Next Article in Journal
Hallmarks of Splicing Defects in Cancer: Clinical Applications in the Era of Personalized Medicine
Next Article in Special Issue
Design, Implementation, Evaluation and Application of a 32-Channel Radio Frequency Signal Generator for Thermal Magnetic Resonance Based Anti-Cancer Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms in Colorectal Cancer Risk
Previous Article in Special Issue
Differences of the Immune Phenotype of Breast Cancer Cells after Ex Vivo Hyperthermia by Warm-Water or Microwave Radiation in a Closed-Loop System Alone or in Combination with Radiotherapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/cancers12061380
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Controlled Release of Therapeutics from Thermoresponsive Nanogels: A Thermal Magnetic Resonance Feasibility Study

by
Yiyi Ji
1,
Lukas Winter
2,
Lucila Navarro
3,4,
Min-Chi Ku
1,
João S. Periquito
1,
Michal Pham
1,
Werner Hoffmann
2,
Loryn E. Theune
3,
Marcelo Calderón
3,5,6 and
Thoralf Niendorf
1,7,*
1
Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), 13125 Berlin, Germany
2
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), 10587 Berlin, Germany
3
Freie Universität Berlin, Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 14195 Berlin, Germany
4
Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC), Universidad Nacional del Litoral (UNL)—Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Santa Fe 3000, Argentina
5
POLYMAT and Applied Chemistry Department, Faculty of Chemistry, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
6
IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48013 Bilbao, Spain
7
Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, 13125 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2020, 12(6), 1380; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061380
Submission received: 31 March 2020 / Revised: 23 May 2020 / Accepted: 25 May 2020 / Published: 27 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hyperthermia-based Anticancer Treatments)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Thermal magnetic resonance (ThermalMR) accommodates radio frequency (RF)-induced temperature modulation, thermometry, anatomic and functional imaging, and (nano)molecular probing in an integrated RF applicator. This study examines the feasibility of ThermalMR for the controlled release of a model therapeutics from thermoresponsive nanogels using a 7.0-tesla whole-body MR scanner en route to local drug-delivery-based anticancer treatments. The capacity of ThermalMR is demonstrated in a model system involving the release of fluorescein-labeled bovine serum albumin (BSA-FITC, a model therapeutic) from nanometer-scale polymeric networks. These networks contain thermoresponsive polymers that bestow environmental responsiveness to physiologically relevant changes in temperature. The release profile obtained for the reference data derived from a water bath setup used for temperature stimulation is in accordance with the release kinetics deduced from the ThermalMR setup. In conclusion, ThermalMR adds a thermal intervention dimension to an MRI device and provides an ideal testbed for the study of the temperature-induced release of drugs, magnetic resonance (MR) probes, and other agents from thermoresponsive carriers. Integrating diagnostic imaging, temperature intervention, and temperature response control, ThermalMR is conceptually appealing for the study of the role of temperature in biology and disease and for the pursuit of personalized therapeutic drug delivery approaches for better patient care.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The delivery of therapeutics to its target site is crucial for a successful anticancer treatment. Lack of specificity in the delivery of drug formulations can cause systemic side effects, series toxicities in non-tumorous tissue, and/or low drug concentrations at the target constraining the therapeutic outcome [1]. To address these shortcomings, nanotechnology has played an important role in the “smart” delivery of drugs, contrast agents, genes, proteins, etc. [2,3,4,5]. One of the recent approaches for effective delivery is based on stimuli-responsive, so-called “smart” carriers that deliver their cargo in response to one or more stimuli such as pH, light, or temperature [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Among all, the thermal stimulus using mild hyperthermia is particularly interesting as it can be externally applied and thus be spatially and temporally controlled.
Many formulations of temperature-sensitive or thermoresponsive carriers were developed for biomedical applications [12]. From these, thermoresponsive nanogels are nanosized soft polymeric gel particles capable of holding large amounts of water and thus emerged as a hydrophilic platform to encapsulate a variety of cargo molecules [8,13]. The thermoresponsive polymer poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) is widely used in the formulation of thermoresponsive nanogels as it is biocompatible and shows a transition temperature close to body temperature [14]. The use of such thermoresponsive polymers in crosslinked nanogel networks yields temperature-sensitive particles, which collapse when their so-called “volume phase transition temperature” (VPTT) is exceeded. This collapse is accompanied by the expulsion of the inner water molecules and can be used as a trigger for the release of encapsulated cargoes [13].
Techniques for heating tissue in vivo build upon various forms of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) including but not limited to interstitial radio frequency (RF) and microwave (MW) probes, RF antenna arrays, laser light [15,16,17,18], and high-intensity focus ultrasound (HIFU) [19,20,21]. Laser light devices have been employed for drug delivery in superficial tumors and are reported to be constrained by depth penetration which is challenging if not prohibitive for deep-seated tumor treatment. Interstitial RF and MW probes can reach deeper locations. These probes are invasive and are primarily used for thermal ablation (T > 50 °C) to directly kill the cells rather than mild hyperthermia (T = 40–43 °C) which does not cause cell necrosis but increases perfusion and permeability and promotes accumulation of nanocarriers in the tumor site [11,22,23]. HIFU presents a valuable alternative for mild hyperthermia-induced drug release and has shown promising results in the study of small tumor sites [24,25,26]. Hyperthermia using extracorporeal RF antenna arrays is non-invasive and affords heating of larger targets [27,28]. Any in vivo heating modality and therapy strongly benefits from imaging guidance that provides exquisite anatomic reference, facilitates functional contrast, and supports temperature mapping and therapy detection.
Magnetic resonance (MR) is a mainstay of diagnostic imaging. MR imaging (MRI) employs radio frequency waves for signal transmission and signal reception to form anatomical images. Ultrahigh field MR (UHF-MR, magnetic field strength B0 ≥ 7.0-tesla, f ≥ 297 MHz) employs higher radio frequencies than conventional MR and has a unique potential to provide controlled temperature manipulation based on constructive interference of the RF waves transmitted within an MRI system. At UHF-MR (f = 297 MHz), the transmitted RF signal has an effective wavelength of ~13 cm in tissue. At this wavelength, the RF energy can be concentrated in a focal region without being too much attenuated in deep tissue, as opposed to microwave or near-infrared heating. This approach facilitates RF controlled delivery of a thermal stimulus and permits targeted hotspots in tissue. For example, for brain tissue, a hotspot size as small as (6 × 9) mm2 was reported for an RF frequency of f = 297 MHz [29,30]. On the other hand, large heating volumes (~500 mL) can also be achieved by manipulating the phase, power, and frequency of different channels of the array [31,32]. To apply heat into a target site, controlled manipulation of temperature is required while concomitantly characterizing its outcome in vivo. Here, we used thermal magnetic resonance (ThermalMR) that provides RF-induced temperature modulation, temperature monitoring using MR thermometry, anatomic reference, functional imaging, and (nano)molecular probing in an integrated RF applicator [29,30,33].
Recognizing the opportunities of adding a thermal intervention dimension to an MRI device, it is conceptually appealing to advance the capabilities of the temperature-induced release of drugs, MR-sensitive probes, or other cargoes from a smart carrier en route to local drug delivery in hyperthermia-based anticancer treatment. To approach this goal, this proof-of-principle study demonstrates the feasibility of ThermalMR for temperature triggered the release of fluorescein-labeled bovine serum albumin as a model therapeutic from thermoresponsive nanogels using a 7.0-tesla whole-body MR system.

2. Results

2.1. Temperature Simulations of the Phantom

Electromagnetic and temperature simulations were performed to demonstrate the feasibility of the phantom setup for thermal intervention. The temperature maps obtained from the electromagnetic and thermal simulations of the phantom using a background temperature of 37 °C yielded T = 43 °C (time = 11 min, Pavg = 100 W) for the middle sample holder, where the loaded thermoresponsive nanogel solution would be placed (Figure 1). The temperature obtained for the controlled sample holder remained constant at T = 37 °C. This confirmed the suitability of the phantom design for carrying out RF heating experiments in an MR system.

2.2. RF Heating of the Experimental Phantom

Following the simulation study, an experimental study was performed to demonstrate the feasibility of the phantom setup for thermal intervention. For this purpose, temperature changes induced in the experimental phantom due to RF heating were accessed with readings from fiber optic temperature sensors and with MR thermometry (MRTh) and are displayed in Figure 2.
In the heated sample, the fiber optic temperature sensor registered a T = 38.8 °C after 5 min of RF heating, T = 40.9 °C after 10 min, T = 43.4 °C after 15 min. In the control sample, a constant temperature of 37 °C was measured.
In the agarose gel phantom, at a depth of 25 mm, a T = 38.8 °C (fiber optic temperature sensor) and T = 38.6 °C (MRTh) was observed after 5 min of RF heating. After 10 min of RF heating, the temperature increased to T = 40.5 °C (fiber optic temperature sensor) vs. T = 40.0 °C (MRTh) and after 15 min temperature readings were T = 42.5 °C (fiber optic temperature sensor) and T = 41.7 °C (MRTh).

2.3. Thermoresponsive Nanogel Synthesis and Characterization

Thermoresponsive nanogels were synthesized according to the method described by Theune et al. [13]. In order to generate nanogels with a VPTT of 38 °C, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) was copolymerized in a precipitation polymerization with poly(N-isopropyl methacrylamide) (PNIPMAM). As a crosslinker for the nanogels, dendritic polyglycerol (dPG) was used, which, in earlier work, was demonstrated as a suitable crosslinker improving biocompatibility and stability of the nanogels [13,34]. For this purpose, in the first step, dPG was functionalized with acrylic groups which will act as anchor points for the growing PNIPAM and PNIPMAM chains. Previous results show that an acrylation degree of 7% of all hydroxyl groups of the 10 kDa dPG is optimum for the preparation of the nanogels intended for protein delivery. Acrylation reaction was carried out as described and the successful reaction of dPG was confirmed by 1H-NMR. Integral analysis revealed 7% acrylation (Figure 3a): 3.1–4.5 ppm (multiplet, 5 H, polyglycerol protons), 5.98–6.10 ppm (multiplet, 1 H, vinyl group), 6.15–6.30 ppm (multiplet, 1 H, vinyl group), 6.40–6.53 ppm (multiplet, 1 H, vinyl group).
Then, the nanogels were prepared using 42 wt % of PNIPAM, 28 wt % of PNIPMAM, and 30 wt % of acrylated dPG (dPG-Ac) by precipitation methodology with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as surfactant and potassium persulfate (KPS) as the initiator of the polymerization. The size of the resulting nanogels was determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) to be 105 nm with low dispersity (PDI = 0.110). The constitution of the nanogels was confirmed by the chemical shifts in the 1H-NMR spectrum (Figure 3b): 1.16 ppm (singlet, 6 H, isopropyl groups of PNIPAM and PNIPMAM), 1.57–2.17 ppm (multiplet, 3 H of the polymer backbone of PNIPAM plus 2 H of the polymer backbone of PNIPMAM), 3.37–4.10 ppm (multiplet, 7 H, polyglycerol scaffold protons plus 1 H of PNIPAM plus 1 H of PNIPMAM).
The nanogels exhibit a sharp transition profile with a VPTT of 38 °C–above which the nanogels shrink drastically by about 50% (Figure 3c). This temperature-induced shrinkage is accompanied by the expulsion of inner water molecules and can be used for the controlled release of an encapsulated cargo [13].

2.4. Nanogel Release Profile using a Water Bath for Temperature Modulation

The release profile of BSA-FITC from the nanogels using the water bath as a heat source is shown in Figure 4. At room temperature of 20 °C (18 °C lower than VPTT = 38 °C), the release of the BSA-FITC from the nanogels was 12.5% after 6 h and 14.1% after 19 h. At 37 °C (1 °C less than VPTT, the shrinkage of the nanogels have already started), the release of the BSA-FITC from the nanogels was increased to 19.5% after 6 h and 27.6% after 19 h. At 43 °C (5 °C higher than the VPTT, nanogels were fully shrunken) the release of the BSA-FITC from the nanogels was boosted to 32.8% after 6 h and 43.6% after 19 h.

2.5. Nanogel Release Profile using ThermalMR for Temperature Modulation

The release profile from the nanogels using ThermalMR and RF heating as a heat source is shown in Figure 5. Using BSA-FITC as a model drug and the indicator for drug release, we found that at room temperature of T = 20 °C (18 °C lower than VPTT = 38 °C), the release of the BSA-FITC from the nanogels was 12.9% after 6 h. At T = 37 °C (1 °C less than VPTT, nanogels partially shrunken), the release of the BSA-FITC from the nanogels was increased to 19.6% after 6 h. At T = 43 °C (5 °C higher than the VPTT, nanogels fully shrunken) the release of the BSA-FITC from the nanogels was raised to 29.3% after 6 h.

3. Discussion

This proof-of-principle study demonstrates the feasibility of RF heating induced release of bovine serum albumin labeled with fluorescein (BSA-FITC) from thermoresponsive nanogels using an integrated ThermalMR setup for anatomic reference imaging, temperature monitoring, and thermal intervention. The release profile from the thermoresponsive nanogels obtained for the reference data using a water bath as temperature stimulus is in accordance with the release kinetics deduced from the ThermalMR setup and from previous studies [35,36,37,38]. The nanogels were initially designed to deliver proteins into the skin thus the slower release rate in comparison to thermoresponsive carriers tailored for drug delivery at the tumor site [39,40]. Notwithstanding this kinetic difference, our findings support the feasibility of ThermalMR for temperature-controlled release of a model therapeutic cargo from thermoresponsive nanocarriers.
In our feasibility study, a single bow tie dipole RF antenna has been used for MR imaging, temperature intervention, and MR temperature monitoring. This approach constrained the heating rate to ΔT = 0.3 °C/min for a peak power of P = 100 W and a duty cycle of 10%. To enhance the heating rate, an array of RF antennas can be exploited [30,31]. This approach would afford the shaping and the steering of the temperature hotspot and would support parallel MR imaging to reduce acquisition times needed for temperature monitoring of larger volumes [41,42].
In the present feasibility study, RF heating was interleaved with MR thermometry, with the latter requiring scan times of about 20 s for covering three slices across the object under investigation and for providing reliable temperature information when benchmarked against calibration curves derived from fiber optic temperature sensors. If expanded to whole object or organ coverage, the MR thermometry approach used in our study would require several minutes of scan time. Here, temperature-sensitized techniques that deliver accelerated and accurate MRTh provide a solution for fast thermal dose calibration, thermal dose control, and cargo release management. For this purpose, a fast spin-echo MRI variant [43], which simultaneously supports T2 relaxation-based and PRF-based temperature mapping in a single acquisition (two-in-one) provides a speed gain and advancement over traditional gradient-echo-based PRF approaches. For multislice acceleration and enhanced anatomic coverage of the fast spin-echo MRI variant, a low RF power multiband approach can be incorporated [44]. For further speed gain and reduction of RF power deposition, an echo-planar read-out can be amended to the fast spin-echo read-out train [44].
In the current work, we loaded a fluorescent model therapeutic into thermoresponsive nanogels and compared the release profiles with fluorescence spectroscopy upon conventional water bath heating or after ThermalMR stimulus. Swift translation of ThermalMR triggered the release of cargo from a nanocarrier remains conceptually appealing and an ambitious undertaking en route to clinical feasibility studies of thermal therapeutics. For the assessment of the efficacy of thermal interventions, it is of paramount importance to examine the release rate and kinetics in vivo. Here, thermoresponsive nanocarriers loaded with MR-sensitive fluorine (19F) probes could provide ideal means to monitor release kinetics and bioavailability [45] of the MR visible cargo in vivo which would be a major leap forward to temperature-induced drug delivery in vivo. Similar to 1H MR thermometry, fluorine resonance frequency (19F) is also affected by temperature [46]. This feature can be exploited for temperature monitoring of fluorinated probes.
The performance of the thermoresponsive carrier as a potential treatment was previously studied [13] showing a high cytocompatible profile of the nanogels based on PNIPAM and PNIPMAM using MTT assays with HeLa cell line (at 37 °C). In the same study, protein stability upon encapsulation and release was assessed by circular dichroism. The protein encapsulation did not affect the secondary structure of the protein. As the nanogels are designed for temperature triggered the release of their encapsulated cargo, the stability of the used model protein BSA at different temperatures was analyzed with and without nanogels present. BSA is stable until temperatures of around 50 °C and starts to unfold at higher temperatures and the presence of the nanogels does not alter this behavior. In another broader study [47], the biocompatible profile of dPG-PNIPAM-based nanogels was demonstrated using primary-derived keratinocytes, showing that such nanogels exhibit no adverse effects with regard to cytotoxicity, oxidative stress induction, genotoxicity, and potential for eye irritation.
For this first proof-of-concept study, we chose to work with the simplest and most characterized nanogel–protein pair that we have in our labs, as we aimed to validate the methodology of ThermalMR for controlled drug release. Meanwhile, we have screened and optimized synthetic conditions, and we have broadened the range of crosslinkers and monomers, enabling the yielding of a series of nanogels with controllable sizes and porosities [48]. This will allow us to choose the best nanogel candidate once we decide for the therapeutic protein to use in further studies. Notwithstanding the success of our feasibility study, further weight should be put behind explorations that are designed to elucidate the potential of the nanogels as smart nanocarriers of therapeutic proteins, as well as other thermoresponsive carriers such as p(DEGMAco-OEGMA-b-[TMSPMA-co-VBA] or temperature-sensitive liposomes [10,39,40,49,50].
En route to anticancer treatment, further research is warranted to explore the feasibility of our approach to tracking thermally triggered events at the cellular level, both in vitro and in vivo. To approach this goal, we have already performed studies demonstrating their intracellular pathway and uptake mechanism regarding the dPG-based nanogels. dPG-PNIPAM nanogels showed to be uptaken by HaCaT and NHK cells through endocytosis, and localize predominantly within lysosomal compartments [47]. Moreover, we demonstrated with dendritic cells that polyglycerol-based thermoresponsive nanogels experience a shift in the specific uptake pathway, depending on if the nanogels are on the swelling or in the shrunken state (below or above the VPTT) [51]. The study points to caveolae-mediated endocytosis as being the major uptake mechanism at 37 °C, which is above the VPTT of the nanogels. Interestingly, an additional uptake mechanism, beside caveolae-mediated endocytosis, was observed at the VPTT of the studied nanogels (29 °C). At this temperature, macropinocytosis was involved as well.
Temperature as an external therapeutic release stimulus has the advantage of being able to be applied in a temporally and spatially controlled manner. Compared to other external stimuli, such as light or microwave, where the penetration depth is limited, temperature increase due to RF heating using a multiarray ThermalMR setup can reach deep laying tissues, for instance in the center of the brain [29]. This approach affords localized heating with the target area as small as (6 × 9) mm2 in the center of the brain at 300 MHz using tailored phase settings for the RF array instead of loco-regional heating supported by low radio frequency electromagnetic wave applications at 70–100 MHz [28], and thus prevents the damage of surrounding healthy tissue next to the target site.
Besides being a drug release trigger, mild hyperthermia (T = 40–43 °C) has been shown to promote the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect of tissues, especially in the tumor site [11,22,23]. The increased EPR enhances the accumulation of nanocarriers in the intratumoral space and affords a higher drug level at the target. Furthermore, hyperthermia has shown synergic effects with chemotherapy as the increase in temperature enhances the cytotoxicity of several anticancer drugs [52,53].
The temperature stimulus used in this feasibility study can be applied in combination with internal stimuli such as pH variations, biomolecule concentrations (e.g., enzymes, hormones), or redox gradient, among others, that are specific to the microenvironment of certain diseases [2,54]. For instance, dual pH- and temperature-responsive carriers are feasible for application on tumor sites as it typically presents increased acidity [55]. In this way, the therapeutics would receive internal as well as external stimuli to promote the drug release.
The transition from this technical feasibility study to in vivo treatment is a recognized challenge. It needs to be carefully accessed to ensure tumor heating coverage and to avoid healthy tissue damage. Pretreatment temperature simulations should be adopted for each patient and tumor to ensure maximum efficacy as the tumor type, morphology, volume, and perfusion could impact the heating as well as the uptake of the nanocarriers. For smaller tumors it is easier to achieve uniform heating across the target [31] and the accumulation of drug nanocarriers is higher [48]. Although hyperthermia can increase the EPR effect, in reality it is a heterogeneous phenomenon so that certain areas of the tumor can still not be reachable [11,23].
The treatment time of ThermalMR needs to be carefully examined in future studies to ensure the best outcome and patient comfort. We estimate an exposure time of about one hour in accordance with other temperature triggered drug release studies [11,56]. Such an exposure time is common in comprehensive MRI examinations with a growing number of reports referring to the clinical application of MRI at 7.0-tesla [57,58,59,60]. These efforts include studies on the subjective acceptance during UHF-MR to examine discomfort and sensory side effects including dizziness, peripheral nerve stimulation, and metallic taste. The high levels of subjective acceptance found in these studies led to the conclusion that UHF MRI is very well tolerated as a diagnostic tool in clinical practice [61,62,63].
In conclusion, ThermalMR adds a thermal intervention dimension to an MRI device. Our approach integrates diagnostic imaging, temperature intervention, and temperature response control providing an ideal testbed for the study of temperature-induced release cargoes (drugs, contrast agents, etc.) from thermoresponsive carriers, for research into the role of temperature in biology and disease, for the pursuit of personalized therapeutic drug delivery approaches for anticancer treatment, and for better patient care.

4. Materials and Methods

All reagents, if not otherwise stated, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich GmbH, Munich, Germany.

4.1. Phantom Design for RF-Induced Heating in MRI Scanner

A dedicated test object referred to as a phantom was designed to carry out temperature-controlled release experiments in a 7.0-tesla whole-body MR system (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), as depicted in Figure 6a. The phantom comprises a (180 × 280 × 90) mm3 rectangular box filled with agarose gel (20 g/L) doped with NaCl (5 g/L) and CuSO4 (0.7 g/L), yielding a conductivity (σ) of 1.03 S/m and a relative permittivity (εr) of 71.9 at 297.2 MHz (working frequency of the MR system). Seven cylindrical containers with inner diameter = 22 mm and height = 30 mm were inserted into the phantom as sample holders (Figure 6b): five were placed in the hotspot area produced by an RF antenna (for the heated sample), and the other two were placed in a region where the RF antenna would not produce a temperature rise (for the control sample). Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tubes with inner diameter = 1 mm were inserted along the long axis of the phantom at depth of 5 mm, 15 mm, 25 mm, and 35 mm (Figure 6c) to accommodate fiber optic probes that measure a temperature reference for MRTh. The phantom was placed in a water box connected to a water bath to modify the background temperature.
Prior to the construction of the phantom, the heat distribution induced by the RF energy provided by a bow tie RF antenna (Figure 6d) was assessed in order to verify if the above-mentioned conditions—RF heating of heated sample holders and no RF heating of control sample holders—were met. For this purpose, electromagnetic field simulation using the finite-difference time-domain method and temperature simulations solving Pennes bioheat equation (Sim4life, ZMT AG, Zurich, Switzerland) were performed using the setup shown in Figure 6e. The phantom was placed inside a water box (250 × 360 × 120) mm3, with the background temperature set to 37 °C. A bow tie dipole RF antenna was placed on top of the phantom and centered on the heated sample. The basic mesh resolution of (5 × 5 × 5) mm3 was locally refined to (0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5) mm3 to secure all electrical connections, resulting in a total mesh of 10 million cells. The electromagnetic field simulations were performed at 297.2 MHz, the operating resonance frequency of the 7.0 T MR system.

4.2. Experimental Setup for RF-Induced Heating in an MRI Scanner

The RF-heating-induced release experiment was carried out in a whole-body 7.0 T MR system (f = 297.2 MHz) using one bow tie dipole RF antenna. This type of RF antenna [30] (Figure 6d) was used since the E-field is parallel to the bow tie with the Poynting vector being orthogonal to the surface of the bow tie, in this way the RF energy is more efficiently delivered to the target [64]. The bow tie RF antenna was etched from 16 µm copper on an FR4 substrate with a thickness of 1.5 mm. Deuterium oxide (D2O) was used as a low loss dielectric substrate (ε ≈ 81 at 297.2 MHz) to shorten the effective antenna length. The RF feeding port of the antenna was placed in the center of the bow tie RF antenna in between the two conductive triangles. From the antenna tip a parallel transmission line was connected to the matching and tuning network.
The experimental setup for RF heating in an MR system included (i) three Vivaspin filters with 400 μL of the nanogel–(BSA-FITC) solution, (ii) the agarose gel phantom, (iii) the water box connected to a water bath to keep the background temperature at 37 °C, (iv) a bow tie dipole RF antenna for imaging and RF energy delivery, (v) a customized high-power transmit/receive (Tx/Rx) switch [65] to support high-power RF pulses, and (vi) fiber optic temperature sensors (Omniflex, Neoptix, Quebec, Canada) used as an external temperature reference.
The phantom was placed in the water box and preheated overnight to 37 °C. In the next day, one Vivaspin filter was placed in the middle sample holder of the hotspot area of the phantom, a second filter was placed in the control sample holder beyond the hotspot and a third filter was kept outside the MRI scanner room in the lab at room temperature (20 °C). All sample holders were filled with a 0.1 M NaCl solution (σ = 1.05 S/m, ε = 80.4) to avoid magnetic susceptibility artifacts. Four fiber optic temperature sensors were placed in the middle sample holder (heated sample), in the control sample holder, inside the phantom at depth of 15 mm next to the middle sample holder, and inside the phantom at depth of 25 mm next to the middle sample holder. The bow tie dipole RF antenna was placed on the lid of the water box centered to the middle sample holder of the phantom (Figure 7). The bow tie dipole RF antenna was tuned and matched to the B0 field frequency of the MRI scanner (f = 297.2 MHz) and connected over a high-power Tx/Rx switch [65] to the RF transmission and RF signal reception chain of the MR system.

4.3. Synthesis and Characterization of Thermoresponsive Nanogels

The thermoresponsive nanogels were synthesized using precipitation polymerization of acrylated dendritic polyglycerol (dPG-Ac) as a macromolecular crosslinker and temperature-sensitive polymers PNIPAM and PNIPMAM as linear counterpart (Figure 8).
dPG was obtained from Nanopartica GmbH, Berlin, Germany with a molecular weight (MW) of 10 kDa and a polydispersity index (PDI) of 1.3. The dPG-Ac (7% acrylation) was synthesized according to reported methodology [13]. In brief, the dPG (7% mol OH groups, 1 eq.) was predried under a high vacuum at 80 °C for 24 h. Afterwards, it was dissolved in 20 mL of dry dimethylformamide and the solution was cooled down on ice. Triethylene amine (2 eq.) was added to the flask followed by the dropwise addition of acryloyl chloride (1.3 eq.) under argon atmosphere. The solution was stirred for 4 h and then quenched by adding a small amount of water. dPG was purified by dialysis using a regenerated cellulose membrane (molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) 1 kDa) in water for 2 d. The product was obtained with a yield of 85–90% and stored at 6–8 °C. The synthesis of dPG-Ac was characterized by 1H-NMR using a 400 MHz NMR spectrometer (Jeol, ECX 400, Tokyo, Japan).
Thermoresponsive nanogels were synthesized according to previously reported methodologies [66] with minor modifications. In brief, a total amount of 100 mg of the monomers; 30 mg of dPG-Ac, 42 mg of PNIPAM, 28 mg of PNIPMAM, and 1.8 mg of SDS were dissolved in 4 mL of distilled water. The reaction was purged with argon for 30 min and then transferred to an oil bath at 70 °C. After 15 min, 1 mL of a solution of KPS (3.3 mg/mL) was added to initiate the polymerization. The reaction mixture was stirred for 4 h at 70 °C. The nanogels were purified for 3 d via dialysis (regenerated cellulose, MWCO 50 kDa) in water. The product was lyophilized and rendered a white cotton-like solid in a yield of 80–90%.
The characterization of the nanogels was performed by 1H-NMR using a 400 MHz NMR spectrometer (Jeol, ECX 400, Tokyo, Japan). The size, PDI, and the volume phase transition temperature (VPTT) of the nanogels were evaluated using dynamic light scattering. A Malvern Zetasizer Nano-ZS 90 (Malvern Instrument, Malvern, Worcestershire, UK) equipped with a red He-Ne laser (λ = 633 nm, 4.0 mW) was used for the measurement under a scattering angle of 173°. Prior testing, the samples were left to stabilize for 5 min under a certain temperature. The VPTT was determined by measuring the size of the nanogels in a range of 25–55 °C using a heating rate of 1 °C/minute. The VPTT is defined as the temperature of the inflection point of the normalized size vs. temperature curve.

4.4. Protein Encapsulation in the Thermoresponsive Nanogels

Bovine serum albumin labeled with fluorescein (BSA-FITC) was used as a model therapeutic in the temperature triggered release experiments. To encapsulate BSA-FITC, the dry nanogels (5 mg) were swollen in 1 mL of a solution of BSA-FITC in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) (0.5 mg/mL, pH 7.4) for at least 24 h at 4 °C. The solution was purified three times by centrifugation using Vivaspin 300 kDa centrifugal filter (5 mL, 10 min each time, speed = 4800 × g, Vivaspin 6, Sartorius AG, Göttingen, Germany). With this procedure, the nanogels are retained in the concentrate and the non-encapsulated BSA-FITC (MW = 66 kDa) is washed out with the filtrate. The concentration of encapsulated BSA-FITC was determined by fluorescence (Tecan, Infinite 200 Pro, Männedorf, Switzerland; excitation wavelength (λex) = 490 nm, emission wavelength (λem) = 525 nm).

4.5. Evaluation of BSA Release using a Water Bath

An initial evaluation of the release profile of the BSA-FITC was assessed using a water bath as a heat source. The above-mentioned nanogel loaded with BSA-FITC was diluted with a buffer (PBS, pH 7.4) to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL of the nanogel. Three Vivaspin filters (Vivaspin 500, Sartorius AG, Göttingen, Germany), each with 400 μL of the diluted solution, were placed in the water bath at 20 °C (room temperature), 37 °C (body temperature) and 43 °C (hyperthermia temperature). The filters were wrapped with parafilm to avoid contact with the water of the water bath. At certain time intervals, the samples were centrifuged (10 min, 4800 × g) and the filtrates were taken for analysis (fluorescence at λex/λem = 490/525 nm) while the same volume was replaced with a fresh buffer. The filters were weighed before and after centrifugation to calculate the buffer volume to be replaced.

4.6. RF-Induced Heating Paradigm and Release Study

The heating paradigm consisted of RF pulses delivering an average power (Pavg) = 100 W at the RF antenna’s feeding point for 15 min. This paradigm was interleaved every 5 min with 2D MRTh.
The RF power was provided by the 7.0-tesla MR system’s RF power amplifier using a rectangular RF pulse (t = 4 ms, U = 280 V, repetition time TR = 40 ms, duty cycle = 10%). Hardware losses of 2.12 dB between the RF transmitter and the feeding point at the bow tie dipole RF antenna were measured with a vector network analyzer (ZVT8, Rhode & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG, Memmingen, Germany).
The same bow tie dipole RF antenna that was used for RF heating was also used for MR thermometry. For this purpose, a proton resonance frequency shift method [67] in conjunction with a dual gradient-echo technique [68,69] (FOV = (290 × 290) mm2, TR = 102ms, TE1 = 2.26 ms and TE2 = 11.44 ms, spatial resolution = (1.5 × 1.5 × 4) mm3, nominal flip angle = 30°) was employed. Fiber optic temperature sensors were used as an external reference for the MRTh temperature maps.
After reaching a temperature of 43 °C in the middle sample holder, the temperature was maintained with subsequent RF pulses for 1 to 2 min. At certain time intervals, Vivaspin filters were taken out, centrifuged (10 min, 4800 × g) and the filtrates were taken for analysis (fluorescence at λex/λem = 490/525 nm); then, the fresh buffer was replaced and Vivaspin filters were placed again in the phantom. The filters were weighed before and after centrifugation to calculate the buffer volume to be replaced.

5. Conclusions

MRI has been described as one of the most important medical innovations [70,71]. Current clinical MR approaches offer neither integrated means for diagnosis nor thermal intervention (thermo-theranostics) inherent to the RF fields applied. The ThermalMR approach adds a thermal intervention dimension to an MRI device and provides an ideal testbed for the study of the temperature-induced release of drugs, MR probes, and other agents from thermoresponsive carriers. Integrating diagnostic imaging, temperature intervention, and temperature response control with ThermalMR can boost diversity in the field and holds the potential to improve the study of the role of temperature in biology and disease. Our approach opens an entirely new research field where physics, chemistry, biology, and medicine meet and promotes explorations into personalized therapeutic drug delivery approaches for advancing hyperthermia-based anticancer treatment and for better patient care.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Y.J., L.W., and T.N.; methodology: Y.J., L.W., L.N., M.-C.K., J.S.P., M.P., W.H., and L.E.T.; software: Y.J., L.W., and M.P.; validation, Y.J., L.W., and L.N.; formal analysis, Y.J. and L.N.; investigation, Y.J., L.W., L.N., and J.S.P.; data curation, Y.J. and L.N.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.J. and T.N.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, Y.J., L.N., and L.E.T.; supervision: T.N. and M.C.; project administration, T.N. and M.C.; funding acquisition, T.N. and M.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 743077 (ThermalMR), and by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) through the NanoMatFutur program (13N12561).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest

References

  1. Besse, H.C.; Barten-van Rijbroek, A.D.; van der Wurff-Jacobs, K.M.G.; Bos, C.; Moonen, C.T.W.; Deckers, R. Tumor drug distribution after local drug delivery by hyperthermia, in vivo. Cancers 2019, 11, 1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Barreto, J.A.; O’Malley, W.; Kubeil, M.; Graham, B.; Stephan, H.; Spiccia, L. Nanomaterials: Applications in cancer imaging and therapy. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, H18–H40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhao, C.-Y.; Cheng, R.; Yang, Z.; Tian, Z.-M. Nanotechnology for cancer therapy based on chemotherapy. Molecules 2018, 23, 826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Hirakura, T.; Yasugi, K.; Nemoto, T.; Sato, M.; Shimoboji, T.; Aso, Y.; Morimoto, N.; Akiyoshi, K. Hybrid hyaluronan hydrogel encapsulating nanogel as a protein nanocarrier: New system for sustained delivery of protein with a chaperone-like function. J. Control. Release 2010, 142, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Panyam, J.; Labhasetwar, V. Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to cells and tissue. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2003, 55, 329–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lynn, D.M.; Amiji, M.M.; Langer, R. pH-responsive polymer microspheres: Rapid release of encapsulated material within the range of intracellular pH. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1707–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, D.; Zong, S.; Yang, L.; Zhong, Y.; Cui, Y. pH and thermo dual-stimuli-responsive drug carrier based on mesoporous silica nanoparticles encapsulated in a copolymer–lipid bilayer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 10895–10903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Molina, M.; Giulbudagian, M.; Calderón, M. Positively charged thermoresponsive nanogels for anticancer drug delivery. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2014, 215, 2414–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rwei, A.Y.; Wang, W.; Kohane, D.S. Photoresponsive nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nano Today 2015, 10, 451–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Dunn, A.E.; Dunn, D.J.; Macmillan, A.; Whan, R.; Stait-Gardner, T.; Price, W.S.; Lim, M.; Boyer, C. Spatial and temporal control of drug release through pH and alternating magnetic field induced breakage of Schiff base bonds. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 3311–3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Seynhaeve, A.L.B.; Amin, M.; Haemmerich, D.; van Rhoon, G.C.; Ten Hagen, T.L.M. Hyperthermia and smart drug delivery systems for solid tumor therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wolinsky, J.B.; Colson, Y.L.; Grinstaff, M.W. Local drug delivery strategies for cancer treatment: Gels, nanoparticles, polymeric films, rods, and wafers. J. Control. release 2012, 159, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Theune, L.E.; Charbaji, R.; Kar, M.; Wedepohl, S.; Hedtrich, S.; Calderón, M. Critical parameters for the controlled synthesis of nanogels suitable for temperature-triggered protein delivery. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 100, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ramos, J.; Imaz, A.; Forcada, J. Temperature-sensitive nanogels: Poly (N-vinylcaprolactam) versus poly (N-isopropylacrylamide). Polym. Chem. 2012, 3, 852–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lin, J.C. Electromagnetic Fields in Biological Systems; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011; ISBN 143985999X. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kok, H.P.; Crezee, J. A comparison of the heating characteristics of capacitive and radiative superficial hyperthermia. Int. J. Hyperth. 2017, 33, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Lin, C.-H.; Aljuffali, I.A.; Fang, J.-Y. Lasers as an approach for promoting drug delivery via skin. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2014, 11, 599–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ahmed, M.; Liu, Z.; Lukyanov, A.N.; Signoretti, S.; Horkan, C.; Monsky, W.L.; Torchilin, V.P.; Goldberg, S.N. Combination radiofrequency ablation with intratumoral liposomal doxorubicin: Effect on drug accumulation and coagulation in multiple tissues and tumor types in animals. Radiology 2005, 235, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aubry, J.-F.; Pauly, K.B.; Moonen, C.; Haar, G.; Ries, M.; Salomir, R.; Sokka, S.; Sekins, K.M.; Shapira, Y.; Ye, F. The road to clinical use of high-intensity focused ultrasound for liver cancer: Technical and clinical consensus. J. Ther. Ultrasound 2013, 1, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Cranston, D. A review of high intensity focused ultrasound in relation to the treatment of renal tumours and other malignancies. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2015, 27, 654–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Grüll, H.; Langereis, S. Hyperthermia-triggered drug delivery from temperature-sensitive liposomes using MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound. J. Control. Release 2012, 161, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. May, J.P.; Li, S.-D. Hyperthermia-induced drug targeting. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2013, 10, 511–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ojha, T.; Pathak, V.; Shi, Y.; Hennink, W.E.; Moonen, C.T.W.; Storm, G.; Kiessling, F.; Lammers, T. Pharmacological and physical vessel modulation strategies to improve EPR-mediated drug targeting to tumors. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2017, 119, 44–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Hijnen, N.; Kneepkens, E.; de Smet, M.; Langereis, S.; Heijman, E.; Grüll, H. Thermal combination therapies for local drug delivery by magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E4802–E4811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Bing, C.; Patel, P.; Staruch, R.M.; Shaikh, S.; Nofiele, J.; Wodzak Staruch, M.; Szczepanski, D.; Williams, N.S.; Laetsch, T.; Chopra, R. Longer heating duration increases localized doxorubicin deposition and therapeutic index in Vx2 tumors using MR-HIFU mild hyperthermia and thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin. Int. J. Hyperth. 2019, 36, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Staruch, R.M.; Hynynen, K.; Chopra, R. Hyperthermia-mediated doxorubicin release from thermosensitive liposomes using MR-HIFU: Therapeutic effect in rabbit Vx2 tumours. Int. J. Hyperth. 2015, 31, 118–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Paulides, M.M.; Trefna, H.D.; Curto, S.; Rodrigues, D.B. Recent technological advancements in radiofrequency-and microwave-mediated hyperthermia for enhancing drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hildebrandt, B.; Gellermann, J.; Riess, H.; Wust, P. Induced hyperthermia in the reatment of cancer. In Cancer Management in Man: Chemotherapy, Biological Therapy, Hyperthermia and supporting Measures; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011; Volume 13, pp. 365–377. [Google Scholar]
  29. Winter, L.; Oezerdem, C.; Hoffmann, W.; van de Lindt, T.; Periquito, J.; Ji, Y.; Ghadjar, P.; Budach, V.; Wust, P.; Niendorf, T. Thermal magnetic resonance: Physics considerations and electromagnetic field simulations up to 23.5 Tesla (1GHz). Radiat. Oncol. 2015, 10, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Winter, L.; Özerdem, C.; Hoffmann, W.; Santoro, D.; Müller, A.; Waiczies, H.; Seemann, R.; Graessl, A.; Wust, P.; Niendorf, T. Design and evaluation of a hybrid radiofrequency applicator for magnetic resonance imaging and RF induced hyperthermia: Electromagnetic field simulations up to 14.0 Tesla and proof-of-concept at 7.0 Tesla. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oberacker, E.; Kuehne, A.; Nadobny, J.; Zschaeck, S.; Weihrauch, M.; Waiczies, H.; Ghadjar, P.; Wust, P.; Niendorf, T.; Winter, L. Radiofrequency applicator concepts for simultaneous MR imaging and hyperthermia treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Curr. Dir. Biomed. Eng. 2017, 3, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Kuehne, A.; Oberacker, E.; Waiczies, H.; Niendorf, T. Solving the Time-and Frequency-Multiplexed Problem of Constrained Radiofrequency Induced Hyperthermia. Cancers 2020, 12, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Eigentler, T.W.; Winter, L.; Han, H.; Oberacker, E.; Kuehne, A.; Waiczies, H.; Schmitter, S.; Boehmert, L.; Prinz, C.; Trefna, H.D. Wideband Self-Grounded Bow-Tie Antenna for Thermal MR. NMR Biomed. 2020, 33, e4274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Miceli, E.; Kuropka, B.; Rosenauer, C.; Osorio Blanco, E.R.; Theune, L.E.; Kar, M.; Weise, C.; Morsbach, S.; Freund, C.; Calderón, M. Understanding the elusive protein corona of thermoresponsive nanogels. Nanomedicine 2018, 13, 2657–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Plank, R.; Yealland, G.; Miceli, E.; Cunha, D.L.; Graff, P.; Thomforde, S.; Gruber, R.; Moosbrugger-Martinz, V.; Eckl, K.; Calderón, M. Transglutaminase 1 Replacement Therapy Successfully Mitigates the Autosomal Recessive Congenital Ichthyosis Phenotype in Full-Thickness Skin Disease Equivalents. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2019, 139, 1191–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Giulbudagian, M.; Yealland, G.; Hönzke, S.; Edlich, A.; Geisendörfer, B.; Kleuser, B.; Hedtrich, S.; Calderón, M. Breaking the barrier-potent anti-inflammatory activity following efficient topical delivery of etanercept using thermoresponsive nanogels. Theranostics 2018, 8, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. De León, A.S.; Molina, M.; Wedepohl, S.; Muñoz-Bonilla, A.; Rodríguez-Hernández, J.; Calderón, M. Immobilization of stimuli-responsive nanogels onto honeycomb porous surfaces and controlled release of proteins. Langmuir 2016, 32, 1854–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Witting, M.; Molina, M.; Obst, K.; Plank, R.; Eckl, K.M.; Hennies, H.C.; Calderón, M.; Frieß, W.; Hedtrich, S. Thermosensitive dendritic polyglycerol-based nanogels for cutaneous delivery of biomacromolecules. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2015, 11, 1179–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Landon, C.D.; Park, J.-Y.; Needham, D.; Dewhirst, M.W. Nanoscale drug delivery and hyperthermia: The materials design and preclinical and clinical testing of low temperature-sensitive liposomes used in combination with mild hyperthermia in the treatment of local cancer. Open Nanomed. J. 2011, 3, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. De Smet, M.; Langereis, S.; van den Bosch, S.; Grüll, H. Temperature-sensitive liposomes for doxorubicin delivery under MRI guidance. J. Control. Release 2010, 143, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Niendorf, T.; Sodickson, D.K. Parallel imaging in cardiovascular MRI: Methods and applications. NMR Biomed. Int. J. Devoted Dev. Appl. Magn. Reson. Vivo 2006, 19, 325–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sodickson, D.K.; Hardy, C.J.; Zhu, Y.; Giaquinto, R.O.; Gross, P.; Kenwood, G.; Niendorf, T.; Lejay, H.; McKenzie, C.A.; Ohliger, M.A. Rapid Volumetric MRI Using Parallel Imaging With Order-of-Magnitude Accelerations and a 32-Element RF Coil Array: Feasibility and implications1. Acad. Radiol. 2005, 12, 626–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Fuchs, K.; Hezel, F.; Klix, S.; Mekle, R.; Wuerfel, J.; Niendorf, T. Simultaneous dual contrast weighting using double echo rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2014, 72, 1590–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Paul, K.; Huelnhagen, T.; Oberacker, E.; Wenz, D.; Kuehne, A.; Waiczies, H.; Schmitter, S.; Stachs, O.; Niendorf, T. Multiband diffusion-weighted MRI of the eye and orbit free of geometric distortions using a RARE-EPI hybrid. NMR Biomed. 2018, 31, e3872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ji, Y.; Waiczies, H.; Winter, L.; Neumanova, P.; Hofmann, D.; Rieger, J.; Mekle, R.; Waiczies, S.; Niendorf, T. Eight-channel transceiver RF coil array tailored for 1H/19F MR of the human knee and fluorinated drugs at 7.0 T. NMR Biomed. 2015, 28, 726–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Prinz, C.; Delgado, P.R.; Eigentler, T.W.; Starke, L.; Niendorf, T.; Waiczies, S. Toward 19 F magnetic resonance thermometry: Spin–lattice and spin–spin-relaxation times and temperature dependence of fluorinated drugs at 9.4 T. Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. Biol. Med. 2019, 32, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gerecke, C.; Edlich, A.; Giulbudagian, M.; Schumacher, F.; Zhang, N.; Said, A.; Yealland, G.; Lohan, S.B.; Neumann, F.; Meinke, M.C. Biocompatibility and characterization of polyglycerol-based thermoresponsive nanogels designed as novel drug-delivery systems and their intracellular localization in keratinocytes. Nanotoxicology 2017, 11, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Navarro, L.; Theune, L.E.; Calderón, M. Effect of crosslinking density on thermoresponsive nanogels: A study on the size control and the kinetics release of biomacromolecules. Eur. Polym. J. 2020, 124, 109478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hervault, A.; Dunn, A.E.; Lim, M.; Boyer, C.; Mott, D.; Maenosono, S.; Thanh, N.T.K. Doxorubicin loaded dual pH-and thermo-responsive magnetic nanocarrier for combined magnetic hyperthermia and targeted controlled drug delivery applications. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 12152–12161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Peller, M.; Willerding, L.; Limmer, S.; Hossann, M.; Dietrich, O.; Ingrisch, M.; Sroka, R.; Lindner, L.H. Surrogate MRI markers for hyperthermia-induced release of doxorubicin from thermosensitive liposomes in tumors. J. Control. Release 2016, 237, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Edlich, A.; Gerecke, C.; Giulbudagian, M.; Neumann, F.; Hedtrich, S.; Schäfer-Korting, M.; Ma, N.; Calderon, M.; Kleuser, B. Specific uptake mechanisms of well-tolerated thermoresponsive polyglycerol-based nanogels in antigen-presenting cells of the skin. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2017, 116, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Issels, R.D.; Lindner, L.H.; Verweij, J.; Wust, P.; Reichardt, P.; Schem, B.-C.; Abdel-Rahman, S.; Daugaard, S.; Salat, C.; Wendtner, C.-M. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy alone or with regional hyperthermia for localised high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma: A randomised phase 3 multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 2010, 11, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Issels, R.D. Hyperthermia adds to chemotherapy. Eur. J. Cancer 2008, 44, 2546–2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Liu, D.; Yang, F.; Xiong, F.; Gu, N. The smart drug delivery system and its clinical potential. Theranostics 2016, 6, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Rimondino, G.N.; Miceli, E.; Molina, M.; Wedepohl, S.; Thierbach, S.; Rühl, E.; Strumia, M.; Martinelli, M.; Calderón, M. Rational design of dendritic thermoresponsive nanogels that undergo phase transition under endolysosomal conditions. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 866–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Willerding, L.; Limmer, S.; Hossann, M.; Zengerle, A.; Wachholz, K.; ten Hagen, T.L.M.; Koning, G.A.; Sroka, R.; Lindner, L.H.; Peller, M. Method of hyperthermia and tumor size influence effectiveness of doxorubicin release from thermosensitive liposomes in experimental tumors. J. Control. Release 2016, 222, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Trattnig, S.; Springer, E.; Bogner, W.; Hangel, G.; Strasser, B.; Dymerska, B.; Cardoso, P.L.; Robinson, S.D. Key clinical benefits of neuroimaging at 7 T. Neuroimage 2018, 168, 477–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Obusez, E.C.; Lowe, M.; Oh, S.-H.; Wang, I.; Bullen, J.; Ruggieri, P.; Hill, V.; Lockwood, D.; Emch, T.; Moon, D. 7T MR of intracranial pathology: Preliminary observations and comparisons to 3T and 1.5 T. Neuroimage 2018, 168, 459–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. De Cocker, L.J.L.; Lindenholz, A.; Zwanenburg, J.J.M.; van der Kolk, A.G.; Zwartbol, M.; Luijten, P.R.; Hendrikse, J. Clinical vascular imaging in the brain at 7 T. Neuroimage 2018, 168, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Niendorf, T.; Schulz-Menger, J.; Paul, K.; Huelnhagen, T.; Ferrari, V.A.; Hodge, R. High field cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: A case for ultrahigh field cardiac magnetic resonance. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2017, 10, e005460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Klix, S.; Els, A.; Paul, K.; Graessl, A.; Oezerdem, C.; Weinberger, O.; Winter, L.; Thalhammer, C.; Huelnhagen, T.; Rieger, J. On the subjective acceptance during cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 7.0 Tesla. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2015, 17, P13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Versluis, M.J.; Teeuwisse, W.M.; Kan, H.E.; van Buchem, M.A.; Webb, A.G.; van Osch, M.J. Subject tolerance of 7 T MRI examinations. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013, 38, 722–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rauschenberg, J.; Nagel, A.M.; Ladd, S.C.; Theysohn, J.M.; Ladd, M.E.; Möller, H.E.; Trampel, R.; Turner, R.; Pohmann, R.; Scheffler, K. Multicenter study of subjective acceptance during magnetic resonance imaging at 7 and 9.4 T. Invest. Radiol. 2014, 49, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Winter, L.; Niendorf, T. Electrodynamics and radiofrequency antenna concepts for human magnetic resonance at 23.5 T (1 GHz) and beyond. Magn. Reson. Mater. Physics, Biol. Med. 2016, 29, 641–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Ji, Y.; Hoffmann, W.; Pham, M.; Dunn, A.E.; Han, H.; Özerdem, C.; Waiczies, H.; Rohloff, M.; Endemann, B.; Boyer, C.; et al. High peak and high average radiofrequency power transmit/receive switch for thermal magnetic resonance. Magn. Reson. Med. 2018, 80, 2246–2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Cuggino, J.C.; Strumia, M.C.; Welker, P.; Licha, K.; Steinhilber, D.; Mutihac, R.-C.; Calderón, M. Thermosensitive nanogels based on dendritic polyglycerol and N-isopropylacrylamide for biomedical applications. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 11259–11266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ishihara, Y.; Calderon, A.; Watanabe, H.; Okamoto, K.; Suzuki, Y.; Kuroda, K.; Suzuki, Y. A precise and fast temperature mapping using water proton chemical shift. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995, 34, 814–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rieke, V.; Butts Pauly, K. MR thermometry. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging Off. J. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008, 27, 376–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wonneberger, U.; Schnackenburg, B.; Wlodarczyk, W.; Walter, T.; Streitparth, F.; Rump, J.; Teichgräber, U.K.M. Intradiscal temperature monitoring using double gradient-echo pulse sequences at 1.0 T. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010, 31, 1499–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fuchs, V.R.; Sox Jr, H.C. Physicians’ views of the relative importance of thirty medical innovations. Health Aff. 2001, 20, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Vyas, K. 10 Medical Inventions of All Time That Changed the World. Available online: https://interestingengineering.com/10-medical-inventions-of-all-time-that-changed-the-world (accessed on 29 August 2019).
Cancers 12 01380 g001 550
Figure 1. Simulated radio-frequency-induced heating in the phantom with Pavg = 100 W for 15 min. (a) Simulated temperature distribution in the phantom (depth = 25 mm, coronal plane) at 5, 10, and 15 min. (b) Time-dependent temperature evolution in the heated sample (red line, at the red cross located in (a)) compared to the control sample (blue line, at the blue cross located in (a)). The schematic view of the phantom on the right-hand side shows the coronal plane where the temperature distribution maps were taken. The data show that the radio frequency (RF) heating is constrained to the central sample, while the control sample temperature profile is unaffected.
Figure 1. Simulated radio-frequency-induced heating in the phantom with Pavg = 100 W for 15 min. (a) Simulated temperature distribution in the phantom (depth = 25 mm, coronal plane) at 5, 10, and 15 min. (b) Time-dependent temperature evolution in the heated sample (red line, at the red cross located in (a)) compared to the control sample (blue line, at the blue cross located in (a)). The schematic view of the phantom on the right-hand side shows the coronal plane where the temperature distribution maps were taken. The data show that the radio frequency (RF) heating is constrained to the central sample, while the control sample temperature profile is unaffected.
Cancers 12 01380 g001
Cancers 12 01380 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Temperature distribution maps in the phantom at depth = 25 mm obtained with magnetic resonance (MR) thermometry and the bow tie dipole RF antenna. To guide the eye, the gray circles were inserted to mark the sample holders and the black rectangle marked the position of the fiber optic temperature sensor. (b) Temperature along time from the fiber optic temperature sensor readings in the controlled sample holder (blue line), in the heated sample holder (red line) and inside phantom (green line) next to the heated sample (black rectangle in (a)), and temperature obtained by MR thermometry (black dot) at the position of the black rectangle.
Figure 2. (a) Temperature distribution maps in the phantom at depth = 25 mm obtained with magnetic resonance (MR) thermometry and the bow tie dipole RF antenna. To guide the eye, the gray circles were inserted to mark the sample holders and the black rectangle marked the position of the fiber optic temperature sensor. (b) Temperature along time from the fiber optic temperature sensor readings in the controlled sample holder (blue line), in the heated sample holder (red line) and inside phantom (green line) next to the heated sample (black rectangle in (a)), and temperature obtained by MR thermometry (black dot) at the position of the black rectangle.
Cancers 12 01380 g002
Cancers 12 01380 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) 1H-NMR spectrum of acrylated dendritic polyglycerol (dPG-Ac). (b) 1H-NMR spectrum of the nanogels confirming its constitution. (c) Nanogel size vs. temperature curve obtained by dynamic light scattering (intensity). The VPTT defined as the temperature of the inflection point of this curve is 38 °C.
Figure 3. (a) 1H-NMR spectrum of acrylated dendritic polyglycerol (dPG-Ac). (b) 1H-NMR spectrum of the nanogels confirming its constitution. (c) Nanogel size vs. temperature curve obtained by dynamic light scattering (intensity). The VPTT defined as the temperature of the inflection point of this curve is 38 °C.
Cancers 12 01380 g003
Cancers 12 01380 g004 550
Figure 4. Bovine saline albumin labeled with fluorescein (BSA-FITC) release from the nanogels using a water bath as a heat source. After 6 h, 12.5%, 19.5%, and 32.8% of the BSA-FITC were released from the nanogels at 20 °C, 37 °C and 43 °C, respectively. After 19 h, 14.1%, 27.6% and 43.6% of the BSA-FITC were released from the nanogels at 20 °C, 37 °C, and 43 °C, respectively.
Figure 4. Bovine saline albumin labeled with fluorescein (BSA-FITC) release from the nanogels using a water bath as a heat source. After 6 h, 12.5%, 19.5%, and 32.8% of the BSA-FITC were released from the nanogels at 20 °C, 37 °C and 43 °C, respectively. After 19 h, 14.1%, 27.6% and 43.6% of the BSA-FITC were released from the nanogels at 20 °C, 37 °C, and 43 °C, respectively.
Cancers 12 01380 g004
Cancers 12 01380 g005 550
Figure 5. Bovine serum albumin labeled with fluorescein (BSA-FITC) released from the nanogels using RF heating within the MR system. After 6 h, 12.9%, 19.6% and 29.3% of the BSA-FITC were released from the nanogels at T = 20 °C, T = 37 °C, and T = 43 °C, respectively.
Figure 5. Bovine serum albumin labeled with fluorescein (BSA-FITC) released from the nanogels using RF heating within the MR system. After 6 h, 12.9%, 19.6% and 29.3% of the BSA-FITC were released from the nanogels at T = 20 °C, T = 37 °C, and T = 43 °C, respectively.
Cancers 12 01380 g005
Cancers 12 01380 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Photograph of the agarose phantom with sample holders. (b) Schematic of the phantom (top view) with five sample holders located within the RF heated area and two outside for control purposes. (c) Schematics of the phantom (frontal view) depicting the positioning of the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tubes for the insertion of fiber optic temperature sensors. The PTFE tubes were placed at each side of the sample holders (please note that the holders are not all in the same plane) at a depth of 5, 15, and 25 mm and at the bottom of the holders at a depth of 35 mm). (d) Photograph of the bow tie dipole RF antenna. (e) Setup for the electromagnetic field and temperature simulations. The phantom was placed inside a water box with a background temperature of 37 °C, and a bow tie dipole RF antenna was placed on top, centered in the heated sample.
Figure 6. (a) Photograph of the agarose phantom with sample holders. (b) Schematic of the phantom (top view) with five sample holders located within the RF heated area and two outside for control purposes. (c) Schematics of the phantom (frontal view) depicting the positioning of the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tubes for the insertion of fiber optic temperature sensors. The PTFE tubes were placed at each side of the sample holders (please note that the holders are not all in the same plane) at a depth of 5, 15, and 25 mm and at the bottom of the holders at a depth of 35 mm). (d) Photograph of the bow tie dipole RF antenna. (e) Setup for the electromagnetic field and temperature simulations. The phantom was placed inside a water box with a background temperature of 37 °C, and a bow tie dipole RF antenna was placed on top, centered in the heated sample.
Cancers 12 01380 g006
Cancers 12 01380 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Photograph of the experimental setup at the MR system; the agarose gel phantom for holding the Vivaspin filter with the BSA-FITC-loaded nanogels, the water box connected to a water bath for background temperature modification (in this case 37 °C), a bow tie dipole RF antenna for imaging and RF heating, a customized high-power Tx/Rx switch and fiber optic temperature sensors as temperature reference for MR thermometry. (b) MR images of the phantom. The Vivaspin tube with the nanogel sample in the middle sample holder (heated sample) is indicated by the yellow arrows. Left: axial view at a depth of 15 mm (at the level of the second row of the PTFE tubes). Right: axial view at the center of the middle sample holder.
Figure 7. (a) Photograph of the experimental setup at the MR system; the agarose gel phantom for holding the Vivaspin filter with the BSA-FITC-loaded nanogels, the water box connected to a water bath for background temperature modification (in this case 37 °C), a bow tie dipole RF antenna for imaging and RF heating, a customized high-power Tx/Rx switch and fiber optic temperature sensors as temperature reference for MR thermometry. (b) MR images of the phantom. The Vivaspin tube with the nanogel sample in the middle sample holder (heated sample) is indicated by the yellow arrows. Left: axial view at a depth of 15 mm (at the level of the second row of the PTFE tubes). Right: axial view at the center of the middle sample holder.
Cancers 12 01380 g007
Cancers 12 01380 g008 550
Figure 8. Structure of the thermoresponsive nanogel: linear temperature-sensitive polymers based on poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) and poly(N-isopropyl methacrylamide) (PNIPMAM) are crosslinked by acrylated dendritic polyglycerol (dPG-Ac). When the surrounding temperature is higher than the volume phase transition temperature (VPTT) of the thermoresponsive nanogels, they shrink and release the encapsulated cargo.
Figure 8. Structure of the thermoresponsive nanogel: linear temperature-sensitive polymers based on poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) and poly(N-isopropyl methacrylamide) (PNIPMAM) are crosslinked by acrylated dendritic polyglycerol (dPG-Ac). When the surrounding temperature is higher than the volume phase transition temperature (VPTT) of the thermoresponsive nanogels, they shrink and release the encapsulated cargo.
Cancers 12 01380 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ji, Y.; Winter, L.; Navarro, L.; Ku, M.-C.; Periquito, J.S.; Pham, M.; Hoffmann, W.; Theune, L.E.; Calderón, M.; Niendorf, T. Controlled Release of Therapeutics from Thermoresponsive Nanogels: A Thermal Magnetic Resonance Feasibility Study. Cancers 2020, 12, 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061380

AMA Style

Ji Y, Winter L, Navarro L, Ku M-C, Periquito JS, Pham M, Hoffmann W, Theune LE, Calderón M, Niendorf T. Controlled Release of Therapeutics from Thermoresponsive Nanogels: A Thermal Magnetic Resonance Feasibility Study. Cancers. 2020; 12(6):1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061380

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ji, Yiyi, Lukas Winter, Lucila Navarro, Min-Chi Ku, João S. Periquito, Michal Pham, Werner Hoffmann, Loryn E. Theune, Marcelo Calderón, and Thoralf Niendorf. 2020. "Controlled Release of Therapeutics from Thermoresponsive Nanogels: A Thermal Magnetic Resonance Feasibility Study" Cancers 12, no. 6: 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061380

APA Style

Ji, Y., Winter, L., Navarro, L., Ku, M. -C., Periquito, J. S., Pham, M., Hoffmann, W., Theune, L. E., Calderón, M., & Niendorf, T. (2020). Controlled Release of Therapeutics from Thermoresponsive Nanogels: A Thermal Magnetic Resonance Feasibility Study. Cancers, 12(6), 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061380

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop