K.L.; Khadka, S.; Lacount, D.J.; Kuhn, R.J.; Randall, G. Dengue virus nonstructural protein 3 redistributes fatty acid synthase to sites of viral replication and increases cellular fatty acid synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 17345–17350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Greseth, M.D.; Traktman, P. De novo fatty acid biosynthesis contributes significantly to establishment of a bioenergetically favorable environment for vaccinia virus infection. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Namazue, J.; Kato, T.; Okuno, T.; Shiraki, K.; Yamanishi, K. Evidence for attachment of fatty acid to varicella-zoster virus glycoproteins and effect of cerulenin on the maturation of varicella-zoster virus glycoproteins. Intervirology 1989, 30, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Teng, C.F.; Wu, H.C.; Hsieh, W.C.; Tsai, H.W.; Su, I.J. Activation of ATP citrate lyase by mTOR signal induces disturbed lipid metabolism in hepatitis B virus pre-S2 mutant tumorigenesis. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 605–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Daker, M.; Bhuvanendran, S.; Ahmad, M.; Takada, K.; Khoo, A.S. Deregulation of lipid metabolism pathway genes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2013, 7, 731–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Li, Y.; Webster-Cyriaque, J.; Tomlinson, C.C.; Yohe, M.; Kenney, S. Fatty acid synthase expression is induced by the Epstein-Barr virus immediate-early protein BRLF1 and is required for lytic viral gene expression. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 4197–4206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, W.; Wang, G.; Xu, Z.G.; Tu, H.; Hu, F.; Dai, J.; Chang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lu, Y.; Zeng, H.; et al. Lactate Is a Natural Suppressor of RLR Signaling by Targeting MAVS. Cell 2019, 178, 176–189.e115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhou, L.; He, R.; Fang, P.; Li, M.; Yu, H.; Wang, Q.; Yu, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, A.; et al. Hepatitis B virus rigs the cellular metabolome to avoid innate immune recognition. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fang, R.; Jiang, Q.; Guan, Y.; Gao, P.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, Z.; Jiang, Z. Golgi apparatus-synthesized sulfated glycosaminoglycans mediate polymerization and activation of the cGAMP sensor STING. Immunity 2021, 54, 962–975.e968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fang, R.; Jiang, Q.; Jia, X.; Jiang, Z. ARMH3-mediated recruitment of PI4KB directs Golgi-to-endosome trafficking and activation of the antiviral effector STING. Immunity 2023, 56, 500–515.e506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Qin, C.; Feng, S.; Feng, P. STeerING PI4P for innate immune activation. Immunity 2023, 56, 463–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Song, N.; Qi, Q.; Cao, R.; Qin, B.; Wang, B.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Li, W.; Du, X.; Liu, F.; et al. MAVS O-GlcNAcylation Is Essential for Host Antiviral Immunity against Lethal RNA Viruses. Cell Rep. 2019, 28, 2386–2396.e2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wang, Q.; Fang, P.; He, R.; Li, M.; Yu, H.; Zhou, L.; Yi, Y.; Wang, F.; Rong, Y.; Zhang, Y.; et al. O-GlcNAc transferase promotes influenza A virus-induced cytokine storm by targeting interferon regulatory factor-5. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaaz7086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Shen, L.; Hu, P.; Zhang, Y.; Ji, Z.; Shan, X.; Ni, L.; Ning, N.; Wang, J.; Tian, H.; Shui, G.; et al. Serine metabolism antagonizes antiviral innate immunity by preventing ATP6V0d2-mediated YAP lysosomal degradation. Cell Metab. 2021, 33, 971–987.e976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Wald, M.E.; Sieg, M.; Schilling, E.; Binder, M.; Vahlenkamp, T.W.; Claus, C. The Interferon Response Dampens the Usutu Virus Infection-Associated Increase in Glycolysis. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 823181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Olson, G.S.; Murray, T.A.; Jahn, A.N.; Mai, D.; Diercks, A.H.; Gold, E.S.; Aderem, A. Type I interferon decreases macrophage energy metabolism during mycobacterial infection. Cell Rep. 2021, 35, 109195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Shima, K.; Kaeding, N.; Ogunsulire, I.M.; Kaufhold, I.; Klinger, M.; Rupp, J. Interferon-γ interferes with host cell metabolism during intracellular Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Cytokine 2018, 112, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Burke, J.D.; Platanias, L.C.; Fish, E.N. Beta interferon regulation of glucose metabolism is PI3K/Akt dependent and important for antiviral activity against coxsackievirus B3. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 3485–3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhang, L.; Jiang, C.; Zhong, Y.; Sun, K.; Jing, H.; Song, J.; Xie, J.; Zhou, Y.; Tian, M.; Zhang, C.; et al. STING is a cell-intrinsic metabolic checkpoint restricting aerobic glycolysis by targeting HK2. Nat. Cell Biol. 2023, 25, 1208–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. He, Q.Q.; Huang, Y.; Nie, L.; Ren, S.; Xu, G.; Deng, F.; Cheng, Z.; Zuo, Q.; Zhang, L.; Cai, H.; et al. MAVS integrates glucose metabolism and RIG-I-like receptor signaling. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yan, S.; Kumari, M.; Xiao, H.; Jacobs, C.; Kochumon, S.; Jedrychowski, M.; Chouchani, E.; Ahmad, R.; Rosen, E.D. IRF3 reduces adipose thermogenesis via ISG15-mediated reprogramming of glycolysis. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Romero-Brey, I.; Berger, C.; Colpitts, C.C.; Boldanova, T.; Engelmann, M.; Todt, D.; Perin, P.M.; Behrendt, P.; Vondran, F.W.; Xu, S.; et al. Interferon-inducible cholesterol-25-hydroxylase restricts hepatitis C virus replication through blockage of membranous web formation. Hepatology 2015, 62, 702–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Li, C.; Deng, Y.Q.; Wang, S.; Ma, F.; Aliyari, R.; Huang, X.Y.; Zhang, N.N.; Watanabe, M.; Dong, H.L.; Liu, P.; et al. 25-Hydroxycholesterol Protects Host against Zika Virus Infection and Its Associated Microcephaly in a Mouse Model. Immunity 2017, 46, 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Coggins, S.A.; Mahboubi, B.; Schinazi, R.F.; Kim, B. SAMHD1 Functions and Human Diseases. Viruses 2020, 12, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Gizzi, A.S.; Grove, T.L.; Arnold, J.J.; Jose, J.; Jangra, R.K.; Garforth, S.J.; Du, Q.; Cahill, S.M.; Dulyaninova, N.G.; Love, J.D.; et al. A naturally occurring antiviral ribonucleotide encoded by the human genome. Nature 2018, 558, 610–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Raniga, K.; Liang, C. Interferons: Reprogramming the Metabolic Network against Viral Infection. Viruses 2018, 10, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Schmidt, S.V.; Schultze, J.L. New Insights into IDO Biology in Bacterial and Viral Infections. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mounce, B.C.; Poirier, E.Z.; Passoni, G.; Simon-Loriere, E.; Cesaro, T.; Prot, M.; Stapleford, K.A.; Moratorio, G.; Sakuntabhai, A.; Levraud, J.P.; et al. Interferon-Induced Spermidine-Spermine Acetyltransferase and Polyamine Depletion Restrict Zika and Chikungunya Viruses. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 20, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mounce, B.C.; Cesaro, T.; Moratorio, G.; Hooikaas, P.J.; Yakovleva, A.; Werneke, S.W.; Smith, E.C.; Poirier, E.Z.; Simon-Loriere, E.; Prot, M.; et al. Inhibition of Polyamine Biosynthesis Is a Broad-Spectrum Strategy against RNA Viruses. J. Virol. 2016, 90, 9683–9692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mounce, B.C.; Olsen, M.E.; Vignuzzi, M.; Connor, J.H. Polyamines and Their Role in Virus Infection. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2017, 81, e00029-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Brenner, C. Viral infection as an NAD(+) battlefield. Nat. Metab. 2022, 4, 2–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Welsby, I.; Hutin, D.; Gueydan, C.; Kruys, V.; Rongvaux, A.; Leo, O. PARP12, an interferon-stimulated gene involved in the control of protein translation and inflammation. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 26642–26657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Li, L.; Shi, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, J.; Zu, S.; Xu, X.; Gao, M.; Sun, N.; Pan, C.; Peng, L.; et al. ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP11 suppresses Zika virus in synergy with PARP12. Cell Biosci. 2021, 11, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Moore, A.M.; Zhou, L.; Cui, J.; Li, L.; Wu, N.; Yu, A.; Poddar, S.; Liang, K.; Abt, E.R.; Kim, S.; et al. NAD(+) depletion by type I interferon signaling sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to NAMPT inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2012469118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Schoggins, J.W.; Wilson, S.J.; Panis, M.; Murphy, M.Y.; Jones, C.T.; Bieniasz, P.; Rice, C.M. A diverse range of gene products are effectors of the type I interferon antiviral response. Nature 2011, 472, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Dantoft, W.; Robertson, K.A.; Watkins, W.J.; Strobl, B.; Ghazal, P. Metabolic Regulators Nampt and Sirt6 Serially Participate in the Macrophage Interferon Antiviral Cascade. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Huffaker, T.B.; Ekiz, H.A.; Barba, C.; Lee, S.H.; Runtsch, M.C.; Nelson, M.C.; Bauer, K.M.; Tang, W.W.; Mosbruger, T.L.; Cox, J.E.; et al. A Stat1 bound enhancer promotes Nampt expression and function within tumor associated macrophages. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Harris, N.; Buller, R.M.; Karupiah, G. Gamma interferon-induced, nitric oxide-mediated inhibition of vaccinia virus replication. J. Virol. 1995, 69, 910–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Colasanti, M.; Persichini, T.; Venturini, G.; Ascenzi, P. S-nitrosylation of viral proteins: Molecular bases for antiviral effect of nitric oxide. IUBMB Life 1999, 48, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhang, S.; Carriere, J.; Lin, X.; Xie, N.; Feng, P. Interplay between Cellular Metabolism and Cytokine Responses during Viral Infection. Viruses 2018, 10, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Pan, C.; Li, B.; Simon, M.C. Moonlighting functions of metabolic enzymes and metabolites in cancer. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 3760–3774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Guo, D.; Tong, Y.; Jiang, X.; Meng, Y.; Jiang, H.; Du, L.; Wu, Q.; Li, S.; Luo, S.; Li, M.; et al. Aerobic glycolysis promotes tumor immune evasion by hexokinase2-mediated phosphorylation of IκBα. Cell Metab. 2022, 34, 1312–1324.e1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Gao, X.; Wang, H.; Yang, J.J.; Liu, X.; Liu, Z.R. Pyruvate kinase M2 regulates gene transcription by acting as a protein kinase. Mol. Cell 2012, 45, 598–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Wolf, A.J.; Reyes, C.N.; Liang, W.; Becker, C.; Shimada, K.; Wheeler, M.L.; Cho, H.C.; Popescu, N.I.; Coggeshall, K.M.; Arditi, M.; et al. Hexokinase Is an Innate Immune Receptor for the Detection of Bacterial Peptidoglycan. Cell 2016, 166, 624–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Tang, Y.; Kwon, H.; Neel, B.A.; Kasher-Meron, M.; Pessin, J.B.; Yamada, E.; Pessin, J.E. The fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase TIGAR suppresses NF-κB signaling by directly inhibiting the linear ubiquitin assembly complex LUBAC. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 7578–7591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Xie, M.; Yu, Y.; Kang, R.; Zhu, S.; Yang, L.; Zeng, L.; Sun, X.; Yang, M.; Billiar, T.R.; Wang, H.; et al. PKM2-dependent glycolysis promotes NLRP3 and AIM2 inflammasome activation. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Olona, A.; Leishman, S.; Anand, P.K. The NLRP3 inflammasome: Regulation by metabolic signals. Trends Immunol. 2022, 43, 978–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Wang, X.; Liu, R.; Qu, X.; Yu, H.; Chu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, W.; Wu, X.; Gao, H.; Tao, B.; et al. α-Ketoglutarate-Activated NF-κB Signaling Promotes Compensatory Glucose Uptake and Brain Tumor Development. Mol. Cell 2019, 76, 148–162.e147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Tannahill, G.M.; Curtis, A.M.; Adamik, J.; Palsson-McDermott, E.M.; McGettrick, A.F.; Goel, G.; Frezza, C.; Bernard, N.J.; Kelly, B.; Foley, N.H.; et al. Succinate is an inflammatory signal that induces IL-1β through HIF-1α. Nature 2013, 496, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Peace, C.G.; O’Neill, L.A. The role of itaconate in host defense and inflammation. J. Clin. Investig. 2022, 132, e148548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Hooftman, A.; Angiari, S.; Hester, S.; Corcoran, S.E.; Runtsch, M.C.; Ling, C.; Ruzek, M.C.; Slivka, P.F.; McGettrick, A.F.; Banahan, K.; et al. The Immunomodulatory Metabolite Itaconate Modifies NLRP3 and Inhibits Inflammasome Activation. Cell Metab. 2020, 32, 468–478.e467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Humphries, F.; Shmuel-Galia, L.; Ketelut-Carneiro, N.; Li, S.; Wang, B.; Nemmara, V.V.; Wilson, R.; Jiang, Z.; Khalighinejad, F.; Muneeruddin, K.; et al. Succination inactivates gasdermin D and blocks pyroptosis. Science 2020, 369, 1633–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Reid, M.A.; Lowman, X.H.; Pan, M.; Tran, T.Q.; Warmoes, M.O.; Ishak Gabra, M.B.; Yang, Y.; Locasale, J.W.; Kong, M. IKKβ promotes metabolic adaptation to glutamine deprivation via phosphorylation and inhibition of PFKFB3. Genes. Dev. 2016, 30, 1837–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Zhou, F.; Xu, X.; Wu, J.; Wang, D.; Wang, J. NF-κB controls four genes encoding core enzymes of tricarboxylic acid cycle. Gene 2017, 621, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Tateishi, K.; Miyake, Y.; Kawazu, M.; Sasaki, N.; Nakamura, T.; Sasame, J.; Yoshii, Y.; Ueno, T.; Miyake, A.; Watanabe, J.; et al. A Hyperactive RelA/p65-Hexokinase 2 Signaling Axis Drives Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 5330–5343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Mauro, C.; Leow, S.C.; Anso, E.; Rocha, S.; Thotakura, A.K.; Tornatore, L.; Moretti, M.; De Smaele, E.; Beg, A.A.; Tergaonkar, V.; et al. NF-κB controls energy homeostasis and metabolic adaptation by upregulating mitochondrial respiration. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13, 1272–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Cogswell, P.C.; Kashatus, D.F.; Keifer, J.A.; Guttridge, D.C.; Reuther, J.Y.; Bristow, C.; Roy, S.; Nicholson, D.W.; Baldwin, A.S., Jr. NF-kappa B and I kappa B alpha are found in the mitochondria. Evidence for regulation of mitochondrial gene expression by NF-kappa B. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 2963–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Johnson, R.F.; Witzel, I.I.; Perkins, N.D. p53-dependent regulation of mitochondrial energy production by the RelA subunit of NF-κB. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 5588–5597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Londhe, P.; Yu, P.Y.; Ijiri, Y.; Ladner, K.J.; Fenger, J.M.; London, C.; Houghton, P.J.; Guttridge, D.C. Classical NF-κB Metabolically Reprograms Sarcoma Cells Through Regulation of Hexokinase 2. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Yang, W.; Xia, Y.; Cao, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Bu, W.; Zhang, L.; You, M.J.; Koh, M.Y.; Cote, G.; Aldape, K.; et al. EGFR-induced and PKCε monoubiquitylation-dependent NF-κB activation upregulates PKM2 expression and promotes tumorigenesis. Mol. Cell 2012, 48, 771–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Chen, L.; Lin, X.; Lei, Y.; Xu, X.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, Y.; Liu, H.; Jiang, J.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, F.; et al. Aerobic glycolysis enhances HBx-initiated hepatocellular carcinogenesis via NF-κBp65/HK2 signalling. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 41, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Zammit, N.W.; Wong, Y.Y.; Walters, S.N.; Warren, J.; Barry, S.C.; Grey, S.T. RELA governs a network of islet-specific metabolic genes necessary for beta cell function. Diabetologia 2023, 66, 1516–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Remels, A.H.V.; Derks, W.J.A.; Cillero-Pastor, B.; Verhees, K.J.P.; Kelders, M.C.; Heggermont, W.; Carai, P.; Summer, G.; Ellis, S.R.; de Theije, C.C.; et al. NF-κB-mediated metabolic remodelling in the inflamed heart in acute viral myocarditis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2018, 1864, 2579–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Rius, J.; Guma, M.; Schachtrup, C.; Akassoglou, K.; Zinkernagel, A.S.; Nizet, V.; Johnson, R.S.; Haddad, G.G.; Karin, M. NF-kappaB links innate immunity to the hypoxic response through transcriptional regulation of HIF-1alpha. Nature 2008, 453, 807–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Pawlus, M.R.; Wang, L.; Hu, C.J. STAT3 and HIF1α cooperatively activate HIF1 target genes in MDA-MB-231 and RCC4 cells. Oncogene 2014, 33, 1670–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Demaria, M.; Giorgi, C.; Lebiedzinska, M.; Esposito, G.; D’Angeli, L.; Bartoli, A.; Gough, D.J.; Turkson, J.; Levy, D.E.; Watson, C.J.; et al. A STAT3-mediated metabolic switch is involved in tumour transformation and STAT3 addiction. Aging 2010, 2, 823–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Ramadoss, P.; Unger-Smith, N.E.; Lam, F.S.; Hollenberg, A.N. STAT3 targets the regulatory regions of gluconeogenic genes in vivo. Mol. Endocrinol. 2009, 23, 827–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Liao, K.Y.; Chen, C.J.; Hsieh, S.K.; Pan, P.H.; Chen, W.Y. Interleukin-13 ameliorates postischemic hepatic gluconeogenesis and hyperglycemia in rat model of stroke. Metab. Brain Dis. 2020, 35, 1201–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Poli, V.; Camporeale, A. STAT3-Mediated Metabolic Reprograming in Cellular Transformation and Implications for Drug Resistance. Front. Oncol. 2015, 5, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wegrzyn, J.; Potla, R.; Chwae, Y.J.; Sepuri, N.B.; Zhang, Q.; Koeck, T.; Derecka, M.; Szczepanek, K.; Szelag, M.; Gornicka, A.; et al. Function of mitochondrial Stat3 in cellular respiration. Science 2009, 323, 793–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Zhang, Q.; Raje, V.; Yakovlev, V.A.; Yacoub, A.; Szczepanek, K.; Meier, J.; Derecka, M.; Chen, Q.; Hu, Y.; Sisler, J.; et al. Mitochondrial localized Stat3 promotes breast cancer growth via phosphorylation of serine 727. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 31280–31288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Gough, D.J.; Corlett, A.; Schlessinger, K.; Wegrzyn, J.; Larner, A.C.; Levy, D.E. Mitochondrial STAT3 supports Ras-dependent oncogenic transformation. Science 2009, 324, 1713–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Wang, J.; Filippakis, H.; Hougard, T.; Du, H.; Ye, C.; Liu, H.J.; Zhang, L.; Hindi, K.; Bagwe, S.; Nijmeh, J.; et al. Interleukin-6 mediates PSAT1 expression and serine metabolism in TSC2-deficient cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Zhang, R.; Xu, A.; Qin, C.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, S.; Lang, Y.; Wang, M.; Li, C.; Feng, W.; Zhang, R.; et al. Pseudorabies Virus dUTPase UL50 Induces Lysosomal Degradation of Type I Interferon Receptor 1 and Antagonizes the Alpha Interferon Response. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e01148-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. He, S.; Zhao, J.; Song, S.; He, X.; Minassian, A.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.; Brulois, K.; Wang, Y.; Cabo, J.; et al. Viral pseudo-enzymes activate RIG-I via deamidation to evade cytokine production. Mol. Cell 2015, 58, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Wang, T.Y.; Zhao, J.; Savas, A.C.; Zhang, S.; Feng, P. Viral pseudoenzymes in infection and immunity. FEBS J 2020, 287, 4300–4309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Zhao, J.; Zeng, Y.; Xu, S.; Chen, J.; Shen, G.; Yu, C.; Knipe, D.; Yuan, W.; Peng, J.; Xu, W.; et al. A Viral Deamidase Targets the Helicase Domain of RIG-I to Block RNA-Induced Activation. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 20, 770–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Zhang, J.; Zhao, J.; Xu, S.; Li, J.; He, S.; Zeng, Y.; Xie, L.; Xie, N.; Liu, T.; Lee, K.; et al. Species-Specific Deamidation of cGAS by Herpes Simplex Virus UL37 Protein Facilitates Viral Replication. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 24, 234–248.e235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Huang, H.; Zhao, J.; Wang, T.Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Rao, Y.; Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Xia, Z.; et al. Species-Specific Deamidation of RIG-I Reveals Collaborative Action between Viral and Cellular Deamidases in HSV-1 Lytic Replication. mBio 2021, 12, e00115-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Sepúlveda, C.S.; García, C.C.; Damonte, E.B. Inhibitors of Nucleotide Biosynthesis as Candidates for a Wide Spectrum of Antiviral Chemotherapy. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Moore, E.C. N-(Phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartate inhibition of the enzyme complex of pyrimidine biosynthesis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1982, 31, 3313–3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Grem, J.L.; King, S.A.; O’Dwyer, P.J.; Leyland-Jones, B. Biochemistry and clinical activity of N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartate: A review. Cancer Res. 1988, 48, 4441–4454. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  164. Zhao, J.; Tian, M.; Zhang, S.; Delfarah, A.; Gao, R.; Rao, Y.; Savas, A.C.; Lu, A.; Bubb, L.; Lei, X.; et al. Deamidation Shunts RelA from Mediating Inflammation to Aerobic Glycolysis. Cell Metab. 2020, 31, 937–955.e937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Boukalova, S.; Hubackova, S.; Milosevic, M.; Ezrova, Z.; Neuzil, J.; Rohlena, J. Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase in oxidative phosphorylation and cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2020, 1866, 165759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Hoffmann, H.H.; Kunz, A.; Simon, V.A.; Palese, P.; Shaw, M.L. Broad-spectrum antiviral that interferes with de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5777–5782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Sibille, G.; Luganini, A.; Sainas, S.; Boschi, D.; Lolli, M.L.; Gribaudo, G. The Novel hDHODH Inhibitor MEDS433 Prevents Influenza Virus Replication by Blocking Pyrimidine Biosynthesis. Viruses 2022, 14, 2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Yang, C.F.; Gopula, B.; Liang, J.J.; Li, J.K.; Chen, S.Y.; Lee, Y.L.; Chen, C.S.; Lin, Y.L. Novel AR-12 derivatives, P12-23 and P12-34, inhibit flavivirus replication by blocking host de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018, 7, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Luthra, P.; Naidoo, J.; Pietzsch, C.A.; De, S.; Khadka, S.; Anantpadma, M.; Williams, C.G.; Edwards, M.R.; Davey, R.A.; Bukreyev, A.; et al. Inhibiting pyrimidine biosynthesis impairs Ebola virus replication through depletion of nucleoside pools and activation of innate immune responses. Antivir. Res. 2018, 158, 288–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Luganini, A.; Sibille, G.; Mognetti, B.; Sainas, S.; Pippione, A.C.; Giorgis, M.; Boschi, D.; Lolli, M.L.; Gribaudo, G. Effective deploying of a novel DHODH inhibitor against herpes simplex type 1 and type 2 replication. Antivir. Res. 2021, 189, 105057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Jin, L.; Li, Y.; Pu, F.; Wang, H.; Zhang, D.; Bai, J.; Shang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Ma, X.X. Inhibiting pyrimidine biosynthesis impairs Peste des Petits Ruminants Virus replication through depletion of nucleoside pools and activation of cellular immunity. Vet. Microbiol. 2021, 260, 109186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Lucas-Hourani, M.; Dauzonne, D.; Jorda, P.; Cousin, G.; Lupan, A.; Helynck, O.; Caignard, G.; Janvier, G.; André-Leroux, G.; Khiar, S.; et al. Inhibition of pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway suppresses viral growth through innate immunity. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Qing, M.; Zou, G.; Wang, Q.Y.; Xu, H.Y.; Dong, H.; Yuan, Z.; Shi, P.Y. Characterization of dengue virus resistance to brequinar in cell culture. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 3686–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Schnellrath, L.C.; Damaso, C.R. Potent antiviral activity of brequinar against the emerging Cantagalo virus in cell culture. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2011, 38, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Wang, Q.Y.; Bushell, S.; Qing, M.; Xu, H.Y.; Bonavia, A.; Nunes, S.; Zhou, J.; Poh, M.K.; Florez de Sessions, P.; Niyomrattanakit, P.; et al. Inhibition of dengue virus through suppression of host pyrimidine biosynthesis. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 6548–6556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Kaur, H.; Sarma, P.; Bhattacharyya, A.; Sharma, S.; Chhimpa, N.; Prajapat, M.; Prakash, A.; Kumar, S.; Singh, A.; Singh, R.; et al. Efficacy and safety of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) inhibitors “leflunomide” and “teriflunomide” in COVID-19: A narrative review. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 906, 174233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Debing, Y.; Emerson, S.U.; Wang, Y.; Pan, Q.; Balzarini, J.; Dallmeier, K.; Neyts, J. Ribavirin inhibits in vitro hepatitis E virus replication through depletion of cellular GTP pools and is moderately synergistic with alpha interferon. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Geraghty, R.J.; Aliota, M.T.; Bonnac, L.F. Broad-Spectrum Antiviral Strategies and Nucleoside Analogues. Viruses 2021, 13, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Cameron, C.E.; Castro, C. The mechanism of action of ribavirin: Lethal mutagenesis of RNA virus genomes mediated by the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 14, 757–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Pająk, B.; Zieliński, R.; Manning, J.T.; Matejin, S.; Paessler, S.; Fokt, I.; Emmett, M.R.; Priebe, W. The Antiviral Effects of 2-Deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG), a Dual D-Glucose and D-Mannose Mimetic, against SARS-CoV-2 and Other Highly Pathogenic Viruses. Molecules 2022, 27, 5928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Varanasi, S.K.; Donohoe, D.; Jaggi, U.; Rouse, B.T. Manipulating Glucose Metabolism during Different Stages of Viral Pathogenesis Can Have either Detrimental or Beneficial Effects. J. Immunol. 2017, 199, 1748–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Kern, E.R.; Glasgow, L.A.; Klein, R.J.; Friedman-Kien, A.E. Failure of 2-deoxy-D-glucose in the treatment of experimental cutaneous and genital infections due to herpes simplex virus. J. Infect. Dis. 1982, 146, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Shannon, W.M.; Arnett, G.; Drennen, D.J. Lack of efficacy of 2-deoxy-D-glucose in the treatment of experimental herpes genitalis in guinea pigs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1982, 21, 513–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Aliyari, S.R.; Ghaffari, A.A.; Pernet, O.; Parvatiyar, K.; Wang, Y.; Gerami, H.; Tong, A.J.; Vergnes, L.; Takallou, A.; Zhang, A.; et al. Suppressing fatty acid synthase by type I interferon and chemical inhibitors as a broad spectrum anti-viral strategy against SARS-CoV-2. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2022, 12, 1624–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Viruses 16 00035 g001
Figure 1. Metabolic enzymes in viral life cycles. Figure shows a schematic illustration of viral life cycles including entry, viral genome replication, transcription, viral protein maturation, assembly, and egress. Metabolic enzymes involved in the viral life cycle are highlighted in red. Abbreviations: GLUT, glucose transporter; LDLR, low-density lipoprotein receptor; CAD, carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase, aspartate transcarbamoylase, and dihydroorotase; DHODH, dihydroorotate dehydrogenase; PPAT, phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate amido transferase; PFAS, phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine synthase; PAICS, phosphoribosylaminoimidazole carboxylase and phosphoribosylamino-imidazolesuccinocarboxamide synthase; IMPDH, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase; ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; FASN, fatty acid synthase; HXK, hexokinase; PFK-1, phosphofructokinase-1; PK, pyruvate kinase; GFAT-1, glutamine fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase 1. Created with Biorender.com.
Figure 1. Metabolic enzymes in viral life cycles. Figure shows a schematic illustration of viral life cycles including entry, viral genome replication, transcription, viral protein maturation, assembly, and egress. Metabolic enzymes involved in the viral life cycle are highlighted in red. Abbreviations: GLUT, glucose transporter; LDLR, low-density lipoprotein receptor; CAD, carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase, aspartate transcarbamoylase, and dihydroorotase; DHODH, dihydroorotate dehydrogenase; PPAT, phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate amido transferase; PFAS, phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine synthase; PAICS, phosphoribosylaminoimidazole carboxylase and phosphoribosylamino-imidazolesuccinocarboxamide synthase; IMPDH, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase; ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; FASN, fatty acid synthase; HXK, hexokinase; PFK-1, phosphofructokinase-1; PK, pyruvate kinase; GFAT-1, glutamine fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase 1. Created with Biorender.com.
Viruses 16 00035 g001
Viruses 16 00035 g002
Figure 2. Glycolytic enzymes are hijacked by viruses. Figure shows a schematic illustration of the cross-regulation between viruses and glycolytic enzymes. Abbreviations: GLUT, glucose transporter; HK, hexokinase; GPI, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase; PK, pyruvate kinase; PFK, phosphofructokinase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PDC, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; PDK, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase; G6PD, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; G6P, glucose-6 phosphate; F6P, fructose 6-phosphate; F 1,6BP, fructose-1,6-bisphosphate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvic acid; PPP, pentose phosphate pathway; DENV, dengue viruses; EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCMV, human cytomegalovirus; AdV, adenoviruses; HCV, hepatitis C virus; CVB3, coxsackievirus B3; HSV-1, herpes simplex virus type 1; HPV 16, human papillomavirus type 16; KSHV, Kaposi’s sarcoma herpesvirus. Created with Biorender.com.
Figure 2. Glycolytic enzymes are hijacked by viruses. Figure shows a schematic illustration of the cross-regulation between viruses and glycolytic enzymes. Abbreviations: GLUT, glucose transporter; HK, hexokinase; GPI, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase; PK, pyruvate kinase; PFK, phosphofructokinase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PDC, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; PDK, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase; G6PD, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; G6P, glucose-6 phosphate; F6P, fructose 6-phosphate; F 1,6BP, fructose-1,6-bisphosphate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvic acid; PPP, pentose phosphate pathway; DENV, dengue viruses; EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCMV, human cytomegalovirus; AdV, adenoviruses; HCV, hepatitis C virus; CVB3, coxsackievirus B3; HSV-1, herpes simplex virus type 1; HPV 16, human papillomavirus type 16; KSHV, Kaposi’s sarcoma herpesvirus. Created with Biorender.com.
Viruses 16 00035 g002
Viruses 16 00035 g003
Figure 3. Enzymes in TCA cycle are hijacked by viruses. Figure shows a schematic illustration of the cross-regulation between viruses and TCA-cycle enzymes. Abbreviations: PC, pyruvate carboxylase; PDC, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; GDH, glutamate dehydrogenase; GLS, glutaminase; SLC1A5, solute carrier family 1 member 5; α-KG, α-ketoglutarate; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; HCMV, human cytomegalovirus; AdV, adenoviruses; HSV-1, herpes simplex virus type 1; KSHV, Kaposi’s sarcoma herpesvirus; IAV, influenza A virus. Created with Biorender.com.
Figure 3. Enzymes in TCA cycle are hijacked by viruses. Figure shows a schematic illustration of the cross-regulation between viruses and TCA-cycle enzymes. Abbreviations: PC, pyruvate carboxylase; PDC, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; GDH, glutamate dehydrogenase; GLS, glutaminase; SLC1A5, solute carrier family 1 member 5; α-KG, α-ketoglutarate; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; HCMV, human cytomegalovirus; AdV, adenoviruses; HSV-1, herpes simplex virus type 1; KSHV, Kaposi’s sarcoma herpesvirus; IAV, influenza A virus. Created with Biorender.com.
Viruses 16 00035 g003
Viruses 16 00035 g004
Figure 4. Enzymes in nucleotide synthesis are hijacked by viruses. Figure shows a schematic illustration of the cross−regulation between viruses and nucleotide synthesis enzymes. Abbreviations: CAD, carbamoyl−phosphate synthetase, aspartate transcarbamoylase, and dihydroorotase; DHODH, dihydroorotate dehydrogenase; UMPS, uridine monophosphate synthase; UMP, uridine monophosphate; UTP, uridine−5′-triphosphate; CTPS1, cytidine triphosphate synthase 1; CTP, cytidine 5′−triphosphate; SARS−CoV−2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; EBOV, Ebola virus; IAV, influenza A virus; PRPP, phosphoribosyl diphosphate; PPAT, phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate amido transferase; GART, glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase; PFAS, phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine synthase; PAICS, phosphoribosylaminoimidazole carboxylase and phosphoribosylamino−imidazolesuccinocarboxamide synthase; ADSL, adenylosuccinate lyase; ATIC, 5−aminoimidazole−4−carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase; IMPDH, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase; GMPS, guanine monophosphate synthase; IMP, inosine monophosphate; AMP, adenosine monophosphate; XMP, xanthosine monophosphate; GMP, guanosine monophosphate; MHV68, murine gammaherpesvirus 68; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCMV, human cytomegalovirus; HSV−1, herpes simplex virus type 1; KSHV, Kaposi’s sarcoma herpesvirus; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; EMCV, encephalomyocarditis virus; VEEV; Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. Created with Biorender.com.
Figure 4. Enzymes in nucleotide synthesis are hijacked by viruses. Figure shows a schematic illustration of the cross−regulation between viruses and nucleotide synthesis enzymes. Abbreviations: CAD, carbamoyl−phosphate synthetase, aspartate transcarbamoylase, and dihydroorotase; DHODH, dihydroorotate dehydrogenase; UMPS, uridine monophosphate synthase; UMP, uridine monophosphate; UTP, uridine−5′-triphosphate; CTPS1, cytidine triphosphate synthase 1; CTP, cytidine 5′−triphosphate; SARS−CoV−2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; EBOV, Ebola virus; IAV, influenza A virus; PRPP, phosphoribosyl diphosphate; PPAT, phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate amido transferase; GART, glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase; PFAS, phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine synthase; PAICS, phosphoribosylaminoimidazole carboxylase and phosphoribosylamino−imidazolesuccinocarboxamide synthase; ADSL, adenylosuccinate lyase; ATIC, 5−aminoimidazole−4−carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase; IMPDH, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase; GMPS, guanine monophosphate synthase; IMP, inosine monophosphate; AMP, adenosine monophosphate; XMP, xanthosine monophosphate; GMP, guanosine monophosphate; MHV68, murine gammaherpesvirus 68; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCMV, human cytomegalovirus; HSV−1, herpes simplex virus type 1; KSHV, Kaposi’s sarcoma herpesvirus; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; EMCV, encephalomyocarditis virus; VEEV; Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. Created with Biorender.com.
Viruses 16 00035 g004
Viruses 16 00035 g005
Figure 5. Lipogenic enzymes are hijacked by viruses. Figure shows a schematic illustration of the cross-regulation between viruses and lipogenic enzymes. Abbreviations: α-KG, α-ketoglutarate; ACLY, ATP citrate lyase; VACV, vaccinia virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; FASN, fatty acid synthase; DENV, dengue viruses; EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; FFA, free fatty acid; TGs, triglycerides; SREBPs, sterol regulatory element binding proteins; HCMV, human cytomegalovirus. Created with Biorender.com.
Figure 5. Lipogenic enzymes are hijacked by viruses. Figure shows a schematic illustration of the cross-regulation between viruses and lipogenic enzymes. Abbreviations: α-KG, α-ketoglutarate; ACLY, ATP citrate lyase; VACV, vaccinia virus; HBV, hepatitis B virus; ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; FASN, fatty acid synthase; DENV, dengue viruses; EBV, Epstein–Barr virus; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; FFA, free fatty acid; TGs, triglycerides; SREBPs, sterol regulatory element binding proteins; HCMV, human cytomegalovirus. Created with Biorender.com.
Viruses 16 00035 g005
Viruses 16 00035 g006
Figure 6. Metabolic enzymes interact with innate immunity. Figure shows a schematic illustration of the cross-regulation between innate immune modulators and metabolic enzymes in various pathways, including glycolysis, the TCA cycle, and nucleotide synthesis. Abbreviations: GLUT, glucose transporter; HK2, hexokinase-2; MAVS, mitochondrial antiviral-signaling protein; STING, stimulator of interferon gene; IκBα, inhibitor of NF-κB α; PFKFB3, 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3; PFK, phosphofructokinase; IKKβ, inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta; PKM, pyruvate kinase muscle isozyme; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ISG15, interferon stimulated gene 15; G6PD, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; GFPT2, glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate transaminase 2; PHGDH, phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase; PSAT1, phosphoserine aminotransferase 1; IFN, interferon; IL-6, interleukin 6; GDH, glutamate dehydrogenase; GLS, glutaminase; CAD, carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase, aspartate transcarbamoylase and dihydroorotase; CTPS1, cytidine triphosphate synthase 1; PPAT, phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate amido transferase; PFAS, phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine synthase; IRF3, interferon regulatory factor 3; RIG-I, retinoic acid-inducible gene-I; DHAP, dihydroxyacetone phosphate; GA3P, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvic acid; α-KG, α-ketoglutarate; SucCoA, Succinyl-CoA; OAA, oxaloacetate. Created with Biorender.com.
Figure 6. Metabolic enzymes interact with innate immunity. Figure shows a schematic illustration of the cross-regulation between innate immune modulators and metabolic enzymes in various pathways, including glycolysis, the TCA cycle, and nucleotide synthesis. Abbreviations: GLUT, glucose transporter; HK2, hexokinase-2; MAVS, mitochondrial antiviral-signaling protein; STING, stimulator of interferon gene; IκBα, inhibitor of NF-κB α; PFKFB3, 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3; PFK, phosphofructokinase; IKKβ, inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase subunit beta; PKM, pyruvate kinase muscle isozyme; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ISG15, interferon stimulated gene 15; G6PD, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; GFPT2, glutamine-fructose-6-phosphate transaminase 2; PHGDH, phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase; PSAT1, phosphoserine aminotransferase 1; IFN, interferon; IL-6, interleukin 6; GDH, glutamate dehydrogenase; GLS, glutaminase; CAD, carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase, aspartate transcarbamoylase and dihydroorotase; CTPS1, cytidine triphosphate synthase 1; PPAT, phosphoribosyl pyrophosphate amido transferase; PFAS, phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine synthase; IRF3, interferon regulatory factor 3; RIG-I, retinoic acid-inducible gene-I; DHAP, dihydroxyacetone phosphate; GA3P, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvic acid; α-KG, α-ketoglutarate; SucCoA, Succinyl-CoA; OAA, oxaloacetate. Created with Biorender.com.
Viruses 16 00035 g006
Table 1. Metabolic alteration in various virus infections.
Table 1. Metabolic alteration in various virus infections.
Metabolic PathwaysMetabolic Enzymes/Regulators/PathwaysVirusesEffectsVirus Types
GlycolysisHK2, PFKPAdVUp-regulating expressionDNA virus
PFK-1HSV-1Up-regulating expressionDNA virus
PFK, Pyruvate kinase, GLUT4HCMVUp-regulating expressionDNA virus
PFKUp-regulating enzymatic activity
GLUT1Down-regulating expression
HK2, PDK1, GLUT1, PKM2EBVUp-regulating expressionDNA virus
PKM2KSHVUp-regulating expressionDNA virus
GLUT1, HK2DENVUp-regulating expressionRNA virus
PKM2HPVDown-regulating enzymatic activityDNA virus
GLUT1HBVUp-regulating expressionDNA virus
HK2HCVUp-regulating enzymatic activityRNA virus
HIF-1αSARS-CoV-2Up-regulating transcriptional factor activityRNA virus
HK2, PFKM, PKM2CVB3Up-regulating expressionRNA virus
Pentose phosphate pathwayG6PDHBVUp-regulating expressionDNA virus
TCA cycleGlutamine anaplerosis, reductive carboxylationAdVActivating the pathwaysDNA virus
SLC1A5KSHVUp-regulating expressionDNA virus
GLS, GDHHCMVUp-regulating expression and enzymatic activityDNA virus
GLSHCVUp-regulating expressionRNA virus
PCSARS-CoV-2Up-regulating expressionRNA virus
Oxidative glutamine metabolismInhibiting pathway activity
Reductive carboxylationActivating pathway activity
Nucleotide synthesisCADSARS-CoV-2Up-regulating enzymatic activityRNA virus
CTPS1
Viral nucleotide synthetaseHSV-1Enhancing host nucleotide synthesisDNA virus
Lipid synthesisSREBP1HCMVUp-regulating transcriptional factor activityDNA virus
VLCFA synthetic enzymesUp-regulating expression
FASNDENVUp-regulating enzymatic activityRNA virus
SREBF1HBVUp-regulating transcriptional factor activityDNA virus
FASN, LDLREBVUp-regulating expressionDNA virus
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qin, C.; Xie, T.; Yeh, W.W.; Savas, A.C.; Feng, P. Metabolic Enzymes in Viral Infection and Host Innate Immunity. Viruses 2024, 16, 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16010035

AMA Style

Qin C, Xie T, Yeh WW, Savas AC, Feng P. Metabolic Enzymes in Viral Infection and Host Innate Immunity. Viruses. 2024; 16(1):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16010035

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qin, Chao, Taolin Xie, Wayne Wei Yeh, Ali Can Savas, and Pinghui Feng. 2024. "Metabolic Enzymes in Viral Infection and Host Innate Immunity" Viruses 16, no. 1: 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16010035

APA Style

Qin, C., Xie, T., Yeh, W. W., Savas, A. C., & Feng, P. (2024). Metabolic Enzymes in Viral Infection and Host Innate Immunity. Viruses, 16(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16010035

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop