Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of Graphene Oxide/Chitosan Composite Aerogels with High Mechanical Performance
Next Article in Special Issue
Superhydrophobic Polytetrafluoroethylene/Heat-Shrinkable Polyvinyl Chloride Composite Film with Super Anti-Icing Property
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of H2O2 Bleaching Treatment on the Properties of Finished Transparent Wood
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fabric Composites Reinforced with Thermally Bonded and Irregularly Aligned Filaments: Preparation and Puncture Resistant Performance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

PP/TiO2 Melt-Blown Membranes for Oil/Water Separation and Photocatalysis: Manufacturing Techniques and Property Evaluations

1
Innovation Platform of Intelligent and Energy-Saving Textiles, School of Textile Science and Engineering, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China
2
Tianjin and Education Ministry Key Laboratory of Advanced Textile Composite Materials, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300387, China
3
Fujian Key Laboratory of Novel Functional Fibers and Materials, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China
4
Fujian Engineering Research Center of New Chinese Lacquer Material, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China
5
Department of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan
6
Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
7
College of Textile and Clothing, Qingdao University, Shandong 266071, China
8
Laboratory of Fiber Application and Manufacturing, Department of Fiber and Composite Materials, Feng Chia University, Taichung 40724, Taiwan
9
School of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
10
Department of Fashion Design, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2019, 11(5), 775; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050775
Submission received: 20 March 2019 / Revised: 24 April 2019 / Accepted: 25 April 2019 / Published: 1 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer Hybrid Composites)

Abstract

:
This study aims to produce polypropylene (PP)/titanium dioxide (TiO2) melt-blown membranes for oil/water separation and photocatalysis. PP and different contents of TiO2 are melt-blended to prepare master batches using a single screw extruder. The master batches are then fabricated into PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes. The thermal properties of the master batches are analyzed using differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis, and their particle dispersion and melt-blown membrane morphology are evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. TiO2 loaded on melt-blown membranes is confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The oil/water separation ability of the melt-blown membranes is evaluated to examine the influence of TiO2 content. Results show that the thermal stability and photocatalytic effect of the membranes increase with TiO2 content. TiO2 shows a good dispersion in the PP membranes. After 3 wt.% TiO2 addition, crystallinity increases by 6.4%, thermal decomposition temperature increases by 25 °C compared with pure PP membranes. The resultant PP/TiO2 melt-blown membrane has a good morphology, and better hydrophobicity even in acetone solution or 6 h ultraviolet irradiation, and a high oil flux of about 15,000 L·m−2·h−1. Moreover, the membranes have stabilized oil/water separation efficiency after being repeatedly used. The proposed melt-blown membranes are suitable for mass production for separating oil from water in massively industrial dyeing wastewater.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Currently, water pollution problems have given rise to strong repercussions in society, particularly for oily wastewater pollution. This considerable amount of oily wastewater usually comes from textile, petrochemical, and steel factories. Sometimes, in the marine transportation, oil spills happen by leakage, which pollutes the ocean and causes oily wastewater pollution [1,2]. Therefore, how to deal with these oily wastewater pollutions and to achieve oil/water separation have attracted the attention of researchers.
In the industry, oil/water mixtures can be purified by some mechanical devices, such as skimmers, air flotation, centrifugation, booms, and chemical coagulation. However, these purifying methods need to input energy and high pressure to operate [3,4]. Porous materials such as foam [5,6] and textiles [7,8] are often used to deal with oil leakage by adsorption. However, water and oil are both adsorbed and the separation efficiency is poor. Moreover, recovery is difficult and time consuming and even leads to secondary environmental pollution [9]. To address these issues, many scholars coated thermal- [10] or pH- [11,12] responsive materials on metallic mesh to improve oil/water separation ability and to provide different applications. Similarly, titanium meshes [13] and porous polyethylene (PE) meshes [14] that are modified with poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) -poly(styrenesulfonate) have high resistance to the harshest chemical conditions. Metallic meshes have shown promising results for the selective separation of oil/water mixtures. However, such meshes have disadvantages such as heavy weight, high material cost, and poor corrosion resistance impeding practical applications. By contrast, textiles/fabric based substrates are low cost, light weight, flexible, and corrosion resistant. Several studies focused on nanofiber membranes and their application in the separation of oil/water systems. For example, electrospun mats composed of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-block-poly (4-vinylpyridine) polymers show excellent pH switchability for oil-water separation [15]. Electrospun membranes composed of a fluorine-containing polymer exhibit self-healing ability by self-cleaning, which is ascribed to the low-surface-energy of fluorine-containing polymer [16]. However, this fluorine-containing polymer has environmental damage. Preferably, TiO2 not only can decompose the organic pollutants on the membranes, but also demonstrate light-induced oil resistance and self-cleaning function [17,18]. As a photocatalyst, TiO2 decomposes organic pollutants via light-induced oxidative holes and hydroxyl radicals [19,20]. Comparatively, TiO2 is commonly used in the photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants because of its superior advantages, such as low production cost, high stability, and good photocatalysis [21]. TiO2 also commonly used in oil/water separation. For example, depositing TiO2 on stainless steel meshes [22,23] or titanium meshes [18] can produce oil/water-separating membranes. A good prospect in separating oil from water effectively is achieved by adding TiO2 with meshes or membranes. However, these methods still have some limitations. Even under low water resistance, TiO2 and meshes present a low adhesion between them. Therefore, ideal photocatalyst-immobilized substrate materials should be selected for stable anchoring to prevent catalyst leaching, maintain reactive oxygen stability, and increase selective affinity toward target contaminants [24].
To overcome the aforementioned shortcomings of metal mesh and electrospinning, previous studies employed an effective melt-blown method to form microfiber membranes and improve TiO2 adhesion [25,26,27]. As a commonly available low-cost melt-blown substrate, polypropylene (PP) exhibits efficient air filtration performance and water purification [28,29,30,31]. Liu et al. [28] found that melt-blown PP membrane significantly decreased the amount of chemical oxygen demand (COD), suspended solids (SS), and NH3-N in the reclaimed water. Moreover, some particles, such as nanoclay [29], silicon dioxide [30], and tourmaline particles [31] can be added in the melt-blowing process in order to create additional new function in a greater diversity application. In addition, melt-blending process is an efficient method to produce massive functional matrix, featuring high production efficiency, less pollution, and ease of processing. Moreover, some particles, such as nanoclay [29], silicon dioxide [30], and tourmaline particles [31], can be added in the melt-blowing process to create new functions for different applications. Melt-blending is an efficient method to produce massive functional matrices featuring high production efficiency, less pollution, and ease of processing. Therefore, in this study, a single-screw melting blending process is first used to prepare PP/TiO2 blends, and then photocatalytic PP/TiO2 membranes are formed by melt-blowing. The TiO2 dispersion, thermal stability, wetting property, and photocatalytic effect and oil/water separation of PP/TiO2 membranes are characterized.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

PP (Shanghai Yiding Plastics, Shanghai, China) has a melt index (MI) of 35 g/10 min at 170 °C. TiO2 particle (Shandong Jiechen Chemical, Shandong, China) has an average diameter of about 100 nm. Methylene blue (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), Rhodamine B (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.), oil red O (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.), and organic solvents (petroleum ether, n-hexane, acetone) were purchased from Aladdin Chemistry Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China. All chemicals were of analytical and used as received without further purification.

2.2. Preparation of Melt-Blown Membranes

PP and TiO2 are mixed through several physical processes at mass ratios of 100/0, 100/1, 100/3, and 100/5, melted, extruded, and then pelletized for seven times using a single-screw extruder (Qingdao Keshengda Plastic Machinery, Qingdao, China) forming a PP/TiO2 master batch. PP/TiO2 master batches are prepared after seven cycles, and the screw and pelletizing speed ratio is 1:1.52. The processing parameters of the melted blends are shown in Table 1, and the prepared master batches are named PP/TiO2-1, PP/TiO2-3, and PP/TiO2-5 depending on the different amounts of TiO2. Some master batches are then poured into a twin-screw mixer at 180 °C for 3 min at a rotary speed of 130 rpm. The obtained blends are then hot-pressed at 160 °C for 2 min under a pressure of 20 MPa to obtain PP/TiO2 hot-pressed films. The hot-pressed films are named F-PP/TiO2-0, F-PP/TiO2-1, F-PP/TiO2-3, and F-PP/TiO2-5 depending on the different amounts of TiO2.
The master batches are dried at 80 °C for 10 h and then poured into a melt-blowing machine (Tianjin Shengruiyuan Machinery Technology, Tianjin, China) with a die temperature of 180–230 °C (Table 1), a hot air temperature of 180 °C, and a pressure of 0.04 MPa. The melt-blowing process is shown in Figure 1. The metering pump frequency is 5 Hz, and the distance between the die and the collector is 20 cm. The membranes are denoted as M-PP/TiO2-0, M-PP/TiO2-1, M-PP/TiO2-3, and M-PP/TiO2-5 depending on the different amounts of TiO2.

2.3. Measurements and Characterizations

The thermal properties of the PP/TiO2 master batches are analyzed using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC 209F3, NETZSCH, Bavaria, Germany). All samples are heated from 25 °C to 200 °C at increments of 10 °C/min and then stored at 200 °C for 3 min to eliminate the thermal history. Afterward, the samples are cooled to 25 °C at 10 °C/min, during which the cooling curves are recorded. Samples are again heated to 200 °C at increments of 10 °C/min, during which the heating curves are recorded. All experiments are performed under nitrogen atmosphere. Thermogravimetric is conducted with a thermogravimetric analyzer (TG209F3, NETZSCH, Bavaria, Germany) with dry nitrogen gas at a flow rate of 60 mL/min. The relative mass losses of the PP/TiO2 master batches are recorded from 50 °C to 700 °C at a heating rate of 20 °C/min. The fractured surface morphology of the F-PP/TiO2 membranes and the surface morphology of the M-PP/TiO2 membranes are analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, TM3030, HITACHI, Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 3 KV. Prior to the test, the F-PP/TiO2 hot-press film samples are brittle fractured with liquid nitrogen, and then all samples are sputtered with gold to provide enhanced conductivity. The SEM images are analyzed using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software. A bundle of fibers per image are used to measure the diameter of the nanofibers, and Origin is used to plot the diameter distribution and compute the standard deviations. The contact angles of the M-PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes are measured using a tester JC2000DM (Powereach, Shanghai Zhongchen Digital Technology Apparatus, Shanghai, China). The contact angles at five sites of the sample are measured and recorded.

2.4. Oil/Water Separation and Photocatalytic Activity Analysis

The M-PP/TiO2 melt-blown membrane is affixed between two glass vessels. To distinguish, water is dyed with methylene blue, and organic solvents (i.e., kerosene, hexane, petroleum ether, and toluene) are dyed with oil red O. Water (30 mL) and oil (30 mL) are blended, and the mixture is gently poured into the container. Oil and water are separated under gravity, and the water/oil separation efficiency is computed using Equation (1) [32]:
η = (V1/V0) × 100,
where V0 and V1 correspond to the volume of oil before and after the separation, respectively. Oil that adheres to the vessel is not included in the calculation.
The photocatalytic activities of the M-PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes are evaluated using rhodamine B and kerosene. Rhodamine B has an initial concentration of 10 mg/L. Moreover, 5 mg/30 mL of TiO2 is used as the photocatalyst. Photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B is conducted using a photochemical reaction apparatus (XPA-VII photochemical reactor, Xujiang electromechanical, Nanjing, China). Ultraviolet light irradiation is sourced from a 300 W Hg lamp that resides in a double glazing jacket where circulating cool water flows. Then, a specified volume of solution is extracted at different times. The solution is first centrifuged, after which the supernatant liquor is taken and the absorbance is recorded at 554 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Mapada, UV-1800PC, Shanghai, China). Rhodamine B has the maximum absorbance wavelength of 554 nm.
The decomposition of kerosene is analyzed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Nicolet iS10, Waltham, MA, USA). PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes that are immersed in kerosene are exposed to a 300 W radiation from a high-pressure Hg lamp for 3 h. A specified volume of kerosene is collected and then scanned in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 using a FTIR instrument. Differences in the plotted spectrum are compared to evaluate the photocatalytic capabilities of the membranes.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Thermal Behaviors and Thermal Stability of the PP/TiO2 Master Batch

Figure 2a,b shows the DSC cooling and heating curves of the PP/TiO2 master batches after eliminating the thermal history. Table 2 shows the melt crystallization temperature (Tmc), the glass transition temperature (Tg), the melt temperature (Tm), and the degree of crystallinity (Xc) of the PP/TiO2 master batches with different TiO2 contents. The Tg of pure PP is 41 °C, which is heightened with the presence of TiO2. However, the content of TiO2 only has a marginal positive influence. During the cooling process, the master batches exhibit a cold crystallization peak. The cold crystallization peak increases with TiO2 content, indicating that the crystallization rate of the PP/TiO2 master batch. This result suggests that using TiO2 accelerates the crystallinity of PP. The reason is that TiO2 inorganic particles can serve as a heterogeneous nucleation agent. Thus, polymer crystals have changed from homogeneous nucleation to heterogeneous nucleation, facilitating the crystallization. The crystallinity of the PP/TiO2 master batches is proportional to the content of TiO2. The degree of crystallinity (Xc) of the samples is calculated using the following equation:
Xc = {(ΔHm − ΔHcc)/ΔH0} × 100%,
where ΔHm is the melting enthalpy, ΔHcc is the cold crystallization enthalpy, and ΔH0 is the fusion enthalpy of the completely crystalline PP [33].
When the TiO2 content is 3 wt. %, the PP/TiO2-3 master batch has a crystallinity of 42.69%, which is higher than that of PP/TiO2-0 (36.29%). Nevertheless, greater TiO2 content is not beneficial to the crystallinity of PP, which suggests that increasing TiO2 to a certain extent decreases crystallization. As a result, the crystallinity remains the same and the heterogeneous nucleation agent is saturated.
The Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential thermogravimetry analysis (DTG) curves of the PP/TiO2 master batches are related to the content of TiO2 as shown in Figure 2c,d. The results of thermogravimetric show that the TGA curves of the PP/TiO2 master batches shift toward high temperature as the TiO2 content is increased. Table 3 shows the initial decomposition temperature (T0.05), a weight loss 50% temperature (T0.5), remains mass, and “Tmax” is the decomposition temperature corresponding to the weight loss rate obtained from the DTG curve in Figure 2d. The PP/TiO2 master batches decomposition temperature increases with increasing TiO2 content. The T0.5 of PP/TiO2-0 is 350 °C, and that of the PP/TiO2 master batch containing 5 wt. % TiO2 is 400 °C. This finding demonstrates that the presence of TiO2 increases the decomposition temperature and improves the thermal stability of PP/TiO2. This result is due to the fact that TiO2 can enhance the interaction between polymer molecular chains, which consequently increases the degree of crosslinking and restricts the segmental motion. The thermal decomposition of PP molecular chains is terminated, while the distribution of TiO2 in the PP polymer limits the transmission of heat energy [34]. In addition, the PP/TiO2 master batches have high remnant mass than PP/TiO2-0, and the remaining amount is almost equivalent to the content of TiO2. The greater TiO2 content generates the higher remnant mass.

3.2. Morphology of PP/TiO2 Hot-Press Film and Melt-Blown Membranes

The fractured surface of the PP/TiO2 hot-press film and the surface morphology of the PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes are shown in Figure 3a–d. The fractured surface of PP/TiO2-0 is continual and homogeneous. By contrast, the PP/TiO2 hot-press film has a rugged fractured surface where the white particles are TiO2. During melt-blending, some agglomerated particles can be separated by a strong shear force effectively [35]. However, increasing the content of TiO2 leads to agglomeration in the polymer matrix, and the agglomeration becomes more apparent with increasing TiO2 content, suggesting that the adhesion between PP and TiO2 is low. Some of the TiO2 particles fall apart from the membranes because of the brittle fracture caused by liquid nitrogen, leaving some empty holes. This phenomenon is more exaggerated as the TiO2 content is increased
Figure 3e–h shows the fiber morphology of the PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes with the corresponding fiber diameter distribution (Figure 3i–l). Table 4 shows the average diameter and standard deviation of the membranes. M-PP/TiO2-0 is composed of fibers with an average diameter of about 2 µm and has a smooth surface. With the addition of TiO2, M-PP/TiO2 is composed of fibers with different diameters, and some fibers are coalesced obviously, which is ascribed to the presence of TiO2. During melt-blowing, TiO2 of a small particle size is enwrapped in the fibers, whereas some agglomerated TiO2 particles protrude the fibers and are responsible for the rough fiber surface.

3.3. XRD and FTIR Analysis of PP/TiO2 Melt-Blown Membrances

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of TiO2, M-PP/TiO2-0, and M-PP/TiO2-3 are shown in Figure 4a–c. The XRD pattern of M-PP/TiO2-0 predominantly consists of α -phase with (110), (040), and (130) characteristic peaks at 2 θ = 14°, 17°, and 18.6°, respectively (Figure 4b,c). TiO2 has (101), (004), and (200) characteristic peaks corresponding to 25.37°, 37.88°, and 48.12° (Figure 4a). All of these characteristic peaks can be observed from M-PP/TiO2-3 in Figure 4c. This result indicates that TiO2 is successfully loaded on the melt-blown membrane. The surface composition of the membranes is further analyzed by FTIR, as shown in Figure 4d. For the M-PP/TiO2 membranes, the peaks at 2950 and 2917 cm−1 are respectively assigned to the –CH3 and –CH2– asymmetric stretching vibrations, respectively; those at 2873 and 2840 cm−1 correspond to the –CH3 and –CH2– symmetric stretching vibrations, respectively; and those at 1459 and 1377 cm−1 correspond to –CH2– bending vibration and –CH3 symmetric deformation vibration, respectively. No additional XRD and FTIR characteristic peaks are found, which shows that the incorporation of TiO2 cannot change the crystal structure and chemical groups of the membrane compared with M-PP/TiO2-0.

3.4. Oil/Water Separation of PP/TiO2 Melt-Blown Membranes

A high selective wettability for oil and water is another crucial factor for oil/water separation materials [36]. The wettability of M-PP/TiO2 is determined by the water contact angle measurements. Figure 5a shows the contact angle observation of the membranes, and the accurate contact angle is shown in Table 5. M-PP/TiO2-0 has a contact angle of 140°, representing good hydrophobicity. Although high TiO2 contents decrease the water contact angle, it remains beyond 130°. Therefore, the membranes possess hydrophobicity, and the presence of TiO2 does not impact their wettability. Moreover, the oil (i.e., kerosene) and organic solvent (i.e., petroleum ether, n-hexane, and acetone) contact angle of the membranes is 0° (Figure 5b), suggesting super lipophilicity. The contact angle of the acetone drops on the filtration membrane gradually increases with increasing TiO2 content. When the ratio of acetone and water is 3:2, the contact angle of acetone solution in M-PP/TiO2-0 is 20°, whereas that in M-PP/TiO2-3 is 98°. The surface tension of the acetone-simulated organic pollutant solution is measured using a liquid surface tension tester (BZY-3B, Shanghai Hengping Instrument and Meter Factory) to confirm the interaction of TiO2 in the membrane and operating environment at organic pollutants. Figure 5c shows the surface tension of different acetone solutions. The surface tension of the solution decreases gradually with increasing acetone concentration, whereas the surface tension of the membranes decreases gradually with increasing TiO2 content to meet the different surface tensions of liquid filtration.
According to Young equation, the wetting angle of a droplet is related to the surface tension of the solid–gas, liquid–gas, and liquid–solid interfaces. For the same droplet, the liquid surface tension is constant. The greater the contact angle, the greater the difference between the surface tension of the solid–gas and solid–liquid interfaces. As a result, the introduction of TiO2 changes the surface tension of the membranes.
γ s g γ s l = γ l g c o s θ ,
where γ s g is the surface tension of the solid–gas interface, γ s l is the surface tension of the solid–liquid interface, γ l g is the surface tension of the liquid–gas interface, and θ is the contact angle.
M-PP/TiO2 exhibits both hydrophobicity and super lipophilicity and thus can be applied to oil/water separation. A simple oil/water separation equipment is assembled, and its separation process is shown in Figure 6. The membrane is affixed between two glass containers, after which the water/kerosene mixture is poured into the upper container slowly. With the help of gravity, kerosene can permeate through the membrane and reach the lower glass container, during which water is intercepted and stays over the melt-blown membrane. No other external forces are applied. As a result, oil is separated from water effectively, which proves that the separation process can be easily conducted with a low energy cost.
Afterward, the oil/water separation performance of M-PP/TiO2 is computed to obtain the oil–water separation efficiency (ηs). Figure 7a shows that the separation efficiency of the membranes is influenced by TiO2 content. The separation efficiency is between 95–98%, suggesting effective oil/water separation. Noticeably, the membranes retain their oil/water separation capability even after 100 repeated tests. The test result proves that the proposed membranes have a high stability (Figure 7b). Importantly, the separation efficiency is not dependent on the TiO2 content when the test is conducted under gravity. The oil flux (F) can be yielded using the following Equation (3):
F = V S t ,
where V is the volume of kerosene (i.e., V = 50 mL), S is the effective geometric area (1256 mm2), and t is the time required.
The oil flux of the PP/TiO2 membranes is 14,789–15,410 L·m−2·h−1 as shown in Figure 7c, which is higher than those of the stainless filtering net-based membranes and electrospinning membranes [37].

3.5. Photocatalysis of PP/TiO2 Melt-Blown Membranes

Figure 8 shows the photocatalysis of the F-PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes. Rhodamine B solution almost does not decompose under UV light irradiation [38]. Therefore, rhodamine B is selected as a model organic pollutant to study the photocatalytic performance of the F-PP/TiO2 membranes. Figure 8a shows the photocatalysis of the melt-blown membrane-decomposed rhodamine B solution. The melt-blown membranes composed of high TiO2 amounts demonstrate greater photocatalysis, which is lower than that of pure TiO2. This phenomenon can be attributed to two reasons. For one thing, the melt-blown membranes are hydrophobic, and the polluted sample and photocatalyst may not have sufficient contact during the photocatalysis. For another, some TiO2 particles are enwrapped in the PP melt-blown membranes or fibers, which deprives TiO2 of its possibility to directly contact with light sources. Therefore, the membranes demonstrate a low photocatalysis.
Kerosene is used as the contaminant to testify the major factor affecting the photocatalysis of the membranes. The membranes possess a good lipophilic property and thus have good wettability. Figure 8b shows the spectrum of kerosene before/after photocatalysis. Kerosene demonstrates C–H stretching at 3000–2850 cm−1 and C–H vibration at 1465–1340 cm−1, which indicates strong characteristic peak. When the TiO2 content is increased, the intensity of the characteristic peak gradually declines. The photocatalysis of the PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes is dependent on the content of TiO2 distributed over the fibers. When the TiO2 content is 3% or 5%, the photocatalytic effect is similar, which proves that the TiO2 content in the membranes is similar. Combined with the SEM image (Figure 3), when the TiO2 content is 3%, the membranes show higher photocatalytic effect and better morphology.

4. Conclusions

In this study, TiO2 and PP are melt-blended to form PP/TiO2 master batches using a single-screw extruder, after which the master batches are prepared into PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes. The thermal properties of PP/TiO2 master batches and the melt-blown membrane morphology are characterized. DSC shows that the presence of TiO2 accelerates crystallization rate, providing the master batch with high crystallinity. Similarly, TGA results show that the presence of TiO2 enhances the thermostability of PP, and the thermal decomposition temperature is proportional to the content of TiO2 and reaches the required temperature of 180–230 °C. SEM images show that TiO2 is evenly dispersed in the PP matrices due to multiple melt-blending processes. In addition, TiO2 provides the fibers with a large diameter and a rough surface, which makes the fiber web fluffy. TiO2 also contributes photocatalytic activity to the membranes and a great amount of kerosene flux, leading to high water/oil separation efficiency. Moreover, the membranes can be used repeatedly and maintain stabilized filtering efficacy. The membranes remain stable after 6 h of ultraviolet irradiation, indicating that TiO2 does not degrade PP. The proposed melt-blown membranes are suitable for mass production for separating oil from water in massively industrial dyeing wastewater.

Author Contributions

In this study, the concepts and designs for the experiment are supervised by J.-H.L. and C.-W.L. Experiment and data processing are conducted by F.S. and H.R. Text composition and results analysis are performed by T.-T.L. and F.S. The experimental result is examined by Q.J., H.-K.P., and Q.L.

Funding

This work was supported by the Open Project Program of Fujian Key Laboratory of Novel Functional Fibers and Materials (Minjiang University), China (No. FKLTFM 1722), National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 51503145, 21806121, and 11702187]; the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City [grant numbers 18JCQNJC03400 and 17JCQNJC08000]; the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [grant numbers 2018J01504, 2018J01505]; the Opening Project of Green Dyeing and Finishing Engineering Research Center of Fujian University (2017001A, 2017001B, 2017002B, and 2017004B), the Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Tianjin [grant number TD13-5043].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, P.; Xu, Z. Mineral-Coated Polymer Membranes with Superhydrophilicity and Underwater Superoleophobicity for Effective Oil/Water Separation. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ali, N.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, H.; Zaman, W.; Li, X.; Li, W.; Zhang, Q. Interfacially active and magnetically responsive composite nanoparticles with raspberry like structure; synthesis and its applications for heavy crude oil/water separation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2015, 472, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shi, Z.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, F.; Liu, X.; Wang, D.; Jin, J.; Jian, L. Ultrafast Separation of Emulsified Oil/Water Mixtures by Ultrathin Free-Standing Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Network Films. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2422–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ventikos, N. A high-level synthesis of oil spill response equipment and countermeasures. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004, 107, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Calcagnile, P.; Fragouli, D.; Bayer, I.S.; Anyfantis, G.C.; Martiradonna, L.; Cozzoli, P.D.; Cingolani, R.; Athanassiou, A. Magnetically Driven Floating Foams for the Removal of Oil Contaminants from Water. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 5413–5419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dong, X.; Chen, J.; Ma, Y.; Wang, J.; Chan-Park, M.B.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.; Huang, W.; Chen, P. Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic hybrid foam of graphene and carbon nanotube for selective removal of oils or organic solvents from the surface of water. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 166–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, J.; Seeger, S. Polyester Materials with Superwetting Silicone Nanofilaments for Oil/Water Separation and Selective Oil Absorption. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 4699–4704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, P. Smart surfaces with switchable superoleophilicity and superoleophobicity in aqueous media: Toward controllable oil/water separation. NPG Asia Mater. 2012, 4, e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Adebajo, M.O.; Frost, R.L.; Kloprogge, J.T.; Carmody, O.; Kokot, S. Porous Materials for Oil Spill Cleanup: A Review of Synthesis and Absorbing Properties. J. Porous Mater. 2003, 10, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhou, Y.; Li, J.; Luo, Z. PhotoATRP-Based Fluorinated Thermosensitive Block Copolymer for Controllable Water/Oil Separation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 10714–10722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cao, Y.; Liu, N.; Fu, C.; Li, K.; Tao, L.; Feng, L.; Wei, Y. Thermo and pH Dual-Responsive Materials for Controllable Oil/Water Separation. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces 2014, 6, 2026–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, B.; Guo, Z. pH-responsive bidirectional oil–water separation material. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 9416–9418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Teng, C.; Lu, X.; Ren, G.; Zhu, Y.; Wan, M.; Jiang, L. Underwater Self-Cleaning PEDOT-PSS Hydrogel Mesh for Effective Separation of Corrosive and Hot Oil/Water Mixtures. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 1, 1400099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao, T.; Zhang, D.; Yu, C.; Jiang, L. Facile Fabrication of a Polyethylene Mesh for Oil/Water Separation in a Complex Environment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 24186–24191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, J.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Luo, Z. Electrospun Fibrous Mat with pH-Switchable Superwettability That Can Separate Layered Oil/Water Mixtures. Langmuir 2016, 32, 13358–13366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fang, W.; Liu, L.; Li, T.; Dang, Z.; Qiao, C.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y. Electrospun N-Substituted Polyurethane Membranes with Self-Healing Ability for Self-Cleaning and Oil/Water Separation. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 878–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nakata, K.; Fujishima, A. TiO2 photocatalysis: Design and applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 2012, 13, 169–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Murakami, T.; Fujishima, A. Sol–gel SiO2/TiO2 bilayer films with self-cleaning and antireflection properties. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2008, 92, 1434–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pan, J.H.; Wang, X.Z.; Huang, Q.; Shen, C.; Koh, Z.Y.; Wang, Q.; Engel, A.; Bahnemann, D.W. Large-scale Synthesis of Urchin-like Mesoporous TiO2 Hollow Spheres by Targeted Etching and Their Photoelectrochemical Properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, C.; Ma, W.; Zhao, J. Semiconductor-mediated photodegradation of pollutants under visible-light irradiation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 4206–4219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, Z.; Chen, C.; Wu, F.; Zou, B.; Zhao, M.; Wang, J.; Feng, C. Photodegradation of rhodamine B under visible light by bimetal codoped TiO2 nanocrystals. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jo, S.; Kim, Y. Superhydrophilic–underwater superoleophobic TiO2-coated mesh for separation of oil from oily seawater/wastewater. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 33, 3203–3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, J.; Yan, L.; Hu, W.; Li, D.; Zha, F.; Lei, Z. Facile fabrication of underwater superoleophobic TiO2 coated mesh for highly efficient oil/water separation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 489, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Singh, S.; Mahalingam, H.; Singh, P.K. Polymer-supported titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental remediation: A review. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013, 462–463, 178–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, T.; Huang, X. Air drawing of polymers in the melt blowing nonwoven process: Mathematical modelling. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2004, 12, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, T.; Huang, X. Modeling Polymer Air Drawing in the Melt Blowing Nonwoven Process. Text. Res. J. 2003, 73, 651–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Feng, J. Preparation and properties of poly(lactic acid) fiber melt blown non-woven disordered mats. Mater. Lett. 2017, 189, 180–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, L.; Xu, Z.; Song, C.; Gu, Q.; Sang, Y.; Lu, G.; Hu, H.; Li, F. Adsorption-filtration characteristics of melt-blown polypropylene fiber in purification of reclaimed water. Desalination 2006, 201, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hegde, R.R.; Bhat, G.S. Nanoparticle effects on structure and properties of polypropylene meltblown webs. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 115, 1062–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Song, X.; Zhou, S.; Wang, Y.; Kang, W.; Cheng, B. Mechanical properties and crystallization behavior of polypropylene non-woven fabrics reinforced with POSS and SiO2 nanoparticles. Fiber Polym. 2012, 13, 1015–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yu, B.; Han, J.; He, X.; Xu, G.; Ding, X. Effects of tourmaline particles on structure and properties of polypropylene filtration melt-blown nonwoven electrets. J. Macromol. Sci. B 2012, 51, 619–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, J.; Kang, R.; Tang, X.; She, H.; Yang, Y.; Zha, F. Superhydrophobic meshes that can repel hot water and strong corrosive liquids used for efficient gravity-driven oil/water separation. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 1–29. [Google Scholar]
  33. Jiang, Q.; Pei, X.; Wu, L.; Li, T.T.; Lin, J.H. UV resistance and water barrier properties of PP/PLA/MAH/TiO2 functional hybrid biocomposite films for packaging application. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2018, 37, 2971–2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mallakpour, S.; Barati, A. Efficient preparation of hybrid nanocomposite coatings based on poly(vinyl alcohol) and silane coupling agent modified TiO2 nanoparticles. Prog. Coat. 2011, 71, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yu, B.; Wang, M.; Sun, H.; Zhu, F.; Han, J.; Bhat, G. Preparation and properties of poly (lactic acid)/magnetic Fe3O4 composites and nonwovens. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 41929–41935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kota, A.K.; Kwon, G.; Choi, W.; Mabry, J.M.; Tuteja, A. Hygro-responsive membranes for effective oil–water separation. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Raza, A.; Ding, B.; Zainab, G.; El-Newehy, M.; Al-Deyab, S.S.; Yu, J. In situ cross-linked superwetting nanofibrous membranes for ultrafast oil–water separation. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014, 2, 10137–10145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liang, Y.; Wang, H.; Sanchez Casalongue, H.; Chen, Z.; Dai, H. TiO2 nanocrystals grown on graphene as advanced photocatalytic hybrid materials. Nano Res. 2010, 3, 701–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The melt-blowing process of polypropylene/titanium dioxide (PP/TiO2) melt-blown membranes.
Figure 1. The melt-blowing process of polypropylene/titanium dioxide (PP/TiO2) melt-blown membranes.
Polymers 11 00775 g001
Figure 2. Thermal properties of PP/TiO2 master batch. (a) DSC thermograms of first cooling processes; (b) DSC thermograms of second heating; (c) TG curves of PP/TiO2; (d) DTG curves of PP/TiO2.
Figure 2. Thermal properties of PP/TiO2 master batch. (a) DSC thermograms of first cooling processes; (b) DSC thermograms of second heating; (c) TG curves of PP/TiO2; (d) DTG curves of PP/TiO2.
Polymers 11 00775 g002
Figure 3. The fracture surfaces of PP/TiO2 hot-press film (a) F-PP/TiO2-0, (b) F-PP/TiO2-1, (c) F-PP/TiO2-3, (d) F-PP/TiO2-5; the SEM images of PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes (e) M-PP/TiO2-0, (f) M-PP/TiO2-1, (g) M-PP/TiO2-3 (h) M-PP/TiO2-5, and the fiber diameter of PP/TiO2 nonwovens (i) M-PP/TiO2-0, (j) M-PP/TiO2-1, (k) M-PP/TiO2-3, and (l) M-PP/TiO2-5.
Figure 3. The fracture surfaces of PP/TiO2 hot-press film (a) F-PP/TiO2-0, (b) F-PP/TiO2-1, (c) F-PP/TiO2-3, (d) F-PP/TiO2-5; the SEM images of PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes (e) M-PP/TiO2-0, (f) M-PP/TiO2-1, (g) M-PP/TiO2-3 (h) M-PP/TiO2-5, and the fiber diameter of PP/TiO2 nonwovens (i) M-PP/TiO2-0, (j) M-PP/TiO2-1, (k) M-PP/TiO2-3, and (l) M-PP/TiO2-5.
Polymers 11 00775 g003
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) TiO2; (b) M-PP/TiO2-0; (c) M-PP/TiO2-3; and (d) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of M-PP/TiO2 membranes.
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of (a) TiO2; (b) M-PP/TiO2-0; (c) M-PP/TiO2-3; and (d) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of M-PP/TiO2 membranes.
Polymers 11 00775 g004
Figure 5. (a) Contact angle of M-PP/TiO2 (m:n represent acetone/water (v/v)); (b) the oil and water drip on the melt-blown membrane (the red circle is kerosene, blue drop is water), and (c) the surface tension of different acetone solution.
Figure 5. (a) Contact angle of M-PP/TiO2 (m:n represent acetone/water (v/v)); (b) the oil and water drip on the melt-blown membrane (the red circle is kerosene, blue drop is water), and (c) the surface tension of different acetone solution.
Polymers 11 00775 g005
Figure 6. The oil-water separation process of M-PP/TiO2.
Figure 6. The oil-water separation process of M-PP/TiO2.
Polymers 11 00775 g006
Figure 7. (a) Oil/water separation efficiency (ηs) of melt-blown membranes as related to TiO2 content, (b) oil/water separation efficiency of M-PP/TiO2-3 as related to recycle numbers, and (c) gravity-driven kerosene flux of melt-blown membranes as related to TiO2 content.
Figure 7. (a) Oil/water separation efficiency (ηs) of melt-blown membranes as related to TiO2 content, (b) oil/water separation efficiency of M-PP/TiO2-3 as related to recycle numbers, and (c) gravity-driven kerosene flux of melt-blown membranes as related to TiO2 content.
Polymers 11 00775 g007
Figure 8. (a) The absorbance of rhodamine B along with time and (b) FTIR spectrum of kerosene photocatalysis PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes.
Figure 8. (a) The absorbance of rhodamine B along with time and (b) FTIR spectrum of kerosene photocatalysis PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes.
Polymers 11 00775 g008
Table 1. The Processing parameters of melt-blending.
Table 1. The Processing parameters of melt-blending.
ParameterScrew 1 Temperature (°C)Screw 2 Temperature (°C)Screw 3 Temperature (°C)Nozzle Temperature (°C)Screw Speed (r/min)Pelletized Speed (r/min)
1802001901702132
Table 2. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results of melt-blown membranes.
Table 2. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results of melt-blown membranes.
SampleTmc (°C)Tg (°C)Tm (°C)Xc (%)
PP/TiO2-0113.6041.50164.9036.29
PP/TiO2-1115.0042.40162.5037.68
PP/TiO2-3115.8042.20163.3042.69
PP/TiO2-5116.0042.10161.9040.81
Table 3. TGA and DTG results of PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes.
Table 3. TGA and DTG results of PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes.
Sample TypeT0.05 (°C)T0.5 (°C)Tmax (°C)Remnant Mass (%)
PP/TiO2-0349.80418.13438.600.02
PP/TiO2-1350.70421.30440.400.84
PP/TiO2-3385.50450.40462.602.95
PP/TiO2-5399.30456.60466.605.11
Table 4. Diameter distribution of melt-blown membranes as related to the content of TiO2.
Table 4. Diameter distribution of melt-blown membranes as related to the content of TiO2.
SampleN TotalMeanStandard DeviationSum (μm)Minimum (μm)Median (μm)Maximum (μm)
M-PP/TiO2-0881.990.54175.370.941.863.56
M-PP/TiO2-11044.931.93512.802.464.439.72
M-PP/TiO2-3995.342.26529.081.745.229.91
M-PP/TiO2-5935.781.95537.761.746.099.84
Table 5. The contact angle of acetone solution at PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes.
Table 5. The contact angle of acetone solution at PP/TiO2 melt-blown membranes.
Acetone:Water (v/v)M-PP/TiO2-0M-PP/TiO2-1M-PP/TiO2-3M-PP/TiO2-5
0:5140138134132
1:4116130132132
2:3109116120124
3:220597698

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, F.; Li, T.-T.; Ren, H.; Jiang, Q.; Peng, H.-K.; Lin, Q.; Lou, C.-W.; Lin, J.-H. PP/TiO2 Melt-Blown Membranes for Oil/Water Separation and Photocatalysis: Manufacturing Techniques and Property Evaluations. Polymers 2019, 11, 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050775

AMA Style

Sun F, Li T-T, Ren H, Jiang Q, Peng H-K, Lin Q, Lou C-W, Lin J-H. PP/TiO2 Melt-Blown Membranes for Oil/Water Separation and Photocatalysis: Manufacturing Techniques and Property Evaluations. Polymers. 2019; 11(5):775. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050775

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Fei, Ting-Ting Li, Haitao Ren, Qian Jiang, Hao-Kai Peng, Qi Lin, Ching-Wen Lou, and Jia-Horng Lin. 2019. "PP/TiO2 Melt-Blown Membranes for Oil/Water Separation and Photocatalysis: Manufacturing Techniques and Property Evaluations" Polymers 11, no. 5: 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050775

APA Style

Sun, F., Li, T. -T., Ren, H., Jiang, Q., Peng, H. -K., Lin, Q., Lou, C. -W., & Lin, J. -H. (2019). PP/TiO2 Melt-Blown Membranes for Oil/Water Separation and Photocatalysis: Manufacturing Techniques and Property Evaluations. Polymers, 11(5), 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11050775

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop