Next Article in Journal
A Modified Ceramic-Coating Separator with High-Temperature Stability for Lithium-Ion Battery
Previous Article in Journal
CAGW Peptide Modified Biodegradable Cationic Copolymer for Effective Gene Delivery
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 9
Issue 5
10.3390/polym9050157
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Strategy to Enhance the Electrode Performance of Novel Three-Dimensional PEDOT/RVC Composites by Electrochemical Deposition Method

by
Ali Aldalbahi
1,*,
Mostafizur Rahaman
1 and
Mohammed Almoiqli
2
1
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
2
Nuclear Sciences Research Institute, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh 12371, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2017, 9(5), 157; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9050157
Submission received: 27 March 2017 / Revised: 20 April 2017 / Accepted: 25 April 2017 / Published: 28 April 2017
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this article, three-dimensional (3D) microstuctured poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT)/reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC) composite electrodes with varying amount of PEDOT loadings were successfully prepared by electrochemical deposition method. The composites were characterized by Raman spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and cyclic voltammetry. Raman spectra suggest that there is a strong interaction between the RVC and backbone of PEDOT chain. It is revealed from the SEM images that the PEDOT amount, thickness, surface roughness, porosity, and globular structure on RVC electrode are increased with the increase in polymerization time. The capacitance of PEDOT/RVC electrode has increased by a factor of 2230 compared to a bare RVC electrode when polymerization is carried out for 120 min. Moreover, the capacitance of PEDOT was found to be very high compared with other PEDOT studies. The electrodes also show good cyclic stability. This substantial increase in capacitance of RVC electrode is due to the rough, highly porous, and honeycomb-like fine structure of PEDOT coating, which shows a flower-like morphology, consisting of numerous thin flakes with numbers of macropores and micropores. This interesting morphology has enhanced the performance of PEDOT because of increased electrode surface area, specific capacitance, and macroporous structure of RVC electrode.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Nowadays, many researchers have focused on the development of novel carbon materials [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] such as activated carbon, carbon aerogel, carbon nanotubes, graphene, ordered mesoporous carbon, and their composites to make electrodes with high specific surface area, high conductivity, reasonable microstructured pores, and high electrosorption capacity. In addition, conducting polymers have been combined with such carbon materials to improve the carbon electrode properties and performance [10,11,12] because they have high electrical conductivity and high surface area [13,14]. All these electrodes were built as two-dimensional structure electrodes without significant thickness. However, a limited improvement in the electrosorption capacity is still far less than the theoretical value, which is mainly due to shortcomings such as the low effective surface area [15].
The conducting polymer PEDOT (poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)) is an active material for the preparation of an electrode because of its interesting properties such as high electrical conductivity, surface area, environmental stability [16], facile synthesis via electrochemical polymerization, etc. In addition, a novel PEDOT material can be used as a three-dimensional porous electrode with well-interconnected macropores, and numerous mesopores and micropores embedded in the reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC) walls because this improves ion diffusion by providing a decreased ion diffusion distance [15]. PEDOT has also been used in bioelectronics for coating on medical devices and in making highly performed electrochemical transistor [17,18]. The presence of macropores, serving as ion-buffering reservoirs, guarantees a shorter ion diffusion distance [19,20], which facilitates the rapid transportation of the ions into the interior of the bulk material. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that 3D porous carbon with an interconnected pore system shows an excellent performance in the field of electrochemistry [20,21,22,23,24,25].
RVC as a substrate was used for PEDOT film deposition because it has three-dimensional (3D) porous structure that provides high macroscopic surface area and other interesting characteristics such as a low density, high chemical inertness with low electrical and fluid flow resistance, and is also amenable to surface modification with conducting polymers [26,27,28,29].
This article describes and discusses the electrodeposition of various amounts of PEDOT to coat RVC electrodes. These electrodes were characterized for their morphology, Raman spectrum, thermal stability, and electrochemical properties.

2. Materials, Methods, and Experimental

2.1. Chemicals and Materials

Commercial 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene monomer (EDOT) with purity 99.9% was purchased from Sheng Chemical Ltd. (Taichung, Taiwan), and was used as received. The following chemicals, obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany), were also used as received: acetonitrile (ACN) (AR grade), lithium perchlorate (LiClO4) (AR grade), concentrated nitric acid (70%) and sodium chloride (AR grade). The reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC) (60 ppi (normal pores per linear inch)) was purchased from ERG Materials and Aerospace Engineering and used as received. Milli-Q water with a resistivity of 18.2 mΩ cm−1 was used in all preparations.

2.2. Pre-Treatment of the RVC Electrode

All reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC) electrodes (length 4 cm × width 3.5 cm × thickness 0.3 cm (32.5 or 4.2 cm3) were cut from a block of RVC material, and soaked in 2 M HNO3 for 24 h to remove any impurities [30]. Electrodes were thoroughly washed with distilled water to remove the acid. The pH of the effluent was checked periodically until the wash became neutral. All RVC electrodes were then soaked in methanol for 2 h to remove any organic impurities [30]. The RVC electrodes were dried under a brief flow of nitrogen and kept in an oven at 110 °C overnight. All RVC electrodes were weighed after drying.

2.3. Electrochemical Polymerization of PEDOT on RVC Electrode

In this work, the PEDOT/RVC composite electrodes were synthesized by cyclic voltammetric and chronoamperometry. In both techniques before polymerizations, the RVC pieces were left in contact with the working electrolyte for at least 24 h to ensure their complete wetting. In order to prepare the working electrodes, electrical contact was made by a hook of Pt wire. The electropolymerization was performed in an organic electrolyte, where the reference electrode was an Ag/AgCl (3 M NaCl) electrode and the counter electrode was a Pt mesh with size 4 × 4 cm2. The electrolyte was an acetonitrile solution containing 0.01 M monomer, EDOT and 0.1 M supporting electrolyte salt (LiClO4) [31,32]. The solution was thoroughly deoxygenated by nitrogen (N2) before the electropolymerization for 10 min prior to all electrochemical experiments at room temperature. PEDOT was deposited on the RVC working electrode by cyclic voltammetry using three-electrode systems in the voltage range between 0 and 1.3 V at 50 mV/s scan rate. In addition, PEDOT films were galvanostatically deposited on the RVC working electrode with a constant voltage applied for various periods of time. The quantity of PEDOT-ClO4 coating on the RVC electrodes was determined by calculating the total charge passed in the electropolymerization. The charge values were read directly from the I to V curves by computer.

2.4. Physical Characterization

The thermal stability of the PEDOT on PEDOT/RVC electrodes and the amount of PEDOT coated on the RVC were determined by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Experiments were performed using a Q500 (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) apparatus at a ramp rate of 5 °C/min in air, with a combined gas flow of 10 mL min−1 Nitrogen (N2) and 90 mL min−1 air from 25 to 750 °C. Moreover, the morphology and the thickness of the PEDOT deposits on RVC electrodes were analyzed by using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, ZEISS Sigma, Hamburg; Germany) at specific voltages of 0.5 KV. Furthermore, Raman spectra were measured on a Raman spectrometer equipped with a visible Raman microscope and CCD detector. The excitation wavelength was 632.81 nm and spectra were obtained over 30 s at 1.0 cm−1 resolution.

2.5. Electrochemical Characterization

The capacitance and the effect of different scan rates were determined by cyclic voltammetry (CV). A PEDOT/RVC composite electrode was used as the working electrode (WE) in 1 M NaCl aqueous solution and scanned in the voltage range between −0.2 to 0.8 V using a three-electrode system; RVC electrode and Ag/AgCl (3 M NaCl) were used as counter electrode (CE) and reference electrode (RE), respectively. The scan rates range from 5 to 200 mV/s. Contacts to the WE and CE were made using Pt wire.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. PEDOT Deposited on RVC Electrode

PEDOT can be polymerized using multiple different ways, but for the purposes of this work, electrochemical polymerization has been used to synthesize PEDOT. This method is important because it requires only a small amount of monomer, short polymerization time, and can yield both electrode-supported and free-standing film. This method utilizes electrochemical oxidation of the electron-rich EDOT-based monomers by three different techniques; namely, cyclic voltammetry, chronoamperometry and chronopotentiometry. In this project, chronoamperometry method was selected to grow thick PEDOT coated RVC electrodes and cyclic voltammetry was used to select the potential of EDOT monomer oxidation to form PEDOT.

3.2. Cyclic Voltammetry

EDOT monomer was prepared in acetonitrile as electrolyte because it has the advantage of a higher conductivity than that prepared in aqueous solution [33]. Figure 1 shows the cyclic voltammograms related to the EDOT. It can be seen from the figure that the EDOT oxidation started at 1.1 V for the anodic scan. Furthermore, the EDOT electropolymerization is characterized by cycles with a crossover of the reverse cathodic scan over the anodic scan, giving rise to what has been called the “nucleation loop” [34]. In particular, we observe that the current of the reverse scan is higher than that of the forward scan in the region close to the switching potential, but it drops again to the level of the current–voltage curve of the forward scan. Such kind of CV profiles have been interpreted as due to polymer nucleation effects [35] or, more recently, to homogeneous reactions between an oligomeric follow-up product and the starting monomer [36]. Moreover, an increase of both anodic and cathodic current intensities with increasing number of scans is also evident. This effect can be explained by considering the growth at the electrode surface of an electroactive polymer film, whose thickness increases regularly with the number of cycles [37]. Moreover, the RVC foam electrode was observed after polymerization to have a visible bluish color on the foam skeleton and this has been reported in available literature [38]. The polymerization mechanism of PEDOT has been described in Supplementary Materials.

3.3. Effect of Applied Constant Potential on PEDOT Electrosynthesis

Chronoamperometry was used to deposit PEDOT on RVC electrodes. The aim of this experiment is to study the effect of increasing the constant potential on electrochemical polymerization and to determine the best constant potential to be used for further experiments. These potentials were selected based on the CV of PEDOT growth (Figure 1) obtained previously that showed no over-oxidation of the polymer because polymer growth continued to increase with increasing number of cycles. Current–time curves for the electrodeposition of EDOT by potential steps 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 V are shown in Figure 2. All of these curves attain to the same charge consumed of 48 C. It is clear that the general features of these curves are similar to those reported in the literature [39,40,41]. The current starts to increase because the molecules of monomer diffuse from the solution to the electrode surface and, once they are oxidized, return to the solution where the oligomerization process occurs in the vicinity of the electrode surface. When an oligomeric high density region is established, clusters are deposited onto the electrode creating the growing nuclei. After that, the current increases until it reaches a current plateau. This region is generally attributed to nucleation and growth. The phenomena of nucleation and growth of PEDOT were also observed and reported in published literature [42]. Figure 2 also shows that PEDOT electrodeposition on RVC at a constant voltage of 1.1 V was too slow and it took time (around 160 min) to attain a charge consumed of 48 C. It can be observed that when the constant potential applied was increased from 1.1 to 1.2 and 1.3 V, the current increased as expected. This led to a decrease in the time required to electrodeposit PEDOT on the RVC. For example, the same RVC electrode at a constant potential of 1.3 V required 20 min to attain the same charge consumed of 48 C. It is clear that the polymerization time decreased 8 times at 1.3 V compared with that at 1.1 V. In addition, when the potential of deposition is increased, the porosity of PEDOT surface morphology is increased [43]. According to these reasons, the constant voltage of 1.3 V was selected as the optimum potential to deposit PEDOT on RVC electrode using the potentiostatic mode in the work presented earlier.

3.4. Electrodeposition of Different Amounts of PEDOT on RVC Electrodes

The PEDOT films were electropolymerized onto (4 × 3.5 × 0.3 cm3) RVC electrodes by applying a constant potential of 1.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl until polymerization times of 10, 20, 50, 70 and 120 min were reached. The aim of these experiments is to increase the amount of PEDOT on the RVC. Figure 3 shows a combination of chronoamperometric curves of PEDOT deposition on RVC electrodes and the arrows indicate the polymerization times for each electrode. It is clear that the chronoamperogram started at 0.19 A, then immediately rose sharply to 0.32 A within the first 5 min. After that, the curve increased dramatically to reach 0.62 A after 35 min. The chronoamperometric curve plateaued for 18 min then started to decrease steadily to 0.46 A when finally the current became almost stable. The charge consumed at each electrode was read directly from the I to V curve by computer and it was 20.64, 46.04, 112.71, 185.73 and 380.98 Coulombs (C) for polymerization times 10, 20, 50, 70 and 120 min, respectively. Table 1 shows the polymerization time, charge passed through the electrode, and the mass of PEDOT coating on the RVC electrode calculated using the following Equation (1) [44]:
m = ( Q   ×   M EDOT )   + ( Q   × γ × M ClO 4   ) n   ×   F
where, m is mass (g); M EDOT is molecular weight (142.16 g/mol) of EDOT; M ClO 4   is molecular weight (99.45 g/mol) of ClO4; Q is charge passed (C) on the working electrode; n is the number of electrons transferred, which equals to 2 + γ, where two electrons are associated with polymerization and γ electrons are associated with doping of one monomer unit in PEDOT; and F is the faraday constant (96,485.34 C). The doping level γ can be determined from the relation Qmax = (γ/(2 + γ))Q, where Qmax is the charge density at the maximum quantity of oxidized polymer [45]. The value of Qmax is calculated by integrating the current from its initial potential to the potential just after anodic peak. The plot of Qmax vs. Q gives a linear line with the slope γ/(2 + γ). This results γ = 0.45, and hence the value of n = 2.45. It is seen from the table that the PEDOT mass in each electrode increased with increase in polymerization time. It was 13, 29, 71, 117 and 240 mg for polymerization times 10, 20, 50, 70 and 120 min, respectively.

3.5. PEDOT Surface Properties

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to collect information about PEDOT formation and its morphology along the RVC thickness. Figure 4 shows the SEM micrographs for 10 min electrodeposited PEDOT on RVC electrode. Figure 4a confirms that 10 min polymerization was enough to uniformly cover PEDOT on the RVC electrode and the average size of the pores of 60 ppi RVC is about 350 µm. It is clear that the surface of PEDOT coating is rough (Figure 4b) and highly porous (Figure 4c). This morphology can enhance the performance of PEDOT because of high conductivity, increased electrode surface area and specific capacitance, and macroporous structure of RVC electrode. Figure 4d shows the cross-section of a region of PEDOT/RVC composite electrode and it can be observed that the average thickness of PEDOT covering the RVC is around 280 nm.
Figure 5 shows a SEM of PEDOT coated RVC electrode prepared with 120 min electropolymerization of EDOT. It is very clear that the original pores of the RVC electrode about 350 µm size are not significantly affected by the PEDOT coating, and the average size of the composite electrode pores have become about 320 µm (Figure 5a). The PEDOT possesses an extraordinary fuzzy like and loose structure with honeycomb-like fine structure. The fine structure of PEDOT shows a flower-like morphology, consisting of numerous thin flakes with a number of fuzziness as seen in Figure 5b,c. The appearance of this structure is assumed to be related to the fast kinetics and will be useful for use as a capacitive deionization (CDI) electrode.
The morphology of the electrosynthesized PEDOT on RVC electrode is affected by polymerization time. The PEDOT amount increased with increased polymerization time, as discussed above. Figure 6 shows SEM images of the strut of the RVC electrode after coating by PEDOT at various polymerization times. It is clear that PEDOT of relatively smoother surface covered all the strut of RVC after 10 min polymerization (Figure 6a) and the surface roughness was increased with increased polymerization time, as seen in Figure 6c,e,g,i. After 20 min polymerization, a globular structure of PEDOT started growing. Moreover, the globular structure of PEDOT increased upon increasing the polymerization time and also the fuzzy like morphology increased as a function of polymerization time. The thicknesses of PEDOT deposited on RVC electrodes were measured from the SEM image (Figure 6b,d,f,h,j). The thicknesses of PEDOT were 0.28, 0.61, 1.12, 2.53 and 4.64 µm at 10, 20, 50, 70 and 120 min electropolymerization, respectively.

3.6. Thermogravimetric Analysis

The thermal stability and the amount of PEDOT coated on RVC electrodes were determined from the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves which give the dependence of the weight loss of a sample as a function of temperature or time. Figure 7 shows TGA curves of pure RVC electrode and various PEDOT/RVC composite electrodes. It can be seen that the TGA curve of the RVC electrode exactly matches those reported in the literature [28,46], where 10% of the initial weight loss occurred between 25 and 250 °C, then it was stable and did not show a dramatic decomposition in the tested temperature range between 250 and 550 °C followed by a major weight loss between 550 and 700 °C. The TGA curve of the PEDOT/RVC composite electrode consisted of three stages [47,48]: volatilization, decomposition of PEDOT and carbonization reaction. All PEDOT/RVC composite electrodes followed the same behavior. The first 10% weight loss almost happened up to the temperature of 250 °C (Stage 1). This was probably due to desorption of moisture and contaminant. Furthermore, the major weight loss between 550 and 700 °C (Stage 3) was most likely due to carbonization by breaking chemical bonds such as C–H. It is clear that all composite electrodes followed a similar decomposition with temperature in Stage 2. From 250 °C a continuous degradation occurs until major decomposition occurred in the region between 350 and 550 °C. Therefore, in Stage 2, the amount of PEDOT in the various composite electrodes were calculated by loss in weight due to decomposition, and found to be 4%, 9%, 20%, 31% and 56% for 10, 20, 50, 70 and 120 min electropolymerization, respectively. In addition, almost no weight loss occurred after 700 °C.

3.7. Raman Spectroscopy

The Raman spectrum of the RVC substrate is shown in Figure 8 and is in keeping with published reports for RVC electrodes [49,50]. It has a typical two-band spectrum of disordered polycrystalline and noncrystalline graphitic carbons. The first band at 1360 cm−1 is called the D-band and the second band at 1600 cm−1 is called the G-band (graphitic) which is attributed to the graphite basal plane. The figure also shows the Raman spectra of RVC electrode after polymerizations that afford some information about the PEDOT structure. They confirm that the surface of RVC electrodes was coated by PEDOT. The principal assignments of the main bands have been made considering the data reported in the literature (Table 2) [34,51,52,53]. Raman spectra of composite electrodes have seven strong bands that dominate the spectrum which are related to the PEDOT vibrational spectrum. The most intense peak is at 1423 cm−1 which can be assigned to the symmetric Cα=Cβ (–O) stretching. Asymmetric C=C stretching shifts from 1509 cm−1 to 1507 cm−1 and at 1364 cm−1 appears a peak related to Cα=Cβ stretching. The asymmetric Cα–Cα– (inter-ring) stretching band is located at 1257 cm−1. The C–O–C deformation, which appears at 1152, 1120 and 1085 cm−1 peaks, combines as one peak at 1098 cm−1. Oxyethylene ring deformation peaks appear at 988 and 570 cm−1. In addition, the other peaks observed in the Raman spectrum of PEDOT coated RVC electrode are at 848 cm−1 (related to C–H bending of 2,3,5-trisubstituted thiophene due to α,α′ polymerization) and 685 cm−1 (symmetric C–S–C deformation). These results indicate that RVC electrodes do not affect the PEDOT structure.

3.8. Electrochemical Characterizations

Cyclic voltammetry was used to evaluate the electrochemical properties of the PEDOT/RVC composite electrodes. In this section, the effect of coating RVC by PEDOT on electrode capacitance, the effect of increasing scan rate on electron transfer and capacitance, and the stability of the electrode are considered. The specific capacitance of a PEDOT coating on RVC electrodes was calculated according to the following equations [54,55]:
Cvolume = Q/(2 × Z × ΔV)
Cmass = Q/(2 × m × ΔV)
Carea = Q/(2 × A × ΔV)
where Cvolume, Cmass and Carea are capacitance of electrode in term of F/cm3, F/g, and F/cm2, respectively; Q is charge (C); m is mass (g); Z is geometric volume (cm3); A is geometric area (cm2); and V is voltage (V).

3.9. Comparison between RVC before and after PEDOT Coating

Figure 9a shows the cyclic voltammograms of 1 cm3 RVC electrode and same electrode coated by PEDOT (PEDOT-120 min/RVC electrode) at the scan rate of 5 mV/s. It is clear that the CV curve of RVC compared with PEDOT coated electrode is very small. The capacitance of the RVC electrode in terms of geometric volume, calculated using Equation (2), is 0.002 F/cm3. The current of PEDOT-120 min/RVC composite electrode compared to a bare RVC electrode of same geometric volume has increased by a factor of 2230. This is related to the large surface area of PEDOT compared to a RVC electrode according to the Randle–Sevcik relationship [56]. Figure 9b shows the effect of increasing PEDOT in geometric volume of RVC on specific capacitance. It can be observed that the capacitance increased when polymerization time of PEDOT increased. The RVC geometric volume capacitance has increased by a factor of 220, 485, 1045 and 1710 at PEDOT coated RVC, where the PEDOT polymerization time was 10, 20, 50 and 70 min, respectively. The capacitance of PEDOT coated RVC electrodes at various polymerization time and various scan rates has been discussed more fully in the next section.

3.10. Effect of Increasing Scan Rate on the Electrode Capacitance

In this study, the PEDOT-120 min/RVC composite electrode was also selected for the same previous reasons. Figure 10 shows the cyclic voltammograms of PEDOT-120 min/RVC composite electrode obtained at various scan rates of 5 to 200 mV/s. It can be noted that the shape of the CVs at scan rates up to 50 mV/s were nearly semi-rectangular and highly symmetrical (Figure 10a) which indicates an ideal behavior characteristic of double layered mechanism, fast charge/discharge process with insignificant ohmic resistance. The reason for its novel fast charge/discharge ability is that its granules are small and so encourage a large amount of meso-channels in the PEDOT/RVC composite, as shown in Figure 5, that can effectively reduce the diffusion length of ions (L) so as to reduce the diffusion time (t), which can be estimated as (L2/D) where D is the diffusion coefficient [57]. This shape helps to achieve a constant specific capacitance [58]. Furthermore, as the scan rate increased, the peak current also increased linearly (inset in Figure 10a). This result is similar to those published in the literature [59,60]. On the other hand, when the scan rate was increased above 50 mV/s, the curves were characterized by non-rectangular shapes (Figure 10b). This indicated resistance-like electrochemical behavior because the electrode is very porous, which hinders the migration of NaCl to the pores, and this becomes pronounced at increasing scan rates. This leads to a continuous decrease in the capacitance of electrodes with increasing scan rate; which is discussed in the next section.

3.11. Capacitance

The capacitive behavior of the PEDOT resulted mainly from electrochemical double-layer charging. The specific capacitances of PEDOT/RVC electrodes were calculated from the CV curves of PEDOT coated RVC electrodes using a three-electrode system at different scan rates of 5 to 200 mV/s, as shown in Figure 11a. It is observed that PEDOT has high capacitive behavior, and increasing the amount of PEDOT into the RVC electrode led to a decrease in the capacitance of the composite electrode. The specific capacitance of the PEDOT was significantly decreased from 185.29 F/g to 86.56 F/g when the polymerization time of PEDOT in the composite electrode was increased from 10 to 120 min, determined at a low scan rate of 5 mV/s. The value of specific capacitance of PEDOT at PEDOT-10 min/RVC electrode was very close to the value of theoretical specific capacitance (210 F/g) [61]. Furthermore, the specific capacitances of PEDOT coated RVC electrodes, in all electrodes, were found to be very high compared with other PEDOT studies [61,62,63] at low scan rate but its capacitance markedly decreased at high scan rates. The specific capacitance of the PEDOT-10 min/RVC was significantly decreased from 185.29 to 83.57 F/g as the potential scan rate was increased from 5 to 200 mV/s, as shown in Table 3. These results are in keeping with published reports for all cases of PEDOT [61,64,65]. It can be seen that the specific capacitance trend of all PEDOT electrodes decrease, when the scan rate was increased above 50 mV/s. It should be noted that the specific capacitance values in term of mass of all electrodes were calculated using Equation (3). As mentioned earlier, the aim of this study is to discuss the effect of increasing PEDOT amount in terms of geometric volume and area of the electrode on the capacitance results.
Figure 11b shows the comparison cyclic voltammograms for the same PEDOT/RVC electrodes using current per gram of PEDOT and current per geometric volume of electrode. It is very clear that current behavior in geometric volume unit was totally opposite to the current behavior in units of gram. Therefore, the capacitances per unit geometric volume of PEDOT/RVC electrodes were calculated using Equation (2) and are presented in the same Table 3 as F/cm3. The capacitance was 0.65 F/cm3 for the PEDOT-10 min/RVC and 6.18 F/cm3 for the PEDOT-120 min/RVC a low a scan rate of 5 mV/s. This indicates that the surface area of PEDOT coated in the RVC electrode was increased by increasing the amount of PEDOT, and the porous structure enhanced. Figure 11c shows that the trend of the capacitances in (F/cm3) was completely opposite to the direction of the trend for capacitance per gram.
Furthermore, the capacitance per unit geometric area was calculated using Equation (4) and are reported in the same Table 3 as F/cm2. It is expected that the capacitance (F/cm2) behavior of electrodes followed the capacitance (F/cm3) behavior. The capacitance has increased by a factor of 10 with increasing loading of PEDOT; that is, PEDOT-10 min/RVC electrode compared to PEDOT-120 min/RVC electrode.

3.12. Cycling Stability of PEDOT/RVC Electrodes

Stability is one of the most critical characteristics and electrodes with poor mechanical and electrochemical stabilities may lose their function. The electrochemical cycling performance of the PEDOT/RVC electrodes was investigated for 200 cycles at 5 mV/s, as shown in Figure 12. It can be observed that the CVs’ shape do not change much and are almost identical at the beginning and end of the stability test, as shown in other studies [66]. The PEDOT-120 min/RVC electrode shows quite good cycling stability and retains approximately 96% of its current density after 200 cycles. The loss may be due to the irreversible reactions of the PEDOT backbone, which represents a deterioration of the electrochemical reversibility [67]. The 3D mesoporous network structure can enable PEDOT to avoid shrinkage during continuous quick charging/discharging [68].

4. Conclusions

In this study, PEDOT has been successfully deposited by electropolymerization on RVC. The polymerization time decreases with the increase in electrode potential. SEM images confirm that 10 min polymerization was enough to uniformly cover PEDOT on the RVC electrode. The morphology of the PEDOT on RVC electrode is affected by polymerization time. The average pore size of RVC electrode is reduced marginally with the increase in polymerization time. The PEDOT amount, thickness, surface roughness, porosity, and globular structure on RVC electrode are increased with the increase in polymerization time. The surface of PEDOT coating was rough and highly porous, and loose with honeycomb-like fine structure, which shows a flower-like morphology, consisting of numerous thin flakes with numbers of macropores and micropores. This observed morphology can enhance the performance of PEDOT because of high conductivity, increased electrode surface area and specific capacitance, and macroporous structure of RVC electrode. TGA results show that the weight loss value of PEDOT increases with polymerization time. Raman spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry suggest a strong interaction between the RVC and the backbone of the PEDOT chain. This improves the surface area and conductivity of the PEDOT/RVC composite electrode. It has been shown that the capacitance of PEDOT-120 min/RVC electrode has increased by a factor of 2230 compared to a bare RVC electrode. The capacitance of PEDOT was found to be very high compared with other PEDOT studies. The value of specific capacitances decreases with the increase in scan rate irrespective of polymerization time. The specific capacitance per unit mass is decreasing but the specific capacitance per unit volume and unit area is increasing with the increase in polymerization time irrespective of scan rate. The electrodes show good cyclic stability. Hence, the performance of RVC electrode has substantially increased by the electrodeposition of PEDOT on it. The results show that the PEDOT/RVC composites can be used as a capacitive deionization electrode.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/9/5/157/s1, Figure S1: Scheme of oxidative polymerization mechanism of PEDOT.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this work through research group No. (RG-1436-005).

Author Contributions

Mostafizur Rahaman and Mohammed Almoiqli have designed and performed the experiments, and analyzed the data. Ali Aldalbahi also has analyzed the data and written the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Oh, H.-J.; Lee, J.-H.; Ahn, H.-J.; Jeong, Y.; Kim, Y.-J.; Chi, C.-S. Nanoporous activated carbon cloth for capacitive deionization of aqueous solution. Thin Solid Films 2006, 515, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dai, K.; Shi, L.; Fang, J.; Zhang, D.; Yu, B. NaCl adsorption in multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Mater. Lett. 2005, 59, 1989–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jung, H.; Hwang, S.; Hyun, S.; Lee, K.; Kim, G. Capacitive deionization characteristics of nanostructured carbon aerogel electrodes synthesized via ambient drying. Desalination 2007, 216, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pekala, R.W.; Farmer, J.C.; Alviso, C.T.; Tran, T.D.; Mayer, S.T.; Miller, J.M.; Dunn, B. Carbon aerogels for electrochemical applications. J. Non Cryst. Solids 1998, 225, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, H.; Lu, T.; Pan, L.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Z. Electrosorption behavior of graphene in NaCl solutions. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 6773–6779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, G.; Pan, C.; Wang, L.; Dong, Q.; Yu, C.; Zhao, Z.; Qiu, J. Activated carbon nanofiber webs made by electrospinning for capacitive deionization. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 69, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Peng, Z.; Zhang, D.; Shi, L.; Yan, T. High performance ordered mesoporous carbon/carbon nanotube composite electrodes for capacitive deionization. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 6603–6612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Villar, I.; Suarez-De La Calle, D.J.; González, Z.; Granda, M.; Blanco, C.; Menéndez, R.; Santamaría, R. Carbon materials as electrodes for electrosorption of NaCl in aqueous solutions. Adsorption 2011, 17, 467–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, H.; Zou, L.; Pan, L.; Sun, Z. Using graphene nano-flakes as electrodes to remove ferric ions by capacitive deionization. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 75, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, C.; Zou, L.; Short, R. Single-walled carbon nanotubes and polyaniline composites for capacitive deionization. Desalination 2012, 290, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, S.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, S. Polypyrrole nanowire modified graphite (PPy/G) electrode used in capacitive deionization. Synth. Met. 2010, 160, 1392–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, S.; Wang, J. Effect of dopants on the adsorbing performance of polypyrrole/graphite electrodes for capacitive deionization process. Synth. Met. 2012, 162, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wallace, G.G. Conductive Electroactive Polymers: Intelligent Polymer Systems; Taylor & Francis: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  14. Frydrychewicz, A.; Czerwiński, A.; Jackowska, K. Electrochemistry of multilayer electrodes RVCPaniPdPani. Synth. Met. 2001, 121, 1401–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wen, X.; Zhang, D.; Shi, L.; Yan, T.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J. Three-dimensional hierarchical porous carbon with a bimodal pore arrangement for capacitive deionization. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 23835–23844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Groenendaal, L.; Jonas, F.; Freitag, D.; Pielartzik, H.; Reynolds, J.R. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) and Its Derivatives: Past, Present, and Future. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 481–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wei, B.; Liu, J.; Ouyang, L.; Kuo, C.C.; Martin, D.C. Significant Enhancement of PEDOT Thin Film Adhesion to Inorganic Solid Substrates with EDOT-Acid. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 15388–15394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rivnay, J.; Leleux, P.; Ferro, M.; Sessolo, M.; Williamson, A.; Koutsouras, D.A.; Khodagholy, D.; Ramuz, M.; Strakosas, X.; Owens, R.M. High-performance transistors for bioelectronics through tuning of channel thickness. Sci. Adv. 2015, 1, 1400251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rolison, D.R. Catalytic nanoarchitectures—The importance of nothing and the unimportance of periodicity. Science 2003, 299, 1698–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Carriazo, D.; Pico, F.; Gutierrez, M.C.; Rubio, F.; Rojo, J.M.; del Monte, F. Block-copolymer assisted synthesis of hierarchical carbon monoliths suitable as supercapacitor electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 773–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yuan, Y.; Kim, S. Polypyrrole-coated reticulated vitreous carbon as anode in microbial fuel cell for higher energy output. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2008, 29, 168–172. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dalmolin, C.; Biaggio, S.R.; Rocha, R.C.; Bocchi, N. Reticulated vitreous carbon/polypyrrole composites as electrodes for lithium batteries: Preparation, electrochemical characterization and charge-discharge performance. Synth. Met. 2010, 160, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Frydrychewicz, A.; Vassiliev, S.Y.; Tsirlina, G.A.; Jackowska, K. Reticulated vitreous carbon-polyaniline-palladium composite electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 2005, 50, 1885–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, D.W.; Li, F.; Liu, M.; Lu, G.Q.; Cheng, H.-M. 3D aperiodic hierarchical porous graphitic carbon material for high-rate electrochemical capacitive energy storage. Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, F.; Cai, R.; Zeng, Q.; Zou, C.; Wu, D.; Li, F.; Lu, X.; Liang, Y.; Fu, R. Fast ion transport and high capacitance of polystyrene-based hierarchical porous carbon electrode material for supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 1970–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Friedrich, J.M. Reticulated vitreous carbon as an electrode material. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 2004, 561, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Czerwiski, A.; Rogulski, Z.; Obrecbowski, S.; Siwek, H.; Paleska, I.; Chotkowski, M.; Aukaszewski, M. RVC as new carbon material for batteries. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2009, 39, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Frysz, C.A.; Shui, X.; Chung, D.D.L. Electrochemical behavior of porous carbons. Carbon 1997, 35, 893–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, J. Reticulated vitreous carbon-a new versatile electrode material. Electrochim. Acta 1981, 26, 1721–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shedge, H.Y. Specific and Non-Specific Binding of Proteins and Nucleic Acids on Chemically Modified Reticulated Vitreous Carbon Electrodes. Ph.D. Thesis, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  31. Otero, T.F.; Romero, M.C. Conformational energy from the oxidation kinetics of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) films. Polym. Int. 2010, 59, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Seshadri, V.; Wu, L.; Sotzing, G.A. Conjugated polymers via electrochemical polymerization of thieno[3,4-b]thiophene (T34bT) and 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT). Langmuir 2003, 19, 9479–9485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, Y.-C.; Hwang, B.-J. Identification of oxidized polypyrrole on Raman spectrum. Synth. Met. 2000, 113, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tamburri, E.; Orlanducci, S.; Toschi, F.; Terranova, M.L.; Passeri, D. Growth mechanisms, morphology, and electroactivity of PEDOT layers produced by electrochemical routes in aqueous medium. Synth. Met. 2009, 159, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Downard, A.J.; Pletcher, D. The influence of water on the electrodeposition of polypyrrole in acetonitrile. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1986, 206, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Heinze, J.; Rasche, A.; Pagels, M.; Geschke, B. On the origin of the so-called nucleation loop during electropolymerization of conducting polymers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 989–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sakmeche, N.; Aeiyach, S.; Aaron, J.J.; Jouini, M.; Lacroix, J.C.; Lacaze, P.C. Improvement of the electrosynthesis and physicochemical properties of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) using a sodium dodecyl sulfate micellar aqueous medium. Langmuir 1999, 15, 2566–2574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, L.; Wang, M.; Huang, Z.-H.; Cui, T.; Gui, X.; Kang, F.; Wang, K.; Wu, D. Capacitive deionization of NaCl solutions using carbon nanotube sponge electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 18295–18299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zainal, M.F.; Mohd, Y. Characterization of PEDOT films for electrochromic applications. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2015, 54, 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chao, F.; Costa, M.; Tian, C. Different steps in electrodeposition of poly(3-methylthiophene) films on platinum electrodes studied by ellipsometry, SEM and AFM techniques. Synth. Met. 1993, 53, 127–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schrebler, R.; Grez, P.; Cury, P.; Veas, C.; Merino, M.; Gomez, H.; Cordova, R.; Del Valle, M.A. Nucleation and growth mechanisms of poly(thiophene) part 1. Effect of electrolyte and monomer concentration in dichloromethane. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1997, 430, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, J.; Wei, B.; Sloppy, J.D.; Ouyang, L.; Ni, C.; Martin, D.C. Direct imaging of the electrochemical deposition of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) by transmission electron microscopy. ACS Macro Lett. 2015, 4, 897–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Patra, S.; Barai, K.; Munichandraiah, N. Scanning electron microscopy studies of PEDOT prepared by various electrochemical routes. Synth. Met. 2008, 158, 430–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Snook, G.A.; Peng, C.; Fray, D.J.; Chen, G.Z. Achieving high electrode specific capacitance with materials of low mass specific capacitance: Potentiostatically grown thick micro-nanoporous PEDOT films. Electrochem. Commun. 2007, 9, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Randriamahazaka, H.; Noël, V.; Chevrot, C. Nucleation and growth of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) in acetonitrile on platinum under potentiostatic conditions. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1999, 472, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xu, H.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Y. Porous carbon/silica composite monoliths derived from resorcinol-formaldehyde/TEOS. J. Cryst. Solids 2010, 356, 971–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shin, H.-J.; Jeon, S.S.; Im, S.S. CNT/PEDOT core/shell nanostructures as a counter electrode for dye-sensitized solar cells. Synth. Met. 2011, 161, 1284–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yuvaraj, H.; Jeong, Y.T.; Lee, W.K.; Lim, K.T. Synthesis of MWNT/PEDOT Composites for the Application of Organic Light Emitting Diodes. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2009, 514, 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Goncalves, E.S.; Rezende, M.C.; Ferreira, N.G. Dynamics of defects and surface structure formation in reticulated vitreous carbon. Braz. J. Phys. 2006, 36, 264–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pesin, L.A. Review Structure and properties of glass-like carbon. J. Mater. Sci. 2002, 37, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Garreau, S.; Louarn, G.; Buisson, J.P.; Froyer, G.; Lefrant, S. In situ spectroelectrochemical raman studies of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDT). Macromolecules 1999, 32, 6807–6812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tamburri, E.; Sarti, S.; Orlanducci, S.; Terranova, M.L.; Rossi, M. Study of PEDOT conductive polymer films by admittance measurements. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2011, 125, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Selvaganesh, S.V.; Mathiyarasu, J.; Phani, K.L.N.; Yegnaraman, V. Chemical Synthesis of PEDOT–Au Nanocomposite. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2007, 2, 546–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Endut, Z.; Hamdi, M.; Basirun, W.J. Pseudocapacitive performance of vertical copper oxide nanoflakes. Thin Solid Films 2013, 528, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, J.H.; Li, W.Z.; Wang, D.Z.; Yang, S.X.; Wen, J.G.; Ren, Z.F. Electrochemical characterization of carbon nanotubes as electrode in electrochemical double-layer capacitors. Carbon 2002, 40, 1193–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bard, A. Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed.; Allen, J., Bard, R., Faulkner, A., Eds.; John Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang, J.; Xu, Y.; Sun, X.; Li, X.; Du, X. Electrochemical capacitance of the composite of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) and functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2008, 12, 947–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ran, L.; Seung Il, C.; Sang Bok, L. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanotubes as electrode materials for a high-powered supercapacitor. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 215710. [Google Scholar]
  59. Sen, P.; De, A. Electrochemical performances of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)–NiFe2O4 nanocomposite as electrode for supercapacitor. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 4677–4684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Si, W.; Lei, W.; Han, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Hao, Q.; Xia, M. Electrochemical sensing of acetaminophen based on poly(3,4- ethylenedioxythiophene)/graphene oxide composites. Sens. Actuators B 2014, 193, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lota, K.; Khomenko, V.; Frackowiak, E. Capacitance properties of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/carbon nanotubes composites. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2004, 65, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Czardybon, A.; Lapkowski, M. Synthesis and electropolymerisation of 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene functionalised with alkoxy groups. Synth. Met. 2001, 119, 161–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Anothumakkool, B.; Bhange, S.N.; Unni, S.M.; Kurungot, S. 1-Dimensional confinement of porous polyethylenedioxythiophene using carbon nanofibers as a solid template: an efficient charge storage material with improved capacitance retention and cycle stability. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 11877–11887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, J.; Xu, Y.; Chen, X.; Du, X. Electrochemical supercapacitor electrode material based on poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/polypyrrole composite. J. Power Sources 2007, 163, 1120–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pandey, G.P.; Rastogi, A.C. Synthesis and characterization of pulsed polymerized poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) electrodes for high-performance electrochemical capacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 87, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Li, L.; Zou, L.; Song, H.; Morris, G. Ordered mesoporous carbons synthesized by a modified sol–gel process for electrosorptive removal of sodium chloride. Carbon 2009, 47, 775–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lu, Y.; Li, T.; Zhao, X.; Li, M.; Cao, Y.; Yang, H.; Duan, Y.Y. Electrodeposited polypyrrole/carbon nanotubes composite films electrodes for neural interfaces. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 5169–5181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Chen, L.; Yuan, C.; Dou, H.; Gao, B.; Chen, S.; Zhang, X. Synthesis and electrochemical capacitance of core–shell poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate)-modified multiwalled carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 2335–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 09 00157 g001 550
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammetry of RVC electrode in a solution containing 0.01 M EDOT and 0.1 M LiClO4 in acetonitrile, using a three-electrode system; RVC electrode and Ag/AgCl (3 M NaCl) were used as counter electrode (CE) and reference electrode (RE), respectively.
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammetry of RVC electrode in a solution containing 0.01 M EDOT and 0.1 M LiClO4 in acetonitrile, using a three-electrode system; RVC electrode and Ag/AgCl (3 M NaCl) were used as counter electrode (CE) and reference electrode (RE), respectively.
Polymers 09 00157 g001
Polymers 09 00157 g002 550
Figure 2. Chronoamperometric curves at various constant potential applied to coat RVC electrodes by PEDOT in a solution containing 0.01 M EDOT and 0.1 M LiClO4 in acetonitrile, using a three-electrode system; RVC electrode and Ag/AgCl (3 M NaCl) were used as counter electrode (CE) and reference electrode (RE), respectively.
Figure 2. Chronoamperometric curves at various constant potential applied to coat RVC electrodes by PEDOT in a solution containing 0.01 M EDOT and 0.1 M LiClO4 in acetonitrile, using a three-electrode system; RVC electrode and Ag/AgCl (3 M NaCl) were used as counter electrode (CE) and reference electrode (RE), respectively.
Polymers 09 00157 g002
Polymers 09 00157 g003 550
Figure 3. Combination chronoamperogram at 1.3 V constant potential obtained at RVC electrodes (4.2 cm3) in a solution containing 0.01 M EDOT and 0.1 M LiClO4 in acetonitrile, using a three-electrode system; RVC electrode and Ag/AgCl (3 M NaCl) were used as counter electrode (CE) and reference electrode (RE), respectively (arrows with number 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 indicate the polymerization time for each electrode).
Figure 3. Combination chronoamperogram at 1.3 V constant potential obtained at RVC electrodes (4.2 cm3) in a solution containing 0.01 M EDOT and 0.1 M LiClO4 in acetonitrile, using a three-electrode system; RVC electrode and Ag/AgCl (3 M NaCl) were used as counter electrode (CE) and reference electrode (RE), respectively (arrows with number 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 indicate the polymerization time for each electrode).
Polymers 09 00157 g003
Polymers 09 00157 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM of PEDOT coated RVC electrode for 10 min electropolymerization at 1.3 V: top surface (a–c); and cross-section (d).
Figure 4. SEM of PEDOT coated RVC electrode for 10 min electropolymerization at 1.3 V: top surface (a–c); and cross-section (d).
Polymers 09 00157 g004
Polymers 09 00157 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM of PEDOT coated RVC electrode for 120 min electropolymerization at 1.3 V, showing the top surface of (a) pore size; and (b,c) fuzzy like morphology.
Figure 5. SEM of PEDOT coated RVC electrode for 120 min electropolymerization at 1.3 V, showing the top surface of (a) pore size; and (b,c) fuzzy like morphology.
Polymers 09 00157 g005
Polymers 09 00157 g006 550
Figure 6. The top surface and cross-section of PEDOT coated RVC strut: for 10 min polymerization (a,b); for 20 min polymerization (c,d); for 50 min polymerization (e,f); for 70 min polymerization (g,h); and for 120 min polymerization (i,j).
Figure 6. The top surface and cross-section of PEDOT coated RVC strut: for 10 min polymerization (a,b); for 20 min polymerization (c,d); for 50 min polymerization (e,f); for 70 min polymerization (g,h); and for 120 min polymerization (i,j).
Polymers 09 00157 g006
Polymers 09 00157 g007 550
Figure 7. TGA curves of pure RVC electrode and various PEDOT/RVC composite electrodes.
Figure 7. TGA curves of pure RVC electrode and various PEDOT/RVC composite electrodes.
Polymers 09 00157 g007
Polymers 09 00157 g008 550
Figure 8. Raman spectra of PEDOT-ClO4 grown by chronoamperometry at 1.3 V in acetonitrile containing 0.01 M EDOT and 0.1 M LiClO4.
Figure 8. Raman spectra of PEDOT-ClO4 grown by chronoamperometry at 1.3 V in acetonitrile containing 0.01 M EDOT and 0.1 M LiClO4.
Polymers 09 00157 g008
Polymers 09 00157 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) Cyclic voltammograms of 1 cm3 bare RVC and same size of PEDOT-120 min/RVC composite electrode in 1 M NaCl using a scan rate of 5 mV/s and Ag/AgCl reference electrode; and (b) effect of increasing polymerization time of PEDOT on the specific capacitance of PEDOT/RVC electrodes.
Figure 9. (a) Cyclic voltammograms of 1 cm3 bare RVC and same size of PEDOT-120 min/RVC composite electrode in 1 M NaCl using a scan rate of 5 mV/s and Ag/AgCl reference electrode; and (b) effect of increasing polymerization time of PEDOT on the specific capacitance of PEDOT/RVC electrodes.
Polymers 09 00157 g009
Polymers 09 00157 g010 550
Figure 10. Cyclic voltammograms of PEDOT-120 min/RVC electrode at: (a) 5 to 50 mV/s scan rates; and (b) 50 to 200 mV/s scan rates in a three-electrode systems in 1 M NaCl solution.
Figure 10. Cyclic voltammograms of PEDOT-120 min/RVC electrode at: (a) 5 to 50 mV/s scan rates; and (b) 50 to 200 mV/s scan rates in a three-electrode systems in 1 M NaCl solution.
Polymers 09 00157 g010
Polymers 09 00157 g011 550
Figure 11. (a) The specific capacitance (F/g) of PEDOT/RVC electrodes at various scan rates; (b) cyclic voltammograms of PEDOT/RVC electrodes using current per gram of PEDOT and current per geometric volume of electrode at 5 mV/s scan rate; and (c) the specific capacitance of PEDOT/RVC electrodes in terms of F/g and F/cm3 at 5 mV/s scan rate. Electrolyte: 1 M NaCl solution. Potential range: between −0.2 and 0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl using a three-electrode system.
Figure 11. (a) The specific capacitance (F/g) of PEDOT/RVC electrodes at various scan rates; (b) cyclic voltammograms of PEDOT/RVC electrodes using current per gram of PEDOT and current per geometric volume of electrode at 5 mV/s scan rate; and (c) the specific capacitance of PEDOT/RVC electrodes in terms of F/g and F/cm3 at 5 mV/s scan rate. Electrolyte: 1 M NaCl solution. Potential range: between −0.2 and 0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl using a three-electrode system.
Polymers 09 00157 g011
Polymers 09 00157 g012 550
Figure 12. The electrochemical cycling stability of PEDOT-120 min/RVC electrode in 1 M NaCl solution recorded in the potential range between −0.2 and 1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl using a three-electrode system at 5 mV/s scan rate for 200 cycles.
Figure 12. The electrochemical cycling stability of PEDOT-120 min/RVC electrode in 1 M NaCl solution recorded in the potential range between −0.2 and 1.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl using a three-electrode system at 5 mV/s scan rate for 200 cycles.
Polymers 09 00157 g012
Table
Table 1. Charge consumed during polymerization, polymerization time and mass of PEDOT coating on RVC electrode calculated by Equation (1).
Table 1. Charge consumed during polymerization, polymerization time and mass of PEDOT coating on RVC electrode calculated by Equation (1).
SamplePolymerization time (min)Charge consumed (C)Mass of PEDOT-ClO4 (mg)
PEDOT-10 min/RVC1020.6413
PEDOT-20 min/RVC2046.0429
PEDOT-50 min/RVC50112.7171
PEDOT-70 min/RVC70185.73117
PEDOT-120 min/RVC120380.98240
Table
Table 2. Calculated Raman band wavenumbers and vibrational assignments of PEDOT.
Table 2. Calculated Raman band wavenumbers and vibrational assignments of PEDOT.
Description of the vibrationcm−1Description of the vibrationcm−1
asym C= Cstr1509C–O–C def1152, 1120 and 1085
CH2 Scissoring1477Oxyethylene ring def988
Sym Cα=Cβ(–O) str1426ClO4–933
Cβ=Cβ str1365C–H bending806
Cα=Cα str1252Sym C–S–C def690
Cα=Cα str1236Oxyethylene ring def572
Key: str: stretching; def: deformation.
Table
Table 3. Specific capacitance of PEDOT/RVC electrodes measured in various units at various scan rates.
Table 3. Specific capacitance of PEDOT/RVC electrodes measured in various units at various scan rates.
Composite electrodePEDOT-10 min/RVCPEDOT-20 min/RVCPEDOT-50 min/RVCPEDOT-70 min/RVCPEDOT-120 min/RVC
Scan rate (mV/s)Capacitance F/g
5185.29171.04155.36142.5386.56
10160.12147.41137.16126.5178.62
20140.15130.90118.63107.5967.77
50125.66111.32102.0494.7862.41
100108.23100.3691.5281.4754.34
20083.5772.9565.8157.9639.45
Composite electrodePEDOT-10 min/RVCPEDOT-20 min/RVCPEDOT-50 min/RVCPEDOT-70 min/RVCPEDOT-120 min/RVC
Scan rate (mV/s)Capacitance F/cm2
50.080.190.410.660.80
100.070.170.360.590.73
200.060.150.310.500.63
500.060.120.270.440.58
1000.050.110.240.380.50
2000.040.080.170.270.36
Composite electrodePEDOT-10 min/RVCPEDOT-20 min/RVCPEDOT-50 min/RVCPEDOT-70 min/RVCPEDOT-120 min/RVC
Scan rate (mV/s)Capacitance F/cm3
50.651.483.185.146.18
100.561.282.814.575.62
200.491.142.433.894.84
500.440.972.093.424.46
1000.380.871.872.943.88
2000.290.631.352.092.82

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aldalbahi, A.; Rahaman, M.; Almoiqli, M. A Strategy to Enhance the Electrode Performance of Novel Three-Dimensional PEDOT/RVC Composites by Electrochemical Deposition Method. Polymers 2017, 9, 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9050157

AMA Style

Aldalbahi A, Rahaman M, Almoiqli M. A Strategy to Enhance the Electrode Performance of Novel Three-Dimensional PEDOT/RVC Composites by Electrochemical Deposition Method. Polymers. 2017; 9(5):157. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9050157

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aldalbahi, Ali, Mostafizur Rahaman, and Mohammed Almoiqli. 2017. "A Strategy to Enhance the Electrode Performance of Novel Three-Dimensional PEDOT/RVC Composites by Electrochemical Deposition Method" Polymers 9, no. 5: 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9050157

APA Style

Aldalbahi, A., Rahaman, M., & Almoiqli, M. (2017). A Strategy to Enhance the Electrode Performance of Novel Three-Dimensional PEDOT/RVC Composites by Electrochemical Deposition Method. Polymers, 9(5), 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9050157

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop