Next Article in Journal
Extension of PERMANOVA to Testing the Mediation Effect of the Microbiome
Previous Article in Journal
Exosomal miRNA Profile in Small-for-Gestational-Age Children: A Potential Biomarker for Catch-Up Growth
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/genes13060939
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Osmoprotectant Switch of Potassium to Compatible Solutes in an Extremely Halophilic Archaea Halorubrum kocurii 2020YC7

by
Runting Ding
1,2,
Na Yang
1 and
Jianguo Liu
1,3,*
1
CAS and Shandong Key Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology, Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 7 Nanhai Road, Qingdao 266071, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Laboratory for Marine Biology and Biotechnology, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, 1 Wenhai Road, Qingdao 266237, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2022, 13(6), 939; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13060939
Submission received: 14 March 2022 / Revised: 27 April 2022 / Accepted: 13 May 2022 / Published: 24 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Microbial Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The main osmoadaptive mechanisms of extremely halophilic archaea include the “salt-in” strategy and the “compatible solutes” strategy. Here we report the osmoadaptive mechanism of an extremely halophilic archaea H. kocurii 2020YC7, isolated from a high salt environment sample. Genomic data revealed that strain 2020YC7 harbors genes trkA, trkH, kch for K+ uptake, kefB for K+ output, treS for trehalose production from polysaccharide, and betaine/carnitine/choline transporter family gene for glycine betaine uptake. Strain 2020YC7 could accumulate 8.17 to 28.67 μmol/mg protein K+ in a defined medium, with its content increasing along with the increasing salinity from 100 to 200 g/L. When exogenous glycine betaine was added, glycine betaine functioned as the primary osmotic solute between 200 and 250 g/L NaCl, which was accumulated up to 15.27 mg/mg protein in 2020YC7 cells. RT-qPCR results completely confirmed these results. Notably, the concentrations of intracellular trehalose decreased from 5.26 to 2.61 mg/mg protein as the NaCl increased from 50 to 250 g/L. In combination with this result, the transcript level of gene treS, which catalyzes the production of trehalose from polysaccharide, was significantly up-regulated at 50–100 g/L NaCl. Therefore, trehalose does not act as an osmotic solute at high NaCl concentrations (more than 100 g/L) but at relatively low NaCl concentrations (50–100 g/L). And we propose that the degradation of cell wall polysaccharide, as a source of trehalose in a low-salt environment, may be one of the reasons for the obligate halophilic characteristics of strain 2020YC7.

1. Introduction

Halophilic archaea are microorganisms that can live in a high-salt environment, such as salt lakes, salt farms, pickled food, and other environments [1]. Due to the NaCl concentration being 2.5–5.2 M, most halophilic archaea are classified as extremely halophilic microorganisms [2]. To live in hypersaline environments, osmoadaptive strategies are employed by extremely halophilic microorganisms through increasing the osmotic activity of cytoplasm, which is of general biological interest.
It has been reported that halophilic archaea can survive in a high-salt environment due to the high proportion of acidic amino acids, the synthesis of bacterioruberin (a C50 carotenoid) and two osmoadaptive strategies. A high proportion of acidic amino acids, causes the intracellular proteins to bind more K+ [3,4,5]. Bacterioruberin could increase the rigidity of cell membranes by reducing fluidity as well as exert an anti-stress effect and was regulated by salinity [6,7,8]. The main osmoadaptive mechanisms included the “salt-in” strategy and the “compatible solutes” strategy [2,5,9,10,11]. The “salt-in” strategy is based on the input of K+, which balanced the high concentration of Na+ in the high-salt medium [12,13]. Series of enzymes and transport systems are activated and/or induced by K+, which acts as a signal molecule to adapt to the changing osmotic pressure [14]. Common compatible solutes in extremely halophilic archaea include amino acids and their derivatives, polyols, carbohydrates, etc. [15,16]. Studies had shown that organic solutes trehalose and glycine betaine were widespread in the extremely halophilic archaea by de novo synthesis or uptake from environment [17,18]. Trehalose is an important component that has both osmoadaptive regulation and cell protection effects in halophilic archaea [19]. There are 5 pathways for the biosynthesis of trehalose, including OstAB, TreS, TreP, TreY and TreT pathway, respectively [20]. The OstAB pathway is ubiquitous in halophilic archaea, such as Halococcus saccharolyticus, Halogranum salarium, Natrinema pellirubrum, etc. And halophilic archaeal species with ostAB gene have lower optimal growth salinity than those lacking this pathway [19]. Glycine betaine is another widely used solute by many species, including most archaea, bacteria, plants and humans, etc [21,22]. The de novo synthesis pathway of glycine betaine generally used choline or glycine as a precursor [23,24].
K+ is the first choice for osmoadaptive regulation due to the ubiquitous transport system, high transport efficiency and good regulation effect [25]. The increase of K+ is an early response to a high-salt environment in eubacteria [26,27]. The main osmoprotectants change from K+ to organic compatible solutes over time, such as proline and glycine betaine [28]. Therefore, eubacteria tend to use zwitter ionic or nonionic solutes to balance osmotic pressure with the outside world. During the transition from moderate salinity (around 1 M NaCl) to high salinity (2 to 3 M NaCl), the main osmoprotectant of moderately halophilic bacterium Halobacillus halophilus was converted from glutamate to proline [29]. Furthermore, the main osmoprotectant switch from K+ to glycine betaine has also been found in extremely halophilic bacteria Halorhodospira halophila when the K+ concentration in the environment was less than 1 g/L [30]. Conversely, in archaea, the K+ concentration is relatively stable in a high-salt environment, which makes K+, rather than compatible solutes, considered as the main osmoprotectant [2,15]. In recent years, it has been found that genes for trehalose synthesis and glycine betaine transport are widespread in halophilic archaea, and the intracellular K+ concentration decreased after the addition of glycine betaine [17]. This raises the question of whether a complex switching mechanism of osmoprotectants also exists in halophilic archaea.
The current researches of halophilic mechanism of halophilic archaea mainly focuses on the physiological level detection of intracellular osmoaprotectants [17,18,31,32,33]. Few gene-level and global issues were addressed and few research advances were put into practice. In this study, the osmoadaptive mechanism of an extremely halophilic archaea H. kocurii 2020YC7 was studied. The whole genome of H. kocurii 2020YC7 has been sequenced, and genes related to the osmoadaptive regulation have been mined. After the addition of trehalose and glycine betaine in different salinities, the physiological levels of trehalose and glycine betaine have been measured, and the expression levels of related genes have been analyzed. This study aims to perform a more systematic and in-depth exploration of the osmoadaptive mechanism and discuss the mutual influence of each part of the osmoadaptive mechanism.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Archaeal Strain and Growth Condition

H. kocurii 2020YC7 was isolated from high salt water (Northern China) and grown in YCM1 medium (MgSO4·7H2O 20 g/L, KCl 2 g/L, sodium citrate tribasic dihydrate 3 g/L, oxoid yeast extract 3 g/L, tryptone 5 g/L, pH = 7.0). For osmoadaptive experiments, media YCM2 (Tris-Cl 50 mM, glucose 10 g/L, pH = 7.0) was used. The NaCl concentrations of both YCM1 and YCM2 were 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 g/L.

2.2. Genomic Sequencing

The genome of H. kocurii strain 2020YC7 was sequenced using PacBio Sequel platform and Illumina NovaSeq PE150 (Novogene, Beijing, China). Genomic DNA was extracted with the SDS method (Lim, Lee, Yoon, Chua, & Son, 2016). The harvested DNA was detected by the agarose gel electrophoresis and quantified by Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Preliminary assembly Program SMRT Link v5.0.1 was used to preliminary gene assembly. By the variant Caller module of the SMRT Link software, the arrow algorithm was used to correct and count the variant sites in the preliminary assembly results. The corrected assembly result, which was used as the reference sequence, was blasted with Illumina data by bwa. Futhermore, the result was filtered with the base minimum mass value of was 20, the minimum read depth of 4 and the maximum read depth of 1000. Based on the overlap between the head and the tail, we examined whether the chromosomal sequence formed a circle or not, then corrected the initial site by blasting with the DNA database. Finally, the chromosome and plasmid sequences were screened by blast with plasmid database. Six databases were used to predict gene functions. They were GO (Gene Ontology) [34], KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) [35], COG (Clusters of Orthologous Groups) [36], Non-Redundant Protein Database (NR) [37], TCDB (Transporter Classification Database) [38], and Swiss-Prot [39]. A whole genome Blast search (E-value less than 1 × 10−5, minimal alignment length percentage larger than 40%) was performed against above seven databases.

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

Homologous gene sequence search was completed by BLAST algorithm at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/blast/) (accessed on 23 February 2022) [40]. Gene multiple sequence alignment was done by DNAMAN and ClustalW Multiple Alignment program (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/) (accessed on 23 February 2022) [41]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm method by the MEGA 7 program [42]. The reliability of the branching was tested by 1000 bootstraps.

2.4. Reverse Transcription qPCR (RT-qPCR) Analysis

The primers’ information of eight osmoadaptive -related genes was shown in Table S1, and primers were synthesized by a company (Sangon, Shanghai, China). The 16s rRNA gene of H. kocurii 2020YC7 was chosen as reference gene for internal standard-dization. Each gene was normalized using the CT value of the 50 g/L group in the same group of treatments. Total RNA extraction was completed from strains cultured for 24 h with a bacterial total RNA extraction kit (Insight, Qingdao, China). Total RNA reverse transcription was performed according to the protocol using a ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Msater Mix (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan). The total RNA extracted and cDNA reverse transcribed were confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Reverse transcription qPCR (RT-qPCR) reaction system consisted of cDNA templates, primers, and TOROGreen 5G qPCR premix (Toroivd, Shanghai, China). The RT-qPCR was carried out in a total volume of 20 μL, containing 10 μL TOROGreen qPCR premix, 2 μL cDNA template, 4 μL forward primer and 4 μL reverse primer. The process adopted a two-step method. Thermal cycling conditions were an initial denaturation step at 92 °C for 2 min followed by 40 cycles consisting of denaturation at 95 °C for 3 s and primer annealing and strand extension at 60 °C for 20 s. RT-qPCR was completed by QuantStudio 6 Flex (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), and sequencing results collection and analysis were also completed by this equipment. The results are analyzed using the ΔΔCt method.

2.5. Determination of Biomass and Bacterioruberin Accumulation

Biomass and bacterioruberin content were both measured by UV spectrophotometry. Biomass was measured at 600 nm absorbance in the media YCM1 with 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 g/L NaCl per 24 h. Bacterioruberin was extracted by methanol and then determined at 494 nm absorbance. The ratio of A494 to A600 was used to express the bacteriocin content of unit cells.

2.6. Determination of Intracellular K+, Trehalose and Glycine Betaine Concentration

The archaea cultured to the stationary phase (A600 value no longer changed with time, about 0.5) in YCM1 media was collected and transferred to YCM2 medium after being washed 3 times with 250 g/L NaCl solution. Cells were cultivated in different salinities in the media YCM2 for 24 h with or without adding extra 1% trehalose and 1% glycine betaine. Cells were lysed by ddH2O. Osmoprotectants were identified and quantified in cell-free extracts. Concentration of intracellular K+, trehalose and glycine betaine measured using K+ turbid assay kit, colorimetric trehalose assay kit and glycine betaine assay kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China). The principle of K+ detection was that K+ reacted with Na2B4O7·xH2O to produce K2B4O7·5H2O which was insoluble in water, and the turbidity was proportional to the K+ concentration within a certain range. The detection of trehalose utilized the anthrone spectrophotometric methods. The detection principle of glycine betaine was that glycine betaine reacted with Reinecke salt under strong acid conditions to form a precipitate, which can be dissolved in acetone to form a red solution with a characteristic absorption peak at 525 nm.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Each experiment was repeated three times. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 16.0 (Chicago, IL, USA). The variation of each treatment was tested by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedure. The differences between groups were analyzed by least significant difference (LSD). Differences were considered significant at a probability level of p < 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. General Features

Growth media with different concentrations of NaCl (50, 100, 150, 200, 250 g/L) were used for the cultivation of strain 2020YC7. The optimal growth condition for strain 2020YC7 was 150–250 g/L (Figure 1a,b). Based on this result, strain 2020YC7 is an extremely halophilic archaea [16]. The bacterioruberin content increased with increasing NaCl concentrations. Compared with the 50 g/L group, the accumulation of bacteriocin in the 250 g/L group was 1.58 times higher. (Figure 1a,c). Maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm method was performed to build the phylogenetic tree of strain 2020YC7 (Figure 1d). Strain 2020YC7 was compared with some species of the same genus and another two strains belonging to the same family based on the 16S rRNA sequences. Strain 2020YC7 had the highest similarity to the H. kocurii JCM 14978 sequences with a similarity value of 100%.

3.2. Genome Features and Osmoadaptive Genes

The total length of H. kocurii 2020YC7 genome was 3,727,755 bp. The information of the chromosome is shown in Table 1. The GC content of the chromosome was up to 68.22%, which made its DNA more stable in a hypertonic environment. The GC content of halophilic archaea genomes was generally high, such as H. kocurii BG-1 (69.4%), H. saccharovorum NCIMB 2081 (71.2%) and H. lacusprofundi ACAM 34 (65.3%) [43,44]. In contrast, the NCBI data (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) showed that the GC content of non-halophilic Escherichia coli was 50.4%. H. kocurii 2020YC7 contains a linear chromosome and 3 linear plasmids. By gathering the genome information of various halophilic and non-halophilic species, the proportion of acidic amino acids in H. kocurii 2020YC7 was higher (17.14%) than that of non-halophilic and halophilic species (Halobacterium salinarum NRC-1 13.20%, Haladaptatus paucihalophilus DX253 12.87%, Halobacterium hubeiense 13.97%, Nesterenkonia alba DSM 19423 12.97%, Salinicoccus albus DSM 19776 11.50%, Staphylococcus agnetis 10.23%, Dunaliella salina 9.15% and E. coli str. K-12 substr. MG1655 8.93%). The higher proportion of acidic amino acids indicated that more cations for osmotic regulation could be combined in strain 2020YC7 cells [3].
Based on the genome results, a total of 34 genes related to osmoadaptive regulation were identified in strain 2020YC7 (Table 2). The genes included Trk system (trkA and trkH) and K+ voltage-gate channel (kch) for K+ uptake, K+/H+ antiporter (kefB) for potassium discharge. Genes for the synthesis or uptake of trehalose and glycine betaine were also detected in the genome of H. kocurii 2020YC7, including amylase/trehalose synthase (treS), sugar ABC transporter (sugA), and betaine/carnitine/choline transporter (bcct). The genes used for analysis in the article had been deposited in the NCBI database with GenBank numbers (Table 2). Becker et al. performed a phylogenetic analysis of the osmoadaptative strategies of extreme halophilic archaea and constructed a generalized model. The results showed that the Trk uptake system, the Kef anti-transporter and the NhaC anti-transporter played a pervasive function in the osmoregulation strategy of halophilic archaea [45].
The Trk system of H. kocurii 2020YC7 included TrkA and TrkH without TrkE [46,47]. Studies have shown that although TrkE binds ATP, ATP may only play a regulatory role and not provide energy for the transport process [48]. In many species, the presence of TrkE protein was not necessary and may be replaced by other ABC transporters [31,49]. TreS can catalyze polysaccharide to maltose and then transform it to trehalose (Figure 2) [50,51]. Strain H. kocurii 2020YC7 could use other types of polysaccharides for the production of trehalose, as no starch was detected using the iodine method in our study, which needs further study [52].

3.3. Osmoadaptive Mechanisms without Exogenous Compatible Solutes

The relative expression levels of K+ uptake genes trkH, trkA, kch, and kefB were detected. Results showed that the transcripts of all those genes increased with increasing NaCl concentrations (Figure 3a). Compared with kch, gene expression of Trk system was more strongly affected by salinity. Especially trkH, the relative expression level in 250 g/L group was 500 times higher than 50 g/L group. It showed the Trk potassium uptake system played a significant role during the osmoadaptive regulation in H. kocurii 2020YC7, which is consistent with other species of halophilic archaea [14,47,53]. The expression level of amylase/trehalose synthesis gene treS was also examined and decreased with the increasing NaCl concentrations (Figure 3b). The relative expressions in 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 g/L NaCl concentration were 1.00, 0.68, 0.46, 0.50, and 0.51, respectively. Without external supplementation, the transcripts of glycine betaine transport gene bcct and trehalose transport gene sugA did not change (Figure 3b).
The uptake of K+ was considered to be the most important osmoadaptive way for halophilic archaea [17,54,55,56,57,58,59]. As is shown in Figure 4a, the intracellular K+ concentration increased with increasing NaCl concentrations. The intracellular K+ concentration increased significantly in cells with 150–250 g/L NaCl compared to those in cells with 50–100 g/L (p < 0.05). The K+ concentration in 200 g/L group reached up to 28.67 μmol/mg protein which was 7.5 times higher than that in 50 g/L group, indicating that K+ uptake was an important way for H. kocurii 2020YC7 to regulate osmotic pressure. Since the genome showed that H. kocurii 2020YC7 had the amylase/trehalose synthesis gene treS, we detected the trehalose content in its cells. Trehalose concentration decreased with increasing NaCl concentrations (Figure 4b) which was consistent with the relative expression change trend of treS. Trehalose concentration decreased from 5.00 to 2.67 mg/mg protein during the NaCl concentration increasing from 50 to 250 g/L. No gene related to glycine betaine synthesis was found in the genome, and no endogenous glycine betaine was detected in the cells. It meant that glycine betaine cannot be de novo synthesized by H. kocurii 2020YC7.

3.4. Osmoadaptive Mechanisms with Addling Exogenous Compatible Solutes

Glycine betaine was one of the most widespread compatible solutes, and was originally discovered to be utilized by halophilic eubacteria [60,61,62]. Its transporters (BCCT family of secondary transporters and QAT family of ABC transporters) were later found to be widespread in halophilic archaea taxa and validated in H. salinarum NRC-1 [17]. We found two copies of BCCT family transporters (OM942798 and OM942799) in the genome of H. kocurii 2020YC7. At the same time, halophilic cyanobacteria also exist in the high salt environment where strain 2020YC7 lived. It can synthesize glycine betaine as an osmoprotectant and release it into the environment [12]. Therefore, we proposed that strain 2020YC7 could uptake glycine betaine released by other organisms co-lived in the high salt environment.
When exogenous glycine betaine was supplied, the relative expression levels of potassium transport genes trkH, trkA, kch and kefB still increased with the increasing NaCl concentrations, but the amplitude of trkH decreased. (Figure 5a). We noted that with glycine betaine, there was no difference in the expression of trkH between 200 and 250 g/L, which was different from the treatment without exogenous addition (Figure 5a). The relative expression level of the amylase/trehalose synthesis gene treS also showed a downward trend. In these two BCCT family gene copies, only OM942799 was detected by RT-qPCR method. The relative expression of the glycine betaine transport gene bcct showed an obvious upward trend with increased salinity (Figure 5b).
After exogenous glycine betaine was added, both intracellular K+ and trehalose concentrations decreased significantly compared to the treatment without any exogenous compatible solutes in 150–250 g/L NaCl (p < 0.05) (Figure 4a,b). Intracellular glycine betaine was detected in the cells of H. kocurii 2020YC7. And the glycine betaine concentration increased with increasing NaCl concentrations, with a maximum of 15.27 mg/mg protein detected at 200 g/L (Figure 4c). Combined with expression analysis of potassium and glycine betaine transport genes, it was speculated that when the NaCl concentration was higher than 200 g/L, osmoadaptative functions of some K+ were replaced by exogenous glycine betaine. The changes of K+ concentration showed that the osmoadaptative mechanism of H. kocurii 2020YC7 was the combination of glycine betaine and K+, rather than relying entirely on a single substance when the K+ concentration was 2 g/L. “Compatible solute” strategy was more flexible than “salt-in” strategy in terms of osmoregulation. Therefore, microorganisms that can utilize compatible solutes to cope with osmotic stress can adapt to a wider range of salinity [63]. This allowed the main osmoadaptative mechanism to switch from K+ uptake to glycine betaine transport in the presence of glycine betaine in strain 2020YC7. Due to the presence of glycine betaine in its natural growth environment, it was the result of evolution that H. kocurii 2020YC7 did not have the ability to synthesize glycine betaine like other halophilic archaea species but had evolved a powerful BCCT family transport system.
Due to the presence of sugA in the genome, we also added exogenous trehalose for experiments. When added trehalose, the relative expression of potassium transport genes trkH, trkA, kch, kefB still showed an upward trend. The relative expression of amylase/trehalose synthesis gene treS also decreased with the increase of NaCl concentration. The expression of the trehalose transport gene sugA was not significantly changed in 50–200 g/L salinity groups (p > 0.05), whereas had a 2.5-fold increase in 250 g/L NaCl concentration group compared to 50 g/L group (Figure 6b).
Unlike glycine betaine, the addition of trehalose did not significantly decrease the intracellular K+ concentration at 50, 100, 200, 250 g/L NaCl groups (p > 0.05) (Figure 6a,b). This indicated that H. kocurii 2020YC7 was not inclined to absorb trehalose for performing osmotic regulation in conjunction with K+. These results suggested that strain 2020YC7 preferred to transport glycine betaine rather than trehalose from the environment. The decreased trehalose concentration with increasing salinity has been validated in H. paucihalophilus [17] and H. hamelinensis [18]. These studies suggested that the reason for the decrease of trehalose content with NaCl concentration was that the energy cost of synthesizing trehalose was higher than other osmoadaptive mechanisms [12,17]. However, combined with the changing trend of K+ concentration after the addition of trehalose, trehalose did not act as an osmoadaptative solute at high NaCl concentrations (more than 100 g/L) but at relatively low NaCl concentrations (50–100 g/L). Trehalose was derived from polysaccharides in strain 2020YC7. In a low-salt environment, polysaccharide breakdown caused cells collapse, then trehalose was released. This explained why strain 2020YC7 cannot survive in a low-salt environment from another perspective.
In total, the osmoadaptive strategy of H. kocurii 2020YC7 was first “K+ - in”, second glycine betaine uptake, and finally, the de novo biosynthesis of trehalose via treS. The osmoadaptative mechanism of H. kocurii 2020YC7 was summarized as Figure 7.

4. Conclusions

Uptake of K+ and glycine betaine and biosynthesis of trehalose were the main osmoadaptive mechanisms in halophilic archaea H. kocurii 2020YC7. The transporters of K+ and glycine betaine were activated at an external NaCl concentration between 100–150 g/L. Uptake of K+ was the main osmoadaptative mechanism employed by 2020YC7 at 100–200 g/L NaCl. With exogenous addition of glycine betaine, glycine betaine functioned as the primary osmotic solute while intracellular K+ declined between 200 and 250 g/L NaCl. The intracellular content of trehalose was significantly increased at 50–100 g/L NaCl, indicating the enhanced degradation of polysaccharides in a relatively hypotonic environment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes13060939/s1, Table S1: Primer sequences of osmoadaptive genes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L., N.Y. and R.D.; methodology, N.Y. and R.D.; software, R.D.; validation, J.L., N.Y. and R.D.; formal analysis, R.D.; investigation, R.D.; resources, N.Y.; data curation, R.D.; writing—original draft preparation, R.D.; writing—review and editing, N.Y., J.L. and R.D.; visualization, N.Y.; supervision, J.L. and N.Y.; project administration, J.L.; funding acquisition, J.L. and N.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, China [grant number XDB42000000] and the Young Scientists Fund of LMBB, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao), China [grant number YQ2018NO04].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All the gene accession numbers mentioned in the text are available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information databases and listed in Table S1.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Wenjie Yu and Mengjie Zhang for their help in the experimental method, and Weiying Luan for their support in the grammatical revision of the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Oren, A. Life at High Salt Concentrations; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 421–440. [Google Scholar]
  2. Oren, A. Microbial life at high salt concentrations: Phylogenetic and metabolic diversity. Saline Syst. 2008, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Deole, R.; Challacombe, J.; Raiford, D.W.; Hoff, W.D. An Extremely Halophilic Proteobacterium Combines a Highly Acidic Proteome with a Low Cytoplasmic Potassium Content. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Madigan, M.T.; Martinko, J.M.; Stahl, D.A.; Clark, D.P. Brock Biology of Microorganisms, 13th ed.; Pearson Education: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. Grant, W.D. Life at low water activity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2004, 359, 1249–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Hou, J.; Cui, H.L. In Vitro Antioxidant, Antihemolytic, and Anticancer Activity of the Carotenoids from Halophilic Archaea. Curr. Microbiol. 2017, 75, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lazrak, T.; Wolff, G.; Albrecht, A.M.; Nakatani, Y.; Ourisson, G.; Kates, M. Bacterioruberins reinforce reconstituted Halobacterium lipid membranes. BBA—Biomembr. 1988, 939, 160–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. D’Souza, S.E.; Altekar, W.; D’Souza, S.F. Adaptive response of Haloferax mediterranei to low concentrations of NaCl (<20%) in the growth medium. Arch. Microbiol. 1997, 168, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Brown, A.D. Microbial water stress. Bacteriol. Rev 1976, 40, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Galinski, E.; Trüper, H. Microbial behaviour in salt-stressed ecosystems. Fems Microbiol. Rev. 1994, 15, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Csonka, L.N. A third L-proline permease in Salmonella typhimurium which functions in media of elevated osmotic strength. J. Bacteriol. 1982, 151, 1433–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Oren, A. Bioenergetic Aspects of Halophilism. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1999, 63, 334–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lanyi, J.K. Salt-Dependent Properties ofProteins fromExtremely Halophilic Bacteria. Bacteriol. Rev. 1974, 38, 272–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Epstein, W. The roles and regulation of potassium in bacteria. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 2003, 75, 293. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Martin, D.D.; Ciulla, R.A.; Roberts, M.F. Osmoadaptation in Archaea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 1815–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Oren, A. Halophilic Archaea. In Encyclopedia of Microbiology, 4th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  17. Youssef, N.H.; Savage-Ashlock, K.N.; McCully, A.L.; Luedtke, B.; Shaw, E.I.; Hoff, W.D.; Elshahed, M.S. Trehalose/2-sulfotrehalose biosynthesis and glycine-betaine uptake are widely spread mechanisms for osmoadaptation in the Halobacteriales. ISME J. Emultidisciplin. J. Microb. Ecol. 2014, 8, 636–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Goh, F.; Jeon, Y.J.; Barrow, K.; Neilan, B.A.; Burns, B.P. Osmoadaptive Strategies of the Archaeon Halococcus hamelinensis Isolated from a Hypersaline Stromatolite Environment. Astrobiology 2011, 11, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Desmarais, D.; Jablonski, P.E.; Fedarko, N.S.; Roberts, M.F. 2-Sulfotrehalose, a novel osmolyte in haloalkaliphilic archaea. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Avonce, N.; Mendoza-Vargas, A.; Morett, E.; Iturriaga, G. Insights on the evolution of trehalose biosynthesis. BMC Evol. Biol. 2006, 6, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Farwick, M.; Siewe, R.M.; Kramer, A. Glycine betaine uptake after hyperosmotic shift in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 4690–4695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Rudulier, D.L.; Strom, A.R.; Dandekar, A.M.; Smith, L.T.; Valentine, R.C. Molecular Biology of Osmoregulation. Science 1984, 224, 1064–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sakamoto, A. The role of glycine betaine in the protection of plants from stress: Clues from transgenic plant. Plant Cell Environ. 1998, 25, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, T.; Murata, N. Enhancement of tolerance of abiotic stress by metabolic engineering of betaines and other compatible solutes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yancey, P.H.; Clark, M.E.; Hand, S.C.; Bowlus, R.D.; Somero, G.N. Living with Water Stress: Environment of Osmolyte System. Science 1982, 217, 1212–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Baldwin, W.W.; Myer, R.; Kung, T.; Anderson, E.; Koch, A.L. Growth and buoyant density of Escherichia coli at very low osmolarities. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 235–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Cayley, S.; Lewis, B.A.; Guttman, H.J.; Record, M.T., Jr. Characterization of the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli K-12 as a function of external osmolarity: Implications for protein-DNA interactions in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 222, 281–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Csonka, L.N. Physiological and genetic responses of bacteria to osmotic stress. Microbiol. Rev. 1989, 53, 121–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Saum, S.H.; Muller, V. Salinity-dependent switching of osmolyte strategies in a moderately halophilic bacterium: Glutamate induces proline biosynthesis in Halobacillus halophilus. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Deole, R.; Hoff, W.D. A potassium chloride to glycine betaine osmoprotectant switch in the extreme halophile Halorhodospira halophila. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Roesser, M.; Müller, V. Osmoadaptation in bacteria and archaea: Common principles and differences. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 3, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kokoeva, M.V. A novel mode of sensory transduction in archaea: Binding protein-mediated chemotaxis towards osmoprotectants and amino acids. Embo J. 2014, 21, 2312–2322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Regev, R.; Peri, I.; Gilboa, H.; Avidor, Y. 13C NMR study of the interrelation between synthesis and uptake of compatible solutes in two moderately halophilic eubacteria. Bacterium Ba1 and Vibro costicola. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1990, 278, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ashburner, M.; Ball, C.A.; Blake, J.A.; Botstein, D.; Butler, H.; Cherry, J.M.; Davis, A.P.; Dolinski, K.; Dwight, S.S.; Eppig, J.T. Gene Ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Minoru, K.; Susumu, G.; Shuichi, K.; Yasushi, O.; Masahiro, H. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, D277. [Google Scholar]
  36. Galperin, M.Y.; Makarova, K.S.; Wolf, Y.I.; Koonin, E.V. Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D261–D269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Li, W.; Jaroszewski, L.; Godzik, A. Tolerating some redundancy significantly speeds up clustering of large protein databases. Bioinformatics 2002, 18, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Saier, M.H.; Reddy, V.S.; Tamang, D.G.; Vastermark, A. The Transporter Classification Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 42, D251–D258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Amos, B.; Rolf, A. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 45–48. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ye, J.; Coulouris, G.; Zaretskaya, I.; Cutcutache, I.; Rozen, S.; Madden, T.L. Primer-BLAST: A tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinform. 2012, 13, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; Higgins, D.G. Clustal W and Clustal X Version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Gutiérrez, M.; Castillo, A.M.; Pagaling, E.; Heaphy, S.; Kamekura, M.; Xue, Y.; Ma, Y.; Cowan, D.A.; Jones, B.E.; Grant, W.D. Halorubrum kocurii sp. nov., an archaeon isolated from a saline lake. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 2031–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cui, H.L.; Tohty, D.; Zhou, P.J.; Liu, S.J. Halorubrum lipolyticum sp. nov. and Halorubrum aidingense sp. nov., isolated from two salt lakes in Xin-Jiang, China. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 1631–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Becker, E.A.; Seitzer, P.M.; Tritt, A.; Larsen, D.; Krusor, M.; Yao, A.I.; Wu, D.; Madern, D.; Eisen, J.A.; Darling, A.E. Phylogenetically Driven Sequencing of Extremely Halophilic Archaea Reveals Strategies for Static and Dynamic Osmo-response. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Schlösser, A.; Meldorf, M.; Stumpe, S.; Bakker, E.P.; Epstein, W. TrkH and its homolog, TrkG, determine the specificity and kinetics of cation transport by the Trk system of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 1908–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Parra-Lopez, C.; Baer, M.T.; Groisman, E.A. Molecular genetic analysis of a locus required for resistance to antimicrobial peptides in Salmonella typhimurium. Embo J. 1993, 12, 4053–4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nakamura, T.; Yamamuro, N.; Stumpe, S.; Unemoto, T.; Bakker, E.P. Cloning of the trkAH gene cluster and characterization of the Trk K+-uptake system of Vibrio alginolyticus. Microbiology 1998, 144, 2281–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Meury, J.; Kohiyama, M. ATP is required for K+ active transport in the archaebacterium Haloferax volcanii. Arch. Microbiol. 1989, 151, 530–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pan, Y.T.; Carroll, J.D.; Asano, N.; Pastuszak, I.; E Da Vana, V.K.; Elbein, A.D. Trehalose synthase converts glycogen to trehalose. FEBS J. 2010, 275, 3408–3420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kalscheuer, R.; Weinrick, B.; Veeraraghavan, U.; Besra, G.S.; Jacobs, W.B., Jr. Trehalose-recycling ABC transporter LpqY-SugA-SugB-SugC is essential for virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 21761–21766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Holler, A.C. Stable Starch Solutions for Iodometry. Anal. Chem. 1955, 27, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jie, F.; Liu, B.; Zhang, Z.; Yan, R.; Yang, L.; Gan, F.; Huang, Y.; Chen, X.; Shen, P.; Wang, L. The Complete Genome Sequence of Natrinema sp. J7-2, a Haloarchaeon Capable of Growth on Synthetic Media without Amino Acid Supplements. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41621. [Google Scholar]
  54. Reed, R.H. Microbial water stress physiology: Principles and perspectives. Trends Biotechnol. 1990, 8, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vreeland, R.H. Mechanisms of Halotolerance in Microorganisms. CRC Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 1987, 14, 311–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Christian, J.; Waltho, J.A. Solute concentrations within cells of halophilic and non-halophilic bacteria. BBA—Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1962, 65, 506–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mojica, F.J.; Cisneros, E.; Ferrer, C.; Rodríguez-Valera, F.; Juez, G. Osmotically induced response in representatives of halophilic prokaryotes: The bacterium Halomonas elongata and the archaeon Haloferax volcanii. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 5471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Oren, A.; Heldal, M.; Norland, S.; Galinski, E.A. Intracellular ion and organic solute concentrations of the extremely halophilic bacterium Salinibacter ruber. Extremophiles 2002, 6, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Pérezfillol, M.; Rodríguezvalera, F. Potassium ion accumulation in cells of different halobacteria. Microbiologia 1986, 2, 73. [Google Scholar]
  60. Galinski, E.A.; Trüper, H.G. Betaine, a compatible solute in the extremely halophilic phototrophic bacterium Ectothiorhodospira halochloris. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1982, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Imhoff, J.F.; Rodriguez-Valera, F. Betaine is the main compatible solute of halophilic eubacteria. J. Bacteriol. 1984, 160, 478–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Courtenay, E.S.; Capp, M.W.; Anderson, C.F.; Record, M.T., Jr. Vapor Pressure Osmometry Studies of OsmolyteProtein Interactions: Implications for the Action of Osmoprotectants in Vivo and for the Interpretation of "Osmotic Stress" Experiments in Vitro. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 4455–4471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kunte, H.J.; Trüper, H.; Stan-Lotter, H. Halophilic microorganisms. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2004, 4, 185–200. [Google Scholar]
Genes 13 00939 g001 550
Figure 1. Growth status after 48 h incubation (a) in YCM2 medium, growth curve (b) and bacterioruberin accumulation (c) in YCM1 medium of H. kocurii 2020YC7 at 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 g/L NaCl concentration. Maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm method phylogenetic tree (d), based on 16s rRNA gene sequence of H.kocurii 2020YC7 (“▲” marked), and compared with Halorubrum sp. YIM 93749 (JF449434) Halorubrum sp. strain LN27 (MN829451), Halorubrum sp. PG-1 (KJ644278), Halorubrum saccharovorum strain JCM 8865 (NR_113484), Halorubrum sp. LZY-12 (KJ644292), Halorubrum lipolyticum strain JCM 13559 (NR_113480), H. kocurii JCM 14978 (NR_113215), Halorubrum lacusprofundi ATCC 49239 (NR_074194), Halorubrum sp. YC-9 (JN216854), Halobaculum gomorrense JCM 9908 (AB477983), Salinigranum rubrum GX10 (GU951431).
Figure 1. Growth status after 48 h incubation (a) in YCM2 medium, growth curve (b) and bacterioruberin accumulation (c) in YCM1 medium of H. kocurii 2020YC7 at 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 g/L NaCl concentration. Maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm method phylogenetic tree (d), based on 16s rRNA gene sequence of H.kocurii 2020YC7 (“▲” marked), and compared with Halorubrum sp. YIM 93749 (JF449434) Halorubrum sp. strain LN27 (MN829451), Halorubrum sp. PG-1 (KJ644278), Halorubrum saccharovorum strain JCM 8865 (NR_113484), Halorubrum sp. LZY-12 (KJ644292), Halorubrum lipolyticum strain JCM 13559 (NR_113480), H. kocurii JCM 14978 (NR_113215), Halorubrum lacusprofundi ATCC 49239 (NR_074194), Halorubrum sp. YC-9 (JN216854), Halobaculum gomorrense JCM 9908 (AB477983), Salinigranum rubrum GX10 (GU951431).
Genes 13 00939 g001
Genes 13 00939 g002 550
Figure 2. The trehalose synthesis pathway of treS in H. kocurii 2020YC7.
Figure 2. The trehalose synthesis pathway of treS in H. kocurii 2020YC7.
Genes 13 00939 g002
Genes 13 00939 g003 550
Figure 3. The relative expression levels of potassium uptake genes trkH, trkA, kch and output gene kefB (a), amylase/trehalose synthesis gene treS, compatible solutes transport genes sugA and BCCT family gene (b) in different salt concentration without exogenous compatible solutes.
Figure 3. The relative expression levels of potassium uptake genes trkH, trkA, kch and output gene kefB (a), amylase/trehalose synthesis gene treS, compatible solutes transport genes sugA and BCCT family gene (b) in different salt concentration without exogenous compatible solutes.
Genes 13 00939 g003
Genes 13 00939 g004 550
Figure 4. Intracellular K+ (a), trehalose (b) and glycine betaine (c) concentration changes with the different NaCl concentrations. “A, B, C, D” refers to the significance analysis between groups with different NaCl concentrations (50–250 g/L). “a, b, c, d” refers to the significance analysis between groups with no extras, add 1% extra trehalose and add 1% glycine betaine.
Figure 4. Intracellular K+ (a), trehalose (b) and glycine betaine (c) concentration changes with the different NaCl concentrations. “A, B, C, D” refers to the significance analysis between groups with different NaCl concentrations (50–250 g/L). “a, b, c, d” refers to the significance analysis between groups with no extras, add 1% extra trehalose and add 1% glycine betaine.
Genes 13 00939 g004
Genes 13 00939 g005 550
Figure 5. The relative expression levels of potassium uptake genes trkH, trkA, kch and output gene kefB (a), amylase/trehalose synthesis gene treS, compatible solutes transport genes sugA and BCCT family gene (b) in different salt concentration with adding exogenous glycine betaine.
Figure 5. The relative expression levels of potassium uptake genes trkH, trkA, kch and output gene kefB (a), amylase/trehalose synthesis gene treS, compatible solutes transport genes sugA and BCCT family gene (b) in different salt concentration with adding exogenous glycine betaine.
Genes 13 00939 g005
Genes 13 00939 g006 550
Figure 6. The relative expression levels of potassium uptake genes trkH, trkA, kch and output gene kefB (a), amylase/trehalose synthesis gene treS, compatible solutes transport genes sugA and BCCT family gene (b) in different salt concentration with adding exogenous trehalose.
Figure 6. The relative expression levels of potassium uptake genes trkH, trkA, kch and output gene kefB (a), amylase/trehalose synthesis gene treS, compatible solutes transport genes sugA and BCCT family gene (b) in different salt concentration with adding exogenous trehalose.
Genes 13 00939 g006
Genes 13 00939 g007 550
Figure 7. Overview of the halophilic mechanism of halophilic archaea H. kocurii 2020YC7. “GB” referred to glycine betaine and “Tre” referred to trehalsoe. “CruF” referred to carotenoid 1,2-hydratase.
Figure 7. Overview of the halophilic mechanism of halophilic archaea H. kocurii 2020YC7. “GB” referred to glycine betaine and “Tre” referred to trehalsoe. “CruF” referred to carotenoid 1,2-hydratase.
Genes 13 00939 g007
Table
Table 1. General features of Halorubrum sp. 2020YC7 genome.
Table 1. General features of Halorubrum sp. 2020YC7 genome.
FeatureChromosome Characteristics
Genome topologycircular
Genome size (bp)3,085,069
G+C content (%)68.22
Protein coding genes3513
tRNA genes48
rRNA operons5 s, 16 s, 23 s
Table
Table 2. Genes for uptake and discharge of potassium and sodium, biosynthesis and uptake of trehalose, and uptake of glycine betaine in H. kocurii 2020YC7.
Table 2. Genes for uptake and discharge of potassium and sodium, biosynthesis and uptake of trehalose, and uptake of glycine betaine in H. kocurii 2020YC7.
FunctionGenBank Number
Potassium uptake
Trk potassium uptake systemOM942767, OM942768, OM942769, OM942770, OM942771, OM942772, OM942773, OM942774, OM942775, OM942776, OM942777, OM942778
Potassium voltage gate channel (kch)OM942779
Potassium discharge
Cation:proton antiporter (kefB)OM942780
Sodium uptake
V-type sodium ATPase (ntp)OM942781, OM942782, OM942783, OM942784, OM942785
Sodium discharge
Na+/H+ antiporter (nhaC)OM942786
Multicomponent Na+:H+ antiporter (mrp)OM942787, OM942788, OM942789, OM942790, OM942791,
OM942792, OM942793, OM942794, OM942795
Trehalose biosynthesis
Amylase/trehalose synthase (treS)OM942796
Trehalose uptake
Sugar ABC transporter permease (sugA)OM942797
Betaine uptake
Betaine/carnitine/choline transporter (bcct)OM942798, OM942799
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ding, R.; Yang, N.; Liu, J. The Osmoprotectant Switch of Potassium to Compatible Solutes in an Extremely Halophilic Archaea Halorubrum kocurii 2020YC7. Genes 2022, 13, 939. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13060939

AMA Style

Ding R, Yang N, Liu J. The Osmoprotectant Switch of Potassium to Compatible Solutes in an Extremely Halophilic Archaea Halorubrum kocurii 2020YC7. Genes. 2022; 13(6):939. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13060939

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ding, Runting, Na Yang, and Jianguo Liu. 2022. "The Osmoprotectant Switch of Potassium to Compatible Solutes in an Extremely Halophilic Archaea Halorubrum kocurii 2020YC7" Genes 13, no. 6: 939. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13060939

APA Style

Ding, R., Yang, N., & Liu, J. (2022). The Osmoprotectant Switch of Potassium to Compatible Solutes in an Extremely Halophilic Archaea Halorubrum kocurii 2020YC7. Genes, 13(6), 939. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13060939

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop