Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Biomass and Acid Loading on Methanolysis during Two-Step Lignin-First Processing of Birchwood
Next Article in Special Issue
Nanoscale Cerium Oxide: Synthesis, Biocatalytic Mechanism, and Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Aqueous Extraction of Seed Oil from Mamey Sapote (Pouteria sapota) after Viscozyme L Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Nucleic Acid Modulation for Functional Nanozyme
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/catal11060749
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of a Novel Bi-Enzymatic Nanobiocatalyst for the Efficient Bioconversion of Oleuropein to Hydroxytyrosol

by
Archontoula Giannakopoulou
1,
Alexandra V. Chatzikonstantinou
1,
Nikolaos Chalmpes
2,
Georgia Tsapara
1,
Dimitrios Gournis
2,
Angeliki C. Polydera
1 and
Haralambos Stamatis
1,*
1
Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biological Applications and Technologies, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
2
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2021, 11(6), 749; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11060749
Submission received: 29 May 2021 / Revised: 15 June 2021 / Accepted: 16 June 2021 / Published: 19 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State of the Art and Future Trends in Nanostructured Biocatalysis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lipase A from Candida antarctica (CalA) and β-glucosidase from Thermotoga maritima (bgl) were covalently co-immobilized onto the surface of chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles (CS-MNPs). Several parameters regarding the co-immobilization procedure (glutaraldehyde concentration, incubation time, CS-MNPs to enzyme mass ratio and bgl to CalA mass ratio) were evaluated and optimized. The developed nanobiocatalyst was characterized by various spectroscopic techniques. Biochemical parameters such as kinetic constants and thermal stability were also evaluated. The nanobiocatalytic system revealed an increase in the Km constant followed by a decrease in Vmax value compared with the native enzymes, while a significant increase (>5-fold higher) of the thermal stability of the immobilized CalA, both in individual and in co-immobilized form, was observed after 24 h incubation at 60 °C. Finally, the nanobiocatalyst was efficiently applied for the bioconversion of oleuropein to hydroxytyrosol, one of the most powerful naturally derived antioxidants, and it could be recycled for up to 10 reaction cycles (240 h of constant operation) at 60 °C, retaining more than 50% of its initial activity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Oleuropein (OLE), a major bioactive phenolic antioxidant found in high concentrations in the olive tree Olea europaea, is responsible for the bitter taste of olive oil and fruit [1]. Its chemical structure consists of an ester bond between a molecule of elenolic acid (EA) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethanol or hydroxytyrosol (HT) and a glycosidic bond between the EA and the HT [2]. OLE is characterized by various biological activities, such as antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticancer. It is also a well-known compound for its cardioprotective, neuroprotective and hypolipidemic activities, which establish OLE a potentially natural additive for cosmetics and medicine [3]. On the other hand, HT, the main degradation product of OLE, is considered one of the most powerful naturally derived antioxidants, exhibiting a plethora of biological activities, usually superior to OLE [4]. Apart from HT, other oleuropein’s degradation products, such as the EA or the oleuropein aglycone, are also gaining increasing attention due to their significant biological properties. Oleuropein aglycone has been reported to exhibit many activities similar to those of oleuropein [5], while the secoiridoid, elenolic acid, has been recognized as an antiviral agent [6,7]. However, contents of HT are low in natural sources, and many challenges are revealed in its chemical synthesis, including the low final yield and the large number of toxic reagents and expensive catalysts required.
The bioconversion of OLE to HT could be an optimal alternative over conventional chemical processes as a more environmentally friendly approach with higher conversion rates. Until now, a variety of hydrolytic enzymes including lipases, esterases, cellulases and xylanases has been reported for the efficient synthesis of HT from OLE [8]. Among them, β-glucosidases play a key role in the cleavage of the glycosidic bond of OLE, releasing glucose and its corresponding aglycone. Other enzymes, such as lipases or esterases, could subsequently initiate the breakage of the OLE ester bond, forming HT and an elenolic acid glucoside. The regioselective hydrolysis of oleuropein toward the production of the corresponding biologically active compounds has been recently reported using a free form of a commercial lipase and a thermophilic β-glucosidase from Myceliophthora thermophile [6]. However, the use of immobilized biocatalysts for the regioselective hydrolysis of OLE remains restricted and challenging and usually refers to individually immobilized enzymes [9]. However, the development of robust biocatalysts consisting of more than one enzyme is considered of high priority when referring to reactions that require the synergistic action of two or more enzymes, such as the bioconversion of oleuropein (Figure 1).
Multi-enzyme co-immobilization brings several free enzymes in proximity, so that a specific arrangement of the enzymes can be accomplished, leading to enhanced reaction rates compared to their free form. Moreover, the overall process is characterized by the elimination of reaction byproducts and intermediates and the reduction of diffusion losses, promoting high yields and atom economy [10,11]. Multi-enzyme biocatalytic systems could also offer many other advantages such as the possibility of artificially developing metabolic pathways that do not appear in nature as an alternative to conventional chemical synthesis for the production of high-value chemicals and bioproducts. Especially, under a catalytic point of view, multienzyme nanostructures present higher conversion rates when compared to enzymes immobilized on bulk materials due to their large surface-to-volume ratio [12].
Chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles (CS-MNPs) have been broadly used as promising nanocarriers for both single- and multi-enzyme immobilization of various enzymes [13,14,15,16] as they provide a plethora of multifunctional characteristics such as biocompatibility, nontoxicity, small size and superparamagnetism [17]. The easy separation of these nanocarriers, simple by applying an external magnet, facilitates the reuse of the nanobiocatalyst. Moreover, the chitosan coating of the magnetic nanoparticles provides their surface with new functional groups, such as primary amino and hydroxyl groups, which enables enzyme immobilization [18,19]. Glutaraldehyde is widely used as a crosslinking agent for the covalent immobilization of enzymes on nanocarriers rich in primary groups on their surface, such as chitosan. This agent has the ability to directly react with the primary amino groups of chitosan through the formation of Schiff bases and subsequently attaching enzymes on these groups in high yields. Moreover, as it has been reported [20], glutaraldehyde can cause enzyme attachment on primary hydroxyl groups at lower yields under acidic conditions.
The aim of this work was the development of a robust bi-enzymatic nanobiocatalytic system for the bioconversion of oleuropein to hydroxytyrosol. To this end, chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles were synthesized and used as a carrier for the co-immobilization of two enzymes, namely β-glucosidase from Thermotoga maritima (bgl) and lipase A from Candida antarctica (CalA). The choice of bgl was based on its a key role in the cleavage of the glycosidic bond of OLE [9], while CalA was chosen for its ability to modify a wide range of substrates, including long-chain fatty acids or voluminous substrates due to its peculiar structure [21]. The prepared bi-enzymatic nanobiocatalyst was characterized by various spectroscopic techniques, such as Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and fluorescence spectroscopy. Several parameters concerning the co-immobilization procedure were optimized, while many techniques were applied for the characterization of this bionanoconjugate with respect to its catalytic activity as well as its thermal and operational stability. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a bi-enzymatic nanobiocatalyst consisting of β-glucosidase from Thermotoga maritima and lipase A from Candida antarctica co-immobilized onto chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles is applied for the efficient biotransformation of OLE to HT.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of the Chitosan Magnetic Nanoparticles

In the present study, iron magnetic nanoparticles (Fe3O4) functionalized with chitosan were synthesized according to the ionic gelation method with sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP) as the crosslinking agent [22,23]. Various methods were applied for the characterization of the chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles, such as X-ray diffraction (XRD) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The successful preparation of the CS-MNPs was evidenced with XRD (see Supplementary File, Figure S1), while their structural and morphological characterization was revealed by AFM.

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

The structure and the morphology of the prepared Fe3O4 chitosan nanoparticles was revealed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Representative AFM images of the hybrid system deposited on Si-wafer by drop casting from aqueous dispersions are presented in Figure 2, confirming the presence of spherical nanoparticles with a slightly disrupted circular morphology (Figure 2a,d). In addition, the phase depiction of the Fe3O4 chitosan nanoparticles as shown in Figure 2b is indicative of the creation of a chitosan shell around the core of the magnetic nanoparticles. The size of the hybrid magnetic nanostructure as evaluated by AFM cross-sectional images was close to 50 nm (Figure 2c).

2.2. Preparation of the Bi-Enzymatic Magnetic Nanobiocatalyst

The hydrolytic enzymes bgl and CalA were covalently attached onto the surface of chitosan-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles by employing glutaraldehyde as a crosslinking agent. Several parameters affecting the co-immobilization yield such as the crosslinker concentration, the ratio of CS-MNPs to total enzyme mass, the ratio between bgl and CalA and the incubation time were examined and optimized. It has been reported that glutaraldehyde can directly affect enzyme loading and activity recovery of the enzymes after co-immobilization [20,24]. Therefore, the effect of glutaraldehyde concentration on enzymes activity recovery was investigated in the range of 5–20% v/v, and the results are presented in Figure 3a. The enzymes activity recovery was determined by measuring the activity of the prepared nanobiocatalyst at different glutaraldehyde concentrations through the enzymatic assay for each enzyme (as described in Section 3.2.5). As it can be seen, at varying glutaraldehyde concentrations, the activity recovery of the enzymes was affected, yielding a maximum activity recovery at 10% v/v crosslinker concentration (79% for CalA and 76% for bgl). At higher or lower glutaraldehyde concentrations, the enzymatic activities were slightly reduced, probably because lower crosslinker concentrations may not be sufficient, while higher concentrations might cause conformational changes leading to a loss of enzymatic activity. These results are in agreement with previously reported studies [25,26], reporting that significantly low or high glutaraldehyde concentrations lead to insufficient crosslinking of the enzymes, while enzyme activity recoveries tend to increase with increasing crosslinker concentrations up to a maximum value.
Subsequently, the effect of mass ratio of the nanocarrier to total enzyme content was investigated. More specific, the glutaraldehyde concentration was retained at 10 v/v, while the mass ratio of the nanocarrier to total enzyme content was ranged from 0.5:1 to 1:8 (w/w). As shown in Figure 3b, the activity recovery of bgl does not seem to be strongly affected at different ratios of the nanocarrier, while the activity recovery of CalA is significantly affected by varying ratios, yielding in a maximum activity recovery (85%) at 1:8 mass ratio. At lower mass ratios, sufficient surface area of the nanosupport to bind both enzymes may not be available, while at higher ratios, phenomena such as enhanced immobilization on the surface could be observed, consequently leading to steric hindrance amongst the enzymes, as previously described [27,28,29].
The ratio of bgl to CalA was also investigated with respect to its effect on the activity recovery. The ratio of bgl to CalA was tested in the range of 4:1 to 1:4, and the results are depicted in Figure 3c. It seems that the activity recovery of bgl is not significantly affected by the amount of CalA used for the co-immobilization process. However, the activity recovery of CalA seems to be strongly affected by the amount of bgl, yielding a maximum activity recovery (82%) at a mass ratio of 1:4, namely when the amount of bgl used for the co-immobilization was four times lower than the amount of CalA. As it is illustrated in Figure 3c, when the amount of bgl was higher than CalA, a low activity recovery was observed for CalA, revealing possible competition effects between the two enzymes during the co-immobilization process. Similar results have been reported for the co-immobilization of cellulase and lysozyme on amino-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles [27], where the ratio effects of cellulase to lysozyme on the activities recovery of co-immobilized enzymes also revealed a competition between the two enzymes during co-immobilization.
Finally, the effect of incubation time on the activity recovery of the enzymes during co-immobilization was examined, and the results are shown in Figure 3d. As it can be seen, the activity recovery of both enzymes increased with increasing incubation time demonstrating a maximum activity recovery after 5 h of incubation (bgl: 85% and CalA: 66%). Lower time of incubation might not be sufficient for the attachment of enzymes onto MNPs. However, at extended incubation times, a decline in activity recoveries was observed in a similar manner as previously described [14,25], probably due to rigidification of enzymes that probably affects their configuration, thus leading to abolish enzyme activity.
Based on the experimental data mentioned above, the optimized preparation conditions for the bi-enzymatic magnetic nanobiocatalyst were: glutaraldehyde concentration, 10% v/v; mass ratio of CS-MNPs to enzyme content, 1:8; mass ratio of bgl to CalA, 1:3 and incubation time, 5 h. Under these conditions, the maximum activity recoveries for both bgl and CalA were 92.3% and 79.0%, respectively.

2.3. Characterization of the Bio-Nanoconjugates

In order to confirm the successful binding of the enzymes on the CS-MNPs, as well as to investigate any structural changes on the nanomaterial’s surface after the anchoring of the enzymes or possible interactions of the enzymes with the CS-MNPs, we applied several spectroscopic techniques, such as Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), fluorescence spectroscopy and circular dichroism spectroscopy (CD).

2.3.1. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

The successful anchoring of bgl and CalA on the CS-MNPs was first confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy. Figure 4 illustrates the FTIR spectra of the CS-MNPs and the co-immobilized form of bgl and CalA. As it can be seen, the bands observed around 590 and 3400 cm−1 can be assigned to Fe-O deformation and O-H stretching vibration of water molecules absorbed on the samples. The peak at 1083 cm−1, present in both spectra, can be attributed to the C-O stretching vibration of glycosidic bonds [13], while the peak at 1640 cm−1 is characteristic of the –NH2 bending vibration. Regarding the spectra of Fe3O4-chitosan-bgl-CalA, two absorption bands of a typical protein spectrum are observed. The first absorption around 1649 cm−1 is associated with the Amide I band, which corresponds to the C=O stretching vibrations of amide groups and C=N of imine groups and is directly related to the backbone conformation of the protein [25]. For this reason, an increase in the absorption around 1640–1649 cm−1 in the Fe3O4-chitosan-bgl-CalA spectrum is observed. The second absorption around 1542 cm−1 is associated with the Amide II band of the proteins, which can be referred to C-N stretching and N-H bending vibration of the amide bond. These bands suggest the crosslink between chitosan and the two enzymes and thus their successful immobilization on CS-MNPs [25].

2.3.2. Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy (CD)

In order to investigate the conformational changes of bgl and CalA upon interaction with CS-MNPs, circular dichroism spectroscopy was applied. As it can be seen in Table 1, the interaction of both enzymes with CS-MNPs induces conformational changes that are associated with a slight decrease in the α-helical content followed by an equal increase in the β-sheet content. The increase in β-sheet content could be attributed to the hydrophobic interactions between the enzymes and the CS-MNPs [30], while a loss in the α-helical content has been associated with enzyme inactivation [31]. A slight decrease in the α-helical content has been recently reported for a recombinant Bacillus subtilis lipase immobilized on magnetic nanoparticles [32]. The changes in the secondary structure of CalA in the presence of various carbon-based nanomaterials [30], as well as for the immobilized lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus on multiwalled carbon nanotubes [33], also reveal a decrease in the α-helical content followed by the increase in the β-sheet content. However, another study reported that the interaction of lipase B from Pseudozyma antarctica with magnetic porous carbon nanomaterials [34] resulted in a slight increase in the α-helical content followed by a decrease in the β-sheet content, indicating that different kinds of nanomaterials can induce different conformational changes on protein structure.
A recently reported study highlighted the immobilization of bgl using Eudragit L-100(polyacrylic resin) as a carrier. Circular dichroism studies revealed that the proportion of α-helix and turning angle decreased after immobilization while β-sheet and randomness increased [35], which is in good accordance with our results. The increase in β-sheet content can be correlated with a more rigid structure which subsequently results in enhanced stability that is also confirmed by the stability studies of immobilized bgl on CS-MNPs.

2.3.3. Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Fluorescence spectroscopy is a widely applied technique for the confirmation of the presence of enzymes on solid material [36,37,38]. The fluorescence emission spectra of free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized form of bgl and CalA were recorded in order to confirm the successful anchoring of the enzymes on the CS-MNPs. Excitation wavelength was set at 280 nm, and the emission intensity was recorded in the range of 300–400 nm. The maximum emission wavelength of the free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized form of both bgl and CalA was found at 320 nm. The fluorescence spectra of CS-MNPs were also recorded at the same conditions, and no emission was observed in the range of 300–400 nm. As it can be seen in Figure 5, in all cases, the fluorescence spectra of bionanoconjugates reveal a maximum emission at 320 nm, which indicates the presence of the enzymes and, therefore, their successful immobilization on the CS-MNPs.

2.4. Thermal Stability of the Bi-Enzymatic Nanobiocatalyst

The thermal stability of enzymes consists of a crucial parameter especially when considering their industrial applications [39]. In order to examine the thermal stability of bgl and CalA in their free, individually immobilized or co-immobilized form, all samples were incubated at 60 °C, in sodium phosphate buffer 50 mM, pH 7.0 for CalA and in citrate phosphate buffer 100 mM, pH 6.5 for bgl. The individually immobilized form refers to the nanobiocatalyst consisting of either bgl or CalA covalently attached on the CS-MNPs, while the co-immobilized form refers to the hybrid nanobiocatalyst consisting of both bgl and CalA covalently attached onto the surface of the CS-MNPs. Measurements of the residual activity were taken at standard time intervals, as shown in Figure 6, in order to determine the half-life time of the enzymes, namely the time required for the enzyme to lose 50% of its initial activity. Table 2 demonstrates that the half-life time of CalA both in individually immobilized and co-immobilized form is significantly enhanced by about 6.6 and 5.6 times, respectively. Similar results highlighting an enhancement in thermal stability have been recently reported for the immobilization of CalA onto chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles [13]. In case of bgl used in this work, a well-known highly thermostable β-glucosidase [40], no significant decline in the residual activity was observed for temperatures in the range of 60–90 °C after 24 h of incubation for all forms (free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized) studied. Similar results have been reported for the immobilization of bgl from Thermotoga maritima on porous carbon cuboids nanoparticles [9] or for the co-immobilization of bgl on amino-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles [26]. These results suggest that chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles could be an ideal support for multienzyme immobilization leading to nanobiocatalysts with improved thermostability against denaturation at high temperatures compared to their native forms.

2.5. Kinetic Studies of Free, Individually Immobilized and Co-Immobilized Biocatalysts

In order to gain deeper insight into the affinity of each form of the two enzymes to their respective substrates, we evaluated the intrinsic (for the free form of the enzymes) and apparent (for the individually immobilized and co-immobilized forms of the enzymes) Michaelis constants [41]. Specifically, the determination of the enzyme kinetic constants (Km and Vmax) of the free, individually immobilized or co-immobilized form of bgl and CalA were calculated by the nonlinear regression fitting of the initial reaction rates, with respect to varying pNPG and pNPB concentrations, respectively. As shown in Table 3 and Table 4, the apparent Km values of either individually or co-immobilized form of enzymes were higher than that of their native forms in all the cases, while the apparent Vmax values decreased after immobilization and co-immobilization. The increase in Km values followed by a decrease in Vmax values is usually observed after immobilization. The increase in Km values indicates that the affinity of enzymes toward their substrate declines after immobilization that could be probably due to conformational changes that consecutively reduce/restrict the diffusion of the respective substrates to the active site of the enzymes, indicating lower enzymatic reaction rates. Similar results have been observed for the immobilization of β-glucosidase from Thermotoga maritima on chitin-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles [42] and for the co-immobilization of alcalase and trypsin on Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles coated with chitosan-sodium tripolyphosphate [14].

2.6. Application of the Bi-Enzymatic Nanobiocatalyst to the Bioconversion of Oleuropein to Hydroxytyrosol

The developed bi-enzymatic nanobiocatalytic system was applied to the two-step bioconversion of oleuropein to hydroxytyrosol. Specifically, as illustrated in Figure 1, in the first step, β-glucosidase cleavages the glucosidic bond of oleuropein, producing oleuropein algycon and glucose. In the following step, a lipase such as CalA can catalyze the hydrolysis of oleuropein aglycone to elenolic acid and hydroxytyrosol. A variety of different lipases were tested for their ability to hydrolyze the OLE ester bond where CalA presented the highest conversion yield (see Supplementary File, Table S1). We applied four different reaction systems and evaluated their reaction rates, the % conversion yield of oleuropein (determined through HPLC analysis) and the amount of hydroxytyrosol (mg mL−1) produced as shown in Table 5. In the case of individually immobilized bgl or CalA, the conversion yield of oleuropein presented refers to either the cleavage of the glucosidic bond of oleuropein or to the hydrolysis of the OLE ester bond, respectively. In the case of co-immobilized biocatalyst or the simultaneous use of the two individually immobilized biocatalysts in the reaction mixture, the oleuropein conversion yield could be attributed to their synergistic action. High-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) was employed for the identification and quantification of oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol, as well as for the reaction progress monitoring. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was employed for the characterization of the products of the enzymatic hydrolysis of oleuropein, such as hydroxytyrosol, elenolic acid and glucose (see Supplementary File, Figure S2). Figure 7 illustrates the reaction progress of the enzymatic hydrolysis of oleuropein catalyzed by the bi-enzymatic magnetic complex. Table 5 depicts the initial reaction rates of individually immobilized bgl and CalA and co-immobilized bgl-CalA system for the hydrolysis of oleuropein and percentage conversion yield of oleuropein. As it can be seen in Table 5, individually immobilized biocatalysts or their combination are characterized by lower conversion rates than the co-immobilized magnetic nanobiocatalyst. Similar results highlighting the superior catalytic activity of co-immobilized biocatalysts compared to the individually immobilized ones have been reported by Sojitra and co-workers [28]. In that work, a magnetic tri-enzyme nanobiocatalyst for fruit juice clarification was developed, suggesting that co-immobilization enables substrate channeling, thus leading to higher reaction yields than the individually immobilized enzymes. Moreover, it should be noted than even though both individually immobilized bgl and co-immobilized complex presented a 100% conversion yield of oleuropein, the yield for hydroxytyrosol was significantly lower in the case of individually immobilized bgl, suggesting that the combination of the two enzymes is essential for achieving high hydroxytyrosol yields. Similar results, suggesting a synergistic action of bgl and CalA have also been observed when the enzymes were used in their free form (see Supplementary File, Table S2).

2.7. Reusability of the Bi-Enzymatic Nanobiocatalyst

Recycling of multienzymatic nanobiocatalysts is vital in terms of economic viability especially when considering large-scale biocatalytic processes. In the present study, the operational stability of the bi-enzymatic nanobiocatalyst was evaluated for 10 successive reaction cycles of the bioconversion of oleuropein in a batch mode. Each reaction cycle was carried out in citrate phosphate buffer 100 mM pH 6.5 at 60 °C for 24 h. After each cycle, the nanobiocatalyst was separated through magnetization, washed twice with buffer to remove substrate and product remains and then added to fresh oleuropein solution in order to start a new reaction cycle. Figure 8 illustrates the residual activity of the nanobiocatalyst after each cycle. The remaining hydrolytic activity of the magnetic co-immobilized complex is up to 50% after 10 catalytic cycles, which equals about 240 h of constant operation. Similar results have been reported for immobilized CalA onto chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles, where the biocatalyst gave half of the initial conversion after 7 reaction cycles [13] or for immobilized bgl from Thermotoga maritima on chitin-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles where the nanobiocatalyst presented about 66% of residual activity after 10 reaction cycles [42]. In the case of co-immobilized enzymes, the conservation up to 75% of residual activity after eight consecutive cycles of a tri-enzyme magnetic nanobiocatalyst [28] and the retention of up to 50% after 5 reaction cycles at 50 °C for a four-enzyme magnetic co-immobilized complex have been reported [26]. Any loss in activity could be attributed to conformational changes on the immobilized enzymes [9] or mechanical damage of the biocatalyst during the recycling procedure [26]. Our results are in good agreement with previously reported studies indicating that multienzyme immobilization on magnetic nanosupports can lead to stable biocatalysts that can be efficiently applied for bioconversions of biotechnological interest, such as the synthesis of hydroxytyrosol from oleuropein.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

β-Glucosidase (bgl) from Thermotoga maritima (85 units mg−1) was purchased from Megazyme (Chicago, IL, USA) and was used with no further purification. Novozyme 735 (lipase A from Pseudozyma (Candida) antarctica, CalA) and Lipase B from Pseudozyma (Candida) antarctica (CaLB) were generously provided by Novozymes (Bagsværd, Denmark). Lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus (Lipozyme, TLL, 100 L) was generously provided from Novozymes. Lipase from Aspergillus oryzae (solution, ≥100,000 U/g), lipase from Mucor miehei, (lyophilized powder, ≥4000 units/mg solid) and lipase from Candida antarctica (lyophilized powder, 0.3 U/mg) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Glutaraldehyde solution (25% v/v in H2O), 4-nitrophenyl β-D-galactoside, (p-NPG, ≥98%), p-nitrophenyl butyrate (p-NPB), p-nitrophenol (p-NP), iron (ΙΙ,ΙΙΙ) oxide nanopowder, 50–100 nm particle size (SEM), 97% trace metals basis, sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP) and chitosan from crab shells (low viscosity) were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Oleuropein was purchased from Biosynth Carbosynth (Sankt Gallen, Switzerland). All the other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade and procured from reliable sources. Milli-Q water was used for the preparation of all the buffers and solutions.

3.2. Methods

All experiments were performed by triplicate, and the values are given as mean values and experimental errors.

3.2.1. Functionalization of Iron Oxide Magnetic Nanoparticles (Fe3O4) with Chitosan (CS-MNPs)

In a typical synthesis protocol, 8 mg of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles (Fe3O4) was dispersed in 0.96 mL CS solution (0.2% w/v). Figure 9 schematically represents the functionalization of MNPs with chitosan. For the preparation of the chitosan solution 0.2 g of CS powder was dissolved in 100 mL of 1% v/v acetic acid. Then, 0.32 mL of sodium tripolyphosphate solution (1.5 mg mL−1) was added dropwise to the dispersion and mixed under constant magnet stirring (1000 rpm) for 0.5 h at 25 °C. CS-MNPs were subsequently gathered through magnetization (see Supplementary File, Figure S3) and washed thrice with water and ethanol. Finally, the CS-MNPs were dried at 45 °C overnight for further use.

3.2.2. Characterization of the Chitosan-Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles

XRD

The powder X-ray diffraction patterns were collected on a D8 Advanced Bruker diffractometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) using CuKα (40 kV, 40 mA) radiation and a secondary beam graphite monochromator. The patterns were recorded in a 2-theta (2θ) range from 2 to 80°, in steps of 0.02° and counting time 2 s per step.

AFM

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were obtained in tapping mode with a Bruker Multimode 3D Nanoscope (Ted Pella Inc., Redding, CA, USA) using a microfabricated silicon cantilever type TAP-300G, with a tip radius of <10 nm and a force constant of approximately 20–75 N m−1.

3.2.3. Preparation of Bi-Enzymatic Magnetic Nanobiocatalyst

CalA and bgl were covalently attached onto the surface of CS-MNPs employing glutaraldehyde as crosslinker, which links the free NH2 groups present in chitosan with the free amino groups of the enzymes. In a typical protocol, 24 mg of nanomaterial was dispersed in sodium phosphate buffer (10 mL, 100 mM, pH 6.5) in the presence of 0.11 mL Tween-20 (1% v/v), and the mixture was incubated in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min. After 30 min, the crosslinker glutaraldehyde (10% v/v) was added, and the mixture was allowed to shake for 30 min under agitation at room temperature (30 ± 2). Thorough centrifugation followed the removing of the glutaraldehyde excess. The activated nanoparticles were redispersed in sodium phosphate buffer (10 mL, 100 mM, pH 6.5), and the enzyme cocktail (total protein content of 3 mg) containing bgl and CalA (in a typical mass ratio of 1:3) was added into the solution. Then, the mixture was incubated for 5 h with constant shaking at 150 rpm. After crosslinking, the co-immobilized enzymes were separated with magnet, washed thrice with sodium phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 6.5) and stored at 4 °C. The prepared nanobiocatalyst was used as magnetic bi-enzymatic nanobiocatalyst. Several parameters of the co-immobilization procedure, such as the glutaraldehyde concentration (5%, 10%, 15% and 20%), the incubation time (1 h, 3 h, 5 h and 20 h), the bgl to CalA mass ratio (4:1, 3:1, 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, 1:3 and 1:4) and the total enzyme mass to CS-MNPs ratio (0.5:1, 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 1:6 and 1:8) were examined by one factor at a time in order to attain the maximum activity recoveries of the two enzymes. The activities of enzymes were expressed as activity recovery (%), which is determined as the percent activity of each immobilized enzyme (U) divided by the total initial activity of each enzyme. CalA and bgl were also immobilized separately (individually) onto CS-MNPs using glutaraldehyde as the crosslinker. The immobilization percentage was determined by the Bradford assay [43] through the difference of the protein concentration in the supernatant before and after the immobilization. All experiments were carried out in triplicate.

3.2.4. Characterization of the Bi-Enzymatic Magnetic Nanobiocatalyst

Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

The confirmation of the characteristic functional peaks of chitosan-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles and bi-enzymatic nanobiocatalyst, was performed through a FTIR-8400 infrared spectrometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a deuterated triglycine sulfate (DTGS) detector. All spectra were recorded within the 400–4000 cm−1 range and on average of 32 scans.

Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy (CD)

Circular dichroism measurements were performed on a Jasco J-1500 spectropolarimeter (Tokyo, Japan), equipped with a Peltier system for temperature control. A quartz cell of 10 mm path length was used. All spectra were recorded at 25 °C, with a 2 nm bandwidth of the incident light and a scan speed of 50 nm min−1. The baseline was recorded and subtracted from the protein spectrum for every sample scanned. The protein concentration was 6 μg mL−1 for bgl in citrate phosphate buffer (5 mM, pH 6.5) and 5 μg mL−1 for CalA in phosphate buffer (5 mM, pH 7.5), according to the Beer-Lambert equation. CS-MNPs were added at a final concentration of 1.5 μg mL−1 to minimize any optical phenomena that lowered the signal-to-noise ratio. At least two scans were collected and averaged. Data obtained from CD were analyzed using the DICHROWEB website: http://www.dichroweb.cryst.bbk.ac (Accessed on: 19 May 2020) [44,45].

Fluorescence Spectroscopy

All of the fluorescence measurements were taken at a luminescence spectrofluorometer Jasco-8300 (Tokyo, Japan) by using a solid sample holder. Individually immobilized and co-immobilized enzymes were used in aqueous solutions at concentrations of 1 mg mL−1, while free bgl and CalA at concentrations of 0.45 μg mL−1 and 1 mg mL−1, respectively. Samples were deposited onto silicon wafers (P/Bor, single-side polished) from aqueous solutions by drop casting. The fluorescence emission spectra were recorded from 300 to 400 nm after exciting at 280 nm, with a scan speed of 100 nm min−1 at 25 °C. Slit widths with a nominal band pass of 5 nm were used for both excitation and emission ray.

3.2.5. Enzyme Assays

The enzymatic assays of the free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized β-glucosidase were performed on a UV-Vis spectrophotometer equipped with a Peltier temperature controller (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The activity of bgl was determined by using p-NPG as a substrate. Under optimum conditions, β-glucosidase hydrolyzes p-NPG into p-NP (coloured product) and glucose. For the activity assay, 0.12 μg mL−1 of free enzyme solution (or equivalent amount of individually immobilized and co-immobilized bgl) was mixed with 2.0 mM p-NPG in 100 mM citrate phosphate buffer, pH 6.5 at 60 °C. The reaction was followed by measuring the increase in absorbance of p-NP at 410 nm spectrophotometrically. Absorption values are taken every minute for a total of five minutes and were converted to p-NP concentration using the molar extinction coefficient of p-NP at 410 nm [46]. Enzymatic activity was estimated as the amount (μmoles) of p-NP transformed per minute.
The enzymatic assays of the free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized CalA were performed on a UV-Vis spectrophotometer equipped with a Peltier temperature controller (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The activity of CalA was determined by the hydrolysis of p-NPB as substrate. The released p-NP was quantified spectrophotometrically at 348 nm. For the activity assay, 0.08 μg/mL of free enzyme solution (or equivalent amount of individually immobilized and co-immobilized CalA) was mixed with 0.5 mM p-NPB in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 at 25 °C. The reaction was followed by measuring the increase in absorbance of p-NP at 348 nm spectrophotometrically. Absorption values are taken every minute for a total of 10 minutes and were converted to p-NP concentration using the molar extinction coefficient of p-NP at 348 nm [13]. Enzymatic activity was estimated as the amount (μmoles) of p-NP transformed per minute. The protein concentration was measured by the Bradford method, and bovine serum albumin was used as reference.

3.2.6. Thermal Stability Studies

Thermal stability studies of the free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized form of bgl and CalA were performed by incubating bgl in citrate phosphate buffer 100 mM, pH 6.5 and CalA in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 at 60 °C for 24 h. The hydrolytic activity of bgl and CalA was determined at different time intervals through the hydrolysis of either the p-NPG or p-NPB, respectively, as described above. All experiments were carried out in triplicate.

3.2.7. Kinetic Studies of Free, Individually Immobilized and Co-Immobilized Biocatalysts

Intrinsic and apparent kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax) of the different forms of bgl and CalA (free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized) were estimated through the measurement of the initial reaction rates at varying concentrations of p-NPG and p-NPB, respectively, at 60 °C as described above. The concentrations of p-NPG tested were: 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10 and 20 mM and for p-NPB the concentrations examined were: 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1 mM. The Michaelis–Menten constant (Km) and maximum velocity (Vmax) were calculated from nonlinear regression fitting of the initial reaction rates corresponding to different substrate concentrations by the EnzFitter (Biosoft) software.

3.2.8. Hydrolysis of Oleuropein to Hydroxytyrosol by the Βi-Enzymatic Νanobiocatalyst High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Analysis

The enzymatic hydrolysis of oleuropein was performed in citrate-phosphate buffer 100 mM, pH 6.5. In brief, 1 mg of the magnetic nanobiocatalyst was dispersed in 2 mg mL−1 solution of oleuropein (3.7 mM) in a final volume of 1 mL, which was followed by 24 h incubation at 60 °C under agitation (1200 rpm). The nanobiocatalyst (1 mg mL−1) was separated from the reaction mixture by using an external magnet, and the reaction mixture was eluted with methanol (1:1 ratio) and filtered with 0.45 mm filters. The identification and quantification of oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol were performed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) using a μBondapack C18 column, particle size 10 μm, length 300 mm, diameter 3.9 mm, and a diode array UV detector as described in our previous work [9]. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile (A) and 0.1% acetic acid in water (B). The elution conditions applied for solvent B were as follows: 0–30 min 80–50%, 30–35 min 50% and 35–40 min 80%. The elution conditions were performed at 27 °C with a flow rate of 1 mL min−1, and the samples were detected at 280 nm. The retention times of oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol were 20.16 min and 7.47 min, respectively, while the retention time of the oleuropein aglycon products was in the range of 20–23 min. The quantification and characterization of oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol was based on standard compounds and calibration curves under the same conditions.

3.2.9. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Analysis

The characterization of the products hydroxytyrosol, elenolic acid and glucose in the crude reaction mixture of the enzymatic hydrolysis of oleuropein by the bi-enzymatic nanobiocatalytic system of co-immobilized bgl-CalA was performed through 1H-NMR analysis. The enzymatic hydrolysis of oleuropein was performed directly in D2O solution of citrate-phosphate buffer 100 mM, pH 6.5 in a final volume of 1 mL. In brief, 1 mg of the magnetic nanobiocatalyst was dispersed in 2 mg mL−1 solution of oleuropein (3.7 mM) in a final volume of 1 mL, which was followed by 24 h incubation at 60 °C under shaking (1200 rpm). The nanobiocatalyst was separated from the reaction mixture with the use of an external magnetic field, and the sample of the crude reaction mixture was transferred in an NMR tube (5 mm). A Bruker 500 MHz AV spectrometer, equipped with a broadband inverse probe (Bruker Biospin, Rheinstetten, Germany), was used to record the 1H-NMR spectra at 25 °C, controlled by the software TopSpin 3.2. The 1H-NMR analysis of the standard compounds oleuropein, hydroxytyrosol and glucose was also performed in D2O solution of citrate-phosphate buffer 100 mM, pH 6.5.

3.2.10. Reusability Studies

The reusability of the bi-enzymatic nanobiocatalyst was determined through the completion of consecutive operating cycles for the hydrolysis of 2 mg mL−1 oleuropein. Each reaction cycle was carried out for 24 h at 60 °C under constant shaking (1200 rpm) in citrate-phosphate buffer solution 100 mM, pH 6.5. After each cycle, the nanobiocatalyst (1 mg mL−1) was separated from the reaction mixture with the use of a magnet and washed efficiently with citrate-phosphate buffer solution 100 mM, pH 6.5, and then, it was re-suspended in fresh substrate solution for the initiation of a new reaction cycle. The process was repeated for 10 successive cycles. The activity of each enzyme after each cycle was assessed by means of residual activity. The activity of the first cycle was considered to be 100%.

4. Conclusions

In the present work, the simultaneous covalent co-immobilization of two hydrolytic enzymes, namely β-glycosidase from Thermotoga mariritima and Lipase A from Candida antarctica, for the development of a robust bi-enzymatic nanobiocatalytic system was reported. Chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles proved to be an ideal support for the anchoring of the two enzymes leading to high-recovery activities after co-immobilization. The developed nanobiocatalyst presented enhanced thermal stability at 60 °C and exhibited high reaction yields during its successful use for the bioconversion of oleuropein to hydroxytyrosol. In addition, due to the magnetic core of the CS-MNPs, the nanobiocatalyst could be easily separated from the reaction mixture by applying an external magnetic field, facilitating its reuse in the bioconversion of oleuropein, thus retaining more than 50% of its initial activity after 240 h of constant operation. The numerous advantages of multienzyme co-immobilization such as shorter cycle times, elimination of reaction byproducts and intermediates or reduction of diffusion losses promote atom economy, high yield and efficiency of the total enzymatic process, endorsing that this method can provide an efficient way to design efficient multienzymatic nanoassemblies for a wide range of biocatalysts applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal11060749/s1, Figure S1: X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) patterns of (a) Fe3O4 and (b) Fe3O4 chitosan nanoparticles; Table S1: Concentration of the released hydroxytyrosol through the hydrolysis of oleuropein from lipases of different origin (the standard deviation was less than 5% in all cases); Table S2: Concentration of the released hydroxytyrosol through the hydrolysis of oleuropein through different combinations of the enzymes bgl and CalA (the standard deviation was less than 5% in all cases); Figure S2: Superposition of 1H-NMR spectra of (a) glucose, (b) hydroxytyrosol, (c) oleuropein and (d) the reaction mixture of the enzymatic hydrolysis of oleuropein by the bi-enzymatic nanobiocatalytic system of co-immobilized bgl-CalA, in citrate-phosphate buffer 100 mM, pH 6.5 in D2O. In the inset (e), the structure of elenolic acid is illustrated; Figure S3: Magnetic separation of the CS MNPs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.S.; methodology, A.G., A.V.C., N.C. and H.S.; validation, A.G. and G.T.; investigation, A.G., A.V.C., A.C.P. and H.S.; data curation, A.G., N.C. and D.G.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G. and A.V.C.; writing—review and editing, H.S.; project administration, H.S. and A.C.P.; funding acquisition, H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call ‘Aquaculture’—‘Industrial Materials’—‘Open Innovation in Culture’ (project: AntiMicrOxiPac, project code: Τ6ΥΒΠ-00232).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or supplementary material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Nediani, C.; Ruzzolini, J.; Romani, A.; Calorini, L. Oleuropein, a Bioactive Compound from Olea europaea L., as a Potential Preventive and Therapeutic Agent in Non-Communicable Diseases. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Yuan, J.-J.; Wang, C.-Z.; Ye, J.-Z.; Tao, R.; Zhang, Y.-S. Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Oleuropein from Olea europea (Olive) Leaf Extract and Antioxidant Activities. Molecules 2015, 20, 2903–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Liu, M.; Yong, Q.; Yu, S. Efficient bioconversion of oleuropein from olive leaf extract to antioxidant hydroxytyrosol by enzymatic hydrolysis and high-temperature degradation. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2018, 65, 680–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. De Leonardis, A.; Aretini, A.; Alfano, G.; Macciola, V.; Ranalli, G. Isolation of a hydroxytyrosol-rich extract from olive leaves (Olea Europaea L.) and evaluation of its antioxidant properties and bioactivity. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2008, 226, 653–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, F.; Li, Y.; Zheng, M.; Xi, X.; Zhang, X.; Han, C. Structure Properties, Acquisition Protocols, and Biological Activities of Oleuropein Aglycone. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Nikolaivits, E.; Termentzi, A.; Skaltsounis, A.-L.; Fokialakis, N.; Topakas, E. Enzymatic tailoring of oleuropein from Olea europaea leaves and product identification by HRMS/MS spectrometry. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 253, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Soler-Rivas, C.; Espín, J.C.; Wichers, H.J. Oleuropein and related compounds. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 1013–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ramírez, E.; Brenes, M.; García, P.; Medina, E.; Romero, C. Oleuropein hydrolysis in natural green olives: Importance of the endogenous enzymes. Food Chem. 2016, 206, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Chatzikonstantinou, A.V.; Gkantzou, E.; Thomou, E.; Chalmpes, N.; Lyra, K.-M.; Kontogianni, V.G.; Spyrou, K.; Patila, M.; Gournis, D.; Stamatis, H.; et al. Enzymatic Conversion of Oleuropein to Hydroxytyrosol Using Immobilized β-Glucosidase on Porous Carbon Cuboids. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Giannakopoulou, A.; Gkantzou, E.; Polydera, A.; Stamatis, H. Multienzymatic Nanoassemblies: Recent Progress and Applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 202–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ren, S.; Liu, X.; Jiao, X.; Jia, S.; Jiang, Y.; Bilal, M.; Cui, J. Recent progress in multienzymes co-immobilization and multienzyme system applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 373, 1254–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Filice, M.; Palomo, J.M. Cascade Reactions Catalyzed by Bionanostructures. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 1588–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Monteiro, R.R.C.; Lima, P.J.M.; Pinheiro, B.; Freire, T.M.; Dutra, L.M.U.; Fechine, L.; Gonçalves, L.R.B.; De Souza, M.C.M.; Dos Santos, J.C.S.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Immobilization of Lipase A from Candida antarctica onto Chitosan-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chen, Z.; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Xue, Z.; Guo, Q.; Ma, Q.; Chen, H. Preparation and characterization of a novel nanocomposite with double enzymes immobilized on magnetic Fe3O4-chitosan-sodium tripolyphosphate. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2018, 169, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gokhale, A.M.; Patel, G.R. Analysis of variability in tensile ductility of a semi-solid metal cast A356 Al-alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 392, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Luo, G.; Dai, Y. In situ preparation of magnetic Fe3O4-chitosan nanoparticles for lipase immobilization by cross-linking and oxidation in aqueous solution. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 3459–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mohammed, M.A.; Syeda, J.T.M.; Wasan, K.M.; Wasan, E.K. An Overview of Chitosan Nanoparticles and Its Application in Non-Parenteral Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2017, 9, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Díaz-Hernández, A.; Gracida, J.; García-Almendárez, B.E.; Regalado, C.; Núñez, R.; Amaro-Reyes, A. Characterization of Magnetic Nanoparticles Coated with Chitosan: A Potential Approach for Enzyme Immobilization. J. Nanomater. 2018, 2018, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Assa, F.; Jafarizadeh-Malmiri, H.; Ajamein, H.; Vaghari, H.; Anarjan, N.; Ahmadi, O.; Berenjian, A. Chitosan magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery systems. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 37, 492–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barbosa, O.; Ortiz, C.; Berenguer-Murcia, Á.; Torres, R.T.R.; Rodrigues, R.C.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Glutaraldehyde in bio-catalysts design: A useful crosslinker and a versatile tool in enzyme immobilization. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 1583–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Monteiro, R.R.; Virgen-Ortiz, J.J.; Berenguer-Murcia, Á; da Rocha, T.N.; dos Santos, J.C.; Alcántara, A.R.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Biotechnological relevance of the lipase A from Candida antarctica. Catal. Today 2021, 362, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Akın, D.; Yakar, A.; Gündüz, U. Synthesis of Magnetic Fe3O4-Chitosan Nanoparticles by Ionic Gelation and Their Dye Removal Ability. Water Environ. Res. 2015, 87, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Detsi, A.; Kavetsou, E.; Kostopoulou, I.; Pitterou, I.; Pontillo, A.R.N.; Tzani, A.; Christodoulou, P.; Siliachli, A.; Zoumpoulakis, P. Nanosystems for the Encapsulation of Natural Products: The Case of Chitosan Biopolymer as a Matrix. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cao, C.; Xiao, L.; Chen, C.; Shi, X.; Cao, Q.; Gao, L. In situ preparation of magnetic Fe3O4/chitosan nanoparticles via a novel reduction–precipitation method and their application in adsorption of reactive azo dye. Powder Technol. 2014, 260, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. López-Gallego, F.; Guisán, J.M.; Betancor, L. Glutaraldehyde-Mediated Protein Immobilization. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 1051, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Giannakopoulou, A.; Patila, M.; Spyrou, K.; Chalmpes, N.; Zarafeta, D.; Skretas, G.; Gournis, D.; Stamatis, H. Development of a Four-Enzyme Magnetic Nanobiocatalyst for Multi-Step Cascade Reactions. Catalysts 2019, 9, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Chen, Q.; Liu, D.; Wu, C.; Yao, K.; Li, Z.; Shi, N.; Wen, F.; Gates, I.D. Co-immobilization of cellulase and lysozyme on amino-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles: An activity-tunable biocatalyst for extraction of lipids from microalgae. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 263, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sojitra, U.V.; Nadar, S.; Rathod, V.K. A magnetic tri-enzyme nanobiocatalyst for fruit juice clarification. Food Chem. 2016, 213, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Muley, A.B.; Thorat, A.S.; Singhal, R.S.; Babu, K.H. A tri-enzyme co-immobilized magnetic complex: Process details, kinetics, thermodynamics and applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 118, 1781–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pavlidis, I.V.; Vorhaben, T.; Gournis, D.; Papadopoulos, G.K.; Bornscheuer, U.T.; Stamatis, H. Regulation of catalytic behaviour of hydrolases through interactions with functionalized carbon-based nanomaterials. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tzialla, A.A.; Pavlidis, I.V.; Felicissimo, M.P.; Rudolf, P.; Gournis, D.; Stamatis, H. Lipase immobilization on smectite nanoclays: Characterization and application to the epoxidation of α-pinene. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1587–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Verma, M.L.; Rao, N.M.; Tsuzuki, T.; Barrow, C.J.; Puri, M. Suitability of Recombinant Lipase Immobilised on Functionalised Magnetic Nanoparticles for Fish Oil Hydrolysis. Catalysts 2019, 9, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Verma, M.L.; Naebe, M.; Barrow, C.; Puri, M. Enzyme Immobilisation on Amino-Functionalised Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: Structural and Biocatalytic Characterisation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chatzikonstantinou, A.V.; Polydera, A.C.; Thomou, E.; Chalmpes, N.; Baroud, T.N.; Enotiadis, A.; Estevez, L.; Patila, M.; Hammami, M.A.; Spyrou, K.; et al. Lipase immobilized on magnetic hierarchically porous carbon materials as a versatile tool for the synthesis of bioactive quercetin derivatives. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2020, 9, 100372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, L.; Li, H.; Yan, B.; Yu, S. Preparation of a reversible soluble-insoluble β-d-Glucosidase with perfect stability and activity. J. Biotechnol. 2019, 291, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Girard-Egrot, A.P.; Godoy, S.; Blum, L.J. Enzyme association with lipidic Langmuir–Blodgett films: Interests and applications in nanobioscience. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 116, 205–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Paudyal, S.; Sharma, S.K.; da Silva, R.L.; Mintz, K.J.; Liyanage, P.Y.; Al-Youbi, A.O.; Bashammakh, A.S.; El-Shahawi, M.S.; Leblanc, R.M. Tyrosinase enzyme Langmuir monolayer: Surface chemistry and spectroscopic study. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 564, 254–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ayoub, F.D.P.; Caseli, L. Controlling the molecular architecture of lactase immobilized in Langmuir-Blodgett films of phospholipids to modulate the enzyme activity. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2017, 150, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chapman, J.; Ismail, A.E.; Dinu, C.Z. Industrial Applications of Enzymes: Recent Advances, Techniques, and Outlooks. Catalysts 2018, 8, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gupta, P.; Verma, S.; Vakhlu, J. Comparative Analysis of Β- Glucosidases Thermostability: Differences in Amino Acids Com-position and Distribution among Mesostable and Thermostable Β-Glucosidases. J. Adv. Bioinform. Appl. Res. 2014, 5, 215–227. [Google Scholar]
  41. Shahrestani, H.; Taheri-Kafrani, A.; Soozanipour, A.; Tavakoli, O. Enzymatic clarification of fruit juices using xylanase immobilized on 1,3,5-triazine-functionalized silica-encapsulated magnetic nanoparticles. Biochem. Eng. J. 2016, 109, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alnadari, F.; Xue, Y.; Zhou, L.; Hamed, Y.S.; Taha, M.; Foda, M.F. Immobilization of β-Glucosidase from Thermatoga maritima on Chitin-functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticle via a Novel Thermostable Chitin-binding Domain. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-Dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Whitmore, L.; Wallace, B.A. DICHROWEB, an online server for protein secondary structure analyses from circular dichroism spectroscopic data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, W668–W673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Lobley, A.; Whitmore, L.; Wallace, B.A. DICHROWEB: An interactive website for the analysis of protein secondary structure from circular dichroism spectra. Bioinformatics 2002, 18, 211–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Bowers, G.N., Jr.; McComb, R.B.; Christensen, R.G.; Schaffer, R. High-purity 4-nitrophenol: Purification, characterization, and speci-fications for use as a spectrophotometric reference material. Clin. Chem. 1980, 26, 724–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Catalysts 11 00749 g001 550
Figure 1. Bioconversion of oleuropein to hydroxytyrosol by bgl and CalA.
Figure 1. Bioconversion of oleuropein to hydroxytyrosol by bgl and CalA.
Catalysts 11 00749 g001
Catalysts 11 00749 g002 550
Figure 2. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) height (a,d); phase (b) and cross-section analysis (c) images of Fe3O4 chitosan nanoparticles.
Figure 2. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) height (a,d); phase (b) and cross-section analysis (c) images of Fe3O4 chitosan nanoparticles.
Catalysts 11 00749 g002
Catalysts 11 00749 g003a 550Catalysts 11 00749 g003b 550
Figure 3. Effect of immobilization parameters on the activity recovery of the enzymes as a function of: (a) crosslinker concentration; (b) CS−MNPs to enzyme mass ratio; (c) bgl to CalA mass ratio and (d) incubation time.
Figure 3. Effect of immobilization parameters on the activity recovery of the enzymes as a function of: (a) crosslinker concentration; (b) CS−MNPs to enzyme mass ratio; (c) bgl to CalA mass ratio and (d) incubation time.
Catalysts 11 00749 g003aCatalysts 11 00749 g003b
Catalysts 11 00749 g004 550
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of Fe3O4 chitosan and Fe3O4 chitosan-bgl-CalA nanoparticles, depicting their distinct peaks.
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of Fe3O4 chitosan and Fe3O4 chitosan-bgl-CalA nanoparticles, depicting their distinct peaks.
Catalysts 11 00749 g004
Catalysts 11 00749 g005 550
Figure 5. Fluorescence spectra of free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized form of CalA and bgl on CS-MNPs.
Figure 5. Fluorescence spectra of free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized form of CalA and bgl on CS-MNPs.
Catalysts 11 00749 g005
Catalysts 11 00749 g006 550
Figure 6. Stability of the free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized form of CalA at 60 °C, in sodium phosphate buffer 50 mM, pH 7.0.
Figure 6. Stability of the free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized form of CalA at 60 °C, in sodium phosphate buffer 50 mM, pH 7.0.
Catalysts 11 00749 g006
Catalysts 11 00749 g007 550
Figure 7. Reaction progress of the hydrolysis of oleuropein by the bi-enzymatic nanobiocatalyst (1 mg mL−1) at different time intervals and the formation of hydroxytyrosol (the standard deviation was less than 5% in all cases).
Figure 7. Reaction progress of the hydrolysis of oleuropein by the bi-enzymatic nanobiocatalyst (1 mg mL−1) at different time intervals and the formation of hydroxytyrosol (the standard deviation was less than 5% in all cases).
Catalysts 11 00749 g007
Catalysts 11 00749 g008 550
Figure 8. Reusability studies of the bi-enzymatic magnetic complex comprising bgl and CalA for 10 consecutive cycles. The biotransformation of oleuropein to hydroxytyrosol was carried in citrate phosphate buffer 100 mM pH 6.5 at 60 °C for 24 h (the standard deviation was less than 5% in all cases).
Figure 8. Reusability studies of the bi-enzymatic magnetic complex comprising bgl and CalA for 10 consecutive cycles. The biotransformation of oleuropein to hydroxytyrosol was carried in citrate phosphate buffer 100 mM pH 6.5 at 60 °C for 24 h (the standard deviation was less than 5% in all cases).
Catalysts 11 00749 g008
Catalysts 11 00749 g009 550
Figure 9. Schematic representation of the functionalization of MNPs with chitosan.
Figure 9. Schematic representation of the functionalization of MNPs with chitosan.
Catalysts 11 00749 g009
Table
Table 1. Estimation (%) of the secondary structure elements by CD spectra analysis of bgl and CalA in aqueous solutions both in the absence and in the presence of 1.5 μg mL−1 CS-MNPs.
Table 1. Estimation (%) of the secondary structure elements by CD spectra analysis of bgl and CalA in aqueous solutions both in the absence and in the presence of 1.5 μg mL−1 CS-MNPs.
Sample α-Helixβ-SheetOther
bglBuffer
CS-MNPs		28
25		19
23		53
52
CalABuffer
CS-MNPs		32
31		17
22		51
47
Table
Table 2. Half-life times (h) at 60 °C for CalA in free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized form (the standard deviation was less than 5% in all cases).
Table 2. Half-life times (h) at 60 °C for CalA in free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized form (the standard deviation was less than 5% in all cases).
SampleHalf-Life Time (h)
Free CalA7.8
Co-immobilized CalA44.2
Individually immobilized CalA51.8
Table
Table 3. Intrinsic and apparent kinetic constants of free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized form of bgl at 60 °C (the standard deviation was less than 5% in all cases).
Table 3. Intrinsic and apparent kinetic constants of free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized form of bgl at 60 °C (the standard deviation was less than 5% in all cases).
FormsKm (mM)Vmax (μmol/min)
Free bgl0.729.27
Co-immobilized bgl0.855.60
Individually immobilized bgl1.207.64
Table
Table 4. Intrinsic and apparent kinetic constants of free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized form of CalA at 60 °C (the standard deviation was less than 5% in all cases).
Table 4. Intrinsic and apparent kinetic constants of free, individually immobilized and co-immobilized form of CalA at 60 °C (the standard deviation was less than 5% in all cases).
FormsKm (mM)Vmax (mol/min)
Free CalA0.070.07
Co-immobilized CalA 0.170.04
Individually immobilized CalA0.220.05
Table
Table 5. Initial reaction rates of individually immobilized bgl and CalA and co-immobilized bgl-CalA for the hydrolysis of oleuropein, percentage conversion yield of oleuropein and amount (mg mL−1) of hydroxytyrosol produced after 24 h of incubation in citrate phosphate buffer 100 mM, pH 6.5 at 60 °C (the standard deviation was less than 5% in all cases).
Table 5. Initial reaction rates of individually immobilized bgl and CalA and co-immobilized bgl-CalA for the hydrolysis of oleuropein, percentage conversion yield of oleuropein and amount (mg mL−1) of hydroxytyrosol produced after 24 h of incubation in citrate phosphate buffer 100 mM, pH 6.5 at 60 °C (the standard deviation was less than 5% in all cases).
SampleInitial Reaction Rate
(mM h−1 mg−1 Nanobiocatalyst)		% Conversion Yield of OleuropeinHydroxytyrosol (mg mL−1)
Individually immobilized bgl0.0381000.150
Individually immobilized CalA0.021400.880
Individually immobilized bgl and CalA0.032901.210
Co-Immobilized bgl-CalA0.0461002.000
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giannakopoulou, A.; Chatzikonstantinou, A.V.; Chalmpes, N.; Tsapara, G.; Gournis, D.; Polydera, A.C.; Stamatis, H. Development of a Novel Bi-Enzymatic Nanobiocatalyst for the Efficient Bioconversion of Oleuropein to Hydroxytyrosol. Catalysts 2021, 11, 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11060749

AMA Style

Giannakopoulou A, Chatzikonstantinou AV, Chalmpes N, Tsapara G, Gournis D, Polydera AC, Stamatis H. Development of a Novel Bi-Enzymatic Nanobiocatalyst for the Efficient Bioconversion of Oleuropein to Hydroxytyrosol. Catalysts. 2021; 11(6):749. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11060749

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giannakopoulou, Archontoula, Alexandra V. Chatzikonstantinou, Nikolaos Chalmpes, Georgia Tsapara, Dimitrios Gournis, Angeliki C. Polydera, and Haralambos Stamatis. 2021. "Development of a Novel Bi-Enzymatic Nanobiocatalyst for the Efficient Bioconversion of Oleuropein to Hydroxytyrosol" Catalysts 11, no. 6: 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11060749

APA Style

Giannakopoulou, A., Chatzikonstantinou, A. V., Chalmpes, N., Tsapara, G., Gournis, D., Polydera, A. C., & Stamatis, H. (2021). Development of a Novel Bi-Enzymatic Nanobiocatalyst for the Efficient Bioconversion of Oleuropein to Hydroxytyrosol. Catalysts, 11(6), 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11060749

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop