Next Article in Journal
Microfluidic Chip Fabrication of Fused Silica Using Microgrinding
Next Article in Special Issue
Design and Fabrication of a Low-Cost, Multiband and High Gain Square Tooth-Enabled Metamaterial Superstrate Microstrip Patch Antenna
Previous Article in Journal
Two-Terminal Nonvolatile Write-Once-Read-Many-Times Memory Based on All-Inorganic Halide Perovskite
Previous Article in Special Issue
Low Profile Meandered Printed Monopole WiMAX/WLAN Antenna for Laptop Computer Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dual-Band MIMO Antenna with Enhanced Isolation for 5G NR Application

College of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2023, 14(1), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14010095
Submission received: 25 November 2022 / Revised: 14 December 2022 / Accepted: 21 December 2022 / Published: 30 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Antennas for Wireless Communication Systems)

Abstract

:
A two-port multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) antenna with dual-band characteristics operating at the fifth-generation (5G) new radio (NR) sub-6 GHz n7/n38/n41/n79 bands is proposed. The proposed MIMO antenna is composed of two symmetric antenna elements and a defected ground plane. The antenna element consists of an incomplete circular patch with two L-shaped branches. By applying the defected ground structure and the slotted stub, the current distribution on the ground plane is changed to reduce the mutual coupling between the antenna elements. The measured −10 dB reflection coefficients cover 2.34–2.71 GHz and 3.72–5.10 GHz, while the measured isolation is larger than 20 dB at the whole operating frequency band. The paper has investigated different performance parameters in terms of the envelope correction coefficient (ECC), diversity gain (DG), radiation patterns, antenna gain, and efficiency. The proposed MIMO antenna is suitable for 5G applications.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, the fifth generation (5G) communication system, when it is compared with traditional communication systems, has the advantages of high speed, wide frequency bandwidth, low power consumption, and high reliability. Meanwhile, the multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) antenna system has attracted extensive attention due to it having lower multipath fading effects, higher channel capacity, and an increased transmission rate than those of the single antenna communication system. However, there are still many challenges in designing high-isolation and compact-size MIMO antennas, such as the mutual coupling between the antenna elements [1].
Therefore, it is a critical problem in the design process of the MIMO antenna to reduce mutual coupling. Many scholars have presented various decoupling techniques to reduce mutual coupling between antennas [2,3,4,5,6,7]. In [2], an ultrawideband (UWB) MIMO antenna achieved high isolation values that are larger than 20 dB for the whole operating band by slotted stubs. A coplanar waveguide-fed MIMO antenna with high isolation values was proposed by adding a double Y-shaped branch [3]. In [4], by introducing a creative un-protruded multi-slot (UPMS) isolating element, a four-port MIMO antenna array was proposed to reduce the mutual coupling between the antenna elements further. In [5], each antenna element was placed orthogonally to achieve the good isolation of 45 dB at the band of 36.83–40.0 GHz. It is reported in [6] that a combination of a defected ground structure (DGS) and electromagnetic band gaps (EBG) can be adopted to ease mutual coupling. In [8], the mutual coupling of a four-port MIMO antenna has been reduced by the orthogonal orientation of radiating elements rather than any decoupling structures.
Furthermore, it is also challenging to design a multi-band MIMO antenna to meet substantial wireless communication bands because the same isolation method may not work at different frequency bands. Recently, several dual-band MIMO antennas have been proposed [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. In [9], a dual-notched four-element MIMO antenna with dual-band characteristics has been proposed by introducing gap sleeves and an H slot. It covers the frequency bands of 3.3–4.1 GHz and 8.2–8.6 GHz. A dual-band MIMO antenna was proposed in [10] by implementing an L-shaped feeding strip, a parasitic rectangle strip, and a modified Z-shaped radiating strip. In [13], an eight-element MIMO antenna was designed to meet the requirement of the 5G mobile terminals. A quad-element MIMO antenna with E-shaped and G-shaped stubs was presented to achieve two resonances at 1.5 GHz and 2.45 GHz, respectively in [18]. In [20], a MIMO antenna array was realized which can cover the 5G NR Bands n77/n78/n79 and WLAN 5 GHz band.
In this paper, a two-port MIMO antenna with high isolation and dual-band characteristics is presented. The antenna consists of two identical three-quarter circular patches which are placed symmetrically on the top of the substrate, with the size of 41 × 30 × 1.59 mm3. The antenna generates two frequency resonances by introducing two L-shaped branches and two step-shaped gaps in the radiators. The working bands can cover n7 (2.5–2.69 GHz), n38 (2.57–2.62 GHz), n41 (2.496–2.690 GHz), and n79 bands (4.4–5 GHz). The measured isolation is larger than 20 dB. Other MIMO antenna parameters are presented to analyze the performance, such as the S-parameters (reflection and transmission coefficients), radiation patterns, ECC, DG, and efficiencies.

2. Antenna Design and Analysis

2.1. Antenna Geometry

The configuration and prototype of the designed dual-band antenna are shown in Figure 1. The radiator of the antenna element consists of an L-shaped strip and a defective circular radiator composed of a semicircle with step-shaped strips. The radiator is fed by a 50 Ω micro-strip feedline. Two identical antenna elements are printed on a 1.59 mm thick FR4 substrate with relative permittivity of 4.4 and loss tangent of 0.02. A cambered ground plane is printed on the bottom of the substrate. High isolation is achieved by etching a C-shaped slot, a rectangular slot, and a rectangular slit. Through simulation and optimization, the detailed parameters are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Design Process

Figure 2 presents the detailed process for the proposed antenna to study the performance of the 5G dual-band monopole antenna. Because two antenna elements are placed symmetrically to share the ground plane, S11 and S21 are the same as S22 and S12, respectively. For simplicity, we only discuss S11 and S21. The simulated S-parameters are plotted in Figure 3. In Antenna 1, a three-quarters circular radiation patch with the circular slotted ground plane is designed. Antenna 1 can achieve a −10 dB impedance bandwidth of 500 MHz (2–2.5 GHz) and 1880 MHz (4.05–5.93 GHz). However, the isolation between the radiating elements is non-ideal over the operation bands, which is illustrated in Figure 3b. In Antenna 2, an L-shaped branch is designed to realize a lower frequency shift (right) and a higher frequency shift (left), which can be seen in Figure 3a. By adding an inverted U-shaped slot and an I-shaped slot on the back side, it can reduce the mutual coupling between the antenna elements. In addition, as shown in Antenna 3, introducing the step-shaped radiating elements can realize useful impedance bandwidth. The result indicates that the impedance bandwidth covers 2.33–2.68 GHz and 3.93–5.13 GHz, and the value of S21 adjacent to the defected ground structure decreases to below −24 dB and −17 dB in the 2.5 GHz and 4.5 GHz bands, respectively. Finally, a T-shaped slot and a G-shaped slot are incorporated at the bottom plane to reduce the mutual coupling to below −15 dB for the entire frequency band.

2.3. Parametric Study

The radiators can generate two resonances. The incomplete circular radiation patch generates the lower resonance of the antenna, and the L-shaped antenna branches can generate the higher resonance. Figure 4 describes the two resonance frequencies, which can be independently tuned by changing the values of R2 and H1. When the value of R2 increases, the lower resonance shifts to the lower frequencies, as is shown in Figure 4a. When the value of H1 increases, the ground current path increases, the lower resonance frequency remains at 2.5 GHz, the higher resonance frequency shifts to the lower frequencies, and the −10 dB bandwidth of the higher frequency band is reduced. The optimum values of R2 and H1 are 9 mm and 2.5 mm, respectively.

2.4. Current Distribution

Figure 5 shows the simulated current distributions of the proposed antenna at 2.5 GHz and 4.7 GHz. After adding the DGS, one can see that the current from port 1 to port 2 is cut off. Therefore, high isolation is achieved because the surface current and near fields are concentrated within the decoupling structure.
When Ant_a is excited, the current is mainly concentrated on the edge of a circular patch at 2.5 GHz. While when it is working at 4.7 GHz, there is a strong current on the L-shaped branch and step-shaped part. Thus, each branch in the radiation elements is responsible for stimulating resonance. The formula controlling the relationship between excitation resonant frequency, antenna geometric parameters, and the physical characteristics is as follows:
f r = c 2 L e 2 ϵ r + 1
where Le is the total electric length of the structural antenna elements.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. S-Parameters

Figure 6 presents the simulated and measured S-parameters results for port 1, including S11 and S21. It is exhibited that the measurement results are different from the simulation results because of SMA soldering and unavoidable tolerances in the fabrication and measurement process. To be specific, it is observed that the measured −10 dB impedance band can cover the n7 (2.5–2.69 GHz), n38 (2.57–2.62 GHz), n41 (2.496–2.690 GHz), and n79 bands (4.4–5 GHz) in Figure 6a. From the transmission curves, it can be seen that S21 is below −20 dB over the whole operating frequency band (2.0–6.0 GHz).

3.2. Radiation Pattern

To study the radiation mechanism of the antenna in-depth, Figure 7 presents the measured far-field radiation patterns in the H-plane and the E-plane at 2.5 GHz and 4.7 GHz, respectively. During the measurement and simulation, one port is excited, while the other one is matched with a 50 Ω load terminal. The proposed antenna has nearly stable omnidirectional radiation patterns in the H-plane at 2.5 GHz and 4.7 GHz. At 2.5 GHz, the E-plane is shown as a bidirectional model, while the radiation patterns appear deformed in the E-plane at 4.7 GHz. There is no effect on the radiation performance.

4. The Performance Evaluation of MIMO Antenna Systems

4.1. The Realized Peak Gain and Efficiency

Gain, as one of the critical parameters of the antenna, is used to measure the antenna’s ability to receive and transmit signals. Figure 8 shows the gain and radiation efficiency of the proposed MIMO antenna. It is presented that the peak gain of the proposed antenna is around 3 dBi for the 2.5 GHz band, and it is around 3.8 dBi for the 4.7 GHz band, while the measured radiation efficiency is higher than 62% and 66% in the operating bands, respectively.

4.2. Envelope Correlation Coefficient and Diversity Gain

In addition, gain, the envelope correlation coefficient, and diversity gain are also considered to be valuable parameters to evaluate the antenna system performance. ECC represents the degree of correlation between the antenna elements of a multiple antenna system. The calculation formulas of ECC calculated from the S-parameters or far-field radiation characteristics are shown in Equations (2) and (3) [16], respectively. However, only when the antenna efficiencies are nearly 100%, is Equation (2) accurate. Therefore, ECC is calculated using Equation (3) in this paper.
ECC = | S 11 * S 12 + S 22 * S 21 | 2 ( 1   S 11 2 + | S 21 | 2 ) ( 1   S 22 2 + | S 12 | 2 )
ρ e = [ F 1 ( θ , φ ) × F 2 ( θ , φ ) ] d 2 F 1 θ , φ 2 d F 2 θ , φ 2 d
where ‘Fi(θ,φ)’ is the radiated field of the first antenna.
On the other hand, the DG acts as the other index to evaluate the MIMO antenna isolation performance. The diversity gain is calculated through the following Equation (4):
DG = 10 1   ECC 2
Figure 9 depicts the measured values and simulated values of ECC and DG for the proposed MIMO antenna, respectively. It can be seen that the ECC is below 0.005, and the DG is greater than 9.65 dBi within the operating bands, which meets the engineering standard. A performance comparison of the proposed antenna with previous dual-band antennas is provided in Table 2. In this table, it can be observed that the presented dual-band MIMO antenna has achieved a more compact size, a lower ECC, and a higher isolation compared to those of the other referenced antennas.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, a dual-band MIMO antenna with high isolation has been designed. The size of the proposed antenna is 41 × 30 × 1.59 mm3, and the impedance matching (which is better than −10 dB) covers 5G NR sub-6 GHz n7/n38/n41/n79. The high isolation of a value that is better than 20 dB is successfully realized by adding the defected ground structure and the slotted stub between the two antenna elements. Moreover, it is found that the antenna’s lower gain and efficiency for the proposed system are 3 dBi and 62%, respectively. The measured ECC is less than 0.005, which meets the requirement of the MIMO systems. Therefore, the experimental results and the designed MIMO antenna structure exhibit that the presented antenna is preferred for 5G communication applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.X.; methodology, J.C.; optimization, L.S.; investigation, Q.L.; measurement, L.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.X.; writing—review and editing, Q.L. and G.L.; supervision and funding acquisition, G.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded in part by the Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province, under Grant No. LGG19F010009, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, under Grant No. 61671330, and Wenzhou Municipal Science and Technology Program, under Grant No. C20170005.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Garg, P.; Jain, P. Isolation improvement of MIMO antenna using a novel flower shaped metamaterial absorber at 5.5 GHz WiMAX band. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs 2020, 67, 675–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Altaf, A.; Iqbal, A.; Smida, A.; Smida, J.; Althuwayb, A.A.; Hassan, K.S.; Alibakhshikenari, M.; Falcone, F.; Limiti, E. Isolation improvement in UWB-MIMO antenna system using slotted stub. Electronics 2020, 9, 1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, J.Y.; Wang, Y.F.; Xu, J.M.; Du, C.Z. A CPW-fed UWB-MIMO antenna with high isolation and dual band-notched characteristic. Prog. Electromagn. Res. M 2021, 102, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kulkarni, J.; Desaim, A.; Sim, C.Y.D. Wideband four-port MIMO antenna array with high isolation for future wireless systems. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2021, 128, 1434–8411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sehrai, D.A.; Asifm, M.; Shoaib, N.; Ibrar, M.; Jan, S.; Alibakhshikenari, M.; Lalbakhsh, A.; Limiti, E. Compact quad-element high-isolation wideband MIMO antenna for mm-wave applications. Electronics 2021, 10, 1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Jia, Y. A low correlation and mutual coupling MIMO antenna. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 127384–127392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, Q.C.; Zhang, C.B.; Cai, Q.B.; Loh, T.H.; Liu, G. A MIMO antenna with high gain and enhanced isolation for WLAN applications. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pannu, P.; Devendra, S.K. Miniaturize four-port UWB-MIMO antenna with tri-notched band characteristics. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2021, 63, 1489–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rekha, V.S.D.; Pardhasaradhi, P.; Madhav, B.T.P.; Devi, Y.U. Dual band notched orthogonal 4-element MIMO antenna with isolation for UWB applications. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 145871–145880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, J.; Dong, G.; Cai, J.; Li, H.; Liu, G. A quad-port dual-band MIMO antenna array for 5G smartphone applications. Electronics 2021, 10, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ren, Z.; Zhao, A. Dual-band MIMO antenna with compact self-decoupled antenna pairs for 5G mobile applications. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 82288–82296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. De-sai, A.; Upadhyaya, T.; Palandoken, M.; Gocen, C. Dual band transparent antenna for wireless MIMO system applications. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2019, 61, 1845–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kiani, S.H.; Altaf, A.; Abdullah, M.; Muhammad, F.; Blaauskas, T. Eight element side edged framed MIMO antenna array for future 5G smartphones. Micromachines 2020, 11, 956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dong, G.T.; Huang, J.L.; Chen, Z.Z.; Liu, G. A compact planar dual band two-port MIMO antenna with high isolation and efficiency. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng. 2022, 32, e23245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Thummaluru, S.R.; Kumar, R.; Chaudhary, R.K. Isolation and frequency reconfigurable compact MIMO antenna for wireless local area network aplications. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2019, 13, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sipal, D.; Abegaonkar, M.P.; Koul, S.K. Highly isolated compact planar dual-band antenna with pattern diversity characteristic for MIMO terminals. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2019, 18, 762–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Naidu, P.V.; Nhanekula, M.B.; Almustafa, K.M. Design and performance analysis of MAZE shaped quad port ACS fed tri band MIMO antenna for V2V and multiband applications. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2021, 134, 153676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kannappan, L.; Palaniswamy, S.K.; Wang, L.; Kanagasabai, M.; Kumar, S.; Alsath, M.G.N.; Rao, T.R. Quad-port multiservice diversity antenna for automotive applications. Sensors 2021, 21, 8238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Du, C.Z.; Zhao, Z.L. A CPW-fed dual-band MIMO antenna with enhanced isolation for 5G application. Prog. Electromagn. Res. M. 2020, 98, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, H.D.; Tsai, Y.C.; Sim, C.Y.D.; Kuo, C. Broadband eight-antenna array design for Sub-6 GHz 5G NR bands metal-frame smartphone applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2022, 19, 1078–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The geometry and prototype of the proposed design: (a) perspective view, (b) top view, and (c) bottom view.
Figure 1. The geometry and prototype of the proposed design: (a) perspective view, (b) top view, and (c) bottom view.
Micromachines 14 00095 g001aMicromachines 14 00095 g001b
Figure 2. Design stages of the proposed design.
Figure 2. Design stages of the proposed design.
Micromachines 14 00095 g002
Figure 3. Design stage responses of the intended two-port MIMO antenna: (a) S11 responses and (b) S21 responses.
Figure 3. Design stage responses of the intended two-port MIMO antenna: (a) S11 responses and (b) S21 responses.
Micromachines 14 00095 g003
Figure 4. Reflection coefficients of the proposed MIMO antenna (a) with different values of R2 and (b) with different values of H1.
Figure 4. Reflection coefficients of the proposed MIMO antenna (a) with different values of R2 and (b) with different values of H1.
Micromachines 14 00095 g004
Figure 5. Current distributions of the proposed MIMO antenna system at (a) 2.5 GHz and (b) 4.7 GHz.
Figure 5. Current distributions of the proposed MIMO antenna system at (a) 2.5 GHz and (b) 4.7 GHz.
Micromachines 14 00095 g005
Figure 6. Simulated and measured S-parameters of the proposed MIMO antenna system: (a) S11 and (b) S21.
Figure 6. Simulated and measured S-parameters of the proposed MIMO antenna system: (a) S11 and (b) S21.
Micromachines 14 00095 g006
Figure 7. Two-dimensional radiation patterns at E-plane and H-plane for the intended two-port MIMO antenna at port-1: (a) 2.5 GHz and (b) 5.7 GHz.
Figure 7. Two-dimensional radiation patterns at E-plane and H-plane for the intended two-port MIMO antenna at port-1: (a) 2.5 GHz and (b) 5.7 GHz.
Micromachines 14 00095 g007aMicromachines 14 00095 g007b
Figure 8. Gain and radiation efficiency of the proposed MIMO antenna.
Figure 8. Gain and radiation efficiency of the proposed MIMO antenna.
Micromachines 14 00095 g008
Figure 9. Measured and simulated ECC and DG of the proposed two-element MIMO antenna.
Figure 9. Measured and simulated ECC and DG of the proposed two-element MIMO antenna.
Micromachines 14 00095 g009
Table 1. Parameters of the presented antenna (unit: mm).
Table 1. Parameters of the presented antenna (unit: mm).
ParameterW1W2W3W4W5W6
Value26.753.54.753.43.9
ParameterW7W8H1H2H3H4
Value1.54.342.512.05181.5
ParameterH5H6D1D2D3D4
Value6.540.510.50.4
ParameterD5R1R2WL
Value0.56.294130
Table 2. Performance comparison with dual-band antennas.
Table 2. Performance comparison with dual-band antennas.
Ref.Operating Bands (GHz)Isolation
(dB)
ECCGain
(dBi)
Size (mm3)
[7]2.25–2.9
5.05–6.025
>19.3<0.032.4 and 3.850 × 50 × 1.6
[12]2.23–2.46
3.22–4.04
>1210−5 and 0.0023.6 and 7.1105 × 105 × 1.83
[13]2.5–2.7
4.8–5.0
17.96 and 20.10.006 and 0.124.35 and 4.638.5 × 38.5 × 1.59
[15]2.4–2.5
5.1–5.8
15<0.21.5 and 1.538 × 38 × 1.6
[16]2.3–2.5
5–5.2
20 and 20<0.051.28 and 2.138 × 42 × 0.8
[17]2.25–2.41
4.7–6.25
>18<0.21.7 and 348 × 48 × 1.6
This work2.34–2.71
3.72–5.10
21 and 18<0.005 and <0.0013 and 3.841 × 30 × 1.59
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xi, S.; Cai, J.; Shen, L.; Li, Q.; Liu, G. Dual-Band MIMO Antenna with Enhanced Isolation for 5G NR Application. Micromachines 2023, 14, 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14010095

AMA Style

Xi S, Cai J, Shen L, Li Q, Liu G. Dual-Band MIMO Antenna with Enhanced Isolation for 5G NR Application. Micromachines. 2023; 14(1):95. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14010095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xi, Shuqi, Jing Cai, Lingrong Shen, Qiangjuan Li, and Gui Liu. 2023. "Dual-Band MIMO Antenna with Enhanced Isolation for 5G NR Application" Micromachines 14, no. 1: 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14010095

APA Style

Xi, S., Cai, J., Shen, L., Li, Q., & Liu, G. (2023). Dual-Band MIMO Antenna with Enhanced Isolation for 5G NR Application. Micromachines, 14(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14010095

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop