Next Article in Journal
Zearalenone, an Estrogenic Mycotoxin, Is an Immunotoxic Compound
Next Article in Special Issue
Trophic State and Toxic Cyanobacteria Density in Optimization Modeling of Multi-Reservoir Water Resource Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of a Key Residue for Oligomerisation and Pore-Formation of Clostridium perfringens NetB
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effects of the Toxic Cyanobacterium Limnothrix (Strain AC0243) on Bufo marinus Larvae
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 6
Issue 3
10.3390/toxins6031062
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Two Depuration Periods on the Activity and Transcription of Antioxidant Enzymes in Tilapia Exposed to Repeated Doses of Cylindrospermopsin under Laboratory Conditions

by
Victoria Ríos
,
Remedios Guzmán-Guillén
,
Isabel M. Moreno
,
Ana I. Prieto
,
María Puerto
,
Angeles Jos
and
Ana M. Cameán
*
Area of Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sevilla, C/Profesor García González 2, Sevilla 41012, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2014, 6(3), 1062-1079; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6031062
Submission received: 12 November 2013 / Revised: 25 February 2014 / Accepted: 27 February 2014 / Published: 13 March 2014
(This article belongs to the Collection Marine and Freshwater Toxins)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The cyanobacterial toxin Cylindrospermopsin (CYN), a potent protein synthesis inhibitor, is increasingly being found in freshwater bodies infested by cyanobacterial blooms worldwide. Moreover, it has been reported to be implicated in human intoxications and animal mortality. Recently, the alteration of the activity and gene expression of some glutathione related enzymes in tilapias (Oreochromis niloticus) exposed to a single dose of CYN has been reported. However, little is known about the effects induced by repeated doses of this toxin in tilapias exposed by immersion and the potential reversion of these biochemical alterations after two different depuration periods (3 or 7 days). In the present study, tilapias were exposed by immersion to repeated doses of a CYN-containing culture of Aphanizomenon ovalisporum during 14 days, and then were subjected to depuration periods (3 or 7 days) in clean water in order to examine the potential reversion of the effects observed. The activity and relative mRNA expression by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the antioxidant enzymes glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and soluble glutathione-S-transferases (sGST), and also the sGST protein abundance by Western blot analysis were evaluated in liver and kidney of fish. Results showed significant alterations in most of the parameters evaluated and their recovery after 3 days (GPx activity, sGST relative abundance) or 7 days (GPx gene expression, sGST activity). These findings not only confirm the oxidative stress effects produced in fish by cyanobacterial cells containing CYN, but also show the effectiveness of depuration processes in mitigating the CYN-containing culture toxic effects.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cyanobacterial toxins have become recognized as a potential hazard in drinking water worldwide [1]. Among them, Cylindrospermopsin (CYN) is an emerging toxin [2], which can be produced by several known freshwater cyanobacteria species, such as Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii, Aphanizomenon ovalisporum, Raphidiopsis curvata, and Umezakia natans [3,4,5]. This toxin is a tricyclic alkaloid comprised of a guanidine entity along with a uracil moiety potentially responsible for the toxicity [6]. It is stable in varying heat, light and pH conditions and also highly water-soluble [7]. Thus, the concentration of CYN dissolved in water can constitute as much as 90% of total CYN available [8,9]. The environmental levels of CYN detected worldwide are dependent on the season and the area of detection and the toxin producing species. Thus, in Australia, the levels of CYN produced by natural blooms of C. raciborskii and A. ovalisporum oscillated between 0.3 µg/L to 92 µg/L and 4–120 µg/L, respectively. Higher levels were measured in aquaculture ponds and farm dams produced by A. ovalisporum (589–800 µg/L). In Europe, the CYN levels detected in natural waters were lower than in Australia, thus, in Germany CYN was found in maximum concentrations of 1.80 µg/L and 11.75 µg/L produced by C. raciborskii and A. gracile in different lakes. In France, CYN was detected in eleven water bodies with concentrations up to 1.95 µg/L. In Italy, the presence of CYN was observed in levels in a range from 0.41 to 42.3 µg/L and in Spain CYN was measured in a level up to 9.4 µg/L. In Florida (USA), CYN was positively quantified in a range from 8.07 to 97.12 µg/L [10].
Different studies have revealed the environmental toxicity of CYN towards different groups of organisms, including amphibians [11], gastropods [12], fish [13,14], plants [15], and aquatic macrophytes [16], as well as antibacterial activity [17]. CYN exposure has hepatotoxic, nephrotoxic and general cytotoxic effects and can also lead to fetal toxicity, tumor initiation, micronucleus induction and chromosome loss [4,5]. The toxicity of CYN is due to the inhibition of glutathione and protein synthesis, the inhibition of cytochrome P450, and direct interaction with DNA [18,3]. A depletion of hepatic glutathione has been proved in fish in vivo [19] and in vitro [20]. More recently, some studies have shown that pure CYN is able to induce oxidative stress in tilapia fish (Oreochromis niloticus) when they are exposed to a single dose of CYN by oral route [13,19] and intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection [14]. Alterations in the activity and gene expressions of glutathione-S-transferases (GST) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) in response to a single dose of CYN, has been previously investigated in our laboratory in tilapia fish [13,21]. Results showed that tilapia exposed by gavage to 200 and 400 µg/kg bw of pure CYN and sacrificed after 24 h had alterations in different biomarkers including activity and gene expression of the enzymes GPx and GST [13]. Gutiérrez-Praena et al. [21] proved that the type of exposure and the time of sacrifice played a role in the activity and relative mRNA expression by real time PCR of GPx and GST and the sGST protein abundance.
Under natural conditions, fish are exposed to cyanobacterial blooms for sub-chronic periods, but CYN toxicological studies for long exposure periods are very scarce at the time [22], especially in the case of fish. In this sense, Guzmán-Guillén et al. [23] showed an involvement of oxidative stress as a mechanism of toxic action of CYN in tilapia after sub-chronic exposure to cyanobacterial cells containing CYN (10 and 100 μg CYN/L), for 7 and 14 day by immersion route, mimicking natural exposure). It was demonstrated that subchronic exposure to low concentrations of cyanobacterial cells containing CYN exceeding 10 μg/L should be considered of particularly high risk for fish, because evident histopathological changes were found from this concentration [24].
Several authors have studied the effect of different depuration periods on stress biomarker levels in fish and clams exposed to contaminants [25,26,27,28,29], revealing that depuration reduces the oxidative stress. However in the case of cyanobacterial toxins, depuration studies in aquatic organism are relatively scarce. Ozawa et al. [30] studied the accumulation and depuration of microcystins (MCs) in freshwater snails, and Vasconcelos et al. [31] and Tricarico et al. [32] in the crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Galanti et al. [33] investigated the detoxification dynamic of MC-LR in the shrimp Palaemonetes argentinus. Moreover, Kankaanpää et al. [34] studied the depuration mechanism of nodularin in mussel (Mytilus edulis). As far as we know, in the case of CYN, only Saker et al. [35] investigated the accumulation and depuration of CYN in the freshwater mussel Anodonta cygnea.
Taking all these data into account, the aim of this study was to investigate the transcriptional and catalytic response of the glutathione (GSH) related enzymes GPx and sGST, in tilapia fish (liver and kidney) after a dose repeated exposure (at environmentally relevant concentration) of a CYN-containing culture of Aphanizomenon ovalisporum during 14 days, and the influence of two different depuration periods (3 or 7 days) in these parameters. After CYN-exposure and both depuration periods, mRNA levels and enzymatic activities were measured for GPx and sGST, including protein abundance of sGST.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Results

No fish died and they exhibited no obvious signs of stress during the acclimation period, the exposure to A. ovalisporum culture or during the depuration periods.

2.1.1. Gluthatione Peroxidase and Gluthatione-S-Transferase Activities

In general, no changes in GPx activity were observed in the liver of fish exposed to CYN-containing culture (equivalent to 10 μg CYN/L) in any of the test groups in comparison with their controls (Figure 1a). In the kidneys, a significant increase in GPx activity was observed in fish treated with CYN and not depurated, when comparing with the control group (Figure 1b).
Toxins 06 01062 g001 1024
Figure 1. Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity (nkatals/mg protein) in liver (a) and kidney (b) of fish exposed by immersion to repeated doses of CYN-containing culture (equivalent to 10 µg CYN/L, added into aquaria every two days) for 14 days and later sacrificed (0 day) or depurated (3 or 7 days). The values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 8). The significance levels observed are ** p < 0.01 in comparison with their respective control group, && p < 0.01 when CYN exposed and no depurated fish (0 day group) and fish depurated at different times (3 or 7 days group) are compared, and ### p < 0.001 when comparing CYN-depurated fish at 3 to 7 days of depuration.
Figure 1. Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity (nkatals/mg protein) in liver (a) and kidney (b) of fish exposed by immersion to repeated doses of CYN-containing culture (equivalent to 10 µg CYN/L, added into aquaria every two days) for 14 days and later sacrificed (0 day) or depurated (3 or 7 days). The values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 8). The significance levels observed are ** p < 0.01 in comparison with their respective control group, && p < 0.01 when CYN exposed and no depurated fish (0 day group) and fish depurated at different times (3 or 7 days group) are compared, and ### p < 0.001 when comparing CYN-depurated fish at 3 to 7 days of depuration.
Toxins 06 01062 g001
Toxins 06 01062 g002 1024
Figure 2. Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity (nkatals/mg protein) in liver (a) and kidney (b) of fish exposed by immersion to repeated doses of CYN-containing culture (equivalent to 10 µg CYN/L, added into aquaria every two days) for 14 days and later sacrificed (0 day) or depurated (3 or 7 days). The values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 8). The significance levels observed are *** p < 0.001, * p < 0.05 in comparison with their respective control group, &&& p < 0.001 when CYN exposed and no depurated fish (0 day) and fish depurated at different times (3 or 7 days) are compared, and ### p < 0.001, # p < 0.05 when comparing CYN-depurated fish at 3 to 7 days of depuration.
Figure 2. Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity (nkatals/mg protein) in liver (a) and kidney (b) of fish exposed by immersion to repeated doses of CYN-containing culture (equivalent to 10 µg CYN/L, added into aquaria every two days) for 14 days and later sacrificed (0 day) or depurated (3 or 7 days). The values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 8). The significance levels observed are *** p < 0.001, * p < 0.05 in comparison with their respective control group, &&& p < 0.001 when CYN exposed and no depurated fish (0 day) and fish depurated at different times (3 or 7 days) are compared, and ### p < 0.001, # p < 0.05 when comparing CYN-depurated fish at 3 to 7 days of depuration.
Toxins 06 01062 g002
sGST activities were decreased in both organs during the exposure time (0 day group, liver: 3.8-fold and 1.4-fold in kidney) and after the early days of depuration (3 days group, 1.8-fold and 1.3-fold in liver and kidney, respectively). After 7 days of depuration, the sGST levels in liver and kidney were restored to control values, and significant differences were detected in comparison to fish exposed to cyanobacterial cells containing CYN without depuration. Moreover, significant higher values were also observed after 7 days of depuration in comparison to 3 days of depuration (Figure 2a,b).

2.1.2. Glutathione Peroxidase and Glutathione-S-Transferase Gene Expression

Significant alterations were observed in the relative gene expression of the enzyme GPx in the liver of fish exposed to cyanobacterial cells containing CYN non depurated and depurated for 3 days, in comparison to their respective control groups (4-fold and 3.5-fold up-regulation, respectively). No statistical differences were detected in fish of the longest depuration period (7 days) in comparison with their control group, and significant differences were evident between this group (7 days) and non-depurated fish and those subjected to 3 days of depuration (Figure 3a). In the kidney, all groups of fish showed significant increases in comparison to their respective control groups (4.5, 1.7 and 1.5- fold up-regulation, respectively) (Figure 3b).
Toxins 06 01062 g003 1024
Figure 3. Relative gene expression of glutathione peroxidase (GPx) (×1000) in liver (a) and kidney (b) of fish exposed by immersion to repeated doses of CYN-containing culture (equivalent to 10 µg CYN/L, added into aquaria every two days) for 14 days and later sacrificed (0 day) or depurated (3 or 7 days). The values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 8). The significance levels observed are *** p < 0.001 in comparison with their respective control group, &&& p < 0.001, & p < 0.05 when CYN exposed fish and then sacrificed and fish depurated at different times (3 or 7 days) are compared, and ### p < 0.001 when comparing CYN-depurated fish at 3 to 7days-depurated fish.
Figure 3. Relative gene expression of glutathione peroxidase (GPx) (×1000) in liver (a) and kidney (b) of fish exposed by immersion to repeated doses of CYN-containing culture (equivalent to 10 µg CYN/L, added into aquaria every two days) for 14 days and later sacrificed (0 day) or depurated (3 or 7 days). The values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 8). The significance levels observed are *** p < 0.001 in comparison with their respective control group, &&& p < 0.001, & p < 0.05 when CYN exposed fish and then sacrificed and fish depurated at different times (3 or 7 days) are compared, and ### p < 0.001 when comparing CYN-depurated fish at 3 to 7days-depurated fish.
Toxins 06 01062 g003
Regarding to sGST, both depuration processes assayed induced significant increases in the livers of fish in comparison to their respective control groups (1.7-fold and 2.8-fold for 3 or 7 days, respectively). Moreover, statistical differences were observed between fish exposed to CYN-containing culture and not depurated and those subjected to both depuration periods (1.8 and 3.5-fold for 3 or 7 days, respectively), which were more evident as time of depuration increased (7 days vs. 3 days) (Figure 4a). In the kidney, a significant enhancement was observed in all treated fish in comparison with their control groups (2.5-fold, 1.7-fold and 3-fold, respectively). Similar to the liver, significant differences were observed between both groups of CYN-exposed fish and those subjected to different depuration periods (7 days vs. 3 days) (1.7-fold) (Figure 4b).
Toxins 06 01062 g004 1024
Figure 4. Relative gene expression of Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) (×1000) in liver (a) and kidney (b) of fish exposed by immersion to repeated doses of CYN-containing culture (equivalent to 10 µg CYN/L, added into aquaria every two days) for 14 d and later sacrificed (0 day) or depurated (3 or 7 days). The values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 8). The significance levels observed are *** p < 0.001 in comparison with their respective control group, &&& p < 0.001 when CYN exposed fish and then sacrificed and fish depurated at different times (3 or 7 days) are compared, and ### p < 0.001 when comparing CYN-depurated fish at 3 to 7 days-depurated fish.
Figure 4. Relative gene expression of Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) (×1000) in liver (a) and kidney (b) of fish exposed by immersion to repeated doses of CYN-containing culture (equivalent to 10 µg CYN/L, added into aquaria every two days) for 14 d and later sacrificed (0 day) or depurated (3 or 7 days). The values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 8). The significance levels observed are *** p < 0.001 in comparison with their respective control group, &&& p < 0.001 when CYN exposed fish and then sacrificed and fish depurated at different times (3 or 7 days) are compared, and ### p < 0.001 when comparing CYN-depurated fish at 3 to 7 days-depurated fish.
Toxins 06 01062 g004

2.1.3. Glutathione-S-Transferase Protein Expression (Western Blotting)

The liver experienced a significant decrease in the protein expression of sGST in fish exposed to CYN and not depurated in comparison to their control group (0 day group). After depuration in clean water (3 or 7 days), no alterations in sGST expression were observed (Figure 5a). In the kidney, no significant changes were observed in any group of fish (Figure 5b).
Toxins 06 01062 g005 1024
Figure 5. Relative abundance of Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) protein in liver (a) and kidney (b) of fish exposed by immersion to repeated doses of CYN-containing culture (equivalent to 10 µg CYN/L, added into aquaria every two days) for 14 days and later sacrificed (0 day) or depurated (3 or 7 days). The values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 8). Results are expressed as relative abundance %. The significance levels observed are * p < 0.05 in comparison with their respective control group, & p < 0.05 when CYN exposed fish non depurated and fish depurated at different times (3 or 7 days) are compared.
Figure 5. Relative abundance of Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) protein in liver (a) and kidney (b) of fish exposed by immersion to repeated doses of CYN-containing culture (equivalent to 10 µg CYN/L, added into aquaria every two days) for 14 days and later sacrificed (0 day) or depurated (3 or 7 days). The values are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 8). Results are expressed as relative abundance %. The significance levels observed are * p < 0.05 in comparison with their respective control group, & p < 0.05 when CYN exposed fish non depurated and fish depurated at different times (3 or 7 days) are compared.
Toxins 06 01062 g005

2.1.4. Determination of CYN in Water Samples from Aquaria

The initial concentration of CYN (after adding the first dose of CYN-containing culture into the aquaria) was 11.2 ± 0.5 µg/L and increased up to 42.4 ± 0.2 µg/L after 14 days of exposure. Once fish were removed from the aquaria, no traces of CYN were detected in the clean water during the depuration periods.

2.2. Discussion

Previous studies have reported that oxidative stress might play a role in the pathogenicity of CYN on tilapia exposed to a single dose [13,21] or repeated doses [23] of this molecule. However, the influence of different depuration periods on the changes in oxidative stress biomarkers induced by CYN has not been analyzed up to date.
The biochemical function of GPx is to reduce lipid hydroperoxides to their corresponding alcohols and to reduce free hydrogen peroxide to water. Fourteen days of exposure to CYN-containing culture of A. ovalisporum by immersion have resulted in changes of GPx activity only in the kidney. An increased susceptibility of this parameter to both pure CYN and CYN-containing cyanobacterial cells in the kidney of fish in comparison to the liver has also been found by other authors [13,23]. This could be related to the hydrophilic properties of CYN. Humpage and Falconer [36] considered that the kidney appeared to be the most sensitive organ in mice as well. Moreover, studies of the body distribution of 14C-labeled CYN in mice have shown that the main excretory route is through the kidneys, with nearly 50% of an intraperitoneally (i.p.) administered dose appearing in the urine within 6 h, and 20% of the dose present in the liver [37].
The increase observed both in the GPx activity and genetic expression is in accordance with the higher levels of lipid peroxidation products induced in these fish [38] and may indicate a defensive response of the fish to the toxic insult. Moreover, the increase observed in GPx activity is also related to the reduced values of GSH/GSSG observed in this organ [38] as GSH is being used in the catalytic activity of this enzyme to scavenge reactive oxygen species. GPx gene expression was significantly altered in both organs after 14 days of exposure to CYN-containing culture. This can be interpreted as a higher sensitivity of molecular biomarkers. Other authors have also found an absence of changes on GPx activity in the liver but on the contrary significant changes on GPx gene expression, although CYN concentrations and times of exposure were different [13,21].
Regarding to the effects of the depuration periods considered, no influence was found for GPx activity in the liver as CYN-containing culture did not cause any alteration in this organ after the exposure period. Similarly, Galanti et al. [33] did not observed changes in GPx activity neither in the accumulation period (3 days) nor in the detoxification period (6 days) in the shrimp Palaemonetes argentinus exposed to MC-LR under laboratory conditions. Ferreira et al. [26] found a significant decrease of GPx activity in the liver of mullets after one month of depuration from Douro estuary contaminants. Interestingly, after 4 months the activity increased and the authors attributed this finding to the higher temperatures of this period. In the kidney, the toxic response observed in fish exposed to cyanobacterial cells containing-CYN was recovered already after 3 days of depuration. This is in agreement with the reduction of LPO induction in these fish and the early recovery (only 3 days) of the GSH/oxidized glutathione (GSSG) levels [38] during the depuration process.
GPx gene expression in the liver required 7 days of depuration to decrease the enhancement induced by CYN-containing culture and to restore the basal values. However, in the kidney, 7 days were not enough, suggesting again a higher susceptibility of this organ in comparison to the liver. No other reports have been found in the scientific literature dealing with the influence of depuration periods on the genetic expression of oxidative stress biomarkers for this toxin.
GPx activity and gene expression showed the same pattern in the liver of intoxicated fish, with an increase from day 0 to day 3 and a decrease from day 3 to 7. However, there was no coincidence in other cases (exposure and depuration). This could suggest a post-transcriptional regulation of the enzyme or the combined effect of different GPx genes, as various forms of GPx are found in vertebrates [39,40].
GST is a well-known enzyme of Phase II of the metabolism of detoxication which conjugates glutathione to certain xenobiotics compounds or to their metabolites [41]. Nevertheless it has been demonstrated that GST shows peroxidase activities and may act in the antioxidative defence [42]. In this case, GST activity showed a significant decrease both in the liver and kidney. This finding is in agreement with the reduction of GSH/GSSG observed in these fish [38]. It is not known if GST is involved in CYN metabolism. Actually, the reported CYN metabolic route is a hepatic mixed function oxidation (CYP450) resulting in still unknown metabolites with a prominent role in CYN toxicity [43]. Considering this, the changes observed in GST activity could be attributed to its antioxidative role, as CYN-containing cultures have been demonstrated to increase the oxidation of lipids, DNA and proteins [38]. Previously, we had found a different response, namely an increase of the GST activity, but fish were exposed to pure CYN by acute gavage and intraperitoneal injection [13,21]. Changes of the response of this parameter can be observed even in the same experiment. Thus, Galanti et al. [33] reported an increase in the activity of the membrane bound GST exposed to MC-LR, whereas no change was observed in the soluble GST. Moreover, additional studies reported different sGST and mGST responses after MC-LR exposure in other organisms [44,45].
sGST gene expression showed a different pattern in comparison to the activity, with no changes in the liver and an increase in the kidney of fish exposed to CYN-containing cells for 14 days. Puerto et al. [13] also found the same response in the kidney but not in the liver. Again, different CYN concentrations and exposure time lead to different results. Moreover, responses of liver and kidney can be different, because the transcription of GST isoforms varies in different ways within an organ and among organs, as Li et al. [46] deduced from a study performed on goldfish exposed to MC-LR. There are different isoforms of GSTs, as they are a multiple gene family of dimeric enzymes, which can explain the differences observed between the enzymatic activity and the gene expression or even the differential response of the organs. Also, the absence of changes in GST expression after the intoxication period does not imply the same response after 14 days. He et al. [47] observed an increase of GST expression in tilapia exposed to MC-LR after 8 h of intoxication and, unexpectedly, a decrease after 24 h.
In the case of sGST activity, the depuration process increased the values and allowed the restoration of the basal levels both in the liver and kidney in a time-dependent manner. This finding could be linked to the restoration of GSH/GSSG levels during the depuration process reported by Guzmán-Guillén et al. [38], as the activity of this enzyme depends on a steady supply of GSH. A similar response was observed by Özcan Oruç [27] in tilapia, in which case an increase of the GST activity was observed after 15 days of depuration following chlorpyrifos exposure. In P. argentinus Galanti et al. [33] also observed a significant increase of sGST and mGST during the detoxification period. Kankaanpää et al. [34] evaluated the influence of a 144 h depuration period in Mytilus edulis exposed for 24 h to nodularin, but they did not observe any change in the exposure period or in the depuration time. sGST gene expression of fish on the contrary, was not influenced by the depuration process in the kidney and resulted in higher values in the liver. This could be explained because between the gene expression of a particular enzyme and its final activity there are several molecular processes that can contribute to the differences observed.
sGST protein abundance decreased in the liver and did not show changes in the kidney. The reduction observed in the liver is in accordance with a well-known toxic mechanism of CYN, the inhibition of protein synthesis [48,49]. Thus, Humpage et al. [50] reported that the CYN parent compound was responsible for the inhibition of protein synthesis. This result is not in agreement with previous studies performed by Puerto et al. [13] and Gutiérrez-Praena et al. [21]. However, in those studies only a single dose of pure CYN was used and the observation period was shorter. The authors suggested that the dose employed was not enough or that the effect might need more time to be observed in vivo. In this regard, Kinnear [7] reported that CYN had a delayed toxicity involving multiple organ systems, principally the liver and kidneys. In this case, the continued exposure to CYN-containing cultures (equivalent to 10 µg CYN/L) for 14 days was enough to induce this toxic effect.
The relative abundance of sGST proteins did not correlate in all cases with the activity and the gene expression of the enzyme, suggesting that there is a regulation at the transcriptional and translational level or posttranslational modifications.
The depuration period for this parameter showed a positive influence on the liver, as values were restored to the basal levels already after 3 days. The effect on the kidneys could not be observed due to the fact that cyanobacterial cells that had been exposed to CYN did not affect this biomarker.
The overall positive effects of the depuration periods on the toxicity induced by CYN on oxidative stress biomarkers have been reported previously for other contaminants [28,33,34,51]. These reports suggest that the time necessary to detect the influence of the depuration process is different for every contaminant, and it depends among other factors on the intensity of the toxic exposure, the detoxifying mechanisms available, the elimination kinetic of the toxic substance and the biomarker investigated.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Chemicals and Reagents

CYN standard (purity > 95%) was supplied by Alexis Corporation (Lausen, Switzerland). Standard solutions of CYN were prepared in water milli Q (100 μg/mL, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and diluted as required for their use as working solutions (0.08–5.0 μg/mL). All chemicals and reagents used for the different assays and analysis were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Madrid, Spain) and VWR International Eurolab S.L. (Seville, Spain). Deionized water (>18 MΩ cm−1 resistivity) was obtained from a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). BOND ELUT® Carbon cartridges (500 mg, 6 mL) were supplied by Agilent Technologies (Amstelveen, The Netherlands). Protein assay reagent was obtained from BioRad Laboratories (Hercules, CA, USA).

3.2. Aphanizomenon Ovalisporum Culture

Aphanizomenon ovalisporum (LEGE X-001) cyanobacterial CYN-producing strain (CYN+) was isolated from Lake Kinneret, Israel [52] and supplied by the Marine Research Center (Porto, Portugal). This strain was culture in Z8 medium, temperature of 25 °C, 28 µmol photons m−2s−1 of light intensity in continuous illumination. After 33 days, cultures were harvested by decanting with plankton net (20 µm diameter). The biomass obtained was frozen at –80 °C.

3.3. CYN Extraction and Analysis

For this study LEGE X-001 extract was analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)/MS in order to calculate the CYN present in the extract and produced per cell. CYN extraction from the culture of A. ovalisporum (CYN+) and determination by LC-MS/MS was performed based on Guzmán-Guillén et al. [53]. CYN was detected (retention time of 9.55 min) and quantified, and the concentration of CYN obtained was 0.1 μg CYN/mg of culture. Moreover, its deoxy-derivative (deoxy-CYN) has been also detected in the sample culture (retention time of 9.77 min), it was quantified using the CYN calibration curve (equivalent of CYN), and the concentration obtained was 0.012 μg deoxy-CYN/mg.

3.4. Experimental Set up and Fish Acclimation

Fish (Male O. niloticus, Nile tilapia, Perciformes: Cichlidae) were obtained from a fish hatchery “Aquaculture Valencia” and maintained at the laboratory to reach the average weight of 20 ± 8 g and 7.8 ± 2 cm length. Fish were held in aquaria (eight individuals/aquarium) with 96 L of fresh water. Exposure to chlorine was minimized by filling the tanks at least 3 days before the fish were introduced. The aquaria were also set up with a continuous system of water filtration and aeration (Eheim Liberty 150 (Eheim, Deizisau, Germany) and Bio-Espumador cartridges (Eheim, Deizisau, Germany)). The temperature was kept constant (21 ± 2 °C). Dissolved oxygen values were maintained between 6.5 and 7.5 mg/L. Mean values for additional parameters of water quality were: pH 7.6 ± 0.3, conductivity 287 µS/cm, Ca2+ 0.60 mM/L and Mg2+ 0.3 mM/L. Fish were fed with commercial fish food (ciprinidos, 2 mm, Dibaq, Segovia, Spain) and were acclimatized for 15 days before the beginning of the experiment.

3.5. Experimental Exposure

After the acclimation period, six groups of tilapia (n = 8) were established as is shown in Table 1.
Table
Table 1. Treatment conditions of Tilapia fish (Oreochromis niloticus) exposed to A.ovalisporum (CYN+) culture by immersion.
Table 1. Treatment conditions of Tilapia fish (Oreochromis niloticus) exposed to A.ovalisporum (CYN+) culture by immersion.
Groups of Tilapia fish
Treatment conditionPeriod of treatment123456
Exposure to A. ovalisporum (CYN+) culture14 days-+-+-+
Depuration period0 day++----
3 days--++--
7 days----++
CYN+ = Cells containing Cylindrospermopsin; +, submitted to the treatment condition (exposed/depurated); -, not submitted to the treatment condition (exposed/depurated).
The experiment included a 14-days exposure period followed either by no depuration (Group 2), 3 days (Group 4) or 7 days depuration (Group 6). Controls were included for each experimental group for the same time period (Groups 1, 3, and 5). In addition, fish from Groups 2, 4, and 6 were exposed to CYN-containing culture of LEGE X-001 (Marine Research Center, Porto, Portugal) by immersion during 14 days. Cyanobacterial cells were added into the aquaria in an adequate quantity in order to obtain 10 µg CYN/L water. Afterwards, every 2 days the same amount of cyanobacterial cells was added to the aquaria during the exposure period. This concentration was selected in accordance with our previous experiment carried out in this fish species, in which 10 and 100 µg/L induced damage when fish were exposed sub-chronically by immersion with these concentrations [23]. All groups of fish were fed with commercial fish food (0.3 g/day). At the end of the exposure period, the fish from Aquaria 1–2 were sampled and sacrificed immediately. Fish in Aquarium 1 did not receive the toxin and were used as controls of 14 days of exposure to CYN. At the end of both depuration periods (3 or 7 days) fish were collected and sacrificed. Tilapias from Groups 3 and 5 were used as controls in comparison with fish in Aquaria 4 and 6 previously exposed for 14 days to CYN and subsequently depurated for 3 or 7 days, respectively. The procedure was designed to simulate the fish diet during and after a toxic A. ovalisporum bloom, whereas other feeding sources (represented by the fish food) were available at all times as well.
CYN total levels in the aquaria throughout exposure and depuration periods were measured every 48 h based on Guzmán-Guillén et al. [54] using LC-MS/MS, Briefly, 200 mL of water from each aquarium were subjected to freeze-thaw cycles twice as a cell disruption method, in combination with ultrasonication (15 min), and stirring (15 min). The resulting mixture was centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 15 min and filtered through a glass fiber filter (45 mm). For the clean-up procedure, graphitized carbon cartridges (Bond Elut®, Amstelveen, The Netherlands) were activated with 10 mL of a solvent mixture of dichloromethane (DCM) and methanol (MeOH) (10/90) acidified with 5% formic acid (v/v) and rinsed with 10 mL of MilliQ water. Subsequently, the sample was passed through the cartridges, washed with 10 mL of MilliQ water and eluted with 10 mL DCM/MeOH (10/90). In order to concentrate the sample, the extract was evaporated in a rotary evaporator and resuspended in 250 µL MilliQ water prior to its LC-MS/MS analysis.
The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) of the toxin were 0.5 and 0.9 µg CYN/L, respectively.

3.6. Preparation of Postmitochondrial Supernatant (PMS)

Fish were anesthetized in ice water and sacrificed by transection of the spinal cord. The livers and kidneys were quickly removed, weighed, rinsed with ice-cold 0.9% saline solution, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and kept at –85 °C until use. Enzyme extracts from each tissue were prepared from each individual (not pooled) according to the method described by Puerto et al. [55]. Briefly, tissues were homogenized using 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) containing 20% (v/v) glycerol, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 1.4 mM dithioerythritol. After removal of cell debris (10 min at 13,000 g), the membrane fraction was separated by centrifugation at 105,000 g for 60 min. The remaining supernatant, defined as the soluble (cytosolic) fraction, was used for biochemical measurements.

3.7. Protein Estimation

Protein contents in the samples were estimated by the method of Bradford [56] using bovine γ-globulin as standard. Briefly, 5 μL of the diluted samples were mixed with 250 µL Coomassie Brilliant blue dye (Biorad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and the absorbance was read at 595 nm in the spectrophotometer (Tecan Infinite M200, Männedorf, Switzerland).

3.8. Glutathione Peroxidase and Glutathione-S-Transferase Activities

Glutathione peroxidase (GPx; EC 1.11.1.9) activity was assayed following the rate of NADPH oxidation at 340 nm by the coupled reaction with glutathione reductase [13]. The specific activity was determined using the extinction coefficient of 6.22 mM−1 cm−1.
Glutathione-S-transferase activity (sGST; EC 2.5.1.18) was measured in the liver and renal homogenates according to the method described by Habig et al. [57], by monitoring the formation of a conjugate at 340 nm and the formation of a conjugate between 16 mM GSH and 16 mM 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) [13]. The results of both enzymatic activities were expressed as nkat/mg protein.

3.9. RNA Preparation and Reverse Transcription

Total RNA was extracted and purified using the RNeasy Mini Kit™ (Cat # 74104, Qiagen, Madrid, Spain) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, as previously described by Puerto et al. [58]. The RNA integrity was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis. RNA quality was assessed as the 260/280 nm absorbance ratio using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The RNA was then stored at −80 °C before further processing. Reverse transcription (RT) into cDNA was carried out with the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Madrid, Spain) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA was stored at −20 °C until further use.

3.10. Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

A semi quantitative real-time polymares chain reaction (RT-PCR) protocol was developed to measure the mRNA levels of GPx, sGST in the liver and kidneys of tilapia, using beta-actin as protein control. The cDNA obtained was diluted in miliQ sterile water and used for the amplification by PCR. The forward and reverse primers used in this study are shown in Table 2.
Table
Table 2. Nucleotides sequences (5'-3') of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers of beta-actine, GPx and sGST.
Table 2. Nucleotides sequences (5'-3') of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers of beta-actine, GPx and sGST.
GeneForward primerReverse primer
Beta-actineCAATGAGAGGTTCCGTTGCAGGATTCCATACCAAGGAAGG
GPxCCAAGAGAACTGCAAGAACGACAGGACACGTCATTCCTACAC
GSTTAATGGGAGAGGGAAGATGGCTCTGCGATGTAATTCAGGA
All mRNA sequences were obtained from GenBank (DQ355022, EU234530, EF206801, for GPx, sGST and beta-actin, respectively). PCR primers for GPx, sGST and beta-actine were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Madrid, Spain). Each specific gene product was amplified by RT-PCR using LightCycler®480 System (Roche, Berlin, Germany) according to the following parameters: 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 10 min, 95 °C for 15 s (40 cycles), 60 °C for 1 min (40 cycles), 72 °C for 10 min (40 cycles) and 4 °C until the pickup of the samples. Amplification data were collected by the sequence detector and analyzed with sequence detection software supplied by the manufacturer. For each assay, a standard curve was constructed using increasing amounts of cDNA. In all cases, the slope of the curves indicated adequate PCR conditions (slopes of 3.3–3.6). The RNA concentration in each sample was determined from the threshold cycle (Ct) values and calculated with the sequence detection software supplied by the manufacturer (7000 SDS Software, Applied Biosystems, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) The quantitative fold changes in mRNA expression were determined relative to beta-actin mRNA levels in each corresponding group and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method × 1000 [59].

3.11. Western Blot Analysis for sGST

Liver and kidney tissues were prepared for measurement of sGST protein abundance by Western blot analysis. Homogenates (10% w/v) were prepared in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7, and proteinase inhibitor (1%) at 0–4 °C with a polytron homogenizer RZR2102 (Heido, Germany). The homogenate was centrifuged at 2000 g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was then used for the determination of total protein concentration [56]. Liver and kidney homogenized samples were mixed (1:1) with sample buffer containing β-mercaptoethanol (5%). Proteins were electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose membranes and immunoblotted as described by Mate et al. [60] using monoclonal anti-GST antibodies (Sigma-Adrich, Madrid, Spain), diluted at 1:3000 and 1:1000 in liver and kidney, respectively. The anti-GST antibody was detected by the enhanced chemiluminiscence (ECL) method according to the supplier’s protocol and using a peroxidase-conjugated antimouse IgG as a secondary antibody (1:2000 dilution). The image analysis software Multi Gauge 381472 was used (Fujifilm, Madrid, Spain).

3.12. Statistical Analysis

All results were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and represent means ± SE of eight fish per group (GraphPad Instat Sofware, La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences in mean values between groups were assessed by the Tukey’s test and were considered statistically different from p < 0.05.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the depuration process is an effective measure to mitigate the toxic effects induced by CYN-containing cyanobacterial cell exposure. GPx activity and sGST relative abundance recovered their basal values after only 3 days of depuration whereas GPx gene expression and sGST activity required 7 days. These results suggest that the oxidative stress effects produced in fish by cyanobacterial cells containing CYN could be restored after depuration processes and support the use of such types of damage as indicators of exposure to CYN-containing blooms.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (CICYT, AGL2009–10026ALI) and Junta de Andalucía (P09-AGR-4672) for the financial support for this study. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the European Cooperation in Science and Technology, COST Action ES 1105 “CYANOCOST-Cyanobacterial blooms and toxins in water resources: Occurrence, impacts and management” for adding value to this study through networking and knowledge sharing with European experts and researchers in the field.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Carmichael, W.W.; Azevedo, S.M.; An, J.S.; Molica, R.J.; Jochimsen, E.M.; Lau, S.; Rinehart, K.L.; Shaw, G.R.; Eaglesham, G.K. Human fatalities from cyanobacteria: Chemical and biological evidence for cyanotoxins. Environ. Health Persp. 2001, 109, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Falconer, I.R.; Humpage, A.R. Health risk assessment of cyanobacterial (blue-green algal) toxins in drinking water. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2005, 2, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Poniedziałek, B.; Rzymski, P.; Kokociński, M. Cylindrospermopsin: Water-linked potential threat to human health in Europe. Environ. Toxicol. Phar. 2012, 34, 651–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Merel, S.; Walker, D.; Chicana, R.; Snyder, S.; Baurès, E.; Thomas, O. State of knowledge and concerns on cyanobacterial blooms and cyanotoxins. Environ. Int. 2013, 59, 303–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Neilan, B.A.; Pearson, L.A.; Muenchhoff, J.; Moffitt, M.C.; Dittmann, E. Environmental conditions that influence toxin biosynthesis in cyanobacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 1239–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Banker, R.; Carmeli, S.; Werman, M.; Teltsch, B.; Poral, R.; Sukenik, A. Uracil moiety is required for toxicity of the cyanobacterial hepatotoxin cylindrospermopsin. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2001, 62, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kinnear, S. Cylindrospermopsin: A decade of progress on bioaccumulation research. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 542–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chiswell, R.K.; Shaw, G.R.; Eaglesham, G.; Smith, M.J.; Norris, R.L.; Seawright, A.A.; Moore, M.R. Stability of cylindrospermopsin, the toxin from cyanobacterium, Cylindropsermopsis raciborskii: Effect of pH, temperature, and sunlight on decomposition. Environ. Toxicol. 1999, 14, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rücker, J.; Stüken, A.; Nixdorf, B.; Fastner, J.; Chorus, I.; Wiedner, C. Concentrations of particulate and dissolved cylindrospermopsin in 21 Aphanizomenon-dominated temperate lakes. Toxicon 2007, 50, 800–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. De La Cruz, A.A.; Hiskia, A.; Kaloudis, T.; Chernoff, N.; Hill, D.; Antoniou, M.G.; He, X.; Loftin, K.; O’Shea, K.; Zhao, C.; et al. A review on cylindrospermopsin: the global occurrence, detection, toxicity and degradation of a potent cyanotoxin. Environ. Sci. 2013, 15, 1979–2003. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kinnear, S.H.W.; Fabbro, L.D.; Duivenvoorden, L.J.; Hibberd, E.M.A. Multiple-organ toxicity resulting from cylindrospermopsin exposure in tadpoles of the cane toad (Bufo marinus). Environ. Toxicol. 2007, 22, 550–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. White, S.H.; Duivenvoorden, L.J.; Fabbro, L.D.; Eaglesham, G.K. Influence of intracellular toxin concentration on cylindrospermopsin bioaccumulation in freshwater gastropod (Melanoides tuberculata). Toxicon 2006, 47, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Puerto, M.; Jos, A.; Pichardo, S.; Gutiérrez-Praena, D.; Cameán, A.M. Acute effects of pure Cylindrospermopsin on the activity and transcription of antioxidant enzymes in Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) exposed by gavage. Ecotoxicology 2011, 20, 1852–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gutiérrez-Praena, D.; Jos, A.; Pichardo, S.; Moyano, R.; Blanco, A.; Monterde, J.; Cameán, A.M. Time-dependent histopathological changes induced in Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) after acute exposure to pure cylindrospermopsin by oral and intraperitoneal route. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2012, 76, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Metcalf, J.S.; Barakate, A.; Codd, G.A. Inhibition of plant protein synthesis by the cyanobacterial hepatotoxin, cylindrospermopsin. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 235, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kinnear, S.H.W.; Fabbro, L.D.; Duivenvoorden, L.J. Variable growth responses of water thyme (Hydrilla verticillata) to whole-cell extracts of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2008, 54, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rasmussen, J.P.; Cursaro, M.; Froscio, S.M.; Saint, C.P. An examination of the antibiotic effects of cylindrospermopsin on common gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and the protozoan Naegleria lovaniensis. Environ. Toxicol. 2008, 23, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Žegura, B.; Štraser, A.; Filipic, M. Genotoxicity and potential carcinogenicity of cyanobacterial toxins—A review. Mutat. Res. 2011, 727, 16–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gutiérrez-Praena, D.; Jos, A.; Pichardo, S.; Cameán, A.M. Oxidative stress responses in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) exposed to a single dose of pure cylindrospermopsin under laboratory conditions: influence of the exposure way and the time of sacrifice. Aquat. Toxicol. 2011, 105, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gutiérrez-Praena, D.; Pichardo, S.; Jos, M.A.; Cameán, A.M. Toxicity and glutathione implication in effects observed by exposure of the liver fish cell line PLHC-1 to pure cylindrospermopsin. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2011, 74, 1567–1572. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gutiérrez-Praena, D.; Jos, A.; Pichardo, S.; Puerto, M.; Cameán, A.M. Influence of the exposure way and the time of sacrifice on the effects induced by a single dose of pure Cylindrospermopsin on the activity and transcription of glutathione peroxidase and glutathione-S-transferase enzymes in Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Chemosphere 2013, 90, 986–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Masten, S.; Carson, B. Cylindrospermopsin—Review of Toxicological Literature. Toxicological Summary For Cylindrospermopsin. Final Report 2000; CASRN 143545-90-8; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences: Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  23. Guzmán-Guillén, R.; Prieto, A.I.; Vasconcelos, V.M.; Cameán, A.M. Cyanobacterium producing cylindrospermopsin cause oxidative stress at environmentally relevant concentrations in sub-chronically exposed tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Chemosphere 2013, 90, 1184–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guzmán-Guillén, R.; Prieto, A.I.; Moreno, I.; Vasconcelos, V.M.; Moyano, R.; Blanco, A.; Cameán Fernandez, A.M. Cyanobacterium producing cylindrospermopsin cause histopathological changes at environmentally relevant concentrations in subchronically exposed tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Environ. Toxicol. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ferreira, M.; Moradas-Ferreira, P.; Reis-Henriques, M.A. Oxidative stress biomarkers in two resident species, mullet (Mugil cephalus) and flounder (Platichthys flesus), from a polluted site in River Douro Estuary, Portugal. Aquat. Toxicol. 2005, 71, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ferreira, M.; Moradas-Ferreira, P.; Reis-Henriques, M.A. The effect of long-term depuration on levels of oxidative stress biomarkers in mullets (Mugil cephalus) chronically exposed to contaminants. Mar. Environ. Res. 2007, 64, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Özcan Oruç, E. Oxidative stress, steroid hormone concentrations and acetylcholinesterase activity in Oreochromis niloticus exposed to chlorpyrifos. Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 2010, 96, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Freitas, R.; Ramos Pinto, L.; Sampaioc, M.; Costac, A.; Silva, M.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Quintino, V.; Figueira, E. Effects of depuration on the element concentration in bivalves: Comparison between sympatric Ruditapes decussatus and Ruditapes philippinarum. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2012, 110, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gagnaire, B.; Cavalie, I.; Camilleri, V.; Adam-Guillermin, C. Effects of depleted uranium on oxidative stress, detoxification, and defence parameters of zebrafish Danio rerio. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2013, 64, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ozawa, K.; Yokoyama, A.; Ishikawa, K.; Kumagai, M.; Watanabe, M.F.; Park, H.D. Accumulation and depuration of microcystin produced by the cyanobacterium Microcystis in a freshwater snail. Limnology 2003, 4, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vasconcelos, V.; Oliveira, S.; Teles, F.O. Impact of a toxic and a non-toxic strain of Microcystis aeruginosa on the crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Toxicon 2001, 39, 1461–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tricarico, E.; Bertocchi, S.; Brusconi, S.; Casalone, E.; Gherardi, F.; Giorgi, G.; Mastromei, G.; Parisi, G. Depuration of microcystin-LR from the red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii with assessment of its food quality. Aquaculture 2008, 285, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Galanti, L.N.; Ame, M.V.; Wunderlin, D.A. Accumulation and detoxification dynamic of cyanotoxins in the freshwater shrimp Palaemonetes argentinus. Harmful Algae 2013, 27, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kankaanpää, H.; Leinio, S.; Olin, M.; Sjövall, O.; Meriluoto, J.; Lehtonen, K.K. Accumulation and depuration of cyanobacterial toxin nodularin and biomarker responses in the mussel Mytilus edulis. Chemosphere 2007, 68, 1210–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Saker, M.L.; Metcalf, J.S.; Codd, G.A.; Vasconcelos, V.M. Accumulation and depuration of the cyanobacterial toxin cylindrospermopsin in the freshwater mussel Anodonta cygnea. Toxicon 2004, 42, 185–194. [Google Scholar]
  36. Humpage, A.R; Falconer, I.R. Oral toxicity of the cyanobacterial toxin cylindrospermopsin in male swiss albino mice: determination of no observed adverse effect level for deriving a drinking water guideline value. Environ. Toxicol. 2003, 18, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Norris, R.L.; Seawright, A.A.; Shaw, G.R.; Smith, M.J.; Chiswell, R.K.; Moore, M.R. Distribution of 14C-cylindrospermopsin in vivo in the mouse. Environ. Toxicol. 2001, 16, 498–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guzmán-Guillén, R.; Prieto, A.I.; Moreno, I.; Ríos, V.; Vasconcelos, V.M.; Cameán, A.M. Effects of depuration on oxidative biomarkers in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) after subchronic exposure to cyanobacterium producing cylindrospermopsin. Aquatic Toxicol. 2014, 149, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vernet, P.; Rock, E.; Mazur, A.; Rayssiguier, Y.; Dufaure, J.P.; Drevet, J.R. Selenium-independent epididymis-restricted glutathione peroxidase 5 protein (GPX5) can back up failing Se-dependent GPXs in mice subjected to selenium deficiency. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1999, 54, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, L.; Liang, X.F.; Liao, W.Q.; Lei, L.M.; Han, B.P. Structural and functional characterization of microcystin detoxification-related liver genes in a phytoplanktivorous fish, Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2006, 144, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Almar, M.; Otero, L.; Santos, C.; González Gallego, J. Liver glutathione content and glutathione-dependent enzymes of two species of freshwater fish as bioindicators of chemical pollution. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 1998, 33, 769–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Paris-Palacios, S.; Biagianti-Risbourg, S.; Vernet, G. Biochemical and (ultra)structural hepatic perturbations of Brachydanio rerio (Teleostei Cyprinidae) exposed to two sublethal concentrations of copper sulfate. Aquat. Toxicol. 2000, 50, 109–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Norris, R.L.G.; Seawright, A.A.; Shaw, G.R.; Senogles, P.; Eaglesham, G.K.; Smith, M.J.; Chiswell, R.K.; Moore, M.R. Hepatic xenobiotic metabolism of cylindrospermopsin in vivo in the mouse. Toxicon 2002, 40, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wiegand, C.; Pflugmacher, S.; Oberemm, A.; Meems, N.; Beattie, K.A.; Steinberg, C.E.W.; Codd, G.A. Uptake and effects of microcystin-LR on detoxification enzymes of early life stages of the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environ. Toxicol. 1999, 14, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Burmester, V.; Nimptsch, J.; Wiegand, C. Adaptation of freshwater mussels to cyanobacterial toxins: Response of the biotransformation and antioxidant enzymes. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2012, 78, 296–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, G.; Xie, P.; Fu, J.; Hao, L.; Xiong, Q.; Li, H. Microcystin-induced variations in transcription of GSTs in an omnivorous freshwater fish, goldfish. Aquat. Toxicol. 2008, 88, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. He, S.; Liang, X.; Sun, J.; Shen, D. Induction of liver GST transcriptions by tert-butylhydroquinone reduced microcystin-LR accumulation in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2013, 90, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Terao, K.; Ohmori, S.; Igarashi, K.; Ohtani, I.; Watanabe, M.F.; Harada, K.I.; Ito, E.; Watanabe, M. Electron microscopic studies on experimental poisoning in mice induced by cylindrospermopsin isolated from blue-green alga. Umezakia Natans. Toxicon 1994, 32, 833–843. [Google Scholar]
  49. Runnegar, M.T.; Kong, S.M.; Zhong, Y.Z.; Lu, S.C. Inhibition of reduced glutathione synthesis by cyanobacterial alkaloid cylindrospermopsin in cultured rat hepatocytes. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1995, 49, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Humpage, A.R.; Fontaine, F.; Froscio, S.M.; Burcham, P.C.; Falconer, I.R. Cylindrospermopsin genotoxicity and cytotoxicity: role of cytochrome P-450 and oxidative stress. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2005, 68, 739–753. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sun, Y.; Yu, H.; Zhang, J.; Yin, Y.; Shi, H.; Wang, X. Bioaccumulation, depuration and oxidative stress in fish Carassius auratus under phenanthrene exposure. Chemosphere 2006, 63, 1319–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Banker, R.; Carmeli, S.; Hadas, O.; Teltsch, B.; Poral, R.; Sukenik, A. Identification of cylindrospermopsin in Aphanizomenon ovalisporum (cyanophyceae) isolated from Lake Kinneret, Israel. J. Phycol. 1997, 33, 613–616. [Google Scholar]
  53. Guzmán-Guillén, R.; Prieto Ortega, A.I.; Moreno, I.; González, A.G.; Soria-Díaz, M.E.; Vasconcelos, V.; Cameán, A.M. Development and optimization of a method for the determination of Cylindrospermopsin from strains of Aphanizomenon cultures: intra-laboratory assessment of its accuracy by using validation standards. Talanta 2012, 100, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Guzmán-Guillén, R.; Prieto, A.I.; González, A.G.; Soria-Díaz, M.E.; Cameán, A.M. Cylindrospermopsin determination in water by LC-MS/MS: Optimization and validation of the method and application to real samples. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012, 31, 2233–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Puerto, M.; Prieto, A.I.; Pichardo, S.; Moreno, I.; Jos, A.; Moyano, R.; Cameán, A.M. Effects of dietary N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on the oxidative stress induced in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) exposed to a microcystin-producing cyanobacterial water bloom. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2009, 28, 1679–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bradford, M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Habig, W.H.; Pabst, M.J.; Jakoby, W.B. Glutathione S-transferases: The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. Biol. Chem. 1974, 249, 7130–7139. [Google Scholar]
  58. Puerto, M.; Gutiérrez-Praena, D.; Prieto, A.I.; Pichardo, S.; Jos, A.; Miguel-Carrasco, J.L.; Vázquez, C.M.; Cameán, A. Subchronic effects of cyanobacterial cells on the transcription of antioxidant enzyme genes in tilapia (Oreochromis sp.). Ecotoxicology 2010, 20, 479–490. [Google Scholar]
  59. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using Real-Time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mate, A.; Barfull, A.; Hermosa, A.M.; Gomez-Amores, L.; Vazquez, C.M.; Planas, J.M. Regulation of sodium-glucose cotransporter SGLT1 in the intestine of hypertensive rats. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2006, 291, 760–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ríos, V.; Guzmán-Guillén, R.; Moreno, I.M.; Prieto, A.I.; Puerto, M.; Jos, A.; Cameán, A.M. Influence of Two Depuration Periods on the Activity and Transcription of Antioxidant Enzymes in Tilapia Exposed to Repeated Doses of Cylindrospermopsin under Laboratory Conditions. Toxins 2014, 6, 1062-1079. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6031062

AMA Style

Ríos V, Guzmán-Guillén R, Moreno IM, Prieto AI, Puerto M, Jos A, Cameán AM. Influence of Two Depuration Periods on the Activity and Transcription of Antioxidant Enzymes in Tilapia Exposed to Repeated Doses of Cylindrospermopsin under Laboratory Conditions. Toxins. 2014; 6(3):1062-1079. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6031062

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ríos, Victoria, Remedios Guzmán-Guillén, Isabel M. Moreno, Ana I. Prieto, María Puerto, Angeles Jos, and Ana M. Cameán. 2014. "Influence of Two Depuration Periods on the Activity and Transcription of Antioxidant Enzymes in Tilapia Exposed to Repeated Doses of Cylindrospermopsin under Laboratory Conditions" Toxins 6, no. 3: 1062-1079. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6031062

APA Style

Ríos, V., Guzmán-Guillén, R., Moreno, I. M., Prieto, A. I., Puerto, M., Jos, A., & Cameán, A. M. (2014). Influence of Two Depuration Periods on the Activity and Transcription of Antioxidant Enzymes in Tilapia Exposed to Repeated Doses of Cylindrospermopsin under Laboratory Conditions. Toxins, 6(3), 1062-1079. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins6031062

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop