Organic Walnut Cultivation in Intensive and Super-Intensive System—Sustainable Investment. Case Study: Gorj County, Romania
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- -
- -
- is a fruit species suitable for organic plantation, free of chemical factors from chemical fertilizers and plant protection products, which are air, edaphic environment and groundwater pollutants, meeting the EU program to reduce pesticide and fuel consumption by 35% (in the current context of energy crisis) [11,28];
- -
- is a fruit species with potential to occupy uncultivated areas and to employ surplus labor;
- -
- is part of the support for investments to restore the orchard patrimony, by applying new strategies for implementing European and national agricultural policies; due to its well-developed roots, it is of importance in agroforestry improvements, in combating soil erosion and as protective shield [34];
- -
- benefits from additional subsidies grants by AAPI (Agency for Agricultural Payments and Intervention) and of some facilities in the acquisition of high-performance equipment for plantation maintenance, harvesting, storage and fruit valorization (processing capacities are developed for fruit valorization: fruit dryers, vacuum packing line for nuts, storage warehouses) [35,36];
- -
- the fruits are not perishable and can be kept for long time, without energy consumption, and the walnut kernels have special quality characteristics and represent about 50% of the weight of the nut in shell, depending on the variety;
- -
- presents opportunities for production valorization (kernels for consumption in fresh, dried or in processed form, delivery of packed kernels with other dehydrated fruits, ground, walnut oil, honey and walnut kernels mixture) [34];
- -
- the walnut oil is also used in the technical field, due to its siccative properties (for manufacture of typographical ink, varnishes and luxury soaps); the remaining paste after oil extraction contains 48.5% protein substances, 9.55% fats, 6.76% cellulose and 5.76% ash, used for halvah processing and as concentrated food for animals [34];
- -
- -
2. Literature Review
3. Characteristics of Walnuts and Ecological Requirements
- -
- hereditary
- -
- ecological (with a direct effect on growth and fructification)
- ○
- biotic
- ○
- climatic (water, air, light, temperature)
- ○
- soil (pedological: nutrient content, soil physical-chemical properties, water, air, microbiological activity)
- ○
- organic
- -
- Relief—restrictive factor, given the slope of the land (land with a slope greater than 10–12% cannot be used for walnut plantations in conditions of productive performance and economic profitability), the degree of soil fragmentation, the level of fertilization [17]
- -
- -
- Texture—soils are classified into:
- ○
- sandy lands (with low natural fertility, lacking structure, high permeability for water and air; they heat up easily and lose water easily through evapotranspiration and infiltration; walnut plantations are productive in regions with normal rainfall, groundwater at depths of 1.5–4 m, on semi-movable sands, weakly humiferous sands with a humus content of 0.6–1% and over 5% clay; they require the application of organic fertilizers)
- ○
- loamy lands (most suitable for walnut cultivation, as they allow a good development of the root system, can store and retain water, allow infiltration of excess water, are well aerated, warm easily and contain nutrients)
- ○
- clayey lands (having a clay content of more than 45%, are compact, hardly permeable to water, aerated, acidic, moist, cold, rich in nutrients, difficult for roots to penetrate, unsuitable for fruit species; they have disadvantages in terms of poor root growth, show small and unreliable harvests, prolonged growing season until late autumn, low frost resistance)
- ○
- swampy, salty, stony, calcareous lands (with an active limestone content of 8–10%)—not suitable for walnut cultivation
- -
- Thickness of the penetrable layer for roots—as more than 50% of the roots are between 20 to 120 cm in the ground, the depth of root system should be between 1–1.5 m.
- -
- ○
- humus content—if below than 2%, adversely affects growth and fruiting; low humus soils, strongly eroded, podzolic, clayey-loamy or soils with too high content of organic matter, black meadow soils, do not ensure the balanced growth and development of the walnut;
- ○
- soil reaction—acid pH favorable (between 5.5–8.5), with an optimum 6.2–7.5; at the alkaline level, accumulates Ca and Na and at acidic level, Mn;
- ○
- mineral element content (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, iron, boron, magnesium, zinc, sulphur, copper);
- ○
- high content of harmful salts (chlorides)—has low tolerance in their presence.
- -
- Groundwater level—below 2.5–3 m depth
- -
- Temperature—walnut is a heat-demanding tree species, temperature being a growth factor on which the processes of assimilation, respiration, transpiration, phenophase growth, dormancy during winter depend; walnut grows efficiently in regions with average annual temperatures of 9.0–10.5 Celsius degrees (optimum temperatures of the species = 15–28 Celsius degrees, minimum = 7 Celsius degrees and maximum = 40 Celsius degrees; outside these temperatures, the growth ceases) [29,37,58,60].
- -
- Water requirement—water is the vegetation factor with a decisive role in the life of the tree, as it is part of all its organs (75% in leaves, branches and roots and 85% in fruits) [68]. Drought affects shoot growth, leaf development, fruit quality and the life span of active roots. Under severe and persistent drought conditions, even though walnut is a long-lived species, due to its highly developed root system, its vigour decreases, the regularity of production and size of harvests decreases, trees age prematurely and their life span is shortened. Excess moisture is not favorable because it affects soil aeration and slows down normal root activity, especially on clayey-loamy soils with poor drainage. Water requirements depend on the age of the tree, size of the crown, size of the root system, concentration of nutrient solutions in the soil, structure and humidity of the soil, amount of atmospheric precipitation, wind speed, intensity of light, size of the plantation and slope of the land. Walnut needs water during the first growing season, during the shoot and fruit growth and less during flowering, fruit ripening and leaf drop.
- -
- Light requirement—light is very important in the photosynthesis process, in the growth speed and formation of the aerial organs of the plant, in the respiration and transpiration of leaves, in the growth direction of the shoot. In Romania, light as an aspect of intensity (measured in lux) and duration (number of hours with sunshine) is sufficient to ensure optimal technological conditions. In order to ensure sufficient quantity and intensity of light, walnut plantations should be planted on sloping lands with south, south-west and south-east exposures, ensuring that the optimum planting distance is sufficiently large to prevent shading each other.
- -
- Air requirement—carbon dioxide is important in assimilation, and oxygen in respiration of the aerial and subterranean organs; the permanent movement of air in the walnut plantations is thus important to prevent excess atmospheric humidity. The most favorable are gently sloping terrains (air mass movement occurs even in the absence of wind), flat lands and the plateaus (air movement occurs at the slightest breeze), less favorable being the depressions and the enclosed lowlands (in rainy regions, cryptogamic diseases attack more strongly, the roots of the walnut grow weaker and trees bear less fruits). Dry air causes loss of water from tissues and soil, dries out the stigmata and hinders pollination [3,4,11,12,17]
- -
- Climate—very favorable conditions, multi-year average temperature = 10.20 °C, multi-year average precipitation volume = 753 mm, relative air humidity = 72% and existence of areas with Mediterranean climate influences;
- -
- Relief—represented by the Oltenia Subcarpathians and Getic Plateau, composed of the inland depression Tismana-Novaci and the Subcarpathian hills crossed by rivers and streams, creates a favorable climate for the walnut;
- -
- Soils—ranging in density from alluvial to typical podzols, from skeletal to brown forest soils, have a low degree of natural fertility the favorability coefficient of about 2.4 can be enhanced by fertilization and irrigation measures.
- -
- Very favorable area—located in the inner Subcarpathian depression Tismana—Novaci, on an area of 73,141 ha of agricultural land, with wide possibilities of expanding cultivation, with a Mediterranean-influenced climate, skeletal alluvial soils, weakly podzolic.
- -
- Favorable area—represented by the inner and outer Subcarpathian hills and the Getic Plateau, between Motru and Jiu rivers and between Gilort and Olteţ rivers, with an area of 93,766 ha, with brown forest, normal, eroded, podzolic soils.
- -
- Less favorable area—located in the intracolinary depression Cîlnic—Târgu -Jiu—Câmpu Mare and the rivers` meadows, with an area of 103,766 ha of agricultural land; it is not recommended to establish walnut plantations, since the area is under the influence of cold air currents that move from the mountains to the river valleys, accumulate in the low depression and destroy the fruit buds, and late spring fogs cause crop losses.
4. Materials and Methods
- Land and surface size selection
- -
- soil fertility (fertile soils with medium, loamy texture, loamy-sandy lands, medium to deep permeable, pH = 4.7–8.5);
- -
- land slope (gentle slope of 3–6% for easy maintenance and transport of fruits);
- -
- water source (possibilities for drip irrigation, external water sources with water capture possibilities, wells, drillings);
- -
- occurrence and frequency of frosty conditions (area protected from late spring and early winter frosts, sun exposed land, with N-S oriented rows);
- -
- soil moisture and drainage (permeable soils, to avoid waterlogging, groundwater over 2–3 m deep);
- -
- air currents (it is not recommended to plant in narrow valleys with air currents and in areas with late spring frosts).
- 2.
- Land preparation for the intensive walnut plantation consists of the following technological works:
- -
- demarcation of the land allocated for plantation;
- -
- marking and construction of the protective fence (metal netting and concrete pillars);
- -
- clearing of woody and herbaceous vegetation (clearing of the land with the help of a tractor equipped with special devices for total removal of roots and transport to special places for storage and destruction by chopping or burning);
- -
- levelling of the terrain that favors the accumulation of water or hinders the passage of machinery (one slight slope of the land surface allows the natural drainage of water resulting from the melted snow);
- -
- biological soil test;
- -
- application of pesticides (fungicides, insecticides with disinfectant effect);
- -
- soil fertilization (with manure—40–60 t/ha, P2O5—250 P kg/ha, K2O—300 K kg/ha, organic fertilization being necessary for poor soils; a quantity of 45 t manure /ha is recommended for land preparation by land clearing and 15 kg/tree at the planting pit; organic fertilizers are applied after cleaning and levelling, by uniformly spreading them over the entire area and incorporation into soil by ploughing at 20–25 cm depth; P and K are applied throughout the surface, and incorporated by ploughing or disking; the recommended N content from planting to fruiting is 50 g N active substance/sq.m, therefore N fertilizer should be applied in spring, on the worked area, around the tree, of at least 1 sq.m in the year of planting; fertilizers with a slightly alkaline physiological reaction are recommended: nitrocalcar) [64,65];
- -
- mobilising the soil at 50–60 cm (by unclogging or scarifying—two perpendicular passes, in the autumn before planting or in the spring of the year of planting);
- -
- light ploughing and levelling (at 30–50 cm, 2–3 months before planting);
- -
- two-way disking (a few days before planting);
- -
- parceling and land marking (the choice of the marking pattern depends on the plantation system and on the distances between the trees; consists of marking on the field the places where each tree will be planted, the direction of the rows will be parallel to the long side of the parcel in the N-S direction; for the alignment of the stakes, 1.5–2 m high stakes visible from a distance are used to draw the lines framing the field in a rectangle, with a multiple of 8 × 5 m; marking in the shape of a rectangle is specific to walnut cultivation and ensures an optimal space for tree growth evenly distributed among all the trees in the orchard; the rows are placed at a distance of 4 m from the fence to ensure movement around the fence and to avoid branches growing outside it; the length of the rows is oriented in the north-south direction, to ensure a large amount of light throughout the day and to avoid the phenomenon of plantation shading).
- 3.
- The choice of varieties for planting takes into account the selection criteria: origin of planting material, fruiting time, fruit size, kernel yield, fruit ripening period, diseases and frost resistance. Given that the trees grown on their own roots bear fruit after 10–15 years, the Juglans regia grafted walnuts at year 6–8 after planting and Juglans nigra at 5–6 years, one criterion for selecting varieties is the age at which the first economically efficient harvests appear. Grafted walnuts also produce better quality fruit with higher commercial and food value; from the walnuts grown from seeds a maximum of 20% quality fruit can be collected. For these reasons, it is recommended that the walnut plantation be planted with genetically certified grafted trees, the recommended varieties for modern plantations being small trees, side-fruiting, early, homogenous, productive, and resistant to the main walnut diseases such as bacteriosis and anthracnose [4,11,19,23,28,71]. The nuts of the new varieties have smooth and thin endocarp, strong and welded valves, the kernel fills all the interior and is easily extracted completely or in halves and represents 40% of the fruit weight (Figure 3).
- -
- standard (fruits on long, thin branches, presents long, thick branches and short internodes);
- -
- spur (with early fruiting and short thin or short thick branches);
- -
- semi spur (fruiting on medium-sized branches with short internodes).
- -
- only Romanian varieties (early varieties come into bearing in the 6th–7th year or 8–10 years from planting, but have the advantage that they are tested over time, in terms of production constancy and resistance to climate and diseases) (Table 1);
- -
- only foreign varieties (of Hungarian and French origin, which have the property of bearing fruit much faster, in the 3rd–5th year, but are much less adaptable to the Romanian conditions and show lower resistance to diseases and cold; in years 4–5, these varieties lose their fruit buds and the investment may be compromised);
- -
- local and foreign varieties.
- -
- the varieties show pollination compatibility and have the same flowering period;
- -
- the distance between the basic variety and the pollinating variety is not too large;
- -
- pollination is done with the help of bees and wind, for a good pollination at least two bee families/ha are needed; to protect the bees during the flowering period, it is recommended not to spray with insecticides;
- -
- placing hives for pollination is made in the immediate vicinity of the orchard or right in the middle of it, mandatory at the beginning of flowering.
- 4.
- for intensive plantations, the planting distance = 8 m between rows and 6 m per row between trees, respectively, a density of 208 plants/ha; for super-intensive plantations, planting distance = 7 m between rows and 5 m between trees, respectively, 285 plants/ha; it provides a feeding space of 48 m² for intensive systems and 35 m² for super-intensive systems
- the planting actions take place between 15 October until the first frost or as early as possible in the spring (after soil defrosting and drying, when the soil has high humidity)
- the pits of 50 × 50 × 60 cm size are dug manually or mechanically, on the cleared and prepared land, shortly before planting or on the day of planting, so as not to lose the moisture accumulated in the soil; after digging the pits, add 20–30 kg of well-fermented manure and drag 2/3 from the soil into the planting pit
- the roots are placed in a mixture of 3 parts yellow soil + 2 parts fresh manure + water, the mud layer is intended to provide more moisture around the root system and ensure better adhesion of soil particles around the root
- the trees are planted with the grafting point at the ground level and are watered with 15–20 L water each (Figure 4).
- 5.
- 6.
- Grass planting—for an organic crop production, work will be carried out to eliminate the impact of herbicides. Between the rows, a grass planting system is chosen, with spotted mowing, and the resulting green mass is left on the ground as compost and green manure. This action maintains constant soil moisture by reducing evapotranspiration and will favor the development of micro-organisms with the role of decomposition of the plant mass and nutrients and humus formation needed by plants. Perennial herbs (Lolium) and annual leguminous plants (peas, lentils, vetches) or annual cereals (rye, oats, triticale) are used. Autumn peas incorporated into the soil in spring, provide 120 kg nitrogen (Figure 6).
- Combating late fogs and frosts is achieved by fumigation, slow-burning materials produce a lot of smoke, without flame (semi-dry dung, peat, litter, dried weeds, vines, rubber debris (Figure 7)
- Phytosanitary treatments—for organic walnut cultivation, specific treatments for diseases and pests are necessary, without using toxic chemical compounds [12,34]. Even if the walnut has few diseases and pests, the phytosanitary state must be ensured, to avoid quantitative and qualitative production losses. The methods are applied before and after fruiting to control viruses, bacteria, parasitic fungi, insects, spiders, worms, rodents, birds or by applying mechanical and cultural hygiene measures during the winter period.
- Fertilization involves only the application of organic, mineral or green fertilizers (which ensure normal or vigorous shoot growth, promote the formation of a large number of fruiting shoots for the following year’s production and increase the volume and weight of the fruit, therefore must contain the main and secondary macronutrients N, P, K, Mg and the micro-nutrients Fe, Cu, B, Al, Mn): animal manure, poultry manure and compost (fermented, from farms where no chemical disinfectants were used, applied in autumn, in the amount of 30–40 t/ha, on the area under the crown projection, administered at the planting year and later at the 3rd and 4th year), green manures from legumes (peas, peas, lupins, lentils), cereals (rye, triticale, oats, with incorporation under the furrow in the planting or seeding phase), calcareous additions (on acid soils, but without nitrogen content), organic foliar fertilizers (based on algae and amino acids), copper sulphate (used during the dormant and growing season), organic products and by-products of vegetal and animal nature [3,11,12,28,36].
- irrigation—the super-intensive plantation system requires the provision of supplemental quantities of water, depending on climatic conditions, by the following watering methods [78,79,80,81]:
- ○
- through furrows
- ○
- through sprinkling (distributing water in plantations using systems and devices operating under pressure)
- ○
- through dripping (localized) (slow delivery of water to the active root zone of the trees; watering pipes are placed along the rows of trees, fixed at ground level, or at various heights, on the trunk of the trees or on espaliers at the bottom wire) (Figure 10)
- 7.
- Fruit harvesting—the fruits are harvested in baskets, crates, buckets, sacks, using ladders and platforms, manually or mechanically, with controlled shaking de-vices and equipment (a vibrating equipment attached to a tractor, which applied to the trunk of the tree for 5 min of vibration leads to the fall of the nuts; another machine sweeps the fallen nuts and collects them in a line in between the rows; the pick-up equipment works on flat ground, without grassy debris, after its passage comes an exhauster attached to a tractor which absorbs the nuts and puts them in a trailer); the nuts are then put in a water bath and in a mesocarp removing machine for 2–4 days; they are dried in ventilation plants; they are stored in natural conditions, in ventilated sheds 6–12 months (Figure 11) [3,11,28,82,83,84]
5. Results and Discussion
- Natural suitability score for walnut cultivation = 2.84
- Strengthened favourability score = 3.29
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- McGranahan, G.; Leslie, C. Walnuts (Juglans). Acta Hortic. 1991, 290, 907–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mapelli, S.; Bertani, A.; Malvolti, M.E.; Olimpieri, I.; Pollegioni, P.; Alexandrovski, E.S.; Butkov, E.A.; Botman, E.K. Resources of Juglans regia in Uzbekistan: A valuable step along the silk road. Acta Hortic. 2014, 1032, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cociu, V. Cultura Nucului; Ceres Publishing: Bucharest, Romania, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Blaja, D. Cultura nucului și posibilități de extindere în Oltenia. Rev. Grădina Livada 1964, 9, 10. [Google Scholar]
- Aslantaş, R. Identification of superior walnut (Juglans regia) genotypes in north-eastern Anatolia, Turkey. N. Z. J. Crop Hort. Sci. 2006, 34, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, G.L.; Meng, H.J.; Hao, Y.Y.; Liu, Q.L.; Wang, D.; Tian, J.B. Thirty years of breeding walnut in China. In Proceedings of the VI International Walnut Symposium 861, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 25–27 February 2009; pp. 109–118. [Google Scholar]
- Verma, M.K. Walnut Production Technology. In Training Manual on Teaching of Post-Graduate Courses in Horticulture (Fruit Science), 1st ed.; Walnut Production Technology, Post Graduate School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute: New Delhi, India, 2014; pp. 281–287. [Google Scholar]
- Marchidan, D.; Ștefănescu, V. Cu privire la producția de nuci pe plan mondial. Rev. Grădina Livada 1969, 9, 5–6. [Google Scholar]
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO Statistical Database. Available online: https://www.fao.org/common-pages/search/en/?q=walnuts (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Food and Agriculture Organization. Corporate Statistical Database (FAOSTAT). Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Ţurcanu, I.; Comănici, I. Nucul; Tipografia Centrală: Chişinău, Moldova, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Avanzato, D.; McGranahan, G.H.; Vahdati, K.; Botu, M.; Iannamico, L.; Van, A.J. Following Walnut Footprints (Juglans regia L.): Cultivation and Culture Folklore and History, Traditions and Used; International Society for Horticultural Science ISHS: Leuven, Belgium, 2014; Available online: https://www.ishs.org/scripta-horticulturae/following-walnut-footprints-juglans-regia-l-cultivation-and-culture-folklore (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Bujdosó, G.; Fodor, A.; Karacs-Végh, A. BD6 Walnut. HortScience 2020, 55, 1393–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manthos, I.; Rouskas, D. Ourania Walnut. HortScience 2021, 56, 521–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, J.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Han, F. Development and prospects of the walnut industry in China. In Proceedings of the VI International Walnut Symposium 861, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 25–27 February 2009; pp. 31–38. [Google Scholar]
- United States Department of Agriculture. Available online: http://www.fas.usda.gov/htp/Hort_Circular/2004/12-10-04/12-04%20Walnuts.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Bădescu, G.; Blaja, D.; Bumbac, E.; Bordeianu, T.; Botar, E. Pomologia Republicii Socialiste România—Nucul, Alunul, Migdalul, Castanul Comestibil; Publisher Editura Academiei Republicii Populare Romîne: Bucharest, Romania, 1967; Volume 6. [Google Scholar]
- Bordeianu, T.; Constantinescu, N. Pomologia; Editura Academiei: Bucharest, Romania, 1963; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Cosmulescu, S.; Ionescu, M. Phenological and pomological properties of promising walnut (Juglans regia L.) genotype with cluster fruiting from selected native population in Oltenia, Romania. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2021, 68, 2289–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botu, M.; Tudor, M.; Papachatzis, A. Evaluation of some walnut cultivars with different bearing habits in the ecological conditions of Oltenia—Romania. In Proceedings of the VI International Walnut Symposium 861, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 25–27 February 2009; pp. 119–126. [Google Scholar]
- Cosmulescu, S.; Botu, M. Walnut biodiversity in south-western Romania resource for perspective cultivars. Pak. J. Bot. 2012, 44, 307–311. [Google Scholar]
- Botu, M.; Botu, I.; Achim, G.; Stancu, A.; Alabedallat, Y.F.J. Evaluation of differentiation between romanian walnut cultivars and those with lateral bearing from warmer areas. Ann. Acad. Rom. Sci. Ser. Agric. Silvic. Vet. Med. Sci. 2017, 6, 5–14. [Google Scholar]
- Blaja, D.; Stoian, E. Soiuri noi create la S.C.P.P. Tg. Jiu. In Proceedings of the Volumul Festiv 25 de Ani de Activitate a S.C.P.P. Tg. Jiu; Staţiunea De Cercetare Şi Producţie Pomicolă: Târgu-Jiu, Romania, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Botu, M.; Achim, G.; Botu, I. Selecţii de nuc din judeţul Vâlcea cu perspective de omologare. In Proceedings of the “Probleme Actuale ale Modernizării Culturii Nucului” Conference, Craiova, Romania, 15 December 1995; pp. 33–43. [Google Scholar]
- Agro TV. Available online: https://agro-tv.ro/productia-romaneasca-de-nuci-romania-europa-recolta/ (accessed on 2 December 2022).
- Nucifere Regia. Available online: https://www.nucifereregia.ro/performanta-cu-soiuri-autohtone (accessed on 2 December 2022).
- National Institute for Statistics Romania. Available online: https://insse.ro/cms/ro/content (accessed on 2 December 2022).
- Ministerul Agriculturii și Dezvoltării Durabile, Institutul de Cercetare-Dezvoltare pentru Pomicultură, Ghid Tehnic și Economic, Pitești. 2014, pp. 167–176. Available online: https://icdp.ro/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Pomi-arbusti-fructiferi-capsun.-Ghid-tehnic-si-economic.pdf (accessed on 2 December 2022).
- Amzăr, G. Zonarea culturii nucului în funcţie de condiţiile ecologice din România. In Revista de Horticultură şi Viticultură; Ministerul Agriculturii Publisher: Bucharest, Romania, 1974; Volume 12. [Google Scholar]
- Agrointeligenta. Available online: https://agrointel.ro/24739/ce-potential-are-romania-pe-piata-mondiala-a-nucului-avem-un-milion-de-hectare-de-teren-nelucrate-pe-care-am-putea-infiinta-livezi-de-nuc/ (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Agrointeligenta. Available online: https://agrointel.ro/68148/plantarea-nucului-folosind-nuca-pe-post-de-samanta (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Agro Business. Available online: https://www.agro-business.ro/nucul-o-afacere-la-indemana/2012/07/30/ (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Agro Business. Available online: https://www.agro-business.ro/nucul-o-cultura-de-viitor/2012/02/29 (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Craioveanu, G. Nucul în Depresiunea Subcarpatică a Olteniei; Editura Sitech: Craiova, Romania, 2006; pp. 35–41. [Google Scholar]
- Agentia de Plati si Interventie Pentru Agricultura, Romania. Available online: https://apia.org.ro/?s=nucul (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Toncea, E.; Simion, E.; Ionita, G.; Nitu, D.; Alexandrescu, D.; Toncea, V.A. Manual de Agricultură Ecologică. 2016, p. 331. Available online: http://agriculturadurabila.ro/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/manual.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Strugstad, M.P.; Despotovski, S. A summary of extraction, synthesis, properties, and potentialuses of juglone: A literature review. J. Ecosyst. Manag. 2012, 13, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, M.; Wang, Y.; Song, Z.; Fang, G. Insecticidal activities and active components of the alcohol extract from green peel of Juglans mandshurica. J. For. Res. 2007, 18, 62–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gauthier, M.M.; Douglass, F.J. Walnut (Juglans spp.) ecophysiology in response to environmental stresses and potential acclimation to climate change. Ann. For. Sci. 2011, 68, 1277–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chenevard, D.; Frossard, J.S.; Jay-Allemand, C. Carbohydrate reserves and CO2 balance of hybrid walnut (Juglans nigra no. 23 × Juglans regia) plantlets during acclimatization. Sci. Hortic. 1997, 68, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caglarirmak, N. Biochemical and physical properties of some walnut genotypes (Juglans regia L.). Nahr. Food 2003, 47, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Savage, G.P. Chemical composition of walnuts (Juglans regia L.) grown in New Zealand. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2001, 56, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Jun-xi, L.; Fei, Z.; Di, D.L. Chemical constituents in green walnut husks of Juglans regia. Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs 2009, 6, 126–130. [Google Scholar]
- Simsek, M.; Yilmaz, K.U.; Demirkiran, A.R. Selection and determination of some significant properties of superior walnut genotypes. Sci. Res. Essays 2010, 5, 2987–2996. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Z.; Liao, L.; Moore, J.; Wu, T.; Wang, Z. Antioxidant phenolic compounds from walnut kernels (Juglans regia L.). Food Chem. 2009, 113, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schwindl, S.; Kraus, B.; Heilmann, J. Phytochemical study of Juglans regia L. leaves. Phytochemistry 2017, 144, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, J.A.; Oliveira, I.; Sousa, A.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Bento, A.; Estevinho, L. Bioactive properties and chemical composition of six walnut (Juglans regia L.) cultivars. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 2103–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathera, M.A.; Dar, B.A.; Dar, M.Y.; Wani, B.A.; Shah, W.A.; Bhat, B.A.; Ganai, B.A.; Bhatat, K.A.; Anandd, R.; Qurishi, M.A. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of the leaf essential oil of Juglans regia L. and its constituents. Phytomedicine 2012, 19, 1185–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ip, C.; Lisk, D.J. Bioactivity of selenium from Brazil nut for cancer prevention and selenoenzyme maitenance. Nutr. Cancer 1994, 1, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taha, N.A.; Al-wadaan, M.A. Utility and importance of walnut, Juglans regia Linn: A review. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2011, 5, 5796–5805. Available online: http://www.academicjournals.org/AJMR (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Ahmad, S.; Mukhtar, W.A.; Bukhari, A.Q.S. Fungistatic Action of Juglans, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 1973, 3, 436–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bhargava, U.; Westfall, B. Antitumor activity of Juglans nigra (black walnut) extractives. J. Pharm. Sci. 1968, 57, 1674–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, J.; Nai, Y.; Feng, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, M.; Xu, H. Walnut oil prevents scopolamine-induced memory dysfunction in a mouse model. Molecules 2020, 25, 1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Avanzato, D. Traditional and modern uses of walnut. Acta Hortic. 2010, 861, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Torre, C.; Caputo, P.; Plastina, P.; Cione, E.; Fazio, A. Green husk of walnuts (Juglans regia L.) from southern Italy as a valuable source for the recovery of glucans and pectins. Fermentation 2021, 7, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scedei, D.N.; Iordănescu, O.A.; Duma (Copcea), A.; Beinșan, C.; Alda, S.; Alda, L.M.; Moatăr, M.M.; Blidariu, D.T.; Stoianov, Z.I. Behavior of walnut biotypes (Juglans regia L.), from Cenei, Timis. J. Hortic. For. Biotechnol. 2020, 24, 45–50. Available online: http://www.journal-hfb.usab-tm.ro (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Kamal, P.; Kamal, S. In vitro propagation of walnut—A review. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 290–311. Available online: http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Solar, A. Phenological and pomological characteristics of walnut cultivars in northeastern Slovenia. Acta Hortic. 1990, 284, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cociu, V. Aspecte Privind Tehnologia Culturii Nucului; Agro Silvica de Stat: Bucharest, Romania, 1972; pp. 124–133. [Google Scholar]
- Ramos, D.E. Walnut Production Manual; UCANR Publications: Oakland, CA, USA, 1997; pp. 66–68. [Google Scholar]
- Wilkinson, J. Nut Grower’s Guide: The Complete Handbook for Producers and Hobbyists; CSIRO Publishing: Clayton, VIC, Australia, 2005; Volume 29. [Google Scholar]
- Cosmulescu, S.; Baciu, A.; Botu, M.; Achim, G. Environmental factors’ influence on walnut flowering. Acta Hortic. 2010, 861, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bârsanu, I.M.; Cosmulescu, S. Effect of climatic conditions on flowering of walnut genotypes in Romania. J. Nuts 2017, 8, 161–167. [Google Scholar]
- Daniliuc, D. Starea de asigurare cu fosfor a solurilor. In Situatia Agrochimica a Solurilor din Romania; Editura Ceres: Bucharest, Romania, 1984; pp. 97–107. [Google Scholar]
- Lăcătușu, R. Agrochimie, Editura Terra Nostra. Iași 2006, 61–64, 293–294. [Google Scholar]
- Pini, R.; Paris, P.; Guidi, G.V.; Pisanelli, A. Soil physical characteristics and understory management in a walnut (Juglans regia L.) plantation in central Italy. Agrofor. Syst. 1999, 46, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Revista Fermierului. Available online: https://www.revistafermierului.ro/din-revista/horticultura/item/4412-productia-de-fructe-afectata-de-ingheturile-tarzii.html (accessed on 2 December 2022).
- Ghasemi, K.; Ghasemi, Y.; Ehteshamnia, A.; Nabavi, S.M.; Nabavi, S.F.; Ebrahimzadeh, M.A.; Pourmorad, F. Influence of environmental factors on antioxidant activity, phenol and flavonoids contents of walnut (Juglans regia L.) green husks. J. Med. Plant Res. 2011, 5, 1128–1133. [Google Scholar]
- Prasad, R. Walnuts and Pecans; Academic Press: London, UK, 2003; pp. 6071–6079. [Google Scholar]
- Jahanban-Esfahlan, A.; Ostadrahimi, A.; Tabibiazar, M.; Amarowicz, R.A. Comprehensive review on the chemical constituents and functional uses of walnut (Juglans spp.), Husk. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gandev, S. Budding and grafting of the walnut (Juglans regia L.) and their effectiveness in Bulgaria (Review). Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2007, 13, 683–689. [Google Scholar]
- Manthos, I.; Rouskas, D. Introduction of a new interesting walnut cultivar “Leto”. Plants 2021, 10, 2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rana, J.C.; Singh, D.; Yadav, S.K.; Verma, M.K.; Kumar, K.; Predheep, K. Genetic diversity collected and observed in Persian walnut (Juglas regia L.) in the western himalayan region of India. Plant Genet. Resour News Lett. 2007, 151, 68–73. [Google Scholar]
- Braniște, N.S.; Andrieș, N. Soiuri Rezistente la Boli şi Dăunători în Pomicultură; Editura Ceres: Bucharest, Romania, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Amzăr, G. Influenţa înierbării solului din livadă asupra creşterii şi fructificării mărului, Lucrări ştiinţifice I.C.D.P. Piteşti 1992, 15, 56–60. [Google Scholar]
- Doster, M.A.; Michailides, T.J. Aspergillus moulds and aflatoxin in pistachio nuts in California. Phytopathology 1994, 84, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marin, F.C.; Călinescu, M.; Sumedrea, M. Bolile şi Dăunătorii Speciilor Pomicole Nucifere; Editura ICDP Piteşti Mărăcineni: Arges, Romania, 2020; pp. 4–14. [Google Scholar]
- Akin, S.; Erdem, T. Water use of walnut trees under different irrigation regimes. J. Appl. Hortic. 2018, 20, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Q.; Ma, Y.; He, J.; Zhang, Q.; Hong, M. Effect of drip irrigation and micro—Sprinkler irrigation on water consumption, yields and quality of walnut. J. Water Resour. Water Eng. 2010, 1, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- Huabing, M.; Meimei, L.; Junjie, R.; Baoguo, L.; Guohoi, Q. Effects of different irrigation amounts on water use of precocious walnuts. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 651, 1423–1431. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.B.; Mu, Z.X.; Hong, M.; Zheng, B. Optimization of irrigation methods for grown walnut in arid and semi arid regions. Water Sav. Irrig. 2013, 6, 36–69. [Google Scholar]
- Polat, R.; Gezer, I.; Guner, M.; Dursun, E.; Erdogan, D.; Bilim, H.C. Mechanical harvesting of pistachio nuts. J. Food Eng. 2007, 79, 1131–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kashani, N.M.; Tabil, L.G.; Mortazavi, A.; Seif, K.A. Effect of drying methods on quality of pistachio nuts. Dry. Technol. 2003, 21, 821–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, C.; Zhongli, P. Processing of Tree Nuts, Postharvest Technology. 2022. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/80454 (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- FAO. Handbook on Agricultural Cost of Production Statistics, Guidelines for Data Collection, Compilation and Dissemination. 2016. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/ca6411en/ca6411en.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Official Journal of the European Union. 2014. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52014XC0701(01)&from=LT (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Van Kralingen, H.; Adem, H.H. The effect of tree establishment cost and planting densities on the economic performance of walnut production. Acta Hortic. 2010, 861, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parlamentul României, Legea-Cadru nr. 153/2017 Privind Salarizarea Personalului Plătit din Fonduri Publice. Available online: http://www.mmuncii.ro/j33/images/Documente/L153/Lege-cadru_nr153-2017_actualiz_iulie2019.pdf (accessed on 1 December 2022).
- Ciobănașu, M. Analiza Economico Financiară a Intreprinderii; Universitatea Titu Maiorescu: Bucharest, Romania, 2010; pp. 10–67. [Google Scholar]
- Sobolesvchi-David, S.M.; Robu, V.; Petcu, M.A.; Curea, S.C. Ghid Practic de Analiza Economico-Financiara; Editura ASE: Bucharest, Romania, 2020; pp. 50–80. [Google Scholar]
- Marion, A. Analyse financière. In Concepts et Méthodes, 4th ed.; Dunod: Paris, France, 2007; pp. 20–43. [Google Scholar]
Variety Name | Force | Fruit Size (g) | Walunt Kernel (%) | Fats (%) | Protein Substance (%) | Ripening Period Decade/Month | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Geoagiu 65 | average | 14 | 49.5 | 63.3 | 19.3 | II/9 | - resistant to frost, drought and bacteriosis |
Jupânești | medium | 11 | 51 | 67.3 | 16.3 | III/9 | - resistant to frost and bacteriosis |
Novaci | semivigorous | 11.7 | 47 | 64.5 | 16.5 | II/9 | frost resistant |
Șușița | medium | 12 | 50 | 66.9 | 19.5 | III/9 | resistant to drought and bacteriosis |
Sibișel 252 | medium | 12 | 49.8 | 68 | 16.5 | II/9 | - frost resistant |
Indicator | Recommended Values for the Walnut Plantation | The Values Determined in the Hilly Area of Gorj County |
---|---|---|
Average annual temperatures | 8–9 °C | 8.5–9 °C |
Minimum temperatures | −24−27 °C | −31 °C |
Maximum temperatures | 35–45 °C | 40.6 °C |
Number of cold hours (0–7 °C) | 600–700 | - |
Annual precipitation level | 500–800 mm/year | 750–800 |
The slope of the land | maximum 10% | flat 3% |
Landslides | absent | 0 |
The degree of fragmentation | - | average favorability 3 |
The exploitation depth of the root system | 1–1.5 m | the structure of the soil allows the development of the root system |
Gleization | absent | 0 |
Pseudogleization | absent | 0 |
Texture (0–20 cm) | clayloam | clayloam |
Porosity | −10… −20 | −20 |
Ground water level | maximum 2.5–3 m | 3.5 m |
Excess moisture | absent | 0 |
Floodability | absent | 0 |
ph | 6.2–8.5 | 6.64–6.87 |
The edaphic volume | 101–125% | 113 |
CaCO3 and carbohydrate content | maximum 10% | absent |
Reserve humus | 60–120 t/ha | 90 |
Fertility level | - | medium |
Limiting Factor for Walnut Cultivation | Value Determined | Category of Suitability |
---|---|---|
soil thickness down to the compact rock | 113 | I |
useful edaphic volume | 113 | I |
degree of salinization | 0 | I |
degree of alkalinization | 0 | I |
horizon depth | 175 | I |
activ CaCO3 | absent | I |
soil reaction down to 100 cm | 6.6 | I |
Al changeable | absent | I |
vertical character | no | I |
land slope | 3 | I |
degree of unevenness of the terrain | 1 | I |
damage to the land through surface erosion | 1 | I |
depth erosion | 0 | I |
landslides | absent | I |
groundwater depth | 3.5 | I |
volume of non gleized soil | 95 | I |
excess moisture intensity | 1 | I |
volume of non pseudogleized soil | 95 | I |
lateral infiltration on the slope | 1 | I |
overland flooding | 0 | I |
groundwater drainage | 2 | II |
Name of the Indicator | Value Determined | Classification Limit | Quality Coefficient for Walnut Cultivation |
---|---|---|---|
average annual temperature | 8.5 | 8.1–9.0 °C | 1 |
average annual precipitation | 750 | 701–800 mm | 0.9 |
gleization | 0 | absent | 1 |
pseudogleization | 0 | absent | 1 |
salinization and alkalinisation | 0 | absent | 1 |
texture 0–50 cm | 62 | clayly-loamy texture | 0.9 |
slope | 0.3 | 3–5% | 1 |
landslide | 0 | absent | 1 |
groundwater depth | 3.5 | 1.5–2.0 m | 1 |
flooding | 0 | absent | 1 |
total porosity | +0.5 | 0–10 | 1 |
CaCO3 content | 0 | absent | 1 |
pH (reaction) (0–20 cm) | 6.6 | 6.5–9.0 | 1 |
soil volume | 113 | 101–125% | 1 |
humus reserve | 90 | 61–120 t/ha | 0.9 |
excess moisture | 0 | absent | 1 |
The product of the suitability coeficients | 0.729 | ||
Credit rating | 73 | ||
Quality class | II | ||
Degree of favorability in natural regime | Average favorability Natural favorability 2.84 |
Name of the Agro-Technical Work | Price (Euro) |
---|---|
Scarifying | 184 |
Land leveling | 82 |
Ploughing 25–27 cm | 122 |
Two-ways tilling | 122 |
TOTAL | 510 |
Normativ Position/ Standard/Category of Work | Name of the Work | UM | Materials (Euro) | Labour (Euro) | Equipment (Euro) | TOTAL | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS | SIS | IS | SIS | IS | SIS | IS | SIS | |||
1151 Order 801/386/III | Land marking for classic plantations | ha/ pcs. | 42.4 | 58.4 | 7.4 | 10.2 | - | - | 49.8 | 68.6 |
1161 Order 801/390/III | Digging pits for planting trees 40 × 40 × 40 cm | pcs. | 9.2 | 12.7 | 151.8 | 157.6 | - | - | 161 | 170.3 |
1165 Order 801/3892/I | Distribution of the pickets to pits | pcs. | 84.9 | 116.3 | 46.5 | 63.8 | - | - | 131.4 | 180 |
Tree transport | km | - | - | - | - | 21.4 | 21.4 | 21.4 | 21.4 | |
1773 III | Ditch making for layering 50 × 50 cm | ml | - | - | 1.6 | 2 | - | - | 1.6 | 2 |
1775 III | Layered trees in ditches | pcs. | - | - | 3.9 | 5.3 | - | - | 3.9 | 5.3 |
1168 I | Mud making | thousand pcs. | 0.8 | 1.2 | 3.5 | 4.7 | - | - | 4.3 | 5.9 |
1169 I | Root trimming and mudding | thousand pcs. | 0.8 | 0.8 | 3.5 | 0.8 | - | - | 4.3 | 1.6 |
1171 Order 801/395/I | Manually tree allocation to pits | Thou-sand pcs. | 4245 | 5816.3 | 3.7 | 5.1 | - | - | 4248.7 | 5821.4 |
1952 II | Manure transportation | t h/day | 171.4 | 196 | 6.1 | 8.4 | 12.5 | 17 | 190 | 221.4 |
1191 S.v.c.2.b. II | Manure spreading (20 kg/tree) | t | - | - | 28.4 | 38.8 | - | - | 28.4 | 38.8 |
1174 Order 801/396 IV | Tree planting complete work | pcs. | - | - | 54.5 | 74.7 | - | - | 54.5 | 74.7 |
1176 Order 801/399 I | Watering trees at the pit | pcs. m3 | 0.8 | 1.22 | 11.6 | 16 | 12.5 | 16.7 | 24.9 | 33.92 |
1175 Order 801/397 I | Tying trees to stakes | pcs. | 21 | 28.1 | 9.5 | 12.9 | 1.9 | 4.7 | 32.4 | 45.6 |
Crown formation at planting | pcs. | 34.7 | 37.8 | 4.3 | 5.9 | - | - | 39 | 43.7 | |
1236 I | Manual stem varnishing | kg pcs. | 20.4 | 28.1 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 27.4 | 37.5 |
Grass planting between rows | 306 | 306 | - | - | 31 | 30.6 | 337 | 336.6 | ||
TOTAL | 4937.4 | 6602.9 | 339.8 | 410.9 | 82.8 | 95.1 | 5360 | 7108.8 | ||
% | 92.1 | 92.9 | 6.34 | 5.78 | 1.54 | 1.33 | 100 | 100 |
Material Name | UM | Amount | Value (Euro) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SI | SSI | SI | SSI | ||
Grafted walnut planting material | Pcs. | 208 | 285 | 4245 | 5821.4 |
Wood pickets | Pcs. | 208 | 285 | 42.5 | 58,2 |
Manure | To. | 4.2 | 5 | 171.4 | 196 |
Wood stakes | Pcs. | 208 | 285 | 84.9 | 116 |
Foil for tree binding | Kg. | 2 | 3 | 20.4 | 31 |
Pliers | Pcs. | 5 | 5 | 20.4 | 20.4 |
Hoes | Pcs. | 5 | 5 | 20.4 | 20.4 |
Tree scissors | Pcs. | 3 | 3 | 20.4 | 20.4 |
Lime | Kg. | 5 | 7 | 10.2 | 14.2 |
Water for watering | 301.4 | 305 | |||
TOTAL | 4937 | 6603 |
Normativ Position | Name of the Work | Costs (Euro/ha) | Total (Euro) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Materials | Labour | Equipment | |||||||
SI | SSI | SI | SSI | SI | SSI | SI | SSI | ||
1162 | Digging pits for completed goals 10% | - | - | 15.3 | 20.4 | - | - | 15.3 | 20.4 |
1173 | Trees planted, complete work including watering | 428.5 | 592 | 5.5 | 7.6 | - | - | 434 | 599 |
1175 | Tying the trees to the stakes | 1.02 | 1.4 | 1.02 | 1.4 | - | - | 2.04 | 2.8 |
1236 | Whitening of stems | 2.04 | 2.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | - | - | 2.44 | 3.06 |
1224 | Harrowed 3 times with a hoe of ¼ of the surface | - | - | 104 | 104 | - | - | 104 | 104 |
1757 | Prepared solution for spraying—5 treatments | 318.5 | 347 | 2.5 | 3.06 | - | - | 321 | 350 |
1725 | Sprayed the trees with vermorel—5 treatments | - | - | 101 | 106 | - | - | 101 | 106 |
1261 | Crown forming cuts | - | - | 4.9 | 6.1 | - | - | 4.9 | 6.1 |
221 | Cut the grass per interval | - | - | - | - | 20.4 | 20.4 | 20.4 | 20.4 |
N.L. | Drip irrigation 4 waterings × 30 L/tree | 43 | 59 | 234 | 327 | 102 | 140 | 379 | 526 |
TOTAL | 793 | 1002 | 468 | 576 | 122.4 | 160.4 | 1.384 | 1.738 |
Normativ Position | Name of the Work | Expenses (Euro/ha/Year) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Materials | Labour | Equipment | |||||
IS | SIS | IS | SIS | IS | SIS | ||
1175 | Tying trees to stakes | 5.3 | 7.6 | 4.08 | 5.1 | - | - |
1236 | Stem varnishing | 8.7 | 9.6 | 21.4 | 24.5 | ||
1224 | 3 times hoeing on ¼ of the surface | - | - | 104 | 104 | - | - |
1757 | Solution preparation for spraying—5 treatments | 643 | 882 | 102 | 122 | - | - |
1725 | Spraying trees with pump | - | - | 122 | 168 | - | - |
1261 | Crown formation cuttings | - | - | 8.1 | 10.2 | - | - |
N.L. | Dripping irrigation 4 waterings × 30 L/tree | 71 | 92 | 265 | 318 | 61.2 | 61.2 |
221 | Mechanical grass mowing 3 times | - | - | - | - | 92 | 92 |
TOTAL | 728 | 991 | 627 | 752 | 153 | 153 | |
TOTAL SI | 1508 euro | ||||||
TOTAL SSI | 1896 euro |
Normativ Position | Name of the Work | Expenses (Euro/ha/Year) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Materials | Labour | Equipment | |||||
SI | SSI | SI | SSI | SI | SSI | ||
1175 | Tying the trees to the stakes | 5.3 | 7.6 | 4.08 | 5.1 | - | - |
1236 | Whitening of stems | 8.7 | 9.6 | 21.4 | 24.5 | ||
1224 | Harrowed 3 times with a hoe of ¼ of the surface | - | - | 104 | 104 | - | - |
1757 | Prepared solution for spraying—5 treatments | 643 | 882 | 102 | 122 | - | - |
1725 | Sprayed trees with vermorel | - | - | 122 | 168 | - | - |
1261 | Crown forming cuts | - | - | 8.1 | 10.2 | - | - |
N.L. | Drip irrigation 4 waterings × 30 L/tree | 71 | 92 | 265 | 318 | 61.2 | 61.2 |
221 | Cut the grass mechanically 3 times | - | - | - | - | 92 | 92 |
TOTAL | 728 | 991 | 627 | 752 | 153 | 153 | |
TOTAL SI | 1508 euro | ||||||
TOTAL SSI | 1896 euro |
Specification | U.M. | Cultivation System | |
---|---|---|---|
Intensive | Super-Intensive | ||
Density | No trees/ha | 208 | 285 |
Effective operation life (E.o.l.) | years | 30 | 30 |
Service life (S.l.) | years | 24 | 24 |
Total investment value (T.i.), of which: | euro/% | 12,700/100 | 15,194/100 |
Design and technical assistance | euro/% | 1184/9.3 | 1184/7.8 |
Pedological study | euro/% | 1225/9.6 | 1225/8.0 |
Land preparation | euro/% | 510/4.0 | 510/3.4 |
Fencing | euro/% | 1530/12 | 1531/10.0 |
Material expenses | euro/% | 6458/50.8 | 8596/56.6 |
Labour costs | euro/% | 1435/11.3 | 1739/11.4 |
Mechanical expenses | euro/% | 358/2.8 | 409/2.7 |
Annual expenses (A.e.), of which: | euro | 3051.5 | 3520 |
Annual exploitation (A.Expl.) | euro | 2102 | 2398 |
Direct and unexpected costs 10% | euro | 210.2 | 239.8 |
Indirect costs 10% | euro | 210.2 | 239.8 |
Annual depreciation rate A.d. = T.i./S.l. | euro | 529 | 642 |
Annual direct expenses D.e. = A.d. + A.Expl. | euro | 2631 | 3040 |
Average production (P.) | kg/ha | 3150 | 4100 |
Selling price (S.p.) | euro/kg | 1.6 | 1.6 |
Value of annual production V = P. × S.p. | euro/an | 5000 | 6500 |
Gross annual profit G.A.P. = V − S.p. | euro | 1950 | 2980 |
Income taxes I = G.A.P. × 16% | euro | 312 | 477 |
Net income N.I. = G.A.P. − I | euro | 1638 | 2503 |
Annual profit rate P.r. = N.I./A.e. × 100 | % | 54 | 71 |
Return on investment T = T.i./N.I. | years | 7.7 | 6.0 |
Total profit on the exploatation lifetime P = N.i. × S.ș. | euro | 39,312 | 60,072 |
Economic return on investment ROI = P/T.i. × 100 | % | 310 | 395 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Popa, R.-G.; Bălăcescu, A.; Popescu, L.G. Organic Walnut Cultivation in Intensive and Super-Intensive System—Sustainable Investment. Case Study: Gorj County, Romania. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021244
Popa R-G, Bălăcescu A, Popescu LG. Organic Walnut Cultivation in Intensive and Super-Intensive System—Sustainable Investment. Case Study: Gorj County, Romania. Sustainability. 2023; 15(2):1244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021244
Chicago/Turabian StylePopa, Roxana-Gabriela, Aniela Bălăcescu, and Luminița Georgeta Popescu. 2023. "Organic Walnut Cultivation in Intensive and Super-Intensive System—Sustainable Investment. Case Study: Gorj County, Romania" Sustainability 15, no. 2: 1244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021244
APA StylePopa, R. -G., Bălăcescu, A., & Popescu, L. G. (2023). Organic Walnut Cultivation in Intensive and Super-Intensive System—Sustainable Investment. Case Study: Gorj County, Romania. Sustainability, 15(2), 1244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021244