Cheng, G.; Wang, X.; Wu, M.; Wu, S.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, X.; Dai, F.
Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide. Polymers 2022, 14, 3903.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14183903
AMA Style
Cheng G, Wang X, Wu M, Wu S, Cheng L, Zhang X, Dai F.
Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide. Polymers. 2022; 14(18):3903.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14183903
Chicago/Turabian Style
Cheng, Guotao, Xin Wang, Mengqiu Wu, Siyuan Wu, Lan Cheng, Xiaoning Zhang, and Fangyin Dai.
2022. "Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide" Polymers 14, no. 18: 3903.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14183903
APA Style
Cheng, G., Wang, X., Wu, M., Wu, S., Cheng, L., Zhang, X., & Dai, F.
(2022). Insignificant Difference in Biocompatibility of Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Ternary Reagent Compared with Regenerated Silk Fibroin Prepared with Lithium Bromide. Polymers, 14(18), 3903.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14183903