Next Article in Journal
MicroRNA-106a-5p Inhibited C2C12 Myogenesis via Targeting PIK3R1 and Modulating the PI3K/AKT Signaling
Next Article in Special Issue
Strengthening the One Health Agenda: The Role of Molecular Epidemiology in Aspergillus Threat Management
Previous Article in Journal
SEGF: A Novel Method for Gene Fusion Detection from Single-End Next-Generation Sequencing Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Transcription Factor ZafA Regulates the Homeostatic and Adaptive Response to Zinc Starvation in Aspergillus fumigatus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Host-Pathogen Interactions Mediated by MDR Transporters in Fungi: As Pleiotropic as it Gets!

1
Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
2
Biological Sciences Research Group, iBB—Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2018, 9(7), 332; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070332
Submission received: 18 May 2018 / Revised: 21 June 2018 / Accepted: 27 June 2018 / Published: 2 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fungal Pathogenesis in Humans: The Growing Threat)

Abstract

:
Fungal infections caused by Candida, Aspergillus, and Cryptococcus species are an increasing problem worldwide, associated with very high mortality rates. The successful prevalence of these human pathogens is due to their ability to thrive in stressful host niche colonization sites, to tolerate host immune system-induced stress, and to resist antifungal drugs. This review focuses on the key role played by multidrug resistance (MDR) transporters, belonging to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC), and the major facilitator superfamilies (MFS), in mediating fungal resistance to pathogenesis-related stresses. These clearly include the extrusion of antifungal drugs, with C. albicans CDR1 and MDR1 genes, and corresponding homologs in other fungal pathogens, playing a key role in this phenomenon. More recently, however, clues on the transcriptional regulation and physiological roles of MDR transporters, including the transport of lipids, ions, and small metabolites, have emerged, linking these transporters to important pathogenesis features, such as resistance to host niche environments, biofilm formation, immune system evasion, and virulence. The wider view of the activity of MDR transporters provided in this review highlights their relevance beyond drug resistance and the need to develop therapeutic strategies that successfully face the challenges posed by the pleiotropic nature of these transporters.

1. Introduction

Species belonging to the Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, and Candida genera constitute the most relevant human fungal pathogens. Infections caused by these pathogens are especially severe in immunocompromised patients, particularly HIV-infected patients, cancer patients, and transplant recipients [1,2,3]. Candida albicans and Candida glabrata are the most prevalent of the pathogenic Candida species, being responsible for more than 400,000 life-threatening infections worldwide every year [4], as well as persistent mucosal infections [5,6]. Aspergillus fumigatus is the most frequent pathogenic species of the Aspergillus genus found to cause life-threatening pulmonary disease [7]. Central nervous system manifestations of meningitis or meningoencephalitis are recurrent manifestations associated with Cryptococcus neoformans infections [8].
One very resourceful feature of pathogenic fungi is the expression of multidrug resistance (MDR) transporters, which allow the development of antifungal drug resistance, being responsible for many cases of therapeutic failure [9,10]. MDR transporters belong mainly to two superfamilies, the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) and the major facilitator superfamilies (MFS). The ABC transporters have two main domains, each including a transmembrane domain (TMD) with six trans-membrane segments and a nucleotide-binding domain (NBD). This structure usually allows the transport of different molecules against an electrochemical gradient at the direct expense of ATP hydrolysis [11,12,13]. On the other hand, the transport performed by MFS transporters is driven by a proton-motive force. The MFS-MDR transporters are clustered into two families in fungi, the drug:H+ antiporter 1 (DHA1), including 12 transmembrane segment proteins, and the drug:H+ antiporter 2 (DHA2), including 14 transmembrane segment proteins [14]. Numerous molecules are proposed to be transported by MDR transporters of both superfamilies, including steroids, lipids, anti-cancer molecules, antifungals, herbicides, antibiotics, fluorescent dyes, carbohydrates, metabolites, neurotransmitters, nucleosides, amino acids, peptides, organic and inorganic anions, cations, and various Kreb’s cycle intermediates [15,16], strongly suggesting either a promiscuous nature for MDR transporters or that they may indirectly affect the accumulation of these very diverse compounds, as a consequence of the transport of their physiological substrates.
The best-studied families of fungal drug efflux pumps are those from the model yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae [17], in part, because it was the first eukaryote to have its genome sequenced [18]. In this model eukaryote, the ABC transporters have been classified into three main subfamilies, namely, the pleiotropic drug resistance (PDR), MDR, and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP), composing a total of 21 ABC drug resistance-related transporters [17,19]. Additionally, a total of 22 MFS drug transporters were reported in the genome of S. cerevisiae [20].
Genome sequencing has revealed that there is a wide repertoire of predicted ABC drug efflux pumps among pathogenic fungal species. However, only a few of these proteins have been functionally characterised, including those reported to be involved in multidrug resistance in human pathogens, such as Candida albicans [21,22,23], Candida glabrata [24,25,26,27], A. fumigatus [28,29], and C. neoformans [30,31]. Gaur et al. [32] constructed a complete inventory of ABC proteins in the genome of C. albicans, based on sequence similarities with ABC systems in other living organisms, and they found that C. albicans possesses 28 putative ABC proteins. The genome of the second most prevalent Candida species, C. glabrata, is predicted to have approximately two-thirds the number of ABC transporters predicted for C. albicans (18) [33]. Otherwise, much larger numbers of ABC proteins are predicted in the genomes of A. fumigatus and C. neoformans. The A. fumigatus genome is predicted to encode 49 ABC transporters, 35 of which are predicted to be multidrug efflux pumps [7,34]. C. neoformans is predicted to encode 54 ABC transporters [35].
The MFS transporters constitute the largest group of secondary active transporters, functioning as uniporters, symporters, or antiporters [16]. A subset of these transporters is involved in drug efflux [36]. Costa et al. [20] listed the DHA-MFS transporters found to occur, based on phylogenetic analysis with the model yeast S. cerevisiae, in the pathogenic yeasts of the Candida genus and also in C. neoformans, and A. fumigatus. Within the DHA1-MFS family, it was found 18, 10, 9, and 54 predicted transporters in the genome of C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. neoformans, and A. fumigatus, respectively. Regarding the DHA2-MFS family, 8, 5, 7, and 32 were found as predicted transporters in the genome of C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. neoformans, and A. fumigatus, respectively.
Although the main studied function of MDR transporters in fungi is related to the efflux of antifungal drugs, whose importance in azole resistance is reviewed herein, these transporters have different physiological roles that are also determinant for the survival of fungal pathogens in the human host. In this review, a collection of the identified physiological functions of the MDR transporters is compiled, highlighting how certain roles are necessary for the adaptation of fungi to the host niches, as well as in the fight against stresses imposed by the immune response of the host. Clues on the function of MDR transporters are also extracted from the gathered information on their transcription regulators.

2. MDR Transporters in Fungal Pathogens: Mediators of Azole Drug Resistance

Efflux-mediated drug resistance appears to be the most widespread mechanism of azole drug resistance among pathogenic fungal species [37,38,39]. The ABC drug efflux pumps have, in general, been linked to greater clinical significance [40]. However, and unlike what has been observed for ABC drug efflux pumps, which are widespread from bacteria to man, the MFS-MDR family appears to be strictly conserved within bacteria and fungi, turning these proteins into interesting candidates for targets for the development of new antifungal drugs [20].
The ABC transporters implicated in azole drug resistance in C. albicans are described as Candida Drug Resistance (CDR) genes , with CaCDR1 encoding the best characterised multidrug transporter [41]. Together with CaCDR1, CaCDR2 also contributes to azole resistance mediated by increased drug efflux [23,42]. In the non-albicans Candida species, the CDR genes have also been shown to play a role in azole resistance. In Candida dubliniensis, CdCDR1 is overexpressed in the fluconazole-resistant strains [43]. In addition, CDR1 is also induced in azole resistant Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis clinical isolates [44,45,46]. In turn, the expression of the ABC transporters CgCdr1 and CgCdr2 in C. glabrata is related with the frequent azole resistance observed in this species [47]. Additionally, the ABC transporters CgSnq2 and CgYor1 have also been implicated in azole stress response in C. glabrata [26,48]. Candida krusei, which displays intrinsic azole resistance, harbors two ABC drug efflux pumps (CkAbc1 and CkAbc2) that are upregulated during azole stress [49]. Candida krusei CkAbc1 is involved in intrinsic fluconazole resistance [50] and confers fluconazole resistance through drug efflux upon overexpression in S. cerevisiae [51]. CkABC2 expression was correlated with itraconazole resistance [52].
In A. fumigatus, the mechanisms of antifungal resistance have deserved more intensive investigations in the past ten years. Alteration of the azole target cyp51A is a major mechanism in clinical and environmental isolates. However, there are now also several non-cyp51A-mediated azole-resistant isolates in which the underlying mechanisms remain partially unsolved [53]. The reduced intracellular accumulation of drugs has also been correlated with the overexpression of MDR efflux transporter genes in this pathogen [38]. In contrast to the extensive number of genes predicted to encode transporters in A. fumigatus [54], there are very few studies characterizing these transporters and their relationship with multidrug resistance. However, decreased intracellular accumulation of itraconazole was verified in A. fumigatus, hinting for a possible participation of efflux pumps in azole resistance in this fungus. Slaven et al. [29] and Nascimento et al. [55] have characterised AfuAtrF and AfuMdr4, respectively, as ABC transporters, and correlated them with itraconazole resistance. Additionally, genes encoding the set of transporters AfuAbcA-E, AtrF, and AtrI are induced during voriconazole stress [53,56].
In C. neoformans, the reduced intracellular accumulation of drugs has been correlated with the overexpression of MDR efflux transporter genes [39]. The genome of this pathogen is predicted to encode nearly 86 DHA-MFS transporters and 54 ABC transporters. Nevertheless, only three efflux pumps have been related with drug extrusion, CnAfr1, CnAfr2, and CnMdr1 [30,57,58]. A recent study by Chang et al. [57] demonstrated that CnAfr1 is a crucial for azole efflux and is important for handling other xenobiotics, including cycloheximide, nocodazole, and trichostatin A. The overexpression of the C. neoformans ABC transporter CnAfr1 is known to underlie clinical fluconazole resistance [31], while CnMdr1 confers itraconazole resistance upon overexpression in S. cerevisiae [51]. However, these three efflux pumps appeared to play no clear role in susceptibility towards amphotericin B and 5-fluorocytosine.
Although transporter-mediated azole resistance has been initially associated with ABC drug efflux pumps, further insights have shown that MFS-MDR transporters also play a relevant role in this phenomenon. In fact, several transporters from the MFS-MDR family are also relevant players in clinical azole resistance phenotypes, as is the case with the C. albicans CaMdr1. Considered a major mediator of azole resistance, it is overexpressed in some resistant clinical isolates, underlying fluconazole resistance [59]. A similar case was also identified in Candida dubliniensis, with increased CdMDR1 transcript levels associated with clinical resistance phenotypes to fluconazole, but not to ketoconazole [43,60]. Moreover, C. parapsilosis azole resistant clinical isolates overexpress CpMdr1 [44,45], and such a response is also observed during the in vitro induction of azole resistance [61]. Resistant clinical isolates of C. tropicalis were found to overexpress the CtMdr1 transporter [46,62]. The C. albicans MFS transporter CaFlu1 confers fluconazole resistance in S. cerevisiae, but it plays a secondary role in C. albicans [63,64].
A relevant role of MFS efflux pumps in azole response is also observed in C. glabrata, translated by the increased expression of CgAqr1, CgQdr2, CgTpo1_1, and CgTpo3, found to mediate clotrimazole resistance in clinical isolates [10]. These transporters were previously found to mediate azole resistance in laboratory strains as well [24,25,27,65]. Interestingly, the level of correlation between the increased expression of these transporters and the azole drug resistance was similar to that observed for the CgCDR2 gene, thus highlighting the importance of MFS-MDR transporters in the clinical setting [10]. More recently, the MFS-MDR transporters CgTpo1_2, CgFlr1, and CgFlr2, were also found to confer azole resistance, by mediating the decreased intracellular accumulation of these drugs [65,66]. In A. fumigatus, the MFS transporters can potentially have a relevant role in azole resistance, since AfuMdr3 displays an increased expression in itraconazole-resistant mutants [55]. In addition, three transporters (AfuMfsA–C) are highly expressed during voriconazole stress [56].
Within the MFS-MDR transporters, only eight (CaMdr1, CaFlu1, CaNag3, CaNag4, CaNag6, CaQdr1, CaQdr2, and CaQdr3), seven (CgAqr1, CgFlr1, CgFlr2, CgTpo1_1, CgTpo1_2, CgTpo3, CgQdr2), three (CNA07070, CNC03290, and CND00440/aflT), and six (gliA, mfs56, Mdr3, and MfsA–C), were already characterised in C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. neoformans, and A. fumigatus, respectively [20].
Not only is there a wide variety of MDR transporters involved in azole resistance in several fungal pathogens, but the regulation of their expression is also diverse. The most prominent mechanism of azole resistance acquisition involves increased drug efflux pumps gene expression, which is mediated by master regulators of azole resistance. They include Tac1 and Mrr1 in C. albicans and related species; and CgPdr1 in C. glabrata. These transcription factors are subjected to gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in their protein sequence, which result in hyperactive forms, responsible for constitutive increased transcription of their target genes [44,61,67,68,69,70,71,72]. Additionally, each transcription factor regulates its own expression, increasing their own transcript levels in response to azole stress [67,73,74,75]. ABC transporters in particular have been first described as targets of CaTac1 and CgPdr1 [26,48,76,77,78], but several MFS transporters are also activated by CaMrr1 and CgPdr1 [65,66,71,72], thus reinforcing the role of multiple transporters in azole resistance pathways.
Other than mutations in transcriptional regulators, another regulatory mechanism mediating azole resistance is chromosomal abnormalities. These can include loss of heterozygosity (LOH), chromosomal aneuploidies, or increased gene copy number. Development of azole resistance by LOH events is known to occur in C. albicans, namely in the genomic regions containing CaTAC1 or CaMRR1. Mutations in MRR1 followed by the loss of heterozygosity, contribute to the overexpression of this gene [72]. This phenomenon also occurs to give rise to CaTAC1 homozygous mutations because of the loss of heterozygosity in chromosome 5 [70]. Chromosomal rearrangements also contribute to the amplification of the CaTAC1 gene [79]. In C. glabrata, the existence of differential chromosome configurations and segmental aneuploidies was observed in azole-resistant strains [80]. Alterations in chromosome copy number is related with C. neoformans resistance to azoles. In particular, CnAfr1 overexpression due to chromosome 1 duplication results in resistant populations in response to selection [81].
Although the transcriptional regulation of MDR transporters in A. fumigatus and C. neoformans have not yet been deeply studied, Hagiwara and colleagues [82] reported a novel Zn2–Cys6 transcription factor, AfuAtrR, as playing a key role in an azole resistance mechanism of A. fumigatus, by regulating the drug target AfuCyp51A (14-α sterol demethylase) and the putative drug efflux pump AfuCdr1B (AfuAbcC) expression. Additionally, through the screening of a library of transcription factor mutants, different transcription factors regulating the expression of efflux pumps genes in response to fluconazole exposure were identified in C. neoformans. These include CnCRZ1 and CnYAP1, which had been previously characterised as transcription factors functioning in response to environmental stress, including thermal, hypoxic, and fluconazole, as well as oxidative stress in C. neoformans [83,84]. Chang and co-workers [57] determined that CnAfr1 expression was positively regulated by CnCrz1 and CnYap1 in response to fluconazole.

3. MDR Transporters in Fungal Pathogens: Mediating the Transport of Physiological Substrates as a Way to Adapt to Host Niches

Fungal pathogens have different strategies to colonize, survive, and infect the human host. Each species has preferential niches, developing specific mechanisms that allow adaptation to each microenvironment and evasion from the immune system. For instance, C. albicans exhibits different morphologies to better adapt to each niche, for example switching from the hyphal morphology used to penetrate host epithelial cells to the yeast shape to circulate in the bloodstream [85]. The preferential niches for C. albicans and other Candida species include the oral cavity, the skin, the urogenital, and gastrointestinal tracts, whose infection might lead to disseminated disease [85,86]. In the case of the Cryptococcus species, the preferable niches of the human host include the pulmonary tissue and the central nervous system. The establishment of a Cryptococcus invasive disease often starts with infection of the lung tissue, followed by invasion of the bloodstream, and subsequent dissemination of Cryptococcus cells to the central nervous system [87,88]. Likewise, A. fumigatus infects primarily the lungs, disseminating from there to any possible organ [89].
In each specific niche, different stresses like heat shock, osmotic, oxidative and nitrosative stresses, pH variations, and hypoxia might be encountered, forcing the development of stress resistance mechanisms by fungal pathogens [90]. Given the different stresses and different nutrient availability, fungal pathogens must have increased flexibility to adapt and respond to the environment. This wide capacity of metabolic adaptation and resistance to stress also promotes virulence in fungal pathogens, as it lessens their vulnerability to the surrounding environment [86].
In the oral cavity, different factors protect the host from the presence of fungal pathogens. First of all, different cell types are ready to identify them, including polymorphonuclear leukocytes, monocytes/macrophages, non-major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted CD8+ T cells, and oral epithelial cells [91]. Upon the presence of Candida cells, the epithelial cells from the oral mucosa induce expression of a nitric oxide synthase, which leads to increased levels of nitric oxide believed to have a candidacidal activity, helping in the resistance to mucosal candidiasis [91]. These cells are also able to secrete different antimicrobial peptides, including members of the β-defensin family [92]. Additionally, the saliva has powerful antimicrobial peptides, such as histatins. These are known to promote cell cycle disturbance, increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), and loss of cell volume in C. albicans, ultimately leading to the apoptosis of yeast cells. Histatin-1, -3, and -5 are produced by acinar cells present in human salivary glands [93].
The lungs constitute the first site for Cryptococcus infection. This niche also has its strategies of protection against invasion. As a first defense mechanism of the innate immune system is the presence of bronchial and alveolar Type I and Type II epithelial cells that, besides forming a physical barrier, also release several cytokines and chemokines to activate an immunologic response [94]. Also important for this response is the presence in the lung tissue of inflammatory monocytes, alveolar macrophages, dendritic cells, and neutrophils [95,96]. M1 macrophages produce ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), including nitric oxide, known to have anti-cryptococcal properties [96]. Aspergillus fumigatus also enters the host by inhalation, facing the action of alveolar macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells [97,98].
In turn, the vaginal mucosa is a low pH environment with the presence of weak acids, like acetic and lactic acids [99,100], protected by Candida-specific cell-mediated immunity. This immunity is mediated by T helper (Th) 1-type responses [101]. Additionally, the established microbiome present in this niche is also responsible for its protection. A good example is the role of Lactobacillus crispatus in this context, found to mediate the immune response of vaginal epithelial cells deployed in the presence of C. albicans [102].
Although generally associated to multidrug resistance, some MDR transporters have been found to contribute to the adaptation of fungal pathogens to human host niches. This role of MDR transporters seems to be linked to a general function of cellular detoxification, given their ability to catalyse the efflux of antifungal drugs, but also other toxic metabolites present mainly in the stationary phase of cellular growth [103]. Interestingly, the ability to control the concentration of some of these physiological substrates is likely to confer a selective advantage when growing, both as commensals and pathogens in human host niches.
For example, the C. albicans ABC transporter Cdr1 was found to transport steroids. Accumulation assays with radiolabelled β-estradiol and corticosterone have demonstrated the ability of CaCdr1, expressed in the AD1234568 (AD)-CDR1 S. cerevisiae strain, to enhance the efflux of these human steroids, that appear to compete with drugs such as cycloheximide, O-phenanthroline, chloramphenicol, fluconazole, or rhodamine 123 as Cdr1 substrates [104]. However, the transport of [3H]-β-estradiol was not affected by the truncation of domain 12 of CaCdr1, a mutation that affects drug transport, suggesting that Cdr1 displays different binding sites for these different substrates [105]. Interestingly, increased incidence of vulvovaginal candidiasis has been linked to the presence of elevated estrogen levels during pregnancy or to the presence of exogenous estrogens from oral contraceptives [106,107,108,109]. The effect of β-estradiol or ethynyl estradiol, but not α-estradiol or estriol, on the formation of germ tubes has been reported, revealing the specificity of such an induction [110,111]. Candida albicans strain SC5314 and the vaginal isolate GC15 in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-free supplemented with supraphysiological (10−5 M) or physiological (10−10 M) concentrations of 17-β-estradiol and estradiol, respectively, during different time points, exhibit the upregulation of CaCDR1 and CaCDR2. When both genes were disrupted, the C. albicans cells exposed to 17-β-estradiol had a decreased germ tube formation [111]. These evidences point out the importance that MDR efflux pump-mediated resistance to chemical compounds present in human body niches have in the success of fungal infections.
In S. cerevisiae, sterol uptake requires the involvement of the ABC transporters Pdr11 and Aus1. These are necessary for the nonvesicular movement, from the plasma membrane to the endoplasmatic reticulum, a movement needed for the sterol ester synthesis required for sterol uptake [112]. The S. cerevisiae Upc2 transcription factor is known to induce the AUS1 and PDR11 expression under anaerobiosis conditions, when the sterol uptake is essential. The absence of these two genes leads to defects in sterol uptake [113]. Although, in S. cerevisiae, no connection to MDR has been observed for these transporters; in Cryptococcus gattii, Pdr11 was found to be necessary for fluconazole resistance in the VGII clinical strain [114]; and C. glabrata Aus1 has been linked to sterol transport associated with the presence of azole drugs, being upregulated in anaerobic conditions [115]. In fact, sterol uptake was found to be used by C. glabrata strains defective in ergosterol [116] and in C. glabrata clinical isolates [117]. In fact, upon the use of azoles, which affect the production of ergosterol, the sterol uptake response is activated as a resistance mechanism that allows C. glabrata cells to survive ergosterol defects with host sterols, like cholesterol [118]. Sterol uptake might also be necessary for C. glabrata virulence, as Aus1 is necessary in a mice model of disseminated infection, being significantly upregulated in such conditions [115]. Therefore, sterol uptake is an important strategy developed by C. glabrata to survive in the human host, ensuring its virulence and antifungal resistance in mucosal niches.
Major facilitator superfamilies multidrug transporters have also been found to contribute to lipid homeostasis in C. albicans and C. glabrata. The MFS-MDR transporters Qdr1, Qdr2, and Qdr3 of C. albicans were found to be localized in the plasma membrane, with preferential localization of Qdr1 and Qdr2 in lipid rafts. These transporters do not participate in the resistance to any type of known antifungals [119], although their homologs in C. glabrata and in S. cerevisiae are recognized drug transporters [25,120,121,122]. Nevertheless, they seem to have other important functions for the survival of C. albicans. When absent, CaQDR1, CaQDR2, or CaQDR3 lead to the accumulation of phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylserine, as well as of sphingolipids, thus indicating a role of these transporters in lipid homeostasis [119]. On the other hand, the C. glabrata Tpo1_2 MFS-MDR transporter has also been linked to fatty acid and sterol homeostasis, especially during biofilm formation. The absence of CgTPO1_2 upon biofilm formation leads to a decrease of very long fatty acids. Moreover, ergosterol content in the ∆cgtpo1_2 deletion mutant was found to be 30% higher than in its parental strain [123]. This physiological function of lipid transportation in C. glabrata seems to be important for to the adaptation to low pH environments with organic acids, as alterations in the membrane lipid composition have been described as a mechanism to surpass the stress on such environment [124].
The CgTpo1_2 homolog, CgTpo1_1, is also an MFS drug transporter with an interesting proposed role in the survival of C. glabrata in the oral cavity. One of the mechanisms used by the host to resist candidiasis is the release of the antimicrobial peptide histatin-5 in the saliva [93], as described above. Interestingly, the CgTpo1_1 transporter was found to be necessary for the resistance of C. glabrata to this antimicrobial peptide [123]. Another similar player in histatin-5 resistance is the C. albicans Flu1 MFS transporter involved in the resistance towards fluconazole, ketoconazole, and itraconazole [63]. In fact, the absence of CaFLU1 significantly defects cellular growth and biofilm formation upon the exposure to this antimicrobial peptide [125]. Both studies give evidence of the role of MDR transporters’ action against antimicrobial peptides, a usually effective weapon of the human immune system against microbial infections.
The roles of the Ste6 ABC transporter of S. cerevisiae are also different and interesting. This transporter was found to be responsible for the secretion of a lipopeptide mating pheromone, designated a-factor, but also for the resistance of this species to valinomycin, an antibiotic peptide [126]. Interestingly, C. albicans homolog of Ste6, designated Hst6, was found to be able to complement the role of S. cerevisiae Ste6 in a ∆scste6 deletion mutant [127]. Nevertheless, its specific function in C. albicans remains to be discovered, as this species is not known to secrete mating pheromones. On the other hand, the Ste6 homolog in C. neoformans has been shown to be involved in the mating process of this pathogen [128]. In turn, A. fumigatus Afu3g03430, which is also similar to S. cerevisiae Ste6, has been indicated as being involved in iron uptake [129,130,131]. Iron uptake is an important function for the survival of any fungal pathogen, as this cofactor is necessary for several enzymatic reactions and is withheld in the human host as a protective mechanism against microbial infections [132].
Another example of the importance of MDR transporters in the adaptation to human niches is their role in polyamine resistance. Polyamines like spermine, spermidine, and putrescine are essential organic polycations, which are usually involved in the regulation of nucleic acid and protein synthesis, as well as cell growth [14]. The plasma membrane MFS-MDR transporters, Tpo1–4 and Qdr3, were the first identified as important players in the resistance to polyamines in S. cerevisiae [133,134,135]. In C. glabrata, MFS-MDR transporters have also been found to contribute to the resistance to polyamines, which may become toxic above certain concentrations, such as those found in the human urogenital tract [136]. The prevalence of Candida species in this niche is likely facilitated by two homologs of ScTpo1 in C. glabrata, CgTpo1_1 and CgTpo1_2, which have been identified as determinants in spermine resistance [65]. In turn, the CgTpo3 transporter, known to be involved in C. glabrata azole resistance, presents the same physiological role as its S. cerevisiae homolog, Tpo3, in polyamine resistance [24].
Since the vaginal tract is characterised by an acidic pH of about 4, as well as the presence of weak acids, like acetic and lactic acids [99,100], the ability to tolerate the stress induced by weak acids is crucial for Candida colonization and successful infection. Interestingly, S. cerevisiae MFS-MDR transporters, like Aqr1 and Qdr1, are important determinants in short-chain monocarboxylic acid resistance [120,137]. S. cerevisiae Aqr1 has also been implicated in the excretion of homoserine, threonine, alanine, glutamate, and aspartate, probably through vesicles, releasing the amino acids to the extracellular environment through exocytosis [138]. The homolog of S. cerevisiae Aqr1 in C. glabrata, CgAqr1, has been linked to flucytosine and clotrimazole resistance, as well as resistance against acetic acid [27]. Such a role in the resistance to acetic acid is also performed by the MFS-MDR CgDtr1 and CgTpo3 transporters [139,140], being the later controlled by the CgHaa1 transcription factor, known to regulate the response of C. glabrata to acetic acid [140]. These different roles of MFS transporters [14,20] point out their importance for the survival of such pathogens in acidic human microenvironments.

4. MDR Transporters in Fungal Pathogens: Playing a Role in Virulence, Biofilm Formation, and Phagocytosis Evasion

To persist in the human host, fungal pathogens need to survive in the first site of infection, and disseminate to other niches of the host. To achieve this goal, several barriers imposed by the niches need to be surpassed, as well as the ones imposed by the immune response (Figure 1). To face and resist such offenses, fungal pathogens develop strategies of survival, including biofilm formation, macrophage evasion mechanisms, and virulence factors, where the role of given MDR transporters becomes important.
For example, similarly to the S. cerevisiae Pdr5 and Yor1 ABC transporters [17], C. albicans CaCdr1, CaCdr2, and CaCdr3 have been shown to play a role in phospholipid translocation when expressed in S. cerevisiae. CaCdr1 and CaCdr2 conduct an in-to-out movement of phospholipids through the plasma membrane bilayer in an energy-dependent manner, while CaCdr3, which is not involved in antifungal drug resistance, produces the opposite movement, from the outer to the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane [141]. The transport of phospholipids by Cdr1 may be extremely important for C. albicans evasion to the host immune system, as some phospholipids have been identified as lipid antigens and precursors of lysophospholipids, also known to be lipid antigens recognized by human natural killer T lymphocytes [142,143]. For instance, to avoid identification by the host immune response, C. albicans relies on CaQdr2 and CaQdr3 transporters, given that they are necessary for the maintenance of phosphatidylinositol, which is a lipid antigen recognized by the CD1 antigen-presenting cells from the host [144]. Interestingly, the absence of CaQDR2 and CaQDR3 genes have shown to attenuated C. albicans virulence in a murine model of hematogenously disseminated candidiasis [119].
When fungal evasion is not effective, pathogens are phagocyted and a new environment is set upon them, to which they have to adapt to survive. Different host cells are able to perform phagocytosis, including monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells [145,146]. All these lead to the formation of phagolysosomes that attempt to kill pathogens by producing ROS and RNS, activating the action of proteases and decreasing the pH, resorting to K+ fluxes [146]. Candida species display an activation of oxidative stress response in this environment, as well as other survival mechanisms [147]. In particular, C. glabrata cells are known to be able to resist and proliferate inside mammalian macrophages for a very long time [148]. Together with other more specific mechanisms, C. glabrata is known to count with two transporters from the MFS-MDR family, CgAqr1 and CgDtr1, which are responsible for the resistance to weak acids and oxidative stress [27,139]. CgAqr1 was found to confer resistance to acetic acid [27], like its homolog in S. cerevisiae [137], and CgDtr1 was identified as an acetic acid exporter, allowing the resistance to this acid and oxidative stress [139]. It is likely that the role of CgDtr1 in weak acid and oxidative stress resistance underlies its contribution to the survival of C. glabrata in the macrophages and, indirectly, to increase virulence. Indeed, the CgDTR1 expression is upregulated in cells phagocytozed by Galleria mellonella, hemocytes and the overexpression of this gene leads to an increase in the survival of C. glabrata cells in G. mellonella hemocytes. Furthermore, CgDtr1 was found to be necessary for the full virulence of C. glabrata in the infection model G. mellonella [139].
Cryptococcus neoformans survival in phagocytic cells also depends on its reaction to the new environment with low pH, ROS, and nitric oxide [96]. Upon C. neoformans phagocytosis by macrophages in vitro, the overexpression of the CnAFR1 gene takes place [39]. The Afr1 ABC transporter is known for the in vitro and in vivo resistance to fluconazole [31,39,58], but has also been linked to the virulence of C. neoformans, in intravenous and in inhalation mouse models [39]. Although not helping to avoid phagocytosis, CnAfr1 delays the maturation of the phagolysosome, which exhibits less acid vacuoles. CnAfr1 seems to interfere with the pathway of phagolysosome maturation, as the early endosome marker Rab5 and late marker Rab7 are less detected upon the overexpression of the CnAFR1 gene [149]. Moreover, Goulart and colleagues have reported the upregulation of other ABC transporters in C. neoformans cells phagocyted by peritoneal macrophages [150], highlighting the importance these transporters within the study of the Cryptococcus species survival in the host.
Cryptococcus gattii seems to count with drug transporters for its full virulence in the brain and the pulmonary tissue, like the MFS Mdr1 and the ABC Pdr11 transporters, determinants of C. gattii MDR [58,114]. The MDR1 gene was found to be upregulated in cells recovered from the brain and lungs of infected mice, while PDR11 was overexpressed in cells recovered from the lungs of infected mice [151]. Both Mdr1 and Pdr11 were proposed to play an additional role C. gattii virulence and adaptation to the host environment, although the exact mechanism underlying this observation is unclear.
Likewise, A. fumigatus infects primarily the lungs disseminating to any possible organ [89]. Such infections are believed to make use of the 49 ABC-like genes and 278 MFS-like genes present in this species [54], which, given their elevated number, indicate a major role in A. fumigatus. From all these, some have been identified as antifungal resistant players [28,29,55,56], but having additional roles in expelling toxic molecules [54]. abcA and abcB are two A. fumigatus transporters, with a high similarity to the S. cerevisiae Pdr5 drug efflux pump. abcB is necessary for full virulence of A. fumigatus in the G. mellonella model of infection and the overexpression of the abcA gene leads to an augmentation of virulence in the presence of voriconazole, in the same infection model [152].
The C. albicans Mdr1 MFS transporter is well known for its role in MDR [9,153,154]. Nevertheless, this transporter has been identified as necessary for full virulence in C. albicans in immunocompetent and immunocompromised mice models [155], although its specific functions in virulence have not yet been assessed. Moreover, the CaNag3, CaNag4, and CaNag6 MFS transporters are necessary for the full virulence of C. albicans in a mouse model [156].
Several MDR transporters have also been shown to have roles in biofilm formation, an important feature that allows the persistence of fungal pathogens in the host [157]. One specific case is the activity displayed by CaQdr2 and CaQdr3 in the architecture of C. albicans biofilm, which, although not contributing for the total biomass produced, help to shape the structure of the biofilm [119]. In C. glabrata, the CgTpo1_2 has been highlighted as an important player in biofilm formation, being necessary for the normal expression of CgALS1, CgEAP1, and CgEPA1 genes encoding adhesins. Its role in biofilm formation seems to be linked to its importance in fatty acids homeostasis, as it affects the incorporation of very long chain fatty acids, which are usually found in C. glabrata biofilms [123]. In turn, A. fumigatus Mdr4 transporter has been identified as upregulated upon voriconazole exposure and biofilm formation conditions [129,158], indicating a possible role in the development of biofilm. Interestingly, GOF mutations in the multidrug resistance transcription factor Pdr1 were also found to be required for increased virulence and biofilm formation, by controlling the expression of the adhesion encoding gene EPA1 [159,160].

5. Hints on the Function of MDR Transporters Based on Transcription Regulation

Recently, clues on the physiological roles of MDR transporters, including the transport of lipids, ions, and small metabolites, have emerged from transcriptional regulation data, linking these transporters to important pathogenesis features such as resistance to host niche environments, biofilm formation, immune system evasion, and virulence. In this section, all available information on the transcriptional regulation of ABC/MFS-MDR transporter genes in the human pathogens C. albicans and C. glabrata is reviewed. Although a similar analysis would be very interesting for A. fumigatus and C. neoformans, the available information is very limited and scattered. On the contrary, information on C. albicans and C. glabrata has been recently gathered in the PathoYeastract database (www.pathoyeastract.org) [161], enabling the analysis of MDR transporter regulation, not only in the multidrug resistance context, but also within the perspective of their physiological roles and their implication in other pathogenesis-related phenotypes.
Besides the expected role of the MDR transcription factors, transcription factors controlling stress response, cell cycle, cell wall dynamics, biofilm formation, lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, and nutrient availability have been found to regulate the expression of the MDR transporter encoding genes in C. albicans. In fact, the number of regulatory associations with MDR transporter genes involving transcription factors virtually not related to MDR is much higher than that involving recognized MDR transcription factors. Surprisingly, with regards to multidrug resistance, only 36% (12 out of 33) of the MDR-related transporters in C. albicans are reported to be regulated by at least one MDR-related transcription factor, more specifically, 57% (8 out of 14) of the ABC transporters and nearly 21% (4 out of 19) of the MFS-MDR transporters (Figure 2A). Expectably, the transcription factor CaMrr1, a multidrug resistance regulator in C. albicans, was found to regulate 11 out of the 12 MDR transporters reported to be regulated by at least one MDR-related transcription factor, including the MFS-MDR transporter, CaMdr1, a key player in the acquisition of azole resistance in clinical isolates [71]. Transporters that have been clearly linked to resistance of a wider range of drugs are indeed those that are regulated by a higher number of MDR transcription factors. This is the case for CaCDR1 and CaCDR2, which are the main ABC transporter genes responsible for azole drug resistance in C. albicans. CaCDR1 is regulated by CaFcr1, CaMrr1, CaMrr2, and CaTac1, whereas CaCDR2 is reported to be regulated by CaMrr1 and CaTac1. In particular, the CaCDR1 regulation appears to be highly complex, being controlled by at least 19 transcription factors not only related to MDR, but also with biofilm formation, stress response, cell-wall dynamics, carbohydrate metabolism, cell-cycle, and lipid metabolism. Besides CaMrr1, C. albicans carries yet another major regulator of multidrug resistance transporters, CaTac1, which is described as the major factor needed for the regulation of CaCDR1 and CaCDR2 [76]. Nevertheless, contrasting with CaMrr1, CaTac1 appears to regulate no other MDR transporter genes besides CaCDR1 and CaCDR2 (Figure 2A).
It is surprising the number of stress-related transcription factors reported to regulate MDR transporters in C. albicans. Nearly 67% (22 out of 33) of the C. albicans MDR transporters have been found to be regulated by at least one stress-related transcription factor, with the transcription factors CaCap1 and CaSko1 regulating the highest number of transporters (eight and nine, respectively) (Figure 2B). These two transcription factors are known to be required for oxidative stress tolerance in C. albicans [162,163], which is a vital process for this pathogen to survive in healthy hosts, especially during phagocytosis. Additionally, the transcription factor CaRim101 was found to regulate the expression of a considerable number of MDR transporter genes (7). This regulator plays a crucial role in pH-response [164], and the Rim101 pathway is required for host-pathogen interactions, as it regulates the expression of genes that stimulate host cell damage [165]. Among other stress-related transcription factors that were found to control MDR transporter genes are CaCta8, an essential transcription factor that mediates heat shock response [166]; CaRpn4 and CaHac1, key regulators of unfolded protein response (UPR), which is a crucial phenomenon for cellular protein homeostasis maintenance, which is often lost when cells are under stress such as that induced by antifungals [167]; and Cas5, a zinc finger transcription factor that controls the response to cell wall stress, including those induced by echinocandins [168], but also the response to membrane stress exerted by the azole antifungal drugs [169].
Transcription factors related to biofilm formation were also found to regulate a significant number of MDR transporters in C. albicans (nearly 52%, 17 out of 33) (Figure 2C). Nobile et al. [170] described and analysed the transcriptional network controlling the biofilm formation in C. albicans, whose biofilms are a major source of medical device-associated infections. They demonstrated that CaBcr1, CaTec1, CaEfg1, CaNdt80, CaRob1, and CaBrg1 are the major players in the transcriptional network controlling the biofilm development in this human pathogen, including many MDR transporters. In fact, genes encoding for drug efflux pumps had been previously been reported in biofilms to be differentially regulated during development, as well as upon exposure to antimicrobial agents, including CaCDR1, CaCDR2, CaMDR1, CaNAG3, and CaNAG4 [171,172,173]. CaRob1 and CaNdt80 were found to regulate the highest number of MDR transporters (nearly 65%, 11 out of 17 each), whereas CaTec1 was found to regulate a smaller portion of those (approximately 12%, 2 out of 17). These associations corroborate the observation that efflux pump-mediated multidrug resistance is an important trait of biofilm cells [174].
In C. albicans, the ability to undergo morphological switching from yeast cells to hyphae, in response to various environmental signals, is an important virulence factor that contributes to biofilm formation, invasion and dissemination of Candida in host tissues, and resistance to macrophage and neutrophil engulfment [171,175,176]. Interestingly, cell-cycle/morphology related transcription factors were found to regulate the highest portion of MDR transporters, 72% (24 out of 33), including the CDR genes and MDR1 (Figure 2D). In fact, despite the fact that cell-cycle related transcriptional regulators have never been demonstrated to be crucial for efflux pump expression, a positive correlation between the level of antifungal drug resistance and the ability to form hyphae in the presence of azole drugs has been identified [176]. For instance, Mcm1, which is an essential transcription factor in C. albicans crucial for morphogenesis [177], was found to regulate the expression of several MDR transporters (10 out of 24), including CaCDR1 and CaMDR1. CaMcm1 was previously demonstrated to be dispensable for CaMDR1 upregulation in response to H2O2 , but was required for full CaMDR1 induction by benomyl [177]. The transcription factors CaSfl1 and CaSfl2, two homologous heat shock factor-type transcriptional regulators that antagonistically control morphogenesis in C. albicans, while being required for full pathogenesis and virulence [178], were also found to regulate a number of MDR transporters (11 and 9, respectively). Finally, CaWor1 and CaWor2 are transcriptional regulators of C. albicans opaque cell formation, and were also found to regulate MDR transporters.
Also, cell-wall dynamics related transcription factors regulate MDR transporters in C. albicans (9), including the CDR gene family and CaMDR1 (Figure 2E). The Try transcription factors and Taf14, Ahr1, Uga33, and Zcf39 are all reported regulators of C. albicans yeast form adherence, and they were found to regulate at least one MDR transporter.
Additionally, CaUpc2, the master regulator of the ergosterol biosynthesis (ERG) genes [179], and CaHmo1, which was also shown to bind promoters of ergosterol metabolism genes [180], regulate the expression of 13 MDR transporters (Figure 2F). The regulation of ABC drug efflux pumps by the lipid metabolism related transcription factor, is likely to be due to the activity of some of these MDR transporters in phospholipid translocation or ergosterol transport. It is not likely that all drug pumps involved in multidrug resistance are phospholipid translocators. For instance, CaMDR1 shows no detectable phospholipid exchange activity [181]. However, the observation that these transcription factors also control the expression of MDR-MFS transporters, suggest that they may also play a role in this lipid metabolism. This hypothesis is consistent with the observation that the deletion of MFS-MDR genes CaQDR1, CaQDR2, and CaQDR3 [119], or CgTPO1_2 [123], does affect lipid composition.
In the case of C. glabrata, only a few regulators of MDR transporter genes have yet been unveiled, reflecting the fact that the study of transcriptional regulation in this yeast is still in its infancy, especially in biological processes beyond drug resistance. The transcription factor CgPdr1 is described as the master regulator of multidrug resistance in this organism, regulating the expression of several MDR transporter genes [48]. CgPdr1 is thought to form a heterodimer with CgStb5, as it happens in the closely related S. cerevisiae. The overexpression of CgSTB5 in C. glabrata represses azole resistance, while its deletion produces a shy intensification in resistance. Expression analysis assays established that CgStb5p shares many transcriptional targets with CgPdr1, but, unlike the second, it is a negative regulator of pleiotropic drug resistance [68,182]. These two MDR-related transcription factors were found to regulate a total of 12 MDR transporters (seven ABC and five MFS) (Figure 3A).
Besides the expected role of MDR transcription factors, stress response transcription factors have been found to regulate the MDR transporter encoding genes in C. glabrata. Five stress-responsive transcription factors are reported to regulate the expression of at least one MDR transporter gene (Figure 3B). CgYap1 is the major regulator of oxidative stress response genes in C. glabrata [183], and it was also demonstrated to induce the expression of multidrug transporters [184]. As antifungals induce the endogenous production of ROS, thus inducing oxidative stress response mediated by CgYap1, it is likely that CgYap1 targets the MDR transporters that play a role in the extrusion of oxidative stress generating molecules from the cells. Otherwise, CgYap7 is a transcriptional repressor of nitric oxide oxidase and also regulates the iron–sulfur cluster biogenesis [185]. The remaining transcription factors present in this group were not yet characterised. However, they are thought to be involved in salt tolerance (CgHal9 and CgYap6) and weak acid response (CgWar1), based on the function of their S. cerevisiae homologs. It is interesting to note that the ABC transporter encoding ORF CAGL0M07293g, although uncharacterised, is reported to be regulated by CgYap7, CgYap6, CgHal9, and CgWar1 transcription factors. This is in accordance with its predicted function as a weak-acid-inducible multidrug transporter required for weak organic acid resistance, based on the function of its closest S. cerevisiae homolog ScPdr12.

6. Conclusions and Perspectives.

MDR transporters are undoubtedly necessary players for the successful survival of fungal pathogens in the human host (Table 1 and Table 2). As reviewed herein, their prominent role in MDR has a real impact in the clinical acquisition of drug resistance, allowing these pathogens to persist even upon treatment with different antifungal agents. Indeed, within the characterised MDR transporters, 88.5% and 71.4% of the ABC and MFS, respectively, have been shown to contribute to drug resistance, suggesting that this is their most relevant feature.
This review, however, highlights the observation that both ABC and MFS-MDR transporters contribute to the ability of fungal pathogens to colonize the host and evade host induced defenses, by executing other functions not directly connected with MDR. The study of the transcriptional networks controlling the expression of drug transporters in C. albicans and C. glabrata points towards possible links between MDR transporters and several cellular processes, including stress response, morphological switching, cell wall, and lipid homeostasis. Indeed, mounting evidence suggests that the function of MDR transporters goes well beyond their traditional role in drug resistance. Clues on what may be the physiological role of these transporters, suggest that their natural activity is not linked to the transport of chemical compounds that are not found in nature, but rather the transport of metabolites that can be found in the natural ecosystems where pathogenic fungi thrive. Among the characterised ABC and MFS transporters, 19.2% and 42.8%, respectively have been associated to the transport of such biomolecules. Significantly, MDR transporter roles associated to phospholipid and ergosterol incorporation, as well as in the excretion of metabolites that reach toxic concentrations in host niches, such as polyamines and weak acids, establish a strong link between the MDR transporters and the survival of fungal pathogens in several human microenvironments. Additionally, a few MDR transporters have been linked to the resistance to stress imposed by the host immune system, including phagocytosis and antimicrobial peptides, such as histatin-5. Not surprisingly, a high proportion of the characterised ABC (43.5%) and MFS (39.3%)-MDR transporters were found to be required for full virulence in infection models, several of which, however, for unknown reasons. It will be interesting to ascertain the precise function of these transporters in the context of virulence.
Despite their crucial role in several aspects of pathogenesis, there is still a striking lack of knowledge about the function of the majority of the MDR transporters. Indeed, among the 241 predicted ABC drug transporters in the fungal pathogens approached in this review, only 10.8%, that is 26, have been characterised. In the case of the predicted MFS-MDR transporters, only 5.8% (28 out of 479), have been functionally analysed. This observation highlights the pressing need to invest in the study of these two families of drug transporters, with special emphasis on less studied organisms, which in this context includes A. fumigatus, for which only 2.1% of the MFS-MDR transporters have been characterised, or C. tropicalis, for which only 4.5% of the ABC drug efflux pumps have been studied.
Overall, this review gathers evidence of the multitasking capacity of MDR transporters in fungal pathogens, while highlighting their key role in the successful colonization, persistence, and virulence in the human host. The truly pleiotropic activity of the ABC and MFS-MDR transporters underlines their importance in fungal pathogenesis, and highlights them as very promising drug targets for the development of new antifungals.

Funding

Work conducted in this field has been financially supported by “Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia” (FCT) (Contract PTDC/BBB-BIO/4004/2014 and PhD scholarships to MC and PP).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sims, C.R.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Rex, J.H. Invasive candidiasis in immunocompromised hospitalized patients. Arch. Med. Res. 2005, 36, 660–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chauhan, N.; Latge, J.-P.; Calderone, R. Signalling and oxidant adaptation in Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Schmalzle, S.A.; Buchwald, U.K.; Gilliam, B.L.; Riedel, D.J. Cryptococcus neoformans infection in malignancy. Mycoses Diagn. Ther. Prophyl. Fungal Dis. 2016, 59, 542–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wisplinghoff, H.; Bischoff, T.; Tallent, S.M.; Seifert, H.; Wenzel, R.P.; Edmond, M.B. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: Analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 39, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fidel, P.L.; Vazquez, J.A.; Sobel, J.D. Candida glabrata: Review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease with comparison to C albicans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 80–96. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Mccullough, M.J.; Ross, B.C.; Reade, P.C. Candida albicans: A review of its history, taxonomy, epidemiology, virulence attributes, and methods of strain differentiation. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1996, 25, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Da Silva Ferreira, M.E.S.; Colombo, A.L.; Paulsen, I.; Ren, Q.; Wortman, J.; Huang, J.; Goldman, M.H.S.; Goldman, G.H. The ergosterol biosynthesis pathway, transporter genes, and azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Med. Mycol. 2005, 43, S313–S319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dou, H.-T.; Xu, Y.-C.; Wang, H.-Z.; Li, T.-S. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii in China between 2007 and 2013 using multilocus sequence typing and the DiversiLab system. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015, 34, 753–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sanglard, D.; Kuchler, K.; Ischer, F.; Pagani, J.L.; Monod, M.; Bille, J. Mechanisms of resistance to azole antifungal agents in Candida albicans isolates from AIDS patients involve specific multidrug transporters. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1995, 39, 2378–2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Costa, C.; Ribeiro, J.; Miranda, I.M.; Silva-dias, A.I.; Cavalheiro, M.; Costa-de-oliveira, S.; Rodrigues, A.G.; Teixeira, M.C. Clotrimazole drug resistance in Candida glabrata clinical isolates correlates with increased expression of the drug: H+ antiporters CgAqr1, CgTpo1_1, CgTpo3 and CgQdr2. Front. Microbiol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Prasad, R.; Khandelwal, N.K.; Banerjee, A. Yeast ABC transporters in lipid trafficking. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2016, 93, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cannon, R.D.; Holmes, A.R. Learning the ABC of oral fungal drug resistance. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2015, 30, 425–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Del Sorbo, G.; Schoonbeek, H.J.; De Waard, M.A. Fungal transporters involved in efflux of natural toxic compounds and fungicides. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2000, 30, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sá-Correia, I.; dos Santos, S.C.; Teixeira, M.C.; Cabrito, T.R.; Mira, N.P. Drug: H+ antiporters in chemical stress response in yeast. Trends Microbiol. 2008, 17, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Prasad, R.; Banerjee, A.; Khandelwal, N.K.; Dhamgaye, S. The ABCs of Candida albicans multidrug transporter Cdr1. Eukaryot. Cell 2015, 14, 1154–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pao, S.S.; Paulsen, I.T.; Saier, M.H. Major facilitator superfamily. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998, 62, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Decottignies, A.; Grant, A.M.; Nichols, J.W.; de Wet, H.; McIntosh, D.B.; Goffeau, A. ATPase and multidrug transport activities of the overexpressed yeast ABC protein Yor1p. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 12612–12622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Goffeau, A.; Barrell, B.G.; Bussey, H.; Davis, R.W.; Dujon, B.; Feldmann, H.; Galibert, F.; Hoheisel, J.D.; Jacq, C.; Johnston, M.; et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science 1996, 274, 546–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bauer, B.E.; Wolfger, H.; Kuchler, K. Inventory and function of yeast ABC proteins: About sex, stress, pleiotropic drug and heavy metal resistance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1461, 217–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Costa, C.; Dias, P.J.; Sá-Correia, I.; Teixeira, M.C. MFS multidrug transporters in pathogenic fungi: Do they have real clinical impact? Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Franz, R.; Michel, S.; Morschhäuser, J. A fourth gene from the Candida albicans CDR family of ABC transporters. Gene 1998, 220, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Balan, I.; Alarco, A.M.; Raymond, M. The Candida albicans CDR3 gene codes for an opaque-phase ABC transporter. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 7210–7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sanglard, D.; Ischer, F.; Monod, M.; Bille, J. Cloning of Candida albicans genes conferring resistance to azole antifungal agents: Characterization of CDR2, a new multidrug ABC transporter gene. Microbiology 1997, 143, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Costa, C.; Nunes, J.; Henriques, A.; Mira, N.P.; Nakayama, H.; Chibana, H.; Teixeira, M.C. Candida glabrata drug: H+ antiporter CgTpo3 (ORF CAGL0I10384g): Role in azole drug resistance and polyamine homeostasis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 1767–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Costa, C.; Pires, C.; Cabrito, T.R.; Renaudin, A.; Ohno, M.; Chibana, H.; Sá-Correia, I.; Teixeira, M.C. Candida glabrata drug: H+ antiporter CgQdr2 confers imidazole drug resistance, being activated by transcription factor CgPdr1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 3159–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Torelli, R.; Posteraro, B.; Ferrari, S.; La Sorda, M.; Fadda, G.; Sanglard, D.; Sanguinetti, M. The ATP-binding cassette transporter—Encoding gene CgSNQ2 is contributing to the CgPDR1-dependent azole resistance of Candida glabrata. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 68, 186–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Costa, C.; Henriques, A.; Pires, C.; Nunes, J.; Ohno, M.; Chibana, H.; Sá-Correia, I.; Teixeira, M.C. The dual role of Candida glabrata drug: H+ antiporter CgAqr1 (ORF CAGL0J09944g) in antifungal drug and acetic acid resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tobin, M.B.; Peery, R.B.; Skatrud, P.L. Genes encoding multiple drug resistance-like proteins in Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus flavus. Gene 1997, 200, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Slaven, J.W.; Anderson, M.J.; Sanglard, D.; Dixon, G.K.; Bille, J.; Roberts, I.S.; Denning, D.W. Increased expression of a novel Aspergillus fumigatus ABC transporter gene, atrF, in the presence of itraconazole in an itraconazole resistant clinical isolate. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2002, 36, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thornewell, S.J.; Peery, R.B.; Skatrud, P.L. Cloning and characterization of CneMDR1: A Cryptococcus neoformans gene encoding a protein related to multidrug resistance proteins. Gene 1997, 201, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Posteraro, B.; Sanguinetti, M.; Sanglard, D.; La Sorda, M.; Boccia, S.; Romano, L.; Morace, G.; Fadda, G.; Cassette, B. Identification and characterization of a Cryptococcus neoformans ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter-encoding gene, CnAFR1, involved in the resistance to fluconazole. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 47, 357–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gaur, M.; Choudhury, D.; Prasad, R. Complete inventory of ABC proteins in human pathogenic yeast, Candida albicans. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 9, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Dujon, B.; Sherman, D.; Fischer, G.; Durrens, P.; Casaregola, S.; Lafontaine, I.; de Montigny, J.; Marck, C.; Neuvéglise, C.; Talla, E.; et al. Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature 2004, 430, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nierman, W.C.; Pain, A.; Anderson, M.J.; Wortman, J.R.; Kim, H.S.; Arroyo, J.; Berriman, M.; Abe, K.; Archer, D.B.; Bermejo, C.; et al. Genomic sequence of the pathogenic and allergenic filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature 2005, 438, 1151–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Loftus, B.J.; Fung, E.; Roncaglia, P.; Rowley, D.; Amedeo, P.; Vamathevan, J.; Miranda, M.; Anderson, I.J.; Fraser, J.A.; Allen, J.E.; et al. The genome of the Basidiomycetous yeast and human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Science 2005, 307, 1321–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Holmes, A.R.; Cardno, T.S.; Strouse, J.J.; Ivnitski-Steele, I.; Keniya, M.V.; Lackovic, K.; Monk, B.C.; Sklar, L.A.; Cannon, R.D. Targeting efflux pumps to overcome antifungal drug resistance. Future Med. Chem. 2016, 8, 1485–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. K Redhu, A.; Shah, A.H.; Prasad, R. MFS transporters of Candida species and their role in clinical drug resistance. FEMS Yeast Res. 2016, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lupetti, A.; Danesi, R.; Campa, M.; Del Tacca, M.; Kelly, S. Molecular basis of resistance to azole antifungals. Trends Mol. Med. 2002, 8, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sanguinetti, M.; Posteraro, B.; La Sorda, M.; Torelli, R.; Fiori, B.; Santangelo, R.; Delogu, G.; Fadda, G. Role of AFR1, an ABC transporter-encoding gene, in the in vivo response to fluconazole and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 1352–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cannon, R.D.; Lamping, E.; Holmes, A.R.; Niimi, K.; Baret, P.V.; Keniya, M.V.; Tanabe, K.; Niimi, M.; Goffeau, A.; Monk, B.C. Efflux-mediated antifungal drug resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 291–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Prasad, R.; De Wergifosse, P.; Goffeau, A.; Balzi, E. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel gene of Candida albicans, CDR1, conferring multiple resistance to drugs and antifungals. Curr. Genet. 1995, 27, 320–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Siikala, E.; Rautemaa, R.; Richardson, M.; Saxen, H.; Bowyer, P.; Sanglard, D. Persistent Candida albicans colonization and molecular mechanisms of azole resistance in autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) patients. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2010, 65, 2505–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Moran, G.P.; Sanglard, D.; Donnelly, S.M.; Shanley, D.B.; Sullivan, D.J.; Coleman, D.C. Identification and expression of multidrug transporters responsible for fluconazole resistance in Candida dubliniensis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998, 42, 1819–1830. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Berkow, E.L.; Manigaba, K.; Parker, J.E.; Barker, K.S.; Kelly, S.L.; Rogers, P.D. Multidrug transporters and alterations in sterol biosynthesis contribute to azole antifungal resistance in Candida parapsilosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 5942–5950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Souza, A.C.R.; Fuchs, B.B.; Pinhati, H.M.S.; Siqueira, R.A.; Hagen, F.; Meis, J.F.; Mylonakis, E.; Colombo, A.L. Candida parapsilosis resistance to fluconazole: Molecular mechanisms and in vivo impact in infected Galleria mellonella larvae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 6581–6587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Choi, M.J.; Won, E.J.; Shin, J.H.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, W.G.; Kim, M.N.; Lee, K.; Shin, M.G.; Suh, S.P.; Ryang, D.W.; et al. Resistance mechanisms and clinical features of fluconazole-nonsusceptible Candida tropicalis isolates compared with fluconazole-less-susceptible isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 3653–3661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sanglard, D.; Ischer, F.; Bille, J. Role of ATP-binding-cassette transporter genes in high-frequency acquisition of resistance to azole antifungals in Candida glabrata. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 1174–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Vermitsky, J.-P.; Earhart, K.D.; Smith, W.L.; Homayouni, R.; Edlind, T.D.; Rogers, P.D. Pdr1 regulates multidrug resistance in Candida glabrata: Gene disruption and genome-wide expression studies. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 61, 704–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Katiyar, S.K.; Edlind, T.D. Identification and expression of multidrug resistance-related ABC transporter genes in Candida krusei. Med. Mycol. 2001, 39, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Lamping, E.; Ranchod, A.; Nakamura, K.; Tyndall, J.D.A.; Niimi, K.; Holmes, A.R.; Niimi, M.; Cannon, R.D. Abc1p is a multidrug efflux transporter that tips the balance in favor of innate azole resistance in Candida krusei. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 354–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Lamping, E.; Monk, B.C.; Niimi, K.; Holmes, A.R.; Tsao, S.; Tanabe, K.; Niimi, M.; Uehara, Y.; Cannon, R.D. Characterization of three classes of membrane proteins involved in fungal azole resistance by functional hyperexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 1150–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. He, X.; Zhao, M.; Chen, J.; Wu, R.; Zhang, J.; Cui, R.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, J.; Cao, X.; Xing, Y.; et al. Overexpression of both ERG11 and ABC2 genes might be responsible for itraconazole resistance in clinical isolates of Candida krusei. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Meneau, I.; Coste, A.T.; Sanglard, D. Identification of Aspergillus fumigatus multidrug transporter genes and their potential involvement in antifungal resistance. Med. Mycol. 2016, 54, 616–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Abad, A.; Victoria Fernández-Molina, J.; Bikandi, J.; Ramírez, A.; Margareto, J.; Sendino, J.; Luis Hernando, F.; Pontón, J.; Garaizar, J.; Rementeria, A. What makes Aspergillus fumigatus a successful pathogen? Genes and molecules involved in invasive aspergillosis. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2010, 27, 155–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Nascimento, A.M.; Goldman, G.H.; Park, S.; Marras, S.A.E.; Delmas, G.; Oza, U.; Lolans, K.; Dudley, M.N.; Mann, P.A.; Perlin, D.S. Multiple resistance mechanisms among Aspergillus fumigatus mutants with high-level resistance to itraconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 1719–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Da Silva Ferreira, M.E.; Malavazi, I.; Savoldi, M.; Brakhage, A.A.; Goldman, M.H.S.; Kim, H.S.; Nierman, W.C.; Goldman, G.H. Transcriptome analysis of Aspergillus fumigatus exposed to voriconazole. Curr. Genet. 2006, 50, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Chang, M.; Sionov, E.; Khanal Lamichhane, A.; Kwon-Chung, K.J.; Chang, Y.C. Roles of three Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii efflux pump-coding genes in response to drug treatment. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Basso, L.R.; Gast, C.E.; Bruzual, I.; Wong, B. Identification and properties of plasma membrane azole efflux pumps from the pathogenic fungi Cryptococcus gattii and Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 70, 1396–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wirsching, S.; Michel, S.; Morschhäuser, J. Targeted gene disruption in Candida albicans wild-type strains: The role of the MDR1 gene in fluconazole resistance of clinical Candida albicans isolates. Mol. Microbiol. 2000, 36, 856–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Wirsching, S.; Moran, G.P.; Sullivan, D.J.; Coleman, D.C.; Morschhäuser, J. MDR1-mediated drug resistance in Candida dubliniensis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 3416–3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Silva, A.P.; Miranda, I.M.; Guida, A.; Synnott, J.; Rocha, R.; Silva, R.; Amorim, A.; Pina-Vaz, C.; Butler, G.; Rodrigues, A.G. Transcriptional profiling of azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 3546–3556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bizerra, F.C.; Nakamura, C.V.; De Poersch, C.; Estivalet Svidzinski, T.I.; Borsato Quesada, R.M.; Goldenberg, S.; Krieger, M.A.; Yamada-Ogatta, S.F. Characteristics of biofilm formation by Candida tropicalis and antifungal resistance. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Calabrese, D.; Bille, J.; Sanglard, D. A novel multidrug efflux transporter gene of the major facilitator superfamily from Candida albicans (FLU1) conferring resistance to fluconazole. Microbiology 2000, 146, 2743–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Park, S.; Perlin, D.S. Establishing surrogate markers for fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans. Microb. Drug Resist. 2005, 11, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pais, P.; Costa, C.; Pires, C.; Shimizu, K.; Chibana, H.; Teixeira, M.C. Membrane proteome-wide response to the antifungal drug clotrimazole in Candida glabrata: role of the transcription factor CgPdr1 and the drug: H+ antiporters CgTpo1_1 and CgTpo1_2. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2016, 15, 57–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pais, P.; Pires, C.; Costa, C.; Okamoto, M.; Chibana, H.; Teixeira, M.C. Membrane proteomics analysis of the Candida glabrata response to 5-flucytosine: Unveiling the role and regulation of the drug efflux transporters CgFlr1 and CgFlr2. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Tsai, H.-F.; Krol, A.A.; Sarti, K.E.; Bennett, J.E. Candida glabrata PDR1, a transcriptional regulator of a pleiotropic drug resistance network, mediates azole resistance in clinical isolates and petite mutants. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 1384–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Paul, S.; Schmidt, J.A.; Moye-Rowley, W.S. Regulation of the CgPdr1 transcription factor from the pathogen Candida glabrata. Eukaryot. Cell 2011, 10, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Coste, A.; Turner, V.; Ischer, F.; Morschhäuser, J.; Forche, A.; Selmecki, A.; Berman, J.; Bille, J.; Sanglard, D. A mutation in Tac1p, a transcription factor regulating CDR1 and CDR2, is coupled with loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 5 to mediate antifungal resistance in Candida albicans. Genetics 2006, 172, 2139–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Coste, A.; Selmecki, A.; Forche, A.; Diogo, D.; Bougnoux, M.E.; D’Enfert, C.; Berman, J.; Sanglard, D. Genotypic evolution of azole resistance mechanisms in sequential Candida albicans isolates. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 1889–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Morschhäuser, J.; Barker, K.S.; Liu, T.T.; BlaB-Warmuth, J.; Homayouni, R.; Rogers, P.D. The transcription factor Mrr1p controls expression of the MDR1 efflux pump and mediates multidrug resistance in Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3, e164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Dunkel, N.; Blaß, J.; Rogers, P.D.; Morschhäuser, J. Mutations in the multi-drug resistance regulator MRR1, followed by loss of heterozygosity, are the main cause of MDR1 overexpression in fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans strains. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 69, 827–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Liu, T.T.; Znaidi, S.; Barker, K.S.; Xu, L.; Homayouni, R.; Saidane, S.; Morschhäuser, J.; Nantel, A.; Raymond, M.; Rogers, P.D. Genome-wide expression and location analyses of the Candida albicans Tac1p regulon. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 2122–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Znaidi, S.; De Deken, X.; Weber, S.; Rigby, T.; Nantel, A.; Raymond, M. The zinc cluster transcription factor Tac1p regulates PDR16 expression in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 66, 440–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Schubert, S.; Barker, K.S.; Znaidi, S.; Schneider, S.; Dierolf, F.; Dunkel, N.; Aïd, M.; Boucher, G.; Rogers, P.D.; Raymond, M.; et al. Regulation of efflux pump expression and drug resistance by the transcription factors Mrr1, Upc2, and Cap1 in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 2212–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Coste, A.T.; Karababa, M.; Ischer, F.; Bille, J.; Sanglard, D. TAC1, transcriptional activator of CDR genes, is a new transcription factor involved in the regulation of Candida albicans ABC transporters CDR1 and CDR2. Eukaryot. Cell 2004, 3, 1639–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Caudle, K.E.; Barker, K.S.; Wiederhold, N.P.; Xu, L.; Homayouni, R.; Rogers, P.D. Genomewide expression profile analysis of the Candida glabrata Pdr1 regulon. Eukaryot. Cell 2011, 10, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Tsai, H.-F.; Sammons, L.R.; Zhang, X.; Suffis, S.D.; Su, Q.; Myers, T.G.; Marr, K.A.; Bennett, J.E. Microarray and molecular analyses of the azole resistance mechanism in Candida glabrata oropharyngeal isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 3308–3317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Selmecki, A.; Forche, A.; Berman, J. Genomic plasticity of the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 2010, 9, 991–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Poláková, S.; Blume, C.; Zárate, J.A.; Mentel, M.; Jørck-Ramberg, D.; Stenderup, J.; Piskur, J. Formation of new chromosomes as a virulence mechanism in yeast Candida glabrata. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 2688–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Sionov, E.; Lee, H.; Chang, Y.C.; Kwon-Chung, K.J. Cryptococcus neoformans overcomes stress of azole drugs by formation of disomy in specific multiple chromosomes. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Hagiwara, D.; Miura, D.; Shimizu, K.; Paul, S.; Ohba, A.; Gonoi, T.; Watanabe, A.; Kamei, K.; Shintani, T.; Moye-Rowley, W.S.; et al. A novel Zn2-Cys6 transcription factor AtrR plays a key role in an azole resistance mechanism of Aspergillus fumigatus by Co-regulating cyp51A and cdr1B expressions. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Paul, S.; Doering, T.L.; Moye-Rowley, W.S. Cryptococcus neoformans Yap1 is required for normal fluconazole and oxidative stress resistance. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015, 74, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Lev, S.; Desmarini, D.; Chayakulkeeree, M.; Sorrell, T.C.; Djordjevic, J.T. The Crz1/Sp1 transcription factor of Cryptococcus neoformans is activated by calcineurin and regulates cell wall integrity. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Noble, S.M.; Gianetti, B.A.; Witchley, J.N. Candida albicans cell-type switching and functional plasticity in the mammalian host. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 96–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Brown, A.J.P.; Brown, G.D.; Netea, M.G.; Gow, N.A.R. Metabolism impacts upon Candida immunogenicity and pathogenicity at multiple levels. Trends Microbiol. 2014, 22, 614–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Levitz, S.M. The Ecology of Cryptococcus neoformans and the epidemiology of cryptococcosis. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1991, 13, 1163–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Chen, S.C.-A.; Meyer, W.; Sorrell, T.C. Cryptococcus gattii Infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 980–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Latgé, J.-P. Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 310–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Polke, M.; Hube, B.; Jacobsen, I.D. Candida survival strategies. In Advances in Applied Microbiology; Elsevier Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 2015; Volume 91, pp. 139–235. ISBN 9780128022504. [Google Scholar]
  91. Villar, C.C.; Dongari-Bagtzoglou, A. Immune defence mechanisms and immunoenhancement strategies in oropharyngeal candidiasis. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2008, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Mathews, M.; Jia, H.P.; Guthmiller, J.M.; Losh, G.; Graham, S.; Johnson, G.K.; Tack, B.F.; McCray, P.B. Production of β-defensin antimicrobial peptides by the oral mucosa and salivary glands. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 2740–2745. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  93. Wunder, D.; Dong, J.; Baev, D.; Edgerton, M. Human Salivary Histatin 5 Fungicidal action does not induce programmed cell death pathways in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Taylor-Smith, L.M. Cryptococcus—Epithelial interactions. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Heung, L.J. Innate immune responses to Cryptococcus. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Leopold Wager, C.M.; Hole, C.R.; Wozniak, K.L.; Wormley, F.L. Cryptococcus and phagocytes: Complex interactions that influence disease outcome. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Serrano-Gomez, D.; Dominguez-Soto, A.; Ancochea, J.; Jimenez-Heffernan, J.A.; Leal, J.A.; Corbi, A.L. Dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule 3-grabbing nonintegrin mediates binding and internalization of Aspergillus fumigatus conidia by dendritic cells and macrophages. J. Immunol. 2018, 173, 5635–5643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ellett, F.; Jorgensen, J.; Frydman, G.H.; Jones, C.N.; Irimia, D. Neutrophil interactions stimulate evasive hyphal branching by Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. O’Hanlon, D.E.; Moench, T.R.; Cone, R.A. Vaginal pH and microbicidal lactic acid when lactobacilli dominate the microbiota. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Chaudry, A.N.; Travers, P.J.; Yuenger, J.; Colletta, L.; Evans, P.; Zenilman, J.M.; Tummon, A. Analysis of vaginal acetic acid in patients undergoing treatment for bacterial vaginosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 5170–5175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Fidel, P.L., Jr. Immunity in vaginal candidiasis. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 18, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Niu, X.X.; Li, T.; Zhang, X.; Wang, S.X.; Liu, Z.H. Lactobacillus crispatus modulates vaginal epithelial cell innate response to Candida albicans. Chin. Med. J. 2017, 130, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Sipos, G.; Kuchler, K. Fungal ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters in drug resistance & detoxification. Curr. Drug Targets 2006, 7, 471–481. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  104. Krishnamurthy, S.; Gupta, V.; Snehlata, P.; Prasad, R. Characterisation of human steroid hormone transport mediated by Cdr1p, a multidrug transporter of Candida albicans, belonging to the ATP binding cassette super family. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1998, 158, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Krishnamurthy, S.; Chatterjee, U.; Gupta, V.; Prasad, R.; Das, P.; Snehlata, P.; Hasnain, S.E.; Prasad, R. Deletion of transmembrane domain 12 of CDR1, a multidrug transporter from Candida albicans, leads to altered drug specificity: Expression of a yeast multidrug transporter in baculovirus expression system. Yeast 1998, 14, 535–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bauters, T.G.M.; Dhont, M.A.; Temmerman, M.I.L.; Nelis, H.J. Prevalence of vulvovaginal candidiasis and susceptibility to fluconazole in women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002, 187, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Spinillo, A.; Bernuzzi, A.M.; Cevini, C.; Gulminetti, R.; Luzi, S.; De Santolo, A. The relationship of bacterial vaginosis, Candida and Trichomonas infection to symptomatic vaginitis in postmenopausal women attending a vaginitis clinic. Maturitas 1997, 27, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Spinillo, A.; Capuzzo, E.; Nicola, S.; Baltaro, F.; Ferrari, A.; Monaco, A. The impact of oral contraception on vulvovaginal candidiasis. Contraception 1995, 51, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Fidel, P.L.; Cutright, J.; Steele, C. Effects of reproductive hormones on experimental vaginal candidiasis. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. White, S.; Larsen, B. Candida albicans morphogenesis is influenced by estogen. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1997, 53, 744–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Cheng, G.; Yeater, K.M.; Hoyer, L.L. Cellular and molecular biology of Candida albicans estrogen response. Eukaryot. Cell 2006, 5, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Li, Y.; Prinz, W.A. ATP-binding Cassette (ABC) transporters mediate nonvesicular, raft-modulated sterol movement from the plasma membrane to the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 45226–45234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Wilcox, L.J.; Balderes, D.A.; Wharton, B.; Tinkelenberg, A.H.; Rao, G.; Sturley, S.L. Transcriptional profiling identifies two members of the ATP-binding cassette transporter superfamily required for sterol uptake in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 32466–32472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Yang, M.L.; Uhrig, J.; Vu, K.; Singapuri, A.; Dennis, M.; Gelli, A.; Thompson, G.R. Fluconazole susceptibility in Cryptococcus gattii is dependent on the ABC transporter Pdr11. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 1202–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Nagi, M.; Tanabe, K.; Ueno, K.; Nakayama, H.; Aoyama, T.; Chibana, H.; Yamagoe, S.; Umeyama, T.; Oura, T.; Ohno, H.; et al. The Candida glabrata sterol scavenging mechanism, mediated by the ATP-binding cassette transporter Aus1p, is regulated by iron limitation. Mol. Microbiol. 2013, 88, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Bard, M.; Sturm, A.M.; Pierson, C.A.; Brown, S.; Rogers, K.M.; Nabinger, S.; Eckstein, J.; Barbuch, R.; Lees, N.D.; Howell, S.A.; et al. Sterol uptake in Candida glabrata: Rescue of sterol auxotrophic strains. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2005, 52, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Hazen, K.C.; Stei, J.; Darracott, C.; Breathnach, A.; May, J.; Howell, S.A. Isolation of cholesterol-dependent Candida glabrata from clinical specimens. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2005, 52, 35–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Li, Q.Q.; Tsai, H.F.; Mandal, A.; Walker, B.A.; Noble, J.A.; Fukuda, Y.; Bennett, J.E. Sterol uptake and sterol biosynthesis act coordinately to mediate antifungal resistance in Candida glabrata under azole and hypoxic stress. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 17, 6585–6597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Shah, A.H.; Singh, A.; Dhamgaye, S.; Chauhan, N.; Vandeputte, P.; Suneetha, K.J.; Kaur, R.; Mukherjee, P.K.; Chandra, J.; Ghannoum, M.A.; et al. Novel role of a family of major facilitator transporters in biofilm development and virulence of Candida albicans. Biochem. J. 2014, 460, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Nunes, P.A.; Tenreiro, S.; Sá-Correia, I. Resistance and adaptation to quinidine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of QDR1 (YIL120w), encoding a plasma membrane transporter of the major facilitator superfamily required for multidrug resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 1528–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Vargas, R.C.; Tenreiro, S.; Teixeira, M.C.; Fernandes, A.R.; Sá-correia, I. Saccharomyces cerevisiae multidrug transporter Qdr2p (Yil121wp): Localization and function as a quinidine resistance determinant. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 2531–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Tenreiro, S.; Vargas, R.C.; Teixeira, M.C.; Magnani, C.; Sá-Correia, I. The yeast multidrug transporter Qdr3 (Ybr043c): Localization and role as a determinant of resistance to quinidine, barban, cisplatin, and bleomycin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 327, 952–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Santos, R.; Costa, C.; Mil-Homens, D.; Romão, D.; de Carvalho, C.C.C.R.; Pais, P.; Mira, N.P.; Fialho, A.M.; Teixeira, M.C. The multidrug resistance transporters CgTpo1_1 and CgTpo1_2 play a role in virulence and biofilm formation in the human pathogen Candida glabrata. Cell. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Lin, X.; Qi, Y.; Yan, D.; Liu, H.; Chen, X.; Liu, L. CgMED3 changes membrane sterol composition to help Candida glabrata tolerate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Li, R.; Kumar, R.; Tati, S.; Puri, S.; Edgerton, M. Candida albicans Flu1-Mediated efflux of salivary histatin 5 reduces its cytosolic concentration and fungicidal activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 1832–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Kuchler, K.; Sterne, R.E.; Thorner, J. Saccharomyces cerevisiae STE6 gene product: A novel pathway for protein export in eukaryotic cells. EMBO J. 1989, 8, 3973–3984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Raymond, M.; Dignard, D.; Alarco, A.M.; Mainville, N.; Magee, B.B.; Thomas, D.Y. A Ste6p/P-glycoprotein homologue from the asexual yeast Candida albicans transports the a-factor mating pheromone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 27, 587–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Hsueh, Y.P.; Shen, W.C. A homolog of Ste6, the a-factor transporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is required for mating but not for monokaryotic fruiting in Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot. Cell 2005, 4, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Gibbons, J.G.; Beauvais, A.; Beau, R.; McGary, K.L.; Latgé, J.P.; Rokas, A. Global transcriptome changes underlying colony growth in the opportunistic human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Kragl, C.; Schrettl, M.; Abt, B.; Sarg, B.; Lindner, H.H.; Haas, H. EstB-mediated hydrolysis of the siderophore triacetylfusarinine C optimizes iron uptake of Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot. Cell 2007, 6, 1278–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Schrettl, M.; Kim, H.S.; Eisendle, M.; Kragl, C.; Nierman, W.C.; Heinekamp, T.; Werner, E.R.; Jacobsen, I.; Illmer, P.; Yi, H.; et al. SreA-mediated iron regulation in Aspergillus fumigatus. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 70, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Weiss, G. Iron and immunity: A double-edged sword. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2002, 32, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Albertsen, M.; Bellahn, I.; Krämer, R.; Waffenschmidt, S. Localization and function of the yeast multidrug transporter Tpo1p. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 12820–12825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Tomitori, H.; Kashiwagi, K.; Asakawa, T.; Kakinuma, Y.; Michael, A.J.; Igarashi, K. Multiple polyamine transport systems on the vacuolar membrane in yeast. Biochem. J. 2001, 353, 681–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Teixeira, M.C.; Cabrito, R.; Hanif, Z.M.; Vargas, R.C.; Tenreiro, S.; Sá-Correia, I. Yeast response and tolerance to polyamine toxicity involving the drug: H+ antiporter Qdr3 and the transcription factors Yap1 and Gcn4. Microbiology 2011, 157, 945–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Tyms, A. Polyamines and the growth of bacteria and viruses. In The Physiology of Polyamines; Bachrach, U., Heime, Y., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  137. Tenreiro, S.; Nunes, P.A.; Viegas, C.A.; Neves, M.S.; Teixeira, M.C.; Cabral, G.; Sá-Correia, I. AQR1 gene (ORF YNL065w) encodes a plasma membrane transporter of the major facilitator superfamily that confers resistance to short-chain monocarboxylic acids and quinidine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 292, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Velasco, I.; Tenreiro, S.; Calderon, I.L.; André, B. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Aqr1 is an internal-membrane transporter involved in excretion of amino acids. Eukaryot. Cell 2004, 3, 1492–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Romão, D.; Cavalheiro, M.; Mil-Homens, D.; Santos, R.; Pais, P.; Costa, C.; Takahashi-Nakaguchi, A.; Fialho, A.M.; Chibana, H.; Teixeira, M.C. A New determinant of Candida glabrata virulence: The acetate exporter CgDtr1. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Bernardo, R.T.; Cunha, D.V.; Wang, C.; Pereira, L.; Silva, S.; Salazar, S.B.; Schröder, M.S.; Okamoto, M.; Takahashi-Nakaguchi, A.; Chibana, H.; et al. The CgHaa1-Regulon Mediates Response and Tolerance to Acetic Acid Stress in the Human Pathogen Candida glabrata. G3: Genes Genomes Genet. 2017, 7, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Smriti; Krishnamurthy, S.; Dixit, B.L.; Gupta, C.M.; Milewski, S.; Prasad, R. ABC transporters Cdr1p, Cdr2p and Cdr3p of a human pathogen Candida albicans are general phospholipid translocators. Yeast 2002, 19, 303–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Fox, L.M.; Cox, D.G.; Lockridge, J.L.; Wang, X.; Chen, X.; Scharf, L.; Trott, D.L.; Ndonye, R.M.; Veerapen, N.; Besra, G.S.; et al. Recognition of lyso-phospholipids by human natural killer T lymphocytes. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7, e1000228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Cox, D.; Fox, L.; Tian, R.; Bardet, W.; Skaley, M.; Mojsilovic, D.; Gumperz, J.; Hildebrand, W. Determination of cellular lipids bound to human CD1d molecules. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. De Libero, G.; Mori, L. Recognition of lipid antigens by T cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2005, 5, 485–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Netea, M.G.; Joosten, L.A.B.; van der Meer, J.W.M.; Kullberg, B.-J.; van de Veerdonk, F.L. Immune defence against Candida fungal infections. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 15, 630–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Brown, G.D. Innate antifungal immunity: The key role of phagocytes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 29, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Miramón, P.; Kasper, L.; Hube, B. Thriving within the host: Candida spp. interactions with phagocytic cells. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2013, 202, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Seider, K.; Brunke, S.; Schild, L.; Jablonowski, N.; Wilson, D.; Majer, O.; Barz, D.; Haas, A.; Kuchler, K.; Schaller, M.; et al. the facultative intracellular pathogen Candida glabrata subverts macrophage cytokine production and phagolysosome maturation. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 3072–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Orsi, C.F.; Colombari, B.; Ardizzoni, A.; Peppoloni, S.; Neglia, R.; Posteraro, B.; Morace, G.; Fadda, G.; Blasi, E. The ABC transporter-encoding gene AFR1 affects the resistance of Cryptococcus neoformans to microglia-mediated antifungal activity by delaying phagosomal maturation. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009, 9, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Goulart, L.; Silva, L.K.R.E.; Chiapello, L.; Silveira, C.; Crestani, J.; Masih, D.; Vainstein, M.H. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii genes preferentially expressed during rat macrophage infection. Med. Mycol. 2010, 48, 932–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Fontes, A.C.L.; Oliveira, D.B.; Santos, J.R.A.; Carneiro, H.C.S.; De Queiroz Ribeiro, N.; De Oliveira, L.V.N.; Barcellos, V.A.; Paixão, T.A.; Abrahão, J.S.; Resende-Stoianoff, M.A.; et al. A subdose of fluconazole alters the virulence of Cryptococcus gattii during murine cryptococcosis and modulates type I interferon expression. Med. Mycol. 2017, 55, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Paul, S.; Diekema, D.; Moye-Rowley, W.S. Contributions of Aspergillus fumigatus ATP-binding cassette transporter proteins to drug resistance and virulence. Eukaryot. Cell 2013, 12, 1619–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. White, T.C. Increased mRNA Levels of ERG16, CDR, and MDR1 correlate with increases in azole resistance in Candida albicans isolates from a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 1482–1487. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  154. Hiller, D.; Sanglard, D.; Morschhauser, J. Overexpression of the MDR1 gene is sufficient to confer increased resistance to toxic compounds in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 1365–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Becker, J.M.; Henry, L.K.; Jiang, W.; Koltin, Y. Reduced virulence of Candida albicans mutants affected in multidrug resistance. Infect. Immun. 1995, 63, 4515–4518. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  156. Yamada-Okabe, T.; Yamada-Okabe, H. Characterization of the CaNAG3, CaNAG4, and CaNAG6 genes of the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans: Possible involvement of these genes in the susceptibilities of cytotoxic agents. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2002, 212, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Cavalheiro, M.; Teixeira, M.C. Candida biofilms: Threats, challenges, and promising strategies. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Rajendran, R.; Mowat, E.; McCulloch, E.; Lappin, D.F.; Jones, B.; Lang, S.; Majithiya, J.B.; Warn, P.; Williams, C.; Ramage, G. Azole resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus biofilms is partly associated with efflux pump activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 2092–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Ferrari, S.; Sanguinetti, M.; Torelli, R.; Posteraro, B.; Sanglard, D. Contribution of CgPDR1-regulated genes in enhanced virulence of azole-resistant Candida glabrata. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Vale-Silva, L.A.; Moeckli, B.; Torelli, R.; Posteraro, B.; Sanglard, D. Upregulation of the adhesin gene EPA1 mediated by PDR1 in Candida glabrata leads to enhanced host colonization. mSphere 2016, 1, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Monteiro, P.T.; Pais, P.; Costa, C.; Manna, S.; Sa-Correia, I.; Teixeira, M.C. The PathoYeastract database: An information system for the analysis of gene and genomic transcription regulation in pathogenic yeasts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D597–D603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Alonso-Monge, R.; Román, E.; Arana, D.M.; Prieto, D.; Urrialde, V.; Nombela, C.; Pla, J. The Sko1 protein represses the yeast-to-hypha transition and regulates the oxidative stress response in Candida albicans. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47, 587–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Zhang, X.; De Micheli, M.; Coleman, S.T.; Sanglard, D.; Moye-Rowley, W.S. Analysis of the oxidative stress regulation of the Candida albicans transcription factor, Cap1p. Mol. Microbiol. 2000, 36, 618–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Davis, D.; Wilson, R.B.; Mitchell, A.P. RIM101-dependent and-independent pathways govern pH responses in Candida albicans. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20, 971–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Davis, D.; Edwars John, J.; Mitchell, A.P.; Ibrahim, A.S. Candida albicans RIM101 pH response pathway is required for host-pathogen interactions. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 5953–5959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Nicholls, S.; Leach, M.D.; Priest, C.L.; Brown, A.J.P. Role of the heat shock transcription factor, Hsf1, in a major fungal pathogen that is obligately associated with warm-blooded animals. Mol. Microbiol. 2009, 74, 844–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  167. Leach, M.D.; Cowen, L.E. to sense or die: mechanisms of temperature sensing in fungal pathogens. Curr. Fungal Infect. Rep. 2014, 8, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Bruno, V.M.; Kalachikov, S.; Subaran, R.; Nobile, C.J.; Kyratsous, C.; Mitchell, A.P. Control of the C. albicans cell wall damage response by transcriptional regulator Cas5. PLoS Pathog. 2006, 2, e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Vasicek, E.M.; Berkow, E.L.; Bruno, V.M.; Mitchell, A.P.; Wiederhold, N.P.; Barker, K.S.; Rogers, P.D. Disruption of the transcriptional regulator Cas5 results in enhanced killing of Candida albicans by Fluconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 6807–6818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Nobile, C.J.; Fox, E.P.; Nett, J.E.; Sorrells, T.R.; Mitrovich, Q.M.; Hernday, A.D.; Tuch, B.B.; Andes, D.R.; Johnson, A.D. A Recently evolved transcriptional network controls biofilm development in Candida albicans. Cell 2013, 148, 126–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Mukherjee, P.K.; Chandra, J.; Kuhn, D.M.; Ghannoum, M.A. Mechanism of fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans biofilms: Phase-specific role of efflux pumps and membrane sterols. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 4333–4340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Lepak, A.; Nett, J.; Lincoln, L.; Marchillo, K.; Andes, D. Time course of microbiologic outcome and gene expression in Candida albicans during and following in vitro and in vivo exposure to fluconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 1311–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Fox, E.P.; Bui, C.K.; Nett, J.E.; Hartooni, N.; Mui, M.C.; Andes, D.R.; Nobile, C.J.; Johnson, A.D. An expanded regulatory network temporally controls Candida albicans biofilm formation. Mol. Microbiol. 2015, 96, 1226–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Nobile, C.J.; Mitchell, A.P. Genetics and genomics of Candida albicans biofilm formation. Cell. Microbiol. 2006, 8, 1382–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Lane, S.; Birse, C.; Zhou, S.; Matson, R.; Liu, H. DNA array studies demonstrate convergent regulation of virulence factors by Cph1, Cph2, and Efg1 in Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 48988–48996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Ha, K.C.; White, T.C. Effects of azole antifungal drugs on the transition from yeast cells to hyphae in susceptible and resistant isolates of the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999, 43, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  177. Mogavero, S.; Tavanti, A.; Senesi, S.; Rogers, P.D.; Morschhäuser, J. Differential requirement of the transcription factor Mcm1 for activation of the Candida albicans multidrug efflux pump MDR1 by its regulators Mrr1 and Cap1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 2061–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Znaidi, S.; Nesseir, A.; Chauvel, M.; Rossignol, T.; D’Enfert, C. A comprehensive functional portrait of two heat shock factor-type transcriptional regulators involved in Candida albicans morphogenesis and virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Silver, P.M.; Oliver, B.G.; White, T.C. Role of Candida albicans Transcription factor Upc2p in Drug resistance and sterol metabolism. Eukaryot. Cell 2004, 3, 1391–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Lavoie, H.; Hogues, H.; Mallick, J.; Sellam, A.; Nantel, A.; Whiteway, M. Evolutionary tinkering with conserved components of a transcriptional regulatory network. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8, e1000329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Dogra, S.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Gupta, V.; Dixit, B.L.; Gupta, C.M.; Sanglard, D.; Prasad, R. Asymmetric distribution of phosphatidylethanolamine in C. albicans: Possible mediation by CDR1, a multidrug transporter belonging to ATP binding cassette (ABC) superfamily. Yeast 1999, 15, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Noble, J.A.; Tsai, H.-F.; Suffis, S.D.; Su, Q.; Myers, T.G.; Bennett, J.E. STB5 is a negative regulator of azole resistance in Candida glabrata. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 959–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Roetzer, A.; Klopf, E.; Gratz, N.; Marcet-Houben, M.; Hiller, E.; Rupp, S.; Gabaldón, T.; Kovarik, P.; Schüller, C. Regulation of Candida glabrata oxidative stress resistance is adapted to host environment. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Chen, K.H.; Miyazaki, T.; Tsai, H.F.; Bennett, J.E. The bZip transcription factor Cgap1p is involved in multidrug resistance and required for activation of multidrug transporter gene CgFLR1 in Candida glabrata. Gene 2007, 386, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Merhej, J.; Thiebaut, A.; Blugeon, C.; Pouch, J.; Ali Chaouche, M.E.A.; Camadro, J.-M.; Le Crom, S.; Lelandais, G.; Devaux, F. A network of paralogous stress response transcription factors in the human pathogen Candida glabrata. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The role of multidrug resistance (MDR) transporters in the survival of Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus species upon infection in the human host. (1) MDR transporters involved in multiple azole resistance; (2) MDR transporters necessary for biofilm formation; (3) MDR transporters involved in Cryptococcus species virulence in the central nervous system (CNS); (4) MDR transporters involved in the efflux of histatin-5 in the oral cavity; (5) MDR transporters involved in Cryptococcus species virulence in the lungs; (6) Candida glabrata MDR transporters involved in polyamine or acetic acid export for the survival in the vaginal tract; (7) MDR transporters involved in the fight against the immune response of the host; and (8) MDR transporters known to be essential for normal virulence of fungal pathogens. The central picture summarizes the niches of infection in which the referred fungal pathogens are found. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are highlighted in red and major facilitator superfamilies (MFS) transporters are highlighted in green.
Figure 1. The role of multidrug resistance (MDR) transporters in the survival of Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus species upon infection in the human host. (1) MDR transporters involved in multiple azole resistance; (2) MDR transporters necessary for biofilm formation; (3) MDR transporters involved in Cryptococcus species virulence in the central nervous system (CNS); (4) MDR transporters involved in the efflux of histatin-5 in the oral cavity; (5) MDR transporters involved in Cryptococcus species virulence in the lungs; (6) Candida glabrata MDR transporters involved in polyamine or acetic acid export for the survival in the vaginal tract; (7) MDR transporters involved in the fight against the immune response of the host; and (8) MDR transporters known to be essential for normal virulence of fungal pathogens. The central picture summarizes the niches of infection in which the referred fungal pathogens are found. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are highlighted in red and major facilitator superfamilies (MFS) transporters are highlighted in green.
Genes 09 00332 g001
Figure 2. Transcriptional regulatory networks that control the expression of MDR transporter genes in C. albicans, considering the subgroups of transcription factors known to be involved in multidrug resistance (A); in stress response (B); biofilm formation (C); cell-cycle/morphology (D); cell-wall dynamics (E); and lipid (F). The displayed regulatory associations are according to the data present in the Pathoyeastract database (http://pathoyeastract.org/) [161]. The ABC transporters are highlighted by the yellow colour and the MFS transporters are highlighted by the orange colour. Arrows indicate the experimental basis of the documented regulatory associations, either expression evidence (dashed line) or DNA-binding evidence (filled line). Green, red, blue, or black arrows indicate a positive, negative, positive and negative, or unspecified association, respectively.
Figure 2. Transcriptional regulatory networks that control the expression of MDR transporter genes in C. albicans, considering the subgroups of transcription factors known to be involved in multidrug resistance (A); in stress response (B); biofilm formation (C); cell-cycle/morphology (D); cell-wall dynamics (E); and lipid (F). The displayed regulatory associations are according to the data present in the Pathoyeastract database (http://pathoyeastract.org/) [161]. The ABC transporters are highlighted by the yellow colour and the MFS transporters are highlighted by the orange colour. Arrows indicate the experimental basis of the documented regulatory associations, either expression evidence (dashed line) or DNA-binding evidence (filled line). Green, red, blue, or black arrows indicate a positive, negative, positive and negative, or unspecified association, respectively.
Genes 09 00332 g002aGenes 09 00332 g002bGenes 09 00332 g002c
Figure 3. Transcriptional regulatory networks that control the expression of MDR transporter genes in C. glabrata, considering the subgroups of transcription factors known to be involved in multidrug resistance (A) and in stress response (B). The displayed regulatory associations are according to the data present in the Pathoyeastract database (http://pathoyeastract.org/) [161]. ABC transporters are highlighted by the yellow colour and MFS transporters are highlighted by the orange colour. Arrows indicate the experimental basis of the documented regulatory associations, either expression evidence (dashed line) or DNA-binding evidence (filled line). Green, red, blue, or black arrows indicate a positive, negative, positive and negative, or unspecified association, respectively.
Figure 3. Transcriptional regulatory networks that control the expression of MDR transporter genes in C. glabrata, considering the subgroups of transcription factors known to be involved in multidrug resistance (A) and in stress response (B). The displayed regulatory associations are according to the data present in the Pathoyeastract database (http://pathoyeastract.org/) [161]. ABC transporters are highlighted by the yellow colour and MFS transporters are highlighted by the orange colour. Arrows indicate the experimental basis of the documented regulatory associations, either expression evidence (dashed line) or DNA-binding evidence (filled line). Green, red, blue, or black arrows indicate a positive, negative, positive and negative, or unspecified association, respectively.
Genes 09 00332 g003
Table 1. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters of Candida, Aspergillus, and Cryptococcus species focusing their roles in multidrug resistance (MDR) and physiological functions, as well as their pathogenicity and virulence features.
Table 1. ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters of Candida, Aspergillus, and Cryptococcus species focusing their roles in multidrug resistance (MDR) and physiological functions, as well as their pathogenicity and virulence features.
SpeciesTotal #Characterised #Characterised ORFsRole in MDRPhysiological RolePathogenicity and Virulence Features
ABC ProteinsCandida albicans284orf19.6000/CDR1Multidrug transporter of ABC superfamilyTransport of phospholipids (in-to-out direction), steroidsInduced by β-estradiol, progesterone, corticosteroid, or cholesterol; Spider biofilm induced
orf19.5958/CDR2Multidrug transporter of ABC superfamily, overexpressed in azole-resistant isolatesTransports phospholipids (in-to-out direction)Repressed in young biofilms
orf19.1313/CDR3-Transporter of the Pdr/Cdr family of the ATP-binding cassette superfamily; transports phospholipids (out-to-in direction); expressed in opaque-phase cellsInduced by macrophage interaction; Spider biofilm induced
orf19.5079/CDR4--Rat catheter and flow model biofilm induced
Candida glabrata185CAGL0M01760g/CDR1Multidrug transporter of ABC superfamily, involved in resistance to azoles, expression regulated by Pdr1p, increased abundance in azole resistant strainsExpression increased by loss of the mitochondrial genome-
CAGL0F02717g/CDR2 (PDH1)Multidrug transporter, predicted plasma membrane ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter; regulated by Pdr1p; involved in fluconazole resistance--
CAGL0I04862g /SNQ2Predicted plasma membrane ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter, putative transporter involved in multidrug resistance; involved in Pdr1p-mediated azole resistance--
CAGL0G00242g/YOR1Putative ABC transporter involved in multidrug efflux; gene is upregulated in azole-resistant strain--
CAGL0F01419g/AUS1-ATP-binding cassette transporter involved in sterol uptakeNecessary for C. glabrata virulence in a mice model of disseminated infection
Candida tropicalis221CDR1Induced in clinical azole resistant isolates--
Candida parapsilosis191CPAR2_405290/CDR1Induced in clinical azole resistant isolates--
Candida dubliniensis191Cd36_85210/CDR1Predicted multidrug transporter of ABC superfamily, involved in multidrug resistance, overexpressed in fluconazole-resistant derivatives obtained in vitro --
Candida krusei92ABC1Upregulated during azole stress, involved in innate fluconazole resistance, confers fluconazole resistance through drug efflux upon hyperexpression in S. cerevisiae --
ABC2Upregulated during azole stress, expression correlated with itraconazole resistance --
Aspergillus fumigatus497Afu6g04360/ATRFPutative ABC transporter; drug efflux pump; involved in itraconazole resistance--
Afu1g12690/MDR4ABC multidrug transporter; induced by voriconazole exposure in vitro and in mice; involved in itraconazole resistance-Biofilm growth regulated protein
Afu1g17440/ABCAABC drug exporter; induced during voriconazole stress -Overexpression leads to an augmentation of virulence in the presence of voriconazole in the G. mellonella model of infection
Afu1g10390/ABCBPutative ABC multidrug transporter; transcript induced by voriconazole-Necessary for full virulence of A. fumigatus in the G. mellonella model of infection
Afu1g14330/ABCCPutative ABC transporter; induced during voriconazole stress; mutation causes increased itraconazole, voriconazole and posaconazole sensitivity--
Afu6g03470/ABCDPutative MDR1 family ABC transporter; induced during voriconazole stress -Biofilm growth regulated protein
Afu7g00480/ABCEPutative ABC transporter; induced during voriconazole stress -Biofilm growth regulated protein
Afu3g07300/ATRIPutative ABC transporter; induced during voriconazole stressmutation causes increased itraconazole and voriconazole sensitivity --
Cryptococcus neoformans543AFR1Pump required for azole efflux and other xenobiotics, including cycloheximide, nocodazole, and trichostatin A; involved in clinical fluconazole resistance; role in susceptibility towards amphotericin B and 5-fluorocytosine: expression was positively regulated by CnCrz1 and CnYap1 in response to fluconazole-Necessary for full virulence of C. neoformans in intravenous and in inhalation mouse models; overexpression upon C. neoformans phagocytosis; and involved in the resistance against microglia
AFR2Role in susceptibility towards amphotericin B and 5-fluorocytosine--
MDR1Confers itraconazole resistance upon hyperexpression in S. cerevisiae; role in susceptibility towards amphotericin B and 5-fluorocytosine--
Cryptococcus gattii232MDR1Confers fluconazole resistance in S. cerevisiae-Overexpressed in cells recovered from the brain of infected mice
PDR11Necessary for fluconazole resistance in the VGII clinical strain -Overexpressed in cells recovered from the lungs of infected mice
Table 2. MFS transporters of Candida, Aspergillus, and Cryptococcus species, focusing their roles in MDR and physiological functions, as well as their pathogenicity and virulence features.
Table 2. MFS transporters of Candida, Aspergillus, and Cryptococcus species, focusing their roles in MDR and physiological functions, as well as their pathogenicity and virulence features.
SpeciesTotal #Characterised #Characterised ORFsRole in MDRPhysiological RolePathogenicity and Virulence Features
MFS ProteinsCandida albicans268orf19.5604/MDR1Major mediator of azole resistance; methotrexate is preferred substrate; overexpression in drug-resistant clinical isolates confers fluconazole resistance; repressed in young biofilm-Necessary for full virulence in C. albicans in immunocompetent and immunocompromised mice models
orf19.6577/FLU1Involved in the resistance towards fluconazole, ketoconazole, and itraconazole; confers fluconazole resistance in S. cerevisiaeInvolved in histatin-5 efflux-
orf19.2160/NAG4Required for wild-type cycloheximide resistance-Required for wild-type mouse virulence
orf19.2158/NAG3Required for wild-type cycloheximide resistance-Required for wild-type mouse virulence; Spider biofilm repressed
orf19.2151/NAG6Required for wild-type cycloheximide resistance-Required for wild-type mouse virulence
orf19.508/QDR1-Involved in lipid homeostasisInvolved in biofilm architecture and thickness and virulence
orf19.6992/QDR2-Involved in lipid homeostasisInvolved in biofilm architecture and thickness and virulence in a murine model of hematogenously disseminated candidiasis
orf19.136/QDR3-Involved in lipid homeostasisInvolved in biofilm architecture and thickness and virulence in a murine model of hematogenously disseminated candidiasis
Candida glabrata158CAGL0J09944g/AQR1Involved in resistance to flucytosine and imidazolesInvolved in resistance to acetic acid-
CAGL0G03927g/TPO1_1Putative drug:H+ antiporter, involved in efflux of clotrimazole; required for resistance to clotrimazole and other drugsInvolved in the resistance to histatin-5; involved in spermine resistanceInvolved in virulence
CAGL0E03674g/TPO1_2Putative drug:H+ antiporter, involved in efflux of clotrimazole; required for resistance to clotrimazole and other drugsInvolved in fatty acid and sterol homeostasis upon biofilm formation; involved in spermine resistanceInvolved in virulence in the G. mellonella model and biofilm formation
CAGL0I10384g/TPO3Confers imidazole and triazole drug resistance; activated by CgPdr1Involved in polyamine homeostasis-
CAGL0G08624g/QDR2Confers imidazole drug resistance, involved in clotrimazole efflux; activated by CgPdr1; upregulated in azole-resistant strain--
CAGL0H06017g/FLR1Confers resistance to benomyl; gene is downregulated in azole-resistant strain--
CAGL0H06039g/FLR2Multidrug transporter of the major facilitator superfamily involved in 5-flucytosine resistance --
CAGL0M06281g/DTR1-Acetate exporter in the plasma membraneRequired for virulence in G. mellonella model
Candida tropicalis261MDR1Overexpression in resistant clinical isolates and upon biofilm formation--
Candida parapsilosis341CPAR2_301760/MDR1Member of the MDR family of major facilitator transporter superfamily; putative drug transporter; expression increased in fluconazole and voriconazole resistant strains --
Candida dubliniensis141Cd36_63890/MDR1Predicted multidrug transporter of ABC superfamily, involved in multidrug resistance--
Aspergillus fumigatus2786Afu6g09710/GLIA-Predicted major facilitator type glioxin transporter, encoded in the putative gliotoxin biosynthetic gene cluster
Afu1g05010/MFS56Putative MFS transporter; mutation causes increased azole sensitivity --
Afu3g03500/MDR3Putative multidrug resistance protein; transcript upregulated in response to amphotericin B; displays itraconazole-increased expression in resistant mutants --
Afu8g05710/MFSAHighly expressed during voriconazole stressPutative major facilitator superfamily (MFS) sugar transporter Calcium induced; transcript upregulated in conidia exposed to neutrophils
Afu1g15490/MFSBPutative major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter; highly expressed during voriconazole stress --
Afu1g03200/MFSCPutative major facilitator superfamily (MFS) transporter; highly expressed during voriconazole stress--
Cryptococcus neoformans863CNA07070-Dityrosine transporter-
CNC03290---
CND00440/AFLT---

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cavalheiro, M.; Pais, P.; Galocha, M.; Teixeira, M.C. Host-Pathogen Interactions Mediated by MDR Transporters in Fungi: As Pleiotropic as it Gets! Genes 2018, 9, 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070332

AMA Style

Cavalheiro M, Pais P, Galocha M, Teixeira MC. Host-Pathogen Interactions Mediated by MDR Transporters in Fungi: As Pleiotropic as it Gets! Genes. 2018; 9(7):332. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070332

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cavalheiro, Mafalda, Pedro Pais, Mónica Galocha, and Miguel C. Teixeira. 2018. "Host-Pathogen Interactions Mediated by MDR Transporters in Fungi: As Pleiotropic as it Gets!" Genes 9, no. 7: 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070332

APA Style

Cavalheiro, M., Pais, P., Galocha, M., & Teixeira, M. C. (2018). Host-Pathogen Interactions Mediated by MDR Transporters in Fungi: As Pleiotropic as it Gets! Genes, 9(7), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070332

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop