Next Article in Journal
Biomonitoring of Multiple Mycotoxins in Urine by GC–MS/MS: A Pilot Study on Patients with Esophageal Cancer in Golestan Province, Northeastern Iran
Previous Article in Journal
Effective Treatment of Neurological Symptoms with Normal Doses of Botulinum Neurotoxin in Wilson’s Disease: Six Cases and Literature Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Occurrence of Free and Conjugated Mycotoxins in Aromatic and Medicinal Plants and Dietary Exposure Assessment in the Moroccan Population
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Mycotoxins: Toxicology, Identification and Control

by
Cristina Juan García
Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Valencia, Avda. Vicent Andrés Estellés, S/N, 46100 Burjassot-Valencia, Spain
Toxins 2021, 13(4), 242; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13040242
Submission received: 8 March 2021 / Revised: 22 March 2021 / Accepted: 24 March 2021 / Published: 29 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mycotoxins Study: Toxicology, Identification and Control)
The evaluation of the presence of mycotoxins in different matrices is achieved through different analytical tools (including quantitative or qualitative determinations). Research on optimal mycotoxins’ extraction and clean-up methods, combined with chromatographic equipment coupled to mass spectrometric detectors (Triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometry, tandem mass spectrometry, quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry) is of the utmost importance for accurate measurements of mycotoxins in diverse matrices. All these techniques and methodologies imply key steps in the establishment of the limits of detection, limits of quantification, points of identification, accuracy, reproducibility, and/or repeatability of different procedures. The maximum levels or recommended levels for mycotoxins in different matrices are comprised within a wide range (including the levels tolerated by infants and animals). In addition, their control and evaluation of exposure are demanded by authorities and food safety systems.
Food and feed authorities are concerned not only with the determination of presence of mycotoxins but also with the toxicological effects of them, and in vivo or in vitro assays are necessary for a complete evaluation. In fact, these assays are the basis for the control and prevention of population exposure to mycotoxins in dietary exposure studies. Recent surveys are focused on regulated mycotoxins (aflatoxins, fumonisins, and trichothecenes) and emerging toxins such as enniatins and beauvericin in adult consumers, while very few studies have monitored mycotoxins levels in infant products.
This Special Issue of Toxins comprises 11 original contributions and one review. The issue reports new findings regarding the presence of mycotoxins in aromatic and medicinal plants, mango and orange juice, juices, pulps, jams and beer, from Morocco, Pakistan, and Portugal. In these studies, innovative techniques to study their presence have been developed. El Jai et al. [1] used liquid chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry to analyse mycotoxins and conjugated mycotoxins; there were a total of 14 mycotoxins in 40 samples of aromatic medicinal plants (AMPs) from Morocco. Hussain et al. [2] analyzed patulin in 274 fruit and derived products samples from Pakistan, and Silva et al. [3] evaluated the presence of ochratoxin A in 85 beer samples from Portugal. These results revealed that regular monitoring of cereals or fruits and their products (beer, juices, pulps and jams) during the harvest and processing stages is recommended to enhance the confidence in final consumers.
The Special Issue also presents novel strategies to detect the presence of mycotoxins as reported by Efremenco et al. [4]. They compared the characteristics of a rapid quantitative analysis of different mycotoxins (deoxynivalenol, ochratoxin A, patulin, sterigmatocystin, and zearalenone) using acetyl-, butyrylcholinesterases and photobacterial strains of luminescent cells. The best bioindicators in terms of sensitivity and working range (μg/mL) were as follows: Photobacterium sp. 17 cells for analysis of deoxynivalenol (0.8–89) and patulin (0.2–32); Photobacterium sp. 9.2 cells for analysis of ochratoxin A (0.4–72) and zearalenone (0.2–32); and acetylcholinesterase for analysis of sterigmatocystin (0.12–219).
Related with this highlighted scenario, Rodríguez-Carrasco et al. [5] have evaluated the exposure to enniatin B1 by biomonitoring metabolites in urine and identifying as major products: hydroxylated metabolites (78% samples) and carbonylated metabolites (66% samples). Also toxicological effects of zearalenone metabolites and beauvericin were evaluated by Agahi et al. [6]. They evaluated the metabolism and toxicological effects on SH-SY5Y neuronal cells and IC50 values for the individual and combined treatments of the mentioned mycotoxins.
One important point in control of mycotoxins is decontamination strategies, and in this sense, Oliveria da Cruz et al. (2021) [7] evaluated the efficacy of potentially probiotic fruit-derived Lactobacillus isolates to remove aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) from a phosphate buffer solution (PBS; spiked with 0.15 µg/mL AFM1). The authors concluded that L. paracasei 108, L. plantarum 49, and L. fermentum 111 could have potential application to reduce AFM1 to safe levels in foods and feeds.
Abbasi Pirouz et al. [8] present a simultaneous removal of 11 mycotoxins in palm kernel cake (PKC) using chitosan. PKC is used in ruminant feed; its use in poultry, swine, and fish diets is as a valuable source of protein and energy, while chitosan is a polyaminosaccharide and the second most abundant bio-polymers after cellulose. Mycotoxins studied were: aflatoxins (AFB1, AFB2, AFG1 and AFG2), ochratoxin A (OTA), zearalenone (ZEN), fumonisins (FB1 and FB2), trichothecenes (deoxynivalenol (DON), HT-2, and T-2 toxin) [8].
Another mycotoxin decontamination technique was tested by Yang et al. [9]. They used electron beam irradiation (EBI) and ozone on the degradation of ZEN and OTA. It was observed that 2 mL of 50 µg/mL of ZEN and OTA was completely reduced for ZEN and when 50 mg/L ozone is used, OTA is reduced at 34%. Acetamiprid was used by Nowak et al. [10] to reduce the production of destruxins produced by Metarhizium sp. Acetamiprid at concentrations from 5–50 mg/L did not inhibit the growth of all tested Metarhizium sp.; however, it reduced the level of 19 produced destruxins in direct proportion to the dosage used. Also, Wang et al. [11] studied a destruxin mycotoxin: destruxin A (DA), a cyclodepsipeptidic mycotoxin with pesticide proprieties involved in regulation of transcription and protein synthesis. It was suggested that silkworms’ arginine tRNA synthetase (BmArgRS), Lamin-C Proteins (BmLamin-C), and ATP-dependent RNA helicase PRP1 (BmPRP1) were candidates of DA-binding proteins.
Finally, this Special Issue includes a review by Zhu et al. [12], which summarizes the newly discovered macrocyclic trichothecenes and their bioactivities over the last decade, as well as identifications of genes tri17 and tri18 involved in the trichothecene biosynthesis and putative biosynthetic pathway [12].

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The guest editor of this Special Issue, Cristina Juan García is grateful to the authors for their contributions and particularly to the referees for their invaluable work. Without their effort this special issue would have not been possible. The valuable contributions, organization, and editorial support of the MDPI management team and staff are greatly appreciated.

References

  1. El Jai, A.; Zinedine, A.; Juan-García, A.; Mañes, J.; Etahiri, S.; Juan, C. Occurrence of Free and Conjugated Mycotoxins in Aromatic and Medicinal Plants and Dietary Exposure Assessment in the Moroccan Population. Toxins 2021, 13, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hussain, S.; Rafique Asi, M.; Iqbal, M.; Khalid, N.; Wajih-ul-Hassan, S.; Ariño, A. Patulin Mycotoxin in Mango and Orange Fruits, Juices, Pulps, and Jams Marketed in Pakistan. Toxins 2020, 12, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Silva, J.G.L.; Teixeira, A.C.; Pereira, A.M.P.T.; Pena, A.; Lino, C.M. Ochratoxin A in Beers Marketed in Portugal: Occurrence and Human Risk Assessment. Toxins 2020, 12, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Efremenko, E.; Maslova, O.; Stepanov, N.; Ismailov, A. Using Cholinesterases and Immobilized Luminescent Photobacteria for the Express-Analysis of Mycotoxins and Estimating the Efficiency of Their Enzymatic Hydrolysis. Toxins 2021, 13, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rodríguez-Carrasco, Y.; Narváez, A.; Izzo, L.; Gaspari, A.; Graziani, G.; Ritieni, A. Biomonitoring of Enniatin B1 and Its Phase I Metabolites in Human Urine: First Large-Scale Study. Toxins 2020, 12, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Agahi, F.; Font, G.; Juan, C.; Juan-García, A. Individual and Combined Effect of Zearalenone Derivates and Beauvericin Mycotoxins on SH-SY5Y Cells. Toxins 2020, 12, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Oliveira da Cruz, P.; Jales de Matos, C.; Mangueira Nascimento, Y.; Fechine Tavares, J.; Leite de Souza, E.; Iury Ferreira Magalhães, H. Efficacy of Potentially Probiotic Fruit-Derived Lactobacillus fermentum, L. paracasei and L. plantarum to Remove Aflatoxin M1 In Vitro. Toxins 2021, 13, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abbasi Pirouz, A.; Selamat, J.; Iqbal, S.Z.; Putra Samsudin, N.I. Efficient and Simultaneous Chitosan-Mediated Removal of 11 Mycotoxins from Palm Kernel Cake. Toxins 2020, 12, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Yang, K.; Li, K.; Pan, L.; Luo, X.; Xing, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, R.; Zhai, Y.; Chen, Z. Effect of Ozone and Electron Beam Irradiation on Degradation of Zearalenone and Ochratoxin A. Toxins 2020, 12, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Nowak, M.; Bernat, P.; Mrozińska, J.; Różalska, S. Acetamiprid Affects Destruxins Production but Its Accumulation in Metarhizium sp. Spores Increases Infection Ability of Fungi. Toxins 2020, 12, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wang, J.; Weng, Q.; Yin, F.; Hu, Q. Interactions of Destruxin A with Silkworms’ Arginine tRNA Synthetase and Lamin-C Proteins. Toxins 2020, 12, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Zhu, M.; Cen, Y.; Ye, W.; Li, S.; Zhang, W. Recent Advances on Macrocyclic Trichothecenes, Their Bioactivities and Biosynthetic Pathway. Toxins 2020, 12, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Juan García, C. Mycotoxins: Toxicology, Identification and Control. Toxins 2021, 13, 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13040242

AMA Style

Juan García C. Mycotoxins: Toxicology, Identification and Control. Toxins. 2021; 13(4):242. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13040242

Chicago/Turabian Style

Juan García, Cristina. 2021. "Mycotoxins: Toxicology, Identification and Control" Toxins 13, no. 4: 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13040242

APA Style

Juan García, C. (2021). Mycotoxins: Toxicology, Identification and Control. Toxins, 13(4), 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13040242

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop