Next Article in Journal
In Situ Coating of Polydopamine-AgNPs on Polyester Fabrics Producing Antibacterial and Antioxidant Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Antibacterial, Antifungal and Antiviral Polymeric Food Packaging in Post-COVID-19 Era
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication of Conductive Tissue Engineering Nanocomposite Films Based on Chitosan and Surfactant-Stabilized Graphene Dispersions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Polymeric Packaging Applications for Seafood Products: Packaging-Deterioration Relevance, Technology and Trends
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Functional Polymer and Packaging Technology for Bakery Products

by
Horman San
1,
Yeyen Laorenza
1,
Ehsan Behzadfar
2,3,
Uruchaya Sonchaeng
1,
Kiattichai Wadaugsorn
1,
Janenutch Sodsai
1,
Thitiporn Kaewpetch
1,
Khwanchat Promhuad
1,
Atcharawan Srisa
1,
Phanwipa Wongphan
1 and
Nathdanai Harnkarnsujarit
1,4,*
1
Department of Packaging and Materials Technology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngam Wong Wan Rd., Latyao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
2
Chemical Engineering Department, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
3
Sustainable Packaging Lab, School of Graphic Communications Management, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
4
Center for Advanced Studies for Agriculture and Food, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngam Wong Wan Rd., Latyao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(18), 3793; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14183793
Submission received: 29 August 2022 / Revised: 5 September 2022 / Accepted: 7 September 2022 / Published: 10 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Polymeric Films and Coatings for Food Packaging Applications)

Abstract

:
Polymeric materials including plastic and paper are commonly used as packaging for bakery products. The incorporation of active substances produces functional polymers that can effectively retain the quality and safety of packaged products. Polymeric materials can be used to produce a variety of package forms such as film, tray, pouch, rigid container and multilayer film. This review summarizes recent findings and developments of functional polymeric packaging for bakery products. Functional polymerics are mainly produced by the incorporation of non-volatile and volatile active substances that effectively retain the quality of packaged bakery products. Antimicrobial agents (either synthetic or natural substances) have been intensively investigated, whereas advances in coating technology with functional materials either as edible coatings or non-edible coatings have also preserved the quality of packaged bakery products. Recent patents demonstrate novel structural packaging designs combined with active functions to extend the shelf life of bakery products. Other forms of active packaging technology for bakery products include oxygen absorbers and ethanol emitters. The latest research progress of functional polymeric packaging for bakery products, which provides important reference value for reducing the waste and improving the quality of packaged products, is demonstrated. Moreover, the review systematically analyzed the spoilage factors of baked products from physicochemical, chemical and microbiological perspectives. Functional packaging using polymeric materials can be used to preserve the quality of packaged bakery products.

1. Introduction

The new market research report “Baking Ingredients Market by Type, Application, and Region—Forecast to 2026”, published by Newswire [1], forecasts that the global baking ingredients market will grow from USD 16.6 billion in 2021 to USD 22.3 billion by 2026, at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 6.0%. Globally, one-third of the food produced for human consumption is lost as waste, amounting to 1.3 billion tons per year and worth USD 1 trillion. According to Goryńska-Goldmann et al. (2021) [2], bakery companies’ average daily losses ranged from 9.7% to 14.4% of the production volume, including bread and fresh pastry losses. Many variables, such as nutritional value, taste, freshness, shelf life and consumer attractiveness, impact the quality of bakery products that have a short shelf life, resulting from adverse changes that begin immediately after baking and cause worsening sensory features and crumb texture. Aging of bread is manifested by partial decrease in humidity, growth of filamentous fungi and yeasts, and staling [3].
Active packaging systems are designed to “deliberately incorporate components that would release or absorb substances into or from the packaged food or the environment surrounding the food.” Active packaging materials are intended to extend the shelf life or to maintain or improve the condition of packaged food [4,5]. Garcia and Copetti (2016) [6] distinguished two kinds of antimicrobial packaging. Firstly, the antimicrobial agent migrates from the package to the product’s surface, whereas secondly, it is in direct contact with the food. Various factors influence the release of antimicrobial chemicals from an edible film, such as electrostatic interactions between the antimicrobial agent and the polymer chains, osmosis, and environmentally induced changes in structure. Jideani and Vogt (2016) [7] evaluated the antimicrobial properties of active packaging systems used to prolong the shelf life of bread. Integrating synthetic or organic antimicrobial agents has become one of the active packaging strategies used to protect food goods against deterioration and microbiological growth [8]. Organic acids and their salts (sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate), sulfites, nitrites, antibiotics, and alcohols are typical synthetic antimicrobial chemicals, whereas natural antimicrobial substances such as organic acids, bacteriocins (nisin and lacticin), grape seed extracts, herbal extracts, and enzymes (peroxidase and lysozyme) have also been shown to inhibit the growth of microorganisms.
Some essential oils, such as extracted plant-based compounds, have known antimicrobial, antifungal, antioxidant and anti-carcinogenic properties [7,9]. Nanditha and Prabhasankar (2009) [10] stated that bakery foods most often contain fats and oils. These progressively oxidize during storage, resulting in rancidity and deterioration in the sensory attributes of the food products. Oxidation inhibitors or antioxidants can be used to prevent the autooxidation of fats and oils in packaged foods. Tertiary butyl hydroxy quinone (TBHQ), gallates, butylated hydroxy anisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and other synthetic antioxidants are frequently utilized in bakery products. These compounds are highly effective in preventing the oxidation of fat, are available at a low cost and are easy to incorporate into food products. To improve shelf life and consumer acceptance, several natural antioxidants including α-tocopherol, β-carotene and ascorbic acid can be used in place of synthetic antioxidants. By contrast, several plant extracts from fruits and vegetables contain significant amounts of substances that are functional antioxidants, such as apple and strawberries (vitamin C, bioflavonoids, chalcones), banana fruit (gallocatechin), carrot (α-and β-carotene, phenolic compounds), grapes (phenols, catechins), citrus fruits (β-crytoxanthin, bioflavonoids, chalcones, vitamin C) and garlic, onion, and leeks (allicin, flavonoids, vitamin C, selenium, sulfur) [10,11,12,13]. Antioxidants are also evident in various foodstuffs including milk, cocoa, seaweeds, vanilla, garcinia and agro-industrial wastes but they have yet to be used in bread goods [10]. Similarly, Gavahian et al. 2020 [14] discovered that certain natural essential oils act as preservatives for baked products by inhibiting microbial growth. Both conventional and innovative alternative extraction techniques are used to extract essential oils, and some have antimicrobial properties. For instance, extracted essential oils from orange peel contain limonene, with terpenoids from thymol and carvacrol, and phenylpropenes from eugenol and vanillin and other herbal essential oils. These antimicrobial compounds are effective against spoiling microbial growth in bakery products. Essential oils can also be used as natural preservatives and antimicrobial agents in bakery product packaging.
Kotsianis et al. (2002) [15] reported a review on the use of modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) technology in bakery products. Packaging materials for MAP should have low gas permeability, sealability characteristics, clarity, and antifog properties. They should also have excellent barrier properties to prevent gases from leaking. MAP machinery also needs consideration because it offers benefits by minimizing product costs and extending the shelf life of baked goods. Alternative MAP techniques include oxygen scavengers, which remove oxygen from packaging to prevent aerobic growth of pathogenic bacteria. Ethanol can also be added to the package headspace to prevent the growth of mold, yeast, lactobacilli, and other microbials. Both of these alternative MAP methods can be applied as sachets. Galic et al. (2009) [16] found that the storage conditions and packaging systems of baked goods affected their shelf life. The optimal packaging material must be considered based on each type of baked product by taking into consideration variables such as gases and water vapor permeability, durability, usage, and functionality. For instance, low-density polypropylene (PE-LD) had higher gas permeability, thereby extending bread crumb crispiness. MAP also plays a significant role in delaying the deterioration of bakery goods. Differing packaging materials have various microbiological and intrinsic qualities that influence preservation and bakery product shelf life [17].
Previous reviews examined extending the shelf life of bread using various innovative packaging technologies for microbial growth control in bread and bakery products [6,7,10,14,16]. Garcia and Copetti [6] demonstrated alternative and holistic methods to improve the shelf life of bakery products including controlling unit operations in processing, adding natural preservatives, and utilization of predictive methods. Jideani and Vogt [7] highlighted the roles of antimicrobial packaging produced by the double extrusion process to achieve homogeneous blends between antimicrobial and polymers, whereas the potential combination of antimicrobial agents (allyl isothiocyanate and potassium sorbate) was incorporated into polymers as natural antimicrobial protection for bread. Moreover, the effects of natural and synthetic antioxidants used in bakery products for increasing shelf life have been reviewed [10,14]. Galic et al. [16] reviewed applications of chemical kinetic concepts to food quality deteriorations which efficiently determined shelf-life of bakery, whereas packaging technology had a significant role in product quality. Incorporations of active substances into polymers produces functional polymeric packaging which subsequently affects quality of packaged bakery. These functional polymers include either paper or plastic and can release active functions, e.g., antioxidant and antimicrobial, which delay quality deteriorations of packaged products.
This review assessed the up-to-date information on new packaging innovations for bakery products, such as polymeric functional plastics that incorporate volatile and/or non-volatile compounds, edible polymeric coating, functional paper and coating technology, and other various forms of active packaging for bakery products such as oxygen absorbers and ethanol emitters. This review on functional packaging systems and materials can be used to address additional issues and initiatives for maintaining and enhancing product quality by preserving the nutritional and organoleptic qualities of bakery goods and shelf life. Additionally, it discusses the role of functional packaging in increasing consumer trust and reducing the negative environmental impacts of packaging waste and food loss. The review also provides future research directions for packaging and material technology, food and bakery product development, and food business strategy.

2. Bakery Deterioration Factors through Packaging System

Products from bakeries are prone to spoilage through microbiological, chemical, and physical deterioration. The quality criteria of all types of bread have to be established to determine whether they are acceptable to the consumer or not. Commonly used characteristics related to bread quality are loaf volume, crumb color, and crumb aesthetic. The consumer may squeeze the loaf to determine the softness and make a quick judgment of the freshness. The choice of ingredients, formulations, equipment, and processing methods can affect final product quality. The roles of ingredients and methods of mixing have a large impact on the shelf life of bread. Staling is one of the main processes that causes bread to lose quality [18], whereas package permeabilities including water vapor permeability (WVP) and oxygen permeability (OP) also have major impacts on quality preservation of packaged bakery, examples of which are shown in Table 1.

2.1. Physico-Chemical and Chemical Deteriorations

Baked goods are flour-based foods baked in an oven such as bread, cookies, cakes, donuts, pasties, and pies [19]. They can undergo a variety of changes during storing that reduce their freshness. The deterioration processes affect the properties of both crumb and crust aesthetics, due to loss of moisture and migration of moisture between the two. The bread becomes firmer over time due to changes in the degree of crystallinity of the starch fraction. Recrystallization of starch also causes flavor and aroma loss. Sandwich bread will last anywhere from 3–5 days, whereas craft breads typically last less than a day. Products that can remain soft and mold-free for up to 12 days are now available to consumers [18,20].
Rancidity is a chemical deterioration induced by lipid oxidation of bakery components. Fat rancidity is brought on by storage time and low water activity [21]. Oxygen is a major factor in accelerating lipid oxidation. Packaging with lower oxygen permeability tends to prevent lipid oxidation; however, bakery products commonly have high porosity with high amounts of residual oxygen embedded in food matrices. This oxygen should also be removed from the package and, therefore, oxygen scavenging packaging is important to eliminate oxygen levels after sealing [22]. In items with water activity of under 0.3, this issue typically arises very quickly. Oxidation reduces until it rises once again after the product water activity reaches 0.5 [23]. In addition to the fats used with baked products, other ingredients with naturally high fat content can act as sources of free radicals including oat products and nuts. Some lipases are most active with high water activities but they will still react at lower water activities (0.25), creating challenges [20].
Retrogradation of starch components leads to staling of bakery products which contributes to loss of water and freshness. Water strongly influences the textural properties of bakery products. Higher moisture contents give a softer texture, whereas lower moisture causes harder textural properties. Organoleptic characteristics and physical appearance undergo significant changes over time, associated with the movement of water from both inside and outside the product matrix. The difference in partial pressure of water vapor between the inside of the package and the surrounding environment is the driving force for water transport across the packaging material. For particular, the influence of water vapor permeation might make sandwich bread crumbs firmer or soften cookies while they are being stored [20]. Bakery product quality also depends on packaging and packaging material. The permeability of packaging materials can influence moisture migration by affecting the relative humidity of the atmosphere surrounding the product. Packaging materials with low moisture vapor transmission rates create high relative humidity in the package atmosphere, and this means that equilibrium can be reached between the product and the atmosphere [20]. The hardening of breadcrumbs occurs because of moisture loss due to retrogradation of the starch components and evaporation of water. Water transport is driven by the difference in relative vapor pressure between the bread and the environment, which subsequently reduces water activity. Srisa and Harnkarnsujarit (2020) [24] found a relationship between water activity and hardening in breadcrumbs during storage for 21 days in biodegradable films (Figure 1). They reported that the hardness significantly increased with reduced water activity crumb value. Increasing the degree of recrystallization increased hardness and reduced water activity during storage. Increased crumb hardness followed a zero-order rate equation (R2 = 0.85 to 0.98), with the rate dependent on release of volatile trans-cinnamaldehyde, which further interacted with bread components, including lipids [24,25].
Food packaging permeability plays a key role in the hardening of packaged bread. Films with higher water vapor permeability allow for a higher transfer of water vapor which causes a higher driving force for moisture transportation. Bumbudsanpharoke et al. (2022) [26] found a linear relationship between water vapor permeability of biodegradable and non-biodegradable plastic blend films (PBAT, PBS and LLDPE) and hardness of bread crumb stored for 3 days, whereas a non-linear relationship was found after 6 days of storage (Figure 2). Increasing water vapor permeability (WVP) gave higher permeation rates, which subsequently increased crumb hardness due to enhancing the water transfer from crumbs. Higher water vapor permeability commonly facilitated water transfer from higher relative vapor pressure (RVP) in bread crumbs to lower RVP in the surroundings, leading to decreased water activity [26,27].

2.2. Microbial Deteriorations

Microbiological spoilage is a major problem for bakery products, often limiting their shelf life. Microbial growth causes economic loss for both manufacturers and consumers as a result of poor packaging, sanitation practices in manufacturing, storage conditions and low product turnover [28]. Microorganism can be found in raw materials of the baking goods which contaminated during processing and packaging, or immediately after the oven. Fungal deterioration impacts wheat-based bakery products as Penicillium, Aspergillus, Cladosporium and Neurospora, whereas Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis deterioration are less common [29,30]. Water activity affects bread products, and mold development and other microbial spoilage are the most common problems. Mold spoilage is a serious and costly problem for bakeries. Normal cooking temperatures destroy fungal spores, and post-process contamination from airborne spores and contact with contaminated surfaces must be prevented. Filamentous fungi involved in bread spoilage include Rhizopus sp., and Mucor sp., Penicillium sp., Eurotium sp., Aspergillus sp. and Monilia sitophilia. Rhizopus stolonifer, also referred to as the “bread mold”, is one of the most prevalent. Mold growth appears when bread is stored in low-humidity environments, with generation of mycotoxins also as a concern. Eurotium species are the first fungi to colonize contaminated water, followed by Penicillium and Aspergillus. Losses of bakery goods due to mold spoilage range from 1 to 5%, depending on the weather, the type of product, and the processing techniques. The most common fungi related to losses in bakery products belong to the genera Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Endomyces, Fusarium, Monilia, Mucor, Penicillium, and Rhizopus [31]. Yeast problems also occur in bakery products. Wild yeasts include Trichosporon variable, Saccharomyces, Pichia, and Zygosaccharomyces. Saccharomyces sp. produces white spots in bread, leading to the term chalk bread [28].
Furthermore, rope spoilage in bread is caused by bacteria from the genus Bacillus and occurs in the summer when the climate is most conducive to bacterial growth which is related to temperature changing. The bacteria involved include Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus magaterium and Bacillus cereus [28]. Meanwhile, bacteria possibly contaminate baked goods, and Bacillus is a major contaminant from raw ingredients. Staphylococcus aureus is one type of bacteria known to contaminate pie filling and can cause food poisoning outbreaks from cream-filled bakery products [28]. Before the development of visible indications of deterioration, Needham et al. (2005) [32] examined the ability to distinguish between microbiological spoilage brought on by bacteria, yeast and fungi and enzymic spoilage brought on by lipoxygenase after 48 h using cluster analysis. The volatiles released by the various types of bread spoilage and unspoiled bread analogs were determined using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. The amounts of each microorganism increased over time, according to microbial analyses. Mold growth is the major microbial spoilage agent for many baked products. Generally, mold spores in fresh bread and other baked goods are killed by the baking process. Bread spoilage caused by mold typically occurs after baking by contamination by the air, bakery surfaces, equipment, food handlers, or raw ingredients [28,33].
Permeability of polymeric packaging potentially causes the deterioration of bakery products. Additionally, oxygen permeation allows the growth of aerobic microorganisms such as mold in bakery products. Higher oxygen permeability commonly accelerates aerobic fungal growth. The reduction in oxygen levels in the package limits the mold growth in bakery products [34,35]. On the other hand, water vapor permeability also plays a key role in microbial growth at intermediate water activity levels. Moisture loss from packaged products reduces water activity and partially inhibits microbial growth. Bumbudsanpharoke et al. (2022) [26] indicated that mold growth in packaged bread had insignificant correlation with oxygen permeability, whereas moisture loss from bread crumbs due to high water vapor permeability showed a dominant effect on bacterial growth due to decreasing water activity.
Table 1. Functional polymers and packaging technology for bakery products.
Table 1. Functional polymers and packaging technology for bakery products.
Functional PackagingActive AgentsPackaging FormType of BakeryRemarkable ResultsReferences
Non-volatile active compoundsZinc oxide nanoparticlesChitosan-carboxymethyl cellulose filmPreservative-free soft sliced wheat bread
Coated films had decreased water vapor permeability, maintained higher moisture content, and increased water activity than the control
ZnO 1% and 2% inhibited Aspergillus niger and no mold growth on the bread for 15 days
[36]
NatamycinChitosan-natamycin vacuum packaged and sprayingPhyllo pastry
Chitosan and natamycin preserved sensory attributes for 17 days at 4 °C storage and inhibited Enterococci and Clostridium spp. up to 18 days
[37]
Sodium propionatePolypropylene-sodium propionate filmBread
Enhanced mechanical and thermal stability, increased hydrophilicity
Films showed antimicrobial activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive microbials, and bread showed less spoilage by mold on day 7 during storage
[38]
Silver nanoparticlesPolyvinyl chloride filmSliced Bread
Ag-nanoparticles 1% inhibited microorganisms in bread for 15 days of storage at 26 °C
Improved the properties of PVC material
[39]
ε-poly-L-lysine (ε-PL)Starch filmBread
Inhibition against A. parasiticus and P. expansum and diminished aflatoxin by more than 93.90% after 7 days of testing
[40]
ZnO nanoparticlesGelatin- polyethylene filmSponge cake
Prevented fungal growth for 28 days and maintained cake chemical and organoleptic quality
[41]
TiO2Potato starch filmSliced bread
1% TiO2 coating increased water vapor barrier properties and inhibited the growth of Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli
[42]
ChitosanChitosan-PLA filmSliced bread
All modified chitosan nanoparticles (CSNPs) showed capacity to inhibit S. aureus as high as > 98%, improved elongation at break and maintained oxygen permeation ability in a standard range for food packaging
[43]
Sulfur quantum dotAlginate filmBread
Integrated film improved tensile strength by 18%, UV barrier by 82% and antioxidant activity, while maintaining stiffness and WVP; sulfur-based compounds had antibacterial action against L. monocytogenes and E. coli, as well as against fungi such A. niger and P. chrysogenum and delayed the appearance of mold on bread for 14 days
[44]
Sorbate anionPolypropylene bagWhite bread
The coated film retained organoleptic characteristics, moisture analysis, peroxide evolution and mold count on bread for up to 12 days at ambient temperature and inhibited growth of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica subsp. Arizona, Staphylococcus aureus and Campylobacter jejuni
[45]
Volatile active compoundsCinnamaldehydeGliadin filmsSliced bread
Highly effective against fungal growth for both in vitro and food packing systems; cinnamaldehyde volatility from the solution forming film inhibited activity of P. expansum and A. niger over 10 days
[25]
Oregano essential oilNonwoven tissue/polypropylene-based sachetPreservative-free sliced bread
Inhibited the growth of E. coli, Salmonella Enteritidis and Penicillium sp., bread texture increased with storage time, but sachets had no effect; higher OEO concentration imparted unpleasant sensory effects (bitter taste and strong odor)
[46]
Apricot kernel essential oilChitosan filmSliced bread
The blended film decreased WVP, lower solubility and moisture content enhanced tensile strength and scavenging activity for both H2O2 and DPPH
Delayed bacterial growth as Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli protected against fungal growth of sliced bread within the packaging on day 10
[47]
Grapefruit seed extract/ChitosanPoly(ε-caprolactone)/chitosan filmPreservative-free bread
Grapefruit seed extract incorporation led to increased pits on the film surface but there was no mold growth on packaged bread with film containing ≥ 1.0 mL/g grapefruit seed extract after 7 days
[48]
trans-cinnamaldehydePLA/PBAT filmBread
Increased trans-cinnamaldehyde contributed to reduced barrier properties and decreased mechanical properties due to plasticization and pores embedded in films
Films with trans-cinnamaldehyde from 2% and above effectively inhibited the microbial growth of bacteria and fungi for more than 21 days at 30 °C
[24]
Eugenol and citralCorn starch microcapsule sachetSliced bread
The EOs-containing sachets were effective in inhibiting the growth of molds and yeasts in media and sliced bread without affecting the sensory properties of bread
[49]
ThymolPLA/PBSA filmPreservative-free bread
Effective against fungal growth up to 9 days and improved thermal and barrier properties as well as decreased glass transition temperature, melting temperature and crystallinity
Thymol decreased the permeability of water vapor, oxygen and carbon dioxide, tensile strength and Young’s modulus but increased elongation at break
[50]
Sorbitol/Grapefruit seed extractCorn starch-chitosan filmBread
Inhibition against A. niger and extended bread shelf life up to 20 days at 25 °C and 59% RH
Had low moisture content, water vapor permeability, solubility, high tensile strength and high antifungal activity
[51]
Cymbopogon citratus essential oilCashew gum-gelatin filmBread
The incorporated film extended shelf life to 6 days compared with the control at only 3 days
[52]
CarvacrolPLA/PBAT filmPreservative-free bread
PLA/PBAT blend ratio controlled the strength, permeability and release behavior of carvacrol
Film showed delayed fungal growth and sporulation of Penicillium sp. and Rhizopus sp. with 2.0–2.3 times increased shelf life
[53]
Cinnamon oilNatural rubber pressure-sensitive adhesive patchBanana cake
NR-PSA/CO patch delayed the growth of bacterial and fungal strains as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Aspergillus niger with extension of the 4-day shelf life
[54]
Piper betel Linn extractPoly (vinyl alcohol) filmSliced bread
Films had high UV blocking and antimicrobial efficiency
Inhibition against bacteria such as E. coli, S. typhimurium, S. aureus and P. aeruginosa with 3% of extract concentration and preserved bread quality for 45 days at room temperature
[55]
Cinnamaldehyde
Limonene
Eugenol
Fish gelatin-based nanofiber matBread
The incorporated mat had radical scavenging activity, ferric reducing antioxidant power and better encapsulation with the electrospinning method
Inhibited the growth of E. coli, S. aureus and A. niger
There was no fungal spot on bread antimicrobial packing
[56]
Thyme essential oilPoly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) filmWhite bread
Films containing 30% v/w of thyme essential oils extended the shelf life of bread up to 5 days depending on visible mold growth observation
Films enhanced both water vapor permeability and elongation at break
[57]
Schiff basePLA filmBread
Delayed growth of fungi on bread slices to day 5 compared with the control at day 3
Films also killed the bacteria plasma membrane as an inhibition zone
[58]
Functional paper and paperboardPLACoated paperboard-
PLA-coated paperboards improved water barrier properties through decreasing water vapor permeability and increase in water contact angle
[59]
Vanillin with dimethyl sulfoxide, ethyl alcohol, and chitosanCoated paper-
Each coating successfully inhibited growth of bacteria; however, efficiency varied depending on mixture concentration
[60]
WaxCoated paperMilk cake
Maintained sensory acceptability up to 21 days because the coated paper minimized moisture loss from milk cake
[61]
Cinnamon essential oilCoated paper-
Significantly reduced mold growth by direct migration in packaging and demonstrated resistance to Rhizopusstolonifer growth at 4% concentration
[62]
Ag/TiO2-SiO2, Ag/N-TiO2, or Au/TiO2Paper modification“Pave” bread
Characteristics of the paper including busting, tensile, tearing and breaking resistance decreased as the composite content increased.
Increased whiteness of the paper
Ag/TiO2-SiO2-paper and Ag/N-TiO2-paper extended bread shelf life by more than 2 days compared to unmodified paper in both ambient and refrigeration conditions by offering an efficient control on acidity and yeast and mold growth; Au/TiO2 had no influence on shelf-life extension indicating that nano-Ag had preservation activity and photoactivity
[63]
ChitosanCoating paper-
Coating increased the glossiness of paper as the chitosan filled surface porosity and improved moisture resistance, mechanical characteristics and flexibility
[64]
TiO2
Ag-TiO2
Ag-TiO2-zeolite
Bleached paperBread
Improved barrier properties such as air permeability, water vapor permeability and reduced grease permeation
Bread packed in Ag-TiO2 paper had an extended shelf life for 2 more days than the control package based on yeast and mold growth
[65]
Nano-carbonWrapping paperBrownie cake
Activated carbon-modified bamboo wrapping paper preserved nutrients in food and specifically reduced the level of microbial contamination on brownie cake
[66]
Blending of alginate, carboxymethyl cellulose, carrageenan, and grapefruit seed extractCoated paperMined fish cake
The biopolymer coating improved water and grease resistance, surface hydrophobicity and tensile properties of paper
Coated paper showed strong antimicrobial activity against L. monocytogenes and E. coli
[67]
Chitosan/Ag/TiO2Coated paperClarified butter
Coated paper had better opacity values, reduced water vapor and oxygen permeabilities and decreased oil permeability
Inhibition against E. coli at 70.36% on an agar plate and 73.28% in butter samples, as well as against yeasts and molds at 77.02% on an agar plate and 79.28% in butter samples
After six months, the peroxide value increased 6.47-fold with P-CH-Ag/TiO2 compared to uncoated at 36.71-fold
[68]
Starch, NaCl, AquasealPaper bagBread
Relative humidity (RH) of sandwich paper rose to 72% and enhanced bread sensory quality and freshness up to 72 h of storage, extending the shelf life
[69]
GeraniolPaper sachetSliced bread
PBS/geraniol-10% exhibited inhibition against Escherichia coli and Bacillus cereus with degradation of white bread with total plate count, yeasts, and mold count on day 42 with an antimicrobial sachet, whereas no fungus was spotted on white bread surface preserved with an antimicrobial sachet for the entire 63-day test period
[70]
Schiff base
PLA
Kraft paper coatingBread
Paper properties showed increased smoothness, maintained heat-sealing strength, decreased air porosity value and higher oil-grease resistance
[58]
Edible and non-edible coatingLactobacillus acidophilusEdible starch/probiotic coatingBread
Probiotic coating technique obtained microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus and starch-based material coated onto surface of baked breads resulting in better protection on bread crust and sensory acceptability
[71]
Ag/TiO2 nanocompositeHDPE film
White bread
Bread stored in Ag/TiO2-based packaging inhibited proliferation of yeast/molds, Bacillus cereus and Bacillus subtilis due to scavenging more water and oxygen molecules in the packaging headspace
[72]
Potassium sorbate and citric acidPotato starch, inverted sugar, sucrose coating solutionMini panettones
Panettones with an edible coating containing both additives showed fungal growth from 40 days, and with 1 g/kg potassium sorbate only, yeast and mold growth were not detected until 48 days
During storage, there was reduced water activity, moisture, elasticity and cohesiveness of panettones with additives, whereas the reverse occurred in the controls
[73]
Triticale flourEdible coating and sprayingMuffin
Triticale film coating worked well to prolong the staling process, keeping the fresh muffins softer during 10 days of storage because of delaying crumb-firming kinetics
[74]
Star anise essential oil and thymolPP/SAEO/PET/TH/LDPE filmPreservative-free sliced wheat bread
Insect repellent activity sustained the bread for up to 23 days and prevented antimicrobial growth for 14 days; the developed film had low tensile strength and elastic modulus
[75]
Garlic extract and Bread aromaCoating on PE filmPreservative-free sliced pan loaf
PE film coated with zein containing 0.5% garlic extract and bread aroma maintained bread free of mold growth for 30 days
[76]
Lactic acid bacteriaEdible lactic acid bacteria coating Wheat bread
Coating with Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, sodium alginate, whey and glycerol had the best protective properties against microbial spoilage
Incorporation of lactic acid bacteria in a coating containing alginate ensured good viability for 120 h
Coating diminished A. niger and P. chrysogenum in wheat bread
[77]
Okra mucilageEdible okra mucilage gum surface coatingBiscuit
Coated biscuits were preserved from deterioration and microbial spoilage with improved moisture barrier quality
[78]
Absorber/
Emitter
Iron-based oxygen absorberSachet (FreshPax®)Cracker
Prevented oxidation and extended the shelf life of military ration crackers packaged in hermetically sealed tin cans for 44 weeks
[79]
Oxygen absorber and ethanol emitterSachetWheat bread
Ethanol emitter increased the shelf life of bread by up to 24 days based on sensory and microbiological formation, and by up to 30 days when both ethanol emitters and oxygen absorbers were used
[80]
Iron-based oxygen scavenger sachetsSachetSliced wheat bread
Maintained wheat bread quality for up to 7 days of storage
[81]
Ethanol emitterSachetCiabatta bread
Ethanol emitter extended shelf life to 16 days while maintaining acceptable microbiological quality, whereas the usage of ethanol spray revealed no effect on product sensorial properties
[82]
Oxygen absorber and ethanol emitterSachetChinese steamed bread
The shelf life of Chinese steamed bread with an oxygen absorber and 1 v% ethanol emitter was extended by up to 11 days
[83]
Oxygen scavenger and ethanol emitterPouchSponge cake
The oxygen scavenger and ethanol emitter have high barrier packaging and extended shelf life of sponge cake to at least 42 days by delaying lipid oxidation, color change, cake hardening, and microbial growth
[84]
Oxygen absorberNylon/LLDPE/cast polypropylene filmPreservative-free Chinese pastry (kha-nom pia)
Nylon/CPP film retarded microbial growth better than Nylon/LLDPE and extended shelf life up to 25 days
Hardness of crust and firmness of filling decreased during storage
Oxygen absorber effectively inhibited the growth of total microbial count and yeasts and molds, with no visible mold appearing on the pastries
[85]
Iron-based oxygen scavengerSachetPreservative-free white bread
The oxygen scavenging sachet’s shelf life lasted for only 4 days
Bread shelf life was prolonged up to 5–7 days with a low initial oxygen level of 5% by volume
When packaging film possesses a high oxygen barrier, an oxygen scavenger is unnecessary
[86]
Vacuum conditioningBagChinese steamed bread
Thermal–vacuum packaging kept a higher water content and a longer shelf life, and maintained good taste with lower retrogradation rate of the bread
[87]
Iron based oxygen absorbersBagSourdough sliced bread
The most effective application was the high-capacity oxygen absorber combined with 100% N2, giving 12 days of a shelf life
With 50% CO2 + 50% N2, oxygen conc. increased above 2% due to the trapped O2 in the pores of bread and had a shelf life of only 3 days
Atmospheric conditions prolonged the shelf life for 6 days
[88]
Oxygen scavenging compound—pyrogallolFilm-
Adding the films to the package contributed to lowering oxygen levels in the package headspace for storage at 4, 25, and 50 °C
The maximum oxygen absorption capacity of pyrogallol-incorporated films was 23.0 mL O2/g films
[22]
Ethanol emitter, Oxygen absorber
Moisture absorber
SachetRefined wheat bread (RWF) and Whole wheat bread (WWF)
Bread packed in a combination of ethanol emitter, oxygen absorber and moisture absorber inhibited growth of microbes effectively. Maximum shelf lives of RWF and WWF were 16 and 8 days, respectively
[89]
Palladium-based oxygen scavengerFilmPar-baked bun and toast bread
Scavenger reduced initial oxygen concentration in the headspace from 21% to 2% but was still insufficient to extend the mold-free shelf life
CO2 modification in the packaging system extended shelf life to 10–12 days
[90]
Pyrogallic acidLDPE/sodium carbonate filmFish cake
Pyrogallic acid as oxygen scavenging coated on LDPE-based film showed stabilized fish cake quality by improving oxidation properties and inhibiting microbial growth during storage period of 30 days
[91]

3. Functional Polymeric Plastic

Polymer materials are a vital part of bakery packaging, as seen in Table 1 and Table 2. They play an important role in protecting food, ensuring freshness and modifying barrier properties such as water vapor and oxygen permeability. Polymer materials also influence mechanical properties of tensile strength and elongation at break, while releasing active compounds which inhibit microorganism growth and extend bakery product shelf life. These polymeric materials can be used to make many product forms including film, tray, rigid container, multilayer film and pouch. The active packaging system can involve non-volatile compounds, volatile compounds, edible mixed polymers, coated polymers, active paper and paperboard, oxygen scavenging, and ethanol emitters (Table 1).

3.1. Non-Volatile Active Ingredients

Numerous natural and synthetic ingredients have been incorporated into conventional and biodegradable plastic polymers to produce functional polymers for active packaging. The antimicrobial and antioxidant capacities of these functional polymers depend on several factors, e.g., release behavior, interaction between polymers and ingredients, and morphology of the matrices. Recent applications of these functional polymers are shown in Table 1. To increase the safety and quality of mini panettones, Ferreira et al. (2016) [73] modified citric acid and sorbate potassium by incorporating with edible coating solution, either separately or in combination, to increase shelf life of mini panettone by three times compared to the control. Thanakkasaranee et al. (2018) [38] found that a film made of polypropylene and sodium propionate with a concentration range of 0.5 to 5% enhanced mechanical properties and thermal stability, while increasing hydrophilicity, and demonstrated antimicrobial activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive microbes. Packed bread also showed less mold spoilage on day 7 of storage. Tsiraki et al. (2018) [37] investigated a combination of chitosan and natamycin as an effective antifungal agent that delayed the deterioration of phyllo pastry while preserving the basic freshness, look and acceptable sensory properties of the product. Vacuum packing with chitosan and natamycin prolonged the sensory shelf life by 11 days, and microbiological data showed that mesophilic total viable counts, yeasts and molds, psychotropic bacteria, lactic acid bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae and enterococci of 1 to 3 log CFU/g on the last day were the most prevalent microorganisms (day 18). Kongkaoroptham et al. (2021) [43] determined that PLA packaging films containing chitosan nanoparticles with polyethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate (PEGMA) inhibited the growth of natural microorganisms on bread slices. All modified chitosan nanoparticles (CSNPs) showed capacity to inhibit S. aureus as high as > 98%, improved elongation at break and oxygen permeation ability in a standard range for food packaging. Sulfur quantum dots (5.3 nm, aqueous suspension) were used by Riahi et al. (2022) [44] in alginate-based multifunctional films for bread packaging. The integrated film revealed tensile strength improvement of 18%, UV barrier property at 82% and antioxidant activity. Film stiffness and water vapor permeability were unaffected. Sulfur-based compounds had antibacterial action against L. monocytogenes and E. coli, as well as against fungi such as A. niger and P. chrysogenum. These delayed the appearance of mold on bread for 14 days. The nanosulfur mechanism disrupted metabolic activities by interacting with the target molecules in the microbial cell wall and altering cellular signals. Furthermore, the reactive oxygen species produced by nanosulfur interacted with and weakened the cell walls of microorganisms, causing cell lysis and death. Another mechanism involved the reaction of sulfur nanoparticles inside bacterial cells under acidic conditions, which interfered with cellular component breakdown or prevented DNA replication. Nanosulfur disrupts enzyme SH capabilities that are required for the metabolism of proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates. This results in the breakdown of cellular machinery and cell death [44].
Bio-based polymers, including starch, PBAT, and PLA, showed a high potential to produce biodegradable sustainable packaging [98,99,100]. Likewise, Huntrakul et al. (2020) [101] successfully combined edible heat-sealed acetylated cassava starch with pea protein isolated sachets, demonstrating effective protection for soybean and olive oil stored for up to three months. Pea protein improves interaction between the polymer and glycerol and effectively prevents humidity-induced film shrinkage. To extend the shelf life of bread, Luz et al. (2018) [40] investigated the effects of ε-poly-L-lysine (ε-PL) integrated with a starch-based biofilm as an antifungal agent. They found that ε-PL inhibited growth and showed antifungal efficacy against A. parasiticus and P. expansum. A. parasiticus, the developer of aflatoxin, was also controlled by ε-PL incorporation and diminished aflatoxin by more than 93.90% after 7 days of testing. Sliced bread was packaged in film-forming packaging that contained nanodispersed titanium dioxide (TiO2) by Shulga et al. (2021) [42]. Results revealed that 1% TiO2 coating increased water vapor barrier properties and inhibited the growth of Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli. Viscusi et al. (2021) [45] studied polypropylene film coated with dispersed anionic clay to host sorbate for white bread packaging. The coated film retained organoleptic characteristics, moisture analysis, peroxide evolution and mold count on the bread for up to 12 days at ambient temperature. Moreover, this active packaging inhibited the growth of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica subsp. Arizona, Staphylococcus aureus, and Campylobacter jejuni. Braga et al. (2018) [39] combined polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and silver nanoparticles as an active film for bread packaging. The PVC characteristics of the film were enhanced, and 1% Ag-nanoparticles suppressed the growth of microbes in bread stored at 26 °C for 15 days. Diffusion inhibited against B. subtilis, A. niger, and F. solani growth. However, the utilization of nanoparticles for packaging in the food industry requires safety assessments to ensure compliance with regional and global regulations [102].

3.2. Volatile Active Ingredients

Volatiles and essential oils are compounds that contribute to characteristic flavors and aromas of food products such as fruits, vegetables, herbs, and spices. These compounds mainly comprise terpenes, alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, terpenoids and apocarotenoids [103]. Natural and synthetic volatile compounds have been incorporated into plastic polymers and used for bakery packaging, as shown in Table 1. Likewise, for white pan bread and butter cake, Klinmalai et al. (2021) [53] noted how this food, when packed in blown-film extrusion of PLA/PBAT integrated with carvacrol essential oils (0, 2 and 5%), showed delayed Penicillium sp. and Rhizopus sp. growth and sporulation by film containing 2 and 5% carvacrol, with the shelf life extended by up to 4 days. PLA/PBAT blend films with plasticized carvacrol functionalization prevented growth of mold in baked products. Sharma et al. (2022) [57] studied the bacterial-based biopolymer, poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) or P(3HB-co-4HB) incorporating thyme essential oil as active packaging for white bread shelf life extension. Shelf life was extended up to 5 days compared with 1–4 days for the neat film, with improved film elongation at break and water vapor permeability. Passarinho et al. (2014) [46] developed an antimicrobial sachet containing oregano essential oil that acted against yeasts, mold, and Escherichia coli, Salmonella Enteritidis and Penicillium sp. on sliced bread. During storage, γ-terpenes and φ-cymene inhibited yeast and mold growth on bread slices. Ju et al. (2020) [49] discovered that a mixture of essential oils eugenol and citral (1:1) in corn starch microcapsule sachets decreased molds and yeasts from 100% to 56% at 25 °C and from 90% to 26% at 35 °C of storage conditions. Furthermore, the use of essential oils in sachets had minimal effect on the smell or taste of the bread. Sliced bread packed in LDPE, PP and HDPE bags containing the same essential oil sachets did not develop mold until day 16, 14, and 14, respectively. Mahmood et al. (2022) [56] used electrospinning techniques to produce fish-gelatin-based nanofiber mats embedded with cinnamaldehyde (CEO), limonene (LEO), and eugenol (EEO) at 1, 3, and 5% for bread packaging improvement. Results showed that all essential oils had radical scavenging activity such as CEO = 73.50%, LEO = 51.20%, and EEO = 89.37%, which was the highest at 5% concentration, whereas they also showed ferric-reducing antioxidant power and improved encapsulation with the electrospinning method. They also inhibited the growth of E. coli, S. aureus and A. niger because the gelatin-based mats had good release of essential oils, with no fungal spots on bread antimicrobial packing. Balaguer et al. (2013) [25] developed gliadin films incorporating cinnamaldehyde that were highly effective against fungal growth both in vitro and in food packing systems. Cinnamaldehyde volatility from the solution forming film inhibited the activity of P. expansum and A. niger over 10 days. Similarly, Fasihi et al. (2019) [104] used the Pickering stabilization method to enrich cinnamon essential oil (CEO) and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)–polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) in the solution-forming film and bread coating to increase the anti-UV properties and antifungal properties to prolong bread shelf life. Pickering stabilization impacted CEO by several mechanisms including (i) the generation of a uniform and regular structure of dispersed phase throughout the film matrix leading to increased contact between CEO and fungi, (ii) controlled and regular release of CEO from the film to the outside, which maintained sufficient antimicrobial and antioxidant agents in the headspace, and (iii) protection of CEO from oxidation against undesirable external effects that increased its efficiency as an active compound. PLA and PBAT blend films containing trans-cinnamaldehyde were studied by Srisa and Harnkarnsujarit (2020) [24]. Results showed increased water vapor and oxygen permeability because blending of PBAT/PLA reduced the orientation and non-homogeneity of the network formation. Volatility was higher at increased cinnamaldehyde concentration, and different blending ratios of the film released compounds and inhibited the growth of Aspergillus niger and Penicillium sp., effectively inhibiting microorganism growth for up to 21 days at 30 °C with slightly affected organoleptic properties of cinnamaldehyde taint at 5% concentration. Songtipya et al. (2021) [54] designed a patch that combined natural rubber pressure-sensitive adhesive and cinnamon oil for banana cake packaging. The NR-PSA/CO patch delayed the growth of bacterial and fungal strains of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Aspergillus niger with further extension of the 4-day shelf life. Cashew gum and gelatin were combined with ferulic acid and lemon grass essential oil by Oliveira et al. (2020) [52] to develop a casting film that showed increased water vapor permeability, decreased solubility and enhanced mechanical characteristics. The incorporated film also prevented the formation of mold for up to 7 days of storage, but the barrier properties of the film were limited, and bread was harder than commercial packaging (PE). Priyadarshi et al. (2018) [47] produced chitosan (CA) film integrated with apricot kernel essential oil (AKEO) for sliced bread packaging. The blended film increased water vapor barrier performance by up to 41%, with a solubility of only 4.76% and a moisture content of 8.33% compared to the control film of 18.42%, and 16.21%, respectively. This film had enhanced tensile strength and scavenging activity with both H2O2 and DPPH tests. Moreover, it delayed the bacterial development of Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli and protected sliced bread against fungal growth within the packaging on day 10 with a low concentration ratio of essential oil of 1:0.125 (CA:AKEO) film. Bui et al. (2021) [55] produced a blended film of poly (vinyl alcohol) and Piper betel Linn. leaf extract to extend bread shelf life. The film showed high UV blocking and antimicrobial efficiency, with inhibitory efficacy against E. coli, S. typhimurium, S. aureus and P. aeruginosa at 3% of extract concentration. Moreover, bread quality was preserved for 45 days at room temperature. Jha (2020) [51] produced bio-nanocomposite films based on corn starch chitosan with plasticizer sorbitol and grapefruit seed extract. The film showed maximum inhibition zone against A. niger and extended bread shelf life up to 20 days at 25 ℃ and 59% RH because it had low moisture content, water vapor permeability, solubility, high tensile strength, and high antifungal activity.
Furthermore, based on patents in Table 2, Carolina et al. (2022) [97] found that antifungal packaging comprising a polyolefin with a water-soluble polymer coating such as PVOH with a synergistic mixture of volatile natural compounds selected from carvacrol and allyl-isothiocyanate showed enhanced antifungal activity against the main fungi responsible for damage and spoilage of sliced bread such as A. niger and Penicillium. Bread samples packed in multilayers and coated with a film of LDPE, EVOH, acrylic coating, and mustard oil as an active essential oil showed improved storage for 30 days without any visible fungal growth on the surface of gluten-free bread [96].

4. Functional Paper and Coating Technology

Several coating methods as traditional and modern are commonly used for paper packaging. Traditional methods require a size press, rod coater, blade coater, roll-blade coater, and Vari dwell and fountain blade coaters, whereas modern methods employ a dip coater, slot die coater, curtain coater, electrostatic powder coating, spray coater, and lamination with tie layer (Figure 3) [105].
Table 1 lists some recent functional polymers used in paper packaging for bakery products. Numerous coating technologies have been utilized to enhance the functionality of paper packaging. Shankar and Rhim (2018) [67] developed coated wrapping paper using a solution of alginate, carboxymethylcellulose, carrageenan, and grapefruit seed extract. The paper coating resulted in improved mechanical properties, water vapor barrier, surface hydrophobicity, and tensile strength. This antimicrobial paper also inhibited the bacterial growth of L. monocytogenes and E. coli, with the removal of surface-inoculated bacteria from minced fish cake packaging achieved in 6–9 days. Rodríguez et al. (2008) [62] conducted research on active paper packaging based on the use of solid wax paraffin and cinnamon essential oil. The active coating significantly reduced mold growth by direct migration in packaging and demonstrated resistance to Rhizopusstolonifer growth at 4% concentration. Landge et al. (2009) [61] showed that milk cake packed with wax-coated paper pouches demonstrated a high level of sensory evaluation, with an estimated overall acceptability score of 7.2 out of 9.0 and remained acceptable for up to 21 days. Moisture loss from the cake was minimized because the wax coating had high barrier capabilities. Rhim et al. (2007) [59] produced PLA-coated paperboards with improved water barrier properties, decrease in water vapor permeability (WVP), increase in water contact angle (CA), and reduction in water absorptivity (WA) at an optimal concentration of 3% w/v PLA in chloroform. Antimicrobial sachet systems were designed by Petchwattana et al. (2021) [70] for extending the shelf life of sliced bread by combining paper coated with ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) and poly (butylene succinate) (PBS) with geraniol essential oil (Figure 4). When paper is coated with EVOH, the surface becomes rougher and contains small pores, whereas water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) decreases three-fold, making the paper suitable for use as a release-control component in antimicrobial sachets. Interestingly, the PBS/geraniol-10% pellets exhibited clear zones of inhibition against Escherichia coli and Bacillus cereus from 5 to 15 mm. The shelf life of the bread in packages containing sachets was also extended compared with uncoated paper since the release of geraniol achieved equilibrium around day 40. The degradation of white bread with total plate count, yeast, and mold count occurred on day 42 when using antimicrobial sachets. No fungus appeared on the white bread surface preserved with an antimicrobial sachet for the entire 63-day test period. The antibacterial function of geraniol in the paper coating suppressed mold formation. The mechanism of the antimicrobial sachet begins with the plasticization of the EVOH material in the presence of increased humidity. This then allows the molecules to pass through the coated paper layers. At the same time, geraniol molecules migrate to the surface of the PBS pellets. When the coated paper swells, the geraniol detaches from the antimicrobial sachet and exerts its antimicrobial functions, with the diffusion value 3.18 × 10−14 m2/s according to the diffusivity calculation [70].
For the paper packaging of baked products, Rakchoy et al. (2009) [60] coated vanillin with dimethyl sulfoxide, ethyl alcohol, and chitosan at concentrations of 10, 5, 2.5, and 1.125% w/w. Each coating successfully inhibited the growth of the bacteria; however, the efficiency varied depending on the mixture concentration. Bio-based chitosan-rich starch-coated paper developed by Vrabič Brodnjak (2017) [64] demonstrated more glossiness because the surface pores treated ultrasonically had improved moisture resistance, mechanical characteristics, and flexibility. Apjok et al. (2019) [68] coated cellulose-based papers with chitosan/Ag/TiO2 to package clarified butter for six months of storage. After coating with a mixture of chitosan, Ag, and TiO2 (P-CH-Ag/TiO2), the plain paper had greater opacity, reduced water vapor, and oxygen permeabilities and decreased oil permeability. The coated paper demonstrated good inhibition against E. coli, with percentages of 70.36 on an agar plate and 73.28 in butter samples, as well as against yeasts and molds at 77.02% on an agar plate and 79.28% in butter samples. The maximum allowed limit for animal fats is 4 mEq. O2/kg; however, after six months, the peroxide value increased 6.47-fold with P-CH-Ag/TiO2 compared with uncoated at 36.71-fold [106]. Peter et al. (2016) [63] modified white bread paper packaging with Ag/TiO2-SiO2, Ag/N-TiO2, or Au//TiO2 coating. As the coating composite content increased, paper attributes including bursting, tensile strength, tearing, and breaking resistance decreased, whereas paper whiteness increased. By effectively controlling acidity and inhibiting the growth of yeasts and molds, the packaging increased bread shelf life by two days compared with unmodified paper packaging, both in ambient and refrigeration conditions. Mihaly-Cozmuta et al. (2017) [65] developed active cellulose-based papers containing TiO2, Ag-TiO2, and Ag-TiO2-zeolite nanocomposites for bread packaging. The paper integrated with the nanocomposites via oxygen links that improved barrier properties such as air permeance by 4.36-fold (Ag-TiO2) and water vapor permeability, whereas permeability to grease decreased by 28.75%. Furthermore, bread packed in Ag-TiO2 paper showed increased shelf life at 2 days more than the control package based on yeast and mold growth. Mizielińska et al. (2020) [69] modified a multilayer of paper-based materials with NaCl functioning as a water absorber for bread packing and the relative humidity (RH) of sandwich paper increased to 72%. After 72 h of storage, bread sensory quality and freshness improved, with longer shelf life. Additionally, as shown in Table 2, Sirkku (2010) [94] patented a method for producing coated recyclable paper or paperboard comprised polymer emulsion (acrylic, or styrenebutadiene emulsion) 70–90% dry weight and pigments 10–30% as an aqueous coating layer and then drying and cooling the coated paper or paperboard. Coating improved barrier properties, with water resistance of less than 10 g/m2, moisture vapor transfer rate less than 120 g/m2, and heat sealability.

5. Edible Polymeric Coating in Bakery Products

Edible polymers refer to the polymeric materials that can be easily consumed by humans, animals, or microorganisms without any harmful effects on health. They are categorized into polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids. They have gained increasing application in functional food industries (food packaging and nutrients protection) and biomedical fields (drug delivery, tissue engineering, and wound dressing) [107,108,109]. Edible polymers have been studied and applied as particle form, layer form (coating or film) or as textile structures (edible fibers or modification of non-edible textiles), as shown in Table 1. The coating is a thin layer of liquid applied to the food surface, whereas films are formed on or between the food components and applied as a solid sheet [107,110]. Edible polymers can be made from polysaccharides and proteins and used to preserve quality and extend the shelf life of food. Proteins are composed of amino acids and polysaccharides with long chains of sugar molecules. They can form higher-order structures through a variety of interactions with themselves or with other proteins, including hydrogen and disulfide bonds, London dispersion forces and charge-to-charge interactions. Polysaccharides often have fewer interactions with other polysaccharides, which limits their structural flexibility. These biopolymers have been incorporated with several active ingredients to prolong the shelf life of bakery products. Chitosan is a biopolymer with native antimicrobial functions that have been extensively investigated for active edible coating [111]. For example, in the case, a combination of cassava starch and papain as an active edible film demonstrated successful blending with increased mechanical and surface hydrophobicity characteristics. Papain-blended film also showed its ability to slow the dissolution rate in water [112,113,114]. Lee et al. (2019) [75] used multiple layer films of PP/SAEO/PET/TH/LDPE with star anise essential oil (SAEO) coating the outside that acted as an insect repellent, whereas thymol essential oil (TH) coating the inside functioned as an antimicrobial for sliced wheat bread packaging systems. Results showed that the packaging system sustained insect repellent activity against P. interpunctella larvae for up to 23 days and inhibited S. aureus and P. roqueforti for 14 and 7 days, respectively. These edible layers are used as carriers of active ingredients. Gregirchak et al. (2020) [77] applied an edible coating containing lactic acid bacteria as a probiotic, sodium alginate, whey, and glycerol on wheat bread to protect against microbial spoilage. Results showed that the edible coating of lactic acid bacteria diminished the population of mesophilic aerobic and facultative aerobic bacteria and protected the bread crust against contamination from mycelium fungi of genera Aspergillus and Penicillium, whereas Altamirano-Fortoul et al., 2012, [71] applied a probiotic coating technique to obtain the microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus and starch-based material coated onto the surface of baked breads. This coating resulted in better protection on bread crust with sensory acceptability. Probiotics do not affect consumer health and are good for the digestive system. Short-term storage caused a reduction in the total colony counts of microencapsulated L. acidophilus in all treatments, indicating that a probiotic coating can be applied to protect the bread crust and retain sensory acceptability. Using triticale flour, Bartolozzo et al. (2016) [74] coated muffins with a film-forming solution. The coated muffins had delayed crumb firming kinetics and were softer after 10 days of storage. After 7 days of storage, the coated muffins showed a greater reduction in weight loss than the control sample. Triticale film coating worked well to prolong the staling process, keeping the muffins softer. Okra mucilage was used as the main component of biscuit coating by Senanayake (2021) [78] and showed improved moisture barrier qualities, while maintaining biscuit crispness and reduced deterioration and microbial spoilage. Noshirvani et al. (2017) [36] developed active surface-coating techniques incorporating chitosan, carboxymethyl cellulose, oleic acid, and zinc oxide nanoparticles to prolong sliced bread shelf life by up to 35 days, maintaining moisture content through lower water vapor permeability. Moreover, Ferreira Saraiva et al. (2016) [73] used edible coatings made of potato starch, inverted sugar, and sucrose to control the releasing of both citric acid and sorbate potassium for mini panettone shelf-life preservation.

6. Other Forms of Active Packaging Technology for Bakery Products

Some recent patents on polymeric packaging technology for bakery products are shown in Table 2. Most novel investigations aim to improve the quality and freshness of bakery products and also extend the shelf life. Antimicrobial actions of the package have been developed, with package structures engineered to achieve higher quality of packaged bread suitable for commercial production using extrusion processes. Other forms of packaging technology such as oxygen scavengers and ethanol emitters as shown in Table 1.

6.1. Oxygen Absorbers

Volatiles and essential oils are compounds that contribute to characteristic flavors and aromas of food products such as fruits, vegetables, herbs, and spices. These compounds mainly comprise terpenes, alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, terpenoids, and apocarotenoids [103]. Packaged foods need to be protected against oxidative deterioration to enhance shelf life and customer acceptability while maintaining food security. Oxygen absorbers play an important role in the removal of dissolved oxygen and preservation of the flavor, texture, and aroma of various food products [115]. Oxygen-scavenging activity strongly depends on package conditions including humidity, temperature, and morphology of the scavengers, which can be in the form of films and sachets [116]. Scott et al. (2006) [93] discovered an absorbent structure comprising PET, indium tin oxide, aluminum, silicone-based chrome complex, and wax materials. The absorbent sheet has a non-stick food-contacting surface and may be incorporated into or used with a tray or formed into a roll of absorbent material comprising at least two overlapping absorbent sheets. Commercial iron-based oxygen scavengers have high efficacy to eliminate residual oxygen in the package headspace to less than 0.01%. Oxygen scavenging activity in iron-based scavengers is catalyzed by humidity and higher at the beginning due to rapid oxidation of reduced iron powders and ferrous iron compounds. The formation of iron rust causes a tortuous path that hinders oxygen diffusion and slows down oxidation, giving lower reaction rates after 24 h [84]. Charles et al. (2004) [92] developed a rigid container that contained an oxygen scavenger and an indicator for bakery packaging. This system had good oxygen barrier properties, measurable oxygen concentration within the headspace of an assembled package, and indicated oxygen levels using a luminescent compound, whereas Muizniece-Brasava et al. (2012) [81] investigated conventional multibarrier pouches (MAP, 60% CO2, 40% N2) with an embedded oxygen scavenger to maintain wheat bread quality for up to 7 days of storage. Rüegg et al. (2022) [90] developed a catalytic system based on palladium to eliminate oxygen in the headspace and extend the shelf life of bakery products by inhibiting mold growth for 3 to 9 days. Additionally, the combination of PBAT/TPS and TiO2 demonstrated effective oxygen-scavenging activity, reducing residual remaining oxygen from the packaging headspace [117]. Upasen and Wattanachai (2018) [86] conducted research on blown films with an LDPE layer combined with oxygen absorbers to extend the shelf life of white bread for 4 days by maintaining fungal and mold development at a lower level than control films, whereas Sheng et al. (2015) [83] used an oxygen absorber and an ethanol emitter together to significantly increase the shelf life of Chinese steamed bread. However, a high ethanol content (3%) produced poor sensory qualities, and the bread was unsuitable for preservation. The shelf life of the sample with an oxygen absorber and 1% ethanol emitter was extended by up to 11 days. Latou et al. (2010) [80] extended the shelf life of sliced wheat bread by up to 24 days using an ethanol emitter and by at least 30 days when both an ethanol emitter and an oxygen absorber were present, whereas Berenzon and Saguy (1998) [79] applied an iron-based oxygen absorber in sachet form to prevent oxidation and extended the shelf life of military ration crackers packaged in hermetically sealed tin cans for 44 weeks. Promsorn and Harnkarnsujarit (2022) [22] combined thermoplastic starch and pyrogallol with LLDPE via cast film extrusion. Films designated with pyrogallol showed lower package headspace oxygen levels. After storage at 4, 25, and 50 °C, the maximum oxygen absorption capacity of pyrogallol-incorporated films was between 2.2 and 7.3, 4.6 and 23.0, and 5.0 and 13.1 mL O2/g films, respectively. The investigation of oxygen-absorbing polymers allows wider utilization of oxygen scavengers in the form of non-metallic components. Pyrogallic acid was also used as an oxygen scavenger, and applied as a coating material to the surface of polyethylene film with sodium carbonate (anhydrous). The coated film demonstrated that sodium carbonate accelerated the reaction of pyrogallic acid and oxygen, stabilizing the quality of fish cake by slowing pH reduction and reducing the amount of oxidation. Additionally, PE/SC/PA-20% at 7 log CFU/g suppressed the proliferation of microorganisms after 30 days of storage [91]. Apart from oxygen-scavenging technology, a conventional modified atmosphere which eliminates oxygen levels in the package headspace combined with high oxygen barrier polymeric packaging greatly enhances the shelf life of bakery products. Additionally, Liu et al. (2019) [87] investigated the packaging of Chinese steamed bread such as sealed packaging (SP), vacuum packaging (VP), and thermal–vacuum packaging (T–VP). Results showed that T–VP had higher water content and a longer shelf life because it related to permeability of packaging films which maintained good taste and lower retrogradation rate of the bread because the package delayed the speed of water desorption by blocking the interaction among water molecules, gluten, and starch.

6.2. Ethanol Emitters

Ethanol can be sprayed directly on the product or packaging or inside the package using ethanol emitters [118]. According to Dao and Dantigny (2011) [119], the storage of grain and cereal were protected against toxic mold growth via ethanol vapor fumigation in bakery storage room. Dantigny et al. (2005) [120] used ethanol against 12 common food-borne fungi and determined optimal concentration range of 3–5%, whereas Hempel et al. (2013) [82] demonstrated that ethanol emitters increased shelf life without the usage of extra modified environment gas. After utilizing ethanol emitters in package items in air for 16 days, acceptable microbiological quality criteria were maintained. Comparing the usage of ethanol emitters to ethanol spray techniques and controls revealed no difference in the product quality. Moreover, Janjarasskul et al. (2016) [84] also indicated the anti-stalling effect of ethanol emitters that formed ethanol-amylose/amylopectin complexes and reduced retrogradation, whereas ethanol also plasticized protein networks in cake crumb [84,121]. The permeability of the package containing volatile antimicrobial agents can be improved to control the release using composite and laminate materials [122].

7. Conclusions and Final Remarks

The incorporating active agents into polymeric materials such as plastic and fibers produces active functional packaging that can preserve the quality and extend the shelf life of bakery products. Several volatile and non-volatile substances have been incorporated into polymers to produce active packaging for bakery products with novel volatile ingredients recently investigated. Other forms of active packaging such as oxygen scavengers and ethanol emitters have been applied for the quality preservation of bakery products. The permeability of polymeric films also plays a key role in quality changes that induce moisture loss and reduce water activity, with subsequent restriction of microbial growth. Challenges for these functional packaging include compatibility between active ingredients and organoleptic quality of the bakery, mass transfers of the active substances from polymeric packaging into foods and levels of migration which should be complied with products legislation. The release of antimicrobial volatile substances has a promising role in delaying mold growth. However, odor and flavor contamination by the incompatible active agents possibly limits their commercial applications. More studies on volatile active compounds which have no effects on organoleptic qualities of bakery products are the future perspective of this area of research. All these relationships should be considered when designing proper packaging to retain organoleptic quality while reducing microbial growth in bakery products.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.S. and N.H.; methodology, H.S. and N.H.; formal analysis, H.S. and N.H.; investigation, H.S. and N.H.; writing−original draft preparation, H.S. and N.H.; writing−review and editing, H.S., Y.L., E.B., U.S., K.W., J.S., T.K., K.P., A.S., P.W. and N.H.; supervision, N.H.; funding acquisition, N.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI) FF(KU)1.65.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Newswire, P. Baking Ingredients Market Worth $22.3 Billion by 2026—Exclusive Report by MarketsandMarkets™. PR Newswire US. 2021. Available online: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/baking-ingredients-market-worth-22-3-billion-by-2026--exclusive-report-by-marketsandmarkets-301270475.html (accessed on 25 August 2021).
  2. Goryńska-Goldmann, E.; Gazdecki, M.; Rejman, K.; Łaba, S.; Kobus-Cisowska, J.; Szczepański, K. Magnitude, Causes and Scope for Reducing Food Losses in the Baking and Confectionery Industry—A Multi-Method Approach. Agriculture 2021, 11, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Izabella, K.-K.; Justyna, R.-K.; Lucjan, K. Factors Influencing Quality and Shelf Life of Baking Products. J. Processing Energy Agric. 2014, 18, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yildirim, S.; Röcker, B.; Pettersen, M.K.; Nilsen-Nygaard, J.; Ayhan, Z.; Rutkaite, R.; Radusin, T.; Suminska, P.; Marcos, B.; Coma, V. Active Packaging Applications for Food. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 17, 165–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. European Commission. EU Guidance to the Commission Regulation (EC) No 450/2009 on active and intelligent materials and articles intended to come into contact with food. Off. J. Eur. Union 2009, 38, 214–222. [Google Scholar]
  6. Garcia, M.V.; Copetti, M.V. Alternative methods for mould spoilage control in bread and bakery products. Int. Food Res. J. 2019, 26, 737–749. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jideani, V.A.; Vogt, K. Antimicrobial Packaging for Extending the Shelf Life of Bread—A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 56, 1313–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kuorwel, K.K.; Cran, M.J.; Sonneveld, K.; Miltz, J.; Bigger, S.W. Essential Oils and Their Principal Constituents as Antimicrobial Agents for Synthetic Packaging Films. J. Food Sci. 2011, 76, R164–R177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bagamboula, C.; Uyttendaele, M.; Debevere, J. Inhibitory effect of thyme and basil essential oils, carvacrol, thymol, estragol, linalool and p-cymene towards Shigella sonnei and S. flexneri. Food Microbiol. 2004, 21, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nanditha, B.; Prabhasankar, P. Antioxidants in Bakery Products: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2008, 49, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Madhavi, D.L.; Deshpande, S.S.; Salunkhe, D.K. Food Antioxidants: Technological: Toxicological and Health Perspectives; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  12. Saura-Calixto, F. Antioxidant Dietary Fiber Product: A New Concept and a Potential Food Ingredient. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 4303–4306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Someya, S.; Yoshiki, Y.; Okubo, K. Antioxidant compounds from bananas (Musa Cavendish). Food Chem. 2002, 79, 351–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gavahian, M.; Chu, Y.-H.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Mousavi Khaneghah, A.; Barba, F.J. Essential oils as natural preservatives for bakery products: Understanding the mechanisms of action, recent findings, and applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 310–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kotsianis, I.; Giannou, V.; Tzia, C. Production and packaging of bakery products using MAP technology. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 13, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Galic, K.; Ćurić, D.; Gabric, D. Shelf Life of Packaged Bakery Goods—A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 49, 405–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martins, I.E.; Shittu, T.A.; Onabanjo, O.O.; Adesina, A.D.; Soares, A.G.; Okolie, P.I.; Kupoluyi, A.O.; Ojo, O.A.; Obadina, A.O. Effect of packaging materials and storage conditions on the microbial quality of pearl millet sourdough bread. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 58, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, W.; Hui, Y.H. Bakery Products Sciences and Technology, 2nd ed.; Jonh Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ashokkumar, Y. Textbook of Bakery and Confectionery, 2nd ed.; PHI Learning: Delhi, India, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. Cauvain, S.P.; Young, L.S. Chemical and physical deterioration of bakery products. In Chemical Deterioration and Physical Instability of Food and Beverages; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Bucks, UK, 2010; pp. 381–412. [Google Scholar]
  21. Manley, D. Manley’s Technology of Biscuits, Crackers and Cookies, 4th ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  22. Promsorn, J.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Pyrogallol loaded thermoplastic cassava starch based films as bio-based oxygen scavengers. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2022, 186, 115226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Troller, J.A.; Christian, J. Water Activity and Food; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1978; pp. 372–381. [Google Scholar]
  24. Srisa, A.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Antifungal films from trans-cinnamaldehyde incorporated poly(lactic acid) and poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) for bread packaging. Food Chem. 2020, 333, 127537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Balaguer, M.P.; Lopez-Carballo, G.; Catala, R.; Gavara, R.; Hernandez-Munoz, P. Antifungal properties of gliadin films incorporating cinnamaldehyde and application in active food packaging of bread and cheese spread foodstuffs. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013, 166, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bumbudsanpharoke, N.; Wongphan, P.; Promhuad, K.; Leelaphiwat, P.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Morphology and permeability of bio-based poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT), poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) and linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) blend films control shelf-life of packaged bread. Food Control 2021, 132, 108541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Licciardello, F. Packaging, blessing in disguise. Review on its diverse contribution to food sustainability. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 65, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saranraj, P.; Geetha, M. Microbial Spoilage of Bakery Products and Its Control by Preservatives. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Arch. 2012, 3, 38–48. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pateras, I.M.C. Bread Spoilage and Staling. In Technology of Bread Making; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 275–298. [Google Scholar]
  30. Galanakis, C.M. Recovery of high added-value components from food wastes: Conventional, emerging technologies and commercialized applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 26, 68–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bello, F.D.; Clarke, C.; Ryan, L.; Ulmer, H.; Schober, T.; Ström, K.; Sjögren, J.; van Sinderen, D.; Schnürer, J.; Arendt, E. Improvement of the quality and shelf life of wheat bread by fermentation with the antifungal strain Lactobacillus plantarum FST 1.7. J. Cereal Sci. 2007, 45, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Needham, R.; Williams, J.; Beales, N.; Voysey, P.; Magan, N. Early detection and differentiation of spoilage of bakery products. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 106, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Knight, R.A.; Menlove, E.M. Effect of the Bread-baking process on destruction of certain mold spores. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1961, 10, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Degirmencioglu, N.; Göcmen, D.; Inkaya, A.N.; Aydin, E.; Guldas, M.; Gonenc, S. Influence of modified atmosphere packaging and potassium sorbate on microbiological characteristics of sliced bread. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 48, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rodríguez, M.; Medina, L.M.; Jordano, R. Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on the shelf life of sliced wheat flour bread. Nahrung 2000, 44, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Noshirvani, N.; Ghanbarzadeh, B.; Mokarram, R.R.; Hashemi, M. Novel active packaging based on carboxymethyl cellulose-chitosan-ZnO NPs nanocomposite for increasing the shelf life of bread. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2017, 11, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tsiraki, M.I.; El-Obeid, T.; Yehia, H.M.; Karam, L.; Savvaidis, I.N. Effects of Chitosan and Natamycin on Vacuum-Packaged Phyllo: A Pastry Product. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 1982–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Thanakkasaranee, S.; Kim, D.; Seo, J. Preparation and characterization of polypropylene/sodium propionate (PP/SP) composite films for bread packaging application. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2018, 31, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Braga, L.R.; Rangel, E.T.; Suarez, P.A.Z.; Machado, F. Simple synthesis of active films based on PVC incorporated with silver nanoparticles: Evaluation of the thermal, structural and antimicrobial properties. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 15, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Luz, C.; Calpe, J.; Saladino, F.; Luciano, F.B.; Fernandez-Franzón, M.; Mañes, J.; Meca, G. Antimicrobial packaging based on ɛ-polylysine bioactive film for the control of mycotoxigenic fungi in vitro and in bread. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017, 42, e13370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sahraee, S.; Milani, J.M.; Ghanbarzadeh, B.; Hamishehkar, H. Development of emulsion films based on bovine gelatin-nano chitin-nano ZnO for cake packaging. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 8, 1303–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Shulga, O.; Chorna, A.; Shulga, S. Antimicrobial biodegradable packaging for sliced bakery. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 15, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kongkaoroptham, P.; Piroonpan, T.; Pasanphan, W. Chitosan nanoparticles based on their derivatives as antioxidant and antibacterial additives for active bioplastic packaging. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 257, 117610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Riahi, Z.; Priyadarshi, R.; Rhim, J.-W.; Lotfali, E.; Bagheri, R.; Pircheraghi, G. Alginate-based multifunctional films incorporated with sulfur quantum dots for active packaging applications. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2022, 215, 112519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Viscusi, G.; Bugatti, V.; Vittoria, V.; Gorrasi, G. Antimicrobial sorbate anchored to layered double hydroxide (LDH) nano-carrier employed as active coating on Polypropylene (PP) packaging: Application to bread stored at ambient temperature. Future Foods 2021, 4, 100063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Passarinho, A.T.P.; Dias, N.F.; Camilloto, G.P.; Cruz, R.S.; Otoni, C.; Moraes, A.R.F.; Soares, N.D.F.F. Sliced Bread Preservation through Oregano Essential Oil-Containing Sachet. J. Food Process Eng. 2014, 37, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Priyadarshi, R.; Kumar, B.; Deeba, F.; Kulshreshtha, A.; Negi, Y.S. Chitosan films incorporated with Apricot (Prunus armeniaca) kernel essential oil as active food packaging material. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 85, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, K.; Lim, P.N.; Tong, S.Y.; Thian, E.S. Development of grapefruit seed extract-loaded poly(ε-caprolactone)/chitosan films for antimicrobial food packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 22, 100396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ju, J.; Xie, Y.; Yu, H.; Guo, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Qian, H.; Yao, W. A novel method to prolong bread shelf life: Sachets containing essential oils components. LWT 2020, 131, 109744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Suwanamornlert, P.; Kerddonfag, N.; Sane, A.; Chinsirikul, W.; Zhou, W.; Chonhenchob, V. Poly(lactic acid)/poly(butylene-succinate-co-adipate) (PLA/PBSA) blend films containing thymol as alternative to synthetic preservatives for active packaging of bread. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 25, 100515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jha, P. Effect of plasticizer and antimicrobial agents on functional properties of bionanocomposite films based on corn starch-chitosan for food packaging applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 160, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Oliveira, M.A.; Gonzaga, M.L.; Bastos, M.S.; Magalhães, H.C.; Benevides, S.D.; Furtado, R.F.; Zambelli, R.A.; Garruti, D.S. Packaging with cashew gum/gelatin/essential oil for bread: Release potential of the citral. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 23, 100431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Klinmalai, P.; Srisa, A.; Laorenza, Y.; Katekhong, W.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Antifungal and plasticization effects of carvacrol in biodegradable poly(lactic acid) and poly(butylene adipate terephthalate) blend films for bakery packaging. LWT 2021, 152, 112356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Songtipya, P.; Sengsuk, T.; Songtipya, L.; Prodpran, T.; Kalkornsurapranee, E. A novel natural rubber pressure sensitive adhesive patch amended with cinnamon oil for preserving bakery product. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 29, 100729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bui, Q.T.P.; Nguyen, T.T.; Nguyen, L.T.T.; Kim, S.H.; Nguyen, H.N. Development of ecofriendly active food packaging materials based on blends of cross-linked poly (vinyl alcohol) and Piper betle Linn. leaf extract. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 50974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mahmood, K.; Kamilah, H.; Alias, A.K.; Ariffin, F.; Nafchi, A.M. Functionalization of electrospun fish gelatin mats with bioactive agents: Comparative effect on morphology, thermo-mechanical, antioxidant, antimicrobial properties, and bread shelf stability. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 10, 584–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sharma, P.; Ahuja, A.; Izrayeel, A.M.D.; Samyn, P.; Rastogi, V.K. Physicochemical and thermal characterization of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) films incorporating thyme essential oil for active packaging of white bread. Food Control 2021, 133, 108688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Natesan, S.; Samuel, J.S.; Srinivasan, A.K. Design and development of Schiff’s base (SB)-modified polylactic acid (PLA) antimicrobial film for packaging applications. Polym. Bull. 2021, 79, 4627–4646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rhim, J.-W.; Lee, J.-H.; Hong, S.-I. Increase in water resistance of paperboard by coating with poly(lactide). Packag. Technol. Sci. 2007, 20, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rakchoy, S.; Suppakul, P.; Jinkarn, T. Antimicrobial effects of vanillin coated solution for coating paperboard intended for packaging bakery products. Asian J. Food Agro-Ind. 2009, 2, 138–147. [Google Scholar]
  61. Landge, S.N.; Chavan, B.R.; Kulkarni, D.N.; Khedkar, C.D. Effect of packaging materials, storage period and temper-ature on acceptability of milk cake. J. Dairy. Foods Home Sci. 2009, 28, 20–25. [Google Scholar]
  62. Rodríguez, A.; Nerín, C.; Batlle, R. New Cinnamon-Based Active Paper Packaging against Rhizopusstolonifer Food Spoilage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 6364–6369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Peter, A.; Mihaly-Cozmuta, L.; Mihaly-Cozmuta, A.; Nicula, C.; Ziemkowska, W.; Basiak, D.; Danciu, V.; Vulpoi, A.; Baia, L.; Falup, A.; et al. Changes in the microbiological and chemical characteristics of white bread during storage in paper packages modified with Ag/TiO2–SiO2, Ag/N–TiO2 or Au/TiO2. Food Chem. 2016, 197, 790–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Brodnjak, U.V. Influence of ultrasonic treatment on properties of bio-based coated paper. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 103, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mihaly-Cozmuta, A.; Peter, A.; Craciun, G.; Falup, A.; Mihaly-Cozmuta, L.; Nicula, C.; Vulpoi, A.; Baia, M. Preparation and characterization of active cellulose-based papers modified with TiO2, Ag and zeolite nanocomposites for bread packaging application. Cellulose 2017, 24, 3911–3928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Efiyanti, L.; Hastuti, N.; Indrawan, D.A. Potential Utilization of Nano Carbon Wrapping Paper from Bamboo for Packaging of Brownies Cake. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Innovative Bio-Production Indonesia, Bogor, Indonesia, 10 October 2018; Research Center for Biotechnology: Bogor, Indonesia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  67. Shankar, S.; Rhim, J.-W. Antimicrobial wrapping paper coated with a ternary blend of carbohydrates (alginate, carboxymethyl cellulose, carrageenan) and grapefruit seed extract. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 196, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Apjok, R.; Cozmuta, A.M.; Peter, A.; Cozmuta, L.M.; Nicula, C.; Baia, M.; Vulpoi, A. Active packaging based on cellulose-chitosan-Ag/TiO2 nanocomposite for storage of clarified butter. Cellulose 2019, 26, 1923–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mizielińska, M.; Kowalska, U.; Tarnowiecka-Kuca, A.; Dzięcioł, P.; Kozłowska, K.; Bartkowiak, A. The Influence of Multilayer, “Sandwich” Package on the Freshness of Bread after 72 h Storage. Coatings 2020, 10, 1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Petchwattana, N.; Naknaen, P.; Cha-Aim, K.; Suksri, C.; Sanetuntikul, J. Controlled release antimicrobial sachet prepared from poly(butylene succinate)/geraniol and ethylene vinyl alcohol coated paper for bread shelf-life extension application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 189, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Altamirano-Fortoul, R.; Moreno-Terrazas, R.; Quezada-Gallo, A.; Rosell, C. Viability of some probiotic coatings in bread and its effect on the crust mechanical properties. Food Hydrocoll. 2012, 29, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Cozmuta, A.M.; Peter, A.; Cozmuta, L.M.; Nicula, C.; Crisan, L.; Baia, L.; Turila, A. Active Packaging System Based on Ag/TiO2Nanocomposite Used for Extending the Shelf Life of Bread. Chemical and Microbiological Investigations. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2014, 28, 271–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Saraiva, L.E.F.; Naponucena, L.D.O.M.; Santos, V.D.S.; Silva, R.P.D.; de Souza, C.O.; Souza, I.E.G.L.; Mamede, M.E.D.O.; Druzian, J.I. Development and application of edible film of active potato starch to extend mini panettone shelf life. LWT 2016, 73, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bartolozzo, J.; Borneo, R.; Aguirre, A. Effect of triticale-based edible coating on muffin quality maintenance during storage. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2015, 10, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lee, J.; Park, M.A.; Yoon, C.S.; Na, J.H.; Han, J. Characterization and Preservation Performance of Multilayer Film with Insect Repellent and Antimicrobial Activities for Sliced Wheat Bread Packaging. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 3194–3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Heras-Mozos, R.; Muriel-Galet, V.; López-Carballo, G.; Catalá, R.; Hernandez-Munoz, P.; Gavara, R. Development and optimization of antifungal packaging for sliced pan loaf based on garlic as active agent and bread aroma as aroma corrector. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 290, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gregirchak, N.; Stabnikova, O.; Stabnikov, V. Application of Lactic Acid Bacteria for Coating of Wheat Bread to Protect it from Microbial Spoilage. Mater. Veg. 2020, 75, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Senanayake, C.M.; Nayanakanthi, T.; Siranjiv, P. Development of an Edible Coating from Okra Mucilage to Preserve the Crispiness in Soft Dough Biscuits Upon Storage. Adv. Technol. 2021, 1, 307–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Berenzon, S.; Saguy, I.S. Oxygen Absorber for Externsion of Crackers Shelf-life. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1998, 31, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Latou, E.; Mexis, S.; Badeka, A.; Kontominas, M. Shelf life extension of sliced wheat bread using either an ethanol emitter or an ethanol emitter combined with an oxygen absorber as alternatives to chemical preservatives. J. Cereal Sci. 2010, 52, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Muizniece-Brasava, S.; Dukalska, L.; Murniece, I.; Dabina-Bicka, I.; Kozlinskis, E.; Sarvi, S.; Santars, R.; Silvjane, A. Active Packaging Influence on Shelf Life Extension of Sliced Wheat Bread. Int. J. Nutr. Food Eng. 2012, 6, 480–486. [Google Scholar]
  82. Hempel, A.W.; O’Sullivan, M.G.; Papkovsky, D.B.; Kerry, J.P. Use of smart packaging technologies for monitoring and extending the shelf-life quality of modified atmosphere packaged (MAP) bread: Application of intelligent oxygen sensors and active ethanol emitters. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2013, 237, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sheng, Q.; Guo, X.-N.; Zhu, K.-X. The Effect of Active Packaging on Microbial Stability and Quality of Chinese Steamed Bread. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2015, 28, 775–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Janjarasskul, T.; Tananuwong, K.; Kongpensook, V.; Tantratian, S.; Kokpol, S. Shelf life extension of sponge cake by active packaging as an alternative to direct addition of chemical preservatives. LWT 2016, 72, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chuaythong, C.; Rachtanapun, C. Effect of packaging film and oxygen absorber of shelf life extension of Chinese pastry (kha-nom pia). Ital. J. Food Sci. 2017, 30, 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  86. Upasen, S.; Wattanachai, P. Packaging to prolong shelf life of preservative-free white bread. Heliyon 2018, 4, e00802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Ma, Z.; Liu, L.; Hu, X. Chinese steamed bread: Packaging conditions and starch retrogradation. Cereal Chem. 2018, 96, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Kütahneci, E.; Ayhan, Z. Applications of different oxygen scavenging systems as an active packaging to improve freshness and shelf life of sliced bread. J. Consum. Prot. Food Saf. 2021, 16, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Shashikumar, J.N.; Nidoni, U.; Ramachandra, C.T. Influence of active packaging materials on microbial characteristics of wheat flour bread during storage. Pharma Innov. J. 2022, 11, 531–537. [Google Scholar]
  90. Rüegg, N.; Röcker, B.; Yildirim, S. Application of palladium-based oxygen scavenger to extend the mould free shelf life of bakery products. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 31, 100771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gaikwad, K.K.; Deshmukh, R.K.; Lee, Y.S. Natural phenolic compound coated oxygen scavenging active polyolefin film for preserving quality of fish cake. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2022, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Charles, B.R.; Drew, S.V.; Thomas, K.D.; Marvin, H.R. Oxygen Detection System for a Ridig Container. WO2004/052644A2, 25 November 2004. [Google Scholar]
  93. Scott, M.W.; Terrence, L.P.; William, S.J.; Norman, J.L.; Jonh, F.C.; Tom, W. Absorbent Microwave Interactive Packaging. WO 2006/026345 A2(PCT/US2005/030231), 2006. [Google Scholar]
  94. Sirkku, R.J. Coated Recyclable Paper or Paperboard and Methods for Their Production. WO 2010/052571A2, 10 May 2010. [Google Scholar]
  95. Minna, A.; Gerhard, S. Multilayer Film. WO2012/016938A1, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  96. Carolina, L.D.D.B.A.; Alicia, G.L.M.J.; Abel, G.M.; Jose, V.V.E.; Simon, R.F. Antifungal Polymeric Multilayer Active Packaging with Inner Polymeric Coating Comprising Mustard Oil, Useful for Extending the Shelf Life of Bakery Products for Coeliacs. WO2021207864 (A1), 21 October 2021. [Google Scholar]
  97. Carolina, L.D.D.B.A.; Virginia, M.G.; Simon, R.F.; Abel, G.M.; Alicia, G.L.M.J. Active Antifungal Packaging, Polyolefin with a Water-Soluble Polymer Coating and Synergistic Mixture of Volatile Natural Components, Carvacrol and al-lyl-Isothiocyanate, Useful for Extending the Useful Life of Bakery Products. WO2021068089 (A1), 15 April 2022. [Google Scholar]
  98. Phothisarattana, D.; Wongphan, P.; Promhuad, K.; Promsorn, J.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Blown film extrusion of PBAT/TPS/ZnO nanocomposites for shelf-life extension of meat packaging. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2022, 214, 112472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Wadaugsorn, K.; Panrong, T.; Wongphan, P.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Plasticized hydroxypropyl cassava starch blended PBAT for improved clarity blown films: Morphology and properties. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2021, 176, 114311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wongphan, P.; Panrong, T.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Effect of different modified starches on physical, morphological, thermomechanical, barrier and biodegradation properties of cassava starch and polybutylene adipate terephthalate blend film. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 32, 100844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Huntrakul, K.; Yoksan, R.; Sane, A.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Effects of pea protein on properties of cassava starch edible films produced by blown-film extrusion for oil packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2020, 24, 100480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Phothisarattana, D.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Migration, aggregations and thermal degradation behaviors of TiO2 and ZnO incorporated PBAT/TPS nanocomposite blown films. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2022, 33, 100901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Bhardwaj, A.; Alam, T.; Talwar, N. Recent advances in active packaging of agri-food products: A review. J. Postharvest Technol. 2019, 7, 33–62. [Google Scholar]
  104. Fasihi, H.; Fasihi, H.; Noshirvani, N.; Noshirvani, N.; Hashemi, M.; Hashemi, M.; Fazilati, M.; Fazilati, M.; Salavati, H.; Salavati, H.; et al. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of carbohydrate-based films enriched with cinnamon essential oil by Pickering emulsion method. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2019, 19, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Tyagi, P.; Salem, K.S.; Hubbe, M.A.; Pal, L. Advances in barrier coatings and film technologies for achieving sustainable packaging of food products—A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 115, 461–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Regulation, E. Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the council on laying down specific hygience rules for on the hygiene of foodstuffs. Eur. Comm. 2004, 139, 139. [Google Scholar]
  107. Kouhi, M.; Prabhakaran, M.P.; Ramakrishna, S. Edible polymers: An insight into its application in food, biomedicine and cosmetics. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 103, 248–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Shit, S.C.; Shah, P.M. Edible Polymers: Challenges and Opportunities. J. Polym. 2014, 2014, 427259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ali, A.; Ahmed, S. Recent Advances in Edible Polymer Based Hydrogels as a Sustainable Alternative to Conventional Polymers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 6940–6967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. McHugh, T.H. Protein-lipid interactions in edible films and coatings. Nahrung 2000, 44, 148–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gough, C.R.; Rivera-Galletti, A.; Cowan, D.A.; La Cruz, D.S.-D.; Hu, X. Protein and Polysaccharide-Based Fiber Materials Generated from Ionic Liquids: A Review. Molecules 2020, 25, 3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Wongphan, P.; Khowthong, M.; Supatrawiporn, T.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Novel edible starch films incorporating papain for meat tenderization. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 31, 100787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Kocira, A.; Kozłowicz, K.; Panasiewicz, K.; Staniak, M.; Szpunar-Krok, E.; Hortyńska, P. Polysaccharides as Edible Films and Coatings: Characteristics and Influence on Fruit and Vegetable Quality—A Review. Agronomy 2021, 11, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. BeMiller, J.N. Carbohydrate Chemistry for Food Scientists, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  115. Cichello, S.A. Oxygen absorbers in food preservation: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 52, 1889–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Promsorn, J.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Oxygen absorbing food packaging made by extrusion compounding of thermoplastic cassava starch with gallic acid. Food Control 2022, 142, 109273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Phothisarattana, D.; Wongphan, P.; Promhuad, K.; Promsorn, J.; Harnkarnsujarit, N. Biodegradable Poly(Butylene Adipate-Co-Terephthalate) and Thermoplastic Starch-Blended TiO2 Nanocomposite Blown Films as Functional Active Packaging of Fresh Fruit. Polymers 2021, 13, 4192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. De Pilli, T. Development of a vegetable oil and egg proteins edible film to replace preservatives and primary packaging of sweet baked goods. Food Control 2020, 114, 107273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Dao, T.; Dantigny, P. Control of food spoilage fungi by ethanol. Food Control 2011, 22, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Dantigny, P.; Guilmart, A.; Radoi, F.; Bensoussan, M.; Zwietering, M. Modelling the effect of ethanol on growth rate of food spoilage moulds. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 98, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Kalathenos, P.; Russell, N.J. Ethanol as a food preservative. In Food Preservatives; Russell, N.J., Gould, G.W., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; pp. 196–217. [Google Scholar]
  122. Elsheikh, A. Bistable Morphing Composites for Energy-Harvesting Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The relationship between water activity and crumb hardness during storage for 21 days in biodegradable films at room temperature (Reproduced with permission from Srisa and Harnkarnsujarit (2020) [24]).
Figure 1. The relationship between water activity and crumb hardness during storage for 21 days in biodegradable films at room temperature (Reproduced with permission from Srisa and Harnkarnsujarit (2020) [24]).
Polymers 14 03793 g001
Figure 2. The relationship between water vapor permeability and crumb hardness at 3 and 6 days of storage at room temperature (reproduced with permission from Bumbudsanpharoke et al. (2022) [26]).
Figure 2. The relationship between water vapor permeability and crumb hardness at 3 and 6 days of storage at room temperature (reproduced with permission from Bumbudsanpharoke et al. (2022) [26]).
Polymers 14 03793 g002
Figure 3. Illustration of different paper coating methods, (a) air knife, (b) blade metering, (c) dipcoating, (d) slot die, and (e) curtain coating (reproduced with permission from Tyagi et al. (2021) [105]).
Figure 3. Illustration of different paper coating methods, (a) air knife, (b) blade metering, (c) dipcoating, (d) slot die, and (e) curtain coating (reproduced with permission from Tyagi et al. (2021) [105]).
Polymers 14 03793 g003
Figure 4. Schematic diagram describing the diffusion mechanism in bread packaging (reproduced with permission from Petchwattana et al. (2021) [70]).
Figure 4. Schematic diagram describing the diffusion mechanism in bread packaging (reproduced with permission from Petchwattana et al. (2021) [70]).
Polymers 14 03793 g004
Table 2. Previous recent patents related to packaging technology for bakery products.
Table 2. Previous recent patents related to packaging technology for bakery products.
Materials and ComponentsPackaging FormPackage Conversion TechnologyBakeryKey TechnologyResultsReferences
  • Rigid container
  • Oxygen scavenger and indicator
Oxygen detection systemRigid container with an oxygen detection systemBakery products
  • A rigid container comprising:
    (a)
    An oxygen barrier having an oxygen transmission rate of no more than 100 cc/m2/24 h at 25 °C, 0% RH, 1 atm;
    (b)
    An oxygen scavenger;
    (c)
    An oxygen indicator comprising a luminescent compound wherein the oxygen indicator and oxygen scavenger are substantially shielded by oxygen barriers from environmental air.
  • A rigid container with oxygen barrier properties
  • Can measure oxygen concentration within the headspace of an assembled package
  • Indicates oxygen level with luminescent compound
[92]
  • PET
  • Indium tin oxide
  • Aluminum
  • Silicone-based
  • Chrome complex
  • Wax
Absorbent sheetAbsorbent structure compressionBakery products
  • A structure having absorbent and microwave interactive properties containing:
    (a)
    A polymer film: PET, indium tin oxide and aluminum;
    (b)
    A layer of microwave energy interactive material: indium tin oxide and aluminum;
    (c)
    A liquid-absorbing layer;
    (d)
    A liquid-impervious material;
    (e)
    A release coating overlying silicone-based material, chrome complex, wax, or any combination thereof
  • The absorbent sheet had a non-stick food-contacting surface
  • The absorbent sheet can be incorporated into or used with a tray and formed into a roll of absorbent material comprising at least two overlapping absorbent sheets
[93]
  • Paper or paperboard
  • Polymer emulsion
  • Pigment
Coated paper or paperboardPaper or paperboard is coated with a polymer emulsion in one or more coatingBakery products
  • A method of producing a coated recyclable paper or paperboard comprising:
    (a)
    Polymer emulsion (acrylic emulsion, or styrenebutadiene emulsion) 70–90% dry weight, pigment (grade clays, titanium dioxide, calcium carbonate, barium sulfate, talc, zinc sulfate, aluminum sulfate, calcium oxide, lithopone, zinc sulfide, and mixture thereof) 10–30% dry weight;
    (b)
    Applying an aqueous coating layer;
    (c)
    Drying the coating;
    (d)
    Cooling the coated paper or paperboard
  • Coated paper or paperboard had improved barrier properties including water resistance of less than 10 g/m2, moisture vapor transfer rate of less than 120 g/m2 and was heat sealable.
[94]
  • Bimodal ethylene
  • 1-butylene
  • C6–C12-alpha-olefin terpolymer
  • LDPE
  • Metallocene-produced
Multilayer film
  • Polymerization
  • Coextruded multilayer film
Frozen food packaging
Bakery product
  • The multilayer film comprised a core layer and two outer layers (O-1, O-2)
    (a)
    Core layer: bimodal ethylene/1-butylene/C6-C12-alpha-olefin terpolymer
    (b)
    Outer layer (O-1): bimodal terpolymer, LDPE, or LLDPE, metallocene-produced
    (c)
    Outer layer (O-2): LDPE, or LLDPE, metallocene-produced
  • The Material had excellent mechanical properties, such as stiffness, toughness, and processability and was suitable for co-extrusion processes
[95]
  • LDPE
  • EVOH
  • Acrylic coating
  • Mustard oil
Coated filmMultilayers include coatingGluten-free bread
  • Antifungal active container comprising a high-barrier co-extruded three-layer film with an outer polymeric layer of LDPE, an intermediate polymeric layer of EVOH and an inner polymeric layer of LDPE which carried or incorporated mustard oil
  • Bread samples lasted for 30 days without any fungal growth visible on the surface, whereas the control samples developed a bad taste due to retrogradation of starch
[96]
  • Polyolefin
  • LDPE
  • PVOH
  • Carvacrol
  • Allyl-isothiocyanate (AITC)
FilmCoating filmSliced bread
  • Antifungal packaging comprising a polyolefin with a water-soluble polymer coating as a synergistic mixture of volatile natural compounds selected from carvacrol and allyl-isothiocyanate for extending the shelf life of bakery products
  • PVOH had sufficient coating functional properties, showing high uniformity and adhesion to PE, whereas the combination of carvacrol and AITC showed enhanced antifungal activity against the main fungi responsible for damage and spoilage of sliced bread: Aspergillus niger and Penicillium
[97]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

San, H.; Laorenza, Y.; Behzadfar, E.; Sonchaeng, U.; Wadaugsorn, K.; Sodsai, J.; Kaewpetch, T.; Promhuad, K.; Srisa, A.; Wongphan, P.; et al. Functional Polymer and Packaging Technology for Bakery Products. Polymers 2022, 14, 3793. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14183793

AMA Style

San H, Laorenza Y, Behzadfar E, Sonchaeng U, Wadaugsorn K, Sodsai J, Kaewpetch T, Promhuad K, Srisa A, Wongphan P, et al. Functional Polymer and Packaging Technology for Bakery Products. Polymers. 2022; 14(18):3793. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14183793

Chicago/Turabian Style

San, Horman, Yeyen Laorenza, Ehsan Behzadfar, Uruchaya Sonchaeng, Kiattichai Wadaugsorn, Janenutch Sodsai, Thitiporn Kaewpetch, Khwanchat Promhuad, Atcharawan Srisa, Phanwipa Wongphan, and et al. 2022. "Functional Polymer and Packaging Technology for Bakery Products" Polymers 14, no. 18: 3793. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14183793

APA Style

San, H., Laorenza, Y., Behzadfar, E., Sonchaeng, U., Wadaugsorn, K., Sodsai, J., Kaewpetch, T., Promhuad, K., Srisa, A., Wongphan, P., & Harnkarnsujarit, N. (2022). Functional Polymer and Packaging Technology for Bakery Products. Polymers, 14(18), 3793. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14183793

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop