Next Article in Journal
Optimization and Efficiency Enhancement of Modified Polymer Solar Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrochemical Comparison of 2D-Flexible Solid-State Supercapacitors Based on a Matrix of PVA/H3PO4
Previous Article in Journal
Peculiarity of the Mechanism of Early Stages of Photo-Oxidative Degradation of Linear Low-Density Polyethylene Films in the Presence of Ferric Stearate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fabrication of High-Performance Natural Rubber Composites with Enhanced Filler–Rubber Interactions by Stearic Acid-Modified Diatomaceous Earth and Carbon Nanotubes for Mechanical and Energy Harvesting Applications
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Silver Nanoparticle–PEDOT:PSS Composites as Water-Processable Anodes: Correlation between the Synthetic Parameters and the Optical/Morphological Properties

Polymers 2023, 15(18), 3675; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15183675
by Stefania Zappia 1,*, Marina Alloisio 2,*, Julio Cesar Valdivia 3, Eduardo Arias 3, Ivana Moggio 3,*, Guido Scavia 1,* and Silvia Destri 1
Reviewer 1:
Polymers 2023, 15(18), 3675; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15183675
Submission received: 12 August 2023 / Revised: 30 August 2023 / Accepted: 31 August 2023 / Published: 6 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymeric Materials in Energy Conversion and Storage)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

- DLS would give a better assessment of the size of the prepared nanoparticles, as the number of the measured NPs/clusters by SEM is limited. Zeta potential measurement for the prepared NPs and their clusters will be a good addition to the characterization, and it can be studied under different conditions to prove or test some of their properties. 

- It might be worth investigating the effect of plasticizers on the film formability of the NPs suspensions

- The conclusion is a bit long and more of a summary, it includes unnecessary details, and it must show the significance of the work and what it adds to the accumulating literature.  

- Simple grammatical mistakes better be corrected such as

Line 147: rewrite as follows: 0.1 g of AgNO3 were added.

Line 154: simple past tense fits better than the present perfect tense. 

Author Response

Please see the point-by-point response to Reviewer #1's comments in the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In the manuscript, the Authors present the optimization strategy for improvement of the performance of PEDOT:PSS-AgNPs composite materials, for the ultimate goal which is the design of a prototype of a solar cell. The manuscript is well written, but some parts needs to be improved before accepting for publication:

1. The abstract should not contain abbreviations (PC60BM).

2. Why there are no data for samples 4 and 5 in Fig1 and Fig 3?

3. Fig.1: what are the "circles" visible in d and e?

4. Fig.1a-c: I would prefer not to use the name "spherical" for the shapes in these images - the aggregates look more like stars.

5. Fig.2: UV-vis spectra of both forms of pristine PEDOT:PSS should be present for comparison.

6. In few places, the Authors discuss the conductivity of samples - therefore, it would be recommended to perform an extensive analysis of conductivity of produced materials, e.g. with the use of EIS.

7. Fig.5: Figure legend should be simplified- instead of product code it would be better to write "Orgacon".

 Minor editing of English language required.

Author Response

Please see the point-by-point response to Reviewer #1's comments in the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The revised version of the manuscript is suitable for publication.

Back to TopTop