Next Article in Journal
Nose-to-Brain: The Next Step for Stem Cell and Biomaterial Therapy in Neurological Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
Combination of Paclitaxel and PXR Antagonist SPA70 Reverses Paclitaxel-Resistant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 11
Issue 19
10.3390/cells11193096
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

miR319-Regulated TCP3 Modulates Silique Development Associated with Seed Shattering in Brassicaceae

by
Biting Cao
1,2,3,†,
Hongfeng Wang
3,4,†,
Jinjuan Bai
3,
Xuan Wang
3,
Xiaorong Li
3,
Yanfeng Zhang
5,
Suxin Yang
6,
Yuke He
3,* and
Xiang Yu
1,*
1
School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2
Shanghai Key Lab of Protected Horticultural Technology, Horticultural Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201106, China
3
National Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Science, Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Fenglin Road 300, Shanghai 200032, China
4
The Key Laboratory of Plant Development and Environmental Adaptation Biology, Ministry of Education, School of Life Science, Shandong University, Qingdao 266101, China
5
Hybrid Rape Research Center of Shaanxi Province, Yangling 712100, China
6
Key Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Changchun 130102, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contribute equally to this work.
Cells 2022, 11(19), 3096; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11193096
Submission received: 2 September 2022 / Revised: 27 September 2022 / Accepted: 28 September 2022 / Published: 1 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant, Algae and Fungi Cell Biology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Seed shattering is an undesirable trait that leads to crop yield loss. Improving silique resistance to shattering is critical for grain and oil crops. In this study, we found that miR319-targeted TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1, CYCLOIDEA, and PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN BINDING FACTOR (TCPs) inhibited the process of post-fertilized fruits (silique) elongation and dehiscence via regulation of FRUITFULL (FUL) expression in Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica napus. AtMIR319a activation resulted in a longer silique with thickened and lignified replum, whereas overexpression of an miR319a-resistant version of AtTCP3 (mTCP3) led to a short silique with narrow and less lignified replum. Further genetic and expressional analysis suggested that FUL acted downstream of TCP3 to negatively regulate silique development. Moreover, hyper-activation of BnTCP3.A8, a B. napus homolog of AtTCP3, in rapeseed resulted in an enhanced silique resistance to shattering due to attenuated replum development. Taken together, our findings advance our knowledge of TCP-regulated silique development and provide a potential target for genetic manipulation to reduce silique shattering in Brassica crops.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Angiosperms show various types of siliques, most of which are derived from the ovary walls and fertilized ovules. Their structures are conserved in Arabidopsis thaliana and some species of the Brassicaceae family, including cabbage, broccoli, Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa), and rapeseed (Brassica napus) [1]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, siliques are composed of fertilized ovules and three major regions, namely the valves, repla, and valve margins. The valve margins were formed between the valves and the repla, and two types of cells at the valve margins regulated the silique opening. The separation layer is also called dehiscence zone (DZ), which is composed of 2–3 layers of thin-walled cells and separates the heavily lignified cells of the pericarp edge from the replum. Fruit dehiscence is accompanied by degradation of the thin-walled cells [2,3,4,5]. Canola seeds, which are harvested for oil, are often lost owing to premature silique shattering, particularly under adverse weather conditions, and premature dehiscence or silique shattering leads to significant crop losses [6]. Reducing silique shattering will increase the proportion of seed obtained during harvest, which is conducive to economic income.
Several key genes contributing to silique development have been identified in Arabidopsis. REPLUMLESS (RPL) plays an important role in replum development. rpl mutants exhibit reduced replum width, and the strong alleles display a complete absence of outer replum [7]. SHATTERPROOF1 (SHP1) and SHP2 are necessary for the proper valve margins development. The loss of SHP1 and SHP2 function results in lacking the lignified and separation layers in siliques, which prevents silique opening [8]. INDEHISCENT (IND) and ALCATRAZ (ALC) work downstream of SHP [9,10]. The atypical bHLH protein IND is required for seed dissemination [9]. The small cells of the separation zone and the adjacent lignified cell layers were defective in the siliques of the ind mutant, and mutation of ALC resulted in the lack of the non-lignified cell layer in the separation layer. NO TRANSMITTING TRACT (NTT) encodes a zinc finger transcription factor, and loss of NTT function affects the normal transmitting-tract development [11] and replum development in Arabidopsis fruits [12]. In addition, the siliques of activation-tagged allele of NTT (ntt-3D) are indehiscence and almost lack separation and lignification layer [13]. The cells in the mesophyll tissue layer of fruitfull (ful) mutant are lignified at the later stage of fruit development and are much smaller than in the wild type [14,15]. Overall, the FUL-SHP network play important role in fruit morphology, which is evolutionally conserved in plants [16].
Brassica species are the most closely related crops to Arabidopsis, and they disperse seeds in a similar way [17,18]. Ectopic expression of the Arabidopsis AtFUL gene under control of the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S promoter in Brassica juncea leads to complete shattering-resistant siliques similar to those of 35S::FUL transgenic plants [19,20]. JAGGED (JAG) is involved in maintaining the integrity of boundaries between cell groups with indeterminate or determinate fates. BnJAG-33 mutants enhance silique shatter resistance [21]. BraA.IND.a and BolC.IND.a genes control valve margin cell fate and inhibit replum formation [22]. BnIND mutations in B. napus show higher shatter resistance [23,24]. Taken together, these conserved genetic regulators of silique development can be applied in Brassica breeding for improving seed shattering resistance.
The plant-specific TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1, CYCLOIDEA, and PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN BINDING FACTOR (TCP) family with a bHLH motif that allows DNA binding and protein–protein interactions are involved in growth-related progress, such as branching, floral organ morphogenesis and leaf development [25,26]. There are 24 members of the TCP family in Arabidopsis thaliana, and TCP2, TCP3, TCP4, TCP10, and TCP24 are the targets of miR319 [27]. miR319-regulated TCP genes function in leaf development by regulating cell division arrest [28,29]. In a previous work, we reported that an anther with four microsporangia was transformed into the one with two microsporangia in the jaw-D mutant in which the MIR319a gene is activated [30]. However, the role of miR319-regulated TCPs in fruit development remains unclear. In this study, we revealed that the siliques replum of jaw-D plants, in which the MIR319a gene was activated, was significantly enlarged, and AtTCP3 was one of the major regulators in against to silique elongation and dehiscence via increasing FUL expression. Finally, hyper-activation of BnTCP3.A8 in rapeseed increased silique resistance to shattering. These results uncovered that miR319-regulated TCPs played viral role in silique development and can be used as a genetic editing resource for seed shattering resistance in Brassica crops.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Growth Conditions

The Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 ecotype was used as the wild type in this study. Seeds of Col-0, jaw-D mutants and transgenic Arabidopsis lines were sterilized using 70% (v/v) ethanol. plants were grown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) plates with 1% sucrose under long-day conditions (16-h light/8-h dark) and then transferred to a growth room at 22 °C under long-day conditions.
The rapeseed accession K407 was acquired from Hybrid Rape Research Center of Shaanxi Province [31]. Rapeseed wild-type (accession K407) and transgenic rapeseed lines overexpressing BnTCP3.A8 were sown in a greenhouse. Then, the seedlings were transplanted into a field at the Songjiang Farm Station of the Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology in early September.

2.2. Plasmid Construction and Transformation

To generate the mAtTCP3-overexpression construct, the full-length CDS of AtTCP3 (AT1G53230) was amplified using specific primers. Then, a silent mutation was introduced into the miR319 target site of the AtTCP3 CDS to generate the mAtTCP3 construct using a Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (TaKaRa). The chimeric pAtTCP3::AtTCP3SRDX was constructed as described previously [32]. To generate the p35S::AtFUL construct, the full length CDS of the AtFUL gene was amplified. To generate the p35S::BnTCP3.A8 construct, the full length CDS of the Brassica napus TCP3 gene (Acc. number GSBRNA2T00114181001) was amplified and cloned into the binary vector pChimera. The Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 pMP90RK was used for stable plant transformations. All the primers used for plasmid construction are listed in Table S1.
For rapeseed hypocotyl transformations, we followed the protocol described by Liu et al. and Moloney et al. [33,34]. The p35S::mAtTCP3, pAtTCP3:: AtTCP3SRDX and p35S:: AtFUL vectors were transferred into Col-0 using the floral dip method [35]. The p35S::BnTCP3.A8 and p35S::mAtTCP3 transgenic plants were selected on MS medium containing 50 mg/mL kanamycin after Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Positive seedlings (T0) were transplanted into soils. In the F1 generation, all transgenic plants were confirmed using PCR with gene-specific primers and maintained in a growth room at 22 °C under long-day conditions. Primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

2.3. Isolation of RNA and Real-Time PCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from plants using TRIzol reagent. Before performing quantitative real-time PCR, RNA was treated with DNase I (TaKaRa) to avoid DNA contamination, and then RNA was purified with the phenol chloroform. Real-time detection of all target genes was based on the method of Li et al. (2020) [36]. The quantification of the relative expression levels was performed as reported previously [37]. The relative transcript levels of each gene in Arabidopsis thaliana and B. napus were normalized to that of Actin [36] and UBC21 [38] for quantitation, respectively. Primer Premier 5 software was used to design oligonucleotide primers (http://www.premibiosoft.com (accessed on 1 September 2022)) for real-time PCR to amplify the reference and target genes. All the primers used in this study are shown in Table S1.

2.4. Histological Analyses

For toluidine blue staining, the siliques were harvested one week after opening of flower buds and fixed in FAA for more than 18 h, sectioned and stained with 0.1% toluidine blue [7,8,39]. For phloroglucinol lignin staining, the siliques at the same stage were stained with 2% phloroglucinol solution overnight. Then, the siliques were decolorized in ethanol and photographed.

2.5. In Situ Hybridization

Silique (stage 10–12) sections in the wild-type flowers were prepared using previously described pretreatment and hybridization methods [40]. The primers used to generate hybridization probes specific for AtTCP3 using the fragments (513 bp) in coding sequences according to the method of Wang et al. (2015) [30]. LNA (Locked Nucleic Acid) modified probes specific for AtTCP3 were synthesized and labeled with DIG at the 3′-end by TaKaRa.

2.6. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Siliques (stage 17) of Arabidopsis and B. napus were harvested and fixed overnight at 25 °C in FAA, dehydrated through an ethanol series, and critical-point dried. Samples were sputter-coated with gold and viewed using a Hitachi S-2300 electron microscope. Replum width were measured in the middle of siliques photographed according to the method of Marsch-Martinez, N. et al. (2014) [12].

2.7. Shattering-Resistance Measurements

Mature siliques were collected for the measurement of silique shattering resistance by a random impact test (RIT) [41]. In total, 20 siliques were preserved in a mesh bag overnight after incubation at 60 °C for 60 min to equilibrate the moisture content, and then, they were placed into a cylindrical container, having a diameter of 6 cm and a height of 17 cm, which was pre-loaded with 12 steel balls with a diameter of 13 mm. On a horizontal shaker, the container was shaken at 300 rpm and then the numbers of cracked siliques were recorded after 1 min shaking intervals. A total of 10 recordings were taken. After each recording, the broken siliques were removed, and all the experiments were performed in triplicate. The silique shattering-resistance index (SRI) was calculated using the following equation:
SRI = 1 − ∑ i = 1 10 X i × 11 − i / 200
where Xi represents the number of cracked siliques in time ith, with 1 ≤ i ≤ 10.

2.8. Sequence alignment and Phylogenetic Analysis

Arabidopsis AtTCP protein sequences were downloaded from the Arabidopsis Information Resource (https://www.arabidopsis.org/ (accessed on 1 September 2022)). BnTCP3.A8 and Brp.TCP3 were selected based on their high similarity with AtTCP3. Full-length amino acid sequence multiple alignments were performed using ClustalW and GeneDoc. Unrooted phylogenetic trees were constructed from the aligned amino acid sequences using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA 6.0, and bootstrapping was carried out with 1000 iterations [42].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

We calculate statistical significance using two-tailed Student’s t-test and error bars indicate standard error (SE). Values of p < 0.05 are statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. AtMIR319a-Regulated TCPs Played Negative Role in Silique Development

In previous studies, the development defect of jaw-D mutant plant with activation of AtMIR319a was observed in both vegetable and reproductive stages (Wang et al., 2015). However, the molecular mechanism of silique defect in jaw-D plant has not been uncovered. Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), we found that the repla of the jaw-D silique was wider than those of the wild type in the base, middle, and tip of the mature silique (Figure 1A). Transverse sections of siliques showed that the jaw-D repla were significantly wider compared with wild-type repla (Col-0) in the middle of mature siliques (Figure 1B,C). Thus, these results indicated that activation of AtMIR319a enlarged repla in siliques.
To investigate the expression changes of the five miR319-targeted TCP genes in different tissues of jaw-D mutant plants, real-time PCRs were performed to analyze the expression levels of AtTCP2, AtTCP3, AtTCP4, AtTCP10, and AtTCP24 in cauline leaves, inflorescences, flowers, and siliques. In cauline leaves and inflorescences, the expression of AtTCP2, AtTCP3, AtTCP4, AtTCP10, and AtTCP24 were consistently reduced to a similar level in jaw-D mutants compared to the wild type (Figure 2A). In contrast, their expressions were differently suppressed in flowers (stage 14–15) and siliques (stage 17). Specifically, AtTCP3 was mostly suppressed among all the five TCP genes in silique of jaw-D plants (Figure 2A). Detailed analysis of AtTCP3 expressional level in different plant tissues confirmed that this gene was most accumulated in siliques as compared to in rosette leaves, inflorescences, and flowers (Figure 2B). Given the siliques of Arabidopsis thaliana originated from gynoecium with two fused carpels, we further investigated the mRNA abundance of AtTCP3 during early flowering stage by in situ hybridization. In young flower buds of wild-type plants, AtTCP3 transcripts were highly accumulated in the developing carpel (Figure 2C). These results suggested that AtTCP3 was one of the major regulators of silique development among these five miR319 targeted TCPs.
Notably, TCP4 and TCP24 were also significantly repressed in silique of jaw-D plants compared to Col-0 (Figure 2A). Knockout mutants of AtTCP3 showed no visible phenotypic alterations due to the functional redundancy of the miR319-target TCPs [43,44]. To further confirm the function of AtTCP3 in repla development, we constructed the pAtTCP3::AtTCP3SRDX transgenic line fusing TCP3 with plant-specific ERF-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif repression domain (SRDX), which suppressed target genes of endogenous TCP3 and its functionally redundant TCPs. We found that the replum width of the pAtTCP3::AtTCP3SRDX siliques was similar to jaw-D siliques (Figure 1C). These results further suggested that miR319-regulated TCPs played critical role in replum development in siliques.

3.2. AtTCP3 Negatively Regulated Repla Development and Reduced the Lignification in Siliques

To further study the function of TCP3 in developing siliques, a miR319a-resistant version (p35S::mAtTCP3) of AtTCP3 was introduced into Arabidopsis. As expected, the AtTCP3 transcription level was significantly increased in the transgenic plants compared with wild-type (Figure 3A). In wild-type siliques, valve margins or DZ were differentiated as a narrow strip consisted of few cells within the separation layer and the lignified regions, both of which contributed to the active fruit-opening process [19]. Consistent with the previous studies [43], p35S:mAtTCP3 plants were smaller than wild-type plants (Figure 3B), and their siliques were much shorter (Figure 3C–E). Based on the SEM image of siliques (Stage 17), the repla of p35S:mAtTCP3 siliques were much narrower than those in wide type and jaw-D siliques (Figure 1A). Cross sections in the middle of siliques also showed that the replum cells were relatively smaller in p35S:mAtTCP3 siliques than in wild type and jaw-D. In addition, a layer of large and sparse cells were seen between the valve and the replum in the Col silique, which facilitated the dehiscence of the siliques, whereas this layer of cells was much denser in p35S::mAtTCP3 siliques (Figure 1B). These results suggested that AtMIR319a-regulated TCP3 functioned as a negative regulator of silique development.
Silique wall thickness and replum development are correlated with lignin accumulation in plants [5]. To investigate whether TCP3 play a role in regulating replum lignification, phloroglucinol, a lignin-specific histological stain, was applied to siliques of wild-type, p35S::mAtTCP3, pAtTCP3::AtTCP3SRDX, and jaw-D plants for evaluating the degree of tissue lignification. In the wild-type siliques, lignin-specific signals were clearly seen in the repla and valve margin cells adjacent to the DZ throughout the siliques, while the signals were very faint in the repla and valve margin cells of p35S::mAtTCP3 siliques (Figure 3F). In contrast, the lignin-specific signals were much stronger in the repla and valve margin cells of jaw-D and pAtTCP3::AtTCP3SRDX siliques compared to those in wide type. These results indicated that AtTCP3 overexpression attenuated lignification of repla in the siliques.

3.3. AtFUL Acted Downstream of AtTCP3 in Replum Deficiency

Recent molecular and genetic studies in Arabidopsis have identified several crucial genes involved in the regulation of silique development [45]. To determine the relationship of TCP3 with those valve- and valve-margin-related genes, the expressional level of AtFUL, AtNTT, AtIND, AtALC, AtJAG, AtFIL, AtYAB3, and the replum-related gene AtPRL, were analyzed using real-time PCR. Transcript levels of AtFUL and AtRPL were significantly elevated in the p35S::mAtTCP3 plants as compared to wild-type (Figure 4A). In addition, transcript levels of AtFUL, AtIND, AtRPL, and AtJAG were significantly downregulated in the jaw-D mutants compared to those in the wild type (Figure 4A). In combination, these results implied that AtTCP3 acted as an upstream regulator of AtFUL to suppress the differentiation of the replum.
To further understand the genetic relationship between AtTCP3 and AtFUL, the AtFUL gene were either overexpressed or suppressed in jaw-D mutant background. In FUL jaw-D plant overexpressing FUL, silique repla were narrower in width than that of jaw-D silique but still wider than the wild type, indicating that the wide replum phenotype of jaw-D mutant was partially complemented by AtFUL (Figure 1C and Figure 4B). Besides, the wavy leaf margins phenotypes observed in jaw-D were also restored by AtFUL overexpression in FUL jaw-D plants (Figure 4C). Moreover, ful jaw-D double mutants showed similar repla width with ful mutant (Figure 1C and Figure 4D). Together, these results suggest that AtFUL acted downstream of TCP genes.

3.4. Hyper-Activation of BnTCP3.A8 Affected Silique Development in Rapeseed

Rapeseed and Arabidopsis are members of the Brassicaceae family and display similar silique morphologies. To investigate whether TCP3 is also involved in replum development of rapeseed, we identified the B. napus TCP3 gene by blast searching for the AtTCP3 protein coding sequence in the Brassica database (BRAD). The obtained locus, GSBRNA2T00114181001, which located on chromosome A08, showed the highest similarity to AtTCP3. Thus, this gene was named as BnTCP3.A8 in following studies (Figure 5A, Figure S1A,B). Further sequence alignment of this gene in the same database revealed that BnTCP3.A8 displayed a 98% similarity to B. rapa BrpTCP3 (Figure 5A). BnTCP3.A8 also contained a conserved BrpmiR319a-targeted site within the identified sequences (Figure 5B).
To study the functions of BnTCP3.A8 in silique development, the BnTCP3.A8 CDS was introduced into rapeseed plants (accession K407) under the regulation of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. The expression of BnTCP3.A8 was significantly upregulated in p35S::BnTCP3.A8 transgenic lines T2, T4 (T2 generation), and T26 (T3 generation) (Figure 6A,B). In those plants, silique lengths of the p35S::BnTCP3.A8 line were shorter than that of the wild-type (Figure 6C,D). For immature gynoecium [46], the placenta development of p35S::BnTCP3.A8 line was weaker than that of the wild-type (Figure 6E). Further, the image of SEM showed that the replum in T26 silique was much narrower than that of the wild-type (Figure 6F). We measured the replum width in the middle of siliques. Replum width of T26 silique was significantly narrower than that of the wild-type (Figure 6G). These results indicated that BnTCP3.A8 negatively regulated replum development in rapeseed, consistent with the role of AtTCP3 in Arabidopsis.
Spence et al. (1996) showed that silique shattering resistance was negatively associated with the degree of lignification in the valves, repla, and valve margin cells [18]. To investigate whether the p35S::BnTCP3.A8 plants also reduced lignification in repla, the siliques of both the wild-type and transgenic lines were stained by phloroglucinol. The siliques of T26 showed weaker lignin-specific signals in the repla than those of the wild-type (Figure 6H). In addition, the siliques of T26 exhibited smaller valve margin cells adjacent to the DZs (Figure 6I). These observations indicated that the reduced lignification in the repla was responsible for the resistance of p35S::BnTCP3.A8 plants to silique shattering.

3.5. Hyper-Expression of BnTCP3.A8 Upregulated BnFUL-BnSHP1 Network and Enhanced Silique Shattering Resistance in Rapeseed

To determine whether BnTCP3.A8 is also involved in the regulation of replum- and valve-related genes as AtTCP3, we analyzed expression levels of BnFUL and BnSHP1, BnALC, BnJAG, BnFIL, and BnYAB3 genes in T26 siliques. Real-time PCR showed that BnFUL and BnSHP1 were upregulated in p35S::BnTCP3.A8 siliques, while BnALC, BnJAG, BnFIL, and BnYAB3 were downregulated (Figure 6J). These results revealed that the TCP3-mediated gene regulatory pathways were conserved in rapeseed during silique development.
To define whether the deficiency in replum width of rapeseed affects silique shattering, we determined the silique shattering ratios using the modified method of Bruce et al. (2002) [47]. The siliques of the wild-type plants were opened easily by shattering treatment and released many seeds (Figure 6K); however, the siliques of T26 plants were less opened than the wild-type and released fewer seeds. The SRI (shattering-resistance index) of T26 was 0.58 at 300 rpm, which was significantly high than the SRI of wild-type (SRI = 0.48) (Figure 6L). Thus, these results suggested that overexpression of BnTCP3.A8 enhanced silique shattering resistance.

4. Discussion

4.1. miR319-Targeted TCP Genes Inhibited Replum Enlargement

The miR319-targeted TCP genes control cell division arrest [25,27,28,48,49,50]. In general, proteins encoded by genes expressed in the replum often negatively regulate genes expressed in the valves [1]. We found that these TCP genes were involved in development of repla because repla became wider in jaw-D mutant. Among them, AtTCP3 was down-regulated mostly among these TCP genes. In situ hybridization revealed that AtTCP3 was preferentially expressed in middle region of carpel. In addition, p35S::mAtTCP3 reduced the replum width, and pTCP3::mAtTCP3SRDX increased the replum width. Taken together, these results suggested that AtTCP3 functioned in regulation of replum development.
The factors that control the establishment of medio-lateral silique patterns also regulate proper shoot development and leaf formation [51,52,53,54,55]. We found that AtTCP3 positively regulated valve- and valve margin-related genes AtFUL and AtSHP1. Genetic analysis showed AtFUL acted downstream of miR319a-targeted AtTCP3 in replum deficiency. This evidence indicates that TCP3 functioned in repressing replum enlargement.

4.2. BnTCP3.A8 Enhanced Silique Shattering Resistance

Cell wall lignification is a complex process that only occurs in higher plants, and its main function is to strengthen plant vascular bodies. Cell wall lignification affects silique dehiscence in siliques. SHP1 and SHP2 promotes valve margin lignification [8]. In this study, we found that the lignin-specific staining of the repla of Arabidopsis p35S::mAtTCP3 and p35S::BnTCP3.A8 plants was weaker as compared to wild-type, while the lignin-specific staining of the repla of jaw-D, and pAtTCP3::AtTCP3SRDX siliques were much stronger than that of the wild type.
The premature cracking of siliques before or during ripening causes silique shattering and drastically reduces production. Rapeseed is widely planted in temperate regions. Total yields may reduce 20% owing to silique shattering, and in arid environments this reduction reaches 50% [56,57]. In recent years, some progress has been made in transgenic approaches using Arabidopsis genes to produce indehiscence rape [58]. Chung et al. (2013) reported that the ntt-3D mutant, an activation tagged allele of NTT, showed an enlarged replum and the fruit indehiscence in Arabidopsis [13]. Overexpression of AtFUL gene in B. juncea produces pod shatter-resistant Brassica fruit [19]. The shatter-resistant B. juncea siliques may have smaller non-lignified separation layers than B. napus siliques [59]. A similar phenotype was observed in 35S::FUL Arabidopsis plants, which showed reductions in the lignification of cells adjacent to the DZs, resulting in the formation of indehiscent siliques that did not release seeds normally [20]. The replum of the transgenic line p35S::BnTCP3.A8 displayed a narrower replum and a lower degree of lignification, compared with that of the wild type, and t p35S::BnTCP3.A8 plants exhibited higher silique shatter resistance. Thus, the deficiency in replum may affect silique shattering. Whether are the size and shape of valve margin changed by TCP3 deregulation remains unclear. Both the Arabidopsis p35S::mAtTCP3 and B. napus p35S::BnTCP3.A8 plants exhibited shorter and smaller siliques. This fact implies that the effects of TCP3 on silique development are much broader than expected. An attempt to explore the new function of TCP3 and the other miR319a-targeted gene is underway in our lab. In FUL jaw-D double mutants, silique repla were narrower in width than that of jaw-D silique but still wider than the wild-type, and ful jaw-D double mutants no significant change of repla width was observed compared to ful mutant. TCP3 positively regulated FUL expression and affected replum lignification in Arabidopsis and B. napus. Alternatively, TCP3 may inhibit replum growth in a direct or indirect path unknown. Our results provide novel insights into the mechanisms of silique dehiscence in Arabidopsis and B. napus, which can most likely be applied to other crops and lay a foundation for the development of oil crop varieties having strong shattering-resistance levels.

5. Conclusions

In Summary, this study revealed a critical role of miR319-regulated TCPs in silique development, reducing replum width and lignification via FUL-regulated pathway, which contributed to the silique shattering resistance in both Arabidopsis and B. napus. Specifically, we found that hyper-activation of BnTCP3.A8 enhanced silique resistance to shattering in rapeseed, providing a potential genetic locus for molecular breeders to improve silique shattering resistance in Brassica crops.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11193096/s1, Table S1. Primer and probe sequences used in this study; Figure S1. Alignment and phylogenetic analysis of miR319-regulated TCP proteins in Arabidopsis and TCP3 homologous proteins in B. rapa and B. napus. (A) Alignment of the targets of miR319 in Arabidopsis with TCP3 proteins in B. rapa and B. napus. (B) Phylogenetic tree analysis of miR319-regulated TCP proteins in Arabidopsis and TCP3 homologus protein in B. rapa and B. napus.

Author Contributions

Y.H. and X.Y. designed the research. B.C., H.W., J.B. and X.W. performed the research and analyzed the data. B.C., X.Y. and Y.H. wrote the manuscript. X.L., Y.Z. and S.Y. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2016YFD0101900 and 2016YFD0100500) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31771442 and 31571261).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Weigel from the Max-Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Germany, for providing seeds of jaw-D and ful mutants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gramzow, L.; Klupsch, K.; Fernandez-Pozo, N.; Holzer, M.; Marz, M.; Rensing, S.A.; Theissen, G. Comparative transcriptomics identifies candidate genes involved in the evolutionary transition from dehiscent to indehiscent fruits in Lepidium (Brassicaceae). BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Child, R.D.; Summers, J.E.; Babij, J.; Farrent, J.W.; Bruce, D.M. Increased resistance to pod shatter is associated with changes in the vascular structure in pods of a resynthesized Brassica napus line. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 1919–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Meakin, P.J.; Roberts, J.A. Dehiscence of fruit in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) II. The role of cell wall degrading enzymes and ethylene. J. Exp. Bot. 1990, 41, 1003–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Meakin, P.J.; Roberts, J.A. Dehiscence of fruit in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) I. Anatomy of pod dehiscence. J. Exp. Bot. 1990, 41, 995–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tao, Z.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, G.; Wang, H. BnLATE, a Cys2/His2-Type Zinc-Finger Protein, Enhances Silique Shattering Resistance by Negatively Regulating Lignin Accumulation in the Silique Walls of Brassica napus. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0168046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Dinneny, J.R.; Yanofsky, M.F. Drawing lines and borders: How the dehiscent fruit of Arabidopsis is patterned. Bioessays 2005, 27, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Roeder, A.H.; Ferrandiz, C.; Yanofsky, M.F. The role of the REPLUMLESS homeodomain protein in patterning the Arabidopsis fruit. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13, 1630–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Liljegren, S.J.; Ditta, G.S.; Eshed, Y.; Savidge, B.; Bowman, J.L.; Yanofsky, M.F. SHATTERPROOF MADS-box genes control seed dispersal in Arabidopsis. Nature 2000, 404, 766–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Liljegren, S.J.; Roeder, A.H.; Kempin, S.A.; Gremski, K.; Ostergaard, L.; Guimil, S.; Reyes, D.K.; Yanofsky, M.F. Control of fruit patterning in Arabidopsis by INDEHISCENT. Cell 2004, 116, 843–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Rajani, S.; Sundaresan, V. The Arabidopsis myc/bHLH gene ALCATRAZ enables cell separation in fruit dehiscence. Curr. Biol. 2001, 11, 1914–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Crawford, B.C.; Ditta, G.; Yanofsky, M.F. The NTT gene is required for transmitting-tract development in carpels of Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Marsch-Martinez, N.; Zuniga-Mayo, V.M.; Herrera-Ubaldo, H.; Ouwerkerk, P.B.; Pablo-Villa, J.; Lozano-Sotomayor, P.; Greco, R.; Ballester, P.; Balanza, V.; Kuijt, S.J.; et al. The NTT transcription factor promotes replum development in Arabidopsis fruits. Plant J. 2014, 80, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chung, K.S.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, J.S.; Ahn, J.H. Fruit indehiscence caused by enhanced expression of NO TRANSMITTING TRACT in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Cells 2013, 35, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Gu, Q.; Ferrandiz, C.; Yanofsky, M.F.; Martienssen, R. The FRUITFULL MADS-box gene mediates cell differentiation during Arabidopsis fruit development. Development 1998, 125, 1509–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ferrandiz, C.; Gu, Q.; Martienssen, R.; Yanofsky, M.F. Redundant regulation of meristem identity and plant architecture by FRUITFULL, APETALA1 and CAULIFLOWER. Development 2000, 127, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ferrandiz, C.; Fourquin, C. Role of the FUL-SHP network in the evolution of fruit morphology and function. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 4505–4513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Roberts, J.A.; Elliott, K.A.; Gonzalez-Carranza, Z.H. Abscission, Dehiscence, and Other Cell Separation Processes. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002, 53, 131–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Spence, J.; Vercher, Y.; Gates, P.; Harris, N. Pod shatter in Arabidopsis thaliana, Brassica napus and B. juncea. J. Microscopy 1996, 181, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ostergaard, L.; Kempin, S.A.; Bies, D.; Klee, H.J.; Yanofsky, M.F. Pod shatter-resistant Brassica fruit produced by ectopic expression of the FRUITFULL gene. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2006, 4, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ferrandiz, C.; Liljegren, S.J.; Yanofsky, M.F. Negative regulation of the SHATTERPROOF genes by FRUITFULL during Arabidopsis fruit development. Science 2000, 289, 436–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Zaman, Q.U.; Chu, W.; Hao, M.; Shi, Y.; Sun, M.; Sang, S.F.; Mei, D.; Cheng, H.; Liu, J.; Li, C.; et al. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Multiplex Genome Editing of JAGGED Gene in Brassica napus L. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Girin, T.; Stephenson, P.; Goldsack, C.M.; Kempin, S.A.; Perez, A.; Pires, N.; Sparrow, P.A.; Wood, T.A.; Yanofsky, M.F.; Ostergaard, L. Brassicaceae INDEHISCENT genes specify valve margin cell fate and repress replum formation. Plant J. 2010, 63, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Braatz, J.; Harloff, H.J.; Emrani, N.; Elisha, C.; Heepe, L.; Gorb, S.N.; Jung, C. The effect of INDEHISCENT point mutations on silique shatter resistance in oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 959–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhai, Y.; Cai, S.; Hu, L.; Yang, Y.; Amoo, O.; Fan, C.; Zhou, Y. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing reveals differences in the contribution of INDEHISCENT homologues to pod shatter resistance in Brassica napus L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2019, 132, 2111–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Martin-Trillo, M.; Cubas, P. TCP genes: A family snapshot ten years later. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 15, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shang, X.; Han, Z.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Y.; Qin, H.; Zou, Z.; Zhou, L.; Zhu, X.; Fang, W.; Ma, Y. Genome-Wide Analysis of the TCP Gene Family and Their Expression Pattern Analysis in Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis). Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 840350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Palatnik, J.F.; Allen, E.; Wu, X.; Schommer, C.; Schwab, R.; Carrington, J.C.; Weigel, D. Control of leaf morphogenesis by microRNAs. Nature 2003, 425, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Mao, Y.; Wu, F.; Yu, X.; Bai, J.; Zhong, W.; He, Y. MicroRNA319a-targeted Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis TCP genes modulate head shape in chinese cabbage by differential cell division arrest in leaf regions. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 710–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Koyama, T.; Sato, F.; Ohme-Takagi, M. Roles of miR319 and TCP transcription factors in leaf development. Plant Physiol. 2017, 175, 874–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wang, H.; Mao, Y.; Yang, J.; He, Y. TCP24 modulates secondary cell wall thickening and anther endothecium development. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, W.; Yu, F.; Tian, J.; Li, D.; Guo, A. Functional analysis of the two Brassica AP3 genes involved in apetalous and stamen carpelloid phenotypes. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Mitsuda, N.; Hiratsu, K.; Todaka, D.; Nakashima, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Ohme-Takagi, M. Efficient production of male and female sterile plants by expression of a chimeric repressor in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2006, 4, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, X.X.; Lang, S.R.; Su, L.Q.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.F. Improved Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and high efficiency of root formation from hypocotyl meristem of spring Brassica napus ‘Precocity’ cultivar. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 16840–16855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moloney, M.M.; Walker, J.M.; Sharma, K.K. High-efficiency transformation of Brassica napus using Agrobacterium vectors. Plant Cell Rep. 1989, 8, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, X.; Henriques, R.; Lin, S.S.; Niu, Q.W.; Chua, N.H. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana using the floral dip method. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 641–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Li, Y.; Li, X.; Yang, J.; He, Y. Natural antisense transcripts of MIR398 genes suppress microR398 processing and attenuate plant thermotolerance. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔ CT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lv, J.; Huang, Q.; Sun, Y.; Qu, G.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, H.; Hu, S. Male sterility of an AHAS-mutant induced by tribenuron-methyl solution correlated with the decrease of AHAS activity in Brassica napus L. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ripoll, J.J.; Roeder, A.H.; Ditta, G.S.; Yanofsky, M.F. A novel role for the floral homeotic gene APETALA2 during Arabidopsis fruit development. Development 2011, 138, 5167–5176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Lian, H.; Li, X.; Liu, Z.; He, Y. HYL1 is required for establishment of stamen architecture with four microsporangia in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 3397–3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Peng, P.F.; Li, Y.C.; Mei, D.S.; Colasanti, J.; Fu, L.; Liu, J.; Chen, Y.F.; Hu, Q. Expression divergence of FRUITFULL homeologs enhanced pod shatter resistance in Brassica napus. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 871–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Danisman, S.; van Dijk, A.D.; Bimbo, A.; van der Wal, F.; Hennig, L.; de Folter, S.; Angenent, G.C.; Immink, R.G. Analysis of functional redundancies within the Arabidopsis TCP transcription factor family. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 5673–5685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Li, S.; Zachgo, S. TCP3 interacts with R2R3-MYB proteins, promotes flavonoid biosynthesis and negatively regulates the auxin response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant. J. 2013, 76, 901–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Koyama, T.; Furutani, M.; Tasaka, M.; Ohme-Takagi, M. TCP transcription factors control the morphology of shoot lateral organs via negative regulation of the expression of boundary-specific genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 473–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Maity, A.; Lamichaney, A.; Joshi, D.C.; Bajwa, A.; Subramanian, N.; Walsh, M.; Bagavathiannan, M. Seed Shattering: A Trait of Evolutionary Importance in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 657773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Alvarez-Buylla, E.R.; Benítez, M.; Corvera-Poiré, A.; Cador, Á.C.; Folter, S.D.; Alicia, G.; Garay-Arroyo, A.; García-Ponce, B.; Jaimes-Miranda, F.; Pérez-Ruiz, R. Flower Development. The Arabidopsis Book 2010, 8, e0127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Bruce, D.M.; Farrent, J.W.; Morgan, C.L.; Child, R.D. Determining the oilseed rape pod strength needed to reduce seed loss due to pod shatter. Biosyst Eng. 2002, 81, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, Z.; Jia, L.; Wang, H.; He, Y. HYL1 regulates the balance between adaxial and abaxial identity for leaf flattening via miRNA-mediated pathways. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 4367–4381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Danisman, S. TCP transcription factors at the interface between environmental challenges and the plant’s growth responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Sarvepalli, K.; Nath, U. CIN-TCP transcription factors: Transiting cell proliferation in plants. IUBMB Life 2018, 70, 718–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dinneny, J.R.; Weigel, D.; Yanofsky, M.F. A genetic framework for fruit patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 2005, 132, 4687–4696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Girin, T.; Sorefan, K.; Ostergaard, L. Meristematic sculpting in fruit development. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 1493–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Ragni, L.; Belles-Boix, E.; Gunl, M.; Pautot, V. Interaction of KNAT6 and KNAT2 with BREVIPEDICELLUS and PENNYWISE in Arabidopsis inflorescences. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 888–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Alonso-Cantabrana, H.; Ripoll, J.J.; Ochando, I.; Vera, A.; Ferrandiz, C.; Martinez-Laborda, A. Common regulatory networks in leaf and fruit patterning revealed by mutations in the Arabidopsis ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 gene. Development 2007, 134, 2663–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Carles, C.C.; Fletcher, J.C. Shoot apical meristem maintenance: The art of a dynamic balance. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kadkol, G.P.; Macmillan, R.H.; Burrow, R.P.; Halloran, G.M. Evaluation of Brassica genotypes for resistance to shatter. I. Development of a laboratory test. Euphytica 1984, 33, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Price, J.S.; Hobson, R.N.; Neale, M.A.; Bruce, D.M. Seed losses in commercial harvesting of oilseed rape. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 1996, 65, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hu, Z.; Yang, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, G.; Wang, H.; Hua, W. A large replum-valve joint area is associated with increased resistance to pod shattering in rapeseed. J. Plant Res. 2015, 128, 813–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jaradat, M.R.; Ruegger, M.; Bowling, A.; Butler, H.; Cutler, A.J. A comprehensive transcriptome analysis of silique development and dehiscence in Arabidopsis and Brassica integrating genotypic, interspecies and developmental comparisons. GM Crops Food 2014, 5, 302–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Cells 11 03096 g001 550
Figure 1. The phenotypes of the repla and dehiscence zones in Col (wild-type), jaw-D mutant and p35S::mAtTCP3 plants. (A) Images of scanning electron microscope (SEM) showing the repla of the wild-type, jaw-D, and mAtTCP3 siliques. (B) Cross-sections of siliques (stage 17) showing repla and valve margins of the wild-type, jaw-D, and mAtTCP3 siliques in Arabidopsis. The repla and valve margins in boxes were magnified in right. (C) Bar graph showing replum width of the wild-type (Col), jaw-D, mAtTCP3, FUL jaw-D, ful, AtFUL, ful jaw-D, and AtTCP3SRDX siliques. mAtTCP3, p35S::mAtTCP3 lines. AtFUL, p35S::AtFUL lines. FUL jaw-D, p35S::AtFUL in jaw-D mutant. ful jaw-D, double mutants. AtTCP3SRDX, pAtTCP3:: AtTCP3SRDX. rp, replum. v, valve. * indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 1. The phenotypes of the repla and dehiscence zones in Col (wild-type), jaw-D mutant and p35S::mAtTCP3 plants. (A) Images of scanning electron microscope (SEM) showing the repla of the wild-type, jaw-D, and mAtTCP3 siliques. (B) Cross-sections of siliques (stage 17) showing repla and valve margins of the wild-type, jaw-D, and mAtTCP3 siliques in Arabidopsis. The repla and valve margins in boxes were magnified in right. (C) Bar graph showing replum width of the wild-type (Col), jaw-D, mAtTCP3, FUL jaw-D, ful, AtFUL, ful jaw-D, and AtTCP3SRDX siliques. mAtTCP3, p35S::mAtTCP3 lines. AtFUL, p35S::AtFUL lines. FUL jaw-D, p35S::AtFUL in jaw-D mutant. ful jaw-D, double mutants. AtTCP3SRDX, pAtTCP3:: AtTCP3SRDX. rp, replum. v, valve. * indicates p < 0.05.
Cells 11 03096 g001
Cells 11 03096 g002 550
Figure 2. Expression patterns of miR319a-targeted TCP genes. (A) The relative expression level of AtTCP genes in the jaw-D mutant cauline leaves, inflorescences, flowers (stage 14–15), and siliques (stage 17) as compared to wild type plants (Col). (B) Real-time PCR showing the relative expression levels of AtTCP3 in cauline leaves, flower buds, flowers, and siliques (stage 17) in wild-type plants (Col). (C) In situ hybridization of AtTCP3 in transverse cross-section of Col siliques (stage 8). Three biological replicates are taken. Error bars indicate SE. * indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Expression patterns of miR319a-targeted TCP genes. (A) The relative expression level of AtTCP genes in the jaw-D mutant cauline leaves, inflorescences, flowers (stage 14–15), and siliques (stage 17) as compared to wild type plants (Col). (B) Real-time PCR showing the relative expression levels of AtTCP3 in cauline leaves, flower buds, flowers, and siliques (stage 17) in wild-type plants (Col). (C) In situ hybridization of AtTCP3 in transverse cross-section of Col siliques (stage 8). Three biological replicates are taken. Error bars indicate SE. * indicates p < 0.05.
Cells 11 03096 g002
Cells 11 03096 g003 550
Figure 3. Silique phenotype and lignification of repla in mAtTCP3 transgenic plants. (A) Real-time PCR showing expression levels of AtTCP3 in p35S::mAtTCP3 siliques. (B) Phenotype of the wild-type and p35S::mAtTCP3 plants at reproductive stage. (C) Green siliques (stage 17) of the wild-type (left) and p35S::mAtTCP3 (right) plants. (D) Mature siliques (stage 18) of the wild-type (left) and p35S::mAtTCP3 (right) plants. (E) Graph showing silique length of the wild-type (Col) and mAtTCP3 (p35S::mAtTCP3) plants. (F) Phloroglucinol staining showing lignin-specific signals in the siliques of Col, jaw-D, mAtTCP3, and AtTCP3SRDX plants. mAtTCP3, p35S::mAtTCP3 lines. AtTCP3SRDX, pAtTCP3:: AtTCP3SRDX. The relative transcript level of each gene was normalized to Actin cDNA for quantification. Error bars indicate the standard errors. The asterisks indicate a significant difference (* p < 0.05). Scale bars in (B): 4cm. Scale bars in (C) and (D): 2 cm. Scale bars in (F): 5 mm.
Figure 3. Silique phenotype and lignification of repla in mAtTCP3 transgenic plants. (A) Real-time PCR showing expression levels of AtTCP3 in p35S::mAtTCP3 siliques. (B) Phenotype of the wild-type and p35S::mAtTCP3 plants at reproductive stage. (C) Green siliques (stage 17) of the wild-type (left) and p35S::mAtTCP3 (right) plants. (D) Mature siliques (stage 18) of the wild-type (left) and p35S::mAtTCP3 (right) plants. (E) Graph showing silique length of the wild-type (Col) and mAtTCP3 (p35S::mAtTCP3) plants. (F) Phloroglucinol staining showing lignin-specific signals in the siliques of Col, jaw-D, mAtTCP3, and AtTCP3SRDX plants. mAtTCP3, p35S::mAtTCP3 lines. AtTCP3SRDX, pAtTCP3:: AtTCP3SRDX. The relative transcript level of each gene was normalized to Actin cDNA for quantification. Error bars indicate the standard errors. The asterisks indicate a significant difference (* p < 0.05). Scale bars in (B): 4cm. Scale bars in (C) and (D): 2 cm. Scale bars in (F): 5 mm.
Cells 11 03096 g003
Cells 11 03096 g004 550
Figure 4. The relationship of miR319a and AtTCP3 with replum- and valve-related genes. (A) Real-time PCR showing the relative expression levels of AtFUL, AtNTT, AtIND, AtALC, AtRPL, AtJAG, AtFIL, and AtYAB3 in p35S::mAtTCP3 and jaw-D siliques. (B) SEM images showing repla in the siliques of FUL and FUL jaw-D plants (p35S::AtFUL in jaw-D mutant). (C) The phenotypes of FUL jaw-D plants. (D) SEM images showing repla in siliques of ful, ful jaw-D, and pAtTCP3::AtTCP3SRDX plants. AtTCP3SRDX indicates pAtTCP3:: AtTCP3SRDX. The relative transcript level of each gene was normalized to Actin cDNA for quantification. Error bars indicate the standard errors. The asterisks indicate a significant difference (* p < 0.05).
Figure 4. The relationship of miR319a and AtTCP3 with replum- and valve-related genes. (A) Real-time PCR showing the relative expression levels of AtFUL, AtNTT, AtIND, AtALC, AtRPL, AtJAG, AtFIL, and AtYAB3 in p35S::mAtTCP3 and jaw-D siliques. (B) SEM images showing repla in the siliques of FUL and FUL jaw-D plants (p35S::AtFUL in jaw-D mutant). (C) The phenotypes of FUL jaw-D plants. (D) SEM images showing repla in siliques of ful, ful jaw-D, and pAtTCP3::AtTCP3SRDX plants. AtTCP3SRDX indicates pAtTCP3:: AtTCP3SRDX. The relative transcript level of each gene was normalized to Actin cDNA for quantification. Error bars indicate the standard errors. The asterisks indicate a significant difference (* p < 0.05).
Cells 11 03096 g004
Cells 11 03096 g005 550
Figure 5. Alignment of putative TCP3 proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana, B. rapa, and B. napus and miR319a target sites of AtTCP3 and BrpTCP3. (A) Amino acid sequence alignment of TCP3 proteins in Arabidopsis, B. rapa, and B. napus. The TCP domains are represented by black solid lines. (B) Reverse complementation between mature miR319a and TCP3 mRNA.
Figure 5. Alignment of putative TCP3 proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana, B. rapa, and B. napus and miR319a target sites of AtTCP3 and BrpTCP3. (A) Amino acid sequence alignment of TCP3 proteins in Arabidopsis, B. rapa, and B. napus. The TCP domains are represented by black solid lines. (B) Reverse complementation between mature miR319a and TCP3 mRNA.
Cells 11 03096 g005
Cells 11 03096 g006 550
Figure 6. Silique shattering in rapeseed plants overexpressing BnTCP3.A8. (A) Real-time PCR showing the relative expression level of BnTCP3.A8 in siliques (one week after pollination) of BnTCP3.A8-transgenic lines T2 and T4. (B) Real-time PCR showing the relative expression of BnTCP3.A8 in the siliques (one week after pollination) of BnTCP3.A8-transgenic transgenic line T26. (C) The siliques at the pre-harvesting stage. (D) Graph showing silique length of the wild-type and BnTCP3.A8-transgenic lines T26. (E) The phenotypes of BnTCP3.A8-transgenic lines T26. At stage 9, the magnified views of silique (right) are shown. At stage 13, the magnified views of silique (left) are shown. (F) SEM images showing repla in siliques of the transgenic line T26. (G) Replum width of BnTCP3.A8-transgenic line T26. (H) Phloroglucinol staining of the surfaces of siliques in the transgenic line T26. Magnified views of silique (right) are shown. (I) Cross-sections of WT and T26 siliques showing repla and valve margins. (J) Real-time PCR showing the relative expression levels of BnRPL, BnALC, BnJAG, BnYAB3, BnFIL, BnSHP1, and BnFUL in the siliques of the transgenic line T26. The relative transcript level of each gene was normalized to UBC21 cDNA for quantification. (K) One min after silique shattering treatments. Seeds from shattered siliques after agitation in the random impact test. (L) Silique shattering resistance index of BnTCP3.A8-transgenic line T26. The proportions of siliques opened versus agitation time in the random impact test. Error bars indicate the standard errors. The asterisks indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05). Scale bars in (C), (H,K) 1 cm. WT, accession K407. T26, p35S::TCP3.A8 line. rp, replum. v, valve. vm, valve margin. * indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Silique shattering in rapeseed plants overexpressing BnTCP3.A8. (A) Real-time PCR showing the relative expression level of BnTCP3.A8 in siliques (one week after pollination) of BnTCP3.A8-transgenic lines T2 and T4. (B) Real-time PCR showing the relative expression of BnTCP3.A8 in the siliques (one week after pollination) of BnTCP3.A8-transgenic transgenic line T26. (C) The siliques at the pre-harvesting stage. (D) Graph showing silique length of the wild-type and BnTCP3.A8-transgenic lines T26. (E) The phenotypes of BnTCP3.A8-transgenic lines T26. At stage 9, the magnified views of silique (right) are shown. At stage 13, the magnified views of silique (left) are shown. (F) SEM images showing repla in siliques of the transgenic line T26. (G) Replum width of BnTCP3.A8-transgenic line T26. (H) Phloroglucinol staining of the surfaces of siliques in the transgenic line T26. Magnified views of silique (right) are shown. (I) Cross-sections of WT and T26 siliques showing repla and valve margins. (J) Real-time PCR showing the relative expression levels of BnRPL, BnALC, BnJAG, BnYAB3, BnFIL, BnSHP1, and BnFUL in the siliques of the transgenic line T26. The relative transcript level of each gene was normalized to UBC21 cDNA for quantification. (K) One min after silique shattering treatments. Seeds from shattered siliques after agitation in the random impact test. (L) Silique shattering resistance index of BnTCP3.A8-transgenic line T26. The proportions of siliques opened versus agitation time in the random impact test. Error bars indicate the standard errors. The asterisks indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05). Scale bars in (C), (H,K) 1 cm. WT, accession K407. T26, p35S::TCP3.A8 line. rp, replum. v, valve. vm, valve margin. * indicates p < 0.05.
Cells 11 03096 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cao, B.; Wang, H.; Bai, J.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, S.; He, Y.; Yu, X. miR319-Regulated TCP3 Modulates Silique Development Associated with Seed Shattering in Brassicaceae. Cells 2022, 11, 3096. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11193096

AMA Style

Cao B, Wang H, Bai J, Wang X, Li X, Zhang Y, Yang S, He Y, Yu X. miR319-Regulated TCP3 Modulates Silique Development Associated with Seed Shattering in Brassicaceae. Cells. 2022; 11(19):3096. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11193096

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cao, Biting, Hongfeng Wang, Jinjuan Bai, Xuan Wang, Xiaorong Li, Yanfeng Zhang, Suxin Yang, Yuke He, and Xiang Yu. 2022. "miR319-Regulated TCP3 Modulates Silique Development Associated with Seed Shattering in Brassicaceae" Cells 11, no. 19: 3096. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11193096

APA Style

Cao, B., Wang, H., Bai, J., Wang, X., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Yang, S., He, Y., & Yu, X. (2022). miR319-Regulated TCP3 Modulates Silique Development Associated with Seed Shattering in Brassicaceae. Cells, 11(19), 3096. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11193096

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop