Next Article in Journal
Improved Survival of Lymphoma Patients with COVID-19 in the Modern Treatment and Vaccination Era
Next Article in Special Issue
The Emerging Roles of Protein Interactions with O-GlcNAc Cycling Enzymes in Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Inhibition of Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) Expression Disrupts Cell Proliferation and Alters Energy Metabolism and Fatty Acid Synthesis in Colon Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Glycosyltransferases in Cancer: Prognostic Biomarkers of Survival in Patient Cohorts and Impact on Malignancy in Experimental Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Aberrant Sialylation in Cancer: Therapeutic Opportunities

Centre for Cancer, Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK
Cancers 2022, 14(17), 4248; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174248
Submission received: 12 July 2022 / Revised: 15 August 2022 / Accepted: 23 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Glycosylation in Cancer—Biomarkers and Targeted Therapies)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

All cells are covered in a thick layer of sugar molecules known as glycans. Changes to this sugar coat are common in cancer, and in particular cancer cells often display high levels of a glycan known as sialic acid. Sialic acid glycans play important roles in cancer biology and can help tumours grow, spread to other sites, and evade the immune system. Strategies to target sialic acid are being actively investigated and hold huge potential for cancer research. Here, I outline why sialic acid is so important in cancer, discuss recent advances in this field, and highlight opportunities for the development of new sialic acid targeting therapies.

Abstract

The surface of every eukaryotic cell is coated in a thick layer of glycans that acts as a key interface with the extracellular environment. Cancer cells have a different ‘glycan coat’ to healthy cells and aberrant glycosylation is a universal feature of cancer cells linked to all of the cancer hallmarks. This means glycans hold huge potential for the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. One key change in tumour glycosylation is increased sialylation, both on N-glycans and O-glycans, which leads to a dense forest of sialylated structures covering the cell surface. This hypersialylation has far-reaching consequences for cancer cells, and sialylated glycans are fundamental in tumour growth, metastasis, immune evasion and drug resistance. The development of strategies to inhibit aberrant sialylation in cancer represents an important opportunity to develop new therapeutics. Here, I summarise recent advances to target aberrant sialylation in cancer, including the development of sialyltransferase inhibitors and strategies to inhibit Siglecs and Selectins, and discuss opportunities for the future.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Glycosylation is the most common, complex, and dynamic post-translational modification of both membrane-bound and secreted proteins [1]. Glycans are fundamental to many biological processes and play a key role in protein folding, stability, trafficking, and activity, and act as regulators of signalling pathways, cell differentiation, immune recognition, and host–pathogen interactions [2,3,4]. Glycans consist of two main classes: O-glycans, initiated in the Golgi apparatus by the initial attachment of GalNAc moieties to serine or threonine residues to form the Tn antigen, and N-glycans, which are initiated in the ER via the addition of an oligosaccharide chain to asparagine residues [5,6]. In addition, intracellular proteins can be modified with O-GlcNAc [7]. Glycan chains may be branched or elongated and the cellular glycome is composed of glycans covalently linked to lipids (glycolipids and glycosphingolipids) or proteins (glycoproteins and proteoglycans). The synthesis of glycans is non-templated, meaning that glycan sequences are not directly coded by the genome [8]. Instead, glycans are produced at the tissue level and can respond dynamically to environmental stimuli and signalling molecules via the coordinated activity of biosynthetic enzymes, the trafficking of these enzymes to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus, and the availability of sugar donors [3]. Glycans can be conjugated to proteins and lipids, or they can be secreted without conjugation to other macromolecules. In human cells, glycans are primarily constructed from ten monosaccharides: glucose (Glc), galactose (Gal), N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), fucose (Fuc), sialic acid (Neu5Ac), mannose (Man), xylose (Xyl), glucuronic acid (GlcA), and iduronic acid (IdoA). These monosaccharides are assembled into glycans by biosynthetic enzymes in the Golgi apparatus and the ER, and additional complexity can arise from further modifications by sulfation, phosphorylation, methylation, and acetylation. In addition to glycosylation being an intracellular event, recent studies have demonstrated that glycans can undergo further modification by extracellular enzymes, further revealing the complexity of the dynamic glycome [9,10,11].
Aberrant glycosylation in cancer was first described more than fifty years ago [12]. Since then, changes to glycans have been identified in every type of cancer [13], and altered glycosylation has been linked to all of the cancer hallmarks [3,14,15]. Many of the first cancer-specific antibodies detect oncofoetal antigens present on embryonic and cancer cells but not in adult healthy tissue [16], and numerous FDA-approved tumour markers, including CEA, CA125, and PSA, are glycan antigens or glycoproteins [17,18,19]. Common changes to the tumour glycome include aberrant sialylation, fucosylation, truncated O-glycans and alterations to O- and N-glycan branching. A dense layer of tumour-associated glycans coats the cell surface of cancer cells and is a driving force behind tumour growth, metastasis and immune evasion [15,20,21]. Aberrant glycosylation can interfere with cell adhesion molecules such as cadherins and integrins and alter the function of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). Tumour-associated glycans can also bind to lectins, including galectins, sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-type lectins (Siglecs) and Selectins. Glycans have functional roles in regulating cell proliferation, cell signalling, cell adhesion, extracellular matrix interactions and proximal and distal communication [3]. These biological processes play a critical role in cancer biology, and it has become evident that tumour glycosylation can have a major impact on cancer progression, tumour immunity, and clinical outcome.
Sialic acid is a key monosaccharide building block of mammalian cell-surface glycans and in humans, the most common sialic acid is N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac). Sialic acid residues are present at the tip of glycans, positioning them at the forefront of crucial biological processes [22]. One common feature of cancer cells is increased cell-surface sialylation [22,23]. The ‘sialome’ is a subclass of the glycome [24], and has been described as a dense forest coating the cell surface in a complex array of sialylated structures that has far-reaching consequences for cancer [25]. In this review, I discuss the mechanisms behind how cancer cells become hypersialylated, how increased sialylation is advantageous to cancer cells and tumours, and highlight emerging strategies to target aberrant sialylation to develop new cancer therapeutics.

2. Aberrant Sialylation in Cancer

Aberrant sialylation is a prominent feature across many cancer types and has been recognised as a cancer hallmark [26,27]. The first indications that sialylation is important in tumourigenesis came from studies that discovered increased sialylation and sialyltransferase activity in malignant cells [28,29,30], and showed that the pre-treatment of cancer cells with neuraminidase can reduce engraftment and inhibit tumour growth in vivo [31,32,33]. Early studies also showed that the ability of tumour cells to metastasise correlates with total sialic acid levels [34], and it was proposed that increased sialylation in tumour cells can act as a mask to evade recognition by the immune system [29]. Sialoglycans are known to regulate glycoprotein and glycolipid structure, stability, function and trafficking, and a growing body of evidence now demonstrates how hypersialylation is advantageous to tumours. Increased sialylation of cancer cells can promote tumour growth, metastasis, immune evasion and drug resistance [23], meaning strategies to block aberrant sialylation on tumours will be highly beneficial.
Cancer patients have long been reported to express ‘Hanganutziu–Deicher’ antibodies that recognise gangliosides carrying the non-human sialic acid Neu5Gc (N-glycolylneuraminic acid), which is also detected in human tumours [15]. Neu5Gc is a major form of sialic acid in mammals but cannot be biosynthetically produced in humans due to the loss of CMP-sialic acid hydroxylase (CMAH) [35,36,37]. Neu5Gc differs from human sialic acid, Neu5Ac, by addition of a single oxygen atom and can be present in humans due to the incorporation of diet-derived Neu5Gc into human glycans [15,38]. Humans show variable levels of anti-Neu5Gc antibodies, which has been linked to tumourigenesis. Specifically, in a humanised mouse model lacking the CMAH gene, anti-Neu5Gc antibodies have been linked to an increased rate of liver cancer [35]. The primary dietary source of Neu5Gc is red meat, and it has been speculated that this may help explain the increased cancer risk associated with red meat consumption [15].

2.1. Sialylated Glycans

The cell surface of cancer cells is covered in a dense layer of sialylated glycans, which can include sialyl-Tn (sTn), sialyl-T (sT) and sialyl-Lewis antigens, polysialic acid, and gangliosides [39] (Figure 1 and Table 1). These tumour-associated antigens are often exploited as markers for the detection and monitoring of cancer [15,40]. The sTn antigen is a truncated O-glycan containing a sialic acid α-2,6 linked to GalNAc and is a well-characterised cancer-associated glycan that is upregulated in virtually all epithelial cancers and associated with a poor patient outcomes [40]. sTn has been investigated widely as a circulating biomarker for several cancers, and a vaccine against sTn has been tested in clinical trials [41]. The sialyl-T (sT) antigen (Neu5Acα2-3Galβ1-3GalNAc-) is upregulated in several tumour types, including breast, ovarian, brain and renal cancers, and is associated with reduced survival times in patients [42,43,44,45,46,47].
Other important sialylated glycans include the sialyl Lewis antigens, sLeA and sLeX, which are found at high levels in many solid tumours and adenocarcinomas. Both sLeA and sLeX are ligands for Selectins, a family of lectins that play a role in immune-cell trafficking [48]. Cancer cells displaying sLeA and SLeX are recognised as leucocytes, which enables them to leave the bloodstream and metastasise to other sites [49]. The cancer antigen CA 19-9 contains sLeA and is routinely used to monitor treatment response in pancreatic cancer [50], and sLeX is associated with a higher risk of metastasis [51,52]. Increased levels of sialylation on cancer cells also leads to upregulation of sialylated ligands that are recognised by lectin receptors known as Siglecs (Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-type lectins) on immune cells, and Siglec–sialoglycan interactions can modulate immune cell function and promote an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME) [53] (Figure 2).
Cancer cells also display increased expression of the α2,8-linked polymer known as polysialic acid (polySia). Upregulation of polysialic acid has been detected in several cancer types and is associated with high-grade tumours [3,22,54,55]. Polysialic acid is often present on NCAM1 (neural cell adhesion molecule 1) [54,56], and expression correlates with metastatic disease and poor clinical prognosis [57,58]. Gangliosides (sialic-acid-containing glycosphingolipids) such as the complex ganglioside GD2 can also be upregulated in cancer and are implicated in tumour development [59,60]. Strategies to therapeutically target GD2 are currently in development, including GD2-CAR T cell therapy [61] and the monoclonal antibody dinutuximab [62]. The ganglioside GM3 is also implicated in cancer and is being investigated as a target for immunotherapy [63,64]. In addition to an overall upregulation of sialylated glycans in tumour cells, there can also be changes in sialic acid modifications [15]. A growing number of studies associate sialic acid O-acetylation with cancer, and this has been linked to metastasis and tumour immunity [65,66,67].
Table 1. Summary of sialylation changes in cancer.
Table 1. Summary of sialylation changes in cancer.
Sialylation ChangeLink to CancerReferences
sialyl Tn (sTn)sTn is upregulated in numerous epithelial cancers and associated with poor patient outcomes. sTn has been investigated as a circulating biomarker for several cancers, and the Theratope vaccine against sTn has been tested in clinical trials.[40,41]
Sialyl-T (sT)The sT antigen is upregulated in several tumour types, including breast, ovarian, brain and renal cancers, and is associated with reduced survival times in patients. [42,43,44,45,46,47].
Selectin ligandsThe sialyl Lewis antigens (sLeA and SLeX) are found at high levels in many cancer types and linked to metastasis. sLeA and SLeX are ligands for Selectins and enable cancer cells to leave the bloodstream and colonise other organs.[48,49,51,52]
Siglec ligandsIncreased levels of sialylation on cancer cells leads to upregulation of sialylated ligands that are recognised by Siglec receptors on immune cells. Siglec–sialoglycan interactions can modulate immune cell function and promote an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME).[53]
Polysialic acid (polySia)Polysialic acid is often upregulated in high-grade tumours, and expression correlates with metastatic disease and poor clinical prognosis.[3,22,54,55,57,58]
Gangliosides The gangliosides GD2 and GM3 can be upregulated in cancer and are being actively investigated as therapeutic targets.[59,60,61,62,63,64]

2.2. Sialyltransferase Enzymes

Twenty different sialyltransferase enzymes have been identified and classified into four groups: ST3GAL, ST6GAL, ST6GALNAC and ST8SIA [68,69]. These enzymes add sialic acid (Neu5Ac) to galactose (ST3GAL and ST6GAL), N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) (ST6GALNAC), or sialic acid (ST8SIA) in α2-3, α2-6, or α2-8 glycosidic linkages, respectively [70]. The altered expression of sialyltransferase enzymes plays a critical role in tumour biology, and sialyltransferase enzymes have been linked to malignant disease [22]. Sialic acid can be removed from glycoconjugates by sialidase enzymes (also known as neuraminidases) [71]. There are four sialidase enzymes (NEU1-4) [72], and individual sialidases have also been associated with certain cancer types [73]. The upregulation of sialyltransferases has been linked to Ras and c-Myc signalling, as well as gene amplification, DNA methylation, hypoxia and androgen steroid hormones [74,75,76,77].
The most well-described sialyltransferase is human ST6GAL1, which adds sialic acids in an α2-6 linkage to galactose residues of Galβ1-4GlcNAc-R on N-glycans [75]. A second enzyme, ST6GAL2, can also add α2-6 linked sialic acid to N-glycans, but this enzyme is mainly expressed in the brain [78]. ST6GAL1 is overexpressed in numerous cancer types, and there is extensive literature linking ST6GAL1 to tumour grade, metastasis and poor patient prognosis [75,79,80,81,82]. ST6GAL1 mediated α2,6-linked sialylation of receptors, including the β1 integrin [83,84,85,86,87], the receptor tyrosine kinases EGFR, MET and HER2 [88,89,90] and the Fas and TNFR1 death receptors [91,92], can promote invasion and resistance to apoptosis. ST6GAL1 is also implicated in the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) [88,93] and can promote a cancer-stem-cell phenotype [80,94]. In addition, ST6GAL1 can modulate T-cell responses in the tumour microenvironment and play a role in cancer cell immune evasion [95,96].
Canonically, ST6GAL1 is localised intracellularly within the trans-Golgi network, and it is within this context that the role of ST6GAL1 in cancer biology has been interpreted. However, catalytically active ST6GAL1 is also present in extracellular spaces and systemic circulation, and extracellular ST6GAL1 is a potent modifier of processes including inflammatory cell production, haematopoiesis, B-cell differentiation and the sialylation of IgG [10,97,98,99]. Early work suggested that circulating ST6GAL1 is mainly released by the liver [100], but recent studies suggest that cancer cells also have the capacity to increase extracellular ST6GAL1 levels [11,101]. ST6GAL1 detected in patient blood has been identified as a novel biomarker for lenvatinib-susceptible FGF19-driven hepatocellular carcinoma, which could aid in optimal drug selection [101]. Excitingly, a recent study revealed that breast cancer cells release ST6GAL1 in exosome-like vesicles, and this extracellular enzyme can remodel the cell surface and secrete glycans to promote breast cancer cell growth and invasiveness [11]. This finding is consistent with previous findings that exosomes are enriched with both ST6GAL1 and α2,6-sialylated glycoproteins [102,103], and raises the intriguing possibility of targeting extracellular ST6GAL1 therapeutically.
ST3GAL1 acts predominantly on core-1 O-glycans and catalyses the transfer of sialic acid to a galactose residue in α2-3 linkage to generate the sialyl-T antigen from the T antigen Galβ1-3GalNAc. ST3GAL1 is overexpressed in malignant tissues, including breast [42] and ovarian cancer [43]. In breast cancer, ST3GAL1 has been shown to promote tumorigenesis [104] and is associated with poor clinical outcomes and an inflammatory phenotype [105,106]. ST3GAL1 has also been linked to immune evasion through the sialylation of CD55 [107]. In pancreatic cancer, ST3GAL1 enhances metastatic potential [108] and promotes the synthesis of ligands for Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 on tumour cells to drive tumour-associated macrophage differentiation [109]. Other members of the ST3 family, namely ST3GAL4 and ST3GAL6, have been linked to cancer [22,110,111,112,113,114]. ST3GAL4 and ST3GAL6 are both involved in the synthesis of sLeA and sLeX [48,115]. Cell-surface glycans containing sLeA and sLeX act as binding ligands for Selectins and play key roles in facilitating metastasis. ST3GAL4 upregulation promotes c-Met activation and an invasive phenotype in gastric carcinoma cells [114], and in multiple myeloma ST3GAL6 promotes homing and engraftment to the bone marrow niche and is associated with inferior overall survival in patients [111].
The ST6GALNAC family catalyses the glycosidic linkage of sialic acids to GalNAc (N-galactosamine) residues found on O-glycosylated proteins or glycolipids in an α2-6 linkage. ST6GALNAC1 adds sialic acid to O-linked GalNAc residues to promote the formation of the tumour-associated sialyl-Tn (sTn) antigen [116]. sTn is overexpressed in many cancer types [40,117] and is associated with poor clinical outcomes [118,119,120,121]. Upregulation of ST6GALNAC1 can promote tumour growth and metastasis [122,123,124] and is linked to cancer cell stemness [121,123]. ST6GALNAC1 can be induced by cytokines [125], and studies show that binding of sTn to Siglec-15 on macrophages can suppress T-cell responses, leading to immune evasion in the tumour microenvironment [126,127,128]. High expression of ST6GALNAC2, which synthesises the sialyl-6-T antigen and to a lesser extent sialylates the Tn antigen [116,129], has been linked to poor prognosis in colorectal cancer [130] and metastasis in thyroid cancer [131], but has been identified as a metastasis suppressor and correlated with increased patient survival times in breast cancer [132].
ST8SIA enzymes transfer a sialic acid residue to another sialic acid in α2-8 linkages, contributing to the synthesis of oligosialic and polysialic acid chains [133,134,135]. Of particular interest, 2,8-disialic structures have been shown to be ligands for Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 and may act as glycoimmune checkpoints in cancer [100,101]. ST8SIA2 and ST8SIA4 are polysialyltransferases producing polysialylated cell adhesion molecules, which are re-expressed during cancer progression [134,136,137]. ST8SIA2 correlates with tumour progression in non-small-cell lung cancer [138] and has been linked to tumour invasion and metastasis [139,140]. ST8SIA4 is overexpressed in breast and renal cell carcinoma tissues [141,142] and is linked to chemoresistance in acute myeloid leukaemia [143]. In contrast, in follicular thyroid carcinoma, ST8SIA4 is downregulated and has been shown to suppress tumour growth [144]. ST8SIA3 generates oligo-sialylated structures [133] and has been identified as a therapeutic target for glioblastomas [145]. Other ST8SIA family members, including ST8SIA1, ST8SIA and ST8SIA6, have also been linked to a malignant potential. ST8SIA1 and ST8SIA5 produce di- and tri-sialylated structures, respectively, but exclusively on gangliosides. ST8SIA1 (also known as GD3 synthase) catalyses the ganglioside GD3 [15] and has been associated with tumour growth and progression [146,147]. Decreased expression of ST8SIA5 correlates with reduced survival in patients with colorectal cancer [148] and has been linked to gene regulation by FOXO3, which may facilitate inflammation-mediated colon cancer growth [148]. ST8SIA6 transfers sialic acid onto NeuAcα2,3 (6)Gal disaccharide acceptor substrates including glycolipids and O-linked glycoproteins [149] to generate α2,8-linked disialic acids. ST8SIA6 is upregulated in many cancer types and is associated with poor prognosis [150]. Studies show that ST8SIA6 can promote tumour growth in mice by inhibiting immune responses in tumours, characterised by macrophage polarisation toward M2 and upregulation of the immune modulator arginase [150].

2.3. Sialidase Enzymes

Sialidases cleave sialic acids from glycoconjugates and are key enzymes controlling the sialic acid content of cells. Sialylation levels can be modified synergistically by both sialyltransferase and sialidase enzymes, and while the role of sialyltransferase enzymes in malignancy is well-explored, far fewer studies have investigated the role of sialidases in cancer. There are four mammalian sialidases, NEU1-4, and each enzyme has a distinct cellular location. NEU1 is predominantly located in lysosomes, NEU2 in the cytosol, NEU3 in the plasma membrane, and NEU4 is located in mitochondria [151]. The four human sialidases also differ in their substrate specificities and appear to have differing roles in malignancy [151].
Published data investigating the role of NEU1 in cancer are somewhat contradictory. In colon cancer, NEU1 has been linked to the suppression of metastasis through de-sialylation of integrin beta4 [152], and in bladder cancer, NEU1 is downregulated and can suppress in vivo tumour formation by inhibiting Akt signalling [153]. Downregulation of NEU1 can also inhibit the cell proliferation and invasion capabilities of ovarian cancer cells [154]. However, in contrast, studies have also demonstrated that NEU1 can promote pancreatic cancer metastasis [155]. NEU3 is upregulated in numerous cancer types [156,157,158,159] and contributes to tumorigenesis, most likely by modifying transmembrane signalling [160], and downregulation of NEU4 correlates with increased invasion in colon cancers [161]. These studies show that while increased sialylation of tumours is often attributed to the upregulation of sialyltransferase enzymes, sialidase enzymes are also important modulators of sialylation in cancer cells and can contribute to tumour hypersialylation.

3. The Functional Role of Sialylation in Cancer

3.1. Metastasis

Metastasis is the spread of cancer cells from the primary tumour to surrounding tissues and other organs and is the main cause of death in cancer patients [162]. Metastasis consists of several steps to enable cancer cells to leave the primary tumour mass, to intravasate and survive in the circulation, to extravasate and seed in secondary sites, and to initiate the growth of metastatic lesions. Although recent advances have shed light on the metastatic cascade [163], there is still more to uncover, in particular in relation to the role of glycosylation in metastasis. Hypersialylation is closely linked to a pro-metastatic phenotype, and sialylated glycans are critical to several processes involved in metastasis [13,25,32].
Altered adhesion between cancer cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM) and other cells in the tumour is a key mechanism that allows cells to dissociate from the primary tumour, leading to potential metastasis at secondary sites. Numerous studies have revealed a link between hypersialylation and the altered adhesion of cancer cells [25]. For example, the sialylation of integrins can modulate the adhesion, migration, and signalling of metastatic cells [85,86,87,164]. In breast cancer cells, α2,6 hypersialylation of integrin β1 decreases cell adhesion [165], and in colon cancer cells, enhanced sialylation of β1 promotes adhesion to collagen I and increases cancer cell migration [84], and decreased sialylation of integrin β4 can suppress cell migration, adhesion and invasion [152].
EMT is the process by which immobile epithelial cells transition into motile mesenchymal cells [166]. EMT involves the disruption of cell–cell adhesion and polarity, remodelling of the cytoskeleton, and changes to cell–matrix adhesion. Sialyltransferases play an integral role in EMT to promote cancer cell invasiveness and metastatic activity [167]. In breast cancer, ST6GAL1 can promote TGFβ-induced EMT as well as maintenance of a mesenchymal state [93], and in pancreatic cancer, ST6GAL1-mediated sialylation can upregulate mesenchymal markers and enhance cell invasion [168]. The ST3GAL1 enzyme has also been shown to promote cell migration, invasion, and TGF-β1-induced EMT in ovarian cancer [43,47]. In contrast, other studies show that sialylation can be downregulated during EMT, but then increased again once cells are in a mesenchymal state [169].
To metastasise, cancer cells circulating in the bloodstream or lymphatic system must ‘tether’ to cells at a secondary site by interacting with extracellular molecules, followed by ‘rolling’ of the cancer cell against endothelial cells, resulting in firm adhesion and facilitating extravasation and colonisation. The adhesion of tumour cells to endothelial cells occurs through interactions with a family of cell-adhesion molecules known as Selectins [48,115]. Selectins are classified as P-, E-, and L-selectin and are expressed on platelets, endothelial cells and leukocytes, respectively, and their ligands, sLeA and sLeX, are found on cell-surface antigens such as CD24, CD44 and the P-selectin glycoprotein ligand (PSGL1) [3,170]. The Selectins and their ligands play a key role in cancer metastasis [115,171,172,173] and have also been linked to therapy resistance [174,175]. E-selectin ligands have been shown to promote homing to bone marrow and may play a role in the metastasis of cancer cells to bone [176]. E-selectin is also important in breast cancer, where E-selectin facilitates entry into the bone marrow niche [177], and the binding of cancer cells to E-selectin induces EMT and WNT signalling and promotes breast cancer bone metastasis [178].

3.2. Cancer Cell Survival

The ability of cancer cells to evade programmed cell death by apoptosis is a hallmark of cancer [179]. Glycans play an important role in many of the processes leading to apoptosis, and altered glycosylation of cell death receptors can enable cancer cells to resist cell death [180]. Hypersialylation of receptors, such as Fas and tumour necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1) death receptor, can protect against apoptosis and contribute to increased cancer cell survival [91,92]. Sialylated glycans can also inhibit interactions between Galectin-3 (Gal-3) and its binding partners (which include integrins, collagen, mucins, and fibronectin) [181]. Together, these findings highlight the role of sialylated glycans in promoting cancer cell survival and raise the possibility of targeting aberrant sialylation as a therapeutic strategy to hinder the ability of cancer cells to evade apoptosis.

3.3. Immune Evasion

To grow and successfully metastasise, cancer cells must avoid detection and destruction by the immune system [182]. One way cancer cells achieve this is by mimicking the cell-surface glycosylation of healthy cells to employ a self signal and avoid immune attack [183]. Glycan structures on the cell surface are among the first assemblies that interact with immune cells, and the specific glycan signatures found on tumour cells, known as the tumour glyco-code, can alter how the immune system perceives cancer cells and can induce immune suppression [184]. The early evidence that tumour sialic acid promotes immune evasion came from the discovery that de-sialylated fibrosarcoma cells show decreased proliferation in immunocompetent mice but not in irradiated mice [185]. A family of lectin receptors known as Siglecs (Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-type lectins) have emerged as key mediators of this effect [186] and hypersialylation is now emerging as a potential new immune checkpoint [53] (Figure 2). Siglecs are primarily expressed on immune cells, such as T cells, NK cells and monocytes, and have an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif [187]. Siglecs transmit inhibitory signals and are comparable with the immune checkpoint inhibitor programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) [187,188]. A recent explosion of data implicating Siglecs in cancer has made this an active area of research [188], and studies have shown that tumour cells can exploit Siglec-sialoglycan interactions to modulate immune cell function and promote an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME) [53].
Siglec-7 and -9 expression on tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) can promote cancer progression by driving macrophage polarisation towards the M2 phenotype to establish an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment [109,189,190]. Siglec-10 is also expressed by tumour-associated macrophages and can interact with tumour-expressed CD24 to promote immune suppression [191]. Similarly, interactions between tumour sialoglycans and Siglec-7 or Siglec-9 expressed on natural-killer (NK) cells can inhibit tumour cell death [192,193]. In mouse models of lung cancer, neutrophils that express Siglec-F (the mouse homologue to Siglecs 5 and 8) can remodel the tumour immune microenvironment and drive the growth of tumours [194]. Studies suggest that T cells can express and be negatively regulated by Siglec-5, Siglec-7, Siglec-9 and Siglec-10 [195,196], and Siglec-15 has been shown to increase tumour growth rates and suppresses antigen-specific T-cell responses [126]. Siglec-15 has also been identified as an immune suppressor. Recent findings show that Siglec-15 is upregulated in the tumour microenvironment, and its expression is mutually exclusive to PDL1 across numerous cancer types [126].
Although it was initially hypothesised that immune cells expressing Siglecs are inhibited upon binding to sialylated ligands on target cells, it has now been discovered that Siglec-15 is present on both tumour-infiltrating myeloid cells and tumour cells [126]. There are differences in Siglecs between mouse and humans [197], and moving forward, the development of models expressing human Siglecs on murine immune cells or mouse models engrafted with human immune cells [198,199,200] will increase our understanding of the role Siglecs play in the tumour microenvironment [22]. In addition to Siglecs, numerous other mechanisms have been proposed for how hypersialylation modulates the host immune response to cancer cells, including the skewing of T cell responses [96,201] and sialic-acid-mediated self-recognition by complement factor H [202].

3.4. Therapy Resistance

Increased sialylation of tumours can contribute to chemotherapy and radiotherapy resistance in several types of cancer, believed to be potentially due to the physical barrier of extra sialic acid on the cell surface potentially absorbing ionising radiation, modifying key receptors, and blocking the uptake of drug molecules into the cell. Altered sialylation of tumour cells has been linked to cisplatin and paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer [43,203,204], docetaxel sensitivity in hepatocarcinoma [205], imatinib resistance in chronic myeloid leukaemia [206], multidrug resistance in human acute myeloid leukaemia [143], chemotherapy resistance in gastric cancer [207], resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibition in lung cancer [208], and bortezomib sensitivity of myeloma cells [49]. A correlation between hypersialylation and radiotherapy resistance have also been reported, particularly in colorectal cancer [209,210,211,212]. A recent study also reported that sialylation of the oncogenic receptor Erb2 can mask the epitope of an anti-cancer antibody (trastuzumab) to promote resistance to treatment [213]. These studies raise the potential for targeting aberrant sialylation alongside existing therapies to boost treatment response and suggest that sialylated glycans can likely also be exploited to predict sensitivity and resistance to treatment strategies. As the mechanisms underlying sialic-acid-mediated drug resistance are poorly understood, further investigations in this area will be crucial to develop new therapeutic strategies to disarm drug resistance.

4. Therapeutic Strategies to Inhibit Aberrant Sialylation

4.1. Sialyltransferase Inhibition

There are several potential strategies to block the incorporation of sialic acid onto cell-surface glycans. These include inhibition of the CMP-sialic acid transporter and inhibition of sialyltransferase enzymes. Targeting CMP-sialic acid via a specific inhibitor decreases cell-surface sialic acid and can inhibit the metastasis of colorectal cancer [214], and knockdown of the CMP-sialic acid transporter impeded the growth of melanoma tumours and suggested that hypersialylation impedes T-cell-mediated anti-tumour responses while promoting tumour-associated regulatory T cells [215].
Inhibition of sialyltransferase enzymes is also being pursued as a strategy to block cell-surface sialylation. The cell-permeable peracetylated 3Fax-Neu5Ac (P-3FAX-Neu5Ac) is a global metabolic inhibitor of sialylation [216,217]. Intracellularly, the fluorinated prodrug P-3Fax-Neu5Ac is converted into the active inhibitor CMP-3Fax-Neu5Ac to inhibit all sialyltransferases and reduce global sialylation. 3FAX-Neu5Ac fails to be used as a substrate by biosynthetic enzymes, and thus diminishes sialic acid content by ~80–90%. However, when P-3FAX-Neu5Ac was tested in a murine model, the global inhibition of sialylation produces liver and kidney dysfunction [218]. To overcome the deleterious effect on liver and kidney function, Bull et al. have performed targeted delivery of P-3FAX-Neu5Ac using nanoparticles to prevent metastasis in a mouse lung cancer model [219], and have also utilised intra-tumoural injection of 3Fax-Neu5Ac to suppress tumour growth in multiple cancer models by promoting T-cell-mediated immunity [201]. Despite the localised site of injection, renal toxicity was still noted at higher doses, thus highlighting the need for better-tolerated versions of 3FAX-Neu5Ac for use in vivo. Further derivatives of 3Fax-Neu5Ac have been developed and tested as cancer therapeutics, including C-5-modified 3-fluoro sialic acid sialyltransferase inhibitors (where the natural N-acetamide group is replaced with a carbamate functionality) [220]. These novel inhibitors are more efficiently metabolised towards their CMP analogues, reach higher effective concentrations within the cell, and induce prolonged inhibition of both α2,3 and α2,6-linked sialylation [220]. Hence, C-5 carbamate sialyltransferase inhibitors hold promise to inhibit sialylation in cancer, and future studies should explore the use of these new inhibitors in vivo.
Several natural products with the potential to inhibit sialyltransferases are available, including ginsenosides, which can inhibit both α-2,3- and α-2,6-sialylation [221], soyasaponin I, which inhibits ST3GAL1 [222,223], flavonoids that can inhibit ST6GAL1 [224], and lithocholic acid, which is active against ST3GAL1 [225,226]. Further derivatives of lithocholic acid have been developed, including the novel sialyltransferase inhibitor Lith-O-Asp, which inhibits ST3GAL1, ST3GAL3 and ST6GAL1 and can suppress metastasis [226]. Sialyltransferase inhibitors have also been identified through high-throughput screening, where lead compounds include pyrazole, which shows high selectivity towards ST3GAL3 [227]. In addition, cyclopentanoid-type compounds have also been developed and have shown promise as sialyltransferase inhibitors [228].
Due to the potential off-target effects on the liver and kidney exhibited by the pan-inhibitor 3FAX-Neu5Ac, it has been suggested that for sialyltransferase inhibitors to proceed to clinical trials, they will need to be specific to individual enzymes [25]. However, as sialyltransferase enzymes are often membrane-bound proteins, this has led to difficulties in successfully crystallising the enzymes, and only a handful of human sialyltransferase structures exist [229]. These include ST6GAL1 [230], ST6GalNAC2 [231], and ST8SIA3 [232] and have enabled the development of a new series of carbamate-linked sialyltransferase inhibitors [233]. Of particular interest, arbamate-linked uridyl-based inhibitors of human ST6GAL1 have been developed and provide a promising new class of sialyltransferase inhibitors to be further explored [233]. To date, ST3GAL1 and ST6GAL1 have been the most commonly investigated and targeted sialyltransferase enzymes in cancer. Moving forward, wider studies including the entire panel of 20 human sialyltransferases hold exciting potential to develop novel inhibitors.

4.2. Selectin Inhibitors

Anti-selectin antibodies, antibodies that target selectin ligands, and other platforms to block Selectin–ligand interactions are being investigated as a means of blocking cancer metastasis. Anti-Selectin antibodies in the pipeline as agents to block Selectin–ligand interactions include crizanlizumab, which blocks P-selectin [234], and specific humanized blocking antibodies for P-selectin and PSGL-1 [235]. The E-selectin inhibitor Uproleselan (GMI-1271), developed by GlycoMimetics, has shown promise for treating acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in combination with chemotherapy (NCT02306291) [175,236,237], with phase III trial results expected in 2023 (NCT03616470), and may also re-sensitise multiple myeloma to therapy [235]. In addition, other pharmacological approaches to disrupt Selectin–ligand interactions are also being developed [238,239,240,241,242].

4.3. Antibody–Sialidase Conjugates

Increased sialylation helps cancer cells evade immune destruction, and targeting aberrant sialylation offers the ability to reprogram immune responses to tumours. Sialidase treatment of a variety of cancer cells has been shown to remove Siglec ligands and enhance the clearance of cancer cells injected into mice, thus highlighting an exciting opportunity to sensitise cancer cells to immunosurveillance [192,243]. Antibody–sialidase conjugates can enable the targeted destruction of self-associated sialylated glycans to enhance anti-tumour immunity [244]. Novel routes to target Siglec–sialic acid interactions include using a sialidase conjugated to a HER2 antibody (trastuzumab) to de-sialylate cancer cells [193,245]. Here, cancer cell de-sialylation can remove Siglec ligands and enhance NK cell killing of breast cancer cells. Improved antibody–enzyme conjugates have now been developed that utilise a human sialidase with improved biocompatibility and stability in vivo [246]. In syngeneic breast cancer models, the removal of sialylated glycans enhanced immune cell infiltration and activation and prolonged survival times in mice with trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer. These reagents are currently being further developed by Palleon Pharmaceuticals [188], who are evaluating an HER2–sialidase conjugate, as both a single agent and in combination with pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, melanoma, pancreatic cancer, and ovarian cancer (NCT05259696). This exciting Phase I/II clinical trial will evaluate destroying sialylated glycan-mediated immune checkpoints in combination with traditional immune checkpoint blockade as a novel approach to overcome immune resistance in cancer. Antibody–sialidase conjugates could be applicable to other tumour types in addition to breast cancer. It is exciting to speculate that human sialidases could be conjugated to other antibodies, including, for example, a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) antibody, to selectively de-sialylate prostate cancer cells and induce an anti-tumour immune response. In addition, whereas sialidases can remove Siglec ligands, other enzymes can likely also be used to modify the cancer glycocalyx.

4.4. Anti-Siglec Antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies that target glycan-binding proteins have shown promise as therapeutic agents. Antibodies avoid some of the challenges of directly targeting glycans and benefit from favourable pharmacokinetics and manufacture. Anti-Siglec antibodies can potentially block Siglec–ligand interactions and modulate the function of immune cells. Several companies are pursuing strategies to create Siglec-blocking antibodies. Anti-Siglec-9 antibodies can prevent Siglec-9 inhibitions on TAMs [247] and are currently in preclinical development for cancer immunotherapy [248]. Anti-Siglec 7 antibodies have been shown to be effective at blocking Siglec–ligand interactions to promote NK-mediated killing [192], and an anti-Siglec-15 blocking antibody (NC318) is currently being tested in clinical trials (NCT03665285) [249,250].

4.5. Vaccines

The development of vaccines as human glycan-targeted therapeutics is an active area of research. MUC1 decorated with sTn can predict survival in ovarian cancer [251], which led to the development of the Theratope sTn-KLH vaccine [252,253]. Initial clinical trials showed that Theratope can promote the generation of antibodies against sTn [254], and the presence of anti-sTn antibodies correlates with increased patient survival [255]. However, unfortunately, a phase III clinical trial (NCT00003638) for metastatic breast cancer found no benefit for patients receiving the Theratope vaccine [256]. It is important to note that patient eligibility for the trial was not determined by tumour sTn expression, which could explain the failure of this trial. Other vaccines have since been developed, including a unimolecular pentavalent vaccine (containing glycan portions of Globo-H, GM2, sTn, TF and the Tn antigen) that increased antibody titres to these antigens in a phase I clinical trial (NCT01248273) [257]. A KLH conjugate vaccine has also been produced for sLeA and tested in metastatic breast cancer patients (NCT00470574) [258].

5. Conclusions

Hypersialylation is a common feature of tumours that has far-reaching consequences. Aberrant sialylation plays a key role in tumour progression by enabling evasion of cell death and immunosurveillance and by promoting metastasis. Sialylated glycans can also contribute to chemotherapy and radiotherapy resistance in several cancer types. Targeting abnormal sialylation represents an exciting strategy to develop new glycan-targeting therapeutics, and the groundwork has been laid for an explosion of therapeutic opportunities in this area. Among the most promising therapeutic agents in the pipeline are sialyltransferase inhibitors, antibodies and inhibitors targeting Siglecs and Selectins, antibody–sialidase conjugates, and vaccines (Figure 3 and Table 2). The sialome acts as an essential interface between cells and the surrounding microenvironment; however, much remains to be uncovered regarding the function of sialylated glycans in disease. New approaches to improve our ability to detect altered sialylation will catalyse the development of new glycan-targeted therapeutics. As the focus of cancer therapy moves towards precision medicine, the tumour glycome will provide clinically actionable information towards patient-tailored treatments. There is much to be gained from targeting aberrant sialylation in cancer but still so much to explore.

Funding

This work was supported by Prostate Cancer UK through a Research Innovation Award (RIA16-ST2-011), Prostate Cancer Research (grant reference 6961), and The Mark Foundation for Cancer Research.

Conflicts of Interest

J.M. is a shareholder and Director of GlycoScoreDx Ltd. The funders had no role in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Varki, A.; Kornfeld, S. Historical Background and Overview. In Essentials of Glycobiology; Varki, A., Cummings, R.D., Esko, J.D., Stanley, P., Hart, G.W., Aebi, M., Mohnen, D., Kinoshita, T., Packer, N.H., Prestegard, J.H., et al., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  2. Möckl, L. The Emerging Role of the Mammalian Glycocalyx in Functional Membrane Organization and Immune System Regulation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pinho, S.S.; Reis, C.A. Glycosylation in cancer: Mechanisms and clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2015, 15, 540–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gagneux, P.; Hennet, T.; Varki, A. Biological Functions of Glycans. In Essentials of Glycobiology; Varki, A., Cummings, R.D., Esko, J.D., Stanley, P., Hart, G.W., Aebi, M., Mohnen, D., Kinoshita, T., Packer, N.H., Prestegard, J.H., et al., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 79–92. [Google Scholar]
  5. Stanley, P.; Moremen, K.W.; Lewis, N.E.; Taniguchi, N.; Aebi, M. N-Glycans. In Essentials of Glycobiology; Varki, A., Cummings, R.D., Esko, J.D., Stanley, P., Hart, G.W., Aebi, M., Mohnen, D., Kinoshita, T., Packer, N.H., Prestegard, J.H., et al., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 103–116. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brockhausen, I.; Wandall, H.H.; Hagen, K.G.T.; Stanley, P. O-Galnac Glycans. In Essentials of Glycobiology; Varki, A., Cummings, R.D., Esko, J.D., Stanley, P., Hart, G.W., Aebi, M., Mohnen, D., Kinoshita, T., Packer, N.H., Prestegard, J.H., et al., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 117–128. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferrer, C.M.; Sodi, V.L.; Reginato, M.J. O-GlcNAcylation in Cancer Biology: Linking Metabolism and Signaling. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 3282–3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lazar, I.M.; Lazar, A.C.; Cortes, D.F.; Kabulski, J.L. Recent advances in the MS analysis of glycoproteins: Theoretical considerations. Electrophoresis 2010, 32, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lee, M.M.; Nasirikenari, M.; Manhardt, C.T.; Ashline, D.J.; Hanneman, A.J.; Reinhold, V.N.; Lau, J.T. Platelets Support Extracellular Sialylation by Supplying the Sugar Donor Substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 8742–8748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nasirikenari, M.; Veillon, L.; Collins, C.C.; Azadi, P.; Lau, J.T.Y. Remodeling of Marrow Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells by Non-self ST6Gal-1 Sialyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 7178–7189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hait, N.C.; Maiti, A.; Wu, R.; Andersen, V.L.; Hsu, C.-C.; Wu, Y.; Chapla, D.G.; Takabe, K.; Rusiniak, M.E.; Bshara, W.; et al. Extracellular sialyltransferase st6gal1 in breast tumor cell growth and invasiveness. Cancer Gene Ther. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, H.C.; Meezan, E.; Black, P.H.; Robbins, P.W. Comparative studies on the carbohydrate-containing membrane components of normal and virus-transformed mouse fibroblasts. I. Glucosamine-labeling patterns in 3T3, spontaneously transformed 3T3, and SV-40-transformed 3T3 cells. Biochemistry 1969, 8, 2509–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Häuselmann, I.; Borsig, L. Altered Tumor-Cell Glycosylation Promotes Metastasis. Front. Oncol. 2014, 4, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Munkley, J.; Elliott, D.J. Hallmarks of glycosylation in cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 35478–35489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Bellis, S.L.; Reis, C.A.; Varki, A.; Kannagi, R.; Stanley, P. Glycosylation Changes in Cancer. In Essentials of Glycobiology; Varki, A., Cummings, R.D., Esko, J.D., Stanley, P., Hart, G.W., Aebi, M., Mohnen, D., Kinoshita, T., Packer, N.H., Prestegard, J.H., et al., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor: New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  16. Feizi, T. Carbohydrate antigens in human cancer. Cancer Surv. 1985, 4, 245–269. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Hammarström, S. The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family: Structures, suggested functions and expression in normal and malignant tissues. Semin. Cancer Biol. 1999, 9, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moss, E.L.; Hollingworth, J.; Reynolds, T.M. The role of CA125 in clinical practice. J. Clin. Pathol. 2005, 58, 308–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gilgunn, S.; Conroy, P.J.; Saldova, R.; Rudd, P.M.; O′Kennedy, R.J. Aberrant PSA glycosylation—A sweet predictor of prostate cancer. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2013, 10, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Munkley, J.; Mills, I.G.; Elliott, D.J. The role of glycans in the development and progression of prostate cancer. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2016, 13, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mereiter, S.; Balmana, M.; Campos, D.; Gomes, J.; Reis, C.A. Glycosylation in the Era of Cancer-Targeted Therapy: Where Are We Heading? Cancer Cell 2019, 36, 6–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rodrigues, E.; Macauley, M. Hypersialylation in Cancer: Modulation of Inflammation and Therapeutic Opportunities. Cancers 2018, 10, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pearce, O.M.T.; Läubli, H. Sialic acids in cancer biology and immunity. Glycobiology 2015, 26, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cohen, M.; Varki, A. The Sialome—Far More Than the Sum of Its Parts. OMICS 2010, 14, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dobie, C.; Skropeta, D. Insights into the role of sialylation in cancer progression and metastasis. Br. J. Cancer 2020, 124, 76–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fuster, M.M.; Esko, J.D. The Sweet and Sour of Cancer: Glycans As Novel Therapeutic Targets. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5, 526–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pietrobono, S.; Stecca, B. Aberrant Sialylation in Cancer: Biomarker and Potential Target for Therapeutic Intervention? Cancers 2021, 13, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ruhenstroth-Bauer, G.; Fuhrmann, G.F.; Kuebler, W.; Rueff, F.; Munk, K. On the Importance of Neuraminic Acid in the Cell Membrane for the Growth of Malignant Cells. Z Krebsforsch 1962, 65, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Schauer, R. Sialic acids and their role as biological masks. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1985, 10, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Narayanan, S. Sialic acid as a tumour marker. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 1994, 24, 376–385. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sanford, B.H. An alteration in tumor histocompatibility induced by neuraminidase. Transplantation 1967, 5, 1273–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schultz, M.J.; Swindall, A.F.; Bellis, S.L. Regulation of the metastatic cell phenotype by sialylated glycans. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2012, 31, 501–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sedlacek, H.H.; Meesmann, H.; Seiler, F.R. Regression of spontaneous mammary tumors in dogs after injection of neuraminidase-treated tumor cells. Int. J. Cancer 1975, 15, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yogeeswaran, G.; Salk, P.L. Metastatic Potential Is Positively Correlated with Cell Surface Sialylation of Cultured Murine Tumor Cell Lines. Science 1981, 212, 1514–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Samraj, A.N.; Pearce, O.M.T.; Läubli, H.; Crittenden, A.N.; Bergfeld, A.K.; Banda, K.; Gregg, C.J.; Bingman, A.E.; Secrest, P.; Diaz, S.L.; et al. A red meat-derived glycan promotes inflammation and cancer progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 112, 542–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Varki, N.M.; Varki, A. Diversity in cell surface sialic acid presentations: Implications for biology and disease. Lab. Investig. 2007, 87, 851–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Chou, H.-H.; Takematsu, H.; Diaz, S.; Iber, J.; Nickerson, E.; Wright, K.L.; Muchmore, E.A.; Nelson, D.L.; Warren, S.T.; Varki, A. A mutation in human CMP-sialic acid hydroxylase occurred after the Homo-Pan divergence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 11751–11756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bardor, M.; Nguyen, D.H.; Diaz, S.; Varki, A. Mechanism of Uptake and Incorporation of the Non-human Sialic Acid N-Glycolylneuraminic Acid into Human Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 4228–4237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Munkley, J.; Scott, E. Targeting Aberrant Sialylation to Treat Cancer. Medicines 2019, 6, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Munkley, J. The Role of Sialyl-Tn in Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Julien, S.; Videira, P.A.; Delannoy, P. Sialyl-tn in cancer: (How) did we miss the target? Biomolecules 2012, 2, 435–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Burchell, J.; Poulsom, R.; Hanby, A.; Whitehouse, C.; Cooper, L.; Clausen, H.; Miles, D.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J. An 2,3 sialyltransferase (ST3Gal I) is elevated in primary breast carcinomas. Glycobiology 1999, 9, 1307–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wu, X.; Zhao, J.; Ruan, Y.; Sun, L.; Xu, C.; Jiang, H. Sialyltransferase ST3GAL1 promotes cell migration, invasion, and TGF-beta1-induced EMT and confers paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chong, Y.K.; Sandanaraj, E.; Koh, L.W.; Thangaveloo, M.; Tan, M.S.; Koh, G.R.; Toh, T.B.; Lim, G.G.; Holbrook, J.D.; Kon, O.L.; et al. ST3GAL1-Associated Transcriptomic Program in Glioblastoma Tumor Growth, Invasion, and Prognosis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2016, 108, djv326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bai, Q.; Liu, L.; Xia, Y.; Long, Q.; Wang, J.; Xu, J.; Guo, J. Prognostic significance of ST3GAL-1 expression in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yeo, H.L.; Fan, T.C.; Lin, R.J.; Yu, J.C.; Liao, G.S.; Chen, E.S.; Ho, M.Y.; Lin, W.D.; Chen, K.; Chen, C.H.; et al. Sialylation of vasorin by ST3Gal1 facilitates TGF-beta1-mediated tumor angiogenesis and progression. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 144, 1996–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wen, K.-C.; Sung, P.-L.; Hsieh, S.-L.; Chou, Y.-T.; Lee, O.K.-S.; Wu, C.-W.; Wang, P.-H. α2,3-sialyltransferase type I regulates migration and peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 29013–29027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Natoni, A.; Macauley, M.S.; O’Dwyer, M.E. Targeting Selectins and Their Ligands in Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2016, 6, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Natoni, A.; Farrell, M.L.; Harris, S.; Falank, C.; Kirkham-McCarthy, L.; Macauley, M.S.; Reagan, M.R.; O’Dwyer, M. Sialyltransferase inhibition leads to inhibition of tumor cell interactions with E-selectin, VCAM1, and MADCAM1, and improves survival in a human multiple myeloma mouse model. Haematologica 2020, 105, 457–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Munkley, J. The glycosylation landscape of pancreatic cancer (Review). Oncol. Lett. 2019, 17, 2569–2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cazet, A.; Julien, S.; Bobowski, M.; Burchell, J.; Delannoy, P. Tumour-associated carbohydrate antigens in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2010, 12, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Julien, S.; Ivetic, A.; Grigoriadis, A.; QiZe, D.; Burford, B.; Sproviero, D.; Picco, G.; Gillett, C.; Papp, S.L.; Schaffer, L.; et al. Selectin Ligand Sialyl-Lewis x Antigen Drives Metastasis of Hormone-Dependent Breast Cancers. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 7683–7693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. van de Wall, S.; Santegoets, K.C.; van Houtum, E.J.; Büll, C.; Adema, G.J. Sialoglycans and Siglecs Can Shape the Tumor Immune Microenvironment. Trends Immunol. 2020, 41, 274–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Falconer, R.; Errington, R.; Shnyder, S.; Smith, P.; Patterson, L. Polysialyltransferase: A New Target in Metastatic Cancer. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2012, 12, 925–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tanaka, F.; Otake, Y.; Nakagawa, T.; Kawano, Y.; Miyahara, R.; Li, M.; Yanagihara, K.; Inui, K.; Oyanagi, H.; Yamada, T.; et al. Prognostic significance of polysialic acid expression in resected non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 1666–1670. [Google Scholar]
  56. Seidenfaden, R.; Krauter, A.; Schertzinger, F.; Gerardy-Schahn, R.; Hildebrandt, H. Polysialic Acid Directs Tumor Cell Growth by Controlling Heterophilic Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule Interactions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 5908–5918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Al-Saraireh, Y.M.J.; Sutherland, M.; Springett, B.R.; Freiberger, F.; Morais, G.R.; Loadman, P.M.; Errington, R.J.; Smith, P.J.; Fukuda, M.; Gerardy-Schahn, R.; et al. Pharmacological Inhibition of polysialyltransferase ST8SiaII Modulates Tumour Cell Migration. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Elkashef, S.M.; Allison, S.J.; Sadiq, M.; Basheer, H.A.; Morais, G.R.; Loadman, P.M.; Pors, K.; Falconer, R.A. Polysialic acid sustains cancer cell survival and migratory capacity in a hypoxic environment. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Groux-Degroote, S.; Rodriguez-Walker, M.; Dewald, J.H.; Daniotti, J.L.; Delannoy, P. Gangliosides in Cancer Cell Signaling. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2018, 156, 197–227. [Google Scholar]
  60. Nazha, B.; Inal, C.; Owonikoko, T.K. Disialoganglioside GD2 Expression in Solid Tumors and Role as a Target for Cancer Therapy. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Majzner, R.G.; Ramakrishna, S.; Yeom, K.W.; Patel, S.; Chinnasamy, H.; Schultz, L.M.; Richards, R.M.; Jiang, L.; Barsan, V.; Mancusi, R.; et al. GD2-CAR T cell therapy for H3K27M-mutated diffuse midline gliomas. Nature 2022, 603, 934–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ladenstein, R.; Potschger, U.; Valteau-Couanet, D.; Luksch, R.; Castel, V.; Yaniv, I.; Laureys, G.; Brock, P.; Michon, J.M.; Owens, C.; et al. Interleukin 2 with anti-GD2 antibody ch14.18/CHO (dinutuximab beta) in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN): A multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 1617–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zheng, C.; Terreni, M.; Sollogoub, M.; Zhang, Y. Ganglioside GM3 and Its Role in Cancer. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019, 26, 2933–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Labrada, M.; Dorvignit, D.; Hevia, G.; Rodríguez-Zhurbenko, N.; Hernández, A.M.; Vázquez, A.M.; Fernández, L.E. GM3(Neu5Gc) ganglioside: An evolution fixed neoantigen for cancer immunotherapy. Semin. Oncol. 2018, 45, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Visser, E.A.; Moons, S.J.; Timmermans, S.B.; de Jong, H.; Boltje, T.J.; Büll, C. Sialic acid O-acetylation: From biosynthesis to roles in health and disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 297, 100906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cavdarli, S.; Delannoy, P.; Groux-Degroote, S. O-acetylated Gangliosides as Targets for Cancer Immunotherapy. Cells 2020, 9, 741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Mandal, C.; Schwartz-Albiez, R.; Vlasak, R. Functions and Biosynthesis of O-Acetylated Sialic Acids. Top. Curr. Chem. 2012, 366, 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  68. Harduin-Lepers, A.; Vallejo-Ruiz, V.; Krzewinski-Recchi, M.-A.; Samyn-Petit, B.; Julien, S.; Delannoy, P. The human sialyltransferase family. Biochimie 2001, 83, 727–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Schjoldager, K.T.; Narimatsu, Y.; Joshi, H.J.; Clausen, H. Global view of human protein glycosylation pathways and functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 729–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Szabo, R.; Skropeta, D. Advancement of Sialyltransferase Inhibitors: Therapeutic Challenges and Opportunities. Med. Res. Rev. 2016, 37, 219–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Miyagi, T.; Yamaguchi, K. Mammalian sialidases: Physiological and pathological roles in cellular functions. Glycobiology 2012, 22, 880–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Lipničanová, S.; Chmelová, D.; Ondrejovič, M.; Frecer, V.; Miertuš, S. Diversity of sialidases found in the human body—A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 148, 857–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Forcella, M.; Mozzi, A.; Stefanini, F.M.; Riva, A.; Epistolio, S.; Molinari, F.; Merlo, E.; Monti, E.; Fusi, P.; Frattini, M. Deregulation of sialidases in human normal and tumor tissues. Cancer Biomark. 2018, 21, 591–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Jones, R.B.; Dorsett, K.A.; Hjelmeland, A.B.; Bellis, S.L. The ST6Gal-I sialyltransferase protects tumor cells against hypoxia by enhancing HIF-1α signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 5659–5667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Dorsett, K.A.; Marciel, M.P.; Hwang, J.; Ankenbauer, E.K.; Bhalerao, N.; Bellis, S.L. Regulation of ST6GAL1 sialyltransferase expression in cancer cells. Glycobiology 2020, 31, 530–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bull, C.; Stoel, M.A.; den Brok, M.H.; Adema, G.J. Sialic acids sweeten a tumor′s life. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 3199–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Munkley, J.; Vodak, D.; Livermore, K.E.; James, K.; Wilson, B.T.; Knight, B.; Mccullagh, P.; Mcgrath, J.; Crundwell, M.; Harries, L.W.; et al. Glycosylation is an Androgen-Regulated Process Essential for Prostate Cancer Cell Viability. eBioMedicine 2016, 8, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Lehoux, S.; Groux-Degroote, S.; Cazet, A.; Dhaenens, C.-M.; Maurage, C.-A.; Caillet-Boudin, M.-L.; Delannoy, P.; Krzewinski-Recchi, M.-A. Transcriptional regulation of the human ST6GAL2 gene in cerebral cortex and neuronal cells. Glycoconj. J. 2009, 27, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Garnham, R.; Scott, E.; Livermore, K.E.; Munkley, J. ST6GAL1: A key player in cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2019, 18, 983–989. [Google Scholar]
  80. Swindall, A.F.; Londoño-Joshi, A.I.; Schultz, M.J.; Fineberg, N.; Buchsbaum, D.J.; Bellis, S.L. ST6Gal-I Protein Expression Is Upregulated in Human Epithelial Tumors and Correlates with Stem Cell Markers in Normal Tissues and Colon Cancer Cell Lines. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 2368–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Hsieh, C.C.; Shyr, Y.M.; Liao, W.Y.; Chen, T.H.; Wang, S.E.; Lu, P.C.; Lin, P.Y.; Chen, Y.B.; Mao, W.Y.; Han, H.Y.; et al. Elevation of beta-galactoside alpha2,6-sialyltransferase 1 in a fructoseresponsive manner promotes pancreatic cancer metastasis. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 7691–7709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wichert, B.; Milde-Langosch, K.; Galatenko, V.; Schmalfeldt, B.; Oliveira-Ferrer, L. Prognostic role of the sialyltransferase ST6GAL1 in ovarian cancer. Glycobiology 2018, 28, 898–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hou, S.; Hang, Q.; Isaji, T.; Lu, J.; Fukuda, T.; Gu, J. Importance of membrane-proximal N-glycosylation on integrin beta1 in its activation and complex formation. FASEB J. 2016, 30, 4120–4131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Seales, E.C.; Jurado, G.A.; Brunson, B.A.; Wakefield, J.K.; Frost, A.R.; Bellis, S.L. Hypersialylation of β1 Integrins, Observed in Colon Adenocarcinoma, May Contribute to Cancer Progression by Up-regulating Cell Motility. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 4645–4652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Liu, Y.; Pan, D.; Bellis, S.L.; Song, Y. Effect of altered glycosylation on the structure of the I-like domain of beta1 integrin: A molecular dynamics study. Proteins 2008, 73, 989–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chiang, C.-H.; Wang, C.-H.; Chang, H.-C.; More, S.V.; Li, W.-S.; Hung, W.-C. A novel sialyltransferase inhibitor AL10 suppresses invasion and metastasis of lung cancer cells by inhibiting integrin-mediated signaling. J. Cell. Physiol. 2010, 223, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Bellis, S.L. Variant glycosylation: An underappreciated regulatory mechanism for $beta;1 integrins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 2004, 1663, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Britain, C.M.; Holdbrooks, A.T.; Anderson, J.C.; Willey, C.D.; Bellis, S.L. Sialylation of EGFR by the ST6Gal-I sialyltransferase promotes EGFR activation and resistance to gefitinib-mediated cell death. J. Ovarian Res. 2018, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Rao, T.C.; Beggs, R.R.; Ankenbauer, K.E.; Hwang, J.; Ma, V.P.-Y.; Salaita, K.; Bellis, S.L.; Mattheyses, A.L. ST6Gal-I–mediated sialylation of the epidermal growth factor receptor modulates cell mechanics and enhances invasion. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 298, 101726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Liu, N.; Zhu, M.; Linhai, Y.; Song, Y.; Gui, X.; Tan, G.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Deng, Z.; Chen, X.; et al. Increasing HER2 α2,6 sialylation facilitates gastric cancer progression and resistance via the Akt and ERK pathways. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 40, 2997–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Holdbrooks, A.T.; Britain, C.M.; Bellis, S.L. ST6Gal-I sialyltransferase promotes tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-mediated cancer cell survival via sialylation of the TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) death receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 1610–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Swindall, A.F.; Bellis, S.L. Sialylation of the Fas Death Receptor by ST6Gal-I Provides Protection against Fas-mediated Apoptosis in Colon Carcinoma Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 22982–22990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Lu, J.; Isaji, T.; Im, S.; Fukuda, T.; Hashii, N.; Takakura, D.; Kawasaki, N.; Gu, J. Beta-Galactoside alpha2,6-sialyltranferase 1 promotes transforming growth factor-beta-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 34627–34641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Schultz, M.J.; Holdbrooks, A.T.; Chakraborty, A.; Grizzle, W.E.; Landen, C.N.; Buchsbaum, D.J.; Conner, M.G.; Arend, R.C.; Yoon, K.J.; Klug, C.A.; et al. The Tumor-Associated Glycosyltransferase ST6Gal-I Regulates Stem Cell Transcription Factors and Confers a Cancer Stem Cell Phenotype. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 3978–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Perdicchio, M.; Ilarregui, J.M.; Verstege, M.I.; Cornelissen, L.A.M.; Schetters, S.T.T.; Engels, S.; Ambrosini, M.; Kalay, H.; Veninga, H.; Haan, J.M.M.D.; et al. Sialic acid-modified antigens impose tolerance via inhibition of T-cell proliferation and de novo induction of regulatory T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 3329–3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wang, L.; Li, S.; Yu, X.; Han, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, S.; Chen, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, S. Alpha2,6-Sialylation promotes immune escape in hepatocarcinoma cells by regulating T cell functions and CD147/MMP signaling. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 75, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Irons, E.E.; Lau, J.T.Y. Systemic ST6Gal-1 Is a Pro-survival Factor for Murine Transitional B Cells. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Irons, E.E.; Punch, P.R.; Lau, J.T.Y. Blood-Borne ST6GAL1 Regulates Immunoglobulin Production in B Cells. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Irons, E.E.; Lee-Sundlov, M.M.; Zhu, Y.; Neelamegham, S.; Hoffmeister, K.M.; Lau, J.T. B cells suppress medullary granulopoiesis by an extracellular glycosylation-dependent mechanism. eLife 2019, 8, e47328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jones, M.B.; Oswald, D.M.; Joshi, S.; Whiteheart, S.W.; Orlando, R.; Cobb, B.A. B-cell-independent sialylation of IgG. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 7207–7212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Myojin, Y.; Kodama, T.; Maesaka, K.; Motooka, D.; Sato, Y.; Tanaka, S.; Abe, Y.; Ohkawa, K.; Mita, E.; Hayashi, Y.; et al. ST6GAL1 Is a Novel Serum Biomarker for Lenvatinib-Susceptible FGF19-Driven Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 27, 1150–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhang, H.; Freitas, D.; Kim, H.S.; Fabijanic, K.; Li, Z.; Chen, H.; Mark, M.T.; Molina, H.; Martin, A.B.; Bojmar, L.; et al. Identification of distinct nanoparticles and subsets of extracellular vesicles by asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018, 20, 332–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Nasirikenari, M.; Lugade, A.A.; Neelamegham, S.; Gao, Z.; Moremen, K.W.; Bogner, P.N.; Thanavala, Y.; Lau, J.T.Y. Recombinant Sialyltransferase Infusion Mitigates Infection-Driven Acute Lung Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Picco, G.; Julien, S.; Brockhausen, I.; Beatson, R.; Antonopoulos, A.; Haslam, S.; Mandel, U.; Dell, A.; Pinder, S.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.; et al. Over-expression of ST3Gal-I promotes mammary tumorigenesis. Glycobiology 2010, 20, 1241–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Fan, T.-C.; Yeo, H.L.; Hsu, H.-M.; Yu, J.-C.; Ho, M.-Y.; Lin, W.-D.; Chang, N.-C.; Yu, J.; Yu, A.L. Reciprocal feedback regulation of ST3GAL1 and GFRA1 signaling in breast cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2018, 434, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sproviero, D.; Julien, S.; Burford, B.; Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.; Burchell, J.M. Cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme induces the expression of the alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase-3 (ST3Gal-I) in breast cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 44490–44497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Lin, W.-D.; Fan, T.-C.; Hung, J.-T.; Yeo, H.-L.; Wang, S.-H.; Kuo, C.-W.; Khoo, K.-H.; Pai, L.-M.; Yu, J.; Yu, A.L. Sialylation of CD55 by ST3GAL1 Facilitates Immune Evasion in Cancer. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2021, 9, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pérez-Garay, M.; Arteta, B.; Pagès, L.; de Llorens, R.; de Bolòs, C.; Vidal-Vanaclocha, F.; Peracaula, R. α2,3-Sialyltransferase ST3Gal III Modulates Pancreatic Cancer Cell Motility and Adhesion In Vitro and Enhances Its Metastatic Potential In Vivo. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e12524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Rodriguez, E.; Boelaars, K.; Brown, K.; Li, R.J.E.; Kruijssen, L.; Bruijns, S.C.M.; van Ee, T.; Schetters, S.T.T.; Crommentuijn, M.H.W.; van der Horst, J.C.; et al. Sialic acids in pancreatic cancer cells drive tumour-associated macrophage differentiation via the Siglec receptors Siglec-7 and Siglec-9. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Saito, S.; Yamashita, S.-I.; Endoh, M.; Yamato, T.; Hoshi, S.; Ohyama, C.; Watanabe, R.; Ito, A.; Satoh, M.; Wada, T.; et al. Clinical significance of ST3Gal IV expression in human renal cell carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2002, 9, 1251–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Glavey, S.V.; Manier, S.; Natoni, A.; Sacco, A.; Moschetta, M.; Reagan, M.R.; Murillo, L.S.; Sahin, I.; Wu, P.; Mishima, Y.; et al. The sialyltransferase ST3GAL6 influences homing and survival in multiple myeloma. Blood 2014, 124, 1765–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Carvalho, A.S.; Harduin-Lepers, A.; Magalhaes, A.; Machado, E.; Mendes, N.; Costa, L.T.; Matthiesen, R.; Almeida, R.; Costa, J.; Reis, C.A. Differential expression of alpha-2,3-sialyltransferases and alpha-1,3/4-fucosyltransferases regulates the levels of sialyl Lewis a and sialyl Lewis x in gastrointestinal carcinoma cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2010, 42, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Wu, Y.; Chen, X.; Dong, W.; Xu, Z.; Jian, Y.; Xu, C.; Zhang, L.; Wei, A.; Yu, X.; Wang, S.; et al. ST3Gal IV Mediates the Growth and Proliferation of Cervical Cancer Cells In Vitro and In Vivo Via the Notch/p21/CDKs Pathway. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 540332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Gomes, C.; Osorio, H.; Pinto, M.T.; Campos, D.; Oliveira, M.J.; Reis, C.A. Expression of ST3GAL4 leads to SLe(x) expression and induces c-Met activation and an invasive phenotype in gastric carcinoma cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Laubli, H.; Borsig, L. Selectins promote tumor metastasis. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2010, 20, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Marcos, N.T.; Pinho, S.; Grandela, C.; Cruz, A.; Samyn-Petit, B.; Harduin-Lepers, A.; Almeida, R.; Silva, F.; Morais, V.; Costa, J.; et al. Role of the human ST6GalNAc-I and ST6GalNAc-II in the synthesis of the cancer-associated sialyl-Tn antigen. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 7050–7057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Schmitt, F.C.; Figueiredo, P.; Lacerda, M. Simple mucin-type carbohydrate antigens (T, sialosyl-T, Tn and sialosyl-Tn) in breast carcinogenesis. Virchows Arch. 1995, 427, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Victorzon, M.; Nordling, S.; Nilsson, O.; Roberts, P.J.; Haglund, C. Sialyl Tn antigen is an independent predictor of outcome in patients with gastric cancer. Int. J. Cancer 1996, 65, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Leivonen, M.; Nordling, S.; Lundin, J.; von Boguslawski, K.; Haglund, C. STn and Prognosis in Breast Cancer. Oncology 2001, 61, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Costa, C.; Pereira, S.; Lima, J.; Peixoto, A.; Fernandes, E.; Neves, D.; Neves, M.; Gaiteiro, C.; Tavares, A.; Gil Da Costa, R.M.; et al. Abnormal Protein Glycosylation and Activated PI3K/Akt/mTOR Pathway: Role in Bladder Cancer Prognosis and Targeted Therapeutics. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Ogawa, T.; Hirohashi, Y.; Murai, A.; Nishidate, T.; Okita, K.; Wang, L.; Ikehara, Y.; Satoyoshi, T.; Usui, A.; Kubo, T.; et al. ST6GALNAC1 plays important roles in enhancing cancer stem phenotypes of colorectal cancer via the Akt pathway. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 112550–112564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Julien, S.; Adriaenssens, E.; Ottenberg, K.; Furlan, A.; Courtand, G.; Vercoutter-Edouart, A.-S.; Hanisch, F.-G.; Delannoy, P.; Le Bourhis, X. ST6GalNAc I expression in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells greatly modifies their O-glycosylation pattern and enhances their tumourigenicity. Glycobiology 2005, 16, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wang, W.-Y.; Cao, Y.-X.; Zhou, X.; Wei, B.; Zhan, L.; Sun, S.-Y. Stimulative role of ST6GALNAC1 in proliferation, migration and invasion of ovarian cancer stem cells via the Akt signaling pathway. Cancer Cell Int. 2019, 19, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ozaki, H.; Matsuzaki, H.; Ando, H.; Kaji, H.; Nakanishi, H.; Ikehara, Y.; Narimatsu, H. Enhancement of metastatic ability by ectopic expression of ST6GalNAcI on a gastric cancer cell line in a mouse model. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2012, 29, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kvorjak, M.; Ahmed, Y.; Miller, M.L.; Sriram, R.; Coronnello, C.; Hashash, J.G.; Hartman, D.J.; Telmer, C.A.; Miskov-Zivanov, N.; Finn, O.J.; et al. Cross-talk between Colon Cells and Macrophages Increases ST6GALNAC1 and MUC1-sTn Expression in Ulcerative Colitis and Colitis-Associated Colon Cancer. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2020, 8, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wang, J.; Sun, J.; Liu, L.N.; Flies, D.B.; Nie, X.; Toki, M.; Zhang, J.; Song, C.; Zarr, M.; Zhou, X.; et al. Siglec-15 as an immune suppressor and potential target for normalization cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 656–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Angata, T.; Tabuchi, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Nakamura, M. Siglec-15: An immune system Siglec conserved throughout vertebrate evolution. Glycobiology 2007, 17, 838–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Büll, C.; Nason, R.; Sun, L.; Van Coillie, J.; Sørensen, D.M.; Moons, S.J.; Yang, Z.; Arbitman, S.; Fernandes, S.M.; Furukawa, S.; et al. Probing the binding specificities of human Siglecs by cell-based glycan arrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2026102118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Pinho, S.; Marcos, N.T.; Ferreira, B.; Carvalho, A.S.; Oliveira, M.J.; Santos-Silva, F.; Harduin-Lepers, A.; Reis, C.A. Biological significance of cancer-associated sialyl-Tn antigen: Modulation of malignant phenotype in gastric carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2007, 249, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Schneider, F.; Kemmner, W.; Haensch, W.; Franke, G.; Gretschel, S.; Karsten, U.; Schlag, P.M. Overexpression of sialyltransferase CMP-sialic acid: Galbeta1,3GalNAc-R alpha6-Sialyltransferase is related to poor patient survival in human colorectal carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 4605–4611. [Google Scholar]
  131. Miao, X.; Zhao, Y. ST6GalNAcII mediates tumor invasion through PI3K/Akt/NF-kappaB signaling pathway in follicular thyroid carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2016, 35, 2131–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Murugaesu, N.; Iravani, M.; van Weverwijk, A.; Ivetic, A.; Johnson, D.A.; Antonopoulos, A.; Fearns, A.; Jamal-Hanjani, M.; Sims, D.; Fenwick, K.; et al. An In Vivo Functional Screen Identifies ST6GalNAc2 Sialyltransferase as a Breast Cancer Metastasis Suppressor. Cancer Discov. 2014, 4, 304–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Angata, K.; Suzuki, M.; McAuliffe, J.; Ding, Y.; Hindsgaul, O.; Fukuda, M. Differential biosynthesis of polysialic acid on neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) and oligosaccharide acceptors by three distinct alpha 2,8-sialyltransferases, ST8Sia IV (PST), ST8Sia II (STX), and ST8Sia III. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 18594–18601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Harduin-Lepers, A.; Mollicone, R.; Delannoy, P.; Oriol, R. The animal sialyltransferases and sialyltransferase-related genes: A Phylogenetic approach. Glycobiology 2005, 15, 805–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Harduin-Lepers, A.; Petit, D.; Mollicone, R.; Delannoy, P.; Petit, J.-M.; Oriol, R. Evolutionary history of the alpha2,8-sialyltransferase (ST8Sia) gene family: Tandem duplications in early deuterostomes explain most of the diversity found in the vertebrate ST8Sia genes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Jarahian, M.; Marofi, F.; Maashi, M.S.; Ghaebi, M.; Khezri, A.; Berger, M.R. Re-Expression of Poly/Oligo-Sialylated Adhesion Molecules on the Surface of Tumor Cells Disrupts Their Interaction with Immune-Effector Cells and Contributes to Pathophysiological Immune Escape. Cancers 2021, 13, 5203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Scheidegger, E.P.; Sternberg, L.R.; Roth, J.; Lowe, J.B. A Human STX cDNA Confers Polysialic Acid Expression in Mammalian Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 22685–22688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Tanaka, F.; Otake, Y.; Nakagawa, T.; Kawano, Y.; Miyahara, R.; Li, M.; Yanagihara, K.; Nakayama, J.; Fujimoto, I.; Ikenaka, K.; et al. Expression of polysialic acid and STX, a human polysialyltransferase, is correlated with tumor progression in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 3072–3080. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  139. Suzuki, M.; Suzuki, M.; Nakayama, J.; Suzuki, A.; Angata, K.; Chen, S.; Sakai, K.; Hagihara, K.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Fukuda, M. Polysialic acid facilitates tumor invasion by glioma cells. Glycobiology 2005, 15, 887–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Gong, L.; Zhou, X.; Yang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, H. Effects of the regulation of polysialyltransferase ST8SiaII on the invasiveness and metastasis of small cell lung cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2016, 37, 131–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Ma, X.; Dong, W.; Su, Z.; Zhao, L.; Miao, Y.; Li, N.; Zhou, H.; Jia, L. Functional roles of sialylation in breast cancer progression through miR-26a/26b targeting ST8SIA4. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Pan, Y.; Wu, Y.; Hu, J.; Shan, Y.; Ma, J.; Ma, H.; Qi, X.; Jia, L. Long noncoding RNA HOTAIR promotes renal cell carcinoma malignancy through alpha-2, 8-sialyltransferase 4 by sponging microRNA-124. Cell Prolif. 2018, 51, e12507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ma, H.; Zhou, H.; Song, X.; Shi, S.; Zhang, J.; Jia, L. Modification of sialylation is associated with multidrug resistance in human acute myeloid leukemia. Oncogene 2014, 34, 726–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ma, W.; Zhao, X.; Liang, L.; Wang, G.; Li, Y.; Miao, X.; Zhao, Y. miR-146a and miR-146b promote proliferation, migration and invasion of follicular thyroid carcinoma via inhibition of ST8SIA4. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 28028–28041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Baeza-Kallee, N.; Berges, R.; Souberan, A.; Colin, C.; Denicolai, E.; Appay, R.; Tchoghandjian, A.; Figarella-Branger, D. Glycolipids Recognized by A2B5 Antibody Promote Proliferation, Migration, and Clonogenicity in Glioblastoma Cells. Cancers 2019, 11, 1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Nguyen, K.; Yan, Y.; Yuan, B.; Dasgupta, A.; Sun, J.; Mu, H.; Do, K.A.; Ueno, N.T.; Andreeff, M.; Battula, V.L. ST8SIA1 Regulates Tumor Growth and Metastasis in TNBC by Activating the FAK-AKT-mTOR Signaling Pathway. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2018, 17, 2689–2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Ohkawa, Y.; Zhang, P.; Momota, H.; Kato, A.; Hashimoto, N.; Ohmi, Y.; Bhuiyan, R.H.; Farhana, Y.; Natsume, A.; Wakabayashi, T.; et al. Lack of GD3 synthase (St8sia1) attenuates malignant properties of gliomas in genetically engineered mouse model. Cancer Sci. 2021, 112, 3756–3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Penrose, H.; Cable, C.; Heller, S.; Ungerleider, N.; Nakhoul, H.; Baddoo, M.; Hartono, A.B.; Lee, S.; Burow, M.E.; Flemington, E.F.; et al. Loss of Forkhead Box O3 Facilitates Inflammatory Colon Cancer: Transcriptome Profiling of the Immune Landscape and Novel Targets. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 7, 391–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Takashima, S.; Ishida, H.K.; Inazu, T.; Ando, T.; Ishida, H.; Kiso, M.; Tsuji, S.; Tsujimoto, M. Molecular cloning and expression of a sixth type of alpha 2,8-sialyltransferase (ST8Sia VI) that sialylates O-glycans. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 24030–24038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Friedman, D.J.; Crotts, S.B.; Shapiro, M.J.; Rajcula, M.; McCue, S.; Liu, X.; Khazaie, K.; Dong, H.; Shapiro, V.S. ST8Sia6 Promotes Tumor Growth in Mice by Inhibiting Immune Responses. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2021, 9, 952–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Miyagi, T.; Takahashi, K.; Hata, K.; Shiozaki, K.; Yamaguchi, K. Sialidase significance for cancer progression. Glycoconj. J. 2012, 29, 567–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Uemura, T.; Shiozaki, K.; Yamaguchi, K.; Miyazaki, S.; Satomi, S.; Kato, K.; Sakuraba, H.; Miyagi, T. Contribution of sialidase NEU1 to suppression of metastasis of human colon cancer cells through desialylation of integrin beta4. Oncogene 2009, 28, 1218–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Zhou, X.; Zhai, Y.; Liu, C.; Yang, G.; Guo, J.; Li, G.; Sun, C.; Qi, X.; Li, X.; Guan, F. Sialidase NEU1 suppresses progression of human bladder cancer cells by inhibiting fibronectin-integrin alpha5beta1 interaction and Akt signaling pathway. Cell Commun. Signal. 2020, 18, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Ren, L.R.; Zhang, L.P.; Huang, S.Y.; Zhu, Y.F.; Li, W.J.; Fang, S.Y.; Shen, L.; Gao, Y.L. Effects of sialidase NEU1 siRNA on proliferation, apoptosis, and invasion in human ovarian cancer. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2016, 411, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Gilmour, A.M.; Abdulkhalek, S.; Cheng, T.S.; Alghamdi, F.; Jayanth, P.; O’Shea, L.K.; Geen, O.; Arvizu, L.A.; Szewczuk, M.R. A novel epidermal growth factor receptor-signaling platform and its targeted translation in pancreatic cancer. Cell. Signal. 2013, 25, 2587–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kakugawa, Y.; Wada, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Yamanami, H.; Ouchi, K.; Sato, I.; Miyagi, T. Up-regulation of plasma membrane-associated ganglioside sialidase (Neu3) in human colon cancer and its involvement in apoptosis suppression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 10718–10723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Ueno, S.; Saito, S.; Wada, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Satoh, M.; Arai, Y.; Miyagi, T. Plasma Membrane-associated Sialidase Is Up-regulated in Renal Cell Carcinoma and Promotes Interleukin-6-induced Apoptosis Suppression and Cell Motility. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 7756–7764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Nomura, H.; Tamada, Y.; Miyagi, T.; Suzuki, A.; Taira, M.; Suzuki, N.; Susumu, N.; Irimura, T.; Aoki, D. Expression of NEU3 (Plasma Membrane-Associated Sialidase) in Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma of the Ovary: Its Relationship with T Factor of pTNM Classification. Oncol. Res. Featur. Preclin. Clin. Cancer Ther. 2006, 16, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Kawamura, S.; Sato, I.; Wada, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Li, Y.; Li, D.; Zhao, X.; Ueno, S.; Aoki, H.; Tochigi, T.; et al. Plasma membrane-associated sialidase (NEU3) regulates progression of prostate cancer to androgen-independent growth through modulation of androgen receptor signaling. Cell Death Differ. 2011, 19, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Hata, K.; Tochigi, T.; Sato, I.; Kawamura, S.; Shiozaki, K.; Wada, T.; Takahashi, K.; Moriya, S.; Yamaguchi, K.; Hosono, M.; et al. Increased sialidase activity in serum of cancer patients: Identification of sialidase and inhibitor activities in human serum. Cancer Sci. 2015, 106, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Yamanami, H.; Shiozaki, K.; Wada, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Uemura, T.; Kakugawa, Y.; Hujiya, T.; Miyagi, T. Down-regulation of sialidase NEU4 may contribute to invasive properties of human colon cancers. Cancer Sci. 2007, 98, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Seyfried, T.N.; Huysentruyt, L.C. On the Origin of Cancer Metastasis. Crit. Rev. Oncog. 2013, 18, 43–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Ganesh, K.; Massagué, J. Targeting metastatic cancer. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Almaraz, R.T.; Tian, Y.; Bhattarcharya, R.; Tan, E.; Chen, S.-H.; Dallas, M.R.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Konstantopoulos, K.; et al. Metabolic Flux Increases Glycoprotein Sialylation: Implications for Cell Adhesion and Cancer Metastasis. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2012, 11, M112-017558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Yuan, Y.; Wu, L.; Shen, S.; Wu, S.; Burdick, M.M. Effect of alpha 2,6 sialylation on integrin-mediated adhesion of breast cancer cells to fibronectin and collagen IV. Life Sci. 2016, 149, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Brabletz, T.; Kalluri, R.; Nieto, M.A.; Weinberg, R.A. EMT in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2018, 18, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Dongre, A.; Weinberg, R.A. New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 20, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Britain, C.M.; Bhalerao, N.; Silva, A.D.; Chakraborty, A.; Buchsbaum, D.J.; Crowley, M.R.; Crossman, D.K.; Edwards, Y.J.; Bellis, S.L. Glycosyltransferase ST6Gal-I promotes the epithelial to mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Du, J.; Hong, S.; Dong, L.; Cheng, B.; Lin, L.; Zhao, B.; Chen, Y.G.; Chen, X. Dynamic Sialylation in Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF-beta)-induced Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 12000–12013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Hakomori, S. Glycosylation defining cancer malignancy: New wine in an old bottle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 10231–10233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Coupland, L.; Parish, C.R. Platelets, Selectins, and the Control of Tumor Metastasis. Semin. Oncol. 2014, 41, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Läubli, H.; Borsig, L. Selectins as Mediators of Lung Metastasis. Cancer Microenviron. 2010, 3, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Rosen, S.D.; Bertozzi, C.R. The selectins and their ligands. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1994, 6, 663–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Barbier, V.; Erbani, J.; Fiveash, C.; Davies, J.M.; Tay, J.; Tallack, M.R.; Lowe, J.; Magnani, J.L.; Pattabiraman, D.R.; Perkins, A.; et al. Endothelial E-selectin inhibition improves acute myeloid leukaemia therapy by disrupting vascular niche-mediated chemoresistance. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Muz, B.; Abdelghafer, A.; Markovic, M.; Yavner, J.; Melam, A.; Salama, N.N.; Azab, A.K. Targeting E-Selectin to Tackle Cancer Using Uproleselan. Cancers 2021, 13, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Sipkins, D.A.; Wei, X.; Wu, J.W.; Runnels, J.M.; Côté, D.; Means, T.K.; Luster, A.D.; Scadden, D.T.; Lin, C.P. In vivo imaging of specialized bone marrow endothelial microdomains for tumour engraftment. Nature 2005, 435, 969–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Price, T.T.; Burness, M.L.; Sivan, A.; Warner, M.J.; Cheng, R.; Lee, C.H.; Olivere, L.; Comatas, K.; Magnani, J.; Lyerly, H.K.; et al. Dormant breast cancer micrometastases reside in specific bone marrow niches that regulate their transit to and from bone. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 340ra73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Esposito, M.; Mondal, N.; Greco, T.M.; Wei, Y.; Spadazzi, C.; Lin, S.-C.; Zheng, H.; Cheung, C.; Magnani, J.L.; Lin, S.-H.; et al. Bone vascular niche E-selectin induces mesenchymal–epithelial transition and Wnt activation in cancer cells to promote bone metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 627–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Elmore, S. Apoptosis: A review of programmed cell death. Toxicol. Pathol. 2007, 35, 495–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Lichtenstein, R.; Rabinovich, A.G. Glycobiology of cell death: When glycans and lectins govern cell fate. Cell Death Differ. 2013, 20, 976–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Zhuo, Y.; Chammas, R.; Bellis, S.L. Sialylation of beta1 integrins blocks cell adhesion to galectin-3 and protects cells against galectin-3-induced apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 22177–22185. [Google Scholar]
  182. Hanahan, D. Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions. Cancer Discov. 2022, 12, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Scott, E.; Elliott, D.J.; Munkley, J. Tumour associated glycans: A route to boost immunotherapy? Clin. Chim. Acta 2020, 502, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Rodríguez, E.; Schetters, S.T.T.; Van Kooyk, Y. The tumour glyco-code as a novel immune checkpoint for immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Cohen, M.; Elkabets, M.; Perlmutter, M.; Porgador, A.; Voronov, E.; Apte, R.N.; Lichtenstein, R. Sialylation of 3-Methylcholanthrene–Induced Fibrosarcoma Determines Antitumor Immune Responses during Immunoediting. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 5869–5878. [Google Scholar]
  186. Macauley, M.S.; Crocker, P.R.; Paulson, J.C. Siglec-mediated regulation of immune cell function in disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 14, 653–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Lubbers, J.; Rodríguez, E.; Van Kooyk, Y. Modulation of Immune Tolerance via Siglec-Sialic Acid Interactions. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2807. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  188. Smith, B.A.H.; Bertozzi, C.R. The clinical impact of glycobiology: Targeting selectins, Siglecs and mammalian glycans. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 217–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Beatson, R.; Tajadura-Ortega, V.; Achkova, D.; Picco, G.; Tsourouktsoglou, T.-D.; Klausing, S.; Hillier, M.; Maher, D.A.J.; Noll, S.K.T.; Crocker, P.R.; et al. The mucin MUC1 modulates the tumor immunological microenvironment through engagement of the lectin Siglec-9. Nat. Immunol. 2016, 17, 1273–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Beatson, R.; Graham, R.; Freile, F.G.; Cozzetto, D.; Kannambath, S.; Pfeifer, E.; Woodman, N.; Owen, J.; Nuamah, R.; Mandel, U.; et al. Cancer-associated hypersialylated MUC1 drives the differentiation of human monocytes into macrophages with a pathogenic phenotype. Commun. Biol. 2020, 3, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Barkal, A.A.; Brewer, R.E.; Markovic, M.; Kowarsky, M.; Barkal, S.A.; Zaro, B.; Krishnan, V.; Hatakeyama, J.; Dorigo, O.; Barkal, L.J.; et al. CD24 signalling through macrophage Siglec-10 is a target for cancer immunotherapy. Nature 2019, 572, 392–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Hudak, J.E.; Canham, S.; Bertozzi, C.R. Glycocalyx engineering reveals a Siglec-based mechanism for NK cell immunoevasion. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2013, 10, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Daly, J.; Carlsten, M.; O’Dwyer, M. Sugar Free: Novel Immunotherapeutic Approaches Targeting Siglecs and Sialic Acids to Enhance Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity Against Cancer. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  194. Engblom, C.; Pfirschke, C.; Zilionis, R.; Martins, J.D.S.; Bos, S.A.; Courties, G.; Rickelt, S.; Severe, N.; Baryawno, N.; Faget, J.; et al. Osteoblasts Remotely Supply Lung Tumors with Cancer-Promoting Siglecf(High) Neutrophils. Science 2017, 358, 6367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Ikehara, Y.; Ikehara, S.K.; Paulson, J.C. Negative regulation of T cell receptor signaling by Siglec-7 (p70/AIRM) and Siglec-9. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 43117–43125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Vuchkovska, A.; Glanville, D.G.; Scurti, G.M.; Nishimura, M.I.; White, P.; Ulijasz, A.T.; Iwashima, M. Siglec-5 is an inhibitory immune checkpoint molecule for human T cells. Immunology 2022, 166, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Läubli, H.; Varki, A. Sialic Acid-Binding Immunoglobulin-Like Lectins (Siglecs) Detect Self-Associated Molecular Patterns to Regulate Immune Responses. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 593–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. O′Sullivan, J.A.; Wei, Y.; Carroll, D.J.; Moreno-Vinasco, L.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, F.; Lee, J.J.; Zhu, Z.; Bochner, B.S. Frontline Science: Characterization of a novel mouse strain expressing human Siglec-8 only on eosinophils. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2018, 104, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Schwarz, F.; Landig, C.S.; Siddiqui, S.; Secundino, I.; Olson, J.; Varki, N.; Nizet, V.; Varki, A. Paired Siglec receptors generate opposite inflammatory responses to a human-specific pathogen. EMBO J. 2017, 36, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Kim, M.Y.; Yu, K.-R.; Kenderian, S.S.; Ruella, M.; Chen, S.; Shin, T.-H.; Aljanahi, A.A.; Schreeder, D.; Klichinsky, M.; Shestova, O.; et al. Genetic Inactivation of CD33 in Hematopoietic Stem Cells to Enable CAR T Cell Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cell 2018, 173, 1439–1453.e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Bull, C.; Boltje, T.J.; Balneger, N.; Weischer, S.M.; Wassink, M.; van Gemst, J.J.; Bloemendal, V.R.; Boon, L.; van der Vlag, J.; Heise, T.; et al. Sialic Acid Blockade Suppresses Tumor Growth by Enhancing T-cell–Mediated Tumor Immunity. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 3574–3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Fedarko, N.; Fohr, B.; Robey, P.; Young, M.F.; Fisher, L.W. Factor H Binding to Bone Sialoprotein and Osteopontin Enables Tumor Cell Evasion of Complement-mediated Attack. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 16666–16672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Schultz, M.J.; Swindall, A.F.; Wright, J.W.; Sztul, E.S.; Landen, C.N.; Bellis, S.L. ST6Gal-I sialyltransferase confers cisplatin resistance in ovarian tumor cells. J. Ovarian Res. 2013, 6, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Ou, L.; He, X.; Liu, N.; Song, Y.; Li, J.; Gao, L.; Huang, X.; Deng, Z.; Wang, X.; Lin, S. Sialylation of FGFR1 by ST6Gal-I overexpression contributes to ovarian cancer cell migration and chemoresistance. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020, 21, 1449–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Chen, X.; Wang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Yuan, S.; Wu, Q.; Zhu, X.; Niang, B.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J. ST6Gal-I modulates docetaxel sensitivity in human hepatocarcinoma cells via the p38 MAPK/caspase pathway. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 51955–51964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Patel, K.D.; De, M.; Jethva, D.D.; Rathod, B.S.; Patel, P.S. Alterations in Sialylation Patterns are Significantly Associated with Imatinib Mesylate Resistance in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Arch. Med. Res. 2021, 53, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Santos, S.N.; Junqueira, M.S.; Francisco, G.; Vilanova, M.; Magalhães, A.; Baruffi, M.D.; Chammas, R.; Harris, A.L.; Reis, C.A.; Bernardes, E.S. O-glycan sialylation alters galectin-3 subcellular localization and decreases chemotherapy sensitivity in gastric cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 83570–83587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Yen, H.-Y.; Liu, Y.-C.; Chen, N.-Y.; Tsai, C.-F.; Wang, Y.-T.; Chen, Y.-J.; Hsu, T.-L.; Yang, P.-C.; Wong, C.-H. Effect of sialylation on EGFR phosphorylation and resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 6955–6960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Lee, M.; Lee, H.-J.; Bae, S.; Lee, Y.-S. Protein Sialylation by Sialyltransferase Involves Radiation Resistance. Mol. Cancer Res. 2008, 6, 1316–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Lee, M.; Lee, H.J.; Seo, W.D.; Park, K.H.; Lee, Y.S. Sialylation of integrin beta1 is involved in radiation-induced adhesion and migration in human colon cancer cells. Int. J. Radiat Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2010, 76, 1528–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Park, J.-J.; Lee, M. Increasing the α 2, 6 Sialylation of Glycoproteins May Contribute to Metastatic Spread and Therapeutic Resistance in Colorectal Cancer. Gut Liver 2013, 7, 629–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Punch, P.R.; Irons, E.E.; Manhardt, C.T.; Marathe, H.; Lau, J.T.Y. The sialyltransferase ST6GAL1 protects against radiation-induced gastrointestinal damage. Glycobiology 2020, 30, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Duarte, H.O.; Rodrigues, J.G.; Gomes, C.; Hensbergen, P.J.; Ederveen, A.L.H.; de Ru, A.H.; Mereiter, S.; Polónia, A.; Fernandes, E.; Ferreira, J.A.; et al. ST6Gal1 targets the ectodomain of ErbB2 in a site-specific manner and regulates gastric cancer cell sensitivity to trastuzumab. Oncogene 2021, 40, 3719–3733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Harvey, B.; Thomas, P. Inhibition of CMP-Sialic Acid Transport in Human Liver and Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines by a Sialic Acid Nucleoside Conjugate (KI-8110). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993, 190, 571–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Perdicchio, M.; Cornelissen, L.A.M.; Streng-Ouwehand, I.; Engels, S.; Verstege, M.I.; Boon, L.; Geerts, D.; van Kooyk, Y.; Unger, W.W.J. Tumor sialylation impedes T cell mediated anti-tumor responses while promoting tumor associated-regulatory T cells. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 8771–8782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Rillahan, C.D.; Antonopoulos, A.; Lefort, C.T.; Sonon, R.; Azadi, P.; Ley, K.; Dell, A.; Haslam, S.M.; Paulson, J.C. Global metabolic inhibitors of sialyl- and fucosyltransferases remodel the glycome. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012, 8, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Bull, C.; Boltje, T.J.; Wassink, M.; de Graaf, A.M.; van Delft, F.L.; den Brok, M.H.; Adema, G.J. Targeting aberrant sialylation in cancer cells using a fluorinated sialic acid analog impairs adhesion, migration, and in vivo tumor growth. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2013, 12, 1935–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Macauley, M.S.; Arlian, B.M.; Rillahan, C.D.; Pang, P.-C.; Bortell, N.; Marcondes, M.C.G.; Haslam, S.M.; Dell, A.; Paulson, J.C. Systemic Blockade of Sialylation in Mice with a Global Inhibitor of Sialyltransferases. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 35149–35158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Bull, C.; Boltje, T.J.; van Dinther, E.A.W.; Peters, T.; de Graaf, A.M.A.; Leusen, J.H.W.; Kreutz, M.; Figdor, C.G.; Brok, M.H.D.; Adema, G.J. Targeted Delivery of a Sialic Acid-Blocking Glycomimetic to Cancer Cells Inhibits Metastatic Spread. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 733–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Heise, T.; Pijnenborg, J.F.A.; Büll, C.; van Hilten, N.; Kers-Rebel, E.D.; Balneger, N.; Elferink, H.; Adema, G.J.; Boltje, T.J. Potent Metabolic Sialylation Inhibitors Based on C-5-Modified Fluorinated Sialic Acids. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 62, 1014–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Huang, W.; Sun, L.; Wang, B.; Ma, Y.; Yao, D.; Han, W.; Wang, L. Ginsenosides, potent inhibitors of sialyltransferase. Z. Für Nat. C 2019, 75, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Chang, W.-W.; Yu, C.-Y.; Lin, T.-W.; Wang, P.-H.; Tsai, Y.-C. Soyasaponin I decreases the expression of α2,3-linked sialic acid on the cell surface and suppresses the metastatic potential of B16F10 melanoma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 341, 614–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Hsu, C.-C.; Lin, T.-W.; Chang, W.-W.; Wu, C.-Y.; Lo, W.-H.; Wang, P.-H.; Tsai, Y.-C. Soyasaponin-I-modified invasive behavior of cancer by changing cell surface sialic acids. Gynecol. Oncol. 2005, 96, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Hidari, K.I.; Oyama, K.-I.; Ito, G.; Nakayama, M.; Inai, M.; Goto, S.; Kanai, Y.; Watanabe, K.-I.; Yoshida, K.; Furuta, T.; et al. Identification and characterization of flavonoids as sialyltransferase inhibitors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 382, 609–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Chang, K.-H.; Lee, L.; Chen, J.; Li, W.-S. Lithocholic Acid Analogues, New and Potent α-2,3-Sialyltransferase Inhibitors. Chem. Commun. 2006, 37, 629–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Chen, J.-Y.; Tang, Y.-A.; Huang, S.-M.; Juan, H.-F.; Wu, L.-W.; Sun, Y.-C.; Wang, S.-C.; Wu, K.-W.; Balraj, G.; Chang, T.-T.; et al. A Novel Sialyltransferase Inhibitor Suppresses FAK/Paxillin Signaling and Cancer Angiogenesis and Metastasis Pathways. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Rillahan, C.D.; Brown, S.J.; Register, A.C.; Rosen, H.; Paulson, J.C. High-Throughput Screening for Inhibitors of Sialyl- and Fucosyltransferases. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12534–12537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Li, W.; Niu, Y.; Xiong, D.-C.; Cao, X.; Ye, X.-S. Highly Substituted Cyclopentane–CMP Conjugates as Potent Sialyltransferase Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 7972–7990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Bowles, W.H.D.; Gloster, T.M. Sialidase and Sialyltransferase Inhibitors: Targeting Pathogenicity and Disease. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 705133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Kuhn, B.; Benz, J.; Greif, M.; Engel, A.M.; Sobek, H.; Rudolph, M.G. The structure of human α-2,6-sialyltransferase reveals the binding mode of complex glycans. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2013, 69, 1826–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Moremen, K.W.; Ramiah, A.; Stuart, M.; Steel, J.; Meng, L.; Forouhar, F.; Moniz, A.H.; Gahlay, G.; Gao, Z.; Chapla, D.; et al. Expression system for structural and functional studies of human glycosylation enzymes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017, 14, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Volkers, G.; Worrall, L.J.; Kwan, D.H.; Yu, C.-C.; Baumann, L.; Lameignere, E.; Wasney, A.G.; Scott, E.N.; Wakarchuk, W.; Foster, L.J.; et al. Structure of human ST8SiaIII sialyltransferase provides insight into cell-surface polysialylation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2015, 22, 627–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Montgomery, A.; Dobie, C.; Szabo, R.; Hallam, L.; Ranson, M.; Yu, H.; Skropeta, D. Design, synthesis and evaluation of carbamate-linked uridyl-based inhibitors of human ST6Gal I. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2020, 28, 115561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Ataga, K.I.; Kutlar, A.; Kanter, J.; Liles, D.; Cancado, R.; Friedrisch, J.; Guthrie, T.H.; Knight-Madden, J.; Alvarez, O.A.; Gordeuk, V.R.; et al. Crizanlizumab for the Prevention of Pain Crises in Sickle Cell Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Muz, B.; Azab, F.; de la Puente, P.; Rollins, S.; Alvarez, R.; Kawar, Z.; Azab, A.K. Inhibition of P-Selectin and PSGL-1 Using Humanized Monoclonal Antibodies Increases the Sensitivity of Multiple Myeloma Cells to Bortezomib. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 417586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. DeAngelo, D.J.; Jonas, B.A.; Becker, P.S.; O’Dwyer, M.; Advani, A.S.; Marlton, P.; Magnani, J.; Thackray, H.M.; Liesveld, J. GMI-1271, a novel E-selectin antagonist, combined with induction chemotherapy in elderly patients with untreated AML. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. DeAngelo, D.J.; Jonas, A.B.; Liesveld, J.L.; Bixby, D.L.; Advani, A.S.; Marlton, P.; O′Dwyer, E.M.; Fogler, W.E.; Magnani, J.L.; Chen, M.M.; et al. High E-Selectin Ligand Expression Contributes to Chemotherapy-Resistance in Poor Risk Relapsed and Refractory (R/R) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients and Can be Overcome with the Addition of Uproleselan. Blood 2019, 134, 2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Ferber, S.; Tiram, G.; Sousa-Herves, A.; Eldar-Boock, A.; Krivitsky, A.; Scomparin, A.; Yeini, E.; Ofek, P.; Ben-Shushan, D.; Vossen, L.I.; et al. Co-targeting the tumor endothelium and P-selectin-expressing glioblastoma cells leads to a remarkable therapeutic outcome. eLife 2017, 6, e25281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Bhat, R.; García, I.; Aznar, E.; Arnaiz, B.; Martínez-Bisbal, M.C.; Liz-Marzán, L.M.; Penadés, S.; Martínez-Máñez, R. Lectin-gated and glycan functionalized mesoporous silica nanocontainers for targeting cancer cells overexpressing Lewis X antigen. Nanoscale 2017, 10, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Shodai, T.; Suzuki, J.; Kudo, S.; Itoh, S.; Terada, M.; Fujita, S.; Shimazu, H.; Tsuji, T. Inhibition of P-selectin-mediated cell adhesion by a sulfated derivative of sialic acid. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 312, 787–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Morita, Y.; Kamal, M.; Kang, S.-A.; Zhang, R.; Lokesh, G.L.; Thiviyanathan, V.; Hasan, N.; Woo, S.; Zhao, D.; Leslie, M.; et al. E-selectin Targeting PEGylated-thioaptamer Prevents Breast Cancer Metastases. Mol. Ther.-Nucleic Acids 2016, 5, e399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Chen, W.C.; Completo, G.C.; Sigal, D.S.; Crocker, P.R.; Saven, A.; Paulson, J.C. In vivo targeting of B-cell lymphoma with glycan ligands of CD22. Blood 2010, 115, 4778–4786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Jandus, C.; Boligan, K.F.; Chijioke, O.; Liu, H.; Dahlhaus, M.; Demoulins, T.; Schneider, C.; Wehrli, M.; Hunger, R.E.; Baerlocher, G.M.; et al. Interactions between Siglec-7/9 receptors and ligands influence NK cell-dependent tumor immunosurveillance. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 1810–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  244. Rodrigues, E.; Macauley, M.S. Targeted self-destruction. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2020, 16, 1281–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Xiao, H.; Woods, E.C.; Vukojicic, P.; Bertozzi, C.R. Precision glycocalyx editing as a strategy for cancer immunotherapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 10304–10309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Gray, M.A.; Stanczak, M.A.; Mantuano, N.R.; Xiao, H.; Pijnenborg, J.F.A.; Malaker, S.A.; Miller, C.L.; Weidenbacher, P.A.; Tanzo, J.T.; Ahn, G.; et al. Targeted glycan degradation potentiates the anticancer immune response in vivo. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2020, 16, 1376–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Läubli, H.; Pearce, O.M.T.; Schwarz, F.; Siddiqui, S.S.; Deng, L.; Stanczak, M.A.; Deng, L.; Verhagen, A.; Secrest, P.; Lusk, C.; et al. Engagement of myelomonocytic Siglecs by tumor-associated ligands modulates the innate immune response to cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 14211–14216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Bénac, O.; Gaudin, M.; Ors, M.; Le Roy, A.; Blanc, H.R.; Soulas, C.; Chanteux, S.; Rossi, B.; Gauthier, L.; Paturel, C.; et al. Abstract 2713: Preclinical development of first-in-class antibodies targeting Siglec-9 immune checkpoint for cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 2713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. He, F.; Wang, N.; Li, J.; He, L.; Yang, Z.; Lu, J.; Xiong, G.; Yu, C.; Wang, S. High affinity monoclonal antibody targeting Siglec-15 for cancer immunotherapy. J. Clin. Transl. Res. 2021, 7, 739–749. [Google Scholar]
  250. Cao, G.; Xiao, Z.; Yin, Z. Normalization cancer immunotherapy: Blocking Siglec-15! Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2019, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Kobayashi, H.; Terao, T.; Kawashima, Y. Serum sialyl Tn as an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 1992, 10, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Ibrahim, N.K.; Murray, J.L. Clinical Development of the STn-KLH Vaccine (Theratope®). Clin. Breast Cancer 2003, 3, S139–S143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Holmberg, A.L.; Sandmaier, B.M. Theratope® vaccine (STn-KLH). Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2001, 1, 881–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. MacLean, G.D.; Reddish, M.; Koganty, R.R.; Wong, T.; Gandhi, S.; Smolenski, M.; Samuel, J.; Nabholtzl, J.M.; Longenecker, B.M. Immunization of breast cancer patients using a synthetic sialyl-Tn glycoconjugate plus Detox adjuvant. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 1993, 36, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. MacLean, G.D.; Reddish, M.A.; Koganty, R.R.; Longenecker, B.M. Antibodies against Mucin-Associated Sialyl-Tn Epitopes Correlate with Survival of Metastatic Adenocarcinoma Patients Undergoing Active Specific Immunotherapy with Synthetic STn Vaccine. J. Immunother. Emphas. Tumor. Immunol. 1996, 19, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Miles, D.; Roché, H.; Martin, M.; Perren, T.J.; Cameron, D.A.; Glaspy, J.; Dodwell, D.; Parker, J.; Mayordomo, J.; Tres, A.; et al. Phase III Multicenter Clinical Trial of the Sialyl-TN (STn)-Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin (KLH) Vaccine for Metastatic Breast Cancer. Oncologist 2011, 16, 1092–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. O′Cearbhaill, R.E.; Ragupathi, G.; Zhu, J.; Wan, Q.; Mironov, S.; Yang, G.; Spassova, M.K.; Iasonos, A.; Kravetz, S.; Ouerfelli, O.; et al. A Phase I Study of Unimolecular Pentavalent (Globo-H-GM2-sTn-TF-Tn) Immunization of Patients with Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer in First Remission. Cancers 2016, 8, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Ragupathi, G.; Damani, P.; Srivastava, G.; Srivastava, O.; Sucheck, S.J.; Ichikawa, Y.; Livingston, P.O. Synthesis of sialyl Lewis(a) (sLe (a), CA19-9) and construction of an immunogenic sLe(a) vaccine. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2009, 58, 1397–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Hypersialylation is a common feature of cancer cells. Tumour cells have increased levels of sialylated glycans on their cell surface, which include sialyl LewisA (SLeA), sialyl-LewisX (SLeX), sialyl-Tn (sTn), Sialyl-T (sT), polysialic acid (polySia), GM3 and GD2 antigens.
Figure 1. Hypersialylation is a common feature of cancer cells. Tumour cells have increased levels of sialylated glycans on their cell surface, which include sialyl LewisA (SLeA), sialyl-LewisX (SLeX), sialyl-Tn (sTn), Sialyl-T (sT), polysialic acid (polySia), GM3 and GD2 antigens.
Cancers 14 04248 g001
Figure 2. Siglec–sialoglycan interactions can modulate immune cell function and promote an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME).
Figure 2. Siglec–sialoglycan interactions can modulate immune cell function and promote an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME).
Cancers 14 04248 g002
Figure 3. Strategies to target aberrant sialylation in cancer.
Figure 3. Strategies to target aberrant sialylation in cancer.
Cancers 14 04248 g003
Table 2. Overview of therapeutic strategies to target aberrant sialylation in cancer.
Table 2. Overview of therapeutic strategies to target aberrant sialylation in cancer.
ApproachProgressReferences
Sialyltransferase
inhibitors
Intra-tumoural injection of 3Fax-Neu5Ac suppresses tumour growth in multiple cancer models by promoting T-cell mediated immunity. Targeted delivery of P-3FAX-Neu5Ac using nanoparticles can prevent metastasis in a mouse lung cancer model. However, 3Fax-Neu5Ac has been shown to produce liver and kidney dysfunction in mice. C-5 carbamate sialyltransferase inhibitors that reach higher concentrations within the cell and induce prolonged inhibition of sialylation have been developed but are yet to be tested in vivo.[168,218,219,220]
Selectin inhibitorsBlocking antibodies for P-Selectin have been developed. The E-selectin inhibitor Uproleselan (GMI-1271) has shown promise for treating acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in combination with chemotherapy, and may also re-sensitise multiple myeloma to therapy. [234,235]
NCT02306291
[175,235,236,237]
NCT03616470
Antibody–sialidase
conjugates
A sialidase conjugated to a HER2 antibody (tratuzumab) can de-sialylate cancer cells, remove Siglec ligands and prolong survival times in mice. A HER2-sialidase conjugate is currently in Phase I/II clinical trials in combination with traditional immune checkpoint blockade for patients with non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, melanoma, pancreatic cancer, and ovarian cancer.[188,193,245,246]
NCT05259696
Anti-Siglec
antibodies
Anti-Siglec 9 antibodies are in preclinical development. Anti-Siglec 7 antibodies have been shown to promote NK mediated killing. The anti-Siglec-15 blocking antibody (NC318) is being tested in clinical trials.[192,247,248,249,250]
NCT03665285
VaccinesThe Theratope sTn-KLH vaccine can promote the generation of anti-sTn antibodies, but a phase III trial showed no benefit for metastatic breast cancer patients. A unimolecular pentavalent vaccine containing vaccine portions of Globo-H, GM2, sTn, TF and the Tn antigen has been tested in patients with ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer, and produced increased antibody titres to these antigens in a phase I clinical trial. A KLH conjugate vaccine has also been produced for sLeA and tested in metastatic breast cancer patients.NCT00003638
[256]
NCT01248273
NCT00470574
[257,258]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Munkley, J. Aberrant Sialylation in Cancer: Therapeutic Opportunities. Cancers 2022, 14, 4248. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174248

AMA Style

Munkley J. Aberrant Sialylation in Cancer: Therapeutic Opportunities. Cancers. 2022; 14(17):4248. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174248

Chicago/Turabian Style

Munkley, Jennifer. 2022. "Aberrant Sialylation in Cancer: Therapeutic Opportunities" Cancers 14, no. 17: 4248. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174248

APA Style

Munkley, J. (2022). Aberrant Sialylation in Cancer: Therapeutic Opportunities. Cancers, 14(17), 4248. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174248

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop