Historical Agricultural Landforms—Central European Bio-Cultural Heritage Worthy of Attention
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Terminology
2.2. Spatial Distribution of HALs in Czechia
2.3. Management of HALs
2.4. Geomorphic Diversity of HALs
2.5. Ecological Functions of HALs
3. Results
3.1. Distribution of HALs in Czechia
3.2. HALs Management Changes through Time
3.3. Effects of HALs on Secondary Geodiversity
3.4. Ecological Functions of HALs
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Filippo, B.; Cremaschi, M.; Manuela, P. Estimating the Potential of Archaeo-historical Data in the Definition of Geomorphosites and Geo-educational Itineraries in the Central Po Plain (N Italy). Geoheritage 2019, 11, 1371–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisher, C. Archaeology for Sustainable Agriculture. J. Archaeol. Res. 2020, 28, 393–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turner, S.; Kinnaird, T.; Koparal, E.; Lekakis, S.; Sevara, C. Landscape archaeology, sustainability and the necessity of change. World Archaeol. 2020, 52, 589–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montanarella, L.; Panagos, P. The relevance of sustainable soil management within the European Green Deal. Land Use Policy 2021, 100, 104950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kay, S.; Crous-Duran, J.; Ferreiro-Domínguez, N.; de Jalón, S.G.; Graves, A.; Moreno, G.; Mosquera-Losada, M.R.; Palma, J.H.N.; Roces-Díaz, J.V.; Santiago-Freijanes, J.J.; et al. Spatial similarities between European agroforestry systems and ecosystem services at the landscape scale. Agrofor. Syst. 2018, 92, 1075–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brabec, E.; Molnárová, K. Pluzina: The Issues of Documenting a Vernacular Landscape; Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning Faculty Publication Series; 2010; Volume 61. Available online: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/larp_faculty_pubs/61 (accessed on 21 October 2020).
- Lieskovský, J.; Bürgi, M. Persistence in cultural landscapes: A pan-European analysis. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2018, 18, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latocha, A.; Reczyńska, K.; Gradowski, T.; Świerkosz, K. Landscape memory in abandoned areas—physical and ecological perspectives (Central European mountains case study). Landsc. Res. 2019, 44, 600–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uhlig, H.; Lienau, C. Die Siedlungen des ländlichen Raumes. In Materialien zur Terminologie der Agrarlandschaft, 2nd ed.; Lenz-Verlag: Giessen, Germany, 1972; p. 410. (In German) [Google Scholar]
- Láznička, Z. Typy Venkovského Osídlení V Československu; Československá akademie věd, Práce brněnské základny Československé akademie věd: Prague, Czechia, 1956; p. 95. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
- Erný, E. Zaniklé Středověké Osady a Jejich Plužiny: Metodika Historicko-Geografického Výzkumu V Oblasti Drahanské Vrchoviny, 1st ed.; Academia: Prague, Czechia, 1979; p. 167. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
- Houfková, P.; Bumerl, J.; Pospíšil, L.; Karlík, P.; Beneš, J.; Bernardová, A.; Hrabalíková, M.; Molnárová, K.J.; Hejcman, M. Origin and development of long-strip field patterns: A case study of an abandoned medieval village in the Czech Republic. CATENA 2015, 135, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sklenicka, P.; Molnarová, K.J.; Brabec, E.; Kumble, P.; Pittnerova, B.; Pixova, K.; Salek, M. Remnants of medieval field patterns in the Czech Republic: Analysis of driving forces behind their disappearance with special attention to the role of hedgerows. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2009, 129, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sklenicka, P.; Kottová, B.; Šálek, M. Success in preserving historic rural landscapes under various policy measures: Incentives, restrictions or planning? Environ. Sci. Policy 2017, 75, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šitnerová, I.; Beneš, J.; Kottová, B.; Bumerl, J.; Majerovičová, T.; Janečková, K. Archaeological research into field systems and agrarian terraces as the phenomena of the historical landscape in the Czech Republic. Archaeol. Hist. 2020, 45, 141–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuna, M.; Beneš, M.; Drelerová, D.; Gojda, M.; Hrubý, P.; Křivánek, R.; Majer, A.; Prach, K.; Tomášek, M. Nedestruktivní Archeologie—Teorie, Metody a Cíle; Academia, Czech Academy of Science: Prague, Czechia, 2014; p. 555. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
- Löw, J.; Míchal, I. Krajinný Ráz, 1st ed.; Lesnická Práce: Kostelec nad Černými Lesy, Czechia, 2003; p. 552. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
- Gojda, M. Archeologie Krajiny; Academia: Prague, Czechia, 2000; p. 238. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
- Lipský, Z. Sledování Změn V Kulturní Krajině; Czech University of Life Sciences Prague: Prague, Czechia, 2000; p. 71. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
- Bičík, I.; Kabrda, J. Land use changes in Czech border regions (1845–2000). Acta Univ. Carol. Geogr. 2007, 42, 23–52. [Google Scholar]
- Lieskovský, J.; Kenderessy, P.; Špulerová, J.; Lieskovský, T.; Koleda, P.; Kienast, F.; Gimmi, U. Factors affecting the persistence of traditional agricultural landscapes in Slovakia during the collectivization of agriculture. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29, 867–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Molnárová, K. Hedgerow-Defined Medieval Field Patterns in the Czech Republic and Their Conservation. Ph.D. Thesis, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czechia, 2008; p. 100. [Google Scholar]
- Patro, M.; Węgorek, T.; Zubala, T. Ploughed-on terraces in loess landscape of strongly developed high plains. Ann. Wars. Univ. Life Sci. SGGW. Land Reclam. 2008, 39, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riezner, J. Krajinný ráz území typických agrárními valy a mezemi a jejich vegetací na vybraných příkladech ze Severozápadních Čech. Studia Oecologica 2011, 5, 65–79. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
- Slamova, M.; Jančura, P.; Danis, D. Methods of Historical Landscape Structures Identification and Implementation into Landscape Studies. Ekológia 2013, 32, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kovář, P.; Bačinová, H.; Loula, J.; Fedorova, D. Use of terraces to mitigate the impacts of overland flow and erosion on a catchment. Plant Soil Environ. 2016, 62, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Šitnerová, I.; Beneš, J.; Trpáková, I.; Bumerl, J.; Komárková, V.; Majerovičová, T.; Hrabáková, L.; Janečková, K. Landscape Transformed: Archaeological, Historical and Environmental Dating of the Early Modern Field System in Valštejn, Czech Republic. Interdiscip. Archaeol. Nat. Sci. Archaeol. 2020, 11, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latocha, A.; Reczyńska, K.; Świerkosz, K.; Gradowski, T. Geomorphological and ecological persistence of traces of past settlement—An example of Karpno village in the Złote Mts (Eastern Sudetes). Przyr. Sudet. 2021, 23, 223–240. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Houben, P. Scale linkage and contingency effects of field-scale and hillslope-scale controls of long-term soil erosion: Anthropogeomorphic sediment flux in agricultural loess watersheds of Southern Germany. Geomorphology 2008, 101, 172–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oshunsanya, S. Spacing effects of vetiver grass (Vetiveria nigritana Stapf) hedgerows on soil accumulation and yields of maize–cassava intercropping system in Southwest Nigeria. CATENA 2013, 104, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayer, T.; Beneš, J. Medieval terraced fields in the Bohemian Forest as a hydropedological phenomenon and problem of landscape archaeology [Středověká terasová pole na Šumavě jako hydropedologický fenomén a archeologický problém]. Arch Rozhl. 2004, 56, 139–159. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
- Kovář, P.; Vaššová, D.; Hrabalíková, M. Mitigation of surface runoff and erosion impacts on catchment by stone hedgerows. Soil Water Res. 2011, 6, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Seeger, M.; Ries, J.B. Soil degradation and soil surface process intensities on abandoned fields in Mediterranean mountain environments. Land Degrad. Dev. 2008, 19, 488–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodman-Elgar, M. Evaluating soil resilience in long-term cultivation: A study of pre-Columbian terraces from the Paca Valley, Peru. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2008, 35, 3072–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latocha, A. Przemainy Środowiska Przyrodniczego W Sudetach Wschodnich W Warunkach Antropopresji; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wroclawskiego: Wroclaw, Poland, 2007; p. 215. [Google Scholar]
- Latocha, A. Geomorphic connectivity within abandoned small catchments (Stołowe Mts, SW Poland). Geomorphology 2014, 212, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Affek, A. Past Carpathian landscapes recorded in the microtopography. Geogr. Pol. 2016, 89, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duma, P.; Latocha, A.; Łuczak, A.; Piekalski, J. Stone Walls as a Characteristic Feature of the Cultural Landscape of the Izera Mountains, southwestern Poland. Int. J. Hist. Archaeol. 2020, 24, 22–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chartin, C.; Bourennane, H.; Salvador-Blanes, S.; Hinschberger, F.; Macaire, J.-J. Classification and mapping of anthropogenic landforms on cultivated hillslopes using DEMs and soil thickness data—Example from the SW Parisian Basin, France. Geomorphology 2011, 135, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Froehlicher, L.; Schwartz, D.; Ertlen, D.; Trautmann, M. Hedges, colluvium and lynchets along a reference toposequence (Habsheim, Alsace, France): History of erosion in a loess area. Quaternaire 2016, 27, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Montgomery, I.; Caruso, T.; Reid, N. Hedgerows as Ecosystems: Service Delivery, Management, and Restoration. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2020, 51, 81–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gil-Tena, A.; De Cáceres, M.; Ernoult, A.; Butet, A.; Brotons, L.; Burel, F. Agricultural landscape composition as a driver of farmland bird diversity in Brittany (NW France). Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2015, 205, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelletier-Guittier, C.; Théau, J.; Dupras, J. Use of hedgerows by mammals in an intensive agricultural landscape. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 302, 107079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tschumi, M.; Birkhofer, K.; Blasiusson, S.; Jörgensen, M.; Smith, H.G.; Ekroos, J. Woody elements benefit bird diversity to a larger extent than semi-natural grasslands in cereal-dominated landscapes. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2020, 46, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dover, J.W. (Ed.) The Ecology of Hedgerows and Field Margins; Routledge: London, UK, 2019; p. 306. [Google Scholar]
- Poschlod, P.; Braun-Reichert, R. Small natural features with large ecological roles in ancient agricultural landscapes of Central Europe—History, value, status, and conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2017, 211, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forman, R.T.T.; Godron, M. Landscape Ecology; John Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1986; p. 619. [Google Scholar]
- Ucar, T.; Hall, F.R. Windbreaks as a pesticide drift mitigation strategy: A review. Pest Manag. Sci. 2001, 57, 663–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marshall, E.; Moonen, A. Field margins in northern Europe: Their functions and interactions with agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2002, 89, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Council of Europe. European Landscape Convention; European Treaty Series, No. 176; Council of Europe: Florence, Italy, 2000; p. 7. [Google Scholar]
- Henkel, G. Kann die überlieferte Kulturlandschaft ein Leitbild für die Planung sein? Ber. Zur Dtsch. Landeskd. 1997, 71, 27–37. (In German) [Google Scholar]
- Wöbse, H.H. Kulturlandschaft und historische Kulturlandschaft. Inf. Zur Raumentwickl. 1999, 26, 269–278. (In German) [Google Scholar]
- Schama, S. Landscape and Memory; Vintage: New York, NY, USA, 1995; p. 652. [Google Scholar]
- Špulerová, J.; Dobrovodská, M.; Lieskovský, J.; Baca, A.; Halabuk, A.; Kohut, F.; Mojses, M.; Kenderessy, P.; Piscová, V.; Barančok, P.; et al. Inventory and classification of historical structures of the agricultural landscape in Slovakia. Ekológia 2011, 30, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Špulerová, J.; Bezák, P.; Dobrovodská, M.; Lieskovský, J.; Štefunková, D. Traditional agricultural landscapes in Slovakia: Why should we preserve them? Landsc. Res. 2017, 42, 891–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burel, F.; Baudry, J. Social, aesthetic and ecological aspects of hedgerows in rural landscapes as a framework for greenways. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1995, 33, 327–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slámová, M. Význam Historických Krajinných Štruktúr Turca Pri Posudzovaní Kvality Krajinného Obrazu [Value of Historical Landscape Structures of Turiec for Landscape Quality Assesment]. In Vybrané Problémy Tvorby Krajiny [Selected Issues of Landscape Planning]; Daniš, D., Jančura, P., Eds.; Janka Čižmárová—Partner: Banská Bystrica, Slovakia, 2007; pp. 56–61. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
- Meeus, J. Pan-European landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1995, 31, 57–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Zanden, E.H.; Levers, C.; Verburg, P.H.; Kuemmerle, T. Representing composition, spatial structure and management intensity of European agricultural landscapes: A new typology. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2016, 150, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Zanden, E.H.; Verburg, P.; Mucher, S. Modelling the spatial distribution of linear landscape elements in Europe. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 27, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rotherham, I. Bio-cultural heritage and biodiversity: Emerging paradigms in conservation and planning. Biodivers. Conserv. 2015, 24, 3405–3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ernst, L.M.; Tscharntke, T.; Batáry, P. Grassland management in agricultural vs. forested landscapes drives butterfly and bird diversity. Biol. Conserv. 2017, 216, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- van der Zanden, E.H.; Carvalho-Ribeiro, S.M.; Verburg, P.H. Abandonment landscapes: User attitudes, alternative futures and land management in Castro Laboreiro, Portugal. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2018, 18, 1509–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Walczak, C.; Machová, I.; Müller, F.; Kubát, K. Lesesteinwälle Im Sachsich-Böhmishen Erzgebirge/Agrární Valy A Terasy Na České a Saské Straně Krušných Hor; Technical University in Dresden, Dresden, Germany, J.E. Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Ústí nad Labem, Czechia; Naturschutzinstitut Freiberg: Freiberg, Germany, 2021; p. 140. [Google Scholar]
- Fink, P.; Heinze, S.; Raths, U.; Riecken, U.; Ssymank, A. Rote Liste der Gefährdeten Biotoptypen Deutschlands; Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt; No. 156; Landwirtschaftsverlag: Bad Godesberg, Germany, 2017; p. 637. (In German) [Google Scholar]
- Grunewald, K.; Syrbe, R.-U. Bilanzierung von Ausgewählten Leistungen und Anforderungen der Landschaftspflege in Sachsen Aus Landesweiter Sicht; Schriftenreihe des Landesamtes für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie; No. 17; Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie: Sachsen, Germany, 2013; p. 208, (In German). Available online: https://publikationen.sachsen.de/bdb/artikel/15185/documents/25979 (accessed on 29 March 2022). (In German)
- Representation of Formation Groups of Natural Habitats in the Czech Republic—Web Map App of Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic, 2nd ed.; Chytrý, M.; Kučera, T.; Kočí, M. (Eds.) Catalog of habitats of the Czech Republic; Agency for Nature and Landscape Protection of the Czech Republic: Prague, Czechia, 2010; p. 445. Available online: https://aopkcr.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=c38db59779714a78aec4c731152b0290 (accessed on 21 October 2021).
- Mazáková, E. Rozšíření Agrárních Valů a Teras Na Území Čech. Master’s Thesis, J.E. Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Ústí nad Labem, Czechia, 2019; p. 100. [Google Scholar]
- Cajthaml, J.; Pacina, J. Old Maps as a Source of Landscape Changes—Georeferencing, Accuracy and Error Detection. In Proceedings of the 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM, Albena, Bulgaria, 18–24 June 2015; Volume 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaccard, P. The distribution of the flora in the alpine zone.1. New Phytol. 1912, 11, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krebs, C.H.J. Ecological Methodology; Benjamin/Cummings, Californian University: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1999; p. 620. [Google Scholar]
- MAPIRE. Arcanum Maps—The Historical Map Portal. Available online: https://maps.arcanum.com/en/ (accessed on 28 March 2020).
- Biszak, E.; Biszak, S.; Timár, G.; Nagy, D.; Molnár, G. Historical topographic and cadastral maps of Europe in spotlight—Evolution of the MAPIRE web portal. In Proceedings of the 12th ICA Conference Digital Approaches to Cartographic Heritage, Venice, Italy, 26–28 April 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Sobala, M. Do historical maps show the maximal anthropopressure in the Carpathians? J. Mt. Sci. 2021, 18, 2184–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Den Berge, S.; Vangansbeke, P.; Baeten, L.; Vanneste, T.; Vos, F.; Verheyen, K. Soil carbon of hedgerows and ‘ghost’ hedgerows. Agrofor. Syst. 2021, 95, 1087–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buček, A.; Černušáková, L.; Friedl, M.; Machala, M.; Maděra, P. Ancient Coppice Woodlands in the Landscape of the Czech Republic. Eur. Countrys. 2017, 9, 617–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nyssen, J.; Debever, M.; Poesen, J.; Deckers, J. Lynchets in eastern Belgium—A geomorphic feature resulting from non-mechanised crop farming. CATENA 2014, 121, 164–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Riezner, J. Adaptace historických agrárních komunit na přírodní podmínky horských oblastí v Českých zemích. In Adaptabilita a Resilience: Studie k Integrujícím Přístupům V Geografickém Výzkumu; Raška, P., Hruška, V., Anděl, J., Balej, M., Bláha, J.D., Kučerová, S.R., Riezner, J., Eds.; J. E. Purkyně University: Ústí nad Labem, Czechia, 2014; pp. 41–61. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
- Klimek, K.; Latocha, A. Response of small mid-mountain rivers to human impact with particular reference to the last 200 years; Eastern Sudetes, Central Europe. Geomorphology 2007, 92, 147–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horák, J.; Janovský, M.; Hejcman, M.; Šmejda, L.; Klír, T. Soil geochemistry of medieval arable fields in Lovětín near Třešť, Czech Republic. CATENA 2018, 162, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pulerová, J.; Štefunková, D.; Dobrovodská, M.; Izakovičová, Z.; Kenderessy, P.; Vlachovičová, M.; Lieskovský, J.; Piscová, V.; Petrovič, F.; Kanka, R.; et al. Historické Štruktúry Poľnohospodárskej Krajiny Slovenska; Veda: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2017; p. 144. (In Slovak) [Google Scholar]
- Gray, M. Geodiversity: Valuing and Conserving Abiotic Nature; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2004; p. 448. [Google Scholar]
- Kubalíková, L.; Kirchner, K.; Bajer, A. Secondary Geodiversity and its Potential for Urban Geotourism: A Case Study from Brno City, Czech Republic. Quaest. Geogr. 2017, 36, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brown, A.G.; Fallu, D.; Walsh, K.; Cucchiaro, S.; Tarolli, P.; Zhao, P.; Pears, B.R.; van Oost, K.; Snape, L.; Lang, A.; et al. Ending the Cinderella status of terraces and lynchets in Europe: The geomorphology of agricultural terraces and implications for ecosystem services and climate adaptation. Geomorphology 2021, 379, 107579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, M.G.E.; Bennett, E.M.; Gonzalez, A. Linking Landscape Connectivity and Ecosystem Service Provision: Current Knowledge and Research Gaps. Ecosystems 2013, 16, 894–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senf, C.; Seidl, R. Natural disturbances are spatially diverse but temporally synchronized across temperate forest landscapes in Europe. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2018, 24, 1201–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zádorová, T.; Penížek, V.; Žížala, D.; Matějovský, J.; Vaněk, A. Influence of former lynchets on soil cover structure and soil organic carbon storage in agricultural land, Central Czechia. Soil Use Manag. 2018, 34, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levers, C.; Schneider, M.; Prishchepov, A.V.; Estel, S.; Kuemmerle, T. Spatial variation in determinants of agricultural land abandonment in Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 644, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Land Parcel Identification System—LPIS. Land Registry—Farmer’s Portal—Web Map Application of State Agricultural Intervention Fund. 2021. Available online: https://eagri.cz/public/app/lpisext/lpis/verejny2/plpis/ (accessed on 25 March 2021).
- Weber, H.E. Gebüsche, Hecken, Krautsäume; Ulmer: Stuttgart, Germany, 2003; p. 229. (In German) [Google Scholar]
- Riezner, J. Agrární Formy Reliéfu a Jejich Vegetace V Kulturní Krajině Jesenicka. Ph.D. Thesis, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia, 2007; p. 169. (In Czech). [Google Scholar]
- Machová, I. Floristicko-Fytocenologická Studie Agrárních Valů V CHKO České Středohoří. Ph.D. Thesis, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czechia, 2011; p. 217. [Google Scholar]
- Kc, B. Complexity in balancing conservation and tourism in protected areas: Contemporary issues and beyond. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2022, 22, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dragouni, M. An Economic Analysis of Heritage as Commons: Reflections on Theory, Methodology and Social Imagery. In Cultural Heritage in the Realm of the Commons: Conversations on the Case of Greece; Lekakis, S., Ed.; Ubiquity Press: London, UK, 2020; pp. 45–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment, EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing Nature Back into Our Lives. 2021, p. 33. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/677548 (accessed on 31 May 2022).
Group Animals | Habitat | Species Number | Simpson’s Diversity Index | Habitats Compared | Mutual Species | Bray-Curtis Index of Similarity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Araneae | Forest | 56 | 0.83 | Forest × grassland | 26 | 0.25 |
Grassland | 42 | 0.86 | Grassland × HAL | 29 | 0.63 | |
HAL | 62 | 0.91 | HAL × forest | 34 | 0.24 | |
Carabidae | Forest | 35 | 0.90 | Forest × grassland | 15 | 0.36 |
Grassland | 28 | 0.81 | Grassland×HAL | 19 | 0.60 | |
HAL | 35 | 0.86 | HAL × forest | 17 | 0.53 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zacharová, J.; Riezner, J.; Elznicová, J.; Machová, I.; Kubát, K.; Holcová, D.; Holec, M.; Pacina, J.; Štojdl, J.; Grygar, T.M. Historical Agricultural Landforms—Central European Bio-Cultural Heritage Worthy of Attention. Land 2022, 11, 963. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11070963
Zacharová J, Riezner J, Elznicová J, Machová I, Kubát K, Holcová D, Holec M, Pacina J, Štojdl J, Grygar TM. Historical Agricultural Landforms—Central European Bio-Cultural Heritage Worthy of Attention. Land. 2022; 11(7):963. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11070963
Chicago/Turabian StyleZacharová, Johana, Jiří Riezner, Jitka Elznicová, Iva Machová, Karel Kubát, Diana Holcová, Michal Holec, Jan Pacina, Jiří Štojdl, and Tomáš Matys Grygar. 2022. "Historical Agricultural Landforms—Central European Bio-Cultural Heritage Worthy of Attention" Land 11, no. 7: 963. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11070963
APA StyleZacharová, J., Riezner, J., Elznicová, J., Machová, I., Kubát, K., Holcová, D., Holec, M., Pacina, J., Štojdl, J., & Grygar, T. M. (2022). Historical Agricultural Landforms—Central European Bio-Cultural Heritage Worthy of Attention. Land, 11(7), 963. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11070963