Next Article in Journal
Functionalization of Partially Bio-Based Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) by Blending with Fully Bio-Based Poly(Amide) 10,10 and a Glycidyl Methacrylate-Based Compatibilizer
Next Article in Special Issue
Biodegradable Oligoesters of ε-Caprolactone and 5-Hydroxymethyl-2-Furancarboxylic Acid Synthesized by Immobilized Lipases
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrogel Functionalized Polyester Fabrics by UV-Induced Photopolymerization
Previous Article in Special Issue
A New Insight into the Comonomer Effect through NMR Analysis in Metallocene Catalysed Propene–co–1-Nonene Copolymers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Graphene Oxide and Oxidized Carbon Black as Catalyst for Crosslinking of Phenolic Resins

1
Department of Chemistry and Biology and INSTM Research Unit, Università di Salerno, 84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy
2
Pirelli Tyre SpA, Viale Sarca 222, 20126 Milano, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2019, 11(8), 1330; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081330
Submission received: 22 July 2019 / Revised: 7 August 2019 / Accepted: 7 August 2019 / Published: 10 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Catalytic Polymerization)

Abstract

:
Influence of different graphite-based nanofillers on crosslinking reaction of resorcinol, as induced by hexa(methoxymethyl)melamine, is studied. Curing reactions leading from low molecular mass compounds to crosslinked insoluble networks are studied by indirect methods based on Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Reported results show a catalytic activity of graphene oxide (eGO) on this reaction, comparable to that one already described in the literature for curing of benzoxazine. For instance, for an eGO content of 2 wt %, the exothermic crosslinking DSC peak (upon heating at 10 °C/min) shifted 6 °C. More relevantly, oxidized carbon black (oCB) is much more effective as catalyst of the considered curing reaction. In fact, for an oCB content of 2 wt %, the crosslinking DSC peak can be shifted more than 30 °C and a nearly complete crosslinking is already achieved by thermal treatment at 120 °C. The possible origin of the higher catalytic activity of oCB with respect to eGO is discussed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Polymer nanocomposites have attracted a great interest from researchers, due to significant increase of properties obtained with low amounts of nano-dispersed fillers. Nanographite and graphene nanoplatelets have been largely studied as fillers for polymer nanocomposites [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Graphene is generally dispersed in various polymer matrices as reduced graphene oxide. Polymer matrices reinforced with graphene and nano-graphite platelets present higher electrical and thermal conductivity, improved strength, modulus, heat distortion temperature and barrier properties.
Many studies have been devoted to nanocomposites with epoxy matrices and graphite nanofillers. Some of these studies have shown a catalytic activity of graphene oxide and of oxidized carbon black on the reaction between the epoxy and amine groups of the resin, leading to higher crosslinking density in milder conditions [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. This catalytic activity, suggested by the well-established catalytic behavior of graphene oxide for many organic reactions [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32], has been proved by experiments on the epoxide ring opening reaction, for monofunctional epoxide and amine reactants, which lead to an uncrosslinked product being suitable for full chemical characterization [17,19].
Many studies have been also devoted to nanocomposites with graphite nanofillers in different kinds of phenolic resins [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. One of these studies [39] has clearly shown that reduced graphene oxide (r-GO) can enhance mechanical properties and thermal stability of composites. Moreover, a study on benzoxazine-based composites has shown that addition of a few weight percent of graphene oxide accelerates the ring opening reactions leading to not only a decrease in cure temperature, but also to improvements of thermal stability [42].
In the present paper, the possible catalytic activity of graphene oxide and of oxidized carbon black on the crosslinking reaction of resorcinol, as induced by hexa(methoxymethyl)melamine (HMMM), is investigated (Figure 1). As in previous reports [16,19,42], the kinetic studies are mainly based on isothermal and non-isothermal scans by Differential Scanning Calorimetry.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

The hexa(methoxymethyl)melamine (HMMM) was Cyrez 963 from Allnex (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) and resorcinol was Rhenogran Resorcinol 80 from Rhein Chemie (Mannheim, Germany).
Synthetic Graphite 8427® with a high surface area (HSAG, of about 308 m2/g) and a high shape anisotropy of the crystallites [41] was purchased from Asbury Graphite Mills Inc (Asbury, NJ, USA).
Two different carbon black samples, with designated grades N110 and N234 according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)/D1765, and exhibiting BET surface areas of 151 m2/g and 125 m2/g, respectively, were purchased from Cabot (Alpharetta, GA, USA).
All other standard reagents were bought from Aldrich.

2.2. Procedures

Preparation of GO and oCB Samples

Graphite oxide (GO) and oxidized carbon black (oCB) were prepared by Hummers’ method [43]. A total of 120 mL of sulfuric acid and 2.5 g of sodium nitrate were introduced into a 2000 mL three-neck round-bottomed flask immersed into an ice bath and 5 g of carbon samples were added, with magnetic stirring. After obtaining a uniform dispersion, 15 g of potassium permanganate were added very slowly to minimize the risk of explosion. The reaction mixture was thus heated to 35 °C and stirred for 24 h. Deionized water (700 mL) was added in small amounts into the resulting black and dark green slurry for carbon black and graphite, respectively, under stirring and, finally, gradually adding 5 mL of H2O2 (30 wt %). The obtained sample was poured into 7 L of deionized water, and then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min with a Hermle Z 323 K centrifuge (Wehingen, Germany). The isolated GO and oCB powders were first washed twice with 100 mL of a 5 wt % HCl aqueous solution and subsequently washed with 500 mL of deionized water. Finally, powders were dried at 60 °C for 12 h. About 6 g of oCB and 7 g of GO powders were obtained.
Exfoliated graphite oxide (eGO) samples were prepared by GO powders introduced in 125 mL ceramic jars (inner diameter of 75 mm) together with stainless steel balls (10 mm in diameter) and dry-milled in a planetary ball mill Fritsch Pulverisette 7 for 2 h with a milling speed of 500 rpm and a ball-to-powder mass ratio of 10 to 1.
Carbon nanofillers and resorcinol were dispersed in HMMM by mechanical stirring.

2.3. Characterization Techniques

2.3.1. Elemental Analysis

Elemental analyses were conducted by a Thermo FlashEA 1112 Series CHNS-O analyzer (Waltham, MA, USA). The analyzed samples were pretreated in an oven for 12 h at 100 °C.
Elemental analysis of the obtained graphite oxide, graphene oxide and oxidized carbon black samples are reported in Table 1.

2.3.2. Wide-Angle X-ray Diffraction

Wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) patterns were obtained by an automatic Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer (Karlsruhe, Germany), in reflection, at 35 KV and 40 mA, using nickel filtered Cu-Kα radiation (1.5418 Å). The d-spacings were calculated using Bragg’s law and the observed integral breadths (βobs) were determined by a fit with a Lorentzian function of the intensity corrected diffraction patterns. The instrumental broadening (βinst) was also determined by fitting of Lorentzian function to line profiles of a standard silicon powder 325 mesh (99%). For each observed reflection, the corrected integral breadths were determined by subtracting the instrumental broadening of the closest silicon reflection from the observed integral breadths, β = βobs − βinst. The correlation lengths (D) were determined using Scherrer’s equation:
D = K λ β cos θ
where λ is the wavelength of the incident X-rays and 2θ the diffraction angle, assuming the Scherrer constant K = 1.

2.3.3. FTIR Spectra

FTIR spectra were obtained with a FTIR (BRUKER Vertex70, Ettlingen, Germany) spectrometer equipped with a deuterated triglycine sulfate (DTGS) detector and a KBr beam splitter, at a resolution of 2.0 cm−1. The frequency scale was internally calibrated to 0.01 cm−1 using a He-Ne laser. A total of 32 scans were signal averaged to reduce the noise. Spectra of powder samples were collected by using potassium bromide (KBr) pellets.

2.3.4. Differential Scanning Calorimetry

The reactivity of filled and unfilled phenolic resin was measured using a differential scanning calorimeter (TA instruments DSC Q2000, New Castle, DE, USA).

3. Results

3.1. X-ray Diffraction and FTIR Characterizations of the Graphite-Based Nanofillers

X-ray diffraction patterns of the graphite-based fillers used in the present study are reported in Figure 2. The used high-surface-area graphite (HSAG with a negligible oxygen content, Figure 2a) shows an interlayer distance of 0.34 nm, and a high shape anisotropy (d/d = 3.1) [44]. The X-ray diffraction pattern of the derived graphite oxide (GO, with an O/C weight ratio of 0.71) shows an increase of the interlayer distance from 0.34 nm to 0.84 nm (Figure 2b). The correlation length perpendicular to the layers (as evaluated from the first 00l reflection) decreases from 9.8 nm to 4.2 nm, while the in-plane correlation length (as evaluated from the 100 reflection) remains almost unchanged (d ≈ 30 nm), thus leading to an increased shape anisotropy up to d/d = 7. The X-ray diffraction pattern of graphene oxide (eGO, Figure 2c), as derived by ball-milling of graphite oxide shows the complete disappearance of the 001 and 004 reflections and maintenance of 100 and 110 reflections, confirming the maintenance of in-plane crystalline order and complete loss of crystalline order perpendicular to the graphitic planes, i.e., a complete graphite oxide exfoliation. The WAXD pattern of one of the considered oCB samples (CB N110) and of the corresponding oxidized sample are shown in Figure 2d,e, respectively. As discussed in detail in Reference [45], these patterns can be interpreted as a disordered spatial arrangement of graphene and graphene oxide layers, exhibiting short in-plane correlation lengths. For instance, the in-plane correlation length, as evaluated on the basis of the half-height-width of the 100 reflections in Equation (1), is equal to 26 nm and 4 nm for the graphene oxide and oxidized oCB samples of Figure 2c,e, respectively.
FTIR spectra of the considered carbon materials are collected in Figure 3. It is apparent that the spectra of the oCB samples (Figure 3d,e) are much better resolved than the spectra of graphite oxide (Figure 3b) and of graphene oxide (Figure 3c). This is, of course, related to their much shorter in-plane correlation length, i.e., much smaller lateral size of the oxidized graphene layers, as pointed out by the WAXD patterns of Figure 2.

3.2. DSC Study of Crosslinking of the Phenolic Resin

The DSC scan of neat resin with a weight ratio resorcinol/HMMM equal to 1 is shown in Figure 4a. The scan shows a crosslinking exothermic peak with an enthalpy change of nearly 270 J/g whose maximum is located at 173 °C.
The addition to the mixture of 2 wt % of GO affects the position of the exothermic peak, whose maximum shifts down to 167 °C (Figure 4b). An analogous behavior has been described in the literature for curing of benzoxazine, whose crosslinking peak shifts from 261 °C to 250 °C, due to an addition to the resin of 1 wt % of GO [42]. The influence of oCB on the studied crosslinking reaction is much stronger. In fact, as shown for two oCB samples, the exothermic peaks maintain nearly the same area but become much broader and are largely shifted toward lower temperatures (Figure 4c,d). In particular, for the oCB samples with an O/C ratio and S content similar to those of the used eGO sample, the peak maximum moves down to 148 °C (Figure 4c). The exothermic peak is further moved to 141 °C, by using the oCB sample with a higher O/C weight ratio (Figure 4d).
It is worth noting the presence of small superimposed endothermic peaks, roughly located at 175 °C (Figure 4c,d), typical of oxidized carbon black, as for instance shown by DSC scans of Figure 3 of Reference [45].
DSC scans of the resin with a weight ratio resorcinol/HMMM equal to 1 and with different amounts of oCB-N110, i.e., with the oCB sample with a higher O/C ratio, are shown in Figure 5. A remarkable influence of the carbon filler on resin crosslinking is clearly present also for a content of 1 wt %, with peak broadening and a shift of its maximum down to 150 °C (Figure 5b). The influence of the carbon filler on resin crosslinking becomes instead negligible for an oCB content as low as 0.2 wt % (Figure 5a).
Exothermic peak positions (Tpeak) and peak shifts (ΔT = Tpeak(unfilled) − Tpeak(filled)), as taken from DSC scans of Figure 4 and Figure 5, are collected in the 2nd and 3rd columns of Table 2.
Also informative are DSC scans of the same phenolic resin after isothermal curing at different temperatures. These kinds of scans allow obtaining quantitative evaluation of the degree of crosslinking (α) achieved by isothermal crystallization.
DSC scans of resorcinol/HMMM, 1/1 resins after treatment at 120 °C for 30 min are shown in Figure 6, for the case of the neat resin as well as of resins containing 2 wt % of different oxidized carbon fillers. It is apparent that in all cases the enthalpy of the exothermic crosslinking peak is heavily reduced. In fact, for the neat resin, the enthalpy of the peak reduces from 270 J/g to 117 J/g, indicating that nearly 60% of the crosslinking reaction had already occurred at 120 °C. It is also apparent that the presence of the carbon nanofillers (mainly of the oxidized CB) strongly reduces the area of the exothermic peaks and hence of the residual crosslinking.
DSC scans like those of Figure 6 can be used to evaluate the degree of crosslinking (α) after the isothermal treatment, simply by evaluating the enthalpy of the residual exothermic peak (ΔHres) and applying the equation
α = (ΔHunannealed − ΔHres)/ΔHunannealed,
where ΔHunannealed is the enthalpy of the exothermic peaks in dynamic scans. For our resin and for the considered resorcinol/HMMM 1/1 weight ratio, ΔHunannealed = 270 J/g.
Residual crosslinking enthalpies after isothermal treatment at 120 °C for 30 min (ΔHres) as taken by DSC scans like those of Figure 6 are collected in the 4th column of Table 2. Degrees of crosslinking (α) after the considered isothermal treatment, as calculated from ΔHres by using Equation (2), are collected in the 5th column of Table 2.
Scans of Figure 6 and data of Table 2 clearly show that the addition of 2 wt % of oCB-N110 is sufficient to achieve a nearly complete crosslinking already at 120 °C, while in the same conditions the neat resin has only reached a degree of crosslinking close to 60%.
The reported data clearly show that oxidized carbon black samples are much more efficient than graphene oxide as catalysts of crosslinking of the considered phenolic resin. The reported data also show that the higher catalytic activity is not due to the amount of oxidized groups. In fact, oCB N234, exhibiting an O/C weight ratio lower than for the considered eGO and similar sulfur amount (Table 1), leads to a much higher reduction of crosslinking peak temperature.
WAXD (Figure 2) and FTIR (Figure 3) characterizations of the used nanofillers suggest that the higher catalytic activity of oCB samples, with respect to GO samples, is possibly due to the higher exposure of the active oxidized groups on smaller and more defective graphene layers of oCB.

4. Conclusions

The influence of different oxidized graphite-based nanofillers (graphene oxide and oxidized carbon black) on the crosslinking reaction of a phenolic resin, constituted by resorcinol and hexa(methoxymethyl)melamine, was studied.
Curing reactions leading from low molecular mass compounds to crosslinked insoluble networks were studied by Differential Scanning Calorimetry by scans on as-mixed resins as well as on isothermally treated resins.
DSC scans show a catalytic activity of graphene oxide (eGO) on the considered crosslinking reaction, comparable to one already described in the literature for curing of benzoxazine. For instance, for an eGO content of 2 wt %, the exothermic crosslinking DSC peak (upon heating at 10 °C/min) is shifted from 173 °C to 167 °C.
The main result of this paper is that oxidized carbon black samples are much more effective than eGO as catalyst of the curing reaction. In fact, for the oCB sample exhibiting a comparable O/C ratio (0.58 vs. 0.62), for the same content in the resin (2 wt %), the crosslinking DSC peak is shifted nearly 25 °C, rather than 6 °C. This shift also becomes bigger (32 °C) by using an oCB sample with a higher O/C weight ratio (O/C = 0.83 by wt). The reported study also shows that, by using an oCB content of 2 wt %, an isothermal treatment at 120 °C is sufficient to get complete resin crosslinking, while in the same conditions the sample with eGO only reaches a degree of crosslinking close to 60%.
FTIR and WAXD characterizations of the used carbon nanofillers suggest that the higher catalytic activity of oCB, with respect to eGO, is possibly due to higher exposure of active oxidized groups on smaller and more defective graphene layers of oCB.

Author Contributions

L.G. and G.G. conceived of the presented idea. M.A. and M.M. verified the analytical methods. G.G. and M.A. supervised the findings of this work. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. A.V. and L.T. carried out the experiments. G.G. wrote the manuscript with support from A.V. and M.A. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis and manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Financial support by Pirelli Tyre Research Center and "Ministero dell’ Istruzione, dell’ Università e della Ricerca" is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, J.; Vaisman, L.; Marom, G.; Kim, J.K. Br Treated Graphite Nanoplatelets for Improved Electrical Conductivity of Polymer Composites. Carbon 2007, 45, 744–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Terenzi, A.; Vedova, C.; Lelli, G.; Mijovic, J.; Torre, L.; Valentini, L.; Kenny, J.M. Chemorheological Behaviour of Double-Walled Carbon Nanotube-Epoxy Nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Tech. 2008, 68, 1862–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yu, A.; Ramesh, P.; Sun, X.; Bekyarova, E.; Itkis, M.E.; Haddon, R.C. Enhanced Thermal Conductivity in A Hybrid Graphite Nanoplatelet-Carbon Nanotube Filler for Epoxy Composites. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 4740–4744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Veca, L.M.; Meziani, M.J.; Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Lu, F.; Zhang, P.; Lin, Y.; Fee, R.; Connell, J.W.; Sun, Y.P. Carbon Nanosheets for Polymeric Nanocomposites with High Thermal Conductivity. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2088–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liang, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Z.; Cai, J.; Zhang, C.; Gao, H.; Chen, Y. Electromagnetic Interference Shielding of Graphene/Epoxy Composites. Carbon 2009, 47, 922–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zaman, I.; Phan, T.T.; Kuan, H.-C.; Meng, Q.; La, L.T.B.; Luong, L.; Youssf, O.; Ma, J. Epoxy/Graphene Platelets Nanocomposites with Two Levels of Interface Strength. Polymer 2011, 52, 1603–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Steiner, S.; Busato, S.; Ermanni, P. Mechanical Properties and Morphology of Papers Prepared from Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Functionalized with Aromatic Amides. Carbon 2012, 50, 1713–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shahil, K.M.F.; Balandin, A.A. Graphene-Multilayer Graphene Nanocomposites as Highly Efficient Thermal Interface Materials. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Longo, S.; Mauro, M.; Daniel, C.; Musto, P.; Guerra, G. Rayleigh Scattering by Graphene-Oxide in Syndiotactic Polystyrene Aerogels. Carbon 2014, 77, 896–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guadagno, L.; Raimondo, M.; Vertuccio, L.; Mauro, M.; Guerra, G.; Lafdi, K.; Vivo, B.D.; Lamberti, P.; Spinelli, G.; Tucci, V. Optimization of Graphene-Based Materials Ouperforming Host Epoxy Matrices. Rsc Adv. 2015, 57, 36969–36978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. D’Urso, L.; Acocella, M.R.; Guerra, G.; Iozzino, V.; De Santis, F.; Pantani, R. PLA Melt Stabilization by High-Surface-Area Graphite and Carbon Black. Polymers 2018, 10, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bortz, D.R.; Heras, E.G.; Martin-Gullon, I. Impressive Fatigue Life and Fracture Toughness Improvements in Graphene Oxide/Epoxy Composites. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qiu, S.L.; Wang, C.S.; Wang, Y.T.; Liu, C.G.; Chen, X.Y.; Xie, H.F.; Huang, Y.A.; Cheng, R.S. Effects of Graphene Oxides on the Cure Behaviors of a Tetrafunctional Epoxy Resin. Expr. Polym. Lett. 2011, 5, 809–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, W.; Koh, K.L.; Lu, J.; Yang, L.; Phua, S.; Kong, J.; Chen, Z.; Lu, X. Simultaneous Catalyzing and Reinforcing Effects of Imidazole-Functionalized Graphene in Anhydride-Cured Epoxies. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 18395–18402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Park, J.K.; Kim, D.S. Effects of An Aminosilane and A Tetra-Functional Epoxy on the Physical Properties of Di-Functional Epoxy/Graphene Nanoplatelets Nanocomposites. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2014, 54, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mauro, M.; Acocella, M.R.; Corcione, C.E.; Maffezzoli, A.; Guerra, G. Catalytic Activity of Graphite-Based Nanofillers on Cure Reaction of Epoxy Resins. Polymer 2014, 55, 5612–5615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Acocella, M.R.; Corcione, C.E.; Giuri, A.; Maggio, M.; Maffezzoli, A.; Guerra, G. Graphene Oxide as A Catalyst for Ring Opening Reactions in Amine Crosslinking of Epoxy Resins. Rsc Adv. 2016, 6, 23858–23865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, X.; Jin, J.; Song, M.; Lin, Y. Effect of Graphene Oxide Sheet Size on the Curing Kinetics and Thermal Stability of Epoxy Resins. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 105303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Acocella, M.R.; Esposito Corcione, C.; Giuri, A.; Maggio, M.; Guerra, G.; Maffezzoli, A. Catalytic Activity of Oxidized Carbon Black and Graphene Oxide for the Crosslinking of Epoxy Resins. Polymers 2017, 9, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stasi, E.; Giuri, A.; La Villetta, M.; Cirillo, D.; Guerra, G.; Maffezzoli, A.; Ferraris, E.; Esposito Corcione, C. Catalytic Activity of Oxidized Carbon Waste Ashes for the Crosslinking of Epoxy Resins. Polymers 2019, 11, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sarvari, M.H.; Sharghi, H. Solvent-Free Catalytic Friedel-Crafts Acylation of Aromatic Compounds with Carboxylic Acids by Using a Novel Heterogeneous Catalyst System: P-Toluenesulfonic Acid/Graphite. Helv. Chim. Acta 2005, 88, 2282–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dreyer, D.R.; Jarvis, K.A.; Ferreira, P.J.; Bielawski, C.W. Graphite Oxide as a Dehydrative Polymerization Catalyst: A One-Step Synthesis of Carbon-Reinforced Poly (phenylene methylene) Composites. Macromolecules 2011, 44, 7659–7667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Verma, S.; Mungse, H.P.; Kumar, N.; Choudhary, S.; Jain, S.L.; Sain, B.; Khatri, O.P. Graphene Oxide: An Efficient and Reusable Carbocatalyst for Aza-Michael Addition of Amines to Activated Alkenes. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 12673–12675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dreyer, D.R.; Bielawski, C.W. Graphite Oxide as An Olefin Polymerization Carbocatalyst: Applications in Electrochemical Double Layer Capacitors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 3247–3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Acocella, M.R.; Mauro, M.; Falivene, L.; Cavallo, L.; Guerra, G. Inverting the Diastereoselectivity of the Mukaiyama-Michael Addition with Graphite-Based Catalysts. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 492–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Acocella, M.R.; Mauro, M.; Guerra, G. Regio- and Enantioselective Friedel-Crafts Reactions of Indoles to Epoxides Catalyzed by Graphene Oxide: A Green Approach. ChemSusChem 2014, 7, 3279–3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Navalon, S.; Dhakshinamoorthy, A.; Alvaro, M.; Antonietti, M.; Garcia, H. Active Sites on Graphene-Based Materials as Metal-Free Catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4501–4529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Villano, R.; Acocella, M.R.; Guerra, G. Oxidized Carbon Black as Catalysts for the Enamine Formation in Solvent-Free Conditions: A Green Strategy to Build the Benzodiazepine Scaffold. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 10559–10564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Acocella, M.R.; Maggio, M.; Ambrosio, C.; Aprea, N.; Guerra, G. Oxidized Carbon Black as An Activator of Transesterification Reactions under Solvent-Free Conditions. Acs Omega 2017, 2, 7862–7867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Navalón, S.; Herance, J.R.; Álvaro, M.; García, H. Covalently Modified Graphenes in Catalysis, Electrocatalysis and Photoresponsive Materials. Chem.-Eur.J. 2017, 23, 15233–15537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Navalón, S.; Herance, J.R.; Álvaro, M.; García, H. General Aspects in the Use of Graphenes in Catalysis. Mater. Horiz. 2018, 5, 363–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Acocella, M.R.; Guerra, G. Graphene-Based Carbocatalysts for Thermoset Polymers and for Diastereoselective and Enantioselective Organic Synthesis. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 2350–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Singh, A.P.; Garg, P.; Alam, F.; Singh, K.; Mathur, R.B.; Tandon, R.P.; Chandra, A.; Dhawan, S.K. Phenolic Resin-Based Composite Sheets Filled with Mixtures of Reduced Graphene Oxide, γ-Fe2O3 and Carbon Fibers for Excellent Electromagnetic Interference Shielding in the X-band. Carbon 2012, 50, 3868–3875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Si, J.; Li, J.; Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Jing, X. Enhanced Thermal Resistance of Phenolic Resin Composites at Low Loading of Graphene Oxide. Compos. Part. A: Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2013, 54, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Qian, Y.; Ismail, I.M.; Stein, A. Ultralight, High-Surface-Area, Multifunctional Graphene-Based Aerogels from Self-Assembly of Graphene Oxide and Resol. Carbon 2014, 68, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yuan, F.Y.; Zhang, H.-B.; Li, X.; Ma, H.L.; Li, X.Z.; Yu, Z.Z. In situ Chemical Reduction and Functionalization of Graphene Oxide for Electrically Conductive Phenol Formaldehyde Composites. Carbon 2014, 68, 653–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhou, J.; Yao, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wei, D.; Xu, T. Fabrication and Mechanical Properties of Phenolic Foam Reinforced with Graphene Oxide. Polym. Compos. 2014, 35, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Ouyang, Z.; Li, J.; Wei, G.; Su, Z. Interactive Oxidation–Reduction Reaction for the in Situ Synthesis of Graphene–Phenol Formaldehyde Composites with Enhanced Properties. Acs Appl. Mater. Interf. 2014, 6, 4254–4263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Han, H.; Jiang, C.; Huo, L.; Gao, J. Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Cationic Ring-Opening o-Cresol Formaldehyde Epoxy/Polyurethane Acrylate Composites Enhanced by Reducing Graphene Oxide. Polym. Bull. 2016, 73, 2227–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Park, G.W.; Jeon, S.K.; Yang, J.Y.; Choi, S.D.; Kim, G.J. Electrochemical Properties of Graphene Oxide/Resol Composites as Electrode Materials for Supercapacitor Applications. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2016, 16, 4320–4327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zheng, H.; Shao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Meng, G.; Liu, B. Reinforcing the Corrosion Protection Property of Epoxy Coating by Using Graphene Oxide-Poly (urea-formaldehyde) Composites. Corros. Sci. 2017, 123, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zeng, M.; Wang, J.; Li, R.; Liu, J.; Chen, W.; Xu, Q.; Gu, Y. The Curing Behavior and Thermal Property of Graphene Oxide/Benzoxazine Nanocomposites. Polymer 2013, 54, 3107–3116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hummers, W.S.; Offeman, R.E. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mauro, M.; Cipolletti, V.; Galimberti, M.; Longo, P.; Guerra, G. Chemically Reduced Graphite Oxide with Improved Shape Anisotropy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 24809–24813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Maggio, M.; Acocella, M.R.; Guerra, G. Intercalation Compounds of Oxidized Carbon Black. Rsc Adv. 2016, 6, 105565–105572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scheme of the crosslinking reaction of the used phenolic resin.
Figure 1. Scheme of the crosslinking reaction of the used phenolic resin.
Polymers 11 01330 g001
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns (Cu Kα) of the high-surface-area graphite (HSAG) (a), of the derived GO (b) and eGO (c), and of one of the used carbon black, CB N110 (d) and of the corresponding oxidized sample (e).
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns (Cu Kα) of the high-surface-area graphite (HSAG) (a), of the derived GO (b) and eGO (c), and of one of the used carbon black, CB N110 (d) and of the corresponding oxidized sample (e).
Polymers 11 01330 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra, in the wavenumber range 2000–400 cm−1, of the high-surface-area graphite (HSAG) (a), of the derived GO (b) and eGO (c), and of the oxidized carbon black samples, oCB N234 (d) and oCB N110 (e).
Figure 3. FTIR spectra, in the wavenumber range 2000–400 cm−1, of the high-surface-area graphite (HSAG) (a), of the derived GO (b) and eGO (c), and of the oxidized carbon black samples, oCB N234 (d) and oCB N110 (e).
Polymers 11 01330 g003
Figure 4. DSC scans at a heating rate of 10 °C/min for resorcinol/HMMM resins (for the weight ratio 1): (a) without filler; (bd) with 2 wt % of carbon filler: (b) eGO; (c) oCB-N234; and (d) oCB-N110.
Figure 4. DSC scans at a heating rate of 10 °C/min for resorcinol/HMMM resins (for the weight ratio 1): (a) without filler; (bd) with 2 wt % of carbon filler: (b) eGO; (c) oCB-N234; and (d) oCB-N110.
Polymers 11 01330 g004
Figure 5. DSC scans at a heating rate of 10 °C/min for resorcinol/HMMM resins (for the weight ratio 1) and different amounts of oCB-N110: (a) 0.2 wt %; (b) 1.0 wt %; and (c) 2.0 wt %.
Figure 5. DSC scans at a heating rate of 10 °C/min for resorcinol/HMMM resins (for the weight ratio 1) and different amounts of oCB-N110: (a) 0.2 wt %; (b) 1.0 wt %; and (c) 2.0 wt %.
Polymers 11 01330 g005
Figure 6. DSC scans at a heating rate of 10 °C/min for resorcinol/HMMM resins (for the weight ratio 1), after isothermal curing at 120 °C for 30 min: (a) without filler; (bd) with 2 wt % of carbon filler: (b) eGO; (c) oCB-N234; and (e) oCB-N110.
Figure 6. DSC scans at a heating rate of 10 °C/min for resorcinol/HMMM resins (for the weight ratio 1), after isothermal curing at 120 °C for 30 min: (a) without filler; (bd) with 2 wt % of carbon filler: (b) eGO; (c) oCB-N234; and (e) oCB-N110.
Polymers 11 01330 g006
Table 1. Elemental analysis of the obtained graphite oxide (GO), exfoliated graphene oxide (eGO) and of two oxidized carbon black (oCB) samples.
Table 1. Elemental analysis of the obtained graphite oxide (GO), exfoliated graphene oxide (eGO) and of two oxidized carbon black (oCB) samples.
SampleC (wt %)H (wt %)O (wt %)S (wt %)O/C
GO56.11.239.82.70.71
eGO59.40.637.12.60.62
oCB N23460.31.735.02.80.58
oCB N11050.32.341.75.40.83
Table 2. Peak positions (Tpeak) and peak shifts (ΔT) taken from dynamic DSC scans like those of Figure 3 and Figure 4. Residual crosslinking enthalpies after isothermal treatment at 120 °C for 30 min (ΔHres), as taken by DSC scans like those of Figure 6. Degree of crosslinking (α) after the considered isothermal treatment was calculated from ΔHres by using Equation (2).
Table 2. Peak positions (Tpeak) and peak shifts (ΔT) taken from dynamic DSC scans like those of Figure 3 and Figure 4. Residual crosslinking enthalpies after isothermal treatment at 120 °C for 30 min (ΔHres), as taken by DSC scans like those of Figure 6. Degree of crosslinking (α) after the considered isothermal treatment was calculated from ΔHres by using Equation (2).
SampleTpeak (°C)ΔT (°C)ΔHres (J/g)α (%)
Neat Resin173-11757
oCB N110 0.2%173010860
eGO 2%16767572
oCB N110 1%150234085
oCB N234 2%148253189
oCB N110 2%14132797

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Acocella, M.R.; Vittore, A.; Maggio, M.; Guerra, G.; Giannini, L.; Tadiello, L. Graphene Oxide and Oxidized Carbon Black as Catalyst for Crosslinking of Phenolic Resins. Polymers 2019, 11, 1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081330

AMA Style

Acocella MR, Vittore A, Maggio M, Guerra G, Giannini L, Tadiello L. Graphene Oxide and Oxidized Carbon Black as Catalyst for Crosslinking of Phenolic Resins. Polymers. 2019; 11(8):1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Acocella, Maria Rosaria, Aniello Vittore, Mario Maggio, Gaetano Guerra, Luca Giannini, and Luciano Tadiello. 2019. "Graphene Oxide and Oxidized Carbon Black as Catalyst for Crosslinking of Phenolic Resins" Polymers 11, no. 8: 1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081330

APA Style

Acocella, M. R., Vittore, A., Maggio, M., Guerra, G., Giannini, L., & Tadiello, L. (2019). Graphene Oxide and Oxidized Carbon Black as Catalyst for Crosslinking of Phenolic Resins. Polymers, 11(8), 1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081330

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop