A Theoretical Concept of an Innovative and Sustainable Product Based on an Unconventional Approach to Design Development
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Designcommunication (DIS:CO) as a Bridge between Society, Economy, and Design
2.2. Safe and Secure Traveling
2.3. Smart Technologies
2.4. Aspects of Sustainable Development
3. Methodology
3.1. The Aim of the Study
3.2. Research Question
- What will be the new norm of tourism?
- How can design support achieving the new norm of tourism?
- How can we design future-proof products in today’s analog and digital worlds?
- How can we create a sustainable product?
- What types of products and services are there consumer demand for?
- How can the new norm of tourism serve consumer needs?
How can sustainable product design and development support the prosperity of different tourism products in the new normal?
Q1: What are the important aspects of digital and analog lifestyles?
Q2: How can the aspired value (derived from Q1) manifest through a product concept?
3.3. Research Strategy
3.4. Data Collection and the Characteristics of the Sample
3.5. Analysis Phase–QCA
3.6. Development Phase–DIS:CO Development Framework
4. Discussion
4.1. Findings of the Qualitative Research
- Analog experience-seeking: collecting experiences that require mobility, are real-time and are gained in a physical environment. Examples: 14, 7;
- In-person contact: the reinforcement of personal relationships and the establishment of new ones in real-time and in a physical environment. Examples: 2, 81;
- Analog knowledge transfer and value creation: the sharing of one’s knowledge and experience with no transfer medium between individuals. Examples: 23, 112;
- The complementary role of digitalisation: digital solutions support the acquisition of and the immersion in in-person experiences, but they cannot replace them. Examples: 56, 14, 99;
- The connection between virtuality and separation: digital communication platforms can only alleviate the experience of physical distance partially, the quality of relationships changes. Examples: 56, 7;
- A sustainable community lifestyle: the consideration of the wellbeing and sociocultural values of interrelated groups. Examples: 24, 114
4.2. Results of Product Development
4.2.1. Safe–Secure–Smart–Sustainable: The Concept of 4S Travelling
4.2.2. Description of the Device
4.2.3. The Use of the Device in Tourism
5. Conclusions and Implications
6. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Miettinen, S. Designing the Creative Tourism Experience; University of Art and Design Helsinki: Helsinki, Finland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Stickdorn, M. Service Design in Tourism. In Designing Services with Innovative Methods; Miettinen, S., Koivisto, M., Eds.; Taik Publications: Helsinki, Finland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Tussyadiah, I.P. Toward a Theoretical Foundation for Experience Design in Tourism. J. Travel Res. 2013, 53, 543–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, S.; Boone, P. From Lockdown to Locked in, Here’s What Post-Pandemic Travel Could Look Like. 2020. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/05/coronavirus-lockdown-travel-tourism/ (accessed on 22 January 2022).
- United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). Impact Assessment of the COVID-19 Outbreak on International Tourism. 2020. Available online: https://www.unwto.org/impact-assessment-of-the-covid-19-outbreak-on-international-tourism (accessed on 22 January 2022).
- De Vos, J. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives The effect of COVID-19 and subsequent social distancing on travel behavior. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2020, 5, 100121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Irimiás, A.; Michalkó, G. Hosting while being hosted: A perspective of Hungarian migrant hospitality workers in London, UK. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2016, 16, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitev, A.; Irimiás, A. Travel Craving. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020, 90, 103111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Freire-Gibb, L.C.; Lorentzen, A. A platform for local entrepreneurship: The case of the lighting festival of Frederikshavn. Local Econ. 2011, 26, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Megyeri, G.; Boros, K.; Fekete, B. Hidakból teremtett emlékek, avagy kísérlet egy innovatív tárgy megalkotására a B-bridge koncepción keresztül. Tur. Bull. 2020, 20, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cosovan, A.; Horváth, D.; Mitev Ariel, Z. A designkommunikáció antropológiai megközelítése. Replika 2018, 106, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cosovan, A.; (DISCO). Co&Co Communication, 2009.
- Zieliñski, G.; Studziñska, M. Application of design-thinking models to improve the quality of tourism services. Zarzdzanie I Finans. J. Manag. Financ. 2015, 13, 133–145. [Google Scholar]
- Robbins, P.; Devitt, F. Collaboration, creativity and entrepreneurship in tourism: A case study of how design thinking created a cultural cluster in Dublin. Int. J. Entrep. Innov. Manag. 2017, 21, 185–211. [Google Scholar]
- Sándorová, Z.; Repáňová, T.; Palenčíková, Z.; Beták, N. Design thinking-A revolutionary new approach in tourism education? J. Hosp. Leis. Sport Tour. Educ. 2020, 26, 100238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cosovan, A. VY. Vez.-Bp. Manag. Rev. 2017, 48, 4–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cosovan, A.; Horváth, D. Emóció–Ráció: Tervezés–Vezetés: Designkommunikáció. Vez.-Bp. Manag. Rev. 2016, 47, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Megyeri, G.; Boros, K.; Fekete, B. 3S Traveling–Turizmus a poszt-COVID19 érában. Tur. Bull. 2021, 21, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, C.M.; Scott, D.; Gössling, S. Pandemics, transformations and tourism: Be careful what you wish for. Tour. Geogr. 2020, 22, 577–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Zhang, S.; Liu, X.; Kozak, M.; Wen, J. Seeing the invisible hand: Underlying effects of COVID-19 on tourists’ behavioral patterns. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2020, 18, 100502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bieger, T.; Laesser, C. The Future of Tourism with and Potentially After SARSCoV-2: Continuous Small Steps and Drawbacks towards a Temporary New “Normal”; AIEST: St Gallen, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Dupeyras, A.; Haxton, P.; Stacey, J. The Covid-19 Crisis and Tourism: Response and Recovery Measures to Support the Tourism Sector in OECD Countries; OECD, G20 Policy Insights: Paris, France, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Gössling, S.; Scott, D.; Hall, C.M. Pandemics, tourism and global change: A rapid assessment of COVID-19. J. Sustain. Tour. 2021, 29, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogerson, C.M.; Baum, T. COVID-19 and African tourism research agendas. Dev. South. Afr. 2020, 37, 727–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zátori, A.; Michalkó, G.; Nagy, J.T.; Kulcsár, N.; Balizs, D. The tourist experience of domestic VFR travellers: The case of Hungary. Curr. Issues Tour. 2019, 22, 1437–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steen Jacobsen, J.K.; Farstad, E.; Higham, J.; Hopkins, D.; Landa-Mata, I. Travel discontinuities, enforced holidaying-at-home and alternative leisure travel futures after COVID-19. Tour. Geogr. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weman-Josefsson, K. Perspectives of Life in Sweden During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Clin. Sport Psychol. 2021, 15, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvarez-Sousa, A.; Paniza Prados, J.L. Visitor Management in World Heritage Destinations before and after Covid-19, Angkor. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clair, A. Homes, Health, and COVID-19: How Poor Housing Adds to the Hardship of the Coronavirus Crisis. Social Market Foundation. 2020. Available online: https://www.smf.co.uk/commentary_podcasts/homes-health-and-covid-19-how-poor-housing-adds-to-the-hardship-of-the-coronavirus-crisis/ (accessed on 26 September 2021).
- Crompton, J.L. Motivations for pleasure vacation. Ann. Tour. Res. 1979, 6, 408–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.; Sun, Z. A Novel Evaluation Approach for Tourist Choice of Destination Based on Grey Relation Analysis. Sci. Program. 2016, 1812094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, T.-K.; Tsai, Y.-F.; Wu, H.-H. The preference analysis for tourist choice of destination: A case study of Taiwan. Tour. Manag. 2009, 30, 288–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Song, H.; Guo, R. A Study on the Causal Process of Virtual Reality Tourism and Its Attributes in Terms of Their Effects on Subjective Well-Being during COVID-19. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, Y.; Hickerson, B.; Lee, J. Investigation of the technology effects of online travel media on virtual travel experience and behavioral intention. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2018, 35, 320–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shokouhyar, S.; Shokoohyar, S.; Sobhani, A.; Gorizi, A.J. Shared mobility in post-COVID era: New challenges and opportunities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 67, 102714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultan, M.-T.; Sharmin, F.; Badulescu, A.; Stiubea, E.; Xue, K. Travelers’ Responsible Environmental Behavior towards Sustainable Coastal Tourism: An Empirical Investigation on Social Media User-Generated Content. Sustainability 2021, 13, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roman, M.; Kosiński, R.; Bhatta, K.; Niedziółka, A.; Krasnodębski, A. Virtual and Space Tourism as New Trends in Travelling at the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 2022, 14, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milgram, P.; Kishino, F. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 1994, 77, 1321–1329. [Google Scholar]
- Kounavis, C.D.; Kasimati, A.E.; Zamani, E.D. Enhancing the tourism experience through mobile augmented reality: Challenges and prospects. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag. 2012, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hutchins, B.; Andrejevic, M. Olympian Surveillance: Sports Stadiums and the Normalization of Biometric Monitoring. Int. J. Commun. 2021, 15, 363–382. [Google Scholar]
- FIPRA. Despite Devastating Blow, COVID-19 Gives Tourism Industry A Chance to Redeem Itself. 2020. Available online: https://fipra.com/update/despite-devastating-blow-covid19-gives-tourism-industry-a-chance-to-redeem-itself/ (accessed on 28 March 2021).
- Rahimizhian, S.; Irani, F. Contactless hospitality in a post-COVID-19 world. Int. Hosp. Rev. 2021, 35, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuklina, M.; Trufanov, A.; Krasnoshtanova, N.; Urazova, N.; Kobylkin, D.; Bogatyreva, M. Prospects for the Development of Sustainable Tourism in the Okinsky District of the Republic of Buryatia. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). Our Common Future; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Buckley, R. Sustainable tourism: Research and reality. Ann. Tour. Res. 2012, 39, 528–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Iniesta-Bonillo, M.A.; Sánchez-Fernández, R.; Jiménez-Castillho, D. Sustainability, value, and satisfaction: Model testing and cross-validation in tourist destinations. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 5002–5007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ko, T.G. Development of a tourism sustainability assessment procedure: A conceptual approach. Tour. Manag. 2005, 26, 431–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solís-Radilla, M.M.; Hernández-Lobato, L.; Pastor-Durán, H. The importance of sustainability in the loyalty to a tourist destination through the management of expectations and experiences. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rahmoun, M.; Baeshen, Y. Marketing tourism in the digital era and determinants of success factors influencing tourist destinations preferences. Asia-Pac. Manag. Account. J. 2020, 16, 163–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez-Díaz, M.; Espino-Rodríguez, T. Determining the sustainability factors and performance of a tourism destination from the stakeholders’ perspective. Sustainability 2016, 8, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gössling, S.; Peeters, P. Assessing tourism’s global environmental impact 1900–2050. J. Sustain. Tour. 2015, 23, 639–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veiga, C.; Santos, M.C.; Águas, P.; Santos, J.A.C. Sustainability as a key driver to address challenges. Worldw. Hosp. Tour. Themes 2018, 10, 662–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanafiah, M.H.; Zulkifly, M.I. Tourism destination competitiveness and tourism performance: A secondary data approach. Compet. Rev. 2019, 29, 592–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamel, N. Examining the mediating role of celebrity endorsement in green advertisements to improve the intention of Egyptian Millennials towards environmental behaviours in tourist destinations. Tour. Manag. Stud. 2020, 16, 7–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hediger, W. Sustainable development and social welfare. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 32, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clark, G.; Kosoris, J.; Hong, L.N.; Crul, M. Design for sustainability: Current trends in sustainable product design and development. Sustainability 2009, 1, 409–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karlsson, R.; Luttropp, C. EcoDesign: What’s happening? An overview of the subject area of EcoDesign and of the papers in this special issue. J. Clean. Prod. 2006, 14, 1291–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, M.C.; Veiga, C.; Santos, J.A.C.; Águas, P. Sustainability as a success factor for tourism destinations: A systematic literature review. Worldw. Hosp. Tour. Themes 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N.M.; Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kirchherr, J.; Reike, D.; Hekkert, M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 127, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morse, J.M. Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research; Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C., Eds.; Sage Publication: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2003; pp. 189–208. [Google Scholar]
- Harrison, R.L.; Reilly, T.M. Mixed methods designs in marketing research. Qual. Mark.Res. Int. J. 2011, 14, 7–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denzin, N.K. The Research Act, 3rd ed.; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Denzin, N.K.; Lincoln, Y.S. Handbook of Qualitative Research; Sage Publication: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Wildemuth, B.M. Qualitative analysis of content. In Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science; Wildemuth, B.M., Ed.; Libraries Unlimited: Westport, CT, USA, 2009; pp. 308–319. [Google Scholar]
- Mayring, P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken, 7th ed.; Deutscher Studien Verlag: Weinheim, Germany, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Patton, M.Q. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods; Sage Publication: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- CO&CO; Cosovan, A. DSI-Red Dot. 2012. Available online: https://www.red-dot.org/project/dsi-29724 (accessed on 22 January 2022).
- CO&CO; Cosovan, A. Tequball—Red Dot. 2015. Available online: https://www.red-dot.org/project/teqball-1-8088 (accessed on 22 January 2022).
- CO&CO; Cosovan, A. Coco Dice—Red Dot. 2011. Available online: https://www.red-dot.org/project/cocodice-corner-contact-game-system-28164 (accessed on 22 January 2022).
- CO&CO; Cosovan, A. Nosiboo—Red Dot. 2014. Available online: https://www.red-dot.org/project/nosiboo-32116 (accessed on 22 January 2022).
- Cosovan, A.; Horváth, D. Tervező művész(ek) a közgazdászképzésben. In EMOK XXII. OrszágosKonf.—Hitel. Értékorientáció A Mark; Fehér, A., Kiss, V.Á., Soós, M., Szakály, Z., Eds.; Debreceni Egyetem Gazdaságtudományi Kar: Debrecen, Hungary, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Galla, D.D. Gyerekek. Otthon. Együttműködés. Kreativitás. A Designkommunikáció, Mint a Soft Készségek Fejlesztését Támogató Oktatásmódszertani Eszköz. Ph.D. Thesis, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horváth, D.; Cosovan, A.; Horváth, D.; Lachin, N. Tanulás-munka interface. A valós idejű találkozások jelentősége a digitális oktatási környezetben. Vez.-Bp. Manag. Rev. 2018, 49, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorst, K. The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Des. Stud. 2011, 32, 521–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srikrishnan, M.R.; Archana, N.; Niresh, J. The Evolution of Smart Wrist Band by Using Sensors. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Eng. Technol. 2020, 13, 525–535. [Google Scholar]
- Prince, P.B.; Lovesum, S.P.J. Privacy Enforced Access Control Model for Secured Data Handling in Cloud-Based Pervasive Health Care System. SN Comput. Sci. 2020, 1, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seraphin, H. COVID-19: An opportunity to review existing grounded theories in event studies. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2020, 22, 3–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozili, P.K.; Arun, T. Spillover of COVID-19: Impact on the Global Economy. SSRN Electron. J. 2020, 3562570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). Youth Travel Matters Understanding the Global Phenomenon of Youth Travel; World Youth Student & Educational Travel Confederation (WYSE): Madrid, Spain, 2008; ISBN 978-92-844-1239-6. [Google Scholar]
- Mok, K.H.; Xiong, W.; Ke, G.; Cheung, J.O.W. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on international higher education and student mobility: Student perspectives from mainland China and Hong Kong. Int. J. Educ. Res. 2021, 105, 101718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaworek, M.A. The Effects of Temper Traits and Study Method (Full-Time vs. Extramural) on Polish Students’ Adaptability to Online Learning as a Result of COVID-19. A Pilot Study. Sustainability 2021, 13, 14017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bączek, M.; Zagańczyk-Bączek, M.; Szpringer, M.; Jaroszyński, A.; Wożakowska-Kapłon, B. Students’ perception of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. A survey study of Polish medical students. Medicine 2021, 100, e24821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, P.; Mittal, P.; Gupta, M.S.; Yadav, S. Opinion of students on online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 3, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Megyeri, G.; Horváth, D.; Cosovan, A. Analóg Lények Vagyunk Egy Digitális Világban–Avagy a Digitalizáció Következményei és Lehetőségei Kutató és Tervezői Szemszögből. In Az Egyesület a Marketing Oktatásért és Kutatásért XXV.; Ismerjük a Vevők? A Vásárlás Pszichológiája; Országos Konferenciájának előadása; Veres, Z., Sasné Grósz, A., Liska, F., Eds.; Pannon Egyetem: Veszprém, Hungary, 2019; pp. 711–720. ISBN 978-615-00-58. [Google Scholar]
- Michalkó, G.; Timothy, D.J. Cross-border shopping in Hungary: Causes and effects. Vis. Leis. Bus. 2001, 20, 4–22. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Megyeri, G.; Boros, K.; Fekete, B. A Theoretical Concept of an Innovative and Sustainable Product Based on an Unconventional Approach to Design Development. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053022
Megyeri G, Boros K, Fekete B. A Theoretical Concept of an Innovative and Sustainable Product Based on an Unconventional Approach to Design Development. Sustainability. 2022; 14(5):3022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053022
Chicago/Turabian StyleMegyeri, Gábor, Kitti Boros, and Balázs Fekete. 2022. "A Theoretical Concept of an Innovative and Sustainable Product Based on an Unconventional Approach to Design Development" Sustainability 14, no. 5: 3022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053022
APA StyleMegyeri, G., Boros, K., & Fekete, B. (2022). A Theoretical Concept of an Innovative and Sustainable Product Based on an Unconventional Approach to Design Development. Sustainability, 14(5), 3022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053022