Next Article in Journal
Holocellulose from a Winemaking By-Product to Develop a Biopolymeric System for Bacterial Immobilization: Adsorption of Ochratoxin A in Wine Model Solutions (Box–Behnken Design)
Previous Article in Journal
Neurotoxicological Effects of Some Mycotoxins on Humans Health and Methods of Neuroprotection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Levels and Profile of Tetrodotoxins in Spawning Cephalothrix mokievskii (Palaeonemertea, Nemertea): Assessing the Potential Toxic Pressure on Marine Ecosystems

by
Grigorii V. Malykin
,
Peter V. Velansky
and
Timur Yu. Magarlamov
*
A.V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, 690041 Vladivostok, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2025, 17(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17010025
Submission received: 5 December 2024 / Revised: 31 December 2024 / Accepted: 2 January 2025 / Published: 6 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Marine and Freshwater Toxins)

Abstract

:
The ribbon worms of the closely related species Cephalothrix simula, Cephalothrix cf. simula, and Cephalothrix mokievskii, representing the C. simula species complex, possess high concentrations of tetrodotoxin (TTX) and its analogues in all developmental stages from eggs to adults. It has recently been suggested that the eggs and larvae of these animals can be a source of tetrodotoxins (TTXs) for other aquatic organisms. In the current study, TTXs in mature and post-spawning individuals and in the eggs of C. mokievskii were identified using high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. For the first time, the quantity and profile of TTXs that these nemerteans released into the environment during spawning were estimated. We showed that the spawning C. mokievskii females released significant amounts of TTX and 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX with their eggs; these levels were sufficient for the potential toxification of marine bioresources. The issues surrounding the monitoring of TTXs in commercial marine animals, and collecting at the sites of the spawning of nemerteans from the C. simula species complex, are discussed.
Key Contribution: In the current study, we showed that spawning female nemerteans of Cephalothrix mokievskii released, along with their eggs, amounts of TTX and 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX that were sufficient for the toxification of marine bioresources. The data obtained expand our understanding of TTX transfer in a marine environment.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Tetrodotoxin (TTX) is a low-molecular-weight guanidinium neurotoxin, which is initially associated with the puffer fishes of the family Tetraodontidae, and has been subsequently discovered in the venom of various marine animals, including blue-ringed octopuses, flatworms, sea slugs, echinoderms, nemerteans, and mollusks [1,2]. In recent years, the contamination of mollusks, especially commercially valuable species, with TTX has attracted increased interest from researchers. Cases of TTX detection in commercial mollusks and the TTX-poisoning incidents following the ingestion of gastropods have been reported worldwide and, increasingly, by European countries [1,3]. Following this trend, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) proposed a safety limit of 44 µg/kg TTX in the meat of marine gastropods and bivalves [4]. While the pathway of accumulation of the other group of guanidinium neurotoxins, known as saxitoxins, in mollusks is well known and referred to as algal blooms [5], TTX accumulation is poorly understood. Most studies on TTX migration in marine ecosystems focus on the higher trophic-level species, such as puffer fishes, for which the accumulation of TTX through the food chain is proposed [6,7,8,9]. The exogenous and symbiotic TTX-producing bacteria, that are considered as a primary source of the toxin in marine TTX-bearing animals [10,11,12], have been isolated from several mollusk species [13,14,15] and their habitats [16]. Several studies showed a relationship between the microalgal blooms and TTX occurrence in bivalves, supporting the hypothesis that phytoplankton could be another source of the toxin in mollusks [16,17]. However, trace amounts of TTX, produced by bacteria [11,18], and the absence of direct evidence of TTX synthesis in microalgae, do not allow us to confirm that mollusks accumulate TTX from microorganisms. Since bivalves are filter feeders, the accumulation of TTX during the spawning of other TTX-bearing animals was suggested [17,19,20]. High levels of TTX were detected in the ovaries of many TTX-bearing animals, including puffer fish [21,22,23], flatworms [8,19,24,25], and nemerteans [26]. In a recent study, the ability of bivalves to acquire TTX through feeding on the flatworm larvae was demonstrated in the laboratory [19].
The eggs and larvae of nemerteans from the Cephalothrix simula species complex [17,20], which currently includes C. simula s. str., Cephalothrix cf. simula, and Cephalothrix mokievskii [27], are considered to be one of the possible sources of TTX in mollusks. An indirect support of the hypothesis of TTX migration from C. simula to bivalves was obtained in a recent study by Dhanji-Rapkova and colleagues [20]. Authors detected the DNA of C. simula in the digestive tract of the oyster Crassostrea gigas. They also found that the concentration of TTX in mollusks reached its highest value during the period of the highest concentration of C. simula DNA in seawater. A wide distribution of the nemerteans from the C. simula species complex in the Pacific region, along with their frequent detection in the habitats of wild and mariculture oyster farms [28,29,30], support the above hypothesis. Since the early 1990s, the habitat of C. simula was considered to be limited to the Sea of Japan [28,31]. However, further reports have provided evidence for the introduction of C. simula to the other regions of the world, including the coasts of Portugal, Spain, Italy [30,32], the Netherlands [33], England [34], and the USA [35]. The other members of the C. simula species complex, C. cf. simula and C. mokievskii, are found in the Sea of Japan and in the Sea of Okhotsk [36].
In this study, we investigated the content of TTX and its analogues in the nemertean C. mokievskii during spawning. A previous study showed that in a small sampling of C. mokievskii of an unknown sex, five out of ten animals contained high concentrations of tetrodotoxins (TTXs) [27]. The levels of TTXs found in C. mokievskii correspond to those in strongly toxic animals, as defined by Noguchi and Arakawa [6]. The current investigation includes eighty-eight individual C. mokievskii, collected along the coasts of Sakhalin Island (Sea of Okhotsk), where this species is abundant. Using high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS), we determined the concentration and profile of TTXs in mature and post-spawning animals and eggs. The issues of a potential toxic load on the ecosystem and on mollusk communities during the spawning of C. mokievskii, and the subsequent potential risk to human health, are addressed.

2. Results

The differences in TTX concentrations between mature males, mature females, post-spawning individuals of unidentified sex, and post-spawning C. mokievskii females were evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis H test. The test showed that TTX concentrations in the studied groups were statistically different (p-value < 0.05). Pairwise comparison of studied groups using the Mann–Whitney U test revealed that TTX concentrations were statistically different between all groups (p-value > 0.05), except mature males and post-spawning females. TTX concentrations between mature males and post-spawning females did not differ significantly (p-value < 0.05). Figure 1 shows the mean values of total TTX concentrations for the studied groups with a standard deviation and median values.
The differences in weight between mature males, mature females, post-spawning individuals of unidentified sex, and post-spawning C. mokievskii females were evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis H test. The test showed that the weights of individuals in the studied groups were not statistically different (p-value > 0.05). Figure 2 shows the mean values of individual masses for the studied groups, with a standard deviation.
In the bodies of all mature and post-spawning animals, between seven and nine TTXs, specifically TTX, 4-epiTTX, 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX, 6,11-dideoxyTTX, 4,9-anhydroTTX, 5-deoxy/11-deoxyTTX, 11-norTTX-6(S/R)-ol, 4-epi-11-oxoTTX, and 11-oxoTTX, were detected (Supplementary Material Table S1 and Figure S1). The spectrum of TTXs in the bodies of mature males and post-spawning individuals of unidentified sex was similar (Figure 3).
The total concentration of TTXs in mature nemerteans ranged from 54 µg/g to 3087.4 µg/g of the total body weight. The mean total concentration of TTXs in females exceeded that in males by approximately 6.5-fold (Figure 1, Supplementary Material Table S1).
In post-spawning nemerteans, the total concentrations of TTXs ranged from 35.7 µg/g to 864.1 µg/g of the total body weight. The mean total concentrations of TTXs in post-spawning females and individuals of unidentified sex was lower than in mature females by approximately 10.5- and 3.8-fold, respectively (Figure 1, Supplementary Material Table S1).
The samples of eggs contained between five and seven TTXs, specifically TTX, 4-epiTTX, 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX, 6,11-dideoxyTTX, 4,9-anhydroTTX, 5-deoxy/11-deoxyTTX, and 11-oxoTTX (Supplementary Material Table S2). The total amount of TTXs per egg varied from 3.4 ng to 6.4 ng (Supplementary Material Table S2).
The toxins, comprising at least 5% of the total concentration of TTXs per sample, were counted as major. The toxins, comprising less than 5% of the total concentration of TTXs per sample, were counted as minor. Mature females contained between two and five major toxins (Supplementary Material Table S1). TTX (31.4–61%) and 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX (30.3–55.7%) were presented as major in all females (Figure 3d). The number of minor toxins in mature females varied from four to seven, and their total sum ranged from 2.9% to 12.9% (Supplementary Material Table S1). Mature males contained between four and five major toxins (Supplementary Material Table S1). TTX (5.6–38%), 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX (27.6–75%), 6,11-dideoxyTTX (5.9–25.2%), and 11-oxoTTX (5–22.1%) were counted as major in most mature males (Figure 3a). The number of minor toxins in mature males varied from four to five, and their total sum ranged from 1.6 to 7.1% (Supplementary Material Table S1). Post-spawning nemerteans contained between three and five major toxins (Supplementary Material Table S1). TTX (10.4–35.2%), 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX (21–63.5%), 6,11-dideoxyTTX (5.2–42.6%), and 11-oxoTTX (6.4–22.4%) were counted as major in most post-spawning individuals of unidentified sex (Figure 3b). TTX (22–57.7%), 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX (22.9–49%), and 11-oxoTTX (6.8–20.2%) were counted as major in all post-spawning females (Figure 3e). The number of minor toxins in post-spawning nemerteans varied from four to six, and their total sum ranged from 0.9 to 9% (Supplementary Material Table S1). Eggs contained two major toxins–TTX (50.8–57.3%) and 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX (34.7–43.6%) (Figure 3c). The number of minor toxins in the eggs was six, and their total sum ranged from 3.3 to 9.8% (Supplementary Material Table S2).

3. Discussion

In subsequent years, the presence of TTXs in nemerteans of the C. simula species complex was reported by various scientific groups. And although the concentration between individuals of different species and between individuals collected in different locations may vary significantly, representatives of this species complex can contain significant amounts of TTXs, comparable with the amounts found in blue-ringed octopuses and puffer fishes. The amount of TTXs in C. simula individuals collected from the intertidal zone in Shimoda (Shizuoka prefecture, Japan) and in the Hiroshima Bay (Japan) reached up to 23,000 MU/g (4094 μg/g) [30] and 25,590 MU/g (4555 μg/g) [28] of the body weight, respectively According to Vlasenko and Magarlamov [37], TTX concentrations in individual C. cf. simula, collected from the Peter the Great Bay (See of Japan), varied from 85.75 μg/g to 7108.26 μg/g. An individual C. simula collected off of the coast of England had a total TTX concentration of 54.3 μg/g [33]. In the current study, we have shown that individual C. mokievskii contained between 54 µg/g and 3087.4 µg/g of TTXs (Supplementary Material Table S3). Thus, in the current study, we have shown that the concentration of TTX in C. mokievskii can also vary significantly (even in individuals at the same maturation stage (Figure 1)), but the reasons for this have yet to be clarified.
The nemertean C. simula from the C. simula species complex is one candidate for TTX transfer to bivalves [17,20]. In the present study, we, for the first time, showed that mature C. mokievskii females (another member from the C. simula species complex) contain TTXs (50% of which comprised TTX) in their eggs, but not in other tissues. We assume that the TTX-containing eggs of C. mokievskii, as well as larvae hatched from them, can toxify bivalves in the breeding sites of this species, distributed in the Sea of Japan and the Sea of Okhotsk.
Despite the increasing interest in the hypothesis of TTX migration from nemerteans to bivalves, it is not yet clear how much toxins the worms release during spawning and what toxic load on mollusks or the ecosystem can be expected. Our results show that the mature individual C. mokievskii contain significant amounts of TTXs (up to 3087.4 µg/g), with females containing more toxins than males by approximately 1–2 orders of magnitude (Figure 1). Moreover, the level of TTXs in individuals before and after spawning differs mainly in females. The level of TTXs in females after spawning can be 100-fold lower compared to the females before spawning, while the weight of spawned and mature animals is not statistically different (Figure 2). Although in C. mokievskii males, reproductive products can contribute to the toxification of bivalves, eggs can be considered as the main source of toxins for these animals. According to the obtained data, a female C. mokievskii can lose up to 420 µg of TTXs during spawning. In theory, for a 3-year-old mussel weighting 150 g, an intake of 6.7 μg of TTXs, corresponding to the toxins content in approximately 1000 oocytes of C. mokievskii, would be sufficient to exceed the recommended limit of TTX (44 μg/kg) set by EFSA [4]. Thus, the amount of TTXs, which one C. mokievskii female releases with eggs during spawning, is sufficient to toxify about 60 mollusks. The attention to the monitoring of the level of TTXs in bivalves during the spawning period of TTX-bearing nemerteans seems reasonable.
Since different TTXs could affect human health differently, attention should be paid to the spectrum of toxins which the bivalves accumulated. In the extracts of mature individual C. mokievskii, up to nine TTXs were detected, while in the eggs the maximum of seven toxins were observed. More than 90% of the TTX amount in the eggs was composed of TTX (about 50%) and 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX (about 40%). Similar patterns in the distribution of TTXs can be traced for the other aquatic organisms, which contain a wide range of toxins in the body and eggs, while TTX and 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX remain the predominant toxins in the eggs. This was demonstrated for the nemertean C. cf. simula, collected in the West coast of the Sea of Japan [26], flatworm P. multitentaculata, collected in the coastal area of Hayama, Kanagawa (Japan) [8], and puffer fish Lagocephalus sceleratus, collected from the South Crete coast [38]. It is unclear whether the eggs accumulate predominantly TTX and 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX due to the peculiarities of the intrabody TTX transport, or the physicochemical properties of these toxins. However, it seems that the profile of TTXs in the eggs and larvae of the animals, presumably involved in bivalve toxification, do not depend on their species or geographical location. Although the majority of studies of TTXs in mollusks revealed only TTX, in a case study on shellfish poisoning in the Mediterranean Sea in 2008, poisoned mollusks contained high concentrations of both TTX and 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX [39]. Despite the fact that, among the major TTXs found in eggs, TTX is the most dangerous for humans with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 5.43 nM [40], 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX with IC50 of 4196 nM [40] can also pose a threat, acting like a TTX agonist, and enhancing the toxic effect [40].

4. Conclusions

This study shows, for the first time, that the female nemerteans of C. mokievskii release significant amounts of TTX and 5,6,11-trideoxyTTX during spawning and can be a potential source of these toxins in marine ecosystems. The origin of TTX in highly toxic animals, including nemerteans from the C. simula species complex, remains unclear. One hypothesis states that TTX can be produced by free-living and/or symbiotic microflora and transmitted through the food web, accumulating in high concentrations in animals at higher trophic levels. While it is impossible to define the reason for higher TTX levels in female C. mokievskii at the moment, they can be considered as a promising model for the study on the origin of TTXs in nemerteans. The present study also opens up perspectives regarding the investigating of TTX transfer from the eggs of nemerteans from the C. simula species complex to commercial bivalves in the artificial toxification experiments.

5. Materials and Methods

In total, 88 samples of C. mokievskii (26 mature males, 24 mature females, 25 post-spawning individuals of unidentified sex, and 13 post-spawning females) were collected from their habitat from the bottom face of stones in the upper littoral of Aniva Bay, Sea of Okhotsk (46.02° N, 142.17° E), at 15–17 August 2024 by Timur Yu. Magarlamov (Figure 4). The biological material was collected from the not-protected area, not requiring a Research Access or Field Permit. Manipulations with animals were performed according to ARRIVE guidelines (https://arriveguidelines.org/arrive-guidelines, accessed on 14 July 2020).
Prior to the experiments, the animals were stored separately in the tanks with aerated, filtered seawater at 17 °C for 1–3 h. To filter the seawater, 0.45 µm pore membrane (hydrophobic polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)) filters were used (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Individuals were washed three times before fixation in filtered seawater.
A preliminary identification of C. mokievskii was performed based on morphological features. The species is characterized by a thin body, which can reach a length of up to 30 cm and a width of up to 1–3 mm. The body of this worm has a dark yellow coloration, often with a greenish tinge. The tip of the head is pointed, and often has a bright orange color. C. mokievskii has dark intestine, which Korotkevich [41] described as a “dark mediodorsal stripe” (Figure 5).
For the genetic identification of specimens, they were fixed in 96% ethanol. Genomic DNA was extracted from specimens using DNAZol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the protocol recommended by the manufacturer. A fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was amplified using the LoboF1 (5′-KBTCHACAAAYCAYAARGAYATHGG-3′) and LoboR1 (5′-TAAACYTCWGGRTGWCCRAARAAYCA-3′) primers (Lobo et al., 2013). The amplification was performed with the following conditions: denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 5 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 45 °C for 90 s, and 72 °C for 60 s, followed by 45 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 54 °C for 90 s, 72 °C for 60 s, and a final elongation at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplified products were purified using an QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The direct sequencing of both DNA strands was carried out using the BigDye Terminator ver. 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) and the same PCR primers using an ABI Prism 3500 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). BLAST searches were performed as implemented in the NCBI website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 9 December 2024). The resulting sequences were submitted to the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank databases (PQ724485).
Spawning was induced by a rapid temperature increase. Mature female individuals were placed in a separate Petri dish with filtered seawater at 27 °C. Eggs were collected in a sterile 2 mL tube with 96% ethanol.
For TTX extraction, the specimens of adult nemerteans (one specimen = the total extract of one individual) and eggs (one specimen = the total extract of 10 eggs) were fixed in 2 mL of 96% ethanol. The specimens of adult worms were additionally homogenized in a 0.1% solution of acetic acid in 70% ethanol (with a specimen/solution ratio of 1:10 v/v) for 5 min using a hand-held homogenizer. After that, all the specimens were ultrasonicated on a Sonopuls HD 2070 homogenizer (Bandelin, Berlin, Germany) for 5 min (at a frequency of 20 kHz; amplitude, 228 µm; working cycle, 0.8 s; and interval, 0.2 s) and were centrifuged at 14,000× g, 10 min, 4 °C; then, the supernatants were collected. The obtained sediments were extracted twice, using a 0.1% solution of acetic acid in 70% methanol (with a specimen/solution ratio of 1:1 v/v); after centrifugation, the supernatants were pooled. The specimens were dried on a rotary evaporator (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA) at 60 °C. The dry precipitates were dissolved in a 0.1% aqueous solution of acetic acid and concentrated using 3 kDa Vivaspin turbo concentrators (Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany).
TTXs were identified and quantified using HPLC-MS/MS according to the methodology Bane et al. [42] with modifications according to the methods of Malykin et al. [26] (Supplementary Material File S1). The limit of quantification (LoQ) was 0.6 ng/mL (0.0006 µg/g); the limit of detection (LoD) was 0.2 ng/mL (0.0002 µg/g).
Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistica toolbox version 10.0 (Dell, Round Rock, TX, USA). TTXs values between the groups of specimens (mature males, mature females, post-spawning individuals of unidentified sex, and post-spawning females) were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis H test and the Mann–Whitney U test (p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/toxins17010025/s1. Supplementary Table S1: Tetrodotoxins concentrations of mature animals of Cephalothrix mokievskii. Supplementary Figure S1: Chromatograms and spectra of putative tetrodotoxins. Supplementary Table S2: Tetrodotoxins concentration in eggs of Cephalothrix mokievskii. Supplementary Table S3: Tetrodotoxins initial data. Supplementary File S1: Parameters of tetrodotoxins analysis, according to [43,44,45,46,47,48].

Author Contributions

G.V.M. analyzed the data, and wrote the draft manuscript. P.V.V. performed the HPLC-MS/MS analysis. T.Y.M. conceptualized and managed the study. All authors contributed to editing the manuscript, and they approved the final draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was conducted without any funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with commission on biomedical ethics of A.V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Science (protocol code 1-261224, meeting №14, date of approval 26 November 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank Anna Martynova and Vasily Kuznetsov (A.V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, NSCMB FEB RAS) for their participation in the species identification process. The authors are grateful to D.I. Melnikova (NSCMB FEB RAS) for help with translating the manuscript. The research was carried out with the assistance of the Primorsky Aquarium Shared Equipment Facility of the A. V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (NSCMB FEB RAS). We are grateful for the support of the non-profit charitable foundation “Support for bioresearch “BIOM”” (the project №3/2024-gr).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Katikou, P.; Gokbulut, C.; Kosker, A.R.; Campàs, M.; Ozogul, F. An Updated Review of Tetrodotoxin and Its Peculiarities. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Melnikova, D.I.; Magarlamov, T.Y. An Overview of the Anatomical Distribution of Tetrodotoxin in Animals. Toxins 2022, 14, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Biessy, L.; Boundy, M.J.; Smith, K.F.; Harwood, D.T.; Hawes, I.; Wood, S.A. Tetrodotoxin in Marine Bivalves and Edible Gastropods: A Mini-Review. Chemosphere 2019, 236, 124404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Knutsen, H.K.; Alexander, J.; Barregård, L.; Bignami, M.; Brüschweiler, B.; Ceccatelli, S.; Cottrill, B.; Dinovi, M.; Edler, L.; Grasl-Kraupp, B.; et al. Risks for Public Health Related to the Presence of Tetrodotoxin (TTX) and TTX Analogues in Marine Bivalves and Gastropods. EFSA J. 2017, 15, e04752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Costa, P.R.; Giráldez, J.; Rodrigues, S.M.; Leão, J.M.; Pinto, E.; Soliño, L.; Gago-Martínez, A. High Levels of Tetrodotoxin (TTX) in Trumpet Shell Charonia lampas from the Portuguese Coast. Toxins 2021, 13, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Noguchi, T.; Arakawa, O. Tetrodotoxin—Distribution and Accumulation in Aquatic Organisms, and Cases of Human Intoxication. Mar. Drugs 2008, 6, 220–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Itoi, S.; Suzuki, M.; Asahina, K.; Sawayama, E.; Nishikubo, J.; Oyama, H.; Takei, M.; Shiibashi, N.; Takatani, T.; Arakawa, O.; et al. Role of Maternal Tetrodotoxin in Survival of Larval Pufferfish. Toxicon 2018, 148, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Suo, R.; Tanaka, M.; Oyama, H.; Kojima, Y.; Yui, K.; Sakakibara, R.; Nakahigashi, R.; Adachi, M.; Nishikawa, T.; Sugita, H.; et al. Tetrodotoxins in the Flatworm Planocera multitentaculata. Toxicon 2022, 216, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yonezawa, R.; Hayashi, K.; Oyama, H.; Yoshitake, K.; Sato, S.; Senevirathna, J.D.M.; Smith, A.R.; Okabe, T.; Suo, R.; Kinoshita, S.; et al. Tissue Localization of Tetrodotoxin in the Flatworm Planocera multitentaculata (Platyhelminthes: Polycladida). Mar. Biotechnol. 2024, 26, 649–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bane, V.; Lehane, M.; Dikshit, M.; O’Riordan, A.; Furey, A. Tetrodotoxin: Chemistry, Toxicity, Source, Distribution and Detection. Toxins 2014, 6, 693–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Jal, S.; Khora, S.S. An Overview on the Origin and Production of Tetrodotoxin, a Potent Neurotoxin. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Magarlamov, T.Y.; Melnikova, D.I.; Shokur, O.A.; Gorobets, E.A. Rapid Production of Tetrodotoxin-like Compounds during Sporulation in a Marine Isolate Bacillus sp. 1839. Microbiology 2017, 86, 192–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hwang, D.-F.; Cheng, C.-A.; Chen, H.-C.; Jeng, S.-S.; Noguchi, T.; Ohwada, K.; Hashimoto, K. Microflora and Tetrodotoxin-Producing Bacteria in the Lined Moon Shell Natica lineata. Fish. Sci. 1994, 60, 567–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cheng, C.A.; Hwang, D.F.; Tsai, Y.H.; Chen, H.C.; Jeng, S.S.; Noguchi, T.; Ohwada, K.; Hasimoto, K. Microflora and Tetrodotoxin-Producing Bacteria in a Gastropod, Niotha clathrata. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1995, 33, 929–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, X.-J.; Yu, R.-C.; Luo, X.; Zhou, M.-J.; Lin, X.-T. Toxin-Screening and Identification of Bacteria Isolated from Highly Toxic Marine Gastropod Nassarius semiplicatus. Toxicon 2008, 52, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Antonelli, P.; Peruzzo, A.; Mancin, M.; Boscolo Anzoletti, A.; Dall’Ara, S.; Orsini, M.; Bordin, P.; Arcangeli, G.; Zanolin, B.; Barco, L.; et al. Tetrodotoxin in Bivalve Mollusks: An Integrated Study towards the Comprehension of the Influencing Factors of a Newly Native Phenomenon. Chemosphere 2023, 339, 139682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Biessy, L.; Pearman, J.K.; Mertens, K.N.; Réveillon, D.; Savar, V.; Hess, P.; Hampton, H.; Thompson, L.; Lebrun, L.; Terre-Terrillon, A.; et al. Sudden Peak in Tetrodotoxin in French Oysters during the Summer of 2021: Source Investigation Using Microscopy, Metabarcoding and Droplet Digital PCR. Toxicon 2024, 243, 107721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Matsumoto, T.; Nagashima, Y.; Kusuhara, H.; Ishizaki, S.; Shimakura, K.; Shiomi, K. Pharmacokinetics of Tetrodotoxin in Puffer Fish Takifugu rubripes by a Single Administration Technique. Toxicon 2008, 51, 1051–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Okabe, T.; Saito, R.; Yamamoto, K.; Watanabe, R.; Kaneko, Y.; Yanaoka, M.; Furukoshi, S.; Yasukawa, S.; Ito, M.; Oyama, H.; et al. The Role of Toxic Planocerid Flatworm Larvae on Tetrodotoxin Accumulation in Marine Bivalves. Aquat. Toxicol. 2021, 237, 105908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Dhanji-Rapkova, M.; Hatfield, R.G.; Walker, D.I.; Hooper, C.; Alewijnse, S.; Baker-Austin, C.; Turner, A.D.; Ritchie, J.M. Investigating Non-Native Ribbon Worm Cephalothrix simula as a Potential Source of Tetrodotoxin in British Bivalve Shellfish. Mar. Drugs 2024, 22, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Matsumura, K. Production of Tetrodotoxin in Puffer Fish Embryos. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1998, 6, 217–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gao, W.; Kanahara, Y.; Tatsuno, R.; Soyano, K.; Nishihara, G.N.; Urata, C.; Takatani, T.; Arakawa, O. Maturation-Associated Changes in Internal Distribution and Intra-Ovarian Microdistribution of Tetrodotoxin in the Pufferfish Takifugu pardalis. Fish. Sci. 2018, 84, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sato, S.; Kawaura, R.; Togashi, K.; Mizusawa, N.; Yasumoto, K.; Takada, K.; Amano, M.; Watabe, S. De Novo Accumulation of Tetrodotoxin and Its Analogs in Pufferfish and Newt and Dosage-Driven Accumulation of Toxins in Newt: Tissue Distribution and Anatomical Localization. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Oyama, H.; Ito, M.; Suo, R.; Goto-Inoue, N.; Morisasa, M.; Mori, T.; Sugita, H.; Mori, T.; Nakahigashi, R.; Adachi, M.; et al. Changes in Tissue Distribution of Tetrodotoxin and Its Analogues in Association with Maturation in the Toxic Flatworm, Planocera multitentaculata. Mar. Biotechnol. 2022, 24, 1158–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Malykin, G.V.; Velansky, P.V.; Melnikova, D.I.; Magarlamov, T.Y. Tetrodotoxins in Larval Development of Ribbon Worm Cephalothrix cf. simula (Palaeonemertea, Nemertea). Mar. Biotechnol. 2023, 25, 918–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Malykin, G.V.; Velansky, P.V.; Magarlamov, T.Y. First Data on Tetrodotoxins in Cephalothrix mokievskii (Palaeonemertea, Nemertea) and Possible Involvement of Poisonous Nemerteans in Toxification of Marine Bioresources. Toxicon 2024, 251, 108155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Asakawa, M.; Toyoshima, T.; Shida, Y.; Noguchi, T.; Miyazawa, K. Paralytic Toxins in a Ribbon Worm Cephalothrix Species (Nemertean) Adherent to Cultured Oysters in Hiroshima Bay, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. Toxicon 2000, 38, 763–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Asakawa, M.; Ito, K.; Kajihara, H. Highly Toxic Ribbon Worm Cephalothrix simula Containing Tetrodotoxin in Hiroshima Bay, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. Toxins 2013, 5, 376–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kajihara, H.; Sun, S.C.; Chernyshev, A.V.; Chen, H.X.; Ito, K.; Asakawa, M.; Maslakova, S.A.; Norenburg, J.L.; Strand, M.; Sundberg, P.; et al. Taxonomic Identity of a Tetrodotoxin-Accumulating Ribbon-Worm Cephalothrix simula (Nemertea: Palaeonemertea): A Species Artificially Introduced from the Pacific to Europe. Zool. Sci. 2013, 30, 985–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ali, A.E.; Arakawa, O.; Noguchi, T.; Miyazawa, K.; Shida, Y.; Hashimoto, K. Tetrodotoxin and Related Substances in a Ribbon Worm Cephalothrix linearis (Nemertean). Toxicon 1990, 28, 1083–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sagorny, C.; Wesseler, C.; Krämer, D.; von Döhren, J. Assessing the Diversity and Distribution of Cephalothrix Species (Nemertea: Palaeonemertea) in European Waters by Comparing Different Species Delimitation Methods. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2019, 57, 497–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Faasse, M.A.; Turbeville, J.M. The First Record of the North-West Pacific Nemertean Cephalothrix simula in Northern Europe. Mar. Biodivers. Rec. 2015, 8, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Turner, A.; Fenwick, D.; Powell, A.; Dhanji-Rapkova, M.; Ford, C.; Hatfield, R.; Santos, A.; Martinez-Urtaza, J.; Bean, T.; Baker-Austin, C.; et al. New Invasive Nemertean Species (Cephalothrix simula) in England with High Levels of Tetrodotoxin and a Microbiome Linked to Toxin Metabolism. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ellison, C.I.; Frey, M.R.; Sanford, E.; Maslakova, S. Ribbon Worms (Phylum Nemertea) from Bodega Bay, California: A Largely Undescribed Diversity. ZooKeys 2024, 1204, 15–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chernyshev, A.V. Nemerteans from the Far Eastern Seas of Russia. Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 2020, 46, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rawlinson, K.A. The Diversity, Development and Evolution of Polyclad Flatworm Larvae. EvoDevo 2014, 5, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Vlasenko, A.E.; Magarlamov, T.Y. Tetrodotoxins in ribbon worms Cephalothrix cf. simula and Kulikovia alborostrata from Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Toxins 2023, 15, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alkassar, M.; Sanchez-Henao, A.; Reverté, J.; Barreiro, L.; Rambla-Alegre, M.; Leonardo, S.; Mandalakis, M.; Peristeraki, P.; Diogène, J.; Campàs, M. Evaluation of Toxicity Equivalency Factors of Tetrodotoxin Analogues with a Neuro-2a Cell-Based Assay and Application to Puffer Fish from Greece. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rodriguez, P.; Alfonso, A.; Vale, C.; Alfonso, C.; Vale, P.; Tellez, A.; Botana, L.M. First Toxicity Report of Tetrodotoxin and 5,6,11-TrideoxyTTX in the Trumpet Shell Charonia lampas lampas in Europe. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 5622–5629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Reverté, J.; Rambla-Alegre, M.; Sanchez-Henao, A.; Mandalakis, M.; Peristeraki, P.; Molgó, J.; Diogène, J.; Sureda, F.X.; Campàs, M. 1 Toxicity Equivalency Factors for Tetrodotoxin Analogues 2 Determined with Automated Patch Clamp on Voltage-Gated 3 Sodium Channels in Neuro-2a Cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 32, 18192–18200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Korotkevitsch, V.S. New and Rare Nemerteans (Nemertini) from the Southern Shelf of the Sakhalin Island. Issled. Fauny Morey 1982, 29, 12–26. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bane, V.; Brosnan, B.; Barnes, P.; Lehane, M.; Furey, A. High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Tetrodotoxin (TTX) and Its Analogues in Puffer Fish and Shellfish. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2016, 33, 1468–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kudo, Y.; Yasumoto, T.; Konoki, K.; Cho, Y.; Yotsu-Yamashita, M. Isolation and structural determination of the first 8-epi-type tetrodotoxin analogs from the newt, Cynops ensicauda popei, and comparison of tetrodotoxin analogs profiles of this newt and the puffer fish, Fugu poecilonotus. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 655–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Shoji, Y.; Yotsu-Yamashita, M.; Miyazawa, T.; Yasumoto, T. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of tetrodotoxin and its analogs: Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, tandem mass spectrometry, and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem. 2001, 290, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Turner, A.D.; Dhanji-Rapkova, M.; Coates, L.; Bickerstaff, L.; Milligan, S.; O’neill, A.; Faulkner, D.; McEneny, H.; Baker-Austin, C.; Lees, D.N.; et al. Detection of tetrodotoxin shellfish poisoning (TSP) toxins and causative factors in bivalve molluscs from the UK. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Vale, P. Complex profiles of hydrophobic paralytic shellfish poisoning compounds in Gymnodinium catenatum identified by liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection and mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1195, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yotsu-Yamashita, M.; Abe, Y.; Kudo, Y.; Ritson-Williams, R.; Paul, V.J.; Konoki, K.; Cho, Y.; Adachi, M.; Imazu, T.; Nishikawa, T.; et al. First identification of 5,11-dideoxytetrodotoxin in marine animals, and characterization of major fragment ions of tetrodotoxin and its analogs by high resolution ESI-MS/MS. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 2799–2813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Chen, X.W.; Liu, H.X.; Jin, Y.B.; Li, S.F.; Bi, X.; Chung, S.; Zhang, S.S.; Jiang, Y.Y. Separation, identification and quantification of tetrodotoxin and its analogs by LC-MS without calibration of individual analogs. Toxicon 2011, 57, 938–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The mean total concentrations of tetrodotoxin and its analogues (TTXs) in mature males, mature females, post-spawning individuals of unidentified sex, and post-spawning Cephalothrix mokievskii females collected in the Aniva Bay, Sea of Okhotsk. Rectangles with dots show median values.
Figure 1. The mean total concentrations of tetrodotoxin and its analogues (TTXs) in mature males, mature females, post-spawning individuals of unidentified sex, and post-spawning Cephalothrix mokievskii females collected in the Aniva Bay, Sea of Okhotsk. Rectangles with dots show median values.
Toxins 17 00025 g001
Figure 2. Average weight of Cephalothrix mokievskii individuals from Aniva Bay, Sea of Okhotsk.
Figure 2. Average weight of Cephalothrix mokievskii individuals from Aniva Bay, Sea of Okhotsk.
Toxins 17 00025 g002
Figure 3. The percent proportions of the mean concentrations of tetrodotoxin and its analogues in the Cephalothrix mokievskii collected in Aniva Bay, Sea of Okhotsk. (a) Mature males. (b) Post-spawning individuals of unidentified sex. (c) Eggs. (d) Mature females. (e) Post-spawning females.
Figure 3. The percent proportions of the mean concentrations of tetrodotoxin and its analogues in the Cephalothrix mokievskii collected in Aniva Bay, Sea of Okhotsk. (a) Mature males. (b) Post-spawning individuals of unidentified sex. (c) Eggs. (d) Mature females. (e) Post-spawning females.
Toxins 17 00025 g003
Figure 4. The locality of Cephalothrix mokievskii sampling. (a) Geographical location of the sampling area (asterisk); (b) the habitat of C. mokievskii.
Figure 4. The locality of Cephalothrix mokievskii sampling. (a) Geographical location of the sampling area (asterisk); (b) the habitat of C. mokievskii.
Toxins 17 00025 g004
Figure 5. Live specimens of Cephalothrix mokievskii, collected on 15 August 2024 in Aniva Bay, Sea of Okhotsk. Arrows indicate the head. (a) Female. Inset shows the body with eggs (arrowheads). (b) Male.
Figure 5. Live specimens of Cephalothrix mokievskii, collected on 15 August 2024 in Aniva Bay, Sea of Okhotsk. Arrows indicate the head. (a) Female. Inset shows the body with eggs (arrowheads). (b) Male.
Toxins 17 00025 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Malykin, G.V.; Velansky, P.V.; Magarlamov, T.Y. Levels and Profile of Tetrodotoxins in Spawning Cephalothrix mokievskii (Palaeonemertea, Nemertea): Assessing the Potential Toxic Pressure on Marine Ecosystems. Toxins 2025, 17, 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17010025

AMA Style

Malykin GV, Velansky PV, Magarlamov TY. Levels and Profile of Tetrodotoxins in Spawning Cephalothrix mokievskii (Palaeonemertea, Nemertea): Assessing the Potential Toxic Pressure on Marine Ecosystems. Toxins. 2025; 17(1):25. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17010025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Malykin, Grigorii V., Peter V. Velansky, and Timur Yu. Magarlamov. 2025. "Levels and Profile of Tetrodotoxins in Spawning Cephalothrix mokievskii (Palaeonemertea, Nemertea): Assessing the Potential Toxic Pressure on Marine Ecosystems" Toxins 17, no. 1: 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17010025

APA Style

Malykin, G. V., Velansky, P. V., & Magarlamov, T. Y. (2025). Levels and Profile of Tetrodotoxins in Spawning Cephalothrix mokievskii (Palaeonemertea, Nemertea): Assessing the Potential Toxic Pressure on Marine Ecosystems. Toxins, 17(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17010025

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop