Next Article in Journal
Nutritional Composition of Infant Cereal Prototypes Can Precisely Predict Their Glycemic Index
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of a Supervised Adapted Physical Activity Program Associated or Not with Oral Supplementation with Arginine and Leucine in Subjects with Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Scrutinizing the Nutritional Aspects of Asian Mushrooms, Its Commercialization and Scope for Value-Added Products
Previous Article in Special Issue
Changes in Body Composition and Physical Performance in Children with Excessive Body Weight Participating in an Integrated Weight-Loss Programme
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Role of Postbiotics in Diet-Induced Metabolic Disorders

Food Functionality Research Division, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju 55365, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(18), 3701; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14183701
Submission received: 9 August 2022 / Revised: 1 September 2022 / Accepted: 6 September 2022 / Published: 7 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Specialized Diet, Obesity and Associated Metabolic Diseases)

Abstract

:
Although the prevalence of metabolic disorders has progressively increased over the past few decades, metabolic disorders can only be effectively treated with calorie restriction and improved physical activity. Recent research has focused on altering the gut microbiome using prebiotics, probiotics, and postbiotics because various metabolic syndromes are caused by gut microbial dysbiosis. Postbiotics, substances produced or released by microorganism metabolic activities, play an important role in maintaining and restoring host health. Because postbiotics have a small amount of literature on their consumption, there is a need for more experiments on short- and long-term intake. This review discusses current postbiotic research, categories of postbiotics, positive roles in metabolic syndromes, and potential therapeutic applications. It covers postbiotic pleiotropic benefits, such as anti-obesity, anti-diabetic, and anti-hypertensive qualities, that could aid in the management of metabolic disorders. Postbiotics are promising tools for developing health benefits and therapeutic goals owing to their clinical, technical, and economic properties. Postbiotic use is attractive for altering the microbiota; however, further studies are needed to determine efficacy and safety.

1. Introduction

Metabolic syndrome is a broad cluster of symptoms that increases the risk of developing vascular and neurological complications such as cardiovascular disease, insulin resistance, diabetes, and cerebrovascular accidents [1]. Various metabolic diseases are related to each other, and individuals with metabolic syndrome often have three or more of the following conditions: obesity, hyperglycemia, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Treatment of metabolic syndrome mainly includes lifestyle changes, diet, increased physical activity, and targeted drug therapy for specific affections. Currently, there are no single etiological factors or pivotal pathophysiological changes to effectively control disease progression. Current studies on the relationship between diet and metabolic syndrome focus on the efficacy of regulation of intestinal microflora in terms of weight maintenance and insulin sensitivity recovery, as well as calorie restriction and macronutrient supplementation.
The interaction between commensal bacteria and host cells in a healthy gut promotes the development of intestinal barrier function and immunological responses, both of which help to maintain host homeostasis [2,3]. In addition, much evidence indicates that an imbalance in the composition of the gastrointestinal microbial composition may contribute to obesity-related insulin resistance development as well as metabolic disorders such as hypertension and colitis [4,5,6,7]. This hypothesizes that modulating the gut microbiota may promote weight loss or prevent obesity in humans. However, it is unclear how and why the gut microbiome of obese hosts influences lipid metabolism to extract more energy from food. Bile acid metabolism, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, and metabolic endotoxemia may be major causes of increased energy absorption by the gut microbiota [8]. This pathological condition further leads to low-grade systemic inflammation that can contribute to the pathogenesis of insulin resistance, diabetes, and obesity. Thus, the composition of the gut microbiota has the potential to influence the pathogenesis of several metabolic disorders.
Recently, “postbiotics” have gained popularity because they prevent metabolic syndrome by causing beneficial effects in intestinal microbiota. We summarized recent studies to comprehensively demonstrate the effectiveness of the administration of individual types of postbiotics in the prevention, alleviation, and treatment of diet-induced metabolic disorders due to the numerous beneficial effects of postbiotics and the concerns associated with the supplementation of live probiotic microbes.

2. Postbiotic Definition and Characteristics

Postbiotics are metabolites produced after the beneficial gut bacteria metabolize prebiotics or probiotic components, or substances derived from the bacterial cell wall after cell wall destruction (Figure 1) [9,10]. The most commonly used approach for extracting postbiotics from microorganisms is to isolate metabolites produced by microbes using heat, enzymes, ultrasonication, ultraviolet treatment, centrifugation, and ultrafiltration procedures [11]. Fermentation using a proteolytic broth is also a widely utilized approach in the laboratory; postbiotic yield is increased when the pH is close to neutral [12].
The notion that destroyed microbes enhance or sustain health is not novel and several terms have been used to characterize them, including “parabiotics,” “ghost probiotics,” “inactivated probiotics,” “non-viable probiotics,” “heat-killed probiotics,” and “Tyndallized probiotics.” Parabiotics, also known as beneficial inactivated probiotics, refer to intact or ruptured microbial cells containing cellular components such as peptidoglycan, teichoic acid, and surface proteins, or crude cell extracts with complex chemical composition [13]. Postbiotics are complex mixtures of metabolites secreted by probiotics such as enzymes, secreted proteins, short-chain fatty acids, vitamins, secreted biosurfactants, amino acids, peptides, and organic acids from cell-free supernatants [14]. However, parabiotics have been used to refer to the entire category of postbiotics since they are known as postbiotics when inactive microbial components have biological activity in the host; similarly, “postbiotics” is used to refer to both terms here.
What is known as the probiotic effect is most likely a postbiotic effect. Interestingly, postbiotics overcome probiotic safety limitations [13]. Moreover, postbiotics have little interaction with food ingredients, are easy to process, and are advantageous for storage and shipping [15]. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics defines probiotics as “living microorganisms that, when administered in appropriate doses, confer a health benefit on the host” [16]. However, it is difficult to maintain probiotic stability because these microorganisms must reach the host intestine without being killed by processing, storage, or passage through the gastrointestinal tract. Moreover, concerns have been raised about the functionality and safety of probiotics in immunocompromised people and the elderly [17]. In contrast, postbiotics easily deliver active ingredients to the intestine and may be used in places where storage and transport are difficult to maintain, such as in developing countries [14]. Postbiotics may be used as a substitute for people who have difficulty taking probiotics because of safety concerns [18]. Wegh et al. [14] report that postbiotics boost the effectiveness of active microorganisms or convert them into functional ingredients.
However, there are reports of limitations and potential side effects in the use of specific postbiotics for treating and preventing diseases. Three out of seven randomized comparative studies in children under the age of five found that postbiotics cause vomiting, bloating, and severe dehydration [19]. Thus, while postbiotics have several advantages over probiotics, additional studies are necessary to determine the biological effects and safeties.

3. Postbiotic Types and Features

Postbiotics include numerous compounds, most of which are secreted by microbes, such as SCFAs, exopolysaccharides (EPSs), enzymes, and vitamins [20,21,22]. Postbiotics also include chemicals that comprise cell structures, such as components of microbial cell walls and bacterial cultures [22]. As delineated in Table 1, postbiotics also possess anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, anti-obesity, and cholesterol-lowering properties. Postbiotic metabolites (e.g., SCFAs, EPSs, enzymes, and vitamins) produced by gut microbes are considered a direct measure to correct dysregulation of the gut microbiota and restore a healthy balance, independent of production by the microbiota. Metabolites that are administered directly as “postbiotics” may be given to the gut or bloodstream [14,23]. However, for some postbiotic efficacy, such as cell wall components, specific microorganisms are effective [24,25]. These properties may be important factors in designing studies on the effective effects of specific postbiotics on metabolic disorders.

3.1. SCFAs

SCFAs are produced by intestinal microbes by digesting vegetable polysaccharides; they are typically composed of 1–6 carbon-based anions [43]. Dietary fiber, i.e., undigested dietary carbohydrates that reach the large intestine, is the most important energy source for glycolytic microorganisms in the large intestine; as microbial consumption of dietary fiber increases, so does the production of SCFAs [44].
Butyrate (C4), propionate (C3), and acetate (C2) are the most representative intestinal SCFAs [43], and they are found in the large intestine and feces at a ratio of approximately 60:20:20 [45]. SCFAs promote the growth of beneficial bacteria by converting the intestinal milieu to be more acidic [20]. In addition, they are known to have anti-inflammatory [46], appetite modulation, cardiovascular disease prevention [47], anti-obesity, and diabetes prevention properties [48,49]. Features of each SCFA type are as follows:
Butyric acid is a major source of energy in colon cells [43]. It modulates cell proliferation and differentiation, and has immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties [49,50]. In addition, butyric acid may control gene expression by inhibiting histone deacetylases [51]. Butyric acid is one of the most important energy sources in intestinal cells and has long been used to treat colon disorders. When butyric acid is supplied to the colon of patients with colorectal cancer, inflammation is reduced compared to that in individuals who received a placebo [50].
Propionic acid is one of the primary substrates of gluconeogenesis, the process by which glucose is produced in the liver [52]. By slowing energy absorption in humans, propionic acid prevents long-term weight gain [48] and improves animals’ physical ability [53]. Gao et al. [52] confirm that propionic acid protects hepatocytes from palmitic acid-induced lipotoxicity in calves. Lipotoxicity is a precursor of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and destroys hepatocytes while activating hepatic stellate and immune cells [54].
Although acetic acid is less abundant than butyric acid and propionic acid, it has anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties [55]. In addition to increasing energy expenditure and releasing intestinal hormones, acetic acid may help manage hunger and weight in the central nervous system, implying that it may help prevent cardiovascular disease [47]. When an acetic acid-rich diet is consumed, resistance to enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (O157: H7) is boosted [56], probably because acetic acid adheres to the intestinal barrier and inhibits toxins from entering the circulatory system.

3.2. Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPSs)

Bacterial polysaccharides are produced both intra- and extra-cellularly. EPSs are composed of a capsule that is covalently bound to the cell surface and a slime layer that is loosely attached to the cell surface or secreted to the outside [57]. EPSs are diverse; thus, they may be classified using various criteria. The most common criterion is to divide them into homopolysaccharides, composed of the same polysaccharide, and heteropolysaccharides, composed of two or more polysaccharide types [58]. Bacterial EPSs have different physical properties depending on the type and structural characteristics of the constituent sugars, and are easily degraded and recovered [59]. Therefore, EPSs are used in various industrial fields, e.g., as coagulants, emulsifiers, and stabilizers. Because they have a function similar to that of lactic acid bacteria, they have attracted attention for medical usage [60].

3.3. Enzymes

Enzymes are active proteins found in all living organisms that catalyze various biological reactions [61]. Microorganism enzymes break down components such as carbohydrates, proteins, and fats into individual monomers to aid in human digestion and bioavailability, offer flavor and texture to food, and convert unsaturated fatty acids to saturated fatty acids [62,63]. When probiotics are added to the diet of farmed fish, digestive enzymes generated by the probiotics increase digestion and absorption of the fish feed, thereby increasing growth [64]. Therefore, industrial enzymes have been produced by a variety of microorganisms, ranging from eukaryotes such as yeast and molds to prokaryotes, comprising both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria [61]. Lactic acid bacteria have been extensively investigated because they produce lactases, proteases, peptidases, fructanases, amylases, bile salt hydrolases, phytases, and esterases [63]. For numerous years, enzymes produced by lactic acid bacteria have been used in commercial foods and beverages, improving the safety of fermented products by producing various compounds that inhibit harmful bacteria [65]. However, studies of the utilization of antioxidant enzymes in vivo are limited [66].

3.4. Vitamins

Vitamins are essential nutrients required for metabolic activity in living cells [67]. Because humans are unable to synthesize most vitamins [68], they must be obtained through the diet, mainly from dairy- and grain-based foods, fruits, and vegetables. Some vitamins, such as vitamins K and B, are synthesized by gut bacteria and probiotics [22]. Dietary B vitamins are absorbed in the small intestine, whereas B vitamins produced by microorganisms are absorbed by the large intestine [69], suggesting the possibility that B vitamins derived from diet and intestinal microbes are metabolized differently in the human body. Water-soluble B vitamins such as biotin, cobalamin, folic acid, nicotinic acid, pantothenic acid, pyridoxine, riboflavin, and thiamine are synthesized by human intestinal microbiota [22]. Cobalamin is a vitamin that is only synthesized by anaerobic bacteria and not by animals, plants, or fungi [67].
The vitamins most commonly synthesized by human gut microbiota are riboflavin and niacin [69]. Riboflavin is a nutrient required for healthy maintenance of the human nervous, endocrine, cardiovascular, and immune systems [70]. According to Aljaadi et al. [71], riboflavin intake below the average requirement may increase the risk of anemia. B vitamins are important cofactors and coenzymes in many metabolic pathways and play a significant role in immunological homeostasis [68]. Dietary components and gut microbiota modulate host immune function via B vitamins. When compared to chemically manufactured vitamins, vitamins synthesized using gut bacteria are more consumer-friendly and less prone to induce side effects [67].

3.5. Cell Wall Components

Probiotic cell wall components have beneficial effects on human health; they may be used for therapeutic purposes. Peptidoglycan and teichoic acid, the major components of the cell wall, have immunomodulatory effects [31,33]. Teichoic acid is classified into two types: lipoteichoic acid and wall teichoic acid. Lipoteichoic acid binds to the bacterial membrane through a glycolipid, whereas wall teichoic acid forms covalent bonds with peptidoglycans [72]. Various Lactobacillus-derived peptidoglycans inhibit the release of inflammatory cytokines in an LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cell model [24,33]. In addition, peptidoglycan derived from L. rhamnosus improves the innate immune response in Streptococcus-infected immunodeficient mice [31]. Lipoteichoic acid may also be effective in treating skin infections. Zong et al. [73] find that lipoteichoic acid-producing gut microbes play an important role in preventing bacterial and viral infections by inducing the release of antimicrobial peptides such as β-defensin and cathelicidin. In contrast, Tominari et al. [25] have reported that lipoteichoic acid does not reduce inflammation, but instead induces inflammatory alveolar bone loss. Therefore, more research on the anti-inflammatory effects of lipoteichoic acid is required.

3.6. Cell-Free Supernatants of Bacteria

Bacterial cell-free supernatants are obtained by centrifugation of cell cultures to collect biologically active metabolites such as SCFA, EPSs, enzymes, and vitamins [22]. Similar to bacteria, active metabolites released by bacteria have beneficial effects on human health. According to Kuley et al. [74], bacterial culture supernatants show higher antioxidant capacity than intact cells. Culture supernatants from different bacteria have several functions. For example, supernatants from Lactobacillus paracasei cultures suppress obesity in rats [35], whereas those from L. rhamnosus GG inhibit alcoholic liver disease in mice [36] and those from L. casei DG reduce intestinal inflammation in an ex vivo organ culture model [37].

4. The Role of Postbiotics in Different Metabolic Disorders

Altering factors of gut microbiota such as diet, exercise, and drugs can result in alterations to gut microbiome that influence host metabolism. Gut dysbiosis can modify the host’s ability to utilize energy from ingestions, as well as progress to metabolic diseases. Thus, postbiotics have potentials to alleviate metabolic disease factors without the need to alter the gut microbiota.

4.1. Regulation of Low-Grade Inflammation

Inflammation is a bioprotective reaction that restores body function in response to a variety of stimuli, such as damage caused by external factors and bacterial infections [75]. Acute and chronic inflammation are the two types of inflammatory responses; acute inflammation is an immunological response triggered either by a pathogen, injury, or trauma; it is a short-term high-grade inflammation response [76,77]. In contrast, chronic inflammation is caused by multiple factors, such as poor diet, stress, lack of physical activity, and environmental pollution that may lead to serious inflammatory disorders and cancer [75]. LPS, a component of the cell wall of gram-negative bacteria, causes inflammation in eukaryotic hosts. LPS also induces the production of inflammatory mediators, such as nitric oxide and proinflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-6, and inhibits the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10 [78]. Overproduction of inflammatory cytokines results in acute and chronic inflammation, which may lead to inflammatory disorders.
Probiotics and postbiotics are effective anti-inflammatory agents. SCFAs, as postbiotics, control the immune system through various mechanisms, including the activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and inhibition of histone deacetylase [79]. SCFAs inhibit TNF-α, IL-6, and nitric oxide production in macrophages and enhance the release of IL-10 [80], but inhibit IL-10 in mononuclear cells [81]. Thus, SCFAs may have varied effects on different cell types. The EPSs of Lactobacillus sp. extracted from healthy human vaginas lower TNF-α production in cervical cancer HeLa cells and show significant anti-inflammatory effects by increasing the production of IL-10 [29]. In addition, peptidoglycan, a major component of the cell wall, inhibits the release of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, which occur when macrophages are stimulated with LPSs [24].

4.2. Anti-Obesity Effects

Obesity is a major health issue worldwide; research on managing obesity through energy consumption has recently received attention [82]. Obesity is caused by an imbalance between energy intake and consumption, which negatively impacts various metabolic pathways in the body [5]. Although diet is an important factor in host metabolism, energy homeostasis malregulation due to excessive food intake leads to obesity [8]. High-calorie diets such as high-fat and high-sugar diets are considered the greatest risk factors for obesity [83].
SCFAs activate GPCR43, inhibit excessive energy and insulin-mediated fat accumulation by white adipose tissue, and regulate energy balance by promoting fat consumption [84]. GPCR43 overstimulation may be a treatment method for metabolic disorders, including obesity and diabetes [85]. SCFAs stimulate peptide YY (PYY) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion from L cells that secrete hormones in the intestine [84]. PYY and GLP-1 are hormones that suppress appetite: they are released from the intestine and function as signals that give the brain a feeling of satiety [86]. According to van der Beek et al. [87], when acetic acid is injected into the distal colon of obese volunteers, fat oxidation is promoted, and the concentration of PYY increases compared to that in individuals who received a placebo. Propionic acid also stimulates PYY and GLP-1 secretion in human colon cells [48]. These results suggest that SCFAs effectively prevent and suppress obesity by participating in various human metabolic processes.

4.3. Antidiabetic Effects

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease characterized by elevated blood sugar levels [88]. Diabetes is divided into two types: type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). T1D is caused by autoimmune-cell destruction and no insulin secretion, whereas T2D is caused by insulin resistance, where insulin is secreted, but the pancreas loses function, and peripheral tissues and organs such as the liver, muscles, and adipose tissue have a reduced ability to respond [89]. Diabetes prevalence is steadily increasing worldwide, and its causes are very diverse due to genetic factors, unhealthy eating habits, lack of exercise, and obesity. An imbalance in intestinal microbiota may be a fundamental cause of diabetes [88].
Probiotics and postbiotics have antidiabetic properties [41]. SCFAs bind to GPCR41 and GPCR43 at the end of the intestine to produce the intestinal hormones PYY and GLP-1, affecting satiety and glucose homeostasis [85]. Propionic and butyric acids improve glucose and energy homeostasis by inducing intestinal gluconeogenesis and sympathetic nerve activity [90]. When butyric acid is administered orally for 4 weeks, peripheral insulin sensitivity in healthy patients significantly improves, but glucose metabolism in patients with metabolic syndrome is not affected [91]. Therefore, butyric acid has no potential as a therapeutic agent for glucose control in patients with T2D.
Insulin absorbs glucose from the human body; when insulin is insufficient, glucose cannot be used as an energy source and remains in the blood, maintaining high blood sugar levels [90]. Glucose in the blood accumulates as fat; the improvement of insulin sensitivity is very important [85]. Oral administration of the EPSs producing Bifidobacterium animalis IPLA R1 to rats fed a high-fat diet decreases serum insulin content without significant fluctuations in fasting glucose and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) indices [92]. Therefore, EPSs have a positive effect on insulin sensitivity.

4.4. Prevention of Hypertension

Hypertension is a major cause of cardiovascular diseases such as myocardial infarction and strokes [6]. Preventing hypertension may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. A high-fat diet induces changes in the gut microbiota, disrupts the intestinal barrier, and increases plasma LPS levels, inducing oxidative stress [93]. According to a study by Li, Zhao, Wang, Chen, Tao, Tian, Wu, Liu, Cui, Geng, Zhang, Weldon, Auguste, Yang, Liu, Chen, Yang, Zhu, and Cai [6], patients with hypertension have fewer essential bacteria required for healthy conditions, such as Faecalibacterium, Oscillibacter, Roseburia, Bifidobacterium, Coprococcus, and Butyrivibrio, than those of healthy controls. Moreover, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase, a major source of free radicals in blood vessels, may be involved in hypertension and intestinal barrier dysfunction [94].
SCFAs influence blood pressure in humans through various mechanisms. Butyric acid diminishes angiotensin II-induced hypertension in mice [95], and some SCFAs are known to have ligands that can potentially be engineered as therapeutic targets for hypertension (e.g., GPR41, GPR43, GPR109a in mice and SCFA receptors such as Olf78/OR51E2 in human) [96]. Thus, supplementation with SCFAs may have a positive effect on the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.

4.5. Effects on Cholesterol Levels

Cholesterol accumulation is one of the leading causes of cardiovascular disease, resulting in a high number of deaths [97]. Therefore, lowering blood cholesterol levels is critical for preventing cardiovascular disease. HDL cholesterol removes cholesterol from the bloodstream and prevents arteriosclerosis, while low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol causes cholesterol to accumulate in blood vessels [98]. A significant correlation exists between high HDL cholesterol and low coronary heart disease risk, whereas low HDL cholesterol levels are correlated with early cardiovascular disease in younger patients [99].
Probiotics and postbiotics reduce cholesterol levels in the body through direct or indirect mechanisms. In an experiment where Bifidobacterium longum SPM1207 is disrupted by sonication, and postbiotics are isolated and used to analyze their effect on high-cholesterol fed rats [26], compared to the controls, serum total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels are significantly reduced, and HDL cholesterol levels are slightly increased in high-cholesterol postbiotic-fed rats. In recent years, dietary supplementation with probiotic metabolites such as EPSs has gained popularity to lower blood cholesterol levels. Bhat and Bajaj [30] have observed that the EPSs of Lactobacillus paracasei M7 have high cholesterol-lowering activity (70.78%) in vitro. Thus, the intake of probiotics may help manage mild hypercholesterolemia. However, further studies are needed to investigate the exact mechanism of this cholesterol-lowering action.

5. Conclusions

Postbiotics are metabolites or cell wall components secreted by live bacteria or released after bacterial lysis; these substances confer host health benefits. Postbiotics produced by intestinal microbiota are closely related to host conditions and the intestinal environment. As research to elucidate the functional mechanism of postbiotics continues, the regulatory function of individual postbiotics will be elucidated. Furthermore, postbiotics are promising materials that overcome the constraints of probiotic stability and safety because they are in a dead cell state, have low reactivity, are easy to process (for example, by heat treatment), and are suitable for storage and transportation.
To date, research has focused on demonstrating correlations or elucidating the functionality of specific microbes, such as probiotics. Isolation and identification of intestinal microbiota and their metabolites remain difficult, requiring specialized technology and more complex methods than normal bacterial culture conditions; therefore, materials that may be exploited as postbiotics are currently limited. To compensate for postbiotic limitations, it will be necessary to establish a diet that uses postbiotics to control the microbiome and study the efficacy of the human body. Thus, effective postbiotic materials have great potential for application in next-generation therapies for metabolic and immunological disorders, going beyond the health function improvement effects of existing probiotics and prebiotics. It is envisaged that this will revitalize the food market and energize the development of the national food industry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P. and H.-Y.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P. and M.J.; writing—review and editing, H.-Y.P., J.-H.P. and S.K.H.; supervision, H.-Y.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Main Research Program (E0210602-02) of the Korea Food Research Institute (KFRI) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Swarup, S.; Goyal, A.; Grigorova, Y.; Zeltser, R. Metabolic Syndrome; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Martorell, P.; Alvarez, B.; Llopis, S.; Navarro, V.; Ortiz, P.; Gonzalez, N.; Balaguer, F.; Rojas, A.; Chenoll, E.; Ramon, D.; et al. Heat-Treated Bifidobacterium longum CECT-7347: A Whole-Cell Postbiotic with Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Gut-Barrier Protection Properties. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Schiavi, E.; Gleinser, M.; Molloy, E.; Groeger, D.; Frei, R.; Ferstl, R.; Rodriguez-Perez, N.; Ziegler, M.; Grant, R.; Moriarty, T.F.; et al. The Surface-Associated Exopolysaccharide of Bifidobacterium longum 35624 Plays an Essential Role in Dampening Host Proinflammatory Responses and Repressing Local T(H)17 Responses. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2016, 82, 7185–7196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kaden-Volynets, V.; Basic, M.; Neumann, U.; Pretz, D.; Rings, A.; Bleich, A.; Bischoff, S.C. Lack of liver steatosis in germ-free mice following hypercaloric diets. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019, 58, 1933–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, R.; Li, H.; Yang, X.; Xue, X.; Deng, L.; Shen, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, C. Genetically Obese Human Gut Microbiota Induces Liver Steatosis in Germ-Free Mice Fed on Normal Diet. Front Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, J.; Zhao, F.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Tao, J.; Tian, G.; Wu, S.; Liu, W.; Cui, Q.; Geng, B.; et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis contributes to the development of hypertension. Microbiome 2017, 5, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lopez-Siles, M.; Duncan, S.H.; Garcia-Gil, L.J.; Martinez-Medina, M. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii: From microbiology to diagnostics and prognostics. ISME J. 2017, 11, 841–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Tseng, C.H.; Wu, C.Y. The gut microbiome in obesity. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2019, 118, S3–S9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aguilar-Toala, J.E.; Garcia-Varela, R.; Garcia, H.S.; Mata-Haro, V.; Gonzalez-Cordova, A.F.; Vallejo-Cordoba, B.; Hernandez-Mendoza, A. Postbiotics: An evolving term within the functional foods field. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 75, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Salminen, S.; Collado, M.C.; Endo, A.; Hill, C.; Lebeer, S.; Quigley, E.M.M.; Sanders, M.E.; Shamir, R.; Swann, J.R.; Szajewska, H.; et al. The International Scientific Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of postbiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastro. Hepat. 2021, 18, 649–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dinic, M.; Lukic, J.; Djokic, J.; Milenkovic, M.; Strahinic, I.; Golic, N.; Begovic, J. Lactobacillus fermentum Postbiotic-induced Autophagy as Potential Approach for Treatment of Acetaminophen Hepatotoxicity. Front Microbiol. 2017, 8, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Amiri, S.; Rezazadeh-Bari, M.; Alizadeh-Khaledabad, M.; Rezaei-Mokarram, R.; Sowti-Khiabani, M. Fermentation optimization for co-production of postbiotics by Bifidobacterium lactis BB12 in cheese whey. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2021, 12, 5869–5884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zendeboodi, F.; Khorshidian, N.; Mortazavian, A.M.; da Cruz, A.G. Probiotic: Conceptualization from a new approach. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2020, 32, 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wegh, C.A.M.; Geerlings, S.Y.; Knol, J.; Roeselers, G.; Belzer, C. Postbiotics and Their Potential Applications in Early Life Nutrition and Beyond. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. De Almada, C.N.; Almada, C.N.; Martinez, R.C.R.; Sant’Ana, A.S. Paraprobiotics: Evidences on their ability to modify biological responses, inactivation methods and perspectives on their application in foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 58, 96–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hill, C.; Guarner, F.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Merenstein, D.J.; Pot, B.; Morelli, L.; Canani, R.B.; Flint, H.J.; Salminen, S.; et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastro. Hepat. 2014, 11, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Daliri, E.B.-M.; Lee, B.H.; Oh, D.H. Safety of probiotics in health and disease. In The Role of Functional Food Security in Global Health; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 603–622. [Google Scholar]
  18. Deshpande, G.; Athalye-Jape, G.; Patole, S. Para-probiotics for Preterm Neonates-The Next Frontier. Nutrients 2018, 10, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Malagon-Rojas, J.N.; Mantziari, A.; Salminen, S.; Szajewska, H. Postbiotics for Preventing and Treating Common Infectious Diseases in Children: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sanna, S.; van Zuydam, N.R.; Mahajan, A.; Kurilshikov, A.; Vila, A.V.; Vosa, U.; Mujagic, Z.; Masclee, A.A.M.; Jonkers, D.M.A.E.; Oosting, M.; et al. Causal relationships among the gut microbiome, short-chain fatty acids and metabolic diseases. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 600–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Inturri, R.; Mangano, K.; Santagati, M.; Intrieri, M.; Di Marco, R.; Blandino, G. Immunomodulatory Effects of Bifidobacterium longum W11 Produced Exopolysaccharide on Cytokine Production. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2017, 18, 883–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Thakur, K.; Tomar, S.K. Invitro study of riboflavin producing lactobacilli as potential probiotic. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 68, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Puccetti, M.; Xiroudaki, S.; Ricci, M.; Giovagnoli, S. Postbiotic-enabled targeting of the host-microbiota-pathogen interface: Hints of antibiotic decline? Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Salva, S.; Tiscornia, I.; Gutiérrez, F.; Alvarez, S.; Bollati-Fogolín, M. Lactobacillus rhamnosus postbiotic-induced immunomodulation as safer alternative to the use of live bacteria. Cytokine 2021, 146, 155631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tominari, T.; Sanada, A.; Ichimaru, R.; Matsumoto, C.; Hirata, M.; Itoh, Y.; Numabe, Y.; Miyaura, C.; Inada, M. Gram-positive bacteria cell wall-derived lipoteichoic acid induces inflammatory alveolar bone loss through prostaglandin E production in osteoblasts. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shin, H.S.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, D.K.; Kim, S.A.; An, H.M.; Kim, J.R.; Kim, M.J.; Cha, M.G.; Lee, S.W.; Kim, K.J.; et al. Hypocholesterolemic Effect of Sonication-killed Bifidobacterium longum Isolated from Healthy Adult Koreans in High Cholesterol Fed Rats. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2010, 33, 1425–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Balaguer, F.; Enrique, M.; Llopis, S.; Barrena, M.; Navarro, V.; Alvarez, B.; Chenoll, E.; Ramon, D.; Tortajada, M.; Martorell, P. Lipoteichoic acid from Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BPL1: A novel postbiotic that reduces fat deposition via IGF-1 pathway. Microb. Biotechnol. 2021, 15, 805–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Inturri, R.; Molinaro, A.; Di Lorenzo, F.; Blandino, G.; Tomasello, B.; Hidalgo-Cantabrana, C.; De Castro, C.; Ruas-Madiedo, P. Chemical and biological properties of the novel exopolysaccharide produced by a probiotic strain of Bifidobacterium longum. Carbohyd. Polym. 2017, 174, 1172–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sungur, T.; Aslim, B.; Karaaslan, C.; Aktas, B. Impact of Exopolysaccharides (EPSs) of Lactobacillus gasseri strains isolated from human vagina on cervical tumor cells (HeLa). Anaerobe 2017, 47, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bhat, B.; Bajaj, B.K. Hypocholesterolemic potential and bioactivity spectrum of an exopolysaccharide from a probiotic isolate Lactobacillus paracasei M7. Bioact. Carbohydr. Diet. Fibre 2019, 19, 100191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kolling, Y.; Salva, S.; Villena, J.; Alvarez, S. Are the immunomodulatory properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus CRL1505 peptidoglycan common for all Lactobacilli during respiratory infection in malnourished mice? PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kim, H.G.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, N.R.; Lee, H.Y.; Ko, M.Y.; Jung, B.J.; Kim, C.M.; Lee, J.M.; Park, J.H.; Han, S.H.; et al. Lactobacillus plantarum lipoteichoic acid down-regulated Shigella flexneri peptidoglycan-induced inflammation. Mol. Immunol. 2011, 48, 382–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Matsuguchi, T.; Takagi, A.; Matsuzaki, T.; Nagaoka, M.; Ishikawa, K.; Yokokura, T.; Yoshikai, Y. Lipoteichoic acids from Lactobacillus strains elicit strong tumor necrosis factor alpha-inducing activitives in macrophages through toll-like receptor 2. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immun. 2003, 10, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, S.H.; Ahmadi, S.; Nagpal, R.; Jain, S.; Mishra, S.P.; Kavanagh, K.; Zhu, X.W.; Wang, Z.; McClain, D.A.; Kritchevsky, S.B.; et al. Lipoteichoic acid from the cell wall of a heat killed Lactobacillus paracasei D3-5 ameliorates aging-related leaky gut, inflammation and improves physical and cognitive functions: From C. elegans to mice. Geroscience 2020, 42, 333–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Osman, A.; El-Gazzar, N.; Almanaa, T.N.; El-Hadary, A.; Sitohy, M. Lipolytic Postbiotic from Lactobacillus paracasei Manages Metabolic Syndrome in Albino Wistar Rats. Molecules 2021, 26, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, Y.H.; Liu, Y.L.; Sidhu, A.; Ma, Z.H.; McClain, C.; Feng, W.K. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG culture supernatant ameliorates acute alcohol-induced intestinal permeability and liver injury. Am. J. Physiol. Gastr. L. 2012, 303, G32–G41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Compare, D.; Rocco, A.; Coccoli, P.; Angrisani, D.; Sgamato, C.; Iovine, B.; Salvatore, U.; Nardone, G. Lactobacillus casei DG and its postbiotic reduce the inflammatory mucosal response: An ex-vivo organ culture model of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017, 17, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gao, J.; Li, Y.B.; Wan, Y.; Hu, T.T.; Liu, L.T.; Yang, S.J.; Gong, Z.L.; Zeng, Q.; Wei, Y.; Yang, W.J.; et al. A Novel Postbiotic From Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG With a Beneficial Effect on Intestinal Barrier Function. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nakamura, F.; Ishida, Y.; Sawada, D.; Ashida, N.; Sugawara, T.; Sakai, M.; Goto, T.; Kawada, T.; Fujiwara, S. Fragmented Lactic Acid Bacterial Cells Activate Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors and Ameliorate Dyslipidemia in Obese Mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 2549–2559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ghoneim, M.A.M.; Hassan, A.I.; Mahmoud, M.G.; Asker, M.S. Effect of polysaccharide from Bacillus subtilis sp on cardiovascular diseases and atherogenic indices in diabetic rats. BMC Complem. Altern. Med. 2016, 16, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dahech, I.; Belghith, K.S.; Hamden, K.; Feki, A.; Belghith, H.; Mejdoub, H. Antidiabetic activity of levan polysaccharide in alloxan-induced diabetic rats. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 49, 742–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mi, X.-j.; Tran, T.H.M.; Park, H.-R.; Xu, X.Y.; Subramaniyam, S.; Choi, H.S.; Kim, J.A.; Koh, S.C.; Kim, Y.J. Immune-enhancing effects of postbiotic produced by Bacillus velezensis Kh2-2 isolated from Korea Foods. Food Res. Int. 2021, 152, 110911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gill, P.A.; van Zelm, M.C.; Muir, J.G.; Gibson, P.R. Short chain fatty acids as potential therapeutic agents in human gastrointestinal and inflammatory disorders. Aliment. Pharm. Ther. 2018, 48, 15–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hernández-Granados, M.J.; Franco-Robles, E. Postbiotics in human health: Possible new functional ingredients? Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Takagi, R.; Sasaki, K.; Sasaki, D.; Fukuda, I.; Tanaka, K.; Yoshida, K.; Kondo, A.; Osawa, R. A Single-Batch Fermentation System to Simulate Human Colonic Microbiota for High-Throughput Evaluation of Prebiotics. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lee, C.; Kim, B.G.; Kim, J.H.; Chun, J.; Im, J.P.; Kim, J.S. Sodium butyrate inhibits the NF-kappa B signaling pathway and histone deacetylation, and attenuates experimental colitis in an IL-10 independent manner. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2017, 51, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jiao, A.; Yu, B.; He, J.; Yu, J.; Zheng, P.; Luo, Y.; Luo, J.; Yan, H.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H.; et al. Sodium acetate, propionate, and butyrate reduce fat accumulation in mice via modulating appetite and relevant genes. Nutrition 2021, 87, 111198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pingitore, A.; Chambers, E.S.; Hill, T.; Maldonado, I.R.; Liu, B.; Bewick, G.; Morrison, D.J.; Preston, T.; Wallis, G.A.; Tedford, C.; et al. The diet-derived short chain fatty acid propionate improves beta-cell function in humans and stimulates insulin secretion from human islets in vitro. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2017, 19, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mariño, E.; Richards, J.L.; McLeod, K.H.; Stanley, D.; Yap, Y.A.; Knight, J.; McKenzie, C.; Kranich, J.; Oliveira, A.C.; Rossello, F.J.; et al. Gut microbial metabolites limit the frequency of autoimmune T cells and protect against type 1 diabetes. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 552–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, X.; Wu, Y.; He, L.; Wu, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z. Effects of the intestinal microbial metabolite butyrate on the development of colorectal cancer. J. Cancer 2018, 9, 2510–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chriett, S.; Dąbek, A.; Wojtala, M.; Vidal, H.; Balcerczyk, A.; Pirola, L. Prominent action of butyrate over β-hydroxybutyrate as histone deacetylase inhibitor, transcriptional modulator and anti-inflammatory molecule. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gao, W.; Fang, Z.; Lei, L.; Ju, L.; Jin, B.; Loor, J.J.; Liang, Y.; Shi, Z.; Shen, T.; Yu, H.; et al. Propionate alleviates palmitic acid-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress by enhancing autophagy in calf hepatic cells. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 9316–9326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Scheiman, J.; Luber, J.M.; Chavkin, T.A.; MacDonald, T.; Tung, A.; Pham, L.D.; Wibowo, M.C.; Wurth, R.C.; Punthambaker, S.; Tierney, B.T.; et al. Meta-omics analysis of elite athletes identifies a performance-enhancing microbe that functions via lactate metabolism. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1104–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Farrell, G.C.; Haczeyni, F.; Chitturi, S. Pathogenesis of NASH: How Metabolic Complications of Overnutrition Favour Lipotoxicity and Pro-Inflammatory Fatty Liver Disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1061, 19–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Deghima, A.; Righi, N.; Rosales-Conrado, N.; León-González, M.E.; Baali, F.; Gómez-Mejía, E.; Madrid, Y.; Bedjou, F. Anti-inflammatory activity of ethyl acetate and n-butanol extracts from Ranunculus macrophyllus Desf. and their phenolic profile. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 265, 113347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Al-Rousan, W.M.; Olaimat, A.N.; Osaili, T.M.; Al-Nabulsi, A.A.; Ajo, R.Y.; Holley, R.A. Use of acetic and citric acids to inhibit Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus in tabbouleh salad. Food Microbiol. 2018, 73, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rahbar Saadat, Y.; Yari Khosroushahi, A.; Pourghassem Gargari, B. A comprehensive review of anticancer, immunomodulatory and health beneficial effects of the lactic acid bacteria exopolysaccharides. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 217, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Oleksy, M.; Klewicka, E. Exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus sp.: Biosynthesis and applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 450–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Korcz, E.; Varga, L. Exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria: Techno-functional application in the food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 110, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Angelin, J.; Kavitha, M. Exopolysaccharides from probiotic bacteria and their health potential. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 853–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Paul, P.E.V.; Sangeetha, V.; Deepika, R.G. Emerging trends in the industrial production of chemical products by microorganisms. In Recent Developments in Applied Microbiology and Biochemistry; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 107–125. [Google Scholar]
  62. Garcia-Cano, I.; Rocha-Mendoza, D.; Kosmerl, E.; Zhang, L.; Jimenez-Flores, R. Technically relevant enzymes and proteins produced by LAB suitable for industrial and biological activity. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2020, 104, 1401–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Maske, B.L.; Pereira, G.V.D.; Vale, A.D.; Neto, D.P.D.; Karp, S.G.; Viesser, J.A.; Lindner, J.D.; Pagnoncelli, M.G.; Soccol, V.T.; Soccol, C.R. A review on enzyme-producing lactobacilli associated with the human digestive process: From metabolism to application. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2021, 149, 109836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zuo, Z.H.; Shang, B.J.; Shao, Y.C.; Li, W.Y.; Sun, J.S. Screening of intestinal probiotics and the effects of feeding probiotics on the growth, immune, digestive enzyme activity and intestinal flora of Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish Shellfish Immun. 2019, 86, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. García-Cano, I.; Rocha-Mendoza, D.; Ortega-Anaya, J.; Wang, K.; Kosmerl, E.; Jiménez-Flores, R. Lactic acid bacteria isolated from dairy products as potential producers of lipolytic, proteolytic and antibacterial proteins. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 5243–5257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zolkiewicz, J.; Marzec, A.; Ruszczynski, M.; Feleszko, W. Postbiotics-A Step Beyond Pre- and Probiotics. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Uebanso, T.; Shimohata, T.; Mawatari, K.; Takahashi, A. Functional Roles of B-Vitamins in the Gut and Gut Microbiome. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2020, 64, e2000426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hosomi, K.; Kunisawa, J. The Specific Roles of Vitamins in the Regulation of Immunosurveillance and Maintenance of Immunologic Homeostasis in the Gut. Immune Netw. 2017, 17, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Steinert, R.E.; Lee, Y.K.; Sybesma, W. Vitamins for the Gut Microbiome. Trends Mol. Med. 2020, 26, 137–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mosegaard, S.; Dipace, G.; Bross, P.; Carlsen, J.; Gregersen, N.; Olsen, R.K.J. Riboflavin Deficiency-Implications for General Human Health and Inborn Errors of Metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Aljaadi, A.M.; How, R.E.; Loh, S.P.; Hunt, S.E.; Karakochuk, C.D.; Barr, S.I.; McAnena, L.; Ward, M.; McNulty, H.; Khor, G.L.; et al. Suboptimal Biochemical Riboflavin Status Is Associated with Lower Hemoglobin and Higher Rates of Anemia in a Sample of Canadian and Malaysian Women of Reproductive Age. J. Nutr. 2019, 149, 1952–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wu, C.H.; Rismondo, J.; Morgan, R.M.L.; Shen, Y.; Loessner, M.J.; Larrouy-Maumus, G.; Freemont, P.S.; Gründling, A. Bacillus subtilis YngB contributes to wall teichoic acid glucosylation and glycolipid formation during anaerobic growth. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zong, X.; Fu, J.; Xu, B.; Wang, Y.; Jin, M. Interplay between gut microbiota and antimicrobial peptides. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 6, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kuley, E.; Yazgan, H.; Özogul, Y.; Ucar, Y.; Durmus, M.; Özyurt, G.; Ayas, D. Effectiveness of Lactobacilli cell-free supernatant and propolis extract microcapsules on oxidation and microbiological growth in sardine burger. Food Biosci. 2021, 44, 101417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Calder, P.C.; Bosco, N.; Bourdet-Sicard, R.; Capuron, L.; Delzenne, N.; Dore, J.; Franceschi, C.; Lehtinen, M.J.; Recker, T.; Salvioli, S.; et al. Health relevance of the modification of low grade inflammation in ageing (inflammageing) and the role of nutrition. Ageing Res. Rev. 2017, 40, 95–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Campos-Sanchez, J.C.; Esteban, M.A. Review of inflammation in fish and value of the zebrafish model. J. Fish Dis. 2021, 44, 123–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Furman, D.; Campisi, J.; Verdin, E.; Carrera-Bastos, P.; Targ, S.; Franceschi, C.; Ferrucci, L.; Gilroy, D.W.; Fasano, A.; Miller, G.W.; et al. Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1822–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. You, X.; Yang, L.; Zhao, X.; Ma, K.; Chen, X.; Zhang, C.; Wang, G.; Dong, M.; Rui, X.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Isolation, purification, characterization and immunostimulatory activity of an exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus pentosus LZ-R-17 isolated from Tibetan kefir. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 158, 408–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Van der Hee, B.; Wells, J.M. Microbial Regulation of Host Physiology by Short-chain Fatty Acids. Trends Microbiol. 2021, 29, 700–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Nakkarach, A.; Foo, H.L.; Song, A.A.; Mutalib, N.E.A.; Nitisinprasert, S.; Withayagiat, U. Anti-cancer and anti-inflammatory effects elicited by short chain fatty acids produced by Escherichia coli isolated from healthy human gut microbiota. Microb. Cell Fact. 2021, 20, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cox, M.A.; Jackson, J.; Stanton, M.; Rojas-Triana, A.; Bober, L.; Laverty, M.; Yang, X.X.; Zhu, F.; Liu, J.J.; Wang, S.K.; et al. Short-chain fatty acids act as antiinflammatory mediators by regulating prostaglandin E-2 and cytokines. World J. Gastroenterol. 2009, 15, 5549–5557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Marlatt, K.L.; Ravussin, E. Brown Adipose Tissue: An Update on Recent Findings. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2017, 6, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Miyamoto, J.; Igarashi, M.; Watanabe, K.; Karaki, S.; Mukouyama, H.; Kishino, S.; Li, X.; Ichimura, A.; Irie, J.; Sugimoto, Y.; et al. Gut microbiota confers host resistance to obesity by metabolizing dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Yao, Y.; Yan, L.; Chen, H.; Wu, N.; Wang, W.; Wang, D. Cyclocarya paliurus polysaccharides alleviate type 2 diabetic symptoms by modulating gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids. Phytomedicine 2020, 77, 153268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Zhang, S.; Zhao, J.; Xie, F.; He, H.; Johnston, L.J.; Dai, X.; Wu, C.; Ma, X. Dietary fiber-derived short-chain fatty acids: A potential therapeutic target to alleviate obesity-related nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Obes. Rev. 2021, 22, e13316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. McCarty, T.R.; Jirapinyo, P.; Thompson, C.C. Effect of Sleeve Gastrectomy on Ghrelin, GLP-1, PYY, and GIP Gut Hormones: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann. Surg. 2020, 272, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Van der Beek, C.M.; Canfora, E.E.; Lenaerts, K.; Troost, F.J.; Damink, S.; Holst, J.J.; Masclee, A.A.M.; Dejong, C.H.C.; Blaak, E.E. Distal, not proximal, colonic acetate infusions promote fat oxidation and improve metabolic markers in overweight/obese men. Clin. Sci. 2016, 130, 2073–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Arora, A.; Behl, T.; Sehgal, A.; Singh, S.; Sharma, N.; Bhatia, S.; Sobarzo-Sanchez, E.; Bungau, S. Unravelling the involvement of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Life Sci. 2021, 273, 119311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cabello-Olmo, M.; Arana, M.; Urtasun, R.; Encio, I.J.; Barajas, M. Role of Postbiotics in Diabetes Mellitus: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives. Foods 2021, 10, 1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. He, L. Alterations of Gut Microbiota by Overnutrition Impact Gluconeogenic Gene Expression and Insulin Signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bouter, K.E.C.; Bakker, G.J.; Levin, E.; Hartstra, A.V.; Kootte, R.S.; Udayappan, S.D.; Katiraei, S.; Bahler, L.; Gilijamse, P.W.; Tremaroli, V.; et al. Differential metabolic effects of oral butyrate treatment in lean versus metabolic syndrome subjects. Clin. Transl. Gastroenol. 2018, 9, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Salazar, N.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Bindels, L.B.; Druart, C.; Ruas-Madiedo, P.; Coni, P.D.; de los Reyes-Gavilan, C.G.; Delzenne, N.M. Functional Effects of EPS-Producing Bifidobacterium Administration on Energy Metabolic Alterations of Diet-Induced Obese Mice. Front Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Robles-Vera, I.; Toral, M.; Romero, M.; Jimenez, R.; Sanchez, M.; Perez-Vizcaino, F.; Duarte, J. Antihypertensive Effects of Probiotics. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2017, 19, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Grylls, A.; Seidler, K.; Neil, J. Link between microbiota and hypertension: Focus on LPS/TLR4 pathway in endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation, and therapeutic implication of probiotics. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 137, 111334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kim, S.; Wang, G.; Lobaton, G.; Li, E.; Yang, T.; Raizada, M. The Microbial Metabolite, Butyrate Attenuates Angiotensin Ii-Induced Hypertension and Dysbiosis. J. Hypertens. 2016, 34, E60–E61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Muralitharan, R.M.; Marques, F.Z. Diet-related gut microbial metabolites and sensing in hypertension. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2021, 35, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Majeed, M.; Majeed, S.; Nagabhushanam, K.; Arumugam, S.; Beede, K.; Ali, F. Evaluation of the in vitro cholesterol-lowering activity of the probiotic strain Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856. Int. J. Food Sci. Techmol. 2019, 54, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Linton, M.F.; Yancey, P.G.; Davies, S.S.; Jerome, W.G.; Linton, E.F.; Song, W.L.; Doran, A.C.; Vickers, K.C. The Role of Lipids and Lipoproteins in Atherosclerosis. In Endotext; Feingold, K.R., Anawalt, B., Boyce, A., Chrousos, G., de Herder, W.W., Dhatariya, K., Dungan, K., Hershman, J.M., Hofland, J., Kalra, S., et al., Eds.; MDText.com, Inc.: South Dartmouth, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  99. Shahid, M.; Sun, R.L.; Liu, Y.; Bao, J.L.; Huang, C.X.; Liao, Y.; Zhou, S.X.; Wang, J.F.; Zhang, Y.L. Is high high-density lipoprotein cholesterol beneficial for premature coronary heart disease? A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2016, 23, 704–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of various health benefits of postbiotic molecules in the host. EPSs, extracellular polymeric substances; GPCRs, G-protein-coupled receptors; HDACs, Histone deacetylases; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of various health benefits of postbiotic molecules in the host. EPSs, extracellular polymeric substances; GPCRs, G-protein-coupled receptors; HDACs, Histone deacetylases; SCFAs, short-chain fatty acids.
Nutrients 14 03701 g001
Table 1. In vitro and in vivo studies that highlight physiological effects by postbiotics.
Table 1. In vitro and in vivo studies that highlight physiological effects by postbiotics.
PartBacteriaDerived PostbioicsType of StudyPhysiological EffectsReferences
BifidobacteriumBifidobacterium longum SPM1207Dead cell (sonication)In vivo: Male ratsReduce total and LDL cholesterolShin et al. [26]
Bifidobacterium longum CECT-7347Dead cell (heat killed)In vivo: Caenorhabditis elegans In vitro: Human colonic epithelial cells (HT-29)Anti-inflammatory
(Reduce acute inflammatory response, gut-barrier disruption)
Martorell et al. [2]
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis CECT 8145Lipoteichoic acidIn vivo: Caenorhabditis elegansAnti-obesity
(Reduce nematode’s fat content)
Balaguer et al. [27]
Bifidobacterium longum W11Exo-polysaccharide (EPS)In vitro: Human lung fibroblasts (MRC-5)Antioxidant
(Reduce ROS, Increase RSH levels of H2O2 treated MRC-5)
Inturri et al. [28]
Bifidobacterium longum W11EPSIn vitro: Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)Immunomodulation
(Immune stimulatory in ConA-stimulated PBMCs)
Inturri et al. [21]
Bifidobacterium longum 35624EPSIn vitro: Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs) Anti-inflammatory
(Modulate cytokine secretion and NF-κB activation)
Schiavi et al. [3]
LactobacillusLactobacillus sp.EPSIn vitro: Human Cervical Carcinoma cells (HeLa)Anti-inflammatory
(Decrease TNF-α, Increase IL-10)
Sungur et al. [29]
Lactobacillus paracasei M7EPSIn vitroReduce total cholesterolBhat and Bajaj [30]
Lactobacillus rhamnosus CRL1505 Peptidoglycan In vivo: Male Swiss-albino miceImmunomodulation
(Improve innate immune response,
Respiratory and systemic adaptive immune response)
Kolling et al. [31]
Lactobacillus plantarumLipoteichoic acid In vitro: Human monocyte-like cells (THP-1)Immunomodulation
(Attenuate the pro-inflammatory signaling in THP-1 cells)
Kim et al. [32]
Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus reuteri,
Lactobacillus plantarum
Lipoteichoic acid In vitro: RAW264.7 cellsImmunomodulation
(Inhibit LPS-induced TNF-α production)
Matsuguchi et al. [33]
Lactobacillus paracasei D3–5Lipoteichoic acid In vivo: Male C57BL/6J mice Anti-inflammatory
(Enhance mucin (Muc2) expression by modulating TLR-2/p38-MAPK/NF-kB pathway)
Wang et al. [34]
Lactobacillus paracaseiBacterial lysatesIn vivo: Wistar albino male ratsAnti-obesity
(Reduce total serum lipids and serum triglyceride)
Osman et al. [35]
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GGBacterial lysatesIn vivo: Male micePreventing alcoholic liver diseaseWang et al. [36]
Lactobacillus casei DGBacterial lysatesEx-vivo: Organ culture modelImmunomodulation
(Relieve inflammatory response of the intestinal mucosa)
Compare et al. [37]
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GGBacterial lysates: Protein (HM0539)In vitro: Intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2) In vivo: C57BL/6 miceProtect intestinal epithelium Prevent colitis, intestinal barrier dysfunction, bacteria translocationGao et al. [38]
Lactobacillus amylovorus CP1563Dead cell (heat killed)In vivo: Male C57BL/6N miceAnti-obesity
(Prevention and treatment of dyslipidemia)
Nakamura et al. [39]
BacillusBacillus subtilis sp.PolysaccharideIn vivo: Male Sprague–Dawley ratsDecrease glucose levels in the blood Increase insulin levels in the serumGhoneim et al. [40]
Bacillus licheniformisPolysaccharideIn vivo: Male Wistar ratsPrevent diabetes complications
(Increase glycogen level, SOD, CAT
Decrease glucose level, TBARS, hepatic, and renal indices’ toxicity)
Dahech et al. [41]
Bacillus velezensis Kh2–2Bacterial lysatesIn vitro: RAW264.7 cells
In vivo: Male mice
Ex-vivo: Splenocytes in mouse
Immunomodulation
(Induce NO, immune-related cytokine in RAW264
Induce IL-2, IFN-γ and inhibit IL-10 in the ex vivo study
Enhance innate and adaptive immunity, stimulate immune-related cytokine secretion, and modulate gut microbiota dysbiosis in mice)
Mi et al. [42]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, M.; Joung, M.; Park, J.-H.; Ha, S.K.; Park, H.-Y. Role of Postbiotics in Diet-Induced Metabolic Disorders. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3701. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14183701

AMA Style

Park M, Joung M, Park J-H, Ha SK, Park H-Y. Role of Postbiotics in Diet-Induced Metabolic Disorders. Nutrients. 2022; 14(18):3701. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14183701

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Miri, Minji Joung, Jae-Ho Park, Sang Keun Ha, and Ho-Young Park. 2022. "Role of Postbiotics in Diet-Induced Metabolic Disorders" Nutrients 14, no. 18: 3701. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14183701

APA Style

Park, M., Joung, M., Park, J. -H., Ha, S. K., & Park, H. -Y. (2022). Role of Postbiotics in Diet-Induced Metabolic Disorders. Nutrients, 14(18), 3701. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14183701

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop