Next Article in Journal
Quasi Natural Approach for Crystallization of Zeolites from Different Fly Ashes and Their Application as Adsorbent Media for Malachite Green Removal from Polluted Waters
Next Article in Special Issue
Thermal Behavior of Pyromorphite (Pb10(PO4)6Cl2): In Situ High Temperature Powder X-ray Diffraction Study
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental and Modeling Analysis of Holey Graphene Electrodes for High-Power-Density Li-Ion Batteries
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Na2−nHn[Zr(Si2O7)]∙mH2O Minerals and Related Compounds (n = 0–0.5; m = 0.1): Structure Refinement, Framework Topology, and Possible Na+-Ion Migration Paths
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Crystals
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/cryst10111062
crystals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Crystal Chemistry of Alkali–Aluminum–Iron Sulfates from the Burnt Mine Dumps of the Chelyabinsk Coal Basin, South Urals, Russia

by
Andrey A. Zolotarev
1,*,
Sergey V. Krivovichev
1,2,
Margarita S. Avdontceva
1,
Vladimir V. Shilovskikh
3,
Mikhail A. Rassomakhin
4,
Vasiliy O. Yapaskurt
5 and
Igor V. Pekov
5
1
Department of Crystallography, Institute of Earth Sciences, St. Petersburg State University, University Emb. 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
2
Federal Research Center, Kola Science Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Fersmana Str. 14, 184209 Apatity, Russia
3
Geomodel Research Centre, St. Petersburg State University, University Emb. 7/9, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia
4
South Urals Federal Research Center of Mineralogy and Geoecology of UB RAS, 456317 Miass, Russia
5
Faculty of Geology, Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2020, 10(11), 1062; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10111062
Submission received: 5 November 2020 / Revised: 17 November 2020 / Accepted: 20 November 2020 / Published: 22 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crystal Chemistry and Properties of Minerals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Technogenic steklite, KAl(SO4)2, and unnamed mineral phase (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6 from burnt dumps of the Chelyabinsk Coal Basin have been investigated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction and electron microprobe analysis. Steklite is trigonal, space group P 3 ¯ , a = 4.7277(3), c = 7.9871(5) Å, V = 154.60(2) Å3. The crystal structure was refined to R1 = 0.026 (wR2 = 0.068). It is based upon the [Al(SO4)2]− layers formed by corner sharing of SO4 tetrahedra and AlO6 polyhedra. The anionic [Al(SO4)2]− layers are parallel to the (001) plane and linked via interlayer K+ ions. The regular octahedral coordination of Al is observed that distinguishes technogenic steklite from that found in Tolbachik fumaroles. The (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6 phase is trigonal, space group R 3 ¯ , a = 13.932(2), c = 17.992(2) Å, V = 3024.4(7) Å3, R1 = 0.073 (wR2 = 0.108). The crystal structure is based upon the anionic chains [(Fe,Al)(SO4)3]3− running parallel to the c axis and interconnected via K+ and Na+ ions. There are no known minerals or synthetic compounds isotypic to (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6, due to the presence of separate K and Na sites in its structure.

1. Introduction

This study is a continuation of the series of our publications devoted to the specific features of the crystal chemistry of technogenic minerals from burnt dumps of the Chelyabinsk Coal Basin [1,2,3,4,5]. Here, we report, in detail, the features of two alkali-bearing Al–Fe sulfates crystallized from gaseous phases in high-temperature technogenic environments.
In general, sulfates constitute one of the most important classes of minerals which contains numerous species diverse from both chemical and structural points of view [6]. The technogenic sulfates formed at burning dumps of coal mines are close in their genetic features to purely natural sulfates crystallizing in oxidizing-type volcanic fumaroles (for recent discoveries, see [7,8,9,10,11]).
The first sulfate phase studied here is steklite, ideally KAl(SO4)2, which was originally reported by B.V. Chesnokov in 1991 as a new mineral species from burnt dumps of coal mines of the Chelyabinsk Coal Basin, South Urals, Russia [12,13]. The crystals of the technogenic mineral phase were visually very similar to glass plates, which inspired its name “steklite” from the Russian word “steklo”, which means “glass”. Like many other new phases from the burnt coal dumps of the Chelyabinsk Coal Basin, steklite was not accepted by the International Mineralogical Association (IMA) as a valid mineral species at the time, due to its technogenic origin. Later, steklite was found in sublimates of the Yadovitaya (Poisonous) fumarole at the second scoria cone of the Northern Breach of the Great Fissure Tolbachik Eruption at the Tolbachik volcano (Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia) and was approved by the IMA as a valid mineral species [14]. Even before the official approval of steklite in 2013, the KAl(SO4)2 phase was repeatedly reported from various natural and anthropogenic environments: the volcanic exhalations at the Showashinzan lava dome, Hokkaido, Japan [15]; fumaroles of two active volcanoes in Central America, namely Izalco in El Salvador and Santiagito in Guatemala [16]; high-temperature products of coal fire at the anthracite mines in eastern Pennsylvania, USA [17]; exhalations of fires in mine dumps at Radvanice, Czech Republic [18], and at Marcel, Poland [19]. The Raman spectroscopic study of synthetic KAl(SO4)2 was performed by Košek et al. [20].
Another sulfate reported here is a new mineral phase with the simplified formula (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6, found in association with the abovementioned technogenic steklite. This phase has not been previously described in the literature. It is related to some known natural sulfates, especially aluminocoquimbite and pyracmonite (see details below).
According to the current recommendations of the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) of the IMA, the newly formed minerals found in burnt coal dumps can be considered as valid mineral species, assuming that “the fire occurred as a result of natural events (self-ignition or lightning) and, beyond a shadow of doubt, was not of anthropogenic origin” [21]. Therefore, the new (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6 phase reported herein can be considered as a potential separate mineral species, despite its techogenic origin in burnt mine dumps of the Chelyabinsk coal basin. In the following we shall call both the new phase and steklite from the Kopeisk dumps “technogenic”, in order to distinguish their origin from the mineral phases found in volcanic fumarolic environments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The samples of steklite (Figure 1) studied by us are of technogenic origin and were selected from the collection of Boris V. Chesnokov currently deposited at the Natural Science Museum of the Ilmen State Reserve (Miass, Russia). The sample originates from the coal dump of the mine No. 47 in the city of Kopeisk, Chelyabinsk area, Southern Urals, Russia [13], where it was found as transparent colorless hexagonal lamellar crystals with the average size of 0.3–0.5 mm.
The (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6 phase occurs together with steklite. It is transparent colorless with a characteristic reddish hue and forms platy crystals up to 0.1 mm. According to Chesnokov et al. [13], steklite and (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6 are high-temperature (650–750 °C) pneumatolytic compounds related to sintered rocks.

2.2. Chemical Composition

The chemical composition of technogenic steklite was determined using a Hitachi S-3400N equipped with Oxford X-Max 20 energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer at the Resource Centre “Geomodel” of St. Petersburg State University. The spectra were processed automatically using the AzTec Energy software package using the TrueQ technique. The electron beam accelerating voltage was 20 kV and 1 nA current was used. The X-ray acquisition time was 60 s both in spot mode and small area scanning. Quantification of elemental compositions was conducted using standard samples of natural and synthetic compounds (NaAlSi3O8 for Na and Al, KAlSi3O8 for K, CaSiO3 for Si and O, FeS2 for Fe, CaSO4 for S). The average composition (wt.%) is Na2O 0.26, K2O 17.08, Al2O3 21.65, Fe2O3 2.52, SiO2 0.21, SO3 58.75; total 100.47. The empirical formula calculated based on 8 oxygen atoms is (K0.94Na0.02)Σ0.96(Al1.10Fe3+0.08Si0.01)Σ1.19S1.91O8, and the idealized formula is KAl(SO4)2.
The chemical composition of the (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6 phase was determined on a Jeol JSM-6480LV scanning electron microscope equipped with an INCA-Wave 500 wavelength-dispersive spectrometer (Laboratory of Analytical Techniques of High Spatial Resolution, Dept. of Petrology, Moscow State University), with an acceleration voltage of 20 kV, a beam current of 20 nA, and a 3 μm beam diameter. The following standards were used: albite (Na), microcline (K), diopside (Ca, Mg), Mn (Mn), Al2O3 (Al), magnetite (Fe), and SrSO4 (S). The average composition (wt.%) is Na2O 15.09, K2O 10.90, CaO 0.12, MgO 0.10, MnO 0.05, Al2O3 5.07, Fe2O3 10.29, SO3 57.25, total 98.87. The empirical formula calculated based on 24 oxygen atoms is (K1.95Na1.05)Σ3(Na3.05Ca0.02)Σ3.07(Fe3+1.08Al0.84Mg0.02Mn0.01)Σ1.95S6.02O24.

2.3. Single-Crystal X-ray Diffraction

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction study of steklite and (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6 from Kopeisk was performed at the X-ray Diffraction Resource Centre of St. Petersburg State University. In the case of steklite, a Bruker Kappa APEX DUO diffractometer operated at 45 kV and 0.6 mA and equipped with a CCD area detector was used for data collection. The study was done by means of monochromatic MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å), frame widths of 0.5° in ω, and 10 s counting time for each frame. The intensity data were reduced and corrected for Lorentz, polarization, and background effects using Bruker software APEX2 [22]. A semiempirical absorption-correction based upon the intensities of equivalent reflections was applied [23]. The (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6 phase was studied on a STOE IPDS II diffractometer. More than half of the diffraction sphere were collected using MoKα radiation and scanning along ω with a step of 2° and 3 min exposition. The distance of the crystal detector was chosen equal to 100 mm. The numerical absorption correction based on measured crystal faces was applied using the X-RED [24] and X-SHAPE [25] programs.
The crystal structure of steklite was solved by direct methods and refined in the space group P 3 ¯ to R1 = 0.026 (wR2 = 0.068) for 565 unique observed reflections with I ≥ 2σ(I) using ShelX program package [26] within the Olex2 shell [27]. The crystal structure of (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6 was solved and refined in the space group R 3 ¯ to R1 = 0.073 (wR2 = 0.108) for 1200 unique observed reflections with I ≥ 2σ(I) using ShelX program package [26].
Crystal data, data collection information, and structure refinement details for both phases are given in Table 1; atom coordinates and displacement parameters are in Table 2 and Table 3, and selected interatomic distances are in Table 4. Crystallographic data have been deposited at Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (2,042,224 for steklite; 2,042,223 for (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6) (also see Supplementary Materials).

3. Results

The crystal structure of synthetic KAl(SO4)2 was first reported in 1970 [29] as based upon the [Al(SO4)2]− layers formed by corner sharing of SO4 tetrahedra and AlO6 polyhedra (Figure 2). The anionic [Al(SO4)2]− layers are parallel to the (001) plane and linked via interlayer K+ ions. The layer topology in steklite can be described using the 2D graph representation, where black and white vertices symbolize the Al and S polyhedra, respectively (Figure 3). The observed topology is identical to that of the [Fe(SO4)2]− layers in yavapaiite, KFe(SO4)2 [30,31], and the [Mg(PO4)2]4− layers in brianite, Na2CaMg(PO4)2 [32], as well as to the similar anionic layers in a number of synthetic compounds [33]. The average <S-O> bond length in sulfate tetrahedra in steklite is 1.471 Å, with the S–O distances for the O atoms bridging between sulfate tetrahedra with AlO6 polyhedra (1.478 Å) essentially longer than that for the terminal O atoms (1.443 Å) (Table 4). The Al atom has an octahedral coordination with the <Al-O> bond length equal to 1.889 Å (see Discussion for more details). The interlayer K+ cations are coordinated by 12 oxygen atoms with the <K-O> bond length equal to 3.061 Å (Figure 4b).
In the crystal structure of (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6, there are three symmetrically independent sites with octahedral coordination. All of them are predominantly occupied by Fe3+ with some amount of Al (Table 2). The average interatomic cation–anion distances for these sites approximately correlate with the amount of Al in these positions. Two crystallographic positions of S are in tetrahedral coordination; the average <S-O> bond lengths are 1.468 and 1.470 Å for S1 and S2, respectively. There are two sites occupied by the Na+ and K+ cations. The 9-coordinated K site (Figure 4a) contains mainly K, with the rather high Na content (27%) reflected in the noticeable shortening of the K–O bond lengths compared to pure K. The Na site is fully occupied by sodium and has a strongly distorted octahedral coordination (Figure 4a).
The projection of the crystal structure of (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6 phase is shown in Figure 5. It is based upon the anionic chains [(Fe,Al)(SO4)3]3−, running parallel to the c axis and interconnected via K+ and Na+ ions. Within the chains, each [(Fe,Al)O6] octahedron is corner-linked to six adjacent (SO4) tetrahedra, while only two O atoms of each tetrahedron are bridging; that is, they form the S–O–Fe bonds (Figure 6a). The S–O bond lengths for the bridging O atoms are longer (1.482–1.501 Å) than those for terminal oxygen atoms (1.439–1.450 Å), in agreement with the similar observation for steklite. The calculated crystal chemical formula of (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6 phase can be represented as (K2.19Na0.81)Σ3Na3(Fe3+1.44Al0.56)Σ2(SO4)6, which is generally in good agreement with the empirical formula, taking into account variations in the composition of the studied phase.
The average <S-O> bond lengths for both sulfates studied herein are consistent with the average value of 1.473 Å, determined for sulfate minerals by Hawthorne et al. [6]. In both phases, the S–O bond lengths for bridging O atoms are longer than those for terminal oxygen atoms, which is typical for heteropolyhedral complexes with tetrahedral oxoanions and is widely manifested, for example, in uranyl salts [34].

4. Discussion

The most interesting aspect of the crystal structure of steklite studied here is related to the shape of the AlO6 polyhedra. In general, the AlO6 coordination polyhedron in KAl(SO4)2 may theoretically adopt either trigonal prismatic or octahedral geometry. For the KM(SO4)2 compounds (where M is a trivalent cation), the octahedral AlO6 configuration was reported for the P 3 ¯ space group, and the trigonal prismatic configuration was observed for the P312 space group [33]. West et al. [35] indicated that synthetic KAl(SO4)2 crystallizes in the P 3 ¯ space group with the octahedral coordination of Al and disorder in the stacking of adjacent layers due to the rotation of polyhedra within the layers around the direction parallel to the c axis. However, Murashko et al. [14] described natural, fumarolic steklite from the Tolbachik volcano with coordination polyhedron of Al intermediate in a shape between a trigonal prism and octahedron with the rotation angle between the upper and lower triangular bases of about 10° (it is equal to 0 and 30° for a trigonal prism and an octahedron, respectively). In the case of fumarolic steklite, no disorder induced by the rotation of AlO6 polyhedra was detected, and the crystal structure is well described by the P312 space group. In the case of technogenic steklite studied here, the regular octahedral coordination of Al was observed (space group P 3 ¯ ) that distinguishes Kopeisk steklite from that found in Tolbachik fumaroles. The origin of different AlO6 configurations in steklite from different occurrences requires additional comment. The difference in unit cell volumes between Tolbachik and Kopeisk samples of steklite is in fact negligible (154.76 vs. 154.60 Å3, respectively) and does not allow considering them as temperature-related. According to Murashko et al. [14], the temperature of formation of steklite in fumaroles cannot be determined reliably; the possible temperature range is 150–340 °C. For the Kopeisk sulfates, Chesnokov et al. [13] assigned the crystallization temperature of 650–750 °C, i.e., sufficiently higher than that in volcanic fumaroles. There is a general agreement that the symmetry and shape of local configurations in crystals tends to be higher with the increase of temperature [36]. This agrees well with the possible higher-temperature origin of the Kopeisk steklite compared to the Tolbachik sample, since the symmetry of an octahedron (m–3m; point group order = 48) is higher than that of a trigonal prism (−62m; point group order = 12). However, the problem is far from being clear and needs further experimental investigation.
The topology of the octahedral–tetrahedral chains in (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6 can be described using the 1D graph shown in Figure 6b, where black and white vertices symbolize octahedra and tetrahedra, respectively. Figure 6c shows an idealized graph in which each black vertex is 6-connected, and each white vertex is 2-connected. The topology shown in Figure 6c is quite common for the crystal structures of oxosalts of metals in octahedral coordination [33]. Among minerals, it was observed in the crystal structures of kaatialaite, Fe(H2AsO4)3(H2O)5 [37], and ferrinatrite, Na3[Fe3+(SO4)3](H2O)3 [38,39], as well as in fumarolic minerals such as aluminocoquimbite, AlFe(SO4)3(H2O)9 [40], and pyracmonite, (NH4)3Fe(SO4)3 [41]. However, none of these minerals is isotypic to (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6 due to the presence of separate K and Na sites in its structure. Ferrinatrite, aluminocoquimbite, and pyracmonite were found in the fumaroles of the La Fossa Crater (Vulcano Island, Sicily, Italy), which indicates the possibility of the formation of (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6 under natural conditions during crystallization from high-temperature volcanic gases.
According to the current recommendations of the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification (CNMNC) of the IMA, the newly formed minerals found in burnt coal dumps can be considered as valid mineral species, assuming that “the fire occurred as a result of natural events (self-ignition or lightning) and, beyond a shadow of doubt, was not of anthropogenic origin” [21]. Therefore, the new (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6 phase reported herein can be considered as a separate mineral species, despite its techogenic origin in burnt mine dumps of the Chelyabinsk coal basin.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/10/11/1062/s1, KAl(SO4)2.CIF: Crystallographic Information file (CIF) for the crystal structure of KAl(SO4)2, (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6.CIF: Crystallographic Information file (CIF) for the crystal structure of (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.Z. and S.V.K.; Methodology, A.A.Z. and S.V.K.; Investigation, A.A.Z., S.V.K., M.S.A., M.A.R., V.V.S., I.V.P., V.O.Y.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, A.A.Z. and S.V.K.; Writing—Review & Editing, S.V.K., I.V.P.; Visualization, A.A.Z. and S.V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (electron probe microanalysis, single crystal X-ray diffraction; grant No. 19-05-00628) and by the President of Russian Federation grant for leading scientific schools (the theoretical crystal chemical analysis; grant No. NSh-2526.2020.5).

Acknowledgments

The X-ray diffraction studies were performed in the X-ray Diffraction Resource Centre of St. Petersburg State University. The chemical analytical studies were done in “Geomodel” Resource Centre of St. Petersburg State University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Krivovichev, S.V.; Shcherbakova, E.P.; Nishanbaev, T.P. The crystal structure of β-CaMg2(SO4)3, a mineral phase from coal dumps of the Chelyabinsk coal basin, Russia. Can. Mineral. 2010, 48, 1469–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Krivovichev, S.V.; Shcherbakova, E.P.; Nishanbaev, T.P. The crystal structure of svyatoslavite and evolution of complexity during crystallization of a CaAl2Si2O8 melt: A structural automata description. Can. Mineral. 2012, 50, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zolotarev, A.A.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Panikorovskii, T.L.; Gurzhiy, V.V.; Bocharov, V.N.; Rassomakhin, M.A. Dmisteinbergite, CaAl2Si2O8, a metastable polymorph of anorthite: Crystal-structure and Raman spectroscopic study of the holotype specimen. Minerals 2019, 9, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Zolotarev, A.A.; Zhitova, E.S.; Krzhizhanovskaya, M.G.; Rassomakhin, M.A.; Shilovskikh, V.V.; Krivovichev, S.V. Crystal chemistry and high-temperature behaviour of ammonium phases NH4MgCl3·6H2O and (NH4)2Fe3+Cl5·H2O from the burned dumps of the Chelyabinsk coal basin. Minerals 2019, 9, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zolotarev, A.A.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Avdontceva, M.S.; Zhitova, E.S.; Pekov, I.V.; Shchipalkina, N.V. Crystal chemistry of technogenic SFCA from burned dumps of the Chelyabinsk coal basin. Crystallogr. Rep. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hawthorne, F.C.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Burns, P.C. The crystal chemistry of sulfate minerals. Rev. Miner. Geochem. 2000, 40, 1–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pekov, I.V.; Shchipalkina, N.V.; Zubkova, N.V.; Gurzhiy, V.V.; Agakhanov, A.A.; Belakovskiy, D.I.; Chukanov, N.V.; Lykova, I.S.; Vigasina, M.F.; Koshlyakova, N.N.; et al. Alkali sulfates with aphthitalite-like structures from fumaroles of the Tolbachik volcano, Kamchatka, Russia. I. Metathenardite, a natural high-temperature modification of Na2SO4. Can. Mineral. 2019, 57, 885–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pekov, I.V.; Agakhanov, A.A.; Zubkova, N.V.; Koshlyakova, N.V.; Shchipalkina, N.V.; Sandalov, F.D.; Yapaskurt, V.O.; Turchkova, A.G.; Sidorov, E.G. Oxidizing-type fumaroles of the Tolbachik Volcano, a mineralogical and geochemical unique. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 2020, 61, 675–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Filatov, S.K.; Shablinskii, A.P.; Vergasova, L.P.; Saprikina, O.Y.; Bubnova, R.S.; Moskaleva, S.V.; Belousov, A.B. Belomarinaite KNa(SO4): A new sulfate from 2012–2013 Tolbachik Fissure eruption, Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia. Mineral. Mag. 2019, 83, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Nazarchuk, E.V.; Siidra, O.I.; Nekrasova, D.O.; Shilovskikh, V.V.; Borisov, A.S.; Avdontseva, E.Y. Glikinite, Zn3O(SO4)2, a new anhydrous zinc oxysulfate mineral structurally based on OZn4 tetrahedra. Mineral. Mag. 2020, 84, 563–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shchipalkina, N.V.; Pekov, I.V.; Chukanov, N.V.; Belakovskiy, D.I.; Zubkova, N.V.; Koshlyakova, N.N.; Britvin, S.N.; Sidorov, E.G. Alkali sulfates with aphthitalite-like structures from fumaroles of the Tolbachik volcano, Kamchatka, Russia. II. A new mineral, natroaphthitalite, and new data on belomarinaite. Can. Mineral. 2020, 58, 167–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chesnokov, B.V.; Bazhenova, L.F.; Bushmakin, A.F.; Kotlyarov, V.A.; Belogub, E.V. New minerals from burnt dumps of the Chelyabinsk coal basin (communication seven). Ural. Mineral. Sbornik 1995, 4, 3–28. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  13. Chesnokov, B.V.; Shcherbakova, E.P.; Nishanbaev, T.P. Minerals of Burnt Dumps of the Chelyabinsk Coal Basin; Ural Branch of RAS: Miass, Russia, 2008; pp. 1–139. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  14. Murashko, M.N.; Pekov, I.V.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Chernyatyeva, A.P.; Yapaskurt, V.O.; Zadov, A.E.; Zelensky, M.E. Steklite, KAl(SO4)2: A finding at the Tolbachik Volcano, Kamchatka, Russia, validating its status as a mineral species and crystal structure. Geol. Ore Depos. 2013, 55, 594–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mizutani, Y. Volcanic sublimates and incrustations from Showashinzan. J. Earth Sci. Nagoya Univ. 1962, 10, 135–148. [Google Scholar]
  16. Stoiber, R.E.; Rose, W.I. Fumarole incrustations at active Central American volcanoes. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1974, 38, 495–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lapham, D.M.; Barns, J.H.; Downey, W., Jr.; Finkelman, R.B. Mineralogy associated with burning anthracite deposits of eastern Pennsylvania. In Reports of the Common Wealth of Pennsylvania; Dept. of Environmental Resources, Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey, Mineral Resources: Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 1980; Volume 78, pp. 1–82. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tvrdý, J.; Sejkora, J. Novotvořené minerální fáze na hořícím odvalu dolu Kateřina v Radvanicích. Uhlí Rudy Geol. Průzkum 2000, 7, 19–24. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  19. Ciesielczuk, J.; Krzykawski, T.; Misz-Kennan, M. Minerals formed by exhalation on the burning coal-waste dumps of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin, Poland. Mineral. Spec. Pap. 2010, 36, 74. [Google Scholar]
  20. Košek, F.; Culka, A.; Jehlička, J. Raman spectroscopic study of six synthetic anhydrous sulfates relevant to the mineralogy of fumaroles. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2018, 49, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Parafiniuk, J.; Hatert, F. New IMA CNMNC guidelines on combustion products from burning coal dumps. Eur. J. Mineral. 2020, 32, 215–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Bruker-AXS. APEX2, Version 2014.11-0; Bruker-AXS: Madison, WI, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sheldrick, G.M. SADABS; University of Goettingen: Goettingen, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  24. Stoe & Cie. X-AREA (Version 1.16) and X-RED (Version 1.22); Stoe & Cie: Darmstadt, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  25. Stoe & Cie. X-SHAPE, Version 1.06; Stoe & Cie: Darmstadt, Germany, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. 2015, C71, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. Olex2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brese, N.E.; O’Keeffe, M. Bond-valence parameters for solids. Acta Crystallogr. 1991, B47, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Manoli, J.M.; Herpin, P.; Pannetier, G. Structure cristalline du sulfate double d’aluminium et de potassium. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1970, 1, 98–101. (In French) [Google Scholar]
  30. Graeber, E.J.; Rosenzweig, A. The crystal structures of yavapaiite, KFe(SO4)2, and goldichite, KFe(SO4)2(H2O)4. Am. Mineral. 1971, 56, 1917–1933. [Google Scholar]
  31. Anthony, J.W.; McLean, W.J.; Laughon, R.B. The crystal structure of yavapaiite: A discussion. Am. Mineral. 1972, 57, 1546–1549. [Google Scholar]
  32. Alkemper, J.; Fuess, H. The crystal structures of NaMgPO4, Na2CaMg(PO4)2 and Na18Ca13Mg5(PO4)18: New examples for glaserite related structures. Z. Kristal. 1998, 213, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Krivovichev, S.V. Structural Crystallography of Inorganic Oxysalts; University Press: Oxford, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  34. Krivovichev, S.V. Comparative study of flexibilities of structural units in uranyl sulfates, chromates and molybdates. Radiochemistry 2004, 46, 434–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. West, D.V.; Huang, Q.; Zandbergen, H.W.; McQueen, T.M.; Cava, R.J. Structural disorder, octahedral coordination and two-dimensional ferromagnetism in anhydrous alums. J. Solid State Chem. 2008, 181, 2768–2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Yogev-Einot, D.; Avnir, D. Pressure and temperature effects on the degree of symmetry and chirality of the molecular building blocks of low quartz. Acta Crystallogr. 2004, B60, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Raade, G.; Mladeck, M.H.; Kristiansen, R.; Din, V.K. Kaatialaite, a new ferric arsenate mineral from Finland. Am. Mineral. 1984, 69, 383–387. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mackintosh, J.B. Notes on some native iron sulphates from Chili. Am. J. Sci. 1889, 38, 242–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Scordari, F. The crystal structure of ferrinatrite, Na3(H2O)3[Fe(SO4)3] and its relationship to Maus’s salt, (H3O)2K2{K0.5(H2O)0.5}6[Fe3O(H2O)3(SO4)6](OH)2. Mineral. Mag. 1977, 41, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Demartin, F.; Castellano, C.; Gramaccioli, C.M.; Campostrini, I. Aluminocoquimbite, AlFe(SO4)3·9H2O, a new aluminum iron sulfate from Grotta dell’Allume, Vulcano, Aeolian Islands, Italy. Can. Mineral. 2010, 48, 1465–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Demartin, F.; Gramaccioli, C.M.; Campostrini, I. Pyracmonite, (NH4)3Fe(SO4)3, a new ammonium iron sulfate from La Fossa crater, Vulcano, Aeolian Islands, Italy. Can. Mineral. 2010, 48, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Crystals 10 01062 g001 550
Figure 1. The colorless platelets of steklite on a sintered rock from the burnt dump of the Mine No. 47, Kopeisk, South Urals.
Figure 1. The colorless platelets of steklite on a sintered rock from the burnt dump of the Mine No. 47, Kopeisk, South Urals.
Crystals 10 01062 g001
Crystals 10 01062 g002 550
Figure 2. The crystal structure of steklite, KAl(SO4)2. SO4 tetrahedra are yellow, AlO6 octahedra are blue, and K atoms are green circles.
Figure 2. The crystal structure of steklite, KAl(SO4)2. SO4 tetrahedra are yellow, AlO6 octahedra are blue, and K atoms are green circles.
Crystals 10 01062 g002
Crystals 10 01062 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) The anionic [Al(SO4)2]− layer in steklite; (b) its 2D graph.
Figure 3. (a) The anionic [Al(SO4)2]− layer in steklite; (b) its 2D graph.
Crystals 10 01062 g003
Crystals 10 01062 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) The nine-coordinated K and six-coordinated Na sites in the crystal structure of (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6; (b) the twelve-coordinated K site in the crystal structure of steklite, KAl(SO4)2.
Figure 4. (a) The nine-coordinated K and six-coordinated Na sites in the crystal structure of (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6; (b) the twelve-coordinated K site in the crystal structure of steklite, KAl(SO4)2.
Crystals 10 01062 g004
Crystals 10 01062 g005 550
Figure 5. The crystal structure of (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6: projection onto the (001) plane. SO4 tetrahedra are yellow, FeO6 octahedra are brown, K and Na atoms are green and purple circles, respectively.
Figure 5. The crystal structure of (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6: projection onto the (001) plane. SO4 tetrahedra are yellow, FeO6 octahedra are brown, K and Na atoms are green and purple circles, respectively.
Crystals 10 01062 g005
Crystals 10 01062 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) The anionic [(Fe,Al)(SO4)3]3− chain in (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6, (b) its 1D graph, and (c) the idealized graph with 6-connected black and 2-connected white vertices.
Figure 6. (a) The anionic [(Fe,Al)(SO4)3]3− chain in (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6, (b) its 1D graph, and (c) the idealized graph with 6-connected black and 2-connected white vertices.
Crystals 10 01062 g006
Table
Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinement parameters for both studied sulfates.
Table 1. Crystal data and structure refinement parameters for both studied sulfates.
PhaseSteklite KAl(SO4)2(K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6
Crystal system trigonal trigonal
Space group P 3 ¯ R 3 ¯
a, Å 4.7277(3)13.932(2)
c, Å7.9871(5)17.992(2)
V, Å3154.60(2)3024.4(7)
Z16
Dcalc, g cm−32.801 2.784
μ, mm−1 1.873 2.354
F(000) 129.0 2497.0
RadiationMoKα (λ = 0.71073) MoKα (λ = 0.71073)
2Θ range for data collection, ° 5.1 to 81.7424.06 to 53.98
Index ranges −8 ≤ h ≤ 5, −7 ≤ k ≤ 8, −14 ≤ l ≤ 14 −17 ≤ h ≤ 17, −17 ≤ k ≤ 17, −19 ≤ l ≤ 22
Reflections collected 1948 6934
Independent reflections 650 [Rint = 0.0208]1466 [Rint = 0.088]
Data/restraints/parameters 650/0/21 1466/0/116
Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.107 1.184
Final R indexes [I ≥ 2σ (I)] R1 = 0.0262, wR2 = 0.0680 R1 = 0.0728, wR2 = 0.1075
Final R indexes [all data] R1 = 0.0314, wR2 = 0.0712 R1 = 0.0914, wR2 = 0.1130
Largest diff. peak/hole/e Å−3 1.09/−0.42 0.76/−0.56
Table
Table 2. Atomic fractional coordinates, site occupancies, bond valence sums, and equivalent displacement parameters (Å2) for atoms of both studied sulfates.
Table 2. Atomic fractional coordinates, site occupancies, bond valence sums, and equivalent displacement parameters (Å2) for atoms of both studied sulfates.
AtomxyzUeqOccupancyBVS *
Steklite KAl(SO4)2
K0000.0235(1)K1.09
Al00½ 0.0089(2)Al0.90Fe0.103.15
S⅓⅔0.29602(4)0.0092(1)S6.06
O1⅓⅔0.1153(1)0.0188(3)O1.76
O20.2805(2)0.9312(2)0.35885(9)0.0133(1)O2.06
(K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6
Fe10 0 0 0.0075(4) Fe0.78Al0.222.92
Fe2⅓⅔−0.08861(9) 0.0083(3) Fe0.66Al0.343.06
Fe3⅓⅔1/6 0.0090(4) Fe0.78Al0.222.95
S1 0.31822(11)0.49209(11)0.03634(7) 0.0150(3) S6.08
S2 0.04720(11)0.19237(10)0.12854(7) 0.0142(3) S6.04
K 0.29774(13)0.22033(12)0.07635(9) 0.0265(4) K0.73Na0.270.94
Na 0.4390(2) 0.3950(2) −0.0843(2)0.0308(6) Na1.06
O1 0.0604(4) 0.1398(3) 0.0596(2) 0.0237(9) O2.02
O2 0.1557(3) 0.2626(4) 0.1594(2) 0.0235(9) O2.05
O3 0.4613(3) 0.6927(3) −0.1522(2) 0.0199(8) O1.97
O4 0.2515(4) 0.2621(4) −0.1097(3) 0.029(1)O2.01
O5 0.3590(4) 0.5619(4) 0.1053(2) 0.0243(9) O1.99
O6 0.3705(4) 0.4246(4) 0.0351(2)0.0253(9) O2.05
O7 0.1989(3) 0.4289(4) 0.0351(3)0.0259(9) O2.02
O8 0.3626(4) 0.5673(4) −0.0286(2)0.0255(9) O2.00
* Bond valence parameters are taken according to [28].
Table
Table 3. Anisotropic displacement parameters of atoms (Å2) for the crystal structures of steklite and (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6.
Table 3. Anisotropic displacement parameters of atoms (Å2) for the crystal structures of steklite and (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6.
AtomU11U22U33U23U13U12
Steklite KAl(SO4)2
K0.0212(2)=U110.0280(2)000.01062(9)
S0.0076(1)=U110.0123(1)000.00380(6)
Al0.0065(2)=U110.0136(3)000.033(1)
O10.0220(4)=U110.0124(4)000.0110(2)
O20.0107(3)0.0087(3)0.0216(3)−0.0002(2)0.0020(2)0.0056(2)
(K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6
Fe10.0090(5) =U110.0045(9) 0 0 0.0045(3)
Fe20.0103(4) =U110.0041(6) 0 0 0.0052(2)
Fe30.0107(6) =U110.0056(9) 0 0 0.0053(3)
S1 0.0155(6) 0.0143(6) 0.0151(7) −0.0001(5) −0.0001(5) 0.0073(5)
S2 0.0155(6) 0.0127(6) 0.0143(6) −0.0013(5) −0.0003(5) 0.0069(5)
K 0.0287(8) 0.0187(7) 0.0335(9) 0.0041(6) 0.0114(7) 0.0129(6)
Na 0.0258(13)0.0296(13)0.0348(14)0.0109(12)−0.0027(11)0.0121(11)
O1 0.029(2) 0.018(2) 0.020(2) −0.0016(17)0.0008(18)0.0081(18)
O2 0.021(2) 0.021(2) 0.021(2) −0.0080(17)−0.0043(17)0.0055(17)
O3 0.021(2) 0.020(2)0.019(2) −0.0020(16)0.0030(16)0.0103(17)
O4 0.026(2) 0.018(2) 0.042(3) −0.0081(19)−0.009(2) 0.0086(18)
O5 0.028(2) 0.030(2) 0.019(2) −0.0091(18)−0.0046(18)0.0184(19)
O6 0.033(2) 0.025(2) 0.027(2) −0.0024(18)−0.001(2)0.021(2)
O7 0.018(2) 0.024(2) 0.029(2) −0.0041(19)−0.0030(19)0.0055(18)
O8 0.027(2) 0.028(2) 0.022(2) 0.0083(19)0.0050(18)0.0141(19)
Table
Table 4. Selected bond lengths (Å) in crystal structures of steklite and (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6.
Table 4. Selected bond lengths (Å) in crystal structures of steklite and (K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6.
Steklite KAl(SO4)2
K-O23.2421(7) ×6S-O21.4799(7) ×3Al-O21.8888(7) ×6
K-O12.8808(4) ×6S-O11.4431(11)
<K-O>3.0614<S-O>1.4707
(K,Na)3Na3(Fe,Al)2(SO4)6
Fe1-O12.004(4) ×6S2-O2 1.439(4)K-O62.606(5)
S2-O4 1.450(4)K-O72.671(5)
Fe2-O81.953(4) ×3S2-O3 1.495(4)K-O22.768(5)
Fe2-O31.993(4) ×3S2-O1 1.497(4)K-O42.774(5)
<Fe2-O>1.973<S2-O>1.470K-O12.928(5)
K-O43.025(5)
Fe3-O52.000(4) ×6Na-O22.277(5)K-O33.174(4)
Na-O42.373(5)K-O13.219(5)
S1-O7 1.441(4)Na-O72.400(5)K-O33.245(4)
S1-O6 1.449(4)Na-O62.467(5)<K-O>2.934
S1-O8 1.482(4)Na-O52.594(5)
S1-O5 1.501(4)Na-O62.733(5)
<S1-O>1.468<Na-O>2.474
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zolotarev, A.A.; Krivovichev, S.V.; Avdontceva, M.S.; Shilovskikh, V.V.; Rassomakhin, M.A.; Yapaskurt, V.O.; Pekov, I.V. Crystal Chemistry of Alkali–Aluminum–Iron Sulfates from the Burnt Mine Dumps of the Chelyabinsk Coal Basin, South Urals, Russia. Crystals 2020, 10, 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10111062

AMA Style

Zolotarev AA, Krivovichev SV, Avdontceva MS, Shilovskikh VV, Rassomakhin MA, Yapaskurt VO, Pekov IV. Crystal Chemistry of Alkali–Aluminum–Iron Sulfates from the Burnt Mine Dumps of the Chelyabinsk Coal Basin, South Urals, Russia. Crystals. 2020; 10(11):1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10111062

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zolotarev, Andrey A., Sergey V. Krivovichev, Margarita S. Avdontceva, Vladimir V. Shilovskikh, Mikhail A. Rassomakhin, Vasiliy O. Yapaskurt, and Igor V. Pekov. 2020. "Crystal Chemistry of Alkali–Aluminum–Iron Sulfates from the Burnt Mine Dumps of the Chelyabinsk Coal Basin, South Urals, Russia" Crystals 10, no. 11: 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10111062

APA Style

Zolotarev, A. A., Krivovichev, S. V., Avdontceva, M. S., Shilovskikh, V. V., Rassomakhin, M. A., Yapaskurt, V. O., & Pekov, I. V. (2020). Crystal Chemistry of Alkali–Aluminum–Iron Sulfates from the Burnt Mine Dumps of the Chelyabinsk Coal Basin, South Urals, Russia. Crystals, 10(11), 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10111062

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop