Explicit Solution for Critical Depth in Closed Conduits Flowing Partly Full
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Please see the attached file.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
The comments about the use of English are too numerous to mark on the manuscript. Any improvements with the help of a person experienced in English technical writing will improve the presentation of the paper.
There are also several occasions where there is inconsistent use of subscripts or superscripts, or cases where an index is presented with a lower case letter, followed by the same index as an upper case letter.
I consider that my job is to provide a review with regard to the technical/scientific soundness of the paper and not act as an editor on the use of the english language or a proof-reader. These are aspects of the job of the authors and, possibly, your editorial staff.
Author Response
Thanks for your comments.My manuscript was edited for proper English language, grammar, punctuation, spelling, and overall style by one or more of the highly qualified native English speaking editors at AJE.The editing certificate in the attachment.I have re-checked the correctness and completeness of the manuscript.Thanks again for your review and comments.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Please see the attached file.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx