Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Thermoplastic Polyurethanes Containing Bio-Based Polyester Polyol and Their Fiber Property
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Copolymer on the Wrinkle Structure Formation and Gloss of a Phase-Separated Ternary Free-Radical/Cationic Hybrid System for the Application of Self-Matting Coatings
Previous Article in Journal
Overview: Polycarbonates via Ring-Opening Polymerization, Differences between Six- and Five-Membered Cyclic Carbonates: Inspiration for Green Alternatives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lead Free Multilayered Polymer Composites for Radiation Shielding
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evaluation of the Hydrolysis Efficiency of Bacterial Cellulose Gel Film after the Liquid Hot Water and Steam Explosion Pretreatments

Polymers 2022, 14(10), 2032; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14102032
by Izabela Betlej 1,*, Andrzej Antczak 1, Jan Szadkowski 1, Michał Drożdżek 1, Krzysztof Krajewski 1, Andrzej Radomski 1, Janusz Zawadzki 1 and Sławomir Borysiak 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Polymers 2022, 14(10), 2032; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14102032
Submission received: 25 April 2022 / Revised: 11 May 2022 / Accepted: 14 May 2022 / Published: 16 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Polymeric Films)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this study, the authors pretreated bacterial cellulose gel film using liquid hot water and steam explosion methods and investigated the effectiveness of its conversion to degraded sugars. The manuscript was written in an understandable way, however it presents a few issues that may require the authors to further address.

  1. The introduction may be further polished, specifically for the first paragraph. it sounds too verbose.
  2. Line 53-54, bacterial cellulose does not contain 100% cellulose component. The percentage of cellulose may account for 90-95%, others may have proteins, lipids, and some extracellular polysaccharides. These extracellular polysaccharides may have similar structures to hemicelluloses. The literature has published relevant articles in these topic. 
  3. The authors focus on the enzymatic conversion of cellulose. Although this is not major topic in this study, it is suggested for the authors to add some background information about enzymatic conversion of cellulose into biofuels, including the use of commercial enzymes and treatment process.
  4. The subtitles under 3. Results and Discussion should be renumbered. 
  5. The description of the inhibitors was not clear. How was the inhibitors generated during the enzymatic degradation process? How did these inhibitors affect the conversion of cellulose to glucose/fructose? Did the cellulose degradation only produce glucose and fructose without any trace of other oligocelluloses?
  6. The figure 1 and 2 should be switched.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

In this paper, the authors evaluated the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose gel film subjected to physicochemical pretreatment using the steam explosion and liquid hot water methods. According to the results, higher process temperatures can inhibit enzymatic activity. At the lower temperature of the cellulose pretreatment, more glucose is observed which passed into the liquid fraction. As a result, the low pretreatment temperature of bacterial cellulose gel film by the LHW and SE methods favors specific applications including bioethanol production. The paper is well presented, data was solid, and the investigation is of interest to researchers in related fields. And thus, I recommend the publication of this paper in Polymers.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

N/A

Back to TopTop