Next Article in Journal
Biodegradable Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) Antibacterial Nanocomposites Reinforced with MgO Nanoparticles
Next Article in Special Issue
Flexible Methyl Cellulose/Polyaniline/Silver Composite Films with Enhanced Linear and Nonlinear Optical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Applications of Electrospun Optically Transparent Fibrous Membrane
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/polym13040509
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study Analysis of Thermal, Dielectric, and Functional Characteristics of an Ethylene Polyethylene Diene Monomer Blended with End-of-Life Tire Microparticles Amounts

by
Marc Marín-Genescà
1,*,
Ramon Mujal-Rosas
2,
Jordi García-Amorós
3,
Miguel Mudarra
4,
Xavier Ramis Juan
5 and
Xavier Colom Fajula
6
1
Mechanical Engineering Department, Escola Tècnica Superior d’Enginyeria Química, Rovira i Virgili University, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
2
Electrical Engineering Department, Escola d’Enginyeria de Terrassa, Technical University of Catalonia, 08222 Terrassa, Spain
3
Electrical Engineering Department, Escola Tècnica Superior d’Enginyeria, Rovira i Virgili University, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
4
Physics Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08222 Terrassa, Spain
5
Machines and Thermal Motors Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08222 Terrassa, Spain
6
Chemical Engineering Department, Escola d’Enginyeria de Terrassa, Technical University of Catalonia, 08222 Terrassa, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(4), 509; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13040509
Submission received: 22 January 2021 / Revised: 1 February 2021 / Accepted: 3 February 2021 / Published: 8 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer-Based Dielectric Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The recycling and disposal of disused tires is a topic of great concern to today’s companies, researchers, and society in general. In this sense, our research aims to recycle end-of-life tires (GTRs) through the separation of the fraction of vulcanized rubber from the other compounds in order to later grind this fraction and separate it into lower particle sizes. Finally, we aim to incorporate these GTR particles as a filler of an ethylene-polyethylene-diene monomer (EPDM). The obtained composites with EPDM and GTR are tested (5%, 10%, 20%) comparing these values with neat EPDM as a control sample. Thermal tests such as differential calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) as well as dielectric tests (DEA) are performed in order to characterize these materials and check their viability as dielectric or semiconductor, for industrial use. It is checked how the presence of GTR increases functional properties such as conductivity/permittivity. The influence of temperature (40 to 120 °C) and addition of GTR particles in electrical properties has also been analyzed. The dielectric behavior of these composites is fully characterized, analyzing the different types of relaxation with increasing frequency (10 mHz to 3 MHz), using the electric modulus, and Argand diagrams among other measures. The influence of GTR and temperature in the dielectric and thermal behavior of these materials has been analyzed, where CB of GTR creates interfacial polarization phenomena in the dielectric behavior of the composite and increases the permittivity (real and imaginary) as well as the conductivity. Finally, with these obtained properties, the possible application of EPDM/GTR composites as industrial dielectrics has been studied.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The recycling of tires once they have ended their use or useful life is one of the great problems posed to the environment [1,2] due to the great worldwide proliferation of this waste type, with a global rubber production of over 30 million tons yearly [1]. The tires finally end the useful lifetime, forming part of landfills, often uncontrolled or without any control measures, where they release their components and cause first-order pollution. This fact has special incidence when these landfills are in the oceans and seas due to the decomposition acceleration and pollution to the environment in a relevant way, further affecting flora and fauna.
The major obstruction to the recycling of tires is the presence of crosslinked rubber in the composition of the tire, which makes any attempt to recycle through reprocessing with a simple heat treatment completely impossible [3,4]. There are numerous processes for recycling and recovery of this waste; we will analyze some of the proposals in this regard: energy recovery, due to the use as a fuel of parts of tires or rubber. Another recycling issue is the devulcanization or decrosslinking of the structures remaining in the rubber. This solution is certainly the optimum, as it would enable recycling and it is possible to manufacture new tires from used tires. These methods have a certain advantage, that is, to make possible the complete reuse of the rubber, but they are difficult because they combine different types of treatments of different complexity (i.e., microwaves, ultrasounds, thermomechanical or biological treatments) [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Due to the complexity, these different devulcanize methods need an intermediate step before being able to reprocess again the rubber, and many times they do not achieve devulcanization to 100%. This means that the rubber reticulated structures have difficulties admitting other material in the inner; although, with previous treatments it is possible to put fractions of waste rubber materials without metallic and textile fraction in polymeric matrices. These obtained composites can have several applications such as in playgrounds, or as elements for public works, in urban parks, and others [12,13,14,15]. In this case, recycling is much easier than devulcanization because it only requires the crushing and separation of the particles of GTR from whole components of tires [16,17]. This type of recycling denotes a big simplicity that allowed to obtain a great number of commodity applications.
This research is based on the addition of GTR microparticles (diameter particle <200 µm) in a nonpolar elastomeric polymer such as EPDM (Ethylene Polyethylene Diene Monomer), nonvulcanized. Thus, in this research, we will assess the possible interaction of GTR particles in an EPDM polymeric matrix and then analyze both thermally and dielectrically behavior. In addition, the potential of these samples has been studied for possible applications based on these performed and analyzed composites (EPDM and GTR). In dielectric behavior, it is known that the incorporation of carbon black (CB) produces an increase of conductivity in several analyzed polymer composites [18,19,20,21,22,23,24], so it is expected that the presence of CB in tires increases this parameter and improves a conductive behavior. EPDM rubbers are good insulators with a relatively high electrical resistivity [25], with nonpolar chemical groups in their polymeric structure. However, the electrical properties of composites are more dependent on the additives used in the composite blends than on the matrix elastomeric base, so it defines the insulation properties for the low/medium voltage range.
Recent research has demonstrated the presence of relaxation of Maxwell-Wagner-Sillars (MWS) [26,27,28] in composites with tire particles in thermoplastic polymer matrices [29,30,31,32]. The present research aims to fully characterize the dielectric behavior completely for the GTR particles reinforcement EPDM composites and demonstrate the existence of such MWS relaxations in these materials and their possible use in dielectrics or also in semiconductor industrial applications. To analyze the dielectric behavior, the Electrical Module (M) will be used in these composite materials, both for neat EPDM without any reinforcement (0% GTR) and for samples with different percentages of GTR (5%, 10%, 20% GTR), to investigate the behavior that has these materials with the addition of particles of GTR.

2. Materials and Samples Processing

2.1. Materials and Samples Preparation

Ethylene Propylene Diene Rubber (EPDM) used as a composite basis material is an elastomeric polymer that has good abrasion resistance and wears. The composition of this material contains 70% ethylene, being, in general, more resistant the higher the percentage of ethylene. It is very easy to process, making, with extreme agility, parts by extrusion, molding, however, in its processing (Brabender mixer machine, Brabender GmbH & Co, Duisburg, Germany). The materials used can be easily processed with standard plastic mixing machines, such as the Brabender Machine type WPL50EHT, as in the present research manuscript. The used grinding recycled tire (GTR), with different particle sizes (<700 μm), was provided by GMN (Gestió Mediambiental de Neumàtics, SL, Maials, Spain) and it has been tested by TGA analysis that the carbon black content is around 30%. The original GTR particles were screened into particles <200 μm in diameter, by sieving. There has been performed four different types of samples materials for the present research: the first one, was performed using only EPDM (100% EPDM), the other samples have been added a range of ground tire rubber particles in different compositions (5%, 10%, and 20% of GTR). Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) has been used without vulcanization, so any vulcanizing additive has been added to the formulation. The dienes generally range from 2.5% to up to 12% by weight. The qualities of this type of elastomer are its oxidation resistance. The incorporated diene in the polymerization phase makes it an elastomer that is difficult to oxidize, moreover its resistance to atmospheric agents is remarkable. Regarding heat resistance, the EPDM temperature range between −15 to 130 °C, and it can reach 140 °C (Table 1). This elastomer shows very notable resistance to water in general and good electrical resistance properties. About degradation, EPDM does not degrade or age easily and it is easy to process. EPDM elastomer used in the present research was acquired from Lanxess Chemicals, company, in pellets form, in 1–4 mm diameter granulated materials. The main characteristics of the EPDM used are in Table 1.

2.2. Compound Preparation Process

The GTR microparticles were selected employing a mechanical sieve with a diameter of less than 200 µm and dried in a forced-air oven at a temperature of 100 °C for 24 h. Subsequently, 4 samples of the composite material were prepared with GTR of compositions (0, 5%, 10%, 20%). The mixing process was done with a Brabender mixer-plastograph type W PL 50 EHT (Brabender GmbH & Co., Duisburg, Germany), at Processing Temperature (180 °C) to prevent polymer degradation, using a hot plate press in a Collin Mod. P 200 E (Dr. Collin GmbH, Germany). The laminates of the different base materials with GTR (150 mm × 150 mm × 2 mm) were obtained using a hot plate press at 200 bars, for 10 min. The cooling process was carried out with cold water under pressure until it reached room temperature, this process was carried out in the same press, under pressure, for 10 min. Samples were performed appropriately according to ASTM 150. A sample of the pure polymer (EPDM without GTR) was also prepared with the same requirements to obtain comparable results.

2.3. Test Methods

2.3.1. Morphology Analysis

The morphology analysis was performed with Quanta 600 Scanning Electron Microscope (FEI company, Hillsboro, OR, USA), at a level voltage of 20 kV, with no sputtering, and 200 and 630 magnifications. The Quanta 600 FEG (FEI company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) is a field emission scanning electron microscope capable of generating and collecting high-resolution and low-vacuum images. The microphotography obtained has been used for morphology analysis, and specifically to analyze the dispersion of GTR particles in the EPDM matrix samples and to study the cohesion and interaction between composites phase: GTR (reinforcement) and EPDM (elastomeric matrix).

2.3.2. Thermal Test Methods: TGA and DSC

The calorimetric analysis was performed using a Mettler DSC-822e calorimeter with a TSO801RO robotic arm, calibrated using an indium (heat flow calibration and temperature calibration) and zinc (temperature calibration) standards. Samples of approximately 10 mg of the mass were deposited in the aluminum pans under a nitrogen atmosphere to test performance from −75 to 150 °C at 10 °C/min. DSC was used to determine glass transition temperatures (Tg) and melting data. Tg’s were determined as the temperature of the half-way point of the jump in the heat capacity when the material changed from a glassy to a rubbery state and the error was estimated as ±1 °C. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA) was carried out with a Mettler TGA/SDTA 851e/LF/1100 thermobalance. Samples with an approximate mass of 10 mg were decomposed between 30 and 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min in N2 atmosphere (50 cm3/min measured in normal conditions). TGA was used to study the thermal stability of the formulations and to differentiate the different components of the formulations.

2.3.3. Dielectric Test Methods: DEA

The test specimens for electrical tests (ASTM D-150 [33]) are cylindrical with 25 mm diameter and 0.1 mm thickness. To perform the electrical tests, the DEA (Dynamic Electric Analysis, Novocontrol Technologies GmbH & Co, Montabaur, Germany) spectroscopic technique was used, introducing the assembly into a test chamber, whose function is to provide the required temperature. The parameters and dielectric magnitudes were measured through DEA dielectric test (Dielectric Analysis) [34,35] with a BDS40 by Novocontrol. Temperature control was carried out with a Novotherm system. Golden plated parallel electrodes with 2 cm diameter were used. Samples thickness was 1 mm. The measures were undertaken on a range of frequencies from 1 mHz and 3 MHz, and on 10 °C steps from 30 to 120 °C. Complex permittivity, modulus, and conductivity are calculated from the complex impedance tested.

3. Thermal and Morphological Results

3.1. Microphotography’s: Morphology Analysis

Figure 1 shows the complete dispersion of GTR particles in the EPDM elastomeric matrix in the sample of 20% GTR (Figure 1a,b) and 10% GTR (Figure 1c,d) with different magnification (200× and 630×). The dispersion analyzed with the images at 200 magnifications (Figure 1a,c) shows a suitable dispersion of particles in the sample, showing a homogeneous distribution of GTR in samples. On the other hand, Figure 1a,d shows a low interaction between GTR and EPDM elastomeric matrix. It can be explained due to lack of compatibility between both phases, therefore we can conclude that the two phases (GTR and EPDM) have a rather low affinity that explains the low interaction between GTR particles and the matrix, as can be described from the analyzed images.

3.2. Thermal Properties

3.2.1. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

Figure 2a shows the thermogravimetric curves for all formulations studied. It can be observed that the degradation took place in two steps except for a neat EPDM. These degradation steps can be easily assigned to the constituent parts because the second step appeared at the same temperature as the neat sample of 100% EPDM, in Figure 2b, observe the shoulders associated to GTR in the negative peaks of all non-neat formulations. The first decomposition step takes place at the temperature range of 350–400 °C, corresponds to the degradation of the GTR and the second degradation step occurring at the temperature range 450–500 °C can be attributed to the thermal decomposition of the EPDM. The weight loss associated with each degradation step correlates with the weight composition of samples. Figure 2 shows the TGA of EPDM/GTR samples, and it can observe that the thermogram moves to a lower temperature whit increasing GTR. This means that the sample is less stable and initiates the decomposition at a lower temperature. The initial decomposition temperature of the 80% EPDM decreases practically 100 °C, and it falls in the range of temperatures reported for reworkable materials. This result can be useful when it is necessary to decompose under controlled conditions to recover, for example, a substrate with higher added value, when EPDM/GTR composites are used as a coating.
In Figure 2b is checked the GTR degradation in the heating up to 500 °C which corresponds to the degradation of elastomers. Two minimums can be seen in GTR curve which means that there are two different elastomers in the GTR composition, the first one is natural rubber and the second is styrene-butadiene.

3.2.2. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

The polymeric materials are usually characterized by two main types of transition temperatures: the crystalline melting temperature Tm (or crystalline melting point) and the glass transition temperature Tg. The crystalline melting temperature is the melting temperature of the crystalline domains of a polymer sample. The glass transition temperature is the temperature at which the amorphous domains of a polymer changes from the glassy to the rubbery state. Semicrystalline polymers, such as EPDM, show a kind of transition. Tm is a first-order transition with a discontinuous change in the specific volume at the transition temperature. Tg is a second-order transition that involves only a change in the temperature coefficient of the specific volume. The two thermal transitions are generally affected in the same way by the molecular symmetry, the structural rigidity, and the secondary attractive forces of the polymer chains. By DSC, Tg is shown as a change in heat capacity and Tm as an endothermic peak.
Figure 3 shows the DSC thermograms at 10 °C/min of al formulations studied. It can be observed the Tg (glass transition) at low temperature (amorphous part) and the melting peak (crystalline part) at a higher temperature. Ethylene-Propylene-Diene-Monomer Rubber (EPDM) shows a semicrystalline behavior with values of Tg and Tm (Table 2) similar to the reported in the literature [36].
All the material samples analyzed give similar results. In this sense, the Tg and Tm hardly change with the GTR amount (Figure 3 and Table 2), which indicates the low interactions between EPDMA and GTR. Enthalpy of fusion slightly decreases on increasing GTR content according to the relative amount of both components in the formulation and to the amorphous character of GTR.

4. Dielectric Test Results

The dielectric response of polymeric materials at various frequencies can be described in terms of the complex relative permittivity εr*. To describe the effect of the polarization of the electrode and solve the relaxation at low frequencies, the term “electric modulus” was used. The electric modulus was introduced by McCrum et al. [37] and is used for the study of electrical relaxation phenomena in many polymers [38,39,40,41] and has been used for the present dielectric characterization and analysis. Electrical Modulus is defined by Equation (1), where M′ and M″ are, the real and imaginary part of the electrical modulus.
M r * = 1 ε r * = ε r ′ ε r ′ − j ε r ″ + j ε r ″ ε r ′ 2 + ε r ″ 2 = M r ′ + j M r ″
From the physical point of view, the electric modulus corresponds to the relaxation of the electric field in the material when the electric displacement remains constant so that the electric modulus represents the real dielectric relaxation process. Despite the fact that there is no additional information in the electric modulus, in the case of the conductive processes that are observed at low frequencies, the loss factor exhibits a sharp increase whereas the imaginary part of the electric modulus shows a peak, so that this function is suitable to study the space charge relaxation phenomena, as they are reflected by the changes of this peak.

4.1. Permittivity Analysis

4.1.1. Real Permittivity (ε′) or Dielectric Constant

Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the values of the real permittivity and imaginary permittivity in the range of the frequency for different temperatures (from 40 to 120 °C) for each one of EPDM/GTR composites. According to Figure 4 and Figure 5 both, real and imaginary permittivity are influenced by the content of GTR, frequency, and temperature. Both increase with increasing GTR content and increases also with temperature, at the same level range of frequencies, and decreases of ε′ with rises of frequency, at the same temperature and/or GTR percent. In this sense, increases in frequency cause slight increases in losses (ε″) in compounds with low GTR contents until reaching a maximum, after which the effect is slightly reversed. As the temperature increases, the permittivity increases because the mobility of some segments in the polymer chain also increases. Although in general, the shape of the real part of the permittivity undergoes minor changes.

4.1.2. Imaginary Permittivity (ε″)

A similar trend can be observed for imaginary permittivity (ε″) in Figure 5. The imaginary permittivity increases with the amount of GTR amount on EPDM composites, in the low, medium, and high frequencies, and with the increase of temperature, except in the samples of neat EPDM just the opposite temperature dependence relation (the higher temperature the lower ε″). Another clear trend observed in Figure 5 is the relaxation peak of permittivity shift of the peak relaxation frequency to higher frequency values with temperature rises. It can identify two effects from GTR amount in the samples: direct effects and indirect effects. About direct effects (red arrow in Figure 5) it can check rises of ε″ with the growth of GTR amounts in the samples at low frequencies and rise of the peak frequency of relaxation at middle frequencies with ascent temperatures. About indirect effect, frequencies (green circle) are checked the rises on ε″ relaxation peak (over 101–103 Hz) and a distortion (over 104 Hz).

4.2. Conductivity Analysis: (DC/AC) Regime

At constant temperature, the conductivity AC can be expressed as σac = σdc + A·ωs, where σdc is the limit value (ω → 0) of σac, A and s are parameters dependent on temperature and filler content [42,43], therefore, the AC conductivity (σac = ε0 · ω · ε″) of composite materials depends on the test temperature and the frequency ranges, and conductivity rises with increasing one of them. This can be seen in Figure 6, where at low frequencies the influence of DC conduction (direct current) is very important and the dependence on the frequency can be expressed through a power law of the type σac ~ ωs (0 < s < 1) [44,45]. In general, conductivity is higher in samples with higher GTR particle content, which suggests that GTR favors the transfer of electrical charges at the EPDM-GTR composite interface. The conductivity values alternate by an order of magnitude with temperature, indicating the existence of thermally activated processes.

4.3. Electrical Modulus

4.3.1. Real Electrical Modulus

To facilitate the study of relaxation phenomena, the electrical modulus formalism is commonly used [46,47]. In Figure 7 and Figure 8 the real electrical modulus (M′) and imaginary electrical modulus (M″) are observed for compounds with different concentrations of GTR as a function of the frequency and in a temperature range from 40 to 120 °C. In the composite samples, interfacial polarization phenomena are happening due to the presence of the GTR phase in the EPDM and GTR composite. M′ rises with ascents frequency up to reach a constant value, over 10−6 Hz. In general, low changes are seen in M′ (Figure 8) with percent GTR of increasing amounts.

4.3.2. Imaginary Modulus

In turn, in the same frequency interval, a peak in M″ develops, indicating the presence of relaxation processes. These peaks correspond to α relaxations that are formed at high temperatures (≈Tg of the resin) when the mobility of the polymer molecules is high enough [48]. On the other hand, unlike what occurs in the measurement of dielectric losses, in the case of the study of M″ a new relaxation at high frequencies can be appreciated that can be attributed to a phenomenon of the Maxwell-Wagner-Sillars type (MWS). This kind of relaxation has its origin in the interfacial polarization and appears in heterogeneous materials, such as partially crystalline or semicrystalline polymers, such as EPDM, they contain crystalline regions with conductivity and permittivity different from the amorphous regions [49]. Therefore, Figure 9 allows us to simultaneously see the evolution with temperature and frequency for different percent amount of GTR in the EPDM matrix. At least three relaxation peaks are observed: β (low frequencies, below 10−2 Hz), α (medium frequencies, over 102 Hz), and MWS (medium/high frequencies, over 104 Hz). These dielectric relaxation peaks are thermally activated phenomena, and they are moved to higher frequencies as the temperature increases as we have seen in Figure 9. This allows an analysis of the dependence of each dielectric relaxation with temperature.
At the present analysis, it appears a second relaxation peak with the presence of GTR at high frequencies, the imaginary component of the dielectric module presents a relaxation that can be attributed to a phenomenon of the Maxwell-Wagner-Sillars type. Due to ionic conduction effects at medium/high frequencies, that peak is not directly detectable in the spectrum of permittivity [50]. This class of peak relaxation has its origin in interfacial polarization and appears in heterogeneous materials, like GTR composites [51]. However, because semicrystalline polymers like such as PP [52] or EPDM contain crystalline regions with conductivity and permittivity different from amorphous regions, it turns out that they are also able to detect this interfacial polarization peak [53].

4.4. Argand Diagram

Argand diagram analysis does not detect any semicircles that lead to Debye-like behavior [54], so neither neat EPDM nor EPDM/GTR samples have non-Debye behavior in any of the cases analyzed. It has not been observed that a Coelho relaxation [55] can be reproduced that can be deduced from the Argand diagram because the semicircle characteristic of this relaxation is not observed in Figure 9. In the Argand diagram (Figure 9) it is observed that dielectric relaxations take place from M′ approximately at 0.5–0.9, this dielectric relaxation is of alpha type. Thermally we see how the alpha relaxation is activated in an obvious way, more than the other two observed relaxations. Besides, it is observed from 10% and 20% how the initial relaxation is decomposed into 2 relaxations: MWS and α (Figure 9c).

4.5. Relaxations Type (α, β, MWS) and Activation Energy (Ea)

At high frequencies, an M″ and ε″ peak can be seen that can be associated with the MWS relaxation of EPDM (MWS Peak relaxation), as are seen in Figure 8c,d and Figure 9c,d. The behavior of this relaxation, which is linked to interfacial polarization, is due to the expression of Arrhenius for thermally activated relaxations, according to the following Equation (2):
f = f 0 e − E a k T
where f is the maximum frequency of relaxation, f0 is the natural frequency (at T = ∞), Ea is the activation energy, k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the temperature in degrees Kelvin. Activation energies of between 0.44 eV and 0.35 eV were obtained in the adjustments made with the EPDM/GTR samples (Figure 10). However, observing a decreasing trend in Ea with increasing GTR concentration (10 to 20% GTR), according to Table 3. This trend is logical because, with incorporation of GTR, less energy is required to energetic activation of GTR-EPDM mixtures analyzed, due to the capacitive effect that occurs at the GTR-EPDM interface with the accumulation of opposite sign charges in the interface composite GTR-EPDM, called interfacial polarization process. The increasing percentages of GTR shows a Maxwell-Wagner-Sillars (MWS) relaxation type, observed mainly in the analyzed 10%–20% GTR samples. This prominent dielectric relaxation is seen in Figure 8 and Figure 9 [56,57]. On the other hand, we should also note the visualization of the beginning of a dielectric relaxation at very low frequencies (<10−2 Hz) and which can be identified as a relaxation of β type.

5. Discussion: GTR Effect and Composites Application

The value of the dielectric constant is closely related to the polarization orientation. When the orientation increases, the dielectric constant increases as well. Polarization orientation is due to the presence of permanent dipoles in a molecule, so, logically, changes in a structure created by the presence of GTR create increases in the dipole moments, and therefore also in the polarization and dielectric constant. On the other hand, analysis of Figure 6 on conductivity characteristics shows a shift towards higher frequencies observed when imaginary conductivity appears, with the increase of GTR in the analyzed samples. In this sense, this rises in GTR amounts also ascents the imaginary conductivity of the analyzed samples; this is consistent with interfacial polarization phenomena, such as those we tested in the EPDM and GTR samples.
According to electrical criteria, a suitable application for spacers for power lines used in electrical installations to separate the electrical cables from others or other parts from installation, according to International Electrotechnical Committee (IEC) 61854, is as follows: overhead lines—requirements and tests for spacers, the value of resistivity needs to be >5.5 × 105 Ω·cm or <1.8 × 10−5 S/cm, so the mixtures of EPDM and GTR from 5% to 20%GTR (Table 4) accomplish this criterion of conductivity is suitable for the aforementioned application [58,59]. Flexible cable spacers are electrical accessories designed to provide uniform spacing between wire conductors in a bundle of two horizontal conductors, and they are used to ensure electrical characteristics of the cables and to minimize vibration and thermal effects, avoiding the appearance of damage to the conductors.

6. Conclusions

At the morphological level, we can conclude that the analysis of microphotographs of the analyzed GTR and EPDM composites shows a good dispersion of the particles in the composite EDPM but a low cohesion of the reinforcing particles with the polymer matrix. This fact is also confirmed by DSC that hardly shows GTR content influence on the thermal transitions, in the thermal parameters, attributable to the low interaction between both components of composites.
At the dielectric level, electrical properties observed are logical increases in conductivity due to the conductive fraction of carbon black that forms (35%) of GTR particles which configure the composite reinforcement. One of the most notable effects of the presence of GTR fractions in the EPDM matrix is the appearance, from 5% and up to 20% of GTR of highly visible interfacial polarization phenomena, in the form of a Maxwell-Wagner-Sillars (MWS) relaxation, this relaxation appears in composite materials when an interface appears, similar than GTR composites analyzed. In the present experience, this MWS relaxation appears almost after the medium frequency relaxation of the β EPDM relaxation, identified. This fact is explained by many opposite signs appearing at the interface between the GTR reinforcement and the EPDM matrix (interphase).
Activation energies have been analyzed for MWS relaxations identified in the permittivity analysis, analysis of electrical modules as well as with Argand diagrams. These activation energies are reduced with the increasing presence of GTR, which is explained by the fact that with the presence of GTR, less energy will be required to activate the polarization processes that cause MWS relaxations in the analyzed composites.
The addition of GTR to the EPDM matrix induces changes in the dipole moments of the material, modifying and creating interfacial polarization phenomena in the dielectric behavior of the composite and increases the permittivity (real and imaginary) as well as the conductivity due to the presence of carbon black coming from GTR placed between the chains of the matrix polymer, which increases the conductive properties of the composite. However, these increases do not experience large variations because EPDM is a nonpolar polymer. Broadly, one of the main conclusions is that the incorporation of increasing amounts of GTR into a polymeric EPDM matrix does not significantly increase the conductivity of the material even though it has a good amount of CB (30%). One explanation is that the EPDM nonpolarity attenuates the conductive behavior of GTR in an EPDM composite for fractions up to 20% of GTR. Moreover, EPDM and GTR composites properly maintain thermal and dielectric properties, so the application of EPDM loaded with GTR fractions could be used in a low dielectric requirements application like spacers of cable and electrical lines, according to conductivity data obtained from the dielectric test. This gives an alternative recycling GTR method instead of other complex rubber-devulcanization methods.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.-G.; Data curation, R.M.-R.; Formal analysis, M.M.-G., X.R.J. and M.M.; Investigation, M.M.-G. and R.M.-R.; Methodology, M.M.-G., X.R.J. and M.M.; Resources, R.M.-R., X.R.J. and M.M.; Software, J.G.-A.; Supervision, X.C.F.; Validation, J.G.-A. and X.C.F.; Visualization, J.G.-A.; Writing—original draft, M.M.-G.; Writing—review & editing, J.G.-A., X.R.J. and M.M. and X.C.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

No funding has been provided for this research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

To Servei de Recursos Cientifics i Tècnics (SRCiT), from Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV) for support to the research, specially to Area of Microscopy and Nanometric Techniques, providing support to morphology and microscopy technical analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Myhre, M.; Saiwari, S.; Dierkes, W.K.; Noordermeer, J.W. Rubber Recycling: Chemistry, Processing, and Applications. Rubber Chem. Technol. 2012, 85, 408–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fukumori, K.; Matsushita, M.; Okamoto, H.; Sato, N.; Suzuki, Y.; Takeuchi, K. Recycling technology of tire rubber. JSAE Rev. 2002, 23, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Karger-Kocsis, J.; Mészáros, L.; Bárány, T. Ground tyre rubber (GTR) in thermoplastics, thermosets, and rubbers. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 48, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ikeda, Y.; Kato, A.; Kohjiya, S.; Nakajima, Y. Rubber Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jana, G.K.; Mahaling, R.N.; Das, C.K. A novel devulcanization technology for vulcanized natural rubber. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 99, 2831–2840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Masaki, K.; Ohkawara, S.-I.; Hirano, T.; Seno, M.; Sato, T. Devulcanization of nitrile butadiene rubber in nitrobenzene. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 91, 3342–3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rooj, S.; Basak, G.C.; Maji, P.K.; Bhowmick, A.K. New Route for Devulcanization of Natural Rubber and the Properties of Devulcanized Rubber. J. Polym. Environ. 2011, 19, 382–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lapkovskis, V.; Mironovs, V.; Goljandin, D. Suitability of devulcanized crumb rubber for oil spills remediation. Energy Procedia 2018, 147, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Markl, E.; Lackner, M. Devulcanization Technologies for Recycling of Tire-Derived Rubber: A Review. Materials 2020, 13, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Ozernovs, O.; Jevmenovs, I. Method for Devulcanization of Rubber and Devulcanization Catalyst for Such Purpose. Patent Application PCT/IB2014/066580, 11 June 2015. [Google Scholar]
  11. Colom, X.; Marín-Genescà, M.; Mujal, R.; Formela, K.; Cañavate, J. Structural and physico-mechanical properties of natural rubber/GTR composites devulcanized by microwaves: Influence of GTR source and irradiation time. J. Compos. Mater. 2018, 52, 3099–3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bulei, C.; Todor, M.P.; Heput, T.; Kiss, I. Directions for material recovery of used tires and their use in the production of new products intended for the industry of civil construction and pavements. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 294, 012064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Adhikari, J.; Das, A.; Sinha, T.K.; Saha, P.; Kim, J.K. Chapter 1: Grinding of Waste Rubber. In Rubber Recycling: Challenges and Developments; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2018; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  14. López, F.A.; Ramos, G.; Alguacil, F.J. The recycling of end-of-life tyres. Technological review. Rev. Met. 2011, 47, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Marín-Genescà, M.; Garcia-Amorós, J.; Mujal-Rosas, R.; Vidal, L.M.; Arroyo, J.B.; Fajula, X.C. Ground Tire Rubber Recycling in Applications as Insulators in Polymeric Compounds, According to Spanish UNE Standards. Recycling 2020, 5, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lapkovskis, V.; Mironov, V.; Kasperovich, A.; Myadelets, V.; Goljandin, D. Crumb Rubber as a Secondary Raw Material from Waste Rubber: A Short Review of End-Of-Life Mechanical Processing Methods. Recycling 2020, 5, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Torretta, V.; Rada, E.C.; Ragazzi, M.; Trulli, E.; Istrate, I.A.; Cioca, L.I. Treatment and disposal of tyres: Two EU approaches. A review. Waste Manag. 2015, 45, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Liu, X.H.; Krückel, J.; Zheng, G.Q.; Schubert, D.W. Electrical conductivity behavior of sheared poly(methylmethacrylate)/carbon black composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 100, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, J.; Dai, K.; Liu, C.; Zheng, G.; Wang, B.; Liu, C.; Chen, J.; Shen, C. A comparison between strain sensing behaviors of carbon black/polypropylene and carbon nanotubes/polypropylene electrically conductive composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2013, 48, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Markov, A.; Fiedler, B.; Schulte, K. Electrical conductivity of carbon black/fibers filled glass-fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2006, 37, 1390–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Marín-Genescà, M.; García-Amorós, J.; Mujal-Rosas, R.; Salueña Berna, X.; Massagués Vidal, L. Comparison of Mechanical and Electrical Characteristics of Various Polymers Blended with Ground Tire Rubber (GTR) and Applications. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Marín-Genescà, M.; García-Amorós, J.; Mujal-Rosas, R.; Massagués, L.; Colom, X. Study and Characterization of the Dielectric Behavior of Low Linear Density Polyethylene Composites Mixed with Ground Tire Rubber Particles. Polymers 2020, 12, 1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mujal, R.; Marin-Genesca, M.; Orrit-Prat, J.; Rahhali, A.; Colom-Fajula, X. Dielectric, mechanical, and thermal characterization of high-density polyethylene composites with ground tire rubber. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2012, 25, 537–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mujal-Rosas, R.; Orrit, J.; Marin, M.; Rahhali, A.; Colom, X. Dielectric and mechanical properties of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) reinforced with used tires (GTR). Afinidad: Revista de química teórica y aplicada. Afinidad Barc. 2010, 67, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  25. Katia, S.K.; Damon, D.H. D.C. conductivity of ethylene propylene rubber. In Proceedings of the Conference on Electrical Insulation & Dielectric Phenomena—Annual Report 1983, Buck Hill Falls, PA, USA, 16–20 October 1983; pp. 503–510. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ohki, Y. Dielectric relaxation phenomena of several insulating polymers analyzed by electric modulus spectra. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on the Properties and Applications of Dielectric Materials (ICPADM), Sydney, Australia, 19–22 July 2015; pp. 192–195. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wu, K.; Cheng, C. Interface charges between insulating materials. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2017, 24, 2633–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Anil Arya, P.; Sharma, A.L. Dielectric relaxations and transport properties parameter analysis of novel blended solid polymer electrolyte for sodium-ion rechargeable batteries. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 7131–7155. [Google Scholar]
  29. Marín-Genescà, M.; García-Amorós, J.; Mujal-Rosas, R.; Massagués Vidal, L.; Colom Fajula, X. Application Properties Analysis as a Dielectric Capacitor of End-of-Life Tire-Reinforced HDPE. Polymers 2020, 12, 2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mujal-Rosas, R.; Orrit-Prat, J.; Ramis, X.; Marín-Genescà, M. Electrical application of polyamide reinforced with old tire rubber (ground tire rubber). J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2013, 27, 1209–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kalogeras, I.; Pallikari-Viras, F.; Vassilikou-Dova, A. Dielectric and thermal characterization of electroactive sol gel/polymer composites. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Electrets (ISE 9), Shangai, China, 27 September 1996; pp. 499–504. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tsangaris, G.; Kouloumbi, N.; Kyvelidis, S. Interfacial relaxation phenomena in particulate composites of epoxy resin with copper or iron particles. Mater. Chem. Phys. 1996, 44, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. ASTM D150-18. Standard Test Methods for AC Loss Characteristics and Permittivity (Dielectric Constant) of Solid Electrical Insulation; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ravikumar, K.; Palanivelu, K.; Ravichandran, K. Dielectric Properties of Natural Rubber Composites filled with Graphite. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 16, 1338–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Inal, M. Determination of dielectric properties of insulator materials by means of ANFIS: A comparative study. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008, 195, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Penava, N.V.; Rek, V.; Houra, I.F. Effect of EPDM as a compatibilizer on mechanical properties and morphology of PP/LDPE blends. J. Elastomers Plast. 2012, 45, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. McCrum, N.G.; Read, B.E.; Williams, G. Anelastic and Dielectric Effects in Polymeric Solids; Dover Publications, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  38. Boukheir, S.; Samir, Z.; Belhimria, R.; Kreit, L.; Achour, M.E.; Éber, N.; Costa, L.; Oueriagli, A.; Outzourhit, A. Electric Modulus Spectroscopic Studies of the Dielectric Properties of Carbon Nanotubes/Epoxy Polymer Composite Materials. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B 2018, 57, 210–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Belattar, J.; Graça, M.P.F.; Costa, L.; Achour, M.E.; Brosseau, C. Electric modulus-based analysis of the dielectric relaxation in carbon black loaded polymer composites. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 124111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tsangaris, G.M.; Psarras, G. The dielectric response of a polymeric three-component composite. J. Mater. Sci. 1999, 34, 2151–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. El Hasnaoui, M.; Graça, M.P.F.; Achour, M.E.; Costa, L.C. Electric Modulus Analysis of Carbon Black/Copolymer Composite Materials. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2011, 2, 1421–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Leon, C.; Lucía, M.L.; Santamaria, J. Correlated ion hopping in single-crystal yttria-stabilized zirconia. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 55, 882–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Geuskens, G.; Gielens, J.; Geshef, D.; Deltour, R. The electrical conductivity of polymer blends filled with carbon-black. Eur. Polym. J. 1987, 23, 993–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Song, Y.; Zheng, Q. Conduction stability of high-density polyethylene/carbon black composites due to electric field action. Eur. Polym. J. 2005, 41, 2998–3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Blythe, A.R. Electrical Properties of Polymers; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mudarra, M.; Belana, J.; Cañadas, J.C.; Diego, J.; Sellarès, J.; Díaz-Calleja, R.; Sanchís, M.J. Space charge relaxation in polyetherimides by the electric modulus formalism. J. Appl. Phys. 2000, 88, 4807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Saad, A.L.G.; Aziz, H.A.; Dimitry, O.I.H. Studies of electrical and mechanical properties of poly(vinyl chloride) mixed with electrically conductive additives. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 91, 1590–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chanmal, C.V.; Jog, J.P. Dielectric relaxations in PVDF/BaTiO3 nanocomposites. eXPRESS Polym. Lett. 2008, 2, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Arous, M.; Ben Amor, I.; Kallel, A.; Fakhfakh, Z.; Perrier, G. Crystallinity and dielectric relaxations in semi-crystalline poly(ether ether ketone). J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2007, 68, 1405–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mujal-Rosas, R.; Orrit-Prat, J.; Ramis-Juan, X.; Marín-Genescà, M.; Rahhali, A. Study on dielectric, thermal, and mechanical properties of the ethylene vinyl acetate reinforced with ground tire rubber. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2011, 30, 581–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mujal-Rosas, R.; Ramis, X.; Marin, M.; Rahhali, A.; Orrit, J. Study on dielectric, mechanical and thermal properties of polypropylene (PP) composites with ground tyre rubber (GTR). Polym. Polym. Compos. 2012, 20, 755–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, Q.M.; Li, H.; Poh, M.; Xia, F.; Cheng, Z.-Y.; Xu, H.; Huang, C. An all-organic composite actuator material with a high dielectric constant. Nature 2002, 419, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tiwari, S.K.; Choudhary, R.N.P.; Mahapatra, S.P. Dynamic mechanical and dielectric relaxation studies of chlorobutyl elastomer nanocomposites: Effect of nanographite loading and temperature. High Perform. Polym. 2015, 27, 274–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Coelho, R. On the static permittivity of dipolar and conductive media—An educational approach. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 1991, 131, 1136–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Patra, A.; Prasad, V. Effect of LaNiO3 on the impedance and dielectric properties of CoFe2O4: A high temperature study. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2019, 53, 045301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Mujal, R.; Orrit-Prat, J.; Ramis, X.-J.; Marín-Genescà, M.; Rahhali, A. Dielectric, Thermal, and Mechanical Properties of Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Reinforced with Used Tires. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2013, 32, E399–E415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rosas, R.M.; Genesca, M.M.; Amoros, J.G.; Fajula, X.C.; Berna, X.S. Comparación de las Características Mecánicas y Dieléctricas de Varios Polímeros Mezclados con Caucho de Neumáticos Fuera de Uso (GTR) Para su Aplicación Como Aislante de Calzado de Trabajo Industrial. DYNA 2020, 95, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Prat, J.O.; Mujal-Rosas, R.; Rahhali, A.; Genescá, M.M.; Fajula, X.C.; Punseti, J.B. Dielectric and mechanical characterization of PVC composites with ground tire rubber. J. Compos. Mater. 2010, 45, 1233–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mujal Rosas, R.; Marín Genescà, M.; Colom Fajula, X. Analysis of the different types of devulcanization in the characterization of new elastomeric materials formed by the mixture of styrene butadiene-natural rubber and mixed with end-of-life tires (GTR). Afinidad 2017, 74, 247–256. [Google Scholar]
Polymers 13 00509 g001 550
Figure 1. SEM micrographs of EDPM at 20% GTR (a,b) and at 10% GTR (c,d), and at different magnifications: 200× (a,c) and 630× (b,d).
Figure 1. SEM micrographs of EDPM at 20% GTR (a,b) and at 10% GTR (c,d), and at different magnifications: 200× (a,c) and 630× (b,d).
Polymers 13 00509 g001
Polymers 13 00509 g002 550
Figure 2. Thermogravimetric analysis: (a) Mass fraction (%) versus Temperature (°C), for EPDM and EPDM/GTR samples; (b) Rate of weight loss versus Temperature (°C), for EPDM and EPDM/GTR samples.
Figure 2. Thermogravimetric analysis: (a) Mass fraction (%) versus Temperature (°C), for EPDM and EPDM/GTR samples; (b) Rate of weight loss versus Temperature (°C), for EPDM and EPDM/GTR samples.
Polymers 13 00509 g002
Polymers 13 00509 g003 550
Figure 3. Heat flow versus Temperature at 10 °C/min for EPDM and EPDM and GTR samples.
Figure 3. Heat flow versus Temperature at 10 °C/min for EPDM and EPDM and GTR samples.
Polymers 13 00509 g003
Polymers 13 00509 g004 550
Figure 4. Real permittivity in EPDM composites for: (a) 0% GTR or neat EPDM; (b) EPDM + 5% GTR; (c) EPDM + 10% GTR; (d) EPDM + 20% GTR.
Figure 4. Real permittivity in EPDM composites for: (a) 0% GTR or neat EPDM; (b) EPDM + 5% GTR; (c) EPDM + 10% GTR; (d) EPDM + 20% GTR.
Polymers 13 00509 g004
Polymers 13 00509 g005 550
Figure 5. Imaginary permittivity in EPDM composites for: (a) 0% GTR or neat EPDM; (b) EPDM + 5% GTR; (c) EPDM + 10% GTR; (d) EPDM + 20% GTR.
Figure 5. Imaginary permittivity in EPDM composites for: (a) 0% GTR or neat EPDM; (b) EPDM + 5% GTR; (c) EPDM + 10% GTR; (d) EPDM + 20% GTR.
Polymers 13 00509 g005
Polymers 13 00509 g006 550
Figure 6. S-Conductivity (S/cm) in EPDM composites for: (a) 0% GTR or neat EPDM; (b) EPDM + 5% GTR; (c) EPDM + 10% GTR; (d) EPDM + 20% GTR.
Figure 6. S-Conductivity (S/cm) in EPDM composites for: (a) 0% GTR or neat EPDM; (b) EPDM + 5% GTR; (c) EPDM + 10% GTR; (d) EPDM + 20% GTR.
Polymers 13 00509 g006
Polymers 13 00509 g007 550
Figure 7. Real modulus in EPDM composites for: (a) 0% GTR or neat EPDM; (b) EPDM + 5% GTR; (c) EPDM + 10% GTR; (d) EPDM + 20% GTR.
Figure 7. Real modulus in EPDM composites for: (a) 0% GTR or neat EPDM; (b) EPDM + 5% GTR; (c) EPDM + 10% GTR; (d) EPDM + 20% GTR.
Polymers 13 00509 g007
Polymers 13 00509 g008 550
Figure 8. Imaginary modulus in EPDM composites for: (a) 0% GTR or neat EPDM; (b) EPDM + 5% GTR; (c) EPDM + 10% GTR; (d) EPDM + 20% GTR.
Figure 8. Imaginary modulus in EPDM composites for: (a) 0% GTR or neat EPDM; (b) EPDM + 5% GTR; (c) EPDM + 10% GTR; (d) EPDM + 20% GTR.
Polymers 13 00509 g008
Polymers 13 00509 g009 550
Figure 9. Argand diagram (M″-M′) in EPDM/GTR composites: for 0%, 5%, 10%, 20% GTR amount, for: (a) 60 °C; (b) 80 °C; (c) 100 °C; (d) 120 °C.
Figure 9. Argand diagram (M″-M′) in EPDM/GTR composites: for 0%, 5%, 10%, 20% GTR amount, for: (a) 60 °C; (b) 80 °C; (c) 100 °C; (d) 120 °C.
Polymers 13 00509 g009
Polymers 13 00509 g010a 550Polymers 13 00509 g010b 550
Figure 10. EPDM and GTR samples composites dielectric behavior, at frequency: 50 Hz, and different temperatures: 40 °C, 80 °C and 120 °C (a) real modulus; (b) imaginary modulus; (c) real permittivity; (d) imaginary permittivity; (e) S-Conductivity (S/cm) in EPDM composites for neat EPDM (0% GTR) and EPDM and GTR (5–10–20% GTR).
Figure 10. EPDM and GTR samples composites dielectric behavior, at frequency: 50 Hz, and different temperatures: 40 °C, 80 °C and 120 °C (a) real modulus; (b) imaginary modulus; (c) real permittivity; (d) imaginary permittivity; (e) S-Conductivity (S/cm) in EPDM composites for neat EPDM (0% GTR) and EPDM and GTR (5–10–20% GTR).
Polymers 13 00509 g010aPolymers 13 00509 g010b
Table
Table 1. EPDM Features.
Table 1. EPDM Features.
Mechanical Properties
Shore Hardness, Shore A40–90
Tensile strength25 MPa
Density0.90–2.00 g·cm−³
EPDM Physical Characteristics (by manufacturer)
Hardness60° Shore A
Specific weight1.55 kg/dm3
Apparent density1.56 kg/L
Elongation at break750%
Stretch resistance6 N/mm2
Granulated volume0.73 kg/L
Table
Table 2. Glass transition temperature (Tg), melting peak (Tm), and enthalpy of fusion for EPDM and GTR + EPDM composites.
Table 2. Glass transition temperature (Tg), melting peak (Tm), and enthalpy of fusion for EPDM and GTR + EPDM composites.
CompositionGlass Transition Temperature
Tg (°C)		Melting Peak
Tm (°C)		Enthalpy of Fusion
(J/g)
100% EPDM−41.88 °C48.00 °C9.06 J/g
95% EPDM−39.39 °C48.67 °C8.54 J/g
90% EPDM−40.46 °C48.50 °C8.55 J/g
80% EPDM−39.73 °C48.00 °C7.68 J/g
Table
Table 3. Evolution of Peak β and Maxwell-Wagner-Sillars (MWS) Relaxations, for EPDM composites with 10 and 20% GTR amounts in EPDM composites, at 50 Hz, and evolution of activation energies (Ea) for 10 and 20% of GTR contents in EPDM composites.
Table 3. Evolution of Peak β and Maxwell-Wagner-Sillars (MWS) Relaxations, for EPDM composites with 10 and 20% GTR amounts in EPDM composites, at 50 Hz, and evolution of activation energies (Ea) for 10 and 20% of GTR contents in EPDM composites.
% GTRTemperature (°C)α Peak Relaxation (Freq.; Hz)α Peak Relaxation (M″)MWS Relaxation (Freq.; Hz)MWS Relaxation (M″)
10409.52 × 1012.44 × 10−13.43 × 1031.69 × 10−1
603.14 × 1022.45 × 10−15.11 × 1031.73 × 10−1
806.98 × 1022.44 × 10−11.13 × 1041.71 × 10−1
1007.61 × 1033.07 × 10−18.31 × 1041.70 × 10−1
1205.11 × 1032.53 × 10−15.58 × 1041.94 × 10−1
20401.41 × 1022.21 × 10−13.43 × 1031.73 × 10−1
604.68 × 1022.20 × 10−17.61 × 1031.60 × 10−1
801.03 × 1032.22 × 10−11.69 × 1041.59 × 10−1
1002.30 × 1032.22 × 10−12.51 × 1041.61 × 10−1
1205.11 × 1032.44 × 10−15.58 × 1041.84 × 10−1
Activation Energy (Ea)
%GTRMWS Peak
100.4429 eV
200.3593 eV
Table
Table 4. Evolution of real modulus; imaginary modulus; real permittivity; imaginary permittivity and conductivity (S/cm), for EPDM composites with GTR growing amounts, at 50 Hz and 40, 80 and 120 °C.
Table 4. Evolution of real modulus; imaginary modulus; real permittivity; imaginary permittivity and conductivity (S/cm), for EPDM composites with GTR growing amounts, at 50 Hz and 40, 80 and 120 °C.
% GTREps’ Eps’’ Modulus’Modulus’’S [S/cm]Temperature
02.663.72 × 10−13.68 × 10−15.15 × 10−28.88 × 10−1240 °C
52.555.41 × 10−13.73 × 10−17.91 × 10−21.29 × 10−11
101.757.95 × 10−14.72 × 10−12.14 × 10−11.89 × 10−11
202.351.003.58 × 10−11.53 × 10−12.40 × 10−11
02.681.17 × 10−13.72 × 10−11.62 × 10−22.79 × 10−1280 °C
52.781.11 × 10−13.58 × 10−11.42 × 10−22.65 × 10−12
102.875.19 × 10−13.36 × 10−16.08 × 10−21.23 × 10−11
203.365.57 × 10−12.89 × 10−14.79 × 10−21.33 × 10−11
02.645.00 × 10−13.78 × 10−17.15 × 10−31.19 × 10−12120 °C
52.745.77 × 10−13.63 × 10−17.63 × 10−31.37 × 10−12
103.062.41 × 10−13.24 × 10−12.55 × 10−25.75 × 10−12
203.653.69 × 10−12.70 × 10−12.73 × 10−28.81 × 10−12
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marín-Genescà, M.; Mujal-Rosas, R.; García-Amorós, J.; Mudarra, M.; Ramis Juan, X.; Colom Fajula, X. Study Analysis of Thermal, Dielectric, and Functional Characteristics of an Ethylene Polyethylene Diene Monomer Blended with End-of-Life Tire Microparticles Amounts. Polymers 2021, 13, 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13040509

AMA Style

Marín-Genescà M, Mujal-Rosas R, García-Amorós J, Mudarra M, Ramis Juan X, Colom Fajula X. Study Analysis of Thermal, Dielectric, and Functional Characteristics of an Ethylene Polyethylene Diene Monomer Blended with End-of-Life Tire Microparticles Amounts. Polymers. 2021; 13(4):509. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13040509

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marín-Genescà, Marc, Ramon Mujal-Rosas, Jordi García-Amorós, Miguel Mudarra, Xavier Ramis Juan, and Xavier Colom Fajula. 2021. "Study Analysis of Thermal, Dielectric, and Functional Characteristics of an Ethylene Polyethylene Diene Monomer Blended with End-of-Life Tire Microparticles Amounts" Polymers 13, no. 4: 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13040509

APA Style

Marín-Genescà, M., Mujal-Rosas, R., García-Amorós, J., Mudarra, M., Ramis Juan, X., & Colom Fajula, X. (2021). Study Analysis of Thermal, Dielectric, and Functional Characteristics of an Ethylene Polyethylene Diene Monomer Blended with End-of-Life Tire Microparticles Amounts. Polymers, 13(4), 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13040509

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop