Next Article in Journal
Therapeutic Potential and Pharmaceutical Development of a Multitargeted Flavonoid Phloretin
Next Article in Special Issue
Food Environment around Schools: A Systematic Scope Review
Previous Article in Journal
Exosome-Containing Extracellular Vesicles Contribute to the Transport of Resveratrol Metabolites in the Bloodstream: A Human Pharmacokinetic Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Household Income Is Related to Dietary Fiber Intake and Dietary Acid Load in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationships between Food Production Experience and the Behavior, Attitude, and Knowledge of Dietary Recommendations among Japanese Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

Home Economics Education Course, Cooperative Faculty of Education, Gunma University, Aramaki 4–2, Maebashi 371-8510, Japan
Nutrients 2022, 14(17), 3639; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173639
Submission received: 8 August 2022 / Revised: 30 August 2022 / Accepted: 1 September 2022 / Published: 2 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diet Quality, Food Environment and Diet Diversity)

Abstract

:
The Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries proposed to educate more people in food production as one of the objectives of the Basic Plan for Food and Nutrition Education Promotion. This cross-sectional study aims to elucidate the relationship between food production experience (agricultural, forestry, and fishery experiences) and the behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations among Japanese adults. This study was conducted using data obtained from the “Survey on Dietary Habits and Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishery Experiences (2019)”. This survey was conducted by mailing paper questionnaires to respondents aged 20–69 years living in 17 regions across Japan. The independent variable was food production experience. The dependent variables were each of the 13 goals of the dietary guidelines in Japan, the total score for adherence to the 13 items (low scores indicate good adherence), adherence to a Japanese-style diet, and four items on the attitude and knowledge of dietary recommendations. I also examined the association between the point in life the food production experience occurred and the above outcomes. The data obtained from 3461 participants aged 20 to 69 years were used for multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses. Food production experience was positively associated with an improved behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations among adults in Japan. The study found a strong relationship with food production experiences in adulthood.

1. Introduction

Food production experiences (agricultural, forestry, and fishery experiences) are positively associated with dietary behavior, awareness, and knowledge [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Several review articles suggest a positive association between food production experience and healthy-eating knowledge or positive attitudes toward fruits and vegetables [1,2,3,4]. Other reviews report positive associations between food production experience and dietary behavior, such as fruit and vegetable intake, balanced meal intake, and improved food access; however, the results are partially inconsistent for fruit and vegetable intake [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Additionally, several Japanese studies report the associations between food production experience and dietary behavior, awareness, and knowledge [14,15,16]. Most of the food production experiences involve the production of crops through gardening or other means; however, some include the experience of making processed foods from crops harvested on the farm [14,15,16]. Most of the studies treated school or community gardening as a form of exposure/intervention [14,15,16]. In addition, no study considered forestry or fishing experiences as standalone exposures/interventions [14,15,16]. As with studies in other countries, Japanese studies have reported inconsistent results on the association between fruit and vegetable intake, although reports of positive associations predominate [14,16]. Moreover, the associations are not the only factors contributing to health, such as an increased preference for and intake of fruits and vegetables or increased diversity in food intake [14,15]. Scholars also observed positive associations with dietary awareness related to environmental conservation, such as a sense of gratitude for food and less food waste [14,16]. Thus, food production experiences are related to multifaceted dietary behavior, awareness, and knowledge. Because of this background, the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries proposes that increasing people’s food production experience is one of the objectives of the Basic Plan for Food and Nutrition Education Promotion [17].
However, no studies have determined whether differences exist in dietary behavior, awareness, and knowledge during adulthood and beyond according to the life stage at which the food production experience occurs. The associations between food production experience and dietary behavior, awareness, and knowledge have been examined at various life stages [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Many studies on children have used gardens in kindergartens and schools as interventions and exposures. Many studies on adults and beyond have used community, allotment, and urban gardens as interventions and exposures [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. In terms of design, many of these studies are cross-sectional or interventional ones that evaluate short-term effects [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. In other words, no studies have determined whether food production experiences in childhood exert long-term effects on eating habits in adulthood and beyond, or whether only food production experiences during adulthood and beyond are relevant to eating habits in adulthood and beyond.
This cross-sectional study determines the associations between food production experiences and the behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations in Japan. Then, this study examines whether differences exist in behavior, attitude, and knowledge in adulthood according to the life stage at which food production was experienced.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data

The data were derived from the Survey on Dietary Habits and Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishery Experiences 2019 (Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries) from the Social Science Japan Data Archive, Center for Social Research and Data Archive [18,19]. The objective of the survey was to confirm the level of recognition of the Japanese Dietary Balance Guide, the level of implementation of dietary guidelines for Japanese, and the proportion of respondents who participated in food production experiences throughout Japan. Moreover, the survey intended to provide basic data for future policy development. This survey was conducted using paper questionnaires mailed to respondents aged between 20 and 69 years and living in 17 regions across Japan [18]. The survey was conducted by dividing Japan into four areas (Tokyo area, Kinki area, regional cities, and small cities/counties); setting the percentage of the total sample for each of the four areas; and then allocating the sample to each area by sex, age, and household composition according to the population composition ratio of the 2015 National Population Census [18]. Random sampling was conducted according to the allocation performed by survey monitors from Rakuten Insight, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan) [18].
Anonymous data were obtained from 3645 individuals, out of which data from 3461 individuals with complete responses were included for analysis. This study was conducted using anonymous information from a previously completed survey and per the ethical guidelines for life science and medical research involving human subjects in Japan [20]. This report followed the STROBE Statement [21].

2.2. Variables

2.2.1. Independent Variables

The study employed the status of food production experience as the independent variable (with and without experience [ref.]). The survey asked, “Have you or has anyone in your family ever participated in a food production experience?” [18]. If a respondent answered “yes”, the respondent was asked whether they had participated in the experience [18]. Only those respondents who had themselves participated in food production were treated as “with experience” in this study.
The life stage at which the respondents had experienced food production (elementary school ages or younger, junior-high-school ages or older (less than 20 years old), 20 years old or older, and without experience [ref.]) was used as another independent variable. The respondents were asked for the life stage at which they had experienced food production in multiple questions with nine categories (younger than elementary school age; elementary school age; junior-high-school age; high-school age; 10s other than above; in their 20s, 30s, 40s, and 50s or older). Then, these categories were aggregated into the three categories listed above based on the distribution of responses and station-in-life fit [18].

2.2.2. Outcomes

I used the behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations as outcomes. Adherence to dietary guidelines for Japanese and Japanese-style diets was used for dietary behavior. For dietary attitude and knowledge, the following items were used: attitude to food and nutrition education, knowledge about the Japanese Dietary Balance Guide, knowledge of dietary guidelines for Japanese, and knowledge of Japanese-style diet.
Adherence to dietary guidelines for Japanese. The main feature of the dietary guidelines for the Japanese is that they were created with a broad perspective on the entire dietary system, which ranges from food production and distribution to dining and health [22]. The guidelines emphasize improving quality of life; focusing on a well-balanced diet; and considering a stable supply of food, the food culture, and the environment [22]. The dietary guidelines for Japanese consist of the following preferred practices: (1) enjoy your meals; (2) establish a healthy rhythm by keeping regular hours for meals; (3) maintain appropriate weight through adequate exercise and well-balanced meals; (4) eat well-balanced meals with staple food, as well as main and side dishes; (5) eat enough grains, such as rice and other cereals; (6) combine vegetables, fruits, milk products, beans, and fish in your diet; (7) avoid too much salt, and attention should be paid to the quality and quantity of fat ingested; (8) take advantage of the Japanese dietary culture and local food products; preserve local dishes; (9) conserve food resources and practice dietary habits that minimize leftovers and food waste; and (10) develop your understanding of food and review your dietary life [22]. Respondents to the Survey on Dietary Habits and Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishery Experiences 2019 were asked to respond to the items of the dietary guidelines, which were rated using a four-point Likert-type scale (1 = usually; 2 = often; 3 = seldom; 4 = never). Notably, practices 6 and 7 could not be captured using one question. Thus, their items were presented as follows: (6a) ensure vitamin, mineral, and fiber intakes by consumption of vegetables and fruit daily; (6b) maintain calcium intake from milk, dairy products, green and yellow vegetables, beans, and small fish; (7a) avoid food and dishes with a high salt content; (7b) consume balanced proportions of fats from animals, vegetables, and fish; and (7c) establish a habit of checking nutrition fact labels when selecting food and eating out [18]. In this study, the total score for the 13 items (13–52 points: the lower the score, the higher the adherence) and each item (two categories: usually/often or seldom/never [ref.]) were used for analyses. The reliability of the total score was acceptable (Cronbach’s α = 0.857).
Adherence to a Japanese-style diet. The following question focused on this: “Are you practicing a Japanese-style diet?”. This item was rated using the four-point Likert-type scale. Two categories (usually/often or seldom/never [ref.]) were used for analyses. The question described the Japanese-style diet as one that consists of rice and various side dishes, such as fish, meat, milk, dairy products, vegetables, seaweed, legumes, fruits, and green tea. It is assembled within a few days to a week and can be combined with retort food, frozen food, and eating out. The Japanese-style diet intake is inversely associated with the risk of functional disability, dementia, and mortality due to cardiovascular diseases [23,24,25].
Attitude and knowledge. For attitude toward food and nutrition education, the participants were asked about their interest in food and nutrition education using four categories: interested, somewhat interested, somewhat uninterested, and uninterested. Two categories (interested/somewhat interested or somewhat uninterested/uninterested [ref.]) were used for analyses. This item is commonly used to measure the interest of the Japanese people in food and nutrition education [26]. In terms of knowledge about the Japanese Dietary Balance Guide, dietary guidelines for Japanese, and Japanese-style diet, the participants were asked about the degree of their knowledge about each item using three responses: “I know the item including its contents”, “I have heard of it at least by name”, and “I do not know it”. Responses to the first two questions were summarized as “known”. Two values, namely, known and unknown [ref.], were used for analyses. Adherence to the Japanese Dietary Balance Guide reportedly reduces the risk of mortality [27,28].

2.2.3. Basic Characteristics

The following basic characteristics were used for analyses: sex (women; men), age (20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, and 60s), marriage status (not married; married), household structure (living alone; married couple; parents and children; grandparents, parents, and children; other).

2.3. Analyses

First, the analysis was conducted on food production experience as the independent variable. Multiple regression analysis was used when the total score for dietary guideline adherence was used as the outcome variable. The other outcome variables were composed of binary data. Thus, binary logistic regression analysis was used.
Multiple regression and binary logistic regression analyses were then conducted to determine the life stages at which the respondents experienced food production as the independent variable. Here, sensitivity analyses that included only those aged 50 and older were conducted because young adults would have less opportunity to experience food production after the age of 20 years than middle-aged adults would have had.
For both analyses, crude and adjusted models using the basic characteristics (age was not used in sensitivity analysis) as covariates were created, and regression coefficients (B) or odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated.
SPSS Statistics 28.0 (IBM Japan, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was used for analyses with a significance level of 5% (two-tailed test).

3. Results

Table 1 presents the responses according to food production experience.
Table 2 describes the relationships between food production experience and the behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations. The total score for dietary guideline adherence was lower for people with experience than those without experience in food production (adjusted model: B = − 1.496, p < 0.001). In other words, adherence was better among those who experienced food production. The trend was similar for many items when the analysis was conducted for each item (adjusted models: OR: 1.044–1.869, p: <0.001–0.554). However, salt and calcium intakes indicated no significant associations. The adherence to a Japanese-style diet was also positively related to food production experience (OR = 2.176, p < 0.001). In addition, attitude to food and nutrition education and knowledge of the Dietary Balance Guide, dietary guidelines, and Japanese-style diet were positively related to food production experiences (adjusted models: OR: 1.468–2.046, all p-values < 0.001).
Table 3 illustrates the relationships between the life stage at which food production was experienced and the behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations. For the life stages, 798, 304, and 624 experienced food production during their elementary school ages or younger, junior-high-school ages or older, and at 20 years old or older, respectively. A total of 2187 lacked this experience. For the total score for dietary guideline adherence, only those with experience at 20 years old or older exhibited a significantly positive relationship (adjusted model: B = −1.556, p < 0.001). Food production experience at this life stage also exerted significant relationships with each item of the dietary guidelines (except for enjoyment, salt intake, and fat intake), adherence to the Japanese-style diet, attitude to food and nutrition education, and knowledge of Dietary Balance Guide, dietary guidelines, and Japanese-style diet. Food production experience during elementary school ages or younger displayed significantly positive relationships with adherence to Japanese-style diet, attitude to food and nutrition education, and knowledge of Dietary Balance Guide, dietary guidelines, and Japanese-style diet. However, only a few relationships with dietary guideline adherence (traditional and sustainable diets were positively significant; other items and total scores were non-significant). Additionally, food production experience during junior-high-school ages or older exhibited no relationship with nearly all outcomes. Per each item in the dietary guideline adherence, food production experience during junior-high-school ages or older pointed to significant relationships with enjoyment, dietary rhythm, and sustainable diet. For attitude and knowledge, the knowledge of the Japanese-style diet was significantly related to food production experience during this life stage as well.
Table 4 illustrates the results of the sensitivity analyses. For subjects in their 50s and 60s, the B and OR for the life stage at which food production experience occurred was very similar to the B and OR for behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations. Food production experience at an age of 20 years was significantly positively associated with the total score for dietary guideline adherence, 7 out of 13 items for dietary guideline adherence, adherence to a Japanese-style diet, and 3 out of 4 items for attitude and knowledge of dietary recommendations. The difference from the overall analysis was that the OR of experience in elementary school age or younger on “Practice sustainable dietary habits” and “Knowledge of dietary guidelines” was closer to 1.

4. Discussion

This study examined the association between food production experiences and the behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations. Furthermore, the study examined whether differences exist in behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations in adulthood and beyond according to the life stage at which food production was experienced. The results reveal that an adherence to the dietary guidelines for Japanese and Japanese-style diets; attitude to food and nutrition education; and knowledge of the Japanese Dietary Balance Guide, dietary guidelines for Japanese and Japanese-style diets were higher in people with food production experiences. In addition, food production experiences at 20 years old or older displayed significant positive associations with behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations. Furthermore, food production experiences during elementary school or younger were almost not associated with dietary behaviors. However, a significantly positive association between attitude and knowledge of dietary recommendations was noted. Moreover, food production experiences during junior-high-school ages or older exhibited almost no association with behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations. This study strengthened the evidence of the association between food production experiences and behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations among Japanese adults. Furthermore, this study was the first to examine the relationship between previous experiences with food production and behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations in adulthood and beyond, which provide new insights into related studies globally.
Positive associations between food production experiences and behavior, awareness, and knowledge are widely known [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. However, no previous studies used dietary guidelines for Japanese as an outcome; thus, the current study added new knowledge to this field. The dietary guidelines for the Japanese were developed not only to recommend a healthy diet, but also to promote the continuation of traditional diets and sustainability [20]. Therefore, this study inferred that food production experience was positively related to a desirable diet in terms of health, tradition, and sustainability. Previous Japanese studies demonstrated the positive associations between food production experiences and dietary awareness related to environmental conservation and knowledge of traditional foods, which is consistent with the present results [14,16]. This study used a comprehensive item on traditional food preservation and sustainable diets. Previous studies have used indicators, such as knowledge of specific local traditional foods, food waste behavior, and a sense of gratitude for food [14,16]. Future studies should scrutinize these relationships using more specific and systematic indicators.
The results examined, according to the life stage at which food production was experienced, reveal a significant association between food production experience and behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations during adulthood and beyond. Previous cross-sectional studies on Japanese subjects reported positive associations during adulthood and beyond, consistent with the current results [14,15,16]. In addition, these studies did not adjust for food production experiences in childhood [14,15,16]. The present study found that even after adjusting for food production experiences in childhood, food production experiences in adulthood were positively related to dietary behaviors, attitudes, and knowledge. The association is not simply causal in that food production experiences could lead to desirable dietary behavior, attitude, and knowledge, including a reverse causal relationship in those individuals with high levels of dietary awareness frequently under food production experiences. The study inferred that food production experiences during adulthood interact with dietary awareness.
In addition, food production experience during childhood was almost non-significantly associated with dietary behaviors during adulthood. However, food production experiences during elementary school ages and younger were significantly associated with attitude and knowledge of dietary recommendations during adulthood and beyond. Therefore, food production experiences during elementary school or younger may influence dietary attitudes and knowledge during adulthood and beyond. Furthermore, sustainable dietary behaviors in adulthood and beyond were positively associated with food production experiences in elementary school ages or younger and junior-high-school ages or older. In other words, food production experiences during childhood may exert long-term effects on sustainable dietary behaviors that may continue into adulthood and beyond. In this regard, the previous studies pointed out that awareness of environmental conservation can be reinforced by preventing the “extinction of experience” and “shifting the baseline syndrome” [29,30]. The first expression denotes less direct contact with the natural environment [29]. The second expression pertains to a change in accepted norms for the natural environment condition due to the extinction of experience [30]. Presumably, direct contact with nature during experiences with food production could prevent these conditions. Food production experiences during childhood may play a role in environmental conservation from the dietary perspective as a method for avoiding these problems. Given the growing interest in the sustainable diet in recent years, food production experiences may be an important factor in the future [31]. However, in the sensitivity analysis for subjects over 50 years old, there was no longer any association between experience at elementary school age or younger in the categories of “Practice sustainable dietary habits” and “Knowledge of dietary guidelines”. The influence of food production experiences at elementary school age or younger may persist among young adults but not into middle age and older. More detailed studies will be needed in the future.

Limitation

This study had several limitations. First, the subjects were Japanese; thus, caution should be exercised when generalizing the interpretation of the results to other countries and regions. Although many scholars worldwide have reported simple associations between food production experiences during adulthood and food, following up on the long-term effects of food production experiences during childhood in other countries and regions would be desirable. Moreover, all survey items were self-reported; thus, the possibility of recall bias was undeniable. Future research using objective indicators is needed. Furthermore, analyses were conducted using survey items commonly used in Japanese government statistics; as such, a debate may emerge about the validity and reliability of the survey items. Given that the data were obtained from a cross-sectional survey, further verification of the causal relationship between items found to be significantly related to the study is required.

5. Conclusions

Food production experience was positively associated with the behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations among Japanese adults. This association was particularly significant for food production experience at 20 years old or older. Food production experience during elementary school ages or younger was positively associated with attitude and knowledge of dietary recommendations. Sustainable dietary practices were associated with food production experiences during elementary school ages or younger, junior-high-school ages or older, and 20 years old or older. It was suggested that will be important to develop a social infrastructure that allows people to experience food production not only as children, but also as adults.

Funding

D.M. was funded by JSPS KAKENHI; grant number (JP18K13037, JP21K13503).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable. This study was exempt from applying the ethical guidelines for life science and medical research involving human subjects in Japan because anonymous information was derived from a survey conducted prior to the study.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

It is available by applying to the Social Science Japan Data Archive, Center for Social Research and Data Archive, which is affiliated with the Institute of Social Sciences, University of Tokyo.

Acknowledgments

Data for this secondary analysis, “Survey on dietary habits and food production experiences (2019)”, was provided by the Social Science Japan Data Archive, Center for Social Research and Data Archives, Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Garcia, M.T.; Ribeiro, S.M.; Germani, A.C.C.G.; Bógus, C.M. The impact of urban gardens on adequate and healthy food: A systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 2018, 21, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ohly, H.; Gentry, S.; Wigglesworth, R.; Bethel, A.; Lovell, R.; Garside, R. A systematic review of the health and well-being impacts of school gardening: Synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence. BMC Public Health 2016, 16, 286. [Google Scholar]
  3. Davis, J.N.; Spaniol, M.R.; Somerset, S. Sustenance and sustainability: Maximizing the impact of school gardens on health outcomes. Public Health Nutr. 2015, 18, 2358–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Berezowitz, C.K.; Bontrager Yoder, A.B.; Schoeller, D.A. School Gardens enhance academic performance and dietary outcomes in children. J. Sch. Health 2015, 85, 508–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Langellotto, G.A.; Gupta, A. Gardening increases vegetable consumption in school-aged children: A meta-analytical synthesis. HortTechnology 2012, 22, 430–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. McCormack, L.A.; Laska, M.N.; Larson, N.I.; Story, M. Review of the nutritional implications of farmers’ markets and community gardens: A call for evaluation and research efforts. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2010, 110, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Robinson-O’Brien, R.; Story, M.; Heim, S. Impact of garden-based youth nutrition intervention programs: A review. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2009, 109, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schram-Bijkerk, D.; Otte, P.; Dirven, L.; Breure, A.M. Indicators to support healthy urban gardening in urban management. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 621, 863–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Al-Delaimy, W.K.; Webb, M. Community gardens as environmental health interventions: Benefits versus potential risks. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2017, 4, 252–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Savoie-Roskos, M.R.; Wengreen, H.; Durward, C. Increasing fruit and vegetable intake among children and youth through gardening-based interventions: A systematic review. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2017, 117, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vasquez, A.; Sherwood, N.E.; Larson, N.; Story, M. Community-supported agriculture as a dietary and health improvement strategy: A narrative review. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2017, 117, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Egli, V.; Oliver, M.; Tautolo, E.-S. The development of a model of community garden benefits to wellbeing. Prev. Med. Rep. 2016, 3, 348–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alaimo, K.; Beavers, A.W.; Crawford, C.; Snyder, E.H.; Litt, J.S. Amplifying health through community gardens: A framework for advancing multicomponent, behaviorally based neighborhood interventions. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2016, 3, 302–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Machida, D.; Kushida, O. The influence of food production experience on dietary knowledge, awareness, behaviors, and health among Japanese: A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Machida, D. Relationship between community or home gardening and health of the elderly: A web-based cross-sectional survey in Japan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nakamura, K.; Kojima, D.; Ando, M. What reduces household food waste in Japan? Nation-Wide and region-specific contributing factors in urban and rural areas. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 2020 Edition [Summary]. Policies for the Promotion of Shokuiku(White Paper on Shokuiku) the Fiscal Year. Available online: https://www.maff.go.jp/j/syokuiku/wpaper/attach/pdf/r2_index-19.pdf (accessed on 27 July 2022).
  18. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Survey on Dietary Habits and Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing Experiences 2019. Available online: https://warp.da.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/12278798/www.maff.go.jp/j/syokuiku/taiken_tyosa/r01/index.html (accessed on 27 July 2022). (In Japanese).
  19. Institute of Social Science University of Tokyo SSJ Data Archive, Center for Social Research and Data Archive Attached to the Institute of Social Science University of Tokyo. Available online: https://csrda.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/english/ (accessed on 27 July 2022).
  20. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry The Ethical Guidelines for Life Science and Medical Research Involving Human Subjects in Japan. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/000909926.pdf (accessed on 27 July 2022). (In Japanese).
  21. von Elm, E.; Altman, D.G.; Egger, M.; Pocock, S.J.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Vandenbroucke, J.P.; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int. J. Surg. 2014, 12, 1495–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 2016 “Dietary Guidelines for Japanese” was Revised in June. Available online: https://www.maff.go.jp/j/syokuiku/attach/pdf/shishinn-10.pdf (accessed on 27 July 2022).
  23. Tomata, Y.; Watanabe, T.; Sugawara, Y.; Chou, W.T.; Kakizaki, M.; Tsuji, I. Dietary patterns and incident functional disability in elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 study. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2014, 69, 843–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tomata, Y.; Sugiyama, K.; Kaiho, Y.; Honkura, K.; Watanabe, T.; Zhang, S.; Sugawara, Y.; Tsuji, I. Dietary patterns and incident dementia in elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki cohort 2006 study. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2016, 71, 1322–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shirota, M.; Watanabe, N.; Suzuki, M.; Kobori, M. Japanese Japanese-Style diet and cardiovascular disease mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Survey of food and Nutrition Education Awareness. Available online: https://www.maff.go.jp/j/syokuiku/ishiki/r04/pdf_index.html (accessed on 27 July 2022). (In Japanese).
  27. Kurotani, K.; Akter, S.; Kashino, I.; Goto, A.; Mizoue, T.; Noda, M.; Sasazuki, S.; Sawada, N.; Tsugane, S. Japan Public Health Center based Prospective Study Group Quality of diet and mortality among Japanese men and women: Japan Public Health Center based prospective study. BMJ 2016, 352, i1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Oba, S.; Nagata, C.; Nakamura, K.; Fujii, K.; Kawachi, T.; Takatsuka, N.; Shimizu, H. Diet based on the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top and subsequent mortality among men and women in a general Japanese population. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2009, 109, 1540–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Soga, M.; Gaston, K.J. Extinction of experience: The loss of human-nature interactions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2016, 14, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Soga, M.; Gaston, K.J. Shifting baseline syndrome: Causes, consequences, and implications. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2018, 16, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Willett, W.; Rockström, J.; Loken, B.; Springmann, M.; Lang, T.; Vermeulen, S.; Garnett, T.; Tilman, D.; DeClerck, F.; Wood, A.; et al. Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 2019, 393, 447–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Responses based on food production experience.
Table 1. Responses based on food production experience.
Food Production Experience
Without ExperienceWith Experience
n%n%
2187 1274
Sex
Women108349.569254.3
Men110450.558245.7
Age
Their 20s27712.725520.0
Their 30s45320.726420.7
Their 40s50022.930323.8
Their 50s44220.221316.7
Their 60s51523.523918.8
Marriage
Not married69631.837429.4
Married149168.290070.6
Household structure
Living alone33915.518514.5
Married couple45320.720315.9
Parent(s) and child(ren)124556.976760.2
Grandparent (s), parent (s), and child (ren)1245.7997.8
other261.2201.6
BehaviorMSDMSD
Total score for dietary guideline adherence *30.26.128.66.0
Items for adherence to dietary guidelines **n%n%
(1) Enjoy your meals171978.6107684.5
(2) Establish a healthy dietary rhythm152369.694374.0
(3) Maintain appropriate body weight120555.174958.8
(4) Eat a well-balanced meal147267.391671.9
(5) Eat enough grains178581.6111187.2
(6a) Eat enough fruit and vegetable131960.385667.2
(6b) Maintain calcium intake146867.188869.7
(7a) Reduce salt intake111651.065751.6
(7b) Consume fats appropriately125857.579862.6
(7c) Use nutritional fact labels58626.842933.7
(8) Preserve traditional diets68831.557445.1
(9) Practice sustainable dietary habits174579.8110786.9
(10) Develop your understanding of food110950.776860.3
Adherence to a Japanese-style diet121255.491071.4
Attitude and knowledge
Attitude to food and nutrition education164675.3111087.1
Knowledge of Dietary Balance Guide118254.086668.0
Knowledge of dietary guidelines65129.852241.0
Knowledge of Japanese-style diet85839.260147.2
M: mean; SD: standard deviation. * 13–52 points: the lower the score, the higher the adherence. ** (1) Enjoy your meals; (2) establish a healthy rhythm by establishing regular times for meals; (3) maintain appropriate weight through adequate exercise and well-balanced meals; (4) eat well-balanced meals with staple food, as well as main and side dishes; (5) eat enough grains, such as rice and other cereals; (6a) ensure vitamin, mineral, and fiber intakes by consumption of vegetables and fruit on a daily basis; (6b) maintain calcium intake from milk, dairy products, green and yellow vegetables, beans, and small fish; (7a) avoid food and dishes with high salt content; (7b) consume a balanced intake of fats from animals, vegetables, and fish; (7c) establish a habit of checking nutrition fact labels when selecting food and eating out; (8) take advantage of the Japanese dietary culture and local food products, and preserve local dishes; (9) conserve food resources and practice dietary habits to minimize leftovers and food waste; and (10) develop your understanding of food and review your dietary life. The “n” and “%” of “Items for adherence to dietary guidelines”, “Adherence to Japanese-style diet”, and “Attitude and knowledge” represent positive responses (usually/often; interested/somewhat interested; known).
Table 2. Relationships between food production experience and behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations (N = 3461).
Table 2. Relationships between food production experience and behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations (N = 3461).
Crude Models Adjusted Models
B (95%CI)pB (95%CI)p
Behavior
Total score for dietary guideline adherence *−1.547 (−1.964, −1.129)<0.001−1.496 (−1.901, −1.091)<0.001
Each item of dietary guideline adherence **OR (95%CI) OR (95%CI)
(1) Enjoy your meals1.479 (1.232, 1.776)<0.0011.368 (1.131, 1.654)0.001
(2) Establish a healthy dietary rhythm1.242 (1.063, 1.450)0.0061.213 (1.032, 1.425)0.019
(3) Maintain appropriate body weight1.162 (1.010, 1.337)0.0351.205 (1.045, 1.391)0.010
(4) Eat a well-balanced meal1.242 (1.068, 1.445)0.0051.255 (1.069, 1.473)0.005
(5) Eat enough grains1.535 (1.260, 1.868)<0.0011.429 (1.170, 1.747)<0.001
(6a) Eat enough fruit and vegetable1.347 (1.165, 1.557)<0.0011.401 (1.205, 1.629)<0.001
(6b) Maintain calcium intake1.126 (0.970, 1.307)0.1171.148 (0.984, 1.339)0.078
(7a) Reduce salt intake1.021 (0.889, 1.173)0.7591.044 (0.903, 1.207)0.554
(7b) Consume fats appropriately1.238 (1.074, 1.426)0.0031.267 (1.094, 1.466)0.001
(7c) Use nutritional fact labels1.387 (1.194, 1.611)<0.0011.377 (1.182, 1.605)<0.001
(8) Preserve traditional diets1.786 (1.549, 2.060)<0.0011.869 (1.613, 2.166)<0.001
(9) Practice sustainable dietary habits1.679 (1.383, 2.037)<0.0011.747 (1.434, 2.127)<0.001
(10) Develop your understanding of food1.475 (1.282, 1.697)<0.0011.467 (1.270, 1.695)<0.001
Adherence to a Japanese-style diet2.011 (1.734, 2.331)<0.0012.176 (1.858, 2.548)<0.001
Attitude and knowledge
Attitude to food and nutrition education2.224 (1.838, 2.691)<0.0012.046 (1.679, 2.493)<0.001
Knowledge of Dietary Balance Guide1.804 (1.561, 2.085)<0.0011.676 (1.440, 1.952)<0.001
Knowledge of dietary guidelines1.637 (1.417, 1.892)<0.0011.637 (1.412, 1.896)<0.001
Knowledge of Japanese-style diet1.383 (1.203, 1.590)<0.0011.468 (1.272, 1.695)<0.001
B: regression coefficient (linear regression analysis); OR: odds ratio (logistic regression analysis); CI: confidence interval. Independent variable: food production experience (experienced, non-experienced [ref.]) * 13–52 points: the lower the score, the higher the adherence. ** (1) Enjoy your meals; (2) establish a healthy rhythm by establishing regular times for meals; (3) maintain appropriate weight through adequate exercise and well-balanced meals; (4) eat well-balanced meals with staple food, as well as main and side dishes; (5) eat enough grains, such as rice and other cereals; (6a) ensure vitamin, mineral, and fiber intakes by consumption of vegetables and fruit on a daily basis; (6b) maintain calcium intake from milk, dairy products, green and yellow vegetables, beans, and small fish; (7a) avoid food and dishes with a high salt content; (7b) consume a balanced intake of fats from animals, vegetables, and fish; (7c) establish a habit of checking nutrition fact labels when selecting food and eating out; (8) take advantage of the Japanese dietary culture and local food products, and preserve local dishes; (9) conserve food resources and practice dietary habits to minimize leftovers and food waste; and (10) develop your understanding of food and review your dietary life.
Table 3. Life stage at which food production experience occurred and behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations (N = 3461).
Table 3. Life stage at which food production experience occurred and behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations (N = 3461).
Crude Models Adjusted Models
B (95%CI)pB (95%CI)p
Behavior
Total score for dietary guideline adherence *
Elementary school age or younger−0.194 (−0.723, 0.334)0.471−0.458 (−0.979, 0.062)0.085
Junior-high-school ages or older−0.547 (−1.341, 0.246)0.176−0.684 (−1.450, 0.081)0.080
20 years or older−2.070 (−2.608, −1.532)<0.001−1.556 (−2.083, −1.028)<0.001
Each item of dietary guidelines adherence **
(1) Enjoy your mealsOR (95%CI) OR (95%CI)
Elementary school ages or younger1.238 (0.981, 1.562)0.0721.170 (0.918, 1.492)0.203
Junior-high-school ages or older1.417 (0.966, 2.078)0.0741.528 (1.032, 2.263)0.034
20 years old or older1.286 (1.009, 1.638)0.0421.149 (0.892, 1.481)0.279
(2) Establish a healthy dietary rhythm
Elementary school ages or younger0.798 (0.659, 0.966)0.0210.848 (0.695, 1.036)0.109
Junior-high-school ages or older1.362 (1.003, 1.849)0.0481.475 (1.078, 2.017)0.015
20 years old or older1.642 (1.325, 2.034)<0.0011.381 (1.105, 1.724)0.004
(3) Maintain appropriate body weight
Elementary school ages or younger0.885 (0.741, 1.056)0.1770.979 (0.816, 1.175)0.823
Junior-high-school ages or older1.139 (0.871, 1.490)0.3391.128 (0.860, 1.480)0.381
20 years old or older1.406 (1.170, 1.690)<0.0011.331 (1.101, 1.608)0.003
(4) Eat a well-balanced meal
Elementary school ages or younger0.868 (0.719, 1.049)0.1440.979 (0.802, 1.196)0.842
Junior-high-school ages or older0.936 (0.703, 1.245)0.6501.025 (0.761, 1.381)0.867
20 years old or older1.743 (1.414, 2.149)<0.0011.420 (1.139, 1.769)0.002
(5) Eat enough grains
Elementary school ages or younger1.318 (1.024, 1.697)0.0321.152 (0.886, 1.497)0.288
Junior-high-school ages or older1.522 (0.993, 2.333)0.0541.538 (0.997, 2.372)0.051
20 years old or older1.284 (0.989, 1.667)0.0601.329 (1.018, 1.736)0.036
(6a) Eat enough fruit and vegetable
Elementary school ages or younger0.957 (0.798, 1.148)0.6411.090 (0.902, 1.319)0.370
Junior-high-school ages or older1.037 (0.786, 1.368)0.7961.102 (0.829, 1.464)0.502
20 years old or older1.580 (1.301, 1.918)<0.0011.365 (1.116, 1.670)0.002
(6b) Maintain calcium intake
Elementary school ages or younger0.899 (0.746, 1.085)0.2701.000 (0.824, 1.214)0.994
Junior-high-school ages or older1.019 (0.767, 1.355)0.8931.065 (0.797, 1.423)0.667
20 years old or older1.403 (1.148, 1.713)0.0011.230 (1.000, 1.513)0.050
(7a) Reduce salt intake
Elementary school ages or younger0.914 (0.767, 1.090)0.3211.063 (0.883, 1.279)0.517
Junior-high-school ages or older0.946 (0.727, 1.232)0.6850.984 (0.749, 1.293)0.912
20 years old or older1.334 (1.114, 1.597)0.0021.131 (0.936, 1.366)0.201
(7b) Consume fats appropriately
Elementary school ages or younger0.972 (0.813, 1.163)0.7631.089 (0.904, 1.311)0.368
Junior-high-school ages or older1.124 (0.856, 1.476)0.3971.157 (0.876, 1.528)0.302
20 years old or older1.356 (1.125, 1.634)0.0011.206 (0.994, 1.463)0.056
(7c) Use nutrition fact labels
Elementary school ages or younger1.174 (0.971, 1.419)0.0971.161 (0.953, 1.414)0.137
Junior-high-school ages or older1.045 (0.789, 1.384)0.7561.044 (0.785, 1.389)0.763
20 years old or older1.405 (1.164, 1.697)<0.0011.396 (1.149, 1.696)0.001
(8) Preserve traditional diets
Elementary school ages or younger1.135 (0.946, 1.363)0.1721.290 (1.065, 1.562)0.009
Junior-high-school ages or older1.015 (0.773, 1.333)0.9131.046 (0.791, 1.383)0.750
20 years old or older2.233 (1.864, 2.676)<0.0011.992 (1.653, 2.401)<0.001
(9) Practice sustainable dietary habits
Elementary school ages or younger1.264 (0.990, 1.614)0.0591.458 (1.136, 1.871)0.003
Junior-high-school ages or older1.505 (0.989, 2.290)0.0561.561 (1.025, 2.377)0.038
20 years old or older1.891 (1.429, 2.501)<0.0011.678 (1.262, 2.231)<0.001
(10) Develop your understanding of food
Elementary school ages or younger1.027 (0.860, 1.227)0.7631.075 (0.894, 1.294)0.437
Junior-high-school ages or older1.278 (0.974, 1.678)0.0761.309 (0.992, 1.727)0.057
20 years old or older1.642 (1.365, 1.976)<0.0011.505 (1.242, 1.822)<0.001
Adherence to a Japanese-style diet
Elementary school ages or younger1.361 (1.129, 1.641)0.0011.642 (1.345, 2.006)<0.001
Junior-high-school ages or older0.907 (0.682, 1.206)0.5041.014 (0.751, 1.368)0.926
20 years old or older2.327 (1.895, 2.858)<0.0011.937 (1.561, 2.404)<0.001
Attitude and knowledge
Attitude to food and nutrition education
Elementary school ages or younger1.802 (1.406, 2.310)<0.0011.689 (1.305, 2.188)<0.001
Junior-high-school ages or older0.891 (0.614, 1.294)0.5460.950 (0.648, 1.394)0.796
20 years old or older2.598 (1.949, 3.461)<0.0012.349 (1.746, 3.160)<0.001
Knowledge of Dietary Balance Guide
Elementary school ages or younger1.642 (1.362, 1.979)<0.0011.474 (1.208, 1.797)<0.001
Junior-high-school ages or older0.828 (0.627, 1.094)0.1860.856 (0.640, 1.147)0.300
20 years old or older1.628 (1.344, 1.971)<0.0011.583 (1.292, 1.939)<0.001
Knowledge of dietary guidelines
Elementary school ages or younger1.193 (0.993, 1.433)0.0581.212 (1.003, 1.465)0.046
Junior-high-school ages or older1.307 (0.999, 1.710)0.0501.276 (0.972, 1.675)0.078
20 years old or older1.450 (1.208, 1.742)<0.0011.428 (1.183, 1.724)<0.001
Knowledge of Japanese-style diet
Elementary school ages or younger1.076 (0.900, 1.285)0.4181.247 (1.037, 1.501)0.019
Junior-high-school ages or older1.467 (1.125, 1.912)0.0051.405 (1.072, 1.840)0.013
20 years old or older1.445 (1.208, 1.729)<0.0011.385 (1.150, 1.668)0.001
The life stage of food production experience. Without experience: n = 2187 [ref.], with experience during elementary school ages or younger: n = 798, junior-high-school ages or older: n = 304, and 20 years old or older: n = 624 (multiple responses). B: regression coefficient (linear regression analysis); OR: odds ratio (logistic regression analysis); CI: confidence interval. * 13–52 points: the lower the score, the higher the adherence. ** (1) Enjoy your meals; (2) establish a healthy rhythm by establishing regular times for meals; (3) maintain appropriate weight through adequate exercise and well-balanced meals; (4) eat well-balanced meals with staple food, as well as main and side dishes; (5) eat enough grains, such as rice and other cereals; (6a) ensure vitamin, mineral, and fiber intakes through consumption of vegetables and fruit on a daily basis; (6b) maintain calcium intake from milk, dairy products, green and yellow vegetables, beans, and small fish; (7a) avoid food and dishes with a high salt content; (7b) consume a balanced intake of fats from animals, vegetables, and fish; (7c) establish a habit of checking nutrition fact labels when selecting food and eating out; (8) take advantage of the Japanese dietary culture and local food products, and preserve local dishes; (9) conserve food resources and practice dietary habits to minimize leftovers and food waste; and (10) develop your understanding of food, and review your dietary life.
Table 4. Life stage at which food production experience occurred and behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations in their 50s and 60s. (N = 1409).
Table 4. Life stage at which food production experience occurred and behavior, attitude, and knowledge of dietary recommendations in their 50s and 60s. (N = 1409).
Crude Models Adjusted Models
B (95%CI)pB (95%CI)p
Behavior
Total score for dietary guideline adherence *
Elementary school age or younger−0.777 (−1.843, 0.287)0.153−0.756 (−1.774, 0.260)0.145
Junior-high-school ages or older−0.278 (−1.734, 1.178)0.708−0.760 (−2.152, 0.630)0.284
20 years or older−1.764 (−2.562, −0.967)<0.001−1.314 (−2.082, −0.546)<0.001
Each item of dietary guidelines adherence **
(1) Enjoy your mealsOR (95%CI) OR (95%CI)
Elementary school ages or younger1.238 (0.768, 1.996)0.3791.272 (0.782, 2.070)0.331
Junior-high-school ages or older1.626 (0.782, 3.380)0.1921.980 (0.943, 4.156)0.070
20 years old or older1.366 (0.953, 1.958)0.0881.191 (0.818, 1.733)0.360
(2) Establish a healthy dietary rhythm
Elementary school ages or younger0.786 (0.524, 1.180)0.2470.769 (0.509, 1.162)0.213
Junior-high-school ages or older1.018 (0.575, 1.802)0.9481.139 (0.638, 2.032)0.658
20 years old or older1.822 (1.292, 2.571)<0.0011.644 (1.157, 2.336)0.005
(3) Maintain appropriate body weight
Elementary school ages or younger1.023 (0.705, 1.486)0.9011.023 (0.702, 1.489)0.905
Junior-high-school ages or older1.364 (0.805, 2.313)0.2481.405 (0.826, 2.389)0.209
20 years old or older1.156 (0.872, 1.531)0.3121.105 (0.830, 1.472)0.490
(4) Eat a well-balanced meal
Elementary school ages or younger1.157 (0.753, 1.780)0.5041.154 (0.742, 1.794)0.524
Junior-high-school ages or older0.833 (0.465, 1.492)0.5390.968 (0.531, 1.763)0.916
20 years old or older1.768 (1.255, 2.490)0.0011.552 (1.089, 2.213)0.015
(5) Eat enough grains
Elementary school ages or younger0.921 (0.589, 1.439)0.7190.900 (0.574, 1.412)0.648
Junior-high-school ages or older1.697 (0.852, 3.377)0.1311.775 (0.889, 3.544)0.103
20 years old or older1.248 (0.878, 1.773)0.2151.196 (0.838, 1.707)0.323
(6a) Eat enough fruit and vegetable
Elementary school ages or younger1.360 (0.907, 2.040)0.1361.353 (0.896, 2.044)0.149
Junior-high-school ages or older1.024 (0.586, 1.789)0.9311.186 (0.670, 2.099)0.557
20 years old or older1.323 (0.980, 1.785)0.0661.211 (0.889, 1.650)0.223
(6b) Maintain calcium intake
Elementary school ages or younger1.039 (0.693, 1.558)0.8501.030 (0.685, 1.549)0.884
Junior-high-school ages or older0.891 (0.515, 1.540)0.6790.985 (0.567, 1.713)0.959
20 years old or older1.146 (0.844, 1.557)0.3791.074 (0.785, 1.468)0.652
(7a) Reduce salt intake
Elementary school ages or younger1.044 (0.722, 1.511)0.8151.077 (0.741, 1.567)0.694
Junior-high-school ages or older1.172 (0.701, 1.960)0.5431.265 (0.752, 2.129)0.375
20 years old or older1.346 (1.017, 1.782)0.0371.286 (0.964, 1.715)0.086
(7b) Consume fats appropriately
Elementary school ages or younger0.968 (0.663, 1.413)0.8670.947 (0.645, 1.389)0.781
Junior-high-school ages or older1.187 (0.698, 2.019)0.5261.318 (0.768, 2.262)0.315
20 years old or older1.470 (1.096, 1.972)0.0101.361 (1.008, 1.836)0.043
(7c) Use nutrition fact labels
Elementary school ages or younger1.130 (0.770, 1.657)0.5301.145 (0.772, 1.698)0.498
Junior-high-school ages or older1.123 (0.671, 1.880)0.6561.240 (0.730, 2.105)0.425
20 years old or older1.455 (1.098, 1.929)0.0091.346 (1.007, 1.800)0.044
(8) Preserve traditional diets
Elementary school ages or younger1.368 (0.952, 1.965)0.0891.370 (0.946, 1.982)0.094
Junior-high-school ages or older0.976 (0.593, 1.606)0.9251.091 (0.655, 1.816)0.735
20 years old or older2.149 (1.639, 2.817)<0.0011.995 (1.511, 2.633)<0.001
(9) Practice sustainable dietary habits
Elementary school ages or younger0.979 (0.569, 1.684)0.9401.022 (0.594, 1.759)0.936
Junior-high-school ages or older2.561 (0.942, 6.965)0.0652.652 (0.977, 7.202)0.055
20 years old or older1.933 (1.205, 3.102)0.0061.913 (1.187, 3.083)0.007
(10) Develop your understanding of food
Elementary school ages or younger1.222 (0.842, 1.775)0.2891.235 (0.845, 1.805)0.275
Junior-high-school ages or older1.475 (0.864, 2.517)0.1531.681 (0.976, 2.894)0.061
20 years old or older1.549 (1.168, 2.056)0.0021.419 (1.061, 1.897)0.018
Adherence to a Japanese-style diet
Elementary school ages or younger1.424 (0.940, 2.157)0.0941.506 (0.983, 2.306)0.059
Junior-high-school ages or older1.609 (0.858, 3.016)0.1371.898 (0.997, 3.613)0.050
20 years old or older2.170 (1.565, 3.008)<0.0012.039 (1.454, 2.861)<0.001
Attitude and knowledge
Attitude to food and nutrition education
Elementary school ages or younger3.081 (1.732, 5.482)<0.0013.188 (1.787, 5.688)<0.001
Junior-high-school ages or older0.726 (0.352, 1.496)0.3860.855 (0.410, 1.785)0.678
20 years old or older2.529 (1.697, 3.768)<0.0012.218 (1.472, 3.343)<0.001
Knowledge of Dietary Balance Guide
Elementary school ages or younger1.598 (1.100, 2.321)0.0131.681 (1.144, 2.470)0.008
Junior-high-school ages or older0.732 (0.442, 1.214)0.2280.806 (0.478, 1.361)0.421
20 years old or older1.666 (1.263, 2.198)<0.0011.543 (1.156, 2.059)0.003
Knowledge of dietary guidelines
Elementary school ages or younger1.086 (0.751, 1.571)0.6591.069 (0.734, 1.558)0.725
Junior-high-school ages or older1.487 (0.907, 2.440)0.1151.617 (0.977, 2.676)0.061
20 years old or older1.552 (1.183, 2.037)0.0011.469 (1.112, 1.941)0.006
Knowledge of Japanese-style diet
Elementary school ages or younger1.290 (0.900, 1.849)0.1641.271 (0.885, 1.825)0.192
Junior-high-school ages or older1.663 (1.000, 2.763)0.0491.711 (1.027, 2.851)0.038
20 years old or older1.285 (0.981, 1.682)0.0681.228 (0.934, 1.614)0.139
The life stage of food production experience. Without experience: n = 957 [ref.], with experience during elementary school ages or younger: n = 203, junior-high-school ages or older: n = 101, and 20 years old or older: n = 291 (multiple responses). B: regression coefficient (linear regression analysis); OR: odds ratio (logistic regression analysis); CI: confidence interval. * 13–52 points: the lower the score, the higher the adherence. ** (1) Enjoy your meals; (2) establish a healthy rhythm by establishing regular times for meals; (3) maintain appropriate weight through adequate exercise and well-balanced meals; (4) eat well-balanced meals with staple food, as well as main and side dishes; (5) eat enough grains, such as rice and other cereals; (6a) ensure vitamin, mineral, and fiber intakes by consumption of vegetables and fruit on a daily basis; (6b) maintain calcium intake from milk, dairy products, green and yellow vegetables, beans, and small fish; (7a) avoid food and dishes with a high salt content; (7b) consume a balanced intake of fats from animals, vegetables, and fish; (7c) establish a habit of checking nutrition fact labels when selecting food and eating out; (8) take advantage of the Japanese dietary culture and local food products, and preserve local dishes; (9) conserve food resources and practice dietary habits to minimize leftovers and food waste; and (10) develop your understanding of food and review your dietary life.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Machida, D. Relationships between Food Production Experience and the Behavior, Attitude, and Knowledge of Dietary Recommendations among Japanese Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3639. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173639

AMA Style

Machida D. Relationships between Food Production Experience and the Behavior, Attitude, and Knowledge of Dietary Recommendations among Japanese Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients. 2022; 14(17):3639. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173639

Chicago/Turabian Style

Machida, Daisuke. 2022. "Relationships between Food Production Experience and the Behavior, Attitude, and Knowledge of Dietary Recommendations among Japanese Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study" Nutrients 14, no. 17: 3639. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173639

APA Style

Machida, D. (2022). Relationships between Food Production Experience and the Behavior, Attitude, and Knowledge of Dietary Recommendations among Japanese Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients, 14(17), 3639. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173639

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop