Next Article in Journal
Campus Dining Sustainability: A Perspective from College Students
Next Article in Special Issue
Insect-Derived Chitin and Chitosan: A Still Unexploited Resource for the Edible Insect Sector
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Circular Economy in Oil and Gas Produced Water Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fishmeal Replacement by Full-Fat and Defatted Hermetia illucens Prepupae Meal in the Diet of Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/su15032131
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficacy of Phosphine on Different Life Stages of Alphitobius diaperinus and Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)

by
Marina Gourgouta
* and
Christos G. Athanassiou
Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, 38446 Volos, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(3), 2131; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032131
Submission received: 11 November 2022 / Revised: 4 January 2023 / Accepted: 14 January 2023 / Published: 23 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Sustainable Insect Farming: Feed the Future)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The efficacy of phosphine has been established for numerous major stored product insects. However, data related to the evaluation of the effect of phosphine on Tenebrio molitor L and Alphitobius diaperinus Panzer are limited. The present study aims to evaluate the susceptibility of these species to phosphine by using the following evaluation protocols: (a) all life stages were exposed for 3 days to different concentrations of phosphine, (b) adults were exposed to 3000 ppm until all exposed individuals were immobilized, using the Phosphine Tolerance Test (PTT, Detia Degesch GmbH, Germany), and (c) adults were exposed to 3000 ppm of phosphine for 90 min by again using the PTT protocol. For all series of bioassays, delayed mortality was recorded 7 and 14 d post-exposure. According to our results, 100 ppm for three days was sufficient to kill all life stages, including the eggs, for both species. Alphitobius diaperinus adults were found to be more tolerant than those T. molitor, as noticeable survival was observed, even after 90 min of exposure to 3000 ppm. Our study provides some initial data for the efficacy of short and long exposures of A. diaperinus and T. molitor to phosphine.

1. Introduction

Phosphine gas (PH3) is the key fumigant for the control of insects infesting durable agricultural commodities during storage and processing [1,2,3]. The importance of this active ingredient has increased over the last decades due to its numerous advantages over the use of other methods [3]. The most important advantages of this insecticide are its low cost and ease of application, its characterization as a residue-free treatment, and its high efficacy against a wide range of major pests infesting stored products [3,4].
As in the case of the vast majority of insecticides that are currently in use, there are considerable variations in the efficacy of phosphine among different target insect species and different life stages of the same species [3]. In this context, a natural tolerance of some species has been observed that is not related to the development of resistance due to previous exposure to phosphine [5,6]. For instance, Gautam et al. [6] reported that the LC99 values of the eggs of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), and the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), were 51.5 and 84.4, respectively. Moreover, Athanassiou et al. [7] found differences in the susceptibility to phosphine of different life stages of the larger cabinet beetle, Trogoderma inclusum LeConte, and the hide beetle, Dermestes maculatus DeGeer (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). The majority of the data available so far underline that, for most of the species tested, eggs should be considered as the life stage most tolerant to phosphine [3]. Hence, when conducting bioassays to estimate the susceptibility to phosphine, eggs should be included, as this is the life stage that is most likely to survive and cause a rapid population rebound that will continue the infestation in a very short period. The same holds in the case of bioassays that are carried out in the field or in semi-field conditions, given that using adults or larvae alone might provide the impression that the application is effective [8,9]. Collecting eggs is not always possible, as it is a demanding and laborious procedure, but these can be replaced with vials containing adults and commodities that have been left for a certain period to oviposit, which is an approach that can be easily utilized at the industrial level [9,10,11,12].
Several protocols have been developed for the detection of resistance of stored product insects to phosphine and for the quantification of the efficacy of this gas in “real world” applications [3,13]. The most commonly used protocol is the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) test, which was initially proposed by Champ and Dyte [14]. In this protocol, the immediate effect of phosphine is evaluated after a 3-day exposure interval to 30 ppm of phosphine, and subsequent mortality is observed 7 and 14 days later [15,16,17]. Variations of this protocol are used as the “Dose Response” protocols, which are based on exposing individuals for 3 days at different concentrations [6,18,19]. Other protocols, such as the Phosphine Tolerance Test (PTT, Detia Degesch GmbH, Germany), rely on the “speed to immobilization”, providing quick data on the reduced susceptibility to phosphine [3,13,20]. Athanassiou et al. [20] evaluated the susceptibility to phosphine of different populations of thirteen species, obtained from different laboratories in different countries, using immobilization as a quick diagnostic indicator for resistance and providing information for a potential quick indicator of resistance development.
Although the aforementioned protocols have been used and reported for a wide range of species, there are no studies to indicate their utilization for the evaluation of the efficacy of phosphine against the yellow mealworm, Tenebrio molitor L., and the lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus Panzer (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). These species have received great attention in recent years, as they are among the most promising species for mass production and utilization as food and feed [21,22,23,24]. Both species have been detected in a wide range of stored products [23], and A. diaperinus is a potential carrier of various avian pathogens that cause dangerous diseases to poultry and humans [24,25,26].
Taking into consideration the importance of these two species, and the fact that the data available so far for the efficacy of phosphine for their control are scarce, the present study aims to evaluate the immediate and delayed efficacy of phosphine at different life stages of A. diaperinus and T. molitor using different protocols of short and long exposures.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insects

Individuals of both species were obtained from populations maintained at the Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology (LEAZ) at 26 ± 1 °C, 55% relative humidity (r.h.), and continuous darkness. Rearing was carried out in a mixture of one-fifth dry instant yeast (Angel Yeast Co. Ltd., Yichang, China) and four-fifths wheat bran and supplemented with fresh potato slices twice a week, which were used as a moisture source [27].
Adults, pupae, and large larvae of T. molitor were separated from the rearing substrate using a 2 mm sieve, and small larvae were separated using an 850 μm sieve. Similarly, regarding A. diaperinus, adults and pupae were separated from the rearing substrate using a 2 μm sieve. For the separation of large and small larvae, we used a 1 mm and 650 μm sieve, respectively. After the separation of the rearing substrate, individuals in all life stages were collected with a fine paint brush (lineo, No.1, Mesko-Pinsel GmbH, Wieseth, Germany). For both of the species examined, eggs were obtained by placing approx. 100 g of adults in white wheat flour to oviposit for a week. Thereafter, adults were removed, and eggs were collected from the oviposition substrate using a 250 μm sieve.

2.2. Bioassay I

All life stages were tested in this bioassay, i.e., adults, pupae, large larvae, small larvae, and eggs. Ten individuals from each of the different life stages were placed in plastic cylindrical vials (2.5 cm in diameter, 9 cm in height, different series of vials for each life stage). Subsequently, all vials were transferred in 1 L jars which were used as experimental chambers. The gas production was carried out as proposed by Steuerwald et al. [28], and then injected through a gas-tight rubber septum at the lid of the jar using a volumetric syringe to achieve the desired concentration, which was defined as either 50 or 100 ppm. Additional jars, with insects, that contained only air were used as controls. All jars were placed in incubators set at 28 °C and 55% r.h. Three days later, the vials were opened, and the mobile stages, i.e., adults, small larvae, and large larvae, were recorded as active (showing visible movement) or immobilized (with no visible movement). All individuals were removed from the vials and placed in Petri dishes with small quantities of wheat bran, set at 28 °C and 55% r.h. The Petri dishes were supplemented with carrot slices as a moisture source 3 times a week. Seven days later, all adults and larvae (both small and large) were observed for mortality. Eggs were observed for hatching, while pupae were observed for adult emergence. The same procedure was also repeated 14 days after the exposure. There were 2 replicates with 3 subreplicates (6 jars in total) for this test, with new phosphine production each time.

2.3. Bioassay II

In this series of bioassays, adults of both species were tested using the PPT protocol. Phosphine production was conducted as described by Agrafioti et al. [13]. Five adults each were introduced into 100 ml syringes, and all syringes were then filled with 3000 ppm of phosphine. The individuals were recorded visually every 2 min until all exposed individuals were immobilized. Syringes with adults, containing only air, were used as controls. When 100% of the exposed individuals were immobilized, they were removed from the syringe and transferred to Petri dishes in the open air with a small amount of food, along with carrot slices, as above. Mortality was recorded 7 and 14 days later. There were 3 replicates with 3 subreplicates for each species (9 syringes for each combination).

2.4. Bioassay III

In this series of bioassays, adults of both species were exposed to 3000 ppm for 90 min following the procedure described in Bioassay II. After the termination of this interval, all individuals were transferred to Petri dishes in which the immediate response was observed and classified either as active or as immobilized, and delayed effects were recorded 7 and 14 days later.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

For Bioassay I, as 100% of insects from all stages examined were immobilized after 3 days of exposure, no statistical analysis of the results for the immediate effect was performed. Regarding the delayed effect (the percentage of mortality of the eggs), the data were not normally distributed, nor could a transformation be found that allowed the presumption of normality. Non-parametric Wilcoxon tests were used to assess rank differences among the treatments with respect to each variable. Pairwise comparisons among the treatments were performed using a Wilcoxon 2-sample test in order to compare egg mortality at 50 and 100 ppm separately for both post-exposure intervals (7 and 14 days post-exposure) and species. The percentage of mortality for all the life stages tested was 100% for both post-exposure periods. In contrast, 0% mortality was noted for the control insects of all life stages for all intervals. Therefore, no further analysis was performed for this bioassay. Regarding Bioassay II, data were analyzed using probit analysis to estimate the lethal time for killing 50, 95, and 99% of the exposed individuals, i.e., LT50, LT95, and LT99 for both species tested. Finally, for Bioassay III 90, all data were submitted to t-tests separately for each interval to compare adult mortality of the species tested. For all the series of bioassays, regarding delayed efficacy, all data were submitted to t-tests for both post-exposure intervals (7 and 14 days post-exposure time).

3. Results

3.1. Bioassay I

All adults and larvae were immobilized after 3 days of exposure at 50 and 100 ppm (Figure 1). In addition, 100% mortality was observed for both species 7 and 14 days later for both adults and larvae. In contrast, some survival was recorded when eggs were exposed to 50 ppm of phosphine, since 95% of the eggs of A. diaperinus were considered dead, as they did not result in larval hatching in the 7-day post-exposure period, a percentage that was only slightly increased 7 days later (Figure 1). Regarding the T. molitor eggs, the mortality levels were 91.6 and 88.8% after 7 and 14 days, respectively (Figure 2). Eggs that had been exposed at 100 ppm of phosphine did not result in larval hatching for either of the species tested (Figure 1 and Figure 2).

3.2. Bioassay II

Probit analysis fit the data adequately for both species (Table 1). LT99 was determined as 5.54 and 4.34, whereas LT50 was 2.44 and 1.78 for A. diaperinus and T. molitor adults, respectively. However, regarding the 7-day post-exposure period, adult mortality of T. molitor was approx. 60%, i.e., three times the mortality rate of A. diaperinus. Furthermore, adult mortality of A. diaperinus was doubled at the 14-day post-exposure period, reaching 40%, but remained much lower than that of T. molitor adults, which reached 93.3% (Table 2).

3.3. Bioassay III

All adults of both species were immobilized after 90 min of exposure at 3000 ppm of phosphine. Regarding adults of A. diaperinus, a noticeable level of survival was observed, as the mortality recorded was 48.8 and 53.3%, respectively, for 7 and 14 days post-exposure. In contrast, for T. molitor, a 100% mortality was recorded for both post-exposure intervals (Table 3).

4. Discussion

This research demonstrates the efficacy of phosphine for the control of A. diaperinus and T. molitor. Alphitobius diaperinus adults were found to be more tolerant than those of T. molitor, as noticeable survival was observed, even after 90 min of exposure to 3000 ppm, as well as at the 7- and 14-day post-exposure intervals, whereas 100% mortality was noted for T. molitor. In an earlier study, Athanassiou et al. [20] used the PTT protocol to test different populations of major stored product beetle species, evaluating the knockdown time as a “threshold” to separate susceptible from tolerant populations. The times to knockdown here are comparable with those of the species which are listed in the Athanassiou et al. [20] study for both species tested. In addition, the post-exposure mortality times used here suggest that there is considerable delayed mortality, a fact that should be taken into account in “real world” fumigations in the case of the occurrence of surviving individuals. For T. castaneum, it was found that delayed mortality is likely to occur in the case of individuals that are susceptible to phosphine, while resistant populations exhibit a rapid post-exposure recovery [20].
The dose response protocol has long been regarded as a major diagnostic for resistance to phosphine and has been used with good results in different stored product insect species [6,16,18]. Based on our results, for both species tested, all life stages were found to be susceptible to phosphine, as mortality was complete (100%) even at the lowest concentration of 50 ppm for 3 days, whereas exposure to 100 ppm for the same interval was sufficient to kill all the eggs. As expected, eggs of both A. diaperinus and T. molitor were more tolerant to phosphine in comparison with the other life stages, which is in accordance with what has been noted for other stored product insect species [2,5,6,17,29]. For example, Gourgouta et al. [30] found that eggs of the khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium Everts (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) are by far the most tolerant life stage, as compared with the other life stages of this species, including its diapausing larvae. In this study, the authors reported that to obtain 100% egg mortality after 3 days of exposure, 1000 ppm of phosphine was required, in contrast with the other life stages where 50 ppm was found to be sufficient [30]. Furthermore, Athanassiou et al. [20] examined the efficacy of phosphine for different life stages of T. inclusum and D. maculatus and recorded that eggs of both of these species required considerably higher levels of phosphine to obtain 100% mortality, as compared with all other life stages. Despite the fact that our results here are in agreement with the previous observations for the reduced susceptibility of eggs to phosphine, the eggs of both T. molitor and A. diaperinus were only two times more tolerant than the other life stages, suggesting that phosphine can be used with success for the control of these two species without the need to reach concentrations that are extremely high, as in the case of T. granarium [30]. As both species are usually not the dominant beetle species found in storage and processing facilities, they are often not treated with phosphine, and hence, the possibilities of resistance development can be considered as lower than for dominant species such as T. castaneum [31].
To our knowledge, the available published data for the efficacy of phosphine against A. diaperinus are based on the quantification of treatments from field tests, which were carried out only to estimate control levels without the use of resistance evaluation protocols [28,32]. Essentially, this is the first research indicating the effect of phosphine on different life stages of this species using standard laboratory exposure protocols. Since, traditionally, the control of this species in poultry farms is primarily achieved with the application of residual contact insecticides on the walls and floor, most of the research data concern pyrethroids and organophosphates [23,24,33,34,35,36]. Most of the active ingredients that have been tested as contact insecticides against this species have been found to be effective, but there are cases where resistance has been recorded [23,35,37,38]. Likewise, the majority of the data that are available for the control of T. molitor are based on the utilization of contact insecticides, with some being more effective than others [38,39]. For instance, larvae of this species are tolerant to diatomaceous earths at concentrations that are lethal for other major stored product beetle species [40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. Nevertheless, this is the first work that has examined the efficacy of phosphine against this species.
Our study adds important information regarding the control of A. diaperinus and T. molitor, underlining the high effectiveness of phosphine in all the life stages of both species. In addition, we provide information that can be further evaluated for inclusion in the PTT kit as a rapid diagnostic for tolerance to phosphine for these two species. As both species are now important sources of food and feed and are massively reared for this purpose in different parts of the world, control methods are an important element in this production procedure to minimize cross infestations in commercial rearing units, which are becoming more common [46]. Nevertheless, we consider that the results of the present study are mostly related to protocols that can be applied for the control of these two species at the post-harvest stages of durable agricultural commodities, rather than in insect rearing units, as gases will also eliminate the “beneficial” A. diaperinus and T. molitor individuals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.G.A.; methodology, M.G. and C.G.A.; investigation, M.G.; resources, C.G.A.; data curation, M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G.; writing—review and editing, C.G.A.; visualization, M.G. and C.G.A.; supervision, C.G.A.; project administration, C.G.A.; funding acquisition, C.G.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Daglish, G.J. Effect of exposure period on degree of dominance of phosphine resistance in adults of Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae) and Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 2004, 60, 822–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nayak, M.K.; Daglish, G.J.; Phillips, T.W.; Ebert, P.R. Resistance to the fumigant phosphine and its management in insect pests of stored products: A global perspective. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020, 65, 333–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Sakka, M.K.; Romano, D.; Stefanini, C.; Canale, A.; Benelli, G.; Athanassiou, C.G. Mobility parameters of Tribolium castaneum and Rhyzopertha dominica populations with different susceptibility to phosphine. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2020, 87, 101593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Agrafioti, P.; Athanassiou, C.G. Insecticidal effect of contact insecticides against stored product beetle populations with different susceptibility to phosphine. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2018, 79, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nayak, M.K.; Collins, P.J.; Pavic, H.; Kopittke, R.A. Inhibition of egg development by phosphine in the cosmopolitan pest of stored products Liposcelis bostrychophila (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae). Pest Manag. Sci. 2003, 59, 1191–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gautam, S.G.; Opit, G.P.; Hosoda, E. Phosphine resistance in adult and immature life stages of Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) populations in California. J. Econ. Entomol. 2016, 109, 2525–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Athanassiou, C.G.; Phillips, T.W.; Arthur, F.H.; Aikins, M.J.; Agrafioti, P.; Hartzer, K.L. Efficacy of phosphine fumigation for different life stages of Trogoderma inclusum and Dermestes maculatus (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2020, 86, 101556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Athanassiou, C.G.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Arthur, F.H.; Throne, J.E. Efficacy of a combination of beta-cyfluthrin and imidacloprid and beta-cyfluthrin alone for control of stored product insects on concrete. J. Econ. Entomol. 2013, 106, 1064–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Aulicky, R.; Stejskal, V.; Frydova, B.; Athanassiou, C.G. Susceptibility of two strains of the confused flour beetle (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) following phosphine structural mill fumigation: Effects of concentration, temperature, and flour deposits. J. Econ. Entomol. 2015, 108, 2823–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Collins, P.J.; Daglish, G.J.; Bengston, M.; Lambkin, T.M.; Pavic, H. Genetics of resistance to phosphine in Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2002, 95, 862–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaur, R.; Schlipalius, D.I.; Collins, P.J.; Swain, A.J.; Ebert, P.R. Inheritance and relative dominance, expressed as toxicity response and delayed development, of phosphine resistance in immature stages of Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2012, 51, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kucerova, Z.; Kyhos, K.; Aulicky, R.; Lukas, J.; Stejskal, V. Laboratory experiments of vacuum treatment in combination with an O2 absorber for the suppression of Sitophilus granarius infestations in stored grain samples. Crop Prot. 2014, 61, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Agrafioti, P.; Athanassiou, C.G.; Nayak, M.K. Detection of phosphine resistance in major stored-product insects in Greece and evaluation of a field resistance test kit. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2019, 82, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Champ, B.R.; Dyte, C.E. Report of the FAO Global Survey of Pesticide Susceptibility of Stored Grain Pests; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  15. Holloway, J.C.; Falk, M.G.; Emery, R.N.; Collins, P.J.; Nayak, M.K. Resistance to phosphine in Sitophilus oryzae in Australia: A national analysis of trends and frequencies over time and geographical spread. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2016, 69, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nayak, M.K.; Falk, M.G.; Emery, R.N.; Collins, P.J.; Holloway, I.C. An analysis of trends, frequencies and factors influencing the development of resistance to phosphine in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) in Australia. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2017, 72, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Gourgouta, M.; Agrafioti, P.; Athanassiou, C.G. Insecticidal effect of phosphine for the control of different life stages of the khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). Crop Prot. 2021, 140, 105409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pimentel, M.A.G.; Faroni, L.R. D’A.; Tοtola, M.R.; Guedes, R.N.C. Phosphine resistance, respiration rate and fitness consequences in stored-product insects. Pest Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 876–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Nayak, M.K.; Collins, P.J.; Pavic, H. Developing fumigation protocols to manage strongly phosphine-resistant rice weevils, Sitophilus oryzae (L.). In Proceedings of the International Conference of Controlled Atmosphere and Fumigation in Stored Products, Gold Coast, Australia, 8–13 August 2007; Donahaye, E.J., Navarro, S., Bell, C., Jayas, D., Noyes, R., Phillips, T.W., Eds.; pp. 267–273. [Google Scholar]
  20. Athanassiou, C.G.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Brabec, D.L.; Agrafioti, P.; Sakka, M.; Campbell, J.F. Using immobilization as a quick diagnostic indicator for resistance to phosphine. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2019, 82, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Axtell, R.C.; Arends, J.J. Ecology and management of arthropod pests of poultry. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1990, 35, 101–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, S.H.; Chung, T.H.; Park, H.C.; Shin, M.J.; Park, I.G.; Choi, I.H. Effects of diet composition on growth performance and feed conversion efficiency in Alphitobius diaperinus larvae. J. Entomol. Acarol. Res. 2019, 51, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hickmann, F.; de Morais, A.F.; Bronzatto, E.S.; Giacomelli, T.; Guedes, J.V.C.; Bernardi, O. Susceptibility of the lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), from broiler farms of southern Brazil to insecticides. J. Econ. Entomol. 2018, 111, 980–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rumbos, C.I.; Karapanagiotidis, I.T.; Mente, E.; Athanassiou, C.G. The lesser mealworm Alphitobius diaperinus: A noxious pest or a promising nutrient source? Rev. Aquac. 2019, 11, 1418–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hazeleger, W.C.; Bolder, N.M.; Beumer, R.R.; Jacobs-Reitsma, W.F. Darkling beetles (Alphitobius diaperinus) and their larvae as potential vectors for the transfer of Campylobacter jejuni and Salmonella enterica serovar paratyphi B variant Java between successive broiler flocks. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 6887–6891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Gazoni, F.L.; Flores, F.; Bampi, R.A.; Silveira, F.; Boufleur, R.; Lovato, M. Evaluation of the resistance of mealworms (Alphitobius Diaperinus) (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) at different temperatures. Arq. Inst. Biol. 2012, 79, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rumbos, C.I.; Adamaki-Sotiraki, C.; Gourgouta, M.; Karapanagiotidis, I.T.; Asimaki, A.; Mente, E.; Athanassiou, C.G. Strain matters: Strain effect on the larval growth and performance of the yellow mealworm, Tenebrio molitor L. J. Insects Food Feed. 2021, 7, 1195–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Steuerwald, R.; Dierks-Lange, H.; Schmitt, S. Rapid bioassay for determining the phosphine tolerance. In Proceedings of the 9th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 15–18 October 2006; CAB Int.: Wallingford, UK; Volume 4, pp. 306–311. [Google Scholar]
  29. Venkidusamy, M.; Jagadeesan, R.; Nayak, M.K.; Subbarayalu, M.; Subramaniam, C.; Collins, P.J. Relative tolerance and expression of resistance to phosphine in life stages of the rusty grain beetle, Cryptolestes ferrugineus. J. Pest Sci. 2018, 91, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gourgouta, M.; Agrafioti, P.; Athanassiou, C.G. Immediate and delayed effects of short exposures to phosphine on adults and larvae of the khapra beetle, Trogoderma granarium. J. Stored Prod. 2021, 90, 101737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Campbell, J.F.; Athanassiou, C.G.; Hagstrum, D.W.; Zhu, K.Y. Tribolium castaneum: A model insect for fundamental and applied research. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2022, 67, 347–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Subekti, N.; Syahadan, M.A. Comparison the effectiveness of the fumigants sulfuryl fluoride and phosphine in controlling warehouse pest insects. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1918, 052021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kaufman, P.E.; Strong, C.; Rutz, D.A. Susceptibility of lesser mealworm (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) adults and larvae exposed to two commercial insecticides on unpainted plywood panels. Pest Manag. Sci. 2008, 64, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Steelman, C.D. Comparative susceptibility of adult and larval lesser mealworms, Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), collected from broiler houses in Arkansas to selected insecticides. J. Agric. Urban Entomol. 2008, 25, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Oliveira, D.G.P.; Bonini, A.K.; Alves, L.F.A. Field assessments to control the Lesser Mealworm (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) using Diatomaceous Earth in poultry houses. J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 2716–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zafeiriadis, S.; Sakka, M.K.; Athanassiou, C.G. Efficacy of contact insecticides for the control of the lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Stored Prod. 2021, 92, 101817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hamm, R.L.; Kaufman, P.E.; Reasor, C.A.; Rutz, D.A.; Scott, J.G. Resistance to cyfluthrin and tetrachlorvinphos in the lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus, collected from the eastern United States. Pest Manag. Sci. 2006, 62, 673–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kavallieratos, N.G.; Michail, E.J.; Boukouvala, M.C.; Nika, E.P.; Skourti, A. Efficacy of pirimiphos-methyl, deltamethrin, spinosad and silicoSec against adults and larvae of Tenebrio molitor L. on wheat, barley and maize. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2019, 83, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Athanassiou, C.G.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Boukouvala, M.C.; Mavroforos, M.E.; Kontodimas, D.C. Efficacy of alpha-cypermethrin and thiamethoxam against Trogoderma granarium Everts (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) and Tenebrio molitor L. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) on concrete. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2015, 62, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mewis, I.; Ulrichs, C.H. Action of amorphous diatomaceous earth against different stages of the stored product pests Tribolium confusum, Tenebrio molitor, Sitophilus granarius and Plodia interpunctella. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2001, 37, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Athanassiou, C.G.; Vayias, B.J.; Dimizas, C.B.; Kavallieratos, N.G.; Papagregoriou, A.S.; Buchelos, C.T.H. Insecticidal efficacy of diatomaceous earth against Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Tribolium confusum du Val (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) on stored wheat: Influence of dose rate, temperature and exposure interval. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2005, 41, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vayias, B.J.; Athanassiou, C.G.; Korunić, Z.; Rozman, V. Evaluation of natural diatomaceous earth deposits from south-eastern Europe for stored-grain protection: The effect of particle size. Pest Manag. Sci. 2009, 65, 1118–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Baliota, G.V.; Athanassiou, C.G. Evaluation of a Greek diatomaceous earth for stored product insect control and techniques that maximize its insecticidal efficacy. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gourgouta, M.; Rumbos, C.I.; Athanassiou, C.G. Impact of diatomaceous earth on adults and larvae of the yellow mealworm, Tenebrio molitor L. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2022, 98, 101987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rumbos, C.I.; Rigopoulou, M.; Athanassiou, C.G. Are insect meals prone to insect infestation during storage? Development of major storage insects on substrates based on Tenebrio molitor larvae meal. J. Pest Sci. 2020, 93, 1359–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Deruytter, D.; Rumbos, C.I.; Athanassiou, C.G. Insect infestations in mealworm farming: The case of the pyralid moths. J. Insects Food Feed. 2021, 7, 1183–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sustainability 15 02131 g001 550
Figure 1. Mean number (% ± SE) of dead adults, pupae, large larvae, small larvae and eggs of A. diaperinus 7 (A) and 14 days (B) after the termination of the 3-day exposure to 50 and 100 ppm of phosphine (P7 = 0.17, Z7 = −1.34; P14 = 0.40, Z14 = −0.83).
Figure 1. Mean number (% ± SE) of dead adults, pupae, large larvae, small larvae and eggs of A. diaperinus 7 (A) and 14 days (B) after the termination of the 3-day exposure to 50 and 100 ppm of phosphine (P7 = 0.17, Z7 = −1.34; P14 = 0.40, Z14 = −0.83).
Sustainability 15 02131 g001
Sustainability 15 02131 g002 550
Figure 2. Mean number (% ± SE) of dead adults, pupae, large larvae, small larvae, and eggs of T. molitor 7 (A) and 14 days (B) after the termination of the exposure to 0 ppm (control), 50 ppm, 100 ppm for 3 days (P7 = 0.07, Z7 = −1.79; P14 = 0.7, Z14 = −1.78).
Figure 2. Mean number (% ± SE) of dead adults, pupae, large larvae, small larvae, and eggs of T. molitor 7 (A) and 14 days (B) after the termination of the exposure to 0 ppm (control), 50 ppm, 100 ppm for 3 days (P7 = 0.07, Z7 = −1.79; P14 = 0.7, Z14 = −1.78).
Sustainability 15 02131 g002
Table
Table 1. Probit analysis for LT50, LT95, LT99 (confidence intervals) of adults of A. diaperinus and T. molitor after exposure to 3000 ppm concentration for the insect population tested, expressed as minutes to immobilization, using the PPT protocol.
Table 1. Probit analysis for LT50, LT95, LT99 (confidence intervals) of adults of A. diaperinus and T. molitor after exposure to 3000 ppm concentration for the insect population tested, expressed as minutes to immobilization, using the PPT protocol.
SpeciesLT50LT95LT99Slopex2pdf
A. diaperinus2.4
(1.9–2.8)		4.63
(4.1–5.7)		5.5
(4.8–7.0)		0.7 ± 0.125.330.44425
T. molitor1.8
(1.1–2.2)		3.6
(3.1–4.9)		4.3
(3.6–6.3)		0.9 ± 0.223.740.53425
Table
Table 2. Mean mortality (% ± SE) of adults of A. diaperinus and T. molitor, 7 and 14 days after the termination of the exposure to 3000 ppm of phosphine.
Table 2. Mean mortality (% ± SE) of adults of A. diaperinus and T. molitor, 7 and 14 days after the termination of the exposure to 3000 ppm of phosphine.
Species7 Days14 Days
A. diaperinus20.0 ± 5.7 *40.0 ± 6.6 *
T. molitor60.0 ± 9.493.3 ± 3.3
t−3.617.15
p0.002<0.001
* Means with asterisks, obtained on A. diaperinus-exposed adults, are significantly different from the respective means, obtained on T. molitor-exposed adults, within each post-exposure period and column larvae, according to Students’ t-test at p < 0.05.
Table
Table 3. Mean number (% ± SE) of immobilized adults of A. diaperinus and T. molitor, after 90 min of exposure to 3000 ppm of phosphine and mortality (% ± SE) of adults of the aforementioned species, after the termination of 7 and 14-day post-exposure periods.
Table 3. Mean number (% ± SE) of immobilized adults of A. diaperinus and T. molitor, after 90 min of exposure to 3000 ppm of phosphine and mortality (% ± SE) of adults of the aforementioned species, after the termination of 7 and 14-day post-exposure periods.
Species90 min7 Days14 Days
A. diaperinus100.0 ± 0.048.8 ± 8.2 *53.3 ± 10.5 *
T. molitor100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0100.0 ± 0.0
t-−6.204.42
p-<0.001<0.001
* Means with asterisks, obtained on A. diaperinus-exposed adults, are significantly different from the respective means, obtained on T. molitor-exposed adults, within each post-exposure period and column larvae, according to Students’ t-test at p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gourgouta, M.; Athanassiou, C.G. Efficacy of Phosphine on Different Life Stages of Alphitobius diaperinus and Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Sustainability 2023, 15, 2131. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032131

AMA Style

Gourgouta M, Athanassiou CG. Efficacy of Phosphine on Different Life Stages of Alphitobius diaperinus and Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Sustainability. 2023; 15(3):2131. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032131

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gourgouta, Marina, and Christos G. Athanassiou. 2023. "Efficacy of Phosphine on Different Life Stages of Alphitobius diaperinus and Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)" Sustainability 15, no. 3: 2131. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032131

APA Style

Gourgouta, M., & Athanassiou, C. G. (2023). Efficacy of Phosphine on Different Life Stages of Alphitobius diaperinus and Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Sustainability, 15(3), 2131. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032131

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop