Next Article in Journal
RETRACTED: An Infrared Small Target Detection Method Based on a Weighted Human Visual Comparison Mechanism for Safety Monitoring
Next Article in Special Issue
Estimation and Development-Potential Analysis of Regional Housing in Ningbo City Based on High-Resolution Stereo Remote Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
Uncertainty of Partial Dependence Relationship between Climate and Vegetation Growth Calculated by Machine Learning Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prediction of Land Surface Temperature Considering Future Land Use Change Effects under Climate Change Scenarios in Nanjing City, China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Remote Sensing
Volume 15
Issue 11
10.3390/rs15112921
Review Report
remotesensing-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

An Improved Future Land-Use Simulation Model with Dynamically Nested Ecological Spatial Constraints

Remote Sens. 2023, 15(11), 2921; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112921
by Chaoxu Luan, Renzhi Liu *, Jing Sun, Shangren Su and Zhenyao Shen
Reviewer 1:
Zhiming Zhang
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(11), 2921; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112921
Submission received: 14 March 2023 / Revised: 29 May 2023 / Accepted: 1 June 2023 / Published: 3 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Future Prediction and Scenario Analysis of Urbanization Using Remote Sensing and GIS)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It is interesting to develop a called LSDNE land use simulation model which combining the dynamic multi-level ecological spatial contraints into CA model. Moreover, the multi-type random patch seeds were used to analyze the driving factors behind each type of land expansion. This LSDNE mode were used to predict the future land change with five different scenarios. Generally, this work is interesting and is helpful for the Territorial Spatial Planning Policy implementation in China. Some comments  are listed below.

1. The Land Use Simulation model with Dynamic Nested Ecological spatial constraints, the model of LSDNE. It is not very clearly for readers to understand what is "dynamic nested".  The authors should give more detail description about dynamic nested.

2. In section 2, the method of evalution or accuracy assesment or sensitivity analysis for the developed simulation model should be described.

3.  2.3.2 Landscape metrics calculation, I don't know why those landscape metrics should be caculated, for what purposes? I also didn't find any explainations in the Introduction section.

4. Again, without any accuracy assesment or sensitivity analysis results it is hard to compare the differences among the five different scenarios and which one is better.

  

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

See PDF document with my report.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have satisfactorily modified the original submission. In my opinion, the manuscript can now be considered for publication in this jounal.

Back to TopTop