Next Article in Journal
The Transcriptome of Dahlia pinnata Provides Comprehensive Insight into the Formation Mechanism of Polychromatic Petals
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Association Study of Seed Quality and Yield Traits in a Soybean Collection from Southeast Kazakhstan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Differences in Early Root Endophytic Bacterial Communities between Japanese Sake Rice Cultivars and Table Rice Cultivars
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring the Genome of the Endophytic Fungus Botrytis deweyae: Prediction of Novel Secondary Metabolites Gene Clusters: Terpenes and Polyketides

1
Departamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Cádiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
2
Instituto de Investigación en Biomoléculas (INBIO), Universidad de Cádiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
3
Laboratorio de Microbiología, Departamento de Biomedicina, Biotecnología y Salud Pública, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Ambientales, Universidad de Cádiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
4
Instituto de Investigación Vitivinícola y Agroalimentaria (IVAGRO), Universidad de Cádiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(11), 2747; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112747
Submission received: 13 September 2024 / Revised: 28 October 2024 / Accepted: 19 November 2024 / Published: 20 November 2024

Abstract

:
Fungi have played a pivotal role in human history, from the dangers of fungal toxins to the revolutionary discovery of penicillin. Fungal secondary metabolites (SMs), such as polyketides (PKs) and terpenes, have attracted considerable interest due to their diverse biological activities. Botrytis deweyae, an endophytic fungus, exhibits behaviors that are notably distinct from those of its necrotrophic relatives within the genus Botrytis. This study explores the importance of terpenes and PK gene clusters and their conservation between species. In addition, new putative biosynthetic gene clusters corresponding to those families were identified. Consequently, the new PKS BdPKS22-26 were also identified in other Botrytis species and other fungi. In addition, those new gene clusters identified in this work show differences in the degree of conservation and are phylogenetically closely related to some of the 21 PKSs previously described in the reference strain Botrytis cinerea B05.10. Moreover, a new gene cluster related to terpenes in B. deweyae B1 and B. cinerea B05.10 was also identified that had never been detected before. This new gene cluster is well conserved among other Botrytis species in many phylogenetically distant fungal lineages. Understanding the genetic basis and conservation of these putative biosynthetic gene clusters sheds light on the metabolic potential and ecological roles of B. deweyae and related fungal species.

1. Introduction

1.1. Fungal Secondary Metabolites

Fungi have a profound connection with humans, highlighted by significant events such as the Turkey X disease outbreak in the 1960s [1] and the discovery of penicillin [2]. The antibiotic era, initiated by penicillin derived from the Penicillium fungus [3,4], transformed healthcare practices worldwide [3].
Fungi exhibit remarkable metabolic adaptability, producing secondary metabolites (SMs) through complex biosynthetic pathways [5,6]. These SMs serve as signaling molecules and defense mechanisms, providing a competitive advantage in natural environments [7]. Their importance extends to applications in medicine, agriculture, and biotechnology [8,9]. Common SM categories include terpenes, polyketides, non-ribosomal peptides, and indoles [10,11].

1.2. The Genus Botrytis

The Botrytis genus comprises ubiquitous fungal pathogens that significantly impact agriculture, horticulture, and ecology [12]. Notably, Botrytis cinerea is infamous for causing gray mold disease, affecting various crops like grapes, strawberries, and vegetables, leading to substantial yield and quality losses [13,14]. This pathogen poses challenges for growers as it can infect plants both pre- and post-harvest [15,16].
Ecologically, Botrytis serves as a necrotrophic pathogen, contributing to nutrient cycling and decomposition [14,17]. Species within this genus exhibit diverse interactions with plant hosts, ranging from benign to virulent pathogenicity, showcasing their ecological versatility [18]. The genetic diversity and metabolic adaptability of Botrytis enable it to evade host defenses and thrive in varying environments [19,20].
Ongoing research into its biology and genetics offers promising strategies for disease management, with advances in genomic tools providing insights into its life cycle and host interactions [14,21].

1.3. Botrytis Deweyae

B. deweyae stands out in the Botrytis genus for its combination of endophytic and facultative necrotrophic behaviors, differing from typical necrotrophic traits [18,22]. Initially isolated from Hemerocallis plants with “spring sickness”, it causes deformities, stunted growth, chlorosis, and necrotic lesions post-winter [22]. While research interest has been limited until recently, reports of its impact date back to the 1970s [22].
Genetic analysis reveals a close relationship between B. deweyae, Botrytis elliptica, and Botrytis squamosa [22]. Although primarily targeting Hemerocallis, it has a polyphagy index of 1, indicating a more restricted host range than its relatives [15]. B. elliptica is the second most polyphagous species after B. cinerea [15]. Recent observations suggest that B. deweyae may be expanding its ecological niche, with reports of gray mold on Polygonatum cyrtonema in China [23].

1.4. Role of Terpenes and Polyketide Synthases in Secondary Metabolism

1.4.1. Terpenes

Terpenoids, derived from isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP), are synthesized via the mevalonate and deoxyxylulose 5-phosphate pathways [24,25]. The mevalonate pathway, predominant in fungi, converts mevalonate to IPP, which is crucial for terpenoid biosynthesis [25]. Terpenoid biosynthesis begins with IPP and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP), leading to various terpenoid classes through enzymatic transformations [26,27,28,29,30,31]. Terpenoids have diverse biological activities, including hormonal functions and mycotoxin production [32,33,34].

1.4.2. Polyketide Synthases

Polyketides (PKs) are a prominent family of secondary metabolites initiated by the condensation of acetyl-CoA units [35,36]. Polyketide synthases (PKSs) are classified into three major classes based on structure and function: Type I, Type II, and Type III [35,37]. Type I PKSs are multifunctional enzymes resembling fatty acid synthetases, while Type II PKSs are multienzymatic complexes found mainly in prokaryotes [38,39,40,41,42,43]. Type III PKSs are less diverse and primarily involved in plant defense [44,45,46,47]. The structural diversity of PKs is further enhanced by auxiliary enzymes [37].
This study aims to investigate the genomic profiles of B. deweyae to identify gene clusters responsible for secondary metabolite biosynthesis, particularly terpenes and polyketides. By comparing with B. cinerea, we seek to understand genetic variability and phylogenetic relationships of these clusters, alongside their ecological and functional significance, enhancing our knowledge of metabolic diversity within the genus Botrytis and its implications for disease management and biotechnological applications. However, it is important to point out that these results are predictive and, without validation, remain theoretical; therefore, validation would need to be carried out for confirmation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Genome Data Acquisition

The genome data used in this study were sourced from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), with accession numbers GCF_000143535.2 for Botrytis cinerea B05.10 [48,49] and GCF_014898535.1 for Botrytis deweyae B1 [50].

2.2. Genome Set Completeness Assessment

We utilized BUSCO v. 5.7.1 in genome modes, employing the fungi_odb10 dataset, which includes 758 BUSCO groups. This analysis assessed the completeness of the predicted protein set and the genome assembly. We compared the BUSCO scores with those obtained for the Botrytis cinerea genome [51]. The alignment of both genomes was visualized by performing a syntenic plot using the TBtools-II tool [52]. The core genes corresponding to the secondary metabolism of B. deweyae that showed collinearity with B. cinerea were represented in the plot (Supplementary Figure S1).

2.3. Secondary Metabolite Gene Cluster Analysis

Secondary metabolite gene cluster analysis was performed using antiSMASH v. 7.0 (fungal version) software [53]. AntiSMASH is an integrated tool designed to identify putative biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) within fungal genomes, providing comprehensive annotations that predict the presence and type of secondary metabolites these clusters may produce (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). We set up default parameters, which facilitates the identification of potential secondary metabolite gene clusters.

2.4. Domain Analysis

Domain analysis was carried out using the Conserved Domain Database (CDD) alongside the Pfam v. 35 database [54]. Pfam is an extensive collection of protein families, represented by multiple sequence alignments and hidden Markov models (HMMs), facilitating the identification and functional characterization of protein domains. When Pfam did not yield results, the InterPro (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/ (accessed on 30 July 2024)) database was employed. InterPro aggregates predictive models from multiple sources, including Pfam, PRINTS, PROSITE, and SMART, offering a thorough functional analysis of proteins [55,56].

2.5. Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic relationships were inferred using sequences from Bd22-26 and XP_038807933.1, which served as queries in a BLASTP search against the NCBI non-redundant protein sequence database [57]. Homologous proteins were selected from the resulting list following specific criteria: percent identity (>50%), coverage (>70%), and the bit-score (>50) [58,59]. The maximum likelihood method was employed to infer evolutionary history [60], utilizing 55 homologous proteins, except where fewer than 50 sequences were identified, in which case all sequences were included. The optimal tree was displayed, and evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method [60]. This analysis involved 57 amino acid sequences, with ambiguous positions removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). MEGA v. 11 software was used for these evolutionary analyses [61].

2.6. Homologous Protein Identification

Identification of homologous proteins was performed using a BLASTP search with stringent criteria: percent identity (>50%), coverage (>70%), and bit-score (>50) [58,59]. The search targeted the non-redundant protein sequence database, focusing on Botrytis (taxid: 33196), Botryotinia (taxid: 40558), and a broader search across fungi (taxid: 4751). This comprehensive approach ensured the identification of homologous proteins not only within the Botrytis genus but also across a wide range of fungal species, providing a broader context for comparative analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Genome Completeness Assessment

BUSCO (v5.7.1) analysis (Supplementary Table S3) at the genomic level revealed that 99.1% of the fungi dataset was retrieved in full length. Additionally, 0% of the BUSCO genes for fungi, respectively, were identified as duplicated, indicating that the genome was not assembled in a haploid state with no significant evidence of gene duplications (Supplementary Table S3). B. cinerea B05.10 gene content completeness was comparable to that of B. deweyae B1 based on BUSCO metrics even though B. deweyae B1 was a little bit more fragmented.

3.2. Comparative Analysis of Secondary Metabolite Gene Clusters in B. deweyae and B. cinerea

The comparison of secondary metabolite gene clusters between B. deweyae B1 and B. cinerea B05.10 reveals distinct differences in their metabolic capabilities. B. deweyae B1 contains a greater number of polyketide synthase (PKS) clusters, with 11 identified gene clusters compared to 10 in B. cinerea B05.10. Similarly, the number of terpene biosynthesis clusters is higher in B. deweyae B1, with six gene clusters, compared to five in B. cinerea B05.10 (Figure 1).
These differences indicate a higher diversity in the secondary metabolism of B. deweyae. The identified PKS clusters in B. deweyae include several novel clusters that have not been previously described, suggesting potential new pathways for secondary metabolite production. The analysis of these gene clusters provides insights into the unique metabolic capabilities of B. deweyae, which may contribute to its ecological roles and interactions with host plants.
Figure 1 illustrates the distribution of secondary metabolite gene clusters identified in both B. deweyae and B. cinerea. The increased number of clusters in B. deweyae highlights its potential for producing a broader range of secondary metabolites, which could be crucial for its adaptation and survival in diverse environmental conditions.

3.3. Terpene Gene Clusters in B. deweyae

In this section, we focus on the identification and characterization of terpene gene clusters in B. deweyae. The analysis revealed several key findings, highlighting the diversity and potential functional roles of these clusters.
Table 1 presents a detailed comparison of the terpene gene clusters identified in B. deweyae and B. cinerea. The table includes gene IDs, protein IDs, protein lengths, and percentage similarities, providing a comprehensive overview of the similarities and differences between these species.
This table highlights that B. deweyae contains a higher number of unique terpene gene clusters compared to B. cinerea, suggesting a more diverse metabolic potential. Notably, the presence of novel gene clusters in B. deweyae indicates potential new pathways for secondary metabolite production, which could play crucial roles in the organism’s ecological interactions and adaptability.

3.3.1. Description of Terpene Gene Clusters

The identified terpene gene clusters in B. deweyae B1 include several well-conserved genes, such as Bcerg9, Bcstc4, Bcstc7, Bcbot2, and Bcphs1, along with an unannotated gene. Bcerg9 encodes for a key enzyme in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway, essential for maintaining cell membrane integrity [62]. Bcstc4 and Bcstc7 are involved in the biosynthesis of specific sesquiterpenoids: (3R,6E)-nerolidol and (+)-α-bisabolol (for Bcstc4 gene) and (+)-4-epi-eremophil-9-en-11-ol (for Bcstc7 gene) [63,64]. Bcbot2 is associated with the synthesis of botrydial, a phytotoxic sesquiterpene produced by B. cinerea [65]. Bcphs1 plays a role in the biosynthesis of retinal, an aldehyde form of vitamin A [66]. These clusters are crucial for the biosynthesis of various terpenoid compounds, which are known for their diverse biological activities.
In B. cinerea B05.10, gene clusters corresponding to the sesquiterpene family such as Bcstc2 (BCIN_08g02350) and Bcstc5 (BCIN_01g03520) have been detected. However, the gene Bcstc2 is not present in the genome of B. deweyae B1, while the protein BcSTC5 has two homologous proteins, EAE98_005930 and EAE98_005931, with 36% and 63% identity, respectively. The union of these two proteins gives rise to BcSTC5 in B. cinerea B05.10, indicating a putative annotation error in the case of B. deweyae B1.
Figure 2 illustrates the phylogenetic relationships of all the genes that present the IPR008949—Isoprenoid synthase domain superfamily, terpene synthases identified in B. deweyae and their homologs in B. cinerea. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method via MEGA 11 software, with bootstrap values from 1000 trials indicated at each branch node.
BdSTC4, BcSTC3, BdBOT2, BcSTC5, BcERG9, and BdSTC7 are closely related, forming part of the same subclade. On the other hand, BcPAX1, BcCOQ1, BcERG20, and BdUnannotated (XP_038807933.1, which forms a cluster in both B. cinerea B05.10 and B. deweyae B1 according to the antiSMASH cluster prediction tool) are found in another subclade belonging to the same clade 1 (Figure 2). Likewise, for the protein named BcUnannotated the most closely related protein is BcStc2 (Figure 2).
The phylogenetic analysis reveals that the terpene synthases in B. deweyae are closely related to those in B. cinerea, suggesting a shared evolutionary history. However, the presence of unique genes in B. deweyae indicates species-specific adaptations and potential new putative biosynthetic capabilities.

3.3.2. Description of EAE98_008016 Gene in B. deweyae

The EAE98_008016 gene in B. deweyae presents a unique aspect of the species’ genomic architecture, differentiating it from B. cinerea. This gene, identified via the AntiSMASH tool, is part of a cluster predicted to encode an unannotated terpene (BdUnannotated protein) (Figure 3). Notably, this gene cluster does not contain additional genes in either B. deweyae or B. cinerea B05.10 (Figure 3).
The EAE98_008016 gene encodes a protein (XP_038807933.1) with two polyprenyl synthetase domains located between amino acids 316-870 and 858-1097. It shows a 96.33% similarity to the BCIN_14g01170 gene, which encodes the protein XP_024552819.1, in B. cinerea (Table 1).
Comparative analysis reveals homologous proteins across various Botrytis species, indicating conservation of this gene. This protein has homologs in all Botrytis species whose genomes have been sequenced and annotated (Table 2). B. cinerea, one of the most studied species in the genus, is represented by multiple strains including T4, BcDW1, Bc448, and B05.10. These strains exhibit high percentages of identity with B. deweyae, ranging from 96.33% to 96.70%, suggesting close genetic relationships. B. elliptica strain Be9612 shows an even higher percentage of identity (99.75%), indicating a very close genetic similarity to B. deweyae B1 (Table 2). Other strains, such as B. sinoallii (Bc 23 strain) and Botrytis hyacinthi (Bh0001 strain), also display high levels of identity, with percentages of 99.24% and 98.22%, respectively (Table 2). Several strains from different species exhibit identities above 98%, including Botrytis aclada (633 strain), Botryotinia convoluta (MUCL 11595 strain), Botrytis byssoidea (MUCL 94 strain), and Botrytis fragariae (BVB16 strain), among others. In contrast, species such as Botryotinia calthae (MUCL 2830 strain), Botrytis porri (MUCL 3234 and MUCL 3349 strains), and B. squamosa (MUCL 31421 strain) exhibit lower percentages of identity, ranging from 91.42% to 97.11% (Table 2).
On the other hand, some strains, such as Botrytis medusae (B555 strain), Botrytis pseudocinerea (BP362 strain), and Botrytis fabae (DLY-16-612 strain), have not been fully characterized in terms of amino acid sequences (Table 2). However, regions on the draft genomes of B. pseudocinerea, B. fabae, and B. medusae homologous to the XP_038807933.1 protein show percentages of identity with the XP_038807933.1 protein of B. deweyae ranging from 91.42% to 93.66% (Table 2).

3.3.3. Comparative Analysis of EAE98_008016 Protein with Other Fungal Species

In addition to the comparative analysis within the Botrytis genus, Table 3 provides a comprehensive overview of the taxonomic distribution of fungi, focusing on the phyla Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Mucoromycota, Zoopagomycota, and Blastocladiomycota, in relation to the unannotated gene EAE98_008016 from B. deweyae. This breakdown reveals the diversity of fungal species and their distribution across various taxonomic levels, including phyla, classes, and orders. Additionally, the table includes the number of proteins and organisms associated with each taxonomic group, providing valuable insights into the functional and ecological diversity of fungi.
Ascomycota is the largest phylum represented, with 3547 protein sequences across 1419 organisms. The Sordariomyceta clade stands out with 1239 identified proteins and 683 organisms (Table 3A). Within this clade, the Leotiomycetes class includes significant orders such as Heliotales, with 75 proteins in 61 organisms, and Erysiphales (Table 3A). The Sordariomycetes class shows high protein diversity, especially in orders like Xylariales, Hypocreales, and Glomerellales, which have 227, 546, and 159 proteins, respectively, across 122, 259, and 88 organisms (Table 3A).
The Leotiomyceta clade follows closely, with 1462 proteins in 431 organisms. The class Eurotiomycetes is prominent, particularly the order Eurotiales, which has 1116 proteins in 230 organisms (Table 3A). Other notable orders within Eurotiomycetes include Onygenales and Chaetothyriales, which contribute significantly to the protein diversity with 110 and 95 proteins, respectively (Table 3A). Additionally, less common orders like Verrucariales and Phaeomoniellales are represented by fewer proteins and organisms (Table 3A).
Lecanoromycetes, another class within Ascomycota, includes orders such as Teloschistales, Lecanorales, and Trapeliales, each showing varied protein counts and organism numbers (Table 3A). Other classes such as Coniocybomycetes, Xylonomycetes, and Candelariomycetes exhibit lower but still notable protein counts and organism diversity (Table 3A).
The Dothideomyceta clade, with 720 proteins and 232 organisms, represents a diverse group of fungi that includes many plant pathogens, saprobes, and lichenized fungi. The class Dothideomycetes covers a wide range of orders with varying protein counts and organism numbers (Table 3A). For instance, Mycosphaerellales has 251 proteins in 45 organisms, while Dothideales has 138 proteins across 20 organisms. Other orders like Myriangiales, Cladosporiales, and Trypetheliales have fewer proteins and organisms but still contribute to the overall diversity (Table 3A).
Saccharomyceta, the smallest clade in terms of both protein count and organism number, comprises 126 proteins distributed among 73 organisms (Table 3A). This clade, encompassing various orders within the Pezizomycotina subphylum, demonstrates diverse protein counts and organism numbers. Notably, Pezizales has 34 proteins in 26 organisms, and Orbiliales has 35 proteins across 15 organisms (Table 3A). Saccharomycetales exhibits 45 proteins in 23 organisms, showcasing the range of diversity within Saccharomyceta (Table 3A).
Taphrinomycotina incertae sedis, a class within the Taphrinomycotina subphylum, shows limited protein diversity and organism representation, with only three proteins identified in a single organism (Table 3A). In contrast, Taphrinomycetes in the order Taphrinales demonstrates slightly higher protein diversity with three proteins in two organisms (Table 3A). Despite its modest representation, this class highlights the presence of lesser-known fungal taxa, emphasizing the need for further exploration and study.
Basidiomycota, the second-largest phylum, includes classes such as Microbotryomycetes, Agaricomycetes, and Tremellomycetes (Table 3B). Agaricomycetes is particularly diverse, featuring orders like Agaricales, Boletales, and Tremellales (Table 3B). Agaricales is especially prominent, with a high number of proteins and organisms, indicating its ecological and functional importance within the phylum (Table 3B).
Within Microbotryomycetes, various orders demonstrate diverse protein counts and organism numbers (Table 3B). Sporidiobolales stands out with 20 identified proteins across 10 organisms, showing significant protein diversity (Table 3B). Other orders like Leucosporidiales, Microbotryales, and Kriegeriales exhibit lower protein counts and organism numbers (Table 3B).
The class Tremellomycetes includes orders such as Filobasidiales, Trichosporonales, and Tremellales. Tremellales shows higher protein diversity with 99 proteins across 73 organisms. Other orders within Tremellomycetes exhibit varying protein counts and organism numbers, contributing to the overall diversity within the class (Table 3B).
Other phyla, although less represented, still exhibit significant diversity. Chytridiomycota and Mucoromycota include notable orders like Mucorales with 194 proteins in 57 organisms and Mortierellales with 88 proteins in 51 organisms (Table 3C,E). Chytridiomycetes includes orders such as Spizellomycetales and Rhizophlyctidales, each contributing to the overall diversity.
Zoopagomycota and Blastocladiomycota, though less studied, also show interesting diversity (Table 3D,F). Kickxellales within Zoopagomycota stands out with 160 proteins in 137 organisms. The order Blastocladiales in Blastocladiomycota contains 10 proteins in five organisms, adding to the functional variety within these phyla.
In summary, the taxonomic analysis of the EAE98_008016 protein across different fungal phyla reveals extensive diversity. This diversity reflects the wide range of ecological roles and metabolic capabilities present within the fungal kingdom, providing valuable insights into their functional and ecological significance.
On the other hand, regarding the phylogenetic relationship, the XP_038807933 protein (encoded by the EAE98_008016 gene; Supplementary Table S4) from B. deweyae B1 is closely related to proteins of species from the genus Sclerotinia and Stromatinia, with both proteins located in the same subclade (Figure 4). Additionally, XP_038807933 is phylogenetically related to proteins from fungi of the genera Ciborinia, Monilinia, Rustroemia, Chlorociboria, Bisporella, Claussenomyces, Coleophoma, Amorphotheca, Xylogone, Hyphodiscus, Hyaloscypha, Diplocarpon, Marssonina, Drepanopeziza, Rhynchosporium, Cadophora, Rhexocercosporidium, Leptodontidium, Lachnellula, Glarea, Amylocarpus, Venustampulla, Halenospora, and Hymenoscyphus (Figure 4). Moreover, the top 55 sequences selected for the phylogenetic analysis belong to species from the Helotiales order. Among these top hits, one sequence corresponds to an unclassified Leotiomycetes species, Xylogone sp. PMI_703. Another sequence is from Leotiomycetes sp. MPI-SDFR-AT-0126 is closely related to species of the genus Cadophora. Lastly, Claussenomyces sp. TS43310 is classified within the Leotiales order.

3.4. Polyketide Gene Clusters in B. deweyae

In this section, we focus on the identification and characterization of polyketide gene clusters in B. deweyae. The analysis revealed several key findings, highlighting the diversity and potential functional roles of these clusters.
Table 4 presents a detailed comparison of the polyketide gene clusters identified in B. deweyae and B. cinerea. The table includes gene IDs, protein IDs, protein lengths, and percentage similarities, providing a comprehensive overview of the similarities and differences between these species.
This table reveals that B. deweyae harbors six putative polyketide gene clusters not found in B. cinerea, indicating a greater metabolic diversity. These unique clusters (gene IDs: EAE98_002293, EAE98_009027, EAE98_009190, EAE98_010906, and EAE98_010943) suggest the presence of new pathways for secondary metabolite production.

3.4.1. Description of Polyketide Gene Clusters

Previous studies by [20] identified 21 polyketide synthases in B. cinerea, of which only BcBOA6/BcBOA9, BcPKS13, BcPKS1, BcPKS21, BcPKS16, BcCHS1, BcPKS10, BcPKS8, BcPKS2, and BcPKS15 form gene clusters [20]. In B. deweyae, some of these clusters, specifically BcBOA6/BcBOA9, BcPKS1, BcCHS11, BcPKS8, and BcPKS2, were not identified, indicating differences in gene cluster formation between these species.
For the non-cluster-forming polyketide synthases in B. cinerea, no homologous proteins were identified in B. deweyae for BcPKS3, BcPKS7, BcPKS9, BcPKS11, BcPKS17, BcPKS19, and BcPKS20. However, although BcPKS5 was not found as a homologous protein, a genomic region in B. deweyae suggests the presence of this polyketide synthase, indicating its potential yet unannotated presence. This identifies the possible presence of this gene in the genome of this fungus, but it is not properly annotated for this protein.
Additionally, previous studies by [11] proposed several new potential polyketide synthases (PKSs) in B. cinerea B05.10. These genes, including BCIN_09g06350, BCIN_01g00450, BCIN_04g00210, BCIN_03g06470, BCIN_09g06360, BCIN_08g02570, BCIN_08g02560, and BCIN_12g03250, were identified as candidates based on the presence of various indicative domains [11]. However, many of these genes either lack complete PKS domains or are present as fragments. For instance, BCIN_09g06350 contains only the IPR042104 domain with 104 amino acids and lacks other typical PKS domains (Supplementary Table S5). Similarly, BCIN_03g06470, despite having multiple domains such as the zinc-binding dehydrogenase domain, a KR domain, and a phosphopantetheine attachment site domain, does not exhibit the full domain architecture expected of classical PKS genes (Supplementary Table S5). Further analysis reveals that homologous proteins in other fungal species with over 50% identity similarity to these genes often have significantly more amino acids than those in B. cinerea, suggesting that these PKS candidates might be incomplete or fragmented (Supplementary Table S6). In contrast, BcFAS2 (BCIN_01g00440) in B. cinerea is a well-characterized gene, encoding a protein with 1860 amino acids and containing several complete PKS Type I domains. These include Fas_alpha_ACP, FAS_I_H, ACPS, cond_enzymes superfamily, ketoacyl-synt_C superfamily, and NADB_Rossmann superfamily domains, ensuring its functionality as a full polyketide synthase (Supplementary Table S5). The comprehensive domain structure of BcFAS2, along with its relevance and completeness, justifies its selection for inclusion in the phylogenetic analysis. Homologous proteins from other Botrytis species and fungi exhibit similar lengths and domain structures, further supporting the use of BcFAS2 in comparative studies (Supplementary Table S6).
Furthermore, new gene clusters were identified in B. deweyae that do not have homologous gene clusters in the genome of B. cinerea. These new gene clusters, named BdPKS22-26 (following the numbering after the 21 polyketides previously described in B. cinerea), are reported here for the first time, not having been identified in any Botrytis genome before (Figure 5).
The phylogenetic distribution of these new polyketide synthases, along with the 21 previously described in B. cinerea, reveals their arrangement into two distinct clades (Figure 6).
In the first clade, BdPKS22 can be identified in subclade 1, closely related to BcPKS1 and BcPKS21. BdPKS21 shares a subclade with BcPKS2, BcPKS8, as well as BcPKS10 and BcPKS11, which are phylogenetically related to each other. More distantly related within the same subclade is BcBOA9, which is closely related to BdPKS23, BdPKS24, and BdPKS26. Additionally, subclade 2 of clade 1 shows that BcBOA6 is closely related to BcPKS3 and BcPKS7, while BcPKS4 and BcPKS5 are more distantly related to BcBOA6 within the same subclade. It is noteworthy that the gene clusters of the polyketide synthases BcBOA6 and BcBOA9, responsible for the biosynthesis of botcinins, belong to different subclades. BcBOA6 is closely related to other polyketide synthases described in the genome of B. cinerea, while BcBOA9 is closely related to novel gene clusters encoding polyketide synthases in B. deweyae.
In the second clade, two subclades are identified. Subclade 1 contains closely related polyketide synthases BcPKS12–BcPKS15. In subclade 2, BdPKS25 is closely related to BcPKS16, which are on the same branch as BcPKS18 and BcPKS19. Additionally, BcPKS17 and BcPKS20 are more phylogenetically distant within the same clade.
A point of particular interest is the genetic diversity exhibited by the newly described polyketide synthases in B. deweyae. Most of these new PKSs are identified within the same clade and subclade (except for BdPKS22, which belongs to another subclade), with BdPKS25 being the most phylogenetically distant among the newly identified PKSs.

3.4.2. Description of EAE98_002293 Gene in B. deweyae—Bdpks22

The gene cluster containing the EAE98_002293 gene, referred to as Bdpks22 in this study, consists of a single putative biosynthetic gene encoding the protein XP_038813652.1 (Figure 5). The XP_038813652.1 protein, encoded by EAE98_002293, is composed of 2542 amino acids and contains multiple functional domains: beta-ketoacyl synthase N-terminal (aa 21-257, pfam00109), beta-ketoacyl synthase C-terminal (aa 267-382, pfam02801), ketoacyl-synthetase C-terminal extension (aa 386-430, pfam16197), acyl transferase (aa 555-902, cl08282), Hotdog superfamily (aa 956-1242, cl00509), methyltransferase (aa 1453-1558, pfam08242), medium chain reductase/dehydrogenase-like family (aa 1990-2081 and 2044-2165, cl16912), KR domain (aa 2189-2344, pfam08659), and phosphopantetheine attachment site (pfam00550).
BdPKS22 is also found as a homologous protein in B. elliptica, B. convoluta, B. galanthina, B. porri, and B. tulipae. Strains Be9612 of B. elliptica and MUCL 31421 of B. squamosa exhibit high conservation percentages of 97.01% and 94.42%, respectively. However, strains MUCL 3234 and MUCL 3349 of B. porri show lower conservation percentages of 88.08%. For B. squamosa, a specific annotated protein was not identified, but a genomic region (RCTC02000012.1) was found that corresponds to the BdPks22 amino acid sequence (Table 5). This was the only case among the 10 Botrytis genomes where a homologous protein to BdPks22 was not found (Table 5).
The distribution of BdPKS22 in other fungi spans the Sordariomyceta, Leotiomyceta, and Dothideomyceta clades. In Sordariomyceta, PKS proteins are found in the Leotiomycete and Sordariomycete orders. Within Leotiomycete, Heliotales hosts one PKS protein in one organism, and Xylariales contains four PKS proteins among three organisms. Leotiomycetes incertae sedis also harbors one PKS protein. In Leotiomyceta, orders such as Teloschistales and Pertusariales exhibit PKS proteins. Teloschistales displays three PKS proteins across three organisms, while Pertusariales contains one PKS protein. In Eurotiomycetes, Eurotiales includes ten PKS proteins across seven organisms. In Dothideomyceta, Pleosporales stands out with thirteen PKS proteins identified within two organisms (Table 6).
Of the 18 homologous hits to BdPKS22 (Figure 7 and Supplementary Table S7), the phylogenetic distribution shows that BdPKS22 is closely related to Sclerotinia nivalis within the same subclade (subclade 2 of clade 1). All species in clade 1 belong to Sordariomyceta, except Biscogniauxia marginata and Annulohypoxylon truncatum from Leotiomyceta, closely related to Oidiodendron maius, Penicillium occitanis, and Talaromyces rugulosus. Additionally, BdPKS22 shares a clade with species of the genera Xanthoria, Teloschistes, and Aspergillus (Figure 7).

3.4.3. Description of EAE98_009027 Gene in B. deweyae—Bdpks23

The gene cluster containing the EAE98_009027 gene, referred to as Bdpks23 in this study, consists of six putative biosynthetic genes (Figure 5). The gene EAE98_009027 encodes the protein XP_038807018.1, which is composed of 2537 amino acids and contains multiple functional domains: beta-ketoacyl synthase N-terminal (aa 16-266, pfam00109), beta-ketoacyl synthase C-terminal (aa 275-393, pfam02801), ketoacyl-synthetase C-terminal extension (aa 398-528, pfam16197), acyl transferase (aa 556-887, cl08282), polyketide synthase dehydratase (aa 944-1251, pfam14765), methyltransferase (aa 1444-1548, pfam08242), alcohol dehydrogenase GroES-like (aa 1866-1916, cl17172), zinc-binding dehydrogenase (aa 1981-2072, pfam00107), KR domain (aa 2190-2348, pfam08659), and phosphopantetheine attachment site (aa 2467-2525, pfam00550).
Additionally, this cluster includes other genes: EAE98_009028 (543 amino acids, FAD binding domain, aa 101-239, pfam01565), EAE98_009029 (303 amino acids, crotonase/enoyl-CoA hydratase superfamily domain, aa 37-263, cl23717), EAE98_009030 (506 amino acids, FAD binding domain, aa 66-206, cl19922), EAE98_009031 (552 amino acids, cytochrome P450 domain, aa 103-514, cl12078), and EAE98_009032 (438 amino acids, major facilitator superfamily domain, aa 53-391, pfam07690).
The comparative analysis of protein sequence identities among various Botrytis species strains relative to the reference protein XP_038807018.1 (BdPKS23) reveals intriguing insights into the genetic diversity within this fungal genus. B. squamosa strain MUCL 31421 exhibits the highest identity at 98.43%, indicating a close genetic relationship to the reference protein. Despite the lack of an annotated protein in B. squamosa, a genomic region likely involved in the biosynthesis of this protein was identified. B. elliptica strains Be9601 and Be9612 follow closely with identities of 96.43% and 95.87%, respectively, suggesting substantial genetic similarity to BdPKS23. B. sinoallii strain Bc23 and B. fragariae strain BVB16 exhibit identities of 95.77% and 94.07%, respectively. However, B. paeoniae strain Bp0003 shows the lowest identity at 84.85%, indicating greater genetic divergence (Table 5).
The distribution of BdPKS23 in other fungi spans the Ascomycota phylum, specifically within the Sordariomyceta, Leotiomyceta, and Dothideomyceta classes. In Sordariomyceta, PKS proteins are found in the Heliotales (9 PKS proteins in 7 organisms) and Xylariales (32 PKS proteins in 25 organisms) orders. Xylariomycetidae incertae sedis and Diaporthales each contain four PKS proteins found in one and three organisms, respectively. In Leotiomyceta, Lecanorales contains two PKS proteins found in two organisms, Teloschistales exhibits five PKS proteins in four organisms, and Peltigerales and Pertusariales each contain one PKS protein in one organism. In Eurotiomycetes, Eurotiales includes three PKS proteins in two organisms. In Dothideomyceta, Dothideomycetes incertae sedis contains one PKS protein in one organism (Table 6).
The phylogenetic distribution of BdPKS23 is noteworthy as it shows that among the 51 top protein sequences (Figure 8 and Supplementary Table S8), all belong to the Sordariomyceta clade except for three Leotiomyceta species (genera Talaromyces and Letrouitia) and one species, Zopfia rhizophila, belonging to Dothideomyceta. These species are found in a different clade from the one in which BdPKS23 is located, sharing a clade with species of the genera Lachnellula, Hypoxylon, Cudoniella, and Xylaria, among others. In clade 2, BdPKS23 is closely related to species of the genera Mollisia, Xylariaceae, Icmadophila, Teloschistes, Mycoblastus, Alectoria, and Rutstroemia (Figure 8).

3.4.4. Description of EAE98_009190 Gene in B. deweyae—Bdpks24

The gene cluster containing the EAE98_009190 gene, referred to as Bdpks24 in this study, consists of three putative biosynthetic genes (Figure 5). The gene EAE98_009188 encodes a protein with 311 amino acids, containing the domains metallo-beta-lactamase superfamily (aa 70-232, pfam00753) and hydroxyacylglutathione hydrolase C-terminus (aa 233-310, pfam16123). The gene EAE98_009190 encodes the protein XP_038806877.1, which is composed of 2346 amino acids and contains multiple functional domains: beta-ketoacyl synthase N-terminal (aa 11-249, pfam00109), beta-ketoacyl synthase C-terminal (aa 258-376, pfam02801), ketoacyl-synthetase C-terminal extension (aa 380-514, pfam16197), acyl transferase (aa 543-856, cl08282), polyketide synthase dehydratase (aa 931-1228, pfam14765), alcohol dehydrogenase GroES-like (aa 1644-1696, cl17172), zinc-binding dehydrogenase (aa 1759-1849, pfam00107), KR domain (aa 1991-2163, pfam08659), and phosphopantetheine attachment site (aa 2277-2334, pfam00550). Additionally, the gene EAE98_009191 encodes a protein with 551 amino acids, featuring an amidase domain (aa 81-531, cl18951).
The comparative analysis of protein sequence identities among various Botrytis strains highlights the genetic diversity within this fungal genus. B. elliptica strains Be9601 and Be9612 show high sequence identities of 97.29% and 94.43%, respectively, compared to the reference protein XP_038806877.1 (BdPKS24). However, B. squamosa strain MUCL 31421 exhibits a lower identity of 83.28%, indicating greater genetic divergence. Similarly, B. aclada strain 633, B. porri strain MUCL 3234, and B. globosa strain MUCL 444 display identities of 78.53%, 72.12%, and 75.22%, respectively. These similarities were identified based on draft genome sequences, as no homologous proteins for BdPKS24 were annotated in the genomes of B. squamosa, B. aclada, B. porri, and B. globosa (Table 5).
The distribution of BdPKS24 protein across the Ascomycota phylum, specifically within the Leotiomyceta and Sordariomyceta classes, reveals various taxonomic orders harboring these proteins. In the Leotiomyceta clade, the orders Sarrameanales, Trapeliales, Pertusariales, and Teloschistales each contain one PKS protein in one organism, suggesting a diverse distribution of PKS enzymes within this class, reflecting potential ecological adaptations and metabolic diversity. In the Eurotiomyceta clade, the Onygenales order contains one PKS protein in one organism, while the Eurotiales order harbors two PKS proteins in one organism, indicating a comparatively lower abundance of PKS proteins within Eurotiomycetes. In the Sordariomyceta clade, the Sordariomycete order Xylariales exhibits three PKS proteins across two organisms, suggesting a moderate abundance of PKS enzymes within this order (Table 6).
The phylogenetic distribution of BdPKS24 is noteworthy as, among the four top protein sequences (Figure 9 and Supplementary Table S9), all belong to the Leotiomyceta clade except for Monosporascus sp. mg162, which belongs to the Sordariomyceta clade along with Botrytis deweyae. BdPKS24 is also related to species of the genera Loxospora, Trapelia, and Penicillium (Figure 9).

3.4.5. Description of EAE98_010906 Gene in B. deweyae—Bdpks25

The gene cluster containing the EAE98_010906 gene, referred to as Bdpks25 in this study, consists of a single putative biosynthetic gene, EAE98_010906, which encodes the protein XP_038805042.1 with 2208 amino acids (Figure 5). This protein contains multiple functional domains: beta-ketoacyl synthase N-terminal (aa 122-288, pfam00109), beta-ketoacyl synthase C-terminal (aa 296-411, pfam02801), acyl transferase (aa 565-826, cl08282), Hotdog superfamily (aa 979-1214, cl00509), phosphopantetheine attachment site (aa 1280-1338 and 1384-1439, pfam00550), helix–turn–helix (aa 1497-1580, pfam18558), methyltransferase (aa 1682-1782, pfam08242), and BD-FAE (aa 1894-2155, pfam20434).
The comparison of protein sequence identities among various Botrytis strains provides insights into the genetic diversity within this fungal genus. B. paeoniae strain Bp0003 exhibits a sequence identity of 91.95% to the reference sequence XP_038805042.1 (BdPKS25), indicating a relatively close genetic relationship. Similarly, B. globosa strain MUCL 444 shows a sequence identity of 84.54% to its reference sequence KAF7896114.1. In contrast, B. elliptica strains Be9601 and Be9612 demonstrate high sequence identities of 95.90% and 97.11% to their respective reference sequences (TGO71777.1 and KAF7923671.1). B. squamosa strain MUCL 31421 displays a sequence identity of 84.75% to its reference sequence RCTC02000002.1. However, in B. squamosa and B. sinoallii, the similarity was based on draft genome sequences that correspond to the BdPKS25 protein, as no homologous protein for BdPKS25 is annotated in their genomes (Table 5).
The distribution of BdPKS25 protein within the Ascomycota phylum, focusing on the Sordariomyceta and Dothideomyceta clades, demonstrates a diverse array of taxonomic orders harboring these proteins. In the Sordariomyceta clade, the Leotiomycete order Heliotales contains eight PKS proteins across seven organisms, and Leotiomycetes incertae sedis hosts one PKS protein in one organism. Within the Sordariomycete order Hypocreales, six PKS proteins are identified across five organisms, while Microascales exhibits three PKS proteins in two organisms. The Xylariomycetidae incertae sedis order contains four PKS proteins found in one organism. Sordariales contains six PKS proteins across six organisms. In the Dothideomyceta clade, Dothideomycetes incertae sedis contains five PKS proteins in three organisms, and Pleosporales exhibits four PKS proteins in three organisms. Additionally, the Arthoniomycetes order Arthoniales contains one PKS protein in one organism. In the Leotiomyceta clade, Eurotiomycetes order Eurotiales contains five PKS proteins across four organisms, suggesting significant metabolic diversity. Lecanoromycetes of order Lecanorales also contains one PKS protein in one organism (Table 6).
Regarding the phylogenetic relationship of BdPKS25, among the top 25 protein sequences (Figure 10 and Supplementary Table S10), all belong to the Sordariomyceta clade except for Bathelium mastoideum, Viridothelium virens, and Bipolaris maydis, which belong to the Dothideomyceta clade, and Aspergillus sp., which belongs to the Leotiomyceta clade. These latter three are listed as independent branches within the phylogenetic tree. BdPKS25 is closely related to Ciborinia camelliae and shares a subclade with species of the genera Lachnellula and Rutstroemia sp. NJR-2017a BVV2 (Figure 10).

3.4.6. Description of EAE98_010943 Gene in B. deweyae—Bdpks26

The gene cluster containing the EAE98_010943 gene, referred to as Bdpks26 in this study, consists of six putative biosynthetic genes (Figure 5). The gene EAE98_010940 encodes a protein with 294 amino acids, containing a short-chain dehydrogenase domain (aa 5-191, pfam00106). The gene EAE98_010941 encodes a protein with 513 amino acids, showing an acyltransferase family domain (aa 68-448). The gene EAE98_010943, named in this work as Bdpks26, encodes the protein XP_038805079.1, which has 2353 amino acids and contains multiple functional domains: beta-ketoacyl synthase N-terminal (aa 14-265, pfam00109), beta-ketoacyl synthase C-terminal (aa 274-392, pfam02801), ketoacyl-synthetase C-terminal extension (aa 396-517), acyl transferase (aa 546-878, cl08282), polyketide synthase dehydratase (aa 933-1236, pfam14765), KR domain (aa 1967-2145, pfam08659), and phosphopantetheine attachment site (aa 2272-2328, pfam00550). Additionally, the gene EAE98_010945 encodes a protein with 252 amino acids, containing a Rossmann-fold NAD(P)+-binding protein domain (aa 8-200 and 32-246, cl21454), and the gene EAE98_010949 encodes a protein with 576 amino acids, featuring a flavin-binding monooxygenase-like domain (aa 12-554, cl30939).
The comparison of protein sequence identities among various Botrytis strains provides valuable insights into the genetic diversity within this fungal genus. B. elliptica strains Be9601 and Be9612 exhibit remarkably high sequence identities of 98.77% and 98.64% to their respective reference sequences (TGO73554.1 and KAF7923645.1). B. sinoallii strain Bc23 shows a sequence identity of 87.33% to its reference sequence XP_038763137.1. B. galanthina strain MUCL 435 displays a sequence identity of 86.56% to its reference sequence THV54946.1. B. squamosa strain MUCL 31421 demonstrates a high sequence identity of 95.29% to its reference sequence RCTC02000002.1 and a lower identity of 54.23% to the second reference sequence RCTC02000005.1. However, in B. squamosa, the similarity was based on draft genome sequences that correspond to the BdPKS26 protein, as no homologous protein for BdPKS26 is annotated in its genome (Table 5).
The distribution of BdPKS26 protein within the Ascomycota phylum, focusing on the Sordariomyceta, Leotiomyceta, and Dothideomyceta clades, reveals a diverse array of taxonomic orders harboring these proteins. In the Sordariomyceta clade, within the Leotiomycete order Helotiales, eight PKS proteins are distributed across six organisms. The Sordariomycetes order Hypocreales exhibits the highest abundance of PKS proteins, with 12 identified across nine organisms. Additionally, Glomerellales contains 10 PKS proteins in 5 organisms, while Xylariales exhibits 53 PKS proteins across 39 organisms, indicating its significant role in secondary metabolite production. Other orders such as Sordariales, Diaporthales, and Magnaporthales also contain a smaller number of PKS proteins. In the Leotiomyceta clade, Lecanoromycetes order Trapeliales and Teloschistales each contain two and one PKS proteins, respectively, distributed in the same number of organisms. In the Eurotiomycetes class, Eurotiales contains 27 PKS proteins across 13 organisms, while Onygenales exhibits 36 PKS proteins in only 2 organisms. Within the Dothideomyceta clade, Dothideomycetes contains two PKS proteins in Mytilinidiales and one PKS protein each in Pleosporomycetidae incertae sedis, Pleosporales, and Botryosphaeriales (Table 6).
The phylogenetic distribution of BdPKS26 with the top 55 homologous proteins (Figure 11 and Supplementary Table S11) shows a predominance of species belonging to the Sordariomyceta clade, except for Pleomassaria siparia (subclade 1 from clade 1), Mytilinidion resinicola (subclade 1 from clade 1), and Glonium stellatum (clade 2) from the Dothideomyceta clade. Additionally, species of the genus Aspergillus (subclades 1 and 2 from clade 1) and Ophidiomyces ophidiicola (clade 2) belong to the Leotiomyceta clade. BdPKS26 is closely related to Rutstroemia sp. NJR-2017a BVV2 and Bisporella sp. PMI 857 in the same subclade (Figure 11).

4. Discussion

The comparative analysis of secondary metabolites between B. deweyae B1 and B. cinerea B05.10 reveals significant insights into their metabolic diversity, especially in polyketide and terpene biosynthesis. B. deweyae B1 demonstrates a higher number of polyketide clusters (11 gene clusters) compared to B. cinerea B05.10 (10 gene clusters), suggesting potential differences in their secondary metabolite profiles. Similarly, B. deweyae B1 exhibits more clusters related to terpene biosynthesis (six gene clusters) compared to B. cinerea B05.10 (five gene clusters), indicating a nuanced metabolic variation between these closely related species.
Within the terpene biosynthesis clusters of B. deweyae B1, several key genes have been identified, such as Bcerg9, Bcstc4, Bcbot2, and an unannotated terpene gene. While most of these genes have counterparts in B. cinerea B05.10, notable differences exist in their regulatory roles. For instance, Bcstc7 and Bcbot2 in B. cinerea B05.10 regulate the synthesis of eremophilane and botryane metabolites, respectively [63,65]. In contrast, B. deweyae B1 lacks Bcstc2 and Bcstc5 but possesses an unannotated terpene gene also identified in B. cinerea B05.10.
Further analysis of the relationships between these genes reveals interesting clustering patterns. Genes like Bdstc4, Bcstc3, Bdbot2, and Bcstc5 are closely related, forming part of the same subclade, indicating functional similarities in terpene biosynthesis. Conversely, genes like Bcpax1, Bccoq1, Bcerg20, and the unannotated gene form another subclade, suggesting potential functional diversification within the terpene biosynthesis pathway.
The presence of putative unannotated genes in B. deweyae B1 suggests the existence of novel metabolic pathways yet to be characterized. The analysis of these unannotated clusters reveals polyprenyl synthetase domains, indicating potential roles in specialized metabolite synthesis. However, validation would need to be carried out for confirmation. These genes have homologs in other Botrytis species, suggesting conservation and importance across the genus.
Comparative genomic analysis with other Botrytis species highlights the genetic relationships and evolutionary divergence within the genus. Strains like B. cinerea T4, BcDW1, and B05.10 exhibit high genetic identity with B. deweyae B1, indicating close evolutionary ties. However, strains from different species show varying levels of identity, reflecting the genetic diversity within the Botrytis genus.
The taxonomic distribution of fungi, particularly within the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota phyla, provides a comprehensive overview of fungal diversity and the distribution of the unannotated gene EAE98_008016 from B. deweyae. The abundance of proteins and organisms within different classes, orders, and unclassified groups underscores the functional and ecological diversity of fungi. This diversity highlights evolutionary complexity and the potential for discovering novel metabolites with unique biological activities. In addition, this putative unannotated gene is closely related to established terpene biosynthetic pathways, as evidenced by a similarity score of 0.18 to BGC0000673, which is involved in the synthesis of pimara-8(14),15-diene in Aspergillus nidulans. It also shows a similarity score of 0.17 to BGC0002320, responsible for producing conidiogenone in Penicillium rubens. Furthermore, a score of 0.12 connects it to BGC0002604, associated with sartorypyrone A in Aspergillus felis. These connections suggest that the gene may play a significant role in terpene biosynthesis, highlighting its potential importance in the ecological and metabolic dynamics of B. deweyae.
The distribution of polyketide synthase (PKS) gene clusters in B. deweyae reveals significant genetic diversity and evolutionary history compared to B. cinerea. Previous studies identified 21 PKS genes in B. cinerea, with only some forming gene clusters [11,20]. These include Bcboa6/Bcboa9, Bcpks13, Bcpks1, Bcpks21, Bcpks16, Bcchs1, Bcpks10, Bcpks8, Bcpks2, and Bcpks15. However, in B. deweyae, clusters corresponding to Bcboa6/Bcboa9, Bcpks1, Bcchs11, Bcpks8, and Bcpks2 were not identified. Additionally, several non-cluster-forming PKS genes in B. cinerea had no homologs in B. deweyae, except for Bcpks5, which showed potential presence but lacked proper annotation.
New potential PKS genes were identified in B. cinerea B05.10, including BCIN_09g06350, BCIN_01g00450, BCIN_04g00210, BCIN_03g06470, BCIN_09g06360, BCIN_08g02570, BCIN_08g02560, and BCIN_12g03250 [11]. These genes showed various domain compositions, with some lacking typical PKS domains. Homologous proteins for these genes were identified, showing varying degrees of similarity across different fungal species.
In B. deweyae, new putative gene clusters named Bdpks22-26 were discovered, not previously found in any Botrytis genome. These clusters, along with the 21 described in B. cinerea, form two distinct phylogenetic groups. The phylogenetic analysis reveals the presence of novel PKS genes in B. deweyae, indicating evolutionary divergence and potential new metabolic pathways. Within the first clade, Bdpks22 is closely related to Bcpks1, Bcpks21, and other PKS genes in B. cinerea. This clade also includes Bcboa9, Bdpks23, Bdpks24, and Bdpks26, suggesting functional similarities and evolutionary relationships. In the second clade, Bdpks25 is closely related to Bcpks16, Bcpks18, and Bcpks19, indicating potential functional similarities. Other PKS genes in this clade, such as Bcpks17 and Bcpks20, show more distant relationships, suggesting diverse roles in secondary metabolism.
The genetic diversity of PKS genes in B. deweyae highlights its varied metabolic functions and adaptive capabilities. High sequence identities were observed in some strains, indicating close genetic relationships, while others exhibited lower identities, suggesting greater genetic divergence. This diversity underscores the potential for varied functions and roles in secondary metabolism, critical for ecological success and adaptability.
The Bdpks22 in question is likely involved in polyketide biosynthesis, as suggested by its similarity to characterized gene clusters. With a score of 0.32 to BGC0002191 (producing prolipyrone B and gibepyrone D in Fusarium graminearum), and 0.30 to BGC0002155 (nectriapyrone compounds in Pyricularia oryzae), it may contribute to metabolites with diverse biological activities. Additionally, the connection to BGC0001252 indicates potential for producing bioactive polyketides that impact ecological interactions. The gene Bdpks23 is likely involved in polyketide biosynthesis, as indicated by its similarity scores. With a score of 0.33 to BGC0002525, associated with compounds like fusarubin and lucilactaene in Fusarium sp., it suggests a potential role in producing bioactive metabolites. Additionally, the scores of 0.33 and 0.32 with BGC0002194 (epipyrone A in Epicoccum nigrum) and BGC0002191 (prolipyrone B and gibepyrone D in Fusarium graminearum) further support its implication in polyketide biosynthesis. The gene Bdpks24 is likely associated with the biosynthesis of polyketides and non-ribosomal peptides, as indicated by its similarity scores. With a score of 0.29 to BGC0000046, which produces depudecin in Alternaria brassicicola, it suggests potential involvement in generating bioactive metabolites. Additionally, there are scores of 0.28 and 0.27 with BGC0002228 and BGC0002227, linked to non-ribosomal peptides in Colletotrichum incanum and Aspergillus luchuensis, respectively. The gene Bdpks25 is likely involved in polyketide biosynthesis, as suggested by its similarity scores. With a score of 0.20 to BGC0001284, which is associated with alternariol in Parastagonospora nodorum, it indicates a potential role in producing bioactive compounds. Additionally, the score of 0.20 with BGC0002175 (YWA1 in Aspergillus oryzae) and BGC0000107 (naphthopyrone in Aspergillus nidulans) further supports its involvement in diverse metabolic pathways. Finally, the Bdpks26 gene is likely associated with the biosynthesis of polyketides and terpenes, as indicated by its similarity scores. With a score of 0.26 to BGC0001264, linked to betaenones A, B, and C in Phoma betae, it suggests a role in producing bioactive polyketide compounds. Additionally, the score of 0.24 with BGC0002266, associated with calidoustene A, B, and C in Aspergillus calidoustus, highlights its potential involvement in terpene biosynthesis. However, this analysis is a predictive study where further analyses are necessary to identify the metabolites in which these new putative biosynthetic clusters present in B. deweyae are involved.
On the other hand, comparative analysis of PKS sequences among various Botrytis strains highlighted genetic diversity within the genus. Strains of B. deweyae showed varying degrees of similarity to reference sequences, with some strains exhibiting high sequence identity similarities, indicating close relationships, and others showing lower identity similarities, suggesting greater divergence. The phylogenetic distribution of PKS proteins across different fungal species provided insights into their evolutionary relationships. Botrytis PKS proteins were found within the Sordariomyceta, Leotiomyceta, and Dothideomyceta clades, indicating wide distribution across different taxonomic orders. This broad distribution reflects evolutionary complexity and diverse ecological roles of these enzymes.

5. Conclusions

The distribution of PKS and terpene gene clusters in B. deweyae provides valuable insights into the genetic diversity and evolutionary history of this fungus. The absence of certain clusters found in B. cinerea and the discovery of new putative clusters in B. deweyae suggest divergent evolutionary paths in secondary metabolism between these two species. The genetic diversity observed within B. deweyae PKS genes highlights the potential for varied metabolic functions and adaptive capabilities within this species.
Comparative analysis and phylogenetic distribution underscore the evolutionary relationships and wide distribution of PKS genes across different fungal taxa. Understanding the genetic basis of secondary metabolism in Botrytis species has implications for disease management strategies in agriculture and provides opportunities for the discovery of novel bioactive compounds.
The identification of novel putative PKS and terpene biosynthesis gene clusters in B. deweyae highlights its potential for producing unique secondary metabolites. These metabolites could have various applications in agriculture, medicine, and biotechnology. Understanding the biosynthesis pathways of these compounds could lead to the development of new fungicides or pharmaceuticals.
The genetic diversity observed in B. deweyae suggests that this species may have a greater capacity for adaptation and survival in diverse environmental conditions. Future research should focus on characterizing the functions of the unannotated genes and novel clusters identified in B. deweyae. Functional genomics approaches, such as gene knockouts and overexpression studies, could elucidate the roles of these genes in secondary metabolism. Additionally, comparative genomics with other Botrytis species and related fungi could uncover the evolutionary origins and diversification of these metabolic pathways.
Comparative analysis of secondary metabolite gene clusters in B. deweyae and B. cinerea has revealed significant genetic and metabolic diversity. The discovery of novel PKS and terpene biosynthesis gene clusters in B. deweyae underscores its potential for producing unique secondary metabolites. These findings enhance our understanding of the genetic basis of secondary metabolism in Botrytis species and provide a foundation for future research into the ecological and biotechnological applications of these compounds.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy14112747/s1, Figure S1: Synteny plot between B. deweyae B1 and B. cinerea B05.10, showing the BGCs that were collinear with each other. Table S1: BGCs originated by antiSMASH fungal version from B. deweyae B1 genome. Table S2: BGCs originated by antiSMASH fungal version from B. cinerea B05.10 genome. Table S3: BUSCO analysis for B. deweyae B1 and B. cinerea B05.10. Table S4: Top 55 homologous proteins to XP_038807933, Table S5: PKS domains of all the putative PKSs identified in B. cinerea and B. deweyae. Table S6: Distribution of all the putative PKSs described by Suarez et al. in 2024 among other fungi. Table S7: Top 18 homologous proteins to BdPKS22 in other fungi. Table S8: Top 51 homologous proteins to BdPKS23 in other fungi. Table S9: Top 4 homologous proteins to BdPKS24 in other Fungi. Table S10: Top 25 homologous proteins to BdPKS25 in other fungi. Table S11: Top 55 homologous proteins to BdPKS26 in other fungi.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.G. and I.G.C.; methodology, V.C-R. and J.A.; investigation, V.C.-R.; resources, J.A., C.G. and I.G.C.; writing—original draft preparation, V.C.-R., J.A., I.G.C. and C.G.; writing—review and editing, C.G., J.A. and I.G.C.; supervision, J.A., C.G. and I.G.C.; project administration, I.G.C. and C.G.; funding acquisition, C.G., J.A. and I.G.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from PID2021-122899OB-C21 and PID2021-122899OB-C22 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF/EU.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Wageningen University for making the genome of B. deweyae B1 public and Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. for making the genome of B. cinerea B05.10 publicly available at the NCBI.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nesbitt, B.F.; O’kelly, J.; Sargeant, K.; Sheridan, A. Aspergillus Flavus and Turkey X Disease: Toxic Metabolites of Aspergillus flavus. Nature 1962, 195, 1062–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Quinn, R. Rethinking Antibiotic research and development: World war II and the penicillin collaborative. Am. J. Public Health 2013, 103, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Muteeb, G.; Rehman, M.T.; Shahwan, M.; Aatif, M. Origin of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance, and their impacts on drug development: A narrative review. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fleming, A. On the antibacterial action of cultures of a Penicillium, with special reference to their use in the isolation of B. influenzae. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1980, 2, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Macheleidt, J.; Mattern, D.J.; Fischer, J.; Netzker, T.; Weber, J.; Schroeckh, V.; Valiante, V.; Brakhage, A.A. Regulation and role of fungal secondary metabolites. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2016, 50, 371–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Keller, N.P.; Turner, G.; Bennett, J.W. Fungal secondary metabolism—From biochemistry to genomics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 937–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fox, E.M.; Howlett, B.J. Secondary metabolism: Regulation and role in fungal biology. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2008, 11, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Keller, N.P. Fungal secondary metabolism: Regulation, function and drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Devi, R.; Kaur, T.; Guleria, G.; Rana, K.L.; Kour, D.; Yadav, N.; Yadav, A.N.; Saxena, A.K. Fungal secondary metabolites and their biotechnological applications for human health. In New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 147–161. [Google Scholar]
  10. Limón, M.C.; Rodríguez-Ortiz, R.; Avalos, J. Bikaverin production and applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Suárez, I.; Collado, I.G.; Garrido, C. Revealing hidden genes in Botrytis cinerea: New insights into genes involved in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dean, R.; van Kan, J.A.L.; Pretorius, Z.A.; Hammond-Kosack, K.E.; Di Pietro, A.; Spanu, P.D.; Rudd, J.J.; Dickman, M.; Kahmann, R.; Ellis, J.; et al. The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13, 414–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Romanazzi, G.; Feliziani, E. Botrytis cinerea (Gray Mold). In Postharvest Decay; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 131–146. [Google Scholar]
  14. Holz, G.; Coertze, S.; Williamson, B. Botrytis: Biology, Pathology and Control; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; ISBN 978-1-4020-2624-9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mercier, A.; Carpentier, F.; Duplaix, C.; Auger, A.; Pradier, J.; Viaud, M.; Gladieux, P.; Walker, A. The polyphagous plant pathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea encompasses host-specialized and generalist populations. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 21, 4808–4821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lee, J.S.; Kaplunov, T.; Zutahy, Y.; Daus, A.; Alkan, N.; Lichter, A. The significance of postharvest disinfection for prevention of internal decay of table grapes after storage. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 192, 346–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Elad, Y.; Vivier, M.; Fillinger, S. Botrytis, the good, the bad and the ugly. In Botrytis—The Fungus, the Pathogen and Its Management in Agricultural Systems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 1–15. ISBN 9783319233710. [Google Scholar]
  18. van Kan, J.A.L.; Shaw, M.W.; Grant-Downton, R.T. Botrytis species: Relentless necrotrophic thugs or endophytes gone rogue? Mol. Plant Pathol. 2014, 15, 957–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Collado, I.G.; Viaud, M. Secondary metabolism in Botrytis cinerea: Combining genomic and metabolomic approaches. In Botrytis—The Fungus, the Pathogen and Its Management in Agricultural Systems; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 291–313. ISBN 9783319233710. [Google Scholar]
  20. da Silva Ripardo-Filho, H.; Coca Ruíz, V.; Suárez, I.; Moraga, J.; Aleu, J.; Collado, I.G. From genes to molecules, secondary metabolism in Botrytis cinerea: New insights into anamorphic and teleomorphic stages. Plants 2023, 12, 553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fillinger, S.; Elad, Y. (Eds.) Botrytis—The Fungus, the Pathogen and Its Management in Agricultural Systems; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; ISBN 978-3-319-23370-3. [Google Scholar]
  22. Grant-Downton, R.T.; Terhem, R.B.; Kapralov, M.V.; Mehdi, S.; Rodriguez-Enriquez, M.J.; Gurr, S.J.; van Kan, J.A.L.L.; Dewey, F.M. A novel Botrytis species is associated with a newly emergent foliar disease in cultivated Hemerocallis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, W.; Tang, Z.; Cui, X.; Dan, Y.; Yin, F.; Liu, M. First report of Botrytis deweyae causing gray mold on Polygonatum cyrtonema in China. Plant Dis. 2023, 107, 2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sacchettini, J.C.; Poulter, C.D. Creating isoprenoid diversity. Science 1997, 277, 1788–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lange, B.M.; Rujan, T.; Martin, W.; Croteau, R. Isoprenoid biosynthesis: The evolution of two ancient and distinct pathways across genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 13172–13177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kellogg, B.A.; Poulter, C.D. Chain elongation in the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1997, 1, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Perveen, S. Introductory chapter: Terpenes and terpenoids. In Terpenes and Terpenoids; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  28. González-Hernández, R.A.; Valdez-Cruz, N.A.; Macías-Rubalcava, M.L.; Trujillo-Roldán, M.A. Overview of fungal terpene synthases and their regulation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 39, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Christianson, D.W. Unearthing the roots of the terpenome. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2008, 12, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Schmidt-Dannert, C. Biosynthesis of terpenoid natural products in fungi. In Biotechnology of Isoprenoids; Schrader, J., Bohlmann, J., Eds.; Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; Volume 148, pp. 19–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Quin, M.B.; Flynn, C.M.; Schmidt-Dannert, C. Traversing the fungal terpenome. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 1449–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Brian, P.W. Effects of gibberellins on plant growth and development. Biol. Rev. 1959, 34, 37–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Davière, J.-M.; Achard, P. Gibberellin signaling in plants. Development 2013, 140, 1147–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rocha, O.; Ansari, K.; Doohan, F.M. Effects of trichothecene mycotoxins on eukaryotic cells: A review. Food Addit. Contam. 2005, 22, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shen, B. Polyketide biosynthesis beyond the type I, II and III polyketide synthase paradigms. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 7, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Weissman, K.J. Chapter 1 Introduction to polyketide biosynthesis. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; Volume 459, pp. 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Staunton, J.; Weissman, K.J. Polyketide biosynthesis: A millennium review. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2001, 18, 380–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Herbst, D.A.; Townsend, C.A.; Maier, T. The architectures of iterative type I PKS and FAS. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2018, 35, 1046–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cox, R.J.; Simpson, T.J. Chapter 3 fungal type i polyketide synthases. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; Volume 459, pp. 49–78. [Google Scholar]
  40. Cheng, Y.-Q.; Tang, G.-L.; Shen, B. Type I polyketide synthase requiring a discrete acyltransferase for polyketide biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 3149–3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Du, D.; Katsuyama, Y.; Horiuchi, M.; Fushinobu, S.; Chen, A.; Davis, T.D.; Burkart, M.D.; Ohnishi, Y. Structural basis for selectivity in a highly reducing type II polyketide synthase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2020, 16, 776–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hertweck, C.; Luzhetskyy, A.; Rebets, Y.; Bechthold, A. Type II polyketide synthases: Gaining a deeper insight into enzymatic teamwork. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007, 24, 162–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hibi, G.; Shiraishi, T.; Umemura, T.; Nemoto, K.; Ogura, Y.; Nishiyama, M.; Kuzuyama, T. Discovery of type II polyketide synthase-like enzymes for the biosynthesis of cispentacin. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 8065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bisht, R.; Bhattacharyya, A.; Shrivastava, A.; Saxena, P. An overview of the medicinally important plant type III PKS derived polyketides. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 746908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Katsuyama, Y.; Ohnishi, Y. Type III Polyketide synthases in microorganisms. Methods Enzymol. 2012, 515, 359–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hashimoto, M.; Nonaka, T.; Fujii, I. Fungal type III polyketide synthases. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 1306–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Navarro-Muñoz, J.C.; Collemare, J. Evolutionary Histories of Type III Polyketide Synthases in Fungi. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. van Kan, J.A.L.L.; Stassen, J.H.M.M.; Mosbach, A.; Van Der Lee, T.A.J.J.; Faino, L.; Farmer, A.D.; Papasotiriou, D.G.; Zhou, S.; Seidl, M.F.; Cottam, E.; et al. A gapless genome sequence of the fungus Botrytis cinerea. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2017, 18, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Staats, M.; van Kan, J.A.L. Genome update of Botrytis cinerea strains B05.10 and T4. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11, 1413–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Valero-Jiménez, C.A.; Steentjes, M.B.F.; Slot, J.C.; Shi-Kunne, X.; Scholten, O.E.; van Kan, J.A.L. Dynamics in secondary metabolite gene clusters in otherwise highly syntenic and stable genomes in the fungal genus Botrytis. Genome Biol. Evol. 2020, 12, 2491–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Simão, F.A.; Waterhouse, R.M.; Ioannidis, P.; Kriventseva, E.V.; Zdobnov, E.M. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 3210–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Chen, C.; Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Feng, J.; Chen, H.; He, Y.; et al. TBtools-II: A “one for all, all for one” bioinformatics platform for biological big-data mining. Mol. Plant 2023, 16, 1733–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Augustijn, H.E.; Reitz, Z.L.; Biermann, F.; Alanjary, M.; Fetter, A.; Terlouw, B.R.; Metcalf, W.W.; Helfrich, E.J.N.; et al. antiSMASH 7.0: New and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W46–W50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Marchler-Bauer, A.; Bryant, S.H. CD-Search: Protein domain annotations on the fly. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, W327–W331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Paysan-Lafosse, T.; Blum, M.; Chuguransky, S.; Grego, T.; Pinto, B.L.; Salazar, G.A.; Bileschi, M.L.; Bork, P.; Bridge, A.; Colwell, L.; et al. InterPro in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D418–D427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jones, P.; Binns, D.; Chang, H.-Y.; Fraser, M.; Li, W.; McAnulla, C.; McWilliam, H.; Maslen, J.; Mitchell, A.; Nuka, G.; et al. InterProScan 5: Genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1236–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Camacho, C.; Coulouris, G.; Avagyan, V.; Ma, N.; Papadopoulos, J.; Bealer, K.; Madden, T.L. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sangar, V.; Blankenberg, D.J.; Altman, N.; Lesk, A.M. Quantitative sequence-function relationships in proteins based on gene ontology. BMC Bioinform. 2007, 8, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Pearson, W.R. An introduction to sequence similarity (“Homology”) searching. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2013, 42, 3.1.1–3.1.8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zuckerkandl, E.; Pauling, L. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In Evolving Genes and Proteins; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1965; pp. 97–166. [Google Scholar]
  61. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Park, M.Y.; Jeon, B.J.; Kang, J.E.; Kim, B.S. Synergistic interactions of schizostatin identified from Schizophyllum commune with demethylation inhibitor fungicides. Plant Pathol. J. 2020, 36, 579–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Suárez, I.; González-Rodríguez, V.E.; Viaud, M.; Garrido, C.; Collado, I.G. Identification of the sesquiterpene cyclase involved in the biosynthesis of (+)-4-epi-eremophil-9-en-11-ol derivatives isolated from Botrytis cinerea. ACS Chem. Biol. 2020, 15, 2775–2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wen, Y.-H.; Chen, T.-J.; Jiang, L.-Y.; Li, L.; Guo, M.; Peng, Y.; Chen, J.-J.; Pei, F.; Yang, J.-L.; Wang, R.-S.; et al. Unusual (2R,6R)-bicyclo [3.1.1]heptane ring construction in fungal α-trans-bergamotene biosynthesis. iScience 2022, 25, 104030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pinedo, C.; Wang, C.M.; Pradier, J.M.; Dalmais, B.; Choquer, M.; Le Pêcheur, P.; Morgant, G.; Collado, I.G.; Cane, D.E.; Viaud, M. Sesquiterpene synthase from the botrydial biosynthetic gene cluster of the phytopathogen Botrytis cinerea. ACS Chem. Biol. 2008, 3, 791–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Schumacher, J.; Simon, A.; Cohrs, K.C.; Viaud, M.; Tudzynski, P. The transcription factor BcLTF1 regulates virulence and light responses in the necrotrophic plant pathogen Botrytis cinerea. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Distribution of different secondary metabolite gene clusters identified in B. deweyae and B. cinerea.
Figure 1. Distribution of different secondary metabolite gene clusters identified in B. deweyae and B. cinerea.
Agronomy 14 02747 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of the amino acid sequences of terpenes from B. deweyae B1 together with the amino acid sequences from B. cinerea B05.10 that contains the IPR008949 domain. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method via MEGA 11 software and bootstrap values from 500 trials are indicated at each branch node.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of the amino acid sequences of terpenes from B. deweyae B1 together with the amino acid sequences from B. cinerea B05.10 that contains the IPR008949 domain. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method via MEGA 11 software and bootstrap values from 500 trials are indicated at each branch node.
Agronomy 14 02747 g002
Figure 3. Gene cluster predicted by the AntiSMASH tool for the unannotated terpene EAE08_008016 in B. deweyae B1 (Table 1).
Figure 3. Gene cluster predicted by the AntiSMASH tool for the unannotated terpene EAE08_008016 in B. deweyae B1 (Table 1).
Agronomy 14 02747 g003
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of XP_038807933 protein from B. deweyae B1 and homologous protein sequences of other fungal species. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method via MEGA 11 software, with bootstrap values from 500 trials indicated at each branch node. Protein sequences were selected after running similarity search by BlastP using XP_038807933 as query sequence, excluding the Botrytis and Botryotinia taxids (33196 and 40558, respectively), and filtering the results based on percent identity > 50%, coverage > 70%, and bit-score > 50. The top 55 hits were retrieved for sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis. The NCBI accession number of each sequence is shown. Actin (CAA04009.1) of B. cinerea was used as outgroup. Different clades and subclades are indicated by colored branches (red, green, or violet).
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of XP_038807933 protein from B. deweyae B1 and homologous protein sequences of other fungal species. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method via MEGA 11 software, with bootstrap values from 500 trials indicated at each branch node. Protein sequences were selected after running similarity search by BlastP using XP_038807933 as query sequence, excluding the Botrytis and Botryotinia taxids (33196 and 40558, respectively), and filtering the results based on percent identity > 50%, coverage > 70%, and bit-score > 50. The top 55 hits were retrieved for sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis. The NCBI accession number of each sequence is shown. Actin (CAA04009.1) of B. cinerea was used as outgroup. Different clades and subclades are indicated by colored branches (red, green, or violet).
Agronomy 14 02747 g004
Figure 5. Representation of the gene cluster from BdPKS22-26 in B. deweyae predicted by the antiSMASH fungal version tool.
Figure 5. Representation of the gene cluster from BdPKS22-26 in B. deweyae predicted by the antiSMASH fungal version tool.
Agronomy 14 02747 g005
Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree of all the B. cinerea genes that showed polyketide domain together with the new putative polyketide synthases identified in B. deweyae B1. The evolutionary history was inferred using the maximum likelihood [60]. The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 500 replicates [60] is taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analyzed [60]. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% bootstrap replicates are collapsed. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches [60]. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method [60] and are in the units of the number of amino acid substitutions per site. This analysis included 27 amino acid sequences where in the phylogenetic tree were identified in yellow the polyketide synthases previously described in B. cinerea, in blue the polyketide synthases of B. deweyae and in green the new polyketide synthases identified in B. cinerea. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There were a total of 4970 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA 11 [61].
Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree of all the B. cinerea genes that showed polyketide domain together with the new putative polyketide synthases identified in B. deweyae B1. The evolutionary history was inferred using the maximum likelihood [60]. The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 500 replicates [60] is taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analyzed [60]. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% bootstrap replicates are collapsed. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches [60]. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method [60] and are in the units of the number of amino acid substitutions per site. This analysis included 27 amino acid sequences where in the phylogenetic tree were identified in yellow the polyketide synthases previously described in B. cinerea, in blue the polyketide synthases of B. deweyae and in green the new polyketide synthases identified in B. cinerea. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There were a total of 4970 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA 11 [61].
Agronomy 14 02747 g006
Figure 7. Phylogenetic tree of XP_038813652.1 protein (BdPKS22) from B. deweyae and homologous protein sequences from other fungal species. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method via MEGA 11 software, and bootstrap values from 1000 trials are indicated at each branch node. Protein sequences were selected after running a similarity search by BLASTP using XP_038813652.1 as the query sequence, excluding the Botrytis and Botryotinia taxids (33196 and 40558, respectively), and filtering the results based on percent identity > 50%, coverage > 70%, and bit-score > 50. The top 18 hits were retrieved for sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis. NCBI accession numbers of each sequence are shown. Actin (CAA04009.1) of B. cinerea was used as the outgroup. Taxonomic distribution is highlighted by different colors: Sordariomycetes (blue), Dothideomycetes (red), and Leotiomycetes (violet).
Figure 7. Phylogenetic tree of XP_038813652.1 protein (BdPKS22) from B. deweyae and homologous protein sequences from other fungal species. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method via MEGA 11 software, and bootstrap values from 1000 trials are indicated at each branch node. Protein sequences were selected after running a similarity search by BLASTP using XP_038813652.1 as the query sequence, excluding the Botrytis and Botryotinia taxids (33196 and 40558, respectively), and filtering the results based on percent identity > 50%, coverage > 70%, and bit-score > 50. The top 18 hits were retrieved for sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis. NCBI accession numbers of each sequence are shown. Actin (CAA04009.1) of B. cinerea was used as the outgroup. Taxonomic distribution is highlighted by different colors: Sordariomycetes (blue), Dothideomycetes (red), and Leotiomycetes (violet).
Agronomy 14 02747 g007
Figure 8. Phylogenetic tree of XP_038807018.1 protein from B. deweyae and homologous protein sequences from other fungal species. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method via MEGA 11 software, and bootstrap values from 1000 trials are indicated at each branch node. Protein sequences were selected after running similarity search by BLASTP using XP_038807018.1 as query sequence, excluding the Botrytis and Botryotinia taxids (33196 and 40558, respectively), and filtering the results based on percent identity > 50%, coverage > 70%, and bit-score > 50. The top 51 hits were retrieved for sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis. NCBI accession number of each sequence is shown. Actin (CAA04009.1) of B. cinerea was used as outgroup. Different clades and subclades are delimited by color of the branches: Sordariomycetes (blue), Dothideomycetes (red), Leotiomycetes (violet).
Figure 8. Phylogenetic tree of XP_038807018.1 protein from B. deweyae and homologous protein sequences from other fungal species. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method via MEGA 11 software, and bootstrap values from 1000 trials are indicated at each branch node. Protein sequences were selected after running similarity search by BLASTP using XP_038807018.1 as query sequence, excluding the Botrytis and Botryotinia taxids (33196 and 40558, respectively), and filtering the results based on percent identity > 50%, coverage > 70%, and bit-score > 50. The top 51 hits were retrieved for sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis. NCBI accession number of each sequence is shown. Actin (CAA04009.1) of B. cinerea was used as outgroup. Different clades and subclades are delimited by color of the branches: Sordariomycetes (blue), Dothideomycetes (red), Leotiomycetes (violet).
Agronomy 14 02747 g008
Figure 9. Phylogenetic tree of XP_038806877.1 protein (BdPKS24) from B. deweyae and homologous protein sequences from other fungal species. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method via MEGA 11 software, and bootstrap values from 500 trials are indicated at each branch node. Protein sequences were selected after running a similarity search by BLASTP using XP_038806877.1 as the query sequence, excluding the Botrytis and Botryotinia taxids (33196 and 40558, respectively), and filtering the results based on percent identity > 50%, coverage > 70%, and bit-score > 50. The top 4 hits were retrieved for sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis. NCBI accession numbers of each sequence are shown. Actin (CAA04009.1) of B. cinerea was used as the outgroup. Taxonomic distribution is highlighted by different colors: Sordariomycetes (blue) and Leotiomycetes (violet).
Figure 9. Phylogenetic tree of XP_038806877.1 protein (BdPKS24) from B. deweyae and homologous protein sequences from other fungal species. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method via MEGA 11 software, and bootstrap values from 500 trials are indicated at each branch node. Protein sequences were selected after running a similarity search by BLASTP using XP_038806877.1 as the query sequence, excluding the Botrytis and Botryotinia taxids (33196 and 40558, respectively), and filtering the results based on percent identity > 50%, coverage > 70%, and bit-score > 50. The top 4 hits were retrieved for sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis. NCBI accession numbers of each sequence are shown. Actin (CAA04009.1) of B. cinerea was used as the outgroup. Taxonomic distribution is highlighted by different colors: Sordariomycetes (blue) and Leotiomycetes (violet).
Agronomy 14 02747 g009
Figure 10. Phylogenetic tree of XP_038805042.1 protein (BdPKS25) from B. deweyae and homologous protein sequences from other fungal species. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method via MEGA 11 software, and bootstrap values from 1000 trials are indicated at each branch node. Protein sequences were selected after running a similarity search by BLASTP using XP_038805042.1 as the query sequence, excluding the Botrytis and Botryotinia taxids (33196 and 40558, respectively), and filtering the results based on percent identity > 50%, coverage > 70%, and bit-score > 50. The top 25 hits were retrieved for sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis. NCBI accession numbers of each sequence are shown. Actin (CAA04009.1) of B. cinerea was used as the outgroup. Taxonomic distribution is highlighted by different colors: Sordariomycetes (blue) and Leotiomycetes (violet) and Dothideomycetes (red).
Figure 10. Phylogenetic tree of XP_038805042.1 protein (BdPKS25) from B. deweyae and homologous protein sequences from other fungal species. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method via MEGA 11 software, and bootstrap values from 1000 trials are indicated at each branch node. Protein sequences were selected after running a similarity search by BLASTP using XP_038805042.1 as the query sequence, excluding the Botrytis and Botryotinia taxids (33196 and 40558, respectively), and filtering the results based on percent identity > 50%, coverage > 70%, and bit-score > 50. The top 25 hits were retrieved for sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis. NCBI accession numbers of each sequence are shown. Actin (CAA04009.1) of B. cinerea was used as the outgroup. Taxonomic distribution is highlighted by different colors: Sordariomycetes (blue) and Leotiomycetes (violet) and Dothideomycetes (red).
Agronomy 14 02747 g010
Figure 11. Phylogenetic tree of XP_038805079.1 protein (BdPKS26) from B. deweyae and homologous protein sequences from other fungal species. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method via MEGA 11 software, and bootstrap values from 500 trials are indicated at each branch node. Protein sequences were selected after running a similarity search by BLASTP using XP_038805079.1 as the query sequence, excluding the Botrytis and Botryotinia taxids (33196 and 40558, respectively), and filtering the results based on percent identity > 50%, coverage > 70%, and bit-score > 50. The top 55 hits were retrieved for sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis. NCBI accession numbers of each sequence are shown. Actin (CAA04009.1) of B. cinerea was used as the outgroup. Taxonomic distribution is highlighted by different colors: Sordariomycetes (blue) and Leotiomycetes (violet) and Dothideomycetes (red).
Figure 11. Phylogenetic tree of XP_038805079.1 protein (BdPKS26) from B. deweyae and homologous protein sequences from other fungal species. The phylogenetic tree was inferred using the maximum likelihood method via MEGA 11 software, and bootstrap values from 500 trials are indicated at each branch node. Protein sequences were selected after running a similarity search by BLASTP using XP_038805079.1 as the query sequence, excluding the Botrytis and Botryotinia taxids (33196 and 40558, respectively), and filtering the results based on percent identity > 50%, coverage > 70%, and bit-score > 50. The top 55 hits were retrieved for sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis. NCBI accession numbers of each sequence are shown. Actin (CAA04009.1) of B. cinerea was used as the outgroup. Taxonomic distribution is highlighted by different colors: Sordariomycetes (blue) and Leotiomycetes (violet) and Dothideomycetes (red).
Agronomy 14 02747 g011
Table 1. Comparison of Terpene Gene Clusters in B. deweyae and B. cinerea.
Table 1. Comparison of Terpene Gene Clusters in B. deweyae and B. cinerea.
GCGene ID
B. deweyae
Protein ID
B. deweyae
Protein Length in
B. deweyae
Gene ID
B. cinerea
Protein ID
B. cinerea
Protein Length in B. cinerea% SimilarityAnnotation
1EAE98_002948XP_038813097.1482BCIN_06g02400XP_001560441.148293.57%Bcerg9
2EAE98_003830XP_038811923.1437BCIN_04g03550XP_001546971.244179.18%Bcstc4
3EAE98_006162XP_038810179.1278BCIN_11g06510XP_024551950.132180.37%Bcstc7
4EAE98_008016XP_038807933.1394BCIN_14g01170XP_024552819.138196.33%Unknown
5EAE98_008221XP_038807710.1399BCIN_12g06390XP_024552383.139987.72Bcbot2
6EAE98_010975XP_038805111.1611BCIN_01g04560XP_024546243.161090.51%Bcphs1
GC: Gene Cluster. Protein lengths are measured in amino acids (aa). Gene IDs and Protein IDs are sourced from the NCBI database.
Table 2. Distribution of homologous proteins to XP_038807933.1 of B. deweyae within the Botrytis genus. * means that there are no homologous proteins in this species annotated, but there is a region on its draft genome that could encode the XP_038807933.1 protein in this species.
Table 2. Distribution of homologous proteins to XP_038807933.1 of B. deweyae within the Botrytis genus. * means that there are no homologous proteins in this species annotated, but there is a region on its draft genome that could encode the XP_038807933.1 protein in this species.
Botrytis SpeciesStrainGeneBank Genome
Reference
Protein Accession NumberNumber of Amino AcidsPercentage of Identity with B. deweyae
B. cinereaT4GCA_000227075.1CCD33657.139496.70%
B. cinereaBcDW1GCA_000349525.1EMR82980.139496.45%
B. cinereaBc448GCA_037039525.1KAK6598033.138196.59%
B. cinereaB05.10GCA_000143535.4XP_024552819.138196.33%
B. ellipticaBe9612GCA_014898555.1KAF7925222.139499.75%
B. sinoalliiBc 23GCA_014898435.1XP_038758944.139499.24%
B. hyacinthiBh0001GCA_004786245.1TGO37690.139498.22%
B. aclada633GCA_014898285.1KAF7953262.138198.95%
Botryotinia convolutaMUCL 11595GCA_004786275.1TGO54160.138198.95%
B. byssoideaMUCL 94GCA_014898295.1XP_038734128.138198.95%
B. fragariaeBVB16GCA_013461495.1XP_037193855.138198.69%
B. tulipaeBt9001GCA_004786125.1TGO06850.138198.69%
B. paeoniaeBp0003GCA_004786145.1TGO30745.138198.43%
Botryotinia globosaMUCL 444GCA_014898425.1KAF7887299.138198.43%
Botryotinia narcissicolaMUCL 2120GCA_004786225.1TGO61103.138198.43%
Botryotinia calthaeMUCL 2830GCA_004379285.1TEY75198.138197.11%
B. porriMUCL 3234GCA_014898465.1XP_038765908.138195.80%
B. porriMUCL 3349GCA_004786265.1TGO84949.138195.54%
B. squamosaMUCL 31421GCA_014898485.2RCTC02000009.1 *-94.40%
B. medusaeB555GCA_019395255.1JAHXJL010000116.1 *-93.66%
B. pseudocinereaBP362GCA_019395245.1JAHXJK010000109.1 *-92.16%
B. fabae isolateDLY-16-612GCA_004335055.1RSAG01000202.1 *-91.42%
Table 3. Distribution of the XP_038807933 protein (EAE98_008016) gene across the Fungi Kingdom.
Table 3. Distribution of the XP_038807933 protein (EAE98_008016) gene across the Fungi Kingdom.
A. Phylum Ascomycota.
CladeClassOrderNumber of ProteinsNumber of Organisms
SordariomycetaLeotiomycetesHeliotales7561
Unclassified Leotiomycetes11
Leotiales11
Leotiomycetes incertae sedis2723
Erysiphales1511
SordariomycetesTogniniales32
Diaporthales3218
Magnaporthales267
Sordariales9367
Coniochaetales65
Chaetosphaeriales21
Ophiostomatales85
Cephalothecales21
Xylariales227122
Unclassified Xylariomycetidae22
Xylariomycetidae incertae sedis41
Hypocreales546259
Glomerellales15988
Microascales76
Sordariomycetes incertae sedis21
Lulworthiales11
LeotiomycetaLecanoromycetesAcarosporales43
Rhizocarpales21
Lecanorales2212
Peltigerales54
Caliciales32
Teloschistales4720
Unclassified Lecanoromycetidae11
Ostropomycetidae incertae sedis21
Umbilicariales43
Trapeliales1512
Pertusariales33
Sarrameanales22
Ostropales44
Lecanoromycetes incertae sedis11
ConiocybomycetesConiocybales32
XylonomycetesXylonales21
CandelariomycetesCandelariales44
SareomycetesSareales11
LichinomycetesLichinales44
XylobotryomycetesXylobotryales21
GeoglossomycetesGeoglossales54
EurotiomycetesEurotiales1116230
Onygenales11070
Chaetothyriales9541
Verrucariales32
Phaeomoniellales11
Unclassified
Eurotiomycetes
11
DothideomycetaDothideomycetesMycosphaerellales25145
Dothideales13820
Myriangiales76
Cladosporiales64
Capnodiales22
Trypetheliales83
Botryosphaeriales4716
Acrospermales21
Lineolatales11
Dothideomycetes incertae sedis138
Eremomycetales21
Patellariales11
Phaeotrichales11
Mytilinidiales43
Pleosporomycetidae incertae sedis22
Pleosporales216109
Aulographales22
Venturiales155
ArthoniomycetesArthoniales22
SaccharomycetaPezizomycotina incertae sedisThelocarpales22
Vezdaeales22
Pezizomycotina incertae sedis22
PezizomycetesPezizales3426
OrbiliomycetesOrbiliales3515
SaccharomycetesSaccharomycetales4523
Taphrinomycotina incertae sedis 31
-TaphrinomycetesTaphrinales32
B. Phylum Basidiomycota.
ClassOrderNumber of ProteinsNumber of Organisms
MicrobotryomycetesLeucosporidiales11
Sporidiobolales2010
Unclassified Microbotryomycetes11
Microbotryales64
Kriegeriales11
Microbotryomycetes incertae sedis11
MixiomycetesMixiales31
CystobasidiomycetesCyphobasidiales11
PucciniomycetesPucciniales4017
AtractiellomycetesAtractiellales11
AgaricomycetesAgaricomycetes incertae sedis196135
Agaricales233140
Jaapiales11
Boletales6234
Atheliales22
Amylocorticiales21
Geastrales21
Hysterangiales31
Gomphales22
TremellomycetesFilobasidiales64
Trichosporonales188
Tremellales9973
Cystofilobasidiales31
DacrymycetesDacrymycetales22
ExobasidiomycetesExobasidiales32
Tilletiales135
UstilaginomycetesUstilaginales2312
Violaceomycetales11
MalasseziomycetesMalasseziales149
WallemiomycetesWallemiales61
C. Phylum Mucoromycota.
ClassOrderNumber of ProteinsNumber of Organisms
MucoromycetesMucorales19457
UmbelopsidomycetesUmbelopsidales135
EndogonomycetesEndogonales32
MortierellomycetesMortierellales8851
GlomeromycetesGlomerales219
Diversisporales1810
Paraglomerales32
Archaeosporales33
Entrophosporales122
D. Phylum Zoopagomycota.
ClassOrderNumber of ProteinsNumber of Organisms
BasidiobolomycetesBasidiobolales11
EntomophthoromycetesEntomophthorales72
KickxellomycetesKickxellales160137
DimargaritomycetesDimargaritales116
HarpellomycetesHarpellales33
Kickxellomycotina incertae sedisRamicandelaberales11
ZoopagomycetesZoopagales44
E. Phylum Chytridiomycota.
ClassOrderNumber of ProteinsNumber of Organisms
ChytridiomycetesSynchytriales42
Spizellomycetales148
Rhizophlyctidales32
Chytridiomycetes incertae sedis33
Cladochytriales32
Chytridiales77
Lobulomycetales22
Rhizophydiales95
Polychytriales21
MonoblepharidomycetesMonoblepharidales33
NeocallimastigomycetesNeocallimastigales55
F. Phylum Chytridiomycota.
ClassOrderNumber of ProteinsNumber of Organisms
BlastocladiomycotaBlastocladiomycetes105
Physodermatomycetes11
Table 4. Comparison of Polyketide Gene Clusters in B. deweyae and B. cinerea.
Table 4. Comparison of Polyketide Gene Clusters in B. deweyae and B. cinerea.
GCGene ID in
B. deweyae
Protein ID in
B. deweyae
Protein Length in B. deweyaeGene ID
B. cinerea
Protein ID
B. cinerea
Protein Length in B. cinerea% SimilarityAnnotation
1EAE98_002293XP_038813652.12542----Unknown
2EAE98_005009XP_038811280.12579BCIN_05g08400XP_024549041.1257183.33%Bcpks21
3EAE98_006691XP_038809559.12575BCIN_16g05040XP_024554044.1257588%Bcpks16
4EAE98_007035XP_038808800.1499BCIN_13g02130XP_001555327.149993.99%Bcchs1
5EAE98_009027XP_038807018.12537----Unknown
6EAE98_009190XP_038806877.12346----Unknown
7EAE98_009473XP_038806567.12007BCIN_05g06220XP_024548906.1212684.49%Bcpks15
8EAE98_010322XP_038805735.12415BCIN_13g01510XP_001557060.1241794.08%Bcpks10
9EAE98_010696XP_038805323.12143BCIN_03g08050XP_001547095.2213896.08%Bcpks13
10EAE98_010906XP_038805042.12208----Unknown
11EAE98_010943XP_038805079.12353----Unknown
GC: Gene Cluster. Protein lengths are measured in amino acids (aa). Gene IDs and Protein IDs are sourced from the NCBI database.
Table 5. Identification of homologous proteins from BdPKS22-26 in other Botrytis species. * The protein accession number refers to the region of the genome that matches the amino acid sequence of the protein obtained from the T-BLAST result.
Table 5. Identification of homologous proteins from BdPKS22-26 in other Botrytis species. * The protein accession number refers to the region of the genome that matches the amino acid sequence of the protein obtained from the T-BLAST result.
PKSBotrytis SpeciesStrainProtein Accession NumberNumber of Amino AcidsIdentity with
B. deweyae
EAE98_002293 (BdPKS22)Botrytis ellipticaBe9601TGO80363.1251396.73%
Botrytis ellipticaBe9612KAF7928242.1244397.01%
Botrytis convolutaMUCL 11595TGO65325.1263390.31%
Botrytis galanthinaMUCL 435THV55759.1261689.79%
Botrytis porriMUCL 3234XP_038774872.1260188.08%
Botrytis porriMUCL 3349TGO92077.1260188.08%
Botrytis tulipaeBt9001TGO09113.1233089.98%
Botrytis paeoniaeBp0003TGO26315.1252788.98%
Botrytis squamosaMUCL 31421RCTC02000012.1 *-94.42%
EAE98_009027 (BdPKS23)Botrytis ellipticaBe9601TGO77401.1254796.43%
Botrytis ellipticaBe9612KAF7911819.1256295.87%
Botrytis sinoalliiBc23XP_038753118.1254395.77%
Botrytis fragariaeBVB16XP_037188393.1255294.07%
Botryotinia convolutaMUCL 11595TGO52589.1254793.87%
Botrytis hyacinthiBh0001TGO38645.1256292.70%
Botrytis aclada633KAF7946733.1254491.97%
Botrytis paeoniaeBp0003TGO27521.1225884.85%
Botrytis galanthinaMUCL 435THV49893.1188486.19%
Botrytis squamosaMUCL 31421RCTC02000008.1 *-98.43%
EAE98_009190 (BdPKS24)Botrytis ellipticaBe9601TGO80020.1233597.29%
Botrytis ellipticaBe9612KAF7941341.1235994.43%
Botrytis squamosaMUCL 31421RCTC02000005.1 *-83.28%
Botrytis aclada633RCSV01000004.1 *-78.53%
Botrytis porriMUCL 3234RCTA01000006.1 *-72.12%
Botryotinia globosaMUCL 444RCSZ01000002.1 *-75.22%
EAE98_010906 (BdPKS25)Botrytis paeoniaeBp0003TGO20404.1262191.95%
Botryotinia globosaMUCL 444KAF7896114.1252884.54%
Botrytis ellipticaBe9601TGO71777.1213395.90%
Botrytis ellipticaBe9612KAF7923671.1180897.11%
Botrytis squamosaMUCL 31421RCTC02000002.1 *-84.75%
Botrytis sinoalliiBc 23RCTB01000005.1 *-50.05%
EAE98_010943 (BdPKS26)Botrytis ellipticaBe9601TGO73554.1232798.77%
Botrytis ellipticaBe9612KAF7923645.1232798.64%
Botrytis sinoalliiBc 23XP_038763137.1207387.33%
Botrytis galanthinaMUCL 435THV54946.1162386.56%
Botrytis squamosaMUCL 31421RCTC02000002.1 *-95.29%
RCTC02000005.1 * 54.23%
Botrytis medusaeB555JAHXJL010000007.1-89.03%
Botryotinia globosaMUCL 444RCSZ01000001.1-86.14%
Table 6. Distribution of homologous proteins from BdPKS22-26 with an identity percentage > 50% and a coverage > 70% in fungi from genera other than Botrytis.
Table 6. Distribution of homologous proteins from BdPKS22-26 with an identity percentage > 50% and a coverage > 70% in fungi from genera other than Botrytis.
PKSPhylumCladeClassOrderNumber of
Proteins
Number of Organisms
BdPKS22AscomycotaSordariomycetaLeotiomyceteHeliotales11
Leotiomycetes incertae
sedis
11
SordariomyceteXylariales43
LeotiomycetaLecanoromyceteTeloschistales33
Pertusariales11
EurotiomyceteEurotiales107
DothideomycetaDothideomycetesPleosporales132
TOTAL3318
BdPKS23AscomycotaSordariomyceltaSordariomyceteHeliotales97
Xylariales3225
Xylariomycetidae incertae sedis41
Diaporthales43
LeotiomycetaLecanoromycetesLecanorales22
Teloschistales54
Peltigerales11
Pertusariales11
EurotiomycetesEurotiales32
DothideomycetaDothideomycetesDothideomycetes incertae sedis11
TOTAL6247
BdPKS24AscomycotaLeotiomycetaLecanoromyceteSarrameanales11
Trapeliales11
Pertusariales11
Teloschistales22
EurotiomyceteOnygenales11
Eurotiales21
SordariomycetaSordariomyceteXylariales32
TOTAL119
BdPKS25AscomycotaSordariomycetaLeotiomyceteHeliotales87
Leotiomycetes incertae sedis11
SordariomyceteHypocreales65
Microascales32
Xylariomycetidae incertae sedis41
Sordariales66
DothideomycetaDothideomycetesDothideomycetes incertae sedis53
Pleosporales43
ArthoniomycetesArthoniales11
leotiomycetaEurotiomycetesEurotiales54
LecanoromycetesLecanorales11
TOTAL4434
BdPKS26AscomycotaSordariomycetaLeotiomyceteHelotiales86
SordariomycetesHypocreales129
Glomerellales105
Xylariales5339
Sordariales11
Diaporthales21
Magnaporthales11
LeotiomycetaLecanoromycetesTrapeliales22
Teloschistales11
EurotiomycetesEurotiales2713
Onygenales362
DothideomycetaDothideomycetesMytilinidiales21
Pleosporomycetidae incertae sedis11
Pleosporales11
Botryosphaeriales21
TOTAL15984
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Coca-Ruiz, V.; Aleu, J.; Garrido, C.; Collado, I.G. Exploring the Genome of the Endophytic Fungus Botrytis deweyae: Prediction of Novel Secondary Metabolites Gene Clusters: Terpenes and Polyketides. Agronomy 2024, 14, 2747. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112747

AMA Style

Coca-Ruiz V, Aleu J, Garrido C, Collado IG. Exploring the Genome of the Endophytic Fungus Botrytis deweyae: Prediction of Novel Secondary Metabolites Gene Clusters: Terpenes and Polyketides. Agronomy. 2024; 14(11):2747. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112747

Chicago/Turabian Style

Coca-Ruiz, Victor, Josefina Aleu, Carlos Garrido, and Isidro G. Collado. 2024. "Exploring the Genome of the Endophytic Fungus Botrytis deweyae: Prediction of Novel Secondary Metabolites Gene Clusters: Terpenes and Polyketides" Agronomy 14, no. 11: 2747. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112747

APA Style

Coca-Ruiz, V., Aleu, J., Garrido, C., & Collado, I. G. (2024). Exploring the Genome of the Endophytic Fungus Botrytis deweyae: Prediction of Novel Secondary Metabolites Gene Clusters: Terpenes and Polyketides. Agronomy, 14(11), 2747. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112747

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop