Next Article in Journal
Enhancement of Scan Strategy for Improving Surface Characteristics of the SLMed Inconel 718 Alloy Component
Next Article in Special Issue
Perovskite Quantum Dot/Zinc Oxide Composite Films for Enhanced Luminance
Previous Article in Journal
Simultaneous Double Dose Measurements Using TLD-100H
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of MACl on the Crystallization Kinetics of Perovskite via a Two-Step Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

One-Step Fabrication for CsPbBr3 Perovskite Thin Film via a Facile Ion-Solution Spraying Approach

by
Jin Chen
1,
Jinpeng Xu
1,
Yu Sun
1,*,
Fengchao Wang
1,
Jing Yang
1,*,
Yunchen Dou
2,
Canyun Zhang
1 and
Jinfang Kong
1
1
College of Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Technology, 100 Haiquan Road, Shanghai 201418, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology, 100 Haiquan Road, Shanghai 201418, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2024, 14(7), 604; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14070604
Submission received: 14 May 2024 / Revised: 7 June 2024 / Accepted: 27 June 2024 / Published: 29 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress and Prospects of Perovskite Films)

Abstract

:
In the current work, a facile ion-solution spraying strategy was employed for one-step fabrication of CsPbBr3 perovskite thin films under atmosphere. The dependences of sample properties on annealing parameters (toleration temperature and duration time) were investigated in detail. As the results suggested, the sample prepared at 200 °C for 15 min featured better properties than others. The sample displayed a cubic phase with good crystallinity, a dense and compact morphology, a bandgap energy of 2.289 eV, and an average decay lifetime of 55.536 ns. Furthermore, the sample presented a Br-rich state, which was favorable for the carrier behavior and structure stability.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, lead halide perovskite is considered a promising candidate for the applications of solar cells [1], lighting [2], lasers [3], display techniques [4], in sensors [5], and the biomedicine area [6], because of its excellent features of a high absorption coefficient [7], tunable bandgap [8], and good carrier mobility [9]. Tobias et al. investigated the optical properties of CsPbBr3 perovskite organic multiple quantum wells and confirmed their potential as high-efficiency LED and laser sources [10]. Park et al. controlled the crystallization and surface morphology of α-form formamidine lead iodate (FAPbI3) perovskite films by adding volatile alkyl ammonium chloride, achieving control over the growth of perovskite layer crystals and improving the efficiency of perovskite solar cells [11]. In 2024, Li et al. [12] used acid etching-driven nano surface reconstruction to reconstruct perovskite quantum dots (CsPbI3 QDs) on the nano surface, resulting in highly efficient and stable red LED displays. Currently, the hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites (CH3NHPbX3, CH(NH2)2PbX3, X=Cl, Br, I) are in prevalence, and the recorded power conversion efficiency (PCE) of photovoltaic devices is up to 26% [13]. However, the poor heating and moisture stability, which were caused by the volatility of organic cations (CH3NH3+, CH(NH2)2+), is the tricky issue for these hybrid ones [14]. Compared to the abovementioned organic–inorganic perovskites, all-inorganic perovskites showed great stability due to their higher structure tolerance, especially in CsPbX3 material. This was desirable for the fabrication of high-performance photovoltaic devices [15].
Nowadays, devised methods, such as spin coating [16,17], co-evaporation [18,19], gas-phase-assisted solution [20], and nanocrystals (NCs) coating [21] have been employed for the fabrication of perovskite thin films. The co-evaporation and the gas-phase-assisted deposition method belong to vacuum technology. Ma et al. [22] employed the co-evaporation method to prepare a CsPbBr3 photon-harvesting layer, and the PCE of the device was 4.7%. Patil et al. reported the fabrication of this perovskite material by the gas-phase-assisted method, and gained a device PCE of 16.45% [23]. Unfortunately, these vacuum methods were restricted by their high energy consumption and complicated operation. Spin coating and NCs coating were the typical non-vacuum avenues for the fabrication. Wu et al. prepared the perovskite solar cells by spin coating, and the PCE of the fabricated device was 16.07% [24]. In 2021, Hu et al. reported an 8.1% PCE for the device which was fabricated via the strategy of NCs coating [25]. However, the spin coating had poor repeatability and was not suitable for large-area production, and the NCs coating was complicated and time consuming which was caused by the synthesis process.
Concerning the issues of the above methods, the spraying approach, which features facile operation, low time-consumption, and scalable production, may be an effective dissolution strategy. Currently, it has been widely employed for the fabrication of binary and multiple compounds. Yang et al. reported their work on the deposition of CsPbBr3 thin film by the spraying approach based on CsPbBr3 NCs for the first time [26]. Wang [27] et al. first dissolved CsBr and PbBr2 in a DMF solution, then added oleic acid (OA) and oleyl amine (OLA) as ligands, and then placed the above solution in a centrifuge at 8000 rpm for 10 min to remove the residue to obtain a transparent precursor solution. Finally, luminescent CsPbBr3 thin films were prepared by the spraying method. The Park team used dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) as solvents to prepare CsPbBr3 precursor solutions, and then sprayed thin films on a substrate at 150 °C. The crystal size of CsPbBr3 was controlled by adjusting the concentration ratio of DMSO/DMF [28].
Differing from the abovementioned work, a one-step deposition strategy for CsPbBr3 perovskite thin films via the spraying approach with ion-solution was displayed in our current work. To our knowledge, similar reports have been rarely reported to date. Moreover, the effects of annealing parameters (toleration temperature and duration time) on the structural, compositional, morphological, and optical performances of fabricated CsPbBr3 thin films were investigated in detail. The purpose of the present work is to provide a new possibility for the facile and high-performance fabrication of CsPbBr3 thin films, which is desired for photovoltaic devices.

2. Experimental

2.1. Fabrication of CsPbBr3 Thin Films by the Ion-Solution Spraying Method

Typically, 0.2 mmol CsBr (cesium bromide, 99%, AR) and 0.2 mmol PbBr2 (lead bromide, 99%, AR) were successively dissolved in 20 mL DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide, 90%) to prepare the ion-solution. The stoichiometric ratio of Cs:Pb:Br was 1:1:3. The magnetic stirring was carried out for the sufficient dissolution under room temperature. Then, this solution was placed into a spray gun, and deposited on the heating glass-substrate to obtain the precursor thin films. Finally, the above thin films were annealed by a hot platform under atmosphere. Different annealing parameters including toleration temperature and duration time were employed. During the spraying process, the distance between the spray gun and the substrate was about 20 cm, and the inclination angle was 45 °. For the subsequent work, ITO conductive glass was used as the substrate in the experiment. The brief schematic diagram for the preparation process is shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Characterizations for the As-Obtained Samples

The film’s crystalline structure was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Ultima IV, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). The surface morphology was measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Quanta 200, FEI, Eindhoven, Netherlands). The optical property of as-prepared samples was determined by an Ultraviolet-Visible-Infrared spectrophotometer (UV-vis-IR, UH 4150, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS, Genesis Apollo X, EDAX, PA, USA) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Axis Ultra DLD, Kratos, Manchester, UK) were employed for the study of chemical constitution. All tests were carried out at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effects of Toleration Temperature on CsPbBr3 Thin Films

Regarding the spraying method, the possible mechanism could be described as follows. In the first step, the bromides of CsBr and PbBr2 were sufficiently dissolved in the polar solvent of DMSO to form the expected ion-solution. The dissolution process could be displayed in Equations (1) and (2). In this solution, Cs+, Pb2+, and Br ions were distributed isolatedly and homogeneously. In the second stage, the ion-solution was deposited onto the heating substrate. These ions would incorporate with each other to form CsPbBr3 products by heating treatment with the evaporation of the solvent, which was depicted as Equation (3). In this stage, the yellow precursor film could be obtained. Successively, the annealing treatment was carried out to proceed with the reaction further.
CsBr → Cs+ + Br
PbBr2 → Pb2+ + 2Br
Cs+ + Pb2+ +3Br → CsPbBr3
To observe the effect of the annealing temperature on the properties of CsPbBr3 thin films, the temperatures were varied at a 175~250 °C range with an increment of 25 °C. The duration time was 10 min. The XRD patterns of as-prepared samples at different toleration temperatures are shown in Figure 2a. The diffraction peaks locating at 15.21, 21.62, and 30.70° were separately attributed to (100), (110), and (200) planes of CsPbBr3 with cubic structure (JCPDS No 00-054-0752). As seen in Figure 2a, the intensity of the diffraction peak showed an upward trend with the annealing temperature at 175~200 °C, which indicated an improving crystallinity. When the temperature was over 200 °C, the crystallinity deteriorated as the temperature increased. As previously reported [29], when the temperature was low, the decomposition of solvent volatiles was slow, and the growth rate of crystals was slow. However, when the temperature was too high, the solvent evaporates rapidly and the crystal growth was insufficient, resulting in a decrease in grain size. It was observed that the shape of these peaks changed as the temperature varied. These changes could be described by full width at half maximum (FWHM). After 200 °C, the value of FWHM increased when the toleration temperature rose. According to the Scherrer formula [30] (D = kλ/βcosθ, where D is the grain size, k is a constant, λ is the Cu Kα wavelength (0.15406 nm), β is the value of FWHM, and θ is the diffraction angle), the grain size was inversely proportional to FWHM. The error lines for FWHM and crystal size of the samples prepared at different annealing temperature are shown in Figure 2b. It was noted that the 200 °C sample had the largest crystal size compared with the others.
Figure 3 shows the surface morphologies of as-obtained CsPbBr3 thin films fabricated at different annealing temperatures. As observed in Figure 3a–d, the products on the surface were in an angular strip-bulk shape without cracks and holes, meanwhile, these films featured compact and dense. This morphology may facilitate carrier migration, which is desirable for high-performance photovoltaic devices. It was noted that the size of the bulk products at 200 °C was larger than the other samples. In addition, it was also found that the organics from the used solvent could be evaporated as well.
The absorption spectra of as-prepared samples are displayed in Figure 4a. For CsPbBr3 material, the conduction band minimum (CBM) was mostly occupied by Pb-6p orbitals, while the valence band maximum (VBM) with antibonding features was mainly consisted of Br-4p orbitals. The transition from the valence band to the conduction band determined the optical properties of CsPbBr3 in the visible region [31]. As observed, these annealed samples all presented a clear absorption edge. The absorption edge steepened as the annealing temperature increased in the 175~200 °C range, which indicated the crystallinity improved. However, the steepness decreased with the increasing temperature in the 200~250 °C range. This was consistent with XRD analysis. The bandgap energy Eg of these samples was determined by extrapolating the straight line of (Ahv)2 vs. (hv) plots as exampled in the inset of Figure 4b. Here, A is absorbance, h is Planck’s constant, and v is frequency. As observed, the error line of Eg value variation is shown in Figure 4b. When the annealing temperature was 200 °C, the Eg value was 2.262 eV.
As above analyzed, the 200 °C sample featured better crystallinity, morphology, and optical property compared with other samples. This suggested the annealing temperature of 200 °C was promising for the next investigation.

3.2. Effects of Duration Time on CsPbBr3 Thin Films

Here, the annealing time was changed to a 5~20 min range with intervals of 5 min to examine the property variations of the prepared samples. The annealing temperature was set to 200 °C as above suggested. Figure 5a displays the XRD patterns of the samples undertaken by different duration times. As seen, the diffraction peaks at 15.21, 21.62, and 30.70° were attributed to (100), (110), and (200) planes of cubic CsPbBr3, respectively. It was noted that the absence of impurity suggested the obtained product was in the pure phase. It was found that the peak intensity increased as the time prolonged in 5~15 min, which indicated an improving crystallinity and crystal size. Unfortunately, the continued extension of annealing time led to the decomposition of thin film grains, resulting in a decrease in crystallinity and grain size. A similar phenomenon was also reported in previous work [32]. The error lines for FWHM and crystal size of the samples prepared at different annealing times are shown in Figure 5b. The FWHM showed a downward trend in the 5~15 min range, and an upward variation when the annealing time was over 15 min. This was consistent with the shape changes of diffraction peaks. According to the Scherrer formula, FWHM and grain size were inversely proportional. When the annealing time was 15 min, the FWHM of the prepared sample was the smallest and the grain size was the largest.
The surface morphology of the samples prepared at different annealing times is shown in Figure 6. When the annealing time was 5 min, the holes appeared on the sample surface and disappeared during the 10~20 min range. This may be attributed to the product growing as the annealing time increased. As seen, the morphology of these samples was dense and compact. The stripped products on the film surface presented as bulk-state, which is favorable for carrier migration. Regarding the 15 min sample, the largest size of the bulk products could be over 500 nm.
The optical properties of CsPbBr3 thin films prepared at different duration times are shown in Figure 7. Figure 7a shows the absorption spectra of the obtained samples, while the transmission mode was conducted here. All the samples featured a cut-off absorption edge. For the 15 min sample, it had the steepest cut-off edge for the absorption spectrum, which can be attributed to the best crystallinity as suggested by XRD analysis. Figure 7b shows the error line of Eg values variation. As observed, the Eg presented an upward trend in the 5~10 min range and declined when the duration time was prolonged to 20 min. The Eg value of the thin film prepared under annealing of 200 °C and 15 min was 2.289 eV.
According to the above analyses, the properties of the films prepared at 200 °C for 15 min were better than those of the other samples. As suggested by previous work [33], the carrier lifetime was one of the key factors for photovoltaic devices. Figure 8 shows the time-resolved fluorescence decay curves of CsPbBr3 films at 200 °C for 15 min. The curves could be fitted by a bi-exponential function as shown in Equation (4) [34]:
y = A 0 + A 1 exp t τ 1 + A 2 exp ( t τ 2 )
τ a v e = ( A 1 τ 1 2 + A 2 τ 2 2 ) / ( A 1 τ 1 + A 2 τ 2 )
Here, τ1 is the fast decay component which reflects the no-radiative recombination process resulting from the defects, τ2 is the slow decay component relating to the trap-assisted radiative process in the bulk perovskite. A1 and A2 are the corresponding fractional amplitudes of τ1 and τ2, respectively. A0 is a constant. In addition, the average lifetime τave is calculated by Equation (5). For the obtained samples, the τ1 value was 2.308 ns, τ2 value was 99.895 ns, and their corresponding A1 and A2 values were 45.51% and 54.49%, respectively. The calculated τave value was 55.536 ns. This indicated the sample had a good carrier migration behavior which was beneficial to separate the free electron from the hole effectively as suggested by previous work [33]. The value of the statistical indicator R2 was 0.995, which was very close to 1, indicating that the model used had a good fitting effect.
In order to better characterize the performance of the thin film, the SEM cross-sectional image of the prepared sample is shown in Figure 9a. The thickness of the prepared sample is 3.7 μm. In the future, the preparation process could be further improved to make the film thickness thinner. Furthermore, the chemical composition of this sample was determined by EDS. As shown in Figure 9b, the atomic percent of Cs:Pb:Br was 1:0.89:3.03. The Pb/(Cs+Br) ratio was 0.22, which suggested a Pb-poor state of the synthesized sample resulting from the poor solubility of the Pb source in the reaction solution [35]. The Br/(Cs+Pb) ratio was around 1.6. This indicated the sample was in a Br-rich state. As suggested by previous studies [36], the Br-rich state could facilitate the reduction of Br vacancies, which is favorable for the carrier behavior. In addition, this chemical composition was also beneficial for the structure stability of the prepared sample [35].
The composition of the obtained sample prepared under the condition of 200 °C for 15 min was further investigated by XPS observation. The full spectrum of XPS is shown in Figure 10a. It was found that the spectrum of each element had double detected peaks of self-spin orbit splitting, which resulted from the spin orbit coupling [31]. As Figure 10b displays, the peaks located at 723.29 eV and 737.38 eV correspond to Cs 3d5/2 and Cs 3d3/2, respectively. The splitting space was 13.9 eV. This indicated Cs was univalent. For Pb, two characteristic peaks of 137.26 eV and 142.11 eV with a separation of 4.85 eV were observed as shown in Figure 10c. These two peaks were attributed to Pb 4f7/2 and Pb 4f5/2, respectively. This confirmed the existence of bivalent Pb. Two different binding states of 68.15 eV and 67.21 eV were obtained as shown in Figure 10d. It suggested two different chemical environments of the Br element: the peak of 68.15 eV deriving from the high energy band of Pb-Br, and the peak of 67.21 eV originating from the low energy band of Cs-Br [21].

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have successfully fabricated a CsPbBr3 thin film based on the facile spraying approach under atmosphere. The intrinsic relationship between annealing parameters (toleration temperature and duration time) and the samples’ properties was investigated in detail. As the results show, the best sample could be obtained under the condition of 200 °C for 15 min. The sample featured a good crystallinity with a cubic structure, a dense and compact surface morphology, and a bandgap energy of 2.289 eV. The PL lifespan was obtained through fitting, the τ1 value was 2.308 ns, the τ2 value was 99.895 ns, and their corresponding A1 and A2 values were 45.51% and 54.49%, respectively. The calculated τave value was 55.536 ns. Moreover, the fabricated sample was in a Br-rich state, which was favorable for the carrier behavior and structure stability. Finally, the XPS spectrum confirmed the composition of the prepared sample and the binding energy of different elements. In future work, the as-fabricated CsPbBr3 thin film will be involved in the fabrication of photovoltaic devices.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C.; Data curation, Y.D.; Formal analysis, J.C. and Y.S.; Funding acquisition, J.C., F.W. and J.Y.; Investigation, J.X. and J.K.; Methodology, J.Y.; Project administration, F.W.; Software, J.Y. and C.Z.; Supervision, F.W. and C.Z.; Validation, J.X. and Y.S.; Visualization, Y.D. and J.K.; Writing—original draft, Y.S.; Writing—review and editing, J.C. and Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by [the Shanghai Sailing Program] grant number [20YF1447600 and No. 18YF1422500]. And the research was funded by [Start-up Project of the Shanghai Institute of Technology] grant number [YJ2021-60]. This research was funded by [the Collaborative Innovation Project of the Shanghai Institute of Technology] grant number [XTCX2020-12 and No. XTCX2023-22], and [the Science and Technology Talent Development Fund for Young and Middle-Aged Teachers of the Shanghai Institute of Technology] grant number [ZQ2022-6].

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lee, M.M.; Teuscher, J.; Miyasaka, T.; Murakami, T.N.; Snaith, H.J. Efficient hybrid solar cells cased on meso-superstructured organometal halide perovskites. Science 2012, 338, 643–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, L.Q.; Yang, X.L.; Jiang, Q.; Wang, P.Y.; Yin, Z.G.; Zhang, X.W.; Tan, H.; Yang, Y.M.; Wei, M.Y.; Sutherland, B.R.; et al. Ultra-bright and highly efficient inorganic based perovskite light-emitting diodes. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Song, J.; Xiao, L.; Zeng, H.; Sun, H. All inorganic colloidal perovskite quantum dots: A new class of lasing materials with favorable characteristics. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 7101–7108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dai, S.-W.; Hsu, B.-W.; Chen, C.-Y.; Lee, C.-A.; Liu, H.-Y.; Wang, H.-F.; Huang, Y.-C.; Wu, T.-L.; Manikandan, A.; Ho, R.-M.; et al. Perovskite quantum dots with near unity solution and neat-film photoluminescent quantum yield by novel spray synthesis. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ollearo, R.; Ma, X.; Akkerman, H.B.; Fattori, M.; Dyson, M.J.; van Breemen, A.J.J.M.; Meskers, S.C.J.; Dijkstra, W.; Janssen, R.A.J.; Gelinck, G.H. Vitality surveillance at distance using thin-film tandem-like narrowband near-infrared photodiodes with light-enhanced responsivity. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, 9861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, Y.-H.; Kataria, M.; Hung, I.L.; Inbaraj, C.R.P.; Liao, Y.-M.; Hu, H.W.; Chang, T.-J.; Lu, C.-H.; Shih, W.-H.; Wang, W.-H.; et al. Ultrahighly photosensitive and highly stretchable rippled structure photodetectors based on perovskite nanocrystals and graphene. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2019, 1, 1517–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wolf, S.D.; Holovsky, J.; Moon, S.J.; Löper, P.; Niesen, B.; Ledinsky, M.; Haug, F.J.; Yum, J.H.; Ballif, C. Organometallic halide perovskites: Sharp optical absorption edge and its relation to photovoltaic performance. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 1035–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Noh, J.H.; Im, S.H.; Heo, J.H.; Mandal, T.N.; Seok, S.I. Chemical management for colorful, efficient, and stable inorganic-organic hybrid nanostructured solar cells. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1764–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Stoumpos, C.C.; Malliakas, C.D.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Semiconducting tin and lead iodide perovskites with organic cations: Phase transitions, high mobilities, and near-infrared photoluminescent properties. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2013, 52, 9019–9038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Antrack, T.; Kroll, M.; Sudzius, M.; Cho, C.; Imbrasas, P.; Albaladejo-Siguan, M.; Benduhn, J.; Merten, L.; Hinderhofer, A.; Schreiber, F.; et al. Optical properties of perovskite-organic multiple quantum wells. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2200379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Park, J.; Kim, J.; Yun, H.-S.; Paik, M.J.; Noh, E.; Mun, H.J.; Kim, M.G.; Shin, T.J.; Seok, S.I. Controlled growth of perovskite layers with volatile alkylammonium chlorides. Nature 2023, 616, 724–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, H.; Feng, Y.; Zhu, M.; Gao, Y.; Fan, C.; Cui, Q.; Cai, Q.; Yang, K.; He, H.; Dai, X.; et al. Nanosurface-reconstructed perovskite for highly efficient and stable active-matrix light-emitting diode display. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2024, 19, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart. 2024. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (accessed on 10 May 2024).
  14. Rong, Y.G.; Liu, L.F.; Mei, A.Y.; Li, X.; Han, H.W. Beyond efficiency: The challenge of stability in mesoscopic perovskite solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1501066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, B.; Chen, J.S.; Hong, F.; Mao, X.; Zheng, K.B.; Yang, S.Q.; Li, Y.J.; Pullerits, T.; Deng, W.Q.; Han, K. Lead-free, air-stable all-inorganic cesium bismuth halide perovskite nanocrystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 12471–12475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jeon, N.J.; Na, H.; Jung, E.H.; Yang, T.Y.; Lee, Y.G.; Kim, G.; Shin, H.W.; Seok, S.I.; Lee, J.; Seo, J. A fluorene-terminated hole-transporting material for highly efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 682–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Burschka, J.; Pellet, N.; Moon, S.J.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Gao, P.; Nazeeruddin, M.; Graetzel, M. Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 2013, 499, 316–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chen, Q.; Zhou, H.P.; Hong, Z.R.; Luo, S.; Duan, H.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.S.; Li, G.; Yang, Y. Planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells via vapor-assisted solution process. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 622–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lei, J.; Gao, F.; Wang, H.X.; Li, J.; Jiang, J.X.; Wu, X.; Gao, R.R.; Yang, Z.; Liu, S.Z. Efficient planar CsPbBr3 perovskite solar cells by dual-source vacuum evaporation. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 187, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lin, Q.Q.; Armin, A.; Nagiri, R.C.R.; Burn, P.L.; Meredith, P. Electro-optics of perovskite solar cells. Nat. Photonics 2015, 9, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Woo, J.Y.; Kim, Y.; Bae, J.; Kim, T.G.; Kim, J.W.; Lee, D.C.; Jeong, S. Highly stable cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals through in situ lead halide inorganic passivation. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 7088–7092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ma, Q.S.; Huang, S.J.; Wen, X.M.; Green, M.A.; Ho-Baillie, A.W.Y. Hole transport layer free inorganic CsPbIBr2 perovskite solar cell by dual source thermal evaporation. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Patil, J.V.; Mali, S.S.; Hong, C.K. Efficient and stable all-inorganic niobium-incorporated CsPbI2Br based perovskite solar cells. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 27176–27183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, W.J.; Chen, H.Y.; Xu, G.Y.; Xue, R.M.; Wang, S.H.; Li, Y.W.; Li, Y.F. Precise Control of crystal growth for highly efficient CsPbI2Br perovskite solar cells. Joule 2019, 3, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hu, L.; Guan, X.W.; Chen, W.J.; Yao, Y.C.; Wan, T.; Lin, C.; Pham, N.D.; Yuan, L.; Geng, X.; Wang, F.; et al. Linking phase segregation and photovoltaic performance of mixed-halide perovskite films through grain size engineering. ACS Energy Lett. 2021, 6, 1649–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, Z.; Wang, M.Q.; Li, J.J.; Dou, J.J.; Qiu, H.W.; Shao, J.Y. Spray-coated CsPbBr3 quantum dot films for perovskite photodiodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 26387–26395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, F.; Peng, X.; Wang, C.; Dong, H.; Sun, Y.; Kong, J.; Zhang, C.; Chen, J.; Li, L.; Xu, J. Synthesis of CsPbBr3 and CsPbBrXI(3−X) Films by Spray-Coating Technique. ECS J. Solid. State Sci. Technol. 2020, 9, 126007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Park, J.K.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, J.H. Spray-coated nanocrystalline CsPbBr3 perovskite thin-films for large area and efficient rigid and flexible light emitting diodes. J. Alloys Compd. Interdiscip. J. Mater. Sci. Solid-State Chem. Phys. 2022, 918, 165560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gao, B.; Meng, J. High efficiently CsPbBr3 perovskite solar cells fabricated by multi-step spin coating method. Sol. Energy 2020, 211, 1223–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, J.; Chen, Q.M.; Ni, Y.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Wang, T.T.; Jia, Z.; Dou, X.M. The synthesis of Cu2ZnSnS4 nanoparticles via an open-air solution route: Influences of Zn precursor content. J. Sol. Gel Sci. Technol. 2015, 75, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, M.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, M.; Kim, C.S.; Choi, J.W.; Choi, K.; Lee, J.H.; Park, J.; Kang, Y.; Jin, S.; et al. Enhanced photoluminescence quantum efficiency and stability of water assisted CsPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystals. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020, 88, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bai, T.; Wang, S.; Zhang, K.; Chu, C.; Sun, Y.; Yi, L. High stability and strong luminescence CsPbBr3-Cs4PbBr6 thin films for all-inorganic perovskite light-emitting diodes. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 24413–24422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, X.; Gao, X.Y.; Meng, X. Fabrication and characterization of all-inorganic halide perovskite CsPbBr3 films via the two-step sol-gel process: Impact of annealing temperature. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 810, 151943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bi, D.Q.; Yi, C.Y.; Luo, J.S.; Décoppet, J.; Zhang, F.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Li, X.; Hagfeldt, A.; Grätzel, M. Polymer-templated nucleation and crystal growth of perovskite films for solar cells with efficiency greater than 21%. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Peng, X.G.; Chen, J.; Wang, F.C.; Zhang, C.Y.; Yang, B.B. One-pot synthesis of CsPbBr3/Cs4PbBr6 perovskite composite. Optik 2020, 208, 164579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, X.S.; Jin, Z.W.; Zhang, J.R.; Bai, D.L.; Bian, H.; Wang, K.; Sun, J.; Wang, Q.; Liu, S.F. All-ambient processed binary CsPbBr3-CsPb2Br5 perovskites with synergistic enhancement for high-efficiency Cs-Pb-Br-based solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 7145–7154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of spraying process.
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of spraying process.
Crystals 14 00604 g001
Figure 2. (a) XRD pattern and (b) the error lines for FWHM and crystal size of the samples prepared at different toleration temperatures.
Figure 2. (a) XRD pattern and (b) the error lines for FWHM and crystal size of the samples prepared at different toleration temperatures.
Crystals 14 00604 g002
Figure 3. Morphologies of the samples prepared at different temperatures: (a) 175 °C, (b) 200 °C, (c) 225 °C, (d) 250 °C.
Figure 3. Morphologies of the samples prepared at different temperatures: (a) 175 °C, (b) 200 °C, (c) 225 °C, (d) 250 °C.
Crystals 14 00604 g003
Figure 4. (a) Absorption spectra and (b) error lines of (Ahv)2 vs. (hv) of the samples prepared at different temperatures.
Figure 4. (a) Absorption spectra and (b) error lines of (Ahv)2 vs. (hv) of the samples prepared at different temperatures.
Crystals 14 00604 g004
Figure 5. (a) XRD pattern and (b) the error lines for FWHM and crystal size of the samples prepared at different duration times.
Figure 5. (a) XRD pattern and (b) the error lines for FWHM and crystal size of the samples prepared at different duration times.
Crystals 14 00604 g005
Figure 6. Morphologies of the samples prepared at different times: (a) 5 min, (b) 10 min, (c) 15 min, (d) 20 min.
Figure 6. Morphologies of the samples prepared at different times: (a) 5 min, (b) 10 min, (c) 15 min, (d) 20 min.
Crystals 14 00604 g006
Figure 7. (a) Absorption spectra and (b) error lines of (Ahv)2 vs. (hv) of the samples prepared at different times.
Figure 7. (a) Absorption spectra and (b) error lines of (Ahv)2 vs. (hv) of the samples prepared at different times.
Crystals 14 00604 g007
Figure 8. PL lifetime of samples prepared at 200 °C for 15 min.
Figure 8. PL lifetime of samples prepared at 200 °C for 15 min.
Crystals 14 00604 g008
Figure 9. The samples prepared at 200 °C for 15 min: (a) SEM cross-sectional images and (b) chemical composition.
Figure 9. The samples prepared at 200 °C for 15 min: (a) SEM cross-sectional images and (b) chemical composition.
Crystals 14 00604 g009
Figure 10. XPS spectrum of the obtained sample prepared at 200 °C for 15 min. (a) The full spectrum of XPS; (b) the peaks located at 723.29 eV and 737.38 eV correspond to Cs 3d5/2 and Cs 3d3/2, respectively; (c) Two characteristic peaks of 137.26 eV and 142.11 eV with a separation of 4.85 eV were observed; (d) Two different binding states of 68.15 eV and 67.21 eV were obtained.
Figure 10. XPS spectrum of the obtained sample prepared at 200 °C for 15 min. (a) The full spectrum of XPS; (b) the peaks located at 723.29 eV and 737.38 eV correspond to Cs 3d5/2 and Cs 3d3/2, respectively; (c) Two characteristic peaks of 137.26 eV and 142.11 eV with a separation of 4.85 eV were observed; (d) Two different binding states of 68.15 eV and 67.21 eV were obtained.
Crystals 14 00604 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, J.; Xu, J.; Sun, Y.; Wang, F.; Yang, J.; Dou, Y.; Zhang, C.; Kong, J. One-Step Fabrication for CsPbBr3 Perovskite Thin Film via a Facile Ion-Solution Spraying Approach. Crystals 2024, 14, 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14070604

AMA Style

Chen J, Xu J, Sun Y, Wang F, Yang J, Dou Y, Zhang C, Kong J. One-Step Fabrication for CsPbBr3 Perovskite Thin Film via a Facile Ion-Solution Spraying Approach. Crystals. 2024; 14(7):604. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14070604

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Jin, Jinpeng Xu, Yu Sun, Fengchao Wang, Jing Yang, Yunchen Dou, Canyun Zhang, and Jinfang Kong. 2024. "One-Step Fabrication for CsPbBr3 Perovskite Thin Film via a Facile Ion-Solution Spraying Approach" Crystals 14, no. 7: 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14070604

APA Style

Chen, J., Xu, J., Sun, Y., Wang, F., Yang, J., Dou, Y., Zhang, C., & Kong, J. (2024). One-Step Fabrication for CsPbBr3 Perovskite Thin Film via a Facile Ion-Solution Spraying Approach. Crystals, 14(7), 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14070604

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop