Serum Levels of Arachidonic Acid, Interleukin-6, and C-Reactive Protein as Potential Indicators of Pulmonary Viral Infections: Comparative Analysis of Influenza A, Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection, and COVID-19
by
, , , , , , and
Simona Iftimie
1
,
Xavier Gabaldó-Barrios
2,*
,
Joan Penadés-Nadal
1,
Marta Canela-Capdevila
3,
Rubén Piñana
2,
Andrea Jiménez-Franco
3,
Ana F. López-Azcona
1,
Helena Castañé
3,
María Cárcel
2,
Jordi Camps
3,*
,
Antoni Castro
1 and
Jorge Joven
3
1
Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43204 Reus, Spain
2
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43204 Reus, Spain
3
Unitat de Recerca Biomèdica, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43204 Reus, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2024, 16(7), 1065; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16071065
Submission received: 20 May 2024
/
Revised: 22 June 2024
/
Accepted: 26 June 2024
/
Published: 1 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses: Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment)
Abstract
:Acute respiratory tract infections, including influenza A (FluA), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection, and COVID-19, can aggravate to levels requiring hospitalization, increasing morbidity and mortality. Identifying biomarkers for an accurate diagnosis and prognosis of these infections is a clinical need. We performed a cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the changes in circulating levels of arachidonic acid, interleukin 6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with FluA, RSV, or COVID-19, and to analyze the potential of these parameters as diagnosis or prognosis biomarkers. We analyzed serum samples from 172 FluA, 80 RSV, and 217 COVID-19 patients, and 104 healthy volunteers. Individuals with lung viral diseases showed reduced arachidonic acid concentrations compared to healthy people, with these differences being most pronounced in the order COVID-19 > RSV > FluA. Conversely, IL-6 and CRP levels were elevated across diseases, with IL-6 emerging as the most promising diagnostic biomarker, with areas under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics plot higher than 0.85 and surpassing arachidonic acid and CRP. Moreover, IL-6 displayed notable efficacy in distinguishing between FluA patients who survived and those who did not (AUC = 0.80). These findings may provide useful tools for diagnosing and monitoring the severity of acute viral respiratory tract infections, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
1. Introduction
Acute respiratory tract infections often manifest with mild symptoms that tend to resolve spontaneously. Despite this, in certain instances, they may worsen to necessitate hospitalization, exerting a considerable influence on morbidity and mortality, especially among vulnerable populations such as children and older people [1]. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and various strains of influenza virus, particularly influenza A (FluA), have historically been the primary causes behind these infections [2,3]. However, the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 precipitated a paradigm shift, with SARS-CoV-2 assuming a dominant role in this disease spectrum, coinciding with a decreased prominence of previously prevalent viral agents. Studies conducted during this period consistently underscored the overwhelming influence of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory infections [4].
Still, in the summer of 2022, FluA and RSV resurgence was reported, causing increased hospitalizations in children and adults [5,6,7,8,9]. A confluence of factors has likely contributed to the evolving landscape of respiratory infections. Studies have indicated a diminishing risk posed by SARS-CoV-2 over time, potentially attributed to the predominance of less virulent variants, enhanced immunity derived from previous infection or vaccination, and refinements in managing COVID-19 patients [10,11]. Presently, these three infectious agents coexist, causing diseases with similar symptoms. This situation challenges clinicians treating these patients because relying solely on clinical information for accurate virus diagnosis or treatment is often insufficient. Identifying specific biomarkers enabling a more precise diagnosis and severity assessment of viral infections than conventional measures could significantly diminish inappropriate antibiotic treatment. This achievement, in turn, could optimize clinical outcomes by minimizing toxicity and adverse events, curbing healthcare expenses related to infections, and mitigating the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant strains [12]. Hence, understanding the metabolic effects and inflammatory responses of these viruses may be crucial for differential diagnosis or prognosis and finding therapeutic targets in patients with respiratory symptoms [13,14].
Our research group has paid particular interest to studying alterations in circulating lipid levels in viral infections. Lipids mediate the interaction between viral infections and the host’s metabolic and immunological responses. Viruses enter cells through protein–lipid interactions [15,16] and are released from cells via lipid vesicles [17]. Additionally, lipids serve as bioactive molecules within the immune system, and even minor variations in their chemical structures can significantly influence immune responses [18,19]. Our previous research employed semi-targeted lipidomics, identified acylcarnitines, lysophosphatidylethanolamines, arachidonic acid, and oxylipins as the most significantly altered lipid species in COVID-19 patients compared to healthy volunteers [20]. Among these metabolites, arachidonic acid can be a promising biomarker candidate due to the availability of commercial and cost-effective ELISA measurement methods. These methods do not require sophisticated technology and could be valuable additions to day-to-day clinical practice.
Alterations in lipid metabolism may contribute to the inflammatory response triggered by viral infections. This response involves a substantial increase in the production and release of inflammatory cytokines, with interleukin-6 (IL-6) being noteworthy [21]. This molecule is a versatile cytokine produced in response to tissue damage and infections and has been extensively characterized in both human and experimental studies. Elevated systemic levels of IL-6 have been associated with severe clinical outcomes in viral infections, although it is controversial whether its role is beneficial or detrimental to the host. Indeed, while some studies emphasize the role of IL-6 in mounting an effective immune response against certain viruses, others suggest that its elevation during specific viral infections could potentially facilitate virus survival or worsen clinical outcomes [22]. One of the most extensively investigated inflammation markers is C-reactive protein (CRP). The hepatic synthesis of this protein is induced by IL-6 during the acute phase of an inflammatory/infectious process and plays a role in the recognition and clearance of foreign pathogens and damaged cells [23]. A recent study has documented variances in CRP levels among patients afflicted with FluA, RSV, and COVID-19, suggesting its usefulness in evaluating the different levels of inflammatory response in these three diseases [24].
Therefore, our study was aimed to investigate the changes in circulating levels of arachidonic acid, IL-6, and CRP in patients with FluA, RSV, or COVID-19, and to analyze the potential of these parameters as diagnosis of prognosis biomarkers.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
A cross-sectional study was conducted on all patients admitted for acute respiratory pathology at Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan in Reus, Spain, during the specified periods. According to the hospital’s protocols, all patients underwent testing to detect the FluA, RSV, and SARS-CoV-2 viruses. The study comprised serum samples from 469 patients, encompassing 172 cases of FluA, 80 cases of RSV, and 217 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients diagnosed with FluA and RSV were enrolled between 1 October 2022, and 28 February 2023, while those with COVID-19 were recruited from 4 October 2020, to 23 February 2022. Our facility accommodates 367 beds devoted to hospitalization and an Intensive Care Unit with 20 beds. As a general hospital, it serves a population exceeding 175,000 inhabitants, encompassing primary care facilities and elderly residences in the region. The inclusion criterion was patients presenting to our hospital with symptoms of respiratory disease. The exclusion criteria were to be younger than 18 or have missing clinical data. We recorded clinical and demographic data from electronic medical records.
The viral agent was identified by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) from swab samples or with antigen tests in some COVID-19 patients. The methods employed were the Xpert® Xpress Cov-2/Flu/RSV (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), the Procleix® Panther System (Grifols Laboratories, Barcelona, Spain), or the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag rapid test device (Abbott Laboratories, Green Oaks, IL, USA). Patients were classified according to the recommendations of the National Institute of Health [25], as follows: mildly symptomatic if they exhibited compatible symptoms without requiring hospitalization, severely symptomatic if they presented evidence of lower respiratory disease or imaging abnormalities along with specific physiological criteria, and fatally symptomatic if they necessitated advanced respiratory support measures such as high-flow oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Patients who died within 30 days post-diagnosis were classified within the fatally symptomatic group for statistical analysis. The diagnosis was made on the day of admission or onset of symptoms, and blood for this study was drawn up to 2 days after diagnosis for patients with FluA or RSV and up to 7 days for patients with COVID-19.
As a control group, we employed serum samples from 104 healthy volunteers who had no clinical or biochemical evidence of infectious disease, renal insufficiency, liver disease, neoplasia, or neurological disorders. These samples were obtained before COVID-19 pandemic from a study conducted by the epidemiology department of our university, focusing on a healthy population. Participants were recruited via telephone interviews, drawing from data obtained from the censuses of several municipalities in the area. Subsequently, each participant underwent a clinical interview and basic laboratory tests. The serum was divided into aliquots and stored at −80 °C in our biological sample bank until analyses [26].
2.2. Laboratory Procedures
Serum arachidonic acid concentrations were assessed by ELISA (Elabscience Biotechnology Inc., Houston, TX, USA). IL-6 levels were determined by an Elecsys® IL-6 immunoassay on a Cobas e801 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). CRP was measured using a latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay on a Cobas c702 automated analyzer (Roche Diagnostics).
2.3. Statistical Analyses
Quantitative data are presented as medians and 95% confidence intervals and assessed for differences with the Mann–Whitney U test (two groups) or the Kruskal–Wallis test (more than two groups). Qualitative data are shown as numbers and percentages and differences were assessed with the χ2 test. The influence of clinical variables on arachidonic acid, IL-6, and CRP concentrations was analyzed by multiple regression analysis, and the diagnostic accuracy was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves [27]. We employed SPSS 25.0 for statistical analyses and GraphPrism 9 and R 4.3.0 programs for graphics.
3. Results
3.1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Patients and the Control Group
Patients with FluA and RSV were older than those with COVID-19 and the control group. Many patients exhibited symptoms of respiratory distress; however, individuals with FluA were more likely to present with pneumonia, whereas those with RSV infection were more prone to cough and acute respiratory failure. Comorbidities were similar, although chronic lung disease was more prevalent among FluA patients, while cancer was more common in COVID-19. Patients with COVID-19 required more admissions to the Intensive Care Unit and received a higher frequency of treatment with anticoagulants. There were no significant differences in disease severity or mortality rates among the groups (Table 1).
3.2. Changes in the Circulating Levels of Selected Variables in Relation to the Disease
The results of the analyzed variables across the studied diseases and their respective severity levels are depicted in Figure 1. Generally, individuals with lung viral diseases exhibited a notably reduced concentration of arachidonic acid compared to the control group, with these differences being most pronounced in the order COVID-19 > RSV > FluA. Conversely, they showed elevated concentrations of IL-6 and CRP, with relatively consistent levels among the diseases (Figure 1A). While serum concentrations of arachidonic acid did not show any significant differences in relation to severity in any of the studied diseases, IL-6 levels displayed a notable upward trend. Serum CRP concentrations exhibited a similar pattern, albeit less pronounced (Figure 1B).
Multiple regression analysis revealed that serum arachidonic acid concentrations were independently associated only with the presence and type of infectious disease, as indicated in Table 2. Conversely, IL-6 levels showed associations not only with the presence of disease but also with its severity and CRP concentrations (Table 3). Additionally, CRP levels showed associations with both IL-6 concentration and disease severity, albeit with slightly lower significance observed in the association with disease severity compared to IL-6, as illustrated in Table 4.
3.3. Serum Arachidonic Acid, IL-6, and CRP Concentrations as Disease Biomarkers
Next, we conducted a comparative analysis of the efficacy of the studied parameters in discerning between healthy and diseased individuals (diagnosis) and forecasting disease severity (prognosis). The methodology involved employing ROC curves, with a “candidate biomarker of potential interest” designated based on an arbitrary threshold of an area under the curve (AUC) exceeding 0.80. Comprehensive AUC data are provided in Supplementary Tables S1–S3, with selected results in Figure 2.
Our findings highlight IL-6 as the most promising candidate biomarker for diagnosing viral diseases, with AUC higher than 0.85, surpassing arachidonic acid and CRP. Moreover, IL-6 displayed notable accuracy to differentiate between FluA patients who survived and those who did not (AUC = 0.80). However, none of the parameters analyzed demonstrated effective discrimination between mild cases and those categorized as severe or fatal.
4. Discussion
Arachidonic acid, a polyunsaturated fatty acid, is a precursor for synthesizing various inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandins and leukotrienes. Fatty acids play indispensable roles in viral pathogenesis, serving as crucial components for membrane biosynthesis during viral replication [28]. We and other authors have previously reported a marked decrease in the circulating levels of fatty acids measured by metabolomics in patients with COVID-19 [20,29,30], and our previous study [20] showed that arachidonic acid was the fatty acid that presented the most marked alterations. The current study confirms these last results using immunoassay methods and expands them to patients with influenza A and RSV. This observation holds particular relevance from a pathophysiological standpoint, as arachidonic acid exhibits potent antiviral properties, contributing to the neutralization of enveloped viruses [31]. A decline in arachidonic acid concentrations could compromise host defense mechanisms, promoting viral persistence and replication. Indeed, exogenous supplementation with arachidonic acid effectively impedes the replication of the HcoV-229E virus in cultured cells [32]. The decrease in serum arachidonic acid levels can be explained by the need for lipids by the viral particles for their replication and an increase in their catabolism for the synthesis of inflammatory mediators. Arachidonic acid metabolites are inflammatory bioactive lipids that activate various signaling pathways, including p38 MAPK and calcium signaling pathways [33]. The observed decrease in arachidonic acid levels in the order of healthy individuals, and influenza A, RSV, and COVID-19 patients suggests a potential dysregulation of inflammatory pathways across these diseases. Therefore, the decline in arachidonic acid levels may reflect the severity of the inflammatory response mounted by the host against the respective pathogens.
In contrast, IL-6 and CRP are well-established markers of systemic inflammation and acute-phase responses, serving as sentinel indicators of host defense mechanisms activated in response to infection. These molecules actively participate in somatic maintenance processes, reflecting the organism’s investment in protecting, preserving, and repairing somatic tissues. Depending on the physiological state of the host, this maintenance effort may be directed towards resistance against pathogens, including inflammatory responses, tolerance to pathogens, harm reduction, or tissue repair mechanisms [34]. IL-6 emerges as an essential regulator of the inflammatory reaction observed in severe respiratory viral illnesses, exerting pleiotropic effects on immune cell activation, differentiation, and recruitment. The heightened levels of IL-6 in these conditions reflect the magnitude of the systemic inflammatory burden and indicate the severity of the host’s response to the invading pathogens. Consistent with prior studies, our findings corroborate the association between elevated IL-6 levels and adverse clinical outcomes, including prolonged hospital stays, complications, and mortality among COVID-19 patients [35,36,37,38]. These findings underscore the potential clinical utility of IL-6 as an early prognosis marker and advocate for its serial monitoring post-hospitalization to assess the progression of lung infections and worsening clinical features. Indeed, there are currently no described laboratory markers capable of reflecting the severity and disease course in patients with RSV infection [39].
The differential patterns observed in arachidonic acid, IL-6, and CRP levels among the infectious disease groups suggest distinct immunological signatures associated with each pathogen. While arachidonic acid appears useful in distinguishing COVID-19, IL-6 emerges as a superior marker for diagnosing this and other infectious diseases. Furthermore, our findings suggest that IL-6 could serve as a prognostic indicator, signaling the mortality risk in FluA patients. On the contrary, the discriminatory capacity of CRP is modest compared to the other molecules. These findings align with the knowledge of the complex interplay between lipid metabolism, inflammation, and regulating the immune response in infectious diseases.
This study has its limitations. The sample size and demographics of the population studied may not fully represent the broader population affected by infectious diseases, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings. The cross-sectional design also hinders the establishment of causality or assessment of temporal relationships between biomarker levels and disease progression. Further longitudinal studies are needed to understand the dynamic changes in arachidonic acid, IL-6, and CRP levels during infection and recovery. The impact of medical interventions on biomarker levels has yet to be fully explored, and the variability in treatment protocols among patients could confound the interpretation of biomarker data. Addressing these limitations through more extensive prospective studies with standardized methodologies and comprehensive data collection protocols will be crucial for advancing our understanding of the utility of arachidonic acid, IL-6, and CRP as biomarkers in infectious diseases.
5. Conclusions
Our research identifies potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of acute respiratory tract infections, including FluA, RSV infection, and COVID-19, and underscores their practical value. These findings may equip clinicians with valuable tools for diagnosing and monitoring the severity of acute viral respiratory tract infections, thereby significantly improving patient outcomes.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v16071065/s1, Table S1: Areas under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curves for selected metabolites in distinguishing patients from the control group; Table S2: Areas under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curves for selected metabolites in distinguishing mild from severe/fatal patients; Table S3: Areas under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curves for selected metabolites in distinguishing survivors from deceased patients.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.I., X.G.-B. and J.C.; methodology, S.I., X.G.-B. and A.F.L.-A.; software, J.P.-N. and A.F.L.-A.; validation, S.I., X.G.-B. and J.C.; formal analysis, X.G.-B., J.P.-N. and J.C.; investigation, J.P.-N., M.C.-C., R.P., A.J.-F., H.C. and M.C.; resources, A.C. and J.J.; data curation, X.G.-B. and J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.C.; writing—review and editing, S.I., X.G.-B. and J.C.; visualization, S.I., X.G.-B. and J.C.; supervision, S.I., X.G.-B. and J.C.; project administration, J.C.; funding acquisition, A.C. and J.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by a grant from the FUNDACIÓ LA MARATÓ DE TV3 (201807-10), Barcelona, Spain.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (Comité d’Ètica i Investigació en Medicaments) of INSTITUT D’INVESTIGACIÓ SANITÀRIA PERE VIRGILI (Resolution CEIM 040/2018, amended on 16 April 2020).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding authors.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Li, Y.; Nair, H. Trends in the global burden of lower respiratory infections: The knowns and the unknowns. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 1523–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Drew, L. Research round-up: Respiratory syncytial virus. Nature 2023, 621, S66–S67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pandya, M.C.; Callahan, S.M.; Savchenko, K.G.; Stobart, C.C. A contemporary view of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) biology and strain-specific differences. Pathogens 2019, 8, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maltezou, H.C.; Papanikolopoulou, A.; Vassiliu, S.; Theodoridou, K.; Nikolopoulou, G.; Sipsas, N.V. COVID-19 and respiratory virus co-infections: A systematic review of the literature. Viruses 2023, 15, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Terliesner, N.; Unterwalder, N.; Edelmann, A.; Corman, V.; Knaust, A.; Rosenfeld, L.; Gratopp, A.; Ringe, H.; Martin, L.; von Bernuth, H.; et al. Viral infections in hospitalized children in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic: Association with non-pharmaceutical interventions. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 935483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rao, S.; Armistead, I.; Messacar, K.; Alden, N.B.; Schmoll, E.; Austin, E.; Dominguez, S.R. Shifting epidemiology and severity of respiratory syncytial virus in children during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Pediatr. 2023, 177, 730–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ambrosch, A.; Luber, D.; Klawonn, F.; Kabesch, M. Focusing on severe infections with the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in adults: Risk factors, symptomatology and clinical course compared to influenza A/B and the original SARS-CoV-2 strain. J. Clin. Virol. 2023, 161, 105399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jallow, M.M.; Diagne, M.M.; Sagne, S.N.; Tall, F.; Diouf, J.B.N.; Boiro, D.; Mendy, M.P.; Ndiaye, N.K.; Kiori, D.; Sy, S.; et al. Respiratory syncytial virus in pediatric patients with severe acute respiratory infections in Senegal: Findings from the 2022 sentinel surveillance season. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 20404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grangier, B.; Vacheron, C.H.; De Marignan, D.; Casalegno, J.S.; Couray-Targe, S.; Bestion, A.; Ader, F.; Richard, J.C.; Frobert, E.; Argaud, L.; et al. Comparison of mortality and outcomes of four respiratory viruses in the intensive care unit: A multicenter retrospective study. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 6690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markov, P.V.; Ghafari, M.; Beer, M.; Lythgoe, K.; Simmonds, P.; Stilianakis, N.I.; Katzourakis, A. The evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 361–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filip, R.; Gheorghita Puscaselu, R.; Anchidin-Norocel, L.; Dimian, M.; Savage, W.K. Global challenges to public health care systems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A review of pandemic measures and problems. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boon, H.; Meinders, A.J.; van Hannen, E.J.; Tersmette, M.; Schaftenaar, E. Comparative analysis of mortality in patients admitted with an infection with influenza A/B virus, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, metapneumovirus or SARS-CoV-2. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2024, 18, e13237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Caliendo, A.M.; Gilbert, D.N.; Ginocchio, C.C.; Hanson, K.E.; May, L.; Quinn, T.C.; Tenover, F.C.; Alland, D.; Blaschke, A.J.; Bonomo, R.A.; et al. Better tests, better care: Improved diagnostics for infectious diseases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, S139–S170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lipkin, W.I.; Mishra, N.; Briese, T. Screening for viral infections. Encycl. Virol. 2021, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weigele, B.A.; Orchard, R.C.; Jimenez, A.; Cox, G.W.; Alto, N.M. A systematic exploration of the interactions between bacterial effector proteins and host cell membranes. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Q.; Xiang, R.; Huo, S.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, S.; Wang, Q.; Yu, F. Molecular mechanism of interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and host cells and interventional therapy. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lam, S.M.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Z.; Ni, Z.; Zhang, S.; Yang, S.; Huang, X.; Mo, L.; Li, J.; Lee, B.; et al. A multi-omics investigation of the composition and function of extracellular vesicles along the temporal trajectory of COVID-19. Nat. Metab. 2021, 3, 909–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morita, M.; Kuba, K.; Ichikawa, A.; Nakayama, M.; Katahira, J.; Iwamoto, R.; Watanebe, T.; Sakabe, S.; Daidoji, T.; Nakamura, S.; et al. The lipid mediator protectin D1 inhibits influenza virus replication and improves severe influenza. Cell 2013, 153, 112–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lydic, T.A.; Goo, Y.H. Lipidomics unveils the complexity of the lipidome in metabolic diseases. Clin. Transl. Med. 2018, 7, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castañé, H.; Iftimie, S.; Baiges-Gaya, G.; Rodríguez-Tomàs, E.; Jiménez-Franco, A.; López-Azcona, A.F.; Garrido, P.; Castro, A.; Camps, J.; Joven, J. Machine learning and semi-targeted lipidomics identify distinct serum lipid signatures in hospitalized COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative patients. Metabolism 2022, 131, 155197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanaka, T.; Narazaki, M.; Kishimoto, T. IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014, 6, a016295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Velazquez-Salinas, L.; Verdugo-Rodriguez, A.; Rodriguez, L.L.; Borca, M.V. The role of interleukin 6 during viral infections. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nehring, S.M.; Goyal, A.; Patel, B.C. C Reactive Protein. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Levinson, T.; Wasserman, A.; Shenhar-Tsarfaty, S.; Halutz, O.; Shapira, I.; Zeltser, D.; Rogowski, O.; Berliner, S.; Ziv-Baran, T. Comparative analysis of CRP as a biomarker of the inflammatory response intensity among common viral infections affecting the lungs: COVID-19 versus influenza A, influenza B and respiratory syncytial virus. Clin. Exp. Med. 2023, 23, 5307–5313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines. Clinical Spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Available online: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/overview/clinical-spectrum/ (accessed on 12 April 2024).
- Gabaldó, X.; Juanpere, M.; Castañé, H.; Rodríguez-Tomàs, E.; López-Azcona, A.F.; Baiges-Gaya, G.; Castro, L.; Valverde-Díaz, E.; Muñoz-Blázquez, A.; Giménez-Cuenca, L.; et al. Usefulness of the measurement of serum paraoxonase-1 arylesterase activity in the diagnoses of COVID-19. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zweig, M.H.; Campbell, G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin. Chem. 1993, 39, 561–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Theken, K.N.; Tang, S.Y.; Sengupta, S.; FitzGerald, G.A. The roles of lipids in SARS-CoV-2 viral replication and the host immune response. J. Lipid Res. 2021, 62, 100129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, B.; Yi, X.; Sun, Y.; Bi, X.; Du, J.; Zhang, C.; Quan, S.; Zhang, F.; Sun, R.; Qian, L.; et al. Proteomic and metabolomic characterization of COVID-19 patient sera. Cell 2020, 182, 59–72.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dyall, S.C.; Balas, L.; Bazan, N.G.; Brenna, J.T.; Chiang, N.; da Costa Souza, F.; Dalli, J.; Durand, T.; Galano, J.M.; Lein, P.J.; et al. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and fatty acid-derived lipid mediators: Recent advances in the understanding of their biosynthesis, structures, and functions. Prog. Lipid Res. 2022, 86, 101165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casari, I.; Manfredi, M.; Metharom, P.; Falasca, M. Dissecting lipid metabolism alterations in SARS-CoV-2. Prog. Lipid Res. 2021, 82, 101092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, B.; Chu, H.; Yang, D.; Sze, K.H.; Lai, P.M.; Yuan, S.; Shuai, H.; Wang, Y.; Kao, R.Y.; Chan, J.F.; et al. Characterization of the lipidomic profile of human coronavirus-infected cells: Implications for lipid metabolism remodeling upon coronavirus replication. Viruses 2019, 11, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, J.; Zhang, W.; Guo, Z.; Ma, Q. Arachidonic acid metabolism in health and disease. MedComm 2023, 4, e363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Del Giudice, M.; Gangestad, S.W. Rethinking IL-6 and CRP: Why they are more than inflammatory biomarkers, and why it matters. Brain Behav. Immun. 2018, 70, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nikkhoo, B.; Mohammadi, M.; Hasani, S.; Sigari, N.; Borhani, A.; Ramezani, C.; Charajoo, A.; Badri, S.; Rostami, F.; Etemadi, M.; et al. Elevated interleukin (IL)-6 as a predictor of disease severity among COVID-19 patients: A prospective cohort study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2023, 23, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Keddie, S.; Ziff, O.; Chou, M.K.L.; Taylor, R.L.; Heslegrave, A.; Garr, E.; Lakdawala, N.; Church, A.; Ludwig, D.; Manson, J.; et al. Laboratory biomarkers associated with COVID-19 severity and management. Clin. Immunol. 2020, 221, 108614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ulhaq, Z.S.; Soraya, G.V. Interleukin-6 as a potential biomarker of COVID-19 progression. Med. Mal. Infect. 2020, 50, 382–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bourgonje, A.R.; Abdulle, A.E.; Timens, W.; Hillebrands, J.L.; Navis, G.J.; Gordijn, S.J.; Bolling, M.C.; Dijkstra, G.; Voors, A.A.; Osterhaus, A.D.; et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), SARS-CoV-2 and the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J. Pathol. 2020, 251, 228–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manti, S.; Staiano, A.; Orfeo, L.; Midulla, F.; Marseglia, G.L.; Ghizzi, C.; Zampogna, S.; Carnielli, V.P.; Favilli, S.; Ruggieri, M.; et al. UPDATE—2022 Italian guidelines on the management of bronchiolitis in infants. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2023, 49, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Bar plot representation illustrating the serum concentrations of arachidonic acid, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein in healthy controls (n = 104), Influenza A patients (n = 172), respiratory syncytial virus patients (n = 80), and COVID-19 patients (n = 217), categorized by viral pathogen (A) and disease severity (B). The top and bottom lines of bars are the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively, and the line in the middle of the bar is the median. Significance levels: * p < 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1.
Bar plot representation illustrating the serum concentrations of arachidonic acid, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein in healthy controls (n = 104), Influenza A patients (n = 172), respiratory syncytial virus patients (n = 80), and COVID-19 patients (n = 217), categorized by viral pathogen (A) and disease severity (B). The top and bottom lines of bars are the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively, and the line in the middle of the bar is the median. Significance levels: * p < 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with areas under the curve (AUC) greater than 0.80 in the distinction between patients and healthy controls and between survivors and deceased. Numbers in parentheses show the 95% CI of the AUCs. AA: arachidonic acid; FluA: Influenza A, IL6: Interleukin-6. The cutoffs of the different curves, from left to right and from top to bottom were: 6.03 ng/mL (sensitivity: 71%, specificity: 77%); 8.54 pg/mL (sensitivity = 88%, specificity = 100%); 7.35 pg/mL (sensitivity = 83%, specificity = 81%); 7.10 pg/mL (sensitivity = 78%, specificity = 81%); and 85.6 pg/mL (sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 81%).
Figure 2.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with areas under the curve (AUC) greater than 0.80 in the distinction between patients and healthy controls and between survivors and deceased. Numbers in parentheses show the 95% CI of the AUCs. AA: arachidonic acid; FluA: Influenza A, IL6: Interleukin-6. The cutoffs of the different curves, from left to right and from top to bottom were: 6.03 ng/mL (sensitivity: 71%, specificity: 77%); 8.54 pg/mL (sensitivity = 88%, specificity = 100%); 7.35 pg/mL (sensitivity = 83%, specificity = 81%); 7.10 pg/mL (sensitivity = 78%, specificity = 81%); and 85.6 pg/mL (sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 81%).
Table 1.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients and the control group.
| Variable | Control Group n = 104 | Influenza A n = 172 | RSV n = 80 | COVID-19 n = 217 | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 50 (38–65) | 73 (53–73) | 75 (59–81) | 62 (47–76) | <0.001 |
| Male sex | 45 (43.3) | 83 (48.3) | 35 (43.8) | 112 (51.6) | 0.449 |
| Smoking | 33 (31.7) | 26 (15.1) | 7 (8.8) | 32 (14.7) | <0.001 |
| Alcohol | 45 (43.3) | 21 (12.2) | 11 (13.8) | 14 (6.5) | <0.001 |
| Initial admission department | |||||
| Emergency | N.A. | 100 (58.1) | 34 (42.5) | 81 (37.3) | <0.001 |
| Internal Medicine | N.A. | 42 (24.4) | 31 (38.8) | 59 (27.2) | |
| Geriatry | N.A. | 21 (12.2) | 8 (10.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Oncology | N.A. | 3 (1.7) | 4 (5.0) | 21 (9.7) | |
| Intensive Care Unit | N.A. | 1 (0.6) | 2 (2.5) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Surgery | N.A. | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Traumatology | N.A. | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Anesthesiology | N.A. | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Gynecology | N.A. | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.2) | 5 (2.3) | |
| Pneumology | N.A. | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.9) | |
| Other | N.A. | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0.0) | 49 (22.6) | |
| Symptoms | |||||
| Pneumonia | N.A. | 66 (38.4) | 20 (25.0) | 32 (14.7) | <0.001 |
| Bronchitis | N.A. | 49 (28.5) | 17 (21.3) | 0 (0.0) | <0.001 |
| Cough | N.A. | 114 (66.3) | 61 (76.3) | 95 (43.8) | <0.001 |
| Fever | N.A. | 101 (58.7) | 31 (38.8) | 109 (50.2) | 0.011 |
| Odynophagia | N.A. | 7 (4.1) | 3 (3.8) | 7 (3.2) | 0.905 |
| Headache | N.A. | 7 (4.1) | 1 (1.2) | 27 (12.4) | 0.001 |
| Anorexia or hyporexia | N.A. | 4 (2.3) | 2 (2.5) | 5 (2.3) | 0.995 |
| Myalgia | N.A. | 33 (19.2) | 13 (16.3) | 12 (5.5) | 0.001 |
| Arthralgia | N.A. | 23 (13.4) | 10 (12.5) | 10 (4.6) | 0.006 |
| Acute respiratory failure | N.A. | 85 (49.4) | 48 (60.0) | 13 (6.0) | <0.001 |
| Comorbidities | |||||
| Diabetes mellitus | N.A. | 38 (22.1) | 27 (33.8) | 57 (26.3) | 0.145 |
| Cardiovascular disease | N.A. | 100 (58.1) | 49 (61.3) | 111 (51.2) | 0.200 |
| Chronic liver disease | N.A. | 8 (4.7) | 3 (3.8) | 14 (6.5) | 0.579 |
| Chronic kidney disease | N.A. | 27 (15.7) | 18 (22.5) | 31 (14.3) | 0.228 |
| Chronic lung disease | N.A. | 50 (29.1) | 37 (46.3) | 25 (11.5) | <0.001 |
| Chronic neurological disease | N.A. | 36 (20.9) | 13 (16.3) | 31 (14.3) | 0.219 |
| Cancer | N.A. | 9 (5.2) | 7 (8.8) | 34 (15.7) | 0.003 |
| Interventions and treatments | |||||
| Intensive Care Unit admission | N.A. | 7 (4.1) | 6 (7.5) | 30 (13.8) | 0.004 |
| Non-invasive mechanical ventilation | N.A. | 8 (4.7) | 3 (3.8) | 9 (4.1) | 0.941 |
| Invasive mechanical ventilation | N.A. | 5 (2.9) | 1 (1.3) | 14 (6.5) | 0.078 |
| High-flow oxygen therapy | N.A. | 3 (1.7) | 0 (0.0) | 20 (9.2) | <0.001 |
| Conventional oxygen therapy | N.A. | 95 (55.2) | 44 (55.0) | 103 (47.5) | <0.001 |
| Anticoagulants | N.A. | 31 (18.0) | 17 (21.3) | 88 (40.6) | <0.001 |
| Corticosteroids | N.A. | 78 (45.3) | 52 (65.0) | 113 (52.1) | 0.007 |
| Disease severity | |||||
| Mild | N.A. | 80 (46.5) | 28 (35.0) | 93 (42.9) | 0.344 |
| Severe | N.A. | 68 (39.5) | 35 (43.8) | 82 (37.8) | |
| Fatal | N.A. | 24 (13.9) | 17 (21.3) | 42 (19.4) | |
| Deceased | N.A. | 17 (9.9) | 11 (13.8) | 19 (8.8) | 0.444 |
N.A.: not applicable. RSV: respiratory syncytial virus. The results of qualitative variables are shown as numbers and percentages, and statistical significances were calculated by the χ2 test. The results of the quantitative variable (age) are shown as medians and interquartile ranges, and statistical significance was calculated by the Kruskal–Wallis test.
Table 2.
Multiple regression analysis of the variables associated with arachidonic acid concentrations in the patients’ groups.
Table 2.
Multiple regression analysis of the variables associated with arachidonic acid concentrations in the patients’ groups.
| Variable | B | 95% CI for B | β | t | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.014 | −0.041–0.069 | 0.039 | 0.502 | 0.616 |
| Male sex | −1.108 | −2.726–0.509 | −0.078 | −1.348 | 0.179 |
| Smoking | 0.595 | −0.573–1.764 | 0.095 | 1.002 | 0.317 |
| Alcohol | 0.338 | −0.804–1.480 | 0.056 | 0.583 | 0.560 |
| Disease * | −1.038 | −1.664–−0.411 | −0.203 | −3.260 | 0.001 |
| Interleukin-6 | 0.000 | −0.001–0.001 | 0.032 | 0.539 | 0.590 |
| C-reactive protein | 0.014 | −0.085–0.113 | 0.017 | 0.283 | 0.778 |
| Type 2 diabetes mellitus | −0.419 | −2.417–1.578 | −0.025 | −0.413 | 0.680 |
| Cardiovascular disease | −0.526 | −2.577–1.524 | −0.037 | −0.505 | 0.614 |
| Chronic liver disease | 0.099 | −3.453–3.651 | 0.003 | 0.055 | 0.956 |
| Chronic kidney disease | −1.184 | −3.567–1.199 | −0.061 | −0.978 | 0.329 |
| Chronic lung disease | −0.330 | −2.266–1.605 | −0.020 | −0.336 | 0.737 |
| Chronic neurological disease | 0.711 | −1.546–2.969 | 0.037 | 0.620 | 0.536 |
| Cancer | −1.068 | −3.707–1.571 | −0.046 | −0.796 | 0.426 |
| Severity ** | −0.057 | −1.447–1.334 | −0.006 | −0.080 | 0.936 |
| Deceased | −0.611 | −4.141–2.919 | −0.025 | −0.341 | 0.734 |
| Constant | 8.951 | 4.278–13.625 | 3.770 | <0.001 |
* Influenza A, respiratory syncytial virus infection or COVID-19; ** mild, severe, or fatal. Model summary: r = 0.333; standard error: 6.877; sum of squares regression = 1733.696; sum of squares total = 15,591.962; p = 0.004.
Table 3.
Multiple regression analysis of the variables associated with interleukin-6 concentrations in the patients’ groups.
Table 3.
Multiple regression analysis of the variables associated with interleukin-6 concentrations in the patients’ groups.
| Variable | B | 95% CI for B | β | t | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | −4.832 | −11.232–1.568 | −0.115 | −1.486 | 0.138 |
| Male sex | 108.827 | −80.500–298.154 | 0.065 | 1.131 | 0.259 |
| Smoking | −2.108 | −138.983–134.767 | −0.003 | −0.030 | 0.976 |
| Alcohol | 18.935 | −114.661–152.531 | 0.026 | 0.279 | 0.780 |
| Disease * | −98.391 | −172.101–−24.681 | −0.163 | −2.627 | 0.009 |
| Arachidonic acid | 3.679 | −9.758–17.116 | 0.031 | 0.539 | 0.590 |
| C-reactive protein | 16.573 | 5.151–27.995 | 0.169 | 2.856 | 0.005 |
| Type 2 diabetes mellitus | −31.376 | −264.992–202.240 | −0.016 | −0.264 | 0.792 |
| Cardiovascular disease | 10.427 | −229.435–250.289 | 0.006 | 0.086 | 0.932 |
| Chronic liver disease | −95.142 | −510.319–320.035 | −0.025 | −0.451 | 0.652 |
| Chronic kidney disease | 114.124 | −163.616–392.864 | 0.050 | 0.806 | 0.421 |
| Chronic lung disease | −81.901 | −308.071–144.268 | −0.043 | −0.713 | 0.477 |
| Chronic neurological disease | −13.793 | −277.898–250.312 | −0.006 | −0.103 | 0.918 |
| Cancer | 29.816 | −279.067–338.698 | 0.011 | 0.190 | 0.849 |
| Severity ** | 310.316 | 151.692–468.940 | 0.270 | 3.850 | <0.001 |
| Deceased | −358.220 | −769.013–52.574 | −0.123 | −1.716 | 0.087 |
| Constant | −270.133 | −828.788–288.522 | −0.952 | 0.342 |
* Influenza A, respiratory syncytial virus infection or COVID-19; ** mild, severe, or fatal. Model summary: r = 0.351; standard error: 804.139; sum of squares regression = 26,704,617.21; sum of squares total = 216,170,131.9; p = 0.001.
Table 4.
Multiple regression analysis of the variables associated with C-reactive protein concentrations in the patients’ groups.
Table 4.
Multiple regression analysis of the variables associated with C-reactive protein concentrations in the patients’ groups.
| Variable | B | 95% CI for B | β | t | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.045 | −0.019–0.108 | 0.104 | 1.385 | 0.167 |
| Male sex | 2.538 | 0.677–4.400 | 0.149 | 2.684 | 0.008 |
| Smoking | −0.294 | −1.653–1.064 | −0.039 | −0.426 | 0.670 |
| Alcohol | −0.408 | −1.734–0.918 | −0.056 | −0.605 | 0.545 |
| Disease * | −0.249 | −0.989–0.491 | −0.040 | −0.662 | 0.508 |
| Arachidonic acid | 0.019 | −0.114–0.153 | 0.016 | 0.283 | 0.778 |
| Interleukin-6 | 0.002 | 0.001–0.003 | 0.160 | 2.856 | 0.005 |
| Type 2 diabetes mellitus | 2.233 | −0.072–4.539 | 0.111 | 1.907 | 0.058 |
| Cardiovascular disease | −0.566 | −2.946–1.815 | −0.033 | −0.468 | 0.640 |
| Chronic liver disease | −0.479 | −4.602–3.644 | −0.012 | −0.229 | 0.819 |
| Chronic kidney disease | −0.487 | −3.257–2.283 | −0.021 | −0.346 | 0.729 |
| Chronic lung disease | −0.086 | −2.333–2.162 | −0.004 | −0.075 | 0.940 |
| Chronic neurological disease | 0.744 | −1.877–3.365 | 0.032 | 0.559 | 0.577 |
| Cancer | −0.690 | −3.756–2.376 | −0.025 | −0.443 | 0.658 |
| Severity ** | 1.985 | 0.387–3.583 | 0.169 | 2.444 | 0.015 |
| Deceased | 3.203 | −0.880–7.285 | 0.107 | 1.544 | 0.124 |
| Constant | −1.579 | −7.131–3.973 | −0.560 | 0.576 |
* Influenza A, respiratory syncytial virus infection or COVID-19; ** mild, severe, or fatal. Model summary: r = 0.417; standard error: 7.984; sum of squares regression = 3929.966; sum of squares total = 22,607.704; p ≤ 0.001.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Iftimie, S.; Gabaldó-Barrios, X.; Penadés-Nadal, J.; Canela-Capdevila, M.; Piñana, R.; Jiménez-Franco, A.; López-Azcona, A.F.; Castañé, H.; Cárcel, M.; Camps, J.; et al. Serum Levels of Arachidonic Acid, Interleukin-6, and C-Reactive Protein as Potential Indicators of Pulmonary Viral Infections: Comparative Analysis of Influenza A, Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection, and COVID-19. Viruses 2024, 16, 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16071065
AMA Style
Iftimie S, Gabaldó-Barrios X, Penadés-Nadal J, Canela-Capdevila M, Piñana R, Jiménez-Franco A, López-Azcona AF, Castañé H, Cárcel M, Camps J, et al. Serum Levels of Arachidonic Acid, Interleukin-6, and C-Reactive Protein as Potential Indicators of Pulmonary Viral Infections: Comparative Analysis of Influenza A, Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection, and COVID-19. Viruses. 2024; 16(7):1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16071065
Chicago/Turabian StyleIftimie, Simona, Xavier Gabaldó-Barrios, Joan Penadés-Nadal, Marta Canela-Capdevila, Rubén Piñana, Andrea Jiménez-Franco, Ana F. López-Azcona, Helena Castañé, María Cárcel, Jordi Camps, and et al. 2024. "Serum Levels of Arachidonic Acid, Interleukin-6, and C-Reactive Protein as Potential Indicators of Pulmonary Viral Infections: Comparative Analysis of Influenza A, Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection, and COVID-19" Viruses 16, no. 7: 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16071065
APA StyleIftimie, S., Gabaldó-Barrios, X., Penadés-Nadal, J., Canela-Capdevila, M., Piñana, R., Jiménez-Franco, A., López-Azcona, A. F., Castañé, H., Cárcel, M., Camps, J., Castro, A., & Joven, J. (2024). Serum Levels of Arachidonic Acid, Interleukin-6, and C-Reactive Protein as Potential Indicators of Pulmonary Viral Infections: Comparative Analysis of Influenza A, Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection, and COVID-19. Viruses, 16(7), 1065. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16071065
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
