Next Article in Journal
Fe0/H2O Systems for Environmental Remediation: The Scientific History and Future Research Directions
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Flow Assessment Considering Inter- and Intra-Annual Streamflow Variability under the Context of Non-Stationarity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Temperature and De-Icing Salt on the Sedimentation of Particulate Matter in Traffic Area Runoff

by
Steffen H. Rommel
and
Brigitte Helmreich
*
Chair of Urban Water Systems Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Am Coulombwall 3, 85748 Garching, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2018, 10(12), 1738; https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121738
Submission received: 8 November 2018 / Revised: 18 November 2018 / Accepted: 21 November 2018 / Published: 27 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Wastewater Treatment and Reuse)

Abstract

:
Stormwater quality improvement devices use sedimentation as a pre-treatment step to separate contaminant laden particulate matter (PM) from traffic area runoff. Multiple studies describe worse settling behavior during the cold season. This paper is written in response to a decreased PM retention that was observed in the cold season during a 20-month monitoring of a sedimentation tank. However, the data was insufficient to assess the two factors that influence sedimentation during the cold season—temperature and de-icing salt application. Therefore, simplified discrete particle settling models were used to determine the influence of temperature and de-icing salt. These influences were compared to other factors, like overflow rate, particle density, and particle size distribution. To calculate the effect of temperature and de-icing salt on density and viscosity, two empirical models were applied for the first time in this field. The calculations showed that de-icing salt (NaCl) had a negligible influence on the retention of PM. However, reducing the temperature from 20 °C to 5 °C was shown to decrease the total suspended solid removal efficiency by up to 8%. The order of influencing factors was found to be particle size distribution >> overflow rate > particle density > temperature.

1. Introduction

Traffic area runoff is contaminated by, amongst others, wear of pavement and vehicles, leakage, and atmospheric deposition [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Most of the contaminants, e.g., heavy metals, are present in particulate form [6].
In the winter season, abrasives and de-icing salts are applied on roads to ensure traffic safety [7,8]. This application directly causes a higher load of particulate matter (PM) to be present on the road surface [8]. This PM is associated with higher concentrations of contaminants in traffic area runoff due to higher wear and tear of pavement and vehicles, as well as an increased corrosion, enhanced by de-icing salts [9,10,11]. Because most contaminants are particulate bound, an effective removal of PM from traffic area runoff needs to be considered before it is discharged into groundwater or surface water.
The use of decentralized sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) for the treatment of stormwater runoff is becoming increasingly prevalent for the treatment of stormwater runoff at the source [12]. Sustainable urban drainage systems are particularly suitable in dense urban areas as they can provide viable alternatives to more common centralized treatment solutions, such as large end-of-line sedimentation tanks and retention-type soil filters. Among these are technical SUDS or stormwater quality improvement devices (SQIDs), including sedimentation and filtration devices. Stormwater quality improvement devices utilize, in addition to sedimentation different treatment processes based on physical adsorption, precipitation and chemical processes [12,13]. However, their pollution removal efficiencies can be quite different [12]. In the most cases, sedimentation is the pre-treatment step of a multi-step treatment to avoid clogging of sorption filters. Nevertheless, sedimentation is sometimes the sole treatment step.
During a monitoring campaign of a SQID treating the runoff of a highly trafficked road, we observed considerably worse effluent quality of a sedimentation tank during winter [14]. Figure 1a gives an impression of road runoff (left) and effluent of the sedimentation tank (right) of a snowmelt event under de-icing salt influence. This finding is supported by Semadeni–Davies [15], who reported a decreased performance of an urban stormwater pond during winter and spring. Figure 1b highlights multiple possible influencing factors for worse effluent quality of SQIDs during the cold season adapted from Semadeni–Davies [15].
Stratification of the water column in the sedimentation tank caused by temperature differences between the influent and the water volume in the tank can lead to disadvantageous flow patterns and shorter residence times in the system [16,17]. Additionally, densimetric stratification induced by de-icing salt application is increasing this effect [18]. Tchobanoglous et al. [19] mention that as low as a 1 °C temperature differential between incoming wastewater and the water in the sedimentation tank will lead to a density current. Additionally, lower temperature and higher de-icing salt concentration increase density and viscosity of the water in the sedimentation basin. This reduces the settling velocity of particles, and therefore, lowers the removal efficiency of PM in the system. Winkler et al. [20] show that in wastewater treatment, the settling velocity of granular sludge decreases with lower temperature and higher salt (NaCl) concentrations. Similar findings can be expected for particles in urban runoff. However, the properties of granular sludge in wastewater treatment are considerably different to road runoff particles. Furthermore, studies showed that the flocculation of PM is affected by the temperature [21,22,23]. However due to a decreasing floc density with an increasing floc size, it is not clear if flocculation is definitely improving the settling behavior. Thus, this study is describing discrete particle settling.
Adamsson and Bergdahl [17] indicated that temperature and salinity need to be considered to evaluate the performance of detention tanks. Spelman and Sansalone [24] reported that temperature has a minor impact on the treatment efficiency of hydrodynamic separators and clarifiers. However, in this study a minimum temperature of 10 °C was used, which is not representative for the temperate climate zone. Yet, no study covered the influence of temperature and de-icing salt concentration on the settling behavior of PM in traffic area runoff. Because of the relatively low concentration of PM, measured as total suspended solids (TSS), an experimental approach would be affected by huge uncertainties. Reliable statements for a better understanding of the processes, and thus estimation of maintenance intervals is necessary to aid in increasing the acceptance of SQIDs in the future.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the ranking of influencing factors causing decreased performance during the cold season of sedimentation tanks as part of SQIDs used for treatment of traffic area runoff. After analyzing data from a 20-month monitoring of a full-scale sedimentation tank, the influencing processes based on physical settling models were evaluated to substantiate the results.
To calculate densities and viscosities of various de-icing salt solutions the models of Laliberté [25,26] were applied for the first time in this field. Future numerical models could be performed based on those models to consider temperature as well as de-icing salt effects in SQIDs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Monitoring of Full-Scale Sedimentation Tank

To investigate PM removal efficiency of SQIDs for road runoff a full-scale sedimentation tank was monitored. The monitored sedimentation tank is the primary stage of a two-step SQID for road runoff located in Munich, Germany. It is operated as a continuous flow sedimentation tank. The tank consists of a round concrete shaft with a diameter of 2 m, an impounding depth of 2.4 m and a storage volume of 7.5 m3. Runoff from 400 m2 of a heavily trafficked road form the influent to the treatment plant. The annual average daily traffic (AADT) is approximately 24,000 vehicles per day on the attached road surface (46,000 vehicles per day including the separated opposing traffic). The cross-section of the road consists of two traffic lanes, one accelerating lane and one emergency lane with an asphalt surface.
Samples of the influent and effluent of the sedimentation tank were withdrawn time-proportionally (5 min intervals, 250 mL each) during rain events by automatic samplers (WaterSam WS 316 and Edmund Bühler PP 84). The sampling took place from May 2016 to January 2018. The sampling started after the inflow exceeded 1 L min−1 for longer than 1 min. Flow was measured by an electro-magnetic flow meter (Krohne Optiflux 1100 C, DN40, error of measurement <1.6% for q > 2.6 L s−1 ha−1). At the end of the discharge events the sampling stopped. To prevent alteration of samples, they were kept in coolers at 4 ± 1 °C until transport to the lab. Analyses were performed within 72 h.
The discrete samples withdrawn during one discharge event were combined to create one composite sample. Electric conductivity (EC) and pH values were analyzed according to SM 2510 B (detection limit: 1 µS cm−1) and SM 4500-H+, respectively [27]. Electric conductivity was used to verify the de-icing salt application, here sodium chloride (NaCl). Particulate matter was analyzed as total suspended solids (TSS), coarse suspended solids with a diameter greater than 63 μm (SS > 63 µm), and suspended solids between 0.45 µm and 63 µm (SS63). To determine the PM, one liter of sample was sieved by a 1000 µm sieve in the first step, followed by a 63 µm sieve as the second step. In the third step the sieved sample was filtrated under a vacuum over a 0.45 µm membrane filter (cellulose nitrate). Large constituents (>> 1 mm; e.g., leaves, cigarette stubs), which are not representative for the sample, were manually removed. All sieves and filters were dried at 105 °C ± 2 °C until constant mass was achieved. The fine suspended solids (SS63) are the fraction between 0.45 µm and 63 µm, found as residue on the membrane filter. The coarse suspended solids (SS > 63) are the fraction between 1000 µm and 63 µm, found on the 63 µm sieve. Total suspended solids was calculated by the sum of the residues on the 1000 µm and 63 µm sieves, and the 0.45 µm membrane filter after drying. The procedure was a modified method of Dierschke and Welker [28].
Climate data of the measurement station 3379 of The German Weather Service (DWD) was used. The meteorological station is located approximately 5 km from the study site. The annual precipitation height was 955 mm in 2016 and 931 mm in 2017. In 2016, there were 64 days of frost (minimum air temperature < 0 °C) and 71 days in 2017. The temperature of the water in the sedimentation tank was assumed to be equal to the soil temperature at 50 cm depth.

2.2. Calculations

2.2.1. Density

Densities of water ρw (kg m−3) were calculated with Equation (1) [25],
  ρ w = ( ( ( ( (   2.8054253   ×   10 10 t +   1.0556302   ×   10 7 ) t   4.6170461   ×   10 5 ) t   0.0079870401 ) t +   16.945176 ) t +   999.83952 ) 1   +   0.01687985 t  
where t is the temperature (°C). The densities of solutions ρm, in this case sodium chloride (NaCl) solutions, were calculated using the model of Laliberté and Cooper [25]. The model considers temperature and concentration of the solute. ρm (kg m−3) was determined with the following Equations (2) and (3):
  ρ m = 1 w H 2 O ρ H 2 O + w NaCl   v ¯ a p p , N a C l  
  v ¯ a p p , N a C l = w NaCl + 1.01660 + 0.014624   t ( 0.00433   w NaCl + 0.06471 ) e ( 0.000001 ( t + 3315.6 ) 2 )  
where w H 2 O = mass fraction of water in the solution (-), wNaCl = mass fraction of the NaCl in the solution (-) and v ¯ a p p , N a C l = NaCl specific volume (m3 kg−1). Equation (3) is valid for wNaCl > 0.00006 [25], therefore densities of pure water (without NaCl) were calculated with Equation (1).
This study examines the de-icing salt NaCl concerning the by far greatest application rate [7,29]. Concentrations of up to 15 g L−1 NaCl could be present in traffic area runoff [7,29,30]. Because of the thermal expansivity, this study used the mass fraction of solute NaCl (wNaCl) to describe the concentration of the solution. A wNaCl of 0.01 corresponds to 10 g L−1 at 20 °C. To cover extrema, the calculations were conducted up to wNaCl = 0.02, unless otherwise stated.

2.2.2. Viscosity

Dynamic viscosities of the solutions were calculated as a function of temperature and concentration of the solute by means of the model of Laliberté [26], following Equation (4). In the first step the dynamic viscosity of water ηw (kg m−1 s−1) was calculated at temperature t (°C). Equation (4) is valid for t from 0 °C to 100 °C [26].
  η w = ( t + 246 ) × 10 3 ( 0.05594 t + 5.2842 ) t   +   137.37  
In the second step the viscosity of the various NaCl solutions ηm (kg m−1 s−1) were calculated with Equation (5), based on the model of Laliberté [26]:
η m = η w w H 2 O ( exp ( 16.222 ( 1 w H 2 O ) 1.3229 + 1.4849 ( 0.0074691 t + 1 ) ( 30.78 ( 1 w H 2 O ) 2.0583 + 1 ) ) × 10 3 ) w NaCl .  
where ηm = dynamic viscosity of the NaCl solution (kg m−1 s−1), ηw = dynamic viscosity of water (kg m−1 s−1), w H 2 O = mass fraction of water in the solution (−), wNaCl = mass fraction of NaCl in the solution (−) and t = temperature (°C). This formula is valid for t ranging from 5 °C to 154 °C and wNaCl up to 0.264 [26].

2.2.3. Settling Velocity

Stokes’ Law was used to determine the terminal settling velocity vt (m s−1) of the particles [31],
  v t = g ( ρ s ρ w ) d 2 18 η m  
where g = gravitational acceleration (9.81 m s−2), ηm = dynamic viscosity of the solution (kg m−1 s−1), ρm = density of the solution (kg m−3), ρs = density of particles (kg m−3), and d = particle diameter (m).
Because Equation (6) is only applicable for laminar flow (Reynold’s number Re < 1) [19], Re was calculated afterwards with Equation (7),
  Re = v t d ν m  
where ν m = kinematic viscosity of the solution (m2 s−1). Reported settling velocities fulfilled this condition, meaning laminar flow conditions were present.
The mostly non-spherical shape of road runoff particles [32,33] was neglected due to a lack of data about sphericity factors. To investigate the influence of particle density, a low ρs (1.35 g cm−3) [34] and a high ρs (2.25 g cm−3) [33] were used. Because fine SS63 are prevalent in traffic area runoff [30,35,36,37] and showed a significant worse settling behavior, this study focused on those particles <63 μm.

2.2.4. Retention of Suspended Solids

To determine the retention of suspended solids a stationary idealized discrete settling approach was selected. Inflow QIn and outflow QEff were assumed to be equal and constant over time as well as inflow TSS. Scouring of retained particles was neglected. In this model particles with a terminal settling velocity equal to or greater than the critical terminal settling velocity vcrit were removed [19]. The vcrit (m s−1) was equal to the overflow rate determined with Equation (8),
  v crit = Q A = o v e r f l o w   r a t e  
where Q (m3 s−1) = flow rate and A (m2) = surface of the sedimentation basin.
By means of vcrit the critical particle diameter dcrit (µm) was calculated for given conditions like solution temperature, viscosity, density, and particle density. The calculation was conducted with Excel Solver and the solving method GRG nonlinear. Because de-icing salt (NaCl) showed a neglectable effect on the settling velocity (cf. Section 3.2.3), in this step wNaCl was not considered (set to 0). The water temperature was altered in the range from 5 °C to 25 °C. Additionally, the effect of particle density was studied.
The model system corresponded to the monitored system (cf. Section 2.1). The discharge coefficient ψ was set to 1.0, to represent a fully impervious surface and ensure comparability to the test protocol of the Deutsches Insitut für Bautechnik (DIBt) [38]. Rain intensities of 2.5 L s−1 ha−1 and 15 L s−1 ha−1 were investigated. The upper value was chosen based on the knowledge that more intense design rain intensities lead to a minor increase in treatment efficiency [39].
In real traffic area runoff, particles are not uniform in particle size, and therefore, the particle size distribution (PSD) was characterized by a parametric cumulative distribution function (CDF). Selbig and Fienen [40] proposed the usage of the Rosin–Rammler distribution, which is equivalent to the Weibull distribution. This approach was continued by Lee et al. [41]. Based on this knowledge, this method was used to generate a synthetic PSD. The formula of the Rosin–Rammler CDF is
  W ( d , λ , κ ) = 1 e ( d λ ) κ  
where W ( d , λ , κ ) = mass fraction less than d (−); d = particle diameter (μm); λ = shape parameter (−); κ = scale parameter (−) [40]. For our simulation we used λ = {9.3, 60, 116}, equal to a d50 from 6 to 75 μm, and κ was fixed to 0.84 [41].
The TSS removal efficiency (−) was calculated with Equation (10) based on the critical particle diameter dcrit, which is derived from vcrit following Equation (8). Preassigned λ and κ values were used.
  T S S   r e m o v a l   e f f i c i e n c y = 1 W ( d crit , λ , κ )  

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Monitoring of the Full-Scale Sedimentation Tank

The monitoring of the full-scale sedimentation tank was executed over a period of 20 months. To cover all seasonal influences, 23 rain events were taken and analyzed. Table 1 presents the statistics of all measured values from the influent and effluent of the sedimentation tank as well as the calculated retention of TSS, SS > 63, and SS63. Due to the flushing of PM of former events, a few negative removal rates were determined. Remarkable was that the PM occurred almost completely as SS63 (98% of mean TSS). Thereby the focus on the fine fraction of this study was supported.
Figure 2 shows the annual course of TSS influent and effluent of the sedimentation tank, as well as TSS retention. Due to strong seasonal courses [10], data points of different years are plotted together in one figure. At the start of the sampling campaign two events showed strong scouring of sediments (−185% and −365% TSS retention) from previous rain events or maybe even residues of the construction work. Therefore, those two events were removed. In the annual course of TSS the strong increase in the cold seasons was recognizable. Likewise, a decrease of TSS retention during the cold season is shown. Furthermore, in summer three events showed conspicuous low TSS retentions (1%, 2%, and 28%). The event with the lowest TSS retention was the event with the highest inflow. Thus, the high inflow resulted in the low TSS retention. Although the data was not adequate to explain the reason for the low TSS retentions of the other two events. Due to less frequent and less intensive rain events in the cold season, only a few events could be sampled. Therefore, monitoring will be continued to gain more statistical significance.
To evaluate the influence of temperature on the PSD, Figure 3 shows the ratio SS63/TSS in the influent and effluent of the sedimentation tank. During the cold season, the particles were smaller than during summer. Thus, a decreased settling velocity was expected during the cold season. Because SS63/TSS was higher in the effluent than in the influent, the worse removal efficiency of SS63 was visible. The increasing particle size with increasing temperature can be explained by enhanced flocculation [21,22]. Since SS63 is describing a range of particle sizes, the ration SS63/TSS can only be an indicator for the PSD.
The following correlation matrix (Figure 4) shows multiple effects influencing the settling of PM. During cold temperatures, a higher EC, due to the application of de-icing salt, and influent TSS was present (rs < −0.68). Between SS63 removal and mean inflow q a weak correlation was observable(rs = −0.34), which induces that even longer residence times in the studied sedimentation tank do not improve the SS63 retention. In contrast, the retention of SS > 63 correlates considerably with q (rs = −0.71). Overall, this means that the used settling tank is only partially suitable for the retention of fine particulate matter. Only in recent years the SS63 parameter has become popular, and therefore settling tanks were mainly designed to separate the sand fraction (>63 µm). To achieve better settling, the geometry needs to be changed to achieve lower surface loadings, and thus, increased settling times.
Although it was expected that TSS, SS63, and SS > 63 retentions would increase with increasing temperature, following sedimentation theory (cf. Section 2.2), this was not observable in the data. However, an inverse effect is shown in Figure 4, which conflicts with the physical basics of settling. Due to the complex nature of the system, it looks like there is a spurious correlation between temperature and the PM retention. The same unexpected correlation is visible between EC and PM retention. Though TSS and SS63 retention correlate moderately to weakly with t and EC (|rs| ≤ 0.40). Because q is increasing with t and decreasing with EC, it can be assumed that this is masking the expected effects. In addition, PSD was not constant (cf. Figure 3), and therefore removal efficiency of the PM was varying. The monitoring will proceed and with increasing data the trend may alter.
Given that our findings are based on a limited number of sampled events and the uncertainty of sampling, the results of that monitoring should be treated with caution. Bardin et al. [42] demonstrated with a comparable system that established methods of performance measurement are accompanied with a wide margin of uncertainty. Assuming an ideal sampling and preservation of the samples, the removal efficiency of TSS is already within a range of 39% to 59% due to the error of TSS analysis (±10%). This approximation is based on the mean TSS concentrations in the influent and the effluent of the sedimentation tank. Furthermore, there are uncertainties related to the sampling conditions, the sampling cycle performance and the preparation of the composite samples [42].
To further evaluate the ranking of influencing factors on PM retention, the following calculations, based on simplified approaches, were made to substantiate the results.

3.2. Calculations

3.2.1. Density

The densities of various NaCl solutions were calculated with the model of Laliberté and Cooper [25]. Figure 5a shows the calculated densities of solutions ρm with different wNaCl at various temperatures. The solution with wNaCl = 0.00 equates to pure water. Density declines with increasing temperature and increases with increasing wNaCl. The density anomaly of water affected the NaCl solutions as well. While the highest density of pure water was found at 3.98 °C, in accordance with Kell [43], the density of the NaCl solutions peaked at lower temperatures: 1.58 °C with wNaCl = 0.02 and up to 3.38 °C with wNaCl = 0.005. Thereby a trend of shifting the maximum density point towards lower temperatures with increasing wNaCl was derivable. In Figure 5b, density is plotted as a function of wNaCl. A linear correlation between ρm and wNaCl is observable. Density affects settling velocity linearly following Equation (6) (Section 2.2.2), causing colder temperatures and higher wNaCl to lead to a decrease of settling velocity and consequently worse PM retention. Assuming the particle density of ρs = 1.35 g cm−1, the settling velocity at 5 °C and wNaCl = 0.02 is 5% less than at 20 °C and wNaCl = 0.00. Though, wNaCl is an extreme value in this example. Under more likely winter conditions (wNaCl = 0.01), the effect of density variation on settling velocity is <1%. Consequently, this effect is negligible and probably not measurable in full scale. Please refer the Supplementary Materials (S1) for the densities of NaCl solutions at various temperatures.

3.2.2. Viscosity

Based on the model of Laliberté [26], the viscosity of various NaCl solutions were calculated at 20 °C. Figure 6a shows the viscosity as a function of the mass fraction of NaCl in the solution wNaCl. NaCl showed a kosmotropic effect, meaning it acts as a structure maker and increases the viscosity of the solution compared to pure water [44]. The viscosity of pure water is depicted by the solution with wNaCl = 0.00.
In traffic area runoff values of wNaCl < 0.015 (15 g L−1 at 5 to 25 °C) occur [7,30]. Consequently, the viscosity alteration by NaCl does not occur in the full magnitude, which Figure 6a indicates. To investigate the influence of the temperature, the viscosity calculation was carried out with solution temperatures t from 5 to 25 °C with increments of 5 °C following the method of Laliberté [26]. The minimal temperature covered by the model is 5 °C, thus the density peak (cf. Section 3.2.1) cannot be included in the viscosity calculation. Figure 6b shows the viscosity of solutions ηm as a function of wNaCl at various temperatures. In the considered mass fraction range, a slightly positive linear relation between wNaCl and ηm is observable. However, the influence of the solution temperature was significantly stronger. Thereby the solutions revealed a higher viscosity at lower temperatures. The settling velocity in a solution with wNaCl = 0.02 at 5 °C is 35% less than in a solution with wNaCl = 0.00 at 20 °C. Accordingly, viscosity is the main influencing factor on the settling velocity if particle density and size are constant. The viscosity variation was mainly caused by temperature alteration, not by de-icing salt (NaCl). Please refer the Supplementary Materials (S1) for the viscosities of NaCl solutions at various temperatures.

3.2.3. Settling Velocity

To assess the influence of temperature and de-icing salt on the settling velocity two scenarios were assumed: Winter conditions with t = 5 °C and wNaCl = 0.02 and summer conditions with t = 20 °C and wNaCl = 0.00. Figure 7 illustrates settling velocity vt as a function of particle diameter d. There was a severe difference observable between both scenarios. In winter, 38% lower settling velocities were determined.
To analyze the influence of de-icing salt (NaCl) another scenario was modeled at 5 °C solution temperature with wNaCl = 0.00. In this case, a 34% lower settling velocity was calculated for winter conditions without NaCl influence. This resulted in the temperature influencing the settling velocity at a bigger magnitude than the de-icing salt.
Based on that knowledge, it is recommended to design sedimentation tanks with a larger surface area, and thus, lower overflow rates to cope with challenging winter conditions.

3.2.4. Retention of Suspended Solids

Based on the monitored sedimentation tank (cf. Section 2.1) critical particle diameters dcrit under varying boundary conditions (temperature, flow q, particle density) were determined. The critical particle diameter characterizes the lower limit of particle size, which can be separated in the sedimentation tank.
Figure 8 shows that the influence of the temperature on the particle retention is more severe with increasing flow. Furthermore, the influence of the particle density on the separation increases with flow. To assess the TSS removal efficiency PSD was considered. Hereby the information of Figure 8 was relativized. A reduced temperature from 25 to 5 °C lead to differences of ≤8% TSS removal efficiency (Figure 9a).
A decisive influence of de-icing salt on the TSS removal efficiency was not observable (Figure 9b). Increasing wNaCl from 0.00 to 0.02 was shown to decrease the TSS removal efficiency by less than 0.7%. Therefore, de-icing salt was classified as a negligible factor, which was not considered in the following ranking of the influencing factors.
The Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated based on various scenarios (t, ρs, λ or d50 and q) (Table 2). This allowed the influencing factors on the TSS removal efficiency to be ranked. The PSD, specified by d50 or λ, showed the most distinct influence, followed by q and ρs. t was classified as the least influencing factor. However, physical characteristics of particles (ρs and d50/PSD) are regarded site-specific [45,46,47,48,49]. Thus, temperature needs to be considered in future SQID designs to improve treatment efficiency during the cold season. Because the applied model cannot represent effects of occurring density currents caused by temperature and de-icing salt, the effect could occur at bigger magnitudes.
The ranking of the influencing factors PSD > ρs > t of this study was affirmed by Spelman and Sansalone [24]. Additionally, they identified influent hydrograph unsteadiness as the most powerful influencing factor. The hydrograph unsteadiness describes the shape of the hydrograph. A highly unsteady hydrograph rises fast and drops fast after a short time. In comparison to this, a highly steady hydrograph rises slow and drops slow after a long time. Due to the stationary method used in this study, this factor was not assessed. Spelman and Sansalone [24] altered the flow rate q together with the unsteadiness of the influent hydrograph, and therefore, it is not determinable if q or the unsteadiness was the dominant factor. Furthermore, the minimum temperature was 10 °C [24], which is not adequate for the use in the temperate climate zone.
To approximate realistic conditions coming from lab-scale experiments, a variety of effects were neglected in this present study. Kayhanian et al. [33] showed that particles are neither smooth nor spherical, and therefore, models need to be established considering this influence. The current knowledge is that particles in road runoff are not spherical; however, there is no sufficient data describing the shape of runoff particles. Therefore, a representation in simulations is currently not possible. Furthermore, particles were assumed to be non-cohesive. Kayhanian et al. [33] derived from zeta-potential analysis that runoff particles have a relatively low tendency to aggregate. However, experience of handling runoff samples in the lab showed us that aggregation of particles does occur. Li et al. [50] proved this assumption with PSD analysis. Furthermore, the influence of temperature on the flocculation of PM [21,22,23] is not considered, yet. In addition, the influence of de-icing salt on the flocculation of runoff particles is still open. Faltermaier et al. [51] showed an increased settling velocity under de-icing influence. Studies about settling of marine clay-size sediments reported a positive correlation between salinity and settling velocity [52,53]. Since the mineralogy of the particles does have an influence on flocculation, those findings may have limited adaptability to road runoff particles, which contain clay minerals in minor quantities [46,54]. Slight variation in particle density can affect the removal efficiency of PM in sedimentation tanks. Therefore, the common method of particle density determination needs to be verified. Wet particle density [34] could reflect more realistic conditions. It can be expected that the above-mentioned uncertainties affect smaller particles more intensely than bigger size fractions [35,55]. In addition, future studies should be conducted under non-stationary conditions to consider the unsteadiness of the influent hydrograph, like that proposed by Spelman and Sansalone [24].
Further works should improve knowledge about the aforementioned aspects to improve particle separation, and therefore, achieve better effluent quality of SQIDs.

4. Conclusions

A sedimentation tank treating road runoff was monitored for 20 months. During the cold season, reduced PM removal efficiency was observed. However, the data was not sufficient to distinctively assess the influence of temperature and de-icing salt. Therefore, simplified settling models were applied to determine which of the influencing factors had the greatest effect on PM removal. The determined order was PSD >> q > ρs > t. The influence of de-icing salt (NaCl) on the sedimentation of PM was negligible. Since PSD and ρs are assumed to be site-specific, low temperatures need to be considered to improve effluent quality of SQIDs in the cold season. Low temperatures (5 °C) revealed a decrease of up to 8% TSS removal efficiency compared to higher temperatures (20 °C). The simplified models can be extended in future studies by considering de-icing salt induced particle coagulation, stratification, alternated flow patterns, and non-spherical shape of particles.
Two empirical models were applied the first time in this field to calculate density and viscosity of various solutions as a function of temperature and the solute concentration of de-icing salt. These seem promising and can improve future numerical models by considering non-steady water matrices.
Based on the knowledge gained about the sedimentation of PM from road runoff under cold season conditions, we recommend considering low temperatures when designing the sedimentation stages of SQIDs. Effluent quality can be thereby improved. By minimizing the PM load in the effluent of the sedimentation stage, clogging of optional downstream filtration elements can be retarded. Consequently, the intervals between maintenance events could be prolonged.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/10/12/1738/s1, Table S1: Density and viscosity of NaCl solutions at various temperatures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H.R. and B.H.; Methodology, S.H.R., Investigation, S.H.R. and B.H.; Resources, B.H.; Data Curation, S.H.R.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, S.H.R.; Writing—Review & Editing, B.H.; Visualization, S.H.R.; Supervision, B.H.; Project Administration, B.H. and S.H.R.; Funding Acquisition, B.H.

Funding

This research was funded by the City of Munich.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Technical University of Munich (TUM) in the framework of the Open Access Publishing Program. We thank Philipp Stinshoff of the Chair of Urban Water Systems Engineering, Technical University of Munich, for the assistance in operating the study site. We especially thank Claire Sembera for editing the draft.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following symbols are used in this paper:
AArea
AADTAnnual average daily traffic
CDFCumulative distribution function
dParticle diameter
d50Mass-median-diameter of particles
DIBtDeutsches Insitut für Bautechnik
DWDGerman Weather Service
ECElectric conductivity
EffEffluent
gGravitational acceleration
InfInfluent
NaClSodium chloride
PMParticulate matter
PSDParticle size distribution
QFlow rate
qDischarge rate, mean inflow
QEffOutflow
QInInflow
RERemoval efficiency
ReReynold’s number
rsSpearman’s rank correlation coefficients
SQIDStormwater quality improvement device
SS > 63Suspended solids with particle diameter >63 µm
SS63Suspended solids with particle diameter between 0.45 µm and 63 µm
SUDSSustainable urban drainage systems
tTemperature
TSSTotal suspended solids
v ¯ a p p , N a C l NaCl specific volume
vtTerminal settling velocity
wH2OMass fraction of water in the solution
wNaClMass fraction of the NaCl in the solution
ηmDynamic viscosity of the NaCl solution
κScale parameter of CDF
λShape parameter of CDF
νmKinematic viscosity of the solution
ρsParticle density
ρwWater density
ψDischarge coefficient

References

  1. Ball, J.E.; Jenks, R.; Aubourg, D. An assessment of the availability of pollutant constituents on road surfaces. Sci. Total Environ. 1998, 209, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Legret, M.; Pagotto, C. Evaluation of pollutant loadings in the runoff waters from a major rural highway. Sci. Total Environ. 1999, 235, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. McKenzie, E.R.; Money, J.E.; Green, P.G.; Young, T.M. Metals associated with stormwater-relevant brake and tire samples. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 5855–5860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Wik, A.; Dave, G. Occurrence and effects of tire wear particles in the environment—A critical review and an initial risk assessment. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Huber, M.; Welker, A.; Helmreich, B. Critical review of heavy metal pollution of traffic area runoff: Occurrence, influencing factors, and partitioning. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 541, 895–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kayhanian, M.; Fruchtman, B.D.; Gulliver, J.S.; Montanaro, C.; Ranieri, E.; Wuertz, S. Review of highway runoff characteristics: Comparative analysis and universal implications. Water Res. 2012, 46, 6609–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Huber, M.; Welker, A.; Drewes, J.E.; Helmreich, B. Auftausalze im Straßenwinterdienst—Aufkommen und Bedeutung für dezentrale Behandlungsanlagen von Verkehrsflächenabflüssen zur Versickerung (De-icing salts in road maintenance—Occurrence and impact on decentralized systems treating traffic area runoff for infiltration). GWF Wasser/Abwasser 2015, 156, 1138–1152. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fay, L.; Shi, X. Environmental impacts of chemicals for snow and ice control: State of the knowledge. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012, 223, 2751–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Murray, D.C.; Ernst, U.F.W. An Economic Analysis of the Environmental Impact of Highway Deicing; USEPA 600/2-76-033; US EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 1976.
  10. Helmreich, B.; Hilliges, R.; Schriewer, A.; Horn, H. Runoff pollutants of a highly trafficked urban road—Correlation analysis and seasonal influences. Chemosphere 2010, 80, 991–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Shi, X.; Akin, M.; Pan, T.; Fay, L.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Z. Deicer impacts on pavement materials: Introduction and recent developments. Open Civ. Eng. J. 2009, 3, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dierkes, C.; Lucke, T.; Helmreich, B. General technical approvals for decentralised sustainable urban drainage systems (suds)—The current situation in germany. Sustainability 2015, 7, 3031–3051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huber, M.; Helmreich, B.; Welker, A. Einführung in Die Dezentrale Niederschlagswasserbehandlung für Verkehrsflächen- und Metalldachabflüsse: Schacht-/Kompaktsysteme, Rinnensysteme, Straßeneinläufe und Flächenbeläge (Introduction on Decentralized Stormwater Treatment of Traffic Area and Metal Roof Runoff); Technische Universität München Garching: München, Germany, 2015; Volume 213, p. 96. ISSN 0942-914X. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rommel, S.H.; Helmreich, B. Feinpartikuläre Stoffe (AFS63) in Verkehrsflächenabflüssen—Vorkommen und Relevanz für Dezentrale Behandlungsanlagen (Fine Particulate Matter (SS63) in Traffic Area Runoff—Occurrence and Relevance for Decentralized Treatment Systems). In Proceedings of the Aqua Urbanica Trifft RegenwasserTage, Landau (Pfalz), Germany, 18–19 June 2018; Schmitt, T.G., Ed.; Technische Universität Kaiserslautern: Kaiserslautern, Germany, 2018; pp. 159–178. [Google Scholar]
  15. Semadeni–Davies, A. Winter performance of an urban stormwater pond in southern sweden. Hydrol. Process. 2006, 20, 165–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hendi, E.; Shamseldin, A.Y.; Melville, B.W.; Norris, S.E. Experimental investigation of the effect of temperature differentials on hydraulic performance and flow pattern of a sediment retention pond. Water Sci. Technol. 2018, 77, 2896–2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Adamsson, Å.; Bergdahl, L. Simulation of temperature influence on flow pattern and residence time in a detention tank. Hydrol. Res. 2006, 37, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marsalek, J.; Oberts, G.; Exall, K.; Viklander, M. Review of operation of urban drainage systems in cold weather: Water quality considerations. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 48, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Tchobanoglous, G.; Burton, F.L.; Stensel, H.D. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery; McGraw-Hill Education: Berkshire, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  20. Winkler, M.K.H.; Bassin, J.P.; Kleerebezem, R.; van der Lans, R.G.J.M.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Temperature and salt effects on settling velocity in granular sludge technology. Water Res. 2012, 46, 5445–5451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Krishnappan, B.G.; Marsalek, J.; Watt, W.E.; Anderson, B.C. Seasonal size distributions of suspended solids in a stormwater management pond. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 39, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Krishnappan, B.G.; Marsalek, J. Modelling of flocculation and transport of cohesive sediment from an on-stream stormwater detention pond. Water Res. 2002, 36, 3849–3859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lau, Y.L. Temperature effect on settling velocity and deposition of cohesive sediments. J. Hydraul. Res. 1994, 32, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Spelman, D.; Sansalone, J.J. Is the treatment response of manufactured bmps to urban drainage pm loads portable? J. Environ. Eng. 2018, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Laliberté, M.; Cooper, W.E. Model for calculating the density of aqueous electrolyte solutions. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2004, 49, 1141–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Laliberté, M. Model for calculating the viscosity of aqueous solutions. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2007, 52, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Baird, R.; Eaton, A.D.; Rice, E.W.; Bridgewater, L.; American Public Health Association; American Water Works, Association; Water Environment Federation. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater; American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; ISBN 978-087553-287-5. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dierschke, M.; Welker, A. Bestimmung von Feststoffen in Niederschlagsabflüssen (Method for measuring suspended solids in runoffs). GWF Wasser/Abwasser 2015, 156, 440–446. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sansalone, J.J.; Glenn, D.W. Accretion of pollutants in snow exposed to urban traffic and winter storm maintenance activities. I. J. Environ. Eng. 2002, 128, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hilliges, R.; Endres, M.; Tiffert, A.; Brenner, E.; Marks, T. Characterization of road runoff with regard to seasonal variations, particle size distribution and the correlation of fine particles and pollutants. Water Sci. Technol. 2017, 75, 1169–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sansalone, J.; Lin, H.; Ying, G. Experimental and field studies of type I settling for particulate matter transported by urban runoff. J. Environ. Eng. 2009, 135, 953–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sansalone, J.J.; Koran, J.M.; Smithson, J.A.; Buchberger, S.G. Physical characteristics of urban roadway solids transported during rain events. J. Environ. Eng. 1998, 124, 427–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kayhanian, M.; McKenzie, E.R.; Leatherbarrow, J.E.; Young, T.M. Characteristics of road sediment fractionated particles captured from paved surfaces, surface run-off and detention basins. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 439, 172–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, Y.; Kang, J.-H.; Lau, S.-L.; Kayhanian, M.; Stenstrom, M.K. Optimization of settling tank design to remove particles and metals. J. Environ. Eng. 2008, 134, 885–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, Y.; Lau, S.; Kayhanian, M.; Stenstrom, M. Dynamic characteristics of particle size distribution in highway runoff: Implications for settling tank design. J. Environ. Eng. 2006, 132, 852–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gunawardana, C.; Egodawatta, P.; Goonetilleke, A. Role of particle size and composition in metal adsorption by solids deposited on urban road surfaces. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 184, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Charters, F.J.; Cochrane, T.A.; O’Sullivan, A.D. Particle size distribution variance in untreated urban runoff and its implication on treatment selection. Water Res. 2015, 85, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. DIBt. Teil 1: Anlagen zur dezentralen Behandlung des Abwassers von Kfz-Verkehrsflächen zur anschließenden Versickerung in Boden und Grundwasser (Devices treating traffic area runoff for percolation into soil and groundwater). In Zulassungsgrundsätze Niederschlagswasserbehandlungsanlagen (Approval Principles for Stormwater Quality Improvement Devices); Deutsches Insitut für Bautechnik: Berlin, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  39. DWA-A 102 (Draft). Grundsätze zur Bewirtschaftung und Behandlung von Regenwetterabflüssen zur Einleitung in Oberflächengewässer (Principles for Management and Treatment of Runoff for Discharge into Surface Waters); DWA Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e. V.: Hennef, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  40. Selbig, W.R.; Fienen, M.N. Regression modeling of particle size distributions in urban storm water: Advancements through improved sample collection methods. J. Environ. Eng. 2012, 138, 1186–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, D.H.; Min, K.S.; Kang, J.-H. Performance evaluation and a sizing method for hydrodynamic separators treating urban stormwater runoff. Water Sci. 2014, 69, 2122–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bardin, J.P.; Barraud, S.; Chocat, B. Uncertainty in measuring the event pollutant removal performance of online detention tanks with permanent outflow. Urban Water 2001, 3, 91–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kell, G.S. Density, thermal expansivity, and compressibility of liquid water from 0 to 150 °C: Correlations and tables for atmospheric pressure and saturation reviewed and expressed on 1968 temperature scale. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1975, 20, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Corridoni, T.; Mancinelli, R.; Ricci, M.A.; Bruni, F. Viscosity of aqueous solutions and local microscopic structure. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 14008–14013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Faram, M.G.; Iwugo, K.O.; Andoh, R.Y.G. Characteristics of urban run-off derived sediments captured by proprietary flow-through stormwater interceptors. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 56, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gunawardana, C.; Goonetilleke, A.; Egodawatta, P.; Dawes, L.; Kokot, S. Source characterisation of road dust based on chemical and mineralogical composition. Chemosphere 2012, 87, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Gunawardena, J.M.A.; Liu, A.; Egodawatta, P.; Ayoko, G.A.; Goonetilleke, A. Influence of traffic and land use on pollutant transport pathways. In Influence of Traffic and Land Use on Urban Stormwater Quality: Implications for Urban Stormwater Treatment Design; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 27–54. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ferreira, M.; Stenstrom, M.K. The importance of particle characterization in stormwater runoff. Water Environ. Res. 2013, 85, 833–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Selbig, W.R.; Bannerman, R.T. Characterizing the Size Distribution of Particles in Urban Stormwater by Use of Fixed-Point Sample-Collection Methods; US Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2011.
  50. Li, Y.; Lau, S.; Kayhanian, M.; Stenstrom, M. Particle size distribution in highway runoff. J. Environ. Eng. 2005, 131, 1267–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Faltermaier, S.; Krause, S.; Günther, F.W. Einfluss von Streusalz auf die Flockung Partikulärer Stoffe in Regenbecken an Autobahnen (Influence of De-Icing Salt on the Flocculation of Particulate Matter in Stormwater Tanks on Motorways); Aqua Urbanica 2017; Muschalla, D., Gruber, G., Eds.; TU Graz, Institut für Siedlungswasserwirtschaft und Landschaftswasserbau: Graz, Austria, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  52. Portela, L.I.; Ramos, S.; Teixeira, A.T. Effect of salinity on the settling velocity of fine sediments of a harbour basin. J. Coast. Res. 2013, 65, 1188–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sutherland, B.R.; Barrett, K.J.; Gingras, M.K. Clay settling in fresh and salt water. Environ. Fluid Mech. 2015, 15, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Duzgoren-Aydin, N.S.; Wong, C.S.C.; Song, Z.G.; Aydin, A.; Li, X.D.; You, M. Fate of heavy metal contaminants in road dusts and gully sediments in guangzhou, se china: A chemical and mineralogical assessment. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2006, 12, 374–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bäckström, M. Sediment transport in grassed swales during simulated runoff events. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 45, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Influent (left) and effluent (right) samples of a sedimentation tank for road runoff treatment withdrawn during the cold season. Minor difference can be seen in turbidity between the two samples. (b) Diagram showing which influencing factors cause worse effluent quality and total suspended solids (TSS) retention of sedimentation tanks for treatment of road runoff during winter season; grey arrow indicates weaker influence (adapted from Semadeni–Davies [15]).
Figure 1. (a) Influent (left) and effluent (right) samples of a sedimentation tank for road runoff treatment withdrawn during the cold season. Minor difference can be seen in turbidity between the two samples. (b) Diagram showing which influencing factors cause worse effluent quality and total suspended solids (TSS) retention of sedimentation tanks for treatment of road runoff during winter season; grey arrow indicates weaker influence (adapted from Semadeni–Davies [15]).
Water 10 01738 g001
Figure 2. Annual course of TSS influent and effluent of the sedimentation tank and TSS retention; two successive data points of TSS retention were removed due to strong scouring of sediments of previous events (−185% and −365% TSS retention).
Figure 2. Annual course of TSS influent and effluent of the sedimentation tank and TSS retention; two successive data points of TSS retention were removed due to strong scouring of sediments of previous events (−185% and −365% TSS retention).
Water 10 01738 g002
Figure 3. Fraction of fine particulate matter (PM) (SS63) in the TSS in the influent and effluent of the sedimentation tank as a function of temperature.
Figure 3. Fraction of fine particulate matter (PM) (SS63) in the TSS in the influent and effluent of the sedimentation tank as a function of temperature.
Water 10 01738 g003
Figure 4. Correlation matrix of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients rs of full-scale sedimentation tank monitoring; q = mean inflow (L s−1 ha−1), t = water temperature in tank (°C), EC eff. = effluent electrical conductivity (μS cm−1), TSS in = influent TSS (mg L−1), TSS eff = effluent TSS (mg L−1), RE TSS = removal efficiency of TSS (%), RE SS63 = removal efficiency of SS63 (%), RE SS63 = removal efficiency of SS > 63 (%), n = 15 for SS63 and n = 23 for all other parameters.
Figure 4. Correlation matrix of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients rs of full-scale sedimentation tank monitoring; q = mean inflow (L s−1 ha−1), t = water temperature in tank (°C), EC eff. = effluent electrical conductivity (μS cm−1), TSS in = influent TSS (mg L−1), TSS eff = effluent TSS (mg L−1), RE TSS = removal efficiency of TSS (%), RE SS63 = removal efficiency of SS63 (%), RE SS63 = removal efficiency of SS > 63 (%), n = 15 for SS63 and n = 23 for all other parameters.
Water 10 01738 g004
Figure 5. (a) Density of aqueous NaCl solutions as a function of temperature for various wNaCl; (b) density of aqueous NaCl solutions as a function of wNaCl for t = 5 °C and t = 20 °C.
Figure 5. (a) Density of aqueous NaCl solutions as a function of temperature for various wNaCl; (b) density of aqueous NaCl solutions as a function of wNaCl for t = 5 °C and t = 20 °C.
Water 10 01738 g005
Figure 6. (a) Viscosity of various aqueous NaCl solutions at 20 °C; (b) viscosity of aqueous NaCl solutions at various temperatures.
Figure 6. (a) Viscosity of various aqueous NaCl solutions at 20 °C; (b) viscosity of aqueous NaCl solutions at various temperatures.
Water 10 01738 g006
Figure 7. Settling velocity as a function of particle diameter in two aqueous solutions at various temperatures and wNaCl simulating winter and summer conditions (extrema); both ρs = 1.35 g cm−1.
Figure 7. Settling velocity as a function of particle diameter in two aqueous solutions at various temperatures and wNaCl simulating winter and summer conditions (extrema); both ρs = 1.35 g cm−1.
Water 10 01738 g007
Figure 8. Critical particle diameter dcrit for settling, various water temperatures and particle densities.
Figure 8. Critical particle diameter dcrit for settling, various water temperatures and particle densities.
Water 10 01738 g008
Figure 9. (a) TSS removal efficiency as a function of temperature; (b) TSS removal efficiency as a function of wNaCl, λ = 60, d50 = 39 μm; (a,b): ρs = 1.35 g cm−1; q = 15 L s−1 ha−1.
Figure 9. (a) TSS removal efficiency as a function of temperature; (b) TSS removal efficiency as a function of wNaCl, λ = 60, d50 = 39 μm; (a,b): ρs = 1.35 g cm−1; q = 15 L s−1 ha−1.
Water 10 01738 g009
Table 1. Statistics of full-scale sedimentation tank monitoring: q = mean inflow; t = water temperature in sedimentation tank; TSS Inf. = influent TSS; SS63 Inf. = influent SS63; EC Eff. = electric conductivity in effluent.
Table 1. Statistics of full-scale sedimentation tank monitoring: q = mean inflow; t = water temperature in sedimentation tank; TSS Inf. = influent TSS; SS63 Inf. = influent SS63; EC Eff. = electric conductivity in effluent.
ParameterUnitnMin25th PercentileMedianMean75th PercentileMaxSD
qL s−1 ha−1231.63.45.78.17.226.17.5
t°C233.08.817.517.521.724.67.3
TSS Inf.mg L−12373282123166433129
SS > 63 Inf.mg L−11531826354612230
SS63 Inf.mg L−11581873.3121140394130
EC Eff.µS cm−122599511911986747901225
TSS retention%21−3652244186895105
SS > 63 retention%15−46583719310031
SS63 retention%15−49−13725578040
Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficients between TSS removal efficiency, temperature t, particle density ρs, median particle diameter d50 and discharge rate q.
Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficients between TSS removal efficiency, temperature t, particle density ρs, median particle diameter d50 and discharge rate q.
tρsd50q
TSS removal efficiency0.070.220.85−0.32

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rommel, S.H.; Helmreich, B. Influence of Temperature and De-Icing Salt on the Sedimentation of Particulate Matter in Traffic Area Runoff. Water 2018, 10, 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121738

AMA Style

Rommel SH, Helmreich B. Influence of Temperature and De-Icing Salt on the Sedimentation of Particulate Matter in Traffic Area Runoff. Water. 2018; 10(12):1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121738

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rommel, Steffen H., and Brigitte Helmreich. 2018. "Influence of Temperature and De-Icing Salt on the Sedimentation of Particulate Matter in Traffic Area Runoff" Water 10, no. 12: 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121738

APA Style

Rommel, S. H., & Helmreich, B. (2018). Influence of Temperature and De-Icing Salt on the Sedimentation of Particulate Matter in Traffic Area Runoff. Water, 10(12), 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121738

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop